[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 218 (Monday, November 14, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68270-68310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23666]
[[Page 68269]]
Vol. 87
Monday,
No. 218
November 14, 2022
Part III
Department of Homeland Security
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coast Guard
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
46 Parts 121, 160, et al.
Survival Craft Equipment--Update to Type Approval Requirements; Final
Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 87 , No. 218 / Monday, November 14, 2022 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 68270]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 121, 160, 169, 184, and 199
[Docket No. USCG-2020-0107]
RIN 1625-AC51
Survival Craft Equipment--Update to Type Approval Requirements
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is updating the type approval requirements for
certain types of equipment that survival craft are required to carry on
U.S.-flagged vessels. This rule will remove Coast Guard type approval
requirements for nine of these types of survival craft equipment and
replace them with the requirement that the manufacturer self-certify
that the equipment complies with a consensus standard.
DATES: This final rule is effective December 14, 2022.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register on
December 14, 2022. The incorporation by reference of certain other
publications listed in the rule were approved by the Director of the
Federal Register on October 1, 1996.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2020-0107 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document,
call or email Ms. Stephanie Groleau, Lifesaving & Fire Safety Division
(CG-ENG-4), Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1381, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents for Preamble
I. Abbreviations
II. Basis, Purpose, and Regulatory History
III. Background
IV. Discussion of Comments
V. Discussion of Final Rule and Changes From NPRM
VI. Incorporation by Reference
VII. Regulatory Analyses
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Small Entities
C. Assistance for Small Entities
D. Collection of Information
E. Federalism
F. Unfunded Mandates
G. Taking of Private Property
H. Civil Justice Reform
I. Protection of Children
J. Indian Tribal Governments
K. Energy Effects
L. Technical Standards and Incorporation by Reference
M. Environment
I. Abbreviations
ASTM ASTM, International
BLS U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CG-ENG-4 Office of Design and Engineering Standards, Lifesaving &
Fire Safety Division
CGMIX U.S. Coast Guard Maritime Information Exchange
COA Certificate of approval
DHS Department of Homeland Security
ECEC Employer Costs for Employee Compensation
FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration
FR Federal Register
IBA Inflatable buoyant apparatus
IBC Code International Code for the Construction and Equipment of
Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk
IGC Code Amendments to the International Code for the Construction
and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk
ICR Information collection request
IMO International Maritime Organization
ISO International Organization for Standardization
LSA Code Life-Saving Appliances Code
MISLE Marine Information for Safety and Law Enforcement
NAICS North American Industry Classification System
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OES U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment
Statistics
OMB Office of Management and Budget
OPM Office of Personnel Management
OTC Over-the-counter
RA Regulatory analysis
SOLAS International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Basis, Purpose, and Regulatory History
The legal authority for this rule is found in Title 46 of the
United States Code (U.S.C.) Sections 2103, 3103, 3306, 3703, 4102,
4302, 4502, 7101, and 8101. The Secretary of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) has delegated these statutory authorities to the Coast
Guard pursuant to 14 U.S.C. 502 through DHS Delegation No. 00170.1,
Revision No. 01.2, paragraph (II)(92)(a), (b), (e), and (f).
Additionally, 14 U.S.C. 102(3) grants the Coast Guard broad authority
to promulgate and enforce regulations for the promotion of safety of
life and property on waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States.
The purpose of this rule is to update the type approval
requirements for 12 types of survival craft equipment that survival
craft are required to carry on certain, specified U.S.-flagged
vessels--bilge pumps, compasses, fire extinguishers, first-aid kits,
fishing kits, hatchets, jackknives, knives, signaling mirrors,
provisions (food rations), emergency drinking water, and sea anchors--
as well as some of the survival craft equipment required for sailing
school vessels. For nine of these types of equipment, this rule will
replace the Coast Guard type approval requirement with a requirement
that the manufacturer self-certify that the equipment complies with a
consensus standard: bilge pumps, compasses, first-aid kits, fishing
kits, hatchets, jackknives, mirrors, sea anchors, and water. Type
approval is the primary process for equipment and materials to receive
Coast Guard approval. Updating type approval requirements for survival
craft equipment will result in cost savings to equipment manufacturers,
vessel owners and operators, and the Coast Guard.
The Coast Guard issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on
October 5, 2020, and solicited public comment on the proposal during a
comment period of 60 days.\1\ The comment period closed on December 4,
2020. The Coast Guard received 13 comment submissions, which are
discussed later in this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 85 FR 62842.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Background
Many of the current requirements for survival craft equipment were
developed in the 1950s and 1960s and have not been significantly
updated since they were published. After thorough review of these
requirements, as well as Coast Guard enforcement procedures, current
maritime industry practice, and the availability of new consensus
standards, we believe that the additional scrutiny provided by Coast
Guard type approval does not increase the safety of the following nine
types of survival craft equipment: bilge pumps, compasses, first-aid
kits,\2\ fishing kits, hatchets, knives (including jackknives),
mirrors, sea anchors, and emergency drinking water.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Different first-aid kits are required for different survival
craft, and this is explained in section IV of this rule under First-
Aid Kits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For these types of equipment, the current Coast Guard type approval
requirements are outdated and overly prescriptive. This places a burden
on the equipment manufacturers, which, in turn, affects the design
costs of complying with the outdated standard, the administrative
overhead costs, and the time-to-market costs of manufacturing and
selling equipment.
[[Page 68271]]
The requirements also place a financial burden on the vessel owners and
operators who are required to carry this specific approved equipment on
board their survival craft. This equipment is frequently more costly
and more difficult to obtain than similar products that are not type-
approved. Finally, the requirements place a burden on the Coast Guard
to review and approve this equipment without commensurate increases in
safety.
IV. Discussion of Comments
The Coast Guard received 13 comment submissions in response to the
NPRM. Of those 13 comments, 1 was a duplicate and 1 was unrelated to
the rulemaking. The remaining 11 comments were from maritime
organizations, private companies, and individuals. Four comments we
classified as general comments, two comments concerned technical
standards, and five comments concerned first-aid kits. Below, we
discuss each comment and our responses.
General
The Coast Guard received four comments on the NPRM that we
categorized as general comments. One comment supported the proposed
regulatory changes for approval requirements for first-aid kits. The
Coast Guard acknowledges this comment.
Two commenters expressed concerns that removing type approval
requirements could decrease the quality of survival craft equipment. We
disagree. Even without a type approval requirement, the following
checks will remain in place. For emergency drinking water in survival
craft and rescue boats, the water quality will be verified by the local
municipality or by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast
Guard, as required by 46 CFR 199.175(b)(40). Coast Guard-approved
liferaft servicing facilities inspect survival equipment packed in
inflatable liferafts prior to packing. Coast Guard marine inspectors
also regularly check equipment not packed in inflatable liferafts, such
as that in a lifeboat or rescue boat, or the first-aid kits carried on
small passenger vessels, when conducting the required inspections on
board commercial vessels.
Additionally, one commenter, a manufacturer of the approved Coast
Guard items, expressed multiple concerns regarding this rule and the
Coast Guard's regulatory analysis on its estimate of the impacts in the
NPRM. This commenter said that removing type approval requirements will
cause the market to be flooded with substandard products, leading to
revenue losses to the company. The commenter also said that the
liferaft and lifeboat industry has consolidated and there is little
competition, and, therefore, will not pass savings on to consumers.
For the reasons explained in our response to the two commenters
above, we do not expect reduced quality in the equipment that is no
longer required to be type-approved. We therefore do not expect a flood
of products of reduced quality that drive down prices. With this final
rule, prescriptive requirements will be replaced by consensus
standards. Conforming to these international consensus standards will
maintain the same level of safety without imposing unnecessary burdens
on the public and provide alternatives for compliance. These compliance
alternatives should result in cost savings to the directly impacted
entities, which are manufacturers and vessel owners and operators. The
Coast Guard does not have adequate industry information or data to
estimate secondary impacts and indicate whether these savings will be
passed on to the final consumers or end users of services provided by
vessel owners and operators.
The commenter also suggested that some could incur additional
testing costs as a result of this rule. Based on a review of the new
and existing standards, the Coast Guard has not found that
manufacturing firms will have new testing requirements under the
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards.
The commenter suggested that, as an alternative to the removal of
type approval requirements, the manufacturer could cover the cost of
the certificate of approval (COA). Requiring manufacturers to cover the
cost of the COA would result in additional costs to manufacturers
without any attendant safety benefits.
Finally, the commenter asserted that our per-device savings
estimates are too high and not the going rates in the industry. In
preparing our economic analysis, we relied primarily on websites
listing the retail prices of different products that were sold under
ISO standards instead of Coast Guard standards. We believe that the
reason our prices appear to be high to the commenter is because our
analysis was based on retail prices rather than wholesale prices, or
the prices that manufacturers use to sell their products to businesses.
Using retail prices is a common approach across Coast Guard rulemaking,
because we do not have access to consistent wholesale price data across
the industry.
F1003 and F1014 Standards
The Coast Guard received two comments recommending incorporation of
ASTM F1003 (2019), ``Standard Specification for Searchlights on Motor
Lifeboats,'' and ASTM F1014 (2020), ``Standard Specification for
Flashlights on Vessels.'' These 2019 and 2020 standards are more recent
editions of the ASTM standards we proposed to adopt.
However, these standards were updated after the NPRM was developed,
and so we were unable to include them in our proposed rule. The more
recent standards contain significant differences as compared to the
prior editions (the ones we incorporate in this rule), such that more
evaluation is necessary. We will consider incorporating these standards
in a future rulemaking.
First-Aid Kits
The Coast Guard received five comments concerning the proposed
changes to first-aid kits. The comments discussed contents of the
first-aid kits, as well as technical standards that apply to first-aid
kits.
Two commenters supported the proposed use of commercially available
first-aid kits, to remove the burden of assembling very specific kit
components.
Three commenters called for specified first-aid kit components,
rather than leaving the exact number and size of items up to
manufacturers so long as the kit meets ISO 18813:2006. These commenters
said the kit contents should be standardized, and expressed concern
that manufacturers would not provide adequate kits. One commenter also
said that ISO 18813:2006 is not a widely accepted standard and may soon
be revised; that commenter suggested the Coast Guard should develop its
own standard instead. Another commenter supported the use of the ISO
standard. We believe that the contents described in ISO 18813:2006 are
sufficient to meet the needs of basic first-aid kits required by
mariners in a survival situation. The ISO standard specifies design,
performance, and use of various items of survival equipment carried in
survival craft and rescue boats complying with the International
Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974 (as amended),
and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Life-Saving Appliance
Code (LSA Code). The 2006 edition is the most current version of this
standard that is available at this time.
During periodic shipboard inspections by both Coast Guard-licensed
mariners and Coast Guard
[[Page 68272]]
marine inspectors, first-aid kits not packed in inflatable liferafts
are examined to ensure that they contain all the items listed in the
provided instructions, that each unit carton is in an intact waterproof
package, and that they meet the applicable regulatory requirements.
First-aid kits packed in inflatable liferafts are inspected by Coast
Guard-approved liferaft servicing facilities, also to ensure that they
contain all the required items.
One commenter specifically called for a particular Coast Guard-
approved watertight soft plastic pouch to contain the first-aid kit,
because rigid plastic containers can become brittle and because that
pouch is proven to meet the applicable durability requirements. ISO
18813:2006 discourages the use of rigid plastic cases that can shatter.
If the case shatters, an entirely new kit must be purchased because it
is in a not-as-approved condition, and Coast Guard inspectors would
give the vessel a deficiency for not having an approved and in-working-
condition piece of equipment. This would increase costs to the vessel.
One commenter noted that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) does not routinely approve over-the-counter (OTC) products; it
only reviews active ingredients. Another comment inquired about the FDA
regulatory status, product form, or type of delivery for two topical
preparations in the ISO 18813 requirements.
It is up to the first-aid kit manufacturer to determine in what
form the medicinal products are to be provided to meet the intended
needs of the first-aid kit. However, medicinal products must meet the
applicable OTC drug requirements outlined in title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 330, which contains FDA's applicable OTC
requirements. In response to these comments, in this rule we revised
the regulatory text of Sec. 199.175(b)(10)(ii) to reference 21 CFR
part 330.
One commenter asked that the Coast Guard remove the requirement for
specific items with an expiration date (such as aspirin) and allow for
equivalent alternatives. The commenter said that getting supplies
delivered to remote locations can be challenging. The expiration date
of OTC medications is typically between one and five years after
manufacture. The commenter did not specify an alternative item without
an expiration date, but the Coast Guard believes that a year or more is
a reasonable period to plan for replacing first-aid supplies. In
general, the Coast Guard believes that expiration dates are acceptable
and can help ensure that the first-aid kit is reviewed and refreshed at
intervals. The Food and Drug Administration requires OTC medications
have expiration dates (see 21 CFR 211.137 and 211.166).
The same commenter recommended that vessel operators be allowed to
exclude analgesics (pain relief medication) from first-aid kits. This
commenter said that companies often prohibit their vessel crew members
from giving out analgesic medication because of possible adverse side
effects or interactions with other medication. In support of this
recommendation, the commenter said that most passenger vessels operate
near shore with easy access to shoreside medical services.
While access to shoreside medical resources may be available in
certain areas of operation, these should not be relied on to provide
the required first-aid supplies. Shoreside medical resources will not
be readily available to someone with an injury or emergency on the
vessel. The first-aid kit for survival craft is intended to be used in
an emergency away from shore.
Licensed mariners operating vessels in commercial service are
required to have basic first-aid training. Any application of first aid
should be given at the discretion of the licensed mariner and not at a
level beyond the training or capability of the mariner administering
the first aid. Analgesics are common OTC medications that do not
require medical supervision, and the decision to take them is up to the
person who requests them. Accordingly, the Coast Guard has decided to
retain the requirement for analgesics in first-aid kits.
V. Discussion of Final Rule and Changes From NPRM
This final rule amends several approval and carriage requirements
in title 46 CFR. Specifically, this final rule updates the requirements
in part 199, subchapter W, related to the equipment on survival craft
and rescue boats on inspected vessels by replacing the requirement to
carry Coast Guard-approved equipment with self-certification to
voluntary consensus standards for certain equipment. This rule also
makes conforming changes to part 169, subchapter R, for sailing school
vessels that are not covered by subchapter W. In addition, this final
rule revises part 160, subchapter Q, to remove approval standards for
the survival craft equipment that is no longer required to be approved
by the Coast Guard, and it updates the requirements for approval of
emergency provisions to replace prescriptive Coast Guard requirements
with consensus standards. A new subpart 160.046, Emergency Provisions,
is added, to consolidate the applicable standards. Finally, this rule
removes the requirement in part 121, subchapter K, and part 184,
subchapter T, that first-aid kits carried on small passenger vessels
must be approved by the Coast Guard, and updates those requirements to
consensus standards to align with the revised approval requirements.
This final rule includes incorporation by reference of several
voluntary consensus standards consistent with the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, Public Law 104-113 (codified as a
note to 15 U.S.C. 272). Three of the consensus standards this rule
incorporates are international standards: ISO 18813:2006, ``Ships and
marine technology--Survival equipment for survival craft and rescue
boats'' (referred to as ISO 18813); ISO 17339:2018, ``Ships and marine
technology--Sea anchors for survival craft and rescue boats'' (referred
to as ISO 17339); and ISO 25862:2009, ``Ships and marine technology--
Marine magnetic compasses, binnacles and azimuth reading devices''
(referred to as ISO 25862).
While the IMO does specify some standards for survival craft
equipment affected by this rule, it does not stipulate that the
affected survival craft equipment be approved by the Administration. In
some cases (such as first-aid kits and drinking water), the LSA Code
references ISO 18813 as an acceptable standard for the equipment to
meet, whereas in others (such as fishing tackle), the LSA Code merely
requires that the equipment be carried aboard the specified survival
craft.
A more detailed explanation of the amendments to the aforementioned
sections can be found in the NPRM. A number of non-substantive changes
from the NPRM are made with this final rule to correct typographical,
grammar, and format errors or issues, as well as for clarification
purposes.
Lastly, as a result of public comment, this final rule requires
that medicinal products meet the applicable OTC drug requirements as
outlined in 21 CFR part 330. This administrative change is simply
updating an improper reference.
VI. Incorporation by Reference
Material incorporated by reference is currently listed in 46 CFR
199.05 and is added to the new Sec. 160.046-3. Under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51, a publication is eligible for incorporation by
reference if it meets Office of the Federal Register policies and is
reasonably available to and usable by the class of persons affected.
[[Page 68273]]
Regulations in part 51 require that agencies discuss, in the final
rule, ways that the materials the agency incorporates by reference are
reasonably available, to interested parties and how interested parties
can obtain the materials. In addition, the preamble to the final rule
must summarize the material.
In accordance with the OFR's requirements, section VII.L. of this
final rule summarizes the standards that the Coast Guard incorporates
by reference in Sec. Sec. 160.046-3 and 199.05. Interested persons
have access to this material through their normal course of business,
may purchase it from the organization, or may view a copy at Coast
Guard Headquarters.
VII. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below, we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or Executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) direct agencies to assess
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this
rule a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it. A regulatory
analysis (RA) follows.
The Coast Guard received several public comments on the NPRM, as
discussed in section IV. of the preamble to this final rule. In
response to a comment, in this final rule we are making an editorial
change to 46 CFR 199.175(b)(10) that has no cost impact. See table 1.
Additionally, we are replacing prescriptive requirements with
international standards that provide alternatives for compliance, which
should result in cost savings to impacted entities. We also made some
changes to the regulatory analysis, including updating the population
of affected entities, and the wage rate using 2020 estimates, and
removing the renewal instruction, because it is not applicable to this
rule.
Table 1--Changes From NPRM to Final Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Description of change Explanation Cost impact of change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 199.175(b)(10)................ Editorial change that Update the language to No impact because it is
corrects a reference. correctly discuss the updating an improper
FDA's drug approval reference.
process.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With this final rule, the Coast Guard removes the requirement for
nine types of survival craft equipment to be approved by the Coast
Guard from 46 CFR part 160 in subchapter Q (Equipment, Construction,
and Materials: Specifications and Approval) and from Sec. 199.175
(Survival Craft and Rescue Boat Equipment). The requirement for
approvals on these nine types of equipment (bilge pumps, compasses,
first-aid kits, fishing kits, hatchets, jackknives, mirrors, sea
anchors, and water) will be replaced by a self-certification
requirement, in order to comply with the LSA Code. For those types of
equipment that still require a COA, we do not estimate any changes in
costs or cost savings.\3\ Finally, this rule updates the survival craft
requirements for sailing school vessels found in Sec. Sec. 169.525
through 169.529, eliminating the unique requirements for survival craft
equipment on these vessels.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Knives are not required to be Coast Guard-approved; however,
they must meet the requirements in Section 4.1.5.1.2 of the LSA
Code. This is an administrative change that will lead to no cost or
cost savings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2 provides a summary of the affected population, costs, cost
savings, and benefits of this rule. The affected population includes
the manufacturers of survival craft equipment and the vessels equipped
with survival craft. We estimate the cost savings to manufacturers by
reducing reporting, recordkeeping, and production requirements of this
survival craft equipment. We estimate the cost savings to vessel owners
and operators by the price reductions in survival craft equipment, and
we estimate the cost savings for the Government for reducing the review
necessary for certain equipment. We estimate an annualized cost savings
to industry of $303,805 (with a 7-percent discount rate) and an
annualized cost savings to the Government of $10,087, for a total
annualized cost savings of $313,892.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ This analysis assumes the implementation year for this rule
will be 2021.
Table 2--Summary of the Affected Population, Costs, Cost Savings, and
Benefits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicability................ Revises the approval requirements
specific to nine types of survival craft
equipment by removing the Coast Guard
type approval requirements and, instead,
adopting a voluntary consensus standard,
ISO 18813, ``Ships and marine
technology--Survival equipment for
survival craft and rescue boats.'' Also
retains requirements for Coast Guard
approval of emergency provisions, but
revises the requirements to refer to ISO
18813 instead of prescriptive Coast
Guard regulations.
Affected Population.......... Includes 16 manufacturers of 28 unique
Coast Guard-approved products for 9
types of equipment; 14,747 existing U.S.-
flagged vessels with 31,729 survival
craft; and 113 new U.S.-flagged vessels
annually with 449 survival craft.
Costs........................ There will be no costs to industry or the
Federal Government as this rule will
reduce the burden(s).
Benefits..................... There are non-monetary benefits to owners
and operators of vessels with survival
craft in having a larger selection of
equipment to choose from, allowing for
potential operational flexibility.
Industry Cost Savings *...... Annualized: -$303,805, 10-Year: -$2.13
million.
[[Page 68274]]
Government Cost Savings...... Annualized: -$10,087, 10-Year: -$70,847.
Total Cost Savings........... Annualized: -$313,892, 10-Year: -$2.20
million.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The Industry Cost Savings, Government Cost Savings, and Total Cost
Savings are all discounted at 7 percent.
Affected Population
This rule impacts three separate affected populations. First, this
rule impacts manufacturers of Coast Guard-approved equipment because it
changes the standards and approval process for nine types of survival
craft equipment. Second, this rule impacts any new and existing U.S.-
flagged vessels that carry survival craft because it will reduce the
cost of buying and replacing survival craft equipment. Third, this rule
impacts small passenger vessels inspected under subchapter K or T. They
are required to maintain a separate first-aid kit stowed on board, and
this rule reduces the cost of replacing first-aid kits. This rule also
removes Table 169.527 from part 169 and removes the requirements for
equipment outlined in Sec. 169.529(a) through (mm) to conform to the
changes made in 46 CFR part 199.
Data on manufacturers comes from the U.S. Coast Guard Maritime
Information Exchange (CGMIX),\5\ which is a public-facing version of
the Marine Information for Safety and Law Enforcement (MISLE) database,
unless otherwise specified. For each subchapter of inspected vessels
that are required to carry survival craft, we used the MISLE database
to estimate the number of vessels that will be affected by this rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ https://cgmix.uscg.mil/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturers of Coast Guard Approved Equipment
The Coast Guard is eliminating approval requirements for nine types
of survival craft equipment, discussed in detail in section V of this
rule. These nine types of equipment include: (1) bilge pumps, (2)
compasses, (3) first-aid kits for lifeboats and for liferafts, (4)
fishing kits, (5) hatchets, (6) jackknives, (7) signaling mirrors, (8)
sea anchors, and (9) emergency drinking water. For these 9 types of
survival equipment, there are 28 unique Coast Guard type-approved
products.\6\ This rule impacts manufacturers of products currently on
the market as well as newly approved products. Currently approved
products in use on survival craft will remain acceptable for the
purpose of carriage after this rule's implementation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Type Approval is the primary process for equipment and
materials to receive Coast Guard approval. The certificate is valid
for 5 years, and the approval is listed on the CGMIX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 2019 information collection request (ICR) ``Supporting
Statement for Title 46 CFR Subchapter Q: Lifesaving, Electrical,
Engineering and Navigation Equipment, Construction and Materials &
Marine Sanitation Devices (33 CFR part 159)'' (OMB Control Number:
1625-0035) estimates that companies will seek Coast Guard approval for
3 percent of the number of survival craft equipment product types on
the market each year. The Coast Guard estimates that each new product
approval replaces a preexisting product approval, such that the total
number of approved products will not change each year, as the number of
newly approved products has historically been small.
Table 3 presents the annual average of new products each year for
the nine types of survival craft equipment. To calculate the annual
average of new products, we multiplied the values in the ``Number of
Approved Products'' column (a), which contains the number of existing
approved products for each type of survival craft equipment, by 3
percent, from the ``Percentage of New Approvals Each Year'' column,
(b).
Table 3--Number of Products Currently Approved by the Coast Guard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
Number of Percentage of average
Equipment Approval approved new approvals number of new
series products * each year ** products each
year
(a) (b) (c) = (a) x
(b)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bilge pump...................................... 160.044 3 3 0.09
Compass......................................... 160.014 3 3 0.09
First-aid kit for Lifeboats..................... 160.041 5 3 0.15
First-aid kit for Liferafts..................... 160.054 5 3 0.15
Fishing kit..................................... 160.061 1 3 0.03
Hatchet......................................... 160.013 1 3 0.03
Jackknife....................................... 160.043 1 3 0.03
Mirror, Signalling.............................. 160.020 2 3 0.06
Sea anchor...................................... 160.019 1 3 0.03
Water........................................... 160.026 6 3 0.18
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... .............. 28 .............. 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources:
* CGMIX data pull, March 2021.
** ``Supporting Statement for Title 46 CFR Subchapter Q: Lifesaving, Electrical, Engineering and Navigation
Equipment, Construction and Materials & Marine Sanitation Devices (33 CFR 159)'' (OMB Control Number: 1625-
0035).
Note: Values may not sum due to rounding.
[[Page 68275]]
U.S.-Flagged Vessels That Carry Coast Guard-Approved Equipment
This rule impacts a total of 14,747 existing vessels. These
vessels, which are categorized by subchapter, are required to carry
survival craft in accordance with the applicable regulations. Of these
vessels, we estimate the total amount of survival craft maintained by
the affected population to be 31,729. Table 4 shows the breakdown of
the survival craft across the existing vessel population as follows:
2,612 inflatable buoyant apparatuses (IBAs), 23,748 liferafts, 2,835
lifeboats, and 2,534 rescue boats.
Table 4--Vessel and Survival Craft Population
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBAs Inflatable Lifeboats Rescue boats All survival
Total number ---------------- liferafts -------------------------------- craft
Subchapter Type of vessel of vessels (a) ---------------- ---------------
Total (b) Total (c) Total (d) Total (e) Total (f)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C................................. Commercial Fishing 6,022 248 6,267 141 52 6,708
Vessels.
C................................. Uninspected 173 10 258 2 7 277
Passenger Vessels.
D................................. Tank................ 323 3 706 543 49 1,301
H................................. Passenger........... 191 640 444 91 286 1,461
I................................. Cargo............... 1,037 3 3,247 1,200 618 5,068
I-A............................... Mobile Offshore 57 0 263 623 37 923
Drilling Units.
K................................. Small Passenger..... 311 512 950 2 164 1,628
L................................. Offshore Supply 338 0 1,393 55 322 1,770
Vessels.
M................................. Towing Vessels...... 1,434 91 1,485 2 51 1,629
R................................. Nautical Schools.... 29 2 140 79 22 243
R................................. Sailing Schools..... 10 0 24 1 7 32
T................................. Small Passenger..... 4,231 1,025 7,506 5 830 9,366
U................................. Oceanographic 74 3 260 53 36 352
Research.
Other Vessels..................... .................... 517 75 805 38 53 971
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................... 14,747.............. 2,612 23,748 2,835 2,534 31,729
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 5 presents vessels by the subchapter to which they are
inspected in 46 CFR. ``Other vessels'' includes public and recreational
vessels not subject to inspection. The owners and operators of the
14,747 identified vessels will experience cost savings from the lower
estimated cost of replacing equipment. We used this existing vessel
population data from MISLE and multiplied it by the average number of
IBAs, liferafts, lifeboats, and rescue boats per vessel, which we also
retrieved from MISLE, to obtain our estimated survival craft
population. The estimated survival craft population is the number of
survival craft that will need to replace non-durable Coast Guard-
approved equipment over the next 10 years. The replacement equipment
will be less expensive, because the replacement equipment will not need
Coast Guard approval. Those vessels with previously approved survival
craft equipment will not be required to replace their survival craft
equipment until the equipment expires or becomes unserviceable.
After establishing the existing number of current survival craft,
we then estimated the growth in the number of survival craft each year
in order to project our affected population for the next 10 years. To
calculate the number of new survival craft each year, we multiplied the
``Number of New Vessels per Year'' by each ``Average per Vessel''
column to obtain our annual totals for each new survival craft type.\7\
We estimate that 25 new IBAs, 222 new liferafts, 33 new lifeboats, and
31 new rescue boats will be outfitted with equipment subject to this
rule each year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ We calculate the ``Number of New Vessels per Year'' column
by taking the total number of new vessels by subchapter by year from
the MISLE database, and the ``Average per Vessel'' column by
dividing column (b) by column (a) in table 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We then sum the totals for each survival craft type across each
affected subchapter to obtain our estimated population of new survival
craft each year for this final rule. This annual growth in the survival
craft population provides an estimate of the number of new survival
craft that will enter the market each year. The vessel owners and
operators of these craft will experience cost savings from buying some
equipment, as discussed in this final rule, which will no longer need
Coast Guard approval. Table 5 presents the estimated total number of
new survival craft each year.
Table 5--Average Survival Craft per Vessel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBAs Inflatable liferafts Lifeboats Rescue boats
New vessels -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter Type of vessel per year Average per Average per Average per Average per
vessel Total vessel Total vessel Total vessel Total
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C.......................................... Commercial Fishing Vessels.... 19 0.04 1 1.04 20 0.02 0 0.01 0
C.......................................... Uninspected Passenger Vessels. 1 0.06 0 1.49 1 0.01 0 0.04 0
D.......................................... Tank.......................... 5 0.01 0 2.19 11 1.68 8 0.15 1
[[Page 68276]]
H.......................................... Passenger..................... 2 3.35 7 2.32 5 0.48 1 1.50 3
I.......................................... Cargo......................... 9 0 0 3.13 28 1.16 10 0.60 5
I-A........................................ Mobile Offshore Drilling Units 1 0 0 4.61 5 10.93 11 0.65 1
K.......................................... Small Passenger............... 5 1.65 8 3.05 15 0.01 0 0.53 3
L.......................................... Offshore Supply Vessels....... 11 0 0 4.12 45 0.16 2 0.95 10
M.......................................... Towing Vessels................ 22 0.06 1 1.04 23 0 0 0.04 1
R.......................................... Nautical Schools.............. 0 0.07 0 4.83 0 2.72 0 0.76 0
R.......................................... Sailing Schools............... 0 0 0 2.40 0 0.10 0 0.70 0
T.......................................... Small Passenger............... 35 0.24 8 1.77 62 0 0 0.20 7
U.......................................... Oceanographic Research........ 1 0.04 0 3.51 4 0.72 1 0.49 0
Other Vessels.............................. Other Vessels................. 2 0.15 0 1.56 3 0.07 0 0.10 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................. .............................. 113 6 25 37 222 18 33 7 31
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Subchapters K and T Vessels
This rule also affects all U.S.-flagged vessel operators regulated
under subchapters K and T, as these vessel operators are required to
maintain a Coast Guard-approved first-aid kit onboard their vessels, in
addition to any first-aid kits carried in the survival craft. The
owners and operators of these small passenger vessels will no longer be
required to maintain Coast Guard-approved first-aid kits aboard the
vessels themselves. Using MISLE data, we estimate there to be 5,982
existing small passenger vessels, with 40 new vessels being built on an
annual basis. This number includes all small passenger vessels defined
in subchapters K and T, found in Sec. Sec. 121.710 and 184.710,
respectively, regardless of what type of survival craft they have on
board.
Equipment Type for Each Survival Craft
The type of equipment each survival craft is required to carry
varies depending on the intended use of the survival craft. Generally,
survival craft intended for longer (international) voyages require more
equipment than those intended to be used closer to shore. Lifeboats on
inspected vessels generally must carry an equipment pack for an
international voyage.\8\ Table 6 contains the equipment required by
pack and type of survival craft.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ With the exception of lifeboats on sailing school vessels,
which must carry the equipment required in Sec. Sec. 169.527 and
169.529.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 68277]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO22.000
[[Page 68278]]
Equipment Pack Types for Commercial Fishing Vessels
Commercial fishing vessels must be equipped with either a Coastal
Service pack, a SOLAS A pack, or a SOLAS B pack, depending on vessel
size, distance traveled, whether the ocean route is designated as a
cold-water route or warm-water route, and the number of persons on
board. Table 7 provides a brief description of the packs that can be
carried by lifeboats and liferafts.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Readers can find more information on inflatable liferafts
for domestic service at https://ecfr.io/Title-46/sp46.6.160.160_1051.
Table 7--Description of Packs carried by Lifeboats and Liferafts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of pack Contents
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coastal Service pack......... A Coastal pack will contain a Sea Anchor
(Automatically Deployed), Floating/Heavy
Line (Length 100 feet), Rain Water
Collector, Floatable Knife, Waterproof
Equipment Bag, Raft Use Instructions,
Individual Thermal Protective Aids (2
nos.), Floatable Paddles (1 pair),
Manual Inflation/Bilge Pump, Repair
Clamps (6 nos.), Adhesive and Patch
Repair Kit.
SOLAS B pack................. In addition to the items listed in the
Coastal pack, a SOLAS B pack will
contain: Waterproof Flashlight, a Spare
Flashlight Bulb, Spare Flashlight ``D''
Cell Batteries (3 nos.), Sponges (2
nos.), Bailer, SOLAS Handheld Flares (3
nos.), SOLAS Rocket Parachute Flares (2
nos.) Buoyant Smoke Signal (1 no.),
Seasick Bags (1 per person), Water
Storage Bag, Thermal Protective Aid,
Heliograph Mirror (for signaling), First-
Aid Kit, Signaling Whistle, Anti-
Seasickness Pills (6 Per Person), Spare
Sea Anchor.
SOLAS A pack................. In addition to the items listed in the
Coastal pack and the items listed in
SOLAS B, a SOLAS A pack will include: a
Graduated Drinking Cup, Drinking Water
(6 to 20 Person Capacity), Food Ration
(10kj per Person), Can Opener, Fishing
Kit, SOLAS Handheld Flares (Total 6
nos.) and a SOLAS Rocket Parachute Flare
(Total 4 nos.).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equipment Pack Types for Survival Craft
We used vessel route types from MISLE to estimate the percentage of
vessels with a SOLAS A pack compared to a SOLAS B pack. We presume that
all vessels with ``Ocean'' listed as a route type carry survival craft
with SOLAS A packs. We estimate the remaining route types, not listed
as ``Ocean,'' will have SOLAS B packs. Using commercial fishing vessel
data from MISLE and knowledge from subject matter experts from the
Coast Guard's Lifesaving & Fire Safety Division (CG-ENG-4), who
specialize in survival craft data, we estimate that 50 percent of non-
oceangoing fishing vessels will have Coastal Service packs and 50
percent of non-oceangoing fishing vessels will have SOLAS B packs.
We created a distribution of SOLAS A, SOLAS B, and Coastal Service
packs by pulling all U.S.-flagged vessels by the inspection subchapter
and then pulling these vessels by route type from the MISLE database.
We excluded any vessels that did not have survival craft or had an
unknown field for survival craft in the MISLE database. The route-type
designation included ``Ocean'' for oceangoing vessels in MISLE, which
we designated as SOLAS A vessels.\10\ We designated the remainder as
SOLAS B vessels, except for commercial fishing vessels.\11\ We then
calculated the number of SOLAS A packs by dividing the population of
our vessels (by subchapter) by the sum of vessels that had ``Ocean''
routes and dividing that sum by the sum of vessels in that given
subchapter. To calculate the percentage of SOLAS B packs, we simply
subtracted the number of SOLAS A packs from 100 percent. This data pull
provided the total number of inflatable liferafts and lifeboats,
respectively, and the percentage of each survival craft pack type by
subchapter, which is presented in table 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The ``Ocean'' designation in MISLE specifically refers to
vessels with SOLAS certificates that designate them as SOLAS A
vessels. The MISLE data being pulled is from 2008-2020.
\11\ We broke out the Coastal routes and short international
routes by vessel, because Commercial Fishing Vessels are the only
type of vessels in our affected population that will carry Coastal
Service packs instead of only having SOLAS B packs for short
international shipping routes.
Table 8--Percentage of Equipment Pack Types for Lifeboats and Liferafts by Subchapter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Short
Total number Number of Coastal international/ International/
Type of vessel of vessels (a) oceangoing service pack SOLAS B (d) SOLAS A (e)
vessels (b) (c) (percent) (percent) (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial Fishing (Subchapter 6,022 3387 22 22 56
C).............................
Uninspected Passenger 173 105 .............. 39 61
(Subchapter C).................
Tank (Subchapter D)............. 323 313 .............. 3 97
Passenger (Subchapter H)........ 191 67 .............. 65 35
Cargo and Miscellaneous 1037 974 .............. 6 94
(Subchapter I).................
Mobile Offshore Drilling Units 57 55 .............. 4 96
(Subchapter I-A)...............
Small Passenger (Subchapter K).. 311 6 .............. 98 2
Offshore Supply (Subchapter L).. 338 335 .............. 1 99
Towing (Subchapter M)........... 1434 1123 .............. 22 78
Nautical Schools (Subchapter R). 29 28 .............. 3 97
Sailing Schools (Subchapter R).. 10 2 .............. 80 20
Small Passenger (Subchapter T).. 4231 872 .............. 79 21
Oceanographic Research 74 42 .............. 43 57
(Subchapter U).................
Other........................... 517 300 .............. 42 58
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
[[Page 68279]]
We then estimated the number of liferafts and lifeboats by
equipment pack type for existing and new vessels by looking at the
total number of packs carried by lifeboats and liferafts. Table 9
presents the number of SOLAS A, SOLAS B, and Coastal Service packs by
liferaft and lifeboat for each subchapter of vessels.
We calculated the total number of inflatable liferafts with Coastal
Service Packs (column (a) in table 9) by multiplying the percentage of
Coastal Service Packs in liferafts and lifeboats (column (c) in table
8) by the total number of inflatable liferafts by subchapter (column
(c) in table 4). We calculated column (b) in table 9, ``Short
International/SOLAS B packs for inflatable liferafts,'' by multiplying
column (d) in table 8, which is the percentage of Short International/
SOLAS B packs by vessel subchapter, by column (c) in table 4, which is
the total number of inflatable liferafts by subchapter. We calculated
column (c) in table 9, ``International/SOLAS A packs for liferafts,''
by multiplying column (e) in table 8, which is the percentage of
International/SOLAS A packs by vessel subchapter, by column (c) in
table 4, which is the total number of inflatable liferafts by
subchapter. We calculated column (e) in table 9, ``Short International/
SOLAS B packs for lifeboats,'' by taking the sum of multiplying columns
(c) and (d), the percentages of Coastal packs and Short International/
SOLAS B packs in table 8 by column (d) in table 4, which is the total
number of lifeboats by subchapter. Finally, we calculated column (f) in
table 9, ``International/SOLAS A packs for lifeboats'' by multiplying
column (e) from table 8, which is the percentage of International
Packs/SOLAS A, by column (d) in table 4, which is the total number of
lifeboats by subchapter.
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
[[Page 68280]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO22.001
Table 10 presents the total number of new packs needed each year
for new survival craft. We calculated this table by taking the number
of new lifeboats and liferafts presented in table 5 and multiplying
that figure by the
[[Page 68281]]
distribution in table 8 to obtain the number of new packs needed for
the new liferafts and lifeboats on vessels each year.
BILLING CODE 9110-04-C
Table 10--Lifeboats and Liferafts by Equipment Pack Type Needed on an Annual Basis Broken Out by Subchapter
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inflatable liferafts Lifeboats
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of vessel Short Short
Coastal international/ International/ Total international/ International/ Total
service pack SOLAS B SOLAS A SOLAS B SOLAS A
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial Fishing (Subchapter C)....... 4 5 11 20 0 0 0
Uninspected Passenger (Subchapter C).... .............. 0 1 1 0 0 0
Tank (Subchapter D)..................... .............. 0 11 11 0 8 8
Passenger (Subchapter H)................ .............. 3 2 5 1 0 1
Cargo and Miscellaneous (Subchapter I).. .............. 2 26 28 1 9 10
Mobile Offshore Drilling Units .............. 0 5 5 0 11 11
(Subchapter I-A).......................
Small Passenger (Subchapter K).......... .............. 15 0 15 0 0 0
Offshore Supply (Subchapter L).......... .............. 0 45 45 0 2 2
Towing (Subchapter M)................... .............. 5 18 23 0 0 0
Nautical Schools (Subchapter R)......... .............. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sailing Schools (Subchapter R).......... .............. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Small Passenger (Subchapter T).......... .............. 49 13 62 0 0 0
Oceanographic Research (Subchapter U)... .............. 2 2 4 0 1 1
Other Vessels........................... .............. 1 2 3 0 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 4 82 136 222 2 31 33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Values may not sum due to rounding.
Benefits
In addition to the nonquantified benefits discussed in table 2,
this rule will generate a cost savings as follow:
Cost Savings
This rule will generate a cost savings to: (1) vessel owners and
operators from having the option to purchase less expensive survival
craft equipment; (2) equipment manufacturers from reducing reporting,
recordkeeping, and production requirements of survival craft equipment;
and (3) the Federal Government from reducing recordkeeping
requirements. The details and calculations of the cost savings are
discussed later in this final rule.
Wages
This rule will reduce the burden of review that is required by both
industry and the Federal Government. This review includes preparing COA
applications, renewals, and product instructions by certain
manufacturers. We presume clerical employees will be responsible for
all the manufacturer's recordkeeping activities, and production
employees will be responsible for marking equipment and packing
instructions. Federal Government employees who possess the technical
knowledge to review submissions to ensure safety standards will be
senior engineers at the GS-14 grade. These employees will be
responsible for the review of all the submitted information.
We calculate the costs for each activity by estimating the labor
hours required in each labor category and then multiplying those
burdens by the wage rate for each labor category. For this analysis, we
calculated private sector wages using 2020 wage data from the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Employment Statistics
(OES) for the miscellaneous manufacturing sector (North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS) 339000).\12\ We added a load
factor to the industry wages using December 2020 wage and total
compensation data from the BLS Employer Costs for Employee Compensation
(ECEC) survey, which accounts for employee benefits. This load factor
represents the total benefits as a percentage of total salary.\13\
Table 11 summarizes the loaded wage rates for industry used in this RA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ https://www.bls.gov/oes/2020/may/naics3_339000.htm.
\13\ A loaded labor rate is what a company pays per hour to
employ a person beyond the hourly wage. Instead, the loaded labor
rate includes the cost of benefits (health insurance, vacation,
etc.). We calculate the load factor for wages by dividing total
compensation by wages and salaries. For this analysis, we used BLS'
Employer Cost for Employee Compensation/Manufacturing Occupations,
Private Industry report (Series IDs, CMU2013000000000D and
CMU2023000000000D for all workers using the multi-screen data
search). Using 2020 Quarter 4 Manufacturing data, we divided the
total compensation amount of $40.02 by the wage and salary amount of
$26.56 to get the load factor of 1.51 ($40.02 divided by $26.56).
This data is found in table 4 of the Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation December 2020 News Release available at Employer Costs
for Employee Compensation Archived News Releases: U.S. Bureau of
Labor Statistics (bls.gov).
Table 11--Derivation of 2020 Loaded Industry Wage Rates
[Rounded to the nearest dollar]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020 hourly wage Load factor Loaded hourly
------------------------------------ wage
Personnel category Data source(s) -----------------
(a) (b) (c) = (a) x (b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical...................................... Wage Rate: Mean hourly wage for Industrial $44.10 1.51 $67
Engineers, including Health and Safety:
Occupation code (17-2110) under the
miscellaneous manufacturing sector (NAICS
339000) from the BLS OES. Link: https://www.bls.gov/oes/2020/may/naics3_339000.htm#17-0000 0000.
[[Page 68282]]
Loading Factor: Calculated from December 2020 BLS
ECEC non-seasonally adjusted data for wage and
salaries (CMU2013000000000D) and total
compensation (CMU2023000000000D) for private
industry workers in the miscellaneous
manufacturing sector.
Clerical....................................... Wage Rate: Mean hourly wage for Information and $19.87 1.51 $30
Record Clerks: Occupation code (43-4000) under
the miscellaneous manufacturing sector (NAICS
339000) from the BLS OES. Link: https://www.bls.gov/oes/2020/may/naics3_339000.htm#43-4000 4000.
Loading Factor: Calculated from December 2020 BLS
ECEC non-seasonally adjusted data for wage and
salaries (CMU2013000000000D) and total
compensation (CMU2023000000000D) for private
industry workers in the manufacturing sector.
Production..................................... Wage Rate: Mean hourly wage for Assemblers: $17.22 1.51 $26
Occupation code (51-2000) in the miscellaneous
manufacturing sector (NAICS 339000) from the BLS
OES. Link: https://www.bls.gov/oes/2020/may/naics3_339000.htm#51-2000.
Loading Factor: Calculated from December 2020 BLS
ECEC non-seasonally adjusted data for wage and
salaries (CMU2013000000000D) and total
compensation (CMU2023000000000D) for private
industry workers in the manufacturing sector.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Values may not sum due to rounding.
For Federal Government employees, The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) lists the hourly pay for Federal employees according
to the Washington, DC area General Schedule (GS) pay tables.\14\ OPM
records the hourly pay of GS-14, step 5 (the midpoint of the pay band)
as $65.88. We calculate the share of total compensation of Federal
employees to account for a government employee's non-wage benefits. The
Congressional Budget Office (2017) reports total compensation to
Federal employees as $64.80 per hour and wages as $38.30.\15\ We
determine the load factor to be approximately 1.69.\16\ We multiplied
$65.88 by 1.69 to obtain a loaded hourly wage rate of approximately
$111.34 for a GS-14 senior engineer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/20Tables/html/DCB_h.aspx.
\15\ Congressional Budget Office (2017), ``Comparing the
Compensation of Federal and Private-Sector Employees, 2011 to
2015,'' https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress-2017-2018/reports/52637-federalprivatepay.pdf.
\16\ $64.80 divided by 38.30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost Savings to Equipment Manufacturers
We estimate that manufacturers of Coast Guard-approved equipment
will have a cost savings associated with no longer having to complete
applications to obtain and maintain Coast Guard approval. In addition,
this rule will remove recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and
reduce testing requirements for some pieces of survival equipment.
Number of Survival Craft Products
This rule modifies the approval requirements for nine categories of
survival craft equipment. In total, there are 28 approvals for these 9
categories of survival craft equipment. These are the specific items
that vessel owners and operators purchase to comply with the vessel
carriage regulations found in 46 CFR chapter I, subchapters C, T, K,
and W.\17\ These items are required to be stowed on board survival
craft.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Refer to the appendix titled ``Appendix C: Carriage
Requirements for all the Survival Craft Equipment'' in the docket
folder for more information on carriage requirements for all vessels
affected by this final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To comply with the lifesaving equipment regulations in 46 CFR
chapter I, subchapter Q, manufacturers submit an application to the
Coast Guard for review and approval. Once approved, the manufacturer of
each piece of equipment must mark it (or stamp it) with its approval
number (see table 12).
There are two types of survival craft equipment: (1) items that are
durable and need not be replaced or serviced frequently, such as bilge
pumps, compasses, fishing kits,\18\ jackknives, signaling mirrors,
hatchets, and sea anchors; and (2) items that are not durable, expire,
and must be replaced, such as first-aid kits and emergency drinking
water. We used the annual total number of pieces of survival craft
equipment needed to stock new survival craft in order to forecast the
number of new pieces of equipment manufactured and stamped on an annual
basis. We estimate that, in the long term, the supply of new survival
equipment will equal the demand of new survival craft equipment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ There is currently one Coast Guard-approved fishing kit on
CGMIX. The only non-durable aspect of the fishing kit is the bait,
which is made of a synthetic resin known as plastisol. If stored
properly, plastisol has an indefinite shelf life.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Coast Guard does not have substantive data on how long these
durable goods last, and we estimate that these goods will last as long
as the survival craft themselves.
We discuss the renewal rate of non-durable goods, first-aid kits,
and water later in this analysis.\19\ Table 12 lists the estimated
number of pieces of survival craft equipment manufactured on an annual
basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Refer to the sections titled First-Aid Kits, First-Aid Kits
for Liferafts and IBA, and Emergency Water further in the regulatory
analysis.
[[Page 68283]]
Table 12--Estimated Number of Pieces of Equipment Manufactured Annually
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual number
Equipment Approval of pieces of
series equipment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compass................................. 160.014 87
First-aid kit for Lifeboats............. 160.041 188
First-aid kit for Liferafts............. 160.054 285
Fishing kit............................. 160.061 38
Hatchet................................. 160.013 92
Jackknife............................... 160.043 46
Mirror, Signaling....................... 160.020 338
-------------------------------
Total............................... .............. 1,074
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equipment Approval and Markings
In the current regulations, manufacturers seeking Coast Guard
approval must submit a COA application with information such as
technical plans, drawings, specifications, instructional materials, and
test reports. In addition to the initial application, manufacturers of
Coast Guard-approved equipment must also submit application renewals
every 5 years to maintain their approval status. Table 3 presents the
estimated number of new COA applications for each equipment type, as
the annual average number of new products each year.
Table 13 presents the estimated number of application renewals for
each equipment type. Since the Coast Guard estimates that 1 of every 5
applications will be renewed on an annual basis, the number of renewal
applications is equal to 20 percent of the total number of products.
Once a product has been approved, the manufacturer must stamp each
individual piece of survival craft equipment with the Coast Guard
approval number and other information.
Table 13--Total Number of New Renewals
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual
Approval Total percentage of Total renewal
Equipment series products COAs for applications
renewals annually
(a) (b) (c) = (a) x (b)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bilge pump.................................... 160.044 3 20 0.6
Compass....................................... 160.014 3 20 0.6
First-aid kit for Lifeboats *................. 160.041 5 20 1
First-aid kit for Liferafts................... 160.054 5 20 1
Fishing kit................................... 160.061 1 20 0.2
Hatchet....................................... 160.013 1 20 0.2
Jackknife..................................... 160.043 1 20 0.2
Mirror, Signaling............................. 160.020 2 20 0.4
Sea anchor.................................... 160.019 1 20 0.2
Water **...................................... 160.026 6 20 1.2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................................... .............. 28 20 6
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Values may not sum due to rounding.
* This includes the first-aid kits described in the subchapters K and T section of this preamble, which are
covered under the same approval subpart in the CFR.
** For emergency drinking water, this only includes implementation in the first 5 years of the analysis period.
We present the number of affected products in Years 6 through 10 of the analysis period later in this RA.
We estimate that it will take the technical staff 2 hours to
prepare a new application, and the clerical staff will spend 0.17 hours
(10 minutes) \20\ per application on recordkeeping, for a total cost of
$139 per new application [(2 technical hours x $67) + (0.17 clerical
hours x $30) = $139]. For renewal applications, we estimate a burden of
0.5 technical hours and 0.17 clerical hours, for a total cost of $39
[(0.5 technical hours x $67) + (0.17 clerical hours x $30) = $39].
Under this rule, the Coast Guard no longer requires approval
applications for any new survival craft equipment. As shown in table
14, we estimate this will result in a cost saving to industry of
approximately $117 per year for new applications, and approximately
$219 per year for renewal applications. This results in a total annual
cost savings of about $336.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Based on information from the subchapter Q ICR.
[[Page 68284]]
Table 14--Annual Cost Savings of Industry for No Longer Having to Submit New and Renewal Certificate of Approval Applications
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New applications Renewal applications
Approval -------------------------------------------------------------------- Total cost
Equipment series Total number of Total cost Total number of Total cost savings
applications * savings applications ** savings
(a) (b) = (a) x [- (c) (d) = (c) x [- (e) = (b) + (d)
$139] $39]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bilge pump........................................ 160.044 0.09 -$13 0.60 -$23 -$36
Compass........................................... 160.014 0.09 -13 0.60 -23 -36
First-aid kit for Lifeboats....................... 160.041 0.15 -21 1.00 -39 -60
First-aid kit for Liferafts....................... 160.054 0.15 -21 1 -39 -60
Fishing kit....................................... 160.061 0.03 -4 0.20 -8 -12
Hatchet........................................... 160.013 0.03 -4 0.20 -8 -12
Jackknife......................................... 160.043 0.03 -4 0.20 -8 -12
Mirror, Signaling................................. 160.020 0.06 -8 0.4 -16 -24
Sea anchor........................................ 160.019 0.03 -4 0.20 -8 -12
Water............................................. 160.026 0.18 -25 1.20 -47 -72
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... .............. ................ -117 ................ -219 -336
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Values may not sum due to rounding.
* Refer to column (c) in table 3.
** Refer to column (c) in table 13.
The Coast Guard is removing requirements that equipment must be
marked with a Coast Guard approval number. With the exception of
compasses and hatchets, equipment needs to be marked only to indicate
that it meets standards set in ISO 18813. Compasses will no longer need
to be marked with their Coast Guard approval number, but will still
need to be marked to indicate they meet ISO 25862, as is currently
required by the Coast Guard approval guidelines for magnetic compasses
in lifeboats and rescue boats. Hatchets will not need to be marked at
all, as they do not have to meet any consensus standard and because
this rule removes the marking required by Sec. 160.013-5.
The Coast Guard assumes the burden to mark the equipment is the
same whether it is marked with a Coast Guard approval number or whether
it is marked indicating that it meets the ISO standard; therefore, this
change will only result in a cost savings to the manufacturers of
hatchets. The Coast Guard estimates that it takes industry 0.06 hours
of production labor time \21\ to mark each individual piece of
equipment at a cost of $1.56 (0.06 hours x $26 = $1.56) per piece of
equipment. We estimate that 92 hatchets will no longer need to be
marked each year (see table 12), for a total cost savings of
approximately $144 ($1.56 x 92).\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ This is based on information from the subchapter Q ICR.
\22\ This value is incorporated in column (a) of table 19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instructions
The Coast Guard currently requires that equipment manufacturers
provide instruction material with certain types of equipment to ensure
that crew members have access to information on the proper use of the
equipment. We currently require instructions for five of the nine types
of equipment subject to this rulemaking: compasses, first-aid kits,
mirrors, fishing kits, and jackknives. ISO 18813 requires instructions
for three types of equipment: first-aid kits, mirrors, and fishing
kits. ISO 18813 does not state that instructions need to be provided
for compasses and jackknives; therefore, the manufacturers of compasses
and jackknives will no longer have to develop and maintain instructions
for their products under this rule.
Based on information in the current subchapter Q ICR (OMB Control
Number 1625-0035), we estimate that it takes about 8 hours of time to
prepare a set of instructional materials for new equipment, for a cost
of about $536 (8 hours x $67/hour).
Table 15 presents the total annual industry cost savings, $64, for
no longer having to develop new instructions for some types of new
survival craft equipment. The total cost in columns (b) and (d), $536,
is the loaded wage of a safety engineer and inspector, $67, multiplied
by the estimated burden of work, 8 hours, for preparing a set of new
instructions. This table presents the baseline scenario burden, the
proposed post-regulatory scenario burden, and the difference between
the two as cost savings.
Table 15--Annual Cost Savings of Modifying New Instruction Requirements for Applicable Equipment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline scenario Post-regulatory scenario
Approval -------------------------------------------------------------------- Total cost
Equipment series Total new Total new savings
instructions Total cost instructions Total cost
(a) (b) = (a) x $536 (c) (d) = (c) x $536 (e) = (d)-(b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compass........................................... 160.014 0.09 $48 0 $0 -$48
First-aid kit for Lifeboats....................... 160.041 0.15 80 0.15 80 0
First-aid kit for Liferafts....................... 160.054 0.15 80 0.15 80 0
Fishing kit....................................... 160.061 0.03 16 0.03 16 0
Jackknife......................................... 160.043 0.03 16 0 0 -16
Mirror, Signaling................................. 160.020 0.06 32 0.06 32 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... .............. 0.51 272 0.39 208 -64
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
[[Page 68285]]
Laboratory Testing and Recordkeeping
As current regulations stand, the Coast Guard requires product
testing and recordkeeping for some lifesaving equipment to ensure the
equipment meets minimum performance requirements. Table 16 presents a
comparison of the current Coast Guard testing requirements and the
testing requirements stated in ISO 18813 and ISO 25862 (for compasses).
This table also contains a qualitative description of the change in
costs associated with modifying the current testing requirements. We
were unable to obtain any cost data from the Coast Guard-approved labs
that conduct the testing of this equipment, and we received no comments
to the NPRM on this.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ We asked four Coast Guard-approved laboratories for cost
estimates for the testing requirements, but the labs were unable to
provide any cost information.
Table 16--Previous and New Product Testing Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous testing New testing
Product requirements requirements Cost impact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compasses.......................... All testing All testing No cost change, as the
requirements from requirements for requirements of ISO 613
section 4 of ISO 613 class B Compasses as and ISO 25862 are not
\a\. stated in ISO 25862. substantively different.
Dry Heat \a\. Dry Heat.....
Low Damp Heat....
Temperature \a\. Low
Vibration \a\ Temperature.
Solar Vibration....
Radiation \a\. Solar
Corrosion \a\ Radiation.
Corrosion....
Bilge Pump......................... Capacity Capacity None. Testing requirements
Testing \b\. Testing. are the same.
Head Pressure Head Pressure
Testing \b\. Testing.
Operating Operating
Lever Testing \b\. Lever Testing.
Jackknife.......................... Hardness Test Cutting Tests Unquantified cost savings.
\c\. The Coast Guard is unable
Bending and to assess the change in
Drop Tests \c\. burden; there is no
Cutting Tests substantive data.
\c\.
First-Aid for Lifeboats............ Accelerated None......... Unquantified cost savings.
weathering \d\. There is no change in
Salt spray testing requirements;
\d\. therefore, there is no
Temperature change in burden.
change \d\.
Container
watertightness \d\.
Carton
watertightness \d\.
First-Aid for Liferafts............ Accelerated None......... Unquantified cost savings.
weathering \e\. There is no change in
Salt Spray testing requirements;
\e\. therefore, there is no
change in burden.
Mirrors............................ Reflection Reflection Unknown change in cost. The
Test \f\. Test. Coast Guard is unable to
Flatness Flatness Test assess the change in
Tests \f\. Dropping Test burden as there is no
Dropping Test Oil- substantive data.
\f\. Resistance Test.
Salt Spray Lanyard
\f\. Strength Test.
Watertightness.
Emergency Water.................... Chemical and Water quality None. Testing requirements
biological analysis. must be verified by are the same, as under the
Temperature the local ISO standard the water
Storage. municipality or must satisfy international
Leakage...... independent lab. chemical and
Water Low and High microbiological
Immersion Testing. Temperature Storage. requirements. Concerning
Durability... Leakage...... the water quality testing,
Corrosion.... Water the Coast Guard was unable
Drop......... Immersion Testing. to obtain any cost data
Durability... from the laboratories.
Corrosion....
Drop.........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources:
\a\ ``United States Coast Guard Approval Guideline for Magnetic Compasses in Lifeboats/Rescue Boats,'' USCG
Approval Series 160.014, December 2005.
\b\ Sec. 160.044-4
\c\ Sec. 160.043-5
\d\ Sec. 160.041-5
\e\ Sec. 160.054-5
\f\ Documentation provided by subject matter experts in CG-ENG-4.
Based on the information from the current subchapter Q ICR, we
estimate that recordkeeping takes 2 hours of clerical time per year and
costs $60 (2 hours x $30 clerical staff loaded hourly wage rate). The
Coast Guard is removing the requirements for testing records for seven
types of equipment listed in this final rule, as these manufacturers no
longer need these records to document that their products meet the
requirements of the ISO 18813. Table 17 presents the total cost savings
of about $1,500 to industry from removing requirements to keep records
of laboratory testing. The $60 figure used in calculating total cost in
columns (b) and (d) represents the loaded hourly
[[Page 68286]]
wage of a record clerk ($30) multiplied by the estimated burden of work
for fulfilling recordkeeping requirements (2 hours). This table
presents the baseline scenario burden and the post-regulatory scenario
burden and then presents the difference of the two burdens as cost
savings.
Table 17--Annual Cost Savings to Manufacturers for Testing Recordkeeping Requirements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline scenario Post-regulatory scenario
Approval -------------------------------------------------------------------- Total cost
Equipment subpart Total Total savings
products Total cost products Total cost
(a) (b) = (a) x $60 (c) (d) = (c) x $60 (e) = (d) - (b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bilge pump........................................ 160.044 3 $180 0 $0 -$180
Compass........................................... 160.014 3 180 0 0 -180
First-aid kit for Lifeboats....................... 160.041 5 300 0 0 -300
First-aid kit for Liferafts....................... 160.054 5 300 0 0 -300
Jackknife......................................... 160.043 1 60 0 0 -60
Mirror, Signaling................................. 160.020 2 120 0 0 -120
Water............................................. 160.026 6 360 0 0 -360
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... .............. 25 1,500 0 0 -1,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Laboratory Inspections
The Coast Guard currently requires inspectors to examine the
manufacturing process in order to ensure that quality control is
maintained. This rule removes these requirements; however, the Coast
Guard is unable to determine if this removal will generate any cost
savings to industry. Hence, the Coast Guard is not quantifying it as a
cost savings. Manufacturers are likely to still have their production
line inspected to ensure quality as part of best industry practices.
Moreover, manufacturers may continue third-party testing to maintain
certifications, such as the ISO 9001 standard, or to meet other
regulatory obligations. At the time of this final rule, the Coast Guard
does not have enough information to quantify any potential changes in
cost resulting from the changes in inspection requirements.
Additionally, the Coast Guard requires inspecting entities to issue
annual reports to enable a comparison between the production line and
the prototype tested by the Coast Guard.\24\ We were able to estimate a
cost savings that resulted from the removal of this reporting
requirement using information from the subchapter Q ICR, which
estimated that this recordkeeping takes 24 hours of clerical time per
year on average and costs $720 (24 hours x $30 clerical wage rate). The
Coast Guard is removing this reporting requirement for all types of
survival craft equipment. As shown in table 18, we estimate a total
annual cost savings of approximately $17,280. This table presents the
baseline scenario burden, the post-regulatory scenario burden, and the
difference between the two as cost savings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ While the Coast Guard currently requires testing for
jackknives, it does not require laboratory inspections. Therefore,
there are no cost savings to jackknife manufacturers from this
change.
Table 18--Annual Cost Savings for Laboratory Inspection Records
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline scenario Post-regulatory scenario
Approval -------------------------------------------------------------------- Total change in
Equipment series Total Total cost
products Total cost products Total cost
(a) (b) = (a) x $720 (c) (d) = (c) x $720 (e) = (d) - (b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bilge pump........................................ 160.044 3 $2,160 0 $0 -$2,160
Compass........................................... 160.014 3 2,160 0 0 -2,160
First-aid kit for Lifeboats....................... 160.041 5 3,600 0 0 -3,600
First-aid kit for Liferafts....................... 160.054 5 3,600 0 0 -3,600
Mirror, Signaling................................. 160.020 2 1,440 0 0 -1,440
Water............................................. 160.026 6 4,320 0 0 -4,320
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... .............. 24 17,280 0 0 -17,280
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Total Cost Savings to Manufacturers
Table 19 presents the annual total cost savings to equipment
manufacturers. We estimate that manufacturers of Coast Guard-approved
bilge pumps, lifeboats, compasses, first-aid kits, fishing kits,
hatchets, jackknives, signaling mirrors, sea anchors, and emergency
water will save approximately $19,324 per year.
Table 19--Total Annual Cost Savings to Equipment Manufacturers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application
Equipment Approval and marking Instruction Product Laboratory Total cost
series requirements requirements testing inspections savings
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) = (a) + (b)
+ (c) + (d)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bilge pump............................................ 160.044 -$36 $0 -$180 -$2,160 -$2,376
Compass............................................... 160.014 -36 -48 -180 -2,160 -2,424
[[Page 68287]]
First-aid kit for Lifeboats........................... 160.041 -60 -0 -300 -3,600 -3,960
First-aid kit for Liferafts........................... 160.054 -60 -0 -300 -3,600 -3,960
Fishing kit........................................... 160.061 -12 -0 0 0 -12
Hatchet............................................... 160.013 -156 0 0 0 -156
Jackknife............................................. 160.043 -12 -16 -60 0 -88
Mirror, Signaling..................................... 160.020 -24 -0 -120 -1,440 -1,584
Sea anchor............................................ 160.019 -12 0 0 0 -12
Water................................................. 160.026 -72 0 -360 -4,320 -4,752
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................. .............. -480 -64 -1,500 -17,280 -19,324
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Cost Savings to Vessel Owners or Operators
After gathering price data from a variety of sources, we estimate
that removing approval requirements will allow owners and operators of
vessels to purchase less expensive equipment.\25\ While there are
several companies selling Coast Guard-approved equipment, online
information generally does not specify whether the equipment meets ISO
18813 or similar standards. As a result, we had difficulty finding
price data for survival craft equipment products clearly stating that
they met ISO 18813 standards. However, we were able to identify prices
for two products--emergency provisions and emergency water--that the
manufacturer or advertiser explicitly stated met the requirements of
the ISO 18813 standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ We looked at online retailers of survival craft equipment
to assess price data. A search of online retailers determined that
equipment that was not type-approved was less expensive than similar
equipment that was type-approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We then applied percentage price difference between emergency water
products and emergency provisions that had both Coast Guard approval
and met the requirements of ISO 18813, and those emergency provisions
and water products that met only the requirements of ISO 18813.\26\ We
estimate that products without Coast Guard approval affected by this
rule were approximately 28 percent less expensive than products with
Coast Guard approval.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Although emergency provisions are not subject to changes in
this final rule, we still examined them for the purposes of price
comparison, as doing so provided a depth of data allowing us to
determine a more robust ratio.
\27\ We calculated this figure by finding the price differential
for those products that were Coast Guard type-approved and those
products that were not Coast Guard-approved but met ISO standards.
We were not able to derive this figure for all of the products due
to lack of industry data. However, given the similarity of the
equipment type, we assume the price differences would be similar for
all products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We applied this 28-percent price decrease to all the products
affected by this rule, with the exception of first-aid kits, because
the kit content requirements differ between the ISO standard and
current Coast Guard standards, and we estimate the change in price for
first-aid kits by the difference in replacement costs for first-aid
kits. These differences are explained in further detail in the section,
First-Aid Kits, in this RA. For this analysis, we quantified the cost
savings to new vessels from being able to purchase less expensive
equipment, and the cost savings to existing vessels of replacing
expired items with less costly items. For durable items, without data
to estimate how frequently these items are replaced, we are not able to
estimate the cost savings to the owners and operators of existing
vessels for purchasing replacement equipment that we estimate will be
28 percent cheaper. However, since emergency water and first-aid kits
expire, we estimate the cost savings for purchasing replacement
equipment for the owners and operators of both new and existing vessels
based on how frequently this non-durable equipment must be replaced.
This information is presented later in this RA.
Durable Equipment: Bilge Pumps, Compasses, Fishing Kits, Hatchets,
Jackknives, Mirrors, and Sea Anchors
We estimate that only new vessels will purchase bilge pumps,
compasses, fishing kits, hatchets, jackknives, mirrors, and sea anchors
for their survival craft. Based on population estimates (presented in
table 5), 25 new IBAs, 222 new liferafts, 33 new lifeboats, and 31 new
rescue boats will be subject to this rule each year. Table 6 lists the
survival equipment that lifeboats, liferafts, rescues boats, and IBAs
are required to carry. We multiply the populations in table 5 by the
carriage requirements in table 6 to yield the total number of items
purchased for new survival craft in table 20. The Coast Guard requires
new lifeboats to be equipped with bilge pumps, and there were 33 new
lifeboats recorded in table 5, meaning there will be 33 purchases of
new bilge pumps per year.\28\ Only the new lifeboats with equipment
packs for international voyages will require fishing kits (see table
6), and all new lifeboats and rescue boats will be equipped with
compasses, for a total of 64 purchases of compasses each year. All 280
new IBAs, liferafts, and lifeboats are required to be equipped with
mirrors. Finally, 218 liferafts with a SOLAS A or SOLAS B pack will be
equipped with 2 sea anchors each. This rule will require that 93 IBAs,
lifeboats, rescue boats, and liferafts with coastal service packs each
have 1 sea anchor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ The Coast Guard requires all non-self-bailing lifeboats and
rescue boats to have bilge pumps. Based on discussions with subject
matter experts in CG-ENG-4, the Coast Guard estimates that all new
lifeboats will be non-self-bailing and will therefore require bilge
pumps, and all new rescue boats that are not also lifeboats will be
self-bailing and therefore will not require bilge pumps.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 20 presents the annual cost savings from new vessels removing
Coast Guard approval for bilge pumps, compasses, fishing kits,
hatchets, jackknives, mirrors, and sea anchors. In total, we estimate
an annual cost savings of approximately $78,324 for U.S.-flagged
vessels by removing the type approvals for these 7 types of survival
craft equipment.
[[Page 68288]]
Table 20--Annual Cost Savings to New Vessels From Removing Coast Guard Approval for Bilge Pumps, Compasses, Fishing Kits, Hatchets, Jackknives, Mirrors,
and Sea Anchors
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average price Estimated
of coast equipment price Average
Equipment guard- without coast Difference Number of number of Total cost
approved guard approval survival craft items per savings
equipment requirements survival craft
(a) (b) = (a) x 0.72 (c) = (b)-(a) (d) (e) (f) = (c) x
(d) x (e)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bilge pump.......................................... $276 $199 -$77 33 1 -$2,541
Compass............................................. 1,250 900 -350 64 1 -22,400
Fishing kit......................................... 41 30 -11 31 1 -341
Hatchet............................................. 28 20 -8 33 2 -528
Jackknife........................................... 34 24 -10 33 1 -330
Mirror, Signaling................................... 19 14 -5 280 1 -1,400
Sea anchor (Liferafts with SOLAS A and SOLAS B 343 247 -96 218 2 -41,856
packs).............................................
Sea anchor (Other Survival Craft)................... 343 247 -96 93 1 -8,928
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................................... .............. ................ ................ .............. .............. -78,324
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding. All product prices are rounded to the nearest whole dollar.
Jackknives as a Replacement for Can Openers
As specified in Sec. 199.175(b)(5), the Coast Guard allows
jackknives to meet the requirements of a can opener, thereby permitting
jackknives to fulfill two requirements. Table 1 in Sec. 199.175 states
that only lifeboats and rigid liferafts with SOLAS A packs require can
openers, and only lifeboats may carry jackknives. This means that rigid
liferafts with SOLAS A packs are currently carrying both knives and can
openers. This rule will allow these vessels to replace their knives
with jackknives, resulting in a cost savings to vessel owners from
being able to purchase only a jackknife instead of both a knife and a
can opener. We estimate that there are a total of 136 new liferafts
each year that carry SOLAS A packs and, further, assume that these
vessel owners and operators will choose to replace a knife with a
jackknife, thus forgoing the need to purchase a can opener.\29\ We
estimate the price of a can opener meeting the requirements of ISO
18813 to be $6.\30\ Therefore, we estimate that vessel owners and
operators will save $816 (136 SOLAS A liferafts x $6 per can opener)
for no longer needing can openers, because of meeting the jackknife
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ We estimate the cost savings for only one can opener
because the use of a jackknife will only fulfill the replacement
requirement for one can opener.
\30\ We calculated this by taking the average of 10 can opener
products on the market that meet ISO 18813 requirements. The Coast
Guard will now require that can openers meet the standards of ISO
18813.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emergency Water
The Coast Guard requires survival craft with SOLAS A packs be
stocked with 3 liters of water per person, and that lifeboats with
SOLAS B packs be stocked with 1.5 liters of water per person. We
estimate the average cost of Coast Guard-approved water to be $4 per
liter,\31\ while the cost of 1 liter of emergency water that meets the
ISO 18813 standard to be $3.\32\ The price difference between the Coast
Guard-approved water and water approved under ISO 18813 is $1 per
liter.\33\ This is the estimated additional cost of Coast Guard
approval, which is counted as cost savings. Emergency water expires and
will need to be replaced every 5 years; therefore, the Coast Guard
estimates that 20 percent of existing survival craft and 100 percent of
new survival craft will need to purchase emergency water annually.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ We calculated this by taking the average of 14 Coast Guard-
approved emergency drinking water products on the market.
\32\ We calculated this by taking the average of 14 available
emergency drinking water products on the market that were compliant
with ISO 18813 only.
\33\ To calculate this, we took the average of emergency
drinking water prices that were Coast Guard-approved and subtracted
them from emergency drinking water prices that need only meet the
ISO standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate that industry will save a total of $183,255 on an
annual basis (3,215 survival craft x 19 people per survival craft x 3
liters of water x $1 cost savings) for survival craft with SOLAS A
packs during Years 1 through 5 of implementation.\34\ To calculate this
cost savings, we took the 12,690 existing liferafts with SOLAS A packs
and 2,552 lifeboats with international voyage packs (see table 9) for a
total of 15,242 existing survival craft that are required to stock
emergency water. We then estimated that 20 percent (100 percent of
these survival craft / 5 years) or 3,048 survival craft [(12,690
liferafts x 20 percent) + (2,552 lifeboats x 20 percent)] will replace
their emergency water annually. Additionally, all 31 new lifeboats with
international packs and 136 new liferafts with SOLAS A packs (see table
10) are required to buy emergency water. We summed these totals to get
3,215 survival craft that will need to purchase emergency water on an
annual basis (3,048 existing survival craft + 31 new lifeboats + 136
new liferafts). Table 21 presents these cost savings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ We calculated this by taking the average of the survival
craft capacity for all survival craft. We retrieved this data from
the MISLE database in November 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Years 6 through 10, there will be more cost savings, because
vessels will have entirely replaced their survival craft equipment by
Year 6, as described earlier in this rule. Therefore, we estimate an
annual cost savings of about $192,774 [3,382 survival craft (3,215 +
167 new craft) x 19 people per survival craft x 3 liters of water x -$1
cost savings] for survival craft with SOLAS A packs. Table 22 presents
these cost savings.
[[Page 68289]]
Table 21--Total Cost Savings for Coast Guard Approval for Reduced Prices in Emergency Water for SOLAS A Packs in Years 1 Through 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total New Person per Total
liferafts lifeboats Total life Liters of water Cost of Total cost
Years 1 through 5 and and survival saving water needed in water savings
lifeboats liferafts craft craft required liters
(a) (b) (c) = (a) (d) (e) (f) = (c) (g) (h) = (g)
+ (b) x (d) x x (f)
(e)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline................................................ 3,048 167 3,215 19 3 183,255 $4 $733,020
Post-Regulatory......................................... 3,048 167 3,215 19 3 183,255 3 549,765
Change.................................................. .......... .......... .......... 0 0 0 -1 -183,255
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Table 22--Total Cost Savings for Coast Guard Approval for Reduced Prices in Emergency Water for SOLAS A Packs in Years 6 Through 10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total New Person per Total
liferafts lifeboats Total life Liters of water Cost of Total cost
Years 6 through 10 and and survival saving water needed in water savings
lifeboats liferafts craft craft required liters
(a) (b) (c) = (a) (d) (e) (f) = (c) (g) (h) = (g)
+ (b) x (d) x x (f)
(e)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline................................................ 3,215 167 3,382 19 3 192,774 $4 $771,096
Post-Regulatory......................................... 3,215 167 3,382 19 3 192,774 3 578,322
Change.................................................. .......... .......... .......... 0 0 0 -1 -192,774
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
We used the same methodology when calculating the number of SOLAS A
packs in Years 1 through 10 of implementation to estimate the total
costs savings for survival craft with SOLAS B packs. There are a total
of 283 existing lifeboats with SOLAS B packs (see table 9). We estimate
that 20 percent of these survival craft or 57 survival craft (283
lifeboats x 20 percent) will replace their emergency water annually.
Additionally, all 2 new lifeboats with SOLAS B packs are required to
buy emergency water, for a total of 59 survival craft (57 lifeboats + 2
new lifeboats) purchasing emergency water in Years 1 through 5. In
Years 6 through 10, the number of existing lifeboats will increase by 2
to account for the new vessels that will be built in Years 1 through 5
(59) for a total of 61 survival craft (59 existing survival craft + 2
new lifeboats).
The cost savings for survival craft with SOLAS B packs purchasing
emergency water will be approximately $1,682 (59 survival craft x 19
people per survival craft x 1.5 liters of water x -$1 cost savings) in
Years 1 through 5 and approximately $1,739 (61 survival craft x 19
people per survival craft x 1.5 liters of water x -$1 cost savings) in
Years 6 through 10. Table 23 presents these cost savings in Years 1
through 5 of implementation, and table 24 presents these cost savings
in Years 6 through 10 of implementation.
Table 23--Total Cost Savings for Coast Guard Approval for Reduced Prices in Emergency Water for SOLAS B Packs in Years 1 Through 5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Person per
New New Total new life Liters of Total Total cost
Water Years 1-5 liferafts lifeboats survival saving water water Cost savings
craft craft required
(a) (b) (c) = (a) (d) (e) (f) = [(c) (g) (h) = (f)
+ (b) x (d) x x (g)
(e)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline................................................ 57 2 59 19 1.5 1,682 $4 $6,728
Post-Regulatory......................................... 57 2 59 19 1.5 1,682 3 5,046
Change.................................................. 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -1,682
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Table 24--Total Cost Savings for Coast Guard Approval for Reduced Prices in Emergency Water for SOLAS B Packs in Years 6 Through 10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Person per
New New Total new life Liters of Total Total cost
Water years 6-10 liferafts lifeboats survival saving water water Cost savings
craft craft required
(a) (b) (c) = (a) (d) (e) (f) = [(c) (g) (h) = (f)
+ (b) x(d) x x (g)
(e)]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline................................................ 59 2 61 19 1.5 1,739 $4 $6,956
Post-Regulatory......................................... 59 2 61 19 1.5 1,739 3 5,217
Change.................................................. 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -1,739
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Table 25 presents the total annualized cost savings to vessel
owners and operators from removing Coast Guard approval requirements
for emergency water. The Coast Guard estimates an annualized cost
savings of about
[[Page 68290]]
$188,923 with a 7-percent discount rate ($189,372 with 3-percent
discount rate).
Table 25--Total Cost Savings to Vessels From Removing Coast Guard Approval for Reduced Prices in Emergency Water
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost savings Cost savings Annualized cost savings
for vessels for vessels Total cost -------------------------------
Year with SOLAS A with SOLAS B savings
packs packs 3% 7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) (b) (c) (d) = (b) + (e) = (d) / (f) = (d) /
(c) 1.03 \(a)\ 1.07 \(a)\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................... $183,255 $1,682 $184,937 $179,550 $172,838
2............................... -183,255 -1,682 -184,937 -174,321 -161,531
3............................... -183,255 -1,682 -184,937 -169,244 -150,964
4............................... -183,255 -1,682 -184,937 -164,314 -141,088
5............................... -183,255 -1,682 -184,937 -159,528 -131,858
6............................... -192,774 -1,739 -194,513 -162,902 -129,612
7............................... -192,774 -1,739 -194,513 -158,157 -121,133
8............................... -192,774 -1,739 -194,513 -153,550 -113,208
9............................... -192,774 -1,739 -194,513 -149,078 -105,802
10.............................. -192,774 -1,739 -194,513 -144,736 -98,881
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... -1,880,145 -17,105 -1,897,250 1,615,380 -1,326,915
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized.............. .............. .............. .............. -189,372 -188,923
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
First-Aid Kits
The Coast Guard is modifying the requirements for first-aid kits so
that all first-aid kits in survival craft must meet the standards
outlined in ISO 18813. In addition to removing the testing requirements
for the kits, this change modifies the required contents of first-aid
kits by removing the requirements for some items, adding additional
items, or changing the number of mandatory items. Since items within
the kits expire and need to be replaced, the change impacts both new
and existing vessels, including small passenger vessels described in
the Subchapters K and T section in this preamble. Table 26 highlights
these differences in the first-aid kit requirement. Due to the
differences in the first-aid kits, we estimate the cost of purchasing
each of the individual items in the kit.
Table 26--Crosswalk of First-Aid Kit Content Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of items required
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item Lifeboats and rescue Liferaft and IBA
boat requirements requirements under Sec. ISO 18813 requirements
under Sec. 160.041-4 160.054-4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adhesive Plasters.................... 32 1-inch waterproof 16 1-inch waterproof 20 bandages in assorted
bandages. bandages. sizes.
Ammonia Inhalants.................... 10..................... 10..................... 0.
Analgesic Medication................. 50 doses............... 20 doses............... 48 doses.
Antiseptic Preparations.............. 10 iodine swabs........ 10 iodine swabs........ 10 applications.
Burn Preparations.................... 0...................... 0...................... 12 applications.
Compression Bandage (for wounds)..... 5 4-inch bandages 8 2- 1 4-inch bandage 4 2- 10 sterile bandages in
inch bandages. inch bandages. assorted sizes.
Compression Bandage (for securing 2 2-inch-by-6-yard 2 2-inch-by-6-yard 4 meters (4.4 yards) of
splints, dressings, etc.). bandages. bandages. adhesive elastic
bandage.
Eye Dressing Packet.................. 3...................... 3...................... 0.
Instructions......................... 1...................... 1...................... 1.
Sterile Gauze Compress............... 12 3-by-18-inch 4 3-by-18-inch 2.
compresses. compresses.
Tourniquet, with forceps, scissors 1, 1, 1, and 12, 1, 1, 1, and 12, 0.
and pins. respectively. respectively.
Triangle Bandage..................... 3 40-inch bandages..... 0...................... 2.
Waterproof Container................. 1...................... 1...................... 1.
Wire Splint.......................... 1...................... 1...................... 0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First-Aid Kits for Lifeboats and Rescue Boats
We estimate that new vessels with lifeboats or rescue boats will
have a cost savings as a result of the changes to first-aid kits,
because we estimate that first-aid kits that meet the standard are $41
less expensive than Coast Guard-approved kits under approval series
160.041. We estimate that a total of 64 new lifeboats and rescue boats
will purchase a first-aid kit each year for a total costs savings of
approximately $2,624 (64 survival craft x $41 cost savings).
The Coast Guard is not requiring existing vessels to replace their
current kits; however, existing vessels must replace medication and
ointments within the kits by their expiration date.
[[Page 68291]]
Currently, vessels must replace their iodine swabs, pain relief
medication, and eye ointment, which we estimate costs about $19 per
kit.\35\ We calculated the cost per kit by taking the average price for
10 different iodine swab products, 12 different pain relief medication,
and 8 different eye ointments. Under this rule, these vessels will no
longer have to replace eye ointment, and will need to replace fewer
doses of pain relief medication. Additionally, vessel operators will be
able to replace iodine swabs with less expensive antiseptic
preparation. However, under this rule, vessels will incur an additional
cost from replacing the burn cream in the kits, as required by ISO
18813 shown in table 26. We estimate the cost of replacing these items
to be $19, meaning the change is cost-neutral to existing vessels with
lifeboat first-aid kits.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ ISO 18813 uses the specific language of Analgesic and
Ophthalmic when describing the medication in the first-aid kits.
Refer to the appendix titled ``Appendix B: Product Prices'' in the
docket folder for more information on product prices for these items
that comprise the first-aid kit.
\36\ The Coast Guard used the same price estimation for the
average cost of these items as the cost it would take to replace
them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First-Aid Kits for Liferafts and IBAs
We estimate that first-aid kits that meet the requirements of ISO
18813 will be, on average, $1 less expensive than the Coast Guard-
approved kits for liferafts and IBAs.\37\ All 218 new liferafts and all
25 new IBAs will need to be equipped with the kits each year for an
annual cost savings of $243 (243 survival craft x -$1 cost saving).\38\
Liferaft first-aid kits are sealed in plastic bags, and most drugs
expire within a 2- to 3-year timeframe. Vessel owners and operators
have to replace the entire first-aid kit with a brand new kit after
using even one item. Once the packaging for the kit is opened, the
majority of items in it will have the same expiration date, not just
the individual item.\39\ Therefore, the Coast Guard estimates that
vessels will replace the items in their first-aid kits once they have
expired, every 2.5 years (average of 2 and 3 years), and this process
occurs during the annual servicing at an approved servicing facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ The Coast Guard took the average price of six Coast Guard-
approved first-aid kits and subtracted it from an average of six
first-aid kits that met ISO standards.
\38\ There are 222 liferafts affected by this rule, but those
requiring SOLAS A and B packs (218 liferafts) will be required to
have first-aid kits.
\39\ We contacted a liferaft servicing firm to determine how the
expired items in liferaft and lifeboat first-aid kits are replaced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We calculate that 40 percent (1 replacement every 2.5 years) of
vessels will replace these items annually. Forty percent of all
existing 2,612 IBAs and 22,377 liferafts [table 9 (sum of the totals
for SOLAS A and SOLAS B for inflatable liferafts columns)] is 9,996
survival craft [(2,612 IBAs x 40 percent) + (22,377 liferafts x 40
percent)]. Beginning in Year 3, the new survival craft from Year 1 will
need to replace their kits for a total of 10,239 survival craft (9,996
existing survival craft + 243 survival craft built in Year 1). In Year
4, the new survival craft from Year 2 will need to replace their kits,
but those from Year 1 will not need to do this, since they will have
replaced their kits in the prior year. Therefore, the total needing to
replace first-aid kits will still be 10,239 survival craft (9,996
existing survival craft + 243 survival craft built in Year 2). In Year
5, the survival craft built in Year 1 and Year 3 will replace their
kits for a total of 10,482 survival craft (9,996 existing survival
craft + 243 survival craft built in Year 1 + 243 survival craft built
in Year 3). This pattern continues over the 10-year analysis period. In
conclusion, we estimate the total annualized cost savings from removing
Coast Guard approval for liferaft first-aid kits will be $10,660 with a
7-percent discount rate as shown in table 27.
Table 27--Total Cost Savings to Vessels From Removing Coast Guard Approval Requirements for First-Aid Kits in Liferafts and IBAs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost savings for replacement kits Annualized cost savings
------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Year Cost savings Total survival Cost savings Total cost Total cost
to new vessels craft for savings for savings 3% 7%
replacing kits replacement replacements
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) = (c) x (d) (f) = (b) + (e) (g) = (f) / (h) = (f) /
1.03 \(a)\ 1.07 \(a)\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................................... -$243 9,996 -$1 -$9,996 -$10,239 -$9,941 -$9,569
2................................... -243 9,996 -1 -9,996 -10,239 -9,651 -8,943
3................................... -243 10,239 -1 -10,239 -10,482 -9,593 -8,556
4................................... -243 10,239 -1 -10,239 -10,482 -9,313 -7,997
5................................... -243 10,482 -1 -10,482 -10,725 -9,251 -7,647
6................................... -243 10,482 -1 -10,482 -10,725 -8,982 -7,147
7................................... -243 10,725 -1 -10,725 -10,968 -8,918 -6,830
8................................... -243 10,725 -1 -10,725 -10,968 -8,658 -6,383
9................................... -243 11,968 -1 -11,968 -11,211 -8,592 -6,098
10.................................. -243 11,968 -1 -11,968 -11,211 -8,342 -5,699
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................... .............. .............. .............. ............... ............... -91,242 -74,870
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized.................. .............. .............. .............. ............... ............... -10,696 -10,660
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
First-Aid Kits for Small Passenger Vessels (Subchapter K and Subchapter
T)
This final rule will also remove Coast Guard approval requirements
for first-aid kits aboard small passenger vessels, which the Coast
Guard regulates under subchapters K and T. Small passenger vessels are
currently required to have first-aid kits approved under approval
series 160.041; therefore, we used the same cost savings estimates for
replacing first-aid kits in the section titled First-Aid Kits for
Lifeboats and Rescue Boats. This comes to $41 per first-aid kit. The
Coast Guard applied these estimates to small passenger vessels, which
will no longer need Coast Guard approval for the first-aid kits aboard
the vessels themselves. We estimate that there will be 40 new small
passenger vessels every year (see table 5). All of the 40 new passenger
vessels will need to be equipped with first-aid
[[Page 68292]]
kits each year, for an annual cost savings of $1,640.
Total Cost Savings to Vessel Owners and Operators
Table 28 presents the annual undiscounted total cost savings to
vessel owners and operators by equipment type, and table 29 presents
the total annualized cost savings. We estimate the total undiscounted
costs savings to vessel owners and operators at $2.85 million over a
10-year period of analysis, with an annualized total cost savings of
about $284,481 discounted at 7 percent ($284,966 with a 3-percent
discount rate).
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
[[Page 68293]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO22.002
BILLING CODE 9110-04-C
[[Page 68294]]
Table 29--Annualized Cost Savings to Vessel Owners and Operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized cost savings
Year Total cost -------------------------------------
savings 3% 7%
(a) (b) (c) = (b) / 1.03 (d) = (b) / 1.07
\(a)\ \(a)\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1...................................................... -$280,074 -$271,917 -$261,751
2...................................................... -$280,074 -$263,997 -$244,627
3...................................................... -$280,317 -$256,530 -$228,822
4...................................................... -$280,317 -$249,058 -$213,852
5...................................................... -$280,560 -$242,014 -$200,035
6...................................................... -$290,136 -$242,984 -$193,330
7...................................................... -$290,379 -$236,105 -$180,833
8...................................................... -$290,379 -$229,228 -$169,003
9...................................................... -$290,622 -$222,738 -$158,079
10..................................................... -$290,622 -$216,250 -$147,737
Total.............................................. -$2,853,480 -$2,430,819 -$1,998,072
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized..................................... ................. -$284,966 -$284,481
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Total Cost Savings to Industry
Table 30 presents the total annualized costs savings to industry
over the 10-year period of analysis. At a 7-percent discount rate, the
cost savings is approximately $303,805.
Table 30--Total Annualized Cost Savings to Industry
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost Total cost Annualized cost savings
Year savings to savings to Total cost -------------------------------------
manufacturers * vessels ** savings 3% 7%
(a) (b) (c) (d) = (b) + (c) (e) = (d) / 1.03 (f) = (d) / 1.07
\(a)\ \(a)\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1........................................................ -$19,324 -$280,074 -$299,398 -$290,678 -$279,811
2........................................................ -19,324 -280,074 -299,398 -282,211 -261,506
3........................................................ -19,324 -280,317 -299,641 -274,214 -244,596
4........................................................ -19,324 -280,317 -299,641 -266,227 -228,595
5........................................................ -19,324 -280,560 -299,884 -258,683 -213,813
6........................................................ -19,324 -290,136 -309,460 -259,168 -206,206
7........................................................ -19,324 -290,379 -309,703 -251,817 -192,867
8........................................................ -19,324 -290,379 -309,703 -244,482 -180,250
9........................................................ -19,324 -290,622 -309,946 -237,548 -168,590
10....................................................... -19,324 -290,622 -309,946 -230,629 -157,561
Total................................................ -193,240 -2,853,480 -3,046,720 -2,595,657 -2,133,796
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized....................................... ................. ................. ................. -304,290 -303,805
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
* Table 19.
** Table 28.
Federal Government Cost Savings
We estimate that this rule will reduce costs to the Federal
Government, since the Coast Guard will no longer review COA
applications, application renewals, or inspection reports for the
equipment that is subject to this rule. The Coast Guard does not
anticipate that this rule will generate any cost savings from vessels
inspections, as this rule does not modify any inspection requirements.
Equipment Approval
In addition to generating a cost savings to industry by removing
COA application requirements, this rule will also create a cost savings
to the Federal Government, as Coast Guard staff will no longer review
new COA applications and renewals. We estimate that it takes 24 hours
of a GS-14's time to review each new application and 4 hours to review
each renewal.\40\ We estimate the cost of reviewing a new application
at $2,672 (rounded) per applicant (24 hours x $111.34), and the cost
for reviewing a renewal application at $445(rounded) per renewal (4
hours x $111.34). In table 31, the cost of reviewing a new application
is captured in column (b) and the cost of a renewal application is
captured in column (d). In total, we estimate the Federal Government
will save $4,735 each year, due to this rule removing the requirements
of having to review COA applications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ This is based on information from the subchapter Q ICR. For
the wage rate, $111.34, please see the Wages section of this RA.
[[Page 68295]]
Table 31--Annual Cost Savings to Federal Government for No Longer Having To Review New and Renewal Certificate of Approval Applications
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New applications Renewal applications
---------------------------------------------------------------- Total change
Equipment Approval Total number Total number in cost =
series of Total cost of Total cost total cost
applications applications savings
(a) (b) = (a) x [- (c) (d) = (c) x [- (e) = (b) +
$2,672] $445] (d)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bilge pump.............................................. 160.044 0.09 -$240 0.60 -$267 -$507
Compass................................................. 160.014 0.09 -240 0.60 -267 -507
First-aid kit for Lifeboats............................. 160.041 0.15 -401 1 -445 -846
First-aid kit for Liferafts............................. 160.054 0.15 -401 1 -445 -846
Fishing kit............................................. 160.061 0.03 -80 0.20 -89 -169
Hatchet................................................. 160.013 0.03 -80 0.20 -89 -169
Jackknife............................................... 160.043 0.03 -80 0.20 -89 -169
Mirror, Signaling....................................... 160.020 0.06 -160 0.4 -178 -338
Sea anchor.............................................. 160.019 0.03 -80 0.20 -89 -169
Water................................................... 160.026 0.18 -481 1.20 -534 -1015
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................... .............. .............. -2,243 .............. -2,492 -4,735
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Laboratory Inspections
The Coast Guard currently requires manufacturers of some equipment
to submit an annual report with the results of laboratory inspections,
allowing the Coast Guard to ensure the production stock of the
equipment will be identical to those originally tested and approved by
the Coast Guard. This rule removes this reporting requirement for
equipment that is now self-certified by the manufacturer. We were
unable to obtain data about the costs related to laboratory
inspections.
We estimate that it takes approximately 2 hours of a GS-14 senior
engineer's time to review each report, costing $223 (2 hours x
$111.34). Table 32 presents the total annual cost saving to the Federal
Government for no longer having to review laboratory inspection
reports. We estimate these cost savings will be $5,352 per year.
Table 32--Annual Federal Government Cost Savings for No Longer Having to Review Laboratory Inspection Records
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline scenario Post-regulatory scenario Total change
Approval ---------------------------------------------------------------- in cost =
Equipment series total cost
Total products Total cost Total products Total cost savings
(a) (b) = (a) x (c) (d) = (c) x (e) = (d) -
$223 $223 (b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bilge pump.............................................. 160.044 3 $669 0 $0 -$669
Compass................................................. 160.014 3 669 0 0 -669
First-aid kit for Lifeboats............................. 160.041 5 1,115 0 0 -1,115
First-aid kit for Liferafts............................. 160.054 5 1,115 0 0 -1,115
Mirror, Signaling....................................... 160.020 2 446 0 0 -446
Water................................................... 160.026 6 1,338 0 0 -1,338
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................... .............. 24 5,352 0 0 5,352
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Total Federal Government Savings
Table 33 presents the total annual cost savings to the Federal
Government. In total, the Coast Guard estimates this rule to generate a
cost savings of approximately $10,087 per year.
Table 33--Total Annual Cost Savings to the Federal Government
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Renewed Avoided
Equipment Approval applications applications inspection Total cost
series avoided avoided reports savings
(a) (b) (c) (d) = (a) +
(b) + (c)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bilge pump...................... 160.044 -$240 -$267 -$669 -$1,176
Compass......................... 160.014 -240 -267 -669 -1,176
First-aid kit for Lifeboats..... 160.041 -401 -445 -1,115 -1,961
First-aid kit for Liferafts..... 160.054 -401 -445 -1,115 -1,961
[[Page 68296]]
Fishing kit..................... 160.061 -80 -89 0 -169
Hatchet......................... 160.013 -80 -89 0 -169
Jackknife....................... 160.043 -80 -89 0 -169
Mirror, Signaling............... 160.020 -160 -178 -446 -784
Sea anchor...................... 160.019 -80 -89 0 -169
Water........................... 160.026 -481 -534 -1,338 -2,353
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. -2,243 -2,492 -5,352 -10,087
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Change in Safety
Many of the current Coast Guard type approval requirements for
survival craft equipment were developed in the 1950s and 1960s and have
not been significantly updated since they were initially published.
Upon a thorough review of these requirements, Coast Guard enforcement
procedures, current maritime industry practice, and the availability of
new international standards, we have determined that the additional
scrutiny of the Coast Guard type approval does not increase or decrease
the safety for the equipment subject to this rule. For these nine types
of survival craft equipment, the current Coast Guard type approval
requirements are outdated and overly prescriptive. Therefore, the Coast
Guard anticipates that by having equipment meet consensus standards, as
opposed to Coast Guard standards, there will be no decrease in the
level of safety in the maritime environment.
No Cost Changes
This rule will also implement several changes with no cost impacts.
The vast majority of these changes are the result of modifying the
current lifeboat equipment requirements for sailing school vessels as
stated in Sec. 169.527 to align them with the requirements stated in
Sec. 199.175. Table 34 summarizes these changes.
Table 34--Summary of Regulatory Changes With No Cost Impacts
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CFR subpart/ Affected
Equipment section(s) population Changes Basis for no cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bailer....................... Sec. 169.529(a) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirements This is an
Sailing School that bailers in administrative
Vessels with lifeboats on sailing change that allows
Lifeboats. school vessels meet the Coast Guard to
the requirements of consolidate its
Sec. 169.529(a) survival craft
and instead, they equipment standards,
must meet the and the requirements
requirements of Sec. of Sec. Sec.
199.175(b)(1). 169.529(a) and
199.175(b)(1) are
identical.
Boathooks.................... Sec. 169.529(c) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirements Sections 169.529(c)
Sailing School that boathooks in and 199.175(b)(3)
Vessels with lifeboats on sailing set different
Lifeboats. school vessels meet standards for
the prescribed boathooks; however,
design requirements only new U.S.-
of Sec. 169.529(c) flagged sailing
and instead, they school vessels will
must meet the be impacted by the
requirements of Sec. change, and the
199.175(b)(3) and Coast Guard
be designed to estimates that no
minimize the new U.S.-flagged
possibility of sailing school
damage. vessels will be
built during the
analysis period.
Can Openers.................. Sec. All U.S.-flagged Can openers must meet ISO 18813 requires
199.175(b)(5) Vessels with the standards of ISO that can openers in
Lifeboats or 18813. liferafts be of the
Liferafts with safety type. The
SOLAS A packs. Coast Guard
estimates that all
liferafts are
currently equipped
with either a safety
can opener or a can
opener within the
jackknife;
therefore, this
change poses no
additional cost to
industry.
Cover, Protecting............ Sec. New U.S.-flagged Fully enclosed Only new U.S.-flagged
169.529(ll) Sailing School lifeboats on sailing sailing school
Vessels with school vessels do vessels will be
Lifeboats. not need to be impacted by the
equipped with a change, and the
cover. Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period. In
addition, fully
enclosed lifeboats
do not require a
cover; therefore, it
is likely they are
not equipped with
one under the
baseline.
[[Page 68297]]
Ditty Bag.................... Sec. 169.529(f) New U.S.-flagged Motor-propelled Only new U.S.-flagged
Sailing School lifeboats on sailing sailing school
Vessels with school vessels no vessels will be
Lifeboats. longer need to carry impacted by the
a ditty bag. change, and the
Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period.
Drinking Cups................ Sec. 169.529(g) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirements This is an
Sailing School that drinking cups administrative
Vessels with in lifeboats on change that allows
Lifeboats. sailing school the Coast Guard to
vessels meet the consolidate its
requirements of Sec. survival craft
169.529(g) and equipment standards,
instead, they must and the requirements
meet the of Sec. Sec.
requirements of Sec. 169.529(g) and
199.175(b)(8). 199.175(b)(8) are
identical.
Fire Extinguisher............ Sec. All New U.S.- Updates fire This change does not
169.529(h), flagged Vessels extinguisher rating require fire
Sec. with IBAs, names from B-C, size extinguishers meet
199.175(b)(9) Liferafts, II to 40-B to match any different
Lifeboats, or other regulatory requirements as laid
Rescue Boats. text in title 46 of out in the final
the CFR. rule,
``Harmonization of
Standards for Fire
Protection,
Detection and
Extinguishing
Equipment'' (81 FR
482200 July 22,
2016), only that
they have a label.
A review of portable
marine fire
extinguishers found
that both the Coast
Guard and UL ratings
are currently
provided for each
product.
First-Aid Kits............... Sec. 121.710 All U.S.-flagged All medicinal The Coast Guard
Sec. 160.010- Vessels with products within the estimates that,
3(e)(7)(ii) IBAs, Liferafts first-aid kits must under the baseline,
Subpart 160.041 with a SOLAS A use active all medicinal
Subpart 160.054 or B pack, ingredients that products meet U.S.
Sec. 160.151- Lifeboats, or conform to OTC drug OTC drug standards.
21(h) Rescue Boats. regulations set out The Coast Guard did
Sec. 169.529(i) All small in 21 CFR part 330. an extensive inquiry
Sec. 184.710 passenger to ensure that the
Sec. 199.050(c) vessels in medicinal products
Sec. Subchapters K were FDA compliant.
199.175(b)(10) and T.
Flashlights.................. Sec. 169.529(j) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement This is an
Sailing School that flashlights in administrative
Vessels with lifeboats on sailing change that allows
Lifeboats. school vessels meet the Coast Guard to
the prescribed consolidate its
design requirements survival craft
of Sec. 169.529(j) equipment standards.
and instead, they
must meet the
requirements of Sec.
199.175(b)(12) and
be constructed and
marked according to
the American Society
for Testing and
Materials' ASTM
F1014 standard
already incorporated
by reference in that
section.
Heaving Lines................ Sec. 169.529(l) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement This is an
Sailing School that heaving lines administrative
Vessels with on lifeboats on change that allows
Lifeboats. sailing school the Coast Guard to
vessels meet the consolidate its
requirements of Sec. survival craft
169.529(l), and equipment standards,
instead, they must and the requirements
meet the of Sec. Sec.
requirements of Sec. 169.529(l) and
199.175(b)(14). 199.175(b)(14) are
identical.
Ladder....................... Sec. 169.529(n) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement This is an
Sailing School that ladders on administrative
Vessels with lifeboats on sailing change that allows
Lifeboats. school vessels meet the Coast Guard to
the requirements of consolidate its
Sec. 169.529(n), survival craft
and instead, they equipment standards,
must meet the and the requirements
requirements of Sec. of Sec. Sec.
199.175(b)(18). 169.529(n) and
199.175(b)(18) are
identical.
Lanterns..................... Sec. 169.529(o) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement Only new U.S.-flagged
Sailing School that lifeboats on sailing school
Vessels with sailing school vessels are impacted
Lifeboats. vessels carry by the change, and
lanterns. the Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period.
Lifelines.................... Sec. 169.529(p) New U.S.-flagged Removes lifeline This is an
Sailing School standards from Sec. administrative
Vessels with 169.529(p). change, as lifelines
Lifeboats. are not survival
craft equipment and
are, instead,
regulated as part of
the lifeboat design
requirements under
Sec. 160.135-7.
[[Page 68298]]
Life Preservers.............. Sec. 169.529(q) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement Only new U.S.-flagged
Sailing School that lifeboats on sailing school
Vessels with sailing school vessels will be
Lifeboats. vessels carry two impacted by the
additional life change, and the
preservers in their Coast Guard
lifeboat. estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period.
Lockers...................... Sec. 169.529(r) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement Only new U.S.-flagged
Sailing School that lifeboats on sailing school
Vessels with sailing school vessels will be
Lifeboats. vessels have lockers impacted by the
for the storage of change, and the
small items. Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period.
Mast and Sail................ Sec. 169.529(s) New U.S.-flagged Clarifies that motor- Only new U.S.-flagged
Sailing School propelled lifeboats sailing school
Vessels with on sailing school vessels will be
Lifeboats. vessels do not need impacted by the
to carry a mast or change, and the
sails. Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period.
In addition,
motorized boats do
not require a mast
or sails; therefore,
they are not
equipped with them
under the baseline.
Matches...................... Sec. 169.529(t) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement Only new U.S.-flagged
Sailing School that lifeboats on sailing school
Vessels with sailing school vessels will be
Lifeboats. vessels carry impacted by the
matches. change, and the
Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period.
Oars......................... Sec. 169.529(v) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement This is an
Sailing School that oars on administrative
Vessels with lifeboats on sailing change that allows
Lifeboats. school vessels meet the Coast Guard to
the requirements of consolidate its
Sec. 169.529(v), survival craft
and instead, they equipment standards,
must meet the and the requirements
requirements of Sec. of Sec. Sec.
199.175(b)(20). In 169.529(v) and
addition, the Coast 199.175(b)(20) are
Guard is modifying identical. There are
the number of no cost savings
required oars from because there are no
four rowing and one sailing school
steering, to the vessels with
number required by lifeboats.
the manufacturer. In addition, only new
U.S.-flagged sailing
school vessels will
be impacted by the
change, and the
Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period.
Oil, Illuminating............ Sec. 169.529(w) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement Only new U.S.-flagged
Sailing School that lifeboats on sailing school
Vessels with sailing school vessels will be
Lifeboats. vessels carry impacted by the
illuminating oil for change, and the
lanterns. Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period.
Oil, Storm................... Sec. 169.529(x) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement Only new U.S.-flagged
Sailing School that lifeboats on sailing school
Vessels with sailing school vessels will be
Lifeboats. vessels carry storm impacted by the
oil to calm the seas. change, and the
Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period.
Painters..................... Sec. 169.529(y) New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement This is an
Sailing School that painters on administrative
Vessels with lifeboats on sailing change that allows
Lifeboats. school vessels meet the Coast Guard to
the requirements of consolidate its
Sec. 169.529(y), survival craft
and instead, they equipment standards,
must meet the and the requirements
requirements of Sec. of Sec. Sec.
199.175(b)(21). 169.529(n) and
199.175(b)(18) are
identical.
Plug......................... Sec. 169.529(z) New U.S.-flagged Removes plug This is an
Sailing School standards from Sec. administrative
Vessels with 169.529(z). change, as plugs are
Lifeboats. not survival craft
equipment and are,
instead, regulated
as part of the
lifeboat design
requirements under
Sec. 160.135-7
[[Page 68299]]
Provisions................... Subpart 160.046 All Adds to the scope: This is an
manufacturers emergency provisions administrative
of Coast Guard- approved to be change, as this rule
approved carried in lifeboats will update Sec.
provisions. and liferafts. These 199.175(b)(22) and
provisions meet the add regulatory text
IMO recommendations to subpart 160.046
for emergency food stating that the
rations. provisions or food
rations must comply
with ISO 18813
paragraph 4.31,
which is the same as
the current
standard.
Rowlocks..................... Sec. New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement This is an
169.529(bb) Sailing School that rowlocks on administrative
Vessels with lifeboats on sailing change that allows
Lifeboats. school vessels meet the Coast Guard to
the requirements of consolidate its
Sec. 169.529(bb) survival craft
and instead, they equipment standards,
must meet the and the requirements
requirements of Sec. of Sec. Sec.
199.175(b)(20). 169.529(bb) and
199.175(b)(20) are
identical.
Rudder and Tiller............ Sec. New U.S.-flagged Removes rudder and This is an
169.529(cc) Sailing School tiller standards administrative
Vessels with from Sec. change, as Sec.
Lifeboats. 169.529(cc), which 169.035-3(f) was
state the rudder and removed previously
tiller must be from the CFR, and
constructed the section no
according to Sec. longer exists.
169.035-3(f).
Signals, Distress Floating Sec. New and Existing Removes requirement The change will apply
Orange Smoke. 169.529(ee) U.S.-flagged that distress to both new U.S.-
Sailing School floating orange flagged sailing
Vessels with smoke signals on school vessels with
Lifeboats. lifeboats on sailing lifeboats, and
school vessels meet existing sailing
the requirements of school vessels with
Sec. 169.529(ee), lifeboats, as these
and instead, they vessels will have to
must meet the replace their smoke
requirements of Sec. signals after they
199.175(b)(30). expire.
The Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period. In
addition, there are
no existing sailing
school vessels with
lifeboats;
therefore, no
existing vessels
will be impacted by
the change.
Signals, Distress Red Hand Sec. All U.S.-flagged Removes requirement The change will apply
Flare. 169.529(ff) Sailing School that distress red to both new U.S.-
Vessels with hand flare signals flagged sailing
Lifeboats. on lifeboats on school vessels with
sailing school lifeboats, and
vessels meet the existing sailing
requirements of Sec. school vessels with
169.529(ff), and lifeboats, as these
instead, they must vessels will have to
meet the replace their smoke
requirements of Sec. signals after they
199.175(b)(31). expire.
The Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period. In
addition, there are
no existing sailing
school vessels with
lifeboats;
therefore, no
existing vessels
will be impacted by
the change.
Signals, Distress Red Sec. All U.S.-flagged Removes requirement The change will apply
Parachute Flare. 169.529(gg) Sailing School that distress red to both new U.S.-
Vessels with parachute flares on flagged sailing
Lifeboats. lifeboats on sailing school vessels with
school vessels meet lifeboats and
the requirements of existing sailing
Sec. 169.529(gg), school vessels with
and instead, they lifeboats, as these
must meet the vessels will have to
requirements of Sec. replace their smoke
199.175(b)(32). signals after they
expire.
The Coast Guard
estimates that no
new U.S.-flagged
sailing school
vessels will be
built during the
analysis period. In
addition, there are
no existing sailing
school vessels with
lifeboats;
therefore, no
existing vessels
will be impacted by
the change.
Table of Lifesaving Signals.. Sec. New U.S.-flagged Removes requirement This is an
169.529(mm) Sailing School that table of administrative
Vessels with lifesaving signals change that allows
IBAs, on lifeboats on the Coast Guard to
Liferafts, sailing school consolidate its
Lifeboats, or vessels meet the survival craft
Rescue Boats. requirements of Sec. equipment standards,
169.529(mm), and and the requirements
instead, they must of Sec. Sec.
meet the 169.529(mm) and
requirements of Sec. 199.175(b)(36) are
199.175(b)(36). identical.
[[Page 68300]]
Tool Kit..................... Sec. New U.S.-flagged Removes requirements This is an
169.529(hh) Sailing School that toolkits on administrative
Vessels with lifeboats on sailing change that allows
IBAs, school vessels meet the Coast Guard to
Liferafts, the requirements of consolidate its
Lifeboats, or Sec. 169.529(hh), survival craft
Rescue Boats. and instead, they equipment standards,
must meet the and the requirements
requirements of Sec. of Sec. Sec.
199.175(b)(38). 169.529(hh) and
199.175(b)(38) are
identical.
Whistle...................... Sec. New U.S.-Flagged Removes requirement This is an
169.529(jj) Sailing School that whistles on administrative
Vessels with lifeboats on sailing change that allows
IBAs, school vessels meet the Coast Guard to
Liferafts, the requirements of. consolidate its
Lifeboats, or Sec. 169.529(jj), survival craft
Rescue Boats. and instead, they equipment standards,
must meet the and the requirements
requirements of Sec. of Sec. Sec.
199.175(b)(41). 169.529(jj) and
199.175(b)(41) are
identical.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Cost Savings
Table 35 presents the total annualized cost savings of this final
rule to both industry and the Federal Government for the 10-year period
of analysis. The Coast Guard estimates an annualized cost savings of
approximately $314,377 with a 3-percent discount rate, and $313,892
with a 7-percent discount rate.
Table 35--Total Annualized Cost Savings to Industry and Federal Government
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost Annualized cost savings
Total cost savings to Total cost -------------------------------
Year savings to federal savings
industry * government ** 3% 7%
(a) (b) (c) (d) = (b) + (e) = (d) / (f) = (d) /
(c) 1.03 \(a)\ 1.07 \(a)\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................... -$299,398 -$10,087 -$309,485 -$300,471 -$289,238
2............................... -299,398 -10,087 -309,485 -291,719 -270,316
3............................... -299,641 -10,087 -309,728 -283,445 -252,830
4............................... -299,641 -10,087 -309,728 -275,189 -236,290
5............................... -299,884 -10,087 -309,971 -267,384 -221,005
6............................... -309,460 -10,087 -319,547 -267,616 -212,928
7............................... 309,703 10,087 319,790 260,019 199,149
8............................... -309,703 -10,087 -319,790 -252,445 -186,121
9............................... -309,946 -10,087 -320,033 -245,279 -174,077
10.............................. -309,946 -10,087 -320,033 -238,135 -162,689
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... -3,046,720 -100,870 -3,147,590 -2,681,701 -2,204,643
Annualized.............. .............. .............. .............. 314,377 313,892
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
* Table 30.
** Table 33.
Discussion of Alternatives
When creating this rule, the Coast Guard considered four
alternatives, one of which was suggested by public comment. In this
section, we examine how the cost of the rulemaking changes with each
alternative.
Alternative 1: No Action
Using this alternative, the Coast Guard will accept the status quo
and not replace the current approval requirements with an international
consensus standard. This alternative will not harmonize Coast Guard
standards with industry consensus standards, nor reduce the burden to
industry. This will not incur approximately $314,000 in annual cost
savings with no estimated benefits.
Alternative 2: Preferred Alternative--Remove the Need for Coast Guard
Approval
Using this alternative, the Coast Guard will implement the changes
regarding the removal of Coast Guard approval standards. This will lead
to an estimated $314,000 in annual cost savings without any estimated
reduction in benefits, as this analysis shows.
Alternative 3: Remove the Need for Coast Guard Approval and Marking
Requirements
Under this alternative, the Coast Guard will implement the changes
in the preferred alternative, but will, in addition, remove the
requirement that equipment be marked to indicate it meets ISO 25862,
ISO 17339, or ISO 18813. This will lead to an additional annual cost
savings of approximately $397,433. We estimate this by multiplying
254,765 pieces of equipment by $1.56 (allowing 0.06 hours x $26
production rate per hour for the time and cost to mark each piece of
equipment). This will lead to a total cost savings of $711,433, which
we calculated by adding the additional savings from no markings
($397,433) to the total estimated cost savings of this rule, as shown
in alternative 2 ($314,000).
We rejected this alternative for the preferred alternative, since
eliminating the markings will make it impossible for the Coast Guard to
verify if equipment complies with regulations. This alternative could
potentially lead to a decrease in safety, if vessel owners and
operators purchased non- ISO-
[[Page 68301]]
compliant products that were not sufficiently safe or reliable for
usage on board a survival craft. The potential for the additional
burden on the Coast Guard to research and ascertain the compliance
status of a piece of survival craft equipment could lead to much more
significant costs than the current additional cost of $397,433 from
marking equipment.
Alternative 4: Require Manufacturers To Cover the Cost of a COA
The Coast Guard received a public comment suggesting that the
manufacturers should cover the cost of COAs. We interpreted this
comment as suggesting that manufacturers should reimburse the Coast
Guard for the estimated $2,672 in cost per new COA and the $445 in cost
per renewal COA. This alternative will introduce a transfer to cover
the Coast Guard's cost of the approvals. Because this alternative will
introduce a transfer, there will be no net cost saving from this
action. Instead, manufacturing firms will experience an extra $2,672 in
costs each time they apply for a new COA and an extra $445 in costs
each time they try to renew a COA. By raising the costs of approval,
the Coast Guard will be increasing entry barriers to manufacturing PFD
devices.
Additionally, because our preferred alternative removes the
requirements for a COA on nine types of equipment, this alternative
will decrease cost savings by both the government cost savings of
$4,735 and the industry cost savings of $336. Because this alternative
will not decrease costs, and increases the entry barrier faced by
manufacturing firms, we rejected this alternative.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard expects that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on small entities. We expect this rule to result in net
cost savings to regulated entities.
We added two years of data to our data analysis in the NPRM;
however, the random sample of our dataset is still valid. Using the
same number of companies we used in the proposed rule for the final
rule, we estimate there to be 11,139 unique vessel operators and 16
equipment manufacturers affected by this rule. For this analysis, we
presumed any company for which we were not able to find Small Business
Administration (SBA) size data to be a small entity. An estimated 94
percent of the regulated entities (including the companies without SBA
size data) are considered to be small by SBA industry size standards.
Using MISLE data, the Coast Guard estimates there to be 11,155 unique
companies affected in this rule, of which 10,487 (0.94 x 11,155) are
small. We estimate that the average costs to equipment manufacturers
will be reduced by $1,418 per year, and the average costs to vessel
owners and operators will be reduced by $60 per year as a result of
removing Coast Guard approval for the equipment subject to this
rulemaking. We found that all small vessel operators and small
equipment manufacturers impacted by this rule will have a cost savings
less than 1 percent of their annual revenue. No small governmental
jurisdictions will be impacted by this rule.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121, we offer to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for a revision to an approved collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520. As defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(c), ``collection of information''
comprises reporting, recordkeeping, monitoring, posting, labeling, and
other similar actions. The title and description of the information
collections, a description of those who must collect the information,
and an estimate of the total annual burden follow. The estimate covers
the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing sources of
data, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection.
Title: Title 46 CFR Subchapter Q: Lifesaving, Electrical,
Engineering and Navigation Equipment, Construction and Materials &
Marine Sanitation Devices (33 CFR 159).
OMB Control Number: 1625-0035.
Summary of the Collection of Information: The Coast Guard currently
collects information from lifesaving equipment manufacturers under 46
CFR chapter I, subchapter Q. The current ICR, 201811-1625-005 (OMB
Control Number 1625-0035), accounts for the following collections of
information: New Approval Applications, Renewal Approval Applications,
Manufacturer Recordkeeping, Servicing Facility Recordkeeping, Servicing
Facility Problem Reports, Instruction Materials, Markings, Production
Tests and Laboratory Inspections, and Independent Laboratory
Applications and Recognized Laboratory Applications.
Need for Information: The Coast Guard needs this information to
ensure that the manufactured safety equipment meets minimum levels of
performance safety and helps prevent death, injuries, and property
damage associated with commercial maritime operations.
Proposed Use of Information: The Coast Guard uses the technical
plans, drawings, specifications, instruction materials, and markings to
determine compliance with the technical regulatory requirements for
each piece of equipment. Independent laboratory reports ensure that
product and material testing complies with the applicable Coast Guard
regulations. Production testing reports ensure that the production
stock of the equipment is identical to the stock that was originally
tested and approved by the Coast Guard. Independent and recognized
laboratory applications ensure that the laboratories have the technical
capabilities to conduct the required testing and are independent for
the organizations whose products they will test.
Description of the Respondents: The respondents are manufacturers
of the safety equipment subject to Coast Guard approval, accepted and
recognized independent laboratories that conduct testing of the
equipment, and liferaft servicing facilities.
Number of Respondents: The Coast Guard estimates there will be 856
[[Page 68302]]
respondents, comprised of 480 equipment manufacturers, 233 liferaft
servicing facilities, 139 accepted independent laboratories, and 4
recognized independent laboratories. This rule will impact 16 of these
respondents. We do not expect this rule to reduce the total number of
respondents, because equipment manufacturers may still manufacture
other Coast Guard-approved lifesaving equipment that is not subject to
this rule.
Frequency of Response: The number of responses per year will vary
by requirement. New application materials, instructions, and markings
are required with the initial COA application, and renewal application
materials and markings are required 5 years after the initial
application. Production test records and laboratory inspection records
are required to be kept annually. The Coast Guard estimates this rule
will reduce the number of responses for the following collections of
information, presented in table 37, along with the current estimated
time to complete each collection.
Table 37--Time Burden Estimate by Application Type
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours
------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Application......................................... 2
Renewal Applications.................................... 0.5
Manufacturer Records.................................... 0.17
Packing Instruction Materials........................... 0.1
Markings for New Products............................... 0.1
Marking for Revisions................................... 0.1
Testing Records......................................... 2
Laboratory Inspection Records........................... 24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In table 38, we estimate the reduction in the number of annual
responses based on application type.
Table 38--Number of Responses Reduced Annually by Application Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous
Response type iteration of Change in Updated ICR
ICR Appendix B burden Appendix B
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Application................................................. 82 1 81
Renewal Applications............................................ 544 6 538
Manufacturer Records............................................ 2,715 27 2,688
Packing Instruction Materials................................... 272,200 800 271,400
Markings for New Products....................................... 13,575 5 13,570
Marking for Revisions........................................... 108,600 40 108,560
Testing Records................................................. 1,828 6 1,820
Laboratory Inspection Records................................... 1,828 6 1,820
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden of Response: This rule will not modify the burden of
response for any other existing collections of information.
Estimate of Total Annual Burden: The current ICR estimates the
total annual burden to be 114,586 hours. As a result of this rule, we
estimate the annual burden will be 86,430 hours, for an annual
reduction of 28,156 hours. Together, these changes account for a total
annual reduction in burden of 27,903 hours. These changes are
summarized in table 39.
Table 39--Summary of the Change in Burden
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline total burden................................... 114,586
Program Changes......................................... -27,903
Adjustment Changes...................................... -253
Total Changes........................................... -28,156
Proposed Total Burden................................... 86,430
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This rule is making an adjustment to the current OMB ICR. As
required by 44 U.S.C. 3507(d), we will submit a copy of this rule to
OMB for its review of the collection of information. You are not
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism) if it has a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132. Our analysis follows.
It is well settled that States may not regulate in categories
reserved for regulation by the Coast Guard. It is also well settled
that all of the categories regulated under 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3103, 3306,
3703, 4102, 4502, 7101, and 8101 (design, construction, alteration,
repair, maintenance, operation, equipping, personnel qualification, and
manning of vessels), as well as any other category in which Congress
intended the Coast Guard to be the sole source of a vessel's
obligations, are within the field foreclosed from regulation by the
States. See, e.g., United States v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89 (2000) (finding
that the States are foreclosed from regulating tanker vessels), see
also Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 435 U.S. 151, 157 (1978) (State
regulation is preempted where ``the scheme of federal regulation may be
so pervasive as to make reasonable the inference that Congress left no
room for the States to supplement it [or where] the Act of Congress may
touch a field in which the federal interest is so dominant that the
federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on
the same subject.'' (Citations omitted)) Because this rule involves the
design, maintenance, and equipping of vessels; specifically regarding
certain survival craft equipment required to be carried in survival
craft and rescue boats on certain, specified U.S.-flagged vessels, it
relates to vessel standards that are subject to a pervasive scheme of
Federal regulation and is therefore foreclosed from regulation by the
States. Therefore, because the States may not regulate within these
categories, this rule is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
F. Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538,
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a
[[Page 68303]]
State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one
year. Although this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630 (Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights).
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045 (Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks). This
rule is not an economically significant rule and will not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments),
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211 (Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use). We have determined that it is not a
``significant energy action'' under that order because it is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is
not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
L. Technical Standards and Incorporation by Reference
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act, codified as a
note to 15 U.S.C. 272, directs agencies to use voluntary consensus
standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides
Congress, through OMB, with an explanation of why using these standards
will be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test
methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices)
that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule uses the following voluntary consensus standards: ASTM
F1003-02, ASTM F1014-02, ISO 18813:2006, ISO 25862:2009, and ISO
17339:2018. The sections that reference these standards and the
locations where these standards are available are listed in 46 CFR
160.046-3 and 199.05.
This rule uses technical standards developed by voluntary consensus
standards bodies to meet the stringent equipment requirements for
survival craft and rescue boats on board U.S.-flagged vessels. These
standards provide internationally accepted and recognized parameters
that equipment must meet in order to ensure its safety, proper usage,
and preservation on the seas. The standards being incorporated were
developed by either the ASTM or the ISO, which are voluntary consensus
standard-setting organizations. The sections that reference these
standards and the locations where these standards are available are
listed in 46 CFR parts 160 and 199.
Two ASTM standards will be updated and incorporated by reference in
this rulemaking: (1) ASTM F1003-02 (Reapproved 2007), ``Standard
Specification for Searchlights on Motor Lifeboats'' (2007); and (2)
ASTM F1014-02 (Reapproved 2007), ``Standard Specification for
Flashlights on Vessels'' (2002).
These ASTM standards specify requirements for construction of
searchlights and flashlights (respectively), including materials,
dimensions, performance, and capability. The newer versions of these
standards are not materially different from the previous versions. We
are not updating the third ASTM standard already incorporated in Sec.
199.05, ASTM 93-97, ``Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Pensky-
Martens Closed Cup Tester.''
The following three ISO standards are incorporated by reference in
this rulemaking:
1. ISO 18813:2006, Ships and marine technology--Survival equipment
for survival craft and rescue boats.
This standard specifies design, performance, and use of various
items of survival equipment carried in survival craft and rescue boats
complying with SOLAS and the LSA Code. It also includes guidelines for
maintenance and periodic inspections by Administrations or ships' crews
for many items.
2. ISO 25862:2009, Ships and marine technology--Marine magnetic
compasses, binnacles and azimuth reading devices.
This standard gives requirements regarding construction and
performance of marine magnetic compasses for navigation and steering
purposes, binnacles, and azimuth reading devices.
3. ISO 17339:2018, Ships and marine technology--Life saving and
fire protection--Sea anchors for survival craft and rescue boats.
This standard specifies requirements for the design, performance,
and prototype testing of sea anchors fitted to survival craft
(liferafts and lifeboats) and rescue boats in accordance with the LSA
Code.
With this rulemaking, we also updated our incorporation by
reference of International Code for the Construction and Equipment of
Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk (IBC Code), 2016 edition,
and the Amendments to the International Code for the Construction and
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk, (IGC Code),
adopted May 22, 2014, to reflect the updated editions. No changes to
the specific referenced material have been made between the older
editions and the more recent editions. The IBC Code provides an
international standard for the safe transport by sea of dangerous and
noxious liquid chemicals in bulk. The purpose of the IGC Code is to
provide an international standard for the safe transport by sea in bulk
of liquefied gases and certain other substances.
The Director of the Federal Register has approved the material in
Sec. Sec. 160.046-3 and 199.05 for incorporation by reference under 5
U.S.C. 552 and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of the material are available from
the sources listed in Sec. Sec. 160.046-3 and 199.05.
Consistent with 1 CFR part 51 incorporation by reference
provisions, this material is reasonably available. Interested persons
have access to it through their normal course of business, may purchase
it from the organization identified in 46 CFR 160.046-3 or 199.05, or
may view a copy by means we have identified in those sections.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning
[[Page 68304]]
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have made a determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. This rule is categorically excluded under paragraphs
L52, L57, and L58 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 1. Paragraph L52 pertains to regulations concerning
vessel and operation safety standards. Paragraph L57 pertains to
regulations concerning manning, documentation, admeasurements,
inspection, and equipping of vessels. Paragraph L58 pertains to
regulations concerning equipment approval and carriage requirements.
This rule removes the Coast Guard type approval requirement for
some survival craft equipment, and replaces it with the requirement
that the manufacturer self-certify that their equipment complies with a
consensus standard.
List of Subjects
46 CFR Part 121
Communications equipment, Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Passenger vessels.
46 CFR Part 160
Incorporation by reference, Marine safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
46 CFR Part 169
Fire prevention, Incorporation by reference, Marine safety,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Schools, Vessels.
46 CFR Part 184
Communications equipment, Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
46 CFR Part 199
Cargo vessels, Incorporation by reference, Marine safety, Oil and
gas exploration, Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
46 CFR parts 121, 160, 169, 184, and 199 as follows:
PART 121--VESSEL CONTROL AND MISCELLANEOUS SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 121 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3306; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR,
1980 Comp., p. 277; DHS Delegation 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Revise Sec. 121.710 to read as follows:
Sec. 121.710 First-aid kits.
A vessel must carry either a first-aid kit that meets the
requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(10) or a kit with equivalent contents
and instructions. For equivalent kits, the contents must be stowed in a
suitable, watertight container that is marked ``First-Aid Kit''. A
first-aid kit must be easily visible and readily available to the crew.
PART 160--LIFESAVING EQUIPMENT
0
3. The authority citation for part 160 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3103, 3306, 3703, 4102, 4302, and
4502; and DHS Delegation 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2, paragraph
(II)(92)(b).
0
4. Amend Sec. 160.010-3 by revising paragraphs (a)(12)(ii) and
(e)(7)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 160.010-3 Inflatable buoyant apparatus.
(a) * * *
(12) * * *
(ii) Knives. One knife, of a type designed to minimize the chance
of damage to the inflatable buoyant apparatus and secured with a
lanyard ready for use near the painter attachment. Any knife may be
replaced with a jackknife meeting the requirements in 46 CFR
199.175(b)(16). In addition, an inflatable buoyant apparatus that is
permitted to accommodate 13 persons or more must be provided with a
second knife that is of the non-folding type;
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(7) * * *
(ii) First-aid kit. A first-aid kit as described in 46 CFR
199.175(b)(10);
* * * * *
Subpart 160.013 [Removed and Reserved]
0
5. Remove and reserve subpart 160.013, consisting of Sec. Sec.
160.013-1 through 160.013-5.
Subpart 160.026 [Removed and Reserved]
0
6. Remove and reserve subpart 160.026, consisting of Sec. Sec.
160.026-1 through 160.026-7.
Subpart 160.041 [Removed and Reserved]
0
7. Remove and reserve subpart 160.041, consisting of Sec. Sec.
160.041-1 through 160.041-6.
Subpart 160.043 [Removed and Reserved]
0
8. Remove and reserve subpart 160.043, consisting of Sec. Sec.
160.043-1 through 106.043-6.
Subpart 160.044 [Removed and Reserved]
0
9. Remove and reserve subpart 160.044, consisting of Sec. Sec.
160.044-1 through 160.044-5.
0
10. Add subpart 160.046, consisting of Sec. Sec. 160.046-1 through
160.046-11, to read as follows:
Subpart 160.046--Emergency Provisions
Sec.
160.046-1 Scope.
106.046-3 Incorporation by reference.
160.046-5 General requirements for emergency provisions.
160.046-7 Independent laboratory.
160.046-9 Manufacturer certification and labeling.
160.046-11 Manufacturer notification.
Sec. 160.046-1 Scope.
This subpart applies to emergency provisions approved to be carried
in lifeboats and liferafts, in accordance with 46 CFR 199.175(b)(22).
Sec. 160.046-3 Incorporation by reference.
(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart
with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Coast Guard
Headquarters. Contact the Coast Guard at: Commandant (CG-ENG-4), U.S.
Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20593-7509; email: [email protected]; website:
www.dco.uscg.mil/CG-ENG-4/. It is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected]; website: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. All approved material is available from the
source(s) listed in this section.
[[Page 68305]]
(b) International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Chemin de
Blandonnet 8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland; phone: +41 22
749 01 11; email: [email protected]; web: www.iso.org.
(1) ISO 18813:2006(E), Ships and marine technology--Survival
equipment for survival craft and rescue boats, First edition, April 1,
2006; IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 160.046-5; 160.046-7; 160.046-11.
(2) [Reserved]
Sec. 160.046-5 General requirements for emergency provisions.
Emergency provisions must meet the requirements found in ISO
18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.31 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
160.046-3).
Sec. 160.046-7 Independent laboratory.
Unless the Commandant directs otherwise, an independent laboratory
accepted by the Coast Guard under 46 CFR part 159, subpart 159.010,
must perform or witness, as appropriate, inspections, tests, and
oversight required by ISO 18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.31 (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 160.046-3). Approval and production tests of
emergency provisions must be carried out in accordance with the
procedures for independent laboratory inspections in 46 CFR part 159,
subpart 159.007, and in this section unless the Commandant authorizes
alternative tests and inspections. The Commandant may prescribe
additional production tests and inspections necessary to maintain
quality control and to monitor compliance with the requirements of this
subpart.
Sec. 160.046-9 Manufacturer certification and labeling.
(a) Each provision must be certified by the manufacturer as
complying with the requirements of this subpart.
(b) The container should be clearly and permanently marked with:
(1) The name and address of the approval holder;
(2) The U.S. Coast Guard Approval number;
(3) The total food energy value of provisions in the container in
calories and kiloJoules;
(4) The lot number;
(5) The month and year the provision was packed; and
(6) The month and year of expiration (5 years after the date of
packing).
(c) The emergency provision must include waterproof instructions
for use, assuming consumption of 3350 kiloJoules per person per day.
Sec. 160.046-11 Manufacturer notification.
(a) Each manufacturer of emergency provisions approved in
accordance with the specifications of this subpart must send a test
report required by ISO 18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.31.2 (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 160.046-3) to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), U.S.
Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20593-7509 or email [email protected]:
(1) With the application for approval;
(2) Every year as long as the manufacturer continues to produce
provisions; and
(3) Each time the contents of the emergency provisions change.
(b) [Reserved]
0
11. Amend Sec. 160.051-11 by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 160.051-11 Equipment required for Coastal Service inflatable
liferafts.
* * * * *
(b) Knife. One knife, of a type designed to minimize the chance of
damage to the inflatable liferaft and secured with a lanyard. In
addition, an inflatable liferaft that is permitted to accommodate 13
persons or more must be provided with a second knife that is of the
non-folding type. Any knife may be replaced with a jackknife meeting
the requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(16).
Subpart 160.054 [Removed and Reserved]
0
12. Remove and reserve subpart 160.054, consisting of Sec. Sec.
160.054-1 through 106.054-7.
Subpart 160.061 [Removed and Reserved]
0
13. Remove and reserve subpart 160.061, consisting of Sec. Sec.
160.061-1 through 106.061-5.
0
14. Amend Sec. 160.135-7 by revising paragraph (b)(23) to read as
follows:
Sec. 160.135-7 Design, construction, and performance of lifeboats.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(23) Bilge pump. Each lifeboat that is not automatically self-
bailing must be fitted with a manual bilge pump that meets the
requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(2). Each such lifeboat with a
capacity of 100 persons or more must carry an additional manual bilge
pump or an engine-powered bilge pump.
* * * * *
0
15. Amend Sec. 160.151-21 by revising paragraphs (b), (h), (o), and
(q) through (s) as follows:
Sec. 160.151-21 Equipment required for SOLAS A and SOLAS B
inflatable liferafts.
* * * * *
(b) Jackknife (IMO LSA Code, as amended by Resolution MSC.293(87),
Chapter IV/4.1.5.1.2). Each folding knife must be a jackknife meeting
the requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(16).
* * * * *
(h) First-aid kit (IMO LSA Code, as amended by Resolution
MSC.293(87), Chapter IV/4.1.5.1.8). Each first-aid kit must meet the
requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(10).
* * * * *
(o) Signalling mirror (IMO LSA Code, as amended by Resolution
MSC.293(87), Chapter IV/4.1.5.1.15). Each signalling mirror must meet
the requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(19).
* * * * *
(q) Fishing tackle (IMO LSA Code, as amended by Resolution
MSC.293(87), Chapter IV/4.1.5.1.17). The fishing tackle must meet the
requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(11).
(r) Food rations (IMO LSA Code, as amended by Resolution
MSC.293(87), Chapter IV/4.1.5.1.18). The food rations must meet the
requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(22).
(s) Drinking water (IMO LSA Code, as amended by Resolution
MSC.293(87), Chapter IV/4.1.5.1.19). Emergency drinking water must meet
the requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(40). The desalting apparatus or
reverse osmosis desalinator must be approved by the Commandant under
approval series 160.058.
* * * * *
0
16. Amend Sec. 160.156-7 by revising paragraph (b)(22) to read as
follows:
Sec. 160.156-7 Design, construction and performance of rescue boats
and fast rescue boats.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(22) Manual bilge pump. Each rescue boat that is not automatically
self-bailing must be fitted with a manual bilge pump that meets the
requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(2), or an engine-powered bilge pump.
* * * * *
PART 169--SAILING SCHOOL VESSELS
0
17. The authority citation for part 169 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(j); 46 U.S.C. 3306, 6101; E.O. 11735,
38 FR 21243, 3 CFR, 1971-1975 Comp., p. 793; DHS Delegation 00170.1,
Revision No. 01.2; Sec. 169.117 also issued under the authority of
44 U.S.C. 3507.
0
18. Amend Sec. 169.115 by revising paragraphs (a) and (e) to read as
follows:
[[Page 68306]]
Sec. 169.115 Incorporation by reference.
(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part
with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by
reference (IBR) material is available for inspection at the Coast Guard
Headquarters and at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). Contact the Coast Guard at: Commandant (CG-ENG-4), U.S. Coast
Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20593-7509; email: [email protected]; website: www.dco.uscg.mil/CG-ENG-4/. For information on the availability of this material at NARA,
email: [email protected]; website: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. The material may be obtained from the
source(s) in the following paragraph(s) of this section.
* * * * *
(e) The Textile Color Card Association of the United States, Inc.
200 Madison Avenue, New York. (For availability of this material,
contact the Coast Guard--see paragraph (a) of this section.)
(1) Cable No. 70072, Standard Color Card of America, Ninth edition,
1941 for Sec. 169.529(b).
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
19. Revise Sec. 169.527 to read as follows:
Sec. 169.527 Required equipment for lifeboats.
(a) All lifeboats must be equipped in accordance with table 1 to 46
CFR 199.175 except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this
section.
(b) The following equipment must be carried in addition to the
equipment required under 46 CFR 199.175:
(1) Cover;
(2) Ditty bag; and
(3) Mast and sail.
(c) If operating on protected waters, lifeboat equipment need only
to consist of the following:
(1) Boathook--(1);
(2) Bucket--(1);
(3) Fire extinguisher--(2) U.S. Coast Guard-approved Type B:C
(motor propelled lifeboats only);
(4) Hatch--(1);
(5) Lifeline--(1);
(6) Oar unit--(1);
(7) Painter--(1);
(8) Plug--(1);
(9) Oarlock unit--(1); and
(10) Toolkit (motor propelled lifeboats only).
0
20. Revise Sec. 169.529 to read as follows:
Sec. 169.529 Description of lifeboat equipment.
(a) All lifeboat equipment must meet the requirements under 46 CFR
199.175, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) The following equipment, carried in addition to the equipment
required under 46 CFR 199.175, must meet the following requirements:
(1) Cover, protecting. The cover must be of highly visible color
and capable of protecting the occupants against exposure. A cover is
not required for fully enclosed lifeboats.
(2) Ditty bag. The ditty bag must consist of a canvas bag or
equivalent and must contain a sailmaker's palm, needles, sail twine,
marline, and marlin spike, except that motor-propelled lifeboats need
not carry a ditty bag.
(3) Mast and sail. A unit, consisting of a standing lug sail
together with the necessary spars and rigging, must be provided in
accordance with table 1 to this section, except that motor-propelled
lifeboats need not carry a mast or sails. The sails must be of good
quality canvas, or other material acceptable to the Commandant, colored
Indian Orange (Cable No. 70072, Standard Color Card of America;
incorporated by reference, see Sec. 169.115). Rigging must consist of
galvanized wire rope not less than \3/16\-inch in diameter. The mast
and sail must be protected by a suitable cover.
[[Page 68307]]
Table 1 to Sec. 169.529
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Length of lifeboat, feet Standing lug sail Mast \1\ Yard \1\
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------
Luff and head Leach length Foot length Clew to throat Commercial Length Length
Area, lengths ------------------------------------------------------ Ounces per designation ------------------ Diameter, ------------------ Diameter,
Over-- Not over-- square feet ------------------ square yard number inches inches
Feet Inches Feet Inches Feet Inches Feet Inches Feet Inches Feet Inches
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17 58 5 11 12 1 8 10 10 10 14.35 10 11 2 3 6 11 2
17............................................ 19 74 6 8 13 8 10 0 12 2 14.35 10 12 6 3 7 8 2
19............................................ 21 93 7 5 15 1 11 2 13 8 14.35 10 13 10 3\1/2\ 8 5 2\1/2\
21............................................ 23 113 8 3 16 11 12 4 15 1 14.35 10 15 2 3\1/2\ 9 3 2\1/2\
23............................................ 25 135 9 0 18 6 13 6 16 6 14.35 10 16 6 4 10 0 3
25............................................ 27 158 9 9 20 0 14 7 17 10 17.50 8 17 10 4 10 9 3
27............................................ 29 181 10 5 21 5 15 7 19 1 17.50 8 19 2 4\1/2\ 11 5 3\1/4\
29............................................ 31 203 11 0 22 8 16 6 20 3 20.74 6 20 6 4\1/2\ 12 0 3\1/4\
31 \2\........................................ ........... ........... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ........... ........... ....... ....... ........... ....... ....... ...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Mast lengths measured from heel to center of upper halyard sheave. Mast diameters measured at thwart. Mast and yard shall be of clear-grained spruce, fir, or equivalent.
\2\ Subject to special consideration.
[[Page 68308]]
PART 184--VESSEL CONTROL AND MISCELLANEOUS SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT
0
21. The authority citation for part 184 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3306; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3
CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; DHS Delegation 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
22. Revise Sec. 184.710 to read as follows:
Sec. 184.710 First-aid kits.
A vessel must carry either a first-aid kit that meets the
requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(10) or a kit with equivalent contents
and instructions. For equivalent kits, the contents must be stowed in a
suitable, watertight container that is marked ``First-Aid Kit''. A
first-aid kit must be easily visible and readily available to the crew.
PART 199--LIFESAVING SYSTEMS FOR CERTAIN INSPECTED VESSELS
0
23. The authority citation for part 199 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3103, 3306, and 3703; and DHS
Delegation 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2, paragraph (II)(92)(b).
0
24. Revise Sec. 199.05 to read as follows:
Sec. 199.05 Incorporation by reference.
Certain material is incorporated by reference in this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. All approved incorporation by reference (IBR)
material is available for inspection at the Coast Guard Headquarters
and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact
the Coast Guard at: Commandant (CG-ENG-4), U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509,
2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20593-7509, email
[email protected] or visit https://www.dco.uscg.mil/CG-ENG-4/. It
is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, email: [email protected] or go to
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. The material
may be obtained from the following source(s):
(a) ASTM International (ASTM). 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box
C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; phone: (610) 832 9500; email
[email protected]; web: www.astm.org.
(1) ASTM D 93-97, Standard Test Methods for Flash-Point by Pensky-
Martens Closed Cup Tester, approved July 10, 1997; IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 199.261; 199.290.
(2) ASTM F1003-02 (Reapproved 2007), Standard Specification for
Searchlights on Motor Lifeboats, approved May 1, 2007; IBR approved for
Sec. 199.175.
(3) ASTM F1014-02 (Reapproved 2007), Standard Specification for
Flashlights on Vessels, approved May 1, 2007; IBR approved for Sec.
199.175.
(b) International Maritime Organization (IMO). Publications
Section, 4 Albert Embankment, London, SE1 7SR, United Kingdom; phone:
+44 (0)20 7735 7611; email: [email protected]; web: www.imo.org.
(1) IBC Code, International Code for the Construction and Equipment
of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk, 2016 edition, copyright
2016, Chapter 2 Ship survival capability and location of cargo tanks;
IBR approved for Sec. 199.280.
(2) IBC Code, International Code for the Construction and Equipment
of Ships Carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk, 2016 edition, copyright
2016, Chapter 17 Summary of minimum requirements; IBR approved for
Sec. 199.30.
(3) MSC Circular 699, Revised Guidelines for Passenger Safety
Instructions, issued July 17, 1995, IBR approved for Sec. 199.217.
(4) Resolution A.520(13), Code of Practice for the Evaluation,
Testing and Acceptance of Prototype Novel Life-saving Appliances and
Arrangements, adopted November 17, 1983; IBR approved for Sec. 199.40.
(5) Resolution A.657(16), Instructions for Action in Survival
Craft, adopted October 19, 1989; IBR approved for Sec. 199.175.
(6) Resolution A.658(16), Use and Fitting of Retro-reflective
Materials on Life-saving Appliances, adopted October 19, 1989; IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 199.70; 199.176.
(7) Resolution A.760(18), Symbols Related to Life-saving Appliances
and Arrangements, adopted November 4, 1993, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
199.70; 199.90.
(8) Resolution MSC.370(93), Amendments to the International Code
for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in
Bulk, (IGC Code), adopted May 22, 2014; IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
199.30; 199.280.
(c) International Standard Organization (ISO). Chemin de Blandonnet
8, CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland; phone: +41 22 749 01 11;
email: [email protected]; web: www.iso.org.
(1) ISO 17339:2018(E), Ships and marine technology--Life saving and
fire protection--Sea anchors for survival craft and rescue boats,
Second edition, July 2018; IBR approved for Sec. 199.175.
(2) ISO 18813:2006(E), Ships and marine technology--Survival
equipment for survival craft and rescue boats, First edition, April 1,
2006; IBR approved for Sec. 199.175.
(3) ISO 25862:2009(E), Ships and marine technology--Marine magnetic
compasses, binnacles and azimuth reading devices, First edition, May
15, 2009; IBR approved for Sec. 199.175.
Sec. 199.30 [Amended]
0
25. Amend Sec. 199.30 in the definition for ``Toxic vapor or gas'' as
follows:
0
a. Remove the text ``IBC Code'' and add, in its place, the text ``IBC
Code; incorporated by reference, see Sec. 199.05''; and
0
b. Remove the text ``IGC Code'' and add, in its place, the text ``IGC
Code; incorporated by reference, see Sec. 199.05''.
0
26. Amend Sec. 199.175 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(4), remove the word ``and'';
0
b. Redesignate paragraph (a)(5) as paragraph (a)(6);
0
c. Add new paragraph (a)(5);
0
d. In the introductory text to paragraph (b), remove the text ``table
199.175 of this section'' and add, in its place, the text ``table 1 to
this section'';
0
e. Revise the introductory text to paragraph (b)(2), paragraphs (b)(5),
(6), (9) through (13), (16), (17), and (19), and (b)(27)(i);
0
f. In paragraph (b)(28)(i), remove the text ``F 1003'' and add, in its
place, the text ``F1003'';
0
g. Revise paragraph (b)(40) introductory text;
0
h. Redesignate paragraphs (b)(40)(i) and (ii) as paragraphs
(b)(40)(iii) and (iv);
0
i. Add new paragraphs (b)(40)(i) and (ii);
0
j. In newly-redesignated paragraph (b)(40)(iv), remove the words
``reverse osmosis'' and add, in their place, the text ``reverse-
osmosis'';
0
k. Add paragraph (c) immediately before table 199.175;
0
l. Designate table 199.175 as table 1 to Sec. 199.175;
0
m. In newly-designated table 1 to Sec. 199.175, revise entries 5 and
17; and
0
n. Add footnote 11 to the footnotes following table 1 to Sec. 199.175.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 199.175 Survival craft and rescue boat equipment.
(a) * * *
(5) Must be marked with either the Coast Guard approval number or
the standard that the product meets, as applicable; and
* * * * *
[[Page 68309]]
(b) * * *
(2) Bilge pump. The bilge pump must meet the requirements in ISO
18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.3 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
199.05) and must be installed in a ready-to-use condition.
* * * * *
(5) Can opener. A can opener must meet the requirements in ISO
18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.43 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
199.05). A can opener may be in a jackknife meeting the requirements in
paragraph (b)(16) of this section.
(6) Compass. The compass and its mounting arrangement must meet the
requirements in ISO 18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.6 (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 199.05).
(i) In a totally enclosed lifeboat, the compass must be permanently
fitted at the steering position; in any other boat it must be provided
with a binnacle, if necessary, to protect it from the weather, and with
suitable mounting arrangements.
(ii) The compass must be tested in accordance with the provisions
in ISO 25862:2009(E) Annex H (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
199.05) by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard in
accordance with part 159, subpart 159.010, of this chapter.
* * * * *
(9) Fire extinguisher. The fire extinguisher must be approved under
approval series 162.028. The fire extinguisher must have a rating of a
40-B:C. Two 10-B:C extinguishers may be carried in place of a 40-B:C
extinguisher. Extinguishers with larger numerical ratings or multiple
letter designations may be used instead.
(10) First-aid kit. Each first-aid kit must meet the requirements
in ISO 18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.12 (incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 199.05).
(i) A first-aid kit may be considered acceptable if it meets all of
the requirements of ISO 18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.12, except that it
does not contain the burn preparations. It must be clearly marked on
the first-aid kit that it does not include the burn preparations.
(ii) The active ingredients in medicinal products must conform to
over-the-counter (OTC) drug regulations set out in 21 CFR part 330.
(11) Fishing kit. The fishing kit must meet the requirements in ISO
18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.13 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
199.05).
(12) Flashlight. The flashlight must be a type I or type III that
is constructed and marked in accordance with ASTM F1014 (incorporated
by reference, see Sec. 199.05). One spare set of batteries and one
spare bulb, stored in a watertight container, must be provided for each
flashlight.
(13) Hatchet. The hatchet must be suitable for cutting a rope
towline or painter in an emergency and must not require assembly or
unfolding.
(i) The hatchet must be at least 14 inches in length and have a
cutting edge of approximately 3\1/4\ inches in length, with a hardened
steel or equivalent alloy head.
(ii) The hatchet must be provided a lanyard at least 3 feet in
length.
(iii) The hatchet must be stowed in brackets near the release
mechanism and, if more than one hatchet is carried, the hatchets must
be stowed at opposite ends of the boat.
* * * * *
(16) Jackknife. The jackknife must consist of a one-bladed knife
fitted with a can opener and attached to the boat by its lanyard. The
jackknife must meet the requirements in ISO 18813:2006(E) paragraph
4.19 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 199.05).
(17) Knife. The knife must be of the non-folding type with a
buoyant handle as follows:
(i) The knife for a rigid liferaft must be secured to the raft by a
lanyard and stowed in a pocket on the exterior of the canopy near the
point where the painter is attached to the liferaft. If an approved
jackknife is substituted for the second knife required on a liferaft
equipped for 13 or more persons, the jackknife must also be secured to
the liferaft by a lanyard.
(ii) The knife in an inflatable or rigid-inflatable rescue boat
must be of a type designed to minimize the possibility of damage to the
fabric portions of the hull.
(iii) Any knife may be replaced with a jackknife meeting the
requirements in paragraph (b)(16) of this section.
* * * * *
(19) Mirror. The signalling mirror must meet the requirements in
ISO 18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.23 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
199.05).
* * * * *
(27) * * *
(i) The sea anchor for a lifeboat, rescue boat, and rigid liferaft
must meet the requirements in ISO 17339:2018(E) (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 199.05).
* * * * *
(40) Water. The water must meet the requirements in ISO
18813:2006(E) paragraph 4.46 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
199.05).
(i) The water must meet the U.S. Public Health Service ``Drinking
Water Standards'' in 40 CFR part 141 to suitably protect the container
against corrosion. After treatment and packing, the water must be free
from organic matter, sediment, and odor. It must have a pH between 7.0
and 9.0 as determined by means of a standard pH meter using glass
electrodes. Water quality must be verified by the local municipality or
independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard in accordance with
part 159, subpart 159.010, of this chapter.
(ii) Containers of emergency drinking water must be tested in
accordance with the provisions in ISO 18813:2006(E) by an independent
laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard in accordance with part 159,
subpart 159.010, of this chapter.
* * * * *
(c) Any Coast Guard-approved equipment on board before December 14,
2022 may remain on board as long as it remains in good and serviceable
condition.
Table 1 to Sec. 199.175--Survival Craft Equipment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International voyage Short international voyage
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item No. Item Rigid Rigid
Lifeboat liferaft Rescue boat Lifeboat liferaft Rescue boat
(SOLAS A pack) (SOLAS B pack)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
5................................. Can opener \11\..... 3 3 .............. 3 .............. ..............
[[Page 68310]]
* * * * * * *
17................................ Knife \1\ \4\ \11\.. 1 1 1 1 1 1
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
\1\ Each liferaft equipped for 13 persons or more must carry two of these items.
* * * * *
\4\ A hatchet counts towards this requirement in rigid rescue boats.
* * * * *
\11\ One (1) jackknife may replace one (1) can opener and one (1) knife.
Sec. 199.280 [Amended]
0
27. Amend Sec. 199.280 in paragraphs (e)(2) and (3) by removing the
words ``in Bulk'' and adding, in their place, the text ``in Bulk
(incorporated by reference, see Sec. 199.05)''.
Dated: October 26, 2022.
W.R. Arguin,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Prevention
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-23666 Filed 11-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P