
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42545-42549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18044]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0536]
RIN 1625-AA11


Regulated Navigation Area; Chelsea Street Bridge Construction, 
Chelsea, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary interim rule with request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Coast Guard is establishing a regulated 
navigation area (RNA) on the navigable waters of the Chelsea River 
under and surrounding the Chelsea Street Bridge (CSB) that crosses the 
Chelsea River between East Boston and Chelsea, Massachusetts. This 
temporary interim rule allows the Coast Guard to suspend all vessel 
traffic within the RNA for construction operations, both planned and 
unforeseen, that could pose an imminent hazard to vessels operating in 
the area. This rule is necessary to provide for the safety of life on 
the navigable waters during the construction of the Chelsea Street 
Bridge.

DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR on July 19, 2011 through May 
31, 2012. This rule is effective with actual notice for purposes of 
enforcement on July 8, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0536 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone 
number is 202-366-9329.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods. 
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of 
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on 
submitting comments.
    Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the 
docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0536 and are available online by 
going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0536 in the 
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available 
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), 
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room 
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary rule, call or e-mail MST1 David Labadie of the Waterways 
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Boston; telephone 617-223-
3010, e-mail david.j.labadie@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing 
the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 
telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting 
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted, 
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided.
    As this interim rule will be in effect before the end of the 
comment period, the Coast Guard will evaluate and revise this rule as 
necessary to address significant public comments.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0536), indicate the specific section of this 
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each 
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material 
online (via http://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand 
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a 
comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received 
by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you 
fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered as 
having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the 
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and 
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body 
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions 
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become 
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select 
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0536'' in the ``Keyword'' box. 
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions'' 
column. If you submit comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in 
an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail

[[Page 42546]]

and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a 
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all 
comments and material received during the comment period and may change 
this rule based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble 
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, 
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted 
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0536'' and click 
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column. 
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on 
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an 
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket 
Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any 
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or 
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice 
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting in connection with the 
public comment period for this interim rule. But you may submit a 
request for one using one of the four methods specified under 
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be 
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will 
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal 
Register. Although they were not held specifically to solicit public 
comments on this interim rule, and were not announced in the Federal 
Register, the Coast Guard has held or participated in multiple locally 
announced informal waterway user meetings where waterway closures and 
restrictions were discussed, and we anticipate holding one or more 
additional informal meetings, with opportunity for public questions or 
comments, during the bridge construction. We will provide written 
summaries of any such meetings in the docket.

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this interim rule without prior Federal 
Register notice pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the 
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 
authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice when the 
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable, 
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not 
publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this 
rule because the need for waterway closures was not brought to the 
attention of the Coast Guard until April 5, 2011. Concerned that the 
initial waterway closures proposed by J.F. White Contracting Company 
might have a significant impact on waterway users, it was necessary for 
the Coast Guard to move quickly to protect public safety. There was 
insufficient time and therefore it was impracticable to issue an NPRM 
and conduct a prior notice and comment period. We held informal 
planning meetings at which the construction plans were presented to and 
discussed with waterway users; stakeholder comments and concerns were 
identified and many have been incorporated into this regulation. To 
view the stakeholder comments and concerns see the CSB meeting minutes 
in the docket. This rule is necessary to protect the safety of both the 
construction crew and the waterway users operating in the vicinity of 
the bridge construction zone. A delay or cancellation of the ongoing 
bridge maintenance in order to accommodate a full notice and comment 
period would be contrary to the public interest as it would delay 
necessary operations thus prolonging the time that construction barges 
and equipment would be in this location. Additionally, the dynamic 
nature of the construction process and multitude of construction 
vessels necessitate that all mariners navigate at a safe speed within 
the RNA in accordance with Rule 6 of the Inland Navigation Rules, as 
the barge and construction equipment configuration may change on a 
daily basis. In order to address any further public concerns, this rule 
is available for public comment until September 19, 2011. At that time 
the Coast Guard will publish an amended rule if necessary to address 
public concerns.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register, as immediate action is needed to 
protect vessels transiting the area from hazards imposed by 
construction barges and equipment on the Chelsea River under and 
surrounding the Chelsea Street Bridge, Chelsea, MA. Any delay in the 
effective date of this rule would be contrary to the public interest as 
immediate action is necessary to close the channel as needed from July 
8, 2011 to May 31, 2012. These closures are necessary in order to 
protect vessels transiting in the area from hazards imposed by 
construction barges and equipment and to expedite the removal of the 
old Chelsea St. Bridge and construction of the new bridge and fender 
system.

Basis and Purpose

    Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the 
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are determined 
to have hazardous conditions and in which vessel traffic can be 
regulated in the interest of safety. See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and Department 
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    The construction of the Chelsea Street Bridge involves large 
machinery and construction vessel operations above and in the navigable 
waters of the Chelsea River. The ongoing operations are, by their 
nature, hazardous and pose risks both to recreational and commercial 
traffic as well as the construction crew. In order to mitigate the 
inherent risks involved in the construction, it is necessary to control 
vessel movement through the area.
    The purpose of this rule is to ensure the safety of waterway users, 
the public, and construction workers for the duration of the Chelsea 
Street Bridge construction from July 8, 2011 through May 31, 2012. The 
RNA will also protect vessels desiring to transit the area by ensuring 
that vessels are only permitted to transit when it is safe to do so.

Discussion of Rule

    This action is intended to prohibit vessel traffic on a portion of 
the Chelsea River, when necessary for the safety of navigation, while 
construction equipment works in the channel on demolition of the 
existing bridge and construction of its replacement. The Coast Guard 
may close the area prescribed in this rule to all vessel traffic during 
any circumstance, planned or unforeseen, that poses an imminent threat 
to waterway users operating in the area. Complete waterway closures 
will be made with as much advance notice as possible.
    The Coast Guard has discussed this project at length with the 
construction

[[Page 42547]]

contractor, J.F. White Contracting Company, to identify if the project 
can be completed without channel closures and, if possible, what impact 
that would have on the project timeline. Through these discussions, it 
became clear that while the majority of construction activities during 
the span of this project would not require waterway closures, there are 
certain tasks that can only be completed in the channel and will 
require closing the waterway. J.F. White issued a letter on April 5, 
2011 detailing the required channel work phases that will need waterway 
closures.
    There are currently two planned and ten proposed channel closure 
periods which are outlined below:
    The first planned closure period will be from September 28-30, 
2011, and will coincide with the launching of the new bridge truss.
    The second planned closure will be from October 7-9, 2011 and will 
coincide with the concrete bridge deck placement.
    There will be four proposed closure periods on dates to be 
determined between October and December 2011 for the installation of 
new bulkheads along both sides of the Chelsea River.
    The fifth and sixth proposed closure periods will take place in 
January 2012 for the demolition of the fendering system and the 
dredging on the Chelsea, MA side of the Chelsea River. These will be 
for 15-day periods and will be intermittent closures.
    The seventh proposed closure period will take place in February 
2012 for the installation of new aids to navigation on the Chelsea, MA 
side of the Chelsea River and will be a 7-day period with intermittent 
closures.
    The eighth and ninth proposed closure periods will take place in 
February and March of 2012 for the demolition of the fendering system 
and the dredging on the E. Boston, MA side of the Chelsea River. These 
will be for 15-day periods and will be intermittent closures.
    The tenth proposed closure period will take place in March 2012 for 
the installation of new aids to navigation on the E. Boston, MA side of 
the Chelsea River and will be a 7-day period with intermittent 
closures.
    The project is expected to be complete in April 2012 but this rule 
will be made effective through the end of May 2012 to account for any 
unforeseen construction delays.
    On a case-by-case basis, depending on the construction schedule, 
J.F. White may request a waterway closure on various dates from July 8, 
2011 through May 31, 2012. As discussed below, J.F White will notify 
the Coast Guard of planned activities as soon as possible; preferably 
four weeks in advance of any event.
    The Coast Guard will notify the maritime community of planned 
waterway closure dates via Marine Information Broadcasts, Coast Guard 
Local Notices to Mariners and Marine Safety Information Bulletins.
    Closure periods listed above will be made available to J. F. White 
Contracting Company with the understanding that the construction 
schedule as well as weather and tide conditions may not allow them to 
use all closures. For that reason, J. F. White will notify the Coast 
Guard of planned activities as soon as possible and preferably four 
weeks in advance. Closure periods similar to those outlined above 
should be expected throughout the duration of this rule. Additionally, 
during the winter and into the early spring of 2012 there will certain 
tasks (i.e. bulkhead and Aids to Navigation installation) that will 
require a more than 24-hour closure as well as several 15-day long, 12 
hour closures to complete the demolition of fender systems and dredging 
operations. Once these closure periods are identified they will be 
published with the widest distribution among the affected segments of 
the public. Such means of notification will include, but is not limited 
to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners. Entry 
into this RNA during a closure is prohibited unless authorized by the 
Sector Boston Captain of the Port (COTP). In the event of an emergency 
all construction equipment shall be removed from the channel to allow 
for emergency vessels to pass (i.e., Fire Rescue Boat, Marine Police 
Boat, or Environmental Response Boat).
    The implementation of this RNA does not negate the fact that the 
Inland Rules of the Road as found in 33 CFR part 84 (subchapter E) must 
be strictly adhered to. Mariners are strongly urged to monitor VHF 
channel 13 when transiting the area and to communicate with fellow 
mariners to facilitate movement and/or passing arrangements within the 
channel.
    Any violation of the RNA described herein is punishable by, among 
others, civil and criminal penalties, in rem liability against the 
offending vessel, and the initiation of suspension or revocation 
proceedings against Coast Guard-issued merchant-mariner credentials.
    The Sector Boston Captain of the Port will cause notice of 
enforcement, suspension of enforcement, or closure of this RNA to be 
made by all appropriate means to affect the widest distribution among 
the affected segments of the public. Such means of notification will 
include, but is not limited to, Notice of Enforcement published in the 
Federal Register, Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to 
Mariners.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an 
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of 
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it 
under that Order.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on substantial number of small 
entities. This rule will affect the following entities some of which 
may be small entities: The owners or operators of marinas, charter 
fishing vessels and commercial fishing vessels who intend to transit in 
those portions of the Chelsea River between July 8, 2011 and May 31, 
2012.
    This regulation may have some impact on the public, but the 
potential impact will be minimized for the following reasons: The area 
of the closure is not likely to be transited by pleasure craft and they 
will be able to operate on all other portions of the Chelsea River not 
covered by the RNA. Additionally, many parties that have the potential 
to be affected have been involved in the discussions and have made 
plans to work around the closure times. Marine radio broadcasts 
informing the public of any closures made by the RNA will be made 
before,

[[Page 42548]]

during, and at the conclusion of the RNA closure enforcement periods.
    Although the RNA will apply to the entire width of the river, under 
and surrounding the Chelsea Street Bridge traffic will be allowed to 
pass through the area with the permission of the COTP. Before the 
effective period, we will issue maritime advisories widely available to 
users of the river.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its 
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If this rule 
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or 
options for compliance, please call LT Judson Coleman, Prevention 
Department, Sector Long Island Sound, at 203-468-4596.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in 
this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually 
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. 
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph 
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishing of a 
regulated navigation area and therefore falls within the categorical 
exclusion noted above. An environmental analysis checklist and a 
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. Any comments received concerning 
environmental impacts will be considered and changes made to the 
environmental analysis checklist and categorical exclusion 
determination as appropriate.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:


[[Page 42549]]


    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 50 
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation 
No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T01-0536 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T01-0536  Regulated Navigation Area; Chelsea Street Bridge 
Construction, Chelsea, MA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a regulated navigation area: 
All navigable waters of the Chelsea River in Chelsea, MA, from surface 
to bottom, within the following points (NAD 83): from 42[deg]23.10' N, 
071[deg]01.26' W; thence to 42[deg]23.15' N, 071[deg]01.20' W; thence 
to 42[deg]23.10' N, 071[deg]01.17' W; thence to 42[deg]23.07' N, 
071[deg]01.24' W; thence back to the first point.
    (b) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 
165.10, 165.11, and 165.13 apply.
    (2) In accordance with the general regulations, entering into, 
transiting through, mooring or anchoring within this regulated area is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Boston.
    (3) All persons and vessels must comply with the Coast Guard 
Captain of the Port or the designated on-scene patrol personnel.
    (4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, 
flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel must proceed 
as directed.
    (5) Vessels may request permission to enter the zone during periods 
of enforcement on VHF-16 or via phone at 617-223-5757.
    (6) All other relevant regulations, including but not limited to 
the Rules of the Road (33 CFR part 84--Subchapter E, Inland 
Navigational Rules) remain in effect within the regulated area and 
should be strictly followed at all times.
    (c) Effective Period. This rule is effective from July 8, 2011 to 
11:59 p.m. on May 31, 2012.
    (d) Enforcement Period. (1) This regulated navigation area is 
enforceable 24 hours a day from July 8, 2011 until May 31, 2012.
    (2) Notice of suspension of enforcement. If enforcement is 
suspended, the COTP will cause a notice of the suspension of 
enforcement by all appropriate means to affect the widest publicity 
among the affected segments of the public. Such means of notification 
may also include, but are not limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners 
and Local Notice to Mariners. Such notification will include the date 
and time that enforcement is suspended as well as the date and time 
that enforcement will resume.
    (3) Notice of waterway closure. In the event of a complete waterway 
closure, the COTP will make advance notice of the closure by all means 
available to affect the widest public distribution including, but not 
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local Notice to Mariners. 
Such notification will include the date and time of the closure as well 
as the date and time that normal vessel traffic can resume.
    (4) Violations of this regulated navigation area may be reported to 
the COTP Sector Boston, at 617-223-5757 or on VHF-Channel 16.

    Dated: July 7, 2011.
J.B. McPherson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, First Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 2011-18044 Filed 7-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


