
[Federal Register: March 19, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 53)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 13232-13235]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19mr10-6]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2009-1031]
RIN 1625-AA00

 
Safety Zone; Lake Mead Intake Construction, Lake Mead, Boulder 
City, NV

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the navigable 
waters of Lake Mead in support of the construction project for Lake 
Mead's Intake 3. This safety zone is necessary to ensure non-
authorized personnel and vessels remain safe by keeping clear of the 
hazardous area during blasting, excavating, and any other general 
construction work. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering 
into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) or his designated 
representative.

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective in the CFR on March 19, 
2010 through December 31, 2010. This rule is effective with actual 
notice for purposes of enforcement prior to publication.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket USCG-2009-1031 and are available online 
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting

[[Page 13233]]

USCG-2009-1031 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' 
They are also available for inspection or copying at the Docket 
Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West 
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary rule, call or e-mail MST3 Corey McDonald, Waterways 
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, Coast Guard; telephone 
619-278-7262, e-mail Corey.R.McDonald@uscg.mil. If you have questions 
on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket 
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because immediate action is necessary to 
ensure the safety of commercial and recreational vessels in the 
vicinity of any construction on the dates and times this rule will be 
in effect and delay would be contrary to the public interest.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register. Delay in the effective date will 
be contrary to the public interest, since immediate action is needed to 
ensure the public's safety.

Background and Purpose

    Vegas Tunnel Construction will be conducting intermittent blasting, 
excavating, and other general construction operations for the placement 
of an Intake Pipe from Lake Mead throughout 2010. This safety zone is 
necessary to ensure non-authorized personnel and vessels remain safe by 
keeping clear of the hazardous area during the construction operations.

Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone that will be enforced 
intermittently from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010. The 
limits of the safety zone will include the navigable waters within a 
1,300 foot radius around the construction vessels during transit and 
while at blast site located at approximately 36[deg]05'23.677501'' N, 
114[deg]45'59.925819'' W. The safety zone will be enforced only during 
construction operations. This safety zone is necessary to ensure non-
authorized personnel and vessels remain safe by keeping clear of the 
hazardous area during the blasting activities. Persons and vessels are 
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within 
this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his 
designated representative.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not 
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order.
    We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a 
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This determination is based 
on the size and location of the safety zone. Commercial and 
recreational vessels will not be allowed to transit through the 
designated safety zone during the specified times while construction 
operations are being conducted.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be 
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit 
or anchor in a portion of Lake Mead from January 1, 2010 through 
December 31, 2010.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This 
rule will be enforced only when blasting, excavating, or other general 
work is actively being progressed. Vessel traffic can pass safely 
around the zone. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will 
publish Local Notice to Mariners (LNM) and the construction company 
will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM).

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its 
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

[[Page 13234]]

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually 
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. 
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph 
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a 
safety zone.
    An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion 
determination are available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.


0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; 
Pub. L. 107-295; 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add a new section Sec.  165.T11-281 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T11-281  Safety Zone; Lake Mead Intake Construction; Lake 
Mead, Boulder City, NV.

    (a) Location. The limits of the safety zone will include the 
navigable waters of Lake Mead within a 1300 foot radius around the 
construction vessels located at approximately 36[deg]05'24'' N, 
114[deg]45'60'' W.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from March 
15, 2010 through December 31, 2010 during construction operations. The 
safety zone will only be enforced during blasting, excavation, and 
other general construction operations. General public boating will be 
notified prior to commencement of construction operations by 
construction crew via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. If the construction 
concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the COTP will cease 
enforcement of this safety zone.
    (c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
    (1) Designated representative means any Commissioned, Warrant, or 
Petty Officers of the Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, or local, 
state, and federal law enforcement vessels who have been authorized to 
act on the behalf of the COTP.
    (2) Non-authorized personnel and vessels, means any civilian boats, 
fishermen, divers, and swimmers.
    (d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring 
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP San 
Diego or his designated representative.
    (2) Non-authorized personnel and vessels requesting permission to 
transit through the safety zone may request authorization to do so from 
the COTP San Diego or his designated representative. They may be 
contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16, or at telephone number (619) 278-7033.
    (3) Vessels involved in the construction operations are allowed in 
the confines of the established safety zone.
    (4) All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of 
the Coast Guard COTP or his designated representative.
    (5) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard or other official 
personnel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator 
of a vessel must proceed as directed.
    (6) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or 
local agencies.


[[Page 13235]]


    Dated: February 22, 2010.
D.L. LeBlanc,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port San Diego.

[FR Doc. 2010-6029 Filed 3-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

