[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30356-30360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10030]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-97444; File No. SR-NFA-2023-01]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Futures Association; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change to NFA 
Compliance Rule 2-9(c) and the Interpretive Notice Entitled ``NFA 
Compliance Rule 2-9: FCM and IB Anti-Money Laundering Program''

May 5, 2023.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(7) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Exchange Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-7 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby 
given that on March 28, 2023, National Futures Association (``NFA'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change described in Items I, II, and 
III below, which Items have been prepared by NFA. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(7).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its filing with the Commission (File No. SR-NFA-2023-01), NFA 
stated the following: NFA also filed the proposed rule change with the 
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (``CFTC'') in five separate 
filings in October 2011, August 2012, June 2018, May 2020, and 
September 2022; on October 13, 2011, NFA requested that the CFTC make a 
determination that review of the proposed rule change of NFA included 
in the October 2011 filing was not necessary; \3\ on November 16, 2011, 
the CFTC notified NFA that it had determined not to review the proposed 
rule change; \4\ on August 27, 2012, NFA

[[Page 30357]]

requested that the CFTC make a determination that review of the 
proposed rule change of NFA included in the August 2012 filing was not 
necessary; \5\ on August 27, 2013, the CFTC notified NFA that it had 
determined not to review the proposed rule change; \6\ on June 15, 
2018, NFA also filed a proposed rule change with the CFTC and requested 
that the CFTC make a determination that review of the proposed rule 
change of NFA was not necessary; \7\ by letter dated June 28, 2018, the 
CFTC notified NFA of its determination not to review the proposed rule 
change; \8\ on May 28, 2020, NFA filed a proposed rule change with the 
CFTC and requested that the CFTC make a determination that review of 
the proposed rule change of NFA was not necessary; \9\ in an email on 
May 29, 2020, the CFTC requested clarification of NFA's proposed rule 
change filed on May 28, 2020; \10\ by letter dated June 8, 2020, the 
CFTC notified NFA of its determination not to review the proposed rule 
change; \11\ on September 22, 2022, NFA filed a proposed rule change 
with the CFTC and requested that the CFTC make a determination that 
review of the proposed rule change of NFA was not necessary; \12\ by 
letter dated October 19, 2022, the CFTC notified NFA of its 
determination not to review the proposed rule change.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See letter dated October 13, 2011 from Thomas W. Sexton, 
III, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA, to David A. 
Stawick, Office of the Secretariat, CFTC. This letter can be found 
in Exhibit 5(a) of File No. SR-NFA-2023-01.
    \4\ See letter dated November 16, 2011 from Gary Barnett, 
Director, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight, CFTC 
to Thomas W. Sexton, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA. 
This letter can be found in Exhibit 5(b) of File No. SR-NFA-2023-01.
    \5\ See letter dated August 27, 2012 from Thomas W. Sexton, III, 
Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA to David A. Stawick, 
Office of the Secretariat, CFTC. This letter can be found in Exhibit 
5(c) of File No. SR-NFA-2023-01.
    \6\ See letter dated August 27, 2013 from Gary Barnett, 
Director, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight, CFTC 
to Thomas W. Sexton, III, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, 
NFA. This letter can be found in Exhibit 5(d) of File No. SR-NFA-
2023-01.
    \7\ See letter dated June 15, 2018 from Carol A. Wooding, Vice 
President and General Counsel, NFA to Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 
Office of the Secretariat, CFTC. This letter can be found in Exhibit 
5(e) of File No. SR-NFA-2023-01.
    \8\ See Letter dated June 28, 2018 from Matthew Kulkin, 
Director, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight, CFTC 
to Carol A. Wooding, Vice President and General Counsel, NFA. This 
letter can be found in Exhibit 5(f) of File No. SR-NFA-2023-01.
    \9\ See letter dated May 28, 2020 from Carol A. Wooding, Senior 
Vice President and General Counsel, NFA to Christopher J. 
Kirkpatrick, Office of the Secretariat, CFTC. This letter can be 
found in Exhibit 5(g) of File No. SR-NFA-2023-01.
    \10\ See email dated May 29, 2020 from Christopher W. Cummings, 
Special Counsel, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight, 
CFTC to Carol A. Wooding, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, 
NFA. This correspondence can be found in Exhibit 5(h) of File No. 
SR-NFA-2023-01.
    \11\ See letter dated June 8, 2020 from Joshua Sterling, 
Director, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight, CFTC 
to Carol A. Wooding, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA. 
This letter can be found in Exhibit 5(i) of File No. SR-NFA-2023-01.
    \12\ See letter dated September 22, 2022 from Carol A. Wooding, 
Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA to Christopher J. 
Kirkpatrick, Office of the Secretariat, CFTC. This letter can be 
found in Exhibit 5(j) of File No. SR-NFA-2023-01.
    \13\ See letter dated October 19, 2022 from Amanda L. Olear, 
Director, Market Participants Division, CFTC to Carol A. Wooding, 
Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA. This letter can be 
found in Exhibit 5(k) of File No. SR-NFA-2023-01.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Description and Text of the Proposed 
Rule Change

    The proposed amendments to the Interpretive Notice entitled NFA 
Compliance Rule 2-9: FCM and IB Anti-Money Laundering Program 
(``Interpretive Notice'') update the Interpretive Notice to incorporate 
changes the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (``FinCEN'') made to 
Bank Secrecy Act (``BSA'') regulations regarding suspicious activity 
report (``SAR'') confidentiality, as well as advisories issued by 
FinCEN regarding sharing SARs between and among affiliates.\14\ The 
amendments also provide Members with additional guidance regarding the 
timing of SAR filings and record retention requirements, the frequency 
of the employee training and independent audit requirements and 
incorporate existing BSA requirements related to Reports of Foreign 
Bank and Financial Accounts and Reports of International Transportation 
of Currency or Monetary Instruments. Further, the amendments revise the 
references to the Code of Federal Regulations to reflect the adoption 
of Chapter X for BSA requirements.\15\ (October 2011 Amendments)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ NFA notified Members of these changes through Notices to 
Members outlining these new requirements at the time FinCEN 
originally issued or adopted the requirements/advisories.
    \15\ See ``Transfer and Reorganization of Bank Secrecy Act 
Regulations; Final Rule,'' 75 FR 65806 (Oct. 26, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The amendments also revise the Customer Identification Program 
(``CIP'') subsection of the Interpretive Notice, which describes 
guidance that FinCEN and the CFTC issued in 2006 (FIN-2006-G004--
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Customer Identification Programs 
for Futures Commission Merchants and Introducing Brokers, February 14, 
2006) related to CIP obligations with respect to omnibus accounts.\16\ 
Due to concerns that the language in NFA's Interpretive Notice could be 
read to provide that a firm is never required to obtain information on 
beneficial owners, the language was revised to indicate that for 
omnibus accounts where the intermediary is the account holder, an FCM 
should treat the intermediary as the customer and the FCM does not have 
to apply its CIP requirements to the underlying beneficiary. (August 
2012 Amendments).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 31 CFR 1026.220(a)(2)(ii)(C) (2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed amendments to NFA Compliance Rule 2-9(c) as well as 
the related Interpretive Notice incorporate changes FinCEN made to the 
BSA regulations on May 11, 2016 that require financial institutions to 
identify and verify the identity of beneficial owners of legal entity 
(``LE'') customers and amend the Anti-Money Laundering Program 
(``AML'') requirements for FCMs and IBs to require appropriate risk-
based procedures to conduct ongoing customer due diligence 
(collectively, ``CDD Rule''). (June 2018 Amendments).
    The amendments also incorporate guidance issued by the Commission 
[sic] in consultation with FinCEN to CFTC Interpretive Letter No. 19-18 
entitled Interpretive Guidance Regarding Voice Broker Customer 
Identification Program and Beneficial Ownership Rule Requirements. The 
proposed amendments also made minor amendments to unrelated footnotes 
to reflect technical citation changes and re-numbered existing 
footnotes. (May 2020 Amendments).
    Moreover, the amendments also closely align NFA's Interpretive 
Notice with the exact language included in the BSA and its implementing 
regulations. Further, the amendments include the deletion of two 
footnotes that are no longer applicable as well as amendments to other 
footnotes that include outdated language and website links that are no 
longer operable. (September 2022 Amendments).
    The text of the proposed amendments--October 2011 Amendments, 
August 2012 Amendments, June 2018 Amendments, May 2020 Amendments, and 
September 2022 Amendments--to the Interpretive Notice and NFA 
Compliance Rule 2-9(c) is found in Exhibit 4.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NFA included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. NFA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, 
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

[[Page 30358]]

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Section 15A(k) of the Exchange Act \17\ makes NFA a national 
securities association for the limited purpose of regulating the 
activities of NFA Members who are registered as brokers or dealers in 
security futures products under section 15(b)(11) of the Exchange 
Act.\18\ NFA's Interpretive Notice and NFA Compliance Rule 2-9(c) apply 
to all NFA Member FCMs and IBs and require them to develop and 
implement an AML program reasonably designed to achieve and monitor a 
Member's compliance with the requirements of the BSA and the 
implementing regulations promulgated thereunder and could apply to NFA 
Members registered as security futures brokers or dealers under section 
15(b)(11) of the Exchange Act.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(k).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(11).
    \19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NFA is amending the Interpretive Notice to include amendments to 
the BSA regulations that specify that the BSA's confidentiality 
provisions prohibit FCMs and IBs from revealing any information which 
would reveal the existence of a SAR. NFA's amendments also clarify that 
the disclosure prohibition is not limited to the person involved in the 
transaction that is the subject of the SAR, but rather applies to all 
persons except as specifically authorized by the regulation. NFA's 
amendments also incorporate FinCEN's guidance that permits FCMs and IBs 
to share SARs or any information that would reveal the existence of a 
SAR with an affiliate provided that the affiliate is subject to a SAR 
regulation issued by FinCEN or another regulatory agency, including the 
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, the 
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift 
Supervision, and the SEC. NFA's amendments also add existing BSA 
requirements related to the timing for filing a SAR, SAR documentation 
retention requirements, FCM and IB requirements for filing a Report of 
Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, and the FCM requirements for 
filing a Report of International Transportation of Currency or Monetary 
Instruments. The amendments revise all references to the Code of 
Federal Regulations to reflect the adoption of Chapter X for BSA 
requirements.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See ``Transfer and Reorganization of Bank Secrecy Act 
Regulations, Final Rule,'' 75 FR 65806 (Oct. 26, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Moreover, the amendments also revise the CIP subsection of the 
Interpretive Notice, which describes guidance that FinCEN and the CFTC 
issued in 2006 (FIN-2006-G004--Frequently Asked Questions Regarding 
Customer Identification Programs for Futures Commission Merchants and 
Introducing Brokers, February 14, 2006) related to CIP obligations with 
respect to omnibus accounts. Due to concerns that the language in NFA's 
Interpretive Notice could be read to provide that a firm is never 
required to obtain information on beneficial owners, the revised 
language indicates that for omnibus accounts where an intermediary is 
the account holder an FCM should treat the intermediary as the customer 
and the FCM does not have to apply its CIP requirements to the 
underlying beneficiary.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 31 CFR 1026.220(c)(2)(ii)(C) (2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, on August 12, 2016, NFA notified Members of the upcoming 
FinCEN CDD Rule requirements; instructed them to begin considering 
modifications to their AML programs in order to comply with these new 
requirements; and informed them that NFA Compliance Rule 2-9(c) and the 
related Interpretive Notice would be updated to incorporate FinCEN's 
new requirements. FCMs and IBs were required to comply with FinCEN's 
CDD Rule on or before May 11, 2018.
    Currently, NFA Compliance Rule 2-9(c) requires an FCM's and IB's 
AML program to, at a minimum, have four enumerated components--(1) 
policies, procedures and internal controls reasonably designed to 
assure compliance with the applicable provisions of the BSA and the 
implementing regulations; \22\ (2) independent testing; (3) designation 
of a compliance officer responsible for day-to-day compliance; and (4) 
ongoing training for appropriate personnel. NFA is amending Compliance 
Rule 2-9(c) and the Interpretive Notice to incorporate the fifth 
component that FinCEN added to its AML Program Requirements that 
requires firms to adopt and implement appropriate risk-based procedures 
for conducting ongoing customer due diligence, including: (i) 
understanding the nature and purpose of customer relationships for the 
purpose of developing a customer risk profile; and (ii) conducting 
ongoing monitoring to identify and report suspicious transactions, and, 
on a risk basis, to maintain and update customer information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Without explanation, FinCEN also modified this component to 
require that the policies, procedures, and internal controls be 
designed to prevent the financial institution from being used for 
money laundering or the financing of terrorist activities. NFA is 
amending Compliance Rule 2-9(c) to incorporate this change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NFA is also amending the Interpretive Notice to add a separate 
section requiring that FCMs and IBs establish and implement written 
procedures that are reasonably designed to identify and verify the 
identity of beneficial owners of LE customers. Specifically, in 
accordance with FinCEN's requirements, the Interpretive Notice requires 
FCM and IB Members to obtain certain identifying information, including 
a required certification,\23\ from the natural person opening the 
account on behalf of the LE. After a firm identifies the beneficial 
owner(s), it is also required to verify the identity using risk-based 
procedures that, at a minimum, contain the same elements as required 
for verifying the identity of customers that are individuals under the 
CIP requirements. As with CIP requirements, the CDD Rule and NFA's 
Interpretive Notice permit a financial institution to enter into a 
reliance agreement with another financial institution to perform these 
obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Firms may choose to comply with the certification 
requirement by using FinCEN's Certification Form (as adopted as an 
appendix A to the rulemaking) or by obtaining the information 
required by FinCEN's form, along with a certification by the natural 
person regarding the accuracy of the information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NFA is further amending the Interpretive Notice to incorporate the 
CDD Rule's new recordkeeping requirements for FCMs and IBs. Namely, 
firms will be required to make and maintain records of all beneficial 
owners and retain those records for five years after the account is 
closed. Additionally, firms must also make and maintain records of the 
description of the documents and any non-documentary methods used to 
verify the identity of a beneficial owner for a period of five years 
after the record was made. Firms are expected to use the beneficial 
ownership information obtained to ensure they comply with Office of 
Foreign Assets Controls (``OFAC'') Regulations and OFAC-administered 
sanctions. NFA's amendments merely incorporate the requirements of 
FinCEN's beneficial ownership rule and do not impose any additional 
requirements on FCM and IB Members.
    Moreover, NFA is amending the Interpretive Notice to incorporate 
CFTC guidance as provided in the July 22,

[[Page 30359]]

2019, CFTC Interpretive Letter No.19-18 entitled Interpretive Guidance 
Regarding Voice Broker Customer Identification Program and Beneficial 
Ownership Rule Requirements (``CFTC Interpretive Guidance'') addressing 
FCMs' and IBs' compliance with applicable requirements of the BSA and 
its implementing regulations related to CIP and Beneficial Ownership 
and granting relief from the CIP and Beneficial Ownership requirements 
to IBs that do not introduce an account to an FCM and do not have 
customers or accounts for the purposes of the CIP rule. NFA amended 
footnote 6 in the Interpretive Notice to provide a hyperlink to and a 
brief description of the Interpretive Guidance and to clarify that 
these IBs are not required to establish and implement a CIP or apply 
Beneficial Ownership requirements with respect to their voice brokerage 
business under NFA's Interpretive Notice. The footnote also clarifies 
that these IBs are required to conduct suspicious activity reviews and 
comply with other applicable NFA requirements using the information 
available to them. NFA also amended the Interpretive Notice to more 
closely align with the exact language in the BSA and its implementing 
regulations in two unrelated footnotes (i.e., new footnotes 18 and 41) 
to reflect technical citation changes, as well as amendments to make 
required re-numbering of existing footnotes.
    Furthermore, NFA's amendments closely align NFA's Interpretive 
Notice with the exact language included in the BSA and its implementing 
regulations. These amendments also include the deletion of two 
footnotes that are no longer applicable as well as amendments to other 
footnotes that include outdated language and website links that are no 
longer operable.
    Amendments to the Interpretive Notice were previously filed with 
the SEC in SR-NFA-2006-03, Exchange Act Release No. 34-54956 (Dec. 18, 
2006), 71 FR 77431 (Dec. 26. 2006); SR-NFA-2007-06 (withdrawn); SR-NFA-
2008-01, Exchange Act Release No. 34-57640 (Apr. 9, 2008), 73 FR 20341 
(Apr. 15, 2008); and SR-NFA-2011-01 (withdrawn). This is the first 
amendment filing for NFA Compliance Rule 2-9(c) since it was initially 
filed with the SEC in SR-NFA-2002-03, Exchange Act Release No. 34-45887 
(May 7, 2002), 67 FR 32072 (May 13, 2002).
2. Statutory Basis
    NFA believes that the proposed rule change is authorized by, and 
consistent with section 15A(k)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act.\24\ That 
section sets out requirements for rules of a futures association, 
registered under section 17 of the Commodity Exchange Act, that are a 
registered national securities association for the limited purpose of 
regulating the activities of members who are registered as brokers or 
dealers in security futures products pursuant to section 15(b)(11) of 
the Exchange Act.\25\ Under section 15A(k)(2)(B) of the Exchange 
Act,\26\ the rules of such a limited purpose national securities 
association must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative 
acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, 
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest in 
connection with security futures products in a manner reasonably 
comparable to the rules of a registered national securities association 
applicable to securities futures products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(k)(2)(B).
    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(11).
    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(k)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NFA believes the proposed rule change would meet these requirements 
by: specifying that the BSA's confidentiality provisions prohibit FCMs 
and IBs from revealing any information which would reveal the existence 
of a SAR; clarifying that the disclosure prohibition is not limited to 
the person involved in the transaction that is the subject of the SAR, 
but rather applies to all persons except as specifically authorized by 
the BSA regulation; incorporating FinCEN's guidance that permits FCMs 
and IBs to share SARs or any information that would reveal the 
existence of a SAR with an affiliate provided that the affiliate is 
subject to a SAR regulation issued by FinCEN or another regulatory 
agency, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union 
Administration, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the 
Office of Thrift Supervision and the SEC; clarifying timing 
requirements for AML training and AML independent testing; adding 
existing BSA requirements related to the timing for filing a SAR, SAR 
documentation retention requirements, FCM and IB requirements for 
filing a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts and the FCM 
requirements for filing a Report of International Transportation of 
Currency or Monetary Instruments; revising all references to the Code 
of Federal Regulations to reflect the recent adoption of Chapter X for 
BSA; and clarifying CIP responsibilities with respect to omnibus 
accounts.
    The proposed rule change further protects investors and the public 
interest in connection with security futures products by requiring FCMs 
and IBs to modify their AML programs to incorporate FinCEN's new 
regulations requiring financial institutions to identify and verify the 
identity of beneficial owners of LE customers and to conduct ongoing 
customer due diligence. Accordingly, NFA is amending Compliance Rule 2-
9(c) to modify language and to specifically require appropriate risk-
based procedures for conducting customer due diligence.
    Further, NFA is amending the Interpretive Notice to add a separate 
section on identifying and verifying beneficial owners pursuant to 
FinCEN requirements; to amend the suspicious activity reporting section 
to add a requirement that FCMs and IBs develop risk-based ongoing CDD 
procedures in accordance with FinCEN's requirements; to amend the 
Ongoing Compliance Responsibilities--OFAC section to clarify that FCMs 
and IBs should use the beneficial ownership information to help ensure 
that they are in compliance with OFAC regulations; and to clarify that 
voice broker IBs that negotiate/facilitate block futures and cleared 
swap transactions do not have customers or accounts for purposes of the 
CIP Rule and are not required to establish and implement a CIP or apply 
Beneficial Ownership requirements with respect to their voice broker 
business but still required to adopt and implement an AML program to 
conduct suspicious activity reviews and comply with other applicable 
NFA requirements using the information available to them. NFA is also 
amending the Notice [sic] to more closely align the language with the 
exact wording in the BSA and its implementing regulations.
    This proposal is not designed to regulate, by virtue of any 
authority conferred by the Exchange Act, matters not related to the 
purposes of the Exchange Act or the administration of the association. 
To the extent that this proposal regulates activities and transactions 
other than security futures, the authority for regulating those 
activities and transactions comes from the Commodity Exchange Act 
rather than securities laws.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NFA does not believe that the proposed rule changes would impose 
any burden on competition. With the exception of the amendment 
clarifying

[[Page 30360]]

the timing requirements related to training of employees and the 
independent audit, the amendments update the Notice [sic] to 
incorporate or clarify requirements and guidance under the BSA, to 
which NFA Member FCMs and IBs are currently subject. NFA also believes 
that the amendment clarifying the timing of employee training and the 
independent audit will not impose any burden on competition because FCM 
and IB Members are currently required to have annual employee training 
and an annual audit.
    At first glance, the rule change may appear to impose additional 
burdens on FCMs and IBs. However, these new obligations have already 
been imposed by rules adopted by FinCEN in order to prevent and detect 
money laundering activities, and NFA's amendments merely incorporate 
FinCEN's requirements into NFA's rules. The rule changes require FCMs 
and IBs to identify and verify the identity of all beneficial owners of 
LE customers, to adopt new recordkeeping requirements, to make and 
maintain records of all beneficial owners, and to require appropriate 
risk-based procedures to conduct ongoing customer due diligence. NFA 
does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any 
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    NFA did not publish the rule changes to the membership for comment. 
NFA did not receive comment letters concerning the rule change. NFA 
Member FCM and IB Advisory Committees fully supported the proposed 
amendments to the Interpretive Notice and NFA Compliance Rule 2-9(c).

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    NFA filed the proposed rule changes with the CFTC in five separate 
filings filed on the following dates: October 13, 2011,\27\ August 27, 
2013,\28\ June 15, 2018,\29\ May 28, 2020,\30\ and September 22, 
2022.\31\ On November 16, 2011, August 27, 2013, June 28, 2018, and 
June 8, 2020, the CFTC notified NFA that it had determined not to 
review the proposed rule changes.\32\ However, as for the June 2018 
Amendments, FinCEN's rule required FCMs and IBs to comply with the CDD 
Rule on or before May 11, 2018. NFA did not concurrently file the 
proposed rule changes with the SEC. Section 19(b)(7)(B) of the Act 
provides that a proposed rule change filed with the SEC pursuant to 
section 19(b)(7)(A) of the Act shall be filed concurrently with the 
CFTC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See Letter dated October 13, 2011 from Thomas W. Sexton, 
III, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA to David A. 
Stawick, Office of the Secretariat, CFTC.
    \28\ See Letter dated August 27, 2012 from Thomas W. Sexton, 
III, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA to David A. 
Stawick, Office of the Secretariat, CFTC.
    \29\ See Letter dated June 15, 2018 from Carol A. Wooding, Vice 
President and General Counsel, NFA to Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 
Office of the Secretariat, CFTC.
    \30\ See Letter dated May 28, 2020 from Carol A. Wooding, Senior 
Vice President and General Counsel, NFA to Christopher J. 
Kirkpatrick, Office of the Secretariat, CFTC.
    \31\ See Letter dated September 22, 2022 from Carol A. Wooding, 
Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA to Christopher J. 
Kirkpatrick, Office of the Secretariat, CFTC.
    \32\ See Letter dated November 16, 2011 from Gary Barnett, 
Director, Division of Swap and Intermediary Oversight, CFTC to 
Thomas W. Sexton, III, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, 
NFA; Letter dated August 27, 2013 from Gary Barnett, Director 
Division of Swap and Intermediary Oversight, CFTC to Thomas W. 
Sexton, III, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA; Letter 
dated June 28, 2018 from Matthew Kulkin, Director Division of Swap 
Dealer and Intermediary Oversight, CFTC to Carol A. Wooding, Vice 
President and General Counsel, NFA; Letter dated June 8, 2020 from 
Joshua Sterling, Director, Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary 
Oversight, CFTC to Carol A. Wooding, Senior Vice President and 
General Counsel, NFA; and Letter dated October 19, 2022 from Amanda 
L. Olear, Director, Market Participants Division, CFTC to Carol A. 
Wooding, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, NFA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(7)(C) of the Exchange Act provides, inter alia that 
``[a]ny proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization that has 
taken effect pursuant to section 19(b)(7)(B) of the Exchange Act may be 
enforced by such self-regulatory organization to the extent such rule 
is not inconsistent with the provisions of the title, the rules and 
regulations thereunder and applicable Federal law. At any time within 
60 days of the date of effectiveness of the proposed rule change, the 
Commission after consultation with the CFTC, may summarily abrogate the 
proposed rule change and require that the proposed rule change be 
refiled in accordance with the provisions of section 19(b)(1) of the 
Exchange Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted 
by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NFA-2023-01 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NFA-2023-01. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of NFA. Do not 
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We 
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted 
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NFA-2023-01 and 
should be submitted on or before June 1, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(73).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-10030 Filed 5-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


