[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20556-20560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-91567; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2020-100]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; 
Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order Granting Accelerated 
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To 
Modify the Quorum Requirement

April 14, 2021.

I. Introduction

    On December 31, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or 
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to modify the quorum requirement applicable to a 
non-U.S. company where such company's home country law is in direct 
conflict with Nasdaq's quorum requirement. The proposed rule change was 
published for comment in the Federal Register on January 15, 2021.\3\ 
On February 25, 2021, pursuant to Section 19(b(2) of the Act,\4\ the 
Commission designated a longer period within which to either approve 
the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or 
institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed 
rule change.\5\ On April 8, 2021, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to 
the proposed rule change, which replaced and superseded the proposed 
rule change.\6\ The Commission received no comments on the proposed 
rule change. The Commission is publishing notice of the filing of 
Amendment No. 1 to solicit comment from interested persons and is 
approving the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, on 
an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90883 (January 11, 
2021), 86 FR 4158 (January 15, 2021).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91212, 86 FR 12503 
(March 3, 2021). The Commission designated April 15, 2021, as the 
date by which it should approve, disapprove, or institute 
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule 
change.
    \6\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange revised the rule language 
and made clarifying, conforming, and technical changes, as discussed 
in Section VI, infra. Amendment No. 1 is available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2020-100/srnasdaq2020100-8652263-231434.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. The Exchange's Description of the Proposal, as Modified by 
Amendment No. 1

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

[[Page 20557]]

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Nasdaq is filing this amendment to SR-NASDAQ-2020-100 \7\ in order 
to: (i) Make minor technical changes to improve the structure, clarity 
and readability of this proposal; (ii) specify that Nasdaq will (rather 
than may) accept any quorum requirement for a non-U.S. Company, that is 
not a foreign private issuer, if the company's home country law 
mandates such quorum for the shareholders' meeting and prohibits the 
company from establishing a higher quorum required by Nasdaq, and the 
company cannot obtain an exemption or waiver from that law; (iii) 
clarify that such acceptance of any quorum requirement is subject to 
Nasdaq's discretionary authority under Listing Rule 5101; and (iv) add 
a provision that a company relying on the exception from the Nasdaq 
quorum requirement must:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90883 (January 11, 
2021), 86 FR 4158 (January 15, 2021) (the ``Initial Proposal'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (a) Make a public announcement as promptly as possible but not more 
than four business days following the submission of the independent 
counsel's statement to Nasdaq on or through the company's website and 
either by filing a Form 8-K, where required by SEC rules, or by issuing 
a press release explaining the company's reliance on the exception;
    (b) maintain the website disclosure for the period of time the 
company continues to rely on this exception from the quorum 
requirements; and
    (c) update the website disclosure at least annually to indicate 
that the company is prohibited under its home country law from 
complying with Nasdaq's quorum requirements as of such date.
    This amendment supersedes and replaces the Initial Proposal in its 
entirety.
    Nasdaq is proposing to modify Listing Rules 5620(c) and 
5615(a)(4)(E) to allow Nasdaq to accept a quorum less than 33\1/3\% of 
the outstanding shares of a company's common voting stock where the 
company is incorporated outside of the U.S. and such company's home 
country law prohibits the company from establishing a quorum that 
satisfies the such quorum rules.
    Listing Rule 5620(c) establishes quorum requirements for an annual 
meeting of shareholders for Nasdaq companies listing common stock or 
voting preferred stock, and their equivalents.\8\ Under this rule, each 
company that is not a limited partnership must provide for a quorum as 
specified in its by-laws for any meeting of the holders of common 
stock; provided, however, that in no case shall such quorum be less 
than 33\1/3\% of the outstanding shares of the company's common voting 
stock.\9\ Nasdaq notes that domestic listed companies are subject to 
quorum requirements under the laws of their states of 
incorporation.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Listing Rule 5620(a).
    \9\ Listing Rule 5615(a)(4)(E) governing the quorum requirements 
for limited partnerships listed on Nasdaq similarly requires that in 
the event of a meeting of limited partners, the quorum for such 
meeting shall be not less than 33\1/3\ percent of the limited 
partnership interests outstanding (together with the requirements of 
Listing Rule 5620(c), the ``Nasdaq Quorum Requirement'').
    \10\ For example, Delaware allows companies to establish their 
own quorum requirements in their certificates of incorporation or 
bylaws, provided that the quorum must be at least one-third of the 
shares entitled to vote on the matter. In the absence of a quorum 
provision in the company's certificate of incorporation or bylaws, 
Delaware requires a quorum of more than 50% of the shares entitled 
to vote on the matter. See 8 Del. Code Sec. 216.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq recently discovered that the laws of certain foreign 
jurisdictions are in direct conflict with the Nasdaq Quorum 
Requirement. In particular, Nasdaq was approached by a French company 
that took advantage of the foreign private issuer exception and relied 
on home country practices in lieu of the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement, but 
lost its foreign private issuer status and cannot comply with the 
Nasdaq Quorum Requirement due to certain French law requirements.\11\ 
In that regard, Article L. 225-98 of the French Commercial code \12\ 
provides that upon first notice, the ordinary shareholders' meeting 
shall have a quorum requirement of one-fifth (20%) of the shares 
entitled to vote. The Article further provides that by-laws of a French 
company whose shares are listed on a regulated market (which includes 
Euronext Paris) cannot provide for a higher quorum for shareholders' 
meetings than that set forth above. As this rule constitutes a public 
order under French law, it is required to be followed and compliance is 
enforced by the French courts and by the French stock exchange 
authority, the Autorit[eacute] des march[eacute]s financiers. According 
to article L. 225-121, any decision taken in violation of the 
aforementioned rules on quorum is deemed null and void. As such, a 
French company listed on a regulated market cannot comply with the 
Nasdaq Quorum Requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Ordinary shares of at least one Nasdaq listed company DBV 
Technologies S.A. (DBV), are listed on Euronext Paris which is a 
regulated market under French and EU regulations. Accordingly, as 
explained below, DBV cannot amend its bylaws to increase the quorum 
requirement to comply with the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement. Since its 
IPO in 2014, DBV qualified as a foreign private issuer and relied on 
home country practices in lieu of complying with the Nasdaq Quorum 
Requirement. See also footnote 15 below.
    \12\ ``It can only validly deliberate upon first notice if the 
shareholders present or represented own at least one fifth of the 
shares entitled to vote.'' Available at https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCodeArticle.do?idArticle=LEGIARTI000038799445&cidTexte=LEGITEXT000005634379&dateTexte=20190721.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Listing Rule 5615(a)(3) allows a foreign private issuer \13\ to 
follow its home country practice in lieu of the requirements of the 
Rule 5600 Series, including the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement, subject to 
certain disclosure requirements and the requirement that an independent 
counsel in such company's home country certify to Nasdaq that the 
company's practices are not prohibited by the home country's laws.\14\ 
Accordingly, a French foreign private issuer could rely on Listing Rule 
5615(a)(3) to remain in compliance with the Nasdaq corporate governance 
requirements in the Rule 5600 Series.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The term foreign private issuer means any foreign issuer 
other than a foreign government except an issuer meeting the 
following conditions as of the last business day of its most 
recently completed second fiscal quarter: (i) More than 50 percent 
of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer are directly or 
indirectly owned of record by residents of the United States; and 
(ii) Any of the following: (A) The majority of the executive 
officers or directors are United States citizens or residents; (B) 
More than 50 percent of the assets of the issuer are located in the 
United States; or (C) The business of the issuer is administered 
principally in the United States. See Securities Act Rule 405 and 
Exchange Act Rule 3b-4.
    \14\ See Listing Rule 5615(a)(3)(B) and Listing Rule IM-5615-3.
    \15\ As of December 31, 2019, approximately 62% of DBV's 
outstanding ordinary shares were held by U.S. residents. See 
company's Form 20-F filed on March 20, 2020. As of June 30, 2020, 
DBV determined that it no longer qualified as a foreign private 
issuer and would be required to comply with SEC rules for domestic 
issuers as of January 1, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A non-U.S. company \16\ that is not a foreign private issuer 
currently is required to comply with the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement 
without regard to the requirements of such company's home country laws. 
As described above, for some companies, including DBV, the company's 
home country law prohibits the company from establishing a higher 
quorum required by the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ For purposes of this rule, the term non-U.S. company refers 
to a company incorporated outside of the U.S. See also Listing Rules 
5630 and IM-5640 that use this term.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, Nasdaq proposes to modify the Nasdaq Quorum 
Requirement to allow Nasdaq to accept

[[Page 20558]]

any quorum requirement for a non-U.S. company if such company's home 
country law mandates such quorum for the shareholders' meeting and 
prohibits the company from establishing the higher quorum required by 
the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement, and the company cannot obtain an 
exemption or waiver from that law.\17\ This rule change is consistent 
with the approach the Exchange takes in Listing Rule IM-5640 that 
allows Nasdaq to accept any action or issuance relating to the voting 
rights structure of a non-U.S. company that is not prohibited by the 
company's home country law.\18\ Nasdaq proposes to require that a 
company relying on this provision shall submit to Nasdaq a written 
statement from an independent counsel in such company's home country 
describing the home country law that conflicts with Nasdaq's quorum 
requirement. Nasdaq also proposes to require such counsel to certify 
that, as the result of the conflict with the home country law, the 
company is prohibited from complying with the Nasdaq Quorum 
Requirement, and the company cannot obtain an exemption or waiver from 
that law. Finally, to assure appropriate disclosure, Nasdaq proposes to 
require that any company relying on this exception from the Nasdaq 
Quorum Requirement must make a public announcement as promptly as 
possible but not more than four business days following the submission 
of the independent counsel's statement to Nasdaq, as described above, 
on or through the Company's website and either by filing a Form 8-K, 
where required by SEC rules, or by issuing a press release explaining 
the Company's reliance on the exception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Nasdaq notes that under Listing Rule 5101 Nasdaq has broad 
discretionary authority to deny initial listing, apply additional or 
more stringent criteria for the initial or continued listing of 
particular securities, or suspend or delist particular securities 
based on any event, condition, or circumstance that exists or occurs 
that makes initial or continued listing of the securities on Nasdaq 
inadvisable or unwarranted in the opinion of Nasdaq, even though the 
securities meet all enumerated criteria for initial or continued 
listing on Nasdaq.
    \18\ The proposed modified Nasdaq Quorum Requirement will apply 
only in circumstances where the company's home country law 
specifically prohibits the company from establishing a higher quorum 
required by the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement, whereas Listing Rule IM-
5640 allows Nasdaq to accept any voting rights structure of a non-
U.S. company that is not prohibited by the company's home country 
law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, to help assure continuous transparency, Nasdaq 
proposes to require that such website disclosure is maintained for the 
period of time the company continues to rely on the exception from the 
quorum requirements. Finally, to help assure the exception remains 
appropriate, Nasdaq proposes to require the company to update the 
website disclosure at least annually to indicate that the company 
continues to be prohibited under its home country law from complying 
with Nasdaq's quorum requirements as of the date of such update.
    Nasdaq also proposes to modify Listing Rule 5615(a)(4)(E) governing 
the quorum requirements for limited partnerships listed on Nasdaq to 
also reflect this change to the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\19\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act,\20\ in particular, in that it is designed to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments 
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public 
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq believes that the proposed amendments to Listing Rules 
5620(c) and 5615(a)(4)(E) are designed to protect investors and the 
public interest because the proposal would eliminate a conflict forcing 
a company to be in violation of the Nasdaq rule, with a result of 
delisting by following the law in its home jurisdiction. Nasdaq also 
believes that Nasdaq's long experience of listing foreign private 
issuers, including DBV, while allowing such companies to rely on home 
country practices in lieu of the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement provides 
evidence of an appropriate level of investor protection. In addition, 
this modification is consistent with the approach the Exchange takes in 
Listing Rule IM-5640 that allows Nasdaq to accept any action or 
issuance relating to the voting rights structure of a non-U.S. company 
that is not prohibited by the company's home country law. Nasdaq also 
believes the proposed amendments to Listing Rules 5620(c) and 
5615(a)(4)(E) are designed to protect investors and the public interest 
because any company relying on the proposed exception from the Nasdaq 
Quorum Requirement will be required to make public disclosure on or 
through the Company's website and either by filing a Form 8-K, where 
required by SEC rules, or by issuing a press release explaining the 
company's reliance on the exception.
    Nasdaq believes that the proposed requirement that such website 
disclosure is maintained for the period of time the company continues 
to rely on the exception from the quorum requirements is designed to 
protect investors and the public interest because such website 
disclosure would help assure continuous transparency. Nasdaq also 
believes that the proposed requirement to update the website disclosure 
at least annually to indicate that the company continues to be 
prohibited under its home country law from complying with Nasdaq's 
quorum requirements as of the date of such update is designed to 
protect investors and the public interest because such disclosure would 
help Nasdaq assure that the exception remains appropriate.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change will 
address conflicting requirements of jurisdictions currently affecting 
only one company, as described above; and as such, these changes are 
neither intended to, nor expected to, impose any burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    The Commission has carefully reviewed the proposed rule change, as 
modified by Amendment No. 1, and finds that it is consistent with the 
requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\21\ In 
particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as 
modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the 
Act,\22\ which requires, among other things, that the rules of a 
national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to remove impediments to and perfect 
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, 
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest, and are 
not designed to

[[Page 20559]]

permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or 
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f. In approving this proposed rule change, the 
Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, 
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The development and enforcement of meaningful corporate governance 
listing standards for a national securities exchange is of substantial 
importance to financial markets and the investing public, especially 
given investor expectations regarding the nature of companies that have 
achieved an exchange listing for their securities. The corporate 
governance standards embodied in the listing standards of national 
securities exchanges, in particular, play an important role in assuring 
that exchange-listed companies observe good governance practices 
including safeguarding the interests of shareholders.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76814 (Dec. 
31, 2015), 81 FR 820 (Jan. 7, 2016) (NYSE-2015-02) (approving 
amendments to the NYSE Listed Company Manual to exempt early stage 
companies from having to obtain shareholder approval in certain 
circumstances). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48108 
(June 30, 2003), 68 FR 39995 (July 3, 2003) (approving equity 
compensation shareholder approval rules of both the NYSE and the 
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. n/k/a NASDAQ); and 
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58375 (August 18, 2008), 73 FR 
49498 (August 21, 2008) (In the Matter of the Application of BATS 
Exchange, Inc. for Registration as a National Securities Exchange) 
(order approving registration of BATS Exchange, Inc. noting that 
qualitative listing requirements are designed to ensure that 
companies trading on a national securities exchange will adequately 
protect the interest of public shareholders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, current Nasdaq Listing Rule 5620(c) states that 
a company that is not a limited partnership must provide for a quorum 
as specified in its by-laws for any meeting of the holders of common 
stock; provided, however, that in no case shall such quorum be less 
than 33\1/3\% of the outstanding shares of the company's common voting 
stock, and current Nasdaq Listing Rule 5615(a)(4)(E) states that the 
quorum requirements for a meeting of limited partners shall not be less 
than 33\1/3\% of the limited partnership interests outstanding. The 
Exchange proposes to modify the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement to allow 
Nasdaq to accept a quorum of less than 33\1/3\% of the outstanding 
shares of a company's common voting stock or limited partnership 
interests where the company is incorporated outside of the U.S. and 
such company's home country law prohibits the company from establishing 
a quorum that satisfies the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement and the company 
cannot obtain an exemption or waiver from that law.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See proposed Listing Rules 5620(c) and 5615(a)(4)(E).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has carefully considered the proposal and finds that 
the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. The proposed rules 
would only allow the exception to the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement under 
limited circumstances where a non-U.S. company's home country law 
prohibits the company from establishing a quorum that satisfies the 
Nasdaq Quorum Requirement, and the company cannot obtain an exemption 
or waiver from that law.\25\ The company would be required to obtain a 
written statement from an independent counsel in the company's home 
country describing the home country law that conflicts with the Nasdaq 
Quorum Requirement and certifying that the company is prohibited from 
complying with the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement and that the company 
cannot obtain an exemption or waiver from that law.\26\ According to 
the Exchange, the proposed rule change would currently affect only one 
listed company.\27\ The Exchange states that the proposal would 
eliminate the conflict between the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement and the 
company's home country laws, which currently would force a company that 
follows the law in its home jurisdiction to be in violation of the 
Nasdaq Quorum Requirement, and would result in delisting.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See id.
    \26\ See id.
    \27\ See Amendment No. 1, supra note 6 at 14. The Exchange 
states that the proposed changes currently would affect only one 
listed company, DBV, which has been listed on Nasdaq since 2014. See 
supra note 11. DBV previously qualified as a foreign private issuer, 
and therefore relied on home country practices in lieu of the Nasdaq 
Quorum Requirement. See id. As of June 30, 2020, DBV determined that 
it no longer qualified as a foreign private issuer and would be 
required to comply with the Commission rules for domestic issuers as 
of January 1, 2021. The Exchange states that the proposed rule 
change would allow DBV to continue to follow French law quorum 
requirements, as it has been doing, while remaining listed on 
Nasdaq. See id.
    \28\ See supra Section II.A.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange states that it has allowed issuers to 
rely on home country rules in other contexts. The Exchange notes that 
it allows foreign private issuers to rely on home country practices in 
lieu of the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement.\29\ Further, the Exchange states 
that the Exchange takes a similar approach in Listing Rule IM-5640, 
which allows Nasdaq to accept any action or issuance relating to the 
voting rights structure of a non-U.S. company that is not prohibited by 
the company's home country law.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See supra Section II.A.2. See also supra note 11.
    \30\ See supra note 18 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rules require that any company relying on the proposed 
exception from the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement make a public announcement 
on or through the company's website and by filing either a Form 8-K, 
where required by Commission rules, or by issuing a press release 
explaining the company's reliance on the exception.\31\ Such website 
disclosure would be required to be maintained for the period of time 
the company continues to rely on the exception from the quorum 
requirements, and the company would be required to update the website 
disclosure at least annually to indicate that the company continues to 
be prohibited under its home country law from complying with Nasdaq's 
quorum requirements as of the date of such update. The Commission 
believes that such requirements will help to maintain transparency for 
investors and assist the Exchange in ensuring that the exception 
remains applicable to a company.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See proposed Listing Rules 5620(c) and 5615(a)(4)(E).
    \32\ Additionally, a company would have to verify that there are 
no changes to home country law that would allow it to comply with 
the Nasdaq Quorum Requirement, or receive a waiver or exemption from 
home country law, at least annually when updating its website 
disclosure that the company is still relying on the exception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the reasons discussed above, the Commission believes that the 
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent 
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments on Amendment No. 1 to the Proposed Rule 
Change

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning whether Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-100 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-100. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will

[[Page 20560]]

post all comments on the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent 
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule 
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written 
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the 
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from 
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official 
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of 
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted 
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do 
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment 
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NASDAQ-2020-100, and should be submitted on or before May 11, 2021.

VI. Accelerated Approval of the Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by 
Amendment No. 1

    The Commission finds good cause to approve the proposed rule 
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, prior to the thirtieth day 
after the date of publication of notice of the filing of Amendment No. 
1 in the Federal Register. The Commission notes that Amendment No. 1 
clarifies the proposed rule change. In particular, Amendment No. 1: (1) 
Clarified that the rule applies to a non-U.S. company that is not a 
Foreign Private Issuer; (2) stated that the alternative quorum 
requirement will be applicable only if the company cannot obtain an 
exemption or waiver from the company's home country law requirement; 
(3) stated that Nasdaq ``will'' accept an alternative quorum 
requirement if the company's home country law conflicts with the Nasdaq 
requirement and the other conditions of the rule are met (as described 
above); (4) stated that a company relying on the exception must: (i) 
Make a public announcement as promptly as possible but not more than 
four business days following the submission of the independent 
counsel's statement to Nasdaq, on or through the company's website and 
either by filing a Form 8-K, where required by SEC rules, or by issuing 
a press release explaining the company's reliance on the exception, 
(ii) maintain the website disclosure for the period of time the company 
continues to rely on this exception from the quorum requirements, and 
(iii) update the website disclosure at least annually to indicate that 
the company is prohibited from complying with Nasdaq's quorum 
requirements as of such date; (5) clarified that the proposed rule 
change will address conflicting requirements of jurisdictions currently 
affecting only one company; and (6) stated that the Exchange's 
acceptance of any quorum requirement is subject to Nasdaq's 
discretionary authority under Listing Rule 5101. In addition, the 
Exchange made other clarifying, conforming, and technical changes.\33\ 
The changes in Amendment No. 1 should help to provide greater 
transparency in the Exchange's rules by requiring companies to provide 
public disclosure regarding reliance on the exception. In addition, 
Amendment No. 1 provides greater clarity to the proposal and provides 
greater transparency about the application of the rule changes being 
adopted herein. Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause, pursuant 
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\34\ to approve the proposed rule 
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ See supra note 6.
    \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VII. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\35\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2020-100), as 
modified by Amendment No. 1, be, and it hereby is, approved on an 
accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-08047 Filed 4-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


