[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 1 (Thursday, January 2, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 154-156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-28278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87860; File No. SR-NYSE-2019-071]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed 
Rule Change To Add Certain Recently Adopted Trading Rules To the List 
of Minor Rule Violations in Rule 9217

December 26, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on December 16, 2019, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II 
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission 
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule 
change from interested persons and approving the proposal on an 
accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to add certain recently adopted trading rules 
to the list of minor rule violations in Rule 9217. The proposed rule 
change is available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the 
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

[[Page 155]]

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to add certain recently adopted trading rules 
to the list of minor rule violations in Rule 9217. As discussed below, 
the rules the Exchange proposes to add to Rule 9217 are based on the 
rules of its affiliate NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') or on rules the 
Exchange adopted in connection with its transition to Pillar, which 
were based on legacy Exchange rules governing auctions in Exchange-
listed securities. In both cases, substantively similar rules to those 
the Exchange proposes to add are minor fine eligible rules.
Background
    On January 29, 2015, the Exchange announced the implementation of 
Pillar, an integrated trading technology platform designed to use a 
single specification for connecting to the equities and options markets 
operated by the Exchange and its affiliates.\3\ The Exchange underwent 
a multi-phase transition to Pillar that culminated with Exchange-listed 
securities transitioning to Pillar in August 2019. In order to support 
the transition of Exchange-listed securities to Pillar, the Exchange 
adopted trading and other rules including rules to conduct auctions in 
Pillar that were substantively based on the auction rules then in 
effect.\4\ As discussed below, violations of some of those legacy rules 
are already eligible for minor rule violations under Rules 9216 and 
9217.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Trader Update dated January 29, 2015, available here: 
www.nyse.com/pillar.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82945 (March 26, 
2018), 83 FR 13553 (March 29, 2018) (SR-NYSE-2017-36) (``Release No. 
82945''); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85962 (May 29, 2019), 
84 FR 26188 (June 5, 2019) (SR-NYSE-2019-05) (``Release No. 
85962'').
    \5\ Although the Exchange is adding the Pillar equivalent rules 
to the list of rules eligible for a minor rule fine in Rule 9217, 
the Exchange is not proposing to delete the legacy rules from Rule 
9217 at this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Rule Change
    Rule 9217 sets forth the list of rules under which a member 
organization or covered person may be subject to a fine under a minor 
rule violation plan as described in proposed Rule 9216(b). The Exchange 
proposes to add the following rules to the list of rules in Rule 9217 
eligible for disposition pursuant to a fine under Rule 9216(b):
     Rule 7.16 (Short Sales)
     Rule 7.35A(d) (Pre-Opening Indications)
     Rule 7.35B (Cancellation of limit-at-the-close (``LOC'') 
and market-at-the-close (``MOC'') orders)
     Rule 7.35A (Requirements relating to openings, re-
openings, delayed openings, and trading halts)
    Rule 7.16 (Short Sales) establishes requirements relating to short 
sales for trading on the Pillar trading platform. Rule 7.16 is based on 
NYSE Arca Rule 7.16-E and incorporates text from Rule 440B relating to 
Exchange-listed securities.\6\ NYSE Arca Rule 7.16-E is eligible for 
NYSE Arca's Minor Rule Plan.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Release No. 82945, 83 FR at 13565; Release No. 85962, 84 
FR at 26221. Rule 440B (Short Sales) is not applicable to trading on 
the Pillar trading platform.
    \7\ See NYSE Arca Rule 10.12(i)(1) (NYSE Arca Rule 7.16-E); NYSE 
Arca Rule 10.9217(f)(1). NYSE Arca Rule 10.12 is NYSE Arca's legacy 
minor rule plan and applies only to matters for which a written 
statement was served under Rule 10.12 prior to May 27, 2019; 
thereafter, Rules 10.9216(b) and 10.9217 apply. See generally NYSE 
Arca Rules 10.0 (preamble) and 10.9001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rules 7.35A and 7.35B, adopted in 2019, were based on legacy Rule 
15 (Pre-Opening Indications and Opening Order Imbalance Information), 
Rule 123C (The Closing Procedures), and Rule 123D (Openings and Halts 
in Trading). Each of these rules are already eligible for minor fines 
under NYSE Rule 9217.
    Specifically, Rule 7.35A (DMM-Facilitated Core Open and Trading 
Halt Auctions) sets forth DMM responsibilities for the opening and 
reopening of securities, and is based on legacy Rule 123D with minor 
modifications.\8\ Rule 123D is on the list of rules in Rule 9217 
eligible for disposition pursuant to a fine under Rule 9216(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Release No. 85962, 84 FR at 26202.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similarly, Rule 7.35A(d) and its subparagraphs are based on Rule 
15(a)-(f) relating to pre-opening indications with non-substantive 
differences.\9\ Rule 15 is also on the list of rules in Rule 9217 
eligible for disposition pursuant to a fine under Rule 9216(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See id. at 26204-05.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 7.35B (DMM-facilitated Closing Auctions) sets forth DMM 
responsibilities for the closing of securities, and is based in part on 
legacy Rules 123C and 123D.\10\ The entry and cancellation procedures 
for MOC and LOC Orders set forth in Rule 7.35B are based on legacy Rule 
123C,\11\ which is also on the list of rules in Rule 9217 eligible for 
disposition pursuant to a fine under Rule 9216(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See id. at 26209-17.
    \11\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the 
Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5),\13\ in particular, because it is designed to prevent 
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination 
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to 
remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open 
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect 
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Summary fines provide a meaningful sanction for minor or technical 
violations of rules. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule 
change will strengthen the Exchange's ability to carry out its 
oversight and enforcement responsibilities in cases where full 
disciplinary proceedings are unwarranted in view of the minor nature of 
the particular violation.
    Specifically, the proposed rule change is designed to prevent 
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices because it will provide 
the Exchange the ability to issue a minor rule fine for violations of 
its rules where similar conduct is currently eligible for a minor rule 
fine where more formal disciplinary action may not be warranted or 
appropriate. In addition, the Exchange believes that adding a rule 
based on the rules of its affiliate to the Exchange's minor rule plan 
would promote fairness and consistency in the marketplace by permitting 
the Exchange to issue a minor rule fine for violations of a 
substantially similar rule that is eligible for minor rule treatment on 
the Exchange's affiliate, thereby harmonizing minor rule plan fines 
across affiliated exchanges for the same conduct.
    The Exchange also believes that adding rules based on legacy 
Exchange rules that are eligible for a minor rule fine also is designed 
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices because it 
will provide the Exchange the ability to be able to continue issuing 
minor rule fines for violations of rules involving the same or similar 
conduct.
    The Exchange further believes that the proposed amendments to Rule 
9217 are consistent with Section 6(b)(6) of the Act,\14\ which provides 
that members and persons associated with members shall be appropriately 
disciplined for

[[Page 156]]

violation of the provisions of the rules of the exchange, by expulsion, 
suspension, limitation of activities, functions, and operations, fine, 
censure, being suspended or barred from being associated with a member, 
or any other fitting sanction. As noted, the proposed rule change would 
provide the Exchange ability to sanction minor or technical violations 
pursuant to the Exchange's rules to deter the same or violative 
activity that is already eligible for a minor rule fine.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is not 
designed to address any competitive issue but rather to update the 
Exchange's rules to strengthen the Exchange's ability to carry out its 
oversight and enforcement functions and deter potential violative 
conduct.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSE-2019-071 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2019-071. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2019-071 and should be submitted on 
or before January 23, 2020.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of 
Proposed Rule Change

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\15\ In 
particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\16\ which requires that the 
rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to remove impediments and to perfect the mechanism 
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in 
general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Commission 
also believes that the proposal is consistent with Sections 6(b)(1) and 
6(b)(6) of the Act \17\ which require that the rules of an exchange 
enforce compliance with, and provide appropriate discipline for, 
violations of Commission and Exchange rules. Finally, the Commission 
finds that the proposal is consistent with the public interest, the 
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Act, as required by Rule 19d-1(c)(2) under the Act,\18\ which 
governs minor rule violation plans. The Commission notes that the 
Exchange merely proposes to add to its minor rule violation plan Pillar 
rules that are identical to the provisions already included in the 
plan. Accordingly, the Commission believes the proposal raises no novel 
or significant issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has 
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, 
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1) and 78f(b)(6).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the same reasons discussed above, the Commission finds good 
cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\19\ for approving the 
proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of 
publication of the notice of the filing thereof in the Federal 
Register. The proposal merely adds Pillar rules, which are 
substantively based on legacy rules already in the Exchange's minor 
rule violation plan. Accordingly, the Commission believes that a full 
notice-and-comment period is not necessary before approving the 
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 
\20\ and Rule 19d-1(c)(2) thereunder,\21\ that the proposed rule change 
(SR-NYSE-2019-71) be, and hereby is, approved and declared effective on 
an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \21\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
    \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant 
to delegated authority.\22\

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-28278 Filed 12-31-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


