[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 23, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56860-56864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23052]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87330; File No. SR-NYSE-2019-53]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend Its Price List To Add an Additional Step Up Credit Tier

October 17, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on October 1, 2019, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' 
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, 
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to adopt a new 
pricing tier, the Step Up Tier 2 Adding Credit, in Tape A securities. 
The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at 
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the 
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to adopt a new 
pricing tier, the Step Up Tier 2 Adding Credit, in Tape A securities.
    The proposed changes respond to the current competitive environment 
where order flow providers have a choice of where to direct liquidity-
providing orders by offering further incentives for member 
organizations to send additional displayed liquidity to the Exchange.
    The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes effective 
October 1, 2019.
Competitive Environment
    The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for 
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, 
products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, 
the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in 
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current 
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in 
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most 
important to investors and listed companies.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37495, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (Final Rule) 
(``Regulation NMS'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As the Commission itself recognized, the market for trading 
services in NMS stocks has become ``more fragmented and competitive.'' 
\5\ Indeed, equity trading is currently dispersed across 13 
exchanges,\6\ 31 alternative trading systems,\7\ and numerous broker-
dealer internalizers and wholesalers, all competing for order flow. 
Based on publicly-available information, no single exchange has more 
than 18% market share (whether including or excluding auction 
volume).\8\ Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power 
in the execution of equity order flow. More specifically, for the month 
of August 2019, the Exchange's market share of intraday trading (i.e., 
excluding auctions) in Tapes A, B and C securities was only 9.3%.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808, 84 FR 5202, 
5253 (February 20, 2019) (File No. S7-05-18) (Transaction Fee Pilot 
for NMS Stocks Final Rule) (``Transaction Fee Pilot'').
    \6\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume 
Summary, available at http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/. See generally https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/divisionsmarketregmrexchangesshtml.html.
    \7\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData. A list of 
alternative trading systems registered with the Commission is 
available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm.
    \8\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary, 
available at http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
    \9\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
move order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of 
products, in response to fee changes. With respect to non-marketable 
order flow that would provide displayed liquidity on an Exchange, 
member organizations can choose from any one of the 13 currently 
operating registered exchanges to route such order flow. Accordingly, 
competitive forces constrain exchange transaction fees that relate to 
orders that would provide liquidity on an exchange.
    In response to this competitive environment, the Exchange has 
established incentives for its member organizations who submit orders 
that provide liquidity on the Exchange. The proposed fee change is 
designed to attract additional order flow to the Exchange by offering a 
new pricing tier to incentivize member organizations to step up their 
liquidity-providing orders on the Exchange on all tapes.

[[Page 56861]]

Proposed Rule Change
    The Exchange proposes to adopt a ``Step Up Tier 2 Adding Credit'' 
that would offer a higher credit to member organizations that qualify 
for the tier. The proposed tier would also offer an additional credit 
for member organizations providing displayed liquidity in Tapes B and C 
securities.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Exchange proposes several non-substantive conforming 
changes to the existing Step Up Tier Adding Credit. First, the 
existing tier would be re-numbered ``Step Up Tier 1 Adding Credit.'' 
Second, romanette (i) would be moved so as to make the phrase ``has 
Adding ADV, excluding any liquidity added by a DMM, that is'' in 
romanette (ii) redundant, and the phrase would accordingly be 
deleted. Third, the outdated reference to ``Non-Display Reserve 
order'' would be replaced with ``Non-Displayed Limit Orders,'' which 
is the current usage in Rule 7.31(d)(2). Finally, the outdated 
phrase ``traded pursuant to Unlisted Trading Privileges (Tapes B and 
C) on the Pillar Trading Platform'' would be replaced with ``Tapes B 
and C Securities,'' and the ``s'' in securities would be 
capitalized. These last two changes would be reflected in the 
proposed Step Up Tier 2 Adding Credit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As proposed, a member organization that sends orders, except Mid-
Point Liquidity Orders (``MPL'') and Non-Displayed Limit Orders, that 
add liquidity (``Adding ADV'') in Tape A securities would receive a 
credit of $0.0029 if:
     The member organization quotes at least 15% of the 
National Best Bid or Offer (``NBBO'') \11\ in 300 or more Tape A 
securities on a monthly basis, and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Rule 1.1(q) (defining ``NBBO'' to mean the national 
best bid or offer).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The member organization's Adding ADV as a percentage of 
NYSE consolidated average daily volume (``CADV''),\12\ excluding any 
orders by a Designated Market Maker (``DMM''), is at least two times 
more than the member organization's July 2019 Adding ADV as a 
percentage of NYSE CADV, and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The terms ``ADV'' and ``CADV'' are defined in footnote * of 
the Price List.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     the member organization's Adding ADV as a percentage of 
NYSE CADV, excluding any liquidity added by a DMM, exceeds that member 
organization's Adding ADV in July 2019 taken as a percentage of NYSE 
CADV as follows:
     For the billing month of October 2019, an Adding ADV, 
excluding any liquidity added by a DMM, that is at least 0.35% of NYSE 
CADV over that member organization's July 2019 Adding ADV taken as a 
percentage of NYSE CADV.
     For the billing month of November 2019, an Adding ADV, 
excluding any liquidity added by a DMM, that is at least 0.70% of NYSE 
CADV over that member organization's July 2019 Adding ADV taken as a 
percentage of NYSE CADV.
     For the billing month of December 2019 and for every month 
thereafter, an Adding ADV, excluding any liquidity added by a DMM, that 
is at least 1.05% of NYSE CADV over that member organization's July 
2019 Adding ADV taken as a percentage of NYSE CADV.
    In addition, a member organization that meets these requirements, 
and thus qualifies for the $0.0029 credit in Tape A securities, would 
be eligible to receive an additional $0.00005 per share if trades in 
Tapes B and C securities against the member organization's orders that 
add liquidity, excluding orders as a Supplemental Liquidity Provider 
(``SLP''), equal to at least 0.20% of Tape B and Tape C CADV combined. 
The proposed additional credit mirrors the additional credits offered 
in current Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3 and Tier 4 for trades in Tapes B and 
C securities against a member organization's orders that add liquidity, 
excluding orders as an SLP, equal to at least a specified percentage of 
Tape B and Tape C CADV combined.
    For example, member organization A has an Adding ADV of 12 million 
shares when NYSE CADV (Tape A) was 3.0 billion, or 0.40% of NYSE CADV 
in all Tape A securities, in the baseline month of July 2019 (the 
``Baseline Month''). Member organization A also has an Adding ADV of 
0.75% of US CADV in Tape A securities in October 2019.
    Based on the foregoing, member organization A would meet the 0.35% 
step up requirement for October 2019 but fall short of the two times 
Adding ADV as a percentage of NYSE CADV requirement in order to qualify 
for the proposed tier. In order to qualify for the proposed rate in 
October 2019, member organization A would need two times its 0.40% of 
NYSE CADV in the Baseline Month or at least 0.80% of NYSE CADV. In 
order to qualify for the proposed rate in November 2019, member 
organization A would need at least 1.10% share of NYSE CADV. In order 
to qualify for December 2019 and subsequent months, member organization 
A would need at least 1.45% share.
    If member organization B had an Adding ADV of 0.05% of NYSE CADV in 
the Baseline Month, that firm would need an Adding ADV share of NYSE 
CADV of at least 0.40% in October 2019, 0.75% in November 2019, and 
1.10% in December 2019 and onward in order to qualify for the proposed 
rate. By meeting the percentage CADV step up requirement in the 
respective billing months, member organization B with a smaller Adding 
ADV would also meet the two times Adding ADV as a percent of NYSE 
requirement.
    The purpose of this proposed change is to incentivize member 
organizations to increase the liquidity-providing orders in Tape A 
securities they send to the Exchange, which would support the quality 
of price discovery on the Exchange and provide additional price 
improvement opportunities for incoming orders. The Exchange believes 
that by correlating the amount of the credit to the level of orders 
sent by a member organization that add liquidity, the Exchange's fee 
structure would incentivize member organizations to submit more orders 
that add liquidity to the Exchange, thereby increasing the potential 
for price improvement to incoming marketable orders submitted to the 
Exchange.
    The Exchange proposes a higher credit under the proposed Step Up 
Tier 2 compared with the current Step Up Tier to provide an incentive 
for member organizations to send more orders because they would then 
qualify for the credit. As noted above, the Exchange operates in a 
competitive environment, particularly as it relates to attracting non-
marketable orders, which add liquidity to the Exchange. Because, as 
proposed, the tier requires a member organization to increase the 
volume of its trades against orders that add liquidity over that member 
organization's July 2019 baseline at increasing levels in October 2019, 
November 2019, December 2019 and thereafter at the December 2019 level, 
the Exchange believes that the proposed higher credit would provide an 
incentive for member organizations to route additional liquidity to the 
Exchange in order to qualify for it.
    The Exchange does not know how much order flow member organizations 
choose to route to other exchanges or to off-exchange venues. There are 
currently no firms that could qualify for the proposed higher Step Up 
Tier 2 Adding Credit based on their current trading profile on the 
Exchange, but believes that at least 8 member organizations could 
qualify for the tier if they so choose. However, without having a view 
of member organization's activity on other exchanges and off-exchange 
venues, the Exchange has no way of knowing whether this proposed rule 
change would result in any member organization directing orders to the 
Exchange in order to qualify for the new tier.
    Each of the proposed changes are not otherwise intended to address 
other issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any significant problems 
that market participants would have in complying with the proposed 
changes.

[[Page 56862]]

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\13\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\14\ in particular, 
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons 
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between 
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) & (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposed Change Is Reasonable
    As discussed above, the Exchange operates in a highly fragmented 
and competitive market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its 
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining 
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, 
in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market 
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized 
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably 
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that 
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Regulation NMS, 70 FR at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the 
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can 
move order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of 
products, in response to fee changes. With respect to non-marketable 
orders which provide liquidity on an Exchange, member organizations can 
choose from any one of the 13 currently operating registered exchanges 
to route such order flow. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain 
exchange transaction fees that relate to orders that would provide 
displayed liquidity on an exchange. Stated otherwise, changes to 
exchange transaction fees can have a direct effect on the ability of an 
exchange to compete for order flow.
    Given this competitive environment, the proposal represents a 
reasonable attempt to attract additional order flow to the Exchange. As 
noted, the Exchange's market share of intraday trading (i.e., excluding 
auctions) for the month of August 2019, in Tapes A, B and C securities 
was only 9.3%.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See notes 8-9 supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed Step Up Tier 
2 would provide an incentive for member organizations to route 
additional liquidity-providing orders to the Exchange in Tape A 
securities. As noted above, the Exchange operates in a highly 
competitive environment, particularly for attracting non-marketable 
order flow that provides liquidity on an exchange. The Exchange 
believes it is reasonable to provide a higher credit for orders that 
provide additional liquidity. The Exchange believes that requiring 
member organizations to quote at least 15% of the NBBO in 300 or more 
securities on a monthly basis in order to qualify for the proposed Step 
Up Tier 2 Adding Credit is reasonable because it would encourage 
additional displayed liquidity on the Exchange and because market 
participants benefit from the greater amounts of displayed liquidity 
present on the Exchange. Similarly, the Exchange believes that it is 
reasonable to provide an incremental credit to member organizations 
that meet the requirements of the Step Up Tier that add additional 
liquidity in UTP securities on Pillar.
    Since the proposed Step Up Tier 2 would be new with a requirement 
for increased Adding ADV over the baseline month, no member 
organization currently qualifies for the proposed pricing tier. As 
previously noted, there are a number of member organizations that could 
qualify for the proposed higher credit but without a view of member 
organization activity on other exchanges and off-exchange venues, the 
Exchange has no way of knowing whether the proposed rule change would 
result in any member organization qualifying for the tier. The Exchange 
believes the proposed higher credit is reasonable as it would provide 
an additional incentive for member organizations to direct their order 
flow to the Exchange and provide meaningful added levels of liquidity 
in order to qualify for the higher credit, thereby contributing to 
depth and market quality on the Exchange.
The Proposal Is an Equitable Allocation of Fees
    The Exchange believes its proposal equitably allocates its fees 
among its market participants.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed Step Up Tier 2 is equitable 
because the magnitude of the additional credit is not unreasonably high 
relative to the other adding tier credits, which noted above range from 
$0.0015 to $0.0022, in comparison to the credits paid by other 
exchanges for orders that provide additional step up liquidity.\17\ The 
Exchange believes the proposed rule change would improve market quality 
for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a consequence, 
attract more liquidity to the Exchange, thereby improving market-wide 
quality and price discovery. The Exchange believes that requiring 
member organizations to quote at least 15% of the NBBO in 300 or more 
securities on a monthly basis in order to qualify for the proposed 
credit would also encourage additional displayed liquidity on the 
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Cboe BZX Fee Schedule, which has adding credits ranging 
from $0.0025 to $0.0032, at https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/bzx/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the proposed Step Up Tier 2 would be new, no member 
organization currently qualifies for it. As noted, there are currently 
no member organizations that could qualify for the proposed higher 
credit, but without a view of member organization activity on other 
exchanges and off-exchange venues, the Exchange has no way of knowing 
whether this proposed rule change would result in any member 
organization qualifying for the tier. The Exchange believes the 
proposed higher credit is reasonable as it would provide an additional 
incentive for member organizations to direct their order flow to the 
Exchange and provide meaningful added levels of liquidity in order to 
qualify for the higher credit, thereby contributing to depth and market 
quality on the Exchange.
    The proposal neither targets nor will it have a disparate impact on 
any particular category of market participant. All member organizations 
would be eligible to qualify for the higher credit proposed in Step Up 
Tier 2 if they increase their Adding ADV over their own baseline of 
order flow. The Exchange believes that offering a higher step up credit 
for providing liquidity if the step up requirements for Tape A 
securities are met, will continue to attract order flow and liquidity 
to the Exchange, thereby providing additional price improvement 
opportunities on the Exchange and benefiting investors generally. As to 
those market participants that do not presently qualify for the adding 
liquidity credits, the proposal will not adversely impact their 
existing pricing or their ability to qualify for other credits provided 
by the Exchange.
The Proposal Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly 
discriminatory. In the prevailing competitive environment, member 
organizations are free to disfavor the Exchange's pricing if

[[Page 56863]]

they believe that alternatives offer them better value.
    The Exchange believes it is not unfairly discriminatory to provide 
a higher per share step up credit, as the proposed credit would be 
provided on an equal basis to all member organizations that add 
liquidity by meeting the new proposed Step Up 2 Tier's requirements. 
For the same reason, the Exchange believes it is not unfairly 
discriminatory to provide an additional incremental credit to member 
organizations that satisfy the Step Up Tier 2 requirements and add 
liquidity in UTP securities. Further, the Exchange believes the 
proposed Step Up Tier 2 credit would incentivize member organizations 
that meet the current tiered requirements to send more orders to the 
Exchange to qualify for higher credits. The Exchange also believes that 
the proposed change is not unfairly discriminatory because it is 
reasonably related to the value to the Exchange's market quality 
associated with higher volume. Finally, the submission of orders to the 
Exchange is optional for member organizations in that they could choose 
whether to submit orders to the Exchange and, if they do, the extent of 
its activity in this regard.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant 
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement 
regarding the burden on competition.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal 
is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\18\ the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes 
that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of additional 
liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price 
discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities 
for member organizations. As a result, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation 
NMS of fostering integrated competition among orders, which promotes 
``more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, 
large and small.'' \19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
    \19\ Regulation NMS, 70 FR at 37498-99.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Intramarket Competition. The proposed changes are designed to 
attract additional order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes 
that the proposed changes would continue to incentivize market 
participants to direct displayed order flow to the Exchange. Greater 
liquidity benefits all market participants on the Exchange by providing 
more trading opportunities and encourages member organizations to send 
orders, thereby contributing to robust levels of liquidity, which 
benefits all market participants on the Exchange. The proposed credits 
would be available to all similarly-situated market participants, and, 
as such, the proposed change would not impose a disparate burden on 
competition among market participants on the Exchange.
    Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily choose to 
send their orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues if they 
deem fee levels at those other venues to be more favorable. As noted, 
the Exchange's market share of intraday trading (i.e., excluding 
auctions) for the month of August 2019, in Tapes A, B and C securities 
was only 9.3%.\20\ In such an environment, the Exchange must 
continually adjust its fees and rebates to remain competitive with 
other exchanges and with off-exchange venues. Because competitors are 
free to modify their own fees and credits in response, and because 
market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices, 
the Exchange does not believe its proposed fee change can impose any 
burden on intermarket competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See notes 8-9 supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed change could promote 
competition between the Exchange and other execution venues, including 
those that currently offer similar order types and comparable 
transaction pricing, by encouraging additional orders to be sent to the 
Exchange for execution. The Exchange also believes that the proposed 
change is designed to provide the public and investors with a Price 
List that is clear and consistent, thereby reducing burdens on the 
marketplace and facilitating investor protection.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \21\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 
19b-4 \22\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other 
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \23\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSE-2019-53 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2019-53. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the

[[Page 56864]]

Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from 
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official 
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of 
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted 
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do 
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment 
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSE-2019-53 and should be submitted on or before November 13, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-23052 Filed 10-22-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


