
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 51 (Friday, March 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14265-14269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05403]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80236; File No. SR-FICC-2017-003]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; 
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 
1 Thereto, To Expand the Types of Entities That Are Eligible To 
Participate in Fixed Income Clearing Corporation as Sponsored Members 
and Make Other Changes

March 14, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on March 1, 2017, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change. On March 13, 2017, FICC filed Amendment No. 1 to 
the proposed rule change, which amended and replaced the original 
filing in its entirety. The proposed rule change, as modified by 
Amendment No. 1, is described in Items I, II and III below, which Items 
have been prepared by the clearing agency.\3\ The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, 
as modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ FICC previously filed SR-FICC-2017-003 on March 1, 2017, 
which is being amended and replaced in its entirety by this proposed 
rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the 
Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change consists of amendments to the Government 
Securities Division (``GSD'') Rulebook (``Rules'') \4\ that would (i) 
expand the types of entities that are eligible to participate in FICC 
as Sponsored Members under Rule 3A (Sponsoring Members and Sponsored 
Members) and (ii) make the following other amendments and 
clarifications to the Rules:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Capitalized terms not defined herein are defined in the 
Rules, available at http://www.dtcc.com/legal/rules-and-procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Clarify that the ``Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account'' 
definition in Rule 1 (Definitions) refers to an ``Account'' as defined 
in Rule 1;
     Amend Section 7 of Rule 3A to reference the application of 
fails charges to a Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account and to correct 
certain typographical errors;
     Amend Section 9 of Rule 3A to correct an out-of-date 
cross-reference to Rule 13 (Funds-Only Settlement);
     Amend Section 10 of Rule 3A to reflect the current 
Clearing Fund calculation procedures applicable to a Sponsoring Member 
Omnibus Account and to correct certain out-of-date cross-references to 
Rule 4 (Clearing Fund and Loss Allocation);
     Amend Section 12 of Rule 3A to reflect the current loss 
allocation process applicable to Sponsored Member Trades in the event 
that the Sponsoring Member is insolvent or otherwise in default to FICC 
and to correct certain out-of-date cross-references to Rule 4 and 
certain typographical errors;
     Amend Sections 13 and 14 of Rule 3A to correct certain 
out-of-date cross-references to Rule 21 (Restrictions on Access to 
Services); and
     Amend Section 15 of Rule 3A to specify the standard with 
respect to which a Sponsoring Member is deemed by FICC to have 
knowledge that one of its Sponsored Members is insolvent or is 
otherwise unable to perform on any of its material contracts, 
obligations or agreements for purposes of the Sponsoring Member's 
obligation to inform FICC of such matter.

II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the clearing agency included 
statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule 
change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule 
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places 
specified in Item IV below. The clearing agency has prepared summaries, 
set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant 
aspects of such statements.

(A) Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis 
for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    This filing constitutes Amendment No. 1 (``Amendment'') to Rule 
Filing SR-FICC-2017-003 (``Rule Filing'') previously filed by FICC on 
March 1, 2017. This Amendment amends and replaces the Rule Filing in 
its entirety. FICC submits this Amendment in order to clarify the 
Sponsored Member eligibility requirement as proposed herein.
    The proposed rule change would expand the types of entities that 
are

[[Page 14266]]

eligible to participate in FICC as Sponsored Members under Rule 3A 
(Sponsoring Members and Sponsored Members).
    This filing also contains proposed rule changes that are not 
related to the proposed expansion of entity types eligible to be 
Sponsored Members but would provide specificity, clarity and additional 
transparency to the Rules.
(i) Background on the Proposed Expansion of Sponsored Member 
Eligibility
    In 2005, the Commission approved FICC rule filing SR-FICC-2004-
22,\5\ which established a Sponsoring Member-Sponsored Member 
relationship in the Rules. Under Rule 3A (Sponsoring Members and 
Sponsored Members), Bank Netting Members that are well-capitalized (as 
defined under applicable regulations) and have at least $5 billion in 
equity capital are permitted to sponsor certain institutional firms 
(Sponsored Members) into GSD membership.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51896 (June 21, 2005), 
70 FR 36981 (June 27, 2005) (SR-FICC-2004-22).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under Rule 3A, a Sponsoring Member is permitted to submit to FICC 
for comparison, novation and netting certain types of eligible 
transactions between itself and its Sponsored Members (Sponsored Member 
Trades).\6\ The Sponsoring Member is required to establish an omnibus 
account at FICC for all of its Sponsored Members' FICC-cleared activity 
(Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account),\7\ which is separate from the 
Sponsoring Member's regular netting account. For operational and 
administrative purposes, FICC interacts solely with the Sponsoring 
Member as agent for purposes of the day-to-day satisfaction of its 
Sponsored Members' obligations to FICC, including their securities and 
funds-only settlement obligations.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Rule 1, definition of ``Sponsored Member Trades.'' 
Rules, supra note 4.
    \7\ See Rule 1, definition of ``Sponsoring Member Omnibus 
Account.'' Id.
    \8\ See Rule 3A, Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Novation of eligible trading activity to FICC provides Sponsoring 
Members and their Sponsored Members the benefits of FICC's independent 
risk management and guaranty of completion of settlement of such 
trading activity. In addition, Sponsoring Members also may be able to 
offset on their balance sheets their obligations to FICC on Sponsored 
Member Trades against their obligations to FICC on other eligible FICC-
cleared activity, as well as take lesser capital charges than would be 
required to the extent they engaged in the same trading activity with 
their Sponsored Members outside of a central counterparty.\9\ By 
potentially alleviating balance sheet and capital constraints on their 
Sponsoring Members, participation in FICC as Sponsored Members may 
afford eligible institutional firms increased lending capacity and 
income.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Sponsoring Members interested in such relief should discuss 
this matter with their accounting and regulatory capital experts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, eligibility to become a Sponsored Member is limited to 
an entity that is a registered Investment Company under the Investment 
Company Act of 1940,\10\ is a ``qualified institutional buyer'' as 
defined in Rule 144A \11\ under the Securities Act of 1933,\12\ and has 
at least one Sponsoring Member willing to sponsor the entity into GSD 
membership.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq. The Sponsoring Member-Sponsored 
Member relationship has historically been based on a custodial 
banking arrangement in which the Sponsored Member Trades novated to 
FICC reflect investments by the Sponsoring Member of a registered 
Investment Company Sponsored Member's cash through Repo 
Transactions. However, a custodial banking relationship between a 
Sponsored Member and its Sponsoring Member(s) is not required under 
the Rules.
    \11\ See 17 CFR 230.144A.
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.
    \13\ Currently, GSD has one Sponsoring Member and 1422 Sponsored 
Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change would eliminate the requirement that a 
Sponsored Member be a registered Investment Company under the 
Investment Company Act of 1940. Nevertheless, in order to ensure that 
Sponsored Members are financially sophisticated, FICC would retain the 
current requirement that a Sponsored Member be a ``qualified 
institutional buyer'' to the extent that its legal entity type falls 
under one of the enumerated categories of Rule 144A's definition of a 
``qualified institutional buyer.'' For institutional firms whose entity 
types do not clearly fall into one of the enumerated categories in Rule 
144A's definition of ``qualified institutional buyer,'' FICC would 
instead require such Sponsored Members to satisfy the financial 
requirements that an entity specifically listed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) 
of Rule 144A must satisfy in order to be a ``qualified institutional 
buyer'' as specified in that paragraph. Under this alternative 
requirement, institutional firms whose entity types are not expressly 
included within the definition of ``qualified institutional buyer'' in 
Rule 144A (such as non-U.S. sovereign wealth funds) would be eligible 
to be Sponsored Members, provided they satisfy the financial 
requirements that an entity specifically listed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) 
of Rule 144A must satisfy in order to be a ``qualified institutional 
buyer'' as specified in that paragraph. Because conceptions of 
financial sophistication may change with time, FICC believes it is 
appropriate to tie this requirement to the definition of ``qualified 
institutional buyer'' in Rule 144A, as such definition may be amended 
from time to time.
    FICC believes that expanding eligibility to become a Sponsored 
Member beyond registered Investment Companies under the Investment 
Company Act of 1940 is appropriate because FICC's risk management of 
the Sponsoring Member-Sponsored Member relationship occurs primarily at 
the Sponsoring Member level,\14\ and the proposed expansion of the 
entity types eligible to participate in FICC as Sponsored Members (and 
the commensurate potential volume increase in novated activity) would 
not require any changes to FICC's risk management practices applicable 
to Sponsoring Members or to FICC's operational practices applicable to 
the comparison, novation, netting and settlement of Sponsored Member 
Trades.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For example, a Sponsoring Member is responsible under 
Section 10 of Rule 3A for posting to FICC the Required Fund Deposit 
for its Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account, which includes the sum of 
the stand-alone VaR Charges for each of its Sponsored Members' 
novated activity calculated separately. In addition, while Sponsored 
Members are principally liable to FICC for their settlement 
obligations, a Sponsoring Member is also required under Section 2 of 
Rule 3A to provide a guaranty to FICC for such obligations. This 
means that in the event one or more Sponsored Members does not 
satisfy its settlement obligations, FICC is able to invoke the 
guaranty provided by the Sponsoring Member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FICC also believes that the proposed expansion of entity types 
eligible to participate in FICC as Sponsored Members would help to 
safeguard the U.S. financial market by lowering the risk of liquidity 
drain, protecting against fire sale risk,\15\ and decreasing settlement 
and operational risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Fire sale risk is the risk of rapid asset sales of 
securities held by cash lenders when a dealer defaults. This rapid 
sale has the potential to create a market crisis because cash 
lenders are likely to sell large amounts of securities in a short 
period of time, which could dramatically reduce the price of such 
securities that such lenders are looking to sell.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Expanding the types of institutional firms that are eligible to 
participate in FICC as Sponsored Members and thereby benefit from 
FICC's guaranty of completion of settlement of their eligible 
transactions would mitigate the risk of a large scale exit by such 
firms from the U.S. financial market in a stress scenario and therefore 
lower the risk of a liquidity drain in such a scenario. Specifically, 
to the extent institutional firms would otherwise be

[[Page 14267]]

engaging in the same type of eligible trading activity (e.g., 
repurchase agreement transactions) outside of a central counterparty, 
having such activity novated to FICC and subject to FICC's guaranty of 
completion of settlement would reduce the risk that such institutional 
firms discontinue such trading activity in a Netting Member default 
situation.
    Similarly, broadening the pool of entities eligible for central 
clearing at FICC as Sponsored Members would also reduce the potential 
for market disruption from fire sales. Specifically, in a Netting 
Member default situation, the more institutional firms participate in 
FICC as Sponsored Members, the more trading activity with the defaulted 
Netting Member could be centrally liquidated in an orderly manner by 
FICC rather than by individual counterparties in potential fire sale 
conditions.
    Moreover, to the extent institutional firms would otherwise be 
engaging in eligible trading activity (e.g., repurchase agreement 
transactions) outside of a central counterparty, expanding the pool of 
entities eligible to participate in FICC as Sponsored Members would 
also decrease settlement and operational risk in the U.S. financial 
market in that such trading activity would now be eligible to be netted 
and subject to guaranteed settlement, novation and independent risk 
management through FICC.
(ii) Detailed Description of the Proposed Rule Changes Related to the 
Expansion of Sponsored Member Eligibility
A. Proposed Changes to Rule 3A, Sections 2(d) and 3(a)
    Sections 2(d) and 3(a) of Rule 3A currently require that a 
Sponsored Member be a registered Investment Company under the 
Investment Company Act of 1940 and also be a ``qualified institutional 
buyer'' as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.
    FICC is proposing to amend Sections 2(d) and 3(a) of Rule 3A to 
eliminate the requirement that a Sponsored Member be a registered 
Investment Company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
    FICC is also proposing to amend Sections 2(d) and 3(a) of Rule 3A 
to permit institutional firms whose entity types are not expressly 
included within Rule 144A to be Sponsored Members, provided they 
satisfy the financial requirements that an entity specifically listed 
in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of Rule 144A must satisfy in order to be a 
``qualified institutional buyer'' as specified in that paragraph.
    It should be noted that it is currently and, in connection with the 
proposed expansion of entity types eligible to participate in FICC as 
Sponsored Members, would continue to be the responsibility of each 
Sponsored Member and its Sponsoring Member(s) to evaluate whether 
entering into a given Sponsored Member Trade is consistent with a 
Sponsored Member's legal and regulatory requirements, and that FICC has 
no responsibility or liability in the event that a Sponsoring Member 
submits data to FICC for a Sponsored Member Trade that is inconsistent 
with those requirements.
B. Proposed Changes to Rule 3A, Sections 3(c) and 4
    To account for the fact that, as proposed, non-U.S. entities that 
meet the proposed requirements would be permitted to be Sponsored 
Members, FICC is proposing to amend Section 3(c) of Rule 3A to provide 
that Sponsored Members that are FFI Members \16\ would be required to 
be FATCA Compliant and to amend Section 4 of Rule 3A to provide that 
Sponsored Members and their Sponsoring Members would be required to 
comply with global sanctions laws.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Pursuant to Rule 1, the term ``FFI Member'' means ``any 
Person that is treated as a non-U.S. entity for U.S. federal income 
tax purposes.'' For the avoidance of doubt, the term FFI Member also 
includes ``any Member that is a U.S. branch of an entity that is 
treated as a non-U.S. entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes.'' 
Rules, supra note 4.
    \17\ Although GSD has Members, including certain Bank Netting 
Members, which are non-U.S. entities, currently, there are no 
Sponsoring Members that are non-U.S. entities.
    Any future Sponsoring Member or Sponsored Member that is an FFI 
Member will be subject to the same FATCA Compliance screening and 
global sanctions screening as any other Member that is a non-U.S. 
entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(iii) Other Proposed Rule Changes
    This filing also contains proposed rule changes that are unrelated 
to the proposed expansion of entity types eligible to be Sponsored 
Members. These proposed rule changes would provide specificity, clarity 
and additional transparency to the Rules as described below.
A. Proposed Changes to Rule 1 (Definitions)
    FICC is proposing to clarify that the ``Sponsoring Member Omnibus 
Account'' definition in Rule 1 (Definitions) refers to an ``Account'' 
as defined in Rule 1.
B. Proposed Changes to Rule 3A, Section 7
    FICC is proposing to amend Section 7 of Rule 3A to reference the 
application of fails charges \18\ to a Sponsoring Member Omnibus 
Account in the same manner as such charges are applied to Netting 
Members pursuant to Rule 11 (Netting System) and to correct certain 
typographical errors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The term ``fails charge'' refers to the charge imposed by 
FICC on Netting Members for a delivery failure in Treasury 
Securities or debentures issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or the 
Federal Home Loan Banks, pursuant to Section 14 of Rule 11. Rules, 
supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to the application of fails charges, in 2009, FICC 
received Commission approval of a rule filing to impose fails charges 
on Netting Members, which was an action that had been requested of GSD 
by the Treasury Markets Practices Group (``TMPG'') \19\ in order to 
encourage market participants to resolve fails promptly.\20\ The 
approved rule changes were included in Section 14 of Rule 11 (Netting 
System) and were stated to apply to Netting Members. As an account of a 
Netting Member (acting as a Sponsoring Member), FICC has imposed fails 
charges, if applicable, on Sponsoring Members for their Sponsoring 
Member Omnibus Accounts since the implementation of the charges in 
2009. In reviewing the Rules in connection with this present filing, 
FICC believes that the application of the fails charges to a Sponsoring 
Member's Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account should be made clear in Rule 
3A for transparency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ The TMPG is a group of market participants that is active 
in the Treasury securities market and is sponsored by The Federal 
Reserve Bank of New York.
    \20\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59802 (April 20, 2009), 
74 FR 19248 (April 28, 2009) (SR-FICC-2009-03).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Proposed Changes to Rule 3A, Section 9
    FICC is proposing to amend Section 9 of Rule 3A to correct an out-
of-date cross-reference to Rule 13 (Funds-Only Settlement).
D. Proposed Changes to Rule 3A, Section 10
    FICC is proposing to amend Section 10 of Rule 3A to reflect the 
current Clearing Fund calculation procedures applicable to a Sponsoring 
Member's Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account. Specifically, FICC is 
proposing to amend Section 10 of Rule 3A to specify that a Sponsoring 
Member's Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account Required Fund Deposit would 
be equal to the sum of the following: (I) The sum of the VaR Charges 
for all of the Sponsored Members whose activity is represented in the 
Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account as derived pursuant to Section 
1b(a)(i) of Rule 4 (Clearing Fund and Loss Allocation), and (II) all 
amounts derived pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4 other than 
pursuant to Section

[[Page 14268]]

1b(a)(i) of Rule 4 computed at the level of the Sponsoring Member 
Omnibus Account. The proposed rule changes maintain the substance of 
the calculation of the Required Fund Deposit for a Sponsoring Member's 
Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account (i.e., the main charges applicable to 
the individual Sponsored Members in the account are summed and then 
certain components are applied at the level of the Sponsoring Member 
Omnibus Account) but update the rules provisions to reflect the current 
Clearing Fund calculation terminology and delete references to terms 
that are no longer used in the Rules (such as ``Clearing Fund 
components related to Fail Net Settlement Positions and Funds-Only 
Settlement amounts'').
    FICC is also proposing to amend Section 10 of Rule 3A to specify 
that for purposes of calculating the Unadjusted GSD Margin Portfolio 
Amount applicable to a Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account, FICC would 
apply the higher of the Required Fund Deposit calculation as of the 
beginning of the current Business Day and intraday on the current 
Business Day.
    In 2011, FICC received Commission approval to re-calculate each 
Business Day, at times established by FICC for this purpose, the amount 
of the VaR Charge applicable to each Margin Portfolio of a Member, 
based upon the open, intraday positions of such Margin Portfolio, for 
purposes of establishing whether a Member would be required to make 
payment of an additional amount (the Member's ``Intraday Supplemental 
Fund Deposit'') to its Required Fund Deposit.\21\ The approved rule 
changes were included in Section 2a of Rule 4 (Clearing Fund and Loss 
Allocation). Prior to this approval, Clearing Fund requirements 
(including with respect to a Sponsoring Member's Sponsoring Member 
Omnibus Account) were calculated once each Business Day. Since the 
approval of these rule changes in 2011, FICC has calculated the 
Unadjusted GSD Margin Portfolio Amount applicable to a Sponsoring 
Member Omnibus Account based on the higher of the Required Fund Deposit 
calculation as of the beginning of the current Business Day and 
intraday on the current Business Day. In reviewing the Rules in 
connection with this present filing, FICC believes that this 
calculation procedure for the Unadjusted GSD Margin Portfolio Amount 
applicable to a Sponsoring Member Omnibus Account should be made clear 
in Rule 3A for transparency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63986 (February 28, 
2011), 76 FR 12144 (March 4, 2011) (SR-FICC-2010-09).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FICC is also proposing to amend Section 10 of Rule 3A to correct 
certain out-of-date cross-references to Rule 4 (Clearing Fund and Loss 
Allocation).
E. Proposed Changes to Rule 3A, Section 12
    FICC is proposing to amend Section 12 of Rule 3A to reflect the 
current loss allocation process applicable to Sponsored Member Trades 
in the event that the Sponsoring Member is insolvent or otherwise in 
default to FICC. Specifically, FICC is proposing to amend Section 12 of 
Rule 3A to specify that any Remaining Loss incurred by FICC would be 
allocated to the Tier One Netting Members in accordance with the 
principles set forth in Section 7(d) of Rule 4 (Clearing Fund and Loss 
Allocation).
    In 2011, FICC received Commission approval for its current loss 
allocation process set forth in Rule 4, which provides for loss 
mutualization of any Remaining Loss among all Tier One Netting 
Members.\22\ FICC proposes to update references in Section 12 of Rule 
3A to reference the current loss allocation process for Tier One 
Netting Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FICC also proposes to amend Section 12 of Rule 3A to correct 
certain out-of-date cross-references to Rule 4 (Clearing Fund and Loss 
Allocation) and to correct certain typographical errors.
F. Proposed Changes to Rule 3A, Sections 13 and 14
    FICC is proposing to amend Sections 13 and 14 of Rule 3A to correct 
certain out-of-date cross-references to Rule 21 (Restrictions on Access 
to Services).
G. Proposed Changes to Rule 3A, Section 15
    FICC is proposing to amend Section 15 of Rule 3A to specify the 
standard with respect to which a Sponsoring Member is deemed by FICC to 
have knowledge that one of its Sponsored Members is insolvent or is 
otherwise unable to perform on any of its material contracts, 
obligations or agreements for purposes of the Sponsoring Member's 
obligation to inform FICC of such matter. Specifically, FICC is 
proposing to specify that if one or more duly authorized 
representatives of a Sponsoring Member, in its capacity as such, has 
knowledge that one of its Sponsored Members is insolvent or otherwise 
unable to perform on any of its material contracts, obligations or 
agreements, that such knowledge triggers the Sponsoring Member's 
obligation to inform FICC of such matter.
2. Statutory Basis
    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, in part, that the Rules 
be designed to (i) ``promote the prompt and accurate clearance and 
settlement of securities transactions,'' \23\ and (ii) ``remove 
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a national system for the 
prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities 
transactions, and, in general, to protect investors and the public 
interest.'' \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \24\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By expanding the types of entities that may participate in FICC as 
Sponsored Members, FICC believes that the proposed rule change would 
help to safeguard the U.S. financial market by lowering the risk of 
liquidity drain (through FICC's guaranty of completion of settlement 
for a greater number of eligible transactions), protecting against fire 
sale risk (through FICC's ability to centralize and control the 
liquidation of a greater portion of a failed counterparty's portfolio) 
and decreasing settlement and operational risk (by making a greater 
number of transactions eligible to be netted and subject to guaranteed 
settlement, novation and independent risk management through FICC). By 
lowering the risk of liquidity drain in the U.S. financial market and 
protecting against fire sale risk, FICC believes the proposed rule 
change would ``protect investors and the public interest'' consistent 
with the requirements of the Act, cited above. By decreasing settlement 
and operational risk, FICC believes the proposed rule change would also 
``promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of 
securities transactions'' and ``remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a national system for the prompt and accurate clearance 
and settlement of securities transactions'' consistent with the 
requirements of the Act, cited above.
    By providing specificity, clarity, and additional transparency to 
the Rules, the proposed rule changes to Rule 1 (Definitions) and Rule 
3A (Sponsoring Members and Sponsored Members) that are unrelated to the 
proposed expansion of entity types eligible to be Sponsored Members 
would provide Members with a better understanding of the Rules, making 
errors in the performance of their responsibilities to FICC less likely 
to occur and thereby ensuring that FICC's clearing and settlement 
system works efficiently. Therefore, FICC

[[Page 14269]]

believes the proposed rule change would ``promote the prompt and 
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions'' by FICC 
and also ``remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
national system for the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of 
securities transactions'' consistent with the requirements of the Act, 
cited above.

(B) Clearing Agency's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FICC believes that the proposed rule changes associated with the 
expansion of entity types eligible to be Sponsored Members would 
promote competition by increasing the types of entities that may 
participate in FICC as Sponsored Members and therefore permit more 
market participants to utilize FICC's services.
    At the same time, participation in FICC as a Sponsored Member would 
continue to be limited to legal entities that are either ``qualified 
institutional buyers'' as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act 
of 1933, or that otherwise satisfy the financial requirements that an 
entity specifically listed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of Rule 144A must 
satisfy in order to be a ``qualified institutional buyer'' as specified 
in that paragraph, and that have at least one Sponsoring Member willing 
to sponsor them into GSD membership. These limitations may impact 
institutional firms that are unable to satisfy such eligibility 
requirements by excluding them from being able to novate their eligible 
activity to FICC (and avail themselves of the commensurate benefits 
described in Section 3(a)(i)--Background on the Proposed Expansion of 
Sponsored Member Eligibility above). Nevertheless, FICC believes that 
any resulting burden on competition would be necessary and appropriate 
in furtherance of the Act, as permitted by Section 17A(b)(3)(I) of the 
Act,\25\ in light of the fact that such eligibility requirements are 
designed to allow FICC to ensure the financial sophistication of 
Sponsored Members and to prudently manage the risk associated with 
Sponsored Members' participation in FICC. Moreover, FICC would not 
restrict the ability of institutional firms to enter into eligible 
transactions with Netting Members (including Sponsoring Members) 
outside of GSD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(I).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FICC believes that the proposed changes to Rule 1 (Definitions) and 
Rule 3A (Sponsoring Members and Sponsored Members) that are unrelated 
to the proposed expansion of entity types eligible to be Sponsored 
Members would not have an impact, nor impose any burden, on competition 
because each of such proposed changes would simply provide specificity, 
clarity and additional transparency within the Rules.

(C) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change 
Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been 
solicited or received. FICC will notify the Commission of any written 
comments received by FICC.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change, and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the 
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be 
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self- regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the Act. 
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-FICC-2017-003 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2017-003. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of FICC and on 
DTCC's Web site (http://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings.aspx). All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-FICC-2017-003 and should be 
submitted on or before April 7, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-05403 Filed 3-16-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


