
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1415-1419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79711; File No. SR-C2-2016-025]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change 
Relating to Fees for C2 Real-Time Data Feeds

December 29, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on December 19, 2016, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the 
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described 
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the 
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments 
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``C2'') 
proposes to amend fees for certain C2 real-time data feeds. The text of 
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site 
(http://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the Exchange's Office of the 
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Data Fee 
for the BBO and Book Depth Data Feeds and user fees for the Complex 
Order Book (``COB'') Data Feed. These data feeds are made available by 
C2's affiliate Market Data Express, LLC (``MDX''). The Exchange 
proposes to make the following fee changes effective January 1, 2017.
Data Feeds
    BBO Data Feed: The BBO Data Feed is a real-time, low latency data 
feed that includes the following content: (i) Outstanding quotes and 
standing orders at the best available price level on each side of the 
market, with aggregate size (``BBO data''), and last sale data; \3\ 
(ii) totals of customer versus non-customer contracts at the BBO, (iii) 
All-or-None contingency orders priced better than or equal to the BBO, 
(iv) BBO and last sale data for complex strategies (multi-leg 
strategies such as spreads, straddles and buy-writes); (v) expected 
opening price (``EOP'') and expected opening size (``EOS'') information 
that is disseminated prior to the opening of the market and during 
trading rotations, (vi) end-of-day (``EOD'') summary messages that are 
disseminated after the close of a trading session that include summary 
information about trading in C2 listed options (i.e., product name, 
opening price, high and low price during the trading session and last 
sale price), (vii) ``recap messages'' that are disseminated during a 
trading session any time there is a change in the open, high, low or 
last sale price of a C2 listed option, as well as product name and 
total volume traded in the product during the trading session; and 
(viii) product IDs and codes for all C2 listed options contracts. The 
BBO Data Feed includes market data for simple options as well as 
complex strategies. The data in the BBO Data Feed is refreshed 
periodically during the trading session. The BBO and last sale data 
contained in the BBO Data Feed is identical to the data sent to the 
Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') for redistribution to the 
public.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ ``Best bid and offer'' or ``BBO'' data is sometimes referred 
to as ``top-of-book'' data. Data with respect to executed trades is 
referred to as ``last sale'' data.
    \4\ MDX makes available to Customers the BBO data and last sale 
data that is included in the BBO Data Feed no earlier than the time 
at which the Exchange sends that data to OPRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Book Depth Data Feed: The Book Depth Data Feed is a real-time, low 
latency data feed that includes all data contained in the BBO Data Feed 
(as described above) plus outstanding quotes and standing orders for an 
additional four price levels on each side of the market, with aggregate 
size (``Book Depth''). The data in the Book

[[Page 1416]]

Depth Data Feed is refreshed periodically during the trading session.
    COB Data Feed: The COB Data Feed is a real-time data feed that 
includes data regarding the Exchange's Complex Order Book and related 
complex order information. The COB Data Feed contains the following 
information for all C2-traded complex order strategies (multi-leg 
strategies such as spreads, straddles and buy-writes): (i) Outstanding 
quotes and standing orders on each side of the market with aggregate 
size, (ii) last sale data, and (iii) totals of customer versus non-
customer contracts.
Fees
    BBO Data Feed Fees: MDX currently charges a ``Data Fee'', payable 
by a Customer, of $1,000 per month for internal use and external 
redistribution of the BBO Data Feed.\5\ The Data Fee entitles a 
Customer to provide the BBO Data Feed to an unlimited number of 
internal users and Devices \6\ within the Customer. A Customer 
receiving the BBO Data Feed from another Customer is assessed the Data 
Fee by MDX pursuant to its own market data agreement with MDX, and is 
entitled to use the Data internally and/or distribute it externally.\7\ 
All Customers have the same rights to utilize the data internally and/
or distribute it externally as long as the Customer has entered into a 
written agreement with MDX for the data and pays the Data Fee. The 
Exchange proposes to increase the Data Fee from $1,000 per month to 
$1,500 per month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ A ``Customer'' is any person, company or other entity that, 
pursuant to a market data agreement with MDX, is entitled to receive 
data, either directly from MDX or through an authorized 
redistributor (i.e., a Customer or an extranet service provider), 
whether that data is distributed externally or used internally. The 
MDX fee schedule for C2 data is located at https://www.cboe.org/MDX/CSM/OBOOKMain.aspx.
    \6\ A ``Device'' means any computer, workstation or other item 
of equipment, fixed or portable, that receives, accesses and/or 
displays data in visual, audible or other form.
    \7\ A Customer may choose to receive the data from another 
Customer rather than directly from MDX's system because it does not 
want to or is not equipped to manage the technology necessary to 
establish a direct connection to MDX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange currently charges a ``User Fee'', payable by a 
Customer, of $50 per month per Device or user ID for use of the data in 
the BBO Data Feed by ``Display Only Service'' users.\8\ User fees are 
payable only for ``external'' Display Only Service users (Devices or 
user IDs of Display Only Service users who are not employees or natural 
person independent contractors of the Customer, the Customer's 
affiliates or an authorized service facilitator).\9\ The Exchange is 
not proposing to amend the User Fee at this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ A ``Display Only Service'' allows a natural person end-user 
to view and manipulate data using the Customer's computerized 
service, but not to save, copy, export or transfer the data or any 
results of the manipulation to any other computer hardware, software 
or media, except for printing it to paper or other non-magnetic 
media.
    \9\ An entity or person that receives BBO data from a Customer 
through a Display Only Service is not a ``Customer'' unless it has a 
market data agreement in place with MDX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Book Depth Data Feed Fees: MDX currently charges a ``Data Fee'', 
payable by a Customer (as defined above), of $1,000 per month for 
internal use and external redistribution of the Book Depth Data Feed. 
The Data Fee for the Book Depth Data Feed entitles a Customer to 
provide the Book Depth Data Feed to an unlimited number of internal 
users and Devices within the Customer. A Customer receiving the Book 
Depth Data Feed from another Customer is assessed the Data Fee by MDX 
pursuant to its own market data agreement with MDX, and is entitled to 
use the Data internally and/or distribute it externally. All Customers 
have the same rights to utilize the Book Depth data internally and/or 
distribute it externally as long as the Customer has entered into a 
written agreement with MDX for the data and pays the Data Fee. BBO Data 
Feed Customers may upgrade to become Book Depth Data Feed Customers 
without paying any additional Data Fee.\10\ The Exchange proposes to 
increase the Data Fee from $1,000 per month to $1,500 per month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Such Customers would still be subject to Display Only 
Service User Fees as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange currently charges a ``User Fee'', payable by a 
Customer, of $50 per month per Device or user ID for use of the data in 
the Book Depth Data Feed by ``Display Only Service'' users (as defined 
above). User fees are payable only for ``external'' Display Only 
Service users (Devices or user IDs of Display Only Service users who 
are not employees or natural person independent contractors of the 
Customer, the Customer's affiliates or an authorized service 
facilitator).\11\ The Exchange is not proposing to amend the User Fee 
at this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ An entity or person that receives Book Depth data from a 
Customer through a Display Only Service is not a ``Customer'' unless 
it has a market data agreement in place with MDX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    COB Data Feed Fees: MDX currently charges Customers of the COB Data 
Feed a Data Fee of $100 per month plus applicable User Fees (as 
described below). The Data Fee for the COB Data Feed is waived for 
Customers of the C2 BBO and Book Depth Data Feeds.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Such COB Data Feed Customers are still subject to User 
Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MDX charges a Customer User Fees of $25 per month per Device or 
user ID for receipt of the data by ``Professional Users'' \13\. There 
is no charge for receipt of the data by ``Non-Professional Users'' 
\14\. User Fees are subject to a cap of $500 per month (i.e., a 
Customer pays no more than $500 in User Fees for a given month). The 
Exchange proposes to delete this fee cap from the MDX fee schedule for 
C2 data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ A ``Professional User'' is any natural person recipient of 
Data who is not a Non-Professional User (as defined below). User 
Fees for Professional Users are payable for both ``internal'' 
Professional Users (Devices or user IDs of employees of a Customer) 
and ``external'' Professional Users (Devices or user IDs of 
Professional Users who receive the Data from a Customer and are not 
employed by the Customer). (Non-Professional Users must be external 
since a person who uses the COB Data Feed for a commercial purpose 
cannot be a Non-Professional User.)
    \14\ A ``Non-Professional User'' is a natural person or 
qualifying trust that uses Data only for personal purposes and not 
for any commercial purpose and, for a natural person who works in 
the United States, is not: (i) Registered or qualified in any 
capacity with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the 
Commodities Futures Trading Commission, any state securities agency, 
any securities exchange or association, or any commodities or 
futures contract market or association; (ii) engaged as an 
``investment adviser'' as that term is defined in Section 201(11) of 
the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 (whether or not registered or 
qualified under that Act); or (iii) employed by a bank or other 
organization exempt from registration under federal or state 
securities laws to perform functions that would require registration 
or qualification if such functions were performed for an 
organization not so exempt; or, for a natural person who works 
outside of the United States, does not perform the same functions as 
would disqualify such person as a Non-Professional User if he or she 
worked in the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to make a few clean-up changes to the 
MDX fee schedule for C2 data, including removing a few references to a 
January 1, 2015 effective date for prior fee changes and removing the 
$1 per month User Fee for COB Data Feed Non-Professional Users, which 
was eliminated effective January 1, 2015.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, 
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\15\ Specifically, the 
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 
6(b)(4) of the Act,\16\ which requires that Exchange rules provide for 
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges 
among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using its 
facilities. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change is 
consistent

[[Page 1417]]

with the Section 6(b)(5) \17\ requirement that the rules of an exchange 
not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed increases in the Data Fees for the BBO and Book Depth 
Data Feeds are intended to generate revenues that are needed to cover 
C2's actual and anticipated increases in the costs of collecting, 
processing and disseminating options market information and assuring 
the reliability and integrity of that information, as well as increases 
in C2's administrative costs. These costs include enhancements to C2's 
systems that are needed in order to enable C2 to handle the continually 
increasing volume of market information. C2 has not changed the Data 
Fee for BBO data since that fee was established in 2011. C2 has not 
changed the Data Fee for Book Depth data since that fee was established 
effective January 1, 2015.
    The Exchange believes the proposed increase in the Data Fee for BBO 
data is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it would 
apply equally to all Customers. The Exchange believes the proposed Data 
Fee is reasonable because it compares favorably to fees that other 
markets charge for similar products. For example, NASDAQ OMX PHLX 
charges Internal Distributors a monthly fee of $4,000 per organization 
and External Distributors a monthly fee of $5,000 per organization for 
its ``TOPO Plus Orders'' data feed, which like the BBO Data Feed 
includes top-of-book data (including orders, quotes and trades) and 
other market data.\18\ The International Securities Exchange offers a 
``Top Quote Feed'', which includes top-of-book data, and a separate 
``Spread Feed'', which like the BBO Data Feed includes order and quote 
data for complex strategies (i.e., a customer must subscribe to both 
feeds to receive data comparable to the BBO Data Feed). ISE charges 
distributors of its Top Quote Feed a base monthly fee of $3,000 plus 
$20 per month per controlled device. ISE charges distributors of its 
Spread Feed a base monthly fee of $3,000 plus $25 per month per 
controlled device.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See IX. Proprietary Data Feed Fees, TOPO Plus Orders, 
available at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Micro.aspx?id=phlxpricing.
    \19\ See ISE Schedule of Fees available at http://www.ise.com/assets/documents/OptionsExchange/legal/fee/ISE_fee_schedule.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed increase in the Data Fee for 
Book Depth data is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it 
would apply equally to all Customers. The Exchange believes the 
proposed Data Fee is reasonable because it compares favorably to fees 
that other markets charge for similar products. For example, the 
International Securities Exchange offers a ``Depth of Market'' Feed, 
which includes the aggregated volume of all quotes and orders available 
at each of the top five price levels for simple (single legged) 
instruments, and a separate Spread Feed, which like the Book Depth Data 
Feed includes order and quote data for complex strategies (i.e., a 
customer must subscribe to both feeds to receive data comparable to the 
Book Depth Data Feed). ISE charges distributors of its Depth of Market 
Feed a base monthly fee of $5,000 plus $50 per month per controlled 
device. ISE charges distributors of its Spread Feed a base monthly fee 
of $3,000 plus $25 per month per controlled device.\20\ NASDAQ OMX PHLX 
charges Internal Distributors a monthly fee of $4,000 and External 
Distributors a monthly fee of a $4,500 for its Depth of Market data 
feed that includes full depth of quotes and orders and last sale data 
for options listed on PHLX.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Supra Note 17.
    \21\ See IX. Proprietary Data Feed Fees, PHLX Depth Data, 
available at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Micro.aspx?id=phlxpricing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposal to delete the monthly cap on 
User Fees for receipt of the COB Data Feed is equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory because it would apply equally to all 
Customers. The Exchange believes the User Fees, without a fee cap, are 
reasonable because they are similar to fees that other markets charge 
for similar products. For example, NYSE Arca charges $20 per month to 
each Professional User and $1 per month to each Non-Professional User 
for receipt of the Arcabook for Arca Options--Complex data feed. The 
Exchange believes NYSE Arca does not cap its user fees.\22\ Similarly, 
NYSE MKT charges $20 per month to each Professional User and $1 per 
month to each Non-Professional User for receipt of the Arcabook for 
Amex Options Options--Complex data feed. The Exchange believes NYSE MKT 
does not cap its user fees. The Exchange also believes removal of the 
fee cap is reasonable in that it is not anticipated to materially 
affect the amount of User Fees any Customer pays.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See NYSE Market Data Pricing Guide available at 
www.nyxdata.com/doc/241907.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District 
of Columbia Circuit in NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 
2010), upheld reliance by the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') upon the existence of competitive market mechanisms to 
set reasonable and equitably allocated fees for proprietary market 
data:

    In fact, the legislative history indicates that the Congress 
intended that the market system `evolve through the interplay of 
competitive forces as unnecessary regulatory restrictions are removed' 
and that the SEC wield its regulatory power `in those situations where 
competition may not be sufficient,' such as in the creation of a 
`consolidated transactional reporting system.'

    Id. At 535 (quoting H.R. Rep. No. 94-229 at 92 (1975), as reprinted 
in 1975 U.S.C.C.A.N. 323). The court agreed with the Commission's 
conclusion that ``Congress intended that `competitive forces should 
dictate the services and practices that constitute the U.S. national 
market system for trading equity securities.' '' \23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ NetCoalition, 615 F.3d at 535 (Quoting Securities Exchange 
Act Release No. 59039 (December 9, 2008), 73 FR 74770 (December 9, 
2008) at 74771).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained below in the Exchange's Statement on Burden on 
Competition, the Exchange believes that the need to attract order flow 
from market participants provides an effective constraint on the market 
data fees that the Exchange, through MDX, has the ability and the 
incentive to charge. In addition, the existence of alternatives to 
these data products, such as consolidated data and proprietary data 
from other sources, as described below, further ensures that the 
Exchange cannot set unreasonable fees, or fees that are unreasonably 
discriminatory, when vendors and subscribers can select such 
alternatives.
    For the reasons cited above, the Exchange believes the proposed 
fees for the BBO, Book Depth and COB Data Feeds are equitable, 
reasonable and not unfairly discriminatory. In addition, the Exchange 
believes that no substantial countervailing basis exists to support a 
finding that the proposed fees for the BBO, Book Depth and COB Data 
Feeds fail to meet the requirements of the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    C2 does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any 
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    An exchange's ability to price its proprietary market data feed 
products is constrained by (1) the existence of actual competition for 
the sale of such data, (2) the joint product nature of

[[Page 1418]]

exchange platforms, and (3) the existence of alternatives to the 
Exchange's proprietary data.
    The Existence of Actual Competition. The Exchange believes 
competition provides an effective constraint on the market data fees 
that the Exchange, through MDX, has the ability and the incentive to 
charge. C2 has a compelling need to attract order flow from market 
participants in order to maintain its share of trading volume. This 
compelling need to attract order flow imposes significant pressure on 
C2 to act reasonably in setting its fees for market data, particularly 
given that the market participants that will pay such fees often will 
be the same market participants from whom C2 must attract order flow. 
These market participants include broker-dealers that control the 
handling of a large volume of customer and proprietary order flow. 
Given the portability of order flow from one exchange to another, any 
exchange that sought to charge unreasonably high data fees would risk 
alienating many of the same customers on whose orders it depends for 
competitive survival. C2 currently competes with thirteen options 
exchanges (including C2's affiliate, Chicago Board Options Exchange) 
for order flow.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ The Commission has previously made a finding that the 
options industry is subject to significant competitive forces. See 
e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59949 (May 20, 2009), 74 
FR 25593 (May 28, 2009) (SR-ISE-2009-97) (order approving ISE's 
proposal to establish fees for a real-time depth of market data 
offering).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, in the case of products that are distributed through 
market data vendors, the vendors themselves provide additional price 
discipline for proprietary data products because they control the 
primary means of access to certain end users. These vendors impose 
price discipline based upon their business models. For example, vendors 
that assess a surcharge on data they sell are able to refuse to offer 
proprietary products that their end users do not or will not purchase 
in sufficient numbers. Similarly, Customers will not offer the BBO, 
Book Depth or COB Data Feeds unless these products will help them 
maintain current users or attract new ones. For example, a broker-
dealer will not choose to offer the BBO, Book Depth or COB Data Feeds 
to its retail customers unless the broker-dealer believes that the 
retail customers will use and value the data and the provision of such 
data will help the broker-dealer maintain the customer relationship, 
which allows the broker-dealer to increase its revenues. Professional 
users will not request any of these feeds from Customers unless they 
can use the data for profit-generating purposes in their businesses. 
All of these factors operate as constraints on pricing proprietary data 
products.
    Joint Product Nature of Exchange Platform. Transaction execution 
and proprietary data products are complementary in that market data is 
both an input and a byproduct of the execution service. In fact, 
proprietary market data and trade executions are a paradigmatic example 
of joint products with joint costs. The decision whether and on which 
platform to post an order will depend on the attributes of the 
platforms where the order can be posted, including the execution fees, 
data quality, and price and distribution of data products. Without a 
platform to post quotations, receive orders and execute trades, 
exchange data products would not exist.
    The costs of producing market data include not only the costs of 
the data distribution infrastructure, but also the costs of designing, 
maintaining, and operating the exchange's platform for posting quotes, 
receiving orders and executing trades, and the cost of regulating the 
exchange to ensure its fair operation and maintain investor confidence. 
The total return that a trading platform earns reflects the revenues it 
receives from both products and the joint costs it incurs.
    Moreover, an exchange's broker-dealer customers view the costs of 
transaction executions and market data as a unified cost of doing 
business with the exchange. A broker-dealer will only choose to direct 
orders to an exchange if the revenue from the transaction exceeds its 
cost, including the cost of any market data that the broker-dealer 
chooses to buy in support of its order routing and trading decisions. 
If the costs of the transaction are not offset by its value, then the 
broker-dealer may choose instead not to purchase the product and trade 
away from that exchange.
    Analyzing the cost of market data product production and 
distribution in isolation from the cost of all of the inputs supporting 
the creation of market data and market data products will inevitably 
underestimate the cost of the data and data products because it is 
impossible to obtain the data inputs to create market data products 
without a fast, technologically robust, and well-regulated execution 
system, and system and regulatory costs affect the price of both 
obtaining the market data itself and creating and distributing market 
data products. It would be equally misleading, however, to attribute 
all of an exchange's costs to the market data portion of an exchange's 
joint products. Rather, all of an exchange's costs are incurred for the 
unified purposes of attracting order flow, executing and/or routing 
orders, and generating and selling data about market activity. The 
total return that an exchange earns reflects the revenues it receives 
from the joint products and the total costs of the joint products.
    The level of competition and contestability in the market is 
evident in the numerous alternative venues that compete for order flow, 
including 14 options self-regulatory organization (``SRO'') markets, as 
well as various forms of alternative trading systems (``ATSs''), 
including dark pools and electronic communication networks (``ECNs'') 
and internalizing broker-dealers. Competition among trading platforms 
can be expected to constrain the aggregate return that each platform 
earns from the sale of its joint products, but different platforms may 
choose from a range of possible, and equally reasonable, pricing 
strategies as the means of recovering total costs. For example, some 
platforms may choose to pay rebates to attract orders, charge 
relatively low prices for market data products (or provide market data 
products free of charge), and charge relatively high prices for 
accessing posted liquidity. Other platforms may choose a strategy of 
paying lower rebates (or no rebates) to attract orders, setting 
relatively high prices for market data products, and setting relatively 
low prices for accessing posted liquidity. In this environment, there 
is no economic basis for regulating maximum prices for one of the joint 
products in an industry in which suppliers face competitive constraints 
with regard to the joint offering.
    The Existence of Alternatives. C2 is constrained in pricing the 
BBO, Book Depth and COB Data Feeds by the availability to market 
participants of alternatives to purchasing these products. C2 must 
consider the extent to which market participants would choose one or 
more alternatives instead of purchasing the exchange's data. Other 
options exchanges can and have produced their own complex order book 
market data products, and thus are sources of potential competition for 
MDX. For example, as noted above, ISE and NASDAQ OMX PHLX offer market 
data products that compete with the BBO and Book Depth Data Feeds, and 
NYSE Arca and NYSE MKT offer market data products that compete with the 
COB Data Feed.
    The large number of SROs, ATSs and internalizing broker-dealers 
that currently produce proprietary data or are currently capable of 
producing it

[[Page 1419]]

provides further pricing discipline for proprietary data products. Each 
SRO, ATS, and broker-dealer is currently permitted to produce and sell 
proprietary data products, and many currently do. In addition, the OPRA 
data feed is a significant competitive alternative to the BBO and last 
sale data included in the BBO and Book Depth Data Feeds.
    Further, data products are valuable to professional users only if 
they can be used for profit-generating purposes in their businesses and 
valuable to non-professional users only insofar as they provide 
information that such users expect will assist them in tracking prices 
and market trends and making trading decisions.
    The existence of numerous alternatives to the Exchange's products, 
including consolidated data and proprietary data from other sources, 
ensures that the Exchange cannot set unreasonable fees, or fees that 
are unreasonably discriminatory, when vendors and subscribers can elect 
these alternatives or choose not to purchase a specific proprietary 
data product if its cost to purchase is not justified by the returns 
any particular vendor or subscriber would achieve through the purchase.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \25\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \26\ 
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed 
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-C2-2016-025 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2016-025. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2016-025, and should be 
submitted on or before January 26, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-31942 Filed 1-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


