
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70230-70232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27878]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73641; File No. 4-678]


Program for Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Pursuant to 
Rule 17d-2; Order Approving and Declaring Effective a Proposed Plan for 
the Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities Between the Financial 
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. and the Miami International 
Securities Exchange, LLC

November 19, 2014.
    On October 14, 2014, Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC 
(``MIAX'') and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. 
(``FINRA'') (together with MIAX, the ``Parties'') filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or ``SEC'') a plan 
for the allocation of regulatory responsibilities, dated October 13, 
2014 (``17d-2 Plan'' or the ``Plan''). The Plan was published for 
comment on October 23, 2014.\1\ The Commission received no comments on 
the Plan. This order approves and declares effective the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73383 (October 17, 
2014), 79 FR 63448.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Introduction

    Section 19(g)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\2\ among other things, requires every self-regulatory 
organization (``SRO'') registered as either a national securities 
exchange or national securities association to examine for, and enforce 
compliance by, its members and persons associated with its members with 
the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the SRO's own rules, 
unless the SRO is relieved of this responsibility pursuant to Section 
17(d) or Section 19(g)(2) of the Act.\3\ Without this relief, the 
statutory obligation of each individual SRO could result in a pattern 
of multiple examinations of broker-dealers that maintain memberships in 
more than one SRO (``common members''). Such regulatory duplication 
would add unnecessary expenses for common members and their SROs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(1).
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(d) and 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(2), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 17(d)(1) of the Act \4\ was intended, in part, to eliminate 
unnecessary multiple examinations and regulatory duplication.\5\ With 
respect to a common member, Section 17(d)(1) authorizes the Commission, 
by rule or order, to relieve an SRO of the responsibility to receive 
regulatory reports, to examine for and enforce compliance with 
applicable statutes, rules, and regulations, or to perform other 
specified regulatory functions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(d)(1).
    \5\ See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Report of the Senate 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs to Accompany S. 
249, S. Rep. No. 94-75, 94th Cong., 1st Session 32 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To implement Section 17(d)(1), the Commission adopted two rules: 
Rule 17d-1 and Rule 17d-2 under the Act.\6\ Rule 17d-1 authorizes the 
Commission to name a single SRO as the designated examining authority 
(``DEA'') to examine common members for compliance with the financial 
responsibility requirements imposed by the Act, or by Commission or SRO 
rules.\7\ When an SRO has been named as a common member's DEA, all 
other SROs to which the common member belongs are relieved of the 
responsibility to examine the firm for compliance with the applicable 
financial responsibility rules. On its face, Rule 17d-1 deals only with 
an SRO's obligations to enforce member compliance with financial 
responsibility requirements. Rule 17d-1 does not relieve an SRO from 
its obligation to examine a common member for compliance with its own 
rules and provisions of the federal securities laws governing matters 
other than financial responsibility, including sales practices and 
trading activities and practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 240.17d-1 and 17 CFR 240.17d-2, respectively.
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 12352 (April 20, 
1976), 41 FR 18808 (May 7, 1976).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To address regulatory duplication in these and other areas, the 
Commission adopted Rule 17d-2 under the Act.\8\ Rule 17d-2 permits SROs 
to propose joint plans for the allocation of regulatory 
responsibilities with respect to their common members. Under paragraph 
(c) of Rule 17d-2, the Commission may declare such a plan effective if, 
after providing for appropriate notice and comment, it determines that 
the plan is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and for the 
protection of investors; to foster cooperation and coordination among 
the SROs; to remove impediments to, and

[[Page 70231]]

foster the development of, a national market system and a national 
clearance and settlement system; and is in conformity with the factors 
set forth in Section 17(d) of the Act. Commission approval of a plan 
filed pursuant to Rule 17d-2 relieves an SRO of those regulatory 
responsibilities allocated by the plan to another SRO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 12935 (October 28, 
1976), 41 FR 49091 (November 8, 1976).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Proposed Plan

    The proposed 17d-2 Plan is intended to reduce regulatory 
duplication for firms that are common members of both MIAX and 
FINRA.\9\ Pursuant to the proposed 17d-2 Plan, FINRA would assume 
certain examination and enforcement responsibilities for common members 
with respect to certain applicable laws, rules, and regulations. The 
text of the Plan delineates the proposed regulatory responsibilities 
with respect to the Parties. Included in the proposed Plan is an 
exhibit (Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC Rules 
Certification for 17d-2 Agreement with FINRA, referred to herein as the 
``Certification'') that lists every MIAX rule for which FINRA would 
bear responsibility under the Plan for overseeing and enforcing with 
respect to MIAX members that are also members of FINRA and the 
associated persons therewith (``Dual Members'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The proposed 17d-2 Plan refers to these common members as 
``Dual Members.'' See Paragraph 1(c) of the proposed 17d-2 Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, under the 17d-2 Plan, FINRA would assume examination 
and enforcement responsibility relating to compliance by Dual Members 
with the rules of MIAX that are substantially similar to the applicable 
rules of FINRA,\10\ as well as any provisions of the federal securities 
laws and the rules and regulations thereunder delineated in the 
Certification (``Common Rules''). In the event that a Dual Member is 
the subject of an investigation relating to a transaction on MIAX, the 
plan acknowledges that MIAX may, in its discretion, exercise concurrent 
jurisdiction and responsibility for such matter.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See paragraph 1(b) of the proposed 17d-2 Plan (defining 
Common Rules). See also paragraph 1(f) of the proposed 17d-2 Plan 
(defining Regulatory Responsibilities). Paragraph 2 of the Plan 
provides that annually, or more frequently as required by changes in 
either MIAX rules or FINRA rules, the parties shall review and 
update, if necessary, the list of Common Rules. Further, paragraph 3 
of the Plan provides that MIAX shall furnish FINRA with a list of 
Dual Members, and shall update the list no less frequently than once 
each calendar quarter.
    \11\ See paragraph 6 of the proposed 17d-2 Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the Plan, MIAX would retain full responsibility for 
surveillance, examination and enforcement with respect to trading 
activities or practices involving MIAX's own marketplace, including, 
without limitation, registration pursuant to its applicable rules of 
associated persons (i.e., registration rules that are not Common 
Rules); its duties and obligations as a DEA pursuant to Rule 17d-1 
under the Act; and any MIAX rules that are not Common Rules.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See paragraph 2 of the proposed 17d-2 Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion

    The Commission finds that the proposed Plan is consistent with the 
factors set forth in Section 17(d) of the Act\13\ and Rule 17d-2(c) 
thereunder \14\ in that the proposed Plan is necessary or appropriate 
in the public interest and for the protection of investors, fosters 
cooperation and coordination among SROs, and removes impediments to and 
fosters the development of the national market system. In particular, 
the Commission believes that the proposed Plan should reduce 
unnecessary regulatory duplication by allocating to FINRA certain 
examination and enforcement responsibilities for common members that 
would otherwise be performed by MIAX and FINRA. Accordingly, the 
proposed Plan promotes efficiency by reducing costs to common members. 
Furthermore, because MIAX and FINRA will coordinate their regulatory 
functions in accordance with the Plan, the Plan should promote investor 
protection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(d).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.17d-2(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that, under the Plan, MIAX and FINRA have 
allocated regulatory responsibility for those MIAX rules, set forth in 
the Certification, that are substantially similar to the applicable 
FINRA rules in that examination for compliance with such provisions and 
rules would not require FINRA to develop one or more new examination 
standards, modules, procedures, or criteria in order to analyze the 
application of the rule, or a common member's activity, conduct, or 
output in relation to such rule. In addition, under the Plan, FINRA 
would assume regulatory responsibility for certain provisions of the 
federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder that 
are set forth in the Certification. The Common Rules covered by the 
Plan are specifically listed in the Certification, as may be amended by 
the Parties from time to time.
    According to the Plan, MIAX will review the Certification, at least 
annually, or more frequently if required by changes in either the rules 
of MIAX or FINRA, and, if necessary, submit to FINRA an updated list of 
Common Rules to add MIAX rules not included on the then-current list of 
Common Rules that are substantially similar to FINRA rules; delete MIAX 
rules included in the then-current list of Common Rules that are no 
longer substantially similar to FINRA rules; and confirm that the 
remaining rules on the list of Common Rules continue to be MIAX rules 
that are substantially similar to FINRA rules.\15\ FINRA will then 
confirm in writing whether the rules listed in any updated list are 
Common Rules as defined in the Plan. Under the Plan, MIAX will also 
provide FINRA with a current list of common members and shall update 
the list no less frequently than once each quarter.\16\ The Commission 
believes that these provisions are designed to provide for continuing 
communication between the Parties to ensure the continued accuracy of 
the scope of the proposed allocation of regulatory responsibility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See paragraph 2 of the Plan.
    \16\ See paragraph 3 of the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is hereby declaring effective a Plan that, among 
other things, allocates regulatory responsibility to FINRA for the 
oversight and enforcement of all MIAX rules that are substantially 
similar to the rules of FINRA for common members of MIAX and FINRA. 
Therefore, modifications to the Certification need not be filed with 
the Commission as an amendment to the Plan, provided that the Parties 
are only adding to, deleting from, or confirming changes to MIAX rules 
in the Certification in conformance with the definition of Common Rules 
provided in the Plan. However, should the Parties decide to add a MIAX 
rule to the Certification that is not substantially similar to a FINRA 
rule; delete a MIAX rule from the Certification that is substantially 
similar to a FINRA rule; or leave on the Certification a MIAX rule that 
is no longer substantially similar to a FINRA rule, then such a change 
would constitute an amendment to the Plan, which must be filed with the 
Commission pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ The Commission also notes that the addition to or deletion 
from the Certification of any federal securities laws, rules, and 
regulations for which FINRA would bear responsibility under the Plan 
for examining, and enforcing compliance by, common members, also 
would constitute an amendment to the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    This Order gives effect to the Plan filed with the Commission in 
File No. 4-678. The Parties shall notify all

[[Page 70232]]

members affected by the Plan of their rights and obligations under the 
Plan.
    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 17(d) of the Act, that 
the Plan in File No. 4-678, between FINRA and MIAX, filed pursuant to 
Rule 17d-2 under the Act, is approved and declared effective.
    It is further ordered that MIAX is relieved of those 
responsibilities allocated to FINRA under the Plan in File No. 4-678.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(34).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-27878 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


