
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61121-61124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73296; File No. SR-BATS-2014-044]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Rules 
11.13 and 21.9 of BATS Exchange, Inc.

October 3, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the

[[Page 61122]]

``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on September 25, 2014, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and 
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange 
has designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule 
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon filing with 
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend Rule 11.13(a) regarding the 
handling of orders that have been posted to the order book (``BATS 
Book'') \5\ of the Exchange's cash equities trading platform (``BATS 
Equities'') that are subsequently locked or crossed by other Trading 
Centers. Consistent with its practice of offering similar functionality 
for the Exchange's equity options trading platform (``BATS Options'') 
as it does for BATS Equities, the Exchange also proposes to amend Rule 
21.9(a) to make similar changes with respect to BATS Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ As defined in Rule 1.5(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
Web site at http://www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to provide Users of the 
Exchange with additional options with respect to the Exchange's method 
of processing the unfilled balance of a routable limit order that is 
posted to the BATS Book.
    With respect to BATS Equities, the Exchange currently allows Users 
to submit various types of limit orders to the Exchange that are 
processed pursuant to Exchange Rules 11.13(a)(1) and 11.13(a)(2)(B), as 
set forth below. Rule 11.13(a)(1) describes the process by which an 
incoming order would execute against the BATS Book for BATS Equities. 
To the extent an order has not been executed in its entirety against 
the BATS Book, Rule 11.13(a)(2)(B) then describes the process of 
routing marketable limit orders \6\ to one or more Trading Centers, 
including a description of how the Exchange treats any unfilled balance 
that returns to the Exchange following the first attempt to fill the 
order through the routing process. If not filled through routing, and 
based on the order instructions, the unfilled balance of the order may 
be posted to the BATS Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Market orders are also routed away pursuant to Rule 
11.13(a)(2)(A), however the Exchange is not proposing any changes to 
the treatment of routed market orders at this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similarly, with respect to BATS Options, Rule 21.8 describes the 
process by which an incoming order would execute against the BATS 
Options Book.\7\ To the extent an order has not been executed in its 
entirety against the BATS Options Book, Rule 21.9(a)(1) then describes 
the process of routing marketable limit orders \8\ to one or more other 
options exchanges, including a description of how the Exchange treats 
any unfilled balance that returns to the Exchange following the first 
attempt to fill the order through the routing process. If not filled 
through routing, and based on the order instructions, the unfilled 
balance of the order may be posted to the BATS Options Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ As defined in Rule 16.1(a)(9).
    \8\ Market orders are also routed away pursuant to Rule 
21.9(a)(1), however the Exchange is not proposing any changes to the 
treatment of routed market orders at this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to current Exchange rules,\9\ to the extent the unfilled 
balance of an order has been posted to the BATS Book, should the order 
subsequently be locked or crossed by another accessible Trading Center, 
the System \10\ shall route the order to the locking or crossing 
Trading Center if instructed to do so by the User (the ``RECYCLE 
Option''). The Exchange proposes to modify the RECYCLE Option as set 
forth below. At the outset, the Exchange notes that it proposes to re-
name the RECYCLE Option as Re-Route instructions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Rule 11.13(a)(2) for BATS Equities and Rule 21.9(a)(1) 
for BATS Options.
    \10\ As defined in Rule 1.5(aa), the System is the electronic 
communications and trading facility designated by the Board through 
which securities orders of Users are consolidated for ranking, 
execution and, when applicable, routing away.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

BATS Equities
    The Exchange currently offers only one form of RECYCLE, namely, 
that an order will be subject to the RECYCLE Option if it is either 
locked or crossed. The Exchange proposes to retain this functionality 
and to name such functionality the Super Aggressive Re-Route 
instruction, which reference reflects the willingness of the routable 
order posted to the BATS Book to route to away Trading Centers and to 
remove liquidity from such Trading Centers any time such order is 
locked or crossed (i.e., rather than passively waiting for an execution 
on the BATS Book). The Exchange also proposes to add new optional 
functionality that will allow a User to instruct the Exchange to apply 
the Super Aggressive Re-Route instruction solely to routable orders 
posted to the BATS Book with remaining size of less than one round lot.
    In addition to the Super Aggressive Re-Route instruction described 
above, the Exchange proposes to add a second option, the Aggressive Re-
Route instruction, which would subject an order to the routing process 
after being posted to the BATS Book only if the order is subsequently 
crossed by another Trading Center (rather than if the order is locked 
or crossed).
    The Exchange proposes to retain language making clear that unless 
otherwise specified the Re-Route options described above may be 
combined with any of the System routing options specified in paragraph 
(a)(3) of Rule 11.13.
Examples
Example 1--Aggressive Re-Route
    As an example of an order with an Aggressive Re-Route instruction, 
assume the Exchange receives an order to buy 300 shares of a security 
at $10.10 per share. Assume further that the NBBO is $10.09 by $10.10 
when the order is received, and the Exchange's lowest priced offer is 
priced at $10.11. The Exchange will route the order away

[[Page 61123]]

from the Exchange as a bid to buy 300 shares at $10.10. Assume that the 
order obtains one 100 share execution through the routing process and 
then returns to the Exchange. The Exchange will post the order as a bid 
to buy 200 shares at $10.10. If displayed liquidity then appears at one 
or more Trading Centers priced at $10.09 or lower (i.e., crossing the 
posted bid to buy at $10.10), the Exchange will take the displayed bid 
off of the BATS Book and again route such order to the displayed 
liquidity at other Trading Centers.
Example 2--Super Aggressive Re-Route
    As an example of an order with a Super Aggressive Re-Route 
instruction, assume the Exchange receives an order to buy 300 shares of 
a security at $10.10 per share designated with such instruction. Assume 
further that the NBBO is $10.09 by $10.10 when the order is received, 
and the Exchange's lowest priced offer is priced at $10.11. The 
Exchange will route the order away from the Exchange as a bid to buy 
300 shares at $10.10. Assume that the order obtains one 100 share 
execution through the routing process and then returns to the Exchange. 
The Exchange will post the order as a bid to buy 200 shares at $10.10. 
If displayed liquidity then appears in the marketplace priced at $10.10 
or lower, the Exchange will take the displayed bid off of the BATS Book 
and again route such order to the displayed liquidity at other Trading 
Centers.
Example 3--Super Aggressive Re-Route for Odd Lots Only
    Assuming the facts from Example 2 above that results in a 200 share 
order posting to the BATS Book after routing away, if a User has 
elected to apply the Super Aggressive Re-Route instruction solely to 
routable orders posted to the BATS Book with remaining size of less 
than one round lot, then the posted bid to buy 200 shares at $10.10 
would not route off of the BATS Book if displayed liquidity appeared at 
one or more other Trading Centers priced at $10.10 or lower. Assume, 
however, that the posted order to buy 200 shares is later executed on 
the BATS Book against an incoming order to sell 150 shares at $10.10, 
leaving a 50 share order to buy at $10.10. Such order would now be 
subject to the Super Aggressive Re-Route functionality and would route 
to away Trading Centers if locked or crossed.
BATS Options
    In order to maintain consistency between analogous processes 
offered by BATS Equities and BATS Options, the Exchange proposes to 
modify the rules of BATS Options to conform to the changes described 
above related to the Re-Route instruction.
    The proposed Re-Route functionality for BATS Options is similar to 
the proposed functionality for BATS Equities, with the exception of 
language related to odd lot orders. Because, consistent with other 
options exchanges, BATS Options does not categorize any orders as odd 
lot orders or round lot orders, the Exchange has omitted language 
regarding the proposed optional Re-Route functionality applicable to 
odd lot orders for BATS Equities. All other changes for BATS Equities, 
including the rationale and examples described above, are identical for 
BATS Options.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act \11\ and further the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) of the Act \12\ because it is designed to promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, to 
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in 
facilitating transactions in securities, and, in general, to protect 
investors and the public interest. Specifically, the proposed changes 
are designed to provide Users with additional control over their orders 
in the context of a national market system where quotations may lock or 
cross orders posted to the BATS Book. Thus, the proposals are directly 
targeted at removing impediments to and perfect [sic] the mechanism of 
a free and open market and national market system. The proposed rule 
change also is designed to support the principles of Section 11A(a)(1) 
\13\ of the Act in that it seeks to assure fair competition among 
brokers and dealers and among exchange markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule changes would also provide Users with access to 
functionality that may result in the efficient execution of such orders 
and will provide additional flexibility as well as increased 
functionality to the Exchange's System and its Users.
    The Exchange reiterates that the Super Aggressive Re-Route 
instruction is currently contained in Exchange rules as the RECYCLE 
Option. The Exchange believes that adding an optional functionality 
that will only treat orders with size less than a round lot as orders 
with Super Aggressive Re-Route instruction is reasonable because such 
orders are not Protected Quotations under the Act, and thus, are more 
likely to be locked or crossed by external markets. Accordingly, 
allowing such orders to only apply the Super Aggressive Re-Route 
instruction will enhance the likelihood of their prompt execution. The 
Exchange believes that the proposed addition of the Aggressive Re-Route 
instruction is consistent with the Act as it will provide Users with 
another option that may result in the efficient execution of such 
orders and will provide additional flexibility as well as increased 
functionality to the Exchange's System and its Users.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange 
believes that Re-Route functionality generally encourages competition 
by increasing the likelihood of executions of orders that have been 
posted to the Exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on 
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect 
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any 
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as 
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of 
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written 
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a 
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least 
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule 
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative 
delay so that the proposal may

[[Page 61124]]

become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange stated that 
waiver of this requirement would allow the Exchange to immediately 
offer Exchange Users additionally variations of functionality that is 
already available on the Exchange. The Exchange also stated that the 
addition of a variation of Re-Route functionality that applies only 
when an order is crossed by an accessible Trading Center and the odd 
lot variation to the Super-Aggressive Re-Route instruction will benefit 
market participants and their customers by allowing them greater 
flexibility in their efforts to fill orders. The Commission believes 
that the waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore, the 
Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon 
filing.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \17\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-BATS-2014-044 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2014-044. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2014-044 and should be 
submitted on or before October 30, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-24100 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


