
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 234 (Thursday, December 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73214-73223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29042]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-70962; File No. SR-NYSE-2013-76]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend Its Rules Concerning Communications With the Public To Harmonize 
Them With Certain Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. Rules 
and Make Other Conforming Changes

November 29, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Exchange Act'') and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is 
hereby given that on November 15, 2013, New York Stock Exchange LLC 
(``NYSE'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described 
in Items I and II below, which Items have been substantially prepared 
by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. The 
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as constituting a 
``non-controversial'' rule change under Exchange Act Rule 19b-
4(f)(6),\3\ which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this 
filing by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its rules concerning communications 
with the public to harmonize them with certain Financial Industry 
Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') rules and make other conforming 
changes. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the 
Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its rules concerning communications 
with the public to harmonize them with certain FINRA rules and make 
other conforming changes. Set forth below are descriptions of the 
harmonization process, the current NYSE rules, and the proposed NYSE 
rules. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to (i) delete paragraphs 
(a)(1), (d), (i), (j) and (l) of NYSE Rule 472, Supplementary Materials 
472.10(1), (3), (4) and (5), and 472.90, and Interpretations 472/01 and 
472/03 through 472/11; (ii) adopt new rule text that is substantially 
similar to FINRA Rules 2210, 2212, and 9551; and (iii) make other 
conforming changes.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ References to rules are to NYSE rules unless otherwise 
indicated. The remaining provisions of Rule 472 and supplementary 
material and interpretations not addressed in this proposal concern 
research and would remain in place because FINRA and NYSE have not 
yet harmonized their research rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    On July 30, 2007, FINRA's predecessor, the National Association of 
Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD''), and NYSE Regulation, Inc. 
(``NYSER'') consolidated their member firm regulation operations into a 
combined organization, FINRA. Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 17d-2, the 
Exchange, NYSER, and FINRA entered into an agreement (the 
``Agreement'') to reduce regulatory duplication for their members by 
allocating to FINRA certain regulatory responsibilities for NYSE rules 
and rule interpretations (``FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules''). NYSE MKT 
LLC (``NYSE MKT'') became a party to the Agreement effective December 
15, 2008.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Exchange Act Release No. 56148 (Jul. 26, 2007), 72 FR 
42146 (Aug. 1, 2007) (order approving the Agreement); Exchange Act 
Release No. 56147 (Jul. 26, 2007), 72 FR 42166 (Aug. 1, 2007) (order 
approving the incorporation of certain NYSE Rules as ``Common 
Rules''); Exchange Act Release No. 60409 (July 30, 2009), 74 FR 
39353 (Aug. 6, 2009) (order approving the amended and restated 
Agreement, adding NYSE MKT LLC as a party). Paragraph 2(b) of the 
Agreement sets forth procedures regarding proposed changes by FINRA, 
NYSE or NYSE MKT to the substance of any of the Common Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As part of its effort to reduce regulatory duplication and relieve 
firms that are members of FINRA, the Exchange, and NYSE MKT of 
conflicting or unnecessary regulatory burdens, FINRA is now engaged in 
the process of reviewing and amending the NASD and FINRA Incorporated 
NYSE Rules in order to create a consolidated FINRA rulebook.\6\ FINRA 
recently harmonized NASD and FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules and 
interpretations concerning communications with the public.\7\ In that 
filing, FINRA adopted NASD Rules 2210 and 2211 and NASD Interpretive 
Materials 2210-1 and 2210-3 through 2210-8 as FINRA Rules 2210 and 2212 
through 2216 and deleted paragraphs (a)(1), (i), (j) and (l) of FINRA 
Incorporated NYSE Rule 472, FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rule Supplementary 
Materials 472.10(1), (3), (4) and (5) and 472.90, and FINRA 
Incorporated NYSE Rule Interpretations 472/01 and 472/03 through 472/
11. FINRA's rule change became effective on February 4, 2013.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ FINRA's rulebook currently has three sets of rules: (1) NASD 
Rules, (2) FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules, and (3) consolidated FINRA 
Rules. The FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules apply only to those members 
of FINRA that are also members of the NYSE (``Dual Members''), while 
the consolidated FINRA Rules apply to all FINRA members. For more 
information about the FINRA rulebook consolidation process, see 
FINRA Information Notice, dated March 12, 2008.
    \7\ See Exchange Act Release No. 66681 (Mar. 29, 2012), 77 FR 
20452 (Apr. 4, 2012).
    \8\ See FINRA Regulatory Notice 12-29.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current Communications With the Public Rules and Interpretations
    Rule 472(a)(1) requires that each advertisement, sales literature 
or other similar type of communication that is generally distributed or 
made available by a member organization to customers or the public be 
approved in advance by an allied member, supervisory analyst, or 
qualified person designated under the provisions of Rule 342(b)(1).
    Rule 472(d) requires that communications with the public be 
retained in accordance with Rule 440.
    Rule 472(i) provides that no member organization may use any 
communication that contains (i) any untrue statement or omission of a 
material fact or is otherwise false or misleading; (ii) promises of 
specific results, exaggerated or unwarranted claims; (iii) opinions for 
which there is

[[Page 73215]]

no reasonable basis; or (iv) projections or forecasts of future events 
that are not clearly labeled as forecasts.
    Rule 472(j) sets forth specific standards for recommendations, 
records of past performance, projections and predictions, comparisons, 
dating reports, identification of sources, and testimonials.
    Rule 472(l) provides that other communications activities may 
include, but are not limited to, conducting interviews with the media, 
writing books, conducting seminars or lecture courses, writing 
newspaper or magazine articles, or making radio/TV appearances. Member 
organizations must establish specific written supervisory procedures 
applicable to allied members and employees who engage in these types of 
communications activities. These procedures must include provisions 
that require prior approval of such activity by a person designated 
under the provisions of Rule 342(b)(1). These types of activities are 
subject to the general standards set forth in Rule 472(i). In addition, 
any activity that includes discussion of specific securities is subject 
to the specific standards in Rule 472(j).
    Supplementary Materials 472.10(1), (3), (4) and (5) define 
``communication,'' ``advertisement,'' ``market letter,'' and ``sales 
literature,'' respectively. Interpretations 472/01, 472/03, 472/04, and 
472/05 provide additional interpretations relating to these 
definitions. For purposes of Rule 472(a)(1), Supplementary Material 
472.90 defines a ``qualified person'' as one who has passed an 
examination acceptable to the Exchange. Rule Interpretation 472/06 
addresses other communication activities, including public appearances. 
Rule Interpretations 472/08 and 472/09 set forth general and specific 
content standards. Rule Interpretations 472/07, 472/10, and 472/11 
address material externally prepared, guidelines for ``discount'' 
communications, and other regulations, respectively.
Proposed Rule Change
    The Exchange proposes to delete the foregoing rules and 
interpretations relating to communications with the public and adopt 
the text of FINRA Rules 2210, 2212, and 9551, subject to certain 
technical and conforming changes.\9\ As noted in Rule 0, NYSE rules 
that refer to NYSER, NYSER staff or departments, Exchange staff, and 
Exchange departments should be understood as also referring to FINRA 
staff and FINRA departments acting on behalf of the Exchange pursuant 
to the Agreement, as applicable. The Exchange does not propose to adopt 
the text of FINRA Rules 2213, 2214, 2215, and 2216 because they cover 
products that are not traded on the Exchange or a limited exception for 
investment analysis tools that is not being adopted. These rules would 
continue to apply to all Dual Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The technical and conforming changes are that the Exchange 
would (i) substitute the term ``member organization'' for 
``member,'' (ii) substitute the term ``Exchange'' for ``FINRA,'' 
(iii) change certain cross-references to FINRA rules to cross-
references to Exchange rules, and (iv) add supplementary material to 
define the term ``associated person.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Communication Categories
    Under proposed Rule 2210(a), the following three communication 
categories would be established:
     ``Institutional communication'' would include any written 
(including electronic) communication that is distributed or made 
available only to institutional investors, but does not include a 
member organization's internal communications. ``Institutional 
investor'' would include any (i) person described in FINRA Rule 
4512(c), regardless of whether the person has an account with a member 
organization; (ii) governmental entity or subdivision thereof; (iii) 
employee benefit plan, or multiple employee benefit plans offered to 
employees of the same employer, that meet the requirements of Section 
403(b) or Section 457 of the Internal Revenue Code and in the aggregate 
have at least 100 participants, but does not include any participant of 
such plans; (iv) qualified plan, as defined in Exchange Act Section 
3(a)(12)(C), or multiple qualified plans offered to employees of the 
same employer, that in the aggregate have at least 100 participants, 
but does not include any participant of such plans; (v) member 
organization or registered person of such a member organization; and 
(vi) person acting solely on behalf of any such institutional investor.
     ``Retail communication'' would include any written 
(including electronic) communication that is distributed or made 
available to more than 25 retail investors within any 30 calendar-day 
period. ``Retail investor'' would include any person other than an 
institutional investor, regardless of whether the person has an account 
with the member organization.
     ``Correspondence'' would include any written (including 
electronic) communication that is distributed or made available to 25 
or fewer retail investors within any 30 calendar-day period.
    The proposed communication categories would replace the 
communication categories currently defined in Supplementary Material 
472.10(1), (3), (4) and (5).
Approval, Review and Recordkeeping Requirements
    Proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(A) would require an appropriately 
qualified registered principal of the member organization to approve 
each retail communication before the earlier of its use or its filing 
with the Exchange's Advertising Regulation Department (``Department''). 
The principal registration required to approve particular 
communications would depend upon the permissible activities for each 
principal registration category. Current Rule 472(a)(1) requires prior 
approval of certain communications by an allied member, Supervisory 
Analyst, or qualified person designated under the provisions of Rule 
342(b)(1), but the Exchange does not require member organizations to 
file communications with the Exchange.
    Proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(B) would provide that the requirements of 
proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(A) could be met by a Supervisory Analyst 
approved pursuant to Rule 344 with respect to (i) research reports on 
debt and equity securities; (ii) retail communications as described in 
Rule 472.10(2)(a); and (iii) other research that does not meet the 
definition of ``research report'' under Rule 472.10(2), provided that 
the Supervisory Analyst has technical expertise in the particular 
product area. A Supervisory Analyst may not approve a retail 
communication that requires a separate registration unless the 
Supervisory Analyst also has such other registration. As stated above, 
current Rule 472(a)(1) requires prior approval of certain 
communications by an allied member, Supervisory Analyst, or qualified 
person designated under the provisions of Rule 342(b)(1). As such, the 
proposed rule would be limited to approval by Supervisory Analysts only 
and to certain types of communications.
    Proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(C) would provide an exception from the 
principal approval requirements of proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(A) for 
retail communications, if at the time that a member organization 
intends to publish or distribute the retail communication (i) another 
member organization has filed it with the Department and has received a 
letter from the Department stating that it appears to be consistent 
with applicable standards and (ii) the member organization using the 
communication

[[Page 73216]]

in reliance on this exception has not materially altered it and will 
not use it in a manner that is inconsistent with the conditions of the 
Department's letter. The Exchange does not currently have a comparable 
rule because the Exchange has not previously required member 
organizations to file communications with the Exchange.
    Proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(D) would except from the principal 
approval requirements of proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(A) three additional 
categories of retail communications, provided that the member 
organization supervises and reviews such communications in the same 
manner as required for supervising and reviewing correspondence 
pursuant to Rule 342. These communications include (i) any retail 
communication that is excepted from the definition of ``research 
report'' pursuant to Rule 472.10(2)(a), unless the communication makes 
any financial or investment recommendation; (ii) any retail 
communication that is posted on an online interactive electronic forum; 
and (iii) any retail communication that does not make any financial or 
investment recommendation or otherwise promote a product or service of 
the member organization. Under current Rule 342, correspondence and 
communications with the public are subject to all supervisory 
provisions of the Exchange's rules. The proposed rule change would 
specifically delineate these three categories of retail communications 
that would be excepted from the additional principal approval 
requirements under proposed Rule 2210.
    Proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(E) would allow the Exchange, pursuant to 
the Rule 9600 Series, to grant an exemption from the principal approval 
requirements of proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(A) for good cause shown after 
taking into consideration all relevant factors, to the extent that the 
exemption is consistent with the purposes of Rule 2210, the protection 
of investors, and the public interest. Current Rule 9610 sets forth 
procedures for exemptive relief; the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 
9610 by adding a cross-reference to proposed Rule 2210, as described 
below.
    Proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(F) would require, notwithstanding any 
other provision of Rule 2210, a registered principal to approve a 
communication prior to the member organization's filing it with the 
Department. The Exchange does not currently have a comparable rule 
because the Exchange has not previously required member organizations 
to file communications with the Exchange.
    Proposed Rules 2210(b)(2) and (3) generally would impose certain 
supervisory and review requirements with regard to a member 
organization's correspondence and institutional communications. 
Proposed Rule 2210(b)(2) would subject all correspondence to the 
supervision and review requirements already in place under Rule 342. 
Proposed Rule 2210(b)(3) would require each member organization to 
establish written procedures that are appropriate to its business, 
size, structure, and customers for the review by an appropriately 
qualified registered principal of institutional communications used by 
the member organization and its associated persons. Such procedures 
must be reasonably designed to ensure that institutional communications 
comply with applicable standards. When such procedures do not require 
review of all institutional communications prior to first use or 
distribution, they must include provision for the education and 
training of associated persons as to the firm's procedures governing 
institutional communications, documentation of such education and 
training, and surveillance and follow-up to ensure that such procedures 
are implemented and adhered to. Evidence that these supervisory 
procedures have been implemented and carried out must be maintained and 
made available to the Exchange upon request. These requirements are 
similar to current Rule 342.10(B)(v), which provides that 
correspondence and communications with the public are subject to all 
supervisory provisions of the Exchange's rules, and Rule 342.17, which 
requires member organizations to develop written policies and 
procedures that are appropriate for their business, size, structure and 
customers in connection with the review of communications with the 
public relating to their business. Rule 472(c) also requires each 
member organization to establish written procedures reasonably designed 
to ensure that allied members, member organizations and their employees 
are in compliance with Rule 472, which includes both communications 
with the public provisions and research provisions. While proposed Rule 
2210(b)(3) would cover written procedures relating to communications 
with the public, the Exchange would maintain Rule 472(c) to cover 
written procedures for the research provisions that will remain in that 
rule.
    Proposed Rule 2210(b)(4)(A) would set forth the recordkeeping 
requirements for retail and institutional communications. This 
provision would incorporate by reference the recordkeeping format, 
medium and retention period requirements of Exchange Act Rule 17a-
4.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Exchange Act Rule 17a-4(b) requires broker-dealers to 
preserve certain records for a period of not less than three years, 
the first two years in an easily accessible place. Among these 
records, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 17a-4(b)(4), are 
``[o]riginals of all communications received and copies of all 
communications sent (and any approvals thereof) by the member, 
broker or dealer (including inter-office memoranda and 
communications) relating to its business as such, including all 
communications which are subject to rules of a self-regulatory 
organization of which the member, broker or dealer is a member 
regarding communications with the public. As used in this paragraph, 
the term communications includes sales scripts.'' Exchange Act Rule 
17a-4(f) permits broker-dealers to maintain and preserve these 
records on ``micrographic media'' or by means of ``electronic 
storage media,'' as defined in the rule and subject to a number of 
conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 2210(b)(4)(A) specifies that such records would have 
to include:
     A copy of the communication and the dates of first and (if 
applicable) last use;
     The name of any registered principal who approved the 
communication and the date that approval was given;
     In the case of a retail communication or institutional 
communication that is not approved prior to first use by a registered 
principal, the name of the person who prepared or distributed the 
communication; \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ To the extent clerical staff is employed in the preparation 
or distribution of the communication, the records should include the 
name of the person on whose behalf the communication was prepared or 
distributed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Information concerning the source of any statistical 
table, chart, graph or other illustration used in the communication; 
and
     For retail communications that would rely on the exception 
under proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(C), the name of the member organization 
that filed the retail communication with the Department and a copy of 
the Department's review letter.
    Current Rule 440 also incorporates by reference the recordkeeping 
format, medium and retention period requirements of Exchange Act Rule 
17a-4. Current Rule 472(d) provides that communications with the public 
prepared or issued by a member organization must be retained in 
accordance with Rule 440, and the names of the persons who prepared, 
reviewed, and approved the material must be ascertainable from the 
retained records, and those records must be

[[Page 73217]]

readily available to the Exchange upon request. The Exchange proposes 
to delete current Rule 472(d) because proposed Rule 2210(b)(4)(B) would 
address recordkeeping requirements and cross-reference Rule 440 with 
respect to correspondence recordkeeping requirements.
Filing Requirements and Review Procedures
    Proposed Rule 2210(c) would set forth the filing requirements and 
review procedures for retail communications. The Exchange does not 
currently require member organizations to file communications with the 
Exchange, and as such, the Exchange does not currently have a 
comparable rule.
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(1)(A) would require a member organization to 
file with the Department at least 10 business days prior to first use 
any retail communication that is published or used in any electronic or 
other public media, including any generally accessible Web site, 
newspaper, magazine or other periodical, radio, television, telephone 
or audio recording, video display, signs or billboards, motion 
pictures, or telephone directories (other than routine listings). This 
filing requirement continues for a period of one year beginning on the 
date reflected in the Central Registration Depository (``CRD'') system 
as the date that NYSE membership became effective. To the extent any 
retail communication is a free writing prospectus that has been filed 
with the Commission pursuant to Rule 433(d)(1)(ii), promulgated under 
the Securities Act of 1933 (``Securities Act''), the member 
organization may file such retail communication within 10 business days 
of first use rather than at least 10 business days prior to first use.
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(1)(B) would authorize the Department to 
require a member organization to file all of its communications, or the 
portion of the member organization's material relating to specific 
types or classes of securities or services, with the Department at 
least 10 business days prior to first use, if the Department determines 
that the member organization has departed from the standards of the 
proposed rule. The Department would notify the member organization in 
writing of the types of communications to be filed and the length of 
time such requirement is to be in effect. Any filing requirement 
imposed would take effect 21 calendar days after service of the written 
notice, during which time the member organization may request a hearing 
under proposed Rule 9551 \12\ and Rule 9559.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ As discussed below, the Exchange proposes to adopt Rule 
9551, which is substantially similar to FINRA Rule 9551.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(2) would require member organizations to file 
retail communications concerning any registered investment company that 
include self-created rankings and retail communications concerning 
security futures at least 10 business days prior to first use and to 
withhold them from use until any changes specified by the Department 
have been made. The requirement to file retail communications 
concerning security futures prior to first use would not apply to (i) 
retail communications that are submitted to another self-regulatory 
organization having comparable standards pertaining to such 
communications and (ii) retail communications in which the only 
reference to security futures is contained in a listing of the services 
of a member organization. The Exchange does not propose to adopt the 
text of FINRA 2210(c)(2)(C), which requires prior filing of retail 
communications concerning bond mutual funds that include or incorporate 
bond mutual fund volatility ratings as defined in FINRA Rule 2213 (the 
text of which the Exchange also does not propose adopting) because it 
covers products that are not traded on the Exchange, and FINRA Rule 
2213 would continue to apply to all Dual Members.
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(3)(A) would require retail communications 
concerning registered investment companies (including mutual funds, 
exchange-traded funds, variable insurance products, closed-end funds, 
and unit investment trusts) to be filed within 10 business days of 
first use or publication. In addition, the filing of any retail 
communication that includes or incorporates a performance ranking or 
performance comparison of the investment company with other investment 
companies must include a copy of the ranking or comparison used in the 
retail communication. Proposed Rule 2210(c)(3)(B) would require retail 
communications concerning public direct participation programs to be 
filed within 10 business days of first use or publication. The Exchange 
does not propose to adopt the text of FINRA Rule 2210(c)(3)(C), which 
requires prior filing of first use templates for written reports 
produced by, or retail communications concerning an investment analysis 
tool, as such term is defined in FINRA Rule 2214 (the text of which the 
Exchange also does not propose adopting) because it covers a limited 
exception for investment analysis tools that is not being adopted, and 
FINRA Rule 2214 would continue to apply to all Dual Members. As such, 
proposed Rule 2210(c)(3)(C) would be marked ``Reserved.''
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(3)(D) would require member organizations to 
file within 10 business days of first use retail communications 
concerning collateralized mortgage obligations that are registered 
under the Securities Act.
    Under proposed Rule 2210(c)(3)(E), member organizations would have 
to file within 10 business days of first use all retail communications 
concerning any security that is registered under the Securities Act and 
that is derived from or based on a single security, a basket of 
securities, an index, a commodity, a debt issuance or a foreign 
currency, not included within the requirements of paragraphs (c)(1), 
(c)(2) or subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (c)(3) of proposed 
Rule 2210. This provision would exclude retail communications that are 
already subject to a separate filing requirement found elsewhere in 
proposed paragraph (c), such as retail communications concerning 
registered investment companies or public direct participation 
programs.
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(4) would provide that, if a member 
organization has filed a draft version or ``story board'' of a 
television or video retail communication pursuant to a filing 
requirement, then the member organization also must file the final 
filmed version within 10 business days of first use or broadcast.
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(5) would specify that a member organization 
must provide with each filing the actual or anticipated date of first 
use, the name, title and CRD number of the registered principal who 
approved the communication, and the date of approval.
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(6) would provide that each member 
organization's written communications may be subject to a spot-check 
procedure, and that member organizations must submit requested material 
within the time frame specified by the Department.
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(7)(A) would create a filing exclusion for 
retail communications that previously have been filed with the 
Department and that are to be used without material change. Proposed 
Rule 2210(c)(7)(B) would create an exclusion for retail communications 
that are based on templates that were previously filed with the 
Department, the changes to

[[Page 73218]]

which are limited to updates of more recent statistical or other non-
narrative information. Proposed Rule 2210(c)(7)(C) would exclude retail 
communications that do not make any financial or investment 
recommendation or otherwise promote a product or service of the member 
organization.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ This filing exception would have the same scope as the 
proposed exception from the principal pre-use approval requirements 
for retail communications that do not make any financial or 
investment recommendation or otherwise promote a product or service 
of the member organization. See Proposed Rule 2210(b)(1)(D)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Paragraphs (c)(7)(D), (E), (G) and (H) of proposed Rule 2210 would 
create a filing exclusion for retail communications that do no more 
than identify a national securities exchange symbol of the member 
organization or identify a security for which the member organization 
is a registered market maker; advertisements and sales literature that 
do no more than identify the member organization or offer a specific 
security at a stated price; certain ``tombstone'' advertisements 
governed by Securities Act Rule 134; and press releases that are made 
available only to members of the media.
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(7)(F) would create a filing exclusion for 
prospectuses, preliminary prospectuses, fund profiles, offering 
circulars and similar documents that have been filed with the 
Commission or any state, or that are exempt from such registration, 
except that an investment company prospectus published pursuant to 
Securities Act Rule 482 and a free writing prospectus that has been 
filed with the Commission pursuant to Securities Act Rule 433(d)(1)(ii) 
would not be considered a prospectus for purposes of this 
exclusion.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Securities Act Rule 433(d)(1)(ii) requires any offering 
participant, other than the issuer, to file with the Commission a 
free writing prospectus that is used or referred to by such offering 
participant and distributed by or on behalf of such person in a 
manner reasonably designed to lead to its broad unrestricted 
dissemination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(7)(I) would create a filing exclusion for any 
reprint or excerpt of any article or report issued by a publisher 
(``reprint''), provided that the publisher is not an affiliate of the 
member organization using the reprint or any underwriter or issuer of a 
security mentioned in the reprint that the member organization is 
promoting; neither the member organization using the reprint nor any 
underwriter or issuer of a security mentioned in the reprint has 
commissioned the reprinted article or report; and the member 
organization using the reprint has not materially altered its contents 
except as necessary to make the reprint consistent with applicable 
regulatory standards or to correct factual errors.
    Paragraphs (c)(7)(J) and (K) of proposed Rule 2210 would create 
filing exclusions for correspondence and institutional communications. 
Proposed paragraph (c)(7)(L) would exclude from filing communications 
that refer to types of investments solely as part of a listing of 
products or services offered by the member organization.
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(7)(M) would exclude from the filing 
requirements retail communications that are posted on an online 
interactive electronic forum. Proposed Rule 2210(c)(7)(N) would exclude 
from the filing requirements press releases issued by closed-end 
investment companies that are listed on the Exchange pursuant to 
Section 202.06 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (or any successor 
provision).
    The Exchange does not propose to adopt FINRA Rule 2210(c)(8) 
because Section 24(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and Rule 
24b-3 thereunder only apply to a registered national securities 
association, i.e., FINRA. As such, Rule 2210(c)(8) would be marked 
``Reserved.''
    Proposed Rule 2210(c)(9)(A) would allow the Exchange to exempt, 
pursuant to the Rule 9600 Series, a member organization from the pre-
use filing requirements of paragraph (c)(1)(A) for good cause shown. 
Proposed Rule 2210(c)(9)(B) would allow the Exchange to grant an 
exemption from the filing requirements of paragraph (c)(3) for good 
cause shown after taking into consideration all relevant factors, 
provided that the exemption is consistent with the purposes of the 
rule, the protection of investors, and the public interest. Generally, 
this relief would be limited to the same extent as in proposed 
paragraph (b)(1)(E), which would authorize the Exchange to grant 
exemptive relief from the principal approval requirements in proposed 
Rule 2210(b)(1)(A) for retail communications, subject to the same 
standards.
Content Standards
    Proposed Rule 2210(d) would incorporate the current content 
standards applicable to communications with the public that are found 
in Rules 472(i) and (j) and Rule Interpretations 472/08 and 472/09, 
subject to certain changes. Proposed Rule 2210(d)(1) is comparable to 
the general standards for all communications in Rule 472(i) and Rule 
Interpretation 472/08; however, the proposed rule would expand upon 
these general standards.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Consistent with the changes proposed by FINRA, the Exchange 
does not propose to incorporate Rule Interpretations 472/07, 472/10, 
and 472/11, which cover material externally prepared, guidelines for 
``discount'' communications, and other regulations, respectively. 
The Exchange does not believe that it is necessary to address these 
types of communications with the public because they would be 
covered by the general standards of the proposed rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(1)(A) would provide that all member 
organization communications must be based on principles of fair dealing 
and good faith, must be fair and balanced, and must provide a sound 
basis for evaluating the facts in regard to any particular security or 
type of security, industry, or service. In addition, the proposed rule 
would provide that no member organization may omit any material fact or 
qualification if the omission, in light of the context of the material 
presented, would cause the communications to be misleading. Current 
Rule 472(i), which sets forth the general content standards for all 
communications, is comparable to the proposed rule.
    As with current Rule 472(i), which specifically prohibits 
promissory statements, proposed Rule 2210(d)(1)(B) would prohibit a 
member organization from making any false, exaggerated, unwarranted, 
promissory or misleading statement or claim in any communication. In 
addition, no member organization may publish, circulate or distribute 
any communication that the member organization knows or has reason to 
know contains any untrue statement of a material fact or is otherwise 
false or misleading.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(1)(C) would allow information to be placed in 
a legend or footnote only in the event that such placement would not 
inhibit an investor's understanding of the communication. The Exchange 
does not currently have a comparable rule with this specific 
requirement.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(1)(D) would provide that member organizations 
must ensure that statements are clear and not misleading within the 
context in which they are made, and that they provide balanced 
treatment of risks and potential benefits. In addition, communications 
must be consistent with the risks of fluctuating prices and the 
uncertainty of dividends, rates of return and yield inherent to 
investments. The Exchange does not currently have a comparable rule 
with this specific requirement.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(1)(E) would provide that member organizations 
must consider the nature of the audience to

[[Page 73219]]

which the communication will be directed and must provide details and 
explanations appropriate to the audience. The Exchange does not 
currently have a comparable rule with this specific requirement.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(1)(F) would provide that communications may 
not predict or project performance, imply that past performance will 
recur or make any exaggerated or unwarranted claim, opinion or 
forecast; provided, however, the following would not be prohibited:
     A hypothetical illustration of mathematical principles, 
provided that it does not predict or project the performance of an 
investment or investment strategy; and
     A price target contained in a research report on debt or 
equity securities, provided that the price target has a reasonable 
basis, the report discloses the valuation methods used to determine the 
price target, and the price target is accompanied by disclosure 
concerning the risks that may impede achievement of the price target.
    The Exchange does not propose to adopt the text of FINRA Rule 
2210(d)(1)(F)(ii), which references an investment analysis tool, or a 
written report produced by an investment analysis tool, that meets the 
requirements of FINRA Rule 2214 (the text of which the Exchange also 
does not propose adopting) because it covers a limited exception for 
investment analysis tools that is not being adopted, and FINRA Rule 
2214 would continue to apply to all Dual Members. As such, text of 
proposed Rule 2210(d)(1)(F)(ii) would correspond to the text of FINRA 
Rule 2210(d)(1)(F)(iii).
    Current Rule 472(j)(3) provides that any projection or prediction 
must contain the bases or assumptions upon which they are made and must 
indicate that the bases or assumptions of the materials upon which such 
projections and predictions are made are available upon request. The 
proposed rule would make a blanket prohibition against predictions and 
projections and carve out certain exemptions.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(2) would provide that any comparison in 
retail communications between investments or services must disclose all 
material differences between them, including (as applicable) investment 
objectives, costs and expenses, liquidity, safety, guarantees or 
insurance, fluctuation of principal or return, and tax features. 
Similarly, current Rule 472(j)(4) provides that any comparison of one 
member organization's service, personnel, facilities or charges with 
those of other firms must be factually supportable.
    Rule 2210(d)(3) would require all retail communications and 
correspondence to (i) prominently disclose the name of the member 
organization, and would allow a fictional name by which the member 
organization is commonly recognized or which is required by any state 
or jurisdiction; (ii) reflect any relationship between the member 
organization and any non-member organization that, or individual who, 
also is named in the communication; and (iii) if the communication 
includes other names, reflect which products and services are offered 
by the member organization. Proposed Rule 2210(d)(3) would apply these 
standards to correspondence as well as to retail communications. A 
member organization would be permitted to use the name under which the 
member organization's broker-dealer business is conducted as disclosed 
on the member organization's Form BD, as well as a fictional name by 
which the member organization is commonly recognized or which is 
required by any state or jurisdiction. The proposed rule would not 
apply to ``blind'' advertisements used to recruit personnel. The 
Exchange does not currently have a comparable rule with these specific 
requirements.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(4)(A) would specify that in retail 
communications and correspondence, references to tax-free or tax-exempt 
income must indicate which income taxes apply, or which do not, unless 
income is free from all applicable taxes, and provides an example of 
income from an investment company investing in municipal bonds that is 
free from federal income tax but subject to state or local income 
taxes. The Exchange does not currently have a comparable rule with 
these specific requirements.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(4)(B) would prohibit communications from 
characterizing income or investment returns as tax-free or exempt from 
income tax when tax liability is merely postponed or deferred, such as 
when taxes are payable upon redemption. The Exchange does not currently 
have a comparable rule with these specific requirements.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(4)(C) would add new language concerning 
comparative illustrations of the mathematical principles of tax-
deferred versus taxable compounding. First, the illustration would have 
to depict both the taxable investment and the tax-deferred investment 
using identical investment amounts and identical assumed gross 
investment rates of return, which may not exceed 10 percent per annum. 
Second, the illustration would have to use and identify actual federal 
income tax rates. Third, the illustration would be permitted (but not 
required) to reflect an actual state income tax rate, provided that the 
communication prominently discloses that the illustration is applicable 
only to investors that reside in the identified state. Fourth, the tax 
rates used in the illustration that is intended for a target audience 
would have to reasonably reflect its tax bracket or brackets as well as 
the tax character of capital gains and ordinary income. Fifth, if the 
illustration covers an investment's payout period, the illustration 
would have to reflect the impact of taxes during this period. Sixth, 
the illustration could not assume an unreasonable period of tax 
deferral. Seventh, the illustration would have to include the following 
disclosures, as applicable:
     The degree of risk in the investment's assumed rate of 
return, including a statement that the assumed rate of return is not 
guaranteed;
     The possible effects of investment losses on the relative 
advantage of the taxable versus tax-deferred investments;
     The extent to which tax rates on capital gains and 
dividends would affect the taxable investment's return;
     The fact that ordinary income tax rates will apply to 
withdrawals from a tax-deferred investment;
     Its underlying assumptions; \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ These assumptions may include, for example, the age at 
which an investor may begin withdrawing funds from a tax-deferred 
account, the actual federal tax rates applied in the hypothetical 
taxable illustration, any state income tax rate applied in the 
illustration, and the charges associated with the hypothetical 
investment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The potential impact resulting from federal or state tax 
penalties (e.g., for early withdrawals or use on non-qualified 
expenses); and
     That an investor should consider his or her current and 
anticipated investment horizon and income tax bracket when making an 
investment decision, as the illustration may not reflect these factors.

The Exchange does not currently have a comparable rule with these 
specific requirements.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(5) would require retail communications and 
correspondence that present the performance of a non-money market 
mutual fund, to disclose the fund's maximum sales charge and operating 
expense ratio as set forth in the fund's current prospectus fee table. 
The Exchange does not currently have a

[[Page 73220]]

comparable rule with these specific requirements.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(6)(A) would provide that, if any testimonial 
in a communication concerns a technical aspect of investing, the person 
making the testimonial must have the knowledge and experience to form a 
valid opinion. This requirement would be identical to current Rule 
472(j)(7)(iv).
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(6)(B) would require any retail communications 
and correspondence that provide a testimonial concerning the investment 
advice or investment performance of a member organization or its 
products to prominently disclose (i) the fact that the testimonial may 
not be representative of the experience of other customers, (ii) the 
fact that the testimonial is no guarantee of future performance or 
success, and (iii) if more than $100 in value is paid for the 
testimonial, the fact that it is a paid testimonial. The proposed rule 
would be substantially the same as current Rule 472(j)(7)(i)-(iii), 
except that Rule 472(j)(7)(iii) refers instead to a ``nominal amount.''
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(7) would apply to retail communications that 
contain a recommendation. Proposed Rule 2210(d)(7)(A) would require 
disclosure of certain specified conflicts of interest to the extent 
applicable. Retail communications that include a recommendation of 
securities must have a reasonable basis for the recommendation and must 
disclose, if applicable, the following: (i) That at the time the 
communication was published or distributed, the member organization was 
making a market in the security being recommended, or in the underlying 
security if the recommended security is an option or security future, 
or that the member organization or associated persons will sell to or 
buy from customers on a principal basis; (ii) that the member 
organization or any associated person that is directly and materially 
involved in the preparation of the content of the communication has a 
financial interest in any of the securities of the issuer whose 
securities are recommended, and the nature of the financial interest 
(including, without limitation, whether it consists of any option, 
right, warrant, future, long or short position), unless the extent of 
the financial interest is nominal; and (iii) that the member 
organization was manager or co-manager of a public offering of any 
securities of the issuer whose securities were recommended within the 
past 12 months. The proposed rule would be more detailed than current 
Rule 472(j)(1), which covers recommendations.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(7)(B) would require a member organization to 
provide, or offer to furnish upon request, available investment 
information supporting the recommendation, and if the recommendation is 
for a corporate equity security, to provide the price at the time the 
recommendation is made. The proposed rule is comparable to current Rule 
472(j)(1), which provides that when recommending the purchase, sale or 
switch of specific securities, supporting information must be provided 
or offered, and the market price at the time the recommendation is made 
must be indicated.
    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(7)(C) would amend the provisions governing 
communications that include past recommendations, which are currently 
found in Rule 472(j)(2). The proposed standards mirror those found in 
Rule 206(4)-1(a)(2) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 
(``Advisers Act''), which apply to investment adviser advertisements 
that contain past recommendations.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Proposed Rule 2210(d)(7)(C), like Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-
1(a)(2), generally would prohibit retail communications from 
referring to past specific recommendations of the member 
organization that were or would have been profitable to any person. 
The proposed rule would allow, however, a retail communication or 
correspondence to set out or offer to furnish a list of all 
recommendations as to the same type, kind, grade or classification 
of securities made by the member organization within the immediately 
preceding period of not less than one year. The list would have to 
provide certain information regarding each recommended security and 
include a prescribed cautionary legend warning investors not to 
assume that future recommendations will be profitable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 2210(d)(7)(D) expressly would exclude from its 
coverage communications that meet the definition of ``research report'' 
or that are public appearances by a research analyst for purposes of 
Rule 472 and that include all of the applicable disclosures required by 
that rule. Proposed Rule 2210(d)(7)(D) also would exclude any 
communication that recommends only registered investment companies or 
variable insurance products.\18\ The Exchange does not currently have a 
comparable rule regarding registered investment companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The Exchange is proposing to exclude communications that 
recommend only registered investment companies or variable insurance 
products because it believes that recommendations of these products 
do not raise the same kinds of conflicts of interest as 
recommendations of other types of securities, since they are pooled 
investment vehicles rather than securities of a single issuer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under proposed Rule 2210(d)(8), prospectuses, preliminary 
prospectuses, fund profiles and similar documents that have been filed 
with the Commission would not be subject to the standards of proposed 
Rule 2210(d); provided, however, that the standards would apply to an 
investment company prospectus published pursuant to Securities Act Rule 
482 and a free writing prospectus that has been filed with the 
Commission pursuant to Securities Act Rule 433(d)(1)(ii). The Exchange 
does not currently have a comparable rule.
Certain Text Not Adopted
    The Exchange does not propose to adopt the text of FINRA Rule 
2210(e), which relates to limitations on the use of FINRA's name and 
any other corporate name owned by FINRA. The Exchange does not propose 
to adopt the text of FINRA Rule 2210(e)(2) because that provision 
relates to over-the-counter transactions, which the Exchange does not 
regulate. Lastly, the Exchange does not propose to adopt the text of 
FINRA Rule 2210(e)(3) because the Exchange has not previously imposed a 
requirement on member organizations to provide a link to the Exchange's 
Web site in connection with its indication of NYSE membership, and the 
Exchange does not believe it is necessary to impose such a restriction 
at this time. FINRA Rule 2210(e)(3) would continue to apply to all Dual 
Members. As such, Rule 2210(e) would be marked ``Reserved.''
Public Appearances
    Proposed Rule 2210(f) sets forth the general standards that would 
apply to public appearances. Public appearances would have to meet the 
general ``fair and balanced'' standards of proposed Rule 2210(d)(1). 
The disclosure requirements applicable to recommendations in proposed 
Rule 2210(d)(7) would apply if the public appearance included a 
recommendation of a security. The proposed rule also would require 
member organizations to establish appropriate written policies and 
procedures to supervise public appearances, and clarify that scripts, 
slides, handouts or other written (including electronic) materials used 
in connection with public appearances are considered communications for 
purposes of proposed Rule 2210. The proposed requirement to establish 
supervisory policies and procedures for public appearances would be 
consistent with Rule 472(l) and Rule Interpretation 472/06, which 
covers other communications activities.
Violations of Other Rules
    Proposed Rule 2210(g) would provide that any violation by a member 
organization of any rule of the

[[Page 73221]]

Commission or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation applicable 
to member organization communications would be deemed a violation of 
proposed Rule 2210. FINRA Rule 2210(g) also applies to violations of 
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (``MSRB'') rules because FINRA 
enforces such rules. Because the Exchange does not enforce MSRB rules, 
the reference to MSRB rules would not be included in proposed Rule 
2210(g).
Use of Investment Companies Rankings in Retail Communications
    The Exchange proposes to adopt the text of FINRA Rule 2212, which 
would cover the use of investment company rankings in retail 
communications. The Exchange currently does not have a comparable rule.
    Proposed Rule 2212(a) would define ``Ranking Entity'' as ``any 
entity that provides general information about investment companies to 
the public, that is independent of the investment company and its 
affiliates, and whose services are not procured by the investment 
company or any of its affiliates to assign the investment company a 
ranking.''
    Proposed Rule 2212(b) would provide that member organizations may 
not use investment company rankings in any retail communication other 
than (i) rankings created and published by Ranking Entities or (ii) 
rankings created by an investment company or an investment company 
affiliate but based on the performance measurements of a Ranking 
Entity. Rankings in retail communications also would have to conform to 
the requirements described below.
    Proposed Rule 2212(c) would require certain disclosures in retail 
communications. A headline or other prominent statement must not state 
or imply that an investment company or investment company family is the 
best performer in a category unless it is actually ranked first in the 
category. All retail communications containing an investment company 
ranking also would have to disclose prominently:
     The name of the category (e.g., growth);
     The number of investment companies or, if applicable, 
investment company families, in the category;
     The name of the Ranking Entity and, if applicable, the 
fact that the investment company or an affiliate created the category 
or subcategory;
     The length of the period (or the first day of the period) 
and its ending date; and
     Criteria on which the ranking is based (e.g., total 
return, risk-adjusted performance).
    In addition, all retail communications containing an investment 
company ranking would have to disclose:
     The fact that past performance is no guarantee of future 
results;
     For investment companies that assess front-end sales 
loads, whether the ranking takes those loads into account;
     If the ranking is based on total return or the current 
Commission standardized yield, and fees have been waived or expenses 
advanced during the period on which the ranking is based, and the 
waiver or advancement had a material effect on the total return or 
yield for that period, a statement to that effect;
     The publisher of the ranking data (e.g., ``ABC Magazine, 
June 2011''); and
     If the ranking consists of a symbol (e.g., a star system) 
rather than a number, the meaning of the symbol (e.g., a four-star 
ranking indicates that the fund is in the top 30% of all investment 
companies).
    Proposed Rule 2212(d) would provide that any investment company 
ranking included in a retail communication must be, at a minimum, 
current to the most recent calendar quarter ended prior to use or 
submission for publication. If no ranking that meets this requirement 
is available from the Ranking Entity, then a member organization would 
only be able to use the most current ranking available from the Ranking 
Entity unless use of the most current ranking would be misleading, in 
which case no ranking from the Ranking Entity may be used. In addition, 
except for money market mutual funds:
     Retail communications may not present any ranking that 
covers a period of less than one year, unless the ranking is based on 
yield;
     An investment company ranking based on total return must 
be accompanied by rankings based on total return for a one year period 
for investment companies in existence for at least one year; one and 
five year periods for investment companies in existence for at least 
five years; and one, five and ten year periods for investment companies 
in existence for at least ten years supplied by the same Ranking 
Entity, relating to the same investment category, and based on the same 
time period; provided that, if rankings for such one, five and ten year 
time periods are not published by the Ranking Entity, then rankings 
representing short, medium and long term performance must be provided 
in place of rankings for the required time periods; and
     An investment company ranking based on yield may be based 
only on the current Commission standardized yield and must be 
accompanied by total return rankings for the time periods specified in 
Rule 2212(d)(2)(B).
    Proposed Rule 2212(e) would provide specific requirements with 
respect to categories. The choice of category (including a subcategory 
of a broader category) on which the investment company ranking is based 
must be one that provides a sound basis for evaluating the performance 
of the investment company. An investment company ranking must be based 
only on (i) a published category or subcategory created by a Ranking 
Entity or (ii) a category or subcategory created by an investment 
company or an investment company affiliate, but based on the 
performance measurements of a Ranking Entity. Retail communications 
must not use any category or subcategory that is based upon the asset 
size of an investment company or investment company family, whether or 
not it has been created by a Ranking Entity.
    Proposed Rule 2212(f) would provide that investment company 
rankings for more than one class of investment company with the same 
portfolio must be accompanied by prominent disclosure of the fact that 
the investment companies or classes have a common portfolio and 
different expense structures.
    Proposed Rule 2212(g) would provide that retail communications may 
contain rankings of investment company families, provided that these 
rankings comply with proposed Rule 2212, and further provided that no 
retail communication for an individual investment company may provide a 
ranking of an investment company family unless it also prominently 
discloses the various rankings for the individual investment company 
supplied by the same Ranking Entity, as described in proposed Rule 
2212(d)(2)(B). For purposes of Rule 2212, the term ``investment company 
family'' would mean any two or more registered investment companies or 
series thereof that hold themselves out to investors as related 
companies for purposes of investment and investor services.
    Proposed Rule 2212(h) would specify that Rule 2212 would not apply 
to any reprint or excerpt of any article or report that is excluded 
from the Exchange's Advertising Regulation Department filing 
requirements pursuant to Rule 2210(c)(7)(I).

[[Page 73222]]

Failure To Comply With Public Communication Standards
    The Exchange recently adopted certain disciplinary and procedural 
rules modeled on the rules of FINRA; however, at that time, the 
Exchange did not propose to adopt the text of FINRA Rule 9551, which 
then concerned failure to comply with public communication standards in 
NASD Rule 2210.\19\ As such, Rule 9551 is currently marked 
``Reserved.'' As a result of the Exchange's proposed adoption of Rule 
2210, the Exchange proposes to adopt the text of FINRA Rule 9551 as 
Rule 9551, with certain conforming changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See Exchange Act Release No. 69045 (Mar 5, 2013), 78 FR 
15394 (Mar 11, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 9551(a) would provide that the Exchange staff may 
issue a written notice requiring a member organization to file 
communications with the Department at least 10 days prior to use if the 
Exchange staff determines that the member organization has departed 
from the standards of Rule 2210. Proposed Rule 9551(b) would provide 
that, except as otherwise provided, the Exchange staff would serve the 
member organization with such notice in accordance with NYSE Rule 9134. 
When counsel for the member organization or other person authorized to 
represent others under Rule 9141 agrees to accept service of such 
notice, then the Exchange staff may serve notice on counsel or such 
other person authorized to represent others under Rule 9141 as 
specified in Rule 9134.
    Proposed Rule 9551(c) would provide that a notice issued under the 
proposed rule would state the specific grounds and include the factual 
basis for the Exchange action. The notice would state when the Exchange 
action will take effect. The notice would state that the respondent may 
file a written request for a hearing with the Office of Hearing 
Officers pursuant to Rule 9559. The notice also would inform the 
respondent of the applicable deadline for filing a request for a 
hearing and would state that a request for a hearing must set forth 
with specificity any and all defenses to the Exchange action. In 
addition, the notice would explain that, pursuant to Rules 8310(a) and 
9559(n), a Hearing Officer or, if applicable, Hearing Panel, may 
approve, modify or withdraw any and all sanctions or limitations 
imposed by the notice, and may impose any other fitting sanction.
    Proposed Rule 9551(d) would provide that pursuant to proposed Rule 
2210(c)(1)(B), the pre-use filing requirement referenced in a notice 
issued and served under the proposed rule would become effective 21 
days after service of the notice, unless stayed by a request for a 
hearing pursuant to Rule 9559. FINRA Rule 9551(e) also includes a 
cross-reference to FINRA Rule 2220(c)(2), which relates to options 
communications. The Exchange does not propose to adopt the text of 
FINRA Rule 2220 so this cross-reference is not included in the proposed 
rule.
    Proposed Rule 9551(e) would provide that a member organization 
served with a notice under the proposed rule may file with the Office 
of Hearing Officers a written request for a hearing pursuant to Rule 
9559. A request for a hearing would be made before the effective date 
of the notice, as indicated in proposed Rule 9551(d). A request for a 
hearing must set forth with specificity any and all defenses to the 
Exchange action.
    Proposed Rule 9551(f) would provide that if a member organization 
does not timely request a hearing, the pre-use filing requirements 
specified in the notice would become effective 21 days after service of 
the notice and the notice would constitute final Exchange action.
    Proposed Rule 9551(g) would provide that a member organization that 
is subject to a pre-use filing requirement under the proposed rule may 
file a written request for modification or termination of the 
requirement. Such request would be filed with the head of the Exchange 
department or office that issued the notice or, if another Exchange 
department or office is named as the party handling the matter on 
behalf of the issuing department or office, with the head of the 
Exchange department or office that is so designated. The head of the 
appropriate department or office may grant relief for good cause shown.
Conforming Changes
    The Exchange also proposes to make certain conforming changes to 
Rules 342, 9559, and 9610. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend 
Supplementary Materials .10(B) and .17 to Rule 342, which covers the 
approval, supervision, and control of offices, to include a cross-
reference to proposed Rule 2210 in addition to the current cross-
references to Rule 472 in that rule. The Exchange also proposes to 
amend the definition of ``branch office'' in Supplementary Material .10 
to Rule 342 to replace references to ``advertisements'' and ``sales 
literature'' with references to ``retail communications.'' The Exchange 
proposes to amend Rule 9559, which covers hearing procedures for 
expedited proceedings under the Rule 9550 Series, to include cross-
references to proposed Rule 9551. The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 
9610(a), which permits member organizations to apply for exemptive 
relief from other NYSE rules, to include a cross-reference to proposed 
Rule 2210. The Exchange notes that FINRA Rules 9559 and 9610 include 
cross-references to FINRA Rules 9551 and 2210, respectively.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Exchange Act Section 6(b),\20\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Exchange Act Section 6(b)(5),\21\ in particular, because 
it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade and to 
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
market and a national market system. Specifically, the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change supports the objectives of the 
Exchange Act by providing greater harmonization between NYSE rules and 
FINRA rules of similar purpose, resulting in less burdensome and more 
efficient regulatory compliance. In particular, NYSE member 
organizations that are also FINRA members are subject to Rule 472 and 
FINRA Rules 2210, 2212, and 9551, and harmonizing these rules by 
adopting proposed Rules 2210, 2212, and 9551 would promote just and 
equitable principles of trade by requiring a single standard for 
communications with the public. The Exchange believes that to the 
extent the Exchange has proposed changes that differ from the FINRA 
version of the NYSE rules, such changes are generally technical in 
nature and do not change the substance of the proposed rules. The 
Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change would update and 
add specificity to the requirements governing communications with the 
public, which would promote just and equitable principles of trade and 
help to protect investors. As such, the Exchange believes the proposed 
rule change meets the requirements of Exchange Act Section 6(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. The 
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is not intended to 
address competitive issues but rather to achieve greater consistency 
between the Exchange's rules and FINRA's rules.

[[Page 73223]]

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to 
Exchange Act Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) \22\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
thereunder.\23\ Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed, 
or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Exchange Act Section 19(b)(3)(A) and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \24\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\25\ the Commission 
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked 
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal 
may become operative immediately upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is 
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, 
because it would allow the Exchange to immediately conform its rules to 
corresponding FINRA rules. This will ensure that Dual Members generally 
will be subject to a single set of rules governing communications with 
the public. As noted by the Exchange, the proposal would harmonize NYSE 
and FINRA rules. In addition, the proposal would update and add 
specificity to the Exchange's requirements governing communications 
with the public, which are designed to help protect customers of all 
NYSE members. For these reasons, the Commission designates the proposed 
rule change to be operative upon filing.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ For purposes of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the 
Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, 
competition and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. If the 
Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute 
proceedings under Exchange Act Section 19(b)(2)(B) \27\ to determine 
whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted 
by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSE-2013-76 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2013-76. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street 
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the 
hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be 
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the 
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the 
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from 
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSE-2013-76 and should be submitted on or before December 26, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\28\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-29042 Filed 12-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


