
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23295-23298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66789; File No. SR-ISE-2012-30]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, 
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule 
Change Relating to Increasing Certain Rebates and Taker Fees for 
Complex Orders in Options on the SPDR[supreg] S&P500[supreg] ETF Trust

April 12, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on April 10, 2012, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the 
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described 
in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the 
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments 
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE proposes to increase certain rebates and taker fees for 
complex orders in options on the SPDR[supreg] S&P500[supreg] ETF Trust 
(``SPY''). The text of the proposed rule change is available on the 
Exchange's Web site (http://www.ise.com), at the principal office of 
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below.

[[Page 23296]]

The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange currently assesses per contract transaction charges 
and credits to market participants that add or remove liquidity from 
the Exchange (``maker/taker fees'') in a number of options classes (the 
``Select Symbols'').\3\ The Exchange's maker/taker fees are applicable 
to regular and complex orders executed in the Select Symbols. The 
maker/taker fees for complex orders in the Select Symbols also apply to 
all symbols that are in the Penny Pilot program.\4\ The Exchange also 
currently assesses maker/taker fees for complex orders in symbols that 
are in the Penny Pilot program but are not a Select Symbol (``Non-
Select Penny Pilot Symbols'') \5\ and for complex orders in all symbols 
that are not in the Penny Pilot Program (``Non-Penny Pilot 
Symbols'').\6\ Maker/taker fees (and rebates) for complex orders are 
assessed on the following order-type categories: ISE Market Maker,\7\ 
Market Maker Plus,\8\ Firm Proprietary, Customer (Professional) \9\, 
Non-ISE Market Maker\10\, and Priority Customer.\11\ The Exchange is 
proposing to increase certain rebate amounts and taker fees for complex 
orders in options on only one Select Symbol--SPY--as follows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Options classes subject to maker/taker fees are identified 
by their ticker symbol on the Exchange's Schedule of Fees.
    \4\ See Exchange Act Release Nos. 65021 (August 3, 2011), 76 FR 
48933 (August 9, 2011) (SR-ISE-2011-45); and 65550 (October 13, 
2011), 76 FR 64984 (October 19, 2011) (SR-ISE-2011-65).
    \5\ See Exchange Act Release No. 65724 (November 10, 2011), 76 
FR 71413 (November 17, 2011) (SR-ISE-2011-72).
    \6\ See Exchange Act Release Nos. 66084 (January 3, 2012), 77 FR 
1103 (January 9, 2012) (SR-ISE-2011-84); and 66392 (February 14, 
2012), 77 FR 10016 (February 21, 2012) (SR-ISE-2012-06).
    \7\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Competitive Market 
Makers'' and ``Primary Market Makers'' collectively. See ISE Rule 
100(a)(25).
    \8\ A Market Maker Plus is an ISE Market Maker who is on the 
National Best Bid or National Best Offer 80% of the time for series 
trading between $0.03 and $5.00 (for options whose underlying 
stock's previous trading day's last sale price was less than or 
equal to $100) and between $0.10 and $5.00 (for options whose 
underlying stock's previous trading day's last sale price was 
greater than $100) in premium in each of the front two expiration 
months and 80% of the time for series trading between $0.03 and 
$5.00 (for options whose underlying stock's previous trading day's 
last sale price was less than or equal to $100) and between $0.10 
and $5.00 (for options whose underlying stock's previous trading 
day's last sale price was greater than $100) in premium across all 
expiration months in order to receive the rebate. The Exchange 
determines whether a Market Maker qualifies as a Market Maker Plus 
at the end of each month by looking back at each Market Maker's 
quoting statistics during that month. If at the end of the month, a 
Market Maker meets the Exchange's stated criteria, the Exchange 
rebates $0.10 per contract for transactions executed by that Market 
Maker during that month. The Exchange provides Market Makers a 
report on a daily basis with quoting statistics so that Market 
Makers can determine whether or not they are meeting the Exchange's 
stated criteria.
    \9\ A Customer (Professional) is a person who is not a broker/
dealer and is not a Priority Customer.
    \10\ A Non-ISE Market Maker, or Far Away Market Maker 
(``FARMM''), is a market maker as defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the 
Act, registered in the same options class on another options 
exchange.
    \11\ A Priority Customer is defined in ISE Rule 100(a)(37A) as a 
person or entity that is not a broker/dealer in securities, and does 
not place more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average 
during a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Select Symbols, the Exchange currently provides a base 
rebate of $0.32 per contract, per leg, for Priority Customer complex 
orders when these orders trade with non-Priority Customer complex 
orders in the complex orderbook. Additionally, Members can earn a 
higher rebate amount by achieving certain average daily volume (ADV) 
thresholds on a month-to-month basis. In order to enhance the 
Exchange's competitive position and to incentivize Members to increase 
the amount of Priority Customer complex orders for options on SPY that 
they send to the Exchange, the Exchange is proposing to increase the 
base amount of the rebate for options on SPY to $0.33 per contract. 
Additionally, the Exchange is proposing to increase the amount of that 
rebate even further, on a month-by-month and Member-by-Member basis, if 
such Member achieves a certain ADV of Priority Customer complex order 
contracts executed during the calendar month, as follows: If the Member 
achieves an ADV of 75,000 Priority Customer complex order contracts, 
the rebate amount for such SPY option contracts shall be $0.34 
(currently $0.33) per contract per leg; if the Member achieves an ADV 
of 125,000 Priority Customer complex order contracts, the rebate amount 
for such SPY option contracts shall be $0.35 (currently $0.34) per 
contract per leg. The highest SPY rebate amount achieved by the Member 
for the current calendar month shall apply retroactively to all 
Priority Customer complex order SPY contracts that trade with non-
Priority Customer complex orders in the complex orderbook executed by 
the Member during such calendar month.
    Further, the Exchange currently provides a rebate of $0.06 per 
contract, per leg, for Priority Customer complex orders when these 
orders trade against quotes or orders in the regular orderbook. In 
order to enhance the Exchange's competitive position and to incentivize 
Members to increase the amount of Priority Customer complex orders for 
options on SPY that they send to the Exchange, the Exchange is 
proposing to increase the rebate to $0.07 per contract, per leg, for 
Priority Customer complex orders for options on SPY, regardless of 
size, when these orders trade against quotes or orders in the regular 
orderbook.
    Finally, for complex orders in the Select Symbols (including SPY), 
the Exchange currently charges a ``taker'' fee of: (i) $0.34 Per 
contract for ISE Market Maker, Market Maker Plus, Firm Proprietary and 
Customer (Professional) orders; and (ii) $0.38 per contract for Non-ISE 
Market Maker orders. Priority Customer orders are not charged a 
``taker'' fee for complex orders in the Select Symbols. The Exchange 
now proposes to increase the ``taker'' fee for complex orders in SPY to 
(i) $0.35 per contract for ISE Market Maker, Market Maker Plus, Firm 
Proprietary and Customer (Professional) orders; and (ii) $0.39 for Non-
ISE Market Maker orders. The Exchange is not proposing to change the 
``maker'' fees in SPY.
    Additionally, ISE Market Makers who remove liquidity in SPY from 
the complex order book by trading with Priority Customer orders that 
are preferenced to them are currently charged $0.32 per contract. The 
Exchange now proposes to increase to $0.33 per contract the amount 
charged to ISE Market Makers who remove liquidity in SPY from the 
complex order book by trading with Priority Customer orders that are 
preferenced to them.
    Since the rate changes to the Schedule of Fees pursuant to this 
proposal will be effective upon filing, for the transactions occurring 
in April 2012 prior to the effective date of this filing members will 
be assessed the rates in effect immediately prior to those proposed by 
this filing. For transactions occurring in April 2012 on and after the 
effective date of this filing, members will be assessed the rates 
proposed by this filing.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Schedule of 
Fees is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \12\ in general, and 
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \13\ in 
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 
fees and

[[Page 23297]]

other charges among Exchange members and other persons using its 
facilities. The impact of the proposal upon the net fees paid by a 
particular market participant will depend on a number of variables, 
most important of which will be its propensity to interact with and 
respond to certain types of orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that it is reasonable and equitable to 
provide rebates for Priority Customer complex orders when these orders 
trade with Non-Priority Customer complex orders in the complex order 
book because paying a rebate would continue to attract additional order 
flow to the Exchange and create liquidity in the symbols that are 
subject to the rebate, which the Exchange believes ultimately will 
benefit all market participants who trade on ISE. The Exchange already 
provides these types of rebates, and is now merely proposing to 
increase the rebate amount with respect to the SPY product only. The 
Exchange believes that the proposed rebates are competitive with 
rebates provided by other exchanges and are therefore reasonable and 
equitably allocated to those members that direct orders to the Exchange 
rather than to a competing exchange.
    The Exchange also believes that it is reasonable and equitable to 
provide rebates for Priority Customer complex orders when these orders 
trade against quotes or orders in the regular orderbook because paying 
a rebate, in those instances, would also attract additional order flow 
to the Exchange.
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to increase to $0.35 per 
contract (from $0.34 per contract) the ``taker'' fee for ISE Market 
Maker, Market Maker Plus, Firm Proprietary and Customer (Professional) 
orders, and to increase to $0.39 per contract (from $0.38 per contract) 
for Non-ISE Market Maker orders, in SPY is reasonable because the fee 
is within the range of fees assessed by other exchanges employing 
similar pricing schemes and in some cases, is lower than the fees 
assessed by other exchanges. In addition, the Exchange believes that 
charging Non-ISE Market Maker orders a higher rate than the fee charged 
to ISE Market Maker, Market Maker Plus, Firm Proprietary and Customer 
(Professional) orders is appropriate and not unfairly discriminatory 
because Non-ISE Market Makers are not subject to many of the non-
transaction based fees that these other categories of membership are 
subject to, e.g., membership fees, access fees, API/Session fees, 
market data fees, etc. Therefore, it is appropriate and not unfairly 
discriminatory to assess a higher transaction fee on Non-ISE Market 
Makers because the Exchange incurs costs associated with these types of 
orders that are not recovered by non-transaction based fees paid by 
members.
    The complex order pricing employed by the Exchange has proven to be 
an effective pricing mechanism and attractive to Exchange participants 
and their customers. The Exchange believes that increasing its complex 
order rebates will attract additional complex order business.
    The Exchange further believes that the Exchange's complex order 
rebates and its maker/taker fees are not unfairly discriminatory 
because those structures are consistent with fee structures that exist 
today at other options exchanges. Additionally, the Exchange believes 
that the proposed fees and rebates are fair, equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory because the proposed fees and rebates are consistent 
with price differentiation that exists today at other option exchanges. 
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which market 
participants can readily direct order flow to another exchange if they 
deem fee levels at a particular exchange to be excessive. With this 
proposed rebate change, the Exchange believes it remains an attractive 
venue for market participants to trade complex orders.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition 
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, 
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received 
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested 
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\14\ At any time within 60 days of the 
filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may 
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission 
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, 
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-ISE-2012-30 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2012-30. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2012-30 and should be 
submitted on or before May 9, 2012.


[[Page 23298]]


    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9282 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


