
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 133 (Tuesday, July 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40950-40961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-17388]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64816; File No. PCAOB-2011-02]


Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; Notice of Filing of 
Proposed Board Funding Final Rules for Allocation of the Board's 
Accounting Support Fee Among Issuers, Brokers, and Dealers, and Other 
Amendments to the Board's Funding Rules

July 6, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 107(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the 
``Act''), notice is hereby given that on June 21, 2011, the Public 
Company Accounting Oversight Board (the ``Board'' or the ``PCAOB'') 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') 
the proposed rules described in Items I and II below, which items have 
been prepared by the Board. The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rules from interested persons.

I. Board's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rules

    On June 14, 2011, the Board adopted amendments to its rules 
relating to the funding of the Board's operations (PCAOB Rules 7100 
through 7106), and amended certain definitions that would appear in 
PCAOB Rule 1001, related to Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as 
amended by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 
Act \1\ (the ``Dodd-Frank Act'') (collectively, ``the proposed 
rules''). The text of the proposed rules is set out below (additions 
are italicized; deletions are in [brackets]).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (July 21, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

RULES OF THE BOARD

SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

* * *
    Rule 1001. Definitions of Terms Employed in Rules.
* * *

(a)(i) [Accounting Support Fee] [Reserved]

    [The term ``Accounting Support Fee'' means the fee described in 
Rule 7100 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended.]

(a)(iii) Act

    The term ``Act'' means the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as 
amended.
* * *

(b)(iii) Broker

    The term ``broker'' means a broker (as defined in Section 
3(a)(4) of the Exchange Act), that is required to file a balance 
sheet, income statement, or other financial statement under Section 
17(e)(1)(A) of that Act, where such balance sheet, income statement, 
or financial statement is required to be certified by a registered 
public accounting firm.

(b)(iv) Broker-Dealer Accounting Support Fee

    The term ``broker-dealer accounting support fee'' means the 
portion of the accounting support fee established by the Board that 
is to be allocated among brokers and dealers pursuant to the rules 
of the Board.
* * *

(c)(iii) Common Equity

    The term ``common equity'' means any class of common stock or an 
equivalent interest, including but not limited to a unit of 
beneficial interest in a trust or a limited partnership interest.
* * *

(d)(iii) Dealer

    The term ``dealer'' means a dealer (as defined in Section 
3(a)(5) of the Exchange Act), that is required to file a balance 
sheet, income statement, or other financial statement under Section 
17(e)(1)(A) of that Act, where such balance sheet, income statement, 
or financial statement is required to be certified by a registered 
public accounting firm.
* * *

(i)(i) Issuer Market Capitalization

    The terms ``issuer market capitalization'' and ``market 
capitalization of an issuer'' mean--
    (1) Except as provided in paragraph (i)(i)(2) of this rule, the 
aggregate market value of all classes of an issuer's voting and non-
voting common [common stock]equity that trade in the United States; 
or
    (2) With respect to an issuer: (i) that is registered under 
Section 8 of the Investment Company Act or has elected to be 
regulated as a business development company pursuant to Section 54 
of the Investment Company Act, and (ii) whose securities are not 
traded on a national securities exchange or whose [quoted on 
Nasdaq]share price is not otherwise publicly available, the issuer's 
net asset value.

(i)(v) Issuer Accounting Support Fee

    The term ``issuer accounting support fee'' means the portion of 
the accounting support fee established by the Board that is to be 
allocated among issuers pursuant to the rules of the Board.
* * *
    (i[n])(vi) [Notice]Invoice
    The term ``[notice]invoice'' means the document sent by the 
Board to an issuer, broker, or dealer, pursuant to Rule 7103[2], 
setting forth such issuer's, broker's, or dealer's share of the 
accounting support fee under Section 109 of the Act and Rules 7101, 
[and]7102, and 7103.
* * *

(s)(v) Self-Regulatory Organization

    The term ``self-regulatory organization'' means any national 
securities exchange, registered securities association, or 
registered clearing agency, or (solely for purposes of Sections 
19(b), 19(c), and 23(b) of the Exchange Act) the Municipal 
Securities Rulemaking Board established by Section 15B of the 
Exchange Act.

* * *

(t)(ii) Tentative Net Capital

    The term ``tentative net capital'' has the same meaning as such 
term is defined under Rule 15c3-1(c)(15) under the Exchange Act.

(t)(iii) Total Accounting Support Fee

    The term ``total accounting support fee'' means the fee 
described in Rule 7100.
* * *

SECTION 7. FUNDING

* * *
    Rule 7100. Accounting Support Fees.
    The Board shall [calculate]establish a total[n] accounting 
support fee each year in accordance with the Act. The total 
accounting support fee shall be equitably allocated between issuers 
(the ``issuer accounting support fee'') and brokers and dealers (the 
``broker-dealer accounting support fee''). [The accounting support 
fee

[[Page 40951]]

shall equal the budget of the Board, as approved by the Commission, 
less the sum of all registration fees and annual fees received 
during the preceding calendar year from public accounting firms, 
pursuant to Section 102(f) of the Act and the Rules of the 
Board.]The accounting support fees shall then be equitably allocated 
among issuers, in accordance with Rule 7101(b), and among brokers 
and dealers, in accordance with Rule 7102(b).
    Rule 7101. Allocation of Issuer Accounting Support Fee.

(a) Classes of Issuers

    For purposes of allocating the issuer accounting support fee, 
those entities that are issuers as of the date the issuer accounting 
support fee is calculated[ under Rule 7100] shall be divided into 
four classes:

(1) Equity Issuers

    All issuers whose average, monthly issuer market capitalization 
is greater than $75 million during the [preceding]calendar year 
preceding the date the issuer accounting support fee is 
calculated[is greater than $25 million], other than those described 
in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this Rule, and whose share price 
on a monthly, or more frequent, basis is publicly available.
    Note: The [Average,]monthly issuer market capitalization will be 
based on closing [stock]share price[s] of all classes of the 
issuer's voting and non-voting common equity on the closest trading 
day on or before the last day of each calendar month 
[measured]during which trading in the common equity occurred.

(2) Investment Company Issuers

    All issuers (i) who, as of the date the accounting support fee 
is calculated[ under Rule 7100], are registered under Section 8 of 
the Investment Company Act or have elected to be regulated as 
business development companies pursuant to Section 54 of the 
Investment Company Act, other than those described in paragraph 
(a)(3), (ii) whose average, monthly issuer market capitalization is 
greater than $500 million during the [preceding ]calendar year 
preceding the date the issuer accounting support fee is 
calculated[is greater than $250 million], and (iii) whose share 
price (or net asset value) on a monthly, or more frequent, basis is 
publicly [-]available.
    Note: [Average]The[,] monthly issuer market capitalization will 
be based on closing [stock]share price[s]of all classes of the 
issuer's voting and non-voting common equity on the closest trading 
day on or before the last day of each calendar month 
[measured]during which trading in the common equity occurred.
    (3) Issuers Permitted Not to File Audited Financial Statements 
and Bankrupt Issuers that File Modified Reports
    All issuers that, as of the date the issuer accounting support 
fee is calculated[ under Rule 7100], (i) have a basis, under the 
federal securities laws, a Commission rule, or pursuant to other 
action of the Commission or its staff, not to file audited financial 
statements with the Commission, (ii) are employee stock purchase, 
savings, and similar plans, interests in which constitute securities 
registered under the Securities Act, or (iii) are subject to the 
jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court and [satisfy]have provided an 
opinion of counsel that the issuer satisfies the modified reporting 
requirements of Commission Staff Legal Bulletin No. 2.
    Note: [As of April 16, 2003, i]Issuers within paragraph 
(a)(3)(i) of this Rule include (A) asset-backed issuers, (B) unit 
investment trusts, as defined in Section 4(2) of the Investment 
Company Act, that have not filed or updated a registration statement 
that became effective during the [preceding]calendar year preceding 
the date the issuer accounting support fee is calculated, and (C) 
Small Business Investment Companies registered on Form N-5 under the 
Investment Company Act[,] that have not filed or updated a 
registration statement that became effective during the calendar 
year preceding the date the issuer accounting support fee is 
calculated[preceding year].

(4) All Other Public Company Issuers

    All issuers other than those described in paragraphs (a)(1), 
(a)(2), or (a)(3) of this Rule.

(b) Allocation of Issuer Accounting Support Fee Among Issuers

    The issuer accounting support fee shall be allocated among the 
classes in paragraph (a) of this Rule as follows:

(1) Equity and Investment Company Issuers

    Each issuer described in paragraph (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this 
Rule shall be allocated a share of the issuer accounting support fee 
in an amount equal to the issuer accounting support fee multiplied 
by a fraction -
    (i) the numerator of which is the average, monthly market 
capitalization of the issuer during the [preceding ]calendar year 
preceding the date the issuer accounting support fee is calculated, 
except that for issuers described in paragraph (a)(2) of this Rule, 
the numerator is one-tenth of the average, monthly issuer market 
capitalization of the issuer; and
    (ii) the denominator of which is the sum of the average, monthly 
market capitalizations of the issuers described in paragraph (a)(1) 
of this Rule and one-tenth of the average, monthly market 
capitalizations of the issuers described in paragraph (a)(2) of this 
Rule.

(2) All Other Classes

    Each issuer described in paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4) of this 
Rule shall be allocated a share of the issuer accounting support fee 
equal to $0.

(c) Adjustments

    After the issuer accounting support fee is calculated [under 
Rule 7100 ]and allocated under this Rule, any adjustment to the 
share allocated to an issuer shall not affect the share allocated to 
any other issuer.
    Rule 7102. Allocation of Broker-Dealer Accounting Support Fee

(a) Classes of Brokers and Dealers

    For purposes of allocating the broker-dealer accounting support 
fee, those entities that are brokers or dealers as of the date the 
broker-dealer accounting support fee is calculated shall be divided 
into two classes:
    (1) Brokers and Dealers with Average, Quarterly Tentative Net 
Capital Greater than $5 million.
    All brokers and dealers whose average, quarterly tentative net 
capital is greater than $5 million during the calendar year 
preceding the date the broker-dealer accounting support fee is 
calculated, other than those described in paragraphs (a)(2) of this 
Rule.
    Note: Average, quarterly tentative net capital will be based on 
the tentative net capital reported by the broker or dealer in the 
calendar quarterly reports filed pursuant to Commission rules during 
the calendar year preceding the date the broker-dealer accounting 
support fee is calculated.
    (2) Brokers and Dealers Permitted Not to File Audited Financial 
Statements and Brokers and Dealers Not Described in Paragraph (a)(1) 
of This Rule.
    All brokers and dealers that, as of the date the broker-dealer 
accounting support fee is calculated, (i) have a basis, under the 
federal securities laws, a Commission rule, or pursuant to other 
action of the Commission or its staff, not to file audited financial 
statements or (ii) are not described in paragraph (a)(1) of this 
Rule.

(b) Allocation of Broker-Dealer Accounting Support Fee

    The broker-dealer accounting support fee shall be allocated 
among the classes in paragraph (a) of this Rule as follows;
    (1) Brokers and Dealers with Average, Quarterly Tentative Net 
Capital Greater than $5 million.
    Each broker and dealer described in paragraph (a)(1) of this 
Rule shall be allocated a share of the broker-dealer accounting 
support fee in an amount equal to the broker-dealer accounting 
support fee multiplied by a fraction--
    (i) the numerator of which is the average, quarterly tentative 
net capital of the broker or dealer during the calendar year 
preceding the date the broker-dealer accounting support fee is 
calculated; and
    (ii) the denominator of which is the sum of the average, 
quarterly tentative net capital of the brokers and dealers described 
in paragraph (a)(1) of this Rule.

(2) All Other Brokers and Dealers

    Each broker and dealer described in paragraph (a)(2) of this 
Rule shall be allocated a share of the broker-dealer accounting 
support fee equal to $0.

(c) Adjustments

    After the broker-dealer accounting support fee is calculated and 
allocated under this Rule, any adjustment to the share allocated to 
a broker or dealer shall not affect the share allocated to any other 
broker or dealer.
    Rule 7103[2]. Assessment of Accounting Support Fees.

(a) Amount of Assessment

    Each issuer and each broker and dealer is required to pay its 
share of the accounting support fee, as allocated under Rules 7101 
and 7102, rounded to the nearest [hundred]$100.
    Note: If the allocated[an issuer's] share of the accounting 
support fee to an issuer,

[[Page 40952]]

broker, or dealer is less than $50, [that issuer]the assessed share 
of the accounting support fee will [not]be [assessed]zero. If the 
[issuer's]allocated share of the accounting support fee is 
[exactly]$50 or $50 more than [a]the closest multiple of $100, then 
the assessed share will be rounded up to the nearest $100.

(b) Notice of Assessment

    The Board will use its best efforts to send an [notice]invoice 
to each issuer, broker, and dealer, either electronically or by 
first-class mail, at the address shown in [on such issuer's]the most 
recent periodic report filed with the Commission by the issuer, or 
with the designated self-regulatory organization by the broker or 
dealer, at the address [submitted to]contained in the Commission's 
EDGAR system or the broker's or dealer's designated self-regulatory 
organization, or at such other address as the issuer, broker, or 
dealer provides to the Board. The Board's failure to send an issuer, 
broker, or dealer an [notice]invoice, or the [issuer's]failure to 
receive an [notice]invoice sent by the Board, shall not constitute a 
waiver of the Board's right to assess the issuer, broker, or 
dealer[such issuer] for its share of the accounting support fee or 
of the issuer's, broker's, or dealer's responsibility to pay its 
share of the accounting support fee.

(c) Petition for Correction

    Any issuer, broker, or dealer who disagrees with the class in 
which it has been placed, or with the calculation by which its share 
of the accounting support fee was determined, may petition the Board 
for a correction of the share of the accounting support fee it was 
allocated. Any such petition shall include an explanation of the 
nature of the claimed mistake in classification or calculation in 
writing and must be filed with the Board, on or before the 6[3]0th 
day after the [notice]invoice is sent, or within such longer period 
as the Board allows for good cause shown. After a review of such a 
petition, the Board will determine whether the allocation is 
consistent with Section 109 of the Act and the Board's rules 
thereunder and provide the issuer a written explanation of its 
decision. The provisions of Rule 7104[3] shall be suspended while 
such a petition is pending before the Board.
    Rule 7104[3]. Collection of Accounting Support Fees.

(a) Accounting Support Fee Payment Due Date

    Unless the Board directs otherwise, payment shall be due on the 
30th day after the [notice]invoice is sent. Beginning on the 31st 
day, payment shall be deemed past due and interest shall accrue at a 
rate of 6 percent per annum.
    (b) [Confirmation]Determination of Payment of Accounting Support 
Fees by Registered Accounting Firm
    (1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this Rule, no 
registered public accounting firm shall:
    (i) sign an unqualified audit opinion with respect to an 
issuer's, broker's, or dealer's financial statements, [or]
    (ii) issue a consent to include an audit [opinion]report issued 
previously, or
    (iii) sign a document, report, notice, or other record 
concerning procedures or controls of any issuer, broker, or dealer 
required under the securities laws unless the registered public 
accounting firm has ascertained that the issuer (including any 
broker or dealer subsidiary of the issuer), broker, or dealer has 
outstanding no past-due share of the issuer accounting support fee 
or broker-dealer accounting support fee, whichever is applicable, or 
has a petition pursuant to Rule 7103[2](c) pending.
    (2) A registered public accounting firm may:
    (i) sign an unqualified audit opinion with respect to an 
issuer's, broker's, or dealer's financial statements, [or]
    (ii) issue a consent to include an audit [opinion]report issued 
previously, or
    (iii) sign a document, report, notice, or other record 
concerning procedures or controls of any issuer, broker, or dealer 
required under the securities laws even though the issuer (including 
any broker or dealer subsidiary of the issuer), broker, or dealer 
has outstanding a past-due share of the accounting support fee and 
has not filed a petition under Rule 7103[2](c), if the issuer, 
broker, or dealer needs the audit report or consent in order to 
submit a report to, or make a filing with, the Commission or, in the 
case of an issuer only, to issue securities. The [issuer]registered 
public accounting firm shall submit to the Board a notice of the 
signing of the opinion or issuance of the consent not later than the 
next business day after the filing is made with the Commission. This 
exception to paragraph (b)(1) of this Rule shall not continue longer 
than 15 business days after the earlier of the date of the notice's 
submission or the filing of the report with the Commission, and may 
not be invoked for more than one such period with respect to any 
share of the accounting support fee that the issuer, broker, or 
dealer is assessed under Rule 7103[2].
    Note 1: A registered public accounting firm may ascertain that 
an issuer, broker, or dealer has no outstanding past-due share of 
the accounting support fee by obtaining a representation from the 
issuer, broker, or dealer[or a confirmation from the Board that no 
past-due share of the accounting support fee is outstanding].
    Note 2: A notice pursuant to paragraph (b)(2) of this Rule must 
be submitted electronically by e-mail to 
rule7104[3]stay@pcaobus.org.
    Note 3: For purposes of Rule 7104, the term ``audit'' means an 
examination of the financial statements, reports, documents, 
procedures, controls, or notices of any issuer, broker, or dealer by 
an independent public accounting firm in accordance with the rules 
of the Board or the Commission, for the purpose of expressing an 
opinion on the financial statements or providing an audit report. 
For purposes of Rule 7104, the term ``audit report'' means a 
document, report, notice, or other record (1) prepared following an 
audit performed for purposes of compliance by an issuer, broker, or 
dealer with the requirements of the securities laws; and (2) in 
which a public accounting firm either (i) sets forth the opinion of 
that firm regarding a financial statement, report, notice, or other 
document, procedures, or controls; or (ii) asserts no such opinion 
can be expressed.
    (c) Reports [to the Commission ]of Non-payment[ of an Accounting 
Support Fee].
    (1) If an issuer has not paid its share of the issuer accounting 
support fee by the 60th day after the [notice]invoice was sent, and 
the issuer does not have a petition pursuant to Rule 710[2]3(c) 
pending, the Board may send a second [notice]invoice to such issuer 
by certified mail. If the Board has sent such a second 
[notice]invoice and has not been paid by the 90th day after the 
original [notice]invoice was sent, the Board may report the issuer's 
nonpayment to the Commission.
    Note: Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act provides, in part, 
that: ``Every issuer which has a class of securities registered 
pursuant to section 12 of this title and every issuer which is 
required to file reports pursuant to section 15(d) of this title 
shall--* * * (C) notwithstanding any other provision of law, pay the 
allocable share of such issuer of a reasonable accounting support 
fee or fees, determined in accordance with Section 109 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.''
    (2) If a broker or dealer has not paid its share of the broker-
dealer accounting support fee by the 60th day after the invoice was 
sent, and the broker or dealer does not have a petition pursuant to 
Rule 7103(c) pending, the Board may send a second invoice to such 
broker or dealer by certified mail. If the Board has sent such a 
second invoice and has not been paid by the 90th day after the 
original invoice was sent, the Board may report the broker's or 
dealer's nonpayment to the Commission and/or the broker's or 
dealer's designated self-regulatory organization.
    Note: Section 109(h)(1) of the Act provides that ``[e]ach broker 
or dealer shall pay to the Board the annual accounting support fee 
allocated to such broker or dealer under this section.''

[(d) Excess Fees

    If in any Board fiscal year, the Board receives fees in excess 
of the budget for that fiscal year, the Board shall hold those 
excess fees in escrow. Such escrowed excess fees shall be released 
to the Board at the beginning of the next fiscal year and shall 
reduce the Board's accounting support fee in that next fiscal year.]
    Rule 7105[4]. Service as Designated Collection Agent.
    If the Board is designated to serve as collection agent for an 
accounting support fee of a standard-setting body designated by the 
Commission pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Securities Act, the 
assessment and collection of the accounting support fee shall be 
governed by Rules 7103 and [2 and ]7104[3] as if the accounting 
support fee of the standard-setting body were the issuer accounting 
support fee of the Board.
    Rule 7106. [(d) ]Excess [Fees]Funds.
    If in any Board fiscal year, the Board receives [fees]funds in 
excess of the budget of the Board for that fiscal year, as approved 
by the Commission, the Board shall hold those excess [fees]funds in 
escrow. Such escrowed excess [fees]funds shall be released to the 
Board at the beginning of the next

[[Page 40953]]

fiscal year and shall reduce the Board's total accounting support 
fee in that next fiscal year.

II. Board's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the 
Proposed Rules

    In its filing with the Commission, the Board included statements 
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rules and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rules. The text of 
these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV 
below. The Board has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, 
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Board's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the 
Proposed Rules

(a) Purpose
    Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as originally enacted, 
provided that funds to cover the Board's annual budget (less 
registration and annual fees paid by public accounting firms) \2\ would 
be collected from issuers \3\ based on each issuer's relative average, 
monthly equity market capitalization.\4\ The amount due from issuers 
was referred to as the Board's ``accounting support fee.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Section 102(f) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, states that 
registered public accounting firms shall pay fees sufficient for the 
Board to recover the costs of processing and reviewing registration 
applications and annual reports.
    \3\ Section 2(a)(7) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and PCAOB rules 
define ``issuer'' to mean an issuer (as defined in Section 3 of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'')), the securities 
of which are registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or 
that is required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Exchange 
Act, or that files or has filed a registration statement that has 
not yet become effective under the Securities Act of 1933, and that 
it has not withdrawn. See PCAOB Rule 1001(i)(iii).
    \4\ Section 109(g) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 982 of the Dodd-Frank Act granted the Board oversight of 
the audits of brokers and dealers registered with the Commission.\5\ To 
provide funds for the Board's oversight of those audits, the Dodd-Frank 
Act amended Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to require that the 
Board allocate a portion of the accounting support fee among brokers 
and dealers, or classes of brokers and dealers, based on their relative 
``net capital (before or after any adjustments).'' \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For information regarding the audit of brokers' and dealers' 
financial statements and examination of reports regarding compliance 
with Commission requirements, see generally Rule 17a-5 under the 
Exchange Act and related SEC rules and forms.
    \6\ Sections 109(d)(2) and 109(h) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 
which state, in part, that amounts due from brokers and dealers 
``shall be in proportion to the net capital of the broker or dealer 
(before or after any adjustments).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley 
Act requires that the rules of the Board provide for the equitable 
allocation, assessment, and collection by the Board of the accounting 
support fee among issuers, brokers, and dealers, and allow ``for 
differentiation among classes of issuers, brokers, and dealers, as 
appropriate.'' \7\ This section further provides that ``[t]he amount 
due from a broker or dealer shall be in proportion to the net capital 
of the broker or dealer (before or after any adjustments), compared to 
the total net capital of all brokers and dealers (before or after any 
adjustments), in accordance with rules issued by the Board.'' \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Section 109(d)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Pursuant to 
Section 109(e) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Financial Accounting 
Standards Board (``FASB'') accounting support fee is to be allocated 
among issuers. Brokers and dealers therefore will not be allocated a 
portion of the FASB annual accounting support fee.
    \8\ Section 109(h)(3) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Board adopted amendments to its funding rules to 
allocate a portion of the accounting support fee among brokers and 
dealers,\9\ to establish classes of brokers and dealers for funding 
purposes, to describe the methods for allocating the appropriate 
portion of the accounting support fee to each broker and dealer within 
each class, and to address the collection of the assessed share of the 
broker-dealer accounting support fee from brokers and dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The PCAOB is amending its rules to add definitions of 
``broker'' and ``dealer'' consistent with the definitions that the 
Dodd-Frank Act added to Section 110 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These 
definitions incorporate the definition of ``broker'' in Section 
3(a)(4) of the Exchange Act and ``dealer'' in Section 3(a)(5) of the 
Exchange Act, but only include those brokers or dealers that are 
required to file a balance sheet, income statement, or other 
financial statement certified by a registered public accounting 
firm. See Sections 110(3) and (4) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the proposed rules include amendments to the Board's 
funding rules with respect to the allocation, assessment, and 
collection of the accounting support fee among issuers. The proposed 
rules (i) revise the basis for calculating an issuer's market 
capitalization to include the market capitalization of all classes of 
the issuer's voting and non-voting common equity, and (ii) increase the 
average, monthly market capitalization thresholds in the funding rules 
for classes of equity issuers and investment companies. Further, based 
on eight years' experience administering the funding process, the 
proposed rules include technical amendments to the Board's funding 
rules.
    On December 14, 2010, the Board published for public comment 
proposed amendments to its funding rules to provide for a portion of 
the accounting support fee to be allocated among brokers and dealers 
with average, quarterly tentative net capital of greater than $5 
million.\10\ The Board sought comment on all aspects of the proposed 
rules. The Board received eight comments in total, consisting of four 
comments from accounting firms, two from associations of accountants or 
auditors, one from an organization representing independent broker-
dealers, and one from a small broker and dealer. Generally, commenters 
supported the amendments. As discussed more fully in Exhibit 3 in the 
PCAOB's filing with the Commission, on June 14, 2011, the Board adopted 
the proposed rules, which are substantially similar to those proposed 
on December 14, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ PCAOB Release No. 2010-009, Board Funding: Proposal for 
Allocation of the Board's Accounting Support Fee Among Issuers, 
Brokers, and Dealers, and Other Amendments to the Board's Funding 
Rules (December 14, 2010); PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 033 
(the ``proposing release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Statutory Basis
    The statutory basis for the proposed rules is Title I of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

B. Board's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Board does not believe that the proposed rules on funding will 
result in any burden on competition. The proposed rule changes would 
apply equally to all issuers, brokers, and dealers and pursuant to the 
statutory formula, issuers, brokers, and dealers will generally pay a 
fee that is proportionate to the size of their equity market 
capitalization, for issuers, and tentative net capital, for brokers and 
dealers. In addition, the proposed rules would provide for a fee of 
zero for issuers with average, monthly equity market capitalization of 
less than $75 million (or, for investment company issuers, less than 
$500 million) and for brokers and dealers with $5 million or less of 
average, quarterly tentative net capital.

C. Board's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rules Received From 
Members, Participants or Others

    The Board released the proposed rules for public comment in PCAOB 
Release No. 2010-009 (December 14, 2010). The Board received eight 
written comment letters relating to its initial proposed rules. The 
Board has carefully considered all comments received. The Board's 
response to the comments it received and the changes made to the

[[Page 40954]]

rules in response to the comments received are discussed below.
Brokers and Dealers
    As amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley 
Act requires that the rules of the Board provide for the equitable 
allocation, assessment, and collection by the Board of the accounting 
support fee among issuers, brokers, and dealers, and allow ``for 
differentiation among classes of issuers, brokers, and dealers, as 
appropriate.'' \11\ This section further provides that ``[t]he amount 
due from a broker or dealer shall be in proportion to the net capital 
of the broker or dealer (before or after any adjustments), compared to 
the total net capital of all brokers and dealers (before or after any 
adjustments), in accordance with rules issued by the Board.''\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Section 109(d)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Pursuant to 
Section 109(e) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Financial Accounting 
Standards Board (``FASB'') accounting support fee is to be allocated 
among issuers. Brokers and dealers therefore will not be allocated a 
portion of the FASB annual accounting support fee.
    \12\ Section 109(h)(3) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Board is adopting amendments to its funding rules 
to allocate a portion of the accounting support fee among brokers and 
dealers,\13\ to establish classes of brokers and dealers for funding 
purposes, to describe the methods for allocating the appropriate 
portion of the accounting support fee to each broker and dealer within 
each class, and to address the collection of the assessed share of the 
broker-dealer accounting support fee from brokers and dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The PCAOB is amending its rules to add definitions of 
``broker'' and ``dealer'' consistent with the definitions that the 
Dodd-Frank Act added to Section 110 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These 
definitions incorporate the definition of ``broker'' in Section 
3(a)(4) of the Exchange Act and ``dealer'' in Section 3(a)(5) of the 
Exchange Act, but only include those brokers or dealers that are 
required to file a balance sheet, income statement, or other 
financial statement certified by a registered public accounting 
firm. See Sections 110(3) and (4) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 109(d)(3) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as amended 
by the Dodd-Frank Act, the PCAOB is to begin the allocation, 
assessment, and collection of the accounting support fee from brokers 
and dealers to fund the first full fiscal year beginning after the date 
of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, which is the Board's 2011 
fiscal year. Accordingly, the amendments to its funding rules for 
brokers and dealers are effective, subject to approval by the SEC, for 
the allocation, assessment, and collection of the accounting support 
fee for brokers and dealers in 2011.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The Board expects that the initial allocation, assessment, 
and collection of the accounting support fee for brokers and dealers 
will take place during the fall of 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. The Broker-Dealer Accounting Support Fee

    The Report of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
Affairs that accompanied the legislation that would become the Dodd-
Frank Act stated:

    The Committee expects that the PCAOB will reasonably estimate 
the amounts required to fund the portions of its programs devoted to 
the oversight of audits of brokers and dealers, as contrasted to the 
oversight of audits of issuers, in deciding the total amounts to be 
allocated to, assessed, and collected from all brokers and dealers * 
* * Cost accounting for each program is not required.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ S. Rep. No. 176, 111th Cong., 2d Sess. (April 30, 2010) at 
154.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with this expectation, the Board each year will 
reasonably estimate amounts required to fund the portions of the 
Board's programs devoted to the oversight of audits of issuers and the 
amounts required to fund the portions of its programs devoted to the 
oversight of the audits of brokers and dealers. At the time the Board 
establishes a total accounting support fee, it also will allocate the 
respective portions of the total accounting support fee among issuers 
(the ``issuer accounting support fee'') and among brokers and dealers 
(the ``broker-dealer accounting support fee''). In accordance with 
Section 109(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Board's budget, which 
includes the total accounting support fee and the portion of the total 
accounting support fee to be allocated to issuers and the portion to be 
allocated to brokers and dealers, is subject to the Commission's 
approval.

B. Classes of Brokers and Dealers

    The Board is establishing classes of brokers and dealers for 
funding purposes to allow for the equitable distribution of the 
accounting support fee. Establishing classes allows the Board to 
allocate the broker-dealer accounting support fee to those brokers and 
dealers whose audits, due to their relative size and complexity, may 
require more Board time and resources during an inspection than other 
audits of brokers and dealers with relatively small and less complex 
operations.
    Further, because Section 109 requires that allocations be based on 
a broker's or dealer's net capital ``before or after any adjustments,'' 
the Board is basing the classes of brokers and dealers on the average 
``tentative net capital'' reported at the end of the calendar quarters 
during the previous calendar year. ``Tentative net capital'' is defined 
in the Board's rules to have the same meaning that the term has in Rule 
15c3-1(c)(15) under the Exchange Act.\16\ This definition generally 
provides that the ``tentative net capital'' of a broker or dealer is 
its net capital before deducting certain securities haircuts and 
changes in inventory used in calculating the broker's or dealer's net 
capital. Because the investment decisions made by a broker or dealer 
can influence the amount of these deductions and thus influence the net 
capital calculation, ``tentative net capital'' may be a more consistent 
basis for allocation of the broker-dealer accounting support fee. Both 
net capital and tentative net capital amounts are reported by brokers 
and dealers on their quarterly FOCUS reports filed on Form X-17A-5.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ ``Tentative net capital'' is the net capital of a broker or 
dealer before certain adjustments. See Rule 15c3-1(c)(15) under the 
Exchange Act.
    \17\ See generally, Rule 17a-5 under the Exchange Act. The 
tentative net capital and net capital amounts may be reported in 
Part I, II, and IIA of the FOCUS report and are unaudited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In considering the effect of this measurement criterion at the 
proposal phase, the Board reviewed the tentative net capital of 4,656 
brokers and dealers as of the third and fourth quarters of 2009 and the 
first and second quarters of 2010.\18\ Registered brokers and dealers 
had average, quarterly tentative net capital amounts for the four 
quarters ranging up to approximately $15.8 billion. Thirty-three 
brokers and dealers, however, held approximately 80.1% of the total 
average, quarterly tentative net capital maintained by all 4,656 
brokers and dealers. In addition, only 120 brokers and dealers each had 
average, quarterly tentative net capital in excess of $100 million, 452 
brokers and dealers each had average, quarterly tentative net capital 
in excess of $10 million, and 638 brokers and dealers had average, 
quarterly tentative net capital in excess of $5 million. The Board has 
reviewed the tentative net capital of 4,750 brokers and dealers as of 
the four calendar quarters of 2010 and noted no significant differences 
with amounts reviewed during the proposal phase of this project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The data used by the Board for these purposes represents 
data for brokers and dealers that (i) are members of Financial 
Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') and have designated FINRA 
as their designated examining authority (``DEA''); or (ii) are 
members of FINRA and have designated another self-regulatory 
organization as their DEA but file FOCUS information with FINRA on a 
voluntary basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Approximately 86.3% of the brokers and dealers included in the 
statistics reviewed by the staff have average, quarterly tentative net 
capital of less than $5 million. At the same time, the total average, 
quarterly tentative net

[[Page 40955]]

capital for all brokers and dealers in that group was approximately 
1.1% of the total average, quarterly tentative net capital for all 
brokers and dealers. Conversely, approximately 13.7% of all brokers and 
dealers have approximately 98.9% of the total average, quarterly 
tentative net capital.
    Based on the above analysis, which illustrates the significant 
number of brokers and dealers with average, quarterly tentative net 
capital of less than $5 million, the Board is establishing two classes 
of brokers and dealers for purposes of the accounting support fee: (1) 
Those with average, quarterly tentative net capital greater than $5 
million and (2) those with average, quarterly tentative net capital 
less than or equal to $5 million or not filing audited financial 
statements pursuant to a Commission rule or other action of the 
Commission or its staff (sometimes referred to as a ``$5 million 
threshold'' in the release).\19\ The average would be based on the 
tentative net capital as of the end of the calendar quarters of the 
calendar year immediately prior to the Board's calculation of the 
broker-dealer accounting support fee.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Brokers or dealers with larger tentative net capital 
amounts may be ``clearing'' or ``carrying'' brokers and dealers 
rather than ``introducing'' brokers and dealers. Because of the 
nature of their businesses, audits of the compliance reports for 
clearing or carrying brokers and dealers may require more testing 
and documentation than audits of introducing brokers and dealers. 
PCAOB inspections of audits of brokers' and dealers' financial 
statements and examinations of reports regarding compliance with 
Commission and regulatory requirements of brokers and dealers with 
larger amounts of tentative net capital, consequently, may require 
more Board resources.
    \20\ Brokers and dealers generally file quarterly reports within 
17 business days after the end of the calendar quarter. See, for 
example, Rules 17a-5(a)(2)(ii) and (iii) under the Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Allocation of the Broker-Dealer Accounting Support Fee

    Consistent with Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the PCAOB 
funding rules allocate to brokers and dealers in the class with 
average, quarterly tentative net capital greater than $5 million a 
share of the broker-dealer accounting support fee based on a ratio 
where the numerator is the average, quarterly tentative net capital of 
the broker or dealer for the calendar quarters of the immediately prior 
calendar year and the denominator is the sum of the average, quarterly 
tentative net capital of all the brokers and dealers in this class.
    Under these rules, brokers and dealers with average, quarterly 
tentative net capital equal to or less than $5 million will be 
allocated a share of the broker-dealer accounting support fee equal to 
zero.\21\ The Board chose the $5 million tentative net capital 
threshold because it was concerned that, due to the concentration of 
the industry's aggregate tentative net capital among relatively few 
brokers and dealers, the allocation of the broker-dealer accounting 
support fee below the $5 million threshold could impose a relatively 
costly administrative burden on many smaller brokers and dealers. At 
the same time, based on the Board's analysis, allocating a share of the 
broker-dealer accounting support fee equal to zero to such small 
entities should have a negligible effect on the share of the broker-
dealer accounting support fee allocated to the larger brokers and 
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Assigning a broker or dealer a share of the accounting 
support fee equal to zero when its average, quarterly tentative net 
capital is equal to or less than $5 million does not affect the 
Board's oversight of the audits of that broker or dealer. The Dodd-
Frank Act amendments to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act state that if the 
Board establishes a program of inspection for audits of brokers and 
dealers, it shall consider whether differing inspection schedules 
are appropriate for auditors of brokers or dealers that do not 
receive, hold, or handle customer securities, and that the Board may 
exempt certain auditors from its inspection program and, 
consequently, from registration with the Board. See Section 
104(a)(2) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Any Board decisions in these 
matters would be made only after additional rulemakings specific to 
the Board's inspection and registration programs for auditors of 
brokers and dealers and would be subject to Commission approval. If 
the Board decides at a later time that auditors of certain groups of 
brokers or dealers are exempt from the Board's inspection program 
and, therefore, eligible to withdraw from registration with the 
PCAOB, no share or portion of any accounting support fee paid by any 
broker or dealer would be refundable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For example, based on the data for the third and fourth quarters of 
2009 and the first and second quarters of 2010, assuming a broker-
dealer accounting support fee of $15 million,\22\ if no average, 
quarterly tentative net capital threshold was applied, 1,557 brokers 
and dealers would be allocated a share of the broker-dealer accounting 
support fee of $100 or more.\23\ The aggregate share of the broker-
dealer accounting support fee allocated to brokers and dealers with 
average, quarterly tentative net capital of $5 million or less, 
however, would be $141,700, representing 0.9% of the assumed $15 
million broker-dealer accounting support fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ On November 23, 2010, the Board approved its 2011 budget, 
which included a total accounting support fee of approximately 
$202.3 million. The allocated portion of the total accounting 
support fee to brokers and dealers, which is referred to as the 
broker-dealer accounting support fee, was approximately $14.4 
million for 2011. There is no assurance that future broker-dealer 
accounting support fees will be the same as the 2011 broker-dealer 
accounting support fee.
    \23\ The allocated share for each of the remaining 3,099 brokers 
and dealers would be less than $50 and, therefore, under the Board's 
rules rounded down to zero. See PCAOB Rule 7103(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the $5 million threshold, assuming a broker-dealer accounting 
support fee of $15 million, approximately 638 brokers and dealers would 
be allocated a share of the broker-dealer accounting support fee. Under 
this threshold, 919 fewer brokers and dealers are allocated a share of 
the broker-dealer accounting support fee. In addition, under the $5 
million threshold, the share of the broker-dealer accounting support 
fee assessed to brokers and dealers with average, quarterly tentative 
net capital less than $45 million (but above the $5 million threshold) 
would be the same as under the no threshold scenario discussed 
above.\24\ The share of the broker-dealer accounting support fee 
assessed to brokers and dealers with average, quarterly tentative net 
capital greater than $45 million under the $5 million threshold would 
increase by less than 2.0% of the assessed share of the fee under the 
no threshold scenario.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ The allocated share of the broker-dealer accounting support 
fee for 48 out of 441 brokers and dealers with average, quarterly 
tentative net capital between $5 million and $45 million may 
increase by $100 because the additional allocated amount would 
result in the unrounded allocated share being $50 more than a 
multiple of $100 and, therefore, under the Board's rules rounded up 
to the nearest $100. See PCAOB Rule 7103(a). For a more detailed 
discussion of the Board's analysis, see the proposing release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because the accounting support fee will be divided into an issuer 
accounting support fee and a broker-dealer accounting support fee, it 
is possible that affiliated entities may be allocated separate shares 
of both the issuer and broker-dealer accounting support fees. For 
example, if an issuer has one or more broker or dealer subsidiaries, 
the issuer may be allocated a share of the issuer accounting support 
fee and each broker or dealer subsidiary may be allocated a share of 
the broker-dealer accounting support fee. The allocations are designed 
to support oversight programs tailored to the audits of different types 
of entities. The issuer is responsible for payment of the allocated 
share of the issuer accounting support fee and each broker-dealer 
subsidiary is responsible for payment of its allocated share of the 
broker-dealer accounting support fee.

D. Collection

    The Board is adopting amendments to its rules regarding the 
assessment and collection of the accounting support fee to include 
appropriate references to brokers and dealers.
    Currently, if a share of the accounting support fee allocated to an 
issuer is

[[Page 40956]]

past-due \25\ and the issuer has not filed a petition with the Board 
seeking correction of its assigned share, then, with certain 
exceptions, no registered public accounting firm is permitted to sign 
an unqualified audit opinion with respect to that issuer's financial 
statements or to sign a consent to the use of prior audit opinions for 
that issuer. The same concept is being extended to brokers and dealers 
in that no registered public accounting firm is permitted to sign an 
audit report or a document, report, notice, or other record concerning 
procedures or controls for a broker or dealer if its share of the 
broker-dealer accounting support fee is past-due and no petition for 
correction has been filed. In addition, for issuers with one or more 
broker or dealer subsidiaries, if the share of the accounting support 
fee allocated either to the issuer or any of its broker or dealer 
subsidiaries is past due and no petition for correction has been filed 
with respect to that share, no registered public accounting firm may 
sign an audit report for that issuer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Pursuant to PCAOB Rule 7104(a), payment is due 30 days 
after the notice setting forth the allocated share of the accounting 
support fee to the issuer is sent. Under the Board's current rules, 
the ``notice'' referenced in Rule 7104(a) relates to the document 
sent by the Board setting forth an entity's share of the accounting 
support fee under Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the 
Board's funding rules. The Board is adopting amendments to replace 
the term ``notice'' with ``invoice'' in its funding rules so as not 
to cause any confusion with the definition of ``audit'' and ``audit 
report,'' which both now contain a reference to ``notice.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained in the proposing release, to avoid unnecessarily 
preventing issuers from timely access to the capital markets, the 
funding rules contain a limited exception to this prohibition on the 
signing of audit reports and the issuance of consents. The exception 
was originally adopted because an issuer may have a past-due share of 
the accounting support fee at a time when, in order to access or 
preserve its ability to access the capital markets in a timely manner, 
the issuer needs to submit a report to, or make a filing with, the 
Commission and the issuer must include an auditor's opinion or consent 
in that report or filing. If circumstances cause an issuer to rely upon 
the exception, however, the funding rules have required the issuer to 
submit an electronic notice to the Board no later than the next 
business day after the filing is made with the Commission.\26\ The rule 
limits the use of the exception to a single 15 business day period 
beginning on the earlier of the date of the filing with the Commission 
or the date of the notice to the Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See PCAOB Release No. 2003-02, Amended SEC Filing Form 19b-
4 (June 30, 2003). As discussed elsewhere in this release, the Board 
is amending this rule to require that the notice be filed by the 
registered public accounting firm instead of the issuer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board is extending this exception so that it will be available 
when brokers and dealers, including brokers or dealers that are 
subsidiaries of issuers, have an outstanding past-due share of the 
accounting support fee. Under the rules, therefore, if the conditions 
of the rule are met, a registered public accounting firm may sign an 
unqualified audit opinion or provide a consent to the use of a 
previously issued audit report with respect to the financial statements 
of not only an issuer but also a broker or dealer even though the 
issuer, broker, dealer, or a broker or dealer subsidiary of an issuer, 
has outstanding a past-due share of the accounting support fee and has 
not filed a petition for correction. For example, if a broker 
subsidiary of an issuer has an outstanding past-due share of the 
broker-dealer accounting support fee, and the broker subsidiary needs 
an audit report in order to submit a report to, or make a filing with, 
the Commission, then, provided the specific conditions in Rule 7104(b) 
are met, the subsidiary's registered public accounting firm is 
permitted to sign an unqualified audit opinion with respect to that 
broker subsidiary's financial statements or issue a consent to include 
an audit report issued previously.
    Under the terms of the rule, however, the exception may be invoked 
only once with respect to any share of the accounting support fee that 
a broker or dealer is assessed in a given year.\27\ Accordingly, using 
the example above, the exception could not be invoked again with 
respect to the outstanding broker-dealer accounting support fee balance 
if the broker's issuer parent later needs an audit report in order to 
submit a report to, or make a filing with, the Commission. The 
outstanding broker-dealer accounting support fee balance would have to 
be paid before the issuer parent's registered public accounting firm 
signs an unqualified audit opinion or issues a consent to include an 
audit report issued previously with respect to that issuer's financial 
statements. After the broker-dealer accounting support fee is paid, 
however, the issuer parent could invoke the exception with respect to 
an outstanding, past-due share of the issuer's accounting support fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See PCAOB Rule 7104(b), which states ``[t]his exception to 
paragraph (b)(1) of this Rule * * * may not be invoked for more than 
one such period with respect to any share of the accounting support 
fee that the issuer, broker, or dealer is assessed under Rule 
7103.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A note added to the funding rules states that for the purposes of 
the prohibition on signing unqualified audit reports for issuers, 
brokers, and dealers with past-due shares of the accounting support 
fee, the term ``audit'' means an examination of the financial 
statements, reports, documents, procedures, controls, and notices of 
any issuer, broker, or dealer by a registered accounting firm for the 
purpose of expressing an opinion on the financial statements or 
providing an audit report. ``Audit report'' in these circumstances 
means a document, report, notice, or other record prepared following an 
audit performed for purposes of compliance by an issuer, broker, or 
dealer with the requirements of the securities laws and in which the 
auditor either (i) sets forth an opinion of the firm regarding the 
financial statement, report, notice, or other document, procedures, or 
controls, or (ii) asserts that no such opinion can be expressed.\28\ 
These are the same definitions found in new Section 110 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These definitions recognize that auditors today not 
only examine entities' financial statements but, for larger issuers, 
auditors also examine internal control over financial reporting, and, 
for brokers and dealers, auditors further issue mandated reports under 
Rule 17a-5 and other applicable regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ In connection with other rulemaking projects, the Board may 
consider amending its rules to apply more broadly the definitions of 
``audit'' and ``audit report'' in Section 110 of the Sarbanes-Oxley 
Act. If such rulemaking occurs, the Board may revisit the need for 
this Note in the funding rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, consistent with the provisions in the funding rules 
applicable to issuers, the revised funding rules provide that if the 
Board does not receive payment within 30 days of a broker or dealer 
being notified of its share of the accounting support fee, the payment 
will be deemed past due and interest will accrue at a rate of 6% per 
year. If payment is not received by the 90th day after the original 
notice was sent, the Board may report the nonpayment to the Commission 
or the broker's or dealer's designated examining authority, which may 
pursue appropriate disciplinary action in accordance with its 
rules.\29\ Section 109(h)(1) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as amended by 
the Dodd-Frank Act, provides that ``[e]ach broker or dealer shall pay 
to the Board the annual accounting support fee allocated to such broker 
or dealer under this section.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ For issuers, nonpayment of PCAOB accounting support fee 
would continue to be a violation of Section 13(b)(2)(C) of the 
Exchange Act.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 40957]]

E. Public Comment Process and Board Responses

    In response to the proposed rules, the Board received three comment 
letters that addressed establishing classes of brokers and dealers and 
allocating the broker-dealer accounting support fee. Commenters 
supported these rules and, in particular, the proposal to have portions 
of the fee paid only by brokers and dealers with at least $5 million in 
tentative net capital.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ Letters from the National Association of Independent Broker 
Dealers, Terminus Securities LLC, and the California Society of 
Certified Public Accountants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional commenters raised issues regarding re-designated Rule 
7104(b), Determination of Payment of Accounting Support Fees by 
Registered Accounting Firm. This rule is designed to encourage payment 
of the accounting support by issuers, brokers, and dealers by 
prohibiting auditors from signing certain audit opinions and consents 
to the use of prior opinions unless the appropriate fee has been paid 
to the PCAOB. An exception to this prohibition, however, is available 
under specific circumstances. If under the circumstances described in 
Rule 7104(b) a registered public accounting firm signs an unqualified 
audit opinion or issues a consent to include an audit report issued 
previously, that firm must submit a notice to the Board that it and the 
issuer, broker, or dealer are relying on the exception.\31\ The 
commenters questioned whether the rule is necessary, opposed shifting 
the requirement to submit the notice from the issuer (or broker or 
dealer) \32\ to the auditor,\33\ and one commenter requested that Note 
1 to this rule include the word ``solely'' to indicate that an auditor 
may determine that the fee has been paid solely by obtaining a 
representation from management to that effect.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See PCAOB Release No. 2003-02, Amended SEC Filing Form 19b-
4 (June 30, 2003). As discussed elsewhere in this release, the Board 
is amending this rule to require that the notice be filed by the 
registered public accounting firm instead of the issuer.
    \32\ The original PCAOB rule applied only to issuers. The 
amended rule applies to issuers, brokers, and dealers.
    \33\ See the letters from the Center for Audit Quality; Deloitte 
& Touche LLP; KPMG LLP; McGladrey & Pullen, LLP; and 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
    \34\ See the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board adopted the predecessor to new Rule 7104(b) in 2003 as 
part of the original funding rules. As stated in the adopting release 
for the funding rules in 2003, the collection measures in the rules are 
intended to ensure the reliability of the independent funding source 
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act provides for the Board and to promote fairness 
to all entities allocated a share of the accounting support fee.\35\ 
This rule may be part of the reason collection of the accounting 
support fee has worked as intended and the Board has experienced a high 
collection rate of the accounting support fee. Accordingly, subject to 
Commission approval, the rule will continue to be part of the Board's 
funding rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ See Board Funding: Establishment of Accounting Support Fee, 
PCAOB Release No. 2003-003 (April 18, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Some commenters opposed shifting to auditors the requirement to 
submit a notice to the Board that the exception in Rule 7104(b) has 
been used and that an auditor opinion or consent has been signed and 
filed with the Commission despite non-payment of the accounting support 
fee. These commenters indicated that the issuer, and potentially the 
broker or dealer, should make this submission because (1) It is the 
issuer (or broker or dealer) that is delinquent with its share of the 
fee, (2) it is the issuer (or broker or dealer) that is filing its 
documents with the Commission, and (3) a process already has been 
established with issuers under the existing rule.\36\ One commenter 
noted statements in the proposing release expressing that it is the 
issuer's circumstances that cause the use of the exception and that 
submission of the notice is not a condition for reliance on the 
exception and does not affect the validity of the auditor's opinion or 
consent. The commenter indicated that given those statements, it is not 
appropriate to shift the burden for the notice to the auditor.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ See the letters from the Center for Audit Quality; Deloitte 
& Touche LLP; KPMG LLP; McGladrey & Pullen, LLP; and 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
    \37\ See the letter from McGladrey & Pullen, LLP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Shifting the responsibility to the auditor to make the submission, 
however, better aligns the rule with the Board's general oversight 
authority over registered public accounting firms. Furthermore, over 
the past eight years, the Board has received only a few notices under 
this rule. A cursory review of SEC filings by issuers with outstanding 
accounting support fee balances, however, provides anecdotal evidence 
that more notices should have been filed. Such omissions to file might 
be due to issuers being relatively unfamiliar with PCAOB rules or 
unaware of the potential consequences of not complying with a PCAOB 
rule. Auditors should be more familiar with the Board's rules. Also, 
placing the obligation on auditors to file such notices may make 
application of the rule more readily subject to the Board's review. 
Accordingly, the rule is being adopted as proposed.
    Finally, one commenter asked that the word ``solely'' be added to 
Note 1 to proposed Rule 7104(b) in order to make clear that to satisfy 
the obligation to determine that the fee has been paid by the issuer, 
broker, or dealer, the auditor only has to receive a management 
representation to that effect.\38\ While the Board has said that it is 
sufficient if an auditor determines an issuer's payment of the 
accounting support fee by obtaining a management representation of 
payment,\39\ auditors also may determine such payments through other 
means. For example, an auditor also may determine an issuer's payment 
of the accounting support fee by checking the ``List of Issuers with No 
Outstanding Past-Due Share of the Accounting Support Fee'' that is 
posted on the Board's Web site.\40\ Adding the word ``solely'' to the 
Note could result in some firms mistakenly believing that the Board 
prefers management representations over other equivalent means of 
determining such payments. The rule, therefore, is being adopted as 
proposed.

Issuers
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ See the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP.
    \39\ See Question 26 of the Frequently Asked Questions--The 
Accounting Support Fee and the Funding Process, dated April 22, 
2011. The Frequently Asked Questions are located at e3
    \40\ The list is located at http://pcaobus.org/About/Ops/Documents/Support%20Fee/Issuers_Paid.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board also is adopting amendments to its existing rules for the 
allocation, assessment, and collection of the issuer accounting support 
fee. The amendments to the issuer funding rules are effective, subject 
to approval by the Commission, for the allocation, assessment, and 
collection of the 2012 accounting support fee for issuers.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ The Board's allocation, assessment, and collection of the 
accounting support fee for issuers typically takes place during the 
first half of the Board's fiscal year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Definitions of Market Capitalization and Common Equity

    The Board's rules historically have defined the terms ``issuer 
market capitalization'' and ``market capitalization of an issuer'' to 
be the aggregate market value of all classes of an issuer's common 
stock that trade in the United States. Determining an issuer's market 
capitalization based on its outstanding common stock, however, has led 
to interpretive issues, such as whether an entity's ``common stock'' 
includes limited partnership units or interests, securities convertible 
into common stock, rights or options to

[[Page 40958]]

purchase common stock, and other categories of securities.
    To reduce issues regarding the meaning of ``common stock'' in the 
Board's rules, the Board is amending the definition of ``issuer market 
capitalization'' and ``market capitalization of an issuer'' to replace 
the reference to ``common stock'' with a reference to ``voting and non-
voting common equity.'' As amended, references in the Board's rules to 
an issuer's ``market capitalization'' are to the issuer's aggregate 
market value of all classes of voting and non-voting common equity 
traded in the United States.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ See PCAOB Rule 1001(i)(i)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The definition of ``common equity'' being adopted by the Board 
tracks the definition in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. As applied 
by the Board for funding purposes, the amount of common equity 
considered in deriving an issuer's market capitalization is based on 
any class of common stock or equivalent interest, any beneficial 
interest in a trust or a limited partnership interest, and any other 
security that the Commission, by rule, deems to treat as common equity.

B. Classes of Issuers

    The Board also is adopting amendments to the descriptions of the 
existing classes of issuers. The funding rules adopted by the Board in 
2003 identified four classes of issuers: (1) Equity issuers whose 
average, monthly market capitalization during the preceding calendar 
year is greater than $25 million, (2) investment company issuers (and 
entities that have elected to be regulated as business development 
companies) whose average, monthly market capitalization during the 
preceding calendar year is greater than $250 million, (3) issuers that, 
as of the date the accounting support fee is calculated (i) do not have 
to file financial statements pursuant to Commission rule or other 
action of the staff of the Commission, (ii) are employee stock 
purchase, savings, and similar plans, or (iii) are subject to the 
jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court and satisfy the modified reporting 
requirements of Commission Staff Legal Bulletin No. 2 (``SLB No. 2''), 
and (4) all other issuers.
    The Board is amending the description of the classes of issuers in 
two significant ways. First, the Board is raising the average, monthly 
market capitalization threshold for the first two classes of issuers. 
Second, the Board is changing the description of issuers that are 
subject to the jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court and satisfy the 
modified reporting requirements of SLB No. 2.
1. Change in Average, Monthly Market Capitalization Threshold
    The Board is adopting amendments that raise the average, monthly 
market capitalization threshold during the preceding calendar year for 
the first class of issuers from $25 million to $75 million. Equity 
issuers with a market capitalization between $25 million and $75 
million, therefore, are moving from the first class to the fourth class 
and will be allocated a share of the accounting support fee equal to 
zero. The Board notes that the aggregate issuer accounting support fee 
collected from equity issuers with average, monthly market 
capitalizations between $25 million and $75 million during the past 
seven years has been a relatively small part (less than 0.4%) of the 
Board's total accounting support fee from equity issuers.\43\ At the 
same time, approximately 1,100 equity issuers, representing 
approximately 22.6% of all equity issuers assessed a fee in 2010, have 
average, monthly market capitalization within that range.\44\ In 
addition, not allocating a share of the issuer accounting support fee 
to these issuers appears to have a negligible effect on the amounts 
allocated to other issuers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ The Board's use and calculation of $75 million in market 
capitalization for funding purposes should not be confused with the 
criteria to determine whether an issuer is deemed an ``accelerated 
filer,'' as defined by Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. Under that 
rule, an issuer is an accelerated filer if, among other things, it 
has an aggregate worldwide market value of the voting and non-voting 
common equity held by non-affiliates (i.e., public float) of $75 
million or more as of the end of the entity's second quarter. See 
Release No. 33-8128 (September 5, 2002).
    \44\ The aggregate FASB accounting support fee collected on 
behalf of FASB from equity issuers with average, monthly market 
capitalizations between $25 million and $75 million for the 2010 
accounting support fee was a relatively small part (less than 0.4%) 
of the FASB accounting support fee from equity issuers despite the 
fact that approximately 1,100 equity issuers, representing 
approximately 22.6% of all equity issuers assessed a fee, have 
average, monthly market capitalization within that range.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board similarly is raising the average, monthly market 
capitalization threshold for the second class of issuers consisting of 
investment company issuers (and business development companies) 
currently subject to allocation of the support fee from $250 million to 
$500 million.\45\ Investment companies (including business development 
companies) with average, monthly market capitalizations between $250 
million and $500 million, therefore, are moving from the second class 
to the fourth class and will be allocated a share of the accounting 
support fee equal to zero. The Board notes that the aggregate fees 
collected from investment company issuers (including business 
development companies) with average, monthly market capitalizations 
between $250 million and $500 million during the past seven years have 
been a relatively small part (approximately 5.1%) of the Board's total 
accounting support fee from investment companies.\46\ At the same time, 
approximately 1,450 investment companies, representing approximately 
33.4% of all investment companies assessed a share of the issuer 
accounting support fee in 2010, have average, monthly market 
capitalization within that range.\47\ In addition, as discussed below, 
not allocating a share of the issuer accounting support fee to

[[Page 40959]]

these investment companies appears to have a negligible effect on the 
amounts allocated to other investment companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ Under the Board's original funding rules, market 
capitalization for an investment company issuer whose shares are not 
traded on a national exchange or quoted on NASDAQ was the investment 
company's net asset value. As noted in the proposing release, since 
the Board's adoption of its funding rules in 2003, NASDAQ Stock 
Market LLC has become a national securities exchange under 
Commission rules. In light of this change, the Board proposed to 
revise PCAOB Rule 1001(i)(i)(2) by replacing the reference to NASDAQ 
with a reference to the ``OTC Bulletin Board.'' After further 
consideration, however, the Board does not believe the proposed 
reference in the rule to the ``OTC Bulletin Board'' is necessary and 
believes it is preferable for its rules not to refer to any 
particular market that is currently in operation. Accordingly, PCAOB 
Rule 1001(i)(i)(2) is being amended to replace the phrase ``quoted 
on NASDAQ'' with the phrase ``whose share price is not otherwise 
publicly available.'' This is consistent with the current 
requirement contained in Rule 7101(a)(2), which references the 
public availability of the share price in describing investment 
company issuers eligible to be assessed a share of the issuer 
accounting support fee. Therefore, starting in 2012, the market 
capitalization for an issuer that is an investment company whose 
shares are not traded on a national exchange or whose share price is 
not otherwise publically available, will be the investment company's 
net asset value.
    \46\ Approximately 7.9% of the 2010 accounting support fee was 
allocated to investment companies. Under the Board's funding rules, 
when allocating the issuer accounting support fee to investment 
companies, 10% of the investment company issuer's actual average 
monthly market capitalization or net asset value is used in the 
calculation. Accordingly, the amount of the issuer accounting 
support fee allocated to investment companies over the past seven 
years has represented a relatively small portion (average of 
approximately 6.2%) of the total issuer accounting support fee 
assessed.
    \47\ The aggregate fees collected on behalf of FASB from 
investment company issuers (including business development 
companies) with average, monthly market capitalizations between $250 
million and $500 million for the 2010 accounting support fee was a 
relatively small part (approximately 5.3%) of the FASB accounting 
support fee from investment companies despite the fact that 
approximately 1,450 investment companies, representing approximately 
33.4% of all investment companies assessed a share of the FASB 
accounting support fee in 2010, have average, monthly market 
capitalization within that range.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Raising the threshold for the first class of issuers from $25 
million in average, monthly market capitalization to $75 million and 
raising the threshold for the second class of issuers from $250 million 
in average, monthly market capitalization to $500 million should have a 
negligible effect on the amounts allocated to issuers under Section 109 
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.\48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ The changes to the thresholds for the first and second 
classes of issuers are also applicable to the allocation of the FASB 
accounting support fee, which pursuant to Section 109(e) of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act is allocated among issuers only.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Generally, equity issuers with average, monthly market 
capitalization of approximately $600 million or greater are likely to 
see an increase in their allocated share of the issuer accounting 
support fee.\49\ Each entity's allocated share of the fee increases, 
however, by approximately 1% or less. For investment company issuers, 
on average, the allocated share of the accounting support fee increases 
for entities with average, monthly market capitalization of 
approximately $4 billion or greater, with the entity's allocated share 
of the fee increasing by approximately 2% or less.\50\ Accordingly, the 
amendments to the average, monthly market capitalization for class one 
and two issuers should not result in a significant increase in any 
issuer's assessed share of the accounting support fee.\51\ The Board 
has reviewed the impact of increasing the threshold for equity company 
issuers and investment company issuers using the information from the 
allocation, assessment, and collection of the 2011 accounting support 
fee for issuers and noted no significant differences with amounts 
reviewed during the proposal phase of this project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ The allocated share of the issuer accounting support fee 
for 465 out of 1,190 equity issuers with average, monthly market 
capitalization between $75 million and $600 million may increase by 
$100 because the additional allocated amount could result in the 
unrounded allocated share being $50 more than a multiple of $100 
and, therefore, under the Board's rules, rounded up to the nearest 
$100. See PCAOB Rule 7103(a).
    \50\ The allocated share of the issuer accounting support fee 
for 327 out of 2,367 investment companies with average, monthly 
market capitalization between $500 million and $4 billion may 
increase by $100 because the additional allocated amount could 
result in the unrounded allocated share being $50 more than a 
multiple of $100 and, therefore, under the Board's rules rounded up 
to the nearest $100. See PCAOB Rule 7103(a).
    \51\ For a detailed discussion of the Board's analysis, see the 
proposing release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Modified Reporting Requirements of SLB No. 2
    The Board also is amending the description of the class of issuers 
that are not assessed a share of the accounting support fee because 
they are in bankruptcy. As noted above, under the Board's funding rules 
adopted in 2003, issuers that are under the jurisdiction of a 
bankruptcy court and ``satisfy the modified reporting requirements of 
Commission Staff Legal Bulletin No. 2'' are in the third class and are 
assigned a share of the accounting support fee equal to zero.\52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ SEC Staff Legal Bulletin No. 2 (CF) (April 15, 1997), 
available at http://sec.gov/interps/legal/slbcf2.txt, reflects the 
views of the Commission's Division of Corporation Finance that 
companies under the jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court are not 
relieved of their reporting obligations under the securities laws 
but, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, may file reports 
that ``differ in form or content'' from the reports required under 
the Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    SLB No. 2 states that an issuer under the jurisdiction of a 
bankruptcy court may request that the Commission's Division of 
Corporation Finance (``Division'') provide a ``no-action'' letter 
indicating that the Division will not recommend enforcement action if 
the issuer files with the Commission modified reports in lieu of the 
reports required under the Exchange Act. SLB No. 2 describes the 
information and assertions that should be in a request for a ``no-
action'' letter, including information related to the issuer's 
financial condition, prior compliance with Exchange Act filing 
requirements, the timing of the announcement by the issuer of its 
bankruptcy filing, the issuer's ability to continue to file Exchange 
Act reports, and a description of the current market for and trading in 
the issuer's securities.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although acceptance of modified reports is at the discretion of the 
Commission staff, there is no requirement in SLB No. 2 or elsewhere 
that an issuer in bankruptcy ask the Division for a ``no-action'' 
letter prior to filing modified reports. Such ``no-action'' requests 
are voluntary. An issuer in bankruptcy may choose to file modified 
reports without providing the Division with the information and 
assertions in SLB No. 2.\54\ Because the Board's funding rules, 
however, are based on whether an issuer has ``satisf[ied] the modified 
reporting requirements'' of SLB No. 2, when the issuer has not 
requested or not received a ``no-action'' letter from the Division, the 
PCAOB staff has been placed in the position of having to evaluate 
available public information to determine whether the conditions in SLB 
No. 2 are satisfied. To address such situations, PCAOB staff generally 
has requested that issuers provide an analysis demonstrating its 
compliance with the conditions set forth in SLB No. 2 and/or an opinion 
of counsel that the issuer meets the conditions set forth in SLB No. 
2.\55\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ The Commission may deem such a filing to be deficient and 
not to satisfy the issuer's obligations under the Exchange Act and 
Commission rules and forms.
    \55\ See Question 15 of the Frequently Asked Questions--The 
Accounting Support Fee and the Funding Process, dated April 22, 
2011. The Frequently Asked Questions are located at http://pcaobus.org/About/Ops/Pages/SupportFeeFAQ.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board is amending its rules to require that in order to be 
assigned a share of the accounting support fee equal to zero, an issuer 
that is subject to the jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court and asserts 
that it falls within the third class of issuers provide an opinion of 
counsel that the issuer satisfied the modified reporting requirements 
of Commission Staff Legal Bulletin No. 2 as of the date that the issuer 
accounting support fee is calculated. This amendment is consistent with 
the staff's past practices as noted above. The impact of this amendment 
is believed to be negligible on the amounts allocated and assessed to 
issuers under Section 109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.\56\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ For the 2008-2010 accounting support fees, 26 equity 
issuers that were allocated a share of the accounting support fee 
had filed for bankruptcy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Public Comment Process and Board Responses

    One commenter supported the Board's proposals to amend the basis 
for calculating the issuer's market capitalization to include the 
market capitalization of all classes of an issuer's voting and non-
voting common equity and to increase the average monthly market 
capitalization thresholds in the funding rules for classes of equity 
issuers and investment companies.\57\ The Board did not receive any 
comments on the proposed description of the class of issuers that are 
not assessed a share of the accounting support fee because they are in 
bankruptcy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ See the letter from the California Society of Certified 
Public Accountants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, additional commenters raised issues regarding re-
designated Rule 7104(b), Determination of Payment of Accounting Support 
Fees by Registered Accounting Firm. This rule is designed to encourage 
payment of the accounting support fee by issuers, brokers, and dealers 
by prohibiting auditors from signing certain audit opinions and 
consents to the use of

[[Page 40960]]

prior opinions unless the appropriate fee has been paid to the PCAOB. 
An exception to this prohibition, however, is available under specific 
circumstances and conditions, including the submission of a notice to 
the Board that the auditor and the issuer, broker or dealer are relying 
on the exception.\58\ The commenters questioned whether the rule is 
necessary, opposed shifting the requirement to submit the notice from 
the issuer (or broker or dealer) \59\ to the auditor,\60\ and one 
commenter requested that Note 1 to this rule include the word 
``solely'' to indicate that an auditor may determine that the fee has 
been paid solely by obtaining a representation from management to that 
effect.\61\ For the reasons discussed above, the rule is being adopted 
as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \58\ See PCAOB Release No. 2003-02, Amended SEC Filing Form 19b-
4 (June 30, 2003). As discussed elsewhere in this release, the Board 
is amending this rule to require that the notice be filed by the 
registered public accounting firm instead of the issuer.
    \59\ The original PCAOB rule applied only to issuers. The 
amended rule applies to issuers, brokers, and dealers.
    \60\ See the letters from the Center for Audit Quality; Deloitte 
& Touche LLP; KPMG LLP; McGladrey & Pullen, LLP; and 
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
    \61\ See the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other Amendments to the Board's Funding Rules

    The Board also is adopting certain technical changes to its funding 
rules. The most significant of these changes are listed below.
     Rule 7100--The Board is making certain changes to Rule 
7100 to reflect that the Board establishes a total accounting support 
fee each year as part of its budget process.\62\ In addition, the 
amendment to Rule 7100 reflects the Board's obligation under Section 
109 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to equitably allocate the total 
accounting support fee between issuers, as a group, and brokers and 
dealers, as a group.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ The PCAOB Budget is approved by the Board in the preceding 
calendar year and must be approved by the Commission. PCAOB Rule 
7101(a) refers to the date the issuer accounting supporting fee is 
calculated. This date is referred to as the ``calculation date.'' As 
discussed in Question 4 of the Frequently Asked Questions--The 
Accounting Support Fee and the Funding Process, the issuer 
calculation date represents the date as of which the allocation of 
the issuer accounting support fee is determined for equity issuers 
and investment company issuers. The Frequently Asked Questions are 
located at http://pcaobus.org/About/Ops/Pages/SupportFeeFAQ.aspx. 
See also Rule 7102(a), as amended, which contains a similar 
reference to the date the broker-dealer accounting support fee is 
calculated. Under the amendments to the funding rules, this date is 
referred to as the ``broker-dealer calculation date.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Notes to Rule 7101--The Board is adopting technical 
changes to the notes to Rules 7101(a)(1) and (2) to clarify how an 
entity's monthly market capitalization is calculated and that such 
calculation includes market capitalization information for all classes 
of the issuer's voting and non-voting common equity, consistent with 
the amendments to the definition of ``issuer market capitalization'' 
discussed above.
     Rule 7103(c)--The Board is extending the time frame within 
which any issuer, broker, or dealer may petition the Board for 
correction of the class in which it has been placed or its allocated 
share of the accounting support fee. Under the amended rules, an 
issuer, broker, or dealer would have 60 days, rather than 30 days, 
after an invoice is sent to submit a petition for correction. In 
addition, the Board is codifying its existing practice of considering 
petitions received after the deadline when there is good cause to do 
so.\63\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ See Question 6 in the Frequently Asked Questions--The 
Accounting Support Fee and the Funding Process. The Frequently Asked 
Questions are located at http://pcaobus.org/About/Ops/Pages/SupportFeeFAQ.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Rule 7104(b)--The Board is adopting amendments to replace 
the word ``Confirmation'' with ``Determination'' in the caption for 
Rule 7104(b) and to delete the reference in Note 1 to the rule to 
obtaining a confirmation from the Board that no past due share of the 
accounting support fee is outstanding. This amendment clarifies that 
registered public accounting firms are not required to confirm with the 
Board whether an issuer broker, or dealer has any outstanding past due 
share of the accounting support fee prior to signing an unqualified 
audit opinion, consenting to including an audit report issued 
previously, or signing a document, report, notice, or other record 
concerning procedures or controls of any issuer, broker, or dealer 
required under the securities laws. Confirmation with the Board is one 
of a number of procedures that a registered public accounting firm may 
use in determining whether an issuer, broker, or dealer has any 
outstanding past-due share of the accounting support fee.\64\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \64\ See Questions 22-26 in the Frequently Asked Questions--The 
Accounting Support Fee and the Funding Process. The Frequently Asked 
Questions are located at http://pcaobus.org/About/Ops/Pages/SupportFeeFAQ.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Board did not receive any comments on these technical 
amendments,\65\ and they are being adopted as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \65\ As noted above, commenters raised issues with respect to 
other aspects of Rule 7104(b), including the procedures an auditor 
may use to determine whether an issuer, broker, or dealer has an 
outstanding past-due share of the accounting support fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Effective Date
    Pursuant to Section 109(d)(3) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as amended 
by the Dodd-Frank Act, the PCAOB is required to begin the allocation, 
assessment, and collection of the accounting support fee from brokers 
and dealers to fund the first full fiscal year beginning after the date 
of the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, which is the Board's 2011 
fiscal year. Accordingly, the amendments to the Board's funding rules 
are effective, subject to approval by the SEC, for the allocation, 
assessment, and collection of the 2011 broker-dealer accounting support 
fee for brokers and dealers and its 2012 issuer accounting support fee 
for issuers.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rules and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the 
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be 
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the Board consents, the Commission will:
    (a) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule; or
    (b) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed 
rules are consistent with the requirements of Title I of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/pcaob.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number PCAOB-2011-02 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number PCAOB-2011-02. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To 
help the

[[Page 40961]]

Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please 
use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the 
Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/pcaob/shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule changes that are filed 
with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the 
proposed rule changes between the Commission and any person, other than 
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and 
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official business 
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing will 
also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of 
the PCAOB. All comments received will be posted without change; we do 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File No. PCAOB-2011-02 and should be 
submitted on or before August 2, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Office of the Chief Accountant, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-17388 Filed 7-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


