[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 72 (Friday, April 14, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23276-23322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06894]



[[Page 23275]]

Vol. 88

Friday,

No. 72

April 14, 2023

Part III





Department of Transportation





-----------------------------------------------------------------------





National Highway Traffic Safety Administration





-----------------------------------------------------------------------





49 CFR Part 513





Implementing the Whistleblower Provisions of the Vehicle Safety Act; 
Proposed Rule

  Federal Register / Vol. 88 , No. 72 / Friday, April 14, 2023 / 
Proposed Rules  

[[Page 23276]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 513

[Docket No. NHTSA-2023-0014]
RIN 2127-AL85


Implementing the Whistleblower Provisions of the Vehicle Safety 
Act

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Whistleblowers are an important source of information on motor 
vehicle safety, as Congress recognized in enacting the Motor Vehicle 
Safety Whistleblower Act (Whistleblower Act). NHTSA is proposing rules, 
including forms, to implement the Whistleblower Act and seeking comment 
from interested stakeholders. The Whistleblower Act authorizes the 
Secretary of Transportation to pay an award, subject to certain 
limitations, to eligible whistleblowers who voluntarily provide 
original information relating to any motor vehicle defect, 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirement, which is likely to cause 
unreasonable risk of death or serious physical injury, if the 
information provided leads to the successful resolution of a covered 
action. The Whistleblower Act also contains protections relating to the 
whistleblower's identity. This proposed rule will help to facilitate 
the Agency's identification of information provided by whistleblowers 
to ensure that whistleblowers receive the protections afforded under 
the statute. It also describes those limited situations where 
information that could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of 
a whistleblower may be disclosed.

DATES: All comments should be submitted early enough to ensure that the 
Department of Transportation Docket Management receives them not later 
than June 13, 2023. In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, 
NHTSA is also seeking comment on a proposed information collection. See 
the Paperwork Reduction Act section under Regulatory Analyses and 
Notices below. Please submit all comments relating to the information 
collection requirements to NHTSA and to the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) at the address listed in the ADDRESSES section. Comments 
to OMB are most useful if submitted within 30 days of publication. See 
the Regulatory Analysis and Notices portion of this document for DOT's 
Privacy Act Statement regarding documents submitted to the Agency's 
dockets.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments to the docket number 
identified in the heading of this document by any of the following 
methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Docket Management Facility, U.S. 
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 between 9 a.m. and 5 
p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure 
someone is there to help you, please call (202) 366-9826 before coming.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
    Comments on the proposed information collection requirements should 
be submitted to: Office of Management and Budget at www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. To find this particular information collection, 
select ``Currently under Review--Open for Public Comment'' or use the 
search function. NHTSA also requests that comments sent to the OMB also 
be sent to the NHTSA rulemaking docket identified in the heading of 
this document.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name 
and docket number or Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for this 
rulemaking. All documents received will be posted without change to 
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and 
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public 
Participation heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this 
document.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, please visit http://www.regulations.gov, or the 
Docket Management Facility at the street address listed above. Follow 
the online instructions for accessing the dockets via internet.
    Privacy Act: Please see the Privacy Act heading under Regulatory 
Analyses and Notices.
    Confidential Business Information: If you wish to submit any 
information under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit your 
complete submission, including the information you claim to be 
confidential business information (CBI), to NHTSA's Office of the Chief 
Counsel. When you send a comment containing CBI, you should include a 
cover letter setting forth the information specified in our CBI 
regulation.\1\ In addition, you should submit a copy from which you 
have deleted the claimed CBI to the docket by one of the methods set 
forth above. NHTSA is currently treating electronic submission as an 
acceptable method for submitting CBI to NHTSA under 49 CFR part 512. If 
you wish to send CBI via email, please contact the attorney in the 
Office of the Chief Counsel at the address given below under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Likewise, for CBI submissions via a secure 
file transfer application, an attorney in the Office of the Chief 
Counsel must be set to receive a notification when files are submitted 
and have access to retrieve the submitted files. If you wish to send 
CBI via a secure file transfer, please contact the attorney identified 
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. At this time, regulated 
entities should not send a duplicate hardcopy of their electronic CBI 
submissions to DOT headquarters. If you have any questions about CBI or 
the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult the person identified 
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 49 CFR part 512.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerry Kolodziej, Office of the Chief 
Counsel, NCC-100, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(telephone: 202-366-5263), email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. Description of the Proposed Rules
    A. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.1--General
    B. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2--Definitions
    C. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.3--Representation
    D. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.4--Procedures for Submitting Original 
Information
    E. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.5--Confidentiality
    F. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.6--Prerequisites to the Consideration 
of an Award
    G. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.7--Whistleblowers Ineligible for an 
Award
    H. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.8--Provision of False Information
    I. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.9--Procedures for Making a Claim for 
a Whistleblower Award
    J. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.10--Award Determinations

[[Page 23277]]

    K. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.11--Appeals of Award Determinations
    L. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.12--Procedures Applicable to the 
Payment of Awards
    M. Proposed Appendix A--Form WB-INFO
    O. Proposed Appendix B--Form WB-RELEASE
    P. Proposed Appendix C--Form WB-AWARD
III. Public Participation
IV. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
    A. Privacy Act
    B. Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and DOT 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    D. National Environmental Policy Act
    E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
    F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    G. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
    H. Paperwork Reduction Act

I. Background

    NHTSA relies on a wide variety of sources of information to 
identify potential safety issues and violations of law. Whistleblowers 
from the motor vehicle industry have particularized knowledge and 
access to information and can identify issues that otherwise may not 
come to light. Such whistleblowers can and have provided critical 
assistance to the Agency in understanding and investigating safety 
issues.
    The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, Public Law 
114-94, established important protections and incentives for motor 
vehicle safety whistleblowers. The Motor Vehicle Safety Whistleblower 
Act (Whistleblower Act), sections 24351-25352 of the FAST Act, amended 
the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 (the Safety 
Act) to authorize the Secretary of Transportation (the Secretary) to 
pay an award, subject to certain limitations, to eligible 
whistleblowers who voluntarily provide original information relating to 
any motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, or any violation or alleged 
violation of any notification or reporting requirement of 49 U.S.C. 
chapter 301, which is likely to cause unreasonable risk of death or 
serious physical injury, if that information leads to the successful 
resolution of a covered action. Public Law 114-94, sections 24351-52, 
129 Stat. 1716 (2015) (codifying ``Whistleblower incentives and 
protections'' at 49 U.S.C. 30172). The terms ``successful resolution'' 
and ``covered action'' are defined by statute. The FAST Act also 
contains provisions designed to protect a whistleblower's identity. 129 
Stat. at 1718-19.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Additional protections for whistleblowers are found in 49 
U.S.C. 30171. That program is administered by the Department of 
Labor. See 29 CFR part 1988. Specifically, the Department of Labor, 
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) administers the 
whistleblower protection program under 49 U.S.C. 30171. Additional 
information can be found at https://www.whistleblowers.gov. Among 
other things, those provisions prohibit an employer from discharging 
or otherwise discriminating against an employee for providing 
information relating to any motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, or 
any violation or alleged violation of the Safety Act to NHTSA. This 
rulemaking is not intended to implement or otherwise affect 49 
U.S.C. 30171.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the FAST Act was signed into law on December 4, 2015, NHTSA 
has received more than 150 whistleblower submissions. The information 
NHTSA has learned from whistleblowers has helped the Agency identify 
and investigate safety issues and violations of law. In one instance, a 
whistleblower's critical assistance to the Agency resulted in two 
consent orders with civil penalties totaling $210 million.\3\ Pursuant 
to the incentives established by the FAST Act, NHTSA granted the 
whistleblower the maximum award authorized under statute for the 
significant contributions leading to that enforcement action.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/nhtsa-announces-consent-orders-hyundai-and-kia-over-theta-ii-recall.
    \4\ https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/first-whistleblower-award.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to the statutory whistleblower protections and 
incentives added by the FAST Act, Congress required NHTSA to promulgate 
whistleblower regulations.\5\ This proposal effectuates that 
requirement and is informed by the Agency's experience working with 
whistleblowers over the last several years. While the Agency has 
provided certain information to prospective whistleblowers on its 
website,\6\ the Agency believes this proposed rule will provide helpful 
guidance to whistleblowers and other interested stakeholders on the 
interpretation and application of the statutory provisions. This 
proposed rule will also help ensure the Agency receives whistleblower 
information in a manner that is most useful to its safety mission and 
that helps it carry out the legal protections afforded to 
whistleblowers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 49 U.S.C. 30172(i).
    \6\ https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/whistleblower-program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA is proposing to add a new part to its regulations, 49 CFR 
part 513, to further implement the whistleblower program established by 
the Whistleblower Act and codified at 49 U.S.C. 30172. As described in 
detail below, the proposal defines certain terms critical to the 
operation of the whistleblower program, outlines the procedures for 
submitting original information to NHTSA and applying for awards, 
discusses the Agency's procedures for making decisions on award 
applications, and generally explains the scope of the whistleblower 
program to the public and potential whistleblowers. The proposed rule 
would help to facilitate the Agency's identification of information 
provided by whistleblowers to ensure that whistleblowers receive the 
protections accorded under the statute and to inform the public of 
those limited circumstances where information that could reasonably be 
expected to reveal the identity of the whistleblower may be disclosed. 
The Agency requests comment on all aspects of the proposed rule, as 
well as comment on the specific provisions and issues highlighted in 
the discussion below.
    The provisions that later became part of the Whistleblower Act 
appeared in a bill that was introduced in the 113th Congress as S. 2949 
on November 20, 2014, the same day that the Senate Committee on 
Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing to examine the 
Takata air bag recalls.\7\ The then-Chairman discussed in his opening 
remarks at the Takata hearing that record fines had been levied against 
Toyota, GM, and Hyundai, and that ``with the latest news of problems 
with Takata air bags, we are again faced with examining an apparent 
failure with serious safety consequences.'' \8\ The then-Chairman 
stated his belief that whistleblowers could help identify problems 
before injuries or deaths occurred.\9\ The proposed legislation was 
modeled in part on other ``existing statutory whistleblower protections 
that encourage individuals to share information with the Internal 
Revenue Service and the Securities and Exchange Commission.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See S. Rep. 114-13, Motor Vehicle Safety Whistleblower Act, 
Report of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation at 
3 (2015).
    \8\ Thune Opening Statement at Commerce Hearing on Takata Air 
Bag Defects, available at https://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2014/11/thune-opening-statement-at-commerce-hearing-on-takata-air-bag-defects.
    \9\ Id. See also Thune, Nelson Introduce Legislation to Help 
Prevent Auto Injuries, Deaths From Faulty Parts by Incentivizing 
Whistleblowers, available at https://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2014/11/thune-nelson-introduce-legislation-to-help-prevent-auto-injuries-deaths-from-faulty-parts-by-incentivizing-whistleblowers.
    \10\ Thune, Nelson Introduce Legislation to Help Prevent Auto 
Injuries, Deaths From Faulty Parts by Incentivizing Whistleblowers, 
available at https://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2014/11/thune-nelson-introduce-legislation-to-help-prevent-auto-injuries-deaths-from-faulty-parts-by-incentivizing-whistleblowers. See also 
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), Sec. 
21F.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 23278]]

    In proposing these rules, NHTSA has considered other Federal 
whistleblower programs, including the Securities and Exchange 
Commission's (SEC) rules to implement section 21F of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 at 17 CFR 240.21F-1 through 240.21F-17 \11\ and 
the Commodities Future Trading Commission's (CFTC) rules to implement 
section 23 of the Commodity Exchange Act at 17 CFR part 165.\12\ NHTSA 
has also reviewed certain amendments to those rules, including recent 
amendments to the SEC's Whistleblower Program Rules \13\ and 2017 
amendments to the CFTC's whistleblower process \14\ and has had 
discussions with Commission staffs regarding their whistleblower 
programs.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Proposed Rules for Implementing the Whistleblower 
Provisions of Section 21 F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 
75 FR 70488 (Nov. 17, 2010) and Securities Whistleblower Incentives 
and Protections, 76 FR 34300 (June 13, 2011).
    \12\ See Implementing the Whistleblower Provisions of Section 23 
of the Commodity Exchange Act, 75 FR 75728 (Dec. 6, 2010) and 
Whistleblower Incentives and Protection, 76 FR 53172 (Aug. 25, 
2011).
    \13\ See Whistleblower Program Rules, 85 FR 70898 (Nov. 5, 
2020).
    \14\ See Whistleblower Awards Process, 82 FR 24487 (May 30, 
2017).
    \15\ More information regarding the SEC's Whistleblower Program 
may be found at https://www.sec.gov/whistleblower. More information 
regarding the CFTC's whistleblower program may be found at https://www.whistleblower.gov/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Agency has reviewed the U.S. Department of the Treasury's 
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) program for awards for information 
relating to detecting underpayments of tax or violations of the 
Internal Revenue laws.\16\ The Agency also had discussions with the 
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Fraud Section staff 
regarding qui tam proceedings.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Awards for Information Relating to Detecting 
Underpayments of Tax or Violations of the Internal Revenue Laws, 77 
FR 74758 (Dec. 18, 2012) and Awards for Information Relating to 
Detecting Underpayments of Tax or Violations of the Internal Revenue 
Laws, 79 FR 47246 (Aug. 12, 2014). For more information on the IRS 
whistleblower program, please see https://www.irs.gov/compliance/whistleblower-office.
    \17\ Qui tam actions are filed under the False Claims Act, 31 
U.S.C. 3729 to 3733. Relators in successful actions are entitled to 
receive a percentage of any settlement or judgment the government 
recovers. Award percentage ranges depend on whether the government 
participated in the action. See 31 U.S.C. 3730(d). If the government 
intervenes, the relator generally receives ``at least 15 percent but 
not more than 25 percent of the proceeds of the action or settlement 
of the claim, depending upon the extent to which the person 
substantially contributed to the prosecution of the action.'' 31 
U.S.C. 3730(d)(1). If the government does not intervene, generally 
``the person bringing the action or settling the claim shall receive 
an amount which the court decides is reasonable for collecting the 
civil penalty and damages. The amount shall be not less than 25 
percent and not more than 30 percent of the proceeds of the action 
or settlement and shall be paid out of such proceeds.'' 31 U.S.C. 
3730(d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These whistleblower program examples have informed NHTSA's 
proposal; however, there are also several important distinctions 
between the statutory authority and scope of these programs as compared 
to the statutory authority and scope of NHTSA's whistleblower program. 
As such, NHTSA's proposed rules are tailored to its statutory authority 
and programmatic considerations. The following examples of the 
differences between other whistleblower programs and NHTSA's authority 
for its whistleblower program are intended to be illustrative and not 
exhaustive.
    One major difference is that the statutory definition of a 
``whistleblower'' is narrower under the Whistleblower Act than in some 
other contexts. Under 49 U.S.C. 30172(a)(6), a whistleblower must be an 
employee or contractor of a motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, 
or dealership, whereas the definition of a whistleblower under the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures 
Trading Commission (CTFC) programs includes ``any individual.'' \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See 7 U.S.C. 26(a)(7), Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 
U.S.C. 78u-6(a)(6). See also Final Rule, Awards for Information 
Relating to Detecting Underpayments of Tax or Violations of the 
Internal Revenue Service Laws, 79 FR 47246, 47248 (Aug. 12, 2014) 
(discussing how in some instances the final regulation uses the word 
individual instead of whistleblower to mimic the statute).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, under the Whistleblower Act, the whistleblower must 
provide ``original information relating to any motor vehicle defect, 
noncompliance, or violation or alleged violation of any notification or 
reporting requirement of [Chapter 301], which is likely to cause 
unreasonable risk of death or serious physical injury,'' \19\ whereas a 
whistleblower under the SEC authority is an individual who provides 
``information relating to a violation of the securities laws . . . .'' 
\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 49 U.S.C. 30172(a)(6).
    \20\ Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78u-6(a)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, 49 U.S.C. 30172 requires reporting to the company's 
internal reporting mechanism (if the company has one), except in 
certain circumstances, to be eligible for an award, whereas internal 
reporting is not required by statute under the SEC and CFTC's programs. 
Rather, the rulemakings by both the CFTC and SEC appear to consider 
such reporting in other ways.21 22
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See, e.g., Securities Whistleblower Incentives and 
Protections, 76 FR 34360 (``The final rules provide that a 
whistleblower who reports internally can collect a whistleblower 
award from the Commission if his internal report to the company or 
entity results in a successful covered action. In addition, the 
final rules provide that when determining the amount of an award, 
the Commission will consider as a plus-factor the whistleblower's 
participation in an entity's internal compliance procedures.'').
    \22\ See Whistleblower Incentives and Protections, 76 FR 53173 
(``With respect to the criteria for determining the amount of an 
award, the Final Rules provide that while the amount of an award is 
within the Commission's discretion, the Commission will consider (i) 
a whistleblower's report of information internally to an entity's 
whistleblower, compliance or legal system as a factor that 
potentially can increase the amount of an award; and (ii) a 
whistleblower's interference with such internal systems is a factor 
that can potentially decrease the amount of an award. Rule 
165.9(b)(4), (c)(3). A whistleblower may be eligible for an award 
for reporting original information to an entity's internal 
compliance and reporting systems if the entity later reports 
information to the Commission that leads to a successful Commission 
action or related action. Under this provision, all of the 
information provided by the entity to the Commission will be 
attributed to the whistleblower, which means the whistleblower will 
get credit--and potentially a greater award--for any information 
provided by the entity to the Commission in addition to the original 
information reported by the whistleblower. Rule 165.2(i)(3).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While this rulemaking is in progress, it is important to make clear 
that the whistleblower protection and award provisions are statutory 
and not contingent on a rule being in place. NHTSA has an active, 
ongoing whistleblower program. During the pendency of this rulemaking, 
the Agency encourages whistleblowers to continue to submit information 
to the Agency, and notes that whistleblowers are afforded the 
protections contained in 49 U.S.C. 30172(f). Furthermore, a 
whistleblower may receive an award prior to the promulgation of the 
regulations, and the Agency has already issued one such award as noted 
above. A copy of the Agency's decision granting the award and 
additional information on NHTSA's whistleblower program is available on 
the Agency's website at https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/whistleblower-program.
    Since enactment of the statutory whistleblower provisions, the 
Agency has received inquiries from interested persons regarding the 
statute and how to submit whistleblower information or an award 
request. Prior to issuing a final rule, NHTSA has explained that there 
is no required form of submission. In the absence of rules, NHTSA has 
advised potential whistleblowers that any submission should consider 
the statutory provisions and that they may submit materials to NHTSA's 
Office of the Chief Counsel. NHTSA's Office of the Chief Counsel 
coordinates the Agency's whistleblower program. NHTSA has specifically 
encouraged

[[Page 23279]]

prospective whistleblowers to contact the Agency via 
[email protected]. That email account is monitored by NHTSA's 
Office of the Chief Counsel and helps the Agency ensure confidentiality 
and route the submission to the appropriate Agency personnel for 
consideration. NHTSA intends to follow these same practices until a 
final rule is issued, which may provide more specific submission 
requirements as proposed.
    The submission requirements contained in this proposal are designed 
to assist the Agency in effectively administering the whistleblower 
program. However, the Agency recognizes that there are trade-offs in 
adopting more formalized submission requirements, particularly for 
prospective whistleblowers that are not represented by counsel. The 
Agency specifically invites comments regarding this issue.
    Pending the completion of the rulemaking process, NHTSA has been 
reviewing information provided by whistleblowers and award requests and 
is taking action as warranted. Much of this proposal is informed by the 
Agency's experience to date with its whistleblower program. In 
addition, the Agency received several pre-docket submissions from 
stakeholders, which NHTSA has taken into consideration in crafting this 
proposal.
    Specifically, the National Whistleblower Center provided a proposal 
that was modeled on the SEC's and IRS's whistleblower reward laws. A 
copy of this submission is included in the docket.
    The law firm Constantine Cannon LLP also provided submissions 
related to other governmental whistleblower programs and made 
recommendations for NHTSA's program, including its views on how to 
interpret certain provisions of the Whistleblower Act. A copy of these 
submissions will be included in the docket. Constantine Cannon had a 
discussion with NHTSA in April 2021 and provided written material in 
May 2021 regarding its thoughts on NHTSA's whistleblower program. 
Constantine Cannon emphasized the need for NHTSA's whistleblower 
program to be carefully conceived and implemented and provided several 
principles that should guide NHTSA as it develops rules for the 
program. The first principle is that NHTSA should maximize the pool of 
people who can be whistleblowers and not impose impediments to award 
eligibility. Examples of this would include defining both current and 
former employees and contractors under the term ``whistleblower,'' that 
the whistleblower does not need to be an employee or contractor of the 
entity against which NHTSA brings an enforcement action, that the rules 
should consider a whistleblower the ``original source'' of the 
information if it materially adds to the information that NHTSA 
possesses, and that monetary sanctions should not be limited to just 
funds paid to the Treasury. Constantine Cannon also stated that NHTSA 
should interpret the internal-reporting requirement narrowly and in a 
manner that reflects practical workplace realities.
    The next principle articulated by Constantine Cannon is that NHTSA 
should articulate a presumption of award entitlement to whistleblowers 
who meet established requirements and describe the specific 
circumstances in which that presumption will be overcome.
    The final principle stated by Constantine Cannon is that NHTSA and 
DOT leadership must demonstrate that whistleblowers play a key role in 
the Agency's enforcement work, including making it simple for potential 
whistleblowers to make a report, and consider creating a dedicated 
whistleblower office or at least dedicating staff to the whistleblower 
program. Constantine Cannon recommended that leadership publicly 
support the whistleblower program and seek opportunities to publicize 
the program. Constantine Cannon also stated that NHTSA should rely to 
the maximum extent possible on the knowledge and resources 
whistleblowers have to offer, which includes collaborating with the 
whistleblower in the investigation and prosecution of legal violations. 
Additionally, Constantine Cannon states that NHTSA should leverage the 
resources of the specialized whistleblower bar.
    In late 2021, NHTSA also met with Hyundai Motor America Inc.'s 
(Hyundai) counsel and outside counsel, Covington and Burling LLP 
(Covington) regarding their thoughts on the rulemaking to implement 49 
U.S.C. 30172. The stakeholders provided a presentation regarding 
building an effective whistleblower program. A copy of the presentation 
will be included in the docket.
    The presentation noted that the NHTSA program was modeled on the 
Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). They 
noted that while Dodd-Frank is useful, the Whistleblower Act is unique 
and mentioned some differences between the SEC's program and NHTSA's. 
They stated that NHTSA must promulgate clear and specific regulations 
to initiate and implement a successful whistleblower program.
    They highlighted that the procedures that the SEC uses for 
submitting whistleblower award applications and appeared to suggest 
this as a model for NHTSA to consider. They mentioned that when 
determining an award, the most important element to consider is if the 
whistleblower added value. They cautioned that there is a risk that a 
prospective whistleblower will just utilize information in the public 
domain to make an award application. They also argued that the term 
``voluntary'' should not include people who have been subpoenaed, 
highlighted that certain terms warrant additional enumeration in the 
rules and need to be carefully defined, and specifically suggested that 
that NHTSA should define ``leads to.'' The stakeholders also expressed 
their position regarding disqualification criteria and suggested that 
convictions in any tribunal related to the covered action should 
disqualify a whistleblower from an award. They also indicated that a 
whistleblower must show by clear and convincing evidence that the 
company made them commit the alleged violation if that is a defense to 
disqualification.
    Additionally, the stakeholders noted that the internal reporting 
requirement is critical to the mandatory reporting requirements of the 
Safety Act, that NHTSA needs to incentivize the whistleblower to report 
to the company first, and that NHTSA should define the exception to the 
internal reporting requirement narrowly. Finally, they provided their 
thoughts that awards should be based only on amounts collected.
    While the descriptions above are not exhaustive, we appreciate the 
engagement from stakeholders on this important issue and look forward 
to receiving additional public input on this proposal.

II. Description of the Proposed Rules

Part 513--Whistleblower Program

    This proposal would establish a new part 513, within title 49 of 
the Code of Federal Regulations, to house NHTSA's whistleblower rules.

A. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.1--General

    Proposed rule Sec.  513.1 provides a general description of NHTSA's 
whistleblower program. Specifically, it states that part 513 describes 
the whistleblower program that the Agency has established to implement 
the Motor Vehicle Safety Whistleblower Act, 49 U.S.C. 30172; explains 
the procedures

[[Page 23280]]

that the potential whistleblower will need to follow to be eligible for 
an award; and discusses the circumstances under which information that 
may reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a whistleblower 
may be disclosed by NHTSA. Additionally, it cautions potential 
whistleblowers to read the procedures carefully because failure to take 
required steps within the time frames described may result in 
disqualification from receiving an award. The proposed rule provides 
contact information for NHTSA's Office of the Chief Counsel at 
[email protected]. It also states that, unless expressly 
provided for in the rules, no person is authorized to make any offer or 
promise, or otherwise bind the Agency, with respect to the payment of 
an award or the amount thereof, and makes clear that any such offer or 
promise will not be honored.

B. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2--Definitions

1. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(a) Statutory Definitions
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(a) proposes that all terms used in this 
part have the same meaning as those defined in 49 U.S.C. 30102(a) or 
(b), unless otherwise defined in part 513. For example, a 
``manufacturer'' under part 513 would mean those persons manufacturing 
or assembling motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment or importing 
motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment for resale. See 49 U.S.C. 
30102(a)(6). NHTSA notes that manufacturers encompass a number of 
different businesses that often are situated differently. It includes, 
for example, the original assembler or producer of a motor vehicle, 
which may be a foreign corporation operating in a foreign country or a 
domestic corporation. It also includes importers, which may be 
independent corporations domiciled in the United States or U.S. 
subsidiaries of foreign companies such as vehicle manufacturers. It 
also includes registered importers.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ NHTSA authorizes registered importers to import 
noncompliant vehicles and then bring the vehicles into compliance, 
repair and open recalls, certify them as compliant and hold them for 
a mandatory waiting period before releasing them for sale. For more 
information on registered importers, see e.g. 49 U.S.C. 30141 and 49 
CFR part 592.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b) Other Terms
    49 U.S.C. 30172 defines several terms. The Agency has incorporated 
these definitions in proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) but has clarified or 
modified the definitions where necessary to effectuate the purposes of 
the statute. Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) also defines additional 
terms, described below, that are relevant to understanding the scope of 
the whistleblower award program and to provide greater clarity about 
the operation of the program. The Agency requests comment on whether 
other terms should be defined, and if so, the Agency requests that the 
commenter provide proposed definitions for such other terms.
a. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Administrative Action
    The Agency is proposing a definition of administrative action 
because it is a term used in the statutory definition of ``covered 
action.'' 49 U.S.C. 30172(a)(1). Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) defines 
the term ``administrative action'' as meaning all or a portion of an 
action, other than a judicial action, brought by NHTSA or the U.S. 
Department of Transportation under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 that may 
result in civil penalties or other monetary payment paid to and 
collected by the United States government.\24\ It specifically includes 
settlement agreements and consent orders that are entered into by the 
Agency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ As discussed further below, it is our view that civil 
penalties, interest, or other monetary payment referenced in the 
statute only refers to those monies that are payable to the United 
States and that are actually collected by the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA is proposing to include a definition of the term 
``administrative action'' because the definition of ``covered action'' 
contained in 49 U.S.C. 30172 encompasses actions by parties other than 
the Secretary. The Agency proposes to define such administrative 
actions to include those actions brought by NHTSA or the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, which both have jurisdiction to bring 
administrative actions under the Safety Act. The statutory definition 
of ``covered action'' contained in section 30172 refers to 
administrative or judicial actions brought by the Secretary or the 
Attorney General under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301. The Attorney General 
would bring judicial actions under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301, but any 
administrative actions brought under that chapter would be brought by 
NHTSA or the U.S. Department of Transportation.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See 49 U.S.C. 30163 (focusing on civil actions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consent orders issued by NHTSA,\26\ settlement agreements entered 
into by the Agency,\27\ and other such agreements that the Agency is a 
party to in order to administratively resolve claims for civil 
penalties would be considered administrative actions.\28\ 
Administrative actions could also include other final agency actions, 
such as determination letters that a deferred penalty agreed to under a 
consent order is due. The Agency believes that this will best 
effectuate the intent of Congress to incentivize whistleblowers to come 
forward with information that may lead to an award, as these types of 
agreements have most often been the basis of civil penalties exceeding 
$1,000,000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See, e.g., https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/nhtsa-announces-consent-orders-hyundai-and-kia-over-theta-ii-recall; 
https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/nhtsa-announces-consent-order-daimler-trucks-north-america.
    \27\ Although these settlement agreements did not result in 
collected monetary sanctions of over one million dollars, these are 
examples of settlement agreements entered into by the Agency 
recently: In re Northwest Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, AQ17-004 
Settlement Agreement, available at https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2021-11/AQ17-004-Northwest-Settlement-Agreement-08-19-2020-tag.pdf; and In Re Navistar Recalls 18V-315, 18V-316 
Settlement Agreement, available at https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/documents/navistar_settlement_agreement_2019-12-18.pdf.
    \28\ These could encompass such things as amended consent orders 
requiring additional civil penalties. See In re FCA US LLC AQ14-003, 
Amendment to July 25, 2015 Consent Order, available at https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2021-11/AQ14-003X-FCA-Consent-Order-Amendment-EWR-12-8-2015-tag.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, unlike the SEC,\29\ NHTSA does not have administrative 
law judges who issue initial decisions that include findings of fact 
and legal conclusions. Therefore, it is NHTSA's belief that Congress 
did not mean ``administrative action'' in the sense of a formal 
administrative proceeding, such as a proceeding subject to 5 U.S.C. 
554. NHTSA's main method of resolving actions that result in a payment 
of a civil penalty has been through consent orders and settlement 
agreements, and thus it makes sense for those actions to be included in 
the types of actions that may form the basis for a whistleblower award.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See, e.g., How Investigations Work, available at https://www.sec.gov/enforce/how-investigations-work.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Agency
    Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b) defines the term ``Agency'' as 
referring to NHTSA.
c. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Collected Monetary Sanctions
    ``Monetary sanctions'' is defined in section 30172(a)(2), but 
whistleblower awards can only be paid from ``collected monetary 
sanctions'' under section 30172(b)(1). This proposed definition 
clarifies that the term ``collected monetary sanctions'' means monies, 
including penalties and interest, ordered or agreed to be paid and that 
have been collected by the United States pursuant to the authority in 
49 U.S.C. 30165 or under the authority of 49

[[Page 23281]]

U.S.C. 30170. This is consistent with the express terms of the statute, 
which provides: ``Any amount payable [to a whistleblower] . . . shall 
be paid from the monetary sanctions collected, and any monetary 
sanctions so collected shall be available for such payment.'' 49 U.S.C. 
30172(b)(2).
    The Agency is aware that some stakeholders have advocated for the 
position that restitution to parties other than the United States 
ordered in cases should be considered monetary sanctions. The Agency 
believes that ``collected monetary sanctions'' cannot reasonably be 
construed to include such restitution intended to directly compensate 
victims and other affected third parties (as opposed to penalties paid 
to the United States).
    Likewise, in some of the Agency's settlements, companies agree to 
pay a certain amount toward performance obligations, such as investing 
in safety data analytics \30\ or development of a testing 
laboratory.\31\ NHTSA does not view these performance obligations as 
constituting a ``collected'' monetary sanction. In those situations 
where the agreement allows for collection of the performance obligation 
amounts in the form of a monetary payment to the United States 
government as a consequence of the violation of the consent order, and 
the violating company does pay that sum to the United States, the 
Agency's view is that if all of these conditions are met, such amount 
could be considered a collected monetary sanction. Likewise, in those 
cases where the agreement specifies that if the total performance 
amount is not spent and the company is liable for a cash payment to 
NHTSA for the balance of the unspent portion,\32\ and the company pays 
such amount to NHTSA, that could be considered a collected monetary 
sanction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See In Re Daimler Trucks North America LLC, AQ18-002 
Consent Order, Para. 12(c), available at https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/aq18-002_consent_order_executed.pdf.
    \31\ See In re Hyundai Motor America, Inc. RQ17-004, NHTSA 
Recall No. 15V-568, NHTSA Recall No. 17V-226, Consent Order, Para. 
21, available at https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/rq17-004_hyundai_consent_order_executed_11272020.pdf.
    \32\ See In re Kia Motors America, RQ17-003, NHTSA Recall 17V-
224, Consent Order, Para. 26, available at https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/rq17-003_kia_consent_order_executed_11272020.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA has also used ``deferred penalties'' or ``abeyance amounts'' 
in several of its consent orders.\33\ These generally are agreed 
amounts to be paid as a monetary penalty in the event that the company 
violates the consent order, the Safety Act, or the regulations 
thereunder. It is NHTSA's view that these sums only become ``collected 
monetary sanctions'' if and when the deferred penalty or abeyance 
amount is actually paid to the United States government.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ See, e.g., In Re Daimler Trucks North America LLC, AQ18-002 
Consent Order, Para. 12(b), available at https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/aq18-002_consent_order_executed.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These views are consistent with the statutory requirement that: 
``Any amount payable [to a whistleblower] . . . shall be paid from the 
monetary sanctions collected, and any monetary sanctions so collected 
shall be available for such payment.'' 49 U.S.C. 30172(b)(2). Penalties 
allocated to performance obligations and deferred penalties that have 
not been paid to the United States government are neither ``collected'' 
nor ``available for [ ] payment.''
    The Agency anticipates that in circumstances where deferred amounts 
or unspent performance obligation balances become due and are collected 
by the United States, NHTSA will post a notice on its website if such 
action occurs.
d. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Contractor
    Consistent with 49 U.S.C. 30172(a)(6), proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) 
defines ``contractor'' as an individual presently or formerly providing 
goods or services to a motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or 
dealership pursuant to a contract. The Agency believes that the 
definition must include both present and former contractors to maximize 
the reach and effectiveness of the whistleblower program. For example, 
if a contractor were terminated by his or her company after reporting 
safety issues, it would not serve the purpose of the Whistleblower Act 
to bar such a contractor from an award simply because he or she no 
longer works for the company.
e. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Covered Action
    Under the statute, the term ``covered action'' means ``any 
administrative or judicial action, including any related administrative 
or judicial action, brought by the Secretary or the Attorney General 
under this chapter that in the aggregate results in monetary sanctions 
exceeding $1,000,000.'' Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) is based on the 
definition of covered action from section 30172(a)(1) and clarifies how 
the above $1,000,000 threshold can be met.
    The Agency tentatively believes that since the statute specifies 
that the action is brought by the Secretary or Attorney General ``under 
this chapter,'' the statute is referring solely to 49 U.S.C. chapter 
301 and the regulatory obligations promulgated under 49 U.S.C. chapter 
301, as the Whistleblower Act was codified as part of 49 U.S.C. chapter 
301. The Agency tentatively believes that the plain language of the 
statute is clear, and that it does not have discretion under the 
statute to consider actions taken under other statutes (such as 
separate criminal statutes) as part of a ``covered action,'' even if 
such actions involve vehicle safety issues and/or are based on facts 
common to an action taken under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301. One could argue 
that the phrase ``including any related administrative and judicial 
action'' could be read as referring to actions outside of chapter 301 
of title 49, United States Code. However, the Agency tentatively 
believes that its proposal to limit ``covered actions'' to chapter 301 
or regulations thereunder is compelled by the statute.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ In the event a court found ambiguity in the statute, we 
believe that our interpretation is the clearest reading of the 
statute and makes the most sense for the reasons described in this 
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ``[R]elated action'' under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 is given effect by 
considering two actions under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301. For example, if 
NHTSA pursues two separate enforcement actions for violations of 49 
U.S.C. chapter 301, or regulations thereunder, against two different 
companies (for example, a supplier and a vehicle manufacturer) based on 
the same facts provided by a whistleblower, in that case, the two 
separate actions would be related.\35\ If the monetary sanctions 
collected for those two actions exceeded one million dollars in 
aggregate, the two actions together would be considered a ``covered 
action.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ In fact, NHTSA's first whistleblower award came in the 
context of enforcement actions resulting in consent orders with two 
companies (Hyundai and Kia). See https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2022-02/whistleblower-decision-letter-RQ17-003-Kia-RQ17-004-Hyundai_web.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 is ``to reduce traffic 
accidents and deaths and injuries resulting from traffic accidents.'' 
49 U.S.C. 30101. The whistleblower program was designed to reward 
employees or contractors who ``blow the whistle'' on motor vehicle 
defects, noncompliance, or violations or alleged violations of any 
notification or reporting requirement of the chapter which is likely to 
cause an unreasonable risk of death or serious physical injury, and 
thus is closely aligned with the purposes of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301.
    While section 30172(c)(2)(A) generally provides that no award shall 
be made to any whistleblower who is

[[Page 23282]]

convicted of a criminal violation ``related to the covered action'' for 
which the whistleblower otherwise could receive an award under this 
section, NHTSA tentatively does not believe that the use of the word 
``related'' in that context can be extrapolated to the meaning of 
``related'' in 49 U.S.C. 30172(a)(1). That is, it is the Agency's 
tentative view that the whistleblower cannot be issued an award 
percentage of monies paid by a company for criminal violations of 
statutes other than the Safety Act. Such a reading would be 
inconsistent with the requirement of the statute that the action be 
brought ``under this chapter.'' For example, a criminal action for wire 
fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1343 is not an action under the Safety Act (49 
U.S.C. chapter 301). However, the Agency tentatively believes a 
criminal action brought under 49 U.S.C. 30170, the criminal penalties 
provision of the Safety Act, would be a covered action under the 
Whistleblower Act.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ Section 30170(a)(1) provides for criminal liability for 
falsifying or withholding information. It states, ``A person who 
violates [18 U.S.C. 1001] with respect to the reporting requirements 
of section 30166, with the specific intention of misleading the 
Secretary with respect to motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment 
safety related defects that have caused death or serious bodily 
injury to an individual (as defined in section 1365(g)(3)[1] of 
title 18), shall be subject to criminal penalties of a fine under 
title 18, or imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Unlike the SEC \37\ or CFTC,\38\ NHTSA does not have a fund set 
aside from which to pay awards. Rather, it appears that the money to 
pay whistleblowers was intended to come from the entity that paid the 
penalty. The FAST Act, section 31202, appropriates to the Highway Trust 
Fund amounts equivalent to ``covered motor vehicle safety penalty 
collections.'' The section defines ``covered motor vehicle safety 
penalty collections'' as any amount collected in connection with a 
civil penalty under 30165 of title 49, United States Code, reduced by 
any award authorized by the Secretary of Transportation to be paid to 
any person in connection with information provided by such person 
related to a violation of chapter 301 of such title which is a 
predicate to such civil penalty (emphasis added). In addition, 49 
U.S.C. 30172(b)(2) explicitly provides: ``Any amount payable [to a 
whistleblower] . . . shall be paid from the monetary sanctions 
collected, and any monetary sanctions so collected shall be available 
for such payment.'' Based on this, it is our view that whistleblowers 
are paid out of the money collected from the entity that paid a Safety 
Act penalty or fine.\39\ The Agency recognizes that actions under 49 
U.S.C. 30170 are not civil penalty actions brought under 49 U.S.C. 
30165 and the mechanism for funding whistleblower awards under 49 
U.S.C. 30170 does not appear to be defined by statute. The Agency 
therefore requests comment on its interpretation of including actions 
under 49 U.S.C. 30170 as an action ``under this chapter.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ See 15 U.S.C. 78u-6(b)(2) (stating that any whistleblower 
award shall be paid from the ``Fund'') and 15 U.S.C. 78u-6(a)(2) 
(defining the ``Fund'' as the Securities and Exchange Commission 
Investor Protection Fund.'').
    \38\ See 7 U.S.C. 26(g)(2) (establishing a revolving fund to be 
known as the ``Commodity Futures Trading Commission Customer 
Protection Fund'').
    \39\ The Agency's position is also supported by the cost 
estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget Office included in S. 
Rep. 114-13, Motor Vehicle Safety Whistleblower Act, Report of the 
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, p. 4 (2015), 
which stated, ``Basis of estimate: S. 304 would authorize the 
Secretary of Transportation at his discretion, to award to a 
whistleblower up to 30 percent of any civil penalty that exceeds $1 
million and is collected from a company that manufactures motor 
vehicles or parts with serious defects or that violates certain 
safety laws.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a practical matter, NHTSA also does not have ready access to the 
information that would be needed to make a decision about an award 
sought for monies collected from an action brought under a statute 
other than the Safety Act. For example, NHTSA may be unable to evaluate 
the significance of the original information provided by the 
whistleblower to the successful resolution of a criminal action for 
wire fraud or other statute outside NHTSA's jurisdiction and expertise. 
Likewise, NHTSA may be unaware of ``the degree of assistance provided 
by the whistleblower and any legal representative of the whistleblower 
in'' an action brought under statutes outside NHTSA's jurisdiction. 
NHTSA may have limited or no involvement in such an action. Therefore, 
NHTSA's ability to make an award determination may have to rely on the 
Department of Justice to reveal information regarding its internal 
processes and other information that it ordinarily keeps confidential, 
over which release NHTSA does not have control. These practical 
considerations support the plain language reading of the statute as 
limited to actions under the Safety Act.
    In sum, the Agency tentatively does not believe that a covered 
action includes any action brought by the U.S. Department of Justice 
under any statute other than those contained in 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 
or regulation issued thereunder. We are cognizant that this issue is of 
particular interest given the potential implications on the amount of a 
whistleblower award, or whether any award is available in some cases, 
and we invite comments on our views.
    Additionally, the definition of ``covered action'' in proposed rule 
Sec.  513.2(b) clarifies that NHTSA can bring an action, since the 
Secretary's authority under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 has been delegated to 
the Administrator of NHTSA. 49 CFR 1.95(a). In practice, civil penalty 
actions for violations of the Safety Act and regulations thereunder 
resulting in monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000,000 are generally 
accomplished by settlement agreements with NHTSA or consent orders 
issued by the NHTSA Administrator.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ See, e.g., http://www.nhtsa.gov/Laws-&-Regulations/Civil-Penalty-Settlement-Amounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The definition of ``covered action'' in proposed rule Sec.  
513.2(b) also clarifies that an action under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 
includes actions for violations of regulations promulgated under 49 
U.S.C. chapter 301. Including these clarifications in the definition of 
``covered action'' would better effectuate the purposes of the Motor 
Vehicle Safety Whistleblower Act.
    The proposed definition of ``covered action'' also clarifies that 
the over $1,000,000 threshold can be satisfied if the total amount of 
monetary sanctions paid by multiple defendants or parties and collected 
by the United States totals more than $1,000,000 in the covered action. 
That is, the Agency proposes that multiple smaller sanctions paid by 
different parties in the same action could be added up to exceed the 
more than $1,000,000 threshold. Similarly, the Agency also believes 
that multiple smaller sanctions paid by different parties in the 
related actions (or the same party, such as in the case of an amended 
consent order that requires payment of additional penalties or later 
payment of penalties held in abeyance) could be included to exceed the 
more than $1,000,000 threshold.\41\ The Agency does not want to 
foreclose a whistleblower's eligibility for an award in these 
situations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ The Agency believes that in order for these amounts to be 
counted to exceed the more than $1,000,000 threshold, those amounts 
need to be connected to the original information provided by the 
whistleblower. For example, if there was a whistleblower who 
received an award in connection with the initial civil penalty 
action, it is our tentative view that such whistleblower would not 
be eligible for an award percentage of any amount collected from the 
deferred/abeyance amounts, unless the whistleblower provided 
original information that led to the Agency determining the deferred 
penalty payment was required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

f. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Dealership
    The Agency is proposing a definition of ``dealership'' because it 
is a term used in the statutory definition of

[[Page 23283]]

whistleblower. 49 U.S.C. 30172(a)(6). The term ``dealership'' appears 
only in 49 U.S.C. 30172 and does not appear in any other provision of 
49 U.S.C. chapter 301. Given the purpose of the whistleblower 
provisions, the Agency proposes to define ``dealership'' using a 
broader definition than the statutory definition of ``dealer'' found in 
49 U.S.C. 30102(a)(2). Under this proposal, a ``dealership'' means a 
person selling and distributing motor vehicles or motor vehicle 
equipment primarily to purchasers that in good faith purchase the 
vehicles or equipment other than for resale. The definition is not 
limited to a dealership selling new motor vehicles, as is the statutory 
definition of ``dealer.'' For example, an employee of a used car dealer 
could identify and bring to the Agency's attention a safety defect in a 
vehicle that has not been timely recalled. The Agency believes it is 
appropriate to include used car dealerships within the scope of the 
whistleblower provisions to best effectuate the incentives and 
protections of the statute.
g. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Employee
    The Agency is proposing a definition of ``employee'' because it is 
a term used in the statutory definition of whistleblower. 49 U.S.C. 
30172(a)(6). Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) defines ``employee'' as an 
individual presently or formerly employed by a motor vehicle 
manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership. The Agency believes that 
the definition should include both present and former employees to 
maximize the reach and effectiveness of the whistleblower program. It 
would not serve the purpose of the Whistleblower Act to bar a former 
employee from an award simply because he or she no longer works for the 
motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership.
    The Agency requests comment on whether an owner of a motor vehicle 
manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership should be considered an 
``employee'' of such entity, and if so, in what situations it would be 
appropriate to consider such person as an ``employee.'' Relevant 
considerations include the ability of an owner to address potential 
safety issues and violations of law within that entity, and the 
potential for an owner to have information regarding a different 
entity. For example, an owner of a dealership may have information 
regarding safety-related defects or noncompliances with applicable 
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (``FMVSS'') in vehicles for 
vehicles provided to it by a vehicle manufacturer. Another example is 
that an owner of a registered importer may have information about 
potential Safety Act violations committed by another registered 
importer.
h. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Independent Knowledge or Analysis
    Section 30172(a)(3) contains a definition of original information. 
Section 30172(a)(3)(A) states that original information is information 
that ``is derived from independent knowledge or analysis of an 
individual.''
    The Agency considered the definitions of independent knowledge 
contained in the SEC's and CFTC's whistleblower regulations in crafting 
its proposed definition.\42\ Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) defines 
``independent knowledge'' as factual information in the potential 
whistleblower's possession that is not generally known or available to 
the public and is not already known to NHTSA. Publicly available 
sources include both sources that are widely disseminated, such as 
corporate press releases and filings, and media reports, as well as 
sources that, while not widely disseminated, are generally available to 
the public, such as court filings and documents obtained through 
Freedom of Information Act requests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ See 17 CFR 165.2(g) and 17 CFR 240.21F-4(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed definition does not require that a potential 
whistleblower have direct, first-hand knowledge of potential 
violations. The proposed definition states that the potential 
whistleblower may gain independent knowledge from the potential 
whistleblower's experiences, communications and observations in the 
potential whistleblower's business or social interactions. Thus, for 
example, under proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b), a potential whistleblower 
may have ``independent knowledge'' of information even if that 
knowledge derives from facts or other information that has been 
conveyed to the potential whistleblower by third parties. The Agency 
preliminarily believes that defining ``independent knowledge'' in this 
way best effectuates the purpose of the Whistleblower Act, as an 
employee or contractor may learn about potential violations of the 
Safety Act without being personally involved in the conduct and the 
information would not otherwise come to NHTSA's attention.
    The Agency has also proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) to define the 
phrase ``analysis'' to mean the potential whistleblower's examination 
and evaluation of information that may be generally or publicly 
available, but which reveals information that is not generally known or 
available to the public. The proposed definition of ``analysis'' is 
similar to that used in the SEC's whistleblower regulations as well as 
the CFTC's whistleblower regulations.\43\ This proposed definition 
recognizes that potential whistleblowers could review publicly 
available information and, through their individual evaluation and 
examination, provide assistance to the Agency in uncovering violations 
of the Safety Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ See 17 CFR 240-21F-4(b)(3) and 17 CFR 165.2(c) (defining 
analysis as the whistleblower's ``examination and evaluation of 
information that may be publicly available, but which reveals 
information that is not generally known or available to the 
public.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2020, the SEC issued final interpretive guidance regarding the 
term ``analysis,'' specifically with respect to publicly available 
information.\44\ The SEC stated, ``the evaluation of publicly available 
information reveals information that is `not generally known or 
available to the public'--and therefore is `analysis'. . . where ``(1) 
The whistleblower's conclusion of possible securities violations 
derives from multiple sources, including sources that, though publicly 
available are not readily identified and accessed by a member of the 
public without specialized knowledge, unusual effort, or substantial 
cost; and (2) these sources collectively raise a strong inference of 
potential securities law violation that is not reasonably inferable by 
the Commission from any of the sources individually.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ Whistleblower Program Rules, 85 FR 70898, 70929-31 (Nov. 5, 
2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Like the SEC, NHTSA believes that ``analysis'' requires the 
potential whistleblower to do more than merely point the Agency to 
public information assembled by the potential whistleblower. The 
potential whistleblower must bring forth some additional evaluation, 
assessment or insight, as the ``analysis'' must reveal information that 
is not generally known or available to the public. NHTSA may determine 
that a whistleblower's examination and evaluation of publicly available 
information reveals information that is ``not generally known or 
available to the public'' and therefore is ``analysis'' where: (1) The 
whistleblower's conclusion of any motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, 
or any violation or alleged violation of any notification or reporting 
requirement of this chapter, which is likely to cause unreasonable risk 
of death or serious physical injury, derives from multiple sources, 
including sources that, although publicly available, are not

[[Page 23284]]

readily identified and accessed by a member of the public without 
specialized knowledge, unusual effort, or substantial cost; and (2) 
these sources collectively raise a strong inference of an existence of 
a motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, or any violation of a 
notification or reporting requirement that is likely to cause 
unreasonable risk of death or serious physical injury that is not 
reasonably inferable by the Agency from any of the sources 
individually.
    The proposed rule makes it clear that the analysis must be the 
potential whistleblower's own analysis, whether done alone or in 
combination with others.\45\ The proposed rule recognizes that analysis 
is often the product of collaboration among two or more individuals. 
However, the Agency believes that only those individuals who are 
employees or contactors of a motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, 
or dealership could be eligible for an award if they meet the other 
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 30172 and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ The CFTC has defined ``independent analysis'' in a similar 
manner, 17 CFR 165.2(h), as has the SEC, 17 CFR 240.21F-4(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The definition of ``independent knowledge or analysis'' in proposed 
rule Sec.  513.2(b) further provides that information will not be 
considered to derive from an individual's ``independent knowledge or 
analysis'' in some situations. The Agency requests comment on whether 
these are appropriate exclusions and whether additional exclusions 
should be added.
    The first proposed exclusion is for information that was obtained 
solely through a communication that is subject to the attorney-client 
privilege \46\ or work product doctrine.\47\ The Agency recognizes that 
the both the SEC and CFTC whistleblower programs would not exclude the 
disclosure if it was authorized by the applicable Federal or State 
attorney conduct rules,\48\ and requests comment on whether it should 
include a similar carve-out in its regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ This term refers to the protection that applicable law 
provides for confidential attorney-client communications.
    \47\ This term refers to the protection that applicable law 
provides for material prepared in anticipation of litigation or for 
trial.
    \48\ 17 CFR 240.21F-4(i), (ii) and 17 CFR 165.2(g)(2), (3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Agency recognizes that there are some exceptions to these 
various privileges, such as Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) 
(providing that materials prepared in anticipation of litigation may be 
discovered by an adverse party if the party shows ``substantial need'' 
and ``undue hardship''), and the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-
client privilege. However, the Agency has concerns that it will not be 
able to tell whether an exception would apply at the outset. 
Furthermore, NHTSA anticipates that attorneys in its Office of the 
Chief Counsel, in conjunction with engineers or others from the program 
office, will be reviewing submissions made by potential whistleblowers. 
The rule as proposed would help implement 49 U.S.C. 30172 in a manner 
consistent with the State bar ethics rules governing the professional 
responsibilities of lawyers. At this time, NHTSA has determined that we 
cannot review materials protected by attorney-client privilege pursuant 
to the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct. This 
determination is based on our understanding of the District of Columbia 
Bar's Ethics Opinion 318: Disclosure of Privileged Material by Third 
Party.
    Additionally, compliance with 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 and regulations 
thereunder is promoted when individuals, corporate officers, and others 
consult with counsel about potential issues. This important benefit 
could be undermined if an employee or contractor was able to disclose 
the company's attorney-client privileged information or attorney work 
product to the Agency.
    The proposed exclusion is not intended to preclude an individual 
who has independent knowledge or analysis of potential Safety Act 
violations from becoming a whistleblower if that person chooses to 
consult with an attorney or is an attorney. Rather, this exclusion 
would prohibit an employee or contractor from revealing attorney-client 
privileged or work product information that they learned of solely 
through a privileged communication.
    The second proposed exclusion is for information that was obtained 
in a means or manner that is determined by a United States Federal 
court or State court to violate applicable Federal or State criminal 
law. The Agency recognizes that it is likely that a violation 
determination would not yet have been made at the time a whistleblower 
submits documents or other information to NHTSA, and the Agency 
specifically requests comment on this proposal. As one measure, the 
Agency could caution the whistleblower against submission of this 
information if there is reason to believe that the information might be 
determined to violate applicable Federal or State criminal law.
    One rationale for the exclusion is that a potential whistleblower 
should not be rewarded for violating a Federal or State criminal law. 
On the other hand, it is possible that companies could threaten 
potential whistleblowers with criminal prosecution for theft, 
blackmail, extortion, or other such actions if the whistleblower 
provides or attempts to provide information to NHTSA. Threats of 
criminal prosecution would likely deter a whistleblower from reporting 
violations to NHTSA and such deterrence may be contrary to public 
policy.
    NHTSA is not proposing to categorically exclude information that 
may be provided to it in possible violation of judicial or 
administrative orders, such as protective orders in private litigation. 
As explained in a NHTSA Enforcement Guidance Bulletin, ``To the extent 
protective orders, settlement agreements, or other confidentiality 
provisions prohibit information obtained in private litigation from 
being transmitted to NHTSA, such limitations are contrary to Rule 26 of 
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, its state corollaries, and sound 
principles of public policy.'' \49\ However, potential whistleblowers 
must exercise caution to avoid violating a legally binding order, and 
may wish to consult with private counsel before providing NHTSA with 
information covered by any such order. In the event of uncertainty 
(such as in the absence of a protective order provision authorizing 
disclosure to relevant regulatory authorities), NHTSA suggests that 
potential whistleblowers who are aware of material protected by a 
protective order not provide the documents subject to the order, but 
rather disclose the existence of such documents without revealing the 
substance of the material under the protective order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ NHTSA Enforcement Guidance Bulletin 2015-01: Recommended 
Best Practices for Protective Orders and Settlement Agreements in 
Civil Litigation, 81 FR 13026 (Mar. 11, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Agency is also aware that companies may try to use 
confidentiality agreements to prevent whistleblowers from making 
disclosures to NHTSA, which would also appear to be contrary to public 
policy.\50\ In such

[[Page 23285]]

situations, the potential whistleblower may wish to consult with 
private counsel. NHTSA does not believe that a potential violation of a 
confidentiality agreement by the whistleblower should act as an 
exclusion under this proposed rule.\51\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ NHTSA notes that the SEC's Exchange Act Rule 21F-17(a) 
prohibits any person from taking any action to prevent an individual 
from contacting the SEC directly to report a possible securities law 
violation. The rule states that ``[n]o person may take any action to 
impede an individual from communicating directly with the Commission 
staff about a possible securities law violation, including 
enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement . 
. . with respect to such communications.'' According to the SEC's 
2021 Report, the Commission has brought 14 enforcement actions or 
administrative proceedings involving violations of Rule 21F-17. U.S. 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 2021 Annual Report to Congress, 
Whistleblower Program, p. 26, available at https://www.sec.gov/files/owb-2021-annual-report.pdf. See also SEC v. Collector's 
Coffee, Inc., 2021 WL 3082209, *3 (S.D.N.Y. July 21, 2021) (noting 
that certain contractual confidentiality provisions would be 
illegal, and therefore unenforceable). The Agency requests comment 
on whether it should issue a rule similar to that of Rule 21F-17.
    \51\ The SEC's rationale for Rule 21F-17 was that it was 
necessary and appropriate because efforts to impede an individual's 
direct communications with Commission staff about a possible 
securities law violation would conflict with the statutory purpose 
of encouraging whistleblowers to report to the Commission. See 
Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protections, 76 FR 34300, 
34252 (June 13, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA is requesting comment on whether there should be other 
proposed exclusions, including exclusions similar to those contained 
under ``independent knowledge'' and/or ``independent analysis'' in the 
whistleblower programs of the SEC \52\ and CFTC.\53\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ 17 CFR 240.21F-4(b)(4).
    \53\ 17 CFR 165.2(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For example, it is the Agency's tentative view that it will not 
exclude potential whistleblowers where the potential whistleblower 
obtained the information solely because the potential whistleblower was 
or is an officer, director, trustee or partner of an entity and another 
person informed the potential whistleblower of allegations relating to 
any motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, or any violation or alleged 
violation of any notification or reporting requirement of 49 U.S.C. 
chapter 301 or regulation thereunder. The SEC and the CFTC have an 
exception for the exclusion where the person had a reasonable basis to 
believe that disclosure of the information to the Commission is 
necessary to prevent the relevant entity from engaging in conduct that 
is likely to cause substantial injury to the financial interest or 
property of the entity or investors.\54\ For whistleblower disclosures 
made under the Whistleblower Act, in light of potential risks to 
safety, the Agency believes that encouraging disclosure to the Agency 
as soon as possible would be the better course. The Agency recognizes 
that such individuals may have ready access to significant information 
relevant to these issues and does not want to discourage would-be 
whistleblowers from reporting out of concern that this exclusion might 
apply. We note that a person in such a position often may be able to 
piece together information in a unique way or provide additional 
relevant information and may not just simply be a conduit for passing 
on information obtained from another person.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ 17 CFR 240.21F-4(b)(4)(v)(A) and 17 CFR 165.2(g)(7)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are also considering whether there should be an exclusion for 
situations in which the potential whistleblower learned the information 
by participating in or observing established processes of the motor 
vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership to identify, report, 
and address possible violations of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 or a 
regulation thereunder. The Agency specifically requests comment on this 
issue.
    Unlike the whistleblower programs of the SEC and CFTC, Congress 
evidenced an intent in the Whistleblower Act for internal reporting to 
be an important prerequisite to award eligibility, except in 
circumstances where reporting may not be appropriate.\55\ The Agency 
recognizes that companies may view allowing information learned from 
participating in or observing established processes to be considered 
``independent knowledge or analysis'' as circumventing or undermining 
the proper operation of the company's internal processes for 
investigating and responding to potential violations of law. However, 
it is critical that the Agency learn important safety information as 
quickly as it can.\56\ We also note that a company's efforts to come 
into future compliance does not negate prior violations of law. We 
encourage comments on this issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ S. Rep. 114-13, Motor Vehicle Safety Whistleblower Act, 
Report of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation at 
7 (2015).
    \56\ Even the SEC and CFTC allow this type of information to be 
excepted from exclusion if at least 120 days have elapsed since the 
whistleblower provided the information to the relevant entity's 
audit committee, chief legal officer, chief compliance officer (or 
their equivalents), or the whistleblower's supervisor, or since the 
whistleblower received the information, if the whistleblower 
received it under circumstances indicating that the entity's audit 
committee, chief legal officer, chief compliance officer (or their 
equivalents), or the whistleblower's supervisor was already aware of 
the information. See, e.g., 17 CFR 240.21F-4(b)(4)(v)(C) and 17 CFR 
165.2(g)(7)(iii).
    The Agency does not think it prudent to have a 4-month waiting 
period for this type of information for a whistleblower report to 
become eligible, especially since the issues under the Whistleblower 
Act may relate to unreasonable risk of death or serious physical 
injury.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

i. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Motor Vehicle Defect
    NHTSA is proposing a definition of ``motor vehicle defect'' because 
it is a term that is included in the statutory definition of 
whistleblower. 49 U.S.C. 30172(a)(6). Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) 
defines ``motor vehicle defect'' as a defect in a motor vehicle or item 
of motor vehicle equipment.
    Under proposed rule Sec.  513.2(a), the term ``defect'' would have 
the same meaning as that contained in 49 U.S.C. 30102(a)(3), which is 
that a defect includes any defect in performance, construction, a 
component, or material of a motor vehicle or motor vehicle equipment; 
``motor vehicle'' would have the same definition as in 49 U.S.C. 
30102(a)(7), which states that a motor vehicle ``means a vehicle driven 
or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on 
public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle 
operated only on a rail line;'' and ``motor vehicle equipment'' would 
have the same meaning as defined in 49 U.S.C. 30102(a)(8), which 
defines motor vehicle equipment as ``(A) any system, part, or component 
of a motor vehicle as originally manufactured; (B) any similar part or 
component manufactured or sold for replacement or improvement of a 
system, part, or component, or as an accessory or addition to a motor 
vehicle; or (C) any device or an article or apparel, including a 
motorcycle helmet and excluding medicine or eyeglasses prescribed by a 
licensed practitioner, that--(i) is not a system, part, or component of 
a motor vehicle; and (ii) is manufactured, sold, delivered, or offered 
to be sold for use on public streets, roads, and highways with the 
apparent purpose of safeguarding users of motor vehicles against risk 
of accident, injury, or death.'' The Agency has also proposed this 
definition to make it clear that the term ``motor vehicle defect'' also 
encompasses defects in all motor vehicle equipment. NHTSA's authority 
over motor vehicle equipment, in its many forms, is expressed 
unequivocally in the Safety Act. 49 U.S.C. 30102(a)-(b).
    There are several reasons why the Agency believes the term ``motor 
vehicle defect'' should be defined as including defects in motor 
vehicle equipment. First, if the Agency were to interpret the term 
strictly as a ``defect in a motor vehicle,'' one could argue that 
``replacement equipment'' \57\ is not covered, since this type of motor 
vehicle equipment was not installed in or on a motor vehicle at the 
time of delivery to the first purchaser. We believe that Congress 
intended to provide whistleblower protection and award eligibility not 
only to those

[[Page 23286]]

whistleblowers who provide original information concerning defects or 
noncompliances of ``original equipment,'' \58\ but also replacement 
motor vehicle equipment. Congress has provided that a whistleblower can 
be an employee or contractor of a part supplier, which was defined by 
the statute as a ``manufacturer of motor vehicle equipment.'' Both 
original equipment items and replacement equipment items are motor 
vehicle equipment. It does not seem to follow that a whistleblower's 
potential eligibility for an award and statutory identity protection 
depends on where a particular motor vehicle equipment item, such as an 
air bag, goes. For example, the same defective air bag could be placed 
in a motor vehicle, or it could be sold as a replacement part. 
Furthermore, there are other types of motor vehicle equipment, such as 
motorcycle helmets, that are not systems, parts, or components of motor 
vehicles, but nevertheless are motor vehicle equipment. For these 
reasons, the Agency believes that the proposed definition of ``motor 
vehicle defect,'' which would encompass defects in both motor vehicles 
and motor vehicle equipment, better effectuates the statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ ``Replacement equipment'' is defined as ``motor vehicle 
equipment that is not original equipment.'' 49 U.S.C. 
30102(b)(1)(D).
    \58\ ``Original equipment'' means ``motor vehicle equipment 
(including a tire) installed in or on a motor vehicle at the time of 
delivery to the first purchaser.'' 49 U.S.C. 30102(b)(1)(C). Under a 
statutory definition, a defect in original equipment or a 
noncompliance of original equipment with an applicable motor vehicle 
safety standard ``is deemed to be a defect or noncompliance of the 
motor vehicle in or on which the equipment was installed at the time 
of delivery to the first purchaser.'' 49 U.S.C. 30102(b)(1)(F) 
(emphasis added).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

j. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Noncompliance
    We are proposing a definition of ``noncompliance'' as it is a term 
that is included in the statutory definition of whistleblower. Proposed 
rule Sec.  513.2(b) states that noncompliance occurs when a motor 
vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment does not comply with an 
applicable motor vehicle safety standard. This definition aligns with 
the term noncompliance as it is used in sections 30118-30120 of the 
Safety Act.
k. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Original Information
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) begins with the definition of 
``original information'' in section 30172(a)(3) but adds the word 
``Agency'' for the purposes of clarity. Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) 
defines ``original information'' as information that is derived from 
the independent knowledge or analysis of an individual, is not known to 
the Secretary or Agency from any other source, unless the individual is 
the original source of the information; and is not exclusively derived 
from an allegation made in a judicial or an administrative action, in a 
governmental report, a hearing, an audit, or an investigation, or from 
the news media, unless the individual is a source of the information.
    Some definitions of the constituent terms in the definition of 
original information, such as ``independent knowledge or analysis,'' 
have been proposed in proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) so as to further 
describe when an individual provides ``original information.''
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) also adds the requirement that the 
original information be provided to the Agency for the first time after 
December 4, 2015. December 4, 2015 is the date of enactment of the FAST 
Act. This limitation is based on the rule of construction contained in 
section 24352(b) of the FAST Act.
    Although the FAST Act authorizes the Secretary to pay whistleblower 
awards on the basis of original information that is submitted to the 
Secretary prior to the promulgation of rules implementing section 30172 
(assuming all other requirements for an award are met),\59\ it is our 
tentative conclusion that section 30172 does not authorize the 
Secretary to retroactively pay awards based on information submitted 
before the effective date of the statute. Section 24352(b)(1) of the 
FAST Act, Public Law 114-94, provides that ``Information submitted to 
the Secretary of Transportation by a whistleblower in accordance with 
the requirements of section 30172 of title 49, United States Code, 
shall not lose its status as original information solely because the 
whistleblower submitted the information prior to the effective date of 
the regulations issued under subsection (i) of that section if that 
information was submitted after the date of enactment of this Act.'' 
(emphasis added). The Agency tentatively construes this language as 
excluding information that was submitted to the Agency prior to 
December 5, 2015, from the definition of ``original information'' and 
has included such exclusion in proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) for the 
purposes of clarity.\60\ To give meaning to the phrase ``submitted 
after the date of enactment of this Act,'' it appears that a 
whistleblower award is not permitted for information submitted prior to 
that date.\61\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ See Section 24352(b)(2) of the FAST Act, Public Law 114-94 
(stating that a whistleblower may receive an award prior to the 
Secretary promulgating the regulations under subsection (i)).
    \60\ However, the statute is clear that a whistleblower may 
receive an award regardless of whether the violation underlying the 
covered action occurred prior to the Act's date of enactment. Thus, 
if a whistleblower has submitted original information after December 
5, 2015, about a violation that occurred on or prior to December 5, 
2015, the whistleblower may be eligible for an award, assuming that 
all other conditions are met. These timing provisions are consistent 
with the purpose of the Whistleblower Act of incentivizing 
whistleblowers to bring information to the Agency.
    \61\ This interpretation is consistent with language contained 
with language contained in Senate Report 114-13. See S. Rep. 114-13, 
Motor Vehicle Safety Whistleblower Act, Report of the Committee on 
commerce, Science, and Transportation at 7 (2015) (``Nevertheless, 
since this section this section limits the application of the 
[Whistleblower] Act to information submitted after the date of 
enactment, the secretary may not issue an award under this act for 
information previously submitted or for penalties already assessed 
prior to the date of enactment.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Agency notes that this proposed approach is similar to that 
taken by the SEC and affirmed by the Second Circuit. In Stryker v. 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 780 F.3d 163 (2d. Cir 2015), the 
petitioner sought review of an SEC order denying his claim for a 
whistleblower award. In this case, the petitioner provided information 
that the SEC relied upon in a successful enforcement action, but the 
claim was denied because the information was submitted before the 
enactment of Dodd-Frank. The Court noted that the SEC had adopted a 
rule that provided that whistleblower awards may be made only for 
information provided to the Commission for the first time after July 
21, 2010, and that the ``sole basis for petitioner's claim is section 
21F, which was not enacted until after he took the actions that are the 
grounds for the award sought. If the purpose of Dodd-Frank was to 
encourage whistleblower activity, already completed actions would 
arguably not qualify.'' Id. at 166. The Court held, ``We need not, 
however, decide if Congress clearly intended to bar a whistleblower 
award to petitioner at Chevron Step 1 because even if Dodd-Frank is 
ambiguous, we defer to the SEC's interpretation of Dodd-Frank at Step 
2.'' Id. It is the Agency's tentative position that it should follow 
the SEC's practice and not permit whistleblower awards for provision of 
information that predated the Whistleblower Act.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ See also Ross v. Securities and Exchange Comm'n, 34 F.4th 
1114, 1122 (D.C. Cir. 2022) (interpreting the provision in 15 U.S.C. 
78u-7(b) stating that ``Information provided to the Commission in 
writing by a whistleblower shall not lose the status of original 
information (as defined in section 78u-6(a)(3) of this title, as 
added by this subtitle) solely because the whistleblower provided 
the information prior to the effective date of the regulations, if 
the information is provided by the whistleblower after July 21, 
2010'' as specifically requiring exclusion of this category of 
submissions from being considered ``original information'' such that 
the Court could conclude that under ``Chevron Step 1 that the 
Congress has indeed spoken directly and unambiguously to the precise 
question at issue and the SEC followed this directive to the 
letter.'').

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 23287]]

l. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Original Information That Leads to a 
Successful Resolution
    Under section 30172(b), a whistleblower's eligibility for an award 
depends in part on whether the whistleblower's original information 
``leads to'' the successful resolution of a covered action. Proposed 
rule Sec.  513.2(b) defines two situations when the Agency will 
consider the potential whistleblower to have provided original 
information that ``leads to'' a successful resolution.
    Some of NHTSA's proposal is based on the approach taken by the SEC 
and the CFTC in their whistleblower regulations.\63\ The first 
situation in which the Agency will consider the potential whistleblower 
to have provided original information that ``leads to'' a successful 
resolution is when the potential whistleblower gave the Agency original 
information that was sufficiently specific, credible and timely to 
cause the Agency to open an investigation, reopen an investigation that 
the Agency had closed, continue an investigation the Agency would not 
have continued but for the information, or to inquire concerning a 
different potential violation of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 or a regulation 
thereunder as part of a current investigation, and the U.S. Department 
of Transportation, Agency or the Department of Justice brought a 
successful judicial or administrative action based in whole or in part 
on conduct that was the subject of the potential whistleblower's 
original information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ See 17 CFR 240.2F-4(c) and 17 CFR 165.2(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The second situation that the Agency will consider the potential 
whistleblower to have provided information that ``leads to'' a 
successful resolution is, under circumstances delineated below, where 
the potential whistleblower gave the Agency original information about 
conduct that was already under investigation by the Agency. In these 
cases, the proposal would find the information to have ``led to'' the 
successful resolution of the covered action when the potential 
whistleblower's information significantly contributed to the success of 
the covered action and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Agency or 
U.S. Department of Justice brought a successful judicial or 
administrative action based in whole or in part on conduct that was the 
subject of the potential whistleblower's original information.
    In evaluating whether the information ``significantly contributed'' 
to the success, the Agency anticipates it will proceed on a case-by-
case basis to provide flexibility to address all potential scenarios. 
The Agency may consider such things as whether the information allowed 
the Agency to bring a successful action in significantly less time or 
with significantly fewer resources or whether it was able to bring 
additional successful claims against additional individuals or 
entities.
m. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Part Supplier
    The statutory definition of ``part supplier'' means a 
``manufacturer of motor vehicle equipment.'' There is a statutory 
definition of ``motor vehicle equipment'' found at 49 U.S.C. 
30102(a)(8). To avoid confusion, the Agency wants to make it clear that 
its interpretation covers all motor vehicle equipment, regardless of 
whether it is original equipment or replacement equipment, as those 
terms are defined in 49 U.S.C. 30102(b)(1)(C) and (D).
n. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Potential Whistleblower
    Since there is a specific statutory definition of ``whistleblower'' 
that contains a number of prerequisites that need to be met to fall 
under the definition, the Agency proposes to use the term ``potential 
whistleblower'' for the sake of clarity, as the Agency will not be able 
to determine whether a person is a ``whistleblower'' until, at the very 
least, that person submits information to the Agency and it is 
evaluated. Therefore, the Agency proposes that the term ``potential 
whistleblower'' refer to an employee or contractor of a motor vehicle 
manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership submitting information to 
the Agency in accordance with and pursuant to this part.
    It is important to note that the Agency will treat potential 
whistleblowers as subject to the protections in 49 U.S.C. 30172(f).
o. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Related Administrative or Judicial 
Action
    The Agency proposes the term ``related administrative or judicial 
action,'' as used in the definition of covered action, to refer to an 
action that was brought under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 by the U.S. 
Department of Justice, the U.S. Department of Transportation, or the 
Agency and is based on the original information provided by the 
whistleblower. For example, under this interpretation, if the 
whistleblower's submission leads to two separate but related 
enforcement actions, each with a monetary sanction of $600,000, those 
two amounts can be added together to overcome the $1,000,000 threshold 
for a whistleblower award. The Agency believes that under principals of 
statutory construction ``related actions'' are limited to only those 
actions brought under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301. The term ``covered 
action'' is defined in 49 U.S.C. 30172(a)(1) as ``any administrative or 
judicial action, including any related administrative or judicial 
action, brought by the Secretary or the Attorney General under this 
chapter that in the aggregate results in monetary sanctions exceeding 
$1,000,000.'' The Agency believes that the use of the word 
``including'', and the placement of commas makes it clear that 
``related'' actions are a subset of any administrative or judicial 
actions brought under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301, rather than referring to 
actions brought under other statutes. This would mean that deferred 
prosecution agreements and the like entered into by the U.S. Department 
of Justice with companies for violations of criminal laws generally 
would not be considered a ``related'' action, as those actions are not 
brought under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301. Thus, any money collected by the 
government in connection with that deferred prosecution agreement or 
the like would not be compensable to a whistleblower under 49 U.S.C. 
30172.
    As discussed elsewhere in this document, this interpretation also 
makes the most sense with respect to where the money for a 
whistleblower award would come from. Unlike the SEC and CFTC, the 
Agency does not have a separate fund to draw from in making award 
payments. Rather, the Agency anticipates that the ``pot of money'' from 
which to pay the award will come from penalties and additional monetary 
sanctions the manufacturer or other entity that violated the Safety Act 
or the regulations thereunder paid to the United States.
    The Agency also wants to clarify ``related action'' as it may 
pertain to additional actions stemming out of a consent order. For 
example, several consent orders issued by NHTSA contain clauses for 
deferred penalties or abeyance amounts. Generally, under these clauses, 
the company under the consent order stipulates that it will pay a 
certain monetary amount if there is another violation of the consent 
order, the Safety Act, or the regulations thereunder by it. These 
amounts are tied to a yet undetermined violation at the time of the 
execution of the consent

[[Page 23288]]

order. It is the Agency's tentative view that any amounts that come due 
under a deferred or abeyance amount would not be considered part of the 
initial civil penalty action that resulted in the consent order, nor 
would it be considered a ``related'' action. If a whistleblower 
received an award in connection with the initial civil penalty action, 
it is our tentative view that such whistleblower would not be eligible 
for an award percentage of any amount collected from the deferred/
abeyance amounts, unless the whistleblower provided original 
information that led to the Agency determining the deferred penalty 
payment was required. We request comments on this interpretation.
    If a whistleblower provided information that resulted in a deferred 
penalty or abeyance amount coming due under a consent order, it is our 
tentative view that this would be a successful resolution. Any 
determination letter by NHTSA that a penalty was owed could be 
considered a ``covered action'' if the original information provided by 
the whistleblower led to the collection of more than $1,000,000 of the 
deferred penalty or abeyance amounts. It is our tentative view that 
such whistleblower would be eligible for an award under these 
circumstances.
    In some cases, a performance obligation amount would become due 
under a consent order if the company did not meet its spending 
requirements. In that case, the performance obligation amount relates 
to a fixed expenditure obligation arising out of the initial violation 
of law that led to the consent order. It is the Agency's view that if 
any of the performance obligation amounts come due under the consent 
order as money paid to the United States, a whistleblower that was 
eligible to receive an award for that consent order may also be 
eligible for an award of ten (10) to thirty (30) percent of any 
performance obligation amount collected by the United States.\64\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \64\ The Agency also anticipates that if the performance 
obligation spend requirement is collected under the terms of the 
consent order, any such amount could be added to the amounts already 
collected by the United States to reach the over one-million-dollar 
threshold needed to be a ``covered action'' for which an award may 
be paid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

p. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Secretary
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) clarifies that the term Secretary 
means the Secretary of Transportation.\65\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \65\ NHTSA notes that in section 30171, Protection of employees 
providing motor vehicle safety information, the term Secretary 
generally refers to the Secretary of Labor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

q. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Successful Resolution
    The definition of ``successful resolution'' in proposed rule Sec.  
513.2(b) provides additional clarification of what a successful 
resolution includes. Under the proposal, a successful resolution, when 
referring to any administrative or judicial action brought by the 
Secretary, Agency or the Attorney General relating to any potential 
motor vehicle defect, potential noncompliance, or any violation or 
alleged violation of any notification or reporting requirement under 49 
U.S.C. chapter 301 or regulation thereunder, which is likely to cause 
unreasonable risk of death or serious physical injury, includes any 
settlement of the action by the U.S. Department of Transportation, the 
Agency, or the U.S. Department of Justice, or final decision or 
judgment in whole or in partial favor of the Agency, the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, or the U.S. Department of Justice.
    Under this definition, a successful resolution can include, but is 
not limited to, a consent order that is issued by the Agency, a 
decision letter issued by the Agency, a consent decree that is entered 
by a Court, a settlement agreement, or a judicial order in whole or in 
part in the Agency's favor.
r. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.2(b), Whistleblower
    The term ``whistleblower'' is defined in section 30172(a)(6). The 
proposed definition tracks the statutory definition of whistleblower, 
except that the proposed rule uses the term ``Agency'' and clarifies 
that ``any violation or alleged violation of any notification or 
reporting requirements of this chapter'' refers to 49 U.S.C. chapter 
301 and regulations promulgated thereunder for the purposes of clarity.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.2(b) defines ``whistleblower'' as any 
employee or contractor of a motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, 
or dealership who voluntarily provides to the Agency original 
information relating to any motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, or any 
violation or alleged violation of any notification or reporting 
requirement of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 or regulation thereunder, which is 
likely to cause unreasonable risk of death or serious physical injury.
    Because the statute requires that that a whistleblower provide 
information to the Secretary and that the submission be voluntary, it 
is the Agency's tentative view that the whistleblower or the 
whistleblower's legal representative must be the one to directly 
provide the information to NHTSA. For example, it is the Agency's 
tentative view that if a whistleblower provides information to an 
advocacy group, reporter, or some other third-party and that third-
party provides the information to NHTSA, such a submission would not 
comport with the requirement to voluntarily provide original 
information to the Secretary. To the extent the whistleblower is 
concerned about revealing their identity, the Agency believes that the 
proposed anonymous submission procedure should help to mitigate the 
concerns. When a whistleblower provides information directly to the 
Agency (including through a legal representative), the Agency has the 
ability to follow-up and obtain additional information or 
clarification.
    The Agency requests comment on whether it should add the word 
``potential'' in front of the term ``motor vehicle defect'' and 
``noncompliance'' as the terms ``safety-related defect'' and 
``noncompliance'' are understood to have specific meaning in the 
context of the recall and remedy portions of the Safety Act,\66\ and 
the Agency is careful to use those terms only when it is determined 
that there is an actual safety-related defect or noncompliance with an 
applicable FMVSS, not just a potential or apparent safety-related 
defect or noncompliance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ 49 U.S.C. 301118-30120.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A manufacturer may file a notice of safety-related defect or 
noncompliance with the FMVSS pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, or the Agency 
may follow an administrative process to determine that a safety-related 
defect or noncompliance with an applicable FMVSS exists. In cases where 
a manufacturer has not determined that there is a safety-related defect 
or a noncompliance with an applicable FMVSS in a motor vehicle or item 
of motor vehicle equipment, the Safety Act and regulations thereunder 
prescribe a process for the Agency to make such a decision. The steps 
include the Agency making an initial decision, providing to the 
manufacturer all information on which the decision was based, having a 
public meeting on the issue, and making a final decision.\67\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \67\ 49 U.S.C. 30118(b), 49 CFR 554.10, 554.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Agency has provided further clarity to the phrase ``any 
violation or alleged violation of any notification or reporting 
requirements of this chapter'' by specifying that the phrase refers to 
49 U.S.C. chapter 301 and regulations promulgated thereunder.
    The Agency is specifically requesting comment on whether a 
whistleblower has to provide original information related to the 
company that employed or

[[Page 23289]]

contracted with the whistleblower or whether the employee or contractor 
of any motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership can 
report original information regarding any motor vehicle manufacturer, 
part supplier or dealership (not just the one that employed them or 
that they were contractors of).
    One view is that because the statute has an emphasis on internal 
reporting, that Congress may have intended that only employees and 
contractors providing information on the motor vehicle manufacturer, 
part supplier, or dealership that employed them or contracted with them 
could be whistleblowers. However, the statute also provides that the 
Secretary may have good cause to waive the internal reporting 
requirement,\68\ which provides a statutory way to exclude employees or 
contractors of other corporate entities (such as competitors) from 
needing to report to be eligible for an award.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \68\ 49 U.S.C. 30172(c)(2)(E)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Agency believes that competitors, partners, employees of 
another separate corporate entity, and the like often have insight into 
the automotive market and is proposing to allow them to receive 
whistleblower awards. The Agency specifically requests comment on 
whether such employees or contractors of other motor vehicle 
manufacturers, parts suppliers, or dealerships should be considered 
potential whistleblowers. The Agency has provided examples below for 
consideration:
    1. Employee of Tire Manufacturer A has original information that 
Tire Manufacturer B has been falsely certifying its tires as compliant 
with all applicable FMVSS.
    2. Employee of Motor Vehicle Manufacturer C has original 
information that Motor Vehicle Manufacturer D did not report deaths as 
required by Early Warning Reporting (``EWR'') requirements.
    3. Employee of Dealership E has original information that 
Dealership F has been selling new vehicles that have open recalls.
    4. Employee of Motor Vehicle Manufacturer G has original 
information that Dealership G has been selling new vehicles that have 
open recalls.
    5. Employee of Motor Vehicle Equipment Manufacturer H has original 
information that Motor Vehicle Manufacturer I did not timely recall 
vehicles with a safety-related defect.
    6. Employee of parent company Motor Vehicle Manufacturer J has 
information that subsidiary company Motor Vehicle Manufacturer K did 
not timely recall vehicles with a safety-related defect.
    7. An employee of company L that has served as a subcontractor to 
Registered Importer M is aware that Registered Importer M submitted 
false or misleading certificates of conformance to NHTSA.
    The Agency is aware that employees and contractors in the motor 
vehicle industry often have knowledge regarding other corporate 
entities. This often includes companies with a relationship, such as a 
motor vehicle manufacturer and its dealers, a parts supplier and the 
companies that purchase its parts, a related corporate entity (for 
example, a parent and subsidiary) or a partner company. The Agency also 
believes that competitors often have valuable insight into their 
competitors' actions in the market. For example, a company that has 
been undercut on price because its competitor improperly certifies its 
products as complying with applicable FMVSS certainly may have valuable 
information for the Agency and may be further incentivized to inform 
the Agency if a whistleblower award may be possible. In some cases, 
competitors may conduct ``tear downs,'' or other investigations of a 
product as part of their normal business practices, which may lead to 
their conclusion that the competitor's product may contain a safety-
related defect or noncompliance with an applicable FMVSS. NHTSA 
believes that competitor-provided information could be a rich source of 
data. However, based on the language of the statute, it appears that 
the company could not make the claim on its own behalf and be 
considered a ``whistleblower.'' It does appear that an employee or 
contractor of the competitor company could make the report and still 
qualify under the statutory definition of ``whistleblower.'' The Agency 
requests comment on this interpretation.
    The Agency is also requesting comment on whether employees of motor 
vehicle industry related trade groups could be considered 
whistleblowers. The Agency's tentative conclusion is that while trade 
groups themselves cannot be whistleblowers, the employees or 
contractors with the companies within the trade group's membership can 
be whistleblowers, provided they fall into the definition of motor 
vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership. This best 
effectuates the purpose of the statute in incentivizing those with 
access to information on safety issues and violations of law to bring 
them to the Agency's attention.
    The Agency does have some concerns that some unscrupulous actors 
may anonymously or improperly provide information to the Agency not 
because they think there is a safety-problem, but rather with the 
motive to harm the competitor or entity by making false or inaccurate 
allegations. However, this concern may be mitigated by 49 U.S.C. 
30172(g) and proposed rule Sec.  513.8.
    Under 49 U.S.C. 30172(c)(2)(E)(iii), the Secretary may, for good 
cause, waive the requirement to report or attempt to report the 
information through the internal reporting mechanism. This authority 
has been delegated to NHTSA. The Agency anticipates making such 
decisions on a case-by-case basis. However, NHTSA is requesting comment 
on whether it should consider an interpretation or rule that claims 
made by employees or contractors of other motor vehicle manufacturers, 
part suppliers, or dealerships as automatically exempt for good cause 
from the requirements to report it to the internal reporting mechanism 
of the motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership about 
which the whistleblower is providing information or other internal 
reporting.\69\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \69\ The Agency does not think it makes sense to require such 
employee or contractor to make a report to the internal reporting 
mechanism of its motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or 
dealership in those situations where the conduct involved is 
unrelated to the actions of its employing or contracting entity. The 
Agency therefore would not require this type of internal reporting 
should the rule allow for whistleblowers to receive awards for 
reporting conduct of entities that did not employ or contract with 
them, as is proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.3--Representation

    Proposed rule Sec.  513.3 tracks the language of 49 U.S.C. 
30172(d), which provides that a whistleblower may be represented by 
counsel, and also adds the term ``potential whistleblower'' for 
clarity.

D. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.4--Procedures for Submitting Original 
Information

    The Agency proposes that the potential whistleblower submit 
information on a standardized form, WB-INFO. A proposed draft of the 
WB-INFO form is contained in Appendix A to this proposed rule.
    In addition to other benefits, the use of a standardized form (WB-
INFO) will assist the Agency in managing and tracking the whistleblower 
information it receives. This will also better enable the Agency to 
connect whistleblower information to requests for award payment under 
the whistleblower provisions.

[[Page 23290]]

    Proposed rule Sec.  513.4(a) proposes that the standard form must 
be submitted either by email to NHTSA's established account 
([email protected]), which is monitored by the Office of the 
Chief Counsel, or by any such method that the Agency may expressly 
designate on its website.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.4(b) would provide that the potential 
whistleblower must declare under penalty of perjury at the time the 
potential whistleblower submits information on the WB-INFO form that 
the information is true and correct to the best of the potential 
whistleblower's knowledge and belief. The purpose of requiring a sworn 
declaration on the WB-INFO form is to help deter the submission of 
false and misleading information, which undermines the efficient use of 
the Agency's resources. The requirement may also mitigate the potential 
harm to companies and individuals that may be caused by false or 
spurious allegations of wrongdoing.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.4(c) would provide that a potential 
whistleblower may provide original information to the Agency 
anonymously through use of a legal representative. The legal 
representative must submit the information on behalf of the potential 
whistleblower pursuant to the procedures specified in Sec.  513.4(a). 
Prior to the legal representative's submission, the potential 
whistleblower must provide his or her legal representative with a 
completed WB-INFO form that he or she has signed under the penalty of 
perjury. When the legal representative makes the submission on behalf 
of the potential whistleblower, the legal representative must certify 
that he or she: (1) has verified the potential whistleblower's 
identity; (2) has verified that the potential whistleblower is an 
employee or contractor of a motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, 
or dealership; (3) has reviewed the potential whistleblower's signed 
WB-INFO form for accuracy and that the information contained therein is 
true and correct to the best of the legal representative's knowledge, 
information and belief; and (4) has obtained the potential 
whistleblower's non-waivable consent to provide the Agency with the 
original WB-INFO form from the potential whistleblower in the event 
that the Agency requests it.
    The Agency requests comments on whether it should allow non-
attorneys to submit information on behalf of a potential whistleblower.
    Because many potential whistleblowers may wish to provide 
information anonymously, the Agency believes the proposed rule strikes 
an appropriate balance between the Agency's interest in deterring false 
and misleading information while permitting anonymous submissions with 
certain specified conditions. Anonymous potential whistleblowers will 
have the same rights and responsibilities as other potential 
whistleblowers unless expressly exempted. This includes the 
restrictions on providing false information, as addressed in proposed 
rule Sec.  513.8.
    Finally, proposed rule Sec.  513.4(d) follows section 24352(b) of 
the FAST Act by providing that if a potential whistleblower submitted 
original information to the Agency after December 4, 2015 (the date of 
the enactment of the FAST Act) but before the effective date of these 
rules, the submission will be deemed to satisfy the requirements set 
forth in Sec.  513.5(a) and (b).

E. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.5--Confidentiality

    49 U.S.C. 30172(f) provides for protection of whistleblowers. 
Consistent with this section, proposed rule Sec.  513.5(a) explains 
that notwithstanding 49 U.S.C. 30167, the Secretary and any officer or 
employee of the U.S. Department of Transportation shall not disclose 
any information, including information provided by a whistleblower to 
the Secretary, that could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity 
of a whistleblower, except in accordance with the provisions of 5 
U.S.C. 552a unless it falls under one of the circumstances described in 
the statute.
    It is the Agency's view that if an individual is not a 
whistleblower, as defined by the statute, the Agency is not bound by 
the limitations contained in 49 U.S.C. 30172(f). However, it is the 
Agency's intent to afford potential whistleblowers, that is, those 
persons who submit information to the Agency in accordance with this 
part, confidential protections indefinitely, unless otherwise waived or 
permitted.\70\ NHTSA recognizes that potential whistleblowers often put 
themselves at risk of significant consequences, and thus maintaining 
their confidentiality is of the utmost importance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \70\ For those persons who submit information prior to the 
effective date of the final rule on this section, it is the Agency's 
intent to accord them confidential protection, unless otherwise 
waived or otherwise permitted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An important part of maintaining confidentiality of whistleblowers 
relates to the Agency's ability to communicate directly with 
whistleblowers. Therefore, the Agency wants to make it clear that the 
Agency's staff, including its lawyers, may communicate directly with 
potential whistleblowers, including directors, officers, members, 
contractors, or employees of any entity that has counsel, without 
seeking consent of the entity's counsel. 49 U.S.C. 30172 demonstrates a 
strong Congressional policy to encourage disclosure to the Agency 
relating to certain safety information while protecting the identity of 
those who do so. This policy would be significantly impaired if the 
Agency were required to seek the consent of the entity's counsel before 
speaking with an individual who contacts it and who is a director, 
officer, member, contractor, or employee of any entity that has 
counsel. The Agency believes that, in accordance with American Bar 
Association Model Rule 4.2, an attorney on behalf of NHTSA is 
authorized by law to make these communications.\71\ Thus, Agency staff 
(including its attorneys) could meet with the individual privately, 
without the consent, knowledge or presence of counsel of the entity. 
The Agency requests comment on whether it should put this position in a 
rule, similar to that of the 17 CFR 240.21F-17(b).\72\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \71\ American Bar Association Model Rule 4.2 provides, ``In 
representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the 
subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be 
represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has 
the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized to do so by law or 
a court order.'' See Model Rules of Prof'l Conduct, R. 4.2, 
Communications with Persons Represented by Counsel, available at 
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_4_2_communication_with_person_represented_by_counsel.html.
    \72\ See SEC's Rule 21F-17(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained in more detail below, the Agency needs to be able to 
distinguish which information is from a whistleblower or potential 
whistleblower and which information is from a member of the general 
public in order to properly follow the whistleblower requirements 
contained in 49 U.S.C. 30172(f) while not impeding its mission to save 
lives, prevent injuries and reduce economic costs due to road traffic 
crashes, through education, research, safety standards and enforcement 
activity. For example, if the Agency receives a call from a consumer, 
and that consumer is not an employee or contractor of a motor vehicle 
manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership, that person is not a 
whistleblower and is therefore not entitled to the protections under 49 
U.S.C. 30172(f).
    As another example, even if the individual is an employee or 
contractor of a motor vehicle manufacturer, if the

[[Page 23291]]

information they are disclosing relating to a motor vehicle defect, 
noncompliance, or violation of notification or reporting requirement is 
not likely to cause unreasonable risk of death or serious physical 
injury, then that person is not a whistleblower and is not entitled to 
the statutory protection contained in 49 U.S.C. 30172.
    The provisions in proposed Sec.  513.5(a) are based on the 
statutory provisions at 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(1)(A)-(C). Paragraph (a)(1) 
of proposed rule Sec.  513.5 would authorize disclosure of information 
that could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a 
whistleblower when disclosure is required to a defendant or respondent 
in connection with a public proceeding instituted by the Secretary, the 
Agency or any entity described in proposed rule Sec.  513.5(c), which 
includes the U.S. Department of Justice and any appropriate department 
or agency of the Federal Government acting within the scope of its 
jurisdiction.
    Paragraph (a)(2) would authorize disclosure if the whistleblower 
provides prior written consent for the information to be disclosed. An 
example of prior written consent would be if the whistleblower gave 
such consent, such as through the release contained at proposed form 
WB-RELEASE. Even when a release is signed, the Agency endeavors not to 
release information that could reasonably be expected to reveal the 
identity of a whistleblower unless necessary. We believe this practice 
helps reassure prospective whistleblowers that the Agency takes the 
protection of whistleblowers seriously.
    Paragraph (a)(3) would authorize disclosure when the Secretary or 
other officer or employee of the U.S. Department of Transportation 
receives the information through another source, such as during an 
inspection or investigation under section 30166 and has the authority 
under other law to release the information.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.5(b) gives effect to 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(4). 
It provides that notwithstanding paragraph (a), nothing in this section 
is intended to limit the ability of the Attorney General to present 
such evidence to a grand jury or to share such evidence with potential 
witnesses or defendants in the course of an ongoing criminal 
investigation.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.5(c) follows 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(5), but 
replaces the word Secretary with Administrator, as the Secretary has 
authorized the NHTSA Administrator to exercise the authority vested in 
the Secretary under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301. 49 CFR 1.95(a). It provides 
that notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, without the loss of 
its status as confidential in the hands of the Administrator, all 
information referred to in paragraph (a) of this section may, in the 
discretion of the Administrator, when determined by the Administrator 
to be necessary or appropriate to accomplish the purposes of 49 U.S.C. 
chapter 301, be made available to the U.S. Department of Justice or an 
appropriate department or agency of the Federal Government, acting 
within the scope of its authority, provided that each entity shall 
maintain information as confidential in accordance with the 
requirements of paragraph (a).
    49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(2) provides that the Secretary, and any officer 
or employee of the Department of Transportation, shall take reasonable 
measures to not reveal the identity of the whistleblower when 
disclosing any information under 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(1). Since 49 U.S.C. 
30172(f)(2) is entitled ``Redaction,'' the Agency is proposing to 
interpret this provision in Proposed 513.5(d) as meaning that the 
Secretary and any officer or employee of the U.S. Department of 
Transportation should take reasonable measures not to reveal the 
whistleblower's name, and that the whistleblower's name should be 
redacted when information is disclosed under proposed rule Sec.  
513.5(a). 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(1).
    Because 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(4) and (5) are excepted from the 
restrictions in 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(1) and 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(5) 
provides that information may be made available to government agencies 
without losing its status as confidential, our tentative conclusion is 
that we are not required to redact the whistleblower's name when 
providing information under those subsections. Those provisions allow 
information to be disclosed to the U.S. Department of Justice or an 
appropriate department or agency of the Federal Government acting 
within the scope of its jurisdiction. It seems incongruous to provide 
information to the U.S. Department of Justice in support of an 
investigation, but not be able to provide the Department with the name 
of the whistleblower, the source of such information. The Agency 
anticipates that the U.S. Department of Justice would want to speak 
with the whistleblower to assess the whistleblower's credibility or get 
further information in support of its investigation or analysis.
    Proposed 513.5(e) gives effect to 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(3). It 
provides that the identity of the whistleblower and the information 
provided to the Secretary by the whistleblower shall be considered 
exempt from disclosure under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552 to the 
fullest extent permitted by law.
    Proposed 513.5(f) states that the person should identify himself or 
herself as a whistleblower at the time he or she first submits original 
information relating to any potential motor vehicle defect, potential 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirements under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 by 
submitting a WB-INFO form. If the person is represented by a legal 
representative, that legal representative should identify his or her 
client as a whistleblower at the time the legal representative first 
submits original information relating to any potential motor vehicle 
defect, potential noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation 
of any notification or reporting requirements under 49 U.S.C. chapter 
301 on behalf of the legal representative's client in the WB-INFO form.
    The Agency specifically requests comment on whether this 
identification should be mandatory at the outset or be permissive given 
that certain whistleblowers or their legal representatives may simply 
be unaware of the WB-INFO form before contacting the Agency, may first 
reach out with questions before submitting a WB-INFO form, or otherwise 
may have good cause for not immediately submitting a WB-INFO form.
    The reason for this proposed requirement is programmatic. Unlike 
other entities that have a policy and practice to treat all information 
obtained during an investigation as confidential and nonpublic,\73\ 
NHTSA generally makes information on safety-related defect 
investigations for which it has not received a request for confidential 
treatment under 49 CFR part 512 publicly available. The Agency posts 
materials such as Information Requests, Special Orders, and answers 
thereto on its website, www.nhtsa.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \73\ The SEC and CFTC both have this practice. See, e.g., Final 
Rule, Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protections, 76 FR 
34300, 34332 (June 13, 2011); Final Rule, Whistleblower Incentives 
and Protection, 76 FR 53172, 53184 (Aug. 25, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA also makes various consumer complaints publicly available, 
with Personally Identifiable Information (PII) redacted. NHTSA receives 
consumer complaints through a variety of sources, including calls to 
its vehicle safety hotline, which are transcribed, and submissions of 
Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (VOQs) through its website, www.nhtsa.gov.
    NHTSA relies on information submitted by consumers to assist it in 
identifying potential safety issues. For

[[Page 23292]]

example, in opening an investigation into a safety-related defect, 
NHTSA describes the issue being investigated in an ``Opening Resume,'' 
which includes a failure report summary. Applicable VOQs are identified 
in the failure report summary under the heading ``ODI Complaints.'' The 
Opening Resume may include a reference to the identification number(s) 
of the counted VOQs. NHTSA often discusses the VOQs with manufacturers 
when it is conducting an investigation.
    NHTSA also receives information on potential safety issues through 
letters, emails, and phone calls. NHTSA may open an investigation based 
on information provided through any of these sources.
    Because NHTSA currently has no required method or form of 
submission of information by whistleblowers since rules implementing 
the whistleblower program have not yet been enacted, NHTSA has taken a 
broad view of what is considered whistleblower information. This 
information comes from a variety of sources, such as VOQs, and 
information provided by telephone, letter, or email to the Agency. We 
have taken this broad view not only to review and track the information 
submitted, but also to better protect the confidentiality of those who 
have provided whistleblower information to the Agency. As NHTSA has 
received information from over 150 potential whistleblowers since 
enactment of the FAST Act, and as more whistleblowers are expected to 
come forward, the Agency needs a robust way to identify potential 
whistleblowers to afford them the protection available in 49 U.S.C. 
30172.
    Because 49 U.S.C. 30172 requires the U.S. Department of 
Transportation to afford confidential treatment to information ``which 
could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a 
whistleblower'' ``[n]otwithstanding section 30167'' \74\ it is 
important to be able to determine whether a person is a 
``whistleblower'' at the time he or she submits information to the 
Agency. When a person submits a VOQ or other complaint to NHTSA, it may 
not be clear at that point whether the person submitting the 
information would meet the definition of a ``whistleblower.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \74\ 49 U.S.C. 30167 relates to disclosure of information by the 
Secretary of Transportation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, to balance the interest of transparency against the 
whistleblower protection afforded by the statute, the Agency proposes 
that the person should identify himself or herself as a whistleblower 
at the time he or she first submits original information relating to 
any potential motor vehicle defect, potential noncompliance, or any 
violation or alleged violation of any notification or reporting 
requirements under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 or a regulation thereunder. 
Proposed rule Sec.  513.5(f) also requires that if a person is 
represented by a legal representative, the person's legal 
representative should identify the client as a whistleblower at the 
time the legal representative first submits original information 
relating to any potential motor vehicle defect, potential 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirements under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 or 
regulation thereunder on behalf of the legal representative's client.
    The most effective and obvious way for whistleblowers to identify 
themselves to the Agency is for the whistleblower to submit his or her 
original information on a WB-INFO form. It also may be more beneficial 
to the whistleblower to submit the information on the WB-INFO form, as 
failure to do so could make the whistleblower ineligible for an award 
under proposed rule Sec.  513.6(b). Therefore, the Agency is requesting 
comment on whether a person must identify themselves as a whistleblower 
through use of the WB-INFO form. The Agency specifically requests 
comment on this issue, given the potential impact on whistleblowers 
that may not be familiar with NHTSA's regulations, but nevertheless 
could readily be identified as a whistleblower. However, the Agency 
notes its intention to protect all potential whistleblowers, to the 
extent they can be identified, regardless of whether they file a WB-
INFO form.
    Section 30172(f) prohibits disclosure of ``any information, 
including information provided by a whistleblower to the Secretary, 
which could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of the 
whistleblower'' except in certain situations. The Agency is requesting 
comments on whether it should define ``any information . . . which 
could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a 
whistleblower,'' and if so, what the proposed definition should be.
    The Agency recognizes that its investigative function may be 
thwarted if it is not able to follow all lines of inquiry, but a very 
broad view of ``any information . . . which could reasonably be 
expected to reveal the identity of a whistleblower,'' could do just 
that by restricting the Agency's ability to conduct follow-up inquiry. 
For example, if a whistleblower reveals information known only to a 
small group within a company, the Agency's attempts to verify that 
information or obtain related information could lead the company to 
suspect a particular individual has been in communication with the 
Agency. Other than asking the whistleblower to sign a consent form for 
disclosure of information in these cases, NHTSA is requesting comments 
on how the Agency can most effectively investigate whistleblower 
allegations while abiding by the statutory requirements of 49 U.S.C. 
30172(f). NHTSA notes that it believes it has been able to effectively 
balance these competing interests in the several years since the FAST 
Act's enactment, through careful lines of inquiry, by engaging in 
investigatory activity without revealing the identity of the 
whistleblower. However, we are also interested in input from 
stakeholders on this issue.
    NHTSA recognizes that there may be a tension between the statutory 
requirement to deny awards to whistleblowers who fail to report or 
attempt to report information though an internal reporting mechanism 
unless an exception applies (49 U.S.C. 30172(c)(2)(E)) and the mandate 
of 49 U.S.C. 30172(f) for NHTSA to protect any information that could 
reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a whistleblower.
    In a hypothetical situation, a whistleblower would report the issue 
to the company through the internal reporting mechanism, and therefore 
the whistleblower's identity may become known to the company. Even if a 
company had a process to allow for anonymous reports, a company may be 
able to glean a whistleblower's identity from the facts and 
circumstances surrounding the whistleblower's report. If NHTSA were to 
send an inquiry to the company, even in a general way, about the 
information provided to it by the whistleblower, the company might be 
able to discern that the whistleblower also reported the issue to 
NHTSA. NHTSA would run the risk of violating section 30172(f)(1) if 
such inquiry was deemed a ``disclosure'' of information that could 
reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a whistleblower. NHTSA 
does not view such a scenario as a ``disclosure'' of information.
    Additionally, 49 U.S.C. 30171 put in place protections for 
employees of motor vehicle manufacturers, part suppliers, and 
dealerships to protect the employees from discrimination or discharge 
for, among other things, providing to the employer or the Secretary 
information relating to any motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, or any 
violation or alleged violation of any notification or reporting 
requirement of

[[Page 23293]]

49 U.S.C. chapter 301. Such employee may file a complaint with the 
Secretary of Labor alleging such discharge or discrimination. The 
Secretary of Labor is required to notify in writing the person named in 
the complaint of the filing of the complaint, of the allegations 
contained in the complaint, of the substance of evidence supporting the 
complaint, and of the opportunities that will be afforded to such 
person. 49 U.S.C. 30171(b). The regulations addressing the procedures 
under this statute can be found at 29 CFR part 1988.\75\ Therefore, 
under an action brought under 49 U.S.C. 30171, the company should 
already be aware of the employee's identity. If that employee provided 
information to NHTSA and NHTSA discussed even generally the basis of 
the allegations with such company, the company may be able to discern 
the potential whistleblower's identity. Again, NHTSA does not view such 
a scenario as a ``disclosure'' of information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \75\ More information about the U.S. Department of Labor's 
whistleblower protection program can be found at https://www.whistleblowers.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There may be times where, despite receiving information from a 
potential whistleblower, the Agency will still need data or information 
from the manufacturer, part supplier, dealership or other entity in 
order to properly evaluate whether there is a motor vehicle defect, 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirement of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 or a 
regulation thereunder, which is likely to cause unreasonable risk of 
death or serious physical injury. As illustrated by the above examples, 
taking a broad view of ``shall not disclose any information which could 
reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a whistleblower'' 
might impede NHTSA from following up on certain safety information, 
unless it was able to secure written consent from the whistleblower. We 
do not believe this is the intended result of the statute. The Agency 
requests comments on how to effectively investigate whistleblower 
allegations while abiding by the statutory requirements of 49 U.S.C. 
30172(f).

F. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.6--Prerequisites to the Consideration of an 
Award

    Proposed rule Sec.  513.6 summarizes the general prerequisites for 
persons to be considered for the payment of an award, based on the 
statutory language of 49 U.S.C. 30172(b)(1) and the definition of a 
whistleblower under 49 U.S.C. 30172(a)(6), but adds the word 
``potential'' in front of the terms ``motor vehicle defect'' and 
``noncompliance.'' Under proposed rule Sec.  513.6(a), subject to the 
eligibility requirements in these rules, NHTSA may, but is not required 
to, authorize payment of an award to one or more persons who provide a 
voluntary submission to the Agency that contains original information 
relating to any potential motor vehicle defect, potential 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirement of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 or a 
regulation thereunder, which is likely to cause unreasonable risk of 
death or serious physical injury, and the original information in that 
submission leads to the successful resolution of a covered action.
    Paragraph (b) of proposed rule Sec.  513.6 proposes that, to be 
eligible, the person must have given the Agency original information in 
the form and manner required by proposed rule Sec.  513.4. The proposed 
rule also provides that the Agency may waive this requirement for good 
cause shown. The Agency specifically requests comment on this issue, 
given the potential impact on whistleblowers that may not be familiar 
with NHTSA's regulations, but nevertheless could readily be identified 
as a whistleblower.
    For those persons who have submitted original information prior to 
the effective date of a final rule, proposed rule Sec.  513.4(d) would 
allow those persons to be eligible for an award because it could deem 
their submission to satisfy the requirements in proposed rule Sec.  
513.4(a) and (b).
    The Agency requests comment on whether there should be any other 
prerequisites to the consideration of an award.

G. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.7--Whistleblowers Ineligible for an Award

    Proposed rule Sec.  513.7 recites the categories of individuals who 
are ineligible for an award. The Agency's proposal is based on 
statutory construction as well as the statutory provisions contained in 
49 U.S.C. 30172(c)(2) and (g).
    As reflected in proposed rule Sec.  513.7(a), the Agency proposes 
to construe the statute to mean that if the amount of monetary 
sanctions collected in a covered action does not exceed $1,000,000, the 
whistleblower is ineligible for an award. As an example, if the 
whistleblower provides original information about a violation that has 
resulted in a civil penalty of $600,000, even if the maximum civil 
penalty that could have been asserted exceeded $1,000,000, the 
whistleblower would not be eligible for an award under the statute. We 
believe this is most in line with the award provision at 49 U.S.C. 
30172(b) that says the Secretary may pay an award to a whistleblower 
``if the original information that a whistleblower provided to the 
Secretary leads to successful resolution of a covered action.'' 
(emphasis added). This interpretation is also in line with the 
statutory definition of ``covered action,'' which includes a reference 
to ``in the aggregate results in monetary sanctions exceeding 
$1,000,000'' and ``monetary sanctions,'' which is defined as ``monies, 
including penalties and interest, ordered or agreed to be paid.''
    Another proposed exclusion for whistleblower award eligibility in 
proposed rule Sec.  513.7 includes any whistleblower who is convicted 
of a criminal violation related to the covered action for which the 
whistleblower otherwise could receive an award under this part. 
Information regarding such convictions is required in the proposed WB-
AWARD form. The Agency is also proposing to require in its WB-AWARD 
form information about whether the whistleblower is currently a subject 
or target of a criminal investigation in connection with the 
allegations or conduct the whistleblower submitted to NHTSA. While the 
Agency understands that a whistleblower may not know if there is an 
investigation opened into their conduct, it would be beneficial to the 
Agency to be provided with information that they are aware of. The 
Agency requests comment on whether it needs to wait to issue a 
whistleblower award in such situations until the investigation is 
closed or criminal case otherwise adjudicated.
    The Agency also requests comment on whether it should limit the 
criminal conviction bar to only those cases decided by a U.S. Federal 
or State court or whether it should consider convictions issued by 
courts in other countries.
    Other proposed exclusions include any whistleblower who, acting 
without direction from an applicable motor vehicle manufacturer, part 
supplier, or dealership, or agent thereof, deliberately causes or 
substantially contributes to the alleged violation of a requirement of 
49 U.S.C. chapter 301 or regulation thereunder; any whistleblower who 
submits information to the Agency that is based on the facts underlying 
the covered action submitted previously by another whistleblower; any 
whistleblower who fails to provide the original information to the 
Agency in the form required by Section 513.4, absent good cause; or any 
whistleblower who knowingly and intentionally makes any false, 
fictitious, or fraudulent

[[Page 23294]]

statement or representation, or who makes or uses any false writing or 
document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious, or 
fraudulent statement or entry.
    Additionally, if the applicable motor vehicle manufacturer, parts 
supplier, or dealership has an internal reporting mechanism in place to 
protect employees from retaliation, proposed rule Sec.  513.7 provides 
that no award shall be made to any whistleblower who fails to report or 
attempt to report the information through such mechanism, unless the 
whistleblower reasonably believed that such an internal report would 
have resulted in retaliation, notwithstanding 49 U.S.C. 30171(a), the 
whistleblower reasonably believed that the information was already 
internally reported, was already subject to or part of an internal 
inquiry or investigation; or was otherwise already known to the motor 
vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership; or the Agency has 
good cause to waive this requirement, as discussed in additional detail 
above.

H. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.8--Provision of False Information

    Proposed rule Sec.  513.8 tracks the language of 49 U.S.C. 
30172(g), which states that a person who knowingly and intentionally 
makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, 
or who makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to 
contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall 
not be entitled to an award under this section and shall be subject to 
prosecution under 18 U.S.C. 1001.

I. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.9--Procedures for Making a Claim for a 
Whistleblower Award

    Proposed rule Sec.  513.9 describes the steps a whistleblower is 
required to follow in order to make an application for an award. The 
proposed process would begin with the Agency posting a ``Notice of 
Covered Action'' (Notice). The Agency proposes that it publish this 
Notice on the Agency's website whenever any administrative or judicial 
action, including any related administrative or judicial action, 
brought by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Agency, or U.S. 
Department of Justice under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 in the aggregate 
results in collected monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000,000. Such 
Notice will be published subsequent to a final judgment, order, or 
agreement that alone, or in the aggregate, results in collected 
monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000,000.
    While the Agency typically posts consent orders or settlement 
agreements over $1,000,000 to its website shortly after the agreement 
has been executed, the Agency is not proposing that this be the 
``Notice.'' Rather the Agency is planning on posting the Notice, titled 
``Notice of Covered Action'' once an amount over $1,000,000 has been 
collected. In some instances, the Agency has allowed a manufacturer to 
pay civil penalties in installments over time, or may require the 
payment of deferred penalties under certain circumstances. Posting the 
Notice after the money is collected would ensure that there would be a 
pot of money from which to pay the whistleblower claim. In the event 
that a deferred civil penalty becomes due, which results in additional 
collected monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000,000, the Agency plans on 
posting another Notice on its website. In that case, the deferred 
penalties may come due as a result of a violation related to 
information provided by a whistleblower unconnected with the initial 
enforcement action. Prospective claimants should monitor the Agency's 
website for such Notices. In addition, the Agency will endeavor to 
notify a whistleblower of a Notice applicable to information provided 
by that whistleblower.
    The Agency proposes that a claimant will have ninety (90) days from 
the date of the Notice of Covered Action to file a claim, including any 
attachments, for an award based on that action, or the claim will be 
barred. The Agency requests comment on whether this is sufficient time 
and requests comment on what other time frames for submission would be 
appropriate.
    The Agency proposes that the claim is deemed filed on the date that 
it is received by the Agency. If the claim is not received by the 
Agency on or before the ninetieth calendar day from the date the Notice 
of Covered Action is posted, the claim will be barred. The Agency 
requests comment on whether there should be exceptions to the proposed 
bar. The Agency believes imposing a deadline to file claims is 
appropriate. NHTSA requires certainty regarding the claims it needs to 
evaluate in order to stay within the statutory requirements of the 
award program. The program allows one or more whistleblowers to receive 
an award relating to the same covered action. Since these 
whistleblowers would be required to share the ``pot'' of money in 
accordance with the range specified by statute, the Agency needs to 
know all the potential claimants before it can make award 
determinations.
    Paragraph (b) of proposed rule Sec.  513.9 describes the procedure 
for making a claim for an award. Specifically, a claimant would be 
required to submit a WB-AWARD form. The whistleblower must sign this 
form as the claimant and submit it to the Agency by email to NHTSA's 
Office of the Chief Counsel at [email protected], or by other 
such means as the Agency may expressly designate on its website.
    Paragraph (b) further emphasizes that all claim forms, including 
any attachments, must be received by the Agency no later than ninety 
(90) calendar days from the date of the Notice of Covered Action to be 
considered for an award. The Agency interprets the date of the Notice 
of Covered Action to be the date that the Notice is posted on the 
Agency's website, which the Agency will identify in the Notice, along 
with the submission deadline.
    Paragraph (c) includes award application procedures for a claimant 
who submitted original information anonymously. Claimants who had 
previously submitted information anonymously, but who are now making a 
claim for a whistleblower award, are required to disclose their 
identities on the WB-AWARD form. The claimant's identity must be 
verified in a form and manner that is acceptable to the Agency prior to 
the payment of any award to such claimant. One reason for not 
permitting anonymous claimants is that requiring identification would 
help the Agency ensure that the claimant meets the award eligibility 
requirements.
    Nothing in this proposal is intended to prevent claimants from 
making a claim for a whistleblower award prior to the effective date of 
any final rule on this section. Therefore, the Agency has proposed rule 
Sec.  513.9(d) to provide that if a claimant filed a claim for a 
whistleblower award after December 4, 2015 (the date of the enactment 
of the FAST Act) but before the effective date of these rules, the 
claim submission will be deemed to meet the requirements of Sec.  
513.9. However, the Agency will only post a Notice of Covered Action 
for covered actions that arise after the effective date of the rule.
    The Agency also examined whether foreign nationals could be 
eligible for a whistleblower award. It is the Agency's view that 49 
U.S.C. 30172 is not unlawfully extraterritorial and that it is 
authorized to provide whistleblower awards and protection of identity 
for foreign national whistleblowers.
    In the Agency's view, the purpose underlying the statutory award 
program is to incentivize employees and contractors of motor vehicle

[[Page 23295]]

manufacturers, parts suppliers and dealerships to provide information 
about defects, noncompliances and motor vehicle safety reporting 
violations to improve automobile safety and to protect the 
confidentiality of the whistleblowers, when appropriate. This is 
evident through the text and plain meaning of the statute. The 
automotive industry is a global industry, and we believe that the 
intent of the Whistleblower Act is to help prevent deaths and serious 
bodily injury on U.S. roadways as a result of defects, noncompliances 
or violations of notification or reporting requirement of 49 U.S.C. 
chapter 301 regardless of whether the whistleblower is a U.S. citizen, 
legal permanent resident or foreign national.
    Furthermore, the legislative history indicates that the statute 
was, at least in part, modeled after the SEC whistleblower award 
statute.\76\ The Agency notes that in 2014, the SEC awarded a 
whistleblower payment to a foreign resident, and described why the 
foreign resident was eligible for an award ``notwithstanding the 
existence of certain extraterritorial aspects of Claimant's 
application.'' \77\ The SEC stated that in its view, ``there is a 
sufficient U.S. territorial nexus whenever a claimant's information 
leads to the successful enforcement of a covered action brought in the 
United States, concerning violations of the U.S. securities laws, by 
the Commission, the U.S. regulatory agency with enforcement authority 
for such violations.'' \78\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \76\ Commerce Committee Approves Bipartisan Motor Vehicle Safety 
Whistleblower Act, Feb. 26, 2015, available at http://www.thune.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2015/2/commerce-committee-approves-bipartisan-motor-vehicle-safety-whistleblower-act?
    \77\ Order Determining Whistleblower Award Claim, Whistleblower 
Award Proceeding, File No 2014-10, available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/other/2014/34-73174.pdf.
    \78\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The SEC has discussed the global scope of its whistleblower 
program.\79\ The Commission has continued to make awards to foreign 
nationals, including to those whistleblowers living or residing outside 
of the United States.\80\ The Agency also notes that the CFTC has 
granted awards to whistleblowers located outside the United States.\81\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \79\ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2021 Annual Report 
to Congress, p. 31 available at https://www.sec.gov/files/2021_OW_AR_508.pdf (``In FY 2021 alone, the Commission received 
whistleblower submissions from individuals in 99 foreign 
countries.'').
    \80\ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2015 Annual Report 
to Congress on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program, p. 12, 
available at https://www.sec.gov/files/owb-annual-report-2015.pdf. 
See also U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 2020 Annual Report 
to Congress, p. 25, available at https://www.sec.gov/files/2020%20Annual%20Report_0.pdf (stating ``Past whistleblower award 
recipients hail from several different parts of the United States, 
and 19 recipients were foreign nationals or residents of foreign 
countries at the time they submitted their tips to the 
Commission.'').
    \81\ Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Whistleblower Program 
and Customer Education Initiatives, 2020 Annual Report, p. 2 (Oct. 
2020), available at https://whistleblower.gov/sites/whistleblower/files/2020-11/FY20%20Report%20to%20Congress.pdf. See also CFTC 
Announces First Whistleblower Award to a Foreign Whistleblower, July 
16, 2018, available at https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/7755-18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It appears that in the experience of the SEC, information from 
individuals outside the United States could be a rich source. The SEC 
stated, ``Since the beginning of the whistleblower program, the 
Commission has received whistleblower tips from individuals in 
approximately 130 countries outside the United States.'' The Agency 
anticipates receiving submissions from foreign nationals and that such 
submissions may be valuable to protecting automobile safety of the 
American motoring public, given the global nature of the automotive 
industry. In fact, NHTSA has recognized the importance of information 
provided by whistleblowers from non-U.S. companies by granting a 
whistleblower award to an employee of a motor vehicle manufacturer in a 
foreign country.\82\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \82\ https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.gov/files/2022-02/whistleblower-decision-letter-RQ17-003-Kia-RQ17-004-Hyundai_web.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to the global nature of the automotive industry, in 
calendar year (CY) 2019, there were approximately 7.8 million motor 
vehicle equipment items and motor vehicles declared in the Customs and 
Border Patrol (CBP) Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) database. 
ACE ``is the system through which the trade community reports imports 
and exports and the government determines admissibility.'' \83\ 
Furthermore, Congress was well aware of the many foreign manufacturers 
and suppliers that provide motor vehicles and items of motor vehicle 
equipment for the U.S. market. In fact, the situation with exploding 
Takata air bags, which were manufactured by a Japanese supplier, was a 
major motivation for Section 30172.\84\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \83\ https://www.cbp.gov/trade/automated.
    \84\ See, e.g., Thune Opening Statement at Commerce Hearing on 
Takata Air Bag Defects, available at https://www.commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2014/11/thune-opening-statement-at-commerce-hearing-on-takata-air-bag-defects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.10--Award Determinations

    Proposed rule Sec.  513.10 describes the award determination 
process. Under the proposed process described in proposed rule Sec.  
513.10(a), once the time for filing any appeals of the covered action 
(and all related actions) has expired, or where an appeal has been 
filed, after all appeals in the covered action and related actions have 
concluded, and over $1,000,000 in monetary sanctions have been 
collected, the Agency will evaluate all timely whistleblower award 
claims submitted on a WB-AWARD form in accordance with the criteria set 
forth in this part. In connection with this process, the Agency may 
require the claimant to provide additional information relating to the 
claimant's eligibility for an award or satisfaction of any of the 
conditions for an award, as set forth in part 513.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.10(b) implements 49 U.S.C. 30172(c), as 
delegated to the NHTSA Administrator.\85\ It provides that the 
determination of whether, to whom, or in what amount to make an award 
shall be in the discretion of the Administrator. We request comment 
regarding whether the Agency should limit its discretion and, if so, in 
what way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \85\ 49 CFR 1.95(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We understand the question of the Agency's discretion to be of high 
interest to stakeholders. While we are cognizant that the Agency's 
ability to exercise discretion to not grant an award to an otherwise 
eligible whistleblower could deter some potential whistleblowers, we 
tentatively believe that retaining this discretion could be important 
in rare and unusual circumstances. For example, it could be contrary to 
the public interest for NHTSA to issue a whistleblower award to an 
employee of a company that blows the whistle on violations of law by a 
competitor company if that employee is engaged in similar violations of 
law at his or her own employer. In that case, the disqualifier in 49 
U.S.C. 30172(c)(2)(B) would not directly apply (as the ``alleged 
violation of a requirement of this chapter'' concerns the competitor). 
Likewise, it could be contrary to the public interest for NHTSA to 
award money to a whistleblower that commits a crime involving the 
Federal government (for example, threatening to assassinate the 
President), though that is not a disqualifying crime under 49 U.S.C. 
30172(c)(2)(A) (since it is not ``related to the covered action''). We 
emphasize that we would not expect to utilize the

[[Page 23296]]

discretion to not grant an award; however, we tentatively believe that 
the Agency should retain that authority afforded by Congress. We also 
note that the Agency's exercise of discretion would not be unbounded 
and would still be subject to judicial review.
    The Agency anticipates that the determination of how much to award, 
pursuant to proposed rule Sec.  513.10, will involve a highly 
individualized review of the circumstances regarding each claim. The 
Agency preliminarily believes that the criteria below afford the 
Administrator broad discretion to weigh a multitude of considerations 
in making the determination. Depending on the facts and circumstances 
of each case, some considerations may not be applicable or may deserve 
greater weight than others.
    Under proposed rule Sec.  513.10(b), in determining whether to 
grant an award to a whistleblower and the amount of an award, the 
Administrator shall take into consideration, as appropriate: whether a 
whistleblower reported or attempted to report the information 
internally to an applicable motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, 
or dealership; the significance of the original information provided by 
the whistleblower to the successful resolution of the covered action; 
the degree of assistance provided by the whistleblower and any legal 
representative of the whistleblower in the covered action; \86\ the 
statutory purpose of incentivizing whistleblowers; and the public 
interest or such additional factors as the Administrator considers 
relevant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \86\ The degree of assistance provided by the whistleblower and 
any legal representative of the whistleblower may include, but is 
not limited to, providing explanations and other assistance in order 
that the staff may evaluate and use the information the potential 
whistleblower submitted and providing an English translation or 
explanation of the documents, if the original information is not in 
English, to the extent of the whistleblower's capability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed rule Sec.  513.10(c) implements 49 U.S.C. 30172(b)(1). It 
provides that if the Administrator determines that an award is 
warranted, the Administrator shall determine the amount of such award 
or awards to one or more whistleblowers. Whistleblower awards shall be 
in an aggregate amount equal to--(1) not less than 10 percent, in 
total, of monetary sanctions collected in the covered action; and (2) 
not more than 30 percent, in total, of monetary sanctions collected in 
the covered action.
    As an example, if the Agency has collected $100 million in civil 
penalties in a covered action, and the Administrator decides that a 
whistleblower award is warranted, the total award money that can be 
paid out to whistleblowers with respect to that covered action will 
have a range of $10 million (10 percent of $100 million) to $30 million 
(30 percent of $100 million). If there are two or more whistleblowers 
that the Administrator has decided should receive an award in 
connection with that covered action, the total range does not change. 
The amount awarded to each whistleblower with respect to a covered 
action will be decided by the Administrator. In the case where there 
are two or more claimants for an award in connection with a specific 
covered action, the Agency anticipates that the Administrator will 
issue a decision on each claim on or around the same date.
    As set forth in proposed rule Sec.  513.10(d), following the 
Administrator's determination, the Agency would send each claimant an 
Order setting forth whether the claim is allowed or denied, and if 
allowed, setting forth the award amount. The proposal provides that in 
no event will the total amount awarded to all whistleblowers in the 
aggregate be less than 10 percent or greater than 30 percent of the 
amount of monetary sanctions collected in the covered action.
    Other Agencies, such as the SEC \87\ and the CFTC,\88\ post 
redacted Final Orders with respect to whistleblower award applications. 
NHTSA also has done so and plans to continue doing so.\89\ We request 
comment on the extent of the redactions to appropriately balance the 
interests in whistleblower confidentiality and transparency.\90\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \87\ See Final Orders of the Commission, available at https://www.sec.gov/whistleblower/final-orders-of-the-commission.
    \88\ See Final Orders/Award Determinations, available at https://www.whistleblower.gov/orders/.
    \89\ See Whistleblower Award Decisions, available at https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/whistleblower-program.
    \90\ NHTSA notes that other award decisions, such as those of 
the SEC are largely redacted. NHTSA has reviewed differences between 
the SEC's and NHTSA's statutory provisions regarding 
confidentiality. NHTSA's statute, 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(1)(B) provides 
that the whistleblower can provide prior written consent for 
information to be disclosed. Even in cases where there is a prior 
written waiver, NHTSA anticipates redacting the whistleblower's name 
consistent with the purpose of 49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, proposed rule Sec.  513.10(e) follows 49 U.S.C. 30172(e), 
except that it replaces Secretary with Agency. It provides that no 
contract with the Agency is necessary for a whistleblower to receive an 
award.
    In making a determination of a whistleblower award, the Agency 
anticipates reviewing relevant material. This could include the 
claimant's WB-INFO form, including any attachments and other related 
material provided by the potential whistleblower to assist the Agency 
in its investigation or action; the claimant's WB-AWARD form, including 
any other filings or submissions from the potential whistleblower in 
support of the award application; materials from Agency staff, 
including sworn declarations, regarding any matters relevant to the 
award determination; any other documents or materials that are received 
or obtained by the Agency to assist the Agency to resolve the 
claimant's award application, including information related to the 
claimant's eligibility; and any other materials that may be relevant to 
the determination.
    The Agency may request that a claimant enter into a confidentiality 
agreement to review the record. To be clear, the Agency does not intend 
to provide claimants or their counsel any privileged materials or other 
material that may not be disclosed by law, such as pre-decisional, 
attorney-client privilege, attorney work product privilege, or internal 
deliberative process materials related to the Agency's determination to 
file or settle the covered action, and/or any other privileged material 
relating to whether, to whom, and in what amount to make a 
whistleblower award.
    The Agency requests comment on whether it should review information 
from outside persons, such as the company that was liable for the civil 
penalties. It is the Agency's tentative view that outside parties 
should not be able to insert themselves into the award process. In 
accordance with the confidentiality provisions in the statute, NHTSA 
does not comment on individual whistleblower matters. Furthermore, to 
the extent there was a whistleblower in a particular matter, the 
outside party would not know the degree of assistance that a 
whistleblower provided. Additionally, if the Agency considers 
confidential submissions from outside parties, the Agency may be 
prohibited from sharing the information with the claimant, which seems 
to undercut fairness if the claimant does not have an opportunity to 
review and comment on the information provided. Furthermore, the Agency 
believes the intent of the statute was to incentivize potential 
whistleblowers to come forward with their information. If the company, 
or another third party, was allowed to interject in the award 
proceedings, that may undermine a whistleblower's willingness to come 
forward or pursue a claim.

[[Page 23297]]

K. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.11--Appeals of Award Determinations

    49 U.S.C. 30172(h)(2) provides appellate rights for any 
determination made by the Secretary under section 30172 in the 
appropriate court of appeals of the United States not later than 30 
days after the determination is issued by the Secretary. This provision 
allows a claimant to appeal the Administrator's award eligibility 
determinations, including the award amount (if any), which are 
contained in the Agency's Order.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.11(a) follows the statutory language by 
stating that a claimant may appeal any determination made by the 
Administrator under Sec.  513.10 to an appropriate court of appeals of 
the United States not later than 30 days after the Order is issued by 
the Administrator. Proposed rule Sec.  513.11(a)(1) provides that if no 
claimant files an appeal within 30 days after the Order is issued by 
the Administrator, no appeals are permitted with respect to the claim 
that is the subject of the Order. In the case where there are two or 
more claimants for an award in connection with a specific covered 
action, the Agency anticipates that the Administrator will issue his or 
her decision on each claim at or near the same time, to prevent 
unnecessary complications.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.11(a)(2) provides that if any claimant 
appeals within 30 days after the Order is issued by the Administrator, 
no payments with respect to the covered action will be made to any 
whistleblower in the action until the appealed award determination 
action is concluded. This measure is appropriate because the Agency is 
constrained by the statute as to what percentage of the collected 
monetary sanctions in a covered action it may award to all 
whistleblowers. For example, if the applicable United States court of 
appeals finds that the Agency improperly denied a whistleblower an 
award, this whistleblower's share in the ``pot'' of money may affect 
the amount of money that could be awarded to other whistleblowers who 
are sharing in that same ``pot.'' Similarly, if the Court of Appeals 
finds that one whistleblower's share of the ``pot'' should be 
increased, that decision has the potential to affect another 
whistleblower's share of the same ``pot.'' However, the Agency is also 
aware that this could deter a whistleblower from exercising legal 
rights afforded by statute. We request comment on this issue.
    The Agency believes that if there is more than one claimant for a 
covered action, an appeal of an award determination by one may make any 
other claimant a necessary party to that appeal as, depending on how 
the appeals court rules, other claimants may have their award amount 
reduced. However, the Agency is charged with protecting that claimant's 
identity. The Agency requests comment on how best to resolve this 
potential issue and other potential issues involving two or more 
claimants.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.11(b) explicitly provides that these rules 
do not entitle claimants to obtain from the Agency any privileged 
materials such as pre-decisional, attorney-client privilege, attorney 
work product privilege, or internal deliberative process materials 
related to the Administrator's Order, and/or any privileged material 
relating to whether, to whom, and in what amount, to make a 
whistleblower award.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.11(c) makes it clear that the record may 
contain redactions as necessary, including but not limited to 
redactions necessary to comply with statutory restrictions, the 
Agency's enforcement and regulatory functions or regulations, and to 
comply with requests for confidential treatment from law enforcement, 
regulatory authorities, or persons submitting information to the Agency 
pursuant to 49 CFR part 512.
    Finally, as specified in 49 U.S.C. 30172(h)(3), proposed rule Sec.  
513.11(d) provides that the court shall review the determination made 
by the Administrator in accordance with the Administrative Procedure 
Act, 5 U.S.C. 706.

L. Proposed Rule Sec.  513.12--Procedures Applicable to the Payment of 
Awards

    Proposed rule Sec.  513.12 details procedures applicable to the 
payment of awards. Proposed rule Sec.  513.12(a) makes it clear that a 
recipient of a whistleblower award is entitled to payment on the award 
only to the extent that a monetary sanction upon which the award is 
based is collected in the covered action. The Agency's interpretation 
is consistent with 49 U.S.C. 30172(b)(1), which refers to paying awards 
in a range of ten percent to thirty percent of ``collected monetary 
sanctions'' and 30172(b)(2), which states that any amount payable under 
30172(b)(1) ``shall be paid from the monetary sanctions collected, and 
any monetary sanctions so collected shall be available for such 
payment.''
    As discussed above, in prior consent orders, the Agency has allowed 
for deferred penalties and monetary amounts to be expended in 
connection with compliance and outreach by the company (i.e., 
compliance amounts or performance amounts). Under the proposed rule, 
these compliance amounts would generally not be counted toward monetary 
sanctions, unless there was an actual payment to the United States 
under the terms of the consent order or other agreement. The Agency is 
also of the view that any ``deferred'' or abeyance amounts should not 
be counted toward monetary sanctions unless and until they are actually 
paid and collected.
    Proposed rule Sec.  513.12(b) addresses the timing for payment of 
an award made to a whistleblower. It states that payment of a 
whistleblower award for a monetary sanction collected in connection 
with a covered action shall be made within a reasonable time following 
the later of the date on which the monetary sanction totaling over 
$1,000,000 is collected or after completion of the appeals process for 
all award determinations claims arising from the Administrator's Order 
relating to the covered action. The Agency requests comment on whether 
a different time frame for payment is appropriate.
    In some instances, the Agency has allowed a manufacturer to pay 
civil penalties in installments. The Agency is specifically requesting 
comment on whether the Agency should or must wait until all monetary 
sanctions are collected, or whether it should provide whistleblowers 
portions of the award, as the monetary sanctions are collected. For 
example, if a company agrees to pay a civil penalty of $3,000,000 in 
two annual installments of $1,500,000, a whistleblower who was awarded 
10% of the recovery may receive a payment of $150,000 in the first 
year, and another payment of $150,000 in the second year. 
Alternatively, the Agency could wait until the entire $3,000,000 is 
collected before making the $300,000 award payment to the 
whistleblower.
    It is the Agency's tentative view that it need not wait until all 
monetary sanctions are collected to authorize a payment to a 
whistleblower, but that it must wait until over $1,000,000 is collected 
in connection with a covered action before the Agency authorizes any 
disbursement of awards. The Agency believes that this proposal would 
balance the Agency's need for efficiency and manageability while 
providing the whistleblower awardees their award dollars in an 
expedient manner.
    With respect to civil penalties that may become due as a result of 
collection of deferred penalties or abeyance amounts, the Agency has 
tentatively concluded that those actions should be treated as new 
Covered Actions. This means that a whistleblower must follow

[[Page 23298]]

these regulations to request an award, and that any award will only be 
authorized for disbursement after the amount collected under the 
deferred amount or abeyance amount exceeds one million dollars 
($1,000,000).
    With respect to the provision relating to completion of the appeals 
process for all award determination claims arising from the 
Administrator's Order relating to the covered action, it is intended to 
address those situations where a single action results in multiple 
award claims. Under this scenario, if one or more claimants appeals any 
award determination, including whether an award claim was denied or the 
amount of the award determination, the Agency would not pay any awards 
in the action until those appeals have been concluded, because 
disposition of the appeal could affect other awards in connection with 
that action. With respect to making payments to whistleblowers, the 
Agency will follow all applicable Federal laws and regulations.

M. Proposed Appendix A--Form WB-INFO

    The Agency proposes to include form WB-INFO in appendix A to part 
513. The use of a standardized form will be an efficient way for the 
Agency to review the whistleblower information it receives and will 
better allow the Agency to manage and track such information. The 
Agency requests comment on whether the form WB-INFO should be 
prescribed by regulation, whether it would be better to specify the 
content of the form (and not the form itself), or whether the Agency 
should take a different approach.
    The proposed form WB-INFO and the instructions thereto are designed 
to capture basic information about a potential whistleblower, the 
potential whistleblower's legal representative (if applicable), the 
motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier or dealership about whom the 
concern is raised, and the individual's current employer and address, 
and the potential whistleblower's relationship to the company about 
whom the concern is raised.
    It is designed to elicit sufficient information to determine 
whether the information is original information and whether the 
information has been previously provided to NHTSA. It is also designed 
to elicit whether the information may relate to any potential defect, 
potential noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirement of chapter 301 or a regulation 
thereunder, and if so, asks the potential whistleblower to provide 
detailed descriptions related to the allegations and supporting 
materials. The form is also designed to elicit whether the information 
was obtained in a means or manner that was determined by a United 
States Federal court or State court to violate applicable Federal or 
State criminal law and whether the information was obtained through a 
communication that was subject to the attorney-client privilege or work 
product doctrine.
    The WB-INFO form also contains a declaration made under the penalty 
of perjury, as well as a legal representative certification (if 
applicable). The purpose of these sections is to help deter the 
submission of false or misleading information, and the resulting 
inefficient use of the Agency's resources. The requirement would also 
mitigate the potential harm to motor vehicle manufacturers, part 
suppliers, and dealerships resulting from false or misleading 
information.
    Specifically, the proposed form WB-INFO would require the potential 
whistleblower to declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the 
United States that the information contained in the WB-INFO form is 
true and correct to the best of the potential whistleblower's 
knowledge, information and belief. Moreover, the statement would 
acknowledge the potential whistleblower's understanding that he or she 
may be subject to prosecution and ineligible for an award if, in the 
potential whistleblower's submission of information, other dealings 
with NHTSA, or dealings with another authority in connection with a 
related action, the potential whistleblower knowingly and willfully 
makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or 
representations, or uses any false writing or document knowing that the 
writing or document contains any false, fictitious, or fraudulent 
statement or entry. Finally, if the potential whistleblower wanted to 
submit the WB-INFO form anonymously and is represented by a legal 
representative, the WB-INFO form contains a section for the potential 
whistleblower's legal representative's certification that he or she has 
reviewed the form for accuracy and that the information contained in 
the WB-INFO form is true and correct to the best of the legal 
representative's knowledge, information and belief. The legal 
representative also certifies that he or she has verified the identity 
of the potential whistleblower on whose behalf the form is being 
submitted by viewing the potential whistleblower's valid, unexpired 
government issued identification and will retain an original signed 
copy of the form, with Section F signed by the potential whistleblower. 
Finally, the legal representative certifies that he or she has obtained 
the potential whistleblower's non-waivable consent to provide NHTSA 
with his or her original signed WB-INFO form in the event that NHTSA 
requests it.

N. Proposed Appendix B--Form WB-RELEASE

    The Agency is proposing form WB-RELEASE in appendix B for those 
whistleblowers who wish to provide prior written consent for the Agency 
to disclose information that could reasonably be expected to reveal the 
whistleblower's identity. The Agency requests comment on whether the 
form WB-RELEASE should be prescribed by regulation, whether it would be 
better to specify the content of the form (and not the form itself), or 
whether the Agency should take a different approach.
    Due to the way NHTSA investigates, in the course of an inquiry or 
analysis surrounding a whistleblower's allegations, it may become 
necessary for NHTSA to reveal information that reasonably could be 
expected to reveal the whistleblower's identity to persons or their 
counsel or agents at the organization or institution against whom such 
allegations are made or other entities in order to gather needed 
information on the alleged safety issue or misconduct that the 
whistleblower has brought to NHTSA's attention. The WB-RELEASE form 
provides whistleblowers a way to provide such consent. Consent is 
voluntary. The Agency may request that a whistleblower provide such 
consent, as such consent may facilitate NHTSA's review of the claim.

O. Proposed Appendix C--Form WB-AWARD

    The Agency proposes to include form WB-AWARD in appendix C to part 
513. Use of a standardized form will be an efficient way for the Agency 
to review whistleblower award claims. The Agency requests comment on 
whether the form WB-AWARD should be prescribed by regulation, whether 
it would be better to specify the content of the form (and not the form 
itself), or whether the Agency should take a different approach.
    Proposed form WB-AWARD, and the instructions thereto, would request 
basic information about a claimant and his or her legal representative 
(if applicable). The form would also request information on the issue/
information submitted by the claimant, information regarding the Notice 
of Covered Action, information on how the

[[Page 23299]]

claimant acquired the original information, as well as other 
information relevant to the claimant's eligibility for an award.
    The WB-AWARD form also provides an opportunity for the claimant to 
explain why they should receive an award, and any other information 
that may be relevant in light of the criteria for determining the 
amount of an award.
    The WB-AWARD form also would require the claimant to declare under 
the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the 
information contained in the WB-AWARD form is true and correct to the 
best of the claimant's knowledge, information and belief. Moreover, the 
statement would acknowledge the claimant's understanding that he or she 
may be subject to prosecution and ineligible for an award if, in the 
claimant's submission of information, other dealings with NHTSA, or 
dealings with another authority in connection with a related action, 
the claimant knowingly and willfully makes any false, fictitious, or 
fraudulent statements or representations, or uses any false writing or 
document knowing that the writing or document contains any false, 
fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry.

III. Public Participation

    This section describes how you can participate in the commenting 
process.

(1) How do I prepare and submit comments?

    Your comments must be written. To ensure that your comments are 
correctly filed in the docket, please include the docket number NHTSA-
2022-0098 in your comments. If you are submitting comments 
electronically as a PDF (Adobe) file, we ask that the documents 
submitted be scanned using the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) 
process, thus allowing NHTSA to search and copy certain portions of 
your submissions. Please note that pursuant to the Data Quality Act, in 
order for the substantive data to be relied upon and used by NHTSA, it 
must meet the information quality standards set forth in the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) and Department of Transportation (DOT) Data 
Quality Act guidelines. Accordingly, we encourage you to consult the 
guidelines in preparing your comments. OMB's guidelines may be accessed 
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/information-regulatory-affairs/information-policy/. DOT's guidelines may be accessed at https://www.transportation.gov/dotinformation-dissemination-quality-guidelines.

(2) Tips for Preparing Your Comments

    When submitting comments, please remember to:
     Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other 
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and 
page number).
     Explain why you agree or disagree, suggest alternatives, 
and substitute language for your requested changes.
     Describe any assumptions and provide any technical 
information and/or data that you used.
     If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how 
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be 
reproduced.
     Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and 
suggest alternatives.
     Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the 
use of profanity or personal threats.
     Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period 
deadline identified in the DATES section above.

(3) How can I be sure that my comments were received?

    If you submit your comments by mail and wish Docket Management to 
notify you upon its receipt of your comments, enclose a self-addressed, 
stamped postcard in the envelope containing your comments. Upon 
receiving your comments, Docket Management will return the postcard by 
mail. If you submit information through email under a claim of 
confidentiality, as discussed below, you may request a delivery 
receipt.

(4) How do I submit confidential business information?

    If you wish to submit any information under a claim of 
confidentiality, you should submit your complete submission, including 
the information you claim to be confidential business information 
(CBI), to NHTSA's Office of the Chief Counsel. When you send a comment 
containing CBI, you should include a cover letter setting forth the 
information specified in our CBI regulation.\91\ In addition, you 
should submit a copy from which you have deleted the claimed CBI to the 
docket by one of the methods set forth above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \91\ See 49 CFR part 512.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA is currently treating electronic submission as an acceptable 
method for submitting CBI to NHTSA under 49 CFR part 512. Any CBI 
submissions sent via email should be sent to an attorney in the Office 
of the Chief Counsel at the address given above under FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT. Likewise, for CBI submissions via a secure file 
transfer application, an attorney in the Office of the Chief Counsel 
must be set to receive a notification when files are submitted and have 
access to retrieve the submitted files. At this time, regulated 
entities should not send a duplicate hardcopy of their electronic CBI 
submissions to DOT headquarters. If you have any questions about CBI or 
the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult the person identified 
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

(5) Will the Agency consider late comments?

    We will consider all comments that Docket Management receives 
before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated 
above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also consider 
comments that Docket Management receives after that date. If Docket 
Management receives a comment too late for us to consider in developing 
a final rule, we will consider that comment as an informal suggestion 
for future rulemaking action.

(6) How can I read the comments submitted by other people?

    You may read the materials placed in the docket for this document 
(e.g., the comments submitted in response to this document by other 
interested persons) at any time by going to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the 
dockets. You may also read the comments received by Docket Management 
at the address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the Docket are 
indicated above in the same location.
    Please note that, even after the comment closing date, we will 
continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes 
available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly, 
we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material.

IV. Regulatory Analyses and Notices

Privacy Act Statement

    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments 
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual 
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf 
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's 
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on 
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

[[Page 23300]]

Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and DOT Regulatory 
Policies and Procedures

    NHTSA has considered the impact of this rulemaking action under 
Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and the Department of 
Transportation's regulatory policies and procedures. This rulemaking 
document was not reviewed under Executive Order 12866 or Executive 
Order 13563.
    This action would add part 513 to implement the whistleblower 
program. It has been determined that this rulemaking is not a 
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866, as 
supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory 
assessment is not required.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Section 603(a) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act \92\ requires the 
Agency to undertake an initial regulatory flexibility analysis of the 
proposed rule on small entities, unless the Agency certifies that the 
rule, if adopted, would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.\93\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \92\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
    \93\ 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I certify that this rule is not expected to have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The proposed 
rules apply only to those employees and contractors of motor vehicle 
manufacturers, part suppliers, or dealerships who provide information 
to the Agency relating a potential motor vehicle defect, potential 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirement of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 (or 
regulation thereunder), which is likely to cause unreasonable risk of 
death or serious physical injury. Companies and other entities are not 
eligible to participate in the program as whistleblowers. Consequently, 
the persons that would be subject to the proposed rule are not ``small 
entities'' for the purposes to the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 
Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required for this 
proposed action.

National Environmental Policy Act

    NHTSA has analyzed this proposed rule for the purposes of the 
National Environmental Policy Act and determined that it will not have 
any significant impact on the quality of the human environment.

Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)

    NHTSA has examined this proposed rule pursuant to Executive Order 
13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and concluded that no additional 
consultation with States, local governments or their representatives is 
mandated beyond the rulemaking process. The Agency has concluded that 
this action would not have ``federalism implications'' because it would 
not have ``substantial direct effects on States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,'' 
as specified in section 1 of the Executive order. This proposed rule 
generally would apply to employees and contractors of motor vehicle 
manufacturers, part suppliers, or dealerships. Thus, Executive Order 
13132 is not implicated and consultation with State and local officials 
is not required.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires agencies to 
prepare a written assessment of the costs, benefits and other effects 
of proposed or final rules that include a Federal mandate likely to 
result in the expenditure by State, local or tribal governments, in the 
aggregate, or by the private sector, of more than $100 million annually 
(adjusted for inflation with base year of 1995). This proposal would 
not result in the expenditure by State, local or tribal governments, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of more than $100 million 
annually.

Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)

    With respect to the review of the promulgation of a new regulation, 
section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice Reform'' (61 FR 
4729, February 7, 1996), requires that Executive agencies make every 
reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) clearly specifies 
the preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on 
existing Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard 
for affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden 
reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately 
defines key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting 
clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the 
Attorney General.
    Pursuant to this Order, NHTSA notes as follows: This proposed rule 
would implement the whistleblower program, including outlining the 
procedures for submitting original information, applying for awards, 
the Agency's procedures for making decisions on the claims, appeals of 
such decisions, and payment of the award. It discusses communications 
with individuals reporting safety information and protections afforded 
related to the whistleblowers' identity. The statute was effective upon 
enactment.
    The rule would not have retroactive effect. Under the rule of 
construction contained in section 24352(b) of the FAST Act, information 
submitted by a whistleblower in accordance with the requirements at 49 
U.S.C. 30172 does not lose its status as original information solely 
because the whistleblower submitted the information prior to the 
effective date of these regulations if that information was submitted 
after the date of enactment of the FAST Act. Thus, information 
submitted prior to the enactment of the FAST Act would not qualify as 
original information, and therefore cannot form the basis of an award.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    Under the procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 
1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.), Federal agencies must obtain 
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each 
collection of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through 
regulations. A person is not required to respond to a collection of 
information by a Federal agency unless the collection displays a valid 
OMB control number. The Information Collection Request (ICR) for a 
proposed new information collection described below has been forwarded 
to OMB for review and comment. In compliance with these requirements, 
NHTSA asks for public comments on the following proposed collection of 
information for which the agency is seeking approval from OMB.
    The titles for the collection of information are forms: (1) WB-
INFO, (2) WB-RELEASE, and (3) WB-AWARD. Under proposed rules Sec. Sec.  
513.4 and 513.9, these proposed forms would be necessary to implement 
section 30172 of the Safety Act.
    The WB-INFO form allows a whistleblower to provide information to 
the Agency and its staff relating to general information about the 
whistleblower, information about the motor vehicle manufacturer, part 
supplier, or dealership about whom the concern is raised, the type and 
source of information being reported, the individual's legal 
representative (if applicable), the information about any

[[Page 23301]]

potential motor vehicle defect, potential noncompliance, or violation 
or alleged violation of any notification or reporting requirement of 
chapter 301 or regulation thereunder, which is likely to cause 
unreasonable risk of death or serious physical injury, and additional 
information.
    Form WB-RELEASE provides a means for a whistleblower to provide 
prior written consent for the Agency to disclose information which 
could reasonably be expected to reveal the whistleblower's identity.
    The WB-AWARD form allows the claimant to provide information 
related to the claimant's eligibility for an award.
    In compliance with the PRA, we announce that NHTSA is seeking 
comment on a new collection.
    Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
    Title: 49 CFR part 513, Whistleblower Program.
    OMB Control Number: New.
    Form Number(s): WB-INFO, WB-RELEASE, and WB-AWARD.
    Type of Request: Approval of a new collection.
    Type of Review Requested: Regular.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from the date of 
approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information:
    Proposed form WB-INFO, which would be submitted pursuant to 
proposed rule Sec.  513.4 would request the following information:
    (1) Background information regarding the person submitting the 
form, including the person's name, contact information and occupation 
and the person's relationship to the company about whom the concern is 
raised;
    (2) Information about the motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier 
or dealership about whom the concern is raised;
    (3) If the person is represented by a legal representative, the 
name and contact information for the person's legal representative (in 
cases of anonymous submissions the person must be represented by a 
legal representative);
    (4) Information regarding the issue involving a motor vehicle 
manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership, including the date of the 
alleged issue, whether the conduct is on-going, and whether the person 
or their counsel had any prior communication with NHTSA;
    (5) Whether the allegation is related to a potential safety-related 
defect or noncompliance with an applicable FMVSS, and if so a detailed 
description of the allegation and how the allegation affects vehicle/
system/component performance and/or compliance, and the make, model, 
model year, part number, component number, etc. if known;
    (6) Whether the allegation is related to any violation or alleged 
violation of any notification or reporting requirement of the Safety 
Act, and if so, a description of the notification or reporting issue, 
including all facts pertinent to the alleged violation;
    (7) A description of supporting materials in the whistleblower's 
possession and the availability and location of other additional 
supporting materials;
    (8) A description of how the person learned about or obtained the 
information submitted, and, if any information was obtained from a 
public source, a description of that source;
    (9) Identification of documents or other information in the 
submission that the person believes could reasonably be expected to 
reveal the person's identity and the basis for that belief;
    (10) Whether the person or his or her legal representative has 
taken any other action regarding the issue, and if so, a description;
    (11) Whether the person acquired the information through a means or 
manner that has been determined by a United States Federal court or a 
State court to violate applicable Federal or State criminal law, and if 
so, details regarding that determination;
    (12) Whether the person acquired the information that he or she is 
submitting to NHTSA solely through a communication that was subject to 
a privilege, such as the attorney-client privilege or attorney work 
product doctrine;
    (13) Any other relevant information;
    (14) A declaration, signed under penalty of perjury under the laws 
of the United States that the information provided to NHTSA is true and 
correct to the best of the person's knowledge, information and belief 
and acknowledgement from the person that they may be subject to 
prosecution and ineligible for a whistleblower award if, in their 
submission of information, their other dealings with the National 
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or their dealings with another 
authority in connection with a related action, they knowingly and 
willfully make any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or 
representations, or use any false writing or document knowing that the 
writing or document contains any false, fictitious or fraudulent 
statement or entry; and
    (15) If represented by a legal representative, the legal 
representative's certification certifying that the legal representative 
has verified the identity of the individual who completed form WB-INFO 
by viewing that individual's valid, unexpired government issued 
identification, reviewed the individual's WB-INFO form for accuracy, 
and that the information contained therein is true and correct to the 
best of the legal representative's knowledge, information and belief; 
the legal representative will retain an original, signed copy of the 
form with section F filled out by their client in their file; and that 
the legal representative has obtained the whistleblower's non-waivable 
consent to provide the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 
with the whistleblower's original signed WB-INFO form in the event that 
NHTSA requests it.
    Proposed form WB-RELEASE would request the following information:
    (1) Background information regarding the whistleblower submitting 
the WB-RELEASE form, including the person's name and address;
    (2) The name of the motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier and/
or dealership to which the whistleblower's issue or information 
relates;
    (3) An acknowledgment that the person consents to disclosure of 
information that could reasonably be expected to reveal the person's 
identity; and
    (4) Signature of the whistleblower and date.
    Proposed form WB-AWARD, which would be submitted pursuant to 
proposed rule Sec.  513.9 would require the following information:
    (1) The claimant's name, address and contact information;
    (2) If the person is represented by a legal representative, the 
name and contact information for the legal representative;
    (3) Details concerning the issue, including the manner in which the 
information was submitted to NHTSA, the date when the information was 
submitted, the form in which it was submitted, and the name of the 
motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier and/or dealership to which 
the issue or information relates.
    (4) Information concerning the Notice of Covered Action to which 
the claim relates, including the date of the Notice, the Notice Number, 
and the Case name and number; and information regarding related 
actions, if applicable;
    (5) Information relating to the claimant's eligibility for an 
award, including whether the person acquired the information solely 
through a communication that was subject to the attorney-client 
privilege or attorney work product doctrine; whether the

[[Page 23302]]

person acquired the original information by a means or manner that was 
determined by a United States Federal court or State court to violate 
applicable Federal or State criminal law; and whether the person is 
currently a subject or target of a criminal investigation or convicted 
of a criminal violation in connection with the allegations or conduct 
the person submitted to NHTSA. If any of the circumstances noted above 
were applicable, the person is requested to provide an explanation.
    (6) An explanation of the reasons that the person believes that he 
or she should receive an award in connection with the person's 
submission of information to NHTSA, including any information that 
might be relevant in light of the criteria for determining the amount 
of an award set forth in 49 U.S.C. 30172 and proposed 49 CFR part 513; 
and
    (7) A declaration by the claimant under penalty of perjury under 
the laws of the United States that the information provided in the WB-
AWARD form is true and correct to the best of the person's knowledge, 
information and belief and acknowledgement from the person that they 
may be subject to prosecution and ineligible for a whistleblower award 
if, in their submission of information, their other dealings with the 
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or their dealings with 
another authority in connection with a related action, they knowingly 
and willfully make any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or 
representations, or use any false writing or document knowing that the 
writing or document contains any false, fictitious or fraudulent 
statement or entry.
    Description of the Need for the Information and Use of the 
Information:
    The collection of information on proposed form WB-INFO would be 
used to permit the Agency and its staff to collect information from 
whistleblowers regarding any potential motor vehicle defect, potential 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirement of the Safety Act or regulation 
thereunder for which NHTSA has enforcement authority. NHTSA 
investigators consider information provided by whistleblowers, which 
may lead to formal actions like an investigation, recall, or civil 
penalty enforcement action. If this information leads to a successful 
resolution of a covered action resulting in monetary sanctions 
collected by the United States in excess of $1,000,000, a whistleblower 
would be eligible for an award.
    The WB-RELEASE form would provide a means for the whistleblower to 
provide consent for the Agency to disclose information which could 
reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of the whistleblower. 
Being able to disclose this information may allow the Agency to open a 
public investigation or proceed more efficiently with an investigation 
into the whistleblower's allegations.
    The WB-AWARD form would permit the Agency to collect information 
relating to a claimant's eligibility for an award, the claimant's 
position on why they should receive an award, and the claimant's view 
on the criteria for determining the amount of an award. This would 
allow the Administrator to determine claims for whistleblower awards.
    Affected Public:
    The likely respondents to proposed form WB-INFO would be those 
employees or contractors of motor vehicle manufacturers, part 
suppliers, and dealerships who wish to provide the Agency staff with 
information relating to any potential motor vehicle defect, potential 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirement of the Safety Act or regulation 
thereunder, which is likely to cause unreasonable risk of death or 
serious physical injury.
    The likely respondents to proposed form WB-RELEASE would be those 
individuals who wish to provide prior written consent to NHTSA for 
disclosure of information that could reasonably be expected to reveal 
that individual's identity.
    The likely respondents to proposed form WB-AWARD would be those 
individuals who have provided the Agency with original information by 
filing a WB-INFO form, and who believe they are eligible for an award 
under 49 CFR part 513.
    Estimated Number of Respondents for Proposed Form WB-INFO:
    In the time since the enactment of the FAST Act in 2015, NHTSA has 
received over 150 submissions that it has considered potential 
whistleblower submissions.\94\ The Agency estimates that there will be 
approximately 50 individuals per fiscal year who may wish to file such 
form. The Agency estimated the number of individuals based on the 
current number of whistleblower submissions and the Agency's view that 
submissions will increase once the whistleblower reward program is more 
widely known, after the rules are promulgated and additional 
whistleblower awards are made.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \94\ Because there is no required method or form of submission, 
NHTSA has taken a broad view of what is considered whistleblower 
information. Such information comes from a variety of sources, such 
as Vehicle Owner Questionnaires (``VOQ''), information provided by 
telephone, and information submitted by letter or email to the 
Agency. We have taken this broad view not only to review and track 
the information submitted, but also to better protect the 
confidentiality of those who have provided whistleblower information 
to the Agency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Frequency for Proposed Form WB-INFO:
    The Agency expects that the individual will complete one form 
detailing all potential issues they are aware of.
    Number of Responses for Proposed Form WB-INFO: The Agency 
anticipates there will be approximately 50 individuals per fiscal year 
who may wish to file such form. NHTSA assumes half of this number will 
have a legal representative.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours for Proposed Form WB-INFO:
    The proposed collection is estimated to involve approximately an 
average of 10 burden hours per individual who completes the WB-INFO 
form, and 20 hours per individual who has a legal representative 
complete the WB-INFO form. The completion time will depend largely on 
the complexity of the alleged violation and the amount of information 
the whistleblower possesses in support of the allegations. The Agency 
estimates that the total annual PRA burden of form WB-INFO is 750 hours 
per year (25 respondents who use a legal representative x 20 hours) 
plus (25 respondents who fill out their own form x 10 hours). The 
Agency invites public comment on the accuracy of its estimates.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost for Proposed Form WB-INFO:
    We estimate the total annual burden cost for the Proposed Form WB-
INFO to be $266,000. We base the estimate on the following:
    Costs for Legal Representatives to Fill out the Proposed Form WB-
INFO:
    Under the proposed rules, a potential whistleblower who discloses 
their identity may elect to retain a legal representative to represent 
them, while an anonymous potential whistleblower is required to retain 
a legal representative to represent them. The Agency expects that in 
most of those instances where a legal representative is retained, the 
whistleblower's/claimant's legal representative will complete or assist 
in the completion of some or all of the required forms on the client's 
behalf. The Agency also expects that in the vast majority of cases in 
which a

[[Page 23303]]

whistleblower/claimant is represented by a legal representative, such 
person will enter into a contingency fee arrangement with such legal 
representative, providing that the legal representative will provide 
representation in exchange for a fixed percentage of any recovery under 
the whistleblower award program. Therefore, the Agency believes that 
most persons will not incur any direct expenses for attorneys' fees for 
the completion of required forms. The Agency also anticipates that a 
very small number of people will enter into hourly fee arrangements 
with counsel. However, the Agency does believe that approximately half 
of potential whistleblowers will have a legal representative submit the 
forms. The Agency requests comment on this estimate. The Agency has 
estimated the cost of using a legal representative regardless of 
whether the fee is contingent or hourly.
    To estimate those expenses, the Agency makes the following 
assumptions:
    (i) The Agency will receive approximately 50 WB-INFO forms;
    (ii) Of these approximate 50 WB-INFO forms, potential 
whistleblowers will have a legal representative submit approximately 25 
WB-INFO forms;
    (iii) Legal representative cost will be on average $532 \95\ per 
hour; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \95\ This amount is based on the U.S. Attorney's Office for the 
District of Columbia Fees Matrix for 2015-2021, assuming that an 
attorney with 11-15 years of experience assists the whistleblower. 
See https://www.justice.gov/file/1461316/download.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (iv) Legal representatives will bill on average 20 hours to review 
materials and complete form WB-INFO.\96\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \96\ The Agency expects that counsel will need to expend 
additional time to gather information from the whistleblower or 
review sources of information needed to complete the forms, which is 
why this estimate is higher than the estimate to just complete the 
form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on those assumptions, the Agency estimates that each year the 
cost of legal representative time for completion of the forms will be 
$266,000 for the completion of form WB-INFO (($532 x 20 hours) x 25 
respondents). The Agency invites public comment on the accuracy of its 
estimate requirements that would result from the proposed regulations.

Costs of Submission

    The Agency anticipates that the vast majority of whistleblowers/
claimants will submit the forms using electronic means rather than 
mail. Therefore, the expected cost of submission of the forms is $0.00. 
The Agency invites public comment on the accuracy of its estimate 
requirements that would result from the proposed regulations.
    Estimated Number of Respondents for Proposed Form WB-RELEASE:
    The Agency estimates that it would receive 45 WB-RELEASE forms per 
year.
    Frequency for Proposed Form WB-RELEASE:
    The Agency expects that the individual will complete one form per 
year.
    Number of Responses for Proposed Form WB-RELEASE: The Agency 
anticipates there will be approximately 45 individuals per fiscal year 
who may wish to file a form WB-RELEASE.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours for Proposed Form WB-RELEASE:
    The Agency estimates that it will take 15 minutes per individual to 
complete the form, and the Agency estimates that it would receive 45 
WB-RELEASE forms per year. The Agency anticipates that potential 
whistleblowers will complete and submit for themselves 20 WB-RELEASE 
forms annually and that legal representatives will submit on their 
client's behalf 25 WB-RELEASE forms annually. Thus, the Agency 
estimates that that estimated annual PRA burden of form WB-RELEASE is 
11.25 hours per fiscal year (45 respondents x 15 minutes/60).
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost for Proposed Form WB-RELEASE:
    We estimate the total annual burden cost for the Proposed Form WB-
RELEASE to be $3,325. We base the estimate on the following:
    Involvement and Cost of Legal representatives:
    Under the proposed rules, a potential whistleblower who discloses 
their identity may elect to retain a legal representative to represent 
them, while an anonymous potential whistleblower is required to retain 
a legal representative to represent them. The Agency expects that in 
most of those instances where a legal representative is retained, the 
potential whistleblower's legal representative will complete or assist 
in the completion of some or all of the required forms on the client's 
behalf. The Agency also expects that in the vast majority of cases in 
which a potential whistleblower is represented by a legal 
representative, such person will enter into a contingency fee 
arrangement with such legal representative, providing that the legal 
representative will provide representation in exchange for a fixed 
percentage of any recovery under the whistleblower award program. 
Therefore, the Agency believes that most persons will not incur any 
direct expenses for attorneys' fees for the completion of required 
forms. The Agency also anticipates that a very small number of people 
will enter into hourly fee arrangements with counsel. The Agency 
requests comment on this estimate. The Agency has estimated the cost of 
using a legal representative regardless of whether the fee is 
contingent or hourly.
    To estimate those expenses, the Agency makes the following 
assumptions:
    (i) The Agency will receive 45 WB-RELEASE forms annually;
    (v) Potential whistleblowers will have a legal representative 
submit approximately 25 WB-RELEASE forms annually;
    (vi) Attorney cost will be on average $532 \97\ per hour; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \97\ This amount is based on the U.S. Attorney's Office for the 
District of Columbia Fees Matrix for 2015-2021, assuming that an 
attorney with 11-15 years of experience assists the whistleblower. 
See https://www.justice.gov/file/1461316/download.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (vii) Attorneys will bill on average 15 minutes to complete form 
WB-RELEASE.
    Based on those assumptions, the Agency estimates that each year the 
cost of attorney time for completion of the forms will be $3,325 for 
the completion of form WB-RELEASE (($532 x 15 minutes/60) x 25 
respondents). The Agency invites public comment on the accuracy of its 
estimate requirements that would result from the proposed regulations.

Costs of Submission

    The Agency anticipates that the vast majority of potential 
whistleblowers will submit the forms using electronic means rather than 
mail. Therefore, the expected cost of submission of the forms is $0.00. 
The Agency invites public comment on the accuracy of its estimate 
requirements that would result from the proposed regulations.
    Estimated Number of Respondents for Proposed Form WB-AWARD:
    Each individual who has submitted a form WB-INFO and wishes to be 
considered for an award under the program would be required to provide 
a WB-AWARD form to the Agency. A claimant could only submit a WB-AWARD 
form after there has been a ``Notice of Covered Action'' published on 
the Agency's website pursuant to proposed rule Sec.  513.9. The Agency 
estimates that it will post approximately 1-2 such Notices each year. 
The Agency bases this estimate by looking at the enforcement actions 
resulting in civil penalties exceeding $1,000,000 over the last several 
years, not including deferred penalties not collected or performance 
amounts. In some years, the Agency had

[[Page 23304]]

not collected any civil penalties exceeding $1,000,000. In another 
year, the Agency had several instances where it collected more than 
$1,000,000 in civil penalties in connection with an enforcement action. 
The Agency believes that as this whistleblower program grows, more 
actionable submissions will be made and, as a consequence, the Agency 
will have more actions resulting in collected monetary sanctions 
exceeding $1,000,000.
    Considering the estimate of the anticipated yearly covered actions, 
and the Agency's experience to date, the Agency estimates that it would 
receive approximately 2 WB-AWARD forms each year.\98\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \98\ While it is unlikely that there will be whistleblower 
information provided in connection with every Notice of Covered 
Action posted by the Agency, this estimate calculates burden hours 
as if there were one claim for each Covered Action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Frequency for Proposed Form WB-AWARD:
    The Agency expects that the individual will complete one form.
    Number of Responses for Proposed Form WB-AWARD: The Agency 
anticipates there will be approximately 2 individuals per fiscal year 
who may wish to file such.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours for Proposed Form WB-AWARD:
    The proposed collection is estimated to involve approximately 10 
burden hours per individual seeking to be considered for an award under 
the Agency's whistleblower program. The Agency estimates that the 
estimated annual PRA burden of form WB-AWARD is 20 hours per fiscal 
year (2 respondents x 10 hours). The Agency invites public comment on 
the accuracy of its estimates.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost for Proposed Form WB-AWARD:
    We estimate the total annual burden cost for the Proposed Form WB-
AWARD to be $10,640. We base the estimate on the following:

Involvement and Cost of Legal Representatives

    Under the proposed rules, a potential whistleblower who discloses 
their identity may elect to retain a legal representative to represent 
them, while an anonymous potential whistleblower is required to retain 
a legal representative to represent them. The Agency expects that in 
most of those instances where a legal representative is retained, the 
potential whistleblower's/claimant's legal representative will complete 
or assist in the completion of some or all of the required forms on the 
client's behalf. The Agency also expects that in the vast majority of 
cases in which a potential whistleblower/claimant is represented by a 
legal representative, such person will enter into a contingency fee 
arrangement with such legal representative, providing that the legal 
representative will provide representation in exchange for a fixed 
percentage of any recovery under the whistleblower award program. 
Therefore, the Agency believes that most persons will not incur any 
direct expenses for legal representatives' fees for the completion of 
required forms. The Agency also anticipates that a very small number of 
people will enter into hourly fee arrangements with counsel. However, 
the Agency does believe that all individuals submitting a WB-AWARD form 
will use a legal representative. The Agency requests comment on this 
estimate. The Agency has estimated the cost of using a legal 
representative regardless of whether the fee is contingent or hourly.
    To estimate those expenses, the Agency makes the following 
assumptions:
    (i) The Agency will receive approximately 2 WB-AWARD forms 
annually;
    (ii) Claimants will have a legal representative submit 2 WB-AWARD 
forms annually;
    (iii) Legal representative cost will be on average $532 \99\ per 
hour; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \99\ This amount is based on the U.S. Attorney's Office for the 
District of Columbia Fees Matrix for 2015-2021, assuming that an 
attorney with 11-15 years of experience assists the whistleblower. 
See https://www.justice.gov/file/1461316/download.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (iv) Legal representatives will bill on average 10 hours to 
complete a form WB-AWARD.
    Based on those assumptions, the Agency estimates that each year the 
cost of legal representatives' time for completion of the forms will be 
$10,640 for the completion of form WB-AWARD (($532 x 10 hours) x 2 
respondents). The Agency invites public comment on the accuracy of its 
estimate requirements that would result from the proposed regulations.

Costs of Submission

    The Agency anticipates that the vast majority of claimants will 
submit the forms using electronic means rather than mail. Therefore, 
the expected cost of submission of the forms is $0.00. The Agency 
invites public comment on the accuracy of its estimate requirements 
that would result from the proposed regulations.
Mandatory Collection of Information
    A person would be required to complete and submit a WB-INFO form 
and to submit a WB-AWARD form in order to qualify for a whistleblower 
award.
    Public Comments Invited:
    Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(B), the Agency requests comments 
in order to:
     Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
     Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of burden 
of the proposed collections of information;
     Determine whether there are ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
     Evaluate whether there are ways to minimize the burden of 
the collection of information on those who are to respond, including 
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.
    The Agency requests comment and supporting empirical data on the 
burden and cost estimates for the proposed rule, including the costs 
that whistleblowers/claimants may incur.
    A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30 
days of publication. Comments on the proposed information requirements 
should be submitted to: Office of Management and Budget at 
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. To find this particular information 
collection, select ``Current under Review--Open for Public Comment'' or 
use the search function. PRA comments are due within 30 days following 
publication of this document in the Federal Register.
    The Agency recognizes that the collection of information contained 
in today's proposed rule may be subject to revision in response to 
public comments.

Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)

    The Department of Transportation assigns a regulation identifier 
number (RIN) to each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of 
Federal Regulations. You may use the RIN contained in the heading at 
the beginning of this document to find this action in the Unified 
Agenda.

Plain Language

    Executive Order 12866 requires each agency to write all rules in 
plain language. Application of the principles of plain language 
includes consideration of the following questions:
     Have we organized the material to suit the public's needs?
     Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated?

[[Page 23305]]

     Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that 
isn't clear?
     Would a different format (grouping and order of sections, 
use of headings, paragraphing) make the rule easier to understand?
     Would more (but shorter) sections be better?
     Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or 
diagrams?
     What else could we do to make the rule easier to 
understand?
    If you have any responses to these questions, please include them 
in your comments on this proposal.

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 513

    Administrative procedure and practice, Claims, Freedom of 
information, Imports, Investigations, Lawyers, Motor vehicle safety, 
Privacy, Reporting and record keeping requirements, Tires, 
Whistleblowing.

Proposed Regulatory Text

0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the National Highway Traffic 
Safety Administration proposes to add 49 CFR part 513 to read as 
follows:

PART 513--WHISTLEBLOWER PROGRAM

Sec.
513.1 General.
513.2 Definitions.
513.3 Representation.
513.4 Procedures for submitting original information.
513.5 Confidentiality.
513.6 Prerequisites to the consideration of an award.
513.7 Whistleblowers ineligible for an award.
513.8 Provision of false information.
513.9 Procedures for making a claim for a whistleblower award.
513.10 Award determinations.
513.11 Appeals of award determinations.
513.12 Procedures applicable to the payment of awards.
Appendix A--Form WB-INFO
Appendix B--Form WB-RELEASE
Appendix C--Form WB-AWARD

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 322, 49 U.S.C. 30172; 44 U.S.C. chapter 
35, as amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order 1351.29.


Sec.  513.1  General.

    This part describes the whistleblower program established by the 
Agency to implement the Motor Vehicle Safety Whistleblower Act, 49 
U.S.C. 30172, explains procedures that a potential whistleblower must 
follow to be eligible for an award, and the circumstances under which 
information that may reasonably be expected to reveal the identity of a 
whistleblower may be disclosed by National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration (NHTSA). Potential whistleblowers should read these 
procedures carefully because failure to take required steps in a timely 
fashion in conformance with these rules may result in disqualification 
from receiving an award. Questions about the whistleblower program or 
these rules should be directed to the NHTSA Office of the Chief Counsel 
at [email protected]. Unless expressly provided for in this 
part, no person is authorized to make any offer or promise, or 
otherwise bind the Agency with respect to the payment of any award or 
the amount thereof, and any such offer or promise will not be honored.


Sec.  513.2  Definitions.

    (a) Statutory definitions. All terms used in this part have the 
same meaning as in 49 U.S.C. 30102(a) or (b), unless otherwise defined 
in this part.
    (b) Other terms. As used in this part:
    Administrative action. The term ``administrative action'' means all 
or a portion of an action, other than a judicial action, brought by 
NHTSA or the U.S. Department of Transportation under 49 U.S.C. chapter 
301 that may result in civil penalties or other monetary payment paid 
to and collected by the United States government. It specifically 
includes settlement agreements and consent orders that are entered into 
by the Agency.
    Agency. The term ``Agency'' refers to the National Highway Traffic 
Safety Administration (NHTSA).
    Collected monetary sanctions. The term ``collected monetary 
sanctions'' means monies, including penalties and interest, ordered or 
agreed to be paid and that have been collected by the United States, 
pursuant to the authority in 49 U.S.C. 30165 or under the authority of 
49 U.S.C. 30170.
    Contractor. The term ``contractor'' means an individual presently 
or formerly providing goods or services to a motor vehicle 
manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership pursuant to a contract.
    Covered action. The term ``covered action'' means any 
administrative or judicial action, including any related administrative 
or judicial action brought by the Secretary, NHTSA, or the Attorney 
General under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301, or the regulations in this chapter 
that in the aggregate results in monetary sanctions exceeding 
$1,000,000. The over $1,000,000 threshold can be satisfied if the total 
amount of monetary sanctions paid by multiple defendants or parties and 
collected by the United States totals more than $1,000,000 in the 
covered action.
    Dealership. The term ``dealership'' means a person selling and 
distributing motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment primarily to 
purchasers that in good faith purchase the vehicles or equipment other 
than for resale.
    Employee. The term ``employee'' means an individual presently or 
formerly employed by a motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or 
dealership.
    Independent knowledge or analysis. The term ``knowledge'' as used 
in this part means factual information in the potential whistleblower's 
possession that is not generally known or available to the public and 
is not already known to NHTSA. The potential whistleblower may gain 
independent knowledge from the potential whistleblower's experiences, 
communications, and observations in the potential whistleblower's 
business or social interactions. As used in this part, ``analysis'' 
means the potential whistleblower's examination and evaluation of 
information that may be generally or publicly available, but which 
reveals information that is not generally known or available to the 
public. This analysis must be the potential whistleblower's own 
analysis, whether done alone or in combination with others.
    (i) NHTSA will not consider the potential whistleblower's 
information to be derived from the potential whistleblower's 
independent knowledge or analysis if the potential whistleblower 
obtained the information:
    (A) Solely through a communication that was subject to the 
attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine; or
    (B) By a means or in a manner that has been determined by a United 
States Federal court or State court to violate applicable Federal or 
State criminal law.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    Motor vehicle defect. The term ``motor vehicle defect'' means a 
defect in a motor vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment.
    Noncompliance. A ``noncompliance'' occurs when a motor vehicle or 
item of motor vehicle equipment does not comply with an applicable 
Federal motor vehicle safety standard.
    Original information. The term ``original information'' means 
information that:
    (i) Is derived from the independent knowledge or analysis of an 
individual;
    (ii) Is not known to the Secretary or Agency from any other source, 
unless the individual is the original source of the information;
    (iii) Is not exclusively derived from an allegation made in a 
judicial or an administrative action, in a governmental

[[Page 23306]]

report, a hearing, an audit, or an investigation, or from the news 
media, unless the individual is a source of the information; and
    (iv) Is provided to the Agency for the first time after December 4, 
2015.
    Original Information that leads to a successful resolution. The 
Agency will consider that the potential whistleblower provided original 
information that ``leads to'' a successful resolution of a covered 
action in the following circumstances:
    (i) The potential whistleblower gave the Agency original 
information that was sufficiently specific, credible and timely to 
cause the Agency to open an investigation, reopen an investigation that 
the Agency had closed, continue an investigation the Agency would not 
have continued but for the information, or to inquire concerning a 
different potential violation of chapter 301, or the regulations in 
this chapter as part of a current investigation, and the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Agency, or U.S Department of Justice 
brought a successful judicial or administrative action based in whole 
or in part on conduct that was the subject of the potential 
whistleblower's original information; or
    (ii) The potential whistleblower gave the Agency original 
information about conduct that was already under investigation by the 
Agency and the potential whistleblower's information significantly 
contributed to the success of the covered action and the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Agency, or U.S. Department of Justice 
brought a successful judicial or administrative action based in whole 
or in part on conduct that was the subject of the potential 
whistleblower's original information.
    Part supplier. The term ``part supplier'' means a manufacturer of 
motor vehicle equipment.
    Potential whistleblower. The term ``potential whistleblower'' 
refers to an employee or contractor of a motor vehicle manufacturer, 
part supplier, or dealership submitting information to the Agency in 
accordance with and pursuant to this part.
    Related administrative or judicial action. The term ``related 
administrative or judicial action'' means an action that was brought 
under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 by the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S 
Department of Transportation, or the Agency and is based on the 
original information provided by the whistleblower.
    Secretary. The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
Transportation.
    Successful resolution. A successful resolution, when referring to 
any administrative or judicial action brought by the Secretary, Agency, 
or the Attorney General relating to any potential motor vehicle defect, 
potential noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirement under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301, or 
the regulations in this chapter, which is likely to cause unreasonable 
risk of death or serious physical injury, includes any settlement of 
the action by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Agency or the U.S. 
Department of Justice or final decision or judgment in whole or in 
partial favor of the Agency, the U.S. Department of Transportation, or 
the U.S. Department of Justice.
    Whistleblower. The term ``whistleblower'' means any employee or 
contractor of a motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or 
dealership who voluntarily provides to the Agency original information 
relating to any motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, or any violation 
or alleged violation of any notification or reporting requirement of 49 
U.S.C. chapter 301, or the regulations in this chapter, which is likely 
to cause unreasonable risk of death or serious physical injury.


Sec.  513.3  Representation.

    A whistleblower or potential whistleblower may be represented by a 
legal representative.


Sec.  513.4  Procedures for submitting original information.

    (a) A potential whistleblower's submission must be made by 
completing a WB-INFO form and submitting it to the Office of the Chief 
Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, by email to 
[email protected] or other submission method expressly 
designated on NHTSA's website for such submissions.
    (b) By completing the WB-INFO form, the potential whistleblower 
must declare under penalty of perjury at the time the whistleblower 
submits information pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section that the 
information is true and correct to the best of the potential 
whistleblower's knowledge and belief.
    (c) A potential whistleblower may provide original information to 
the Agency anonymously through use of a legal representative. The legal 
representative must submit the information on behalf of the potential 
whistleblower pursuant to the procedures specified in paragraph (a) of 
this section. Prior to the legal representative's submission, the 
potential whistleblower must provide the legal representative with a 
completed WB-INFO form that the potential whistleblower has signed 
under the penalty of perjury. When the legal representative makes the 
submission on behalf of the potential whistleblower, the legal 
representative must certify that the legal representative:
    (1) Has verified the potential whistleblower's identity;
    (2) Has verified that the potential whistleblower is an employee or 
contractor of a motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or 
dealership; Has reviewed the potential whistleblower's signed WB-INFO 
form for accuracy and that the information contained therein is true 
and correct to the best of the legal representative's knowledge, 
information and belief; and
    (3) Has obtained the potential whistleblower's non-waivable consent 
to provide the Agency with the original WB-INFO form for the potential 
whistleblower in the event that the Agency requests it.
    (d) If a potential whistleblower submitted original information to 
the Agency after December 4, 2015, but before [effective date of final 
rule], the submission will be deemed to satisfy the requirements set 
forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.


Sec.  513.5  Confidentiality.

    (a) In general. Notwithstanding 49 U.S.C. 30167, the Secretary and 
any officer or employee of the U.S. Department of Transportation shall 
not disclose any information, including information provided by a 
whistleblower to the Secretary, that could reasonably be expected to 
reveal the identity of a whistleblower, except in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, unless:
    (1) Disclosure is required to a defendant or respondent in 
connection with a public proceeding instituted by the Secretary, the 
Agency, or any entity described in paragraph (c) of this section;
    (2) The whistleblower provides prior written consent for the 
information to be disclosed; or
    (3) The Secretary, or other officer or employee of the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, receives the information through another 
source, such as during an inspection or investigation under 49 U.S.C. 
30166, and has the authority under other law to release the 
information.
    (b) Use by Attorney General. Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this 
section, nothing in this section is intended to limit the ability of 
the Attorney General to present such

[[Page 23307]]

evidence to a grand jury or to share such evidence with potential 
witnesses or defendants in the course of an ongoing criminal 
investigation.
    (c) Availability to Federal Government agencies. Notwithstanding 
paragraph (a) of this section, without the loss of its status as 
confidential in the hands of the Administrator, all information 
referred to in paragraph (a) of this section may, in the discretion of 
the Administrator, when determined by the Administrator to be necessary 
or appropriate to accomplish the purposes of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301, be 
made available to the U.S. Department of Justice or an appropriate 
department or agency of the Federal Government, acting within the scope 
of its jurisdiction, provided that each entity shall maintain 
information as confidential in accordance with the requirements of 
paragraph (a) of this section.
    (d) Redaction. When disclosing any information under paragraph (a) 
of this section, the Secretary and any officer or employee of the U.S. 
Department of Transportation shall take reasonable measures not to 
reveal the identity of the whistleblower by taking measures not to 
reveal the whistleblower's name, and redacting the whistleblower's name 
when information is disclosed under paragraph (a) of this section.
    (e) Section 552(b)(3)(B). The identity of the whistleblower and the 
information provided to Secretary by the whistleblower shall be 
considered exempt from disclosure under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552 
to the fullest extent permitted by law.
    (f) The whistleblower. The person should self-identify as a 
whistleblower at the time the person first submits original information 
relating to any potential motor vehicle defect, potential 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirements under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301, or 
the regulations in this chapter, by submitting a WB-INFO form. If the 
person is represented by a legal representative, that legal 
representative should identify the client as a whistleblower at the 
time the legal representative first submits original information 
relating to any potential motor vehicle defect, potential 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirements under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301, or 
the regulations in this chapter, on behalf of the legal 
representative's client in the WB-INFO form.


Sec.  513.6  Prerequisites to the consideration of an award.

    (a) Subject to the eligibility requirements described in this part, 
NHTSA may, but is not required to, authorize payment of an award to one 
or more persons who:
    (1) Provide a voluntary submission to the Agency;
    (2) Provides in that submission original information relating to 
any potential motor vehicle defect, potential noncompliance, or any 
violation or alleged violation of any notification or reporting 
requirement of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301, or the regulations in this 
chapter, which is likely to cause unreasonable risk of death or serious 
physical injury; and
    (3) The original information provided in that submission leads to 
the successful resolution of a covered action.
    (b) To be eligible, the person must have given the Agency original 
information in the form and manner that the Agency requires in Sec.  
513.4. The Agency may, for good cause, waive this requirement in this 
paragraph (b).


Sec.  513.7  Whistleblowers ineligible for an award.

    No award under Sec.  513.10 shall be made:
    (a) If the amount of monetary sanctions collected in a covered 
action does not exceed $1,000,000;
    (b) To any whistleblower who is convicted of a criminal violation 
related to the covered action for which the whistleblower otherwise 
could receive an award under this part;
    (c) To any whistleblower who, acting without direction from an 
applicable motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership, or 
agent thereof, deliberately causes or substantially contributes to the 
alleged violation of a requirement of 49 U.S.C. chapter 301, or the 
regulations in this chapter;
    (d) To any whistleblower who submits information to the Agency that 
is based on the facts underlying the covered action submitted 
previously by another whistleblower;
    (e) To any whistleblower who fails to provide the original 
information to the Agency in the form required by Sec.  513.4 without 
good cause shown;
    (f) To any whistleblower who knowingly and intentionally makes any 
false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, or who 
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain 
any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; or
    (g) If the applicable motor vehicle manufacturer, parts supplier, 
or dealership has an internal reporting mechanism in place to protect 
employees from retaliation to any whistleblower who fails to report or 
attempt to report the information through such mechanism, unless:
    (1) The whistleblower reasonably believed that such an internal 
report would have resulted in retaliation, notwithstanding 49 U.S.C. 
30171(a);
    (2) The whistleblower reasonably believed that the information:
    (i) Was already internally reported;
    (ii) Was already subject to or part of an internal inquiry or 
investigation; or
    (iii) Was otherwise already known to the motor vehicle 
manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership; or
    (3) The Agency has good cause to waive this requirement in this 
paragraph (g).


Sec.  513.8  Provision of false information.

    A person who knowingly and intentionally makes any false, 
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation, or who makes or 
uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any 
false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall not be 
entitled to an award under this section and shall be subject to 
prosecution under 18 U.S.C. 1001.


Sec.  513.9  Procedures for making a claim for a whistleblower award.

    Whenever any administrative or judicial action, including any 
related administrative or judicial action, brought by the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Agency, or U.S. Department of Justice 
under 49 U.S.C. chapter 301 in the aggregate results in collected 
monetary sanctions exceeding $1,000,000, the Agency will publish on the 
Agency's website a ``Notice of Covered Action.'' Such Notice will be 
published subsequent to a final judgment, order, or agreement that 
alone, or in the aggregate, results in collected monetary sanctions 
exceeding $1,000,000. A claimant will have ninety (90) days from the 
date of the Notice of Covered Action to file a claim, including any 
attachments, for an award based on that action, or the claim will be 
barred. The claim is deemed filed on the date that it is received by 
the Agency.
    (a) To file a claim for a whistleblower award, the claimant must 
complete the WB-AWARD form and submit it no later than ninety (90) 
calendar days from the date of the Notice of Covered Action to NHTSA's 
Office of the Chief Counsel by email to [email protected] or 
another method expressly designated on NHTSA's website.
    (b) If the claimant provided original information anonymously 
pursuant to

[[Page 23308]]

Sec.  513.4, the claimant must disclose the claimant's identity on the 
WB-AWARD form and the claimant's identity must be verified in a form 
and manner that is acceptable to the Agency prior to the authorization 
of payment of any award to such claimant.
    (c) If a claimant filed a claim for a whistleblower award after 
December 4, 2015 (the date of the enactment of the Fixing America's 
Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, but before [effective date of final 
rule], the claim submission will be deemed to meet the requirements of 
Sec.  513.9.


Sec.  513.10  Award determinations.

    Once the time for filing any appeals of the covered action (and all 
related actions) has expired, or where an appeal has been filed, after 
all appeals in the covered action and related actions have concluded, 
and over $1,000,000 in monetary sanctions have been collected, the 
Agency will evaluate all timely whistleblower award claims submitted on 
a WB-AWARD form in accordance with the criteria set forth in this part. 
The Agency may require the claimant to provide additional information 
relating to the claimant's eligibility for an award or satisfaction of 
any of the conditions for an award.
    (a) The determination of whether, to whom, or in what amount to 
make an award shall be in the discretion of the Administrator. In 
determining whether to grant an award to a whistleblower eligible for 
an award and the amount of an award, the Administrator shall take into 
consideration, as appropriate:
    (1) Whether a whistleblower reported or attempted to report the 
information internally to an applicable motor vehicle manufacturer, 
part supplier, or dealership;
    (2) The significance of the original information provided by the 
whistleblower to the successful resolution of the covered action;
    (3) The degree of assistance provided by the whistleblower and any 
legal representative of the whistleblower in the covered action;
    (4) The statutory purpose of incentivizing whistleblowers; and
    (5) The public interest or such additional factors as the 
Administrator considers relevant.
    (b) If the Administrator determines that an award is warranted, the 
Administrator shall determine the amount of such award or awards to one 
or more whistleblowers. Whistleblower awards shall be in an aggregate 
amount equal to:
    (1) Not less than 10 percent, in total, of monetary sanctions 
collected in the covered action; and
    (2) Not more than 30 percent, in total, of monetary sanctions 
collected in the covered action.
    (c) Following the Administrator's determination, the Agency will 
send each whistleblower claimant an Order setting forth whether the 
claim is granted or denied, and if granted, setting forth the award 
amount. If the Administrator determines that an award is warranted, in 
no event will the total amount awarded to all whistleblowers in the 
aggregate be less than 10 percent or greater than 30 percent of the 
amount of monetary sanctions collected in the covered action.
    (d) No contract with the Agency is necessary for a whistleblower to 
receive an award.


Sec.  513.11  Appeals of award determinations.

    (a) A claimant may appeal any determination made by the 
Administrator under Sec.  513.10 to an appropriate court of appeals of 
the United States not later than 30 days after the Order is issued by 
the Administrator.
    (1) If no claimant files an appeal within 30 days after the Order 
is issued by the Administrator, no appeals are permitted with respect 
to the claim that is the subject of the Order.
    (2) If any claimant appeals within 30 days after the Order is 
issued by the Administrator, no payments with respect to the covered 
action will be made until the appealed award determination action is 
concluded.
    (3) The rules in paragraph (a)(1) and (2) of this section do not 
entitle claimants to obtain from the Agency any privileged materials 
such as pre-decisional, attorney-client privilege, attorney work 
product privilege, or internal deliberative process materials related 
to the Administrator's Order and/or any privileged material relating to 
whether, to whom, and in what amount to make a whistleblower award.
    (b) The Agency may make redactions to the materials constituting 
the record as necessary, including but not limited to making redactions 
to comply with statutory restrictions, the Agency's enforcement and 
regulatory functions and regulations, and to comply with requests for 
confidential treatment from law enforcement, regulatory authorities, or 
persons submitting information to the Agency pursuant to part 512 of 
this chapter.
    (c) Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30172(h)(3), the court shall review the 
determination made by the Administrator in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
706.


Sec.  513.12  Procedures applicable to the payment of awards.

    (a) A recipient of a whistleblower award is entitled to payment on 
the award only to the extent that a monetary sanction upon which the 
award is based is collected in the covered action.
    (b) Payment of a whistleblower award for a monetary sanction 
collected in connection with a covered action shall be made within a 
reasonable time following the later of:
    (1) The date on which the monetary sanction totaling over 
$1,000,000 is collected; or
    (2) The completion of the appeals process for all award 
determination claims arising from the Administrator's Order relating to 
the covered action.

Appendix A to Part 513--Form WB-INFO

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P

[[Page 23309]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.022


[[Page 23310]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.023


[[Page 23311]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.024


[[Page 23312]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.025


[[Page 23313]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.026

Privacy Act Statement

    The Privacy Act of 1974 requires that the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) inform individuals of the 
following when asking for information. This form may be used by an 
employee or contractor of a motor vehicle manufacturer, part 
supplier, or dealership, or a legal representative acting on such 
person's behalf, who wishes to provide NHTSA with information 
relating to any potential motor vehicle defect, potential 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 or 
regulation thereunder, which is likely to cause unreasonable risk of 
death or serious physical injury. The information provided will 
allow the Agency to evaluate the claim and elicit information 
relevant to whistleblower eligibility requirements. This information 
may be disclosed to the U.S. Department of Justice or an appropriate 
department or agency of the Federal Government, acting within the 
scope of its jurisdiction, consistent with the confidentiality 
requirements set forth in 49 U.S.C. 30172(f). NHTSA may also 
disclose information that could reasonably be expected to reveal the 
identity of a whistleblower in certain limited situations, including 
when the whistleblower provides prior written consent. Id.
    Furnishing the information contained in this form is voluntary 
but a decision not to do so will result in you not being eligible 
for award consideration.
    Questions concerning this form may be directed to the National 
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel 
by email to [email protected].

Notice of Whistleblower Rights and Protections

    This brief description will provide you with an overview of the 
whistleblower rights and protections.
    Whistleblowers, as that term is defined in 49 U.S.C. 
30172(a)(6), have a right to keep their identity confidential in 
most situations. 49 U.S.C. 30172(f). Generally speaking, any 
information which reasonably could be expected to reveal the 
identity of a whistleblower can be disclosed only under limited 
circumstances. One circumstance where NHTSA could reveal such 
information is if the whistleblower gives prior written consent. 49 
U.S.C. 30172(f)(1)(B).
    The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, gives the 
public access to records of the Federal Government. Individuals can 
obtain information from many categories of records of the 
Government--not just materials that apply to them personally. NHTSA 
must honor requests under the FOIA, with some exceptions. 
Information that could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity 
of a whistleblower is exempted from FOIA disclosure by statute. See 
49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(3); 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3)(B).
    NHTSA may disclose information that could reasonably be expected 
to reveal the identity of a whistleblower if it follows the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a (the Privacy Act of 1974). 49 U.S.C. 
30172(f)(1). The Privacy Act prohibits the disclosure of information 
from a system of records (where information is retrieved by the name 
of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other 
identifying particular assigned to the individual) absent the 
written consent of the subject individual, unless the disclosure is 
pursuant to one of the twelve statutory conditions.
    Furthermore, under 49 U.S.C. 30171, employees providing certain 
motor vehicle safety information have protections from 
discrimination. Under 49 U.S.C. 30171(a)(1), a motor vehicle 
manufacturer, parts supplier or dealership may not discharge an 
employee or otherwise discriminate against the employee because the 
employee provided, caused to be provided, or is about to provide 
(with knowledge of the employer) or cause to be provided to the 
employer or the Secretary of Transportation information relating to 
any motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, or any violation or alleged 
violation of any notification or reporting requirement of the Safety 
Act (49 U.S.C. Chapter 301).

OMB Statement

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty 
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to 
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that 
collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control 
Number. NHTSA estimates that completing and submitting this form 
will take approximately 10 hours. The OMB Control Number for this 
information collection is 2127-XXXX. Please send comments to the 
Agency regarding the accuracy of this estimate and any suggestions 
for reducing this burden.
    The information requested on the WB-INFO form is voluntary; 
however, under 49 CFR part 513 potential whistleblower is required 
to submit a WB-INFO form \1\ and to submit a WB-AWARD form in order 
to qualify for a whistleblower award.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 49 U.S.C. 30172(c)(2)(D).
    \2\ See 49 CFR 513.4 and 513.9(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The data on the WB-INFO would be used to permit the Agency and 
its staff to collect information from potential whistleblowers 
regarding any potential motor vehicle defect, potential 
noncompliance, or any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirement of the Safety Act or 
regulation thereunder, which is likely to cause unreasonable risk of 
death or serious physical injury. The Agency anticipates that this 
information will be submitted to a dedicated email address or other 
method specifically designated on NHTSA's website. NHTSA intends to 
treat the information as

[[Page 23314]]

confidential under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 30172(f).

General Information

     To be eligible for an award under NHTSA's whistleblower 
program, you must first provide us with your information through one 
of two ways. After completing this WB-INFO form, send it to NHTSA 
electronically to [email protected], or submit it by any 
such method that the Agency may expressly designate on its website 
(https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/whistleblower-program).
     Submitting your information is the first step. If the 
information you submit leads to the successful resolution of a 
covered action that in the aggregate results in collected monetary 
sanctions exceeding $1,000,000, you will have an opportunity at a 
later date to submit a claim for an award. That is a separate 
process and is described in our whistleblower rules at 49 CFR part 
513.
     You have the right to submit information anonymously. 
If you are submitting information anonymously, you must be 
represented by a legal representative in this matter and Sections C 
and G of this form must be completed. Otherwise, you may, but are 
not required to have a legal representative. If you are submitting 
information anonymously, please skip Part I of these instructions 
and proceed directly to Part II. Otherwise, please begin by 
following the instructions in Part I.

Part I: Instructions for Filers Who Are Disclosing Their Identity to 
NHTSA

     You are required to complete Sections A, B, D, E, and F 
of this form. If you are represented by a legal representative in 
this matter, you must also complete section C. Specific instructions 
for answering these questions can be found in Part IV below.
     If you are represented, your legal representative does 
not need to complete Section G.
     You will need to submit the WB-INFO form in accordance 
with the Submission Procedures in 49 CFR part 513.

Part II: Instructions for Anonymous Filers

     If you are submitting information anonymously, you must 
be represented by a legal representative on this matter.
     You are required to complete Sections A, B, C, D, E, 
and F of this form and give the signed original to your legal 
representative. Specific instructions for answering these questions 
can be found in Part IV below.
     Your legal representative must retain your signed 
original WB-INFO form.

Part III: Instructions for Legal Representatives Representing Anonymous 
Filers

     Obtain a completed and signed original WB-INFO form, 
filled out in accordance with the Part II above. You must retain 
this signed original in your records.
     You must prepare a WB-INFO form, completing Sections B, 
C, D, and E with your client's information. You must also sign the 
declaration in Section G.
     You will need to submit the WB-INFO form you completed 
in accordance with submission procedures in 49 CFR part 513.

Part IV: Instructions for Completing Form WB-INFO

Section A: Information About Yourself

    Questions 1-16: Please provide the following information about 
yourself:
    [cir] Last Name, First Name, and Middle Initial;
    [cir] Complete Address, including city, state/province, zip/
postal code, and country;
    [cir] Your telephone number, and if available, an alternate 
number where you can be reached;
    [cir] Your email address (to facilitate communications, we 
strongly encourage you to provide your email address);
    [cir] Your preferred method of communication;
    [cir] Your occupation;
    [cir] Your current employer,
    [cir] Your current employer's address, and
    [cir] Your relationship to the company about whom the concern is 
raised.

Section B: Information About the Motor Vehicle Manufacturer, Part 
Supplier, or Dealership About Whom the Concern Is Raised

    Questions 1-7: Please provide the following information about 
the motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership about 
whom the concern is raised:
    [cir] Company name of the motor vehicle manufacturer, part 
supplier or dealership;
    [cir] Complete address of the motor vehicle manufacturer, part 
supplier, or dealership, including city, state/province, zip/postal 
code, and country; and
    [cir] Complete whether you work or worked for the motor vehicle 
manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership about whom the concern is 
raised. If yes, please provide dates that you work or worked for the 
company. If no, provide the name of the motor vehicle manufacturer, 
part supplier, or dealership you work or worked for.
    Question 8: Please check the correct box stating whether the 
motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership about whom 
the concern was raised has or had an internal reporting mechanism. 
The choices are yes, no, and I don't know.
    Question 9: If you checked the ``yes'' box in response to the 
question of whether the motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier or 
dealership had an internal reporting mechanism, please provide the 
following information:
    [cir] If you reported the issue to your company's internal 
reporting mechanism, check the box ``yes'' and provide the date that 
you reported to the internal reporting mechanism.
    [cir] If you did not report the issue to your company's internal 
reporting mechanism, check the box ``no'' and provide your reason 
for not reporting to the internal reporting mechanism.

Section C: Legal Representative Information

    Complete this section only if you are represented by a legal 
representative in this matter. You must be represented by a legal 
representative, and this section must be completed, if you are 
submitting your information anonymously and you want to be 
considered for an award under NHTSA's whistleblower program.
    Questions 1-9: Provide the following information about the legal 
representative representing you in this matter:
    [cir] Legal representative's name;
    [cir] The firm name;
    [cir] The firm's complete address, including city, state, and 
zip code;
    [cir] Your legal representative's telephone number; and
    [cir] Your legal representative's email address.

Section D: Tell Us About the Issue Involving the Motor Vehicle 
Manufacturer, Part Supplier, or Dealership

    Question 1: Please provide the date that the alleged conduct 
began.
    Question 2: Check the option that best describes whether the 
alleged conduct is ongoing.
    Question 3a: Indicate whether you or your legal representative 
had any prior communication with the National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration (``NHTSA'') concerning this matter.
    Question 3b: If you answered ``yes'' to Question 3a, provide the 
name of the NHTSA staff member(s) with whom you or your counsel 
communicated and date of such communication.
    Question 4a: Check the option that best describes whether your 
allegation is related to a potential safety-related defect or 
noncompliance with an applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 
Standard (FMVSS).
    Question 4b: If you answered ``yes'' to Question 4a, provide a 
detailed description of the allegation and a detailed description of 
how the allegation affects vehicle/system/component performance and/
or compliance. Please include the make, model, model year, part 
number, component number, etc. if known.
    Question 5a: Check the option that best describes whether your 
allegation is related to any violation or alleged violation of any 
notification or reporting requirement of the Safety Act?
    Question 5b: If you answered ``yes'' to Question 5a, provide a 
description of the notification or reporting issue. State in detail 
all facts pertinent to the alleged violation.
    Question 6: Describe all supporting materials in your possession 
and the availability and location of additional supporting materials 
not in your possession. Attach additional sheets if necessary.

Section E: Additional Information

    Question 1: Describe how you learned about or obtained the 
information that supports your allegations. In addition, if any 
information was obtained from a public source, identify the source 
with as much particularity as possible. Attach additional sheets if 
necessary.
    Question 2: Identify with particularity any documents or 
information in your submission that you believe could reasonably be 
expected to reveal your identity, and explain the basis for your 
belief that your identity could be reasonably expected to be 
revealed if the documents or information were disclosed to a third 
party.

[[Page 23315]]

    Question 3a: Check the option that best describes whether you or 
your legal representative have taken any other action regarding the 
issue or your allegations.
    Question 3b: If your answer to Question 3a was ``Yes,'' provide 
details. Use additional sheets if necessary.
    Question 4: Check the option that best describes whether you 
acquired information through a means or manner that has been 
determined by a United States Federal court or a State court to 
violate applicable Federal or State criminal law. The question also 
contains a statement that if the answer to this question is yes, to 
please contact NHTSA's Office of the Chief Counsel before you submit 
this form.
    Question 5: Check the option that best describes whether you 
acquired the original information that you are submitting to NHTSA 
solely through a communication that was subject to a privilege, such 
as the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. 
The question also contains a statement that if the answer to this 
question is yes, to please contact NHTSA's Office of the Chief 
Counsel before you submit this form.
    Question 6: Provide any additional information that you think 
may be relevant. Attach additional sheets if necessary.

Section F: Prospective Whistleblower's Declaration

    This is to be completed and signed by the person submitting the 
information.

Section G: Legal Representative Certification

    This is to be completed and signed by an legal representative 
for an anonymous person submitting information. If you have a legal 
representative and are not submitting this form anonymously, this 
section does not need to be completed.
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P

Appendix B to Part 513--Form WB-RELEASE
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.027


[[Page 23316]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.028

Notice of Whistleblower Rights and Protections

    This brief description will provide you with an overview of the 
whistleblower rights and protections.
    Whistleblowers, as that term is defined in 49 U.S.C. 
30172(a)(6), have a right to keep their identity confidential in 
most situations. 49 U.S.C. 30172(f). Generally speaking, any 
information which reasonably could be expected to reveal the 
identity of a whistleblower can be disclosed only under limited 
circumstances. One circumstance where NHTSA could reveal such 
information is if the whistleblower gives prior written consent. 49 
U.S.C. 30172(f)(1)(B).
    The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552, gives the 
public access to records of the Federal Government. Individuals can 
obtain information from many categories of records of the 
Government--not just materials that apply to them personally. NHTSA 
must honor requests under the FOIA, with some exceptions. 
Information that could reasonably be expected to reveal the identity 
of a whistleblower is exempted from FOIA disclosure by statute. See 
49 U.S.C. 30172(f)(3); 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3)(B).
    NHTSA may disclose information that could reasonably be expected 
to reveal the identity of a whistleblower if it follows the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a (the Privacy Act of 1974). 49 U.S.C. 
30172(f)(1). The Privacy Act prohibits the disclosure of information 
from a system of records (where information is retrieved by the name 
of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other 
identifying particular assigned to the individual) absent the 
written consent of the subject individual, unless the disclosure is 
pursuant to one of the twelve statutory conditions.
    Furthermore, under 49 U.S.C. 30171, employees providing certain 
motor vehicle safety information have protections from 
discrimination. Under 49 U.S.C. 30171(a)(1), a motor vehicle 
manufacturer, parts supplier or dealership may not discharge an 
employee or otherwise discriminate against the employee because the 
employee provided, caused to be provided, or is about to provide 
(with knowledge of the employer) or cause to be provided to the 
employer or the Secretary of Transportation information relating to 
any motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, or any violation or alleged 
violation of any notification or reporting requirement of the Safety 
Act (49 U.S.C. 30101 et. seq.).

Privacy Act Statement

    The Privacy Act of 1974 requires that the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (``NHTSA'') inform individuals of the 
following when asking for information. This form may be used by an 
employee or contractor of a motor vehicle manufacturer, part 
supplier, or dealership who wishes to provide prior written consent 
for the Agency to disclose information which could reasonably be 
expected to reveal their identity. Furnishing this form is 
voluntary.
    Questions concerning this form may be directed to the National 
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel 
by email at [email protected], or a NHTSA attorney with 
whom you have previously been in contact.

OMB Statement

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty 
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to 
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that 
collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control 
Number. NHTSA estimates that completing and submitting this form 
will take approximately 15 minutes. The OMB Control Number for this 
information collection is 2127-XXXX. Please send comments to the 
Agency regarding the accuracy of this estimate and any suggestions 
for reducing this burden.
    The information requested on the WB-RELEASE form is voluntary. 
The WB-RELEASE form is for those potential whistleblowers who wish 
to provide prior written consent for the Agency to disclose 
information which could reasonably be expected to reveal the 
potential whistleblower's identity.
    The Agency anticipates that this form will be submitted to a 
dedicated email address or other method specifically designated on 
NHTSA's website. NHTSA intends to treat the information as 
confidential under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 30172(f).

General Information and Submission Procedures

     This form should be used by persons that want to 
provide prior written consent to the Agency to disclose information 
which could reasonably be expected to reveal their identity.

[[Page 23317]]

     You must sign the WB-RELEASE form as the prospective 
whistleblower.
     You must submit your form to NHTSA in one of the 
following ways: by emailing it to [email protected] or by 
any such method that the Agency may expressly designate on its 
website (https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/whistleblower-program).

Instructions for Completing Form WB-RELEASE

Section A: Information

    Questions 1-9: Please provide the following information about 
yourself:
    [cir] Last Name, First Name, and Middle Initial;
    [cir] Complete address, including city, state/province, zip/
postal code, and country
    Question 10: Please provide the name of motor vehicle 
manufacturer, part supplier and/or dealership to which the issue 
relates.

Section B: Release

    Check the box before the word ``CONSENT'' to indicate your 
consent to allow the Agency to reveal any information that could 
reasonably be expected to reveal your identity to persons at the 
organization or institution against whom your allegations are made, 
or their agents or counsel, to governmental entities outside the 
United States and to other persons or entities that NHTSA determines 
should have access to this information to assist in NHTSA's 
analysis, inquiry or investigation.
    This section also informs you that you are not required to 
consent to this release and that you do so voluntarily.

Section C: Prospective Whistleblower's Signature

    This section must be signed and dated by the prospective 
whistleblower.

Appendix C to Part 513--Form WB-AWARD

[[Page 23318]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.029


[[Page 23319]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.030


[[Page 23320]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.031


[[Page 23321]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP14AP23.032

Privacy Act Statement

    The Privacy Act of 1974 requires that the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (``NHTSA'') inform individuals of the 
following when asking for information. This form may be used by an 
employee or contractor of a motor vehicle manufacturer, part 
supplier, or dealership, or a legal representative acting on such 
person's behalf, who wishes to apply for a whistleblower award for 
providing original information that led to the successful resolution 
of a covered action. The information provided will allow the Agency 
to evaluate the claim and elicit information relevant to 
whistleblower eligibility requirements. Furnishing the information 
is voluntary but a decision not to do so will result in you not 
being eligible for award consideration. Questions concerning this 
form may be directed to the National Highway Traffic Safety 
Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel by email to 
[email protected] or the NHTSA attorney with whom you have 
previously been in contact.

OMB Statement

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty 
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to 
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that 
collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control 
Number. NHTSA estimates that completing and submitting this form 
will take approximately 10 hours. The OMB Control Number for this 
information collection is 2127-XXXX. Please send comments to the 
Agency regarding the accuracy of this estimate and any suggestions 
for reducing this burden.
    The information requested on the WB-AWARD form is voluntary. 
However, under Sec.  513.9(b), a WB-AWARD form must be submitted by 
the claimant in order for the

[[Page 23322]]

claimant to be eligible for a whistleblower award.
    The Agency anticipates that this form will be submitted to a 
dedicated email address or other method specifically designated on 
NHTSA's website. NHTSA intends to treat the information as 
confidential under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 30172(f).

General Information

     This form should be used by persons making a claim for 
a whistleblower award in connection with information provided to 
NHTSA. In order to be eligible for an award, you must meet all the 
requirements set forth in 49 U.S.C. 30172 and the rules thereunder, 
as contained in 49 CFR part 513.
     You must sign the WB-AWARD form as the claimant. If you 
provided your information to NHTSA anonymously, you must now 
disclose your identity on this form and your identity must be 
verified in a form and a manner that is acceptable to the Agency 
prior to the payment of any award.
     Your WB-AWARD form, and any attachments thereto, must 
be received by NHTSA within ninety (90) days of the date the Notice 
of Covered Action to which the claim relates.
     You must submit your form to NHTSA in one of following 
two ways: emailing it to [email protected] or by any such 
method that the Agency may expressly designate on its website 
(https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/whistleblower-program).

Instructions for Completing Form WB-AWARD

Section A: Claimant's Information

    Questions 1-13: Please provide the following information about 
yourself:
    [cir] Last Name, First Name, and Middle Initial;
    [cir] Your complete Address, including city, state/province, 
zip/postal code, and country;
    [cir] Your telephone number, and if available, an alternate 
number where you can be reached;
    [cir] Your email address (to facilitate communications, we 
strongly encourage you to provide your email address); and
    [cir] Your preferred method of communication.

Section B: Legal Representative Information

    Complete this section only if you are represented by a legal 
representative in this matter. If you are not represented by a legal 
representative in this matter, leave this Section blank.
    Questions 1-9: Provide the following information about the legal 
representative representing you in this matter:
    [cir] Your legal representative's name;
    [cir] The firm name;
    [cir] Your legal representative's complete address, including 
city, state, and zip code;
    [cir] Your legal representative's telephone number; and
    [cir] Your legal representative's email address.

Section C: Eligibility Requirements and Other Information

    Question 1: Indicate whether you acquired the original 
information that you submitted to NHTSA solely through a 
communication that was subject to the attorney-client privilege or 
attorney work product doctrine.
    Question 2: Indicate whether you acquired the original 
information that you submitted to NHTSA by a means or manner that 
was determined by a United States Federal court or State court to 
violate applicable Federal or State criminal law.
    Question 3: Indicate whether you are currently a subject or 
target of a criminal investigation or whether you have been 
convicted of a criminal violation in connection with the allegations 
or conduct that you submitted to NHTSA.
    Question 4: Indicate whether any of the factors in 49 CFR 513.7 
apply, which could make you ineligible for an award.
    Question 5: If you answered ``yes'' to Questions 1, 2, 3, or 4 
above, provide details. Use additional sheets if necessary.

Section D: Whistleblower Information Details

    Questions 1-3: Provide the following information about the 
whistleblower information that you submitted to NHTSA:
    [cir] Select the method by which you submitted original 
information to NHTSA. If you selected ``Other'' describe how you 
submitted the information;
    [cir] Provide the date that you submitted the original 
information to NHTSA;
    [cir] Provide the name of the motor vehicle manufacturer, part 
supplier, and/or dealership to which the issue relates.

Section E: Notice of Covered Action

    The process for making a claim for a whistleblower award begins 
with the publication of a ``Notice of Covered Action'' on NHTSA's 
website. This notice is published whenever a judicial or 
administrative action brought under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 by NHTSA, 
the U.S. Department of Transportation or the U.S. Department of 
Justice results in collected monetary sanctions exceeding 
$1,000,000.
    A Notice of Covered Action is published on NHTSA's website 
subsequent to the entry of a final judgment, order or agreement that 
by itself, or collectively with other judgments, orders or 
agreements previously entered in the action, results in collected 
monetary sanctions exceeding the $1,000,000 threshold.
    Question 1: Provide the date of the Notice of Covered action to 
which this claim relates.
    Question 2: Provide the notice number of the Notice of Covered 
Action.
    Question 3: Provide the case name referenced in the Notice of 
Covered Action.
    Question 4: Provide the case number referenced in the Notice of 
Covered Action.
    Question 5: Provide the date of the relevant Notice of Covered 
Action for any related action.
    Question 6: Provide the notice number of the related action.
    Question 7: Provide the case name of the related action.
    Question 8: Provide the case number of the related action.

Section F: Award Justification

    Use this section to explain the basis for your belief that you 
should be granted an award in connection with your submission of 
information to NHTSA. Specifically address how you believe you 
voluntarily provided NHTSA with original information that led to the 
successful resolution of a covered action. Provide any information 
that you think may be relevant in light of the criteria for 
determining the amount of an award set forth in 49 U.S.C. 30172 and 
49 CFR part 513.
    49 U.S.C. 30172(c) provides that in determining an award made 
under 49 U.S.C. 30172(b), the Secretary shall take into 
consideration: (i) if appropriate, whether a whistleblower reported 
or attempted to report the information internally to an applicable 
motor vehicle manufacturer, part supplier, or dealership; (ii) the 
significance of the original information provided by the 
whistleblower to the successful resolution of the covered action; 
(iii) the degree of assistance provided by the whistleblower and any 
legal representative of the whistleblower in the covered action; and 
(iv) such additional factors as the Secretary considers relevant.

Section G: Claimant's Declaration

    This section must be completed and signed by claimant.

    Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR 
1.95.
Ann Carlson,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2023-06894 Filed 4-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-C


