[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 77 (Friday, April 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21784-21787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2020-0098; Notice 1]


BMW of North America, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: BMW of North America, LLC (BMW), a subsidiary of BMW AG, 
Munich, Germany, has determined that certain (MY) 2019-2012; BMW and 
2020-2021 Toyota motor vehicles do not fully comply with Federal Motor 
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 104, Windshield Wiping and Washing 
Systems. BMW filed a noncompliance report dated September 11, 2020. BMW 
subsequently petitioned NHTSA on October 9, 2020, and submitted a 
supplement to the petition on February 23, 2021, for a decision that 
the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor 
vehicle safety. This notice announces receipt of BMW's petition.

DATES: Send comments on or before May 24, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data, 
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the 
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and 
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
except for Federal holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging 
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater 
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of 
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in 
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish 
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were 
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the 
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change 
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of 
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the 
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials 
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be 
considered to the fullest extent possible.

[[Page 21785]]

    When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will 
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
indicated at the end of this notice.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials 
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and 
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at 
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for 
accessing the docket. The docket ID number for this petition is shown 
in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a 
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. Overview: BMW has determined that certain (MY) 2019-2012;2021 
BMW and 2020-2021 Toyota motor vehicles do not fully comply with the 
requirements of paragraphs S4.1.1.2 and S4.1.1.3 of FMVSS No. 104, 
Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems (49 CFR 571.104).
    BMW filed a noncompliance report dated September 11, 2020, pursuant 
to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and 
Reports. BMW subsequently petitioned NHTSA on October 9, 2020, and 
submitted a supplement to the petition on February 23, 2021, for an 
exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. 
Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as 
it relates to motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 
30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or 
Noncompliance.
    This notice of receipt of BMW's petition is published under 49 
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any Agency decision or 
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
    II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 244,433 of the following MY 
2019-2021 Toyota and BMW motor vehicles, manufactured between February 
9, 2018, and August 4, 2020, are potentially involved:

 MY 2020-2012;2021 Toyota Supra
 MY 2020-2012;2021 BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe (228i, 228i xDrive, 
M235i xDrive)
 MY 2019-2012;2021 BMW 8 Series Convertible (840i, 840i xDrive, 
M850i xDrive, M8)
 MY 2019-2012;2021 BMW 8 Series Coupe (840i, 840i xDrive, M850i 
xDrive M8)
 MY 2020-2012;2021 BMW 8 Series Gran Coupe (840i, 840i xDrive, 
M850i xDrive, M8)
 MY 2019-2012;2021 BMW X5 sDrive40i, X5 xDrivex40i, X5 
xDrive50i, X5 M50i, X5M
 MY 2021 BMW X5 xDrive45e
 MY 2020-2012;2021 BMW X6 sDrive40i, X6 xDrive40i, X6 M50i, X6M
 MY 2019-2012;2021 BMW X7 xDrive40i, X7 xDrive50i, X7 M50i
 MY 2019-2012;2021 BMW 330i, 330i xDrive, M340i
 MY 2021 BMW 330e, 330e xDrive
 MY 2021 BMW 4 Series Coupe (430i, 430i xDrive, M440i xDrive)
 MY 2021 BMW 4 Series Convertible (430i, M440i)
 MY 2019-2012;2021 BMW Z4 SDrive30i, Z4M40i

    III. Noncompliance: BMW explains that the noncompliance is due to a 
coding parameter issue, where the windshield wiper frequency decreases 
when the vehicle is at rest and in brief intervals when the vehicle 
accelerates from rest and therefore, does not meet the requirements set 
forth in paragraph S4.1.1.2 and S4.1.1.3 of FMVSS No. 104. 
Specifically, when the vehicle speed is 0 km/h, or when accelerating 
after a stop up to a vehicle speed of 4 km/h (approximately 2.5 mph), 
the wiper speed decreases.
    IV. Rule Requirements: Paragraph S4.1.1.2 and S4.1.1.3 of FMVSS No. 
104 include the requirements relevant to this petition. One frequency 
or speed shall be at least 45 cycles per minute regardless of engine 
load and engine speed. Regardless of engine speed and engine load, the 
highest and one lower frequency or speed shall differ by at least 15 
cycles per minute. Such lower frequency or speed shall be at least 20 
cycles per minute regardless of engine speed and engine load.
    V. Summary of BMW's Petition: The following views and arguments 
presented in this section, ``V. Summary of BMW's Petition,'' are the 
views and arguments provided by BMW. They have not been evaluated by 
the Agency and do not reflect the views of the Agency. BMW describes 
the subject noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is 
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
    In support of its petition, BMW offers the following reasoning:
    1. Wiper System Design/Functionality: BMW states that the subject 
vehicles are equipped with a wiper system that contains a driver-
selectable setting/mode Low, a driver-selectable setting/mode High, a 
driver-selectable setting/mode Auto (Rain Sensor), and a non-selectable 
pre-programmed setting/mode that BMW refers to as Standstill Mode 
(``Standstill''). The system function is described below:
    a. Driver Selects Low Mode: If a driver selects the wiper frequency 
mode Low, then wiper frequency while driving is larger than 40 cycles/
min and is model dependent as noted further in the petition. When the 
vehicle comes to rest, e.g., at a stoplight, then the frequency 
decreases. The decreased frequency is also present in the brief period 
of time when the vehicle accelerates from 0 mph to 2.5 mph. This 
decreased frequency is the frequency of the Standstill mode and is due 
to a pre-programmed comfort function described further below. The wiper 
frequency quickly and automatically returns to its selected mode, in 
this case, Low, as soon as the vehicle reaches 2.5mph.
    b. Driver Selects High Mode: If a driver selects wiper frequency 
High mode, then wiper frequency while driving is larger than 56 cycles/
min and is model dependent as noted further in the petition. When the 
vehicle comes to rest, e.g., at a stoplight, then the frequency 
decreases. The decreased frequency is also present in the brief period 
of time when the vehicle accelerates from 0 mph to 2.5 mph. The 
decreased frequency is the frequency of the Low setting/mode and is due 
to the pre-programmed comfort function described further below. The 
wiper frequency quickly and automatically returns to its selected mode, 
in this case, High, as soon as the vehicle reaches 2.5 mph.
    c. Auto (Rain Sensor) Mode: If the driver selects Auto (Rain 
Sensor) mode, then wiper frequency while driving is a function of the 
amount of rain detected on the windshield by the rain sensor. Depending 
upon the amount of rain, the system will provide an appropriate wiper 
frequency up to the maximum wiper system frequency, which is larger 
than the FMVSS No. 104 S4.1.1.2 requirement of 45 cycles/min.
    d. Comfort Function: The decrease in wiper frequency when the 
vehicle is at rest is a ``comfort function'' and was introduced 
because, at vehicle rest, the amount of water on the windshield 
compared to the amount of water on the windshield on a moving vehicle 
is significantly less. The comfort function was introduced to allow the 
driver to focus on the driving task and surroundings, and not be 
distracted (or annoyed) by a wiper system in which the higher frequency 
(when the vehicle was moving) is not needed when the vehicle is at 
rest. At vehicle rest (and during acceleration from 0 mph to 2.5 mph), 
the frequency is decreased briefly

[[Page 21786]]

from either High to Low, or from Low to Standstill, and then quickly 
and automatically increases again to the prior driver-selected 
frequency when the vehicle reaches 2.5 mph.
    e. Driver Can Increase Wiper Frequency While Vehicle is at Rest: 
The driver can also, while the vehicle is at rest, increase the wiper 
frequency.
    If the driver had selected wiper frequency mode Low, then when the 
vehicle comes to rest, the frequency will decrease to Standstill. In 
this case, if the driver perceives a need to increase the frequency 
while the vehicle is momentarily at rest, the driver can quickly and 
easily increase the frequency by moving the wiper arm/control upward. 
The wiper frequency will increase from Standstill to High. When the 
vehicle accelerates, the frequency will remain at High. If desired, the 
driver can then decrease the frequency to Low again.
    If the driver had selected wiper frequency mode High, then when the 
vehicle comes to rest, the frequency will decrease to Low. In this 
case, if the driver perceives a need to increase the frequency while 
the vehicle is momentarily at rest, the driver can quickly and easily 
increase the frequency by moving the wiper arm/control first downward 
and then upward. The wiper frequency will increase from Low to High. 
When the vehicle accelerates, the frequency will remain at High.
    2. Test Results: BMW tested the vehicles and the test results are 
contained in Table 1 of the petition.
    In this petition, although there are more than five vehicle models 
potentially affected, 5 wiper systems account for the systems installed 
across all vehicle models. In some cases, only one vehicle model was 
tested for a given wiper system, such as the 8 Series Gran Coupe, 
whereas, in some cases, more than one vehicle model was tested for a 
given wiper system, such as the X5 SAV and X6 SAC, and also the Z4 and 
Supra.
    Entries in the table for the 2 Series, 3 Series, and 4 Series 
suggest that these vehicles comply with FMVSS No. 104 Sections 4.1.1.2 
and 4.1.1.3. However, due to wiper system tolerances, a slight or 
marginal noncomplying condition could occur.
    The wiper frequencies (cycles/min) in Table 1 of the petition are 
based upon actual measurements of wiper movement on the subject 
vehicles during a three-minute time period and then adjusted for a one-
minute time period to denote wiper frequency in units of cycles/min. To 
assess the accuracy of the three-minute count (and the cycles/minute 
equivalency), a control was used in which a time period was measured 
for a wiper frequency consisting of 10 wipe cycles. Using this control, 
wiper frequency in cycles/min was calculated and then assessed against 
the actual measured three-minute count (adjusted to the equivalent 
frequency for a one-minute time period) as a check.
    As noted earlier, if the driver selected wiper frequency High, then 
due to the comfort function, at vehicle rest (and between 0 mph and 2.5 
mph), wiper frequency changes to Low. The ``High @ . . .'' column 
indicates that some models have a reduced wiper frequency of either 41 
cycles/min or 42 cycles/min.
    Similarly, if the driver selected wiper frequency Low, then due to 
the comfort function, at vehicle rest (and between 0 mph and 2.5 mph), 
wiper frequency changes to Standstill. The ``Low @ . . .'' column 
indicates that the Z4 and Supra have a reduced wiper frequency of 19.8 
cycles/min.
    3. Wiper Frequency Comparisons
    a. Wiper Frequency High: FMVSS No. 104 Section 4.1.1.2 requires a 
minimum wiper frequency of 45 cycles/min. In some vehicle models, the 
frequency is 41 cycles/min. A wiper frequency of 45 cycles/min equates 
to a single wipe cycle of approximately 1.33 seconds. A wiper frequency 
of 41 cycles/min equates to a single wipe cycle of 1.46 seconds. The 
difference is approximately 0.13 seconds and is unlikely to affect 
driver visibility as explained further below in the section comparing a 
stationary vehicle with a moving vehicle regarding the amount of water 
on the windshield.
    b. Wiper Frequency Low: FMVSS 104 Section 4.1.1.3 requires a 
minimum wiper frequency of 20 cycles/min. In some vehicle models, the 
frequency is 19.8 cycles/min. A wiper frequency of 20 cycles/min 
equates to a single wipe cycle of approximately 3.00 seconds. A wiper 
frequency of 19.8 cycles/min equates to a single wipe cycle of 3.03 
seconds. The difference is approximately 0.03 seconds and is extremely 
unlikely to affect driver visibility as explained further below in the 
section comparing a stationary vehicle with a moving vehicle regarding 
the amount of water on the windshield.
    4. Vehicle Travels Very Small Distance When Accelerating from 0 mph 
to 2.5 mph:
    In the brief interval during vehicle acceleration from 0 mph to 2.5 
mph, an average vehicle travels only a small amount, approximately 1 
ft. and, at that point (distance), the driver-selected wiper frequency, 
i.e., either Low or High, is quickly and automatically re-established.
    5. Rain Volume Comparison Between a Vehicle at Rest and a Moving 
Vehicle:
    In a given period of time, the volume of water on the windshield 
while the vehicle is at rest is significantly less than the volume of 
water on the windshield while the vehicle is moving, for example at 
city or highway speeds. For example, the amount of water on the 
windshield while the vehicle is at rest is approximately 50% less than 
the amount of water on the windshield when driving at approximately 25 
mph. Therefore, if wiper frequencies of 20 cycles/min and 45 cycles/min 
are deemed to be sufficient when driving then, when the vehicle is at 
rest, wiper frequencies of 19.8 cycles/min and 41 cycles/min are 
sufficient for an overview of the traffic and roadway conditions. As 
noted earlier, there is only a 0.13 second difference in time for a 
single wipe cycle between the required 45 cycles/min and the 41 cycles/
min condition, and only a 0.03 second difference in time for a single 
wipe cycle between the required 20 cycles/min and the 19.8 cycles/min 
condition.
    For a given rainfall velocity, driver visibility while the vehicle 
is at rest with this slight or marginal noncompliance is greater than 
driver visibility while the vehicle is moving with a compliant system, 
especially when the vehicle is moving at city and highway speeds.
    Another perspective involves determining an equivalent condition 
between a vehicle at rest containing this slight noncompliance and a 
moving vehicle that is compliant. A vehicle at rest with this slight 
noncompliance, i.e., with a wiper frequency of 41 cycles/min (instead 
of 45 cycles/min) has a reduced wiper frequency and, therefore, is 
slightly less efficient in removing the rain from the windshield. An 
equivalent condition would result in a vehicle velocity of 
approximately 2.3mph. Therefore, a vehicle containing this slight 
noncompliance at rest can be considered to be equivalent to a compliant 
vehicle at 2.3 mph. Moreover, this pertains to the High wiper frequency 
mode. If the Low wiper frequency mode is selected, the equivalent 
vehicle velocity is 0.2 mph.
    Driver visibility, while the vehicle is at rest with this slight or 
marginal noncompliance, is greater than driver visibility while the 
vehicle is moving with a compliant system, especially when the vehicle 
is moving at city and highway speeds.
    6. The Wiper System Does Not Decrease During Vehicle Deceleration:

[[Page 21787]]

    The wiper system functionality on the vehicles that are the subject 
of this petition is such that wiper frequency does not decrease during 
vehicle deceleration to 0 mph. Therefore, the slight or marginal 
noncompliance does not exist during vehicle deceleration, including the 
small period of time when the vehicle is coming to rest, e.g., 
approaching a stoplight. In those circumstances, there could be a 
vehicle already at the stoplight or a pedestrian in the crosswalk. In 
these instances, the vehicles that are the subject of this petition are 
fully compliant. BMW contends that the affected vehicles comply with 
all other applicable provisions of FMVSS No. 104. BMW says that the 
wiper system is compliant in the vast majority of driving situations/
modes, especially when wipers are needed most, i.e., while driving when 
the wipers are selected by the driver to be in either ``High'' or 
``Low'' setting/mode. Any potential non-compliance only occurs when the 
vehicle is at rest, or in the very brief time period when accelerating 
from 0 mph to 2.5 mph.
    7. SAE J903 (Passenger Car Windshield Wiper Systems):
    BMW says that it has reviewed the most recent release of SAE J903 
and that it would appear that based upon a review of ``currently 
available engineering data'' by the technical expert group responsible 
for ongoing releases of SAE J903, that the currently-accepted minimum 
performance requirement is 10 cycles/min. As noted in its petition, 
under certain limited circumstances BMW's wiper system frequencies 
(cycles/min) are at approximately 41 or 42 instead of 45, or at 19.8 
instead of 20 and, in all of these conditions, all frequencies are 
well-above a wiper frequency rate of 10 cycles/min. Therefore, it would 
appear, according to the current version of SAE J903 that these wiper 
frequency rates are also safe.
    8. Field Experience:
    BMW affirms that they have not received any complaints from vehicle 
owners and are not aware of any accidents or injuries that have 
occurred as a result of this issue. Toyota is not aware of any 
accidents or injuries and has no field reports or claims relating to 
this issue in Supra vehicles.
    9. Vehicle Production:
    BMW says that vehicle production has been corrected to conform to 
FMVSS No. 104 Sections 4.1.1.2 and 4.1.1.3.
    BMW concludes that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as 
it relates to motor vehicle safety and that its petition to be exempted 
from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49 
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49 
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
    On February 23, 2021, BMW submitted a supplement to its petition 
pertaining to a study created and conducted by BMW's Human-Factor's 
group in conjunction with the technical development group responsible 
for wiper systems. BMW states that the objective of this study was to 
evaluate two different wiping speeds (41 rmp and 45 rpm) in two 
identical vehicles and their influence on the recognizability and 
legibility of traffic signs using an experimental setup. During the 
standardized test, a rain simulation was used to create comparable 
visibility conditions. The participants had to read out different 
traffic signs to an experimenter and evaluate their recognizability 
while sitting in the vehicle with the wipers on. Steady rain conditions 
were simulated by applying water to the windshield. BMW contends that 
there was no statistically significant difference in the self-reported 
difficulty of reading the traffic signs, and there was no difference in 
the recognition rate of the signs (i.e., speed limits and additional 
texts). There was also no difference in the satisfaction with the 
wiping performance.
    BMW's complete petition and all supporting documents, including 
details of the study conducted by BMW, are available by logging onto 
the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at: https://www.regulations.gov and by following the online search instructions to 
locate the docket number as listed in the title of this notice.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a 
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers 
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, 
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance 
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on 
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that BMW no longer 
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. 
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle 
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for 
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate 
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after BMW 
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.

Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-08450 Filed 4-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


