
[Federal Register: March 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 48)]
[Notices]               
[Page 10984-10985]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13mr09-118]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

 
Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention 
Standard; Volkswagen

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document grants in full the petition of Volkswagen Group 
of America (VW) in accordance with 543.9(c)(2) of 49 CFR part 543, 
Exemption from the Theft Prevention Standard, for the Audi A3 vehicle 
line beginning with model year (MY) 2010. This petition is granted 
because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to be 
placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as effective 
in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the 
parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.

DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with 
model year (MY) 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of 
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, W43-439, Washington, DC 20590. 
Ms. Ballard's phone number is (202) 366-0846. Her fax number is (202) 
493-2990.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated November 10, 2008, VW 
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft 
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541) for the Audi A3 vehicle line 
beginning with MY 2010. The petition requested an exemption from parts-
marking pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft 
Prevention Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device 
as standard equipment for an entire vehicle line.
    Under 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an 
exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition, VW 
provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity, design, 
and location of the components of the antitheft device for its new Audi 
A3 vehicle line. VW will install its passive, transponder-based, 
electronic immobilizer antitheft device as standard equipment on its 
Audi A3 vehicle line beginning with MY 2010. Key components of the 
antitheft device will include a passive immobilizer, an immobilizer 
control unit, a mechanical ignition lock with immobilizer reading coil, 
an adapted ignition key, and an engine control unit. The antitheft 
device will not include an audible or visible alarm feature as standard 
equipment. VW's submission is considered a complete petition as 
required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements 
contained in 543.5 and the specific content requirements of 543.6.
    VW stated that once the driver/operator turns on the ignition, the 
key transponder sends a fixed code to the immobilizer control unit. If 
this is identified as the correct code, a variable code is generated in 
the immobilizer control unit and sent to the transponder. A secret 
arithmetic process is then started in the transponder and the control 
unit according to a set of specific equations. The results of the 
computing process is evaluated in the control unit and if they tally, 
the vehicle key is acknowledged as correct. The engine control unit 
then sends a variable code to the immobilizer control unit, enabling 
start up of the vehicle. VW stated that a new variable code is 
generated each time during this secret computing process. Therefore, VW 
believes that the code is undecipherable and impossible to duplicate.
    In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, VW 
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed 
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, VW 
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. VW provided a 
detailed list of the tests conducted (i.e., electrical system 
temperature stability, mechanical integrity, electrical performance, 
environmental compatibility and service life) and believes that the 
device is reliable and durable since the device complied with its 
specific requirements for each test. Additionally, VW stated that after 
adapting in the electronic module of the key transponder has been 
initiated, a pairing between the key and the immobilizer occurs at 
which point the key can no longer be used for any other immobilizer.
    In supplementary information submitted to the agency on January 12, 
2009, VW stated that since the Audi A3 has only been equipped with a 
standard immobilizer and alarm since its introduction in MY 2006, there 
is no comparative Audi data available for the Audi A3 without an 
immobilizer. VW also stated that the agency's MY 2006 theft data 
published in the Federal Register on October 14, 2008, reported that 
the Audi A3 had a theft rate of 1.0751 which is below the median. VW 
also provided data on the theft reduction benefits experienced by other 
vehicle lines installed with immobilizer devices that have recently 
been granted petitions for exemptions by the agency. VW has concluded 
that the antitheft device proposed for its Audi A3 vehicle line is no 
less effective than those devices in the lines for which NHTSA has 
already granted full exemption from the parts-marking requirements. The 
agency agrees that the device is substantially similar to devices in 
these and other vehicle lines for which the agency has already granted 
exemptions.
    Based on the evidence submitted by VW, the agency believes that the 
antitheft device for the Audi A3 vehicle line is likely to be as 
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance 
with the part-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants 
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of part 
541 either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon 
substantial evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely 
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as 
compliance with the parts marking requirements of part 541. The agency 
finds that VW has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the 
antitheft device for the Audi A3 vehicle line is likely to be as 
effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance 
with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard 
(49 CFR part 541). This conclusion is based on the information VW 
provided about its device.
    The agency concludes that the device will provide four of the five 
types of performance listed in 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; 
preventing defeat or circumvention of the device by unauthorized 
persons; preventing operation of the vehicle by unauthorized entrants; 
and ensuring the reliability and durability of the device.

[[Page 10985]]

    For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full VW's 
petition for exemption for the Audi A3 vehicle line from the parts-
marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The agency notes that 49 CFR 
part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted from 
the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year. 49 CFR part 
543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the disposition 
of all part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of 
future product nameplates, the beginning model year for which the 
petition is granted and a general description of the antitheft device 
is necessary in order to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle 
lines exempted from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft 
Prevention Standard.
    If VW decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must 
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must 
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR parts 541.5 
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
    NHTSA notes that if VW wishes in the future to modify the device on 
which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a 
petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a part 543 
exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted under 
this part and equipped with the anti-theft device on which the line's 
exemption is based. Further, part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the 
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of 
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in 
that exemption.''
    The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that part 
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself. 
The agency did not intend in drafting part 543 to require the 
submission of a modification petition for every change to the 
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many 
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the 
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which 
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency 
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33106; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 
1.50.

    Issued on: March 10, 2009.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
 [FR Doc. E9-5477 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
