NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (NCAP)

DYNAMIC ROLLOVER RESISTANCE TEST

Nissan Motor Company

2006 Infiniti FX35 AWD

TEST NUMBER:  07-02

Final Report

October 2006

Prepared by:

Dynamic Research, Inc

355 Van Ness Ave. #200

Torrance, CA 90501

Prepared for:  Virginia Tech Transportation Institute

                       3500 Transportation Research Plaza

                       Blacksburg, VA 24061

The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents of
this report or use thereof.  If trade or manufacturers' names or
products are mentioned, it is only because they are considered essential
to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an
endorsement.  The United States Government does not endorse products or
manufacturers.

	Dynamic Research, Inc. does not endorse or certify products of
manufacturers. The manufacturer’s name appears solely to identify the
test article.  Dynamic Research, Inc. assumes no liability for the
report or use thereof.  It is responsible for the facts and the accuracy
of the data presented herein.  This report does not constitute a
standard, specification, or regulation.

Report Prepared by:

_______________________________________________Date:_____6 October
2006_____

Brian Kebschull, Principal Engineer

Report Approved by:

_______________________________________________Date:_____6 October
2006_____

John Lenkeit, Program Manager

	Technical Report Documentation Page

1.	Report No.

	DRI-TM-06-146	2.	Government Accession No.	3.	Recipient’s Catalog No.

4.	Title and Subtitle

	Final Report of a NCAP Dynamic Rollover

	Maneuver (Fishhook) Test of a 2006 Infiniti FX35 AWD	5.	Report Date

	  DATE  \@ "d MMMM yyyy"  \* MERGEFORMAT  31 October 2006 

	6.	Performing Organization Code

	DRI

7.	Author(s)

	Brian Kebschull, Project Engineer	8.	Performing Organization Report No.

	n/a

9.	Performing Organization Name and Address

	Dynamic Research, Inc.

	355 Van Ness Ave. #200

	Torrance, CA 90501	10.	Work Unit No. (TRAIS)

	11.	Contract or Grant No.

	DTNH22-05-D-01019

12.	Sponsoring Agency Name and Address

	Virginia Tech Transportation Institute

	3500 Transportation Research Plaza

	Blacksburg, VA 24061	13.	Type of Report and Period Covered

	Final Report

	July 2006

		14.	Sponsoring Agency Code

	

15.	Supplemental Notes



16.   Abstract

An NCAP Dynamic Rollover Maneuver (Fishhook) Test was conducted on a
2006 Infiniti FX35 AWD at Dynamic Research, Inc. on 7/13/2006.  The
vehicle did not experience two-wheel lift.  The vehicle’s steering
angle at .3g lateral acceleration at 50 mph was 26.4 degrees.



17.	Key Words

	NCAP Rollover Resistance Ratings

	Fishhook Test

	18.	Distribution Statement

	Copies of this report are available from:

	National Highway Traffic Safety Admin.

	Office of Crash Avoidance Standards

	400 Seventh Street, S. W., Room 5307

	Washington, DC  20590

19.  Security Classif. (of this report) 

     Unclassified	20.  Security Classif. (of this page)

     Unclassified	21.  Number of Pages

51	22.  Price

Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72)	Reproduction of completed page authorized

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I.	INTRODUCTION	 1

II.	VEHICLE PREPARATION	2

	A.	Test Vehicle	2 

	B.	Tires	2

	C.	Vehicle Loading	2

	D.	Steering Controller	5 

	E.	Instrumentation and Data Collection	5 

	F.	Other Vehicle Preparation	5 

III.	TEST PROCEDURES	9 

	A.	Test Procedure Overview	9 

	B.	Test Conditions	10

IV.	RESULTS	13

 

APPENDIX A	Photographs	A-1

APPENDIX B	Test Run Log	B-1

APPENDIX C	Slowly Increasing Steer Test Worksheet	C-1

APPENDIX D	Time History Plots	D-1

LIST OF FIGURES

Page

1.	Nominal Position of Video Cameras for Fishhook Tests	8

2.	DRI-Minter Vehicle Dynamics Area	12

LIST OF TABLES

Page

1.	Test Vehicle Data	3

2.	Tire Information	4

3.	Vehicle Loading	4

4.	Sensors	7

5.	Surface Friction	10

6.	Handwheel Angles	11

7.	Weather Conditions	11

Section I

INTRODUCTION

	Beginning with the 2006 fiscal year, the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) has engaged Dynamic Research, Inc. (DRI)
of Torrance, CA to conduct dynamic rollover testing and gather data from
that testing as part of NHTSA’s New Car Assessment Program (NCAP).  

	The purpose of the testing reported herein was to determine if a
typical 2006 Infiniti FX35 AWD would experience tip-up, defined as
simultaneous two-wheel lift of two inches or more at an entry speed of
50 mph or less in the Fishhook Procedure developed by NHTSA.  This
procedure may be found in the Federal Register (68 FR 59250) or at  
HYPERLINK "http://dmses.dot.gov/docimages/pdf88/256700_web.pdf" 
http://dmses.dot.gov/docimages/pdf88/256700_web.pdf .

	The testing reported herein was accomplished under contract
DTNH22-05-D-01019, Task Order One (1).  The task order is entitled,
“New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) Non-Destructive Vehicle Testing and
Data Gathering.”

Section II

VEHICLE PREPARATION

A.	TEST VEHICLE

	The test vehicle was new or in as-new condition, meaning the vehicle
had been driven no more than 500 miles prior to the start of dynamic
rollover testing.  It was acquired through a commercial rental/leasing
company.  Details of the test vehicle are given in Table 1.

B.	TIRES

	All tires used were new, and of the same make, model, size, and DOT
specification of those installed on the vehicle when purchased new. 
Tire inflation pressures were in accordance with the recommendations
indicated on each vehicle's identification placard.  To reduce the
possibility of tire debeading during Fishhook testing, an appropriately
sized inner tube was installed in each tire.  To further reduce the
possibility of tire debeading, the tires were mounted to the rims
without the use of tire mounting lubricant.  Tire specifications are
listed in Table 2.

C.	VEHICLE LOADING

	The multi-passenger load, described in the Fishhook Procedure, was used
for all tests.  The load and positioning of the load in the vehicle are
listed in Table 3.  

	In addition to water dummies, the loading included instrumentation, a
steering machine, and outriggers.  Test vehicle bumper assemblies were
removed for outrigger installation.  The reduction in vehicle weight due
to the removal of the bumpers was offset by the additional weight of the
outriggers and their mounting system.  The outrigger system typically
outweighs the bumper assemblies. 

Table 1.  Test Vehicle Data

General Data

Model year, make, model	2006 Infiniti FX35 AWD

VIN	JNRAS08WX6X20xxxx

Body style	SUV

Number of doors	5

Trim level	-

Seating positions,                  Front:

2nd row:

3rd row:	2

3

0

Electronic stability control	Yes

4-Wheel ABS  (Yes/No)	Yes

Power steering  (Yes/No)	Yes

Optional equipment

	Touring package (sunroof)

Sport package

Technology package

Roof rack

Hands-free package

Odometer at start of testing	16 miles

Drivetrain

Engine cylinder arrangement	V6

Engine displacement	3.5 L

Transmission type	Automatic

Drive arrangement	AWD

Chassis

Track width	F: 62.7 in, R: 64.6 in

Wheelbase	112.2 in

Curb weight	4345 lb

Certification Data from Vehicle’s Label

Vehicle manufactured by	Nissan Motor Co.

Date of manufacture	04/06

GVWR	5481 lb	(2486 kg)

GAWR Front	2617 lb	(1187 kg)

GAWR Rear	2890 lb	(1311 kg)



Table 2.  Tire Information

Tire Manufacturer	Goodyear

Tire Model	Eagle RS-A

Tire Size	P265/50 R20

Load rating and speed symbol	106

Speed rating	V

Treadwear grade	260

Traction grade	A

Temperature grade	A

Location of “Recommended

Tire Pressure” label	Driver door jamb

Recommended cold tire pressure

Front:

Rear:	

32 psi (220 kPa)

32 psi (220 kPa)

First 8 digits of DOT code	U27E49BR

Table 3.  Vehicle Loading

Water dummy and other loading	3 water dummies in second row.  

Water dummy weight (lb)	525

Fuel level	Full

Weight as Tested

Left front (lb)	1354

Right front (lb)	1292

Left rear (lb)	1410

Right rear (lb)	1368



D.	STEERING CONTROLLER

	A programmable steering machine was installed which generates handwheel
steering inputs for all test maneuvers.  The machine provides at least
35 lb-ft of torque at a handwheel rate of 720 deg/sec, is capable of
actuating the vehicle's steering system through its full range, and
accepts angular rate sensor feedback input for roll rate-induced
steering reversals.

E.	INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA COLLECTION

	The test vehicle was instrumented with an angle encoder, located in the
steering controller; a 3-axis inertial measurement unit to measure roll,
pitch, and yaw rates, and longitudinal, lateral, and vertical
acceleration; two ultrasonic distance measuring sensors to measure
vehicle roll angle; and a radar speed sensor to measure vehicle speed. 
The brake light circuit was monitored to verify that there was no brake
pedal application during any test.

	A list of the sensors is given in Table 4.  A 3B signal conditioning
and power rack was used to provide any necessary sensor power,
excitation, gain, and offset.  Two pole Butterworth anti-alias filters
were used for all analog data channels, using a corner frequency of 20
Hz.  Data were collected at 200 samples/sec, using a Measurement
Computing Corp. PCI-DAS6402/16 A/D board.

	Two video cameras were used to record the Fishhook runs.  They were
positioned nominally as shown in Figure 1.  The recorded videotapes were
reviewed after the Fishhook runs to check for any two wheel lift.  If
any two wheel lift was observed, eight infrared distance measuring
sensors for measurement of wheel lift (two sensors at each wheel) were
then mounted for use in subsequent confirmation Fishhook tests.

F.	OTHER VEHICLE PREPARATION

	In addition to installation and preparation discussed above, the test
vehicle was prepared as follows:

Front and rear bumpers were removed

Outrigger mounts were installed in the bumper locations and titanium
outriggers were fastened to these mounts

A five point safety harness was installed.

Airbags were removed or otherwise disabled

	Photographs of the vehicle tested are given in Appendix A.

Table 4.  Sensors

Data Measured	Type	Range	Manufacturer	Model Number

Handwheel angle

	Encoder	Infinite	Automotive Testing, Inc.	Angle encoder integral with
steering controller

Brake pedal actuation	Tape Switch	On/Off	Vericom Computers	VC3000

Longitudinal, lateral, and vertical acceleration	Multi-axis inertial
sensing system	(2g

	BEI Technologies, Inc., Systron Donner Inertial Division	MP-1

Roll, pitch, and yaw rate

(100 deg/s



Left and right side vehicle ride height (to measure roll angle)
Ultrasonic distance measuring system	4 - 40 inches	Massa Products Corp.
M-5000/220kHz

Vehicle speed	Radar speed sensor	0.1 - 125 mph	B+S Software und
Messtechnik GmbH	DRS-6

Wheel lift (via resolution of two measured distances spaced a known
distance apart), used for confirmation tests only	Analog displacement
measuring system (Infrared; 880 mm)	13.8 - 33.5 in	Wenglor Sensors, Ltd.
HT 66MGV80



 

Figure 1.  Nominal Position of Video Cameras for Fishhook TestsSection
III

TEST PROCEDURES

	This section includes a general overview of the test procedures and
details of the particular test.

A.	TEST PROCEDURE OVERVIEW

	This test was conducted in accordance with NHTSA’s NCAP Rollover
Resistance Test Procedure (Fishhook) as described in the Federal
Register (68 FR 59250).  Detailed descriptions of the test procedure,
pass/fail criteria, and data acquisition specifications may be found at 
 HYPERLINK "http://dmses.dot.gov/docimages/pdf88/25670_web.pdf" 
http://dmses.dot.gov/docimages/pdf88/25670_web.pdf .

	There are two major components of the test procedure, the Slowly
Increasing Steer (SIS) pre-test and the Fishhook test.

	The Slowly Increasing Steer (SIS) maneuver was used to characterize the
steady state lateral dynamics of each vehicle, and is based on the
"Constant Speed, Variable Steer" test defined in SAE J266.  The maneuver
is used to determine the handwheel angle that produces a lateral
acceleration of 0.3 g at 50 mph.  This handwheel angle is then used to
determine the magnitude of steering to be used for the NHTSA Fishhook
maneuver.  

	SIS tests were performed at a constant speed of 50 mph.  Handwheel
angle was input at a rate of 13.5 deg/sec, from 0 to an angle that
provided at least 0.55g.  Three tests were conducted in each direction,
and the data for the six runs were averaged to obtain the handwheel
angle that produced 0.3 g at 50 mph.

	The Fishhook test is a programmed steering maneuver that is implemented
via the steering controller.  The vehicle was initially steered in one
direction and then the steering was reversed. The timing, magnitude and
rate of the steering were prescribed by the Fishhook Procedure. 

	To begin the maneuver, the vehicle was driven in a straight line at a
speed slightly greater than the desired entrance speed.  The driver then
released the throttle.  When the vehicle was at the target speed, the
steering controller automatically initiated the steering maneuver. 
Following completion of the steering reversal the handwheel position was
maintained for three seconds, and then returned to zero angle in 1
second.	The tests were conducted in both left-right and right-left
directions.  The “Default” test series used a handwheel angle equal
to 6.5 times the handwheel angle that produced 0.3 g at 50 mph in the
SIS tests, and initial vehicle speeds beginning at 35 mph and concluding
up to 50 mph (if no two-wheel lift occurs).  Supplemental tests were
also done, as specified in the Fishhook Procedure.

B.	TEST CONDITIONS

1.	Test Surface

	The tests were conducted on the Vehicle Dynamics Area at DRI’s Minter
Field facility, located near Bakersfield, California, on 7/13/2006.  The
VDA has a smooth, flat (slope less than 0.5% throughout) asphaltic
concrete surface.  Its dimensions are as shown in Figure 2.  It was
built in the spring of 2005.

	VDA surface friction measurements were accomplished using the DRI
Mobile Tire Tester.  Three runs were done, one at each of three
previously determined locations. Each run provided for a minimum of 3
seconds of tire friction at constant normal load, slip angle, and speed
in a free rolling condition. The test was accomplished using an ASTM
E1136 tire with an inflation pressure of 35 (±0.5) psi at a test speed
of 40 (±0.5) mph. The net slip angle of the test tire for each test run
was 7.5 deg. The test tire was no older than 6 months from the date of
manufacture. The surface friction measurement results are shown in Table
5.

Table 5.  Surface Friction

Date of surface friction measurements	7/13/2006

Average normalized lateral force	0.801

2.	Fishhook Handwheel Angles

	The 0.3g handwheel angle obtained from the SIS tests and the handwheel
angles used in the Fishhook tests are shown in Table 6.

Table 6.  Handwheel Angles

0.3g handwheel angle (from SIS tests at 50 mph)	26.4

5.5 scalar handwheel angle for Fishhook Test	145

6.5 scalar handwheel angle for Fishhook Test	172



3.	Weather Conditions

	The weather conditions, recorded at the end of testing, are shown in
Table 7.

Table 7.  Weather Conditions

Ambient temperature 	89 (ºF)

Relative Humidity	31%

Wind Speed	2.4 mph

Wind Direction	N-NW



Figure 2.  DRI-Minter Vehicle Dynamics Area

Section IV

RESULTS

	The test run log is given in Appendix B.  The Slowly Increasing Steer
Test Worksheet is given in Appendix C.  Appendix D contains time history
plots for the 50 mph runs and any runs which resulted in two-wheel lift.
 For the 2006 Infiniti FX35 AWD, there was no two-wheel lift at any test
condition.



APPENDIX A

Photographs

LIST OF FIGURES

Page

A1.	Window Sticker	A-3

A2.	Front View, as Delivered 	A-4

A3.	Rear View, as Delivered 	A-5

A4.	Front View, Test Condition	A-6

A5.	Rear View, Test Condition	A-7

A6.	Instrumentation in Vehicle	A-8

A7.	Ballast Condition	A-9

Figure A1. Window Sticker

Figure A2. Front View, as Delivered

Figure A3. Rear View, as Delivered

Figure A4. Front View, Test Condition

Figure A5. Rear View, Test Condition

Figure A6. Instrumentation in Vehicle

Figure A7. Ballast Condition



APPENDIX B

Test Run Log

Vehicle:  2006 Infiniti FX35 AWD		Driver:  Brian Kebschull		Date: 
7/13/2006

Run Number	Test Type	Speed (mph)	Handwheel Angle (deg)	Dir. of First
Steer	2 Wheel Lift	Notes

1	Distance

0	NA	NA	999.0







 

2	Tire Warm-Up 1	35	100	NA	NA	 

3	Tire Warm-Up 2	35	100	NA	NA	 

4	Tire Warm-Up 3	35	100	NA	NA	 

5	Tire Warm-Up 4	35	100	NA	NA	 







 

6	Static	0	0	NA	NA	 

7	Dynamic	50	0	NA	NA	 







 

8	SIS	50	50	Right	NA	 

9	System check	NA	NA	NA	NA

	10	SIS	50	50	Right	NA

	11	SIS	50	50	Right	NA

	12	SIS	50	50	Left	NA

	13	SIS	50	50	Left	NA

	14	SIS	50	50	Left	NA

	15	System check	NA	NA	NA	NA

















































































	

Vehicle:  2006 Infiniti FX35 AWD		Driver: Brian Kebschull		Date: 
7/13/2006

Run Number	Test Type	Speed (mph)	Handwheel Angle (deg)	Dir. of First
Steer	2 Wheel Lift	Notes

16	Fishhook	35	172	Right	No	6.5x scalar

17	Fishhook	40	172	Right	No	 

18	Fishhook	45	172	Right	No	 

19	Fishhook	47.5	172	Right	No	 

20	Fishhook	50	172	Right	No	 

21	Fishhook	35	172	Left	No	 

22	Fishhook	40	172	Left	No	 

23	Fishhook	45	172	Left	No	 

24	Fishhook	47.5	172	Left	No	 

25	Fishhook	50	172	Left	No	 







 

26	Fishhook	45	145	Left	No	5.5x scalar

27	Fishhook	47.5	145	Left	No	 

28	Fishhook	50	145	Left	No	 

29	Fishhook	45	145	Right	No	 

30	Fishhook	47.5	145	Right	No	 

31	Fishhook	50	145	Right	No	 





























































APPENDIX C

Slowly Increasing Steer Test Worksheet



NCAP, 2006 Infiniti FX35 AWD, Multi-Passenger Load, Test date: 13 July
2006











	SIS_out_v2



















	Run	Dir

of

Steer	Start Speed (mph)	End Speed (mph)	Speed Red. (mph)	Index of ay @
0.3g	HW Angle (deg) at 0.3g	ay (g) @ 0.3g index	6.5x HW Angle (deg)	Ramp
Time (sec) at 6.5x	5.5x HW Angle (deg)	Ramp Time (sec) at 5.5x	R2	Zero

Begin

Index	Zero

End

Index

8	0	49.1	3	93.9	1093	26.1	0.307	169.5	0.2354	143.4	0.1992	0.9863	521	721

10	0	48.8	8.3	83.1	1069	26.3	0.318	170.9	0.2373	144.6	0.2008	0.9915	488
688

11	0	49.7	8.1	83.8	1060	25.1	0.299	162.9	0.2262	137.8	0.1914	0.9966	502
702

12	1	49.6	2.2	95.6	1094	-25.6	-0.302	-166.5	-0.2313	-140.9	-0.1957
0.9854	496	696

13	1	48.6	4.2	91.4	1115	-28.3	-0.291	-183.6	-0.2551	-155.4	-0.2158
0.9852	514	714

14	1	49.6	4.2	91.6	1069	-27.2	-0.288	-176.5	-0.2451	-149.3	-0.2074
0.9785	483	683





















	Mean: 	26	0.301	172	0.238	145	0.202



















	Steering Controller Input Values



























	Scalar 6.5 values:













	  Initial HW angle: 	172	 deg











  Initial time: 

0.238	 s











  Reversal HW angle: 	-172	 deg











  Reversal time: 	0.477	 s

























	Scalar 5.5 values:













	  Initial HW angle: 	145	 deg











  Initial time: 

0.202	 s











  Reversal HW angle: 	-145	 deg











  Reversal time: 	0.403	 s













APPENDIX D

Time History Plots

LIST OF FIGURES

Page

D1.	Vehicle Speed, Handwheel Angle, Roll Angle, and Wheel Lift          
                         Time History Plots for Default Series Test,
L-R, 50 mph	D-3

D2.	Steering Machine Operation Time History Plots for Default           
                             Series Test, L-R, 50 mph	D-4

D3.	Yaw Rate, Roll Rate, and Lateral Acceleration Time History Plots for
                     Default Series Test, L-R, 50 mph	D-5

D4.	Pitch Rate and Vertical Acceleration Time History Plots for         
                             Default Series Test, L-R, 50 mph	D-6

D5.	Vehicle Speed, Handwheel Angle, Roll Angle, and Wheel Lift          
                           Time History Plots for Default Series Test,
R-L, 50 mph	D-7

D6.	Steering Machine Operation Time History Plots for                   
                              Default Series Test, R-L, 50 mph	D-8

D7.	Yaw Rate, Roll Rate, and Lateral Acceleration Time History Plots for
                       Default Series Test, R-L, 50 mph	D-9

D8.	Pitch Rate and Vertical Acceleration Time History Plots for         
                           Default Series Test, R-L, 50 mph	D-10

D9.	Vehicle Speed, Handwheel Angle, Roll Angle, and Wheel Lift          
                           Time History Plots for Supplemental 2 Series
Test, L-R, 50 mph	D-11

D10.	Steering Machine Operation Time History Plots for                  
                         Supplemental 2 Series Test, L-R, 50 mph	D-12

D11.	Yaw Rate, Roll Rate, and Lateral Acceleration Time History Plots
for                Supplemental 2 Series Test, L-R, 50 mph	D-13

D12.	Pitch Rate and Vertical Acceleration Time History Plots for        
                  Supplemental 2 Series Test, L-R, 50 mph	D-14

D13.	Vehicle Speed, Handwheel Angle, Roll Angle, and Wheel Lift Time
History Plots for Supplemental 2 Series Test, R-L, 50 mph	D-15

D14.	Steering Machine Operation Time History Plots for                  
                   Supplemental 2 Series Test, R-L, 50 mph	D-16

D15.	Yaw Rate, Roll Rate, and Lateral Acceleration Time History Plots
for           Supplemental 2 Series Test, R-L, 50 mph	D-17

D16.	Pitch Rate and Vertical Acceleration Time History Plots for        
                   Supplemental 2 Series Test, R-L, 50 mph	D-18

Figure D1. Vehicle Speed, Handwheel Angle, and Roll Angle Plots for
Default Test, L-R, 50 mph

Figure D2. Steering Machine Operation Time History Plots for Default
Test, L-R, 50 mph

Figure D3. Yaw Rate, Roll Rate, and Lateral Acceleration Time History
Plots for Default Test, L-R, 50 mph

Figure D4. Pitch Rate and Vertical Acceleration Time History Plots for
Default Test, L-R, 50 mph

Figure D5. Vehicle Speed, Handwheel Angle, and Roll Angle Plots for
Default Test, R-L, 50 mph

Figure D6. Steering Machine Operation Time History Plots for Default
Test, R-L, 50 mph

Figure D7. Yaw Rate, Roll Rate, and Lateral Acceleration Time History
Plots for Default Test, R-L, 50 mph

Figure D8. Pitch Rate and Vertical Acceleration Time History Plots for
Default Test, R-L, 50 mph

Figure D9. Vehicle Speed, Handwheel Angle, and Roll Angle Plots for
Default Test, R-L, 50 mph

Figure D10. Steering Machine Operation Time History Plots for
Supplemental 2 Test, L-R, 50 mph

Figure D11. Yaw Rate, Roll Rate, and Lateral Acceleration Time History
Plots for Supplemental 2 Test, L-R, 50 mph



Figure D12. Pitch Rate and Vertical Acceleration Time History Plots for
Supplemental 2 Test, L-R, 50 mph

Figure D13. Vehicle Speed, Handwheel Angle, and Roll Angle Plots for
Supplemental 2 Test, R-L, 50 mph

Figure D14. Steering Machine Operation Time History Plots for
Supplemental 2 Test, R-L, 50 mph

Figure D15. Yaw Rate, Roll Rate, and Lateral Acceleration Time History
Plots for Supplemental 2 Test, R-L, 50 mph



Figure D16. Pitch Rate and Vertical Acceleration Time History Plots for
Supplemental 2 Test, R-L, 50 mph

 

 

 PAGE   1 

  PAGE  ii 

  PAGE  3 

A-  PAGE  9 

B-  PAGE  1 

C-  PAGE  2 

D-  PAGE  33 

D-  PAGE  33 

1300 ft

R 50 ft

R 50 ft

300 ft

500 ft

30 ft

300 ft

(91 m)

(152 m)

(91 m)

(396 m)

(9 m)

(15 m)

(15 m)

NOT TO SCALE

N

