[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 25, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52406-52409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Revised Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement for the California High-Speed Rail System, Los Angeles to 
Anaheim Project Section, CA

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), on behalf of the 
California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) as the federal lead 
agency under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Assignment 
(July 2019), is issuing this notice to advise other federal, state, 
local, and tribal agencies and the public that the Authority intends to 
revise the scope of the analysis of the combined project-level 
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and project-level Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section 
of the Authority's proposed California High-Speed Rail (HSR) System 
from the Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) in the City of Los Angeles, 
California, to the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center 
(ARTIC) in the City of Anaheim, California, in compliance with relevant 
state and federal laws, in particular the California Environmental 
Quality Act (CEQA) and NEPA. Since publication of the notice of intent 
(NOI), the Authority has identified the proposed BNSF Colton Intermodal 
Facility Component (Colton Component) and BNSF Lenwood Staging Track 
Component (Lenwood Component) as necessary components of the Los 
Angeles to Anaheim Project Section of the HSR system. This Revised NOI 
is being issued to solicit additional public and agency input into the 
development of the scope of the EIR/EIS for the Los Angeles to Anaheim 
Project Section with respect to the Colton and Lenwood Components. 
Public input received during outreach activities conducted by the 
Authority and its representatives will be considered in the preparation 
of the combined EIR/EIS.

DATES: Written comments on the scope of the Los Angeles to Anaheim 
Project Section EIR/EIS should be provided to the Authority starting on 
August 25, 2020 and must be received by the Authority on or before 
September 24, 2020, as noted below. Public scoping meetings are 
scheduled for the following dates and times.
    The Authority expects these meetings to occur via webinar or other 
virtual-only mechanism (please consult www.hsr.ca.gov for up-to-date 
information). Scoping meetings are open to participants from any 
geographic area of the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section.
     Virtual Scoping Meeting #1: Thursday, September 10, 2020, 
5:00 p.m.-7:30 p.m.
     Virtual Scoping Meeting #2: Saturday, September 12, 2020, 
10:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of the Los Angeles to Anaheim 
Project Section EIR/EIS in response to this Revised NOI should be sent 
to Mark A. McLoughlin, Director of Environmental Services, ATTN: Los 
Angeles--Anaheim, California High-Speed Rail Authority, 770 L Street, 
Suite 620, MS-2, Sacramento, CA 95814, or via email with the subject 
line ``Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section HSR'' to: 
Los.Angeles_Anaheim@hsr.ca.gov. Comments may also be provided orally 
via the public scoping meetings described above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    For the Authority: Mark A. McLoughlin, Director of Environmental 
Services, California High-Speed Rail Authority, (telephone: 916-403-
6934; email: mark.mcloughlin@hsr.ca.gov).
    For FRA: Stephanie B. Perez-Arrieta, Regional Lead, Environmental 
Protection Specialist, Federal Railroad Administration, (telephone: 
202-493-0388; email: s.perez-arrieta@dot.gov).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Authority was established by the 
California State Legislature in 1996 and is authorized and directed by 
statute to undertake the planning for the development of a proposed 
statewide HSR network that is fully coordinated with other public 
transportation services.
    In 2005, the Authority and FRA completed a Final Program EIR/EIS 
for the Proposed California High-Speed Train System (statewide program 
EIR/EIS), as a first-tier environmental document. The Statewide Program 
EIR/EIS established the purpose and need for the HSR system, analyzed a 
HSR alternative, and compared it with a No Project Alternative and a 
modal alternative that involved expanding airports, freeways, and 
conventional rail to meet the state's future transportation needs. The 
Authority certified the Statewide Program EIR under CEQA and approved 
the proposed HSR system, and FRA issued a Record of Decision under NEPA 
for the statewide program EIS. The Authority and FRA made the following 
first-tier programmatic decisions: Selected the HSR alternative for 
intercity passenger travel in California between the major metropolitan 
centers of Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay Area in the north, 
through the Central Valley, to the cities of Los Angeles and San Diego 
in the south; selected very high-speed, electrified steel-wheel-on-
steel-rail technology; selected certain general alignment corridors and 
general station locations to be studied in more detail in second-tier 
environmental documents, including a corridor between LAUS and ARTIC; 
and adopted programmatic mitigation strategies and design practices.
    This EIR/EIS is one of a number of second-tier environmental 
documents for sections of the HSR system. It is tiered from and 
incorporates by reference the statewide program EIR/EIS in accordance 
with Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR 
1508.28) and State of California CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs. tit. 
14, 15168[b]). Tiering ensures that the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project 
Section EIR/EIS builds upon all previous work prepared for and 
incorporated in the statewide program EIR/EIS.
    The Authority and FRA previously conducted scoping for the Los 
Angeles to Anaheim Project Section EIR/EIS in the spring of 2007. FRA 
published an NOI in the Federal Register on March 15, 2007 (72 FR 
12250). Since publication of the NOI, the Authority has identified the 
proposed BNSF Colton Intermodal Facility Component (Colton Component) 
and BNSF Lenwood Staging Track Component (Lenwood Component) as 
necessary components of the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section of 
the HSR system. This Revised NOI is being issued to solicit additional 
public and agency input into the development of the scope of the EIR/
EIS for the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section with respect to the 
Colton and Lenwood Components. Public input received during outreach 
activities conducted by the Authority and its representatives will be 
considered in the preparation of the combined EIR/EIS. The 2007 scoping 
and environmental development process remains valid; information 
learned in and since 2007 will be used, supplemented by

[[Page 52407]]

information learned through this additional scoping, in development of 
the Draft EIR/EIS. Most of the information contained in this Revised 
NOI is the same as was contained in the 2007 NOI but is repeated here 
for ease of review. The Authority held three scoping meetings: In Los 
Angeles on April 5, 2007, in Anaheim on April 11, 2007, and in Norwalk 
on April 12, 2007, to engage agency and public input on the project. In 
addition to formal scoping meetings, the Authority has maintained 
ongoing outreach to public agencies and consistently engaged the public 
to provide input during project development. During the alternatives 
analysis process phase of the project, the Authority held seven 
community meetings between 2010 and 2015, as well as four agency 
meetings in 2017. The Authority held 11 open house meetings between 
2016 and 2018 to engage public input on the project.
    The FRA and the State of California executed a Memorandum of 
Understanding pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 dated July 23, 2019, through 
which the State of California, acting through the California State 
Transportation Agency and the Authority, has assumed FRA's 
responsibilities under NEPA and other Federal environmental laws for 
projects necessary for the design, construction, and operation of the 
California HSR System, including the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project 
Section and any ancillary facilities (including, but not limited to, 
electrical interconnections and network upgrades). Accordingly, the 
Authority is the project sponsor and lead federal agency for complying 
with NEPA and other federal environmental laws for the Los Angeles to 
Anaheim Project Section.
    The Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section corridor runs through a 
narrow and constrained urban environment, with other existing rail 
operators in the area, including trains operated by the National 
Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), Metrolink (governed by the 
Southern California Regional Rail Authority), the Union Pacific 
Railroad, and BNSF Railway. Projected cumulative passenger (commuter 
diesel and electric HSR) and freight train volumes require additional 
facilities be added outside the corridor to maintain existing and 
anticipated freight and passenger train operations during project 
construction and operation. Since FRA published the initial NOI, the 
Authority has identified the Colton and Lenwood Components, which are 
located outside the HSR corridor, as necessary components of the Los 
Angeles to Anaheim Project Section that are required to maintain 
freight and passenger train performance at existing levels during 
project construction and accommodate currently projected freight and 
passenger growth during project operation within the corridor.
    The Authority is issuing this Revised NOI to solicit additional 
public and agency input into the scope of issues to be addressed for 
the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section EIR/EIS with respect to the 
Colton and Lenwood Components.
    The preparation of this Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section EIR/
EIS will involve development of preliminary engineering designs and 
assessment of environmental effects associated with the construction, 
operation, and maintenance of the HSR system, including track and 
ancillary facilities and stations along the previously selected Los 
Angeles to Anaheim Project Section corridor between LAUS and ARTIC, as 
well as the Colton and Lenwood Components.
    The Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section EIR/EIS addresses CEQA 
and NEPA, as well as other applicable statutes, regulations, and 
executive orders, including (but not limited to) the Clean Air Act, the 
Clean Water Act, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act 
of 1966, Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, 
the Endangered Species Act, and Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions 
to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations).
    Implementation of the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section of the 
California HSR System is a federal undertaking with the potential to 
affect historic properties. As such, it is subject to the requirements 
of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966. In 
accordance with regulations issued by the Advisory Council on Historic 
Preservation, 36 CFR part 800, the Authority intends to coordinate 
compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act 
of 1966 with the preparation of the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project 
Section EIR/EIS, beginning with the identification of consulting 
parties in a manner consistent with the standards set out in 36 CFR 
800.8. Pursuant to a Programmatic Agreement, phased review of effects 
on historic properties is being conducted as provided by 36 CFR 
800.4(b)(2).
    The Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section EIR/EIS will examine a 
HSR Project Alternative, as well as a No Action Alternative. This 
project level EIR/EIS will describe site-specific environmental 
impacts, will identify specific mitigation measures to address those 
impacts, and will incorporate design practices to avoid and minimize 
potential adverse environmental impacts. The Authority will assess the 
site characteristics, size, nature, and timing of proposed site-
specific projects to determine whether impacts can be avoided or 
mitigated. The EIR/EIS will identify and evaluate the impacts from 
construction, operation, and maintenance of the HSR system. Information 
and documents regarding this HSR environmental review process will be 
available through the Authority's internet site: https://www.hsr.ca.gov/.

Purpose and Need

    The need for a HSR system is directly related to the expected 
growth in population and increase in intercity travel demand in 
California over the next twenty years and beyond. With growth in travel 
demand, there will be an increase in travel delays arising from the 
growing congestion on California's highways and at airports. In 
addition, there will be negative effects on the economy, quality of 
life, and air quality in and around California's metropolitan areas 
from a transportation system that will become less reliable as travel 
demand increases. The intercity highway system, commercial airports, 
and conventional passenger rail serving the intercity travel market are 
currently operating at or near capacity and will require large public 
investments for maintenance and expansion to meet existing demand and 
future growth.
    The purpose of the statewide HSR system is to provide a reliable 
high-speed electric-powered train system that links the major 
metropolitan areas of the state, and that delivers predictable and 
consistent travel times. A further objective is to provide an interface 
with commercial airports, mass transit, and the highway network and to 
relieve capacity constraints of the existing transportation system as 
increases in intercity travel demand in California occur, in a manner 
sensitive to and protective of California's unique natural resources.

Alternatives

    The Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section EIR/EIS will consider a 
No Action Alternative and a HSR Project Alternative.

No Action Alternative

    The No Action alternative is defined to serve as the baseline for 
assessment of the HSR Project Alternative. The No Action Alternative 
represents the region's transportation system (highway, air, and 
conventional rail) as it currently exists, and as it would exist after

[[Page 52408]]

completion of programs or projects currently planned for funding and 
implementation by 2040. The No Action Alternative defines the existing 
and future intercity transportation system for the Los Angeles to 
Anaheim Project Section corridor based on programmed and funded 
improvements to the intercity transportation system through 2040.

HSR Project Alternative

    The Authority envisions the HSR system as an electric-powered, 
high-speed, steel-wheel-on-steel-rail technology, which would employ 
the latest technology, safety, signaling, and automated train control 
systems, approximately 800 miles long. The Los Angeles to Anaheim 
Project Section alignment that was selected for further project-level 
study by the Authority and FRA with the statewide program EIR/EIS 
follows the Los Angeles-San Diego-San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) rail 
corridor as the feasible route option along with a connection between 
LAUS and the existing LOSSAN rail corridor. The Los Angeles to Anaheim 
Project Section of the HSR system would extend approximately 30 miles 
between LAUS in Los Angeles and ARTIC in Anaheim. The HSR alignment in 
this project section would cross the cities of Los Angeles, Vernon, 
Bell, Commerce, Montebello, Pico Rivera, Santa Fe Springs, Norwalk, La 
Mirada, Buena Park, Fullerton, and Anaheim, as well as the 
unincorporated area of Los Angeles County known as West Whittier.
    Station location options were selected for further project-level 
study by the Authority and FRA with the statewide program EIR/EIS 
considering travel time, train speed, cost, local access times, 
potential connections with other modes of transportation, ridership 
potential and the distribution of population and major destinations 
along the route, and local planning constraints/conditions. Potential 
station locations to be evaluated in the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project 
Section EIR/EIS include: City of Los Angeles, LAUS; Cities of Norwalk 
and Santa Fe Springs, Norwalk/Santa Fe Springs Transportation Center; 
City of Fullerton, Fullerton Transportation Center; and City of 
Anaheim, ARTIC.
    The LOSSAN corridor alignment selected by the Authority in 2005 for 
further project-level study in the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project 
Section EIR/EIS is a shared corridor in a built-out urban environment 
hosting both passenger and freight operations across a range of rail 
operators. The Authority is proposing to build additional track(s) for 
HSR and other passenger train operations in the right-of-way owned by 
BNSF Railway. However, in this constrained and complex transportation 
environment, even the construction and operation of additional track 
for HSR and other passenger rail operations would prevent passenger and 
freight mainline track between Redondo Junction and Fullerton Junction 
from reaching planned cumulative mainline passenger and freight 
volumes. Therefore, to accommodate HSR construction activities between 
Redondo Junction and Fullerton Junction, as well as projected 
cumulative 2040 passenger and freight volumes in the LOSSAN corridor, 
the EIR/EIS will evaluate additional facilities located outside the 
primary LOSSAN rail corridor. These facilities would relieve potential 
congestion sufficiently to allow passenger and freight volumes to reach 
projected cumulative 2040 levels and would include the Lenwood Staging 
Tracks (Lenwood Component) and Colton Intermodal Facility (Colton 
Component).
    The Lenwood Component would be required as a new freight train 
staging track facility outside and east of the LOSSAN Corridor, to 
allow freight trains to be staged or held outside and east of the 
corridor, so that windows in corridor rail activity may be provided to 
accommodate project construction. Additionally, operation of a new 
staging track facility outside and east of the corridor would be needed 
during project operational phases to permit adequate service windows 
for routine maintenance in the corridor. It would consist of the 
following main elements: Staging tracks, staging track leads, 
circulation and roadway modifications, and utility modifications. The 
Lenwood Component site would generally be located along the existing 
BNSF main line tracks and south and west of State Route 58 (SR-58) 
within the city of Barstow and unincorporated San Bernardino County, 
California.
    The Colton Component would accommodate future freight train volumes 
(an average of 10 freight trains per day) that could not be 
accommodated in the LOSSAN corridor due to the corridor's use by future 
volumes of HSR and other passenger trains. It would consist of the 
following main elements: Intermodal rail yard, railroad lead tracks, 
circulation and roadway modifications, and utility modifications. The 
Colton Component is in the southwest part of San Bernardino County, 
California, mostly within an unincorporated area of the County, while 
the remainder is primarily in the City of Colton with a small portion 
of the site's southern extent in the City of Grand Terrace. The Colton 
Component is generally south of Interstate 10 and the Union Pacific 
Railroad rail lines and north of the Santa Ana River.
    Both the Lenwood Component and Colton Component are required to 
implement HSR service under the HSR Project Alternative by resolving 
potential freight and passenger rail congestion in the LOSSAN corridor 
between LAUS and Fullerton.

Probable Effects

    The purpose of the EIR/EIS process is to explore in a public 
setting the effects of the proposed project on the physical, human, and 
natural environment. The Authority will continue the tiered evaluation 
of the potential environmental, social, and economic impacts of the 
construction and operation of the HSR system. Impact topics to be 
addressed include: Transportation; air quality and greenhouse gases; 
noise and vibration; electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic 
interference; public utilities and energy; biological and aquatic 
resources; hydrology and water resources; geology, soils, seismicity, 
and paleontological resources; hazardous materials and wastes; safety 
and security; socioeconomics and communities; station planning, land 
use, and development; agricultural farmland and forest land; parks, 
recreation and open space; aesthetics and visual quality; cultural 
resources; regional growth; and environmental justice. Measures to 
avoid, minimize, and mitigate all adverse impacts will be identified 
and evaluated.

Scoping and Comments

    The Authority has previously carried out scoping for the Los 
Angeles to Anaheim Project Section EIR/EIS and identified a Preferred 
Alternative for the HSR Project Alternative for the HSR passenger rail 
corridor between Los Angeles and Anaheim. Since publication of the NOI 
and the identification of the Preferred Alternative, the Authority has 
identified the Colton and Lenwood Components as necessary components of 
the Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section of the HSR system. The 
Authority is issuing this Revised NOI to solicit additional public and 
agency input into the development of the scope of the EIR/EIS for the 
Los Angeles to Anaheim Project Section with respect to the Colton and 
Lenwood Components and to advise the public that the Authority will 
consider public and agency input it receives in the preparation of the 
combined EIR/EIS. Comments and

[[Page 52409]]

suggestions on the additional scope elements described in this Revised 
NOI are invited from all interested agencies, Native American Tribes, 
and the public to ensure the full range of issues related to the 
proposed action and all reasonable alternatives are addressed. In 
particular, the Authority is interested in determining whether there 
are areas of environmental concern where there might be a potential for 
impacts identifiable at a project level. In response to this Revised 
NOI, public agencies with jurisdiction are requested to advise the 
Authority of the applicable permit and environmental review 
requirements of each agency, and the scope and content of the 
environmental information that is germane to the agency's statutory 
responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Currently, 
the Surface Transportation Board and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
are participating as cooperating agencies in the preparation of the 
EIS. Public scoping meetings have been scheduled as an important 
component of the scoping process for both the state and federal 
environmental review. The scoping meetings described above in this 
Revised NOI will also be advertised locally and included in additional 
public notification.
    The environmental review, consultation, and other actions required 
by applicable federal environmental laws for this project are being or 
have been carried out by the State of California pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 
327 and a Memorandum of Understanding dated July 23, 2019, and executed 
by the FRA and the State of California.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Jamie P. Rennert,
Director, Office of Program Delivery.
[FR Doc. 2020-18610 Filed 8-24-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


