
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16036-16039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration


Service Level Environmental Impact Statement for the Texas 
Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Corridor, South Texas to Oklahoma City

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA).

ACTION: Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to advise the public that it will 
prepare a Service Level/Tier 1 EIS with the Texas Department of 
Transportation (TxDOT) to study potential new and/or improved high-
speed intercity passenger rail service along an 850-mile corridor

[[Page 16037]]

extending from Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, to the south Texas cities of 
Laredo and Brownsville (proposed action). In addition to the Service 
Level EIS, the Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study (Study) also 
includes preparation of a service development plan for the corridor for 
each of three sections of the corridor: Oklahoma City to Dallas/Fort 
Worth, Dallas/Fort Worth to San Antonio, and San Antonio to south 
Texas. The Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) is a partnering 
state agency in the development of the EIS. The Service Level EIS will 
evaluate a reasonable range of corridor alternatives and make decisions 
regarding the preferred corridor, location of train service termini, 
location of intermediate stops, the level of service, and future 
planning for projects to implement the service. Alternatives under 
consideration will include a No Action (No Build) alternative, as well 
as multiple build alternatives. The build alternatives may include 
infrastructure improvements in existing or prior rail corridors, the 
development of one or more new rail corridors, or a combination of 
both, as well as varying levels of service. FRA is issuing this Notice 
to solicit public and agency input in the development of the scope of 
the EIS and to advise the public that FRA and TxDOT will conduct 
outreach activities regarding the scope of the EIS. To ensure all 
significant issues are identified and considered, the public is invited 
to comment on the scope of the EIS, including the purpose and need, 
alternatives to be considered, impacts to be evaluated, and 
methodologies to be used in the evaluation.

DATES: Written comments on the scope of the Service Level EIS for the 
Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study should be provided to TxDOT by 
April 26, 2013. Comments will also be accepted at public scoping 
meetings to be held from March 25, 2013, through April 4, 2013, at the 
times and locations identified below:
     Oklahoma City: Metro Tech Center, 1900 Springlake Drive, 
Oklahoma City, OK on March 25, 2013 from 2 p.m. through 4 p.m. and from 
6 p.m. through 8 p.m.
     Ardmore: Ardmore Train Station, 251 E. Main Street, 
Ardmore, OK on March 26, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m.
     Sherman: Sherman Senior Center, 1500 N. Broughton Street, 
Sherman, TX on April 2, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m.
     Fort Worth: TxDOT Training Offices, 2501 SW Loop 820, Fort 
Worth, TX on March 28, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m.
     Dallas: MSDC Offices, 8828 N. Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, TX 
on April 3, 2013 from 2 p.m. through 4 p.m. and from 6 p.m. through 8 
p.m.
     Belton: Central Texas Council of Governments, 2180 N, Main 
Street, Belton, TX on April 1, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m.
     Waco: Heart of Texas Council of Governments, 1514 S. New 
Road, Waco, TX on March 25, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m.
     Austin: TxDOT Austin Office, Building 7, 7901 N. IH 35, 
Austin, TX on March 27, 2013 from 2 p.m. through 4 p.m. and from 6 p.m. 
through 8 p.m.
     Windcrest: Windcrest Civic Center, 9310 Jim Seal Drive, 
Windcrest, TX on April 1, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m.
     Harlingen: Harlingen City Hall, 502 E. Tyler Avenue, 
Harlingen, TX on April 4, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m.
     Corpus Christi: TxDOT Offices, 1701 S. Padre Island Drive, 
Corpus Christi, TX on April 2, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m.
     Laredo: TxDOT Offices, 1817 Bob Bullock Avenue, Laredo, TX 
on April 3, 2013 from 6 p.m. through 8 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of this study should be mailed 
or emailed to Mr. Mark Werner, Rail Division, Texas Department of 
Transportation, 125 E. 11th Street, Austin, TX 78701-2483. The email 
address is provided on the project Web site: www.txokrail.org.
    The buildings used for the scoping meetings are accessible to 
persons with disabilities. Any individual who requires special 
assistance, such as a sign language interpreter, to participate in the 
meetings should contact Mr. Mark Werner, Project Manager, Texas 
Department of Transportation, (512) 486-5137, seven calendar days prior 
to the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Werner, Project Manager, 
TxDOT, 125 E. 11th Street, Austin, TX 78701-2483, (512) 486-5137; or 
Ms. Catherine Dobbs, Office of Railroad Policy and Development, Federal 
Railroad Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 493-6347 . Information 
and documents regarding the Service Level EIS and environmental process 
will be made available for the duration of the environmental process 
at: www.txokrail.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Environmental Review Process

    The Service Level (Tier 1) EIS will be prepared in accordance with 
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on 
Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA and the FRA's 
Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts as set forth in 64 FR 
28545 dated May 26, 1999 (Environmental Procedures). The Service Level 
EIS will also address Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation 
Act, Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 
(49 U.S.C. 303) and other applicable Federal and state laws and 
regulations. The Service Level EIS and any subsequent project (Tier 2) 
environmental documents will be developed in accordance with CEQ 
regulations, FRA's Environmental Procedures, and FRA's Update to NEPA 
Implementing Procedures (78 FR 2713; January 14, 2013).
    FRA and TxDOT will use a tiered process, as provided for in 40 CFR 
1508.28, in the completion of the environmental review of the Study. 
``Tiering'' is a staged environmental review process applied to 
environmental reviews for complex projects. The Service Level EIS will 
address first tier of broad corridor issues and alternatives. 
Subsequent project-level second tier NEPA evaluations will analyze 
site-specific projects based on the decisions made at the Service 
Level. The Service Level NEPA assessment will result in an EIS with the 
appropriate level of detail for corridor decisions and will address 
broad overall issues of concern, including but not limited to:
     Confirm the purpose and need for the proposed action.
     Confirm the study area appropriate to assess reasonable 
alternatives.
     Identify a comprehensive set of goals and objectives for 
the corridor in conjunction with stakeholders. These goals and 
objectives will be crafted to allow comprehensive evaluation of all 
aspects of study alternatives necessary to achieve the goals, including 
train operations, vehicles, and infrastructure.
     Develop alternative evaluation criteria based on purpose 
and need, goals and objectives.
     Identify the range of reasonable alternatives to be 
considered, consistent with the current and planned use of the corridor 
and the existing services within and adjacent to the study area, as 
well as considering a no action/no build alternative.
     Identify the general corridor alignment(s) and right-of-
way requirements of the reasonable build alternatives.

[[Page 16038]]

     Identify, at a corridor planning level, the infrastructure 
and equipment investment requirements for the reasonable build 
alternatives.
     Include the consideration of the No- Build Alternative 
which will be studied as the baseline for comparison with the build 
alternatives. The No-Build Alternative represents other transportation 
modes such as auto, air travel, intercity bus, and existing rail and 
the physical characteristics and capacities as they exist at the time 
of the Service Level EIS, with planned and funded improvements that 
will be in place at the time rail improvements would become 
operational.
     Evaluate and describe, at a corridor planning level, the 
potential environmental consequences (benefits and adverse effects to 
the human and natural environment) associated with the reasonable 
alternatives.
     Establish the timing and sequencing and future NEPA 
processes for component actions to implement the proposed action.
     Identify preferred alternatives for corridor route 
alignment within each of the three corridor sections.
    Subsequent to this Service Level EIS, project level assessment(s) 
will address component projects to be implemented within the selected 
general corridor and where appropriate will incorporate by reference 
the data and evaluations included in the Service Level EIS. Subsequent 
evaluations will concentrate on the issues specific to the component of 
the alternative selected with the Service Level EIS, identify the 
Project alternatives that meet the purpose and need for each component 
project, and analyze the specific environmental consequences and 
measures necessary to mitigate environmental impacts at a site-specific 
level of detail. This Service Level EIS process will be coordinated 
with the ongoing preliminary engineering and environmental planning 
efforts for the Dallas/Fort Worth--Houston passenger rail corridor.

II. Project Background

    The 850-mile Texas Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Corridor extends 
from Oklahoma City in the north through Dallas, Fort Worth, Austin, and 
San Antonio to destinations in south Texas including Laredo, Corpus 
Christi, and Brownsville. Existing passenger rail service includes 
intercity service on the Heartland Flyer (Oklahoma City to Fort Worth), 
Texas Eagle (Fort Worth to San Antonio), and Sunset Limited (Los 
Angeles to New Orleans via San Antonio) operated by Amtrak, and 
regional/commuter rail service on the Trinity Railway Express (Dallas 
to Fort Worth) and Capital MetroRail (Austin) operated by Texas 
operators. Intercity passenger rail between Oklahoma City and San 
Antonio provides service to cities and communities generally along the 
Interstate 35 (I-35) corridor. The purpose of Study is to evaluate 
alternatives to provide higher speed passenger rail service to meet 
future intercity travel demand and to improve rail facilities, reduce 
journey times, and improve connections with regional public transit 
services. These improvements are needed because of the current and 
forecast population and business growth within the study area that has 
resulted in growing congestion on highways and rail services along the 
Interstate 35 (I-35) corridor.
    The I-35 corridor, running from Duluth, Minnesota, to Laredo, 
Texas, is a congressionally identified corridor of national 
significance and is one of the fastest growing regions in the U.S., 
running through six of the largest urban areas and nine of the 50 
largest cities in the U.S. International truck traffic demand, 
intercity truck traffic demand, and passenger travel demand compete for 
highway capacity, creating substantial congestion inside the urban 
areas through which the highway runs. Projections for the Dallas/Fort 
Worth to San Antonio portion of the corridor show average speeds along 
I-35 would drop from 55 to 15 miles per hour by 2035.
    Transportation plans for Texas and Oklahoma have identified 
substantial population growth and population aging within the Study 
corridor. Texas population is expected to grow by 39% from 2010 to 
2035. The population of the Texas Triangle (a region of Texas bounded 
by Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio) has been growing rapidly over the 
last several decades, with growth rates in some areas as high as 27%. 
Texas' population has grown making it the second most populous state in 
the U.S. with most of the state's population centered in the eastern 
half of the state, along and east of the I-35 corridor. Oklahoma City 
is expected to see a population increase of 25% from 2000 to 2035, with 
intensified population densities in the metropolitan area. Populations 
within the Study area are also aging, with the percentage of people who 
are 65 years old or older expected to grow from about 13% to nearly 20% 
by 2030 in Oklahoma and from 10% to over 17% in Texas, with the aging 
population expected to rely more heavily on public transportation such 
as intercity rail. Long range transportation plans in Texas and 
Oklahoma have identified the need to improve passenger rail services to 
meet the future demand brought on by these changes in population.
    While a common need exists for increased passenger rail service 
across the 850-mile Study corridor, the corridor has been divided into 
three sections where the passenger rail needs and opportunities within 
each section, while interdependent, are distinct. Each section will 
both be evaluated separately by section and as parts of the overall 
rail corridor in the Service Level EIS.
    The north section between Oklahoma City and Dallas/Fort Worth has 
existing intercity passenger rail service (Heartland Flyer) with one 
train in each direction per day, where annual ridership has increased 
by as much as 10% within the last three years. In this section, over 
60% of train passengers would otherwise have taken private vehicles and 
up to 29% of passengers would otherwise have not made the journey. This 
passenger rail service is constrained by operation on a busy freight 
railroad line resulting in delays and schedules with inconvenient 
layovers for connecting with other rail or transit services in Fort 
Worth. Rail improvement planning in this section has identified the 
need for enhanced railroad facilities and better coordination with 
other connecting passenger rail services to increase the attractiveness 
of rail as a travel mode choice. Additional needs in this section 
include direct connection to the City of Dallas and the Dallas/Fort 
Worth airport (DFW), improved train control systems to increase train 
speed and allow safe operation of increased numbers of freight and 
passenger trains within the existing rail corridor, and additional 
roadway/railroad grade separations to enhance safety where rail and 
roadways cross.
    The central section between Dallas/Fort Worth and San Antonio via 
Austin has existing intercity passenger rail service in the form of the 
Texas Eagle, the southernmost portion of daily Amtrak service between 
Chicago and San Antonio. From Fort Worth, there are daily connections 
with the Heartland Flyer providing intercity rail service north to 
Oklahoma City. From San Antonio, there are connections with the Sunset 
Limited running three times weekly east to New Orleans and west to Los 
Angeles. Approximately 23% of Amtrak train trips ending in Texas 
originate within the state.
    The central section is characterized by the highest level of 
intercity travel demand within the state. This is, in part, a result of 
its linking three of the four largest metropolitan areas within the 
state, all of which are projected to

[[Page 16039]]

continue to grow in the future. The central section, via existing I-35, 
is characterized by substantially higher automobile and truck volumes 
than any other intercity corridor in the state. These volumes are 
projected to increase steadily through 2035, by which time traffic 
volumes are projected to result in freeway speeds as low as 15 miles 
per hour, contributing to very substantial delays. Air travel between 
the central section termini (i.e., Dallas/Fort Worth and San Antonio) 
is characterized by higher passenger volumes than any other intrastate 
connection. With the exception of the Dallas/Fort Worth-to-Houston 
connection, air travel demand between Dallas/Fort Worth and San Antonio 
is more than twice the demand of any other intrastate intercity 
connection. Enhanced passenger rail service in the central section 
would serve a clear need for additional transportation capacity and 
options. It would assist in meeting the strong demand for intercity 
travel in this highly populated corridor, thereby diverting some of the 
heavy automobile and truck volumes occurring at present and projected 
for the future.
    The southern section between San Antonio and the cities of Laredo, 
Corpus Christi, and Brownsville does not have passenger rail services. 
Instead, Amtrak provides passenger service south of San Antonio by 
motor coach. The border areas of Brownsville and Laredo have heavy 
commercial truck traffic on the highways and freight traffic along 
existing freight railroad lines. The growing congestion in the border 
cities is affecting the economic viability of the region. Other 
intercity public transportation, including transportation to other 
destinations in the U.S. and Mexico, is provided by motor coaches 
operated by an assortment of Mexican and U.S. operators. A need exists 
to provide travel mode options to address future passenger travel 
demand in this area and reduce roadway congestion resulting from the 
passenger buses combined with commercial truck traffic. Rail service in 
this section would provide an efficient, safe, equitable, and 
affordable alternative to highway, bus, or air travel. In this section, 
cross-border travel demand to Mexican destinations such as Monterrey, a 
major business hub, results in strong potential passenger rail demand.

III. Scoping and Public Involvement

    FRA encourages broad participation in the Service Level EIS process 
during scoping and subsequent review of the resulting environmental 
documents. Comments and suggestions are invited from all interested 
agencies and the public at large to ensure the full range of issues 
related to the proposed action and all reasonable alternatives are 
addressed and all significant issues are identified. In particular, FRA 
is interested in determining whether areas of environmental concern 
exist where the potential may exist for significant impacts 
identifiable at a corridor level. Appropriate Federal, State, and local 
agencies and appropriate railroads are being notified of the proposed 
Project and comments are being solicited. Public agencies with 
jurisdiction are requested to advise the FRA and TxDOT of the 
applicable permit and environmental review requirements of each agency 
and the scope and content of the environmental information that is 
germane to the agency's statutory responsibilities in connection with 
the proposed improvements.
    An iterative public involvement/information program will support 
the process. The program will involve stakeholder workshops, 
newsletters, a Web site, public open houses, small group and community 
meetings, and other methods to solicit and incorporate public input 
throughout the Service Level EIS process. To ensure that the full range 
of issues relating to the proposed action is addressed, comments and 
suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments and 
questions concerning the proposed action should be directed to TxDOT or 
to the FRA at the addresses provided above. Additional information can 
be obtained by visiting the web site at www.txokrail.org, or sending an 
email using the link on the Web site.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 7, 2013.
Corey Hill,
Director, Passenger and Freight Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013-05732 Filed 3-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


