
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67060-67069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-28250]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Parts 8 and 141

[Docket No. RM18-14-000; Order No. 852]


Elimination of Form 80 and Revision of Regulations on 
Recreational Opportunities and Development at Licensed Hydropower 
Projects

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) issues 
this Final Rule to amend its regulations to eliminate the Licensed 
Hydropower Development Recreation Report, designated as FERC Form No. 
80 (Form 80). Form 80 solicits information on the use and development 
of recreation facilities at hydropower projects licensed by the 
Commission under the Federal Power Act. In addition, the Commission is 
revising its regulations on recreational use and development at 
licensed hydropower projects in order to modernize licensee public 
notice practices, clarify recreational signage requirements, and 
provide flexibility to assist licensees' compliance with these 
requirements.

DATES: This rule is effective March 28, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jon Cofrancesco (Technical Information), Office of Energy Projects, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 888 First Street NE, Washington, 
DC 20426, (202) 502-8951, jon.cofrancesco@ferc.gov.

[[Page 67061]]

Tara DiJohn (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 
20426, (202) 502-8671, tara.dijohn@ferc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

United States of America

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Docket No. RM18-14-000
Elimination of Form 80 and Revision of Regulations on Recreational 
Opportunities and Development at Licensed Hydropower Projects
ORDER NO. 852
FINAL RULE
(Issued December 20, 2018)

Table of Contents

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Paragraph Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background........................................                  2
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking....................                  5
III. Discussion......................................                  6
    A. Removal of Sec.   8.11--Information Respecting                  6
     Use and Development of Public Recreational
     Opportunities...................................
        1. Licensees' General Recreation Obligations.                  9
        2. Recreational Use Monitoring...............                 14
        3. Mandatory Conditioning Authority..........                 22
        4. Recreation Costs, Revenues, and User Fees.                 28
        5. Commission Determination..................                 30
    B. Removal of Sec.   141.14--Form No. 80,                         31
     Licensed Hydropower Development Recreation
     Report..........................................
    C. Amendments of 18 CFR 8.1 and 8.2..............                 33
        1. Section 8.1--Publication of License                        34
         Conditions Relating to Recreation...........
        2. Section 8.2--Posting of Project Lands as                   43
         to Recreation Use and Availability of
         Information.................................
IV. Regulatory Requirements..........................                 48
    A. Information Collection Statement..............                 48
    B. Environmental Analysis........................                 63
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act....................                 64
    D. Document Availability.........................                 69
    E. Effective Date and Congressional Notification.                 72
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is 
amending its regulations to remove Sec.  8.11, thereby eliminating the 
requirement for licensees to file a Licensed Hydropower Development 
Recreation Report, designated as FERC Form No. 80 (Form 80). Form 80 
solicits information on the use and development of recreation 
facilities at hydropower projects licensed by the Commission under the 
Federal Power Act (FPA). In addition, the Final Rule revises Sec. Sec.  
8.1 and 8.2 of the Commission's regulations to modernize licensee 
public notice practices, clarify recreational signage requirements, and 
provide flexibility to assist licensees' compliance with these 
requirements.

I. Background

    2. Section 10(a)(1) of the FPA requires the Commission to ensure 
that any licensed project is best adapted to a comprehensive plan for 
improving and developing a waterway for a variety of beneficial public 
uses, including recreational use.\1\ Although section 10(a) of the 
Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920 \2\ did not refer specifically 
to recreation, in 1935 when the Federal Water Power Act was re-enacted 
as Part I of the Federal Power Act,\3\ the words `including 
recreational purposes' were added to section 10(a) to make clear that 
recreation considerations were to be included in the comprehensive 
development of the nation's water resources. Pursuant to this 
obligation, the Commission required licensees to allow public access to 
project lands and waters for recreational use and began to include 
standard conditions in licenses for the provision of recreational 
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 16 U.S.C. 803(a)(1) (2012).
    \2\ 41 Stat. 1063.
    \3\ 49 Stat. 838, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. In the 1960s, the Commission developed specific policies and 
practices to ensure that licensees provided reasonable recreational 
opportunities and notice of such opportunities to the public. In 1963, 
the Commission began requiring recreation plans for the public 
utilization of project water and land,\4\ and in 1965 amended its 
regulations by adding part 8, entitled ``Recreation Opportunities and 
Development at Licensed Projects,'' in order to require licensees to 
widely publicize to the general public recreational opportunities at 
individual projects.\5\ Order 313, issued on December 27, 1965, amended 
the Commission's general policy regulations (18 CFR part 2) by adding 
Sec.  2.7 to clarify that licensees whose projects include land and 
water resources with outdoor recreational potential have a 
responsibility to develop those resources in accordance with area 
needs, to the extent that such development is not inconsistent with the 
primary purpose of the project.\6\ In 1966, the Commission further 
amended part 8 of its regulations to require licensees to file Form 80, 
a report that provides an inventory of the use and development of 
recreational facilities at each development contained within a licensed 
project.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Exhibit R, 18 CFR 4.41 (2018), License Applications--
Revision of Regulations, Order 260-A, 29 FPC 777 (1963).
    \5\ Publicizing License Conditions Relating to Recreational 
Opportunities at Hydroelectric Projects, Order No. 299, 33 FPC 1131 
(1965) (Order 299). Section 1 of part 8 requires licensees to 
publicize license conditions related to recreation; section 2 
requires licensees to post, at points of public access, signs 
providing recreation use information and requires licensees to make 
such information available for inspection; and section 3 requires 
licensees to permit use without discrimination. 18 CFR 8.1-8.3 
(2018).
    \6\ Recreational Development at Licensed Projects, Order No. 
313, 34 FPC 1546, 1548 (1965) (Order 313).
    \7\ Inventory of Recreation Facilities at Licensed Hydroelectric 
Projects, Order No. 330, 36 FPC 1030 (1966) (Order 330). Section 
8.11 requires the filing of information on the use and development 
of public recreation opportunities. 18 CFR 8.11 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Over the years, the Commission has continued to revise its 
regulations to reflect the Commission's current public recreation 
policies and practices. And once again, the Commission has decided to 
modify certain recreation-related regulations in order to eliminate 
unnecessary reporting requirements, modernize licensee public notice 
practices, clarify recreational signage requirements, and provide 
flexibility to assist licensees' compliance with these requirements.

[[Page 67062]]

II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    5. On May 17, 2018, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking (NOPR) proposing to eliminate the Form 80, and further 
revise its regulations governing recreational use and development at 
licensed hydropower projects.\8\ In response to the NOPR, the 
Commission received 14 comments from the following entities: eight 
licensees, two federal land management agencies, two local governments, 
and two trade associations.\9\ The proposal set forth in the NOPR, the 
comments received, and the Commission's determinations are discussed 
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Elimination of Form 80 and Revision of Regulations on 
Recreational Opportunities and Development at Licensed Hydropower 
Projects, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 32,726 (2018) (NOPR).
    \9\ The eight licensees include: Duke Energy; Public Utility 
District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington; Idaho Power Company; 
Pacific Gas and Electric Company; PacifiCorp; KEI (USA) Power 
Management, Inc.; Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County, 
Washington; and Alabama Power. Comments were also filed by the 
National Park Service (Park Service); the U.S. Forest Service 
(Forest Service); Roanoke County, Virginia; the Town of Vinton, 
Virginia; Alaska Power Association; and the National Hydropower 
Association (NHA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion

A. Removal of Sec.  8.11--Information Respecting Use and Development of 
Public Recreational Opportunities

    6. Section 8.11 requires licensees to file Form 80, which is a 
report on the use and development of recreational facilities at each 
development contained within a licensed hydropower project, on April 1 
of every sixth year, documenting data compiled during the previous 
calendar year.\10\ For each project development,\11\ the Form 80 
requires licensees to report the number of visits (i.e., recreation 
days),\12\ the use capacity of each type of public recreation facility, 
and the licensee's annual costs and revenues associated with the public 
recreation facilities within the project boundary. In order to complete 
the Form 80, licensees must collect data on recreation use, facilities, 
and capacity for a 12-month period. Licensees may request an exemption 
from the Form 80 requirement if they demonstrate that a project 
development has little or no existing use or recreation potential 
(i.e., less than 100 recreation days per year).\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Modification of Hydropower Procedural Regulations, 
Including the Deletion of Certain Outdated or Non-Essential 
Regulations, Order No. 540, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 30,944 (1992) 
(cross-referenced at 59 FERC ] 61,124). Order 330 originally 
required licensees to file a Form 80 every two years. Order 330, 36 
FPC 1030, 1031. The Commission subsequently amended Sec.  8.11 to 
revise the form and reduce the filing frequency. See Revision of 
Licensed Hydropower Development Recreation Report: FERC Form No. 80, 
Order No. 179, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 30,295 (1981) (cross-referenced 
at 16 FERC ] 61,248 (consolidating, simplifying, and reducing the 
size of the Form 80 by approximately 60 percent); Deletion of a 1987 
Filing Requirement for FERC Form No. 80, Order No. 419, FERC Stats. 
& Regs. ] 30,640 (1985) (cross-referenced at 31 FERC ] 61,154) 
(committing to re-evaluate the need for Form 80, and take further 
action if Form 80 is found unnecessary or in need of modification).
    \11\ Most licensed projects have only one project development. 
However, licensees of projects with more than one development must 
file a separate Form 80 report for each development.
    \12\ The Form 80 defines a recreation day as each visit by a 
person to a development for recreational purposes during any portion 
of a 24-hour period.
    \13\ 18 CFR 8.11(c) (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    7. In the NOPR, the Commission proposed to remove Sec.  8.11 from 
its regulations, thereby eliminating the requirement for licensees to 
file the Form 80. The Commission advanced several reasons for 
eliminating Form 80.\14\ First, unlike in 1965 when Form 80 was 
adopted, licensed projects with significant recreation opportunities 
are often now required to comply with project-specific license 
conditions that direct licensees to prepare and implement a recreation 
plan, conduct recreation monitoring, and file periodic updates to an 
approved recreation plan.\15\ Second, for licensed projects with 
limited recreation opportunities--many of which are exempt from filing 
Form 80--Commission staff relies on a variety of tools other than the 
Form 80 to determine whether the projects are meeting public recreation 
needs, including periodic inspections and investigation of non-
compliance allegations (e.g., any recreation-related inquiries or 
complaints submitted by resource agencies, recreation users, or local 
residents). Third, Commission staff reports limited use of Form 80 data 
and cites concerns about the data's validity and lack of specificity. 
Finally, advances in technology since the advent of the Form 80 (e.g., 
websites, publicly-available aerial photography, and the Commission's 
eLibrary system) allow interested parties and the general public to 
easily access information about a project's recreational opportunities 
and any recreation-related license requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ NOPR, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 32,726 at PP 5-8.
    \15\ In addition, between fiscal years 2016 and 2030, over 500 
projects will begin the relicensing process. During relicensing, the 
Commission's Division of Hydropower Licensing will evaluate the need 
for, and may require, project-specific recreation monitoring in new 
licenses on a case-by-case basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    8. All eight licensees that commented on the NOPR support the 
Commission's proposal to eliminate the Form 80 reporting requirement. 
Alaska Power Association and NHA also filed comments in support of the 
NOPR's proposal to eliminate the Form 80. The Park Service 
conditionally supports the Commission's proposal, provided that the 
Commission strengthens its oversight of licensees' recreation-related 
planning, monitoring, and information dissemination.
1. Licensees' General Recreation Obligations
NOPR Comments
    9. In response to the NOPR's proposal to eliminate Form 80, the 
Park Service commented that additional guidance, training, and 
technical assistance is needed to ensure new and existing recreation 
management plans satisfy the general obligations set forth in Sec.  2.7 
of the Commission's regulations. The Park Service recommends that the 
Commission: (i) Conduct a comprehensive evaluation of its recreation 
planning and monitoring programs for licensing and post-licensing 
compliance; (ii) develop guidance and offer training and technical 
assistance for recreation management planning and monitori \16\ and 
(iii) establish a public process for periodic review of recreation 
facilities, conditions, needs, and recreation flows.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ The Park Service recommends that the Commission consider 
incorporating the basic planning and monitoring framework developed 
by the Interagency Visitor Use Management Council--a collaboration 
between six federal agencies (the Bureau of Land Management, Forest 
Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Park 
Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service). The Interagency Council's Visitor Use Management Framework 
describes a process for managing visitor use on federally-managed 
lands and waters, and can be accessed at https://visitorusemanagement.nps.gov/VUM/Framework. The Commission is not a 
federal land management agency. Staff evaluates and develops 
recreation planning and monitoring requirements that respond to the 
unique resource issues and site conditions at individual projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commission Response
    10. Pursuant to its obligations under the FPA and the Commission's 
regulations, Commission staff evaluates the existing recreation 
resources, facilities, and needs at each existing or proposed 
hydropower project on a case-by-case basis during the licensing process 
and, as appropriate, also during the amendment process. Similarly, as 
appropriate, Commission staff continues to evaluate a project's 
recreational resources, facilities, and needs over the term of a 
license by considering license-required recreation plan updates and 
monitoring reports, conducting periodic project inspections, and 
addressing allegations of non-compliance.
    11. Commission staff frequently provides guidance to licensees on a

[[Page 67063]]

range of recreation management planning and monitoring matters. Staff 
regularly participates in recreation and land use management trainings, 
workshops, and conferences. Staff also strives to provide timely and 
constructive advice to licensees in response to project-specific 
recreation inquiries. In addition, Commission staff is currently 
developing a guidance document for licensees, which will provide 
general guidance on how to prepare a recreation management plan in 
consultation with stakeholders. This guidance document will describe 
the components of an effective recreation management plan, such as 
recreation use monitoring, periodic plan review and updates, and 
circumstances warranting a plan amendment.
    12. The Commission's hydropower licensing and compliance programs 
already incorporate a robust public process that allows for periodic 
review of recreation facilities, conditions, needs, and, where 
appropriate, recreation flows. Most often, public engagement 
opportunities arise during the pre-filing consultation process and the 
Commission's public notice process for license applications and 
recreation-related compliance proceedings (e.g., consideration of a 
recreation management plan or amendment application). During the term 
of a license, agencies, members of the public, and other stakeholders 
have additional opportunities to review and provide input on any 
license-required recreation plan updates, periodic recreation plan 
assessments, or recreation-related monitoring results. Finally, members 
of the public may, at any time during the license term, access and 
review recreation-related documents on the Commission's website, seek 
available project-specific recreation plans or other information from 
individual licensees, or contact Commission staff regarding recreation 
inquiries or complaints.
    13. The foregoing demonstrates that there are sufficient safeguards 
to ensure that our recreation requirements are understood and 
implemented.
2. Recreational Use Monitoring
NOPR Comments
    14. The Park Service expresses concern that the Commission would 
not require projects with limited recreation opportunities to implement 
any new or additional recreation monitoring efforts if it eliminates 
the Form 80 reporting requirement. Rather, for all projects including 
those with little or no recreation opportunities, the Park Service 
recommends that the Commission: (i) Notice project inspections and 
invite stakeholders and the public to participate; (ii) inspect 
projects on a regular basis using staff with recreation expertise; and 
(iii) improve or clarify the process for submitting recreation-related 
complaints to the Commission.
    15. If Form 80 is eliminated, Roanoke County and the Town of Vinton 
urge the Commission to include language in every project license 
requiring licensees to develop a recreation monitoring plan in 
consultation with the appropriate federal agencies, state agencies, 
local governments, and other stakeholders.\17\ Roanoke County and the 
Town of Vinton also ask the Commission to reconsider the NOPR's 
statement that licensed projects with little to no recreation, 
including projects previously exempted from the Form 80 reporting 
requirement pursuant to Sec.  8.11(c), would not be expected to 
implement any new or additional recreation monitoring efforts, but 
should continue to comply with any project-specific license conditions 
related to public recreation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Roanoke County and the Town of Vinton acknowledge that 
their comments on the NOPR are informed by their experience 
consulting as stakeholders on two licensed projects--Smith Mountain 
Project No. 2210 and Niagara Project No. 2466.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    16. PacifiCorp asks the Commission to clarify that projects that do 
not have any license-required recreation use reporting other than Form 
80 submittals will no longer have any routine recreation use reporting 
obligations if the Form 80 is eliminated.
Commission Response
    17. The Commission considers the need for recreation monitoring on 
a project-specific basis, based on the conditions at that project at 
the time of licensing and during post-licensing review, as appropriate. 
Roughly half of all licensed projects will begin the relicensing 
process within the next 12 years and during the relicensing proceeding 
the Commission will conduct a comprehensive review of each project's 
recreational resources and determine the appropriate level of 
recreational use monitoring, if any, needed for each project.
    18. In addition, Commission staff periodically conducts project 
inspections that focus on an individual license's environmental and 
recreation-related requirements. Generally, Commission staff also will 
conduct an environmental inspection for projects with significant 
environmental or public use license requirements--e.g., projects with 
high recreational use, fish passage facilities, or wildlife mitigation 
areas. These inspections allow Commission staff to inspect project 
features, facilities, and areas to ensure that licensees are complying 
with the requirements of their respective project licenses. Commission 
staff also regularly conducts environmental inspections at projects 
with on-going non-compliance or identified resource issues.
    19. Finally, the most efficient way to bring a recreation-related 
complaint or non-compliance allegation to the Commission's attention is 
by directly contacting the Commission's Office of Energy Projects 
through its enforcement hotline telephone number.\18\ Once a 
recreation-related allegation of non-compliance is received by the 
Commission, it is forwarded to staff within the Commission's Office of 
Energy Projects' Division of Hydropower Administration and Compliance 
for investigation and any necessary follow-up action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ For potential violations and wrongdoing involving 
Commission hydropower projects, individuals or stakeholders are 
encouraged to contact the Commission's Office of Energy Projects 
directly at 844-434-0053.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    20. In response to PacifiCorp's clarification request, unless 
recreation use reporting is required by a license condition--including 
any approved recreation plan or report or mandatory agency condition--
licensees will no longer have any specific recreation use reporting 
obligation once the Form 80 is eliminated.
    21. For the reasons discussed above, we will not establish a 
standard requirement for recreational use monitoring at every licensed 
project.\19\ Considering recreation planning and monitoring needs on a 
project-by-project basis is the most appropriate method for Commission 
staff to ensure that each licensed project protects its recreational 
opportunities and is best adapted to the comprehensive development of 
the waterway.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Doing otherwise would merely be retaining the Form 80's 
standardized monitoring approach under the guise of a different name 
(i.e., a standard license condition), defeating the purpose of this 
Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Mandatory Conditioning Authority
NOPR Comments
    22. The Forest Service comments that it values the type of 
information reported by licensees in Form 80 submittals.
    23. The Forest Service expresses concern that if the Form 80 
reporting requirement is eliminated, there will be no long-term 
baseline information on recreational usage to inform the development of 
operational plans or license conditions, and suggests that in

[[Page 67064]]

future relicensing proceedings it will rely increasingly on its 
mandatory conditioning authority under section 4(e) of the FPA to 
ensure that licensees monitor recreation usage, and facility features 
and operations meet public recreational needs on Forest Service lands.
    24. The Forest Service also asks the Commission to clarify how 
eliminating Form 80 will affect projects that are currently awaiting 
final license orders, including projects with 4(e) license conditions 
that may rely on Form 80 information. Under such circumstances, the 
Forest Service cautions that it may need to revise previously-submitted 
4(e) license conditions.
Commission Response
    25. As previously explained in the NOPR, most projects with 
significant recreation resources have a recreation management plan or 
recreation monitoring report requirements and thus are already 
responsible for recreational monitoring or oversight above and beyond 
that required by the Form 80 filing requirement.\20\ In the absence of 
the Form 80 reporting requirement, licensees will remain subject to any 
other recreation monitoring requirements contained within a license 
condition or approved recreation plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Commission staff estimates that between January 2015 and 
the end of September 2018, the Commission issued a total of 73 
licenses for original or relicensed hydropower projects. Of these 
licenses, the Commission specifically included conditions requiring 
the development and implementation of recreation management plans 
for 54 of these projects and also specifically exempted another nine 
of these projects from the current Form 80 filing requirement, due 
to little or no project-specific recreation resources or 
opportunities. In other words, of the licenses issued between 
January 2015 and the end of September 2018, licensees for 63 
licenses (i.e., 86 percent) were required to develop a project-
specific recreation management plan or were exempt from the Form 80 
filing requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    26. Going forward, Commission staff evaluating future license and 
amendment applications will continue to make case-by-case 
determinations on whether recreation monitoring is warranted for a 
particular project and, if so, the type and degree of monitoring 
needed. We anticipate that Federal land management agencies will 
likewise continue to provide input on the appropriateness of recreation 
monitoring during individual licensing proceedings. In any event, 
Federal land management agencies, such as Forest Service, are not 
precluded by this Final Rule from continuing to use their mandatory 
4(e) conditioning authority to require recreational monitoring for 
individual projects during licensing proceedings, as they deem 
appropriate.
    27. As to Forest Service's concern regarding current pending 
license applications, while we have explained that we believe 
sufficient information regarding recreation usage and needs will 
continue to be available after Form 80 is eliminated, the Forest 
Service may, if it deems it necessary, timely amend its 4(e) license 
conditions.
4. Recreation Costs, Revenues, and User Fees
    28. The Park Service states that, following the elimination of Form 
80, the Commission should require all licensees to report annual 
recreation costs and revenues, as well as user fees for specific 
facilities, on a regular basis.
    29. The Commission's regulations allow a licensee to charge 
reasonable fees to help defray the cost of constructing, operating, and 
maintaining recreation facilities.\21\ Form 80 required licensees to 
include data on its annual recreation costs and revenues, but it did 
not require licensees to identify specific user fees for individual 
facilities. Typically, the Commission does not review or approve the 
reasonableness of such fees.\22\ However, if the Commission receives an 
inquiry or complaint regarding recreation costs, revenues, or user fees 
at a particular project, staff may request that the licensee provide 
such information to assist in its investigation of a non-compliance 
allegation. Therefore, the Commission does not believe that 
establishing a standard requirement for every licensee to report to the 
Commission recreation costs, revenues, and user fees on an annual basis 
is necessary, nor does the Park Service elaborate on the utility of 
such a standard reporting requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 18 CFR 2.7 (2018).
    \22\ See, e.g., Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, 
Washington, 160 FERC ] 61,099, at P 23 (2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Commission Determination
    30. For the reasons discussed above, the Commission concludes that 
the benefits and the reduced burden for licensees and staff that result 
from eliminating the Form 80 outweigh the potential minor obstacles 
that may arise during the transition from the Form 80 data to specific 
recreation data gained through licensee compliance with project-
specific license conditions. By this Final Rule, we adopt the NOPR's 
proposal to delete Sec.  8.11 of our regulations, thereby eliminating 
the Form 80 filing requirement.

B. Removal of Sec.  141.14--Form No. 80, Licensed Hydropower 
Development Recreation Report

    31. Added to the Commission's regulations alongside the Form 80 
requirement in 1966,\23\ Sec.  141.14 approved licensee use of Form 80 
in the manner prescribed in Sec.  8.11 of our regulations.\24\ To 
parallel the proposed removal of Sec.  8.11, the NOPR also proposed to 
remove Sec.  141.14 of its regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Order 330, 36 FPC 1030.
    \24\ 18 CFR 141.14 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    32. The Commission did not receive any comments addressing the 
NOPR's proposed removal of Sec.  141.14 of the Commission's 
regulations. Therefore, we retain the NOPR's proposal to delete Sec.  
141.14.

C. Amendments of 18 CFR 8.1 and 8.2

    33. The Commission amends Sec. Sec.  8.1 and 8.2 of its regulations 
to modernize licensee public notice practices, clarify recreational 
signage requirements, and provide flexibility to assist licensees' 
compliance with these requirements. All licensees that filed comments 
in response to the NOPR generally support the Commission's proposal to 
revise Sec. Sec.  8.1 and 8.2 of the Commission's regulations to update 
licensee public notice practices. Forest Service also expressed support 
for the Commission's efforts to modernize and diversify licensee 
options for keeping the public informed of recreation opportunities at 
licensed projects.
1. Section 8.1--Publication of License Conditions Relating to 
Recreation
    34. Section 8.1 directs licensees to publicize information about 
the availability of projects lands and waters for recreational 
purposes, and any recreation-related license conditions.\25\ Section 
8.1 requires licensees, at a minimum, to publish notice in a local 
newspaper once each week for four weeks of any recreation-related 
license conditions that the Commission may designate in an order 
issuing or amending a license.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 18 CFR 8.1 (2018).
    \26\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    35. In addition to publishing notice in the local newspaper, the 
NOPR proposed to require licensees with project websites to also post 
notice of recreation-related license conditions on its website. This 
requirement would only apply to a licensee that already has an existing 
project website, or decides to develop a project website in the future. 
As explained in the NOPR, this additional publication method will 
ensure that the public is informed of

[[Page 67065]]

recreational opportunities and recreation-related license conditions 
regardless of whether members of the public rely on a newspaper or the 
internet as their main information source.
a. Availability of Information
    36. The Park Service recommends that the Commission ensure that the 
information it receives from licensees is available to the public, and 
develop standardized information about recreation facilities and flows 
at licensed projects.\27\ In addition, the Park Service recommends that 
the Commission require every licensee to create and maintain a project 
website that publicizes information about available public recreation 
opportunities. To this end, the Park Service recommends that all 
licensees be required to maintain a project website that, at minimum, 
provides: (i) Operating status of recreation facilities; (ii) notice of 
future recreation reviews and inspections, and the outcome of any such 
evaluations; (iii) recreation management plans, recreation-related 
reports, and the entire license instrument; and (iv) a map that 
provides standard Geographic Information System (GIS) layers 
identifying recreation facilities, public access, and the project 
boundary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ Specifically, the Park Service suggests that the Commission 
consider partnering with the Department of Energy's National 
Laboratories to develop standardized reporting of flow data, 
including scheduled recreational flow releases. The Park Service 
also encourages the Commission to consider a partnership with the 
Park Service to publicize information about public recreation 
opportunities at licensed hydropower projects on the National Rivers 
Project website. As discussed further below, we are satisfied that 
our existing publication requirements keep the public informed of 
recreation opportunities at licensed projects. Commission staff will 
continue to evaluate and include, where appropriate, license 
conditions that require licensees to notify the public of scheduled 
recreation flows on a case-by-case basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    37. As revised by this Final Rule, Sec. Sec.  8.1 and 8.2 of the 
Commission's regulations require licensees to publicize specific 
recreation use and availability information to the public for its 
licensed project through newspaper notices, project signage, its local 
office, and any existing licensee website. We are satisfied that the 
existing publication requirements provide a variety of ways to 
sufficiently inform the public of recreation and public access 
information. Therefore, we decline to adopt the Park Service's 
recommendation that all licensees be required to create and maintain a 
project website.
    38. On occasion, the Commission has required a licensee to provide 
recreation information to the public on a recurring basis through 
telephone recordings or website updates (e.g., periodic notifications 
communicating recreational streamflow data, whitewater boating 
opportunities, or recreation site accessibility). However, we do not 
believe that a blanket requirement directing licensees to regularly 
notify the public of recreation flows or recreation site accessibility 
is appropriate for all licensed projects. In addition, members of the 
public may obtain information about a project's recreational 
opportunities--including detailed information about recreation facility 
availability and use, project boundary maps, and inspection reports--by 
searching the project docket on the Commission's eLibrary website, 
registering for the Commission's e-Subscription service, and 
participating in publicly-noticed licensing and post-licensing 
proceedings, such as the consideration of a recreation plan or 
significant recreation-related license amendment.
b. Newspaper Publication
    39. NHA supports the proposed changes to Sec.  8.1, but asks the 
Commission to eliminate the newspaper publication requirement for 
licensees that publicly notice recreation-related license conditions by 
publication on a project website. In addition, where a licensee does 
not maintain a project website and there is no local newspaper, NHA 
posits that licensees should be allowed to post notice on municipal or 
county websites.
    40. We decline to eliminate the requirement that licensees publish 
notice of recreation-related license conditions in a local newspaper. 
As we noted in the NOPR, requiring licensees to publish notice in a 
local newspaper and, if applicable, on a project website ensures that 
the public is on notice of recreational opportunities and recreation-
related license conditions or amendments regardless of whether a 
particular member of the public relies on a newspaper or the internet 
as their primary news source. Further, the possibility that newspaper 
publication will reach local community members that may not have 
reliable internet access outweighs the negligible time and expense 
necessary to publish a notice in a local newspaper. Licensees are not 
precluded from supplementing the required methods of public notice by 
also posting notice on municipal or country websites or at local 
government offices.
c. Project Website Definition
    41. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) asks the Commission to 
clarify which types of websites will be considered ``project 
websites.'' PG&E recommends that the Commission exclude from its 
definition ``relicensing websites,'' which it describes as websites 
maintained during the relicensing process for stakeholders to access 
documents associated with the pre-filing process and the relicensing 
application process. PG&E further explains that relicensing websites 
are generally targeted to the stakeholders participating in the 
relicensing process, and do not provide specific information about the 
recreation opportunities provided near or on project reservoirs.
    42. We agree that temporary websites developed specifically for a 
relicensing proceeding do not constitute the type of project website 
the Commission expects to be used for the purposes of Sec.  8.1 
publication. To clarify, by using the term ``project website,'' the 
Commission intended to capture any existing website, or webpage, used 
by a licensee to communicate information to the public about recreation 
opportunities provided by a particular project over the duration of the 
project's license. We anticipate that the information required by Sec.  
8.1 is the type of information that is already offered by many website-
ready licensees in an electronic format or can be easily uploaded to an 
existing project webpage.
2. Section 8.2--Posting of Project Lands as to Recreation Use and 
Availability of Information
    43. Section 8.2(a) requires the licensee to post at each public 
access point a visible sign that identifies: The project name, project 
owner, project number, directions to project areas available for public 
recreation, permissible times and activities, and other regulations 
regarding recreation use. Section 8.2(a) also requires licensees to 
post visible notice that project recreation facilities are open to all 
members of the public without discrimination. Section 8.2(b) directs 
the licensee to make available for inspection at its local offices the 
Commission-approved recreation plan and the entire license order 
indexed for easy reference to the recreation-related license conditions 
designated for publication in accordance with Sec.  8.1 of the 
Commission's regulations. As the Commission explained in Order 299, the 
rationale behind the types of public notice required by Sec. Sec.  8.1 
and 8.2 is two-fold: (i) It puts prospective purchasers of land in the 
project vicinity on notice of the project's public access and

[[Page 67066]]

recreation purposes; and (ii) it informs the general public of the 
location and terms of use of the project's recreation facilities.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ Order 299, 33 F.P.C. 1131.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

a. Recreation Signage
    44. To streamline the amount of information that must appear on 
recreation signage, the NOPR proposed revisions to Sec.  8.2(a) that 
would require signs to, at a minimum, identify: The project name and 
number, and a statement that the project is licensed by the Commission; 
the licensee name and contact information for obtaining additional 
project recreation information; and permissible times and activities. 
As explained in the NOPR, the revisions reduce the information 
licensees must include on recreation signage at each public access 
point and afford licensees greater flexibility to design signs that 
effectively communicate recreation information to the public.
    45. A number of commenters filed comments in support of this aspect 
of the Commission's proposal.\29\ No negative comments were filed. The 
Final Rule retains the NOPR's revisions to Sec.  8.2(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ The Park Service asks the Commission to supplement 
recreation signage by encouraging licensees to provide on-site 
interpretive kiosks that explain the history of the project. As a 
general matter, we agree with the Park Service and encourage the use 
of interpretive kiosks or signage to educate visitors about a unique 
or important aspect of the project area (e.g., cultural resources, 
special-status species, etc.). However, installation of interpretive 
kiosks in addition to recreation-related signage is not appropriate 
or necessary for every licensed project. Commission staff will 
continue to consider the appropriateness of on-site interpretive 
kiosks on a project-by-project basis as part of any relevant 
licensing or amendment proceeding before the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Recreation Document Availability
    46. The NOPR also proposed to revise Sec.  8.2(b) to require 
licensees with project websites to include on their websites copies of 
any approved recreation plan, recreation-related reports approved by 
the Commission, and the entire license instrument. This requirement 
would only apply to a licensee that already has an existing project 
website, or establishes a project website in the future.
    47. No negative comments were filed on this aspect of the 
Commission's proposal. The Final Rule retains the NOPR's revisions to 
Sec.  8.2(b).

IV. Regulatory Requirements

A. Information Collection Statement

    48. The Paperwork Reduction Act \30\ requires each federal agency 
to seek and obtain the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval 
before undertaking a collection of information (including reporting, 
record keeping, and public disclosure requirements) directed to ten or 
more persons or contained in a rule of general applicability. OMB 
regulations require approval of certain information collection 
requirements contained in final rules published in the Federal 
Register.\31\ Upon approval of a collection of information, OMB will 
assign an OMB control number and an expiration date. Respondents 
subject to the filing requirements of a rule will not be penalized for 
failing to respond to the collection of information unless the 
collection of information displays a valid OMB control number.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521 (2012).
    \31\ See 5 CFR 1320.12 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    49. Public Reporting Burden: By eliminating the Form 80 filing 
requirement, this Final Rule eliminates an existing data collection, 
FERC-80 (OMB Control No. 1902-0106). In addition, the Final Rule 
modifies certain reporting and recordkeeping requirements included in 
FERC-500 (OMB Control No. 1902-0058) \32\ and FERC-505 (OMB Control No. 
1902-0115).\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ FERC-500 includes the reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements for ``Application for License/Relicense for Projects 
with Capacity Greater Than 5MW.''
    \33\ FERC-505 includes the reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements for ``Small Hydropower Projects and Conduit Facilities 
including License/Relicense, Exemption, and Qualifying Conduit 
Facility Determination.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    50. Under the most recent Form 80 reporting cycle,\34\ 346 
licensees prepared and filed 843 Form 80 reports.\35\ Every three 
years, the Commission is required to request from OMB an extension of 
any currently approved information collection. Since the Form 80 is 
only filed every six years, the most recent annual burden and cost 
figures provided to OMB were based on an estimate of 400 respondents. 
To determine the total number of responses per year for OMB submittal 
purposes, we multiplied the number of respondents (400) by the annual 
number of responses per respondent (0.167) to arrive at 67 responses 
per year. The Commission estimated the current public reporting burden 
to be an average of three hours per form, with an associated cost of 
approximately $224 per form. Because the Form 80 is filed every six 
years, the estimated annualized cost to complete each form is $37.44, 
with a total annual cost for all licenses of approximately 
$14,974.50.\36\ This estimate includes the time required to review 
instructions, research existing data sources, and complete and review 
the collection of information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ Licensees were required to file Form 80 reports by April 1, 
2015, containing recreational use and development data compiled 
during the 2014 calendar year.
    \35\ For projects with more than one development, the licensee 
is required to submit a Form 80 report for each development.
    \36\ These estimates, from the current OMB-approved inventory 
figures for Form 80, used $74.50 per hour for wages and benefits. 
The most recent OMB approval of the Form 80 was issued December 8, 
2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    51. This Final Rule eliminates certain information collection and 
recordkeeping requirements. The removal of the Form 80 report 
eliminates the estimated annual information collection burden (201 
hours) and cost ($14,974.50) associated with FERC-80 (OMB Control No. 
1902-0106).\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ These figures are annual averages (for Paperwork Reduction 
Act purposes) of the burden and cost for the six-year cycle for the 
Form 80. The most recent OMB approval of the Form 80 was issued 
December 8, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    52. In addition, the revisions to Sec. Sec.  8.1 and 8.2, 
associated with the FERC-500 and FERC-505 information collections,\38\ 
are intended to modernize licensee public notice practices, clarify 
recreational signage requirements, and provide flexibility to assist 
licensees' compliance with these requirements. With regard to 
modernized public notice practices, the revisions require licensees 
that have a project website to (1) publish notice on its website of 
license conditions related to recreation; and (2) maintain on its 
website copies of any approved recreation plan, recreation-related 
reports, and the license instrument. If a licensee does not have a 
project website, the website publication requirements would not apply. 
Accordingly, there is a slight increase in the reporting requirements 
and burden for FERC-500 and FERC-505.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ As of September 30, 2018, the Commission currently has 480 
licenses for projects with an installed capacity more than 5 MW 
(reporting requirements covered by FERC-500) and 573 licenses for 
projects 5 MW or less (reporting requirements covered by FERC-505).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    53. The estimated changes to the burden and cost of the information 
collections affected by this Final Rule follow.

[[Page 67067]]



                                            Annual Changes Implemented by the Final Rule in RM18-14-000 \39\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Number of
                                     Number of    responses      Total number  of        Average burden    Total annual burden
                                    respondents      per             responses          hours & cost per      hours  & total    Cost per  respondent ($)
                                                  respondent                               response            annual cost
                                            (1)          (2)  (1) x (2) = (3).......  (4)................  (3) x (4) = 5......  (5) / (1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-80 (reduction) \40\..........          400   \41\ 0.167  67 (rounded)..........  3 hrs.; $224         201 hrs.;            $224 (reduction).
                                                                                       (rounded);           $14,974.50
                                                                                       (reduction).         (rounded);
                                                                                                            (reduction).
FERC-500..........................     \42\ 432            1  432...................  0.5 hr.; $26.77      216 hrs.; $11,565    $26.77 (rounded).
                                                                                       (rounded).           (rounded).
FERC-505..........................     \43\ 287            1  287...................  0.5 hr.; $26.77      144 hrs.; $7,683     $26.77 (rounded).
                                                                                       (rounded).           (rounded).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    54. Titles: FERC-80 (Licensed Hydropower Development Recreation 
Report), FERC-500 (Application for License/Relicense for Water Projects 
with More than 5 Megawatt (MW) Capacity), and FERC-505 (Small 
Hydropower Projects and Conduit Facilities including License/Relicense, 
Exemption, and Qualifying Conduit Facility Determination).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ Hourly costs are based on Bureau of Labor Statistics 
figures for May 2017 wages in Sector 22--Utilities (https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm) and December 2017 benefits 
(https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ecec.pdf). For web developers 
(code 15-1134), the estimated average hourly cost (salary plus 
benefits) is $53.53.
    \40\ The figures are annualized figures contained in the current 
OMB inventory for FERC-80. While OMB requires existing information 
collections to be submitted for approval every three years, the 
Commission's hydropower licenses are only required to submit the 
Form 80 every six years. Therefore, the estimated figures for the 
entire six-year Form 80 cycle would be a total of 400 respondents, 
spending an estimated three hours per report, for a total of 1,200 
hours. Form 80 will be discontinued.
    \41\ This figure indicates that a respondent files a Form 80 
once every six years.
    \42\ We assume approximately 90 percent of the 480 licenses for 
projects with an installed capacity of more than 5 MW (i.e., an 
estimated 432 licenses) have project websites.
    \43\ We assume approximately 50 percent of the 573 licenses for 
projects 5 MW or less (i.e., an estimated 287 licenses) have project 
websites.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    55. Action: Deletion of information collection (FERC-80), and 
revisions to existing collections FERC-500 and FERC-505.
    56. OMB Control Nos.: 1902-0106 (FERC-80), 1902-0058 (FERC-500), 
and 1902-0115 (FERC-505).
    57. Respondents: Hydropower licensees, including municipalities, 
businesses, private citizens, and for-profit and not-for-profit 
institutions.
    58. Frequency of Information: Ongoing (FERC-500 and FERC-505).
    59. Necessity of Information: The revised regulations eliminate 
unnecessary reporting requirements, modernize licensee public notice 
practices, and clarify recreational signage requirements.
    60. Internal Review: The Commission has reviewed the revisions and 
has determined they are necessary. These requirements conform to the 
Commission's need for efficient information collection, communication, 
and management within the energy industry. The Commission has specific, 
objective support for the burden estimates associated with the 
information collection requirements.
    61. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting 
requirements by contacting the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: Ellen Brown, 
Office of the Executive Director], by email to DataClearance@ferc.gov, 
by phone (202) 502-8663, or by fax (202) 273-0873.
    62. Comments concerning the collections of information and the 
associated burden estimates may also be sent to: Office of Information 
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th 
Street NW, Washington, DC 20503 [Attention: Desk Officer for the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission]. Due to security concerns, 
comments should be sent electronically to the following e-mail address: 
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. Comments submitted to OMB should refer to 
FERC-80, FERC-500, and FERC-505 and OMB Control Nos. 1902-0106 (FERC-
80), 1902-0058 (FERC-500), and 1902-0115 (FERC-505).

B. Environmental Analysis

    63. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental 
Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may 
have a significant effect on the human environment.\44\ Excluded from 
this requirement are rules that are clarifying, corrective, or 
procedural, or that do not substantially change the effect of 
legislation or the regulations being amended.\45\ This Final Rule 
updates the Commission's recreation-related regulations by clarifying 
public notice and signage requirements, and eliminating unnecessary 
reporting requirements. Because this rule is clarifying and procedural 
in nature, preparation of an Environmental Assessment or Environmental 
Impact Statement is not required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \44\ Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy 
Act of 1969, Order No. 486, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 30,783 (1987) 
(cross-referenced at 41 FERC ] 61,284).
    \45\ 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii) (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    64. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) \46\ generally 
requires a description and analysis of final rules that will have 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The RFA mandates consideration of regulatory alternatives that 
accomplish the stated objectives of a rulemaking while minimizing any 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.\47\ In lieu of preparing a regulatory flexibility analysis, 
an agency may certify that a final rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.\48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ 5 U.S.C. 601-612 (2012).
    \47\ 5 U.S.C. 603(c) (2012).
    \48\ 5 U.S.C. 605(b) (2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    65. The Small Business Administration's (SBA) Office of Size 
Standards develops the numerical definition of a small business.\49\ 
The SBA size standard for electric utilities (effective January 22, 
2014) is based on the number of employees, including affiliates.\50\ 
Under SBA's current size standards, a hydroelectric power generator 
(NAICS code 221111) \51\ is small if, including its affiliates, it 
employs 500 or fewer people.\52\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ 13 CFR 121.101 (2018).
    \50\ SBA Final Rule on ``Small Business Size Standards: 
Utilities,'' 78 FR 77343 (Dec. 23, 2013).
    \51\ The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 
is an industry classification system that Federal statistical 
agencies use to categorize businesses for the purpose of collecting, 
analyzing, and publishing statistical data related to the U.S. 
economy. United States Census Bureau, North American Industry 
Classification System, https://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/ 
(accessed April 11, 2018).
    \52\ 13 CFR 121.201, Sector 22, Utilities (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    66. This Final Rule directly affects all hydropower licensees that 
are currently required to file the Form 80. The Final Rule removes the 
Form 80 filing requirement, eliminating (for small and large entities) 
the cost of $224

[[Page 67068]]

associated with filing the Form 80 every six years.
    67. In addition, the revisions to Sec. Sec.  8.1 and 8.2 of the 
Commission's regulations would directly affect all hydropower licensees 
of projects that offer existing or potential recreational use 
opportunities. These revisions are intended to modernize licensee 
public notice practices, clarify recreational signage requirements, and 
provide flexibility to assist licensees' compliance with these 
requirements. We expect the clarified signage requirements to benefit 
licensees by providing them more flexibility to design recreation-
related signage strategies that best fit the needs of their individual 
projects. To modernize public notice practices, the revisions will 
require licensees that have a project website, or develop one in the 
future, to publish and maintain certain recreation-related information 
on its website. If a licensee does not have a project website, the 
website publication requirements would not apply. Therefore, there is a 
slight increase in the information collection reporting requirements 
and burden for FERC-500 and FERC-505.\53\ However, we do not anticipate 
the impact on affected entities, regardless of their status as a small 
or large entity, to be significant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \53\ In the Information Collection section, we estimated the 
average burden and cost per respondent to be approximately 30 
minutes and $26.77 per year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    68. Based on this understanding, pursuant to section 605(b) of the 
RFA, the Commission certifies that this Final Rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required.

D. Document Availability

    69. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and print the contents of this document via the 
Internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) and 
in the Commission's Public Reference Room during normal business hours 
(8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern time) at 888 First Street NE, Room 2A, 
Washington, DC 20426.
    70. From the Commission's Home Page on the Internet, this 
information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is 
available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, 
printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type 
the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in 
the docket number field.
    71. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's 
website during normal business hours from the Commission's Online 
Support at (202) 502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at 
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-
8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. E-mail the Public Reference Room at 
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.

E. Effective Date and Congressional Notification

    72. This regulation is effective March 28, 2019. The Commission has 
determined, with the concurrence of the Administrator of the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, that this rule is not a 
``major rule'' as defined in section 251 of the Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.\54\ This rule is being 
submitted to the Senate, House, Government Accountability Office, and 
Small Business Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ 5 U.S.C. 804(2) (2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

List of Subjects

18 CFR Part 8

    Electric power, Recreation and recreation areas, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

18 CFR Part 141

    Electric power, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    By direction of the Commission. Commissioner McIntyre is not 
voting on this order.
    Commissioner McNamee is voting present.

    Issued: December 20, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission amends parts 8 and 141, chapter I, title 18, Code of Federal 
Regulations, as follows:

PART 8--RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND DEVELOPMENT AT LICENSED 
PROJECTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 8 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 551-557; 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r; 42 U.S.C. 
7101-7352.


0
2. Revise Sec.  8.1 to read as follows:


Sec.  8.1  Publication of license conditions relating to recreation.

    Following the issuance or amendment of a license, the licensee 
shall make reasonable efforts to keep the public informed of the 
availability of project lands and waters for recreational purposes, and 
of the license conditions of interest to persons who may be interested 
in the recreational aspects of the project or who may wish to acquire 
lands in its vicinity. Such efforts shall include, but are not limited 
to: the publication of notice in a local newspaper once each week for 4 
weeks, and publication on any project website, of the project's license 
conditions which relate to public access to and the use of the project 
waters and lands for recreational purposes, recreational plans, 
installation of recreation and fish and wildlife facilities, reservoir 
water surface elevations, minimum water releases or rates of change of 
water releases, and such other conditions of general public interest as 
the Commission may designate in the order issuing or amending the 
license.

0
3. Revise Sec.  8.2 to read as follows:


Sec.  8.2  Posting of project lands as to recreational use and 
availability of information.

    (a) Following the issuance or amendment of a license, the licensee 
shall post and maintain at all points of public access required by the 
license (or at such access points as are specifically designated for 
this purpose by the licensee) and at such other points as are 
subsequently prescribed by the Commission on its own motion or upon the 
recommendation of a public recreation agency operating in the project 
vicinity, a conspicuous sign that, at a minimum, identifies: the FERC 
project name and number, and a statement that the project is licensed 
by the Commission; the licensee name and contact information for 
obtaining additional project recreation information; and permissible 
times and activities. In addition, the licensee shall post at such 
locations conspicuous notice that the recreation facilities are open to 
all members of the public without discrimination.
    (b) The licensee shall make available for inspection at its local 
offices in the project vicinity, and on any project website, the 
approved recreation plan, any recreation-related reports approved by 
the Commission, and the entire license instrument, properly indexed for 
easy reference to the license conditions designated for publications in 
Sec.  8.1.


Sec.  8.11  [Removed]

0
4. Remove Sec.  8.11.

PART 141--STATEMENTS AND REPORTS (SCHEDULES)

0
5. The authority citation for part 141 continues to read as follows:


[[Page 67069]]


    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 79; 15 U.S.C. 717-717z; 16 U.S.C. 791a-
828c, 2601-2645; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352.


Sec.  141.14  [Removed]

0
6. Remove Sec.  141.14.
[FR Doc. 2018-28250 Filed 12-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


