
[Federal Register: June 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 120)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 35700-35709]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23jn10-33]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Part 260

[Docket No. RM07-9-003]

 
Revisions to Forms, Statements, and Reporting Requirements for 
Natural Gas Pipelines

June 17, 2010.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission proposes to revise certain financial reporting 
forms required to be filed by natural gas companies (FERC Form Nos. 2, 
2-A,

[[Page 35701]]

and 3-Q) to include functionalized fuel data on pages 521a through 521d 
of those forms, and to include on those forms the amount of fuel 
waived, discounted or reduced as part of a negotiated rate agreement. 
We also propose to revise page 520 accordingly.

DATES: Comments are due August 23, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. RM07-9-
003, by any of the following methods:
     Agency Web Site: http://www.ferc.gov. Documents created 
electronically using word processing software should be filed in native 
applications or print-to-PDF format and not in a scanned format.
     Mail/Hand Delivery: Commenters unable to file comments 
electronically must mail or hand deliver an original and 14 copies of 
their comments to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of the 
Secretary, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Holmes (Technical Information), 
Office of Enforcement, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-6008, E-mail: 
brian.holmes@ferc.gov.
Robert Sheldon (Technical Information), Office of Energy Market 
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-8672, E-mail: 
robert.sheldon@ferc.gov.
Gary D. Cohen (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, Telephone: (202) 502-8321, E-mail: 
gary.cohen@ferc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    1. In response to a court remand \1\ of Order Nos. 710 and 710-
A,\2\ the Commission is granting a motion by the American Gas 
Association (AGA) requesting that the Commission issue a Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking (Notice) proposing that the Commission revise FERC 
Form Nos. 2, 2-A, and 3-Q, to include functionalized fuel data on pages 
521a through 521d of those forms, and to include on such forms the 
amount of fuel waived, discounted or reduced as part of a negotiated 
rate agreement. We also propose to revise page 520 accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ American Gas Association v. FERC, 593 F.3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 
2010).
    \2\ Revisions to Forms, Statements, and Reporting Requirements 
for Natural Gas Pipelines, Order No. 710, FERC Stats. & Regs. ] 
31,267 (2008), order on reh' g and clarification, Order No. 710-A, 
123 FERC ] 61,278 (2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Background

    2. In Order No. 710, the Commission revised its financial forms, 
statements, and reports for natural gas companies, contained in FERC 
Form Nos. 2, 2-A, and 3-Q to make the information reported in these 
forms more useful by updating them to reflect current market and cost 
information relevant to interstate natural gas pipelines and their 
customers.
    3. Among the changes required by the Final Rule, the Commission 
adopted new schedules for Forms 2, 2-A, and 3-Q \3\ and added page 520 
(Gas Account-Natural Gas) to Form 3-Q \4\ to report, in greater detail, 
the acquisition and disposition of shipper-supplied gas.\5\ Order No. 
710 requires pipelines to report: (1) The difference between the volume 
of gas received from shippers and the volume consumed in pipeline 
operations each month; (2) the disposition of any excess gas and the 
accounting recognition given to such disposition, including the basis 
of valuing the gas and the specific accounts charged or credited; and 
(3) the source of the gas used to meet any deficiency.\6\ AGA expressed 
support for these additions to the forms, but argued that greater 
clarity could be achieved if the Commission ``requires the information 
to be broken out by function (e.g., transportation, storage, gathering, 
etc.) and to include, by function, the amount of fuel that has been 
waived, discounted or reduced as part of a negotiated rate agreement.'' 
\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This new schedule reports: (1) the difference between the 
volume of gas received from shippers and the volume of gas consumed 
in pipeline operations each month; (2) the disposition of any excess 
and the accounting recognition given to such disposition, including 
the basis of valuing the gas and the specific accounts charged or 
credited; and (3) the source of gas used to meet any deficiency, 
including the accounting basis of the gas and the specific 
account(s) charged or credited.
    \4\ Page 520 was added to provide more timely reporting of the 
quantity of natural gas received and delivered by the pipeline.
    \5\ Order No. 710, P 13.
    \6\ Id.
    \7\ Id. P 15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. In response to AGA's arguments, the Commission found that the 
information that AGA requested to be broken out by function (e.g., 
transportation, storage, gathering, etc.) is available in Form 2 at 
page 520.\8\ The Commission explained that on page 520 (Gas Account), 
pipelines are required to provide detailed information regarding gas 
received and delivered by the pipeline, identified by function and 
account number.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Order No. 710, P 16.
    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. On rehearing, AGA argued, among other matters, that the fuel 
data would be more useful if such data were broken out by different 
pipeline functions, including transportation, storage, gathering, and 
exploration/production, and should include, by function, the amount of 
fuel waived, discounted or reduced as part of a negotiated rate 
agreement.
    6. In Order No. 710-A, the Commission addressed the various 
requests for rehearing and clarification of Order No. 710, including 
AGA's, and denied AGA's request to add additional detail to the fuel 
costs reported at pages 521a and 521b on the basis that some of the 
information sought by AGA, i.e., certain data broken out by function, 
are already available on page 520 of Form Nos. 2 and 2-A and because 
Order No. 710 also added page 520 to Form No. 3-Q.\10\ The Commission 
found that, while the detail sought by AGA might provide additional 
clarity with respect to fuel costs, the Commission did not believe its 
exclusion would preclude the Commission's or customers' ability to 
assess the justness and reasonableness of pipeline rates.\11\ The 
Commission also denied AGA's request that pipelines provide information 
regarding the amount of fuel that a pipeline has waived, discounted or 
reduced as part of a negotiated rate agreement, deeming such 
information unnecessary and burdensome.\12\ Chairman (then 
Commissioner) Wellinghoff issued a partial dissent arguing that AGA's 
proposals should have been adopted.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Order No. 710-A, P 9-11.
    \11\ Id. P 10.
    \12\ Id. P 11.
    \13\ Id. at 62,708-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    7. Subsequently, AGA filed a petition for review in the United 
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit arguing 
that the Commission erred by not addressing the concerns raised by 
Chairman Wellinghoff in his partial dissent to Order No. 710-A. The 
court agreed and remanded the matter back to the Commission for further 
proceedings.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 593 F.3d at 21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    8. Following the court's remand, AGA filed a motion requesting that 
the Commission issue a Notice proposing revisions to FERC Form Nos. 2, 
2-A, and 3-Q, to add additional details as initially proposed by AGA in 
the rulemaking proceeding. Comments in support of AGA's motion were 
filed by Kansas Corporation Commission and by

[[Page 35702]]

Independent Oil & Gas Association of West Virginia, Inc.

II. Discussion

    9. In this Notice, the Commission addresses the concerns raised by 
AGA in its motion. In Order No. 710-A, the Commission found that the 
detail sought by AGA might provide additional clarity with respect to 
fuel costs, but decided, nonetheless, not to require the reporting of 
this information, based on concerns over the burden associated with 
compliance with such a requirement.\15\ The Commission also declined to 
accept AGA's proposal regarding reporting details about the amount of 
fuel that a pipeline has waived, discounted or reduced as part of a 
negotiated rate agreement, based on concerns that this information 
might not be significant and might not be readily available, as many 
pipelines do not periodically file to adjust fuel rates and may not 
keep records of this type of information.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Order No. 710-A, P 10.
    \16\ Id. P 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    10. The court ruled that the Commission's earlier findings did not 
discuss AGA's argument that pages 520 and 521 of the forms work in 
tandem and unless the information provided on pages 521a and 521b is 
broken out by function, a shipper cannot match the revenues generated 
by the sale of excess fuel with the functionalized costs reported on 
page 520. Thus, our preliminary view is that the additional information 
proposed to be reported on pages 521a and 521b will allow the user to 
determine if there is a cross-subsidy, which is critical to assessing 
the justness and reasonableness of the pipeline's fuel rates.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ We note that our proposal renumbers page 521 as 521a, 
renumbers page 521a as 521b, and adds two runover pages as 521c and 
521d. The pages should line up with 521a on top of page 521b, with 
page 521c a continuation of page 521a and page 521d a continuation 
of page 521b. The references in this Notice to pages 521a and 521b 
assume the inclusion of pages 521c and 521d.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    11. Moreover, as pointed out by AGA, while page 520 of the form 
provides certain fuel information by function, the information is not 
adequate to enable a form user to determine where on the pipeline 
system fuel costs are being incurred and how they are being allocated. 
As stated in the Final Rule, page 520 of Form Nos. 2 and 2-A provides 
fuel losses by function (unaccounted for gas is broken out by function 
at lines 30-34). AGA argues that additional detail regarding fuel costs 
is required for pages 521a and 521b to ensure that the Commission and 
pipeline customers have sufficient information required to assess the 
justness and reasonableness of pipeline rates. We agree and therefore 
propose to require that the fuel information be disaggregated by 
function to provide greater clarity with regard to fuel costs. The 
Commission believes that the availability of this information, reported 
by function, is consistent with our goal in the Final Rule of having 
sufficient information to allow the Commission and pipeline customers 
to assess the impact on pipeline rates of rising fuel costs. Thus, our 
proposal in this Notice includes the level of detail suggested by AGA 
and as explained and shown below, we propose to require additional 
information to be reported on pages 521a and 521b of the forms.
    12. Specifically, we propose to revise pages 521a and 521b to 
provide more detailed information about the information that previously 
has been reported on page 520, Gas Account--Natural Gas. However, the 
functional category for production/extraction/processing that we are 
here proposing to add to page 521a and 521b is additional information 
that has not previously been reported in page 520. Consequently, we 
propose to add a line on page 520 for Gas of Others Received for 
Production/Extraction/Processing (Accounts 490 and 491) and another 
line for Gas of Others Delivered for Production/Extraction/Processing 
(Accounts 490 and 491). This provides a bridge between the production/
extraction/processing function on pages 521a, 521b and 520. In 
addition, we propose to revise page 520, line 29 (current line 27) to 
read Other Deliveries and Gas Used for Other Operations. Again, this 
allows the reporting of gas used in operations with the detail reported 
in pages 521a and 521b.
    13. Finally, we propose to revise the heading on page 520 for Gas 
Unaccounted For to read Gas Losses and Gas Unaccounted For. 
Additionally, as we are here proposing to have more detailed 
information on fuel costs (broken down by function) reported on pages 
521a and 521b, we are removing (as duplicative) the prior requirement 
to report information on fuel costs in a more summary fashion on page 
520.
    14. AGA also requested the reporting of the amount of fuel by 
function that has been waived, discounted or reduced as part of a 
negotiated rate agreement. AGA argued that this information would 
enable pipeline customers to better determine if any inappropriate 
cross-subsidization is occurring. The Commission has a strict policy 
that existing shippers must not subsidize the negotiated rate program, 
and we agree that this additional information could be useful in 
identifying potential violations of that policy.\18\ Therefore, we 
propose that fuel costs and revenues associated with each type of rate 
structure (i.e., negotiated, discounted, or recourse) be broken down by 
function to provide better information with which to assess the 
justness and reasonableness of a pipeline's fuel rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Alternative to Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking 
for Natural Gas Pipelines; Regulations of Negotiated Transportation 
Services of Natural Gas Pipeline (Alternative Rate Policy 
Statement), 74 FERC ] 61,076, at 61,242 (1996), and NorAm Gas 
Transmission Company, 77 FERC ] 61,011 (1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    15. We also are revisiting the earlier finding that information 
regarding the amount of fuel that a pipeline has waived, discounted or 
reduced as part of a negotiated rate agreement, may not be readily 
available. AGA argued that some pipeline maintain this information by 
function in order to change a fuel rate either in a tracking mechanism 
or in a future section 4 rate filing, and that such information is 
readily accessible. After further consideration of these arguments we 
have decided to propose the more detailed reporting of this 
information, as suggested by AGA, and estimate that the burden 
associated with this proposal is related solely to inputting the data 
in the Form Nos. 2, 2-A, and 3-Q and with this additional information 
we now propose to find that, in light of the usefulness of this 
information, this small increase in filing burden is justified.
    16. Thus, we propose in this Notice to revise the financial 
reporting forms required to be filed by natural gas companies (FERC 
Form Nos. 2, 2-A, and 3-Q) to include functionalized fuel data on pages 
521a and 521b of those forms, and to include on such forms the amount 
of fuel waived, discounted or reduced as part of a negotiated rate 
agreement. Specifically, we propose to revise pages 521a and 521b to 
include the following: (1) Expanding line 1 to separately reflect 
shipper supplied fuel by function, i.e., production/extraction/process, 
gathering, transmission, distribution, and storage; (2) expanding lines 
2, 3, and 4 to separately list the volumes for each of these functions; 
(3) expanding the listing of volumes to include discounted, negotiated 
and recourse rates; (4) expanding line 5 to separately list the volumes 
for each of these functions; (5) expanding the reporting of dollar 
amounts to include amounts collected under discounted, negotiated and 
recourse rates; (6) requiring the reporting of volumes of gas (in 
dekatherms) not collected where the request for that gas has been 
waived or reduced under discounted or negotiated rates; and (7) 
directing filers (if the

[[Page 35703]]

pipeline does not use a particular function) to enter a zero for that 
field.
    17. In comments to the notice of proposed rulemaking in this 
proceeding issued on September 20, 2007,\19\ the Interstate Natural Gas 
Association of America commented that the Commission should revise the 
reporting requirement for pages 521a and 521b to have these data 
reported on a quarterly basis, rather than a monthly basis. While this 
suggestion is not part of the Commission's proposal in this Notice, we 
nonetheless invite comments on this suggestion and reserve decision, 
until the final rule, as to which of these options will be adopted in 
our final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Revisions to Forms, Statements, and Reporting Requirements 
for Natural Gas Pipelines, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FERC 
Stats. & Regs. ] 32,623 (2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Information Collection Statement

    18. The following collections of information contained in this 
proposed rule have been submitted to the Office of Management and 
Budget for review under section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995.\20\ The Commission solicits comments on the Commission's need 
for this information, whether the information will have practical 
utility, the accuracy of the burden estimates, ways to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected or 
retained, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondents' burden, 
including the use of automated information techniques.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Annual Burden:
    19. The Commission estimates that on average it will take 
respondents five additional hours per collection to comply with the 
proposed requirements. Most of the additional information required to 
be reported is already compiled and maintained by the pipelines, and 
will not substantially increase the existing reporting burden. This 
proposal will increase the burden hours as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Change in the                   Change in the
                                                     Number of       number of      Filings per    total annual
              Data collection form                  respondents      hours per         year       hours for this
                                                                    respondent                         form
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC Form 2.....................................              84               5               1             420
FERC Form 2-A...................................              44               5               1             220
FERC Form 3-Q...................................             128               5               3           1,920
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Totals......................................  ..............  ..............  ..............           2,560
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Information Collection Costs: The Commission seeks comments on the 
costs to comply with these requirements. As most of the proposed 
additional data are already maintained by the pipelines, the Commission 
estimates that the additional collection costs will not be overly 
burdensome.
    Title: FERC Form No. 2, ``Annual Report for Major Natural Gas 
Companies''; FERC Form No. 2-A, ``Annual Report for Nonmajor Natural 
Gas Companies''; FERC Form No. 3-Q, ``Quarterly Financial Report of 
Electric Utilities, Licensees, and Natural Gas Companies.''
    Action: Proposed information collection.
    OMB Control Nos. 1902-0028 (Form No. 2); 1902-0030 (Form No. 2-A); 
and 1902-0205 (Form No. 3-Q).
    Respondents: Businesses or other for profit.
    Frequency of responses: Annually (Form No. 2 and 2-A) and quarterly 
(Form No. 3-Q).
    20. Necessity of the information: The information maintained and 
collected under the requirements of part 260 is essential to the 
Commission's oversight duties. The data now reported in the forms does 
not provide sufficient information to the Commission and the public to 
permit an evaluation of the filers' jurisdictional rates. Since the 
triennial restatement of rates requirement was abolished and pipelines 
are no longer required to submit this information, the need for current 
and relevant data is greater than in the past. The information 
collection proposed in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking will increase 
the forms' usefulness to both the public and the Commission. Without 
this information, it is difficult for the Commission and the public to 
perform an assessment of pipeline costs, and thereby help to ensure 
that rates are just and reasonable. We do not believe that the 
additional burden created by the reporting of this information is 
significant, because the pipelines should already have this information 
readily available for their own use in developing separately stated 
fuel rates in their tariffs. In any event, we believe this additional 
information will allow the Commission and form users to better analyze 
pipeline fuel costs, an important component in assessing the justness 
and reasonableness of pipelines' rates.
    21. Internal Review: The Commission has reviewed the proposed 
changes and has determined that the changes are necessary. These 
requirements conform to the Commission's need for efficient information 
collection, communication, and management within the energy industry. 
The Commission has assured itself, by means of internal review, that 
there is specific, objective support associated with the information 
requirements.
    22. Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting 
requirements by contacting: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: Ellen Brown, Office 
of the Executive Director, phone (202) 502-8663, fax: (202) 273-0873, 
e-mail: DataClearance@ferc.gov.] For submitting comments concerning the 
collections of information and the associated burden estimates, please 
send your comments to the contact listed above and to the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 
725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503 [Attention: Desk Officer for 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, phone: (202) 395-4638, fax: 
(202) 395-7285]. Due to security concerns, comments should be sent 
electronically to the following e-mail address: oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. Please refer to OMB Control Nos. 1902-0028 
(FERC Form No. 2), 1902-0030 (FERC Form No. 2-A), and 1902-0205 (FERC 
Form No. 3-Q), and the docket number of this proposed rulemaking in 
your submission.

IV. Environmental Analysis

    23. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental 
Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may 
have a significant adverse effect on the human

[[Page 35704]]

environment.\21\ No environmental consideration is necessary for the 
promulgation of a rule that addresses information gathering, analysis, 
and dissemination,\22\ and, also, addresses accounting.\23\ No 
environmental consideration is raised by the promulgation of a rule 
that is procedural or does not substantially change the effect if 
adopted, and thus, this rulemaking falls within these exclusions.\24\ 
This proposed rule, if finalized, involves information gathering, 
analysis, and dissemination. Consequently, neither an Environmental 
Impact Statement nor an Environmental Assessment is required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Regulations Implementing the National Environmental Policy 
Act, 52 FR 47897 (Dec. 17, 1987), Order No. 486, FERC Stats. & 
Regs., Regulations Preambles 1986-1990 ] 30,783 (1987).
    \22\ See 18 CFR 380.4(a)(5).
    \23\ See 18 CFR 380.4(a)(16).
    \24\ See 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    24. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) \25\ generally 
requires a description and analysis of final rules that will have 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.\26\ Under the industry standards used for purposes of the 
RFA, a natural gas company qualifies as a ``small entity'' if it has 
annual revenues of less than $7 million. Most companies regulated by 
the Commission do not fall within the RFA's definition of a small 
entity.\27\ Thus, most interstate natural gas companies to which the 
rules proposed herein, if finalized, would apply, do not fall within 
the RFA's definition of small entities. In fact, our most recent 
information shows that only six natural gas companies not affiliated 
with a large natural gas company fall within the definition of a small 
entity. (These six entities constitute 4.7% of the 128 total 
companies.) Consequently, the rules proposed herein, if finalized, will 
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small 
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
    \26\ Id.
    \27\ 5 U.S.C. 601(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Comment Procedures

    25. The Commission invites interested persons to submit comments on 
the matters and issues proposed in this notice to be adopted, including 
any related matters or alternative proposals that commenters may wish 
to discuss. Comments are due August 23, 2010. Comments must refer to 
Docket No. RM07-9-003, and must include the commenter's name, the 
organization they represent, if applicable, and their address in their 
comments.
    26. The Commission encourages comments to be filed electronically 
via the eFiling link on the Commission's Web site at http://
www.ferc.gov. The Commission accepts most standard word processing 
formats. Documents created electronically using word processing 
software should be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format 
and not in a scanned format. Commenters filing electronically do not 
need to make a paper filing.
    27. Commenters that are not able to file comments electronically 
must send an original and 14 copies of their comments to: Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of the Secretary, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    28. All comments will be placed in the Commission's public files 
and may be viewed, printed, or downloaded remotely as described in the 
Document Availability section below. Commenters on this proposal are 
not required to serve copies of their comments on other commenters.

VII. Document Availability

    29. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the 
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an 
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the 
Internet through FERC's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) and in FERC's 
Public Reference Room during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
Eastern time) at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426.
    30. From FERC's Home Page on the Internet, this information is 
available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on 
eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or 
downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket 
number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket 
number field.
    31. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the FERC's Web 
site during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at 202-502-
6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or e-mail at 
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-
8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. E-mail the Public Reference Room at 
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.

List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 260

    Natural gas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    By direction of the Commission.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.

    Note:  The following revised schedules will not be published in 
the Code of Federal Regulations.

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

[[Page 35705]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23JN10.000


[[Page 35706]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23JN10.001


[[Page 35707]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23JN10.002


[[Page 35708]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23JN10.003


[[Page 35709]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23JN10.004

[FR Doc. 2010-15164 Filed 6-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-C

