

[Federal Register: November 17, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 221)]
[Notices]               
[Page 69751-69752]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17no05-60]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP06-19-000; CP06-20-000; CP06-21-000]

 
Unocal Windy Hill Gas Storage, LLC; Notice of Application

November 9, 2005.
    Take notice that on November 2, 2005, Unocal Windy Hill Gas 
Storage, LLC (Windy Hill), 14141 Southwest Freeway, Sugar Land, Texas 
77478, filed in the above referenced dockets, an application pursuant 
to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), requesting: (i) A 
certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing Windy Hill 
to construct, own, operate, and maintain an underground natural gas 
storage facility in four bedded salt caverns near the town of Brush, 
Morgan County, Colorado; (ii) a blanket certificate pursuant to part 
157, subpart F of the Commissions regulations; (iii) a blanket 
certificate pursuant to part 284, subpart G of the Commission's 
regulations; (iv)

[[Page 69752]]

authorization to provide storage services at market based rates; and 
(v) approval of a pro forma FERC Gas Tariff, all as more fully set 
forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the Web at 
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket 

number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support 
at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free at (866) 208-3676, or TTY, 
contact (202) 502-8659.
    Specifically, Windy Hill proposes to construct and operate a high-
deliverability salt dome natural gas storage facility, including 
compression facilities, near the town of Brush, Morgan County, 
Colorado. When completed, the project will have a total working gas 
capacity of 6 Bcf. The facilities will be capable of injection and 
withdrawal rates of 135 MMcf per day and 400 MMcf per day, 
respectively. Windy Hill also proposes to construct pipeline laterals 
to interconnect with the interstate pipeline systems of Cheyenne Plains 
Gas Pipeline Company, LLC and Colorado Interstate Gas Company, as well 
as the intrastate pipeline system of Public Service Company of 
Colorado.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to J. 
Patrick Nevins, Partner, Hogan & Hartson, LLP, 555 Thirteenth Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20004-1109, phone (202) 637-6441.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of 
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by 
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or 
before the comment date, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to 
intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party 
status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary 
of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the 
applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of 
filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant 
and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the 
proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the 
proceeding.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of 
this project, or in support of or in opposition to this project, should 
submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of 
the Commission. Environmental commenters will be placed on the 
Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the 
environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings associated 
with the Commission's environmental review process. Environmental 
commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on 
all other parties. The Commission's rules require that persons filing 
comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests 
only to the applicant. However, the non-party commenters will not 
receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by the 
Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents issued by 
the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court review of the 
Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments, 
protests, and interventions via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web 
site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.

    Comment Date: November 30, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-6337 Filed 11-16-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
