
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7445-7446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02884]



 ========================================================================
 Rules and Regulations
                                                 Federal Register
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
 having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
 to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
 under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
 
 The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
 Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
 week.
 
 ========================================================================
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 29 / Friday, February 12, 2016 / 
Rules and Regulations  

[[Page 7445]]



DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 601

[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-2103]


Removal of Review and Reclassification Procedures for Biological 
Products Licensed Prior to July 1, 1972

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is 
removing two regulations that prescribe procedures for FDA's review and 
classification of biological products licensed before July 1, 1972. FDA 
is taking this action because the two regulations are obsolete and no 
longer necessary in light of other statutory and regulatory authorities 
established since 1972, which allow FDA to evaluate and monitor the 
safety and effectiveness of all biological products. In addition, other 
statutory and regulatory authorities authorize FDA to revoke a license 
for biological products because they are not safe and effective, or are 
misbranded. FDA is taking this action as part of its retrospective 
review of its regulations to promote improvement and innovation.

DATES: This rule is effective March 14, 2016.

ADDRESSES: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the 
docket number found in brackets in the heading of this final rule into 
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts, and/or go to the Division of 
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1062, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica T. Walker, Center for 
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 
240-402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Executive Summary

A. Purpose of the Final Rule

    FDA is removing two regulations that prescribe procedures for FDA's 
review and classification of biological products licensed before July 
1, 1972, because the two regulations are obsolete and no longer 
necessary in light of other statutory and regulatory authorities 
established since 1972. These other statutory and regulatory 
authorities allow FDA to evaluate and monitor the safety and 
effectiveness of all biological products and authorize FDA to revoke a 
license for products because they are not safe and effective, or are 
misbranded.

B. Summary of the Major Provisions of the Final Rule

    The final rule removes Sec. Sec.  601.25 and 601.26 (21 CFR 601.25 
and 601.26), which prescribe procedures for FDA's review and 
classification of biological products licensed before July 1, 1972.

C. Legal Authority

    FDA is taking this action under the biological products provisions 
of the Public Health Service Act (the PHS Act), and the drugs and 
general administrative provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act).

D. Costs and Benefits

    Because this final rule would not impose any additional regulatory 
burdens, this regulation is not anticipated to result in any compliance 
costs and the economic impact is expected to be minimal.

II. Background

A. History of the Rulemaking

    In the Federal Register of July 2, 2015 (80 FR 38145), FDA proposed 
to remove regulations that prescribe procedures for FDA's review and 
classification of biological products licensed before July 1, 1972. As 
discussed in the preamble to the proposed rule, these regulations were 
originally issued after the Director of the National Institutes of 
Health (NIH) announced in the Federal Register on March 15, 1972, that 
the Division of Biologics Standards, NIH, would review the 
effectiveness of all licensed biologicals (37 FR 5404). In the Federal 
Register of June 29, 1972 (37 FR 12865), FDA announced the transfer of 
regulatory authority over biological products from the Division of 
Biologics Standards, NIH, to FDA. After obtaining regulatory authority 
over biological products, the Commissioner of FDA proposed procedures 
for reviewing the safety, effectiveness, and labeling of all biological 
products licensed at the time of the transfer on July 1, 1972 (37 FR 
16679, August 18, 1972). The procedures for review of biological 
products licensed before July 1, 1972, were codified in 21 CFR 273.245 
(38 FR 4319 at 4321, February 13, 1973) and later redesignated to Sec.  
601.25 (38 FR 32048, November 20, 1973). The procedures for review of 
biological products licensed before July 1, 1972, were supplemented by 
procedures codified in Sec.  601.26 (47 FR 44062, October 5, 1982).

B. Current Methods for Ensuring the Safety and Effectiveness of 
Biological Products

    Since establishing the procedures under Sec. Sec.  601.25 and 
601.26, FDA developed new regulations to assess and ensure the safety 
and efficacy of biological products. FDA issued the Current Good 
Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) regulations, which contain the minimum 
cGMP for preparation of drug products, including biological products. 
The cGMP regulations help FDA ensure that such products meet the 
requirements for product safety, effectiveness, and labeling. FDA also 
helps ensure the safety and effectiveness of biological products 
through application of other regulations, such as the reporting of 
biological product deviations by licensed manufacturers (see 21 CFR 
600.14), postmarketing reporting of adverse experiences (21 CFR 
600.80), and labeling regulations (for example, 21 CFR part 201). 
Biological products that do not meet the requirements under these 
regulations are subject to license revocation under 21 CFR 601.5, which 
allows FDA to revoke any biologics license for a product that fails to 
meet applicable standards and fails to comply with

[[Page 7446]]

regulations designed to help ensure the safety, purity, and potency of 
the licensed product, and that the product is not misbranded.
    In addition, FDA continues to help ensure the safety and 
effectiveness of licensed biological products through the development 
and application of additional standards and mechanisms. These 
mechanisms assist FDA in evaluating and monitoring the safety and 
effectiveness of biological products.

C. Summary of Comments to the Proposed Rule

    FDA did not receive any comments on the proposed rule.

D. General Overview of the Final Rule

    The final rule removes Sec. Sec.  601.25 and 601.26 of the 
regulations, which prescribe procedures for FDA's review and 
classification of biological products licensed before July 1, 1972. FDA 
is taking this action because these regulations are obsolete and no 
longer necessary in light of other statutory and regulatory authorities 
established since 1972, which allow FDA to evaluate and monitor the 
safety and effectiveness of all biological products.

III. Legal Authority

    FDA is issuing this regulation under the biological products 
provisions of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 262 and 264) and the drugs and 
general administrative provisions of the FD&C Act (sections 201, 301, 
501, 502, 503, 505, 510, 701, and 704 (21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 
353, 355, 360, 371, and 374)). Under these provisions of the PHS Act 
and the FD&C Act, we have the authority to issue and enforce 
regulations designed to ensure that biological products are safe, pure, 
and potent; and to prevent the introduction, transmission, and spread 
of communicable disease.

IV. Economic Analysis of Impacts

    We have examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive 
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 
104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct Agencies to assess all 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and 
equity). We believe that this final rule is not a significant 
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866.
    The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires Agencies to analyze 
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule 
on small entities. Because this final rule removes regulations that are 
obsolete and no longer necessary in light of other current statutory 
and regulatory authorities, FDA certifies that the final rule will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires 
us to prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment of 
anticipated costs and benefits, before issuing ``any rule that includes 
any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, 
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of 
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one 
year.'' The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $144 
million, using the most current (2014) Implicit Price Deflator for the 
Gross Domestic Product. This final rule would not result in any 1-year 
expenditure that would meet or exceed this amount.

V. Analysis of Environmental Impact

    We have determined under 21 CFR 25.30(h) that this action is of a 
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
adverse effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
required.

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This final rule contains no collection of information. Therefore, 
clearance by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not 
required.

VII. Federalism

    We have analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles 
set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that the rule 
does not contain policies that would have substantial direct effects on 
the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. Accordingly, the Agency has concluded 
that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism 
implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a 
federalism summary impact statement is not required.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 601

    Administrative practice and procedure, Biologics, Confidential 
business information.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the 
Public Health Service Act, and under authority delegated to the 
Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 601 is amended as follows:

PART 601--LICENSING

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 601 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 1451-1561; 21 U.S.C. 321, 351, 352, 353, 
355, 356b, 360, 360c-360f, 360h-360j, 371, 374, 379e, 381; 42 U.S.C. 
216, 241, 262, 263, 264; sec 122, Pub. L. 105-115, 111 Stat. 2322 
(21 U.S.C. 355 note).


Sec.  601.25  [Removed]

0
2. Remove Sec.  601.25.


Sec.  601.26  [Removed]

0
3. Remove Sec.  601.26.

    Dated: February 5, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02884 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


