[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 13 (Friday, January 18, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4047-4050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00895]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0299; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-029-AD;
Amendment 39-17295; AD 2012-25-13]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-
300, 747-400, 747-400F, and 747SR series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of broken and damaged latch pin retention bolts and
subsequent migration of the latch pins of the main deck side cargo door
(MDSCD). This AD requires various repetitive inspections of the MDSCD
latch pin fittings, measuring the latch pin, and related investigative
and corrective actions if necessary. This AD also requires modifying
the latch pin fittings and installing new latch pins and latch pin
fasteners. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of the cargo door and
rapid depressurization of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective February 22, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of February 22,
2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.
O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; phone: 206-544-5000,
extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6432; fax: 425-917-6590; email: Bill.Ashforth@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM published in the Federal Register on March 27, 2012 (77 FR
18137). That NPRM proposed to require various repetitive inspections of
the MDSCD latch pin fittings, measuring the latch pin, and related
investigative and corrective actions if necessary. That NPRM also
proposed to require modifying the latch pin fittings and installing new
latch pins and latch pin fasteners.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(77 FR 18137, March 27, 2012) and the FAA's response to each comment.
Requests To Change Applicability
Boeing and Thai Airways International PCL requested that we limit
the applicability of the NPRM (77 FR 18137, March 27, 2012) to
airplanes with a Boeing-certified MDSCD instead of airplanes identified
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August
16, 2011. The commenters requested this change to ensure that airplanes
modified in the future to Model 747-400 Boeing Converted Freighter
(BCF) with an MDSCD installation are inspected and modified per the
intent of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated
August 16, 2011.
We partially agree with changing the applicability. The AD already
provides coverage for the future Model 747-400 BCF airplanes with an
MDSCD installation. That is, the applicability of the AD specifies
Model 747-100, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-
400F, and 747SR series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1,
dated August 16, 2011. This service information identifies Model 747-
100, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, and 747-400F
airplanes with an MDSCD installed in production or by a Boeing-approved
modification. For clarification, per the Type Certificate Data Sheet
(TCDS) for those airplanes, Model 747-400 BCF and 747-400 Special
Freighter (SF) airplanes remain as Model 747-400 series airplanes for
documentation purposes on the TCDS and with regard to the applicability
of ADs. Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1,
dated August 16, 2011, specifies ``all'' airplanes, this means past,
present, and future airplanes.
However, we found that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, does not currently provide a grace
period for airplanes that have been modified with an MDSCD after the
initial compliance time of 6 months after the effective date of this
AD. Therefore, the initial compliance time specified in paragraph (g)
of this AD has been modified to add a grace period for airplanes that
are modified with an MDSCD after the effective date of this AD.
Additionally, the initial compliance time reference to paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision
1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011, has been removed from
paragraph (g) of this final rule.
Request To Change Service Information Reference
Boeing requested that we change the service information reference
in paragraphs (g), (h), (i), and (j) of the NPRM (77 FR 18137, March
27, 2012) from Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1,
dated August 16,
[[Page 4048]]
2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision
2, dated December 12, 2011, to Revision 3 of that service information.
(Since Revision 3 has not been published, there is no issue date.)
Boeing stated that Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
52A2294 will be a full revision that will ``update the effectivity list
of Model 747-400 BCF airplanes,'' and will incorporate changes
identified during validation, which was accomplished in March 2012.
Boeing stated that Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
52A2294 will add no new work for airplanes having previously
incorporated the actions specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011; or Revision 2, dated
December 12, 2011.
We disagree with referencing Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-52A2294 in this final rule. Boeing has not submitted
Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294 for FAA
approval. We consider it inappropriate to delay correcting the
identified unsafe condition to wait for this new service information
revision. However, after Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294 is FAA-approved and issued, operators may submit requests
for approval of alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) under the
provisions of paragraph (l) of this AD to use Revision 3. We have not
changed the final rule in this regard.
Request To Change Credit for Previous Actions
Boeing requested that we change paragraph (k) of the NPRM (77 FR
18137, March 27, 2012) to also give credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of the NPRM, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of the AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011. Boeing stated that this request is related to its request to
replace the service information reference in paragraphs (g), (h), (i),
and (j) of the NPRM from Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011, to Revision
3 of that service information.
We partially agree. We agree to provide credit for Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, before
its revision by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2,
dated December 12, 2011. However, since we have not changed the AD to
refer to Revision 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, we
disagree with specifying credit for using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011. We have changed paragraph (k) of this AD to specify credit for
the actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD performed
before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-52A2294, dated July 8, 2010; or Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, before its
revision by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2,
dated December 12, 2011.
Request To Change Unsafe Condition Statement
Boeing requested that we modify the unsafe condition statement in
the NPRM (77 FR 18137, March 27, 2012) by removing the reference to
broken latch pin fittings. Boeing stated that Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-52A2294, dated July 8, 2010, was prompted by broken
retention bolts and the subsequent migration of the latch pins rather
than by the broken latch pin fittings. Boeing also stated that the
service information recommends inspecting the latch pin fittings for
damage, but that no broken latch pin fittings have been associated with
this issue.
We agree with the commenter's request. We have changed the Summary
and paragraph (e) of the AD to state that this AD was prompted by
reports of broken and damaged latch pin retention bolts and subsequent
migration of the latch pins of the MDSCD.
Request To Add Federal Aviation Regulation Reference
Boeing requested that we add a reference to paragraph (b) of
section 25.571 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 25.571) to
paragraph (l)(3), ``Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs),'' of the
NPRM (77 FR 18137, March 27, 2012). Boeing stated that paragraph (b) is
the specific paragraph of 14 CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, that requires
compliance for the Model 747 airframe beyond the original certification
basis.
We find that clarification is necessary. The reference to section
25.571 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 25.571), Amendment
45, was included inadvertently in paragraph (l)(3) of the NPRM (77 FR
18137, March 27, 2012). Therefore, we have revised paragraph (l)(3) of
this final rule to remove the reference to ``14 CFR 25.571, Amendment
45.''
Request To Change Compliance Time for Deactivated MDSCDs
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (KLM) requested that we add alternative
compliance times to the NPRM (77 FR 18137, March 27, 2012) for
deactivated MDSCDs. KLM stated that a deactivated MDSCD is much less
susceptible to mechanical defects than an activated door. KLM suggested
that an initial inspection within 6 months after the effective date of
the AD, and a modification as required by paragraph (h) of the NPRM
within 48 months after the effective date of the AD, would be
sufficient to maintain a safe condition. KLM noted that a similar
alternative was made for deactivated main entry doors in paragraph (f)
of AD 2007-12-11, Amendment 39-15089 (72 FR 31984, June 11, 2007).
We agree that a deactivated MDSCD is much less susceptible to
mechanical defects than an activated door. We have changed paragraphs
(g) and (i) of this AD to reference an exception in new paragraph
(j)(3) of this AD, which states that the repetitive inspections
required by paragraphs (g) and (i) of this AD are not applicable to a
deactivated MDSCD. The initial inspection required by paragraph (g) of
this AD and modifications and replacements required by paragraph (h) of
this AD are still applicable to a deactivated MDSCD. In addition, when
the MDSCD is reactivated, the repetitive inspections required by
paragraphs (g) and (i) of this AD are applicable and must be done at
intervals not to exceed those specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision
1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
[Agr]re consistent with the intent that was proposed in
the NPRM (77 FR 18137, March 27, 2012) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 18137, March 27, 2012).
[[Page 4049]]
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 77 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detailed inspection, including 4 work-hours x $85 $0 $340 per inspection $26,180 per
torque check. per hour = $340 cycle. inspection cycle.
per inspection
cycle.
Modification..................... 11 work-hours x $85 5,530 $6,465............. $497,805.
per hour = $935.
Post-modification detailed 2 work-hours x $85 0 $170 per inspection $13,090 per
inspection. per hour = $170 cycle. inspection cycle.
per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do necessary repairs and
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need these repairs.
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair/replacements (Groups 1 and 2 airplanes) 7 work-hours x $85 per hour = $11,478 $12,073
$595.
Repair/replacements (Group 3 airplanes)....... 7 work-hours x $85 per hour = 12,254 12,849
$595.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2012-25-13 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17295; Docket No. FAA-
2012-0299; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-029-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective February 22, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-200B,
747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400F, and 747SR series
airplanes; certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16,
2011.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 52, Doors.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of broken and damaged latch pin
retention bolts and subsequent migration of the latch pins of the
main deck side cargo door (MDSCD). We are issuing this AD to prevent
loss of the cargo door and rapid depressurization of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection and Corrective Action
At the applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2)
of this AD, whichever occurs later: Do a detailed inspection of the
ten MDSCD latch pin fittings to detect loose, broken, damaged, or
missing retention bolts and nuts; measure the latch pin diameter;
and do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions,
except as required by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised
by Boeing Alert Service
[[Page 4050]]
Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011. Do all
applicable related investigative and corrective actions before
further flight. Repeat the inspection thereafter, except as required
by paragraph (j)(3) of this AD, at intervals not to exceed those
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised
by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated
December 12, 2011.
(1) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD.
(2) Within 6 months after the installation of an MDSCD installed
in Boeing production or by a Boeing-approved modification.
(h) Modification of Latch Pin Fittings and Replacement of Latch Pins
and Latch Pin Retention Fasteners
At the time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August
16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011, except as provided by paragraph
(j)(2) of this AD: Modify the 10 MDSCD latch pin fittings, replace
the latch pins with new latch pins, and replace the latch pin
retention fasteners with new latch pin retention fasteners, except
as required by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12,
2011. Accomplishment of the actions specified in paragraph (h) of
this AD terminates the inspection required in paragraph (g) of this
AD.
(i) Post-Modification Inspection and Corrective Action
At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011,
except as provided by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD: Do a detailed
inspection of the 10 MDSCD latch pin fittings to detect loose,
broken, damaged, or missing retention bolts and nuts; measure the
latch pin diameter; and do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, except as required by paragraph (j)(1) of this
AD; in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16,
2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011. Do the applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before further flight. Repeat
the inspection thereafter, except as required by paragraph (j)(3) of
this AD, at intervals not to exceed those specified in paragraph
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011.
(j) Exceptions to Service Bulletin Specifications
(1) If any damage is found during any inspection required by
this AD, and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1,
dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011, specifies to
contact Boeing for appropriate action: Before further flight, repair
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (l) of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1,
dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011, specifies a
compliance time relative to the issue date of that service bulletin,
this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time
after the effective date of this AD.
(3) The repetitive inspections required by paragraphs (g) and
(i) of this AD are not applicable to a deactivated MDSCD. However,
the initial inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD and
modifications and replacements required by paragraph (h) of this AD
are still applicable to a deactivated MDSCD. When the MDSCD is
reactivated, the repetitive inspections required by paragraphs (g)
and (i) of this AD are applicable and must be done thereafter at
intervals not to exceed those specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294,
Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, as revised by Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated December 12, 2011.
(k) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-52A2294, dated July 8, 2010, which is not incorporated
by reference in this AD; or Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
52A2294, Revision 1, dated August 16, 2011, before its revision by
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2, dated
December 12, 2011.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the
person identified in the Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(m) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Bill Ashforth,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6432; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
Bill.Ashforth@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; phone: 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet: https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 1, dated
August 16, 2011.
(ii) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-52A2294, Revision 2,
dated December 12, 2011.
(3) For The Boeing Company service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-
2207; phone: 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet:
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, the FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 12, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-00895 Filed 1-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P