
[Federal Register: August 18, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 158)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 41642-41646]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18au09-14]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================



[[Page 41642]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0687; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-033-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 and ERJ 190 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: It has been found the
occurrence of two events of aircraft being dispatched with the cargo
door opened without indication. In one of the events the aircraft took
off with the cargo door opened.
    The unsafe condition is a cargo door opening during flight, which
could result in reduced structural integrity and consequent rapid
decompression of the airplane. The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 17,
2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--
12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone: +55 12
3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax: +55 12 3927-7546; e-mail:
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet: http://www.flyembraer.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0687;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-033-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov; including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On April 17, 2007, we issued AD 2007-06-53, Amendment 39-15035 (72
FR 21088, April 30, 2007). That AD requires actions intended to address
an unsafe condition on the products listed above.
    The preamble to AD 2007-06-53 specifies that we consider the
requirements ``interim action'' and that the manufacturer is developing
a modification to address the unsafe condition. That AD explains that
we might consider further rulemaking if a modification is developed,
approved, and available. The manufacturer now has developed such a
modification, and we have determined that further rulemaking is indeed
necessary; this proposed AD follows from that determination.
    The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC),
which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directives 2007-03-01R1, effective June 9, 2008, and
2007-03-02R2, effective November 21, 2008 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    It has been found the occurrence of two events of aircraft being
dispatched with the cargo door opened without indication. In one of
the events the aircraft took off with the cargo door opened.

The unsafe condition is a cargo door opening during flight, which could
result in reduced structural integrity and consequent rapid
decompression of the airplane. Required actions include repetitive
inspections of the forward and aft cargo doors to detect signs of
interference between the lock handle and the aft edge liner assembly
and reworking the assembly; a one-time inspection for signs of damage
of the lateral roller fitting on the forward and aft cargo door frames
at the fuselage and

[[Page 41643]]

replacement of the roller if necessary, and modification of the cargo
door, which ends the repetitive inspections. After accomplishing the
modification, the actions include incorporating information into the
maintenance program to include the operational (OPC) and functional
(FNC) checks of the forward and aft cargo doors and accomplishing
repetitive OPC and FNC checks. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Embraer has issued Alert Service Bulletins 170-52-A036 (for Model
ERJ 170 airplanes) and 190-52-A018 (for Model ERJ 190 airplanes); both
Revision 01, both dated March 23, 2007. Embraer Alert Service Bulletins
170-52-A036 and 190-52-A018, both dated March 12, 2007, were referred
to in the existing AD for accomplishing the required actions. No
additional work is necessary for airplanes on which the original issue
of the service information has been done.
    Embraer has also issued Service Bulletins 170-52-0041, Revision 01,
dated June 13, 2008, and 170-52-0044, dated January 18, 2008 (for Model
ERJ 170 airplanes); and Service Bulletins 190-52-0023, Revision 02,
dated March 11, 2008, and 190-52-0027 dated March 20, 2008 (for Model
ERJ 190 airplanes).
    The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 145 products of U.S. registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2007-06-53 and retained in this
proposed AD take about 1 work-hour per product, at an average labor
rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost
of the currently required actions is $80 per product.
    We estimate that it would take about 7 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about
$17,162 per product. Where the service information lists required parts
costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will
be no charge for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage
for affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than
estimated here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $2,569,690, or $17,722 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15035 (72 FR
21088, April 30, 2007) and adding the following new AD:

Empresa Brasileira De Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-
2009-0687; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-033-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by September 17, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) The proposed AD supersedes AD 2007-06-53, Amendment 39-
15035.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to EMBRAER Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -
100 SE, -100 SU, -200 LR, -200 STD, and -200 SU airplanes; and ERJ
190-100 STD, -100 LR, -100 IGW, -200 LR, -200 STD, and -200 IGW
airplanes; certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52: Doors.

[[Page 41644]]

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    It has been found the occurrence of two events of aircraft being
dispatched with the cargo door opened without indication. In one of
the events the aircraft took off with the cargo door opened.

The unsafe condition is a cargo door opening during flight, which
could result in reduced structural integrity and consequent rapid
decompression of the airplane. Required actions include repetitive
inspections of the forward and aft cargo doors to detect signs of
interference between the lock handle and the aft edge liner assembly
and reworking the assembly; a one-time inspection for signs of
damage of the lateral roller fitting on the forward and aft cargo
door frames at the fuselage and replacement of the roller if
necessary, and modification of the cargo door, which ends the
repetitive inspections. After accomplishing the modification, the
actions include incorporating information into the maintenance
program to include the operational (OPC) and functional (FNC) checks
of the forward and aft cargo doors and accomplishing repetitive OPC
and FNC checks.

Compliance

    (f) Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2007-06-53, With New Service
Information

Preflight Verification of Correct Door Closure

    (g) For Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -100 SE, -100 SU, -200
LR, -200 STD, and -200 SU airplanes; and ERJ 190-100 STD, -100 LR,
and -100 IGW airplanes: As of 24 hours after May 7, 2007 (the
effective date of AD 2007-06-53), before each flight after closing
the cargo doors, verify that the forward and aft cargo doors are
closed flush with the fuselage skin, and that all 4 latched and
locked indicators at the bottom of each door are green. Persons
qualified to do this verification are mechanics and flightcrew
members. If it cannot be verified that both doors are closed flush
with the fuselage skin, and that all 4 latched and locked indicators
at the bottom of each door are green, repair before further flight.
Repeat the verification before every flight until accomplishment of
the actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD.

Inspection for Interference and Damage

    (h) For Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -100 SE, -100 SU, -200
LR, -200 STD, and -200 SU airplanes; and ERJ 190-100 STD, -100 LR,
and -100 IGW airplanes: Within 10 days after May 7, 2007, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3) of this
AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer
Alert Service Bulletins 170-52-A036 (for Model ERJ 170 airplanes) or
190-52-A018 (for Model ERJ 190 airplanes), both dated March 12,
2007; or Revision 01, both dated March 23, 2007; as applicable. As
of the effective date of this AD, use Revision 01 of the service
bulletins.
    (1) Remove the roller fitting cover plate on the forward and aft
cargo door frames.
    (2) Perform a detailed inspection of the forward and aft cargo
doors to detect signs of interference between the lock handle and
the aft edge liner assembly. Then rework the aft edge liner assembly
at the applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(2)(i) or
(h)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) If any sign of interference is detected: Rework the assembly
before further flight.
    (ii) If no sign of interference is detected: Rework the assembly
within 150 flight cycles after the inspection.
    (3) Perform a detailed inspection for signs of damage of the
lateral roller fitting on the forward and aft cargo door frames at
the fuselage. If any damage is found, replace the lateral roller
fitting before further flight with a new roller fitting having the
same part number, in accordance with the applicable service
bulletin.
    (4) Actions done before May 7, 2007, in accordance with Embraer
Alert Service Bulletin 170-52-A036 or 190-52-A018, both dated March
12, 2007, are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding
requirements of this AD.

    Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive examination of a specific item, installation, or
assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available
lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Inspection aids such as
mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface cleaning
and elaborate procedures may be required.''


    Note 2: Embraer Alert Service Bulletins 170-52-A036 and 190-52-
A018 refer to Embraer Service Bulletins 170-50-0006 and 190-50-0006,
respectively, as additional sources of service information for the
rework and roller fitting cover plate removal. Embraer Service
Bulletins 170-50-0006 and 190-50-0006 are currently at Revision 01,
dated March 13, 2007.

Repetitive Inspections for Damage

    (i) For Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -100 SE, -100 SU, -200
LR, -200 STD, and -200 SU airplanes; and ERJ 190-100 STD, -100 LR,
and -100 IGW airplanes: Repeat the inspection specified in paragraph
(h)(3) of this AD at intervals not to exceed 150 flight cycles until
the terminating action specified in paragraph (k)(3) of this AD has
been accomplished.

Parts Installation

    (j) For Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -100 SE, -100 SU, -200
LR, -200 STD, and -200 SU airplanes; and ERJ 190-100 STD, -100 LR,
and -100 IGW airplanes: As of May 7, 2007, no person may install a
roller fitting cover plate on the forward and aft cargo door frames
on any airplane.

New Requirements of This AD: Actions and Compliance

    (k) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) For Model ERJ 190-200 LR, -200 STD, and -200 IGW airplanes:
As of 24 hours after the effective date of this AD, before each
flight after closing the cargo doors, verify that the forward and
aft cargo doors are closed flush with the fuselage skin, and that
all 4 latched and locked indicators at the bottom of each door are
green. Persons qualified to do this verification are mechanics and
flightcrew members. If it cannot be verified that both doors are
closed flush with the fuselage skin, and that all 4 latched and
locked indicators at the bottom of each door are green, repair
before further flight. Repeat the verification before every flight
until accomplishment of the actions required by paragraph (k)(2) of
this AD.
    (2) For Model ERJ 190-200 LR, -200 STD, and -200 IGW airplanes:
Within 10 days after the effective date of this AD, do the actions
specified in paragraphs (k)(2)(i), (k)(2)(ii), and (k)(2)(iii) of
this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Embraer Alert Service Bulletin 190-52-A018, Revision 01, dated March
23, 2007. Repeat the inspection specified in paragraph (k)(2)(iii)
of this AD at intervals not to exceed 150 flight cycles until the
terminating action specified in paragraph (k)(3) of this AD has been
accomplished.
    (i) Remove the roller fitting cover plate on the forward and aft
cargo door frames.
    (ii) Perform a detailed inspection of the forward and aft cargo
doors to detect signs of interference between the lock handle and
the aft edge liner assembly. Then rework the aft edge liner assembly
at the applicable time specified in paragraph (k)(2)(ii)(A) or
(k)(2)(ii)(B) of this AD.
    (A) If any sign of interference is detected: Rework the assembly
before further flight.
    (B) If no sign of interference is detected: Rework the assembly
within 150 flight cycles after the inspection.
    (iii) Perform a detailed inspection for signs of damage of the
lateral roller fitting on the forward and aft cargo door frames at
the fuselage. If any damage is found, replace the lateral roller
fitting before further flight with a new roller fitting having the
same part number, in accordance with Embraer Alert Service Bulletin
190-52-A018, Revision 01, dated March 23, 2007.
    (3) For all airplanes: Within 5,000 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, do the actions specified in paragraphs
(k)(3)(i) and (k)(3)(ii) of this AD on the forward and aft cargo
doors. Accomplishing the actions in this paragraph terminates the
repetitive inspections required by paragraphs (i) and (k)(2) of this
AD.
    (i) Relocate the cargo door closed indication sensor in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer Service
Bulletin 170-52-0041, Revision 01, dated June 13, 2008; or 190-52-
0023, Revision 02, dated March 11, 2008; as applicable.
    (ii) Modify the cargo door lock handle mechanism and replace the
forward and aft cargo door roller fittings having part number (P/N)
170-92569-401 and 170-85452-401 with new fittings having P/N 170-
92569-403 and 170-85452-403, as applicable. Do the modification in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer Service
Bulletins 170-52-0044, dated January 18, 2008; or 190-52-0027, dated
March 20, 2008; as applicable.
    (4) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Embraer

[[Page 41645]]

Service Bulletin 170-52-0041, dated September 6, 2007; or 190-52-
0023, dated September 6, 2007, or Revision 01, dated December 6,
2007; as applicable; are acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding requirements of this AD.
    (5) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD or 12
months after accomplishing the modification required by paragraph
(k)(3) of this AD, whichever occurs later: Incorporate information
into the maintenance program to include the operational (OPC) and
functional (FNC) checks of the forward and aft cargo doors; in
accordance with a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (or its
delegated agent). Within 6,000 flight hours after doing the actions
required by paragraph (k)(3) of this AD, do the OPC and FNC checks
and repeat the checks thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6,000
flight hours.

    Note 3: Guidance on the OPC and FNC checks specified in
paragraph (k)(5) of this AD can be found in Table 1 of this AD, as
applicable.


                                          Table 1--OPC and FNC Guidance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Manual--                                  Task--                                Date--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Embraer 170 Aircraft Maintenance       52-31-00-710-801-A/500....................  July 15, 2008.
 Manual.
                                       52-31-20-720-801-A/500....................  July 15, 2008.
                                       52-32-00-710-801-A/500....................  July 15, 2008.
                                       52-32-20-720-801-A/500....................  July 15, 2008.
Embraer 190 Aircraft Maintenance       52-31-00-710-801-A/500....................  July 15, 2008.
 Manual.
                                       52-31-20-720-801-A/500....................  July 15, 2008.
                                       52-32-00-710-801-A/500....................  July 15, 2008.
                                       52-32-20-720-801-A/500....................  July 15, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Note 4: For the purposes of this AD, a functional check (FNC)
is: ``A quantitative check to determine if one or more functions of
an item perform within specified limits.''


    Note 5: For the purposes of this AD, an operational check (OPC)
is: ``A task to determine if an item is fulfilling its intended
purpose. Since it is a failure finding task, it does not require
quantitative tolerances.''

FAA AD Differences

    Note 6: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: Where the MCAI includes a compliance time of ``after
accomplishment of the modification'' for revising the maintenance
program for Model ERJ-170 airplanes, we have determined that a
compliance time of ``within 12 months after the effective date of
the AD or within 12 months after accomplishment of the modification,
whichever occurs later'' is appropriate. This compliance time is
equivalent to the compliance time required for Model ERJ-190
airplanes. The manufacturer and ANAC agree with this compliance
time.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (l) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone
(425) 227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD. AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2007-06-53, are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of paragraph (i) of this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (m) Refer to Brazilian Airworthiness Directives 2007-03-01R1,
dated June 9, 2008, and 2007-03-02R2, dated November 21, 2008; and
the service information contained in Table 2 of this AD for related
information.

                      Table 2--Service Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Service Bulletin            Revision               Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Embraer Alert Service                       01  March 23, 2007.
 Bulletin 170-52-A036.
Embraer Alert Service                       01  March 23, 2007.
 Bulletin 190-52-A018.
Embraer Service Bulletin 170-               01  June 13, 2008.
 52-0041.
Embraer Service Bulletin 170-         Original  January 18, 2008.
 52-0044.
Embraer Service Bulletin 190-               02  March 11, 2008.
 52-0023.
Embraer Service Bulletin 190-         Original  March 20, 2008.
 52-0027.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 41646]]

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 7, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-19655 Filed 8-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
