
[Federal Register: September 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 181)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 53764-53766]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17se08-35]                         

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================



[[Page 53764]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0990; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-060-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

 
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Model PC-6 Series 
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the 
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory 
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation 
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe 
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 
condition as:

    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is prompted by a potential 
problem with the freedom of the brake pedals of some PC-6 series 
aircraft.
    The freedom of the brake pedals could be prevented because of an 
insufficient clearance between the rudder bar lugs on a few 
aircraft. In such conditions, it is possible that the master brake 
cylinder is not re-filled with the fluid from the reservoir, which 
can lead to a degradation of brake effectiveness. Mostly during 
landing, this can lead to difficulties with the directional control 
of the aircraft on ground and could cause a runway excursion.

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the 
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 17, 
2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory 
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street 
address for the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the 
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly 
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, 
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0990; 
Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-060-AD'' at the beginning of your 
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We 
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend 
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We 
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we 
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD 
No.: 2008-0171, dated September 9, 2008 (referred to after this as 
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified 
products. The MCAI states:

    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is prompted by a potential 
problem with the freedom of the brake pedals of some PC-6 series 
aircraft.
    The freedom of the brake pedals could be prevented because of an 
insufficient clearance between the rudder bar lugs on a few 
aircraft. In such conditions, it is possible that the master brake 
cylinder is not re-filled with the fluid from the reservoir, which 
can lead to a degradation of brake effectiveness. Mostly during 
landing, this can lead to difficulties with the directional control 
of the aircraft on ground and could cause a runway excursion.
    For the reason stated above, the present Airworthiness Directive 
mandates a check of the brake pedals for full and free movement and, 
if any damage is found, the modification of the brake pedals to 
restore their freedom.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD 
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. has issued Pilatus PC-6 Service Bulletin No. 
32-002, Revision 2, dated April 29, 2008. The actions described in this 
service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition 
identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant 
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they 
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and 
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because 
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists 
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type 
design.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service 
Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in 
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it 
necessary to use

[[Page 53765]]

different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for 
U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not 
intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the 
MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those 
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are 
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 50 products of U.S. 
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 2 work-hours per 
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The 
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on 
U.S. operators to be $8,000, or $160 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would 
take about 10 work-hours and require parts costing $100, for a cost of 
$900 per product. We have no way of determining the number of products 
that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. FAA-2008-0990; Directorate 
Identifier 2008-CE-060-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by October 17, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Models PC-6, PC-6-H1, PC-6-H2, PC-6/350, 
PC-6/350-H1, PC-6/350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-6/A-H2, PC-6/B-H2, 
PC-6/B1-H2, PC-6/B2-H2, PC-6/B2-H4, PC-6/C-H2, and PC-6/C1-H2 
airplanes, manufacturer serial numbers (MSN) 101 through 950 and MSN 
2001 through 2092, certificated in any category.

    Note 1: These airplanes may also be identified as Fairchild 
Republic Company PC-6 airplanes, Fairchild Industries PC-6 
airplanes, Fairchild Heli Porter PC-6 airplanes, or Fairchild-Hiller 
Corporation PC-6 airplanes.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 32: Landing 
Gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) 
states:
    This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is prompted by a potential 
problem with the freedom of the brake pedals of some PC-6 series 
aircraft.
    The freedom of the brake pedals could be prevented because of an 
insufficient clearance between the rudder bar lugs on a few 
aircraft. In such conditions, it is possible that the master brake 
cylinder is not re-filled with the fluid from the reservoir, which 
can lead to a degradation of brake effectiveness. Mostly during 
landing, this can lead to difficulties with the directional control 
of the aircraft on ground and could cause a runway excursion.
    For the reason stated above, the present Airworthiness Directive 
mandates a check of the brake pedals for full and free movement and, 
if any damage is found, the modification of the brake pedals to 
restore their freedom.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Inspect the brake pedals for full and free movement within 
100 hours time-in-service after the effective date of this AD or 12 
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, 
following the accomplishment instructions of Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. 
Pilatus PC-6 Service Bulletin No. 32-002, Revision 2, dated April 
29, 2008.
    (2) If as a result of the inspection required by paragraph 
(f)(1) of this AD any stiffness or limited movement of a brake pedal 
is found, before further flight, perform the corrective actions in 
accordance with the paragraph 3.C. of the accomplishment 
instructions of Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC-6 Service Bulletin 
No. 32-002, Revision 2, dated April 29, 2008.
    (3) As of the effective date of this AD, do not install any 
pilot or co-pilot rudder pedal assembly Part Number (P/N) 
6232.0011.00, P/N 6232.0255.52, P/N 116.35.06.050, P/N 
116.35.06.053, or P/N 116.35.06.054 unless it has been inspected and 
modified as applicable in accordance with paragraphs (f)(1) and 
(f)(2) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information 
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, 
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send 
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small 
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090. Before using 
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify 
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight 
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain 
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these 
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective

[[Page 53766]]

actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the 
State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are 
required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to 
service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in 
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned 
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency AD No.: 2008-
0171, dated September 9, 2008; and Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC-
6 Service Bulletin No. 32-002, Revision 2, dated April 29, 2008, for 
related information.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 10, 2008.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-21691 Filed 9-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
