

[Federal Register: November 15, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 220)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 64139-64143]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15no07-8]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-27619; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-164-AD; 
Amendment 39-15257; AD 2007-23-11]
RIN 2120-AA64

 
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 777 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for 
certain Boeing Model 777 airplanes. This AD requires repetitive 
measurements of the freeplay of certain joints of the trailing edge 
flap supports; repetitive lubrication of the support joints; and 
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This AD also 
provides for modifying certain components of the trailing edge flap 
supports, which extends the intervals for the repetitive measurements, 
and revising the maintenance practices of the maintenance planning data 
document. This AD results from reports of excessive wear of the pins, 
bushings, and bearings, and corrosion at the joints of the outboard 
trailing edge flap supports. We are issuing this AD to prevent wear and 
corrosion at the flap support joints, which could result in loss of the 
trailing edge flap and possible loss of control of the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 20, 2007.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of December 20, 
2007.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.

Examining the Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
; or in person at the Docket Management Facility 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, 
any comments received, and other information. The address for the 
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management 
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Oltman, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 
1601 Lind

[[Page 64140]]

Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6443; 
fax (425) 917-6590.

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 
CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to certain Boeing Model 
777 airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 
20, 2007 (72 FR 13048). That NPRM proposed to require repetitive 
measurements of the freeplay of certain joints of the trailing edge 
flap supports; repetitive lubrication of the support joints; and 
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. That NPRM 
also provides for modifying certain components of the trailing edge 
flap supports, which extends the intervals for the repetitive 
measurements, and revising the maintenance practices of the maintenance 
planning data document.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the 
development of this AD. We have considered the comments received.

Request To Change Paragraph (f)(1) of the NPRM

    Boeing asks that paragraph (f)(1) be changed to read ``For 
airplanes that have accumulated 6,000 total flight cycles or more on or 
before the effective date of this AD and on which a teardown inspection 
has not been accomplished before the effective date of this AD.'' 
Boeing states that with the use of the word ``or'' in place of the word 
``and'' as noted above, the NPRM could include ``For airplanes on which 
a teardown inspection has not been accomplished before the effective 
date of this AD'' and could be interpreted as including new airplanes. 
Boeing adds that this may be confusing as the NPRM provides coverage 
for airplanes that have accumulated fewer than 6,000 cycles, or new 
airplanes.
    We agree with changing ``or'' to ``and'' as requested by Boeing 
because the use of the word ``or'' could be interpreted as applying to 
all Model 777 airplanes in the applicability, regardless of the total 
flight cycles, if a teardown inspection has not been done. We have 
changed paragraph (f)(1) of this AD accordingly.
    We disagree with the interpretation that the AD applicability could 
include new airplanes, because Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0066, 
Revision 1, dated May 18, 2006, clearly identifies affected airplanes 
as having line numbers 1 through 546 only, and we refer to that service 
bulletin in paragraph (c), ``Applicability,'' of the NPRM. We have made 
no change to the AD in this regard.

Request To Change Description of Relevant Service Information Section

    Air France asks that certain language specified in the Relevant 
Service Information section of the NPRM be changed. Air France states 
that the last paragraph of the description of Service Bulletin 777-
27A0066, Revision 1, specifies that accomplishing the actions in Boeing 
Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0071, Revision 1, dated October 16, 2006, 
eliminates the need for the repetitive measurements and lubrications of 
certain trailing edge flap supports. Air France notes that Alert 
Service Bulletin 777-27A0071, Revision 1, does not eliminate the need 
for the repetitive inspections, but only extends the interval for the 
repetitive inspections.
    We acknowledge the commenter's concern; however, that section of 
the preamble does not reappear in the final rule. We have provided 
clarification as follows: Service Bulletin 777-27A0071, Revision 1, 
specifies that accomplishing the modification in that service bulletin 
constitutes terminating action for the actions specified in Service 
Bulletin 777-27A0066, Revision 1, for the associated trailing edge flap 
support only. The actions required by paragraph (l) of the AD require 
continuing periodic inspections and maintenance of the support joints 
of the trailing edge flap, which is part of the maintenance inspection 
program. Those are the inspections that are not terminated by the AD. 
As part of the maintenance program, those inspections would generally 
be accomplished at the same time or in combination with normally 
scheduled airplane inspections and other maintenance program tasks. In 
light of these facts, we have made no change to the AD.
    Japan Airlines International (JAL) asks that the NPRM be changed to 
allow modification of the flap support mechanism by incorporating 
Service Bulletin 777-27A0071, Revision 1, dated October 16, 2006, 
instead of doing a support teardown inspection or temporary return to 
service inspection. JAL refers to the Relevant Service Information 
section of the NPRM, which describes procedures for disassembling any 
joint that exceeds the freeplay limits specified in Service Bulletin 
777-27A0066, Revision 1, and doing the related investigative and 
corrective actions in the ``support teardown inspection.'' JAL also 
refers to the teardown inspections required by paragraphs (h)(1), 
(h)(2), and (h)(3) of the NPRM. JAL notes that as an option to the 
support teardown inspection, for certain airplanes, the service 
bulletin describes procedures for a ``temporary return to service'' 
inspection.
    We agree with JAL that allowing operators to accomplish the 
modification specified in Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0071, Revision 
1, instead of the teardown inspection or temporary return to service is 
an acceptable option. However, we do not agree to change the AD because 
that option is already specified in this AD. We have made no change to 
the AD in this regard.

Requests To Clarify Actions in Paragraph (k) of the NPRM

    Air France asks that we include in paragraph (k) of the NPRM the 
extension interval of 16,000 flight cycles for the repetitive 
measurements allowed by the application of Alert Service Bulletin 777-
27A0071, Revision 1, dated October 16, 2006. Air France notes that 
paragraph (k) should specify accomplishing the actions in Alert Service 
Bulletin 777-27A0071, Revision 1; or make a reference to maintenance 
review board (MRB) and maintenance planning document (MPD) item 27-460-
01, which is the item created in the MRB and MPD; or take into account 
airplanes on which Service Bulletin 777-27A0071, Revision 1, has been 
accomplished at the extended 16,000 flight cycle intervals.
    JAL states that paragraph (k) of the NPRM should be clarified to 
include the extended interval of 16,000 flight cycles.
    We agree with the commenters that paragraph (k) of the AD should 
provide the extended interval for the repetitive measurements so it 
corresponds with the interval specified in paragraph (j) of the AD. We 
have included that interval in paragraph (k) for clarification.
    Air France also asks that paragraph (k) of the NPRM include 
terminating action. Air France states that paragraph (k) does not 
specify that application of Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0071, 
Revision 1, is terminating action for the actions specified in 
paragraphs (f), (g), (h), and (i) of the NPRM, for the associated 
trailing edge flap support only. Air France adds that paragraph (k) 
should correspond with paragraph (j) of the NPRM.
    We agree with Air France for the reasons provided, and we have 
included the terminating action in paragraph (k) of the AD for 
clarification.

Request To Change Compliance Times

    JAL asks that the compliance times specified in paragraph (h)(1)(i) 
and (h)(3) of the NPRM be extended from 12

[[Page 64141]]

to 18 months after the first freeplay measurement of 0.020 inch to 
0.100 inch inclusive, and that the repetitive freeplay inspection 
(measurement) interval be reduced to 500 flight cycles. JAL provides 
the following reasons for the request:
     All flap support mechanisms are modified at the same time 
to avoid complexity and save time with the freeplay inspection 
interval. There are many Model 777 airplanes planned for flap-related 
modifications, but once the freeplay value exceeds 0.020 inch, the 
actions must be done within 12 months. The 12-month compliance time 
makes it difficult to schedule additional airplanes because of 
inflexibility; however, 18 months provides more flexibility for 
scheduling flap modifications. Reducing the freeplay inspection 
interval to 500 flight cycles would support the compliance time 
extension.
     Since the freeplay inspection procedure is not precise, it 
frequently measures freeplay data containing human errors. If the 
freeplay measurement value exceeds 0.020 inch the actions should be 
done within 12 months. The teardown inspection must be done before 
further flight if the freeplay value exceeds 0.020 inch. On the next 
measurement the value can get within 0.020 inch, but the actions must 
still be done within 12 months. This is not economical and JAL should 
be allowed an additional 6-month buffer for flexibility.
     Since repetitive inspections are done at intervals of 500 
flight cycles, JAL monitors the freeplay data for the joints. Due to 
the freeplay (wear) value of all joints being monitored, the trend of 
the freeplay value of specific joints is known. For Model 777 airplanes 
utilized for domestic flight (high utilization in terms of flight 
cycles), the 500 flight-cycle freeplay inspection is done within 3 
months, and the normal 1,000 flight-cycle freeplay inspection is done 
at around 6 months.
    In developing an appropriate compliance time for these actions, we 
considered the urgency associated with the subject unsafe condition, 
the availability of required parts, and the practical aspect of 
accomplishing the required modification within a period of time that 
corresponds to the normal scheduled maintenance for most affected 
operators. Additionally, the compliance times were in part based on 
observed wear properties of the applicable parts. We recognize that JAL 
may have data to show that its wear rates are different than that used 
in the manufacturer's analysis. If this is the case, we recommend that 
JAL submit its data in the form of an alternative method of compliance 
because JAL provides no technical justification for changing the 
compliance times. According to the provisions of paragraph (n) of the 
AD, we may approve requests to adjust the compliance time if the 
request includes data that show that the new compliance time would 
provide an acceptable level of safety. We have made no change to the AD 
in this regard.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the 
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public 
interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously. 
We have determined that these changes will neither increase the 
economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 546 airplanes of the affected design in the 
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for 
U.S. operators to comply with this AD.

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     Number of
                                 Work      Average                     Cost per        U.S.-
           Action               hours     labor rate   Parts cost      airplane      registered     Fleet cost
                                           per hour                                  airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Freeplay measurement........         28          $80            0  $2,240, per              145  $324,800, per
                                                                    cycle.                        cycle.
Lubrication.................          2           80            0  $160, per cycle          145  $23,200 per
                                                                                                  cycle.
Modification for flap               135           80      $58,521  $69,321........          145  $10,051,545.
 support No. 3 and 6.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a 
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES 
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, 
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

[[Page 64142]]

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by 
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

2007-23-11 Boeing: Amendment 39-15257. Docket No. FAA-2007-27619; 
Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-164-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective December 20, 2007.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, and -
300ER series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified 
in Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0066, Revision 1, dated May 18, 
2006.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports of excessive wear of the pins, 
bushings, and bearings, and corrosion at the joints of the outboard 
trailing edge flap supports. We are issuing this AD to prevent wear 
and corrosion at the flap support joints, which could result in loss 
of the trailing edge flap and possible loss of control of the 
airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this 
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the 
actions have already been done.

Initial Freeplay Measurement

    (f) At the applicable time in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this 
AD: Measure the freeplay of support joints A, B, C, and D of the 
trailing edge flap supports, numbers 1 through 3 inclusive and 6 
through 8 inclusive, and of joint B of the trailing edge flap 
supports, numbers 4 and 5; in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0066, Revision 1, 
dated May 18, 2006.
    (1) For airplanes that have accumulated 6,000 total flight 
cycles or more on or before the effective date of this AD and on 
which a teardown inspection has not been accomplished before the 
effective date of this AD: At the earlier of the times in paragraph 
(f)(1)(i) or (f)(1)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Prior to the accumulation of 10,000 total flight cycles, or 
within 9 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever 
occurs later.
    (ii) Within 30 months after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) For airplanes that have accumulated fewer than 6,000 total 
flight cycles on or before the effective date of this AD: At the 
later of the times in paragraph (f)(2)(i) or (f)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Prior to the accumulation of 6,000 total flight cycles, or 
within 120 months after the date of issuance of the original 
standard airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance of the 
original export certificate of airworthiness, whichever occurs 
first.
    (ii) Within 30 months after the effective date of this AD.

Repetitive Intervals if the Freeplay Measurement is Less Than 0.020 
Inch

    (g) If, during any freeplay measurement required by paragraph 
(f), (g), or (h) of this AD, the freeplay measurement is less than 
0.020 inch: Repeat the freeplay measurement required by paragraph 
(f) of this AD at the applicable interval in paragraph (g)(1) or 
(g)(2) of this AD. Accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph 
(j) or (k) of this AD, as applicable, extends the intervals for the 
repetitive measurements for the associated flap support only.
    (1) At intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight cycles.
    (2) At intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles or 120 
months, whichever occurs first, if a review of airplane maintenance 
records can conclusively determine that the joints have been 
lubricated with only BMS 3-33 grease at the earlier of intervals not 
to exceed 1,000 flight cycles or 240 days since the last support 
teardown inspection, or since the date of issuance of the original 
standard airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance of the 
original export certificate of airworthiness.

Related Investigative and Corrective Actions, and Repetitive Intervals 
if the Freeplay Measurement is 0.020 Inch or Greater

    (h) If, during any freeplay measurement required by paragraph 
(f), (g), or (h) of this AD, the freeplay measurement is 0.020 inch 
or greater: Do the applicable action in paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2), or 
(h)(3) of this AD. Accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph 
(j) or (k) of this AD, as applicable, extends the intervals for 
repetitive measurements for the associated flap support only. Do all 
actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions and note 
(e) of Table 1 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance.'' of Boeing Service 
Bulletin 777-27A0066, Revision 1, dated May 18, 2006.
    (1) For airplanes that have accumulated 6,000 total flight 
cycles or more as of the effective date of this AD, and for which 
the freeplay measurement is 0.020 inch to 0.100 inch inclusive: 
Repeat the freeplay measurement required by paragraph (f) of this AD 
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 500 flight cycles until the 
support teardown inspection in paragraph (h)(1)(i) or (h)(1)(ii) of 
this AD is done.
    (i) Within 12 months after the first freeplay measurement of 
0.020 inch to 0.100 inch inclusive, do the applicable related 
investigative and corrective actions specified in the service 
bulletin as the ``Support Teardown Inspection,'' and repeat the 
freeplay measurement required by paragraph (f) of this AD thereafter 
at intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles or 120 months, 
whichever occurs first.
    (ii) Before further flight after the first freeplay measurement 
of 0.020 inch to 0.100 inch inclusive, do the applicable related 
investigative and corrective actions specified in the service 
bulletin as the ``Temporary Return to Service Inspection'' and, 
within 24 months after the first freeplay measurement of 0.020 inch 
to 0.100 inch inclusive, do the applicable related investigative and 
corrective actions specified in the service bulletin as the 
``Support Teardown Inspection.'' Repeat the freeplay measurement 
required by paragraph (f) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to 
exceed 6,000 flight cycles, or 120 months, whichever occurs first.
    (2) For airplanes that have accumulated 6,000 total flight 
cycles or more as of the effective date of this AD, and the freeplay 
measurement is greater than 0.100 inch: Do the action in paragraph 
(h)(2)(i) or (h)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Before further flight after the first freeplay measurement 
of greater than 0.100 inch, do the applicable related investigative 
and corrective actions specified in the service bulletin as the 
``Support Teardown Inspection.'' Repeat the freeplay measurement 
required by paragraph (f) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to 
exceed 6,000 flight cycles or 120 months, whichever occurs first.
    (ii) Before further flight after the first freeplay measurement 
of greater than 0.100 inch, do applicable related investigative and 
corrective actions in the ``Temporary Return to Service 
Inspection,'' and within 6 months after the first freeplay 
measurement of greater than 0.100 inch, do the applicable related 
investigative and corrective actions in the ``Support Teardown 
Inspection.'' Repeat the freeplay measurement required by paragraph 
(f) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight 
cycles or 120 months, whichever occurs first.
    (3) For airplanes that have accumulated fewer than 6,000 total 
flight cycles as of the effective date of this AD: Before further 
flight after the first freeplay measurement of 0.020 inch or 
greater, do the related investigative and corrective actions 
specified in the service bulletin as the ``Support Teardown 
Inspection.'' Repeat the freeplay measurement required by paragraph 
(f) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight 
cycles or 120 months, whichever occurs first.

Repetitive Lubrications

    (i) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD: 
Lubricate the joints of the trailing edge flap supports using BMS 3-
33 grease. Repeat the lubrication thereafter at intervals not to 
exceed 1,000 flight cycles, or 240 days, whichever occurs first. Do 
all actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, and 
note (d) of Table 1 in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing 
Service Bulletin 777-27A0066, Revision 1, dated May 18, 2006.

Modification/Repetitive Freeplay Measurements for Flap Support Numbers 
3 and 6

    (j) Before the accumulation of 23,000 total flight cycles or 
within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever is 
later: Replace the pins, ball sets, and bushings on

[[Page 64143]]

the joints of the trailing edge flap at support numbers 3 and 6 with 
new, improved components by doing all the applicable actions, 
including all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the 
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
27A0071, Revision 1, dated October 16, 2006. Before further flight 
after doing the actions, do a detailed inspection of the components 
that interface with the flap support pins for discrepancies 
(corrosion, damage, or excessive wear), and a general visual 
inspection for any blocked lubrication paths; and do all applicable 
corrective actions. Repeat the freeplay measurements for the 
associated trailing edge flap support at intervals not to exceed 
16,000 flight cycles in accordance with the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0071, Revision 
1, dated October 16, 2006. Accomplishing the actions in this 
paragraph constitutes terminating action for the actions specified 
in paragraphs (f), (g), (h), and (i) of this AD, for the associated 
trailing edge flap support only.

Optional Modification for Flap Support Numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8

    (k) Accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph (j) of this 
AD at support numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 8, extends the repetitive 
intervals for the freeplay measurements required by paragraph (g) of 
this AD to an interval not to exceed 16,000 flight cycles for the 
associated trailing edge flap support. Accomplishing the actions in 
this paragraph constitutes terminating action for the actions 
specified in paragraphs (f), (g), (h), and (i) of this AD, for the 
associated trailing edge flap support only.

Revise Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document

    (l) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD: Revise 
the maintenance practices for performing periodic inspections and 
maintenance of the support joints of the trailing edge flap for the 
maintenance inspection program of the Boeing 777 MPD Document by 
doing the actions specified in paragraphs 1 and 3 only of Part 7 of 
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
777-27A0071, Revision 1, dated October 16, 2006.

Actions Accomplished Previously

    (m) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in 
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0066, dated 
July 28, 2005, are acceptable for compliance with the actions 
specified in paragraphs (f), (g), (h), and (i) of this AD, as 
applicable. Actions done before the effective date of this AD in 
accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0071, dated 
March 30, 2006, are acceptable for compliance with the actions 
specified in paragraphs (j), (k), and (l) of this AD, as applicable.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (n)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in 
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different 
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. 
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC 
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA 
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local 
FSDO.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an 
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized 
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis 
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this 
AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (o) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0066, Revision 
1, dated May 18, 2006; and Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-
27A0071, Revision 1, dated October 16, 2006; as applicable, to 
perform the actions that are required by this AD, unless the AD 
specifies otherwise. The Director of the Federal Register approved 
the incorporation by reference of these documents in accordance with 
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Boeing Commercial 
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207, for a copy 
of this service information. You may review copies at the FAA, 
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 
Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at 
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html
.


    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 2, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-21999 Filed 11-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
