[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 33 (Monday, February 22, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10524-10526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0519; FRL-10017-54--Region 9]


Air Quality Implementation Plan; California; Mendocino County Air 
Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve two rule revisions to the Mendocino County Air Quality 
Managment District (MCAQMD or ``District'') portion of the California 
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern the District's 
prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) permitting program for 
new and modified stationary sources of air pollution. We are proposing 
action on these local rules pursuant to requirements under Part C of 
Title I of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the ``Act''). 
We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final 
action.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 24, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2020-0519 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to 
R9AirPermits@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow 
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, 
comments cannot be removed or edited from Regulations.gov. For either 
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA 
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located 
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other 
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact 
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI and 
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective 
comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if 
you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation 
at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amber Batchelder, EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105; by phone: (415) 947-4174, or by 
email to batchelder.amber@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?

[[Page 10525]]

    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?
II. The EPA's Evaluation
    A. How is the EPA evaluating these rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
III. Proposed Action and Public Comment
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this action with the dates 
that they were adopted by the MCAQMD and submitted by the California 
Air Resources Board (CARB), the Governor's designee for California SIP 
submittals.

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Rule No.                                Rule title                    Amended        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1-220..................................  New Source Review Standards (Including         4/7/2020       8/10/2020
                                          PSD Evaluations).
1-230..................................  Action on Applications.................        4/7/2020       8/10/2020
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This proposed action serves as our formal determination that the 
submittal for Rules 1-220 and 1-230 meets the completeness criteria in 
40 CFR part 51 Appendix V.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    On July 3, 2017, the EPA finalized approval of Rule 1-230 and 
limited approval and limited disapproval of Rule 1-220. 82 FR 30770.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?

    On July 3, 2017, we listed the following two deficiencies in our 
final limited approval and limited disapproval of Rule 1-220:
     Rule 1-220 does not contain any provisions specifying that 
required air quality modeling shall be based on the applicable models, 
databases, and other requirements specified in Part 51 Appendix W; 
therefore, the requirements of 40 CFR 51.160(f) and 51.166(l) have not 
been met.
     The requirements of 40 CFR 51.166(r)(2) \1\ have not been 
met because the rule does not include the necessary information about a 
source's obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The 2017 final rule stated incorrectly that the criteria in 
40 CFR 51.166(r)(1) had not been met. Our proposal notice (81 FR 
95074, December 27, 2016) and Technical Support Document (TSD) 
correctly noted that only the criteria in 40 CFR 41.166(r)(2) had 
not been met. See e.g., Section 4.2, number 15 on Page 18 of the TSD 
for the 2017 final action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The District addressed the first deficiency by adding provisions to 
Rule 1-220 and addressed the second deficiency by revising Rule 1-230.
    Rules 1-220 and 1-230 contain the requirements for review and 
permitting of individual stationary sources in the MCAQMD. The amended 
sections of these rules satisfy the statutory and regulatory 
requirements for the New Source Review (NSR) program, including the PSD 
program. The changes the District made to the rules listed above as 
they pertain to the PSD program were largely administrative in nature 
and provide additional clarity to the rules.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Rule 1-220 includes a potential typographical error. The 
term ``bases'' should be ``databases.'' This error does not impact 
applicability nor enforceability. We recommend correcting the 
language the next time the rule is amended. Please see the TSD, 
located in the docket for this rule, for additional information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. The EPA's Evaluation

A. How is the EPA evaluating these rules?

    The EPA reviewed the revised portions of Rules 1-220 and 1-230 for 
compliance with the CAA's general requirements for SIPs in CAA section 
110(a)(2), the EPA's regulations for stationary source permitting 
programs in 40 CFR part 51, 51.160-51.164 and 51.166, and the CAA 
requirements for SIP revisions in CAA section 110(l). The EPA is 
proposing approval of Rules 1-220: New Source Review Standards 
(Including PSD Evaluations) and 1-230: Action on Applications.

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    With respect to procedural requirements, CAA sections 110(a)(2) and 
110(l) require that revisions to a SIP be adopted by the state after 
reasonable notice and public hearing. Based on our review of the public 
process documentation included in the August 10, 2020 submittal of the 
MCAQMD Rules 1-220 and 1-230, we find that the MCAQMD has provided 
sufficient evidence of public notice, opportunity for comment and a 
public hearing prior to adoption and submittal of these rules to the 
EPA.
    We have determined that the revised sections of the rules satisfy 
all of the statutory and regulatory requirements for a PSD permit 
program as set forth in the applicable provisions of Part C of Title I 
of the Act and in 40 CFR part 51, 51.160-51.164 and 51.166. The 
revisions to these rules address and correct the limited disapproval 
issues from our July 3, 2017 final action.
    Our Technical Support Document, which can be found in the docket 
for this rule, contains a more detailed discussion and analysis of the 
approval criteria and the District's submittal.

III. Proposed Action and Public Comment

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is proposing 
to approve the submitted rules because they correct the previously 
identified deficiencies and fulfill all relevant CAA requirements. We 
will accept comments from the public on this proposal until March 24, 
2021. If we finalize this action as proposed, our action will be 
codified through revisions to 40 CFR 52.220a (Identification of plan-in 
part).

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule 
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance 
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by 
reference the MCAQMD rules described in Table 1 of this preamble. The 
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available 
through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office 
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Accordingly, this 
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:

[[Page 10526]]

     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with 
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, New source review, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: February 5, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2021-02912 Filed 2-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


