
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 976-977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00655]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2007-0314; FRL-9988-58-Region 6]


Air Plan Approval; Oklahoma; Interstate Transport Requirements 
for the 1997 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a portion of an 
Oklahoma State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal that pertains to the 
good neighbor provision requirements of the CAA with respect to 
interstate transport of air pollution which will interfere with 
maintenance of the 1997 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards 
(NAAQS). The good neighbor provision requires, in part, that each 
state, in its SIP, prohibit emissions that will interfere with 
maintenance of a new or revised NAAQS in another state. In this action, 
EPA is approving the Oklahoma SIP submittal as having met the interfere 
with maintenance requirement of the good neighbor provision for the 
1997 ozone NAAQS in accordance with section 110 of the CAA.

DATES: This rule is effective on March 4, 2019.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2007-0314. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure 
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are 
available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or 
in hard copy at the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, 
Texas 75202-2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Young, 214-665-6645, 
young.carl@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and 
``our'' means the EPA.

I. Background

    The background for this action is discussed in detail in our 
November 16, 2018 proposal (83 FR 57701). In that document we proposed 
to (1) approve the portion of a May 1, 2007 Oklahoma SIP submittal 
pertaining to the interfere with maintenance requirement of CAA section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 1997 ozone NAAQS and (2) find 
that the state's conclusion that Oklahoma emissions do not interfere 
with maintenance of the 1997 ozone NAAQS in another state is consistent 
with our conclusion regarding this good neighbor obligation. We did not 
receive any comments regarding our proposal.

II. Final Action

    We are approving the portion of a May 1, 2007 Oklahoma SIP 
submittal pertaining to the interfere with maintenance requirement of 
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 1997 ozone NAAQS. We 
find that the state's conclusion that Oklahoma emissions do not 
interfere with maintenance of the 1997 ozone NAAQS in another state is 
consistent with our conclusion regarding this good neighbor obligation. 
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Act.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:

[[Page 977]]

     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has 
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose 
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 2, 2019. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Ozone.

    Dated: December 27, 2018.
Anne Idsal,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart LL--Oklahoma

0
2. In Sec.  52.1920, paragraph (e), the table titled ``EPA-Approved 
Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Oklahoma 
SIP'' is amended by revising the entry for ``Interstate transport for 
the 1997 ozone NAAQS (contribute to nonattainment)'' to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.1920   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

             EPA-Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Oklahoma SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Applicable
     Name of SIP provision          geographic or    State submittal   EPA approval date        Explanation
                                 nonattainment area        date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Interstate transport for the     Statewide.........        5/1/2007   2/1/2019, [Insert   The contribute to
 1997 ozone NAAQS (contribute                                          Federal Register    nonattainment portion
 to nonattainment or interfere                                         citation].          was approved on 12/29/
 with maintenance).                                                                        2011, (76 FR 81837).
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-00655 Filed 1-31-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


