
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 72 (Thursday, April 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20846-20850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8867]



[[Page 20846]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2010-0998; FRL-9295-3]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a request submitted by the Indiana Department 
of Environmental Management on November 24, 2010, to revise the Indiana 
State Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Clean Air Act (CAA). These 
revisions address sulfur dioxide (SO2) and particulate 
matter (PM) limits for Cargill, Incorporated (Cargill) at its facility 
in Hammond (Lake County), Indiana. Indiana's SO2 revisions 
tighten emission limits for some existing units at Cargill's Hammond 
facility and remove the references to other emission units that are no 
longer in operation, in accordance with the terms of a September 2005 
Federal consent decree. The PM revisions reflect the permanent shutdown 
of, and changes in unit identification for other Cargill units.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective June 13, 2011, unless 
EPA receives adverse comments by May 16, 2011. If adverse comments are 
received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule 
in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not 
take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2010-0998, by one of the following methods:
    1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for 
submitting comments.
    2. E-mail: aburano.douglas@epa.gov.
    3. Fax: (312) 408-2279.
    4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano, Chief, Control Strategies 
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such 
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of 
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of 
boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are 
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal 
holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2010-0998. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included 
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at 
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site 
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your 
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of 
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without 
going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is 
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you 
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name 
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any 
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid 
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of 
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. 
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically 
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal 
holidays. We recommend that you telephone Matt Rau, Environmental 
Engineer, at (312) 886-6524 before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, 
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6524, rau.matthew@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information 
section is arranged as follows:

I. What is the background for this action?
II. What is EPA's analysis of the revision?
III. What are the environmental effects of this action?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background for this action?

a. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions

    Cargill entered into a Federal consent decree with EPA and a number 
of states, including Indiana, to resolve a complaint filed against the 
company in the United States District Court for the District of 
Minnesota. The consent decree was lodged on September 1, 2005. It 
covers 24 Cargill facilities in 13 states.
    Paragraph 15 of the consent decree requires, among other things, 
that Cargill submit permit applications to applicable permitting 
authorities that will contain annual SO2 emission limits for 
the facilities and boilers listed in Appendix B of the decree. Appendix 
B lists four boilers at the Hammond facility--Numbers 6, 7, 8, and 10. 
It requires the retirement of Boiler Number 7, while removing the 
emission limits, recordkeeping requirements, and reporting requirements 
for the other three boilers. All four boilers have been permanently 
shutdown.
    Paragraph 27 of the consent decree requires SO2 emission 
reductions at the Hammond facility to be achieved through the 
installation of pollution control technologies and the implementation 
of emission reduction projects to meet a level of control specified for 
the sources in Appendix L of the decree.
    Indiana has revised SIP rule 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 
7-4.1-5 to address these consent decree provisions.

b. Particulate Matter

    Indiana revised Cargill's emission limits in 326 IAC 6.8-2-8 to 
remove the emission units that are no longer in operation at the 
Hammond facility. These revisions were not required by the consent 
decree, but were made to reflect the permanent shutdown of Cargill 
units--ten process sources and two natural gas-fired boilers. Those 
units now have no emission limits and, as such, they cannot be 
operated. In

[[Page 20847]]

addition, Indiana has made changes in unit identification to reflect 
current operations.

II. What is EPA's analysis of the revision?

    The revisions to the SO2 emission limits in 326 IAC 7-
4.1-5 should result in improved air quality. There will no longer be 
emissions from the four boilers that Cargill has permanently shutdown, 
as referenced in Appendix B of the consent decree. In addition, there 
should be substantial SO2 emission reductions resulting from 
the eight units required to be controlled in Appendix L of the consent 
decree. The revisions to the PM emission rule, 326 IAC 6.8-2-8, help to 
clarify the PM requirements for Cargill.
    EPA, therefore, finds these revisions to the SO2 and PM 
SIP rules acceptable.

III. What are the environmental effects of this action?

    As a result of the SO2 emission reduction requirements 
in the consent decree, Cargill shutdown eight units and tightened 
emission limits on four other units. The total allowable SO2 
emissions rate from all Cargill units is now 622 pounds per hour lower. 
The revisions have the potential to reduce SO2 emissions by 
2730 tons per year.
    Sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere can aggravate respiratory and 
cardiovascular disease. Sulfur dioxide emissions also contribute to 
acid rain and fine particulate matter formation.
    Indiana also removed the PM emission limits for ten units that are 
permanently shutdown. The emission limit revisions do not cause a 
reduction in PM emissions as the units have already ceased operation, 
but they are indicative of the reduction in total allowable PM 
emissions that has occurred at the Cargill facility. The facility's 
cumulative allowable PM emissions are now 71 pounds per hour lower. 
That yields a potential annual reduction of 311 tons of PM emissions.
    Particulate matter interferes with lung function when inhaled. 
Exposure to particulates can cause heart and lung disease. Particulate 
matter also aggravates asthma. Airborne particulate matter or PM is the 
main source of haze that causes a reduction in visibility.

IV. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving revisions to the Indiana SIP. This consists of 
revisions of the PM emission rule, 326 IAC 6.8-2-8, and the 
SO2 emission rule, 326 IAC 7-4.1-5.
    We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we 
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse 
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal 
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will 
serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse 
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective June 13, 2011 
without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written 
comments by May 16, 2011. If we receive such comments, we will withdraw 
this action before the effective date by publishing a subsequent 
document that will withdraw the final action. All public comments 
received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the 
proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. 
Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at 
this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an 
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may 
be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those 
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. 
If we do not receive any comments, this action will be effective June 
13, 2011.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by June 13, 2011. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are 
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of 
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules 
section

[[Page 20848]]

of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for 
judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw 
this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed 
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: April 4, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart P--Indiana

0
2. In Sec.  52.770 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising 
the entries for ``Article 6.8. Particulate Matter Limitations For Lake 
County'' and ``Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide Rules'' to read as follows:


Sec.  52.770  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Indiana
    Indiana citation               Subject          effective date   EPA approval date            Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Article 6.8. Particulate Matter Limitations for Lake County
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Rule 1. General Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-1-1.................  Applicability...........       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-1-1.5...............  Definitions.............        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
6.8-1-2.................  Particulate emission            9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           limitations; fuel                         14383.
                           combustion steam
                           generators, asphalt
                           concrete plant, grain
                           elevators, foundries,
                           mineral aggregate
                           operations;
                           modification by
                           commissioner.
6.8-1-3.................  Compliance determination        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
6.8-1-4.................  Compliance schedules....        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
6.8-1-5.................  Control strategies......       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-1-6.................  State implementation            9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           plan revisions.                           14383.
6.8-1-7.................  Scope...................       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Rule 2. Lake County: PM10 Emission Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-2-1.................  General provisions and         2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           definitions.                              23356.
6.8-2-2.................  Lake County: PM10 and          2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           total suspended                           23356.
                           particulates (TSP)
                           emissions.
6.8-2-4.................  ASF-Keystone, Inc.--           2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Hammond.                                  23356.
6.8-2-6.................  BP Products North              2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           America, Inc.--Whiting                    23356.
                           Refinery.
6.8-2-7.................  Bucko Construction             2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Company, Inc.                             23356.
6.8-2-8.................  Cargill, Inc............      11/19/2010  4/14/2011, [Insert
                                                                     page number where
                                                                     the document
                                                                     begins].
6.8-2-9.................  W.R. Grace and Co.--Conn       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-2-13................  Hammond Group, Inc.            2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           (HGI) Halox Division,                     23356.
                           Lead Products Division,
                           and Hammond Expander
                           Division.
6.8-2-14................  Hammond Group, Inc.--          2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Halstab Division.                         23356.
6.8-2-16................  Resco Products, Inc.....       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-2-17................  Mittal Steel--Indiana          2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Harbor East Inc.                          23356.
6.8-2-18................  Jupiter Aluminum               2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Corporation.                              23356.
6.8-2-19................  Dover Chemical                 2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Corporation--Hammond.                     23356.
6.8-2-20................  LaSalle Steel Company...       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-2-21................  Mittal Steel--Indiana          2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Harbor West Inc.                          23356.
6.8-2-22................  Carmeuse Lime Inc.......       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-2-24................  Methodist Hospital Inc..       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-2-25................  National Recovery              2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Systems.                                  23356.
6.8-2-26................  NIPSCo--Dean H. Mitchell       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Station.                                  23356.
6.8-2-27................  Praxair Inc.............       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-2-28................  Premiere Candy Company..       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-2-29................  Reed Minerals--Plant           2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           14.                              23356.
6.8-2-30................  Rhodia, Inc.............       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-2-31................  Silgan Containers              2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Manufacturing                             23356.
                           Corporation.
6.8-2-32................  Smith Ready Mix, Inc....       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-2-33................  State Line Energy, LLC..       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-2-34................  Huhtamaki Foodservice,         2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Inc.                                      23356.
6.8-2-35................  Conopco, Inc. d/b/a            2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Unilever HPC USA.                         23356.
6.8-2-36................  Union Tank Car Company,        2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Plant 1.                                  23356.
6.8-2-37................  United States Gypsum           2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                           Company.                                  23356.

[[Page 20849]]

 
6.8-2-38................  U.S. Steel--Gary Works..       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Rule 4. Lake County: Opacity Limits; Test Methods
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-4-1.................  Test methods............       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Rule 8. Lake County: Continuous Compliance Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-8-1.................  Applicability...........       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-8-2.................  Documentation; operation        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           and maintenance                           14383.
                           procedures.
6.8-8-3.................  Plan requirements.......        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
6.8-8-4.................  Plan; schedule for              9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           complying with 326 IAC                    14383.
                           6.8-7.
6.8-8-5.................  Plan; source categories.        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
6.8-8-6.................  Plan; particulate matter        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           control equipment;                        14383.
                           operation and
                           maintenance.
6.8-8-7.................  Plan; particulate matter        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           control equipment;                        14383.
                           recording; operation;
                           inspection.
6.8-8-8.................  Plan; department review.        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Rule 9. Lake County: PM10 Coke Battery Emission Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-9-1.................  Applicability...........        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
6.8-9-2.................  Definitions.............        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
6.8-9-3.................  Emission limitations....       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Rule 10. Lake County: Fugitive Particulate Matter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-10-1................  Applicability...........       2/22/2008  4/30/2008, 73 FR
                                                                     23356.
6.8-10-2................  Definitions.............        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
6.8-10-3................  Particulate matter              9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           emission limitations.                     14383.
6.8-10-4................  Compliance requirements;        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           control plans.                            14383.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Rule 11. Lake County: Particulate Matter Contingency Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.8-11-1................  Applicability...........        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
6.8-11-2................  ``Ambient monitoring            9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           data'' defined.                           14383.
6.8-11-3................  Exceedances.............        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
6.8-11-4................  Violation of 24-hour            9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           standard.                                 14383.
6.8-11-5................  Violation of annual             9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                           standard.                                 14383.
6.8-11-6................  Reduction measures......        9/9/2005  3/22/2006, 71 FR
                                                                     14383.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Rule 1.1. Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-1.1-1.................  Applicability...........       6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                                                                     56129.
7-1.1-2.................  Sulfur dioxide emission        6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           limitations.                              56129.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Rule 2. Compliance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-2-1...................  Reporting requirements;        6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           methods to determine                      56129.
                           compliance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Rule 3. Ambient Monitoring
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-3-2...................  Ambient monitoring......  ..............  5/13/1982, 47 FR
                                                                     20583.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Rule 4. Emission Limitations and Requirements by County
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-4-2...................  Marion County sulfur           3/11/1999  8/2/2000, 65 FR
                           dioxide emission                          47336.
                           limitations.
7-4-3...................  Vigo County sulfur             9/30/2004  2/28/2005, 70 FR
                           dioxide emission                          9533.
                           limitations.
7-4-4...................  Wayne County sulfur            4/10/1988  9/1/1988, 53 FR
                           dioxide emission                          33808.
                           limitations.
7-4-5...................  LaPorte County sulfur          4/10/1988  9/1/1988, 53 FR
                           dioxide emission                          33808.
                           limitations.
7-4-6...................  Jefferson County sulfur        4/10/1988  9/1/1988, 53 FR
                           dioxide emission                          33808.
                           limitations.
7-4-7...................  Sullivan County sulfur         4/10/1988  9/1/1988, 53 FR
                           dioxide emission                          33808.
                           limitations.
7-4-8...................  Vermillion County sulfur       4/10/1988  1/19/1989, 54 FR
                           dioxide emission                          2112.
                           limitations.
7-4-9...................  Floyd County sulfur            4/10/1988  9/1/1988, 53 FR
                           dioxide emission                          33808.
                           limitations.
7-4-10..................  Warrick County sulfur          8/30/2008  11/10/2009, 74 FR
                           dioxide emission                          57904.
                           limitations.
7-4-11..................  Morgan County sulfur           5/13/1988  12/16/1988, 53 FR
                           dioxide emission                          50521.
                           limitations.
7-4-12.1................  Gibson County sulfur           12/5/1990  9/19/1994, 59 FR
                           dioxide emission                          47804.
                           limitations.
7-4-13..................  Dearborn County sulfur         3/16/2005  2/28/2006, 71 FR
                           dioxide emission                          9936.
                           limitations.
7-4-14..................  Porter County sulfur          10/23/1988  1/19/1989, 54 FR
                           dioxide emission                          2112.
                           limitations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 20850]]

 
                            Rule 4.1. Lake County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limitations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7-4.1-1.................  Lake County sulfur             6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           dioxide emission                          56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-2.................  Sampling and analysis          6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           protocol.                                 56129.
7-4.1-3.................  BP Products North              6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           America Inc. sulfur                       56129.
                           dioxide emission
                           limitations.
7-4.1-4.................  Bucko Construction             6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           sulfur dioxide emission                   56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-5.................  Cargill, Inc. sulfur          11/19/2010  4/14/2011, [Insert
                           dioxide emission                          page number where
                           limitations.                              the document
                                                                     begins].
7-4.1-6.................  Carmeuse Lime sulfur           6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           dioxide emission                          56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-7.................  Cokenergy Inc. sulfur          6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           dioxide emission                          56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-8.................  Indiana Harbor Coke            6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           Company sulfur dioxide                    56129.
                           emission limitations.
7-4.1-9.................  Ironside Energy, LLC           6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           sulfur dioxide emission                   56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-10................  ISG Indiana Harbor Inc.        6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           sulfur dioxide emission                   56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-11................  Ispat Inland Inc. sulfur       6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           dioxide emission                          56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-12................  Methodist Hospital             6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           sulfur dioxide emission                   56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-13................  National Recovery              6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           Systems sulfur dioxide                    56129.
                           emission limitations.
7-4.1-14................  NIPSCO Dean H. Mitchell        6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           Generating Station                        56129.
                           sulfur dioxide emission
                           limitations.
7-4.1-15................  Rhodia sulfur dioxide          6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           emission limitations.                     56129.
7-4.1-16................  Safety-Kleen Oil               6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           Recovery Company sulfur                   56129.
                           dioxide emission
                           limitations.
7-4.1-17................  SCA Tissue North America       6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           LLC sulfur dioxide                        56129.
                           emission limitations.
7-4.1-18................  State Line Energy, LLC         6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           sulfur dioxide emission                   56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-19................  Unilever HPC USA sulfur        6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           dioxide emission                          56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-20................  U.S. Steel--Gary Works         6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           sulfur dioxide emission                   56129.
                           limitations.
7-4.1-21................  Walsh and Kelly sulfur         6/24/2005  9/26/2005, 70 FR
                           dioxide emission                          56129.
                           limitations.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-8867 Filed 4-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


