	SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST

	(in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V)

   SIP Submitted by:  Commonwealth of Virginia

     Date Submitted:   September 12, 2006

            Subject:

Completeness Review 

Completed by:	           Ellen Wentworth

     Date Completed:   October 4, 2006

Administrative Materials

	ACCEPTABLE

	EPA REQUIREMENT	

	STATE SUBMITTAL 	

(X)



1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee,
requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof.	

1.  Letter dated September 12, 2006 from David K. Paylor, Director,
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to Judith M. Katz, Air
Protection Division, Region III.	

 x



2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or
body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in
final form.  That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final
issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from
the adoption/issuance date.	

2.  Revision was adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board on
June 21, 2006, in accordance with the requirements of section 10.1-1308
of the Virginia Air Pollution Control Law, and 40 CFR part 51. 
Effective date of the revision is October 4, 2006.	

 x



3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State
law to adopt and implement the plan.	

3.  Revision adopted pursuant to section 10.1-1308 of the Virginia Air
Pollution Control Law.	

 x



4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and
incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the
changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable.  The
submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document
signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that
it is fully enforceable by the State.  The effective date of the
regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the
document itself.	

4.  Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Environmental Quality, 9 VAC
5-20-206, volatile organic compound and nitrogen oxides emissions
control areas, adopted on June 21, 2006, published in the Virginia
Register on September 4, 2006, effective October 4, 2006.	

x

 



5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements
of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the
adoption/issuance of the plan.	

5.  A letter dated September 12, 2006, from  David K.Paylor, Director,
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to Judith M. Katz, Air
Protection Division, EPA Region III.  Certification of Public
Participation Activities.  Copy of public hearing notice run in the
Richmond Times-Dispatch on November 28, 2005	

 x



6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change
consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of
publication of such notice.	

6.  Copy of hearing notice run in the November 28, 2005 Richmond
Times-Dispatch indicating public hearing would be held on January 12,
2006	

 x



7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the
information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and
constitution, if applicable.	

7.  Public hearing held on January 12, 2006; Certification of Public
Participation Activities found in Enclosure 2 to the letter dated
September 12, 2006 from David K. Paylor, Director, Virginia Department
of Environmental Quality to Judith M. Katz, Air Protection Division, EPA
Region III.	

 x



8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto.	

8.  Record of Hearing and Summary of Testimony found in Enclosure 3 to
the letter dated September 12, 2006 from David K. Paylor, Director,
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality to Judith M. Katz, Air
Protection Division, Region III.	

 x



1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan.	

 1. VOC and NOx	

  x



2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA
attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of
the attainment plan for the affected area(s).	

2.  Fredericksburg, Richmond, and Hampton Roads, VA Emissions Control
Areas.  The Fredericksburg Area is a moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment
area; the Richmond Area and Hampton Roads Areas are marginal 8-hour
ozone nonattainment areas. 	

  

  x



3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the
affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from
affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in
actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the
differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions
anticipated as a result of the revision.	

3.  N/A	

 x



4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality
standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments,
reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as
applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 	

4.   This revision extends Chapter 40 VOC and NOx control measures into
the new VOC and NOx emissions control areas established in 9 VAC
5-20-206.       	

x



5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision,
including input data, output data, models used,  ambient monitoring data
used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data
(where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information
relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis.	

5.  N/A	

x



6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on
continuous emission reduction technology.	

6   N/A	

x



7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice
standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to
ensure emission levels.	

7.  N/A	

x



8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be
determined in practice.	

8.  N/A	

x



9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any
applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.)	

9.  N/A	

x



10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan
demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years
after redesignation.	

10.  N/A	

X



