	SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST

	(in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V)

   SIP Submitted by:	Kendl P. Philbrick		

     Date Submitted: 	June 21, 2006	

            Subject:	Revision #06-06 PM-10 Test Methods 

Completeness Review 

Completed by:		Linda Miller	

     Date Completed: 	July 13, 2006

Administrative Materials

	ACCEPTABLE

	EPA REQUIREMENT	

	STATE SUBMITTAL 	

(X)



1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee,
requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof.	

1.   Letter of June 21, 2006 from Kendl Philbrick, Secretary MDE	X



2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or
body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in
final form.  That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final
issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from
the adoption/issuance date.	

Amendment to Regulation .04 of COMAR 26.11.01  NPR in Maryland Register
June 10, 2005;  Public Hearing July 13, 2005; Adoption May 30, 2006;
Effective June 19, 2006.    

	

X 



3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State
law to adopt and implement the plan.	

3.      Code of Maryland Sections 1-101;
1-404;2-101—2-103;2-301—2-303; 10-102; and 10-103	

 X



4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and
incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the
changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable.  The
submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document
signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that
it is fully enforceable by the State.  The effective date of the
regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the
document itself.	

4.    Maryland Register June 10, 2005  and June 9, 2006 which includes
effective data of June 19, 2006	

 X

 



5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements
of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the
adoption/issuance of the plan.	

5.    Copies of Maryland Register, affadavits and hearing transcript
provided.   Public notice June 10, 2005.  Public hearing held July 13,
2005.	X



6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change
consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of
publication of such notice.	

6. Copies of Maryland Register, affadavits and hearing transcript
provided.   Public notice June 10, 2005.  Public hearing held July 13,
2005.	

 X



7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the
information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and
constitution, if applicable.	

7. Copies of Maryland Register, affadavits and hearing transcript
provided.   Public notice June 10, 2005.  Public hearing held July 13,
2005.	

 X



8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto.	

8.  No public comments rec’d	X



1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan.	

1.  PM-10	X



2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA
attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of
the attainment plan for the affected area(s).	

2.  Major Sources of PM-10	X



3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the
affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from
affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in
actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the
differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions
anticipated as a result of the revision.	

3.   N/A   This action IBR federal reference method for determining
compliance with PM-10 emission limits	X



4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality
standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments,
reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as
applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 	

4.  The FRM will provide assistance with compliance of PSD emission
limits for major sources of PM-10	

X



5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision,
including input data, output data, models used,  ambient monitoring data
used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data
(where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information
relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis.	

5.  N/A	

X



6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on
continuous emission reduction technology.	

6  N/A   This action to approve a FRM will provide assistance with
compliance of PSD emission limits for major sources of PM-10	

X



7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice
standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to
ensure emission levels.	

7.  N/A   This action to approve a FRM will provide assistance with
compliance of PSD emission limits for major sources of PM-10	

X



8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be
determined in practice.	

8  The IBR of the FRM will provide EPA-approved test method for PM-10	

X





9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any
applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.)	

9.  N/A	

N/A



10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan
demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years
after redesignation.	

10.   N/A	

N/A



