SIP
SUBMITTAL
COMPLETENESS
CRITERIA
CHECKLIST
(
in
accordance
with
40
CFR
Part
51
­
App.
V)

SIP
Submitted
by:
West
Virginia
Department
of
Environmental
Protection
(
WVDEP)

Date
Submitted:
May
17,
2006
Subject:
Redesignation
of
the
Huntington
portion
of
the
Huntington­
Ashland
ozone
nonattainment
area
to
attainment
and
approval
of
the
area's
maintenance
plan.

Completeness
Review
Completed
by:
Amy
Caprio
Date
Completed:
May
31,
2006
Administrative
Materials
ACCEPTABLE
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

1.
A
formal
letter
of
submittal
from
the
Governor
or
his
designee,
requesting
EPA
approval
of
the
plan
or
revision
thereof.
1.
Letter
was
submitted
May
17,
2006
on
behalf
of
the
State
of
West
Virginia
from
Stephanie
R.
Timmermeyer
Cabinet
Secretary,
WVDEP
to
Donald
S.
Welsh,
Regional
Administrator,
EPA
Region
III.
X
2.
Evidence
that
the
State
has
adopted
the
plan
in
the
State
code
or
body
of
regulations;
or
issued
the
permit,
order,

consent
agreement
in
final
form.
That
evidence
shall
include
the
date
of
adoption
or
final
issuance
as
well
as
the
effective
date
of
the
plan,
if
different
from
the
adoption/
issuance
date.
2.
N/
A
(
Not
a
regulatory
change
the
submittal
is
request
for
redesignation
and
a
maintenance
plan
that
is
effective
May
2006).
X
3.
Evidence
that
the
State
has
the
necessary
legal
authority
under
State
law
to
adopt
and
implement
the
plan.
3.
WV
Code
16­
20­
5.
X
Administrative
Materials
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

2
4.
A
copy
of
actual
regulation,
or
document
submitted
for
approval
and
incorporation
by
reference
into
the
plan,

including
indication
of
the
changes
made
to
the
existing
approved
plan,
where
applicable.
The
submittal
shall
be
a
copy
of
the
official
State
regulation/
document
signed,
stamped,

dated
by
the
appropriate
State
official
indicating
that
it
is
fully
enforceable
by
the
State.
The
effective
date
of
the
regulation/
document
shall,
whenever
possible,
be
indicated
in
the
document
itself.
4.
N/
A
See
number
2
above.
X
5.
Evidence
that
the
State
followed
all
of
the
procedural
requirements
of
the
State's
laws
and
constitution
in
conducting
and
completing
the
adoption/
issuance
of
the
plan.
5.
N/
A
X
6.
Evidence
that
public
notice
was
given
of
the
proposed
change
consistent
with
procedures
approved
by
EPA,
including
the
date
of
publication
of
such
notice.
6.
WVDEP
provided
proof
that
the
notice
of
public
hearing
was
published
in
the
West
Virginia
Register
on
March
31,

2006.
X
7.
Certification
that
public
hearings
were
held
in
accordance
with
the
information
provided
in
the
public
notice
and
the
State's
laws
and
constitution,
if
applicable.
7.
As
required
by
provisions
of
29A
of
the
West
Virginia
Code,
notice
of
public
hearing
was
given
to
the
public
in
The
Herald­
Dispatch
on
March
31,
2006
and
The
Saturday
Gazette
Mail
on
April
3,
2006.
X
8.
Compilation
of
public
comments
and
the
State's
response
thereto.
8.
The
state
submittal
includes
a
compilation
of
public
comments
and
responses
thereto.
X
Technical
Materials
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

3
1.
Identification
of
all
regulated
pollutants
affected
by
the
plan.
1.
8­
Hour
Ozone
X
2.
Identification
of
the
locations
of
affected
sources
including
the
EPA
attainment/
nonattainment
designation
of
the
locations
and
the
status
of
the
attainment
plan
for
the
affected
area(
s).
2.
Applies
to
the
Huntington
Portion
of
the
Huntington­

Ashland
Ozone
Nonattainment
Area,
comprising
Cabell
and
Wayne
Counties.
X
3.
Quantification
of
the
changes
in
plan
allowable
emissions
from
the
affected
sources;
estimates
of
changes
in
current
actual
emissions
from
affected
sources
or,
where
appropriate,

quantification
of
changes
in
actual
emissions
from
affected
sources
through
calculations
of
the
differences
between
certain
baseline
levels
and
allowable
emissions
anticipated
as
a
result
of
the
revision.
3.
An
updated
allowable
emissions
inventory
was
provided
along
with
submittal.
X
4.
The
State's
demonstration
that
the
national
ambient
air
quality
standards,
prevention
of
significant
deterioration
increments,
reasonable
further
progress
demonstration,
and
visibility,
as
applicable,
are
protected
if
the
plan
is
approved
and
implemented.
4.
The
state
has
developed
a
current
and
projected
(
2002,
2004,

2009,
and
2018)
emissions
inventory
showing
attainment
of
the
national
ambient
air
quality
standard
(
NAAQS).
This
portion
of
the
maintenance
plan
shows
how
the
NAAQS
will
be
protected
since
emission
levels
are
expected
to
remain
at
or
below
the
levels
needed
for
attainment.
X
5.
Modeling
information
required
to
support
the
proposed
revision,
including
input
data,
output
data,
models
used,

ambient
monitoring
data
used,
meteorological
data
used,

justification
for
use
of
offsite
data
(
where
used),
modes
of
models
used,
assumptions,
and
other
information
relevant
to
the
determination
of
adequacy
of
the
modeling
analysis.
5.
All
data
and
evidence
is
present
for
this
action.
X
6.
Evidence,
where
necessary,
that
emission
limitations
are
based
on
continuous
emission
reduction
technology.
6.
N/
A
X
Technical
Materials
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

4
7.
Evidence
that
the
plan
contains
emission
limitations,
work
practice
standards
and
recordkeeping/
reporting
requirements,

where
necessary,
to
ensure
emission
levels.
7.
Evidence
is
shown
that
WVDEP
will
do
periodic
emission
inventory
updates
and
analysis.
X
8.
Compliance/
enforcement
strategies,
including
how
compliance
will
be
determined
in
practice.
8.
West
Virginia
will
continue
to
monitor
ambient
air
in
the
area
and
to
review
the
emissions
inventory.
If
an
exceedance
or
growth
in
the
emissions
inventory
occurs,
contingency
measures
will
be
triggered.
X
9.
Special
economic
and
technological
justifications
required
by
any
applicable
EPA
policies.
(
If
a
policy
is
not
appropriate,

explain
why.)
9.
N/
A
X
10.
A
Section
107
request
must
be
accompanied
by
a
maintenance
plan
demonstrating
maintenance
to
the
relevant
NAAQS
for
at
least
10
years
after
redesignation.
10.
The
Maintenance
Plan
was
submitted
to
EPA
Region
III
on
May
17,
2006.
This
plan
demonstrates
maintenance
for
2006­

2018.
X
