

[Federal Register: March 8, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 45)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 11514-11519]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08mr06-5]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0123; FRL-8042-3]

 
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Pennsylvania; RACT Determinations for Thirteen Individual Sources

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania). The revisions impose reasonably available 
control technology (RACT) on thirteen major sources of volatile organic 
compounds (VOC) or nitrogen oxides (NOX) located in the 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. EPA is approving these revisions to 
establish RACT requirements in the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air 
Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This final rule is effective on April 7, 2006.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID 
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0123. All documents in the docket are listed in 
the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic 

docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential 
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are 
available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air 
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State 
submittal are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental 
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, 
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcia Spink (215) 814-2104 or by e-
mail at spink.marcia@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    On April 18, 2000 (65 FR 20788), EPA published a direct final rule 
approving RACT determinations submitted by the

[[Page 11515]]

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for twenty-
six major sources of NOX and/or volatile organic compounds 
(VOC) and a companion notice of proposed rulemaking. We received 
adverse comments on the direct final rule and a request for an 
extension of the comment period. We had indicated in our April 18, 2000 
direct final rulemaking that if we received adverse comments, we would 
withdraw the direct final rule and address all public comments in a 
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule (65 FR 20788). On June 
19, 2000 (65 FR 38168), EPA published a withdrawal notice in the 
Federal Register informing the public that the direct final rule did 
not take effect. On June 19, 2000 (65 FR 38169), we also published a 
notice providing an extension of the comment period and making 
corrections to our original proposed rule.
    This rule takes final action approving RACT for thirteen of the 
twenty-six sources that were included in the April 18, 2000 proposed 
rulemaking (65 FR 20788). Approvals of RACT for ten of the twenty-six 
sources have already been the subjects of separate final rulemakings. 
Elsewhere in today's Federal Register, EPA is withdrawing its April 18, 
2000 proposed rule with regard to the three remaining sources, namely, 
Doverspike Brothers Coal Co., Hedstrom Corporation, and the thermal 
coal dryers at EME Homer City, LP. These formerly RACT-subject sources 
have been permanently shut down, and the Pennsylvania DEP has indicated 
to EPA that no RACT need be approved for them.

II. Summary of the SIP Revisions

    The Pennsylvania DEP submitted NOX and/or VOC RACT 
determinations for thirteen sources located in the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania. The names of those sources, the DEP Plan Approval (PA) or 
Operating Permit (OP) number for each source, the name of the County in 
which each source is located, and the pollutant for which RACT has been 
imposed are provided in the following table.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Name of source                    PA or OP No.                 County                Pollutant
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cogentrix of Pennsylvania Inc. (Now      33-0137, 33-302-014, 33-  Jefferson..............  NOX
 Village Farms LP)*.                      399-004.
Scrubgrass Generating Company, LP*.....  61-0181.................  Venango................  NOX
Wheelabrator Frackville Energy Co.*....  54-005..................  Schuylkill.............  NOX
Indiana University of Pennsylvania--     32-000-200..............  Indiana................  NOX
 S.W. Jack Cogeneration Facility*.
Fleetwood Motor Homes..................  49-0011.................  Northcumberland........  VOC
Piney Creek, LP*.......................  16-0127.................  Clarion................  NOX
Statoil Energy Power Paxton, LP (Now     22-02015................  Dauphin................  NOX
 NRG Energy CTR Paxton LLC).
Harrisburg Steamworks (Now owned by NRG  22-02005................  Dauphin................  NOX
 Energy CTR Paxton LLC).
Cove Shoe Company (Now H.H. Brown Shoe   07-02028................  Blair..................  VOC
 Company).
PP&L--Fichbach C.T. Facility...........  54-0011.................  Schuylkill.............  NOX
PP&L--Allentown C.T. Facility..........  39-0009.................  Lehigh.................  NOX
PP&L--Harwood C.T. Facility............  40-0016.................  Luzerne................  NOX
PP&L--Jenkins C.T. Facility............  40-0017.................  Luzerne................  NOX
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\*\ For these large NOX sources, the Commonwealth has adopted and implemented additional ``post RACT
  requirements'' to reduce seasonal NOX emissions in the form of a NOX cap and trade regulation, 25 Pa Code
  Chapters 121 and 123, based upon a model rule developed by the States in the Ozone Transport Region. That
  regulation was approved as a SIP revision on June 6, 2000 (65 FR 35842). Pennsylvania has also adopted 25 Pa
  Code Chapter 145 to satisfy the NOX SIP call. That regulation was approved as a SIP revision on August 21,
  2001 (66 FR 43795). Federal approval of a source-specific RACT determination for these major sources of NOX in
  no way relieves those sources from any applicable requirements found in 25 PA Code Chapters 121, 123 and 145.

    On April 18, 2000 (65 FR 20788), EPA proposed to approve RACT SIP 
revisions for these thirteen sources. Detailed descriptions of the RACT 
determination for these thirteen sources were provided in EPA's 
Technical Support Documents (TSDs) prepared in support of its April 18, 
2000 rulemaking as well as in the SIP submissions made by DEP, and 
shall not be restated here. In short, EPA proposed that the DEP had 
established and imposed RACT requirements in accordance with the 
criteria set forth in the SIP-approved RACT regulations applicable to 
these sources. The DEP has also imposed record-keeping, monitoring, and 
testing requirements on these sources sufficient to determine 
compliance with the applicable RACT determinations.

III. Summary of Public Comments Received and EPA's Responses

    EPA received comments on its April 18, 2000 proposal to approve 
Pennsylvania's RACT SIP submittals from Citizens for Pennsylvania's 
Future (PennFuture) and from a concerned citizen. Those comments and 
EPA's responses are as follows:
    PennFuture's Comments: PennFuture comments that EPA should require 
that each RACT submittal include ``effective and enforceable numerical 
emission limits'' as a condition for approval. Additionally, PennFuture 
requests that EPA only approve limits that are no higher than the best 
emission rate actually achieved after the application of RACT, adjusted 
only to reflect legally and technically valid averaging times and 
deviations. PennFuture contends that such an approach will ensure 
maximum environmental benefits and minimize the opportunity for sources 
to generate spurious emission reduction credits (ERCs) against limits 
that exceed emission levels actually achieved following the application 
of RACT. Lastly PennFuture comments that EPA should describe the RACT 
determinations in its rulemaking notices published in the Federal 
Register rather than simply citing to technical support documents and 
other materials available in docket of the rulemaking.
    EPA's Responses: While RACT, as defined for an individual source or 
source category, often does specify an emission rate, such is not 
always the case. EPA has issued Control Technique Guidelines (CTGs) 
which states are to use as guidance in development of their RACT 
determinations/rules for certain sources or source categories. Not 
every CTG issued by EPA includes an emission rate. There are several 
examples of CTGs issued by EPA wherein equipment standards and/or

[[Page 11516]]

work practice standards alone are provided as RACT guidance for all or 
part of the processes covered. Such examples include the CTGs issued 
for Bulk gasoline plants, Gasoline service stations--Stage I, Petroleum 
Storage in Fixed-roof tanks, Petroleum refinery processes, Solvent 
metal cleaning, Pharmaceutical products, External Floating roof tanks 
and Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing (SOCMI)/polymer 
manufacturing. (See http://www. epa.gov/ ttn/catc/ dir1/ctg. txt.)

    In EPA's proposed conditional limited approval of the 
Commonwealth's RACT regulations (62 FR 43134, August 12, 1997) and in 
EPA's final conditional limited approval of those regulations (63 FR 
13789, March 23, 1998), EPA addressed the issue of what types of RACT 
provisions would be acceptable. In the proposed rule EPA noted that 
while it defines RACT as ``the lowest emission limitation that a source 
is capable of meeting by the application of control technology that is 
reasonably available considering technological and economic 
feasibility,'' the definition of emission limitation did not 
necessarily require the establishment of a numerical emission 
limitation. EPA further noted that ``[s]ection 302 of the Act in turn 
defines `emission limitation' as a `requirement * * * which limits the 
quantity, rate or concentration of air pollutants on a continuous 
basis, * * *, and any design, equipment, work practice or operational 
standard promulgated under this chapter.' '' Furthermore, in the March 
23, 1998 final rule EPA stated that, ``it is possible that RACT for 
certain sources and source categories could consist of requirements 
that do not specifically include emission limitations, but instead have 
other limitations.''
    With regard to the criteria EPA uses to determine whether to 
approve or disapprove RACT SIP revisions submitted by DEP pursuant to 
25 Pa Code Chapter 129.91-129.95, we look to the provisions of those 
SIP-approved regulations and to the requirements of the Clean Air Act 
and relevant EPA guidance. As previously stated, on March 23, 1998 (63 
FR 13789), EPA granted conditional limited approval of Pennsylvania's 
generic RACT regulations, 25 PA Code Chapters 121 and 129, thereby 
approving the definitions, provisions and procedures contained within 
those regulations under which the Commonwealth would require and impose 
RACT. Subsection 129.91, Control of major sources of NOX and 
VOCs, requires subject facilities to submit a RACT plan proposal to 
both the Pennsylvania DEP and to EPA Region III by July 15, 1994 in 
accordance with subsection 129.92, entitled, RACT proposal 
requirements. Under subsection 129.92, that proposal is to include 
among other information (1) A list of each subject source at the 
facility; (2) The size or capacity of each affected source, and the 
types of fuel combusted, and the types and amounts of materials 
processed or produced at each source; (3) A physical description of 
each source and its operating characteristics; (4) Estimates of 
potential and actual emissions from each affected source with 
supporting documentation; (5) A RACT analysis which meets the 
requirements of subsection 129.92(b), including technical and economic 
support documentation for each affected source; (6) A schedule for 
implementation as expeditiously as practicable but not later than May 
15, 1995; (7) The testing, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting 
procedures proposed to demonstrate compliance with RACT; and (8) any 
additional information requested by the DEP necessary to evaluate the 
RACT proposal. Under subsection 129.91, the DEP will approve, deny or 
modify each RACT proposal, and submit each RACT determination to EPA 
for approval as a SIP revision. The conditional nature of EPA's March 
23, 1998 conditional limited approval did not impose any conditions 
pertaining to the regulation's procedures for the submittal of RACT 
plans and analyses by subject sources and approval of case-by case RACT 
determinations by the DEP. Rather, EPA stated that ``* * *RACT rules 
may not merely be procedural rules (emphasis added) that require the 
source and the State to later agree to the appropriate level of 
control; rather the rules must identify the appropriate level of 
control for source categories or individual sources.''
    EPA reviews the case-by-case RACT plan approvals and/or permits 
submitted as individual SIP revisions by the Commonwealth to verify and 
determine if they are consistent with the RACT requirements of the Act 
and any relevant EPA guidance. EPA first reviews a SIP submission to 
ensure that the source and the Commonwealth followed the SIP-approved 
generic rule when applying for and imposing RACT, respectively. Then 
EPA performs a thorough review of the technical and economic analyses 
conducted by the source and the state. If EPA believes additional 
information may further support or would undercut the RACT analyses 
submitted by the state, then we may add additional EPA-generated 
analyses to the record. Thus, EPA does not believe it would be 
appropriate to only approve limits that are no higher than the best 
emission rate actually achieved after the application of RACT, adjusted 
only to reflect legally and technically valid averaging times and 
deviations.
    EPA does note that an approved RACT emission limitation alone does 
not constitute the baseline against which ERCs may be generated. There 
are many other factors that must be considered in the calculation of 
eligible ERCs under Pennsylvania's approved SIP regulations governing 
the creation ERCs. Moreover, the scenario posed in PennFuture's comment 
would not create eligible ERC's under the Commonwealth approved SIP 
regulations. Under the Commonwealth's regulations pertaining to ERCs, 
found at 25 Pa. Code Chapter 127, sections 127.206 through 127.210 
[approved by the EPA at 62 FR 64722 on December 9, 1997], sources 
cannot obtain ERCs if they find that their RACT controls result in 
lower emissions than allowed by their specified RACT limits.
    EPA believes that Federal rulemaking procedures allow for the 
format used in April 18, 2000 rulemaking (65 FR 20788). EPA believes 
that anyone interested in the specific requirements of the individual 
RACT determinations did have the opportunity to obtain that 
information, as in the preamble of the April 18, 2000 Federal Register 
notice, EPA offered to send anyone, upon request, a copy of the our 
TSDs prepared in support of the action. Copies of those TSDs are 
included in the docket established for this final rule under Docket ID 
Number at EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0123.
    Additional Comments: A private citizen submitted comments on the 
NOX RACT determinations made for the PP&L facilities and for 
Harrisburg Steamworks. With regard to the PP&L facilities, the 
commenter suggests if the capacity factors upon which the RACT 
determinations are based are ever exceeded, the RACT determinations 
should be re-reviewed, and that such a condition should be placed in 
the RACT permits with appropriate record-keeping and reporting. With 
regard to Harrisburg Steam, the commenter cites to the fact that EPA's 
Technical Support Document (TSD) states that the boilers typically 
operate at a 15% capacity factor, and asserts that if this capacity 
factor was used to determine RACT, then the permit should either limit 
the capacity factor of the boilers or require RACT to be re-evaluated 
when the capacity factor reaches 30% or some other reasonable capacity 
factor.
    EPA's Responses: EPA concurs with these comments. Pennsylvania's 
SIP-

[[Page 11517]]

approved generic RACT rules require that sources operate in accordance 
with the parameters specified in their RACT applications and/or RACT 
permits including capacity factors. The DEP has imposed record-keeping, 
monitoring, and testing requirements on these sources sufficient to 
determine compliance with the applicable parameters of their 
applications and RACT determinations. Sources seeking variances from 
the operating parameters specified in their applications and/or RACT 
permits that could result in emissions increases are subject to re-
evaluation to determine whether those emission increases trigger a more 
stringent RACT determination or the more stringent Pennsylvania SIP 
requirements for new source review.

IV. Final Action

    EPA is approving thirteen revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP 
submitted by DEP to establish and require VOC and/or NOX 
RACT at the thirteen sources indicated herein. EPA is approving these 
RACT SIP submittals because DEP established and imposed these RACT 
requirements in accordance with the criteria set forth in the SIP-
approved RACT regulations applicable to these sources and EPA has 
determined they meet the RACT requirements of section 182 of the CAA. 
The DEP has also imposed recordkeeping, monitoring, and testing 
requirements on these sources sufficient to determine compliance with 
the applicable RACT determinations.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not 
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct 
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the 
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, 
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does 
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). 
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal 
requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of 
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule 
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children 
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant. In reviewing SIP 
submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they 
meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence 
of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary 
consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP 
submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with 
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in 
place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of 
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection 
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. Section 804 exempts from section 801 the following types 
of rules: (1) rules of particular applicability; (2) rules relating to 
agency management or personnel; and (3) rules of agency organization, 
procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or 
obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not required 
to submit a rule report regarding today's action under section 801 
because this is a rule of particular applicability establishing source-
specific requirements for thirteen named sources.

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 8, 2006. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action approving revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP 
submitted by DEP to establish and require VOC and/or NOX 
RACT for thirteen sources located in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 
may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. 
(See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: February 28, 2006.
William Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart NN--Pennsylvania

0
2. In Sec.  52.2020, the table in paragraph (d)(1) is amended by adding 
the entries for Cogentrix of Pennsylvania Inc.; Scrubgrass Generating 
Company, LP; Wheelabrator Frackville Energy Co.; Indiana University of 
Pennsylvania--S.W. Jack Cogeneration Facility; Fleetwood Motor Homes; 
Piney Creek, LP; Statoil Energy Power Paxton, LP; Harrisburg 
Steamworks; Cove Shoe Company; PP&L--Fichbach C.T.

[[Page 11518]]

Facility; PP&L--Allentown C.T. Facility; PP&L--Harwood C.T. Facility; 
and PP&L--Jenkins C.T. Facility at the end of the table to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.2020  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *

   (1) EPA-Approved Source--Specific Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Requirements for Volatile
                              Organic Compounds (VOC) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                    Additional
                                                                     State        EPA approval     explanation/
       Name of source            Permit No.         County      effective date        date        Sec.   52.2063
                                                                                                     citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Cogentrix of Pennsylvania     OP-33-0137.....  Jefferson......         1/27/98  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
 Inc.                                                                            page number      )
                                                                                 where the
                                                                                 document
                                                                                 begins].
                              PA-33-302-014..  ...............        11/15/90  ...............  Except for all
                                                                                                  ton per year
                                                                                                  limits and
                                                                                                  expiration
                                                                                                  dates in these
                                                                                                  permits, for
                                                                                                  Conditions 4,
                                                                                                  5, and 6.
                              OP-33-302-014..  ...............         5/31/93  ...............  Except for
                                                                                                  Condition 2.
                              PA-33-399-004..  ...............        10/31/98  ...............  Except for
                                                                                                  Conditions 1,
                                                                                                  2, 3, 4b, 4c,
                                                                                                  4d, 4e, 5, 6,
                                                                                                  7, 8, 9, 10,
                                                                                                  12, 13, 14,
                                                                                                  15, and 16.
                              OP-33-399-004..  ...............         5/31/93  ...............  Except for
                                                                                                  Condition 2.
Scrubgrass Generating         OP-61-0181.....  Venango........         4/30/98  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
 Company, LP.                                                                    page number      ) Except for
                                                                                 where the        Conditions 4,
                                                                                 document         6, 7, and 9.
                                                                                 begins].
Wheelabrator Frackville       OP-54-005......  Schuylkill.....         9/18/98  3//8/06 [Insert  52.2020(d)(1)(l
 Energy Co.                                                                      page number      ) Except for
                                                                                 where the        the
                                                                                 document         particulate
                                                                                 begins].         and SO2
                                                                                                  emission
                                                                                                  limits found
                                                                                                  in Condition
                                                                                                  4, Condition
                                                                                                  5, 6, 7, 9,
                                                                                                  10, 11, 12 and
                                                                                                  13 and the
                                                                                                  expiration
                                                                                                  date.
Indiana University of         OP-32-000-200..  Indiana........         9/24/98  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
 Pennsylvania--S.W. Jack                                                         page number      ) Except for
 Cogeneration Facility.                                                          where the        the expiration
                                                                                 document         date and
                                                                                 begins].         Conditions 5,
                                                                                                  7, 10, 12, 20,
                                                                                                  21, and 22.
Fleetwood Motor Homes.......  OP-49-0011.....  Northumberland.        10/30/98  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
                                                                                 page number      ) Except for
                                                                                 where the        Conditions 3,
                                                                                 document         5, 23-31 and
                                                                                 begins].         the expiration
                                                                                                  date.
Piney Creek, LP.............  OP-16-0127.....  Clarion........        12/18/98  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
                                                                                 page number      ) Except for
                                                                                 where the        the ton per
                                                                                 document         year and
                                                                                 begins].         /hr
                                                                                                  limits in
                                                                                                  Condition 4,
                                                                                                  Conditions 5
                                                                                                  and 9.
Statoil Energy Power Paxton,  OP-22-02015....  Dauphin........         6/30/99  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
 LP.                                                                             page number      ) Except for
                                                                                 where the        the expiration
                                                                                 document         date and
                                                                                 begins].         Conditions 6,
                                                                                                  16, 19 and 20.
Harrisburg Steamworks.......  OP-22-02006....  Dauphin........         3/23/99  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
                                                                                 page number      ) Except for
                                                                                 where the        Conditions 5,
                                                                                 document         8, 11, 9, 10,
                                                                                 begins].         18, 19, 22,
                                                                                                  23, 24 and the
                                                                                                  expiration
                                                                                                  date.
Cove Shoe Company...........  OP-07-02028....  Blair..........          4/7/99  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
                                                                                 page number      ) except for
                                                                                 where the        Conditions 5,
                                                                                 document         10 and the
                                                                                 begins].         expiration
                                                                                                  date.
PP&L--Fichbach C.T. Facility  OP-54-0011.....  Schuylkill.....          6/1/99  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
                                                                                 page number      ) Except for
                                                                                 where the        the expiration
                                                                                 document         date.
                                                                                 begins]..
PP&L--Allentown C.T.          OP-39-0009.....  Lehigh.........          6/1/99  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
 Facility.                                                                       page number      ) Except for
                                                                                 where the        the expiration
                                                                                 document         date.
                                                                                 begins].
PP&L--Harwood C.T. Facility.  OP-40-0016.....  Luzerne........          6/1/99  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
                                                                                 page number      ) Except for
                                                                                 where the        the expiration
                                                                                 document         date.
                                                                                 begins].

[[Page 11519]]


PP&L--Jenkins C.T. Facility.  OP-40-0017.....  Luzerne........          6/1/99  3/8/06 [Insert   52.2020(d)(1)(l
                                                                                 page number      ) Except for
                                                                                 where the        the expiration
                                                                                 document         date.
                                                                                 begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 06-2150 Filed 3-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
