SIP
SUBMITTAL
COMPLETENESS
CRITERIA
CHECKLIST
(
in
accordance
with
40
CFR
Part
51
­
App.
V)

SIP
Submitted
by:
Commonwealth
of
Virginia
Date
Submitted:
October
25,
2005
Subject:
VOC
Emissions
Standards
for
the
Northern
Virginia
Ozone
Nonattainment
Area,
Consumer
Products
(
Rule
4­
50)

Completeness
Review
Completed
by:
Rose
Quinto
Date
Completed:
November
2,
2005
Administrative
Materials
ACCEPTABLE
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

1.
A
formal
letter
of
submittal
from
the
Governor
or
his
designee,
requesting
EPA
approval
of
the
plan
or
revision
thereof.
1.
Letter
dated
October
25,
2005
from
Robert
G.
Burnley,

Director,
Virginia
Department
of
Environmental
Quality
to
Judith
M.
Katz,
Air
Protection
Division,
Region
III.
Yes
2.
Evidence
that
the
State
has
adopted
the
plan
in
the
State
code
or
body
of
regulations;
or
issued
the
permit,
order,

consent
agreement
in
final
form.
That
evidence
shall
include
the
date
of
adoption
or
final
issuance
as
well
as
the
effective
date
of
the
plan,
if
different
from
the
adoption/
issuance
date.
2.
Revision
was
adopted
by
the
State
Air
Pollution
Control
Board
on
November
3,
2004,
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
section
10.1­
1308
of
the
Virginia
Air
Pollution
Control
Law,
and
40
CFR
Part
51.
Effective
date
of
the
revision
is
March
9,
2005.
Yes
3.
Evidence
that
the
State
has
the
necessary
legal
authority
under
State
law
to
adopt
and
implement
the
plan.
3.
Revision
adopted
pursuant
to
section
10.1­
1308
of
the
Virginia
Air
Pollution
Control
law.
Yes
Administrative
Materials
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

2
4.
A
copy
of
actual
regulation,
or
document
submitted
for
approval
and
incorporation
by
reference
into
the
plan,

including
indication
of
the
changes
made
to
the
existing
approved
plan,
where
applicable.
The
submittal
shall
be
a
copy
of
the
official
State
regulation/
document
signed,
stamped,

dated
by
the
appropriate
State
official
indicating
that
it
is
fully
enforceable
by
the
State.
The
effective
date
of
the
regulation/
document
shall,
whenever
possible,
be
indicated
in
the
document
itself.
4.
Commonwealth
of
Virginia,
Department
of
Environmental
Quality,
9
VAC
5
Chapter
20,
General
Provisions
and
9
VAC
5
Chapter
40,
Existing
Stationary
Sources
­
Consumer
Products
regulation
adopted
on
November
3,
2004,
published
in
the
Virginia
Register
of
Regulations
on
February
7,
2005,
and
effective
on
March
9,
2005.
Yes
5.
Evidence
that
the
State
followed
all
of
the
procedural
requirements
of
the
State's
laws
and
constitution
in
conducting
and
completing
the
adoption/
issuance
of
the
plan.
5.
A
letter
dated
October
25,
2005,
from
Robert
G.
Burnley,

Director,
Virginia
Department
of
Environmental
Quality
to
Judith
M.
Katz,
Air
Protection
Division,
EPA
Region
III.

Certification
of
Public
Participation
Activities.
Copy
of
public
hearing
notice
run
on
August
9,
2004
The
Washington
Times.
Yes
6.
Evidence
that
public
notice
was
given
of
the
proposed
change
consistent
with
procedures
approved
by
EPA,
including
the
date
of
publication
of
such
notice.
6.
Copy
of
hearing
notice
run
on
August
9,
2004
The
Washington
Times.
Yes
7.
Certification
that
public
hearings
were
held
in
accordance
with
the
information
provided
in
the
public
notice
and
the
State's
laws
and
constitution,
if
applicable.
7.
Public
hearing
held
on
September
9,
2004;
Certification
of
Public
Participation
Activities
found
in
Enclosure
2
to
the
letter
dated
October
25,
2005,
from
Robert
G.
Burnley,
Director,

Virginia
Department
of
Environmental
Quality
to
Judith
M.

Katz,
Air
Protection
Division,
EPA
Region
III.
Yes
8.
Compilation
of
public
comments
and
the
State's
response
thereto.
8.
Record
of
Heating
and
Summary
of
Testimony
found
in
Enclosure
3
to
the
letter
dated
October
25,
2005,
from
Robert
G.
Burnley,
Director,
Virginia
Department
of
Environmental
Quality
to
Judith
M.
Katz,
Air
Protection
Division,
EPA
Region
III.
Comments
were
received
on
this
particular
revision.
Yes
Technical
Materials
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

3
1.
Identification
of
all
regulated
pollutants
affected
by
the
plan.
1.
N/
A
2.
Identification
of
the
locations
of
affected
sources
including
the
EPA
attainment/
nonattainment
designation
of
the
locations
and
the
status
of
the
attainment
plan
for
the
affected
area(
s).
2.
N/
A
3.
Quantification
of
the
changes
in
plan
allowable
emissions
from
the
affected
sources;
estimates
of
changes
in
current
actual
emissions
from
affected
sources
or,
where
appropriate,

quantification
of
changes
in
actual
emissions
from
affected
sources
through
calculations
of
the
differences
between
certain
baseline
levels
and
allowable
emissions
anticipated
as
a
result
of
the
revision.
3.
N/
A
4.
The
State's
demonstration
that
the
national
ambient
air
quality
standards,
prevention
of
significant
deterioration
increments,
reasonable
further
progress
demonstration,
and
visibility,
as
applicable,
are
protected
if
the
plan
is
approved
and
implemented.
4.
N/
A
5.
Modeling
information
required
to
support
the
proposed
revision,
including
input
data,
output
data,
models
used,

ambient
monitoring
data
used,
meteorological
data
used,

justification
for
use
of
offsite
data
(
where
used),
modes
of
models
used,
assumptions,
and
other
information
relevant
to
the
determination
of
adequacy
of
the
modeling
analysis.
5.
N/
A
6.
Evidence,
where
necessary,
that
emission
limitations
are
based
on
continuous
emission
reduction
technology.
6
N/
A
Technical
Materials
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

4
7.
Evidence
that
the
plan
contains
emission
limitations,
work
practice
standards
and
recordkeeping/
reporting
requirements,

where
necessary,
to
ensure
emission
levels.
7.
N/
A
8.
Compliance/
enforcement
strategies,
including
how
compliance
will
be
determined
in
practice.
8
N/
A
9.
Special
economic
and
technological
justifications
required
by
any
applicable
EPA
policies.
(
If
a
policy
is
not
appropriate,

explain
why.)
9.
N/
A
10.
A
Section
107
request
must
be
accompanied
by
a
maintenance
plan
demonstrating
maintenance
to
the
relevant
NAAQS
for
at
least
10
years
after
redesignation.
10.
N/
A
