SIP
SUBMITTAL
COMPLETENESS
CRITERIA
CHECKLIST
(
in
accordance
with
40
CFR
Part
51
­
App.
V)

SIP
Submitted
by:
Virginia
Date
Submitted:
August
25,
2005
Subject:
Technical
Documents
Incorporated
by
Reference
in
9
VAC
5
Chapter
20
(
General
Provisions),
and
Cross­
References
to
Regulations
in
9
VAC
5
Chapter
40,
Part
II
(
Existing
Stationary
Sources­
Emission
Standards)

Review
Completed
by:
Harold
A.
Frankford
Date
Completed:
October
7,
2005
Administrative
Materials
ACCEPTABLE
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

1.
A
formal
letter
of
submittal
from
the
Governor
or
his
designee,
requesting
EPA
approval
of
the
plan
or
revision
thereof.
1.
Submittal
letter
was
signed
August
25,
2005
by
Robert
G.

Burnley,
Director,
Department
of
Environmental
Quality,
who
has
been
designated
to
sign
SIP
Submittal
cover
letters
X
2.
Evidence
that
the
State
has
adopted
the
plan
in
the
State
code
or
body
of
regulations;
or
issued
the
permit,
order,

consent
agreement
in
final
form.
That
evidence
shall
include
the
date
of
adoption
or
final
issuance
as
well
as
the
effective
date
of
the
plan,
if
different
from
the
adoption/
issuance
date.
2.
Virginia
provided
proof
that
on
November
7,
2001,
the
Commonwealth
adopted
the
revisions
to
9
Chapter
5
Chapters
20
and
40,
effective
February
1,
2002.
The
final
version
of
the
Appendices
were
published
in
the
December
17,
2001
Virginia
Register
of
Regulations.
X
3.
Evidence
that
the
State
has
the
necessary
legal
authority
under
State
law
to
adopt
and
implement
the
plan.
3.
Revision
was
adopted
and
submitted
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
Section
10.1­
1308
of
the
Virginia
Air
Pollution
Control
Law
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

2
4.
A
copy
of
actual
regulation,
or
document
submitted
for
approval
and
incorporation
by
reference
into
the
plan,

including
indication
of
the
changes
made
to
the
existing
approved
plan,
where
applicable.
The
submittal
shall
be
a
copy
of
the
official
State
regulation/
document
signed,
stamped,

dated
by
the
appropriate
State
official
indicating
that
it
is
fully
enforceable
by
the
State.
The
effective
date
of
the
regulation/
document
shall,
whenever
possible,
be
indicated
in
the
document
itself.
4.
Virginia
has
submitted
a
copy
of
revised
Regulations
9
VAC
5­
20­
21,
5­
40­
460,
5­
40­
2930,
5­
40­
5210,
and
5­
40­
5230.

Virginia
also
submitted
notations
clearly
specifying
that
information
submitted
on
additional
regulatory
revisions
were
submitted
for
information
purposes
only.
X
5.
Evidence
that
the
State
followed
all
of
the
procedural
requirements
of
the
State's
laws
and
constitution
in
conducting
and
completing
the
adoption/
issuance
of
the
plan.
5.
All
required
documentation
provided.
Regulation
were
adopted
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
section
10.1­

1308
of
the
Virginia
Air
Pollution
Control
Law,
which
in
turn
cross­
references
the
requirements
of
Virginia's
Administrative
Process
Act
(
§
9­
6.14:
1
et
seq.,
currently
codified
at
§
2.2­
4000
et
seq.).
X
6.
Evidence
that
public
notice
was
given
of
the
proposed
change
consistent
with
procedures
approved
by
EPA,
including
the
date
of
publication
of
such
notice.
6.
Virginia
provided
notice
to
the
EPA,
Maryland,
the
District
of
Columbia,
Tennessee,
and
the
public
that
hearings
were
to
be
held
in
Richmond,
VA
on
August
16,
2001.
X
7.
Certification
that
public
hearings
were
held
in
accordance
with
the
information
provided
in
the
public
notice
and
the
State's
laws
and
constitution,
if
applicable.
7.
Virginia
certified
that
the
public
hearing
was
held
in
Richmond,
VA
on
August
16,
2001,
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
40
CFR
Section
51.102.
X
Administrative
Materials
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

3
8.
Compilation
of
public
comments
and
the
State's
response
thereto.
8.
In
its
August
25,
2005
submittal,
Virginia
provided
a
statement
that
no
testimony
was
received
on
the
proposed
State
action.
X
Administrative
Materials
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

4
1.
Identification
of
all
regulated
pollutants
affected
by
the
plan.
1.
Not
Applicable
2.
Identification
of
the
locations
of
affected
sources
including
the
EPA
attainment/
nonattainment
designation
of
the
locations
and
the
status
of
the
attainment
plan
for
the
affected
area(
s).
2.
Not
Applicable
3.
Quantification
of
the
changes
in
plan
allowable
emissions
from
the
affected
sources;
estimates
of
changes
in
current
actual
emissions
from
affected
sources
or,
where
appropriate,

quantification
of
changes
in
actual
emissions
from
affected
sources
through
calculations
of
the
differences
between
certain
baseline
levels
and
allowable
emissions
anticipated
as
a
result
of
the
revision.
3.
Not
Applicable
4.
The
State's
demonstration
that
the
national
ambient
air
quality
standards,
prevention
of
significant
deterioration
increments,
reasonable
further
progress
demonstration,
and
visibility,
as
applicable,
are
protected
if
the
plan
is
approved
and
implemented.
4.
Not
Applicable
5.
Modeling
information
required
to
support
the
proposed
revision,
including
input
data,
output
data,
models
used,

ambient
monitoring
data
used,
meteorological
data
used,

justification
for
use
of
offsite
data
(
where
used),
modes
of
models
used,
assumptions,
and
other
information
relevant
to
the
determination
of
adequacy
of
the
modeling
analysis.
5.
Not
Applicable
6.
Evidence,
where
necessary,
that
emission
limitations
are
based
on
continuous
emission
reduction
technology.
6.
Not
Applicable
7.
Evidence
that
the
plan
contains
emission
limitations,
work
practice
standards
and
recordkeeping/
reporting
requirements,

where
necessary,
to
ensure
emission
levels.
7.
Not
Applicable
Administrative
Materials
EPA
REQUIREMENT
STATE
SUBMITTAL
(
X)

5
8.
Compliance/
enforcement
strategies,
including
how
compliance
will
be
determined
in
practice.
8.
Not
Applicable
9.
Special
economic
and
technological
justifications
required
by
any
applicable
EPA
policies.
(
If
a
policy
is
not
appropriate,

explain
why.)
9.
Not
Applicable
10.
A
Section
107
request
must
be
accompanied
by
a
maintenance
plan
demonstrating
maintenance
to
the
relevant
NAAQS
for
at
least
10
years
after
redesignation.
10.
Not
Applicable
