ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
40
CFR
Part
52
[
EPA­
R03­
OAR­
2005­
VA­
0010;
FRL­
]

Approval
and
Promulgation
of
Air
Quality
Implementation
Plans;
Virginia;
Amendments
to
Existing
Regulation
Provisions
Concerning
Maintenance,
Nonattainment,
and
Prevention
of
Significant
Deterioration
Areas
AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA).

ACTION:
Final
rule.

SUMMARY:
EPA
is
approving
State
Implementation
Plan
(
SIP)
revisions
submitted
by
the
Commonwealth
of
Virginia.
These
revisions
consist
of
amendments
to
state
regulation
provisions
concerning
maintenance,
nonattainment,
and
prevention
of
significant
deterioration
(
PSD)
areas
for
incorporation
into
the
Virginia
SIP.
EPA
is
approving
these
SIP
revisions
in
accordance
with
the
Clean
Air
Act
(
CAA
or
Act).

EFFECTIVE
DATE:
This
final
rule
is
effective
on
[
insert
date
30
days
from
date
of
publication].

ADDRESSES:
EPA
has
established
a
docket
for
this
action
under
Docket
ID
Number
EPAR03
OAR­
2005­
VA­
0010.
All
documents
in
the
docket
are
listed
in
the
www.
regulations.
gov
website.
Although
listed
in
the
electronic
docket,
some
information
is
not
publicly
available,
i.
e.,

confidential
business
information
(
CBI)
or
other
information
whose
disclosure
is
restricted
by
statute.
Certain
other
material,
such
as
copyrighted
material,
is
not
placed
on
the
Internet
and
will
be
publicly
available
only
in
hard
copy
form.
Publicly
available
docket
materials
are
available
either
electronically
through
www.
regulations.
gov
or
in
hard
copy
for
public
inspection
during
normal
business
hours
at
the
Air
Protection
Division,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
2
Region
III,
1650
Arch
Street,
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
19103.
Copies
of
the
State
submittal
are
available
at
the
Virginia
Department
of
Environmental
Quality,
629
East
Main
Street,
Richmond,

Virginia,
23219.

FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Ellen
Wentworth,
(
215)
814­
2034,
or
by
email
at
wentworth.
ellen@
epa.
gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:

I.
Background
On
June
12,
2006
(
71
FR
33669),
EPA
published
a
notice
of
proposed
rulemaking
(
NPR)
for
the
Commonwealth
of
Virginia.
The
NPR
proposed
approval
of
formal
SIP
revisions
submitted
by
the
Commonwealth
of
Virginia
on
August
15,
August
17,
August
19,
September
28,
and
October
3,
2005.
These
SIP
revisions
consist
of
amendments
to
existing
regulation
provisions
concerning
maintenance,
nonattainment,
and
PSD
areas
found
in
9
VAC
5,
Chapter
20
of
Virginia's
regulations
for
the
Control
and
Abatement
of
Air
Pollution.

II.
Summary
of
SIP
Revisions
The
August
15,
2005
SIP
revision
amends
9
VAC
5­
20­
203,
Maintenance
areas,
9
VAC
5­
20­

204,
Nonattainment
areas,
and
9
VAC
5­
20­
205,
PSD
areas,
to
reflect
the
redesignation
of
the
Hampton
Roads
ozone
nonattainment
area
to
attainment
of
the
1­
hour
ozone
national
ambient
air
quality
standards
(
NAAQS)
(
62
FR
34408,
June
26,
1997).
3
The
August
17,
2005
SIP
revision
amends
9
VAC
5­
20­
203,
Maintenance
areas,
9
VAC
5­
20­

204,
Nonattainment
areas,
and
9
VAC
5­
20­
205,
PSD
areas,
to
reflect
the
redesignation
of
the
Richmond
ozone
nonattainment
area
to
attainment
of
the
1­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
(
62
FR
61237,
November
17,
1997).

The
August
19,
2005
SIP
revision
amends
9
VAC
5­
20­
204,
Nonattainment
areas,
and
9
VAC
5­

20­
205,
PSD
areas,
to
reflect
the
first
repeal
of
the
1­
hour
ozone
NAAQS
(
63
FR
31087,
June
5,

1998),
which
removed
the
White
Top
Mountain
area
from
the
list
of
1­
hour
ozone
nonattainment
areas
and
from
the
list
of
PSD
areas.
The
White
Top
Mountain
area
was
later
reinstated
as
a
rural
transport
(
marginal)
ozone
nonattainment
area
under
the
1­
hour
ozone
standard
on
July
20,
2000
(
65
FR
45182),
as
a
result
of
a
1999
court
decision
challenging
EPA's
previous
determinations
on
the
applicability
of
the
1­
hour
ozone
standard.

The
September
28,
2005
SIP
revision
amends
9
VAC
5­
20­
204,
Nonattainment
areas,
and
9
VAC
5­
20­
205,
PSD
areas,
by
incorporating
the
new
8­
hour
ozone
nonattainment
areas
into
the
list
of
Virginia's
nonattainment
areas
found
in
9
VAC
5­
20­
204,
and
revising
the
list
of
PSD
areas
found
in
9
VAC
5­
20­
205.
Because
the
1­
hour
ozone
standard
was
revoked,
effective
June
15,
2005,
the
revision
also
adds
a
provision
to
9
VAC
5­
20­
204,
which
removed
the
severe
area
program
in
the
Northern
Virginia
ozone
nonattainment
area
as
the
area
was
constituted
under
the
1­
hour
standard.
Because
the
severe
area
program
imposed
more
stringent
requirements
than
those
required
under
section
184
of
the
CAA
in
that
area,
Virginia
did
not
need
to
have
a
separate
new
source
review
(
NSR)
program
meeting
the
section
184
requirements.
4
EPA
proposed
approval
of
this
revision
(
71
FR,
33670,
June
12,
2006),
contingent
upon
the
Commonwealth
of
Virginia
implementing
the
NSR
program
required
under
section
184
of
the
CAA
in
Virginia's
portion
of
the
Ozone
Transport
Region
(
OTR).
On
July
13,
2006
(
71
FR
39570),
EPA
published
a
final
rulemaking
implementing
the
NSR
program
required
under
section
184
of
the
CAA
in
Virginia's
portion
of
the
OTR.

It
should
be
noted
that
since
the
September
28,
2005
SIP
revision
submittal,
EPA
has
redesignated
the
Fredericksburg
(
70
FR
76165,
December
23,
2005)
and
Shenandoah
National
Park
(
71
FR
24,
January
3,
2006)
areas
to
attainment
of
the
8­
hour
ozone
NAAQS.

Other
specific
requirements
pertaining
to
9
VAC
5,
Chapter
20
of
Virginia's
regulations
for
the
Control
and
Abatement
of
Air
Pollution
and
the
rationale
for
EPA's
proposed
action
are
explained
in
the
NPR
and
will
not
be
restated
here.
No
public
comments
were
received
on
the
NPR.

III.
General
Information
Pertaining
to
SIP
Submittals
From
the
Commonwealth
of
Virginia
In
1995,
Virginia
adopted
legislation
that
provides,
subject
to
certain
conditions,
for
an
environmental
assessment
(
audit)
Aprivilege@'
for
voluntary
compliance
evaluations
performed
by
a
regulated
entity.
The
legislation
further
addresses
the
relative
burden
of
proof
for
parties
either
asserting
the
privilege
or
seeking
disclosure
of
documents
for
which
the
privilege
is
claimed.

Virginia's
legislation
also
provides,
subject
to
certain
conditions,
for
a
penalty
waiver
for
violations
of
environmental
laws
when
a
regulated
entity
discovers
such
violations
pursuant
to
a
5
voluntary
compliance
evaluation
and
voluntarily
discloses
such
violations
to
the
Commonwealth
and
takes
prompt
and
appropriate
measures
to
remedy
the
violations.
Virginia's
Voluntary
Environmental
Assessment
Privilege
Law,
Va.
Code
Sec.
10.1­
1198,
provides
a
privilege
that
protects
from
disclosure
documents
and
information
about
the
content
of
those
documents
that
are
the
product
of
a
voluntary
environmental
assessment.
The
Privilege
Law
does
not
extend
to
documents
or
information
(
1)
that
are
generated
or
developed
before
the
commencement
of
a
voluntary
environmental
assessment;
(
2)
that
are
prepared
independently
of
the
assessment
process;
(
3)
that
demonstrate
a
clear,
imminent
and
substantial
danger
to
the
public
health
or
environment;
or
(
4)
that
are
required
by
law.

On
January
12,
1998,
the
Commonwealth
of
Virginia
Office
of
the
Attorney
General
provided
a
legal
opinion
that
states
that
the
Privilege
law,
Va.
Code
Sec.
10.1­
1198,
precludes
granting
a
privilege
to
documents
and
information
Arequired
by
law,@
including
documents
and
information
Arequired
by
Federal
law
to
maintain
program
delegation,
authorization
or
approval,@
since
Virginia
must
Aenforce
Federally
authorized
environmental
programs
in
a
manner
that
is
no
less
stringent
than
their
Federal
counterparts.
.
.
.@
The
opinion
concludes
that
A[
r]
egarding
'
10.1­

1198,
therefore,
documents
or
other
information
needed
for
civil
or
criminal
enforcement
under
one
of
these
programs
could
not
be
privileged
because
such
documents
and
information
are
essential
to
pursuing
enforcement
in
a
manner
required
by
Federal
law
to
maintain
program
delegation,
authorization
or
approval.@

Virginia's
Immunity
law,
Va.
Code
Sec.
10.1­
1199,
provides
that
A[
t]
o
the
extent
consistent
with
6
requirements
imposed
by
Federal
law,@
any
person
making
a
voluntary
disclosure
of
information
to
a
state
agency
regarding
a
violation
of
an
environmental
statute,
regulation,
permit,
or
administrative
order
is
granted
immunity
from
administrative
or
civil
penalty.
The
Attorney
General's
January
12,
1998
opinion
states
that
the
quoted
language
renders
this
statute
inapplicable
to
enforcement
of
any
Federally
authorized
programs,
since
Ano
immunity
could
be
afforded
from
administrative,
civil,
or
criminal
penalties
because
granting
such
immunity
would
not
be
consistent
with
Federal
law,
which
is
one
of
the
criteria
for
immunity.@

Therefore,
EPA
has
determined
that
Virginia's
Privilege
and
Immunity
statutes
will
not
preclude
the
Commonwealth
from
enforcing
its
program
consistent
with
the
Federal
requirements.
In
any
event,
because
EPA
has
also
determined
that
a
state
audit
privilege
and
immunity
law
can
affect
only
state
enforcement
and
cannot
have
any
impact
on
Federal
enforcement
authorities,
EPA
may
at
any
time
invoke
its
authority
under
the
Clean
Air
Act,
including,
for
example,
sections
113,

167,
205,
211
or
213,
to
enforce
the
requirements
or
prohibitions
of
the
state
plan,
independently
of
any
state
enforcement
effort.
In
addition,
citizen
enforcement
under
section
304
of
the
Clean
Air
Act
is
likewise
unaffected
by
this,
or
any,
state
audit
privilege
or
immunity
law.

IV.
Final
Action
EPA
is
approving
the
amendments
to
existing
regulations
pertaining
to
nonattainment,

maintenance,
and
PSD
areas
found
in
9
VAC
5
Chapter
20,
submitted
on
August
15,17,
19,

September
28,
and
October
3,
2005,
as
revisions
to
the
Commonwealth
of
Virginia
SIP.

V.
Statutory
and
Executive
Order
Reviews
7
A.
General
Requirements
Under
Executive
Order
12866
(
58
FR
51735,
October
4,
1993),
this
action
is
not
a
"
significant
regulatory
action"
and
therefore
is
not
subject
to
review
by
the
Office
of
Management
and
Budget.
For
this
reason,
this
action
is
also
not
subject
to
Executive
Order
13211,
"
Actions
Concerning
Regulations
That
Significantly
Affect
Energy
Supply,
Distribution,
or
Use"
(
66
FR
28355,
May
22,
2001).
This
action
merely
approves
state
law
as
meeting
Federal
requirements
and
imposes
no
additional
requirements
beyond
those
imposed
by
state
law.
Accordingly,
the
Administrator
certifies
that
this
rule
will
not
have
a
significant
economic
impact
on
a
substantial
number
of
small
entities
under
the
Regulatory
Flexibility
Act
(
5
U.
S.
C.
601
et
seq.).
Because
this
rule
approves
pre­
existing
requirements
under
state
law
and
does
not
impose
any
additional
enforceable
duty
beyond
that
required
by
state
law,
it
does
not
contain
any
unfunded
mandate
or
significantly
or
uniquely
affect
small
governments,
as
described
in
the
Unfunded
Mandates
Reform
Act
of
1995
(
Public
Law
104­
4).
This
rule
also
does
not
have
tribal
implications
because
it
will
not
have
a
substantial
direct
effect
on
one
or
more
Indian
tribes,
on
the
relationship
between
the
Federal
Government
and
Indian
tribes,
or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
between
the
Federal
Government
and
Indian
tribes,
as
specified
by
Executive
Order
13175
(
65
FR
67249,
November
9,
2000).
This
action
also
does
not
have
Federalism
implications
because
it
does
not
have
substantial
direct
effects
on
the
States,
on
the
relationship
between
the
national
government
and
the
States,
or
on
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
among
the
various
levels
of
government,
as
specified
in
Executive
Order
13132
(
64
FR
43255,
August
10,
1999).

This
action
merely
approves
a
state
rule
implementing
a
Federal
requirement,
and
does
not
alter
the
relationship
or
the
distribution
of
power
and
responsibilities
established
in
the
Clean
Air
Act.
8
This
rule
also
is
not
subject
to
Executive
Order
13045
AProtection
of
Children
from
Environmental
Health
Risks
and
Safety
Risks@
(
62
FR
19885,
April
23,
1997),
because
it
is
not
economically
significant.

In
reviewing
SIP
submissions,
EPA=
s
role
is
to
approve
state
choices,
provided
that
they
meet
the
criteria
of
the
Clean
Air
Act.
In
this
context,
in
the
absence
of
a
prior
existing
requirement
for
the
State
to
use
voluntary
consensus
standards
(
VCS),
EPA
has
no
authority
to
disapprove
a
SIP
submission
for
failure
to
use
VCS.
It
would
thus
be
inconsistent
with
applicable
law
for
EPA,

when
it
reviews
a
SIP
submission,
to
use
VCS
in
place
of
a
SIP
submission
that
otherwise
satisfies
the
provisions
of
the
Clean
Air
Act.
Thus,
the
requirements
of
section
12(
d)
of
the
National
Technology
Transfer
and
Advancement
Act
of
1995
(
15
U.
S.
C.
272
note)
do
not
apply.

This
rule
does
not
impose
an
information
collection
burden
under
the
provisions
of
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act
of
1995
(
44
U.
S.
C.
3501
et
seq.).

B.
Submission
to
Congress
and
the
Comptroller
General
The
Congressional
Review
Act,
5
U.
S.
C.
801
et
seq.,
as
added
by
the
Small
Business
Regulatory
Enforcement
Fairness
Act
of
1996,
generally
provides
that
before
a
rule
may
take
effect,
the
agency
promulgating
the
rule
must
submit
a
rule
report,
which
includes
a
copy
of
the
rule,
to
each
House
of
the
Congress
and
to
the
Comptroller
General
of
the
United
States.
EPA
will
submit
a
report
containing
this
rule
and
other
required
information
to
the
U.
S.
Senate,
the
U.
S.
House
of
Representatives,
and
the
Comptroller
General
of
the
United
States
prior
to
publication
of
the
rule
in
the
Federal
Register.
This
rule
is
not
a
Amajor
rule@
as
defined
by
5
U.
S.
C.
804(
2).
9
C.
Petitions
for
Judicial
Review
Under
section
307(
b)(
1)
of
the
Clean
Air
Act,
petitions
for
judicial
review
of
this
action
must
be
filed
in
the
United
States
Court
of
Appeals
for
the
appropriate
circuit
by
[
insert
date
60
days
from
date
of
publication
of
this
document
in
the
Federal
Register].
Filing
a
petition
for
reconsideration
by
the
Administrator
of
this
final
rule
does
not
affect
the
finality
of
this
rule
for
the
purposes
of
judicial
review
nor
does
it
extend
the
time
within
which
a
petition
for
judicial
review
may
be
filed,
and
shall
not
postpone
the
effectiveness
of
such
rule
or
action.
This
action,
approving
amendments
to
Virginia's
existing
regulation
provisions
concerning
maintenance,
nonattainment,
and
PSD
areas,
may
not
be
challenged
later
in
proceedings
to
enforce
its
requirements.
(
See
section
307(
b)(
2).)

List
of
Subjects
in
40
CFR
part
52
Environmental
protection,
Air
pollution
control,
Carbon
monoxide,
Nitrogen
dioxide,
Ozone,
Reporting
and
recordkeeping
requirements,
Volatile
organic
compounds.

/
s/
___________
___________________________
Dated:
August
8,
2006
Donald
S.
Welsh,
Regional
Administrator,
Region
III.
10
40
CFR
part
52
is
amended
as
follows:

PART
52
­
[
AMENDED]

1.
The
authority
citation
for
part
52
continues
to
read
as
follows:

Authority:
42
U.
S.
C.
7401
et
seq.

Subpart
VVB
Virginia
2.
In
'
52.2420,
the
table
in
paragraph
(
c)
is
amended
by
revising
the
entries
for
Chapter
20,

Sections
5­
20­
203,
5­
20­
204,
and
5­
20­
205
to
read
as
follows:

'
52.2420
Identification
of
plan.

*
*
*
*
*

(
c)
*
*
*

EPA­
APPROVED
VIRGINIA
REGULATIONS
AND
STATUTES
State
citation
(
9
VAC
5)
Title/
subject
State
effective
date
EPA
approval
date
Explanation
[
former
SIP
citation]

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

Chapter
20
General
Provisions
[
Part
II]

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

5­
20­
203
Air
Quality
Maintenance
Areas
(
AQMA)
01/
01/
98
04/
01/
98
[
Insert
Federal
Register
publication
date]
[
Insert
page
number
where
the
document
begins]
11
State
citation
(
9
VAC
5)
Title/
subject
State
effective
date
EPA
approval
date
Explanation
[
former
SIP
citation]

5­
20­
204
Nonattainment
Areas
01/
01/
98
04/
01/
98
01/
01/
99
08/
25/
04
01/
12/
05
[
Insert
Federal
Register
publication
date]
[
Insert
page
number
where
the
document
begins]

5­
20­
205
Prevention
of
Significant
Deterioration
Areas
01/
01/
98
04/
01/
98
01/
01/
99
08/
25/
04
[
Insert
Federal
Register
publication
date]
[
Insert
page
number
where
the
document
begins]

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
