HAZARD
RANKING
SYSTEM
DOCUMENTATION
PACKAGE
QUANTA
RESOURCES
EDGEWATER,
BERGEN
COUNTY,
NEW
JERSEY
CERCLIS
ID
No.:
NJD000606442
VOLUME
1
of
1
EPA
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
N
o
.
:
68­
W7­
0026
Work
Assignment
N
o
.
:
053­
HRHR­
02ZZ
Work
Order
No.:
'
20064­
053­
100­
2022
December
2000
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
f
o
r
:

UNITED
STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
R
e
g
i
o
n
I1
2
9
0
B
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
,
1
8
t
h
F
l
o
o
r
New
York,
NY
1
0
0
0
7
P
r
e
p
a
z
e
d
by:

Roy
F.
Weston,
Inc
E
d
i
s
o
n
,
NJ
08837
SITE
SUMMARY
The
Quanta
Resources
s
i
t
e
is
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
163
River
Road
i
n
Edgewater,
Bergen
County,
New
Jersey.
The
s
i
t
e
covers'
approximately
8
acres.
The
Quanta
property
i
s
bordered
t
o
t
h
e
north
by
t
h
e
C
e
l
o
t
e
x
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
,
t
o
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
by
the
former
Spencer­
Kellogg
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
,
t
o
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
b
y
R
i
v
e
r
Road,
and
t
o
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
by
the
Hudson
River.
From
approximately
1930
t
o
1981
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
had
been
used
a
s
an
o
i
l
and
t
a
r
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
and
r
e
c
l
a
m
a
t
i
o
n
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.

Beginning
i
n
t
h
e
e
a
r
l
y
1930s,
AlliedChemical
Corporation
Asphalt
Division
(
now
Allied­
Signal)
operated
a
t
a
r
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
t
a
t
t
h
e
site.
In
1974,
Allied
Chemical
s
o
l
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
o
t
h
e
e
s
t
a
t
e
of
M
r
.
James
Frola
and
M
r
.
Albert
Von
Dohln.
In
1977,
M
r
.
Frola
and
Mr.
Van
Dohln
l
e
a
s
e
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
o
E.
R.
P.
Corporation
for
the
storage
and
recycling
of
o
i
l
.
S
h
o
r
t
l
y
t
h
e
r
e
a
f
t
e
r
,
E.
R.
P.
assigned
i
t
s
l
e
a
s
e
t
o
Edgewater
Terminals,
Incorporated.
Quanta
Resources
Corporation
obtained
usage
of
the
property
through
transfer
of
t
h
e
l
e
a
s
e
from
Edgewater
Terminals.
The
s
i
t
e
had
61
above­
ground
storage
tanks
(
ASTs)
with
a
t
o
t
a
l
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
of
over
9
million
gallons,
along
with
an
unknown
number
of
underground
storage
tanks
(
USTs)
and
numerous
underground
pipes.
These
tanks
were
used
t
o
s
t
o
r
e
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
,
o
i
l
,
t
a
r
,
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
,
s
l
u
d
g
e
,
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
w
a
t
e
r
and
other
unknown
liquids.

On
July
2,
1981,
t
h
e
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection
(
NJDEP)
forced
the
c
l
o
s
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
Q
u
a
n
t
a
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
when
it
was
discovered
that
the
storage
tanks
contained
large
quantities
of
oil
with
polychlorinated
biphenyl
(
PCB)
concentrations
as
h
i
g
h
a
s
260
p
a
r
t
s
p
e
r
m
i
l
l
i
o
n
fppm)
.

'
Between
1984
and
1988,
removal
a
c
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
were
conducted
a
t
t
h
e
QRC
s
i
t
e
.
These
actions
were
supervised
by
the
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
and
focused
on
the
cleaning
and
decommissioning
of
the
ASTs
and
USTs.
I
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
some
underground
piping
and
s
h
a
l
l
o
w
s
o
i
l
s
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
were
removed
from
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
.
I
n
1992,
EPA
conducted
an
assessment
of
the
previous
removal
actions,
which
included
the
collection
of
s
o
i
l
,
ground
water,
and
sediment
samples.
Analytical
results
from
these
sampling
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
CERCLA
hazardous
substances
were
s
t
i
l
l
present
on
s
i
t
e
.
From
1992
t
o
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
,
t
h
e
EPA
Removal
Program
has
conducted
several
sampling
events
which
included
the
collection
of
surface
and
subsurface
soil
samples,
and
surface
water
and
sediment
samples
collected
from
the
Hudson
River
i
n
a
r
e
a
s
where
a
sheen
was
observed
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
o
t
h
e
Q
u
a
n
t
a
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
i
t
e
.
A
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
d
a
t
a
from
these
sampling
events
indicated
the
presence
of
elevated
levels
of
polynuclear
aromatic
hydrocarbons
(
PAHs)
and
metals.

Under
an
Administrative
Consent
Order
with
EPA,
Allied­
Signal
contracted
GeoSyntec
Consultants
t
o
conduct
a
Removal
S
i
t
e
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
{
RSI)
a
t
t
h
e
QRC
s
i
t
e
.
This
investigation
was
conducted
i
n
1998
and
1999
and
included
the
collection
of
surface
and
s
u
b
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
s
o
i
l
s
a
m
p
l
e
s
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
from
Quanta
Resources
property
as
w
e
l
l
as
from
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
of
the
Quanta
Resources
property,
ground
water
samples
collected
from
monitoring
wells,
and
sediment
samples
collected
from
the
Hudson
River.
Based
on
the
results
of
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
conducted
during
the
RSI,
heavy
end
product
was
estimated
to
extend
from
the
area
west
of
where
River
Road
exists
to
approximately
750
f
e
e
t
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
River.

An
observed
release
to
surface
water
by
direct
observation
i
s
documented
through
the
d
i
r
e
c
t
d
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
of
heavy
end
coal
t
a
r
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
t
o
h
e
Hudson
River.
Level
I1
concentrations
of
PAHs
(
including
benzo
(
a)
anthracene,
benzo
(
a)
pyrene,
benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene,
,
benzo
(
k
)
fluoroanthene,
and
dibenzo(
a,
h)
anthracene)
are
documented
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
River,
which
i
s
a
fishery
and
a
sensitive
environment
(
i
­
e
.
,
s
t
a
t
e
­
designated
water
body
f
o
r
t
h
e
maintenance
of
aquatic
l
i
f
e
)
.
Name
of
Site:

Contact
Persons
Site
Investigation:

Documentation
Record:
HRS
DOCUMENTATION
RECORD­­
REVIEW
COVER
SHEET
Quanta
Resources
Mr.
Robert
Montgomery
(
732)
906­
6934
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Edison,
NJ
Ben
Conetta
(
212)
637­
4435
U
.
S
.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
New
York,
NY
Dennis
J.
Foerter
(
732)
417­
5877
Roy
F.
Weston,
Inc.
Edison,
NJ
Pathwavs,
Components,
or
Threats
Not
Scored
The
Ground
Water,
Soil
Exposure,
and
Air
Pathways
were
not
scored
because
the
site
score
would
not
be
significantly
impacted
by
those
pathways.
In
addition,
the
Drinking
Water
Threat
of.
the
Surface
Water
Pathway
was
not
scored
because
it
would
not
have
an
impact
on
the
pathway
score.
EELS
DOCUMENTATION
RECORD
Name
of
Site:
Quanta
Resources
EPA
ID
No.:
NJD000606442
EPA
Region:
2
S
t
r
e
e
t
Address
of
S
i
t
e
:
163
River
Road,
Edgewater
County
and
State:
Bergen,
N
J
General
Location
i
n
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
e
:
n
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
N
J
Topographic
Map:
Central
Park,
N
.
Y
.
­
N
.
J
.

Latitude
:
40"
4
8
'
15.5"
North
Date
Prepared:
November
2000
Longitude:
73"
59'
21.0''
West
(
Ref.
3)

Scores
Ground
Water
Pathway
Not
Scored
Surface
Water
Pathway
1
0
0
.
0
0
Soil
Exposure
Pathway
Not
Scored
A
i
r
Pathway
Not
Scored
HRS
SITE
SCORE
50.00
4
WORKSHEET
FOR
COMPUTING
HRS
SITE
SCORE
1.

2a.

2b.

2c.

3.

4
.

5.

6.
Ground
Water
Migration
Pathway
Score
(
S,,)
(
from
Table
3­
1,
l
i
n
e
13)
S
SZ
Not
Scored
Surface
Water
Overland/
Flood
Migration
Component
1
0
0
.
0
0
1
0
,
0
0
0
(
from
Table
4­
1,
l
i
n
e
30)

Ground
Water
t
o
Surface
Water
Migration
Component
Not
Scored
(
from
Table
4­
25,
l
i
n
e
28)

Surface
Water
Migration
Pathway
Score
(
SSJ
1
0
0
.
0
0
1
0
,
0
0
0
E
n
t
e
r
t
h
e
l
a
r
g
e
r
of
l
i
n
e
s
2a
and
2b
a
s
t
h
e
pathway
score.

S
o
i
l
Exposure
Pathway
Score
(
S,)
(
from
Table
5­
1,.
l
i
n
e
22)

A
i
r
Migration
Pathway
Score
(
Sa)
(
from
Table
6­
1,
l
i
n
e
1
2
)
Not
Scored
Not
Scored
Total
of
sq;
+
s,,
Z
+
s,~
+
saz
10,000
HRS
Site
Score
Divide
the
value
on
l
i
n
e
5
by
4
and
t
a
k
e
t
h
e
s
q
u
a
r
e
r
o
o
t
50.00
5
SURFACE
WATER
OVERLAND/
FLOOD
MIGRATION
COMPONENT
SCORESHEET
Factor
Cateqories
and
Factors
Maximum
Value
Value
Assiqned
DRINKING
WATER
THREAT
Likelihood
of
Release
1.

Observed
2.
Potential
to
Release
by
Overland
Flow
2a.
10
Containment
2b.
25
Runoff
­

­

2c.
Distance
to
Surface
Water
2d.
Potential
to
Release
by
Overland
Flow
(
lines
2a
x
[
2b
+
2cl)
500
­

3.
Potential
to
Release
by
Flood
Waste
Characteristics
1
550
6.
Toxicity/
Persistence
a
10,000
I
I
7.
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
a
100
8.
Waste
Characteristics
100
32
Tarqets
9.
Nearest
Intake
I
50
0.00
10.
Population
10a
.,
b
Level
I
Concentrations
lob.
b
Level
I1
Concentrations
6
0.00
0.00
L,*.
,

SURFACE
WATER
OVERLAND/
FLOOD
MIGWTION
COMPONENT
SCORESHEET
1oc.
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
0
.
0
0
b
F
a
c
t
o
r
C
a
t
e
u
o
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
F
a
c
t
o
r
s
DRINKING
WATER
.
THREAT
(
Concluded)
Value
Assiuned
Maximum
Value
10d.
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
l
i
n
e
s
1
0
a
+
10b
+
1Oc)
0
­
00
b
11.
Resources
0
.
0
0
b
1
2
.
Targets
(
l
i
n
e
s
9
+
10d.
+
11)
0.00
5
Drinkinu
Water
T
h
r
e
a
t
S
c
o
r
e
13.
Drinking
Water
T
h
r
e
a
t
S
c
o
r
e
I
I
(
[
l
i
n
e
s
5
x
8
x
12]/
82,500,
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
a
maximum
o
f
100)
1
0
0
0.00
HUMAN
FOOD
CHAIN
THREAT
Likelihood
o
f
Release
1
4
.
Likelihood
of
Release
(
same
v
a
l
u
e
as
l
i
n
e
5)
550
550
Waste
Characteristics
18.

4
5
7
SURFACE
WATER
OVERLAND/
FLOOD
MIGRATION
COMPONENT
SCORESHEET
~~~
~~
~~
~
~
~
_
_
_
_
_

Human
Food
Chain
Threat
S
c
o
r
e
2
1
.
Human
Food
Chain
Threat
S
c
o
r
e
(
[
l
i
n
e
s
14
x
1
7
x
2
0
1
/
8
2
,
5
0
0
,
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
a
maximum
of
100)
96.06
100
8
C
%
laxi
SURFACE
WATER
OVERLAND/
FLOOD
MIGRATION
COMPONENT
SCORESHEET
Factor
Cateqories
and
Factors
Maximum
Value
Value
Assiqned
ENVIRONMENTAL
THREAT
Likelihood
of
Release
22.
Likelihood
of
Release
(

same
5)

550
550
Waste
Characteristics
23.
Ecosystem
Toxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation
a
500,000,000
24.
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
a
100
25.
Waste
Characteris.
tics
1,000
320
Tarqets
26.
Sensitive
Environments
26b.

26c.

Environmental
Threat
Score
28.
Environmental
Threat
Score
([
lines
2­
2
x
25
x
271/
82,500,
subject
to
a
maximum
of
60)
60
10.67
SURFACE
WATER
OVERLAND/
FLOOD
MIGRATION
COMPONENT
SCORE
FOR
A
WATERSHED
29.
Watershed
Score"
(
lines
13
+
21
+
28,

subject
to
of
100)
100
100.00
SURFACE
WATER
OVERLAND/
FLOOD
MIGRATION
COMPONENT
SCORE
30.
Component
Score
(
Sof)
c,
(
highest
score
from
line
29
for
all
watersheds
evaluated,
subject
to
a
maximum
100)
100
100
.
oo
~
m
=
value
applies
to
waste
characteristics
category.
"
Maximum
value
not
applicable.
'
Do
not
round
t
o
n
e
a
r
e
s
t
i
n
t
e
g
e
r
.

9
REFERENCES
Reference
Number
1.

2.

3.

4
.

5
.

6.

7.

8
.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.
Description
of
the
Reference
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
USEPA),
Revised
Hazard
Rankinq
Svstem,
Final
Rule,
55
ER
51532,
December
14,
1990,
(
also
contained
in
40
CFR,
Appendix
A
of
the
National
Contingency
Plan,
2000).
[
135
pp.]

U.
S.
EPA,
Superfund
Chemical
Data
Matrix,
SCDM
Data
Version:
m
9
6
.
[
5
pp.
1
Foerter,
D.,
Roy
F.
Weston,
Inc.
(
WESTON),
Proiect
Note
to
Quanta
Resources
File,
Subject:
Latitude
and
Lonqitude
Calculations,
September
8,
2000.
[
3
PP.
I
WESTON
­
Region
I1
Superfund
Technical
Assessment
and
Response
(
START)
Team,
Samplinq
OA/
OC
Work
Plan,
Ouanta
2
Site,
Edaewater,
Beraen
Countv,
NJ,
DNC
#
START­
02­
F­
01527
(
excludinq
attachments),
December
18,
1997.
[
13
'
PP.
1
Olinger,
K.,
START
Site
Lead,
WESTON
­
Region
I1
START,
Letter
to
Bob
Montqomerv,
On­
Scene
Coordinator
(
OSCI
,
EPA,
Subiect:
Quanta
Resources
Site
PRP
Summarv
Report
(
includinq
PRP
Summarv
report),
December
23,
1998.
[
24
.
PP.
1
Foerter,
D.,
WESTON,
Proiect
Note
to
Quanta
Resources
File,
Subject:
Fisheries
­
Ouanta
Resources
Meetinq,
September
8,
2000.
[
73
pp.]

Presworsky,
I.,
Project
Manager,
WESTON
­
Region
I1
START,
Letter
to
Bob
Montqomerv,
On­
Scene
Coordinator
(
OSC)
,
EPA,
Subiect:
Samplinq
Trip
Report,
Quanta
Edqewater
Site
(
includinq
Samplinq
Trip
Report
minus
fiqures
and
attachments),
April
2,
1998.
17
pp.
1
Rosenberg,
D.,
Data
Reviewer,
WESTON
­
Region
I1
START,
Transmittal
Memo
to
Bob
Montqomerv,
OSC,
EPA,
Subject:
Ouanta
Edqewater
Site,
Edqewater,
Berqen
County,
New
Jersey,
Data
Validation
Assessment,
(
including
final
data
assessment
narrative
and
analvtical
data
packacre),
June
11,
1998.
[
274
PP­
1
Foerter,
D.,
WESTON,
Proiect
Note
to
Ouanta
Resources
File,
Subiect:
Fisheries
­
Quanta
Resources
Site,
September
8,
2000.
[
4
pp.]

Foerter,
D.,
WESTON,
Proiect
Note
to
Quanta
Resources
File,
Subiect:
Sensitive
Environments
­
Ouanta
Resources
Site,
September
8,
2000.
[
5
pp.]

Dorneman,
K.,
WESTON,
Proiect
Note
to
Quanta
Resources
File,
Subject:
Hazardous
Waste
Ouantity,
September
8,
2000.
[
3
pp.]

Foerter,
D.,
WESTON,
Proiect
Note
to
Ouanta
Resources
File.
Subiect:
Heavv
End
Coal
Tar
Product
­
Ouanta
Resources
Site,
September
8,
2000.
[
5
pp.]

Foerter,
D.,
Roy
F.
Weston,
Inc.,
Telecon
Note
with
Ilene
Presworskv,
Environmental
Scientist,
Excel
Environmental,
Subject:
Quanta
Resources,
13
September
2000.
[
l
p.]

U.
S.
Geological
Survey,
Water
Resources
Division,
Water
Resources
Data,
New
York,
Water
Year
1996,
Volume
1.
Eastern
New
York
excludinq
Lonq
Island,
U.
S.
Geoloqical
Survev
Water­
Data
Report
NY­
96­
1,
1997.
[
4
pp.]

Foerter,
D.,
WESTON,
Proiect
Note
to
Ouanta
Resources
File,
Subiect:
Analytical
Data
­
Sample
Ouantitation
Limits,
September
15,
2000.
[
lo
pp.]

10
SD­
Characterization
and
Containment
Source
No.:
1
SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
2.2
Source
Characterization
Number
of
the
source:
­
1
­
Name
and
description
of
the
source:
Heavy
end
product
discharge
Source
type:
Other
Source
1
consists
of
heavy
end
coal
tar
product.
During
the
RSI
conducted
by
GeoSyntec
Consultants,
cone
penetrometer
testing
(
CPT)
was
conducted
utilizing
a
Rapid
Optical
Screening
ToolTM
(
ROSTTM)
.
T
h
i
s
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
was
conducted
i
n
an
e
f
f
o
r
t
t
o
d
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
e
t
h
e
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
e
x
t
e
n
t
of
heavy
end
product
both
on
the
Quanta
Resources
property
and
within
the
Hudson
River.
Heavy
end
product
i
s
composed
o
f
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
,
c
r
e
o
s
o
t
e
and
other
hydrocarbons.
Based
on
t
h
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
of
t
h
i
s
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
,
heavy
end
product
was
estimated
to
extend
from
the
area
west
of
where
the
new
River
Road
exists
to
approximately
750
f
e
e
t
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
R
i
v
e
r
.
I
n
u
p
l
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
s
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
o
f
h
a
r
d
s
o
l
i
d
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
p
i
t
c
h
,
s
t
i
c
k
y
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
r
o
o
f
i
n
g
p
i
t
c
h
and
v
i
s
c
o
u
s
o
i
l
­
l
i
k
e
t
a
r
.
The
product
present
in
Hudson
River
sediments
consisted
of
lenses
of
oil­
like
product
and
roofing
pitch
within
the
river
s
i
l
t
.
(
Ref.
6,
pp.
1,
4
)
.
The
t
o
t
a
l
a
r
e
a
of
the
heavy
end
product
discharge
i
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
o
be
848,225
square
feet
(
Ref.
11,
pp.
1­
3).

I
t
is
a
l
l
e
g
e
d
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
was
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
d
t
o
t
h
?
Hudson
River
via
improperly
closed
underground
piping
which
e
x
i
s
t
s
on
the
Quanta
Resources
property
(
Ref.
13).
During
the
RSI
investigation,
one
pipe
was
believed
t
o
extend
from
a
former
oil/
water
separator
to
t
h
e
Hudson
River
(
Ref.
12,
p.
2
)
.
i
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
t
e
s
t
t
r
e
n
c
h
e
s
were
excavated
during
the
RSI
i
n
an
e
f
f
o
r
t
t
o
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
b
u
r
i
e
d
p
i
p
e
s
.
These
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
identification
of
several
underground
pipes
and
conduits.
Some
of
these
pipes
contained
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
(
R
e
f
.
12,
pp.
3­
7)
.

The
heavy
end
product
discharge
i
s
not
excluded
as
a
source
due
t
o
t
h
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
o
f
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
(
Ref.
5,
pp.
11,
13).
in
addition,
contaminants
not
associated
with
petroleum
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
(
e
.
g
.
,
1,1,2,2­
tetrachloroethane,
styrene)
were
d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
a
waste
sample
collected
from
a
t
e
s
t
p
i
t
where
product
was
present
(
Ref.
8,
pp.
44,
1
0
9
;
13,
p.
1).

Location
of
the
source,
with
reference
to
a
map
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
:

The
heavy
end
coal
t
a
r
product
discharge
extends
southeast
from
an
area
west
of
the
new
River
Road
location
to
approximately
750
f
e
e
t
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
River.
(
Ref.
6,
p.
4
)
.

Containment
Release
via
overland
migration
and/
or
flood:

There
are
no
containment
structures
(
i.
e.,
engineered
cover,
run­
on
control
system,
runoff
management
system,
l
i
n
e
r
s
)
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
s
o
u
r
c
e
1.
Based
on
an
evaluation
of
these
conditions,
a
containment
factor
of
10
i
s
assigned
for
source
1
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51609).

11
1
h
I
SD­
Hazardous
Substances
Source
No.:
1
2
.
4
.
1
Hazardous
Substances
Hazardous
substance+

Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
(
max.
=
520
mg/
kg
98315­
01)

Benzo
(
a)
pyrene
(
max.
=
370
mg/
kg
98315­
01)

Benzo
fg,
h,
i)
perylene
{
max.
=
2003
mg/
kg
98315­
01)

Benzo
(
k
)
fluoranthene
(
max.
=
180
mg/
kg
98315­
01)

Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
(
max.=
52
mg/
kg
98315­
01)
Evidence
RSI
Sampling
Event
(
1998­
1999)

98315­
01*,
98315­
02*,
98317­
06
(
Sed­
4A)
**

98315­
01*,
98315­
02*,
98317­
06
(
Sed­
4A)
**

98315­
01*,
98315­
02*,
98317­
06
(
Sed­
4A)
**

98315­
01*,
98315­
02*,
98317­
06
(
Sed­
4A)
**

98315­
01*,
98315­
02*,
98317­
06
(
Sed­
4A)
**
Reference
Notes
:

"
J"
=
estimated
concentration
­
Although
the
concentration
i
s
q
u
a
l
i
f
i
e
d
a
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
,
the
estimated
value
documents
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
s
e
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
a
r
e
s
t
i
l
l
present.

mg/
kg
=
milligrams
per
kilogram
*
Samples
98315­
01
and
98315­
02
were
s
o
i
l
s
a
m
p
l
e
s
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
monitoring
well
MW­
103.
Sample
98315­
01
was
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
a
t
an
interval
of
0
t
o
1
foot
below
ground
surface
(
bgs)
and
sample
98315­
02
was
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
a
t
a
d
e
p
t
h
i
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
of
3
t
o
4
f
e
e
t
bgs).
These
samples
were
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
t
o
have
flame
ionization
detector
readings
of
50
t
o
300
units
above
background.
Both
samples
consisted
of
wood
brick
and
t
a
r
(
Ref.
5,
p.
13).

*
*
Sample
98317­
06
(
Sed­
4A)
was
collected
from
a
sediment
sample
location
(
i.
e.,
Sed­
4A)
within
the
Hudson
River.
This
sample
was
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
a
t
a
d
e
p
t
h
o
f
4.9
t
o
5.9
f
e
e
t
and
was
,
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
t
o
have
a
black,
oily,
visible
product
present.
The
sample
was
also
reported
t
o
have
a
s
t
r
o
n
g
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
o
d
o
r
(
R
e
f
.
5,
p.
11).

+
Due
t
o
t
h
e
f
a
c
t
h
a
t
h
e
s
e
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
u
b
i
q
u
i
t
o
u
s
i
n
t
h
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
,
no
background
samples
are
required
for
comparison.

12
SD­
Hazardous
Substances
Source
No.:
1
2.4.1
Razardous
Substances
(
cont'd)

On
March
25,
1998,
a
waste
sample
(
TP­
01­
02)
was
collected
from
a
test
pit
by
EPA
(
Ref.
,

8,
pp.
44).
Analytical
results
from
this
sample
indicated
the
presence
of
the
following
PAHs
:

Hazardous
substance
Concentration
(
uu/
kq)

Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
11,000,000
J
Benzo
(
a)
pyrene
12,000,000,
J
Benzo
(
g,
h,
f)
perylene
5,000,000
J
Benzo
(
k)
f
luoranthene
3,800,000
J
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
19,000,000
J
1,1,2,2­
tetrachloro­
55,000
ethane
Styrene
28,000
J
=
estimated
concentration"
ug/
kg
=
micrograms
per
kilogram
Reference
8,
pp.
44,
182
8,
pp.
44,
182
8,
pp.
44,
182
8
,
pp.
44,
182
8,
pp.
44,
182
8,
pp.
44,
109
8,
pp.
44,
109
*
Although
these
values
are
qualified,
the
results
of
these
samples
document
that
these
substances
are
present
at
estimated
concentrations
significantly
above
the
method
detection
limit
of
1,200
ug/
kg
(
Ref.
8,
p.
27)
.
/

13
SD­
Hazardous
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
e
n
t
Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
Source
N
o
.
:
1
2.4.2
Hazardous
Waste
Ouantity
2
.
4
.
2
.
1
.
1
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
e
n
t
Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
The
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
i
s
n
o
t
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
t
o
evaluate
Tier
A
s
o
u
r
c
e
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
c
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
e
n
t
q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
.

H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
e
n
t
Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
V
a
l
u
e
(
S):
N/
A
14
I,
1
SD­
Hazardous
Wastestream
Quantity
Source
No.:
1
2.4.2.1.2
Hazardous
Wastestream
Ouantity
The
information
available
is
not
sufficient
to
evaluate
Tier
B
source
hazardous
wastestream
quantity.

Hazardous
Wastestream
Quantity
(
W):
N/
A
Hazardous
Wastestream
Quantity
Assigned
Value:
N/
A
15
SD­
Volume
Source
No.
:
1
2.4.2.1.3
Volume
Based
on
a
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
of
sampling
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
conducted
during
the
RSI
i
n
1988­
1999,
it
i
s
a
p
p
a
r
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
heavy­
end
product
i
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
d
e
p
t
h
;
however,
t
h
e
e
x
a
c
t
volume
i
s
unknown
(
Ref.
6,
p.
4
)
.
A
source
volume
of
>
O
w
i
l
l
therefore
be
assigned.

Dimension
of
source
(
yd3)
:
>
O
Reference(
s)
:
1,
p.
51591
Volume
Assigned
Value:
>
O
1
6
SD­
Area
Source
No.:
1
2.4.2.1.4
Area
Since
the
volume
of
the
waste
source
has
been
determined,
a
value
of
0
is
given
for
area
measurement.
It
should
be
noted
that
an
evaluation
of
the
extent
of
the
heavy
end
product
discharge
indicates
that
the
estimated
area
of
waste
source
No.
1
is
848,225
square
feet
(
Ref..
11,
pp.
1­
3).

Area
of
source
(
ft')
:
Not
evaluated
Reference(
s)
:
1,
p.
51591
Area
Assigned
Value:
0
17
,.
<_

SD­
Source
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
Value
Source
NO.:
1
2.4.2.1.5
Source
Hazardous
Waste
Ouantitv
Value
Based
on
a
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
of
sampling
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
conducted
during
the
RSI
i
n
1988­
1999,
it
is
a
p
p
a
r
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
heavy­
end
proauct
i
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
d
e
p
t
h
;
however,
t
h
e
e
x
a
c
t
volume
i
s
unknown
(
Ref.
6,
p
.
4
)
.
A
source
waste
quantity
of
>
O
w
i
l
l
therefore
be
assigned.

Source
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
Value:
>
O
18
SD­
Characterization
and
Containment
Source
No.
:
2
SOURCE
DESCRIPTION
2.2
Source
Characterization
Number
of
the
source:
­
2
­
Name
and
description
of
the
source:
Contaminated
Soil
Source
Type:
Contaminated
Soil
Source
2
consists
of
contaminated
s
o
i
l
.
During
the
RSI
conducted
by
GeoSyntec
Consultants
i
n
1998­
1999,
surface
and
subsurface
soil
samples,
were
collected
on
the
Quanta
Resources
property.
Analytical
results
indicated
the
presence
of
PAHs
and
m
e
t
a
l
s
i
n
s
o
i
l
s
a
t
l
e
v
e
l
s
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
l
y
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
t
h
a
n
l
e
v
e
l
s
d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
s
o
i
l
samples
collected
from
areas
which
do
n
o
t
a
p
p
e
a
r
t
o
have
been
impacted
from
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
Q
u
a
n
t
a
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
s
i
t
e
.
Contaminants
detected
i
n
s
o
i
l
a
t
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
l
y
above
background
include
arsenic,
benzo
(
a)
anthracene,
benzo
(
a)
pyrene,
benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene,
benzo
(
k)
fluoranthene,
and
dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene.
Samples
which
represent
background
s
o
i
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
were
collected
from
properties
located
northwest
of
the
Quanta
Resources
site.
These
samples
include
samples
collected
from
sample
locations
HF­
2,
HF­
3,
HF­
4,
and
HF­
5
(
Ref.
6,
pp.
5,
8,
1
0
,
34
4
0
)
.

The
contaminated
s
o
i
l
is
n
o
t
e
x
c
l
u
d
e
d
a
s
a
,
s
o
u
r
c
e
a
t
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
due
t
o
t
h
e
f
a
c
t
t
h
a
t
contaminants
not
associated
with
petroleumproducts
(
e.
g.,
arsenic)
were
d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
s
i
t
e
s
o
i
l
s
(
Ref.
6
,
pp.
5,
8
)
.
I
t
i
s
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
a
r
s
e
n
i
c
was
d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
s
o
i
l
samples,
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
of
the
Quanta
Resources
property,
i
n
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
greater
than
30,000
ppm.
These
samples
were
collected
between
t
h
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
t
r
a
i
l
e
r
s
and
the
sheet
metal
building
(
Ref.
6,
p.
2
)
.

Location
of
the
source,
with
reference
to
a
map
of
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
:

Areas
of
contaminated
s
o
i
l
a
r
e
d
e
f
i
n
e
8
by
S
I
s
o
i
l
sample
locations
T­
1,
T­
8,
MW­
105,
QR­
02,
and
QR­
03.
These
samples
were
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
RSI
investigation
(
Ref.
6,
pp.
5,
8,
1
0
,
4
0
)
.

Containment
Release
via
overland
migration
and/
or
flood:

There
a
r
e
no
containment
struCtures
(
i
.
e
.
,
engineered
cover,
run­
on
control
system,
runoff
.
management
system,
l
i
n
e
r
s
)
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
s
o
u
r
c
e
1.
Eased
on
an
evaluation
of
these
conditions,
a
containment
factor
of
10
i
s
assigned
for
source
1
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51609).
'

1
9
2
.
4
.
1
Hazardous
Substances
Hazardous
substance
Arsenic
max.
=
6
7
.
2
mg/
kg,
98315­
03)

Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
(
rnax.
=
1
,
9
0
0
mg/
kg
98313­
04)

Benzo
(
a)
pyrene
(
rnax.
=
2
,
5
0
0
mg/
kg
98313­
041
benzo
(
g
,
h,
i)
perylene
(
max.
=
1
,
4
0
0
mg/
kg
98313­
04)

Benzo
(
k)
f
luoranthene
(
max.
=
1
,
1
0
0
mg/
kg
98313­
04)
Evidence
RSI
Soil
samples
(
1998­
1999)
:

98313­
02,
98313­
03,
98313­
04,
9
8
3
1
5
­
0
3
,
9
8
3
1
5
­
0
5
98313­
02,
98313­
03,
98313­
04,
98326­
01,
99169­
01,
QR­
02
SD­
Hazardous
Substances
Source
No.:
2
Reference
6,
PP­
5
,
8
6,
pp­
5,
8
,
10,
40
98313­
02,
98313­
03,
98313­
04,
6,
PP­
5,
8,
10,
98326­
01,
99169­
01,
QR­
02
40
98313­
02,
98313­
03,
98313­
04,
98326­
01,
99169­
01,
QR­
02
98313­
02,
98313­
03,
98313­
04,
98326­
01,
99169­
01,
QR­
02
,
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
98313­
02,
98313­
03,
98313­
04,
(
rnax.
=
390
mg/
kg
98326­
01,
99169­
01,
QR­
02
98313­
04)

mg/
kg
­
milligrams
per
kilogram
6,
pp.
5,
8
,
10,
40
Duringthe
RSI
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
,
s
o
i
l
samples
which
represent
background
soil
conditions
were
collected
from
properties
located
northwest
of
the
Quanta
Resources
site.
These
lacations
do
not
appear
t
o
have
been
impacted
by
previous
activities
conducted
a
t
t
h
e
Q
u
a
n
t
a
Resources
'
site.
These
samples
include
samples
collected
from
sample
locations
HF­
2,
HF­
3,
HF­
4,
and
HF­
5
(
Ref.
6,
pp.
5
,
3
4
)
.
The
highest
concentrations
of
the
above
contamznants
d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
background
s
o
i
l
samples
include:

Arsenic
1
0
.
7
mg/
kg
Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
0.0035
mg/
kg
Benzo
(
a)
pyrene
0.0036
mg/
kg
Benzo
(
g
,
h,
i)
perylene
0
.
0
0
1
0
mg/
kg
Benzo
(
k)
fluoranthene
0.0022
mg/
kg
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
0.00037
mg/
kg
Ref.
6,
pp.
5
,
3
4
20
SD­
Hazardous
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
e
n
t
Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
Source
No.
:
2
2.4.2
Hazardous
Waste
Ouantity
2
.
4
.
2
.
1
.
1
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
e
n
t
Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
v
The
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
i
s
n
o
t
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
t
o
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
Tier
A
s
o
u
r
c
e
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
c
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
e
n
t
q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
.

H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
e
n
t
Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
V
a
l
u
e
(
S
I
:
N/
A
21
SD­
Hazardous
Wastestream
Quantity
Source
No.:
2
2.4.2.1.2
Hazardous
Wastestream
Ouantity
The
information
available
is
not
sufficient
to
evaluate
Tier
B
source
hazardous
wastestream
quantity.

Hazardous
Wastestream
Quantity
('
8):
N/
A
Hazardous
Wastestream
Quantity
Assigned
Value:
N/
A
22
SD­
Volume
Source
No.:
2
2.4.2.1.3
Volume
Based
on
a
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
of
s
o
i
l
samples
col1,
ected
during
the
RSI
i
n
1988­
1999,
it
is
apparent'that
some
amount
of
contamination
i
s
present
at
depth;
however,
the
exact
volume
i
s
unknown
(
Ref.
6,
pp;
5
,
8,
1
0
,
4
0
)
.
A
source
volume
of
>
O
'
w
i
l
l
therefore
be
assigned.

Dimension
of
source
(
yd3)
:
>
O
Reference(
s)
:
1,
p.
51591
Volume
Assigned
Value:
N/
A
23
SD­
Area
Source
No.:
2
2.4.2.1.4
Area
Since
the
volume
of
the
waste
source
has
been
determined,
a
value
of
0
is
given
for
area
measurement.

Area
of
source
(
ft')
:
Not
evaluated
Reference(
s)
:
1,
p.
51591
Area
Assigned
Value:
0
24
SD­
Source
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
Value
Source
No.
:
2
2.4.2.1.5
Source
Hazardous
Waste
Ouantitv
Value
Based
on
a
n
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
of
s
o
i
l
samples
collected
during
the
RSI
i
n
1998­
1999,
it
i
s
a
p
p
a
r
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
some
amount
of
contamination
i
s
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
de,
pth;
however,
t
h
e
e
x
a
c
t
volume
i
s
unknown
(
Ref.
6,
pp.
5
,
8,
10,
4
0
)
.
A
source
waste
quantity
of
>
O
w
i
l
l
therefore
be
assigned.

Source
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
Value:
>
o
25
SD­
Summary
SITE
SUMMARY
OF
SOURCE
DESCRIPTIONS
Containment
Source
Hazardous
Source
No.

Value
Water
­
­

1
2
>
O
>
O
NE
10
NE
NE
NE
10
NE
NE
NE
=
Not
Evaluated
2
6
SWOF­
Surface
Water
Overland
Flow/
Flood
Migration
Pathway
4.1
O
V
E
W
/
F
L
O
O
D
MIGRATION
COMPONENT
4.1.1.1
DEFINITION
OF
HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCE
MIGRATION
PATH
FOR
OVERLAND/
FLOOD
COMPONENT
The
s
i
t
e
i
s
located
on
the
banks
of
the
Hudson
River
(
Ref.
6,
p.
3).
Overland
flow
from
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
d
r
a
i
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
toward
the
Hudson
River
(
Ref.
13).

Available
information
indicates
that
an
observed
release
to
the
Hudson
River
has
occurred
by
d
i
r
e
c
t
o
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
d
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
o
n
of
hazardous
substances.
During
the
RSI
conducted
by
GeoSyntec
Consultants,
cone
penetrometer
testing
(
CPT)
was
conducted
u
t
i
l
i
z
i
n
g
a
Rapid
Optical
Screening
ToolTM
(
ROSTm).
T
h
i
s
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
was
conducted
i
n
an
e
f
f
o
r
t
t
o
d
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
e
t
h
e
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
e
x
t
e
n
t
o
f
heavy
end
product
both
on
the
Quanta
Resources
property
and
within
the
Hudson
River.
Heavy
end
product
i
s
composed
of
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
,
c
r
e
o
s
o
t
e
and
other
hydrocarbons.
Based
on
t
h
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
of
t
h
i
s
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
,
heavy
end
product
was
estimated
to
extend
from
the
area
west
of
where
the
new
River
Road
e
x
i
s
t
s
t
o
approximately
750
f
e
e
t
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
River.
In
upland
areas,
the
product
consisted
of
hard
solid
coal
t
a
r
p
i
t
c
h
,
s
t
i
c
k
y
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
r
o
o
f
i
n
g
p
i
t
c
h
and
v
i
s
c
o
u
s
o
i
l
­
l
i
k
e
t
a
r
.
The
product
present
i
n
Hudson
River
sediments
consisted
of
lenses
of
oil­
like
product
and
roofing
pitch
within
t
h
e
r
i
v
e
r
s
i
l
t
.
(
Ref.
6
,
p.
1)
.
The
t
o
t
a
l
a
r
e
a
of
the
heavy
end
product
discharge
i
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
848,225
square
feet
(
Ref.
11,
pp.
1­
3).

I
t
i
s
a
l
l
e
g
e
d
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
was
discharged
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
River
via
improperly
closed
underground
piping
which
exists
on
the
Quanta
Resources
property.
During
the
RSI
investigation,
one
pipe
was
believed
to
extend
from
a
former
oil/
water
separator
to
the
Hudson
River
(
Ref.
1
2
,
p.
2
)
.
In
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
t
e
s
t
t
r
e
n
c
h
e
s
were
excavated
during
the
RSI
i
n
a
n
e
f
f
o
r
t
t
o
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
b
u
r
i
e
d
p
i
p
e
s
.
These
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
identification
of
several
underground
pipes
and
c
o
n
d
u
i
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
River.
Some
of
these
pipes
were
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
t
o
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
(
R
e
f
.
12,
pp.
3­
7)
.
During
EPA
Removal
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
conducted
i
n
1998,
sheens
were
observed
t
o
be
emanating
from
the
Hudson
River
mud
f
l
a
t
s
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
Q
u
a
n
t
a
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
s
i
t
e
.
T
h
i
s
was
especially
evident
during
low
t
i
d
e
(
Ref.
13)
.
An
absorbent
boom
has
been
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
t
o
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
product
(
Ref.
6,
p.
3)
.
Cross
sections
A­
A',
B­
B',
and
D­
D',
generated
during
the
RSI,
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
heavy
end,
coal
tar
product
i
s
continuous
on
the
Quanta
Resources
property
below
t
h
e
s
o
i
l
and
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
River.
Cross
section
C­
C',
also
generated
during
the
RSI,
i
l
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
heavy
end
coal
t
a
r
product
i
s
located
primarily
on
or
adjacent
to
the
Quanta
Resources
property
(
Ref.
12,
pp.
10­
14).

During
the
RSI,
a
sample
was
collected
from
sediment
location
sed­
4A,
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Hudson
River
adjacent
to
the
Quanta
property.
This
sample
was
described
as
being
black
and
o
i
l
y
w
i
t
h
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
and
a
s
t
r
o
n
g
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
odor
(
Ref.
5,
p.
11)
.
Analytical
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
from
t
h
i
s
sample
indicated
the
presence
of
several
PAHs
including
benzo(
a)
pyrene,
b
e
n
z
o
(
a
)
a
n
t
h
r
a
c
e
n
e
,
b
e
n
z
o
(
9,
h
,
i
)
p
e
r
y
l
e
n
e
,
b
e
n
z
o
(
k)
f
l
u
o
r
o
a
n
t
h
e
n
e
,
a
n
d
dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
(
Ref.
6,
pp.
6,
51)
.

The
observed
release
indicated
by
the
direct
deposition
of
hazardous
substances
to
surface
water
constitutes
Level
I1
contamination
of
the
Hudson
River.
The
Hudson
River
i
s
a
f
i
s
h
e
r
y
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
of
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
;
a
g
i
i
l
n
e
t
t
e
r
f
i
s
h
e
s
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
f
o
r
American
shad.
Other
species
fished
for
human
consumption,
from
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
o
f
t
h
e
Hudson
River
adjacent
to
the
Quanta
Resources
site,
include
striped
bass,
white
perch,
white
catfish,
blue
crab,
tomcod,
American
e
e
l
,
and
winter
flounder
(
Ref.
9,
pp.
1,
2
)
.
The
annual
production
of
f
i
s
h
t
a
k
e
n
from
t
h
i
s
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
of
t
h
e
r
i
v
e
r
i
s
unknown
but
i
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
o
be
greater
than
0
.
Hudson
River
i
s
classified
by
the
NJDEP
a
s
a
Class
SE2
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
of
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
;
t
h
i
s
s
t
a
t
e
­
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
n
n
o
t
e
s
a
n
a
r
e
a
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
and
maintenance
o
f
a
q
u
a
t
i
c
l
i
f
e
(
R
e
f
.
1
0
,
pp.
1
­
5
)
.

27
SWOF­
Observed
Release
4.1.2.1
LIKELIHOOD
OF
RELEASE
4.1.2.1.1
Observed
Release
Direct
Observation
bv
Direct
Deposition
Basis
for
D
i
r
e
c
t
O
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Background
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
A
l
l
i
e
d
Chemical
Corporation
Asphalt
Division
(
now
Allied­
Signal)
operated
a
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
t
a
t
t
h
e
site.
The
site
was
a
l
s
o
used
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
and
recycling
of
o
i
l
.
The
s
i
t
e
had
6
1
above­
ground
storage
tanks
(
ASTs)
,
along
with
an
unknown
number
of
underground
storage
tanks
(
USTs)
and
numerous
underground
pipes.
These
tanks
were
used
t
o
s
t
o
r
e
o
i
l
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
PCB­
contaminated
o
i
l
)
,
tar,
asphalt,
sludge,
process
water
and
other
unknown
liquids
(
Ref.
4
,
p.
4
)
.

During
the
RSI
conducted
by
GeoSyntec
Consultants,
cone
penetrometer
testing
(
CPT)
was
conducted
u
t
i
l
i
z
i
n
g
a
Rapid
Optical
Screening
ToolTM
(
ROSTm)
.
T
h
i
s
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
was
conducted
i
n
an
e
f
f
o
r
t
t
o
d
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
e
t
h
e
l
a
t
e
r
a
l
e
x
t
e
n
t
o
f
heavy
end
product
both
on
the
Quanta
,
Resources
property
and
within
the
Hudson
River.
Heavy
end
product
i
s
composed
of
coal
tar,
creosote
and
other
hydrocarbons.
Based
on
t
h
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
,
heavy
end
product
was
estimated
to
extend
from
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
west
of
where
the
new
River
Road
e
x
i
s
t
s
t
o
approximately
750
f
e
e
t
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
River
(
Ref
­
6
,
pp.
1,
4)
.
I
n
u
p
l
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
s
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
d
o
f
h
a
r
d
s
o
l
i
d
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
p
i
t
c
h
,
s
t
i
c
k
y
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
r
o
o
f
i
n
g
p
i
t
c
h
a
n
d
v
i
s
c
o
u
s
o
i
l
­
l
i
k
e
t
a
r
.
The
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
i
n
Hudson
River
sediments
consisted
of
lenses
of
o
i
l
­
l
i
k
e
product
and
roofing
pitch
within
the
river
silt.
(
Ref.
6,
p.
1).
The
t
o
t
a
l
a
r
e
a
of
t
h
e
heavy
end
product
discharge
is
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
o
be
848,225
square
f
e
e
t
(
R
e
f
.
11,'
pp.
1­
3).

I
t
i
s
a
l
l
e
g
e
d
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
was
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
River
via
improperly
closed
underground
piping
which
e
x
i
s
t
s
on
the
Quanta
Resources
property
(
Ref.
13).
During
the
RSI
investigation,
one
pipe
was
believed
t
o
extend
from
a
former
oil/
water
separator
to
the
Hudson
River
(
Ref.
1
2
,
p.
2
)
.
I
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
t
e
s
t
t
r
e
n
c
h
e
s
were
excavated
during
the
RSI
i
n
an
e
f
f
o
r
t
t
o
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
b
u
r
i
e
d
p
i
p
e
s
.
These
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
identification
of
several
underground.
pipes
and
conduits.
Some
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
p
i
p
e
s
were
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
t
o
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
(
R
e
f
.
12,
pp.
3
­
7
)
.
During
EPA
Removal
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
conducted
i
n
1998,
sheens
were
observed
t
o
be
emanating
from
the
Hudson
River
mud
f
l
a
t
s
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
Q
u
a
n
t
a
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
s
i
t
e
.
T
h
i
s
was
especially
evident
during
low
t
i
d
e
(
R
e
f
.
1
3
)
.
An
absorbent
boom
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
t
o
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
e
d
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
(
R
e
f
.
6,
p
.
3)
.
cross^
sections
A­
A'
,
B­
B',
and
D­
D'
,
generated
during
the
RSI,
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
heavy
end
c
o
a
l
t
a
r
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
s
continuous
on
the
Quanta
Resources
property
below
the
s
o
i
l
and
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
Hudson
River.
Cross
section
C­
C`
,
also
generated
during
the
RSI,
i
l
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
heavy
end
coal
t
a
r
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
s
located
primarily
on
o
r
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
Q
u
a
n
t
a
Resources
property
(
Ref.
12,
pp.
1
0
­
1
4
)
.

28
SWOF­
Observed
Release
Hazardous
Substances
i
n
the
Release
Benzo
(
a)
pyrene,
benzo
(
a)
anthracene,
benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene,
benzo
(
k)
fluoroanthene,
and
dibenzo(
a,
h)
anthracene
were
d
e
t
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
samples
collected
from
the
Hudson
River
adjaceht
,

to
the
Quanta
Resources
shoreline.

Sample
I
D
Samplinq
Location
Depth*

Date
Reference
­

98317­
06
RSI
location
Sed­
4A
4
.
9
11/
13/
98
6,
PP­
6,
51
(
Sed
4A)

SED­
5
Hudson
River
*
*
surface
3/
10/
98
71
p.
6;
8
,
PP­
42,
131
SED­
8
Hudson
River**
surface
3/
27­/
98
7
,
P
.
6,
8,
PP.
451
176
*
­
denotes
feet
below
ground~
surface
**
­
Samples
collected
from
Hudson
River
adjacent
to
the
Quanta
property
where
oily
sheens
were
observed
(
Ref.
1
3
)
.

Sample
I
D
Hazardous
Substance
Concentration
Reference
98317­
06
benzo
(
a)
anthracene
470,000
mg/
kg
(
Sed­
4A)
6,
p.
51
benzo
(
a)
pyrene
310,000
mg/
kg
6,
p.
51
benzo
(
k
)
fluoroanthene
160,000
mg/
kg
6,
p.
51
dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
40,000
mg/
kg
6.
P.
5
1
SED­
5
benzo
(

a)

anthracene
1
2
,
0
0
0
ug/
kg
benzo
(

a)

pyrene
8,000
ug/
kg
benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene
2,200
ug/
kg
benzo
(
k
)
fluoroanthene
8
,
7
0
0
ug/
kg
dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
910
ug/
kg
8,
p.
131
8,
p.
131
8,
p.
131
8,
p.
131
8:
P.
131
SED­
8.
benzo
(
a)
anthracene
benzo
(
a)
pyrene
8
,
1
0
0
ug/
kg
8,
p.
1
7
6
5,700
ug/
kg
8,
p.
1
7
6
mg/
kg:
milligrams
per
kilogram
ug/
kg:
micrograms
per
kilogram
Notes:
Sample
Quantitation
L
i
m
i
t
s
(
SQLs)
were
n
o
t
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
f
o
r
Sample
98317­
06
(
Sed­
4A).
The
SQLs
for
observed
release
contaminants
detected
in
sample
SED­
5
i
s
4,300
ug/
kg.
The
SQLs
for
observed
release
contaminants
detected
in
sample
SED­
8
i
s
4,900
ug/
kg
(
Ref.
15)
.

Hazardous
Substances
Released:

benzo
(
a)
anthracene
benzo
(
a)
pyrene
benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene
benzo
(
k
)
fluoranthene
dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
Observed
Release
Factor
Value:
550
29
SWOF/
Food
Chain­
Toxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation
4
.
1
.
3
.
2
WASTE
CHARACTERISTICS
4.1.3.2.1
Toxieity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation
Hazardous
Source
Substance
Arsenic
Benzo
(
a)
1,
2
anthracene
Benzo
(
a)
­
1,
2
pyrene
Benzo(
g,
h,
i)
1,
2
perylene
Benzo
(
k)
1,
2
f
luoranthene
Dibenzo(
a,
h)
1,
2
anthracene
1,1,2,2­
tetra
1
chloroethane
Styrene
1
*

*
*
Toxicity
Factor
,

Value
10,000
1,000
10,000
...

100
10,000
10
10
Persistence
Factor
Value*

1
1
1
0.

0.4
Bioaccu­
mulation
Value**

500
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
5
50
Toxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation
Factor
Value
(
Table
4­
16)
.
­
Ref.

5
x
106
2,
p.
B­
2
5
x
lo7
2,
p.
B­
2
5
x
108
2,
p.
B­
2
...
2,

p.

B­

3
5
x
l
o
6
2,
p.
B­
3
5
x
10'
2,
p.
B­
7
2
2,

p.

B­

18
20
2
,

p.

B­

18
The
closest
upstream
gaging
station
that
records
discharge
data
on
the
Hudson
River
is
located
at
Green
Island,
NY.
This
station
reported
a
mean
annual
discharge
of
13,800
feet
per
second
(
Ref.
14)
.
According
to
Table
4­
13
of
the
HRS,
this
would
qualify
the
Hudson
River
in
the
vicinity
of
the
site
as
a
Large
River
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51613)
.
Therefore,
values
for
"
River"
were
assigned
for
persistence.

Due
to
the
fact
that
the
Hudson
River
is
brackish
in
the
vicinity
of
the
Quanta
Resources
site,
the
higher
of
the
fresh
water
and
salt
water
values
was
evaluated
for
bioaccumulation
(
Ref.
9,
p.
2).

Ben'zo(
a)
pyrene
has
a
Toxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation
values
of
5
x
10';
therefore,
a
value
of
5
x
10'
is
assigned
for
Toxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation
Factor
Value.

Ecosystem
Toxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccmulation
Fadtor
Valuer
5
x
108
30
SWOF/
Food
Chain­
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
4.1.3.2.2
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
Source
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
Source
Number
Value
(
Section
2.4.2.1.5.1
1
2
>
O
>
O
Is
source
hazardous
constituent
quantity
data
complete?
(
ves/
no)

no
no
!
Sum
of
Values:
>
O
The
sum
corresponds
to
a
hazardous
waste
quantity
factor
value
of
1
in
Table
2­
6
of
the
HRS
rule
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51591).
However,
since
surface
water
targets
are
subject
to
Level
I1
contamination,
then
either
the
value
of
Table
2­
6
or
a
value
of
100
is
assigned,
whichever
is
greater
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51592)
.
Therefore,
a
hazardous
waste
quantity
factor
­
value
of
100
is
assigned.

4.1.4.2.3
Waste
Characteristics
Factor
Category
Value
Toxicity/
persistence
factor
value
X
hazardous
waste
quantity
factor
value
10,000
x
100
=
1
x
lo6
(
Toxicity/
persistence
X
hazardous
waste
quantity)
X
bioaccumulation
potential
factor
value
(
1
x
lo6)
.
x
50,000
=
5
x
10''

The
corresponding
waste
characteristics
factor
category
value
from
Table
2­
7
of
the
HRS
rule
is
320
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51592).

Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
Factor
Value:
100
Waste
Characteristics
Factor
Category
Value:
320
31
SWOF/
Food
Chain­
Targets
4.1.3.3
HUMAN
FOOD
CHAIN
THREAT
­
TARGETS
Actual
Human
Food
Chain
Contamination
The
HRS
states
that
a
fishery
(
or
portion
of
a
fishery)
within
the
target
distance
limit
of
the
watershed
subject
to
actual
contamination
can
be
considered
if
hazardous
substances
have
bioaccumulation
potential
factor
values
of
500
or
greater
and
are
present
in
the
observed
release
by
direct
observation
to
the
watershed
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51620).
Samples
with
hazardous
substances
which
meet
this
criteria
are
listed
below:

Sample
ID
98317­
06
(
Sed­
4A)

SED­
5
SED­
8
Hazardous
Substance
Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
Benzo
(
a)
pyrene
Benzo(
g,
h,
i)
perylene
Benzo
(
k)
fluoranthene
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
Benzo
(
a)
pyrene
Benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene
Benzo
(
k
)
f
luoranthene
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
Benzo
(
a)
pyrene
Benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene
Benzo
(
k)
f
luoranthene
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
C
l
o
s
e
d
F
i
s
h
e
r
i
e
s
Identitv
of
Fisherv
Hazardous
Substance
N/
A
Sample
ID
N
/
A
B
e
n
t
h
i
c
T
i
s
s
u
e
Sample
ID
N/
A
Distance
from
Probable
Point
of
Entry
Distance
from
Probable
Point
of
Entry
Bioaccumulation
Potential
Factor
Value
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
Hazardous
Substance
Orcranism
32
SWOF/
Food
Chain­
Targets
Level
I
Concentrations
N/
A
Sample
ID:
N/
A
Sample
Medium:
N/
A
Location:
N/
A
Reference:
N/
A
Hazardous
Substance
Benchmark
Hazardous
Substance
Concentration
Concentration
Benchmark
N
/
A
Reference
for
Benchmark:
N/
A
Most
Distant
Level
I
Sample
Sample
ID:
N/
A
Distance
from
the
probable
point
of
entry:
N/
A
Reference:
N/
A
Level
I
Fisheries
Identitv
of
Fisherv
(
Relative
to
Probable
Point
of
Entrv)
Extent
of
the
Level
I
Fishery
N/
A
Most
Distant
Level
I1
Sample
Sample
ID:
98317­
06
(
Sed­$
A)
Distance
from
the
probable
point
of
entry:
0.0
mi
Reference:
6,
pp.
6,
51
Distance
from
Sample
ID
Probable
Point
of
Entrv
Hazardous
Substance
Factor
Value
Bioaccumulation
98317­
06
0.0
(
Sed­
4A)

SED­
5
0.0
SED­
8
Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
50,000
Benzo
(

a)

pyrene
50,000
Benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene
50,000
Benzo
(
k)
fluoranthene
50,000
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
50,000
Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
50,000
Benzo
(

a)

pyrene
50,000
Benzo
(
9,
h,
i)
perylene
50,000
Benzo
(
k)
fluoranthene
50,000
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
50,000
Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
50,000
Benzo
(

a)

pyrene
50,000
Benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene
50,000
Benzo
(
k)
fluoranthene
50,000
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
50,000
33
SWOF/
Food
Chain­
Targets
Level
I1
Fisheries
Extent
of
Level
I1
Fishery
I
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
o
f
F
i
s
h
e
r
v
(
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
P
r
o
b
a
b
l
e
P
o
i
n
t
of
Entrv)

Hudson
River*
0
.
0
mile**

*
The
Hudson
River
i
s
a
f
i
s
h
e
r
y
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
of
the
site;
a
g
i
l
l
n
e
t
t
e
r
f
i
s
h
e
s
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
f
o
r
American
shad.
Other
species
fished
for
human
food
chain
consumption,
from
the
area
of
the
Hudson
River
adjacent
to
the
Quanta
Resources
site,
include
striped
bass,
white
perch,
white
catfish,
blue
crab,
tomcod,
American
e
e
l
,
and
winter
flounder
(
Ref.
9,
pp.
1,
2
)
.
The
annual
production
of
f
i
s
h
t
a
k
e
n
from
t
h
i
s
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
r
i
v
e
r
i
s
unknown
but
is
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
t
o
be
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
t
h
a
n
0
.

**
Although
samples
were
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
b
a
b
l
e
p
o
i
n
t
s
o
f
e
n
t
r
y
t
o
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
w
a
t
e
r
(
i
.
e
.
,
0.0
mile),
the
extent
of
heavy
end
coal
tar
product
appears
to
extend
approximately
750
f
e
e
t
i
n
t
o
and
approximately
0
.
1
m
i
l
e
along
the
shoreline
of
the
Hudson
River
(
Ref.
6,
p.
4
)
.

34
SWOF/
Food
Chsin­
Food
Chain
Individual
4.3.3.3.1
Food
Chain
Individual
Sample
I
D
:
98317­
06
(
Sed­@)
Hazardous
Substance:
Benzo(
a)
pyrene
Bioaccumulation
Potential:
50,000
Note:
Refer
t
o
t
h
e
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
4
.
1
.
3
.
3
f
o
r
more
details
regarding
the
samples
and
hazardous
substances
associated
with
the
observed
release.

Type
of
Surface
Identitv
of
Fisherv
Water
Bodv
Reference
Dilution
Weiqht
Hudson
River
Large
River
1,
p.
51613;
N/
A
1
4
Based
on
t
h
e
f
a
c
t
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
Hudson
River
is
a
fishery
subject
to
Level
I1
concentrations,
a
value
of
45
i
s
assigned
for
food
chain
individual
factor
value
(
Ref.
1,
P.
51620).

Food
Chain
Individual
Factor
Value:
4
5
35
SWOF/
Food
Chain­
Level
I
Concentrations
4.1.3.3.2
Population
4.1.3.3.2.1
Level
I
Concentrations
I
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
of
Annual
Production
Fishery
N/
A
Human
Food
Chain
Population
Value
Sum
of
Human
Food
Chain
Population
Values:
N/
A
Level
I
Concentrations
Factor
Value:
0
36
SWOF/
Food
Chain­
Level
I1
Concentrations
4.1.3.3.2.2
Level
I1
Concentrations
Identity
of
Annual
Production
Fishery
(
pounds)
Hudson
River
>
O
Reference
1,
p
­
51621;
9,
pp.
1­
3
Human
Food
Chain
Population
Value
0.03
Level
I1
Concentrations
Factor
Value:
0.03
31
SWOF/
Food
Chain­
Potential
Human
Food
Chain
Contamination
4.1.3.3.2.3
Potential
Human
Food
Chain
Contamination
Type
of
Identity
Annual
Surface
Average
Fishery,
(
pounds)
Bodv
Flow
Ref.
Value
(
P,)
Weisht
(
DL
p
i
s
i
of
Production
Water
Annual
Population
Dilution
Because
a
maximum
score
of
100.00
was
achieved
for
the
surface
water
migration
pathway
without
considering
potential
fishery
production
within
the
15­
mile
TDL,
Potential
Human
Food
Chain
Contamination
was
not
scored
(
NS).

Sum
of
PixDi:
NS
(
Sum
of
PixDi)
/
lo:
NS
Potential
Human
Food
Chain
Contamination
Factor
Value:
NS
38
SWOF/
Environment­
Toxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation
4.1.4.2
WASTE
CHARACTERISTICS
4.1.4.2.1
Ecosystem
Toxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation
Hazardous
Substance
Arsenic
Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
Benzo
(
a)
­
pyrene
Benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene
Benzo
(
k
)
fluoranthene
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
1,1,2,2­
tetra
chloroethane
Styrene
*

*
*
Ecosystem
Toxicity
Factor
Value*

100
10,000
10,000
...
...
...

1
0
0
100
Persistence
Factor
Value
*
*

1
1
1
1
'

1
1
0.4
0
.
4
Ecosystem
Toxicity/
Persistence'
Factor
Value
(
Table
4­
20)
­
Ref.

1
0
0
2,

p.

B­
2
1
0
,
0
0
0
2,
p.
B­
2
1
0
,
0
0
0
2,
p.
B­
2
...
2,
p.
B­
3
...
2,
p.
B­
3
*..
2
,
p.
B­
I
40
2,
p.
B­
18
40
2,
p.
B­
18
Due
t
o
t
h
e
f
a
c
t
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
Hudson
River
i
s
b
r
a
c
k
i
s
h
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
of
the
Quanta
Resources
s
i
t
e
;
t
h
e
h
i
g
h
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
f
r
e
s
h
w
a
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
a
l
t
water
values
was
evaluated
for
ecotoxicity
(
Ref.
9,
p.
2
)
.

The
c
l
o
s
e
s
t
u
p
s
t
r
e
a
m
g
a
g
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
r
e
c
o
r
d
s
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
d
a
t
a
on
the
Hudson
River
i
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
Green
Island,
NY.
T
h
i
s
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
reported
a
mean
annual
discharge
of
13,800
feet
per
second
(
Ref.
1
4
)
.
According
t
o
Table
4­
13
of
the
HRS,
t
h
i
s
would
q
u
a
l
i
f
y
t
h
e
Hudson
R
i
v
e
r
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
of
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
a
s
a
Large
River
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51613).
Therefore,
values
for
"
River"
were
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
f
o
r
p
e
r
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
e
.

39
Hazardous
Substance
Arsenic
Benzo
(
a)
anthracene
Benzo
(
a)
pyrene
Benzo
(
g,
h,
i)
perylene
Benzo
(
k)
f
luoranthene
Dibenzo
(
a,
h)
anthracene
1,1,2,2­
tetra
chloroethane
Styrene
*
Ecosystem
Toxicity/
Persistence
Factor
Value
100
10,000
10,000
...
...
...

40
40
Ecosystem
Toxicity/

Bioaccumulation
Persistence/

Factor
Value
Bioaccumulation
(

Section
Ref.

Factor
Value
4.1.3.2.1.2)"
No.
2,
P
.
(
Table
4­
21L
500
50,000
50,000
50,000
B­
2
5
X
104
B­
2
5
x
10'

B­
2
5
x
10'
B­
3
...

50,000
B­
3
...

50,000
E­
I
."

5
B­
18
200
50
B­
18
2
X
103
Due
to
the
fact
that
the
Hudson
River
is
brackish
in
the
vicinity
of
the
Quanta
Resources
site,
the
higher
of
the
fresh
water
and
salt
water
values
was
evaluated
for
bioaccumulation
(
Ref.
9,
p.
2).

Eenzo
(
a)
pyrene
has
an
Ecotoxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation
values
of
5
x
10';
therefore,
a
value
of
5
x
10'
is
assigned
for
Ecosystem
Toxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation.

"_""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""~~"""""""

Ecosystem
Toxicity/
Persistence/
Bioaccumulation
Factor
Value:
5
x
l@

40
SWOF/
Environment­
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
4
.
1
.
4
.
2
.
2
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
Source
Hazardous
'
Waste
Quantity
Source
Number
Value
(
Section
2.4.2.1.5.

1
2
>
O
>
O
Is
source
hazardous
constituent
quantity
data
complete?
(
ves/
no)

no
no
Sum
of
Values:
­
>
O
The
sum
corresponds
to
a
hazardous
waste
quantity
factor
value
of
1
in
Table
2­
6
of
the
HRS
rule
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51591).
However,
since
surface
water
targets
are
subject
to
Level
I1
contamination,
then
either
the
value
of
Table
2­
6
or
a
value
of
100
is
assigned,
whichever
is
greater
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51592).
Therefore,
a
hazardous
waste
quantity
factor
value
of
100
is
assigned.

4
.
1
.
4
.
2
.
3
Waste
Characteristics
Factor
Category
Value
Ecosystem
toxicity/
persistence
factor
value
X
hazardous
waste
quantity
factor
value
10,000
x
100
=
1
x
l
o
6
(
subject
to
a
maximum
value
of
1
x
10')

(
Ecosystem
toxicity/
persistence
X
hazardous
waste
quantity)
X
bioaccumulation
potential
factor
value
(
1
x
IO6)
x
50,000
=
5
x
10"
(
subject
to
a
maximum
value
of
1
x
The
value
exceeds
the
maximum
of
1
x
10"
for
the
waste
characteristics
product.
The
corresponding
waste
characteristics
factor
category
value
from
Table
2­
7
of
the
HRS
rule
is
320
(
Ref.
1,
p.
51592).

Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
Factor
Value:
100
Waste
Characteristics
Factor
Category"
Va1ue:
320
41
SWOF/
Environment­
Targets
4.1.4.3
ENVIRONMENTAL
THREAT
­
TARGETS
Level
I
Concentrations
N/
A
Sample
ID:
Sample
Medium:
Location:
Reference:

Hazardous
Substance
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
N/
A
Reference
for
Benchmark:
Hazardous
Substance
Benchma'rk
Concentration
Concentration
Benchmark
N/
A
Most
Distant
Level
I1
Sample
Sample
ID:
N/
A
Distance
from
the
probable
point
of
entry:
Reference:
N/
A
Hazardous
Substance
N/
A
Hazardous
Substance
Concentration
N/
A
42
SWOF/
Environment­
Level
I
Concentrations
4.1.4.3.1
Sensitive
Environments
4.1.4.3.1.1
Level
I
Concentrations
Sensitive
Environments
Distance
from
Probable
Point
of
Entry
to
Nearest
?
oint
of
Sensitive
Sensitive
Environment
Environment
Reference
Sensitive
Environment
Value
(
s
)

N/
A
Sum
of
Sensitive
Environments
Value:
0
Wetlands
Wetland
N
/
A
Wetland
Frontaqe
Reference
Total
Wetland
Frontage:
N/
A
Wetland
Value:
0
Sum
of
Sensitive
Environments
Value
+
Wetland
Value:
0
Ref.
N/
A
Level
I
Concentrations
Factor
Value:
0
43
SWOF/
Environment­
Level
I1
Concentrations
4.1.4.3.1.2
Level
I1
Concentrations
Sensitive
Environments
Distance
from
Probable
Point
of
Entry
to
Nearest
Sensitive
Point
of
Sensitive
Sensitive
Environment
Environment
Reference
(
s
)
Environment
Hudson
0.0
(
State­
designated
area
for
protection
or
maintenance
of
aquatic
life)
10,
pp.
1­
5
5
Sum
of
Sensitive
Environments
Value:
5
Wetlands
Wetland
N/
A
Wetland
Frontase
Reference
Wetland
Value:
0
Sum
of
Sensitive
Environments
Value
+
Wetland
Value:
0
Ref.
N/
A
Level
I1
Concentrations
Factor
Value:
5
44
i
4.1.4.3.1.3
Potential
Contamination
SWOF/
Environment­
Potential
Contamination
­­"­+
­
'
'

Because
a
maximum
score
of
100.00
was
achieved
for
the
surface
water
migration
pathway,
potential
contamination
was
not
evaluated.

Sensitive
Environments
Type
of
Surface
Water
Bodv
N/
A
Wetlands
Type
of
Surface
Water
Bodv
N
/
A
Type
of
Surface
Water
Bodv
N/
A
Sensitive
Environment
Reference
(
s
)
Sensitive
Environment
Value
(
s
)

Wetlands
Wetlands
Frontaqe
Reference
(
SI
of
Surface
Water
Bodv
Sum
of
Sensitive
Wetland
Environment
Frontaqe
Dilution
Values
CSjl
Value
(
Wjl
Weiqht
(
Djl
Dj
(
Wi
+
S
j
)

Sum
of
Dj
(
Wj
+
Sj)
:
N/
A
(
Sum
Of
Dj
(
Wj
+
S
j
)
)
/
IO:
N/
A
Ref.
N/
A
Potential
Contamination
Factor
Value:
0
45
