25368
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
91
/
Monday,
May
12,
2003
/
Notices
management
plan
(
RMP)
to
EPA.
The
RMP
includes
information
on
offsite
consequence
analyses
(
OCA)
as
well
as
other
elements
of
the
risk
management
program.
On
August
5,
1999,
the
President
signed
the
Chemical
Safety
Information,
Site
Security,
and
Fuels
Regulatory
Relief
Act
(
CSISSFRRA).
The
Act
required
the
President
to
promulgate
regulations
on
the
distribution
of
OCA
information
(
CAA
section
112(
r)(
7)(
H)(
ii)).
The
President
delegated
to
EPA
and
the
Department
of
Justice
(
DOJ)
the
responsibility
to
promulgate
regulations
to
govern
the
dissemination
of
OCA
information
to
the
public.
The
final
rule
was
published
on
August
4,
2000
(
65
FR
48108).
The
regulations
imposed
minimal
requirements
on
the
public,
State
and
local
agencies
that
request
OCA
data
from
EPA.
The
State
and
local
agencies
who
decide
to
obtain
OCA
information
must
send
a
written
request
on
their
official
letterhead
to
EPA
certifying
that
they
are
covered
persons
under
Public
Law
106
 
40,
and
that
they
will
use
the
information
for
official
use
only.
EPA
will
then
provide
paper
copies
of
OCA
data
to
those
agencies
as
requested.
The
rule
authorizes
and
encourages
State
and
local
agencies
to
set
up
reading
rooms.
The
local
reading
rooms
would
provide
read­
only
access
to
OCA
information
for
all
the
sources
in
the
LEPC's
jurisdiction
and
for
any
source
where
the
vulnerable
zone
extends
into
the
LEPC's
jurisdiction.
Members
of
the
public
requesting
to
view
OCA
information
at
Federal
reading
rooms
would
be
required
to
sign
in
and
self
certify.
If
asking
for
OCA
information
from
Federal
reading
rooms
for
the
facilities
in
the
area
where
they
live
or
work,
they
would
be
required
to
provide
proof
that
they
live
or
work
in
that
area.
Members
of
the
public
are
required
to
give
their
names,
telephone
number,
and
the
names
of
the
facilities
for
which
OCA
information
is
being
requested,
when
they
contact
the
central
office
to
schedule
an
appointment
to
view
OCA
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
EPA's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
part
9
and
48
CFR
chapter
15.
The
EPA
would
like
to
solicit
comments
to:
(
i)
Evaluate
whether
the
proposed
collection
of
information
is
necessary
for
the
proper
performance
of
the
functions
of
the
agency,
including
whether
the
information
will
have
practical
utility;
(
ii)
Evaluate
the
accuracy
of
the
agency's
estimate
of
the
burden
of
the
proposed
collection
of
information,
including
the
validity
of
the
methodology
and
assumptions
used;
(
iii)
Enhance
the
quality,
utility,
and
clarity
of
the
information
to
be
collected;
and
(
iv)
Minimize
the
burden
of
the
collection
of
information
on
those
who
are
to
respond,
including
through
the
use
of
appropriate
automated
electronic,
mechanical,
or
other
technological
collection
techniques
or
other
forms
of
information
technology,
e.
g.,
permitting
electronic
submission
of
responses.
Burden
Statement:
For
this
ICR
period,
EPA
estimates
a
total
of
3,270
hours
(
annually)
for
local
agencies
requesting
OCA
data
from
EPA
and
providing
read­
only
access
to
the
public.
For
the
State
agencies,
the
total
annual
burden
for
requesting
OCA
data
from
EPA
and
providing
read­
only
access
to
the
public,
is
3,816
hours.
For
the
public
to
display
photo
identification,
sign
a
sign­
in
sheet,
certify
that
the
individual
has
not
received
access
to
OCA
information
for
more
than
10
stationary
sources
for
that
calendar
month,
and
to
request
information
from
the
vulnerable
zone
indicator
system
(
VZIS),
EPA
estimates
a
total
of
8,754
hours
annually.
The
total
burden
for
the
members
of
the
public,
State
and
local
agencies
is
15,840
hours
and
$
413,380
annually
(
47,520
hours
for
three
years
and
$
1,240,140).
Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
or
disclose
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
develop,
acquire,
install,
and
utilize
technology
and
systems
for
the
purposes
of
collecting,
validating,
and
verifying
information,
processing
and
maintaining
information,
and
disclosing
and
providing
information;
adjust
the
existing
ways
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instructions
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
a
collection
of
information;
search
data
sources;
complete
and
review
the
collection
of
information;
and
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.

Dated:
May
6,
2003.

Deborah
Y.
Dietrich,

Director,
Chemical
Emergency
Preparedness
and
Prevention
Office.
[
FR
Doc.
03
 
11754
Filed
5
 
9
 
03;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6560
 
50
 
P
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
[
RCRA
 
2003
 
0011;
FRL
 
7496
 
6]

Development
and
Implementation
of
a
Mercury
Lamp
Recycling
Outreach
Program
AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
ACTION:
Request
for
Applications
(
RFA)
 
Cooperative
Agreements.

SUMMARY:
In
FY
2002
Congress
appropriated
funds
to
the
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
for
the
development
and
implementation
of
a
lamp
(
light
bulb)
recycling
outreach
program
to
increase
awareness
of
proper
disposal
methods
among
commercial
and
industrial
users
of
mercury­
containing
lamps,
in
compliance
with
the
Universal
Waste
Rule.
Mercury
is
a
naturally
occurring
element
commonly
used
by
lamp
manufacturers
to
increase
the
energy
efficiency
of
the
lamps
they
produce.
Examples
of
these
mercury­
containing
lamps
include
familiar
varieties
such
as
the
fluorescent
lamps
commonly
found
in
office
buildings,
high
intensity
discharge
(
HID)
lamps,
and
mercury
vapor
lamps.
While
mercury
is
an
essential
component
allowing
lamps
to
operate
more
efficiently,
it
is
also
hazardous
to
humans
and
the
environment,
thus
EPA
categorizes
spent
mercury­
containing
lamps
as
hazardous
waste
under
the
Resource
Conservation
and
Recovery
Act
(
RCRA).
On
July
6,
1999,
(
see
64
FR
36466)
mercury­
containing
lamps
were
added
to
EPA's
Universal
Waste
program.
This
program,
created
in
1995,
(
see
60
FR
25492,
May
11,
1995)
eases
the
regulatory
burden
on
facilities
that
manage
certain
widely
generated
hazardous
wastes,
known
as
universal
waste.
The
program
was
designed
to
promote
the
collection
and
recycling
of
these
wastes.
It
is
important
that
mercury­
containing
wastes
are
properly
managed
since
incorrect
disposal
of
these
wastes
can
seriously
threaten
the
health
of
citizens,
the
environment,
and
wildlife.
Repeated
exposure
to
large
amounts
of
mercury
can
cause
kidney,
and
nerve
damage
in
adults
and
children,
and
neurological
damage
in
developing
fetuses.
Unfortunately,
many
members
of
the
industrial
and
commercial
community
do
not
realize
that
the
lamps
in
their
buildings
pose
such
a
threat,
and
they
are
unaware
of
acceptable
methods
for
disposing
of
their
lamps.
As
a
result,
illegal
dumping
of
this
hazardous
waste
is
common.
To
address
this
issue,
EPA's
Lamp
VerDate
Jan<
31>
2003
16:
41
May
09,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00054
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
12MYN1.
SGM
12MYN1
25369
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
91
/
Monday,
May
12,
2003
/
Notices
Recycling
Outreach
Program
was
given
funds
to
award
to
organizations
creating
and
implementing
outreach
programs
that
educate
the
commercial
community
about
the
nature
of
mercury­
containing
lamps
and
their
proper
disposal.
At
the
end
of
FY
2002,
EPA
awarded
approximately
half
of
the
available
funds
in
cooperative
agreements
for
the
development
of
outreach
materials
and
developing
an
outreach
plan.
Today
we
are
requesting
applications
for
funding
of
the
second
phase
of
the
program,
the
implementation
of
outreach,
utilizing
the
tools
and
materials
developed
under
the
first
phase.
Specific
materials
which
are
to
be
developed
in
the
first
phase,
and
which
will
be
available
for
use
during
the
second
phase
are
as
follows:
1.
Printed
collateral
materials
for
use
by
government
and
business
organizations
about
lamp
recycling.
2.
A
searchable
database
of
relevant
state
agency
contacts
involved
with
lamp
recycling.
3.
A
``
Frequently
Asked
Questions''
sheet
on
mercury
lamp
management.
4.
A
CD
 
ROM
with
Power
Point
training
presentations
patterned
after
the
training
module
produced
for,
with
trainer
notes
regarding
lamp
recycling.
With
a
booklet
version
of
training
module.
5.
Electronic
version
of
the
DOE
Rebuild
America
training
that
is
interactive
with
state
links.
6.
A
Business
Lamp
Recycling
Program
Implementation
Guide
that
includes
educational
materials,
handouts,
and
textual
components
for
setting
up
a
mercury
lamp
recycling
program.
7.
Presentation
for
a
Business
Lamp
Recycling
Program
Implementation
Workshop.
8.
Mailers
and
stickers
(
or
POS
materials)
for
use
by
local
franchise
agencies,
SW
companies,
contractors
and
utilities.
9.
Public
service
announcements
targeted
at
local
areas
and
advertising
copy
for
target
media.
10.
An
advertisement
to
promote
recycling
and
increase
awareness
of
the
lamprecycle.
org
web
site.
11.
A
``
Business
Lamp
Recycling
Implementation
Program''
Web
Page.
DATES:
Please
submit
applications
on
or
before
July
11,
2003.
ADDRESSES:
U.
S.
EPA,
1200
Pennsylvania
Avenue,
NW.,
Washington,
DC
20460
(
mailing
addresses);
Crystal
Station
(
7th
Floor);
2800
Crystal
Drive,
Arlington,
VA
22202
(
building
address).

FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Anna
Tschursin
with
EPA's
Office
of
Solid
Waste
and
Emergency
Response,
Office
of
Solid
Waste:
(
703)
308
 
8805
or
tschursin.
anna@
epa.
gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION:

Proposal
Submission
and
Selection
Schedule
(
See:
www.
epa.
gov/
ogd/
grants/
how_
to_
apply.
htm.)
EPA
has
established
an
official
public
docket
for
this
action
under
Docket
ID
No.
RCRA
 
2003
 
0011.
The
official
public
docket
is
the
collection
of
materials
that
is
available
for
public
viewing
at
the
OSWER
Docket
in
the
EPA
Docket
Center
(
EPA/
DC),
EPA
West,
Room
B102,
1301
Constitution
Ave,
NW.,
Washington,
DC.
The
EPA
Docket
Center
Public
Reading
Room
is
open
from
8:
30
a.
m.
to
4:
30
p.
m.,
Monday
through
Friday,
excluding
legal
holidays.
The
telephone
number
for
the
Public
Reading
Room
is
(
202)
566
 
1744,
and
the
telephone
number
for
the
OSWER
Docket
is
(
202)
566
 
0270.
Copies
cost
$
0.15
per
page.
An
electronic
version
of
the
public
docket
is
available
through
EPA's
electronic
public
docket
and
comment
system,
EPA
Dockets.
You
may
use
EPA
Dockets
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
edocket/
to
view
public
comments,
access
the
index
listing
of
the
contents
of
the
official
public
docket,
and
access
those
documents
in
the
public
docket
that
are
available
electronically.
Although
not
all
docket
materials
may
be
available
electronically,
you
may
still
access
any
of
the
publicly
available
docket
materials
through
the
EPA
Docket
Center.
Once
in
the
system,
select
``
search''
then
key
in
the
appropriate
docket
ID
number.
EPA
will
accept
proposals
postmarked
or
sent
to
EPA
via
registered
or
tracked
mail
by
July
11,
2003.
Copies
of
the
Standard
Form
424
(
SF
424)
Application
for
Federal
Assistance
may
be
obtained
by
following
the
links
to
SF
forms
on
the
following
Web
site:
www.
gsa.
gov/
forms.
Applicants
should
send
one
(
1)
original
(
clearly
labeled
as
such)
and
three
(
3)
copies
of
their
proposal
to
the
individual
and
address
shown
below:
Anna
Tschursin,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
1200
Pennsylvania
Avenue,
NW.
(
5303W),
Washington,
DC
20460.
Applicants
must
clearly
mark
information
they
consider
confidential,
and
that
EPA
will
make
final
confidentiality
decisions
in
accordance
with
Agency
regulations
at
40
CFR
part
2,
subpart
B.
EPA
will
offer
preapplication
assistance
by
receiving
and
responding
to
questions
via
e­
mail.
EPA
will
work
with
the
successful
applicant
to
comply
with
the
Intergovernmental
review
requirements
of
Executive
Order
12372
and
40
CFR
part
29.

Authority
Solid
Waste
Disposal
Act,
section
8001
(
a)
authorizes
EPA
to
render
financial
and
other
assistance
to
appropriate
public
(
whether
Federal,
State,
interstate,
or
local)
authorities,
agencies,
and
institutions,
private
agencies
and
institutions,
and
individuals
in
the
conduct
of,
and
promote
the
coordination
of,
research,
investigations,
experiments,
training,
demonstrations,
surveys,
public
education
programs,
and
studies.
The
overall
objective
of
the
Lamp
Recycling
Outreach
Program
is
to
increase
public
awareness
and
access
to
resource
information
by
the
development
of
educational
material
and
a
mechanism
for
disseminating
this
information
through
a
highly
visible
outreach
campaign.
The
objective
of
this
cooperative
agreement
directly
relates
to
the
coordination
of
public
education
programs
and
training
aspect
of
this
statutory
authority.

Award
Information
Anticipated
Type
of
Award(
s):
Cooperative
Agreement.
Anticipated
Total
Available
Funding
Amount:
$
725,417.
Project
Period:
September
2003
 
Sept
2008.

Eligibility
for
Funding
The
term
``
non­
profit''
is
defined
in
OMB
Circular
A
 
122
and
``
educational
institution''
refers
to
colleges
and
universities
subject
to
OMB
Circular
A
 
21.
Groups
of
two
or
more
eligible
applicants
may
choose
to
form
a
coalition
and
submit
a
single
application
for
this
cooperative
agreement.
However,
one
applicant
will
be
accountable
to
EPA
for
proper
expenditure
of
funds
and
any
financial
transactions
between
coalition
members
must
comply
with
40
CFR
part
30.
Per
§
501(
c)(
4)
of
the
Internal
Revenue
Code,
non­
profit
organizations
that
engage
in
lobbying
activities
 
as
defined
in
section
3
of
the
Lobbying
Disclosure
Act
of
1995
 
are
not
eligible
to
apply
or
be
part
of
a
coalition.

Matching
or
Cost
Sharing
Requirements
There
are
no
cost
sharing
requirements.

Applicable
Regulations
The
recipient
will
be
subject
to
EPA
regulations
applicable
to
non­
profit
organizations
and
institutions
of
higher
education,
40
CFR
part
30
and
OMB
Cost
Principles,
A
 
122
or
A
 
21,

VerDate
Jan<
31>
2003
16:
41
May
09,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00055
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
12MYN1.
SGM
12MYN1
25370
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
91
/
Monday,
May
12,
2003
/
Notices
respectively.
The
dispute
resolution
process
will
be
followed
in
accordance
with
40
CFR
30.63.
Executive
Order
12372,
Intergovernmental
Review
of
Federal
Programs
is
applicable.

Evaluation
of
Proposals
EPA
will
conduct
the
competition
consistent
with
EPA
Order
5700.5,
Policy
on
Competition
for
Assistance
Agreements
(
9/
12/
02).
EPA
will
assemble
a
review
panel
consisting
of
members
familiar
with
issues
related
to
public
outreach,
mercury­
containing
lamps,
and
the
Universal
Waste
Rule.
The
review
panel
will
use
a
point
system
to
rank
applications
and
make
recommendations
to
the
Director,
Permits
and
State
Programs
Division,
Office
of
Solid
Waste,
Office
of
Solid
Waste
and
Emergency
Response.
The
Director
will
make
the
final
selection.
Successful
and
unsuccessful
applicants
will
be
notified
of
their
award
status
in
writing.
EPA
anticipates
awarding
the
cooperative
agreement
within
45
days
of
the
application
deadline.
EPA
reserves
the
right
to
reject
all
applications
and
make
no
awards.

Proposal
Contents
Proposals
must
be
clear
and
decisive,
strictly
follow
the
criteria,
and
provide
sufficient
detail
for
the
panel
to
compare
the
merits
of
each
and
decide
which
proposal
best
supports
the
intent
of
the
project.
Vague
descriptions
and
unnecessary
redundancy
may
reduce
the
chance
of
a
favorable
rating.
Proposals
providing
the
best
evidence
of
a
quality
project
and
appropriate
use
of
funds
will
have
the
best
chance
of
being
recommended
by
the
panel.
Each
proposal
must
include
the
following
sections,
all
of
which
are
described
in
detail
further
below:
Cover
Page
(
1
page).
Overview
(
1 
2
page).
Budget
(
1
page).
Responses
to
Threshold
Criteria
(
up
to
4
pages):
Experience
with
public
outreach
on
waste
related
issues;
Experience
with
management
of
Federal
cooperative
agreements
(
or
ability
to
secure
such
experience).
Responses
to
Evaluation
Criteria
(
up
to
10
pages):
Project
Description;
Sustainable,
Comprehensive
Integrated
Outreach
Program;
Qualifications
and
Experience;
Project
Partners/
Institutionalization;
Use
of
Existing
Materials;
Measurability
of
Project
Results;
Transferability.
To
ensure
fair
and
equitable
evaluation
of
the
proposals,
please
do
not
exceed
the
single­
sided
page
limitations
referenced
above.
There
is
no
guarantee
that
pages
submitted
beyond
the
limitations
will
be
reviewed
by
the
evaluation
panel
and
doing
so
could
reduce
your
chances
of
a
favorable
rating.
In
addition,
all
materials
included
in
the
proposal
(
including
attachments)
must
be
printed
on
letter­
sized
paper
with
font
sizes
no
smaller
than
12
points.
Furthermore,
all
materials
must
be
printed
double­
sided
on
paper
with
a
minimum
recycled
content
of
at
least
35%.
Cover
Page:
This
page
is
intended
to
introduce
the
applicant
and
identify
a
primary
point
of
contact
for
communication
with
EPA.
The
cover
page
should
be
on
a
single
page
and
include
the
following
data
elements
in
the
format
of
your
choice:
 
Applicant
identification
 
the
name
of
the
main
implementor
of
the
project.
 
Contact
 
the
name
of
the
person
who
is
responsible
for
the
proposal.
 
Mailing
address/
Telephone
and
Fax
numbers/
e­
mail
address
of
the
point
of
contact
for
the
proposal.
 
Submittal
Date.

Overview
Briefly
summarize
the
overall
goal
of
the
project
and
how
the
achievement
of
that
goal
can
be
measured
after
completion
of
the
project.

Budget
Provide
a
proposed
budget
for
the
project.
A
clear
and
concise
budget
is
a
critical
element
of
the
package.
The
following
budget
categories
may
be
useful
when
presenting
your
budget
in
the
proposal:
personnel,
travel,
equipment,
supplies,
contractual,
other.
EPA
defines
equipment
as
items
which
cost
$
5,000
or
more.
Items
less
than
$
5,000
are
considered
supplies.
Allowable
expenses
include
direct
costs
related
to
organizing
and
implementing
the
project
and
indirect
costs
authorized
under
the
applicable
OMB
Circular.

Threshold
Criteria
In
order
to
be
considered
for
award
of
this
cooperative
agreement,
the
applicant
must
meet
the
threshold
criteria
described
below:
1.
Eligibility:
Applicants
must
demonstrate
that
it
is
an
eligible
nonprofit
organization
or
an
eligible
educational
institution.
2.
Experience
with
management
of
Federal
cooperative
agreements
(
or
ability
to
secure
such
experience).

Evaluation
Criteria
An
applicant's
response
to
each
of
the
following
criteria
will
be
the
primary
basis
on
which
EPA
selects
or
rejects
your
proposal
for
the
project.
The
evaluation
panel
will
review
the
proposals
carefully
and
assess
each
response
based
on
how
well
it
addresses
each
criterion.
A
point
system
will
be
used
to
evaluate
the
proposals.
Next
to
the
title
of
each
evaluation
criterion
below
is
the
maximum
number
of
points
that
can
be
awarded
for
that
criterion
(
with
a
total
possible
score
of
100).
If
a
particular
criterion
is
not
relevant
to
your
proposal,
please
acknowledge
and
explain
why
it
does
not
apply.

1.
Project
Description
(
15
Points)

Provides
a
complete
and
clear
statement
of
project
goals,
activities,
budget,
and
detailed
work
plan.
Budgets
should
include:
how
funds
will
be
used,
estimated
cost
of
each
task,
equipment
supplies,
travel,
etc.
Work
plans
should
include:
the
projected
time­
frame
for
the
outreach
program
from
initiation
through
completion,
as
well
as
a
time
line
of
significant
milestones
and
work
products
to
be
developed.

2.
Sustainable,
Comprehensive
Integrated
Outreach
Program
(
30
Points)

Demonstrates
how
program
will
promote
lamp
recycling
by
commercial
and
industrial
users
of
mercurycontaining
lamps,
in
compliance
with
Federal
and
State
Universal
Waste
Rule
provisions.
Justifies
the
work
products
to
be
developed.
Describes
how
each
product
or
activity
meets
the
program
goals.
Describes
how
your
program
will
deliver
long­
term
national
benefit,
including
how
you
anticipate
assisting
the
attainment
of
a
national
lamp
recycling
goal
of
40%
by
2005
and
80%
by
2009.

3.
Qualifications
and
Experience
(
20
Points)

Explains
qualifications
you
have
which
can
be
applied
to
developing
this
outreach
program.
Details
your
interest
in
recycling.
Demonstrates
the
availability
of
properly
trained
staff,
facilities,
or
infrastructure
to
conduct
the
program.
Demonstrates
an
understanding
of
the
key
audiences
that
need
to
be
reached.
Demonstrates
an
ability
to
develop
accurate
and
compelling
information
for
a
wide
audience.
Demonstrates
a
history
of
successfully
working
with
the
private
sector,
State,
and
local
government
and
recycling
groups
(
business
and
environmental
groups).
Justifies
that
you
have
the
capability
to
develop
an
outreach
program
that
can
continue
to
encourage
long­
term
improved
recycling
rates
even
after
your
direct
involvement
is
complete.

VerDate
Jan<
31>
2003
16:
41
May
09,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00056
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
12MYN1.
SGM
12MYN1
25371
Federal
Register
/
Vol.
68,
No.
91
/
Monday,
May
12,
2003
/
Notices
4.
Project
Partners/
Institutionalization
(
10
Points)

Demonstrates
an
awareness
of
existing
programs.
Describes
efforts
to
leverage
resources
from
other
project
partners,
including
other
cooperative
agreement
awardees
(
from
phase
one
and
phase
two
of
the
program),
surrounding
communities,
non­
profits,
businesses,
State
and
Federal
agencies.
Describes
the
possible
role
of
EPA
within
the
program.
Describes
how
you
will
collaborate
with
other
stakeholders.
(
10
bonus
Points)
Identifies
partnering
organization(
s)
and
documents
the
relationship
with
the
applicant.
This
can
be
done,
for
example,
through
a
letter
of
support,
a
joint
statement,
or
principles
of
agreement
signed
by
other
parties.

5.
Use
of
existing
materials
(
10
Points)

Explains
how
existing
materials
(
including
those
developed
in
phase
one
of
the
program)
will
be
utilized.

6.
Measurability
of
Project
Results
(
5
Points)

Demonstrates
the
ability
to
quantitatively
measure
and
document
the
effectiveness
of
your
program.
Explains
approach
to
tracking
and
reporting
results.
At
the
end
of
the
cooperative
agreement
period,
should
be
able
to
provide
a
description
of
project
outcomes
 
i.
e.,
What,
if
any
was
the
impact
on
the
recycling
rate
of
your
target
audience?

7.
Transferability
(
10
Points)

Explains
how
the
information
and
lessons
learned
during
the
project
will
be
transferred
to
others
in
order
to
continue
to
encourage
long­
term
improved
recycling
rates
even
after
your
direct
involvement
is
complete.

Pre­
application
Assistance
EPA
will
provide
pre­
application
assistance
by
responding
to
all
questions
which
are
submitted
by
e­
mail
to
tschursin.
anna@
epa.
gov.

Terms
and
Reporting
Grants
will
include
programmatic
and
administrative
terms
and
conditions.
These
terms
and
conditions
will
describe
what
is
expected
from
the
grant
recipient.
The
grantee
will
be
required
to
submit
quarterly
progress
reports.
The
grantee
should
only
report
on
activities
funded
(
in
whole
or
in
part)
via
the
grant.
The
narrative
should
include
descriptions
of
all
action
items
resulting
from
meetings,
site
visits,
and
other
activities,
as
well
as
milestones
achieved
and
any
challenges
encountered.
The
reports
should
include
lists
of
action
items
and
corresponding
milestone
dates.
In
addition,
all
quarterly
reports
must
be
internally
reviewed
and
approved
for
quality
assurance
purposes
prior
to
submission.
Costs
incurred
in
complying
with
reporting
requirements
are
an
eligible
expense
under
the
Solid
Waste
Disposal
Act,
section
8001(
a).

Dated:
April
29,
2003.
Robert
Springer,
Director,
Office
of
Solid
Waste.
[
FR
Doc.
03
 
11756
Filed
5
 
9
 
03;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6560
 
50
 
P
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
[
FRL
 
FRL
 
7497
 
1]

Government­
Owned
Invention:
Available
for
Licensing
AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
ACTION:
Notice
of
availability
of
invention
for
licensing.

SUMMARY:
The
invention
named
below
is
owned
by
the
U.
S.
Government
and
is
available
for
licensing
in
the
United
States
in
accordance
with
35
U.
S.
C.
207
and
37
CFR
Part
404.
Pursuant
to
37
CFR
404.7,
beginning
three
months
after
the
date
of
this
notice
the
Government
may
grant
exclusive
or
partially
exclusive
licenses
on
the
invention.
Copies
of
the
patent
application
and
37
CFR
Part
404
can
be
obtained
from
Laura
Scalise,
Patent
Attorney,
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
at
the
address
indicated
below.
Requests
for
copies
of
the
patent
application
must
include
the
patent
application
serial
number
listed
in
this
notice.
Requesters
of
the
patent
application
will
be
asked
to
sign
a
Confidentiality
Agreement
before
the
application
is
mailed.
A
party
that
is
interested
in
obtaining
a
license
must
apply
to
EPA
at
the
contact
address
below.
The
license
application
must
contain
the
information
set
forth
in
37
CFR
404.8,
including
the
license
applicant's
plan
for
development
or
marketing
of
the
invention.
Prior
to
granting
an
exclusive
or
partially
exclusive
license
on
this
invention,
EPA,
pursuant
to
37
CFR
404.7,
will
publish
in
the
Federal
Register
an
additional
notice
identifying
the
specific
invention
and
the
prospective
licensee.
FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
Laura
Scalise,
Patent
Attorney,
Office
of
General
Counsel
(
2377),
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Washington,
DC
20460,
telephone
(
202)
564
 
8303.
Patent
Application
U.
S.
Patent
Application
No.
09/
866,793:
METHODS
FOR
ISOLATING
AND
USING
FUNGAL
HEMOLYSINS;
filed
May
30,
2001.

Dated:
May
6,
2003.
Marla
E.
Diamond,
Associate
General
Counsel.
[
FR
Doc.
03
 
11757
Filed
5
 
9
 
03;
8:
45
am]

BILLING
CODE
6560
 
50
 
P
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
[
FRL
 
7496
 
9]

Meeting
of
the
Mobile
Sources
Technical
Review
Subcommittee
AGENCY:
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA).
ACTION:
Notice
of
meeting.

SUMMARY:
Pursuant
to
the
Federal
Advisory
Committee
Act,
Public
Act,
Pub.
L.
92
 
463,
notice
is
hereby
given
that
the
Mobile
Sources
Technical
Review
Subcommittee
will
meet
in
June
2003.
This
is
an
open
meeting.
The
theme
of
the
meeting
is
future
energy
legislation
and
EPA's
proposed
nonroad
diesel
rule.
The
meeting
will
include
presentations
from
outside
organizations
and
EPA.
The
preliminary
agenda
for
this
meeting
will
be
available
on
the
Subcommittee's
Web
site
in
May.
Draft
minutes
from
the
previous
meetings
are
available
on
the
Subcommittee's
Web
site
now
at:
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
air/
caaac/
mobile_
sources.
html.

DATES:
Wednesday,
June
11,
2003,
from
9
a.
m.
to
1
p.
m.
Registration
begins
at
8:
30
a.
m.
ADDRESSES:
The
meeting
will
be
held
at
the
Radisson
Hotel
Old
Town
Alexandria,
901
N
Fairfax
St,
Alexandria,
VA
22314;
(
703)
683
 
6000.
Cut­
off
date
to
make
reservations
for
discounted
rooms
associated
with
this
meeting
is
May
16,
2003.

FOR
FURTHER
INFORMATION
CONTACT:
For
technical
information:
Mr.
Barry
Garelick,
Technical
Staff
Contact,
Transportation
and
Regional
Programs
Division,
MC:
6406J,
U.
S.
EPA,
1200
Pennsylvania
Ave.,
NW.,
Washington,
DC
20460;
Ph:
(
202)
564
 
9028;
FAX:
(
202)
565
 
2085,
e­
mail;
garelick.
barry@
epa.
gov.
For
logistical
and
administrative
information:
Ms.
Kim
Derksen,
FACA
Management
Officer,
U.
S.
EPA,
2000
Traverwood
Drive,
Ann
Arbor,
Michigan,
Ph:
734
 
214
 
4272;
FAX
734
 
214
 
4906,
e­
mail:
derksen.
kimberly@
epa.
gov.

VerDate
Jan<
31>
2003
16:
41
May
09,
2003
Jkt
200001
PO
00000
Frm
00057
Fmt
4703
Sfmt
4703
E:\
FR\
FM\
12MYN1.
SGM
12MYN1
