6.0
ECONOMIC
IMPACT
ANALYSIS
6.1
Major
Industries
Impacted
In
this
section
the
industries
which
will
have
some
of
the
greatest
impacts
are
profiled,
using
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers
data.
The
industries
profiled,
listed
below,
represent
much
of
the
total
waste
which
is
affected
under
the
anticipated
rule.

°
Basic
Chemicals
(
NAICS
3251)
°
Petrochemical
(
NAICS
325110)
°
Other
Basic
Organic
Chemicals
(
NAICS
325199)
°
Other
Inorganic
Chemicals
(
NAICS
325188)
°
Inorganic
Dyes
and
Pigments
(
NAICS
325131)
°
Cyclic
Crudes
and
Intermediates
(
NAICS
325192)

°
Resin,
Synthetic
Rubber,
and
Artificial
and
Synthetic
Fibers
and
Filaments
(
3252)
°
Plastic
Materials
and
Resins
(
NAICS
325211)

°
Pharmaceutical
and
Medicine
Manufacturing
(
NAICS
3254)
°
Pharmaceutical
Preparations
(
NAICS
325412)

°
Nonferrous
Metal
(
except
aluminum)
Production
and
Processing
(
NAICS
3314)
°
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Copper
(
NAICS
331411)
°
Other
Nonferrous
Metal
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
(
NAICS
331419)
°
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining
and
Alloying
of
Copper
(
NAICS
331423)
°
Other
Nonferrous
Metal
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining,
Alloying
Manufacturing
(
NAICS
331492)

°
Coating,
Engraving,
Heat
Treating,
and
Allied
Activities
(
NAICS
3328)

°
Plating
and
Polishing
(
NAICS
332813)

°
Semiconductor
and
Other
Electronic
Component
Manufacturing
(
NAICS
3344)
°
Printed
Circuit
Board
(
NAICS
334412)

6.1.1
Basic
Chemical
Industry
The
Basic
Chemical
Industry
includes
a
broad
range
of
industries.
For
the
purpose
of
our
analysis,
we
will
be
focusing
on
the
four
major
industries:
Petrochemical
(
NAICS
325110),
Other
Basic
Inorganic
Chemical
(
NAICS
32518),
Other
Basic
Organic
Chemical
(
NAICS
32519)
and
Inorganic
Dye
and
Pigment
(
NAICS
325131).

6.1.1.1
Petrochemical
Industry
Profile
1
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC.
The
petrochemical
manufacturers
are
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
325110
(
SIC
2865
and
2869).
This
industry
is
a
part
of
the
chemical
manufacturing
industry
(
NAICS
325)
and
comprises
establishments
primarily
engaged
in
(
1)
manufacturing
acrylic,
and
(
2)
manufacturing
cyclic
aromatic
hydrocarbons.
1
6.1.1.1.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
Table
6­
1
provides
a
summary
of
the
estimated
U.
S.
total
value
of
shipments
of
petrochemicals
for
1997.

Table
6­
1.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Petrochemical
Products:
1997
YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1997
20,534,750
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.1.1.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
this
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers
and
Census
Current
Industrial
reports.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
54
facilities
located
in
within
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
42
companies.
More
than
half
of
the
industry,
in
terms
of
aggregate
value
of
shipments,
is
dominated
by
approximately
11
percent
of
all
facilities.
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
2.

Table
6­
2.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Petrochemical
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
11
20.4%
0.1%

20
­
49
5
9.3%
0.5%

50
­
99
10
18.5%
4.2%

100
­
249
13
24.1%
13.0%

250
­
499
9
16.7%
25.4%

500
&
above
6
11.0%
56.8%

Total
54
100.0%
100.0%
Table
6­
2.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Petrochemical
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
2
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC.
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.1.1.3
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
576,357,000.

6.1.1.2
Other
Organic
Chemical
Industry
Profile
The
other
organic
chemical
manufacturers
are
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
325199.
This
industry
is
a
part
of
the
chemical
manufacturing
industry
(
NAICS
325)
and
comprises
establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
basic
organic
chemicals
(
except
petrochemicals,
industrial
gases,
and
synthetic
dyes
and
pigments).
2
6.1.1.2.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
Table
6­
3
provides
a
summary
of
the
estimated
U.
S.
total
value
of
shipments
of
other
organic
chemical
products
for
1997.

Table
6­
3.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Other
Organic
Chemical
Products:
1997
YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1997
53,542,377
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.
3
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC.
6.1.1.2.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
this
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers
and
Census
Current
Industrial
reports.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
676
facilities
located
in
within
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
487
companies.
Over
70
percent
of
all
facilities
employ
fewer
than
100
people.
While
more
than
half
of
the
industry,
in
terms
of
aggregate
value
of
shipments,
is
dominated
by
approximately
5
percent
of
all
facilities.
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
4.

Table
6­
4.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Other
Organic
Chemicals
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
251
37.1%
2.5%

20
­
49
136
20.1%
4.1%

50
­
99
100
14.8%
8.2%

100
­
249
118
17.5%
20.4%

250
­
499
33
4.9%
14.2%

500
&
above
38
5.6%
50.6%

Total
676
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.1.2.3
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
185,672,000.

6.1.1.3
Other
Inorganic
Chemical
Industry
Profile
The
other
inorganic
chemical
manufacturers
are
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
325188
(
and
SIC
2819).
This
industry
is
a
part
of
the
chemical
manufacturing
industry
(
NAICS
325)
and
comprises
establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
basic
inorganic
chemicals
(
except
industrial
gases,
inorganic
dyes
and
pigments,
alkalies
and
chlorine
and
carbon
black).
3
6.1.1.3.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
Table
6­
5
provides
a
summary
of
the
estimated
U.
S.
total
value
of
shipments
of
other
inorganic
chemical
products
for
1997.

Table
6­
5.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Other
Inorganic
Chemical
Products:
1997
YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1997
17,255,506
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.1.3.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
this
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers
and
Census
Current
Industrial
reports.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
638
facilities
located
in
within
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
387
companies.
About
28.6
percent
of
all
facilities
employ
fewer
than
100
people.
Almost
half
of
the
industry,
in
terms
of
aggregate
value
of
shipments,
is
dominated
by
approximately
5
percent
of
all
facilities.
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
6.

Table
6­
6.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Other
Inorganic
Chemicals
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
330
51.7%
5.9%

20
­
49
139
21.8%
10.7%

50
­
99
73
11.4%
12.0%

100
­
249
63
9.9%
25.5%

250
­
499
21
3.3%
12.5%

500
&
above
12
1.9%
33.4%

Total
638
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.1.3.3
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
91,371,000.
4
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC.
6.1.1.4
Inorganic
Dye
and
Pigment
Industry
Profile
Inorganic
dye
and
pigment
manufacturers
are
listed
under
the
North
American
Industrial
Classification
(
NAICS)
code
325131
(
and
SIC
2816
and
2819).
The
inorganic
dye
and
pigment
manufacturers
are
a
part
of
the
chemical
manufacturing
industry
(
NAICS
325)
and
this
industry
comprises
establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
industrial
inorganic
chemicals
and
inorganic
pigments.
4
6.1.1.4.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
Table
6­
7
provides
a
summary
of
the
estimated
U.
S.
total
value
of
shipments
of
inorganic
dye
and
pigments
from
1994
­
1998.

Table
6­
7.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Inorganic
Dye
and
Pigments:
1994
­
1998
YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1998
2,526,126
1997
2,606,048
1996
2,486,663
1995
2,284,232
1994
2,470,873
Source:
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
Bureau
of
the
Census,
Current
Industrial
Reports,
Inorganic
Chemicals
1998,
MA
325A(
98)­
1,
February,
2000
6.1.1.4.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
the
inorganic
dye
and
pigment
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers
and
Census
Current
Industrial
reports.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
74
facilities
located
in
within
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
58
companies.
About
65
percent
of
all
facilities
employ
fewer
than
100
people.
Almost
half
of
the
industry,
in
terms
of
aggregate
value
of
shipments,
is
dominated
by
approximately
6
percent
of
all
facilities.
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
8.
Table
6­
8.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Inorganic
Dye
and
Pigment
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
24
32.4%
1.4%

20
­
49
16
21.6%
4.3%

50
­
99
8
10.8%
4.4%

100
­
249
14
18.9%
18.5%

250
­
499
8
10.8%
27.6%

500
&
above
4
5.5%
43.9%

Total
74
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.1.3.3
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
77,556,000.

6.1.1.5
Cyclic
Crudes
and
Intermediates
Industry
Profile
Cyclic
crudes
and
intermediates
manufacturers
are
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
325192
(
and
under
the
SIC
as
industry
2865).
The
cyclic
crudes
and
intermediates
manufacturing
industry
is
a
part
of
the
chemical
manufacturing
industry
(
NAICS
325).
Establishments
in
this
industry
are
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
cyclic
organic
crudes
and
intermediates,
and
organic
dyes
and
pigments.
Important
products
of
this
industry
include:
(
1)
aromatic
chemicals,
such
as
benzene,
toluene,
mixed
xylenes
naphthalene;
(
2)
synthetic
organic
dyes;
and
(
3)
synthetic
organic
pigments.
87,345
6.1.1.5.1
Shipment
Values
Table
6­
9
shows
the
estimated
total
value
of
shipments
of
cyclic
crudes
and
intermediate
products
for
1997.

Table
6­
9.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Cyclic
Crudes
and
Intermediate
Products:
1997
YEAR
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1997
5,975,157
Table
6­
9.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Cyclic
Crudes
and
Intermediate
Products:
1997
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.1.5.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
the
cyclic
crudes
and
intermediates
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
50
facilities
located
in
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
35
companies.
Over
60
percent
of
facilities
employ
fewer
than
100
people.
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
10.

Table
6­
10.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Cyclic
Crudes
and
Intermediates
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
12
24.0%
15.7%

20
­
49
9
18.0%
2.8%

50
­
99
11
22.0%
5.3%

100
­
249
7
14.0%
15.8%

250
&
above
11
22.0%
60.4%

Total
50
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.1.5.3
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
180,181,000.
5
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC
6
EPA.
1995.
EPA
Office
of
Compliance
Sector
Notebook
Project:
Profile
of
the
Plastic
Resin
and
Manmade
Fiber
Industry.
EPA/
310­
R­
97­
006
7
Ibid
6.1.2
Resin,
Synthetic
Rubber,
and
Artificial
and
Synthetic
Fibers
and
Filaments
The
Resin,
Synthetic
Rubber,
and
Artificial
and
Synthetic
Fibers
and
Filaments
industry
(
NAICS
3252)
includes
a
broad
range
of
industries.
For
the
purpose
of
our
analysis,
only
the
Plastic
Material
and
Resin
Manufacturing
Industry
will
be
examined.

6.1.2.1
Plastic
Material
and
Resin
Manufacturing
Industry
Profile
Plastics
material
and
resin
manufacturers
are
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
325211
(
and
under
the
SIC
as
industry
2821).
This
industry
is
a
sub­
sector
of
the
chemical
manufacturing
industry
(
NAICS
325).
This
industry
comprises
establishments
primarily
engaged
in
the
manufacturing
of
synthetic
resins,
plastics
materials,
and
non­
vulcanizable
elastomers.
5
The
plastic
resin
industry
produces
resins
which
are
further
treated
in
plastics
processing
facilities
and
sold
largely
to
the
packaging,
building
and
construction,
and
consumer
markets.
Specific
product
formulations
and
manufacturing
parameters
are
often
kept
as
trade
secrets
since
the
competitiveness
of
many
companies
depends
on
the
ability
to
produce
resins
with
different
physical
characteristics,
such
as
strength,
toughness,
and
flexibility.
6
Plastic
resins
are
typically
broken
down
into
two
categories:
thermoplastics
and
thermosets.
Thermoplastic
resins
are
resins
that
can
be
heated
and
molded
into
shapes
repeatedly,
while
thermoset
resins
are
resins
that
can
be
heated
and
molded
only
once.
Thermoplastic
resins
dominate
plastic
resin
sales
and
production.
In
1994,
thermoplastics
made
up
about
90
percent,
or
63.3
billion
pounds,
of
plastic
resin
production
by
dry
weight
and
accounted
for
82
percent,
or
$
27.2
billion
dollars
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
for
plastic
resin.
Commercially
important
thermoplastics
include
polyethylene
(
all
forms),
polyvinyl
chloride,
polypropylene,
and
polystyrene
and
are
shown
in
Figure
3.
These
four
thermoplastics
make
up
over
69
percent
of
plastic
resin
sales.
These
thermoplastics
are
considered
general
purpose,
or
commodity
plastics
since
they
are
usually
manufactured
in
large
quantities
using
well
established
technology
and
are
typically
geared
towards
a
small
number
of
high
volume
users.
7
6.1.2.1.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
Table
6­
11
shows
the
estimated
U.
S.
total
value
of
shipments
for
plastic
material
and
resins
for
1997.
Table
6­
11.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Plastic
Materials
and
Resin
Products:
1997
YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1997
44,574,918
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.2.1.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
the
plastic
material
and
resin
manufacturing
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
532
facilities
located
in
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
301
companies.
Over
70
percent
of
the
of
all
facilities
employ
fewer
than
100
people.
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
12.

Table
6­
12.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Plastics
Material
and
Resin
Manufacturing
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
115
21.6%
1.5%

20
­
49
160
30.1%
6.9%

50
­
99
114
21.4%
12.1%

100
­
249
94
17.7%
28.1%

250
&
above
49
9.2%
34.4%

Total
532
100.0%
83.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.2.1.3
Typical
Products
Important
products
of
this
industry
include:
cellulose
plastics
materials;
phenolic
and
other
tar
acid
resins;
urea
and
melamine
resins;
vinyl
resins;
styrene
resins;
alkyd
resins;
acrylic
resins;
polyethylene
resins;
polypropylene
resins;
rosin
modified
resins;
coumarone­
indene
and
petroleum
polymer
resins;
miscellaneous
resins,
including
polyamide
resins,
silicones,
polyisobutylenes,
polyesters,
resins,
acetyl
resins,
and
fluorohydrocarbon
resins;
and
casein
plastics.
polycarbonate
8
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC
9
EPA.
1995.
EPA
Office
of
Compliance
Sector
Notebook
Project:
Profile
of
the
Pharmaceutical
Industry.
EPA/
310­
R­
97­
005
10
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
Bureau
of
the
Census,
Current
Industrial
Reports,
Pharmaceutical
Preparations,
Except
Biologicals,
Annual
Report
2000,
MA
325G(
00)­
1,
August
2001.
resins,
acetyl
resins,
and
fluorohydrocarbon
resins;
and
casein
plastics.
8
6.1.2.1.4
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
170,472,000.

6.1.3
Pharmaceutical
and
Medicine
Manufacturing
The
Pharmaceutical
and
Medicine
Manufacturing
Industry
(
NAICS
3254)
contains
a
broad
range
of
industries.
For
the
purpose
of
this
analysis
the
Pharmaceutical
Preparations
Industry
will
be
examined.

6.1.3.1
Pharmaceutical
Preparations
Industry
Profile
Pharmaceutical
preparations
manufacturers
are
listed
under
the
North
American
Industrial
Classification
NAICS
code
as
325412
(
SIC
2834
and
2835).
This
industry
is
a
part
of
the
chemical
manufacturing
industry
(
NAICS
325).
The
pharmaceutical
preparations
industry
is
made
up
of
companies
that
manufacture,
fabricate,
and
process
raw
materials
into
pharmaceutical
preparations
for
human
and
veterinary
uses.
Finished
products
are
sold
in
various
dosage
forms
including,
for
example,
tablets,
capsules,
ointments,
solutions,
suspensions,
and
powders.
These
are
1)
preparations
aimed
for
use
mainly
by
dental,
medical,
or
veterinary
professionals,
and
2)
those
aimed
for
use
by
patients
and
the
general
public.
9
6.1.3.1.1
Shipment
Values
The
total
value
of
shipments
for
pharmaceutical
preparations
in
the
United
States
totaled
$
78.9
billion
in
2000,
a
12­
percent
increase
from
$
70.2
billion
in
1999.
The
leading
product
category
was
pharmaceutical
preparations
that
act
on
the
central
nervous
system
and
sense
organs
in
humans.
Table
6­
13
provides
a
summary
of
estimated
U.
S.
total
value
of
shipments
for
pharmaceutical
preparations.
10
Table
6­
13.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Pharmaceutical
Preparations,
Except
Biologicals:
2000
and
1999
YEAR
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

Total
Prescription
legend
Nonprescription
Bulk
Shipments
2000
78,907,599
63,768,674
13,999,294
1,139,631
1999
70,171,309
54,669,894
14,411,968
1,089,447
Source:
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
Bureau
of
the
Census,
Current
Industrial
Reports,
Pharmaceutical
Preparations,
Except
Biologicals,
Annual
Report
2000,
MA
325G(
00)­
1,
August
2001.

6.1.3.1.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
the
pharmaceutical
preparations
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers
and
Census
Current
Industrial
reports.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
837
facilities
located
in
within
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
710
companies.
More
than
half
of
this
industry,
in
terms
of
aggregate
value
of
shipments,
is
dominated
by
only
6
percent
of
all
facilities.
Over
70
percent
of
all
facilities
employ
fewer
than
100
people.
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
14.

Table
6­
14.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Pharmaceutical
Preparations
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
395
47.2%
1.0%

20
­
49
138
16.5%
1.6%

50
­
99
85
10.2%
3.7%

100
­
249
107
12.8%
11.6%

250
&
above
112
13.3%
82.1%

Total
837
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.3.1.3
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
11
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
258,378,000.

6.1.4
Nonferrous
Metal
(
except
Aluminum)
Production
and
Processing
Industry
Profile
The
nonferrous
metal
production
and
processing
industry
includes
a
broad
range
of
industries.
For
the
purpose
of
this
analysis
we
will
be
focusing
on:
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Copper
(
NAICS
331411),
Other
Nonferrous
Metal
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
(
NAICS
331419),
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining
and
Alloying
of
Copper
(
NAICS
331423),
and
Other
Nonferrous
Metals
Smelting,
Refining
and
Alloying
(
NAICS
331492).

6.1.4.1
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Copper
Industry
Profile
This
industry
is
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
331411
(
SIC
331).
This
industry
is
a
subsector
of
the
primary
metal
industry
(
NAICS
331).
This
industry
comprises
establishments
primarily
engaged
in
(
1)
smelting
copper
ore
and/
or
(
2)
the
primary
refining
of
copper
by
electrolytic
methods
or
other
processes.
11
6.1.4.1.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
Table
6­
15
shows
the
estimated
US
total
value
of
shipments
for
primary
smelting
an
refining
of
copper
products
for
1997.

Table
6­
15.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Copper
Products:
1997
YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1997
6,540,441
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.4.1.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
this
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
16
facilities
located
in
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
9
companies.
A
12
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC
13
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
16.12
Table
6­
16.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Copper
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
1
6.2%
N/
A
20
­
49
1
6.2%
N/
A
50
­
99
0
0.0%
N/
A
100
­
249
3
18.8%
N/
A
250
­
499
11
68.8%
81.8%

Total
16
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.4.1.3
Typical
Products
Establishments
in
this
industry
primarily
make
primary
copper
and
copper
based
alloys,
such
as
brass
and
bronze,
from
ore
or
concentrates.
13
6.1.4.1.4
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
521,876,000.
14
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC
15
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC
6.1.4.2
Other
Nonferrous
Metal
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
Industry
Profile
This
industry
is
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
331419
(
SIC
3339).
This
industry
is
a
subsector
of
the
primary
metal
industry
(
NAICS
331).
This
industry
comprises
establishments
primarily
engaged
in
(
1)
making
(
i.
e.,
the
primary
production)
nonferrous
metals
by
smelting
ore
and/
or
(
2)
the
primary
refining
of
nonferrous
metals
by
electrolytic
methods
or
other
processes.
14
6.1.4.2.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
Table
6­
17
shows
the
estimated
US
total
value
of
shipments
for
other
nonferrous
metal
primary
smelting
and
refining
products
for
1997.

Table
6­
17.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Other
Nonferrous
Metal
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
Products:
1997
YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1997
3,538,056
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.4.2.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
this
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
141
facilities
located
in
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
128
companies.
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
18.15
Table
6­
18.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Other
Nonferrous
Metal
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
76
53.9%
3.2%

20
­
49
21
14.9%
10.2%

50
­
99
18
12.8%
11.6%

100
­
249
13
9.2%
19.3%
Table
6­
18.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Other
Nonferrous
Metal
Primary
Smelting
and
Refining
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
16
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC
17
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

18
EPA.
1995.
EPA
Office
of
Compliance
Sector
Notebook
Project:
Profile
of
the
Nonferrous
Metal
Industry
EPA/
310­
R­
95­
010.
250
­
499
13
9.2%
55.7%

Total
141
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.4.2.3
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
74,719,000.

6.1.4.3
The
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining
and
Alloying
of
Copper
Industry
Profile
The
secondary
smelting,
refining
and
alloying
of
copper
are
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
331423.
This
industry
is
a
subsector
of
the
primary
metal
industry
(
NAICS
331).
This
industry
comprises
establishments
primarily
engaged
in
recovering
copper
and
copper
alloys
from
scrap
and/
or
alloying
purchased
copper.
16
6.1.4.3.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
The
secondary
smelting,
refining,
and
alloying
of
copper
manufacturers
industry
produces
primary
forms,
such
as
ingot,
wire
bar,
cake,
and
slab
from
copper
or
copper
alloys,
such
as
brass
and
bronze.
17
According
to
the
Bureau
of
Mines,
U.
S.
consumption
of
copper
in
1992
was
about
2.2
million
tons.
Consumption
rose
sharply
in
1993
and
1994
to
almost
2.7
million
tons
and
is
expected
to
continue
to
increase
throughout
the
1990s
due
to
a
growing
foreign
market.
However,
in
1991,
the
consumption
of
refined
copper
in
the
U.
S.
decreased
by
four
percent
from
1990
levels.
18
Table
6­
19
shows
the
estimated
US
total
value
of
shipments
for
the
products
in
this
industry
for
1997.
19
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

20
EPA.
1995.
EPA
Office
of
Compliance
Sector
Notebook
Project:
Profile
of
the
Nonferrous
Metal
Industry
EPA/
310­
R­
95­
010.
Table
6­
19.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining,
and
Alloying
of
Copper
Products:
1997
YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1997
1,269,088
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.4.3.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
this
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
35
facilities
located
in
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
34
companies.
Over
75
percent
of
all
facilities
employ
fewer
than
100
people.
19
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
20.
The
secondary
copper
industry
is
concentrated
in
South
Carolina,
Georgia,
Illinois,
and
Missouri.
20
Table
6­
20.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining
and
Alloying
of
Copper
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
6
17.1%
N/
A
20
­
49
12
34.3%
12.3%

50
­
99
9
25.7%
31.0%

100
­
249
8
22.9%
54.9%

Total
35
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.4.3.3
Typical
Products
The
secondary
smelting,
refining,
and
alloying
of
copper
manufacturers
industry
produces
primary
forms,
such
as
ingot,
wire
bar,
cake,
and
slab
from
copper
or
copper
alloys,
such
as
brass
and
bronze.
In
the
secondary
production
of
copper,
scrap
metal
goes
through
pretreatment
and
21
EPA.
1995.
EPA
Office
of
Compliance
Sector
Notebook
Project:
Profile
of
the
Nonferrous
Metal
Industry
EPA/
310­
R­
95­
010.

22
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC
23
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.
smelting.
Pretreatment
can
be
accomplished
through
several
different
methods,
two
of
which
are
the
hydrometallurgical
method
and
the
pyrometallurgical
method.
Hydrometallurgical
technologies
differ
from
pyrometallurgical
processes
in
that
the
desired
metals
are
separated
from
undesirable
metals
using
techniques
that
capitalize
on
differences
between
constituent
solubilities
and/
or
electrochemical
properties
while
in
aqueous
solutions.
After
pretreatment
the
scrap
goes
through
the
smelting
process.
Within
the
United
States,
the
leading
end
users
of
copper
and
copper
alloy
are
the
construction
and
electronic
products
industry.
Transportation
equipment
also
accounts
for
a
fair
amount
of
copper
end­
usage
at
11.6
percent.
21
6.1.4.3.4
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
68,807,000.

6.1.4.4
Other
Nonferrous
Metal
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining,
Alloying
Manufacturing
Industry
Profile
The
other
nonferrous
metal
secondary
smelting,
refining,
and
alloying
manufacturers
are
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
331492
(
SIC
3341).
This
industry
is
a
subsector
of
the
primary
metal
industry
(
NAICS
331).
This
industry
comprises
establishments
primarily
engaged
in
alloying
purchased
nonferrous
metals
and/
or
recovering
nonferrous
metals
from
scrap.
22
6.1.4.4.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
The
secondary
smelting,
refining,
and
alloying
of
nonferrous
metal
manufacturers
industry
produces
primary
forms
(
e.
g.,
bar,
billet,
bloom,
cake,
ingot,
slab,
slug,
wire)
using
smelting
or
refining
processes.
23
Table
6­
21
shows
the
estimated
US
total
value
of
product
shipments.
24
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.
Table
6­
21.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Other
Nonferrous
Metal
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining,
Alloying
Products:
1997
YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1997
3,750,387
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.4.4.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
this
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers.
The
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
252
facilities
located
in
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
236
companies.
Over
85
percent
of
all
facilities
employ
fewer
than
100
people.
24
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
22.

Table
6­
22.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
of
the
Other
Nonferrous
Metal
Secondary
Smelting,
Refining,
Alloying
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
148
58.7%
8.2%

20
­
49
48
19.0%
13.5%

50
­
99
25
9.9%
14.9%

100
­
249
23
9.1%
46.3%

250
­
500
6
2.4%
N/
A
500
&
above
2
0.9%
N/
A
Total
252
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.4.4.3
Typical
Products
The
secondary
smelting,
refining,
and
alloying
of
nonferrous
metal
manufacturers
industry
produce
primary
forms
(
e.
g.,
bar,
billet,
bloom,
cake,
ingot,
slab,
slug,
wire)
using
smelting
or
refining
processes.
In
the
secondary
production
of
nonferrous
metals,
metals
are
produced
from
scrap
and
waste.
Two
metal
recovery
technologies
are
used
to
make
refined
metals,
pyrometallurgical
technology
and
the
hydrometallurgical
technology.
The
four
most
widely
used
nonferrous
metals
in
the
United
States
are
aluminum,
copper,
lead,
and
zinc.
Within
the
United
States,
the
leading
end
users
of
nonferrous
metals
include
the
automotive
industry,
the
construction
industry,
the
power
storage
battery
industry,
and
the
electrical
and
machinery
25
EPA.
1995.
EPA
Office
of
Compliance
Sector
Notebook
Project:
Profile
of
the
Nonferrous
Metal
Industry
EPA/
310­
R­
95­
010.

26
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC.
industry.
25
6.1.4.4.4
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
56,266,000.

6.1.5
Coating,
Engraving,
Heat
Treating,
and
Allied
Activities
The
Coating,
Engraving,
Heat
Treating
and
Allied
Activities
Industry
(
NAICS
3328)
contains
a
broad
range
of
industries.
For
the
purpose
of
this
analysis,
The
Plating
and
Polishing
Industry
will
be
profiled.

6.1.5.1
Plating
and
Polishing
Industry
Profile
The
plating
and
polishing
industry
is
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
for
Paints
and
Coatings
as
332813
(
SIC
3471).
This
industry
is
a
sub­
sector
of
the
fabricated
metal
product
manufacturing
industry
(
NAICS
332).
The
plating
and
polishing
industry
is
primarily
engaged
in
all
types
of
electroplating,
plating,
anodizing,
coloring,
and
finishing
of
metals
and
formed
products
for
the
trade.
Also
included
in
this
industry
are
establishments
which
perform
these
types
of
activities,
on
their
own
account,
on
purchased
metals
or
formed
products.
26
6.1.5.1.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
Table
6­
23
shows
the
estimated
US
total
value
of
shipments
for
plating
and
polishing
products.

Table
6­
23.
Estimated
United
States
Total
Value
of
Shipments
of
Plating
and
Polishing
Products:
1997
YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
($
1,000)

1997
5,940,626
Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.5.1.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
the
plating
and
polishing
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
3,399
facilities
located
in
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
3,282
companies.
Over
95
percent
of
all
facilities
employ
fewer
than
100
people.
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
24.

Table
6­
24.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Plating
and
Polishing
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
36178
2349
69.1%
19.0%

20­
49
674
19.8%
25.6%

50­
99
268
7.9%
27.3%

100­
249
94
2.8%
20.2%

250
&
above
14
0.4%
7.9%

Total
3399
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.5.1.3
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
9,392,000.

6.1.6
Semiconductor
and
Other
Electronic
Component
Manufacturing
The
Semiconductor
and
Other
Electronic
Component
Manufacturing
Industry
(
NAICS
3344)
contains
a
broad
range
of
industries.
For
the
purpose
of
this
analysis,
The
Printed
Circuit
Board
Industry
will
be
examined.

6.1.6.1
Printed
Circuit
Board
Industry
Profile
The
printed
circuit
board
industry
is
listed
under
the
NAICS
code
as
334412
(
and
SIC
3672).
The
printed
circuit
board
industry
is
a
part
of
the
computer
and
electronic
product
manufacturing
industry
(
NAICS
334).
This
industry
comprises
establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
bare
(
i.
e.,
rigid
or
flexible)
printed
circuit
boards
without
mounted
electronic
components.
These
establishments
print,
perforate,
plate,
screen,
etch,
or
photoprint
27
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
1997
Economic
Census:
Bridge
Between
NAICS
and
SIC.
interconnecting
pathways
for
electric
current
on
laminates.
27
6.1.6.1.1
Production
and
Shipment
Values
Table
6­
25
shows
the
estimated
US
total
value
of
shipments
for
printed
circuit
wire
boards.

Table
6­
25.
Value
of
Shipments
of
Printed
Circuit
Boards:
1995
­
2000
(
Value
in
millions
of
dollars)

YEAR
TOTAL
VALUE
OF
SHIPMENTS
2000
11,129
1999
9,150
1998
8,473
1997
8,702
1996
8,217
1995
8,367
Source:
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
Bureau
of
the
Census,
Current
Industrial
Reports,
Inorganic
Chemicals
1998,
MA
334Q(
00)­
1,
September,
2001
6.1.6.1.2
Industry
Size
and
Market
Share
Data
used
to
characterize
the
printed
circuit
board
industry
are
from
the
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers
and
the
2000
Census
Current
Industrial
Report.
The
1997
Census
data
indicate
that
there
are
1,389
facilities
located
in
the
U.
S.,
owned
by
1,315
companies.
Close
to
90
percent
of
all
facilities
employ
fewer
than
100
people.
A
distribution
of
facilities
by
number
of
employees,
and
their
respective
share
of
the
total
value
of
shipments
is
provided
in
Table
6­
26.
Table
6­
26.
Distribution
of
Facilities
by
Employment
for
the
Printed
Circuit
Board
Industry
Employees
Per
Facility
Number
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Facilities
Percent
of
Total
Shipments
Value
1­
19
801
57.7%
5.2%

20­
49
268
19.3%
8.3%

50­
99
144
10.4%
11.5%

100­
249
114
8.2%
22.6%

250
&
above
62
4.4%
52.4%

Total
1,389
100.0%
100.0%

Source:
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
USDC.

6.1.6.1.3
Average
Facility
Size
Annual
sales
for
the
average
facility
was
estimated
assuming
that
the
largest
facilities
in
the
industry
were
reporting
BRS
waste
quantities.
Using
this
assumption,
we
estimated
average
annual
sales,
based
on
1997
Census
data,
updated
to
2001
dollars
using
the
GNP
Implicit
Price
Deflator
to
be
$
25,240,000.

6.2
Facility
Level
Impacts
In
this
section
an
overview
of
facility
level
impacts
is
presented.
Impacts
are
presented
for
average
size
facilities
profiled
in
the
previous
section
which
reported
waste
generation
in
the
1999
Biennial
Report
database.

Facility
revenues
were
estimated
using
Census
of
Commerce
data
from
1997,
updated
to
2002
dollars
using
the
GDP
Implicit
Price
Deflator.
In
order
to
approximate
facility
level
revenues
the
assumption
was
made
that
only
the
largest
facilities
(
in
terms
of
revenue
generation)
would
report
waste
in
the
BRS
database.

Profitability
for
these
facilities
was
estimated
using
data
from
Robert
Morris
Associates.
Financial
data
were
averaged
over
a
3­
year
period
(
1999­
2001)
for
various
sizes
of
facilities
in
terms
of
annual
sales.
All
financial
data
were
updated
to
a
2002
basis
using
the
GDP
Implicit
Price
Deflator.
Profitability
estimates
were
developed
for
various
sizes
of
facilities,
expressed
as
profit
before
taxes
as
a
percent
of
sales.
With
average
sales
data
developed
using
Census
data
(
described
above),
profits
before
taxes
were
estimated
for
average
size
facilities.

Table
6­
27
presents
impacts
from
excluding
reclaimed
wastes
from
RCRA
jurisdiction
if
reclaimed
on­
site
or
reclaimed
off­
site
within
the
same
Industry
Group
(
4­
digit
NAICS).
Impacts
for
each
of
the
major
industries
presented
are
typically
less
than
0.1
percent
of
sales.
Impacts
on
profitability
are
significantly
larger,
with
profitability
increasing
by
as
much
as
2.9
percent
in
NAICS
3252
(
Resin,
Synthetic
Rubber,
and
Artificial
and
Synthetic
Fibers
and
Filaments
Manufacturing).

Table
6­
27.
Facility
Impacts
for
Major
Industry
Groups
(
NAICS)
1/

NAICS
Number
of
Facilities
Affected
Estimated
Annual
Average
Sales
2/
Estimated
Annual
Profit
Before
Taxes
3/
Estimated
Annual
Average
Cost
Savings
4/
Cost
Savings
as
a
Percent
of
Sales
5/
Cost
Savings
as
a
Percent
of
Profits
6/

3251
302
$
186,090,000
$
11,537,000
$
53,230
0.03%
0.46%

3252
112
$
179,369,000
$
6,458,000
$
185,520
0.10%
2.87%

3254
124
$
271,863,000
$
31,264,000
$
57,330
0.02%
0.18%

3312
152
$
447,372,000
$
16,085,000
$
258,580
0.06%
1.61%

3314
105
$
119,793,000
$
4,911,000
$
29,120
0.02%
0.59%

3328
431
$
9,882,000
$
514,000
$
1,440
0.01%
0.28%

3344
464
$
26,558,000
$
1,062,000
$
24,860
0.09%
2.34%

Other
1038
­
­
$
40,770
­
­

NA
165
­
­
$
165,900
­
­

NA­
Not
available
from
BRS
1/
Includes
both
1999
and
1997
generators
who
recycled
some
portion
of
their
waste.
For
off­
site
recovery,
wastes
recovered
at
facilities
in
the
same
Industry
Group
(
4­
digit
NAICS)
as
the
generator
and
off­
site
outside­
generatorindustry
recycled
wastes
which
are
economical
to
recover
on­
site
are
included.
2/
Estimated
average
sales
per
large
quantity
generator
reporting
waste
generation
in
BRS.
Calculated
as
the
average
value
of
shipments
for
the
facilities
with
more
than
50
employees
as
reported
in
1997
Census
(
updated
to
2002
$).
3/
Average
3­
year
profits
in
2002
$
based
on
Robert
Morris
Associates
data
(
1998­
2000)
4/
Based
on
cost
calculations
presented
in
Chapter
5
5/
Annual
average
cost
savings
divided
by
annual
average
sales
6/
Annual
average
cost
savings
divided
by
annual
average
profits
In
addition
to
these
cost
savings
there
will
likely
be
additional
savings
as
facilities
in
other
industries
which
were
not
explicitly
considered
will
recycle
wastes
which
are
currently
disposed.
The
volume
of
additional
waste
which
will
be
recycled
will
depend
on
the
quality
of
the
waste,
especially
the
value/
concentration
of
the
recovered
component.
Accordingly
the
above
estimates
likely
understate
the
total
cost­
reducing
impacts.

6.3
Distributional
Impacts
In
addition
to
the
impacts
presented
in
the
previous
sections
there
will
also
be
certain
distributional
impacts,
especially
resulting
from
changes
in
taxes
levied
on
the
generation
of
hazardous
waste.
State
imposed
hazardous
waste
generation
taxes
and
fees
have
been
identified
for
facilities
located
in
27
states.
These
state
taxes
and
fees
are
listed
in
Appendix
F.

Table
6­
28
presents
a
summary
of
the
estimated
decreases
in
tax
revenue
resulting
from
the
hazardous
waste
generation
taxes.
In
total,
waste
generation
taxes
will
decline
by
approximately
$
12.2
million
for
the
27
states
analyzed.
In
addition
to
the
waste
generation
distributional
impacts
there
will
be
other
distributional
impacts
stemming
from
increased
corporate
income
taxes
which
have
not
been
quantified.
No
tax
effect
is
included
for
wastes
that
are
currently
being
disposed
but
may
be
recovered
post­
rule
due
to
the
uncertainties
about
the
quality
of
waste
and
the
total
amount
which
would
be
recovered.

Table
6­
28.
Estimated
Changes
in
Hazardous
Waste
Generation
Tax
Revenues
State
1/
Total
Decrease
in
State
Tax
Revenue
($/
yr)
Number
Facilities
with
Tax
Decrease
Average
Savings
per
Facility
($/
yr)
AR
1,000
1
626
AZ
13,835
21
5,879
CA
2,046,553
47
7,516
CO
19,696
16
1,231
CT
4,678
12
390
GA
29,520
29
1,018
ID
18,152
3
6,051
KS
13,142
9
1,460
KY
104,775
37
2,832
ME
30,051
11
2,732
MN
2,560,691
47
54,483
MO
65,444
23
2,845
MS
2,500
1
2,500
MT
1,800
3
600
NC
10,603
37
287
NH
60,674
6
10,112
NJ
21,071
36
585
NM
23,070
2
11,535
Table
6­
28.
Estimated
Changes
in
Hazardous
Waste
Generation
Tax
Revenues
State
1/
Total
Decrease
in
State
Tax
Revenue
($/
yr)
Number
Facilities
with
Tax
Decrease
Average
Savings
per
Facility
($/
yr)
NY
648,752
16
40,547
OK
11,754
6
1,959
OR
507,636
31
16,375
SC
538,023
19
28,317
TN
4,500
4
1,125
TX
229,288
61
3,759
VA
9,021
4
2,255
WA
678
15
45
WI
10,707
23
466
6,987,614
520
13,438
1/
Estimates
are
not
included
for
DE,
IL,
NE,
NV,
OH,
and
WV
where
further
analysis
needs
to
be
conducted
to
determine
tax
rates.
In
addition,
all
potential
taxes
are
not
included
in
the
estimates
for
NY
and
TX
where
further
analysis
is
needed
to
determine
tax
rates.
28
U.
S.
EPA,
Office
of
Solid
Waste
and
Emergency
Response,
"
RCRA:
Reducing
Risk
From
Waste
OSWER,"
EPA530­
K­
97­
004,
September
1997,
pp
14­
15.

29
U.
S.
Geological
Survey
 
Minerals
Information,
"
Recycling
 
Metals,"
1996,
p.
1.

30
Ibid.

7­
1
7.0
BENEFITS
Providing
exclusions
from
the
RCRA
Definition
of
Solid
Waste
to
generators
of
metal­
bearing,
solvent,
and
other
wastes
(
e.
g.,
acid)
that
recover
wastes
either
on­
site
or
within
the
same
industry,
provides
an
economic
incentive
for
more
generators
to
recover
metals,
solvents,
and
acids
from
wastes
instead
of
placing
it
in
a
landfill,
reusing
it
as
fuel,
or
neutralizing
the
acid
and
discharging
it
as
wastewater,
respectively.
In
addition,
it
provides
an
incentive
to
generators
recovering
wastes
to
continue
the
practice
in
markets
with
fluctuating
product
values
(
e.
g.,
metal
prices).
Also,
depending
on
the
recovery
technology
implemented,
such
as,
ion
exchange,
it
may
promote
recycling
treated
wastewater
back
into
process
units.
Increased
recovery
of
metals,
solvents
and
other
values,
such
as
acid,
and
treated
wastewater
may
result
in
a
net
benefit
to
both
society
and
the
environment.

7.1
Qualitative
Benefits
Some
of
the
expected
benefits
include
the
following:

°
Landfill
Capacity:
Approximately
23
million
tons
of
hazardous
waste
are
land
disposed
annually.
In
1995,
1
million
tons
of
the
land
disposed
hazardous
waste
were
disposed
in
landfills
along
with
208
million
tons
of
municipal
waste.
28
Available
landfill
space
is
limited
and
as
overcapacity
issues
are
eminent,
any
increase
in
recycling
will
lessen
the
future
burden
on
landfills.

°
Resource
Conservation:
The
supply
of
metals
used
in
processes
such
as
electroplating
are
ultimately
fixed
by
nature.
Many
metals
are
easily
recycled
and
today
recycled
metals
make
up
a
large
portion
of
the
available
metals
supply.
For
instance,
the
U.
S.
Geological
Survey
reported
that
in
1996,
78
million
metric
tons
of
metals
were
recycled
in
the
U.
S.
The
value
of
these
recycled
metals
was
estimated
to
be
approximately
$
18
billion.
29
As
the
U.
S.
Geological
Survey
states,
"
Recycling,
a
significant
factor
in
the
supply
of
many
of
the
key
metals
used
in
our
society,
provides
environmental
benefits
in
terms
of
energy
savings,
reduced
volumes
of
waste,
and
reduced
emissions.
These
reductions,
in
turn,
result
in
reduced
disturbance
to
land,
reduced
pollution,
and
reduced
energy
use."
30
°
Resource
Conservation:
In
some
portions
of
the
United
States
water
is
scarce.
Technologies
such
as
ion
exchange
remove
metal
and
other
ions
from
wastewater
to
concentrations
below
levels
typically
achieved
by
metals
precipitation
technologies.
Treated
wastewater
from
ion
exchange
technologies
can
be
reused
in
the
electroplating
31
Based
on
the
difference
between
imports
and
exports
of
each
commodity
as
reported
in
Jacqueline
A.
McClaskey
and
Stephen
D.
Smith,
"
Survey
Methods
and
Statistical
Summary
of
Nonfuel
Minerals,"
U.
S.
Department
of
the
Interior,
Bureau
of
Mines,
1991.
As
reported,
supra,
Note
38,
USEPA,
p.
134.

32
A
strategic
metal
is
a
metal
which
is
required
for
critical
military
and/
or
civilian
use
and
for
which
the
United
States
is
dependent
upon
from
vulnerable
sources
of
supply.
As
reported,
Borst,
Paul
A.,
"
Recycling
of
Wastewater
Treatment
Sludges
From
Electroplating
Operations,
F006,"
USEPA,
OSW.

33
Supra,
Note
38,
pp.
138­
139.

34
Borst,
Paul
A.,
"
Recycling
of
Wastewater
Treatment
Sludges
From
Electroplating
Operations,
F006,"
USEPA,
OSW.

7­
2
process
reducing
demand
on
scarce
water
resources.

°
Metal
Recovery:
An
increase
in
recycling
of
domestic
metals
will
lessen
the
dependance
of
the
United
States
on
foreign
metal
supplies.
In
1991,
the
United
States
ran
a
$
9.8
billion
balance
of
trade
deficit
for
metal
commodities.
31
Copper,
nickel,
and
zinc,
three
of
the
most
common
metals
recovered
from
electroplating
waste,
accounted
for
more
than
$
2
billion
of
this
total.
Additionally,
several
metal
recyclers
of
F006
waste,
which
is
one
of
many
potential
wastes
affected
by
the
proposed
rule,
reported
that
metal
recovery
of
nickel,
chromium
and
zinc
bearing
secondary
materials
was
more
efficient
in
terms
of
conserving
energy,
and
reducing
solid
waste
residuals
associated
with
primary
metal/
mineral
production.
Finally,
in
its
Report
to
Congress
on
Metal
Recovery,
Environmental
Regulation
and
Hazardous
Waste,
EPA
reported
that
chromium,
a
strategic
metal,
32
is
found
in
sources
of
secondary
materials
such
as
electroplating
waste.
The
report
also
indicates
that
these
secondary
materials
are
underutilized
as
a
potential
source
of
secondary
chromium
to
reduce
U.
S.
dependence
on
foreign
primary
sources.
33
34
°
Solvent/
Acid
Recovery:
An
increase
in
the
recovery
of
solvents/
acids
on
site
will
reduce
the
amount
of
energy
used
and
feedstock
material
used
to
produce
and
transport
virgin
solvents
and
acids.

7.2
Quantitative
Benefits
The
following
salvage
value
estimates
were
derived
only
considering
waste
currently
recovered
in
1999
and
waste
previously
recovered
in
1997.
These
salvage
values
(
revenues)
are
included
in
the
cost
estimates
in
Section
5.
The
estimates
do
not
take
into
consideration
that
there
will
be
additional
benefits
beyond
those
quantified
as
generators
recycle
more
and
more
of
their
waste
as
a
result
of
the
rule.

°
Value
of
Recovered
Metal
Products:
In
1999,
plants
affected
by
this
rulemaking
reported
recovering
409,315
tons
of
metal­
bearing
waste
on
site
and
18,647
tons
off
site
within
the
same
Industry
Group.
In
addition
an
estimated
168,695
tons
of
metal­
bearing
waste
are
recovered
off­
site
in
other
industries,
which
may
be
recovered
on­
site
due
to
the
7­
3
potential
rule
change
if
it
is
economically
feasible
to
construct
on­
site
recovery
facilities.
In
the
analysis,
it
is
assumed
that
these
recovered
wastes
contain
20
percent
recoverable
metals.
At
a
$
4,770
per
ton
average
market
price
(
assuming
a
90
percent
assay
value)
for
copper,
chromium,
and
nickel,
the
estimated
metal
value
is
$
569
million.
This
proposed
rule
encourages
these
plants
to
continue
recovering
these
metals
and
maintaining
these
benefits.

Plants
that
reported
recovering
wastes
in
1997
and
not
in
1999
recovered
2,778
tons
of
metal­
bearing
waste
on
site
and
229
tons
off
site
within
the
same
Industry
Group.
The
estimated
metal
value
is
$
2.9
million.
In
addition,
facilities
that
dispose
two
waste
types
(
48,235
tons
of
emission
control
dust
­
K061,
19,108
tons
of
metal­
containing
liquids
from
the
printed
circuit
board
industry,
and
10,869
tons
of
spent
catalyst
from
the
petroleum
refining
industry
­
K171/
K172)
are
estimated
to
switch
over
to
on­
site
recovery.
In
the
analysis,
it
is
assumed
that
these
recovered
emission
control
dust
wastes
contain
15
percent
recoverable
zinc
at
$
643
per
ton
(
assuming
a
90
percent
assay
value),
the
metal­
containing
liquids
contain
0.02
percent
copper
at
$
1,397
per
ton
(
assuming
a
90
percent
assay
value),
and
the
spent
catalyst
contains
five
percent
molybdenum
at
$
23,940
per
ton
(
assuming
a
90
percent
assay
value).
The
estimated
metal
value
from
these
disposed
wastes
is
$
17.7
million.
This
proposed
rule
may
encourage
these
new
benefits.

The
total
estimated
recovered
metal
value
is
$
590
million.

°
Value
of
Recovered
Solvent
Products:
In
1999,
plants
affected
by
this
rulemaking
reported
recovering
160,119
tons
of
solvent
waste
on
site
and
35,585
tons
off
site
within
the
same
Industry
Group.
In
addition
an
estimated
72,040
tons
of
solvent­
bearing
waste
are
recovered
off­
site
in
other
industries,
which
may
be
recovered
on­
site
due
to
the
potential
rule
change
if
it
is
economically
feasible
to
construct
on­
site
facilities.
In
the
analysis,
it
is
assumed
that
these
recovered
wastes
contain
67
percent
of
recoverable
solvents.
At
a
$
1,542
per
ton
average
market
price
for
solvents,
assuming
90
percent
effectiveness,
the
estimated
solvent
value
is
nearly
$
277
million.
This
proposed
rule
encourages
these
plants
to
continue
recovering
these
solvents
and
maintaining
these
benefits.

Plants
that
reported
recovering
wastes
in
1997
and
not
in
1999
recovered
8,448
tons
of
solvent
waste
on
site
and
4,031
tons
off
site
within
the
same
Industry
Group.
The
estimated
solvent
value
is
$
12.9
million
if
these
facilities
choose
to
switch
back
to
solvent
recovery
instead
of
off­
site
energy
recovery.
This
proposed
rule
may
encourage
these
new
benefits.

The
total
estimated
recovered
solvent
value
is
$
290
million.

°
Value
of
Other
Recovered
Products
(
Acids
and
Fluoride):
In
1999,
plants
affected
by
this
rulemaking
reported
recovering
248,914
tons
of
"
other"
waste
on
site
and
5,205
tons
7­
4
off
site
within
the
same
Industry
Group.
In
addition
an
estimated
15,952
tons
of
other
waste
are
recovered
off­
site
in
other
industries,
which
may
be
recovered
on­
site
due
to
the
potential
rule
change.
In
the
analysis,
it
is
assumed
that
these
recovered
wastes
contain
74
percent
recoverable
acids.
At
a
$
298
per
ton
average
market
price
for
acid,
assuming
90
percent
effectiveness,
the
estimated
acid
value
is
over
$
60
million.
Other
wastes
were
primarily
acids.
This
proposed
rule
encourages
these
plants
to
continue
recovering
these
acids
and
maintaining
these
benefits.

Plants
that
reported
recovering
wastes
in
1997
and
not
in
1999
recovered
16,318
tons
of
other
(
acid)
waste
on
site
and
245
tons
off
site
within
the
same
Industry
Group.
The
estimated
acid
value
is
$
3.7
million
if
these
facilities
choose
to
switch
back
to
acid
recovery
instead
of
on­
site
acid
neutralization.
In
addition,
facilities
that
dispose
two
waste
types
(
71,698
tons
of
spent
aluminum
potliner,
K088,
and
254,109
tons
of
spent
pickle
liquor
from
the
steel
works
industry)
are
estimated
to
switch
over
to
on­
site
recovery.
In
the
analysis,
it
is
assumed
that
these
recovered
spent
aluminum
potliner
wastes
contain
two
percent
recoverable
fluoride
at
$
1,240
per
ton
and
the
spent
pickle
liquor
contains
74
percent
recoverable
acids
at
$
298
per
ton
(
assuming
a
90
percent
assay
value).
The
estimated
metal
value
from
these
disposed
wastes
is
$
57.8
million.
This
proposed
rule
may
encourage
these
new
benefits.

The
total
estimated
recovered
acid
and
fluoride
value
is
$
122
million.
8­
1
8.0
REFERENCES
Anonymous,
1999,
Personal
Communication,
Sun­
Glo
Plating,
Florida.

Anonymous,
1999,
Personal
Communication,
Dearborn
Brass,
Texas.

Bagsarian,
Tom,
"
Cashing
in
on
Steelmaking
Byproducts,"
New
Steel
Web
Extra,
March
1999,
http://
www.
newsteel.
com/
features/
NS9903f2.
htm
Bates,
Peter,
and
Muir,
Adrian,
"
HIsmelt­
Low
Cost
Iron
Making",
Gorham
conference
June
2000,
Commercializing
New
Hot
Metal
Process
­
Beyond
the
Blast
Furnace.

Borst,
Paul
A.,
U.
S.
EPA,
Office
of
Solid
Waste,
Economic,
Methods
and
Risk
Analysis
Division,
"
Recycling
of
Wastewater
Treatment
Sludges
from
Electroplating
Operations,"
F006,
18th
AESF/
EPA
Pollution
Prevention
and
Control
Conference,
January
27­
29,
1997.

Coplan,
Myron
J,
C.
E.,
"
Comments
on
the
Relative
Cost
of
Fluoride
from
NAF
and
FSA",
http://
www.
dartmouth.
edu/~
rmasters/
AHABS/
Costof.
html
Cushnie,
George
C.,
CAI
Engineering,
"
Pollution
Prevention
and
Control
Technology
for
Plating
Operations,"
prepared
for
NCMS/
NAMF.

Environmental
Cost
Handling
Options
and
Solutions
(
ECHOS),
Environmental
Remediation
Cost
Data­
Unit
Price,
4th
Annual
Edition,
published
by
R.
S.
Means
and
Delta
Technologies
Group,
Inc.,
1998.

Envirosource
Technologies
corporate
webpage,
"
Summary
of
Envirosource
and
the
Super
Detox
Technology
for
Treatment
of
Electric
Arc
Furnace
Dust,"
http://
www.
enso.
net/
detox.
html
Finnder,
Earl
,
October
2001,
Personal
Communication,
U.
S.
Filter.

Furukawa,
Tsukasa,
"
Recovering
Zinc
and
Iron
from
EAF
Dust
at
Chiba
Works,"
New
Steel,
June
1997,
http://
www.
newsteel.
com/
features/
NS9706F4.
htm
Griscom,
Frank,
"
FastMelt!
Your
Waste
to
Profit,"
Midrex
4th
Quarter,
1998,
www.
midrex.
com
Hazardous
Waste
Resource
Center,
January
2002
Landfill
Cost
Data,
www.
etc.
org.

HIsmelt
corporate
webpage,
http://
www.
hismelt.
com
Hoffman,
Glenn
E.,
"
Waste
Recycling
with
FastMet
and
FastMelt,"
Midrex
4th
Quarter,
2000,
www.
midrex.
com
8­
2
International
Zinc
Association­
ZincWorld
organization
website,
"
Concentration,
e.
g.
Waelz
Process,"
http://
www.
zincworld.
org/
zwo_
org/
Applications/
Zinc/
031204­
pdf.
pdf
Jarvis,
1999,
Personal
Communication,
Eritech,
North
Carolina.

Lamancusa,
James
P.,
P.
E.,
CEF,
"
Strategies
at
a
Decorative
Chromium
Electroplating
Facility:
On­
line
vs.
Off­
line
Recycling,"
Plating
and
Surface
Finishing,
April
1995.

Logistics
Management
Institute,
Hazardous
Waste
Manifest
Cost
Benefit
Analysis,
dated
October
2000.

Minnesota
Pollution
Control
Agency,
Small
and
Large
Quantity
Generator
License
Fees
and
Generator
(
Superfund)
Tax,
Waste/
Hazardous
Waste
#
1.03b,
March
2002.

MR3
Systems
Incorporated,
http://
www.
mr3systems.
com
Remedial
Action
Cost
Engineering
and
Requirements
(
RACER)
cost
estimating
software,
2002
Robert
Morris
Associates.
Annual
Statement
Studies.
Various
years
including
1999,
2000,
and
2001.
RMA,
One
Liberty
Place,
Philadelphia,
PA.

Shields,
1999,
Personal
Communication,
American
Nickeloid,
Illinois.

Toon,
Hohn,
"
The
Cost
of
Cleaning
the
Air:
Study
Shows
Permit
Application
Costs
Lower
Than
Expected
­
With
Key
Benefits
to
Industry",
Georgia
Tech
Research
News,
September
21,
1999.

Warski,
Kristine.
SIC
vs.
NAICS:
Understanding
the
Difference,
Miller
Brooks
Inc.

U.
S.
Army
Corp
of
Engineers,
Public
Works
Technical
Bulletin
200­
01­
04,
dated
August
31,
1999
(
USACE
Tech
Bulletin).

U.
S.
Army
Corps
of
Engineers,
HTRW
Center
of
Expertise
Information
­
TDSF,
Section
8.2,
obtained
from
http://
www.
environmental.
usace.
army.
mil/
library/
pubs/
tsdf/
sec8­
2/
sec8­
2.
html
on
September
11,
2002.

U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
US
Census
Bureau,
Development
of
NAICS,
http://
www.
census.
gov/
epcd/
www/
naicsdev.
htm..

U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
Census
of
Manufacturers,
Cyclic
Crudes
and
Intermediates,
EC97M­
3251I,
August
1999.

U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
Census
of
Manufacturers,
Alkalies
and
Chlorine
Manufacturing,
EC97M­
3251I,
September
1999.
8­
3
U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
Census
of
Manufacturers,
All
Other
Basic
Inorganic
Chemical
Manufacturing,
EC97M­
3251G,
October
1999.

U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
Census
of
Manufacturers,
All
Other
Basic
Organic
Chemical
Manufacturing,
EC97M­
3251K,
November
1999.

U.
S.
Department
of
Commerce,
1997
Census
of
Manufacturers,
1999.

U.
S.
EPA
1999
and
1997
Hazardous
Waste
Report
(
Biennial
Reports).

U.
S.
EPA,
Office
of
Regulatory
Enforcement,
Estimating
Costs
for
the
Economic
Benefits
of
RCRA
Noncompliance,
dated
September
1994.

U.
S.
EPA,
Economic
Assessment
of
the
Revised
LDR
Treatment
Standards
for
Spent
Aluminum
Potliner
(
K088),
prepared
by
DPRA
Incorporated,
March
1,
2000.

U.
S.
EPA,
Office
of
Management
and
Budget,
"
Economic
Analysis
of
Federal
Regulations
under
Executive
Order
12866"
(
OMB
Circular
A­
94),
dated
January
11,
1996.

U.
S.
EPA,
Regulatory
Impact
Analysis
of
the
Final
Rule
for
a
180­
Day
Accumulation
Time
for
F006
Wastewater
Treatment
Sludges,
November
10,
1999
(
F006
180­
Day
Accumulation
Rule).

U.
S.
EPA,
Office
of
Solid
Waste,
Economics,
Methods
and
Risk
Analysis
Division,
Unit
Cost
Compendium
(
UCC),
prepared
by
DPRA
Incorporated,
September
30,
2000.

U.
S.
EPA
­
New
England,
Pilot
of
the
Pollution
Prevention
Technology
Application
Analysis
Template
Utilizing
Acid
Recovery
System
prepared
by
Zero
Discharge
Technologies,
Inc,
dated
October
1999.
A­
1
Appendix
A
Co­
Proposal
Option
for
the
Regulatory
Modifications
to
the
Definition
of
Solid
Waste
for
the
Association
of
Battery
Recyclers
Notice
of
Proposed
Rulemaking
This
appendix
presents
the
estimated
cost
savings
(
economic
benefits)
for
a
regulatory
option
referred
to
as
the
Co­
Proposal
Option.
Under
the
(
approximately
$
63
million)
(
approximately
$
81
million).
If
facilities
construct
on­
site
recovery
units
they
qualify
for
the
exclusion
under
the
Co­
Proposal
Option.

Co­
Proposal
Option
Incremental
Costs
(
2002
$)

Quantity
(
tons)
Total
Costs
($/
year)

On­
Site
Recovery
­
1999
818,348
($
10,962,000)

On­
Site
Recovery
­
1997
27,544
($
16,151,000)

Off­
Site
Recovery
Within
Industry
Group
­
1999
26,069
($
419,000)

Off­
Site
Recovery
Within
Industry
Group
­
1997
1,059
($
905,000)
Co­
Proposal
Option
Incremental
Costs
(
2002
$)

Quantity
(
tons)
Total
Costs
($/
year)

A­
2
Off­
Site
Recovery
Outside
Industry
Group
Switch
to
On­
site
Recovery
­
1999
257,743
($
63,346,000)

On­
Site/
Off­
Site
Disposal
Switch
to
On­
Site
Recovery
for
Four
Waste
Types
(
K061,
K062,
K088,
and
metal­
containing
liquids
from
printed
circuit
board
industry)
404,019
($
80,827,000)

Total
1,534,782
($
172,610,000)

Note:
Numbers
in
parentheses,
"(
)",
represent
negative
costs
that
reflect
revenues
or
cost
savings.

1999
Off­
site
Recovery
Quantity
NAICS
3254,
pharmaceutical
and
medicine
NAICS
3312,
steel
product
manufacturing
from
purchased
steel,
recovered
6,700
tons
(
25.8
percent)
of
the
total
off­
site
recovery
quantity.
All
of
this
quantity
was
managed
by
metals
recovery.

NAICS
3252,
resin,
synthetic
rubber,
and
artificial
synthetic
fibers
and
filaments
manufacturing,
recovered
2,400
tons
(
9.3
percent)
of
the
total
off­
site
recovery
quantity.
All
of
this
quantity
was
managed
by
other
recovery.
A­
3
.

the
total
off­
site
recovery
quantity.
Nearly
all
of
this
quantity
was
managed
by
metals
recovery.

The
remaining
10
NAICS
codes
that
recover
less
than
30
tons
off­
site
in
1999
account
for
95
tons
(
0.36
percent)
of
the
total
off­
site
recovery
quantity.

Potential
Additional
Recovery
Approximately
1,000
tons
of
hazardous
waste
were
recovered
off­
site
in
1997
but
not
in
1999
within
the
same
Industry
Group
(
4­
digit
NAICS)
by
8
plants
within
4
NAICS
codes.
Facilities
that
recovered
their
waste
in
1997
and
not
in
1999
potentially
waste
under
the
proposed
rule.

One
NAICS
code
recovered
950
tons
in
1997
off­
site
but
not
in
1999.
This
NAICS
code
accounts
for
90
percent
of
the
total
quantity
recovered
off
site.
Metals
recovery,
solvents
recovery,
and
other
recovery
account
for
16
tons,
819
tons,
and
225
tons
of
the
total,
respectively.
Table
A­
2
presents
the
quantity
of
hazardous
waste
managed
off­
site
by
NAICS
code
and
.
This
quantity
was
managed
by
metals
recovery.

Summary
of
Potential
Cost
Savings
Incremental
cost
savings
(
post­
rule
costs
minus
pre­
rule
costs)
were
estimated
for
the
total
number
of
plants
currently
recovering
wastes
in
1999
or
recovered
wastes
in
1997.
These
plants
reclaim
metal,
solvent
and
other
values
from
873,000
tons
of
waste.
The
sum
of
the
pre­
rule
costs,
post­
rule
costs,
and
incremental
cost
savings
for
all
plants
are
presented
in
Table
A­
3
by
individual
unit
cost
item.
A­
4
The
potential
incremental
annual
cost
savings
range
from
$
12
million
if
only
1999
plants
benefit
to
$
28
million
if
the
plants
that
recovered
wastes
in
1997
and
not
in
1999
switch
back
to
recovery.

For
the
1999
on­
site
recovery
plants,
the
total
estimated
annual
cost
savings
is
$
11
million.
This
total
includes
one­
time
(
first
year)
contingency
planning
cost
savings
of
$
0.8
million
that
likely
are
sunk
and
one­
time
notification
of
exclusion
costs
of
$
0.5
million.
The
greatest
annual
savings
result
from
a
portion
of
the
residual
quantity
generated
by
the
recovery
processes
being
classified
as
nonhazardous
($
5.3
million
in
residual
hazardous
waste
landfill
cost
savings
­
$
3.0
million
in
new
non­
hazardous
waste
landfill
costs
+
$
2.3
million
in
nonhazardous
transportation
cost
savings
=
$
4.6
million
in
cost
savings).
The
second
largest
annual
cost
savings
is
from
a
reduction
in
hazardous
materials
training
costs
($
2.8
million
in
cost
savings).
The
third
largest
annual
cost
savings
is
from
a
reduction
in
waste
characterization
testing
costs
($
2.1
million).

For
the
1997
on­
site
recovery
plants,
the
total
estimated
annual
cost
savings
is
$
16.2
million.
This
total
includes
one­
time
(
first
year)
contingency
planning
cost
savings
of
$
0.2
million
that
likely
are
not
sunk
because
plants
are
switching
management
technologies
and
one­
time
notification
of
exclusion
costs
of
$
0.2
million.
The
greatest
annual
savings
result
from
a
portion
of
the
residual
quantity
generated
by
the
recovery
processes
being
classified
as
nonhazardous
($
4.3
million
in
pre­
rule
baseline
management
costs
­
$
1.5
million
in
post­
rule
residual
hazardous
waste
landfill
costs
­
$
0.2
million
in
post­
rule
non­
hazardous
waste
landfill
costs
­
$
8.0
million
in
post­
rule
recovery
system
costs
+
$
2.0
million
in
nonhazardous
transportation
cost
savings
+
$
16.9
million
in
value
from
the
recovered
products
=
$
13.5
million
in
cost
savings).
The
second
largest
annual
cost
savings
is
from
a
reduction
in
waste
characterization
testing
costs
($
1.7
million).
The
third
largest
annual
cost
savings
is
from
a
reduction
in
hazardous
materials
training
costs
($
0.6
million).

For
those
1999
plants
that
recovered
wastes
off­
site
within
the
same
4­
digit
NAICS,
the
total
estimated
annual
cost
savings
is
$
0.4
million.
The
largest
annual
cost
savings
is
from
a
reduction
in
the
cost
to
transport
wastes
for
recovery
because
of
fewer
shipments,
i.
e.,
longer
storage
times
($
0.15
million
in
cost
savings).
The
second
largest
annual
savings
result
from
a
portion
of
the
residual
quantity
generated
by
the
recovery
processes
being
classified
as
nonhazardous
($
0.28
million
in
residual
hazardous
waste
landfill
cost
savings
­
$
0.21
million
in
post­
rule
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
costs
+
$
0.06
million
in
nonhazardous
transportation
cost
savings
=
$
0.13
million
in
cost
savings).
The
third
largest
annual
cost
savings
is
from
a
reduction
in
hazardous
materials
training
costs
($
0.07
million).

For
those
1997
plants
that
recovered
wastes
off­
site
within
the
same
4­
digit
NAICS,
the
total
estimated
annual
cost
savings
is
$
0.9
million.
The
greatest
annual
cost
savings
is
from
a
portion
of
the
residual
quantity
generated
by
the
recovery
processes
being
classified
as
nonhazardous
($
0.32
million
in
pre­
rule
hazardous
waste
management
costs
­
$
0.11
million
in
post­
rule
residual
hazardous
waste
landfill
costs
­
$
0.01
million
in
post­
rule
non­
hazardous
waste
landfill
costs
­
$
0.22
million
in
post­
rule
recovery
system
costs
+
$
0.04
million
in
post­
rule
nonhazardous
transportation
cost
savings
­
$
0.09
million
in
post­
rule
off­
site
recovery
transport
costs
+
$
0.9
million
in
value
from
the
recovered
products
=
$
0.83
million
in
cost
savings).
The
second
largest
annual
savings
result
from
a
reduction
in
waste
characterization
testing
costs
($
0.06
million
in
cost
savings).
There
were
no
cost
savings
predicted
that
would
result
from
a
change
in
generator
status
from
LQG
to
SQG,
etc.
(
e.
g.,
decreased
training,
BRS/
general
administrative
duty,
contingency
planning,
and
initial
characterization
costs).
A­
5
Table
A­
1
Co­
Proposal
Option:
1999
Offsite
Recovery
Within
Same
Industry
Group
(
4­
digit
NAICS
Code)
(
Tons)

NAICS
METALS
RECOVERY
Total
Metals
SOLVENTS
RECOVERY
Total
Solvents
OTHER
RECOVERY
Total
Other
TOTALS
Code
M011
M012
M013
M014
M019
Recovery
M021
M022
M023
M024
M029
Recovery
M031
M032
M039
Recovery
Quantity
%
Cumulative
%

3254
0
14,467
14,467
0
14,467
55.495
55.495
3312
6,734
6,734
0
0
6,734
25.832
81.327
3252
0
0
2,429
2,429
2,429
9.319
90.646
3314
489
242
730
0
0
730
2.802
93.448
3363
0
688
688
0
688
2.638
96.086
3251
0
389
389
121
121
510
1.957
98.043
6113
16
398
414
1
1
0
415
1.591
99.634
3372
0
29
29
0
29
0.111
99.745
3344
12
16
28
0
0
0
28
0.107
99.852
8129
17
17
0
0
17
0.064
99.916
3255
0
15
15
0
15
0.059
99.975
5622
0
0
4
4
4
0.016
99.991
9281
1
1
1
0
0
1
0.005
99.997
3399
0
0
0
0
0
0.002
99.998
3325
0
0
0
0
0
0.001
99.999
9241
0
0
0
0
0
0.001
100.000
3231
0
0
0
0
0
0.000
100.000
TOTAL6,735
0
489
45
657
7,925
15,589
0
0
0
0
15,589
2,429
4
121
2,555
26,069
100.000
 
A­
6
Table
A­
2
Co­
Proposal
Option:
1997
Offsite
Recovery
Within
Same
Industry
Group
(
4­
digit
NAICS
Code)
(
Tons)

NAICS
METALS
RECOVERY
Total
Metals
SOLVENTS
RECOVERY
Total
Solvents
OTHER
RECOVERY
Total
Other
TOTALS
Code
M011
M012
M013
M014
M019
Recovery
M021
M022
M023
M024
M029
Recovery
M031
M032
M039
Recovery
Quantity
%
Cumulative
%

3251
16
16
803
15
818
116
116
950
89.680
89.680
3312
0
0
94
94
94
8.873
98.552
5417
0
0
0
15
15
15
1.437
99.990
3314
0
0
0
0
0
0.010
100.000
TOTAL
0
16
0
0
0
16
804
0
0
0
15
819
94
0
131
225
1,059
100.000
 
A­
7
Table
A­
3.
Co­
Proposal
Option:
Summary
of
Pre­
and
Post­
Rule
Costs
and
Incremental
Costs
Cost
Item
1999
Plants
1997
Plants
Total
Costs
($/
yr)

Pre­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Post­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Incremental
Costs
($/
yr)
Pre­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Post­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Incremental
Costs
($/
yr)

On­
site
Recovery
Residual
Hazardous
Landfill
Disposal
$
60,719,000
$
55,431,000
($
5,288,000)
$
0
$
1,525,000
$
1,525,000
($
3,763,000)

Residual
Non­

Hazardous
Landfill
Disposal
$
0
$
2,976,000
$
2,976,000
$
0
$
165,000
$
165,000
$
3,141,000
1997
Pre­
Rule
Management
(
Hazardous
Landfill,

Energy
Recovery,

on­
site
Acid
Neutralization)
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
4,257,000
$
0
($
4,257,000)
($
4,257,000)

Pre­
Rule
and
Post­

Rule
Metal/

Solvent/
Acid
Recovery
$
167,814,000
$
167,814,000
$
0
$
0
$
7,953,000
$
7,953,000
$
7,953,000
Waste
Characterization
Testing
$
24,026,000
$
21,961,000
($
2,065,000)
$
3,245,000
$
1,581,000
($
1,664,000)
($
3,729,000)

Manifesting
$
3,701,000
$
3,383,000
($
318,000)
$
500,000
$
243,000
($
257,000)
($
575,000)

Loading
$
4,371,000
$
4,371,000
$
0
$
71,000
$
224,000
$
153,000
$
153,000
Waste
Transportation
$
23,184,000
$
20,903,000
($
2,281,000)
$
3,749,000
$
1,734,000
($
2,015,000)
($
4,296,000)
Table
A­
3.
Co­
Proposal
Option:
Summary
of
Pre­
and
Post­
Rule
Costs
and
Incremental
Costs
Cost
Item
1999
Plants
1997
Plants
Total
Costs
($/
yr)

Pre­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Post­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Incremental
Costs
($/
yr)
Pre­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Post­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Incremental
Costs
($/
yr)

A­
8
Recovery
Transportation
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
Salvage
Revenue
($
610,881,000)
($
610,881,000)
$
0
$
0
($
16,898,000)
($
16,898,000)
($
16,898,000)

Hazardous
Materials
Training
$
7,479,000
$
4,719,000
($
2,760,000)
$
2,291,000
$
1,659,000
($
632,000)
($
3,392,000)

Manifest
Training
$
1,539,000
$
1,095,000
($
444,000)
$
459,000
$
382,000
($
77,000)
($
521,000)

BRS/
General
Administrative
Duties
$
1,927,000
$
1,423,000
($
504,000)
$
584,000
$
473,000
($
111,000)
($
615,000)

One­
Time
Contingency
Planning
$
2,072,000
$
1,252,000
($
820,000)
$
640,000
$
442,000
($
198,000)
($
1,018,000)

Initial
Characterization
$
7,066,000
$
7,066,000
$
0
$
1,805,000
$
1,805,000
$
0
$
0
One­
Time
Notification
of
Exclusion
$
0
$
542,000
$
542,000
$
0
$
162,000
$
162,000
$
704,000
On­
site
Recovery
Subtotal
($
306,983,000)
($
317,945,000)
($
10,962,000)
$
17,601,000
$
1,450,000
($
16,151,000)
($
27,113,000)

Off­
site
Recovery
Within
the
Same
Industry
Group
(
4­
Digit
NAICS
Code)
and
Recovery
Facilities
Do
Not
Receive
Shipments
From
Multiple
NAICS
Codes
Table
A­
3.
Co­
Proposal
Option:
Summary
of
Pre­
and
Post­
Rule
Costs
and
Incremental
Costs
Cost
Item
1999
Plants
1997
Plants
Total
Costs
($/
yr)

Pre­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Post­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Incremental
Costs
($/
yr)
Pre­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Post­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Incremental
Costs
($/
yr)

A­
9
Table
A­
3.
Co­
Proposal
Option:
Summary
of
Pre­
and
Post­
Rule
Costs
and
Incremental
Costs
Cost
Item
1999
Plants
1997
Plants
Total
Costs
($/
yr)

Pre­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Post­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Incremental
Costs
($/
yr)
Pre­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Post­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Incremental
Costs
($/
yr)

A­
10
Table
A­
3.
Co­
Proposal
Option:
Summary
of
Pre­
and
Post­
Rule
Costs
and
Incremental
Costs
Cost
Item
1999
Plants
1997
Plants
Total
Costs
($/
yr)

Pre­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Post­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Incremental
Costs
($/
yr)
Pre­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Post­
Rule
Costs
($/
yr)
Incremental
Costs
($/
yr)

A­
11
($
372,000)
[$
470,000
pre­
rule
and
$
98,000
($
166,000)
[$
191,000
pre­
rule
and
$
25,000
($
1,552,000)
[$
3,364,000
pre­
rule
and
$
1,812,000
$
29,000)
[$
393,000
pre­
rule
and
$
364,000
$
1,581,000).
B­
1
Appendix
B
Review
of
Recycled
Waste
Quantities
by
Manufacturing
Industries
One
option
considered
in
the
ABR­
related
rulemaking
was
the
limitation
that
only
waste
generated
by
manufacturing
industries
(
NAICS
31­
33)
would
be
excluded
as
solid
waste.
This
appendix
presents
a
review
of
the
generators
of
waste,
in
manufacturing
and
other
industries,
so
that
the
impacts
of
this
limitation
can
be
more
readily
identified.

The
following
is
a
summary
of
findings
relating
to
the
waste
currently
being
recycled
within
the
same
NAICS
code
from
the
1999
BRS
as
well
as
the
waste
recycled
within
an
industry
in
1997,
but
not
recycled
in
1999.
Given
the
amount
of
waste
generated
in
1997
and
1999,
the
manufacturing
industry,
defined
by
NAICS
codes
31
through
33,
represents
the
industry
which
would
be
most
affected
by
the
ruling.
According
to
the
data
in
Table
1,
the
manufacturing
industry
generated
97.5
percent
of
the
total
waste
generated
in
1999
and
88.4
percent
of
the
total
waste
generated
was
in
1997.

Table
B­
1.
Total
Waste
Generation
for
1999
and
1997,
including
Waste
Generated
by
the
Manufacturing
Industry
1/

Generation
Year
Total
Onsite
and
Offsite
Managed
Waste
(
tons)
Total
Onsite
and
Offsite
Managed
Waste
with
NAICS
Identified
(
tons)
Total
Waste
Generated
by
the
Manufacturing
Industry
(
tons)
Waste
Generated
by
Manufacturers
(%)
3/

1999
884,648
678,463
661,180
97.5
1997
2/
31,957
28,993
25,624
88.4
Total
916,605
707,456
686,804
97.1
1/
Waste
quantities
recycled
(
BRS
management
codes
M011­
M039)
within
the
generating
industry
NAICS.
2/
Waste
quantities
recycled
within
an
industry
in
1997
but
not
in
1999.
3/
Manufacturers
defined
by
NAICS
codes
31
through
33.

Based
on
the
1999
and
1997
biennial
report
data,
limiting
the
waste
that
would
be
excluded
as
solid
waste
would
be
a
relatively
minor
limitation.
Less
than
three
percent
of
all
waste
generated
would
be
affected
by
this
limitation.
C­
1
Appendix
C
Limitation
on
Use
of
Reclaimed
Product
One
option
considered
in
the
ABR­
related
rulemaking
is
the
limitation
that
any
reclaimed
material
will
have
to
be
consumed
by
the
same
industry
(
or
facility)
that
generated
the
waste.
This
appendix
presents
a
preliminary
review
of
the
potential
implications
of
this
option,
so
that
the
impacts
of
this
limitation
can
be
more
readily
identified.

There
are
broad
classes
of
materials
being
recovered
through
recycling
that
will
be
affected
by
any
rule
revising
the
definition
of
solid
waste.
Products
recovered
through
recycling
primarily
consist
of
solvents,
metals
and
acids.
This
discussion
is
limited
to
current
on­
site
and
off­
site
(
within
the
same
industry)
recovery,
and
wastes
recycled
off­
site
in
industries
different
from
the
generator
which
may
be
recovered
on­
site
as
a
result
of
the
rule.

It
is
not
expected
that
waste
currently
being
recycled
will
be
affected
by
this
potential
limitation.
Waste
currently
being
recovered
will
likely
continue
to
be
recovered.
It
is
expected
that
without
the
limitation
additional
waste
will
be
recovered.
The
quantity
of
waste
added
as
a
result
of
the
rule
will
be
some
component
of
the
waste
highlighted
in
Table
4­
7,
nearly
700,000
tons.
If
generators
can
only
take
advantage
of
the
revised
definition
of
solid
waste
if
the
recovered
material
is
used
by
the
generator,
the
amount
of
waste
recovered
will
be
less
than
the
amount
without
the
limitation.
Unfortunately
the
total
amount
of
waste
which
will
be
recovered
with
and
without
the
limitation
cannot
be
determined
at
this
time.
D­
1
Appendix
D
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February
4,
2003
To:
Paul
Borst,
EPA/
OSW/
EMRAD
Tom
Walker,
IEc
From:
Dave
Gustafson
and
Shauna
Lehmann,
DPRA
Re:
Recoverable
Waste
Type
Analysis
for
the
Economic
Assessment
of
the
Association
of
Battery
Recyclers
Proposed
Rulemaking;
EPA
Contract
No.
68­
W­
02­
007,
WA
1­
05
____________________________________________________________________________

This
memorandum
presents
the
results
of
DPRA's
review
of
the
waste
stream
types
reported
being
recovered
in
the
1999
BRS.
DPRA
assumes
that
based
on
these
recoverable
waste
types
we
can
search
the
list
of
waste
streams
currently
not
recovered
(
i.
e.,
land
disposed
or
thermally
destroyed)
that
may
be
recovered
under
post
rule
conditions.
DPRA
limited
its
initial
review
of
waste
streams
to
those
SIC
codes
that
reported
recovering
more
than
30,000
tons
either
on
site
or
off
site
in
1999.
A
more
detailed
summary
of
this
review
is
presented
in
the
two
sections
below.
The
following
table
presents
a
summary
of
DPRA's
recommendations
for
each
SIC
reviewed.
Based
on
the
waste
type
commonalities
identified
from
this
review
we
may
wish
to
expand
the
search
for
potentially
recoverable
wastes
to
include
all
SIC
codes
rather
than
limiting
it
to
the
SIC
reviewed.

Summary
of
DPRA
Recommendations
SIC
Code
On­
site
Recovery
Off­
Site
Recovery
3341
Secondary
Smelting
Lead
Battery
Wastes
(
D008
waste
code)
Lead
Battery
Wastes
(
D008
waste
code)

2869
Organic
Chemicals
Organic
Liquids
(
B201
­
B219
form
codes,
except
B205
(
oil­
water
emulsion
or
mixture),
B206
(
waste
oil),
B207
(
concentrated
aqueous
solution
of
other
organics),
B210
(
adhesives
or
epoxies),
and
B212
(
reactive
or
polymerizable
organic
liquid).
Organic
Liquids
(
B201
­
B219
form
codes,
except
B205
(
oil­
water
emulsion
or
mixture),
B206
(
waste
oil),
B207
(
concentrated
aqueous
solution
of
other
organics),
B210
(
adhesives
or
epoxies),
and
B212
(
reactive
or
polymerizable
organic
liquid);
and
Spent
Carbon
(
B404
form
code)

2819
Inorganic
Chemicals
No
Recommendations.
Not
Reviewed
(<
30,000
tons).

2491
Wood
Preserving
Chlorophenolic
Liquid
Wastes
(
F032
EPA
waste
code).
Exclude
any
waste
streams
with
solid
or
sludge
waste
form
codes.
Not
Reviewed
(<
30,000
tons).
Summary
of
DPRA
Recommendations
SIC
Code
On­
site
Recovery
Off­
Site
Recovery
D­
2
2851
Paints
&
Allied
Products
Organic
Liquids
(
B201
­
B219
form
codes,
except
B205
(
oil­
water
emulsion
or
mixture),
B206
(
waste
oil),
B207
(
concentrated
aqueous
solution
of
other
organics),
B210
(
adhesives
or
epoxies),
and
B212
(
reactive
or
polymerizable
organic
liquid).
Not
Reviewed
(<
30,000
tons).

2834
Pharmaceutical
Preparations
Organic
Liquids
(
B201
­
B219
form
codes,
except
B205
(
oil­
water
emulsion
or
mixture),
B206
(
waste
oil),
B207
(
concentrated
aqueous
solution
of
other
organics),
B210
(
adhesives
or
epoxies),
and
B212
(
reactive
or
polymerizable
organic
liquid).
Not
Reviewed
(<
30,000
tons)

3312
Steel
Works
Spent
pickle
liquor
wastes
(
K062
waste
code).
Note
that
only
one
waste
stream
is
reported
recovered
on
site.
Approximately
five
waste
streams
are
shipped
off
site
for
recovery.
DPRA
tentatively
recommends
pulling
nonrecovered
waste
streams
with
EPA
waste
code
K062
for
evaluation
as
potentially
recoverable
waste
streams
post
rule.
If
neutralization
is
the
common
management
practice
it
may
not
be
cost
effective
to
recover
this
waste.
Emission
control
dust
(
K061
waste
code).

3672
Printed
Circuit
Boards
Not
Reviewed
(<
30,000
tons).
a.)
Metal­
containing
liquid
wastes
(
B103,
B106,
or
B107
form
codes);
b.)
Lead
solder
dross
waste
(
D008
waste
code
with
form
codes
B304,
B307,
and
B319);
c.)
electroplating
wastewater
treatment
sludges
(
F006
waste
code);
d.)
Solutions
containing
gold
(
F007
waste
code);
or
e.)
Solutions
containing
silver
(
D011
waste
code).

2911
Petroleum
Refining
Not
Reviewed
(<
30,000
tons).
Oily
Sludges
(
B603
form
code;
may
already
be
exempt
if
recovered);
Spent
Carbon
(
B404
form
code);
and
Spent
Catalysts
(
K171
and
K172
waste
codes)

3691
Storage
Batteries
Not
Reviewed
(<
30,000
tons).
Lead
Battery
Wastes
(
D008
waste
code)
Summary
of
DPRA
Recommendations
SIC
Code
On­
site
Recovery
Off­
Site
Recovery
D­
3
2821
Plastic
Materials
&
Resins
Not
Reviewed
(<
30,000
tons).
Organic
Liquids
(
B201
­
B219
form
codes,
except
B205
(
oil­
water
emulsion
or
mixture),
B206
(
waste
oil),
B207
(
concentrated
aqueous
solution
of
other
organics),
B210
(
adhesives
or
epoxies),
and
B212
(
reactive
or
polymerizable
organic
liquid).

On­
Site
Recovery:
SIC
codes
recovering
greater
than
30,000
tons
on
site
SIC
Code
3341:
Secondary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Nonferrous
Metals
98%
of
the
managed
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M011­
M019
(
metals
recovery).
Four
waste
streams
contribute
to
approximately
88%
of
the
quantity
for
this
system
type
and
are
as
follows:


Filter
Press
Cake
from
Wastewater
Treatment
System
o
EPA
Code:
D008
­
Lead
o
Form
Code:
B319
­
Other
Waste
Inorganic
Solids
o
Quantity
Managed:
42,972
tons

Battery
Components
from
Lead
Acid
Storage
Batteries
o
EPA
Code:
D008
­
Lead
o
Form
Code:
B309
­
Batteries
or
battery
parts,
casings,
cores
o
Quantity
Managed:
26,347
tons

Lead
Groups
from
Battery
Breaking/
Desulfurization
Operation
o
EPA
Code:
D008
­
Lead
o
Form
Code:
B309
­
Batteries
or
battery
parts,
casings,
cores
o
Quantity
Managed:
21,851
tons

Slag
Furnace
By­
Product
Solid
Originating
from
Recycling
Operations
o
EPA
Code:
D008
­
Lead
o
Form
Code:
B304
­
Other
dry
ash,
slag,
or
thermal
residue
o
Quantity
Managed:
10,645
tons
Of
the
32
waste
streams
with
metals
being
recovered
on
site
22
(
69%)
are
reported
containing
lead
(
D008
EPA
waste
code).
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
3341
that
potentially
contain
recoverable
amounts
of
lead
(
EPA
waste
code
D008)
post
rule.

SIC
Code
2869:
Industrial
Organic
Chemicals,
nec
75%
of
the
managed
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M031­
M039
(
other
recovery).
Three
waste
streams
contribute
to
approximately
61%
of
the
quantity
for
this
system
type
and
are
as
follows:


Acidic
Process
Water
o
EPA
Code:
D002
­
Corrosive
Waste
o
Form
Code:
B105
­
Acidic
Aqueous
Waste
o
Quantity
Managed:
43,542
tons

EDC
Heavy
Ends
from
Ethylene
Dichloride
Manufacturing
o
EPA
Codes:
D028
­
1,2­
Dichloroethane
D­
4
D034
­
Hexachloroethane
D039
­
Tetrachloroethylene
K019
­
Heavy
Ends
from
the
Distillation
of
Ethylene
Dichloride
in
Ethylene
Dichloride
Production
o
Form
Code:
B219
­
Other
Organic
Liquids
o
Quantity
Managed:
13,623
tons

Acid
By­
Product
from
Production
o
EPA
Code:
D002
­
Corrosive
Waste
o
Form
Code:
B105
­
Acidic
Aqueous
Waste
o
Quantity
Managed:
10,610
tons
Even
though
two
of
the
three
largest
waste
streams
are
wastewater
most
waste
streams
have
organic
liquid
waste
form
codes
(
B201
­
B219).
For
waste
streams
being
recovered
by
other
methods
on
site
13
out
of
18
(
72%)
have
an
organic
liquid
form
code.
For
waste
steams
being
recovered
for
solvents
on
site
12
of
15
(
80%)
have
an
organic
liquid
form
code.
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
2869
that
are
organic
liquid
form
codes
as
potentially
recoverable
post
rule.
Include
all
waste
streams
with
B200
form
codes
except
B205
(
oil­
water
emulsion
or
mixture),
B206
(
waste
oil),
B207
(
concentrated
aqueous
solution
of
other
organics),
B210
(
adhesives
or
epoxies),
and
B212
(
reactive
or
polymerizable
organic
liquid)
which
are
unlikely
to
be
recoverable.

SIC
Code
2819:
Industrial
Inorganic
Chemicals,
nec
Virtually
100%
of
the
managed
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M011­
M019
(
metals
recovery).
One
waste
stream
contributes
to
approximately
96%
of
the
quantity
for
this
system
type
and
is
as
follows:


Rinse
Waters,
Process
Wash
Waters,
and
Rain
Water
o
EPA
Codes:
D002
­
Corrosive
Waste
D008
­
Lead
o
Form
Code:
B106
­
Caustic
Solution
with
Metals
but
no
Cyanides
o
Quantity
Managed:
68,462
tons
No
clear
search
pattern
could
be
determined
to
identify
potential
waste
streams
that
may
be
recovered
post
rule.
DPRA
recommends
conducting
no
additional
searches
for
this
SIC
code.

SIC
Code
2491:
Wood
Preserving
100%
of
the
managed
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M031­
M039
(
other
recovery).
One
waste
stream
contributes
to
approximately
96%
of
the
quantity
for
this
system
type
and
is
as
follows:


Wastewater
From
Wood
Preserving
Process,
Containing
Creosote
o
EPA
Codes:
F032
­
Wastewaters,
Process
Residuals,
Preservative
Drippage,
and
Spent
Formulations
from
Wood
Preserving
Processes
Generated
at
Plants
that
Currently
Use,
or
Have
Previously
Used
Chlorophenolic
Formulations
F034
­
Wastewaters,
Process
Residuals,
Preservative
Drippage,
and
Spent
Formulations
from
Wood
Preserving
Processes
Generated
at
Plants
that
Use
Creosote
Formulations
o
Form
Code:
B102
­
Aqueous
Waste
with
Low
Other
Toxic
Organics
o
Quantity
Managed:
31,067
tons
D­
5
Two
of
the
three
waste
streams
are
reported
under
the
F032
EPA
waste
code.
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
2491
that
contain
the
F032
EPA
waste
code.
Exclude
any
waste
streams
with
solid
or
sludge
waste
forms.

SIC
Code
2851:
Paints
and
Allied
Products
71%
of
the
managed
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M021­
M029
(
solvents
recovery).
Two
waste
streams
contribute
to
approximately
46%
of
the
quantity
for
this
system
type
and
are
as
follows:


Spent
Solvent
o
EPA
Codes:
D001
­
Ignitable
Waste
D005
­
Barium
D007
­
Chromium
D008
­
Lead
D035
­
Methyl
ethyl
ketone
F003
­
Select
List
of
Spent
Non­
Halogenated
Solvents
(
see
list)
F005
­
Select
List
of
Spent
Non­
Halogenated
Solvents
(
see
list)
o
Form
Code:
B201
­
Concentrated
Solvent­
Water
Solution
o
Quantity
Managed:
9,792
tons

Spent
Organic
Non­
Halogenated
Solvents
o
EPA
Codes:
(
same
as
above)
o
Form
Code:
B203
­
Nonhalogenated
Solvent
o
Quantity
Managed:
4,892
tons
Most
waste
streams
have
organic
liquid
waste
form
codes
(
B201
­
B219).
For
waste
streams
being
recovered
for
solvents
on
site
48
out
of
53
(
91%)
have
an
organic
liquid
form
code.
Most
waste
streams
contain
F003
or
F005
EPA
waste
codes.
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
2851
that
are
organic
liquid
form
codes
as
potentially
recoverable
post
rule.
Include
all
waste
streams
with
B200
form
codes
except
B205
(
oil­
water
emulsion
or
mixture),
B206
(
waste
oil),
B207
(
concentrated
aqueous
solution
of
other
organics),
B210
(
adhesives
or
epoxies),
and
B212
(
reactive
or
polymerizable
organic
liquid)
which
are
unlikely
to
be
recoverable.

SIC
Code
2834:
Pharmaceutical
Preparations
100%
of
the
managed
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M021­
M029
(
solvents
recovery).
Four
waste
streams
contribute
to
approximately
95%
of
the
quantity
for
this
system
type
and
are
as
follows:


(
No
Waste
Description
Listed)
o
EPA
Code:
D001
­
Ignitable
Waste
o
Form
Code:
B203
­
Nonhalogenated
Solvent
o
Quantity
Managed:
10,548
tons

Ignitable
Spent
Solvent
from
Pharmaceutical
Manufacturing
Process
o
EPA
Codes:
D001
­
Ignitable
Waste
F003
­
Select
List
of
Spent
Non­
Halogenated
Solvents
(
see
list)
o
Form
Code:
B201
­
Concentrated
Solvent­
Water
Solution
o
Quantity
Managed:
8,061
tons

(
No
Waste
Description
Listed)
o
EPA
Code:
D001
­
Ignitable
Waste
o
Form
Code:
B203
­
Nonhalogenated
Solvent
o
Quantity
Managed:
5,742
tons

Ignitable
Spent
Solvent
from
Pharmaceutical
Manufacturing
Process
D­
6
o
EPA
Codes:
D001
­
Ignitable
Waste
D038
­
Pyridine
F005
­
Select
List
of
Spent
Non­
Halogenated
Solvents
(
see
list)
o
Form
Code:
B201
­
Concentrated
Solvent­
Water
Solution
o
Quantity
Managed:
8,061
tons
Most
waste
streams
have
organic
liquid
waste
form
codes
(
B201
­
B219).
For
waste
streams
being
recovered
by
other
methods
on
site
13
out
of
18
(
72%)
have
an
organic
liquid
form
code.
All
12
waste
steams
being
recovered
for
solvents
have
an
organic
liquid
form
code.
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
2851
that
are
organic
liquid
form
codes
as
potentially
recoverable
post
rule.
Include
all
waste
streams
with
B200
form
codes
except
B205
(
oil­
water
emulsion
or
mixture),
B206
(
waste
oil),
B207
(
concentrated
aqueous
solution
of
other
organics),
B210
(
adhesives
or
epoxies),
and
B212
(
reactive
or
polymerizable
organic
liquid)
which
are
unlikely
to
be
recoverable.

SIC
Code
3312:
Steel
Works,
Blast
Furnaces,
and
Rolling
Mills
100%
of
the
managed
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M031­
M039
(
other
recovery).
One
waste
stream
contributes
100%
of
the
quantity
for
this
system
type
and
is
as
follows:


Spent
Pickle
Liquor
HCl
from
Steel
Processing
o
EPA
Codes:
D002
­
Corrosive
Waste
K062
­
Spent
Pickle
Liquor
from
Steel
Finishing
Operations
of
Plants
that
Produce
Iron
or
Steel
o
Form
Code:
B103
­
Spent
Acid
with
Metals
o
Quantity
Managed:
30,222
tons
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
3312
that
contain
the
EPA
waste
code
K062.
Note
that
only
one
waste
stream
is
reported
recovered
on
site.
Approximately
five
waste
streams
are
shipped
off
site
for
recovery.
DPRA
tentatively
recommends
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
with
EPA
waste
code
K062
for
evaluation
as
potentially
recoverable
waste
streams
post
rule.
If
neutralization
is
the
common
management
practice
it
may
not
be
cost
effective
to
recover
this
waste.

Off­
Site
Recovery:
SIC
codes
recovering
greater
than
30,000
tons
off
site
SIC
Code
3312:
Steel
Works,
Blast
Furnaces,
and
Rolling
Mills
96%
of
the
shipped
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M011­
M019
(
metals
recovery).
The
fifteen
highest­
quantity
waste
streams
contribute
to
approximately
53%
of
the
total
quantity
for
this
system
type,
and
can
be
summarized
by
the
following:


Emission
Control
Dust
from
the
Production
of
Steel
in
an
Electric
Arc
Furnace
o
EPA
Codes:
D006
­
Cadmium
D008
­
Lead
K061
­
Emission
Control
Dust/
Sludge
from
the
Primary
Production
of
Steel
in
Electric
Furnaces
o
Form
Codes:
B303
­
Ash,
slag,
or
other
residue
from
incineration
of
wastes
B304
­
Other
dry
ash,
slag,
or
thermal
residue
B306
­
Dry
lime
or
metal
hydroxide
solids
not
fixed
B319
­
Other
waste
inorganic
solids
D­
7
B511
­
Air
pollution
control
device
sludge
o
Sum
of
Shipped
Quantities:
251,441
tons
Most
waste
streams
recovered
off
site
contain
the
EPA
waste
code
K061.
87
of
the
143
(
61%)
of
the
waste
streams
contain
the
K061
waste
code.
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
3312
that
contain
the
K061
EPA
waste
code.

SIC
Code
3672:
Printed
Circuit
Boards
90%
of
the
shipped
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M011­
M019
(
metals
recovery).
NOTE:
there
are
not
many
high­
quantity
waste
streams
for
this
system
type,
so
it
is
difficult
to
determine
the
major
contributing
waste
streams.

Most
waste
streams
either
contain
either:
a.)
form
codes
B103,
B106,
or
B107;
b.)
D008
waste
code
used
for
solder
dross
waste
with
form
codes
B304,
B307,
and
B319;
c.)
F006;
d.)
F007
(
gold
solutions);
or
e.)
D011
(
silver
solutions).
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
3672
that
contain
one
or
more
of
the
above
codes.

SIC
Code
2911:
Petroleum
Refining
78%
of
the
shipped
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M031­
M039
(
other
recovery).
NOTE:
there
are
not
many
high­
quantity
waste
streams
for
this
system
type,
so
it
is
difficult
to
determine
the
major
contributing
waste
streams.

Waste
streams
recovered
off
site
by
other
recovery
methods
are
identified
as
either
oily
sludge
(
form
code
B603)
or
spent
carbon
(
form
code
B404).
Note,
recovery
of
oily
sludge
(
form
code
B603)
may
already
be
exempt
under
prior
RCRA
regulations.
Records
were
removed
in
the
November,
2002,
Economic
Assessment
if
the
system
type
code
was
M032
(
which
includes
waste
oil
recovery).
The
records
remaining
on
the
list
have
different
system
type
codes
(
e.
g.,
M039,
other
recovery
­
type
unknown).
We
may
wish
to
remove
these
records
from
the
analysis
given
their
oily
sludge
form
code
(
B603).
In
addition
catalysts
are
being
recovered
(
EPA
waste
codes
K171
and
K172).
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
2911
that
are
oily
sludges
(
form
code
B603)
or
spent
carbon
form
code
B404)
as
potentially
recoverable
post
rule.
In
addition
pull
non­
recovered
waste
streams
containing
EPA
waste
codes
K171
and
K172.

SIC
Code
2869:
Industrial
Organic
Chemicals,
nec
62%
of
the
shipped
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M021­
M029
(
solvents
recovery).
NOTE:
there
are
not
many
high­
quantity
waste
streams
for
this
system
type,
so
it
is
difficult
to
determine
the
major
contributing
waste
streams.

Most
waste
streams
have
organic
liquid
waste
form
codes
(
B201
­
B219).
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
2869
that
are
organic
liquid
form
codes
as
potentially
recoverable
post
rule.
Include
all
waste
streams
with
B200
form
codes
except
B205
(
oil­
water
emulsion
or
mixture),
B206
(
waste
oil),
B207
(
concentrated
aqueous
solution
of
other
organics),
B210
(
adhesives
or
epoxies),
and
B212
(
reactive
or
polymerizable
organic
liquid)
which
are
unlikely
to
be
recoverable.
In
addition
pull
all
non­
recovered
waste
streams
that
are
spent
carbon
(
form
code
B404).

SIC
Code
3341:
Secondary
Smelting
and
Refining
of
Nonferrous
Metals
D­
8
53%
of
the
shipped
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M031­
M039
(
other
recovery).
Three
waste
streams
contribute
to
approximately
98%
of
the
quantity
for
this
system
type
and
can
be
summarized
by
the
following:


Plastic
from
Lead
Acid
Battery
Cases
Recovered
from
Battery
Breaking
Operations
o
EPA
Code:
D008
­
Lead
o
Form
Code:
B309
­
Batteries
or
battery
parts,
casings,
cores
o
Sum
of
Shipped
Quantities:
18,251
tons
Of
the
53
waste
streams
with
metals
being
recovered
off
site
27
(
51%)
are
reported
containing
lead
(
D008
EPA
waste
code)
primarily
from
batteries.
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
3341
that
potentially
contain
recoverable
amounts
of
lead
(
EPA
waste
code
D008)
post
rule.

SIC
Code
3691:
Storage
Batteries
99%
of
the
shipped
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M011­
M019
(
metals
recovery).
NOTE:
there
are
not
many
high­
quantity
waste
streams
for
this
system
type,
so
it
is
difficult
to
determine
the
major
contributing
waste
streams.

Of
the
142
waste
streams
with
metals
being
recovered
off
site
116
(
82%)
are
reported
containing
lead
(
D008
EPA
waste
code)
primarily
from
batteries.
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
3691
that
potentially
contain
recoverable
amounts
of
lead
(
EPA
waste
code
D008)
post
rule.

SIC
Code
2821:
Plastic
Materials
and
Resins
82%
of
the
shipped
quantity
has
a
system
type
of
M021­
M029
(
solvents
recovery).
NOTE:
there
are
not
many
high­
quantity
waste
streams
for
this
system
type,
so
it
is
difficult
to
determine
the
major
contributing
waste
streams.

Most
waste
streams
have
organic
liquid
waste
form
codes
(
B201
­
B219).
Recommend
pulling
non­
recovered
waste
streams
within
SIC
2821
that
are
organic
liquid
form
codes
as
potentially
recoverable
post
rule.
Include
all
waste
streams
with
B200
form
codes
except
B205
(
oil­
water
emulsion
or
mixture),
B206
(
waste
oil),
B207
(
concentrated
aqueous
solution
of
other
organics),
B210
(
adhesives
or
epoxies),
and
B212
(
reactive
or
polymerizable
organic
liquid)
which
are
unlikely
to
be
recoverable.
35
Sippel,
1999,
Personal
Communication,
Noranda,
Ontario,
Canada.

36
Jarvis,
1999,
Personal
Communication,
Eritech,
North
Carolina
37
Average
distances
to
landfills
and
recyclers
were
previously
estimated
at
200
and
600
miles,
respectively,
based
on
a
review
of
BRS
data
(
DPRA,
1999.
Regulatory
Impact
Analysis
of
the
Proposed
Rule
for
F006
Wastewater
Treatment
Sludges).
The
assumed
incremental
charge
of
$
50
per
ton
is
a
proxy
for
this
cost;
actual
costs
would
depend
on
load
sizes,
pickup
arrangements
and
other
factors.

38
1999
dollar
basis,
adjusted
for
1997
calculations
using
GDP
IPD
39
Sippel,
1999,
Personal
Communication,
Noranda,
Ontario,
Canada.

E­
1
Appendix
E
MEMORANDUM
Date:
November
14,
2002
To:
Paul
Borst,
EPA/
OSW/
EMRAD,
Tom
Walker,
IEc
From:
Dave
Gustafson,
and
Craig
Simons,
DPRA
Re:
Analysis
of
Market
Changes
between
1997
and
1999
This
memo
presents
a
differential
cost
analysis
between
Subtitle
C
metals
recovery
and
Subtitle
C
landfill
for
generators,
comparing
cost
experiences
in
1997
versus
1999.
Also
presented
is
an
overview
of
the
potential
market
affects
regarding
decisions
to
recycle
solvent
based
waste
versus
sending
the
wastes
to
fuel
blending.

Within
the
market
things
are
changing.
Currently
we
assume
that
since
they
recycled
in
the
past
they
will
do
it
in
the
future.
Table
1
presents
pricing
charts
for
four
key
metals,
as
well
as
prices
for
landfilling,
price
indices
for
industrial
chemicals,
and
petroleum.
With
landfill
prices
increasing,,
metals
prices
decreasing,
and
solvent
prices
decreasing,
at
least
between
1997
and
1999,
the
Agency
needs
to
know
what
the
overall
affect
is
on
generators'
decision
to
recycle
versus
dispose
of
the
wastes
generated.
The
wastes
considered
are
those
wastes
which
may
be
affected
by
EPA
exclusions,
brought
about
by
the
ABR
court
decision.
In
short,
we
want
to
determine
how
to
change
the
analytical
framework
for
what
wastes
will
be
recycled.
For
example,
should
the
Agency
maintain
the
current
assumption
that
100
percent
of
1997
metal
and
solvent
recovery
quantities
will
switch
back
to
recycling
or
use
some
alternative
assumption?

During
the
period
from
1997
through
1999
key
recyclable
metals
copper,
chromium
and
nickel
experienced
price
declines
ranging
from
15
to
almost
30
percent,
making
them
less
attractive
to
recycle.
However,
at
least
partially
offsetting
the
effect
of
the
metal
price
declines,
landfilling
prices
increased
approximately
25
percent.

To
identify
how
changes
in
costs
may
affect
recycling
versus
landfilling
decisions
we
look
to
the
recycling
of
copper­
bearing
waste,
the
arrangements
for
which
we
know
the
most
about.
When
this
material
is
sent
directly
to
the
smelter,
which
only
happens
on
a
limited
basis,
the
smelter
would
typically
charge
a
processing
fee,
which
has
been
reported
to
range
from
approximately
$
200
per
ton35
to
$
300
per
ton.
36
For
purposes
of
this
assessment
a
processing
charge
of
$
300
per
ton
is
assumed,
with
an
additional
charge
of
$
50
per
ton
associated
with
increased
transportation
costs.
37
38
Then,
depending
on
the
practice
of
the
smelter,
payment
would
be
made
to
the
generator
based
on
the
assay
value
of
the
copper,
which
may
be
approximately
90
percent
of
the
total
value.
39
With
this
construct
the
breakeven
point,
above
which
the
material
may
be
attractive
from
a
monetary
standpoint,
depends
heavily
on
the
copper
content
of
the
waste,
the
market
price
for
copper,
and
the
cost
for
landfilling.
As
40
USGS
Mineral
Commodity
Summaries:
Copper,
January
2002
41
Environmental
Cost
Handling
Options
and
Solutions
(
ECHOS),
Environmental
Remediation
Cost
Data­
Unit
Price,
4th
Annual
Edition,
published
by
R.
S.
Means
and
Delta
Technologies
Group,
Inc.,
various
years.

E­
2
indicated
in
Table
1,
the
average
price
for
copper,
based
on
USGS
data40
was
estimated
to
be
$
2,140
per
ton
in
1997
and
$
1,518
per
ton
in
1999.
Subtitle
C
landfill
disposal
costs
(
with
stabilization)
are
estimated
at
$
241
and
$
304
per
ton
in
1997
and
1999,
respectively.
41
The
breakeven
point
for
copper­
bearing
sludge,
below
which
the
material
would
be
more
economical
to
landfill
would
be
calculated
as:

CC
=
(
R
­
L)
/(
C
*
0.9)

Where:
CC
is
the
copper
content
of
the
waste
considered
for
recycling,
expressed
as
a
decimal;
R
is
the
per
ton
processing
fee
charged
by
the
recycler
($
300)
plus
incremental
transportation
costs,
assumed
to
be
$
50,
1999
basis;
L
is
the
landfill
cost
per
ton
(
Subtitle
C
with
stabilization);
C
is
the
price
of
copper,
and
0.9
is
the
portion
of
the
assay
value
of
the
copper
in
the
sludge
which
is
assumed
to
be
paid
to
the
generator.

Given
the
assumptions
presented
previously,
the
breakeven
copper
content
would
be
approximately
5.2
percent
in
1997.
In
1999
the
breakeven
copper
content
actually
falls
to
3.4
percent
because
the
affect
of
the
increased
cost
for
landfilling
outweighs
the
decreased
price
for
copper.
At
least
for
copper
waste,
it
appears
that
recycling
was
more
attractive
from
a
monetary
standpoint
in
1999.

Unfortunately
we
have
not
been
able
to
make
similar
calculations
for
other
metals,
most
notably
nickel,
chromium
and
lead
due
to
a
lack
of
information
on
recycling
arrangements.
However
we
note
that
the
decline
in
copper
prices
was
far
greater,
in
percentage
terms,
than
for
the
other
metals.
Based
on
this
observation
it
would
not
seem
that
the
changes
in
metals
prices,
when
considered
in
concert
with
landfill
prices,
would
adversely
affect
generators
decisions
regarding
recycling
their
metal
bearing
wastes.

To
examine
the
cost
implications
for
nickel,
chromium
and
lead
generators
we
use
the
same
general
construct
as
for
copper.
That
is,
generators
are
assumed
to
pay
a
fee
for
recycling
and
in
return
are
reimbursed
for
90
percent
of
the
assay
value
of
the
metal
in
the
waste.
This
is
for
illustrative
purposes
only,
to
show
the
relative
attractiveness
of
recycling
in
1999
versus
1997.

The
breakeven
recycling
charge
for
these
metal
bearing
wastes,
below
which
the
material
would
be
more
economical
to
landfill
would
be
calculated
as:

R
=
L
+
(
MC
*
(
M
*
0.9))

Where:
R
is
the
per
ton
processing
fee
charged
by
the
recycler
plus
incremental
transportation
costs;
L
is
the
landfill
cost
per
ton
(
Subtitle
C
with
stabilization);
MC
is
the
metal
content
of
the
waste
considered
for
recycling,
expressed
as
a
decimal;
M
is
the
price
of
the
metal,
and
0.9
is
the
portion
of
the
assay
value
of
the
metal
in
the
waste
which
is
assumed
to
be
paid
to
the
generator.
E­
3
For
purposes
of
illustration
we
consider
wastes
which
have
a
three
percent
metal
content.
Given
these
assumptions,
the
results
are
presented
in
Table
2.
What
is
notable
is
that
for
all
of
the
metals
the
"
breakeven"
recycling
fee
in
1999
would
have
to
be
from
4
to
23
percent
higher
in
1999
versus
1997
for
the
generator
to
be
more
likely
to
dispose
of
the
waste
in
a
landfill.
Stated
differently,
for
nickel
wastes,
in
1997
the
generator
would
be
indifferent
between
recycling
and
disposal
given
a
recycling
fee
of
$
411
per
ton.
In
1999
this
breakpoint
would
actually
increase
to
a
fee
of
$
451
per
ton.
Recycling
fees
are
not
at
this
level
and
consequently
price
variations
cannot
explain
the
switch
in
waste
management
from
recycling
in
1997
to
disposal
in
1999.

For
solvent
bearing
wastes
the
decision
to
recycle
or
dispose
depends
on
both
the
value
of
the
solvents
and
their
value
to
cement
kilns
as
fuel.
As
shown
in
Table
2,
industrial
chemicals,
as
measured
by
the
producer
price
index,
declined
in
value
by
approximately
6
percent
between
1997
and
1999.
However
residual
fuel
prices
also
declined
by
approximately
8
percent.
Consequently
the
change
in
prices
would
not
seem
to
affect
generators'
decisions
to
dispose
through
fuel
blending.

In
conclusion
we
recommend
that
the
Agency
continue
to
use
the
assumption
that
100
percent
of
the
1997
waste
streams
which
went
to
recycling
(
but
did
not
in
1999)
would
again
be
sent
to
recycling
as
a
result
of
the
change
in
regulatory
status
for
these
wastes.
We
believe
it
is
more
likely
that
additional
wastes
(
beyond
these
1997
wastes)
will
be
recycled
because
of
any
regulatory
exclusions.
In
short,
the
above
assumption
serves
as
a
conservative
proxy.
E­
4
Table
1.
Overview
of
Prices
for
Major
Recycled
Metals,
Industrial
Chemicals
and
Land
Disposal
Commodity
Price/
Unit
Year
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Copper
($/
ton)
2,180
2,140
1,572
1,518
1,764
Nickel
($/
ton)
6,804
6,284
4,200
5,454
7,836
Chromium
($/
ton)
9,500
10,400
9,460
8,860
8,860
Lead
($/
ton)
976
930
906
874
872
Industrial
Chemicals
(
PPI)
127
126
121
119
129
Subtitle
C
Landfill
(
w.
stabilization)
($/
ton)
241
241
304
318
Residual
Fuel
#
6
($/
bl)
19
18
13
16
26
Recycling
Fee
($/
ton)
350
350
350
350
GDP
IPD
0.956
0.974
0.986
1.000
1.023
Sources:
Metals
Prices
form
USGS;
Industrial
Chemicals
PPI
from
Bureau
of
Econ
Analysis;
Landfill
prices
from
R.
S.
Means.
E­
5
Table
2.
Analysis
of
Breakeven
Points
for
Recycling,
1997
versus
1999
1997
1999
Copper
recycling
(%
cu
for
breakeven)
5.2%
3.4%

Nickel
recycling
breakeven
fee
(
3%
Ni
waste)
($/
ton)
411
451
Chromium
recycling
breakeven
fee
(
3%
Cr
waste)
($/
ton)
522
543
Lead
recycling
breakeven
fee
(
3%
Pb
waste)
($/
ton)
266
328
F­
1
Appendix
F
State
Hazardous
Waste
Generation
Taxes
and
Fees
State
imposed
hazardous
waste
generation
taxes
and
fees
have
been
identified
for
facilities
located
in
27
states.
These
state
taxes
and
fees
are
listed
in
Table
F­
1.
Further
analysis
needs
to
be
conducted
for
eight
states
identified
in
the
Table
F­
1
to
determine
if
"
recovery"
is
included
under
their
regulatory
definition
of
"
treatment."
F­
2
Table
F­
1.
State
Hazardous
Waste
Generator
Taxes
and
Fees
State
Non­
size
Specific
Tax
or
Fee
Tax
or
Fee
Size­
specific
Taxes
and
Fees*

Description
LQG
>
2,000
tons/
yr
LQG
1,000
­

2,000
tons/
yr
LQG
500
­
1,000
tons/
yr
LQG
250
­
500
tons/
yr
LQG
50
­
250
tons/
yr
LQG
13.2
50
tons/
yr
SQG
1.3
­
13.2
tons/
yr
CESQG
<
1.3
tons/
yr
AZ
Generators
of
waste
that
retain
the
waste
on­
site
for
disposal
or
who
ship
it
off­
site
to
a
facility
owned
or
operated
by
that
generator
$
4.00/
ton
AR
Monitoring/
inspe
ction
fees
$
500/
yr
$
500/
yr
$
500/
yr
$
500/
yr
$
500/
yr
$
500/
yr
$
150/
yr
$
0/
yr
CA
Generator
fee
and
generator
waste
reporting
surcharge
$
71,432/
yr
$
53,573/
yr
$
35,717/
yr
$
17,858/
yr
$
3,572/
yr
$
1,429/
yr
$
177/
yr
$
0/
yr
CO
Hazardous
waste
TSDF
annual
operating
fee
(
assumed
off­
site
passed
on
to
generator):
Class
III
(
resource
recovery)
$
2.50/
ton
CT
Hazardous
waste
generator
tax
$
9.59/
ton
DE
Fee
for
off­
site
treatment.
Unclear
if
treatment
equals
recovery
in
this
state?

($
16/
ton)
Further
Analysis
Needed
GA
Hazardous
waste
management
fee
$
1/
ton
$
1/
ton
$
1/
ton
$
1/
ton
$
1/
ton
$
1/
ton
$
100/
yr
$
0/
yr
ID
Hazardous
waste
fee
$
30.00/
ton
Table
F­
1.
State
Hazardous
Waste
Generator
Taxes
and
Fees
State
Non­
size
Specific
Tax
or
Fee
Tax
or
Fee
Size­
specific
Taxes
and
Fees*

Description
LQG
>
2,000
tons/
yr
LQG
1,000
­

2,000
tons/
yr
LQG
500
­
1,000
tons/
yr
LQG
250
­
500
tons/
yr
LQG
50
­
250
tons/
yr
LQG
13.2
50
tons/
yr
SQG
1.3
­
13.2
tons/
yr
CESQG
<
1.3
tons/
yr
F­
3
IL
Fee
for
on­
or
off­
site
treatment.
Unclear
if
treatment
equals
recovery
in
this
state?

($
7.19/
ton)
Further
Analysis
Needed
KS
Generator
annual
monitoring
fee
$
5,000/
yr
$
5,000/
yr
$
5,000/
yr
$
1,000/
yr
$
1,000/
yr
$
500/
yr
$
500/
yr
$
100/
yr
KY
Generator
hazardous
waste
assessment
$
2.00/
ton
(
on
site)

$
4.00/
ton
(
off
site)

ME
Off
site
"
handling"
fee
(
assume
handling
=

recovery)
$
30.00/
ton
MN
Quantity
fee
and
tax
and
statewide
program
fee
$
3,290/
yr
$
3,290/
yr
$
3,290/
yr
$
3,290/
yr
$
13.50/
ton
$
52.20/
ton
$
115.41/

ton
$
274.72/

ton
MS
Pollution
prevention
fee
for
generators
$
2,500/
yr
$
2,500/
yr
$
1,500/
yr
$
1,500/
yr
$
1,500/
yr
$
500/
yr
$
250/
yr
$
250/
yr
MO
Hazardous
waste
fee.

For
category
tax,

unclear
if
treatment
equals
recovery
in
this
state?
[$
0.7
(
ton)
2
+

$
20/
yr]
$
1.00/
ton
MT
Generator
fee.
Did
not
have
"
Class"

definition.
Assumed
middle
class/
fee.
$
600.00/
yr
Table
F­
1.
State
Hazardous
Waste
Generator
Taxes
and
Fees
State
Non­
size
Specific
Tax
or
Fee
Tax
or
Fee
Size­
specific
Taxes
and
Fees*

Description
LQG
>
2,000
tons/
yr
LQG
1,000
­

2,000
tons/
yr
LQG
500
­
1,000
tons/
yr
LQG
250
­
500
tons/
yr
LQG
50
­
250
tons/
yr
LQG
13.2
50
tons/
yr
SQG
1.3
­
13.2
tons/
yr
CESQG
<
1.3
tons/
yr
F­
4
NE
TSDF
fee
assessment.

Unclear
if
treatment
equals
recovery
in
this
state?
($
1.92/
ton)
Further
Analysis
Needed
NV
Fee
for
off­
site
treatment.
Unclear
if
treatment
equals
recovery
in
this
state?

($
40.20/
ton)
Further
Analysis
Needed
NH
Hazardous
waste
fee
$
60/
ton
$
60/
ton
$
60/
ton
$
60/
ton
$
60/
ton
$
60/
ton
$
60/
ton
$
0/
ton
NJ
Manifest
processing
fee
(
assumed
18
tons
shipped
per
manifest)
$
0.50/
ton
Hazardous
waste
generator
biennial
reporting
fee
and
inspection
and
compliance
review
fee
$
2,981/
yr
$
2,981/
yr
$
2,981/
yr
$
2,981/
yr
$
2,681/
yr
$
2,428/
yr
$
651/
yr
$
67/
yr
NM
Generation
fee
and
business
fee
$
20/
ton
$
2,500/
yr
$
20/
ton
$
2,500/
yr
$
20/
ton
$
2,500/
yr
$
20/
ton
$
2,500/
yr
$
20/
ton
$
2,500/
yr
$
20/
ton
$
2,500/
yr
$
250/
yr
$
200/
yr
$
100/
yr
$
0/
yr
NY
Special
assessment
on
off­
site
generation,

treatment
or
disposal.

Unclear
if
treatment
equals
recovery
in
this
state?
($
16/
ton)
Further
Analysis
Needed
Hazardous
waste
program
fees
for
generators
$
40,000/
yr
$
40,000/
yr
$
20,000/
yr
$
6,000/
yr
$
6,000/
yr
$
1,000/
yr
$
0/
yr
$
0/
yr
NC
Generator
fee
$
0.50/
ton
$
0.50/
ton
$
0.50/
ton
$
0.50/
ton
$
0.50/
ton
$
0.50/
ton
$
25/
yr
$
0/
yr
Table
F­
1.
State
Hazardous
Waste
Generator
Taxes
and
Fees
State
Non­
size
Specific
Tax
or
Fee
Tax
or
Fee
Size­
specific
Taxes
and
Fees*

Description
LQG
>
2,000
tons/
yr
LQG
1,000
­

2,000
tons/
yr
LQG
500
­
1,000
tons/
yr
LQG
250
­
500
tons/
yr
LQG
50
­
250
tons/
yr
LQG
13.2
50
tons/
yr
SQG
1.3
­
13.2
tons/
yr
CESQG
<
1.3
tons/
yr
F­
5
OH
Hazardous
waste
treatment
and
disposal
fee.
Unclear
if
treatment
equals
recovery
in
this
state?

($
24/
ton)
Further
Analysis
Needed
OK
Annual
fee
for
off­
site
recycling
$
4.00/
ton
Generator
fee
$
100/
yr
$
100/
yr
$
100/
yr
$
100/
yr
$
100/
yr
$
100/
yr
$
25/
yr
$
0/
yr
OR
Annual
hazardous
waste
generation
fee
$
45.00/
ton
Annual
activity
verification
fee
$
525/
yr
$
525/
yr
$
525/
yr
$
525/
yr
$
525/
yr
$
525/
yr
$
300/
yr
$
0/
yr
SC
Annual
hazardous
waste
fee
Annual
nonhazardous
waste
fee
$
34.00/
ton
$
13.70/
t
TN
Annual
generator
fee
$
900/
yr
$
900/
yr
$
900/
yr
$
900/
yr
$
900/
yr
$
900/
yr
$
550/
yr
$
0/
yr
TX
Facility
fee
assessment.

Unclear
if
treatment
equals
recovery
in
this
state?
($
4.80/
ton)
Further
Analysis
Needed
Generation
fee
assessment
$
2/
ton
$
2/
ton
$
2/
ton
$
2/
ton
$
2/
ton
$
2/
ton
$
100/
yr
$
100/
yr
$
0/
yr
VT
Hazardous
waste
generation
fees
$
28.00/
ton
WA
Hazardous
waste
education
fee
$
35.00/
yr
WV
Generator
fee.
Unclear
if
treatment
equals
recovery
in
this
state?
Further
Analysis
Needed
Table
F­
1.
State
Hazardous
Waste
Generator
Taxes
and
Fees
State
Non­
size
Specific
Tax
or
Fee
Tax
or
Fee
Size­
specific
Taxes
and
Fees*

Description
LQG
>
2,000
tons/
yr
LQG
1,000
­

2,000
tons/
yr
LQG
500
­
1,000
tons/
yr
LQG
250
­
500
tons/
yr
LQG
50
­
250
tons/
yr
LQG
13.2
50
tons/
yr
SQG
1.3
­
13.2
tons/
yr
CESQG
<
1.3
tons/
yr
F­
6
WI
Tonnage
fee
and
manifest
fee
(
assumed
18
tons
shipped
per
manifest)
$
0.26/
ton
References:
U.
S.
Army
Corps
of
Engineers,
HTRW
Center
of
Expertise
Information
­
TDSF,
Section
8.2,
obtained
from
http://
www.
environmental.
usace.
army.
mil/
library/
pubs/
tsdf/
sec8­
2/
sec8­
2.
html
on
September
11,
2002.

Minnesota
Pollution
Control
Agency,
Small
and
Large
Quantity
Generator
License
Fees
and
Generator
(
Superfund)
Tax,
Waste/
Hazardous
Waste
#
1.03b,
March
2002.

*
These
size
categories
do
not
fit
for
all
states.
For
cost
modeling
purposes,
taxes
and
fees
for
states
with
different
size
categories
are
approximate
for
certain
size
categories.
G­
1
Appendix
G
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Metals
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.32
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.95
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
7.6
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
32%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.32)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
32%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.32)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
8
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
95%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.95)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
5%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.05)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0.4
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
G
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Metals
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
G­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
20%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.20)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
5
tons
recovered
metal
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
20%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.20)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
5
tons
recovered
metal
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
8
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
(
0.4
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.02
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Landfill
338
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Landfill
338
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

On­
site
Metals
Recovery
Cost
($
308/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
7,700/
yr
On­
site
Metals
Recovery
Cost
($
308/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
7,700/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Landfill
Cost
maximum(
($
312/
ton)
*
(
8
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
($
2,246/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
8,984/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Landfill
Cost
maximum
(
($
312/
ton)
*
(
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
2,246/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
2,987/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Landfill
Cost
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Landfill
Cost
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0.4
tons
non­
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
44/
yr
Appendix
G
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Metals
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
G­
3
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.02
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
1,903/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
4
shipments/
yr)
=
$
944/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.35
shipments/
yr)
=
$
120/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8
tons
residual)
=
$
21/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8
tons
residual)
=
$
21/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
3.73/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
338
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.16/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
50
miles
to
nonhazardous
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
5,047/
yr
Transportation
Costs
($
3.73/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
338
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.16/
mile)*(
0.02
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
50
miles
to
nonhazardous
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
1,676/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
4,770/
ton
metal)
*
(
5
tons
recovered
metal/
yr)
=
­$
23,850/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
4,770/
ton
metal)
*
(
5
tons
recovered
metal/
yr)
=
­$
23,850/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
Appendix
G
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Metals
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
G­
4
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,125/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
7.6
tons
residual/
yr)
=
$
342/
yr
Total
$
29,144/
yr
$
3,276/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
25,868/
yr
H­
1
Appendix
H
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Solvents
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.33
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.85
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
7.0
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
33%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.33)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8.2
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
33%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.33)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8.2
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
8.2
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
85%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.85)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7.0
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
15%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.15)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
1.2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
H
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Solvents
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
H­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
67%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
solvent
product
(
0.67)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
67%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
solvent
product
(
0.67)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
8.2
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
(
1.2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.07
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Energy
Recovery
Facility
577
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Energy
Recovery
Facility
577
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

On­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
$
43.49
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,615
=
$
2,703/
yr
On­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
$
43.49
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,615
=
$
2,703/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Energy
Recovery
Cost
maximum(($
291/
ton)
*
(
8.2
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
($
338/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
2,386/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Energy
Recovery
Cost
maximum
(
($
291/
ton)
*
(
7
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
338/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
2,037/
yr
Appendix
H
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Solvents
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
H­
3
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
($
291/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
($
291/
ton)
*
(
1.2
tons
non­
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
350/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.07
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
1,974/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
4
shipments/
yr)
=
$
944/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.40
shipments/
yr)
=
$
125/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual)
=
$
21/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual)
=
$
21/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
2.94/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
hazardous
energy
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.94/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
nonhazardous
energy
recovery/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
6,786/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
2.94/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
hazardous
energy
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.94/
mile)*(
0.07
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
nonhazardous
energy
recovery/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
2,375/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
1,543/
ton
solvent)
*
(
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent/
yr)
=
­$
25,922/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
1,543/
ton
solvent)
*
(
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent/
yr)
=
­$
25,922/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Appendix
H
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Solvents
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
H­
4
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,125/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
7
tons
residual/
yr)
=
$
315/
yr
Total
$
22,213/
yr
$
1,308/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
20,905/
yr
I­
1
Appendix
I
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
30
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
30
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.26
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.75
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
5.8
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
26%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.26)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
7.8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
26%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.26)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
7.8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
75%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.75)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
5.9
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
25%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.25)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
2.0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
I
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
I­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
74%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.74)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste)
=
22.2
tons
recovered
acid
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
74%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.74)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste)
=
22.2
tons
recovered
acid
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
7.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
(
2.0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.11
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Facility
405
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Facility
405
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

On­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
$
79.50
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,804
=
$
4,189/
yr
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
$
79.50
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,804
=
$
4,189/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Facility
Cost
maximum(($
38/
ton)
*
(
7.8
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
($
316/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
1,264/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Facility
Cost
maximum
(($
38/
ton)
*
(
5.9
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
316/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
1,264/
yr
Appendix
I
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
I­
3
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Facility
Cost
($
38/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Facility
Cost
($
38/
ton)
*
(
2.0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
76/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.11
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
2,045/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
4
shipments/
yr)
=
$
944/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.44
shipments/
yr)
=
$
128/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual)
=
$
20/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual)
=
$
20/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
3.50/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
hazardous
acid
neutralization,
stabilization,
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
3.50/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
nonhazardous
acid
neutralization,
stabilization
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
5,670/
yr
Transportation
Costs
($
3.50/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
hazardous
acid
neutralization,
stabilization/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
3.50/
mile)*(
0.11
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
nonhazardous
acid
neutralization,
stabilization/
nonhazardo
us
waste
shipment)
=
$
2,055/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
298.12/
ton
acid)
*
(
22.2
tons
recovered
acid/
yr)
=
­$
6,618/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
298.12/
ton
acid)
*
(
22.2
tons
recovered
acid/
yr)
=
­$
6,618/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Appendix
I
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
I­
4
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,575/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
5.9
tons
residual/
yr)
=
$
266/
yr
Total
$
36,217/
yr
$
15,743/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
20,474
J­
1
Appendix
J
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Metals
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.32
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.95
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
7.6
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
100%
of
waste
quantity
will
be
disposed
(
1)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
25
tons
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
32%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.32)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
95%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.95)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
5%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.05)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0.4
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
J
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Metals
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
J­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
20%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.20)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste)
=
0
tons
recovered
metal
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
20%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.20)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
5
tons
recovered
metal
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
25
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
(
0.4
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.02
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Landfill
338
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Landfill
338
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

On­
site
Metals
Recovery
Cost
($
308/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
On­
site
Metals
Recovery
Cost
($
308/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
7,700/
yr
Off­
site
Disposal
Cost
at
Hazardous
Landfill
(
baseline)
maximum(
($
312/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
($
2,246/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
8,984/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Landfill
Cost
maximum
(
($
312/
ton)
*
(
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
2,246/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
2,987/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Landfill
Cost
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Landfill
Cost
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0.4
tons
non­
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
44/
yr
Appendix
J
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Metals
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
J­
3
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.02
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
1,903/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
4
shipments/
yr)
=
$
944/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.35
shipments/
yr)
=
$
120/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
waste)
=
$
64/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8
tons
residual)
=
$
21/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
3.73/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
338
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.16/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
50
miles
to
nonhazardous
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
5,047/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
3.73/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
338
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.16/
mile)*(
0.02
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
50
miles
to
nonhazardous
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
1,668/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
4,770/
ton
metal)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
metal/
yr)
=
­$
0/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
4,770/
ton
metal)
*
(
5
tons
recovered
metal/
yr)
=
­$
23,850/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
Appendix
J
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Metals
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
J­
4
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
25
tons
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,125/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
7.6
tons
residual/
yr)
=
$
342/
yr
Total
$
45,337/
yr
$
3,268/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
42,069/
yr
K­
1
Appendix
K
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Solvents
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.33
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.85
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
7
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
100%
of
waste
quantity
will
be
disposed
(
1)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
25
tons
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
33%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.33)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8.2
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
85%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.85)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7.0
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
15%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.15)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
1.2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
K
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Solvents
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
K­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
67%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
solvent
product
(
0.67)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste)
=
0
tons
recovered
solvent
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
67%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
solvent
product
(
0.67)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
50
tons
hazardous
waste/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
(
1.2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.07
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Energy
Recovery
Facility
577
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Energy
Recovery
Facility
577
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

On­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
$
43.49
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,615
=
$
0/
yr
On­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
$
43.49
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,615
=
$
2,703/
yr
Off­
site
Disposal
Cost
at
Energy
Recovery
Facility/
Cement
Kiln
(
baseline)
($
291/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
7,275/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
maximum
(
($
291/
ton)
*
(
7
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
338/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
2,037/
yr
Appendix
K
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Solvents
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
K­
3
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Landfill
Cost
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
($
291/
ton)
*
(
1.2
tons
non­
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
349/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.07
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
1,974/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
4
shipments/
yr)
=
$
944/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.40
shipments/
yr)
=
$
125/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
waste)
=
$
64/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual)
=
$
21/
yr
Hazardous
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
2.94/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
energy
recovery
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
hazardous
energy
recovery
facility/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.94/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
energy
recovery
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
nonhazardous
energy
recovery/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
6,786/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
2.94/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
energy
recovery
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
hazardous
energy
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.97/
mile)*(
0.07
nonhazardous
waste
energy
recovery
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
nonhazardous
energy
recovery/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
2,375/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
1,543/
ton
solvent)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
solvent/
yr)
=
­$
0/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
1,543/
ton
solvent)
*
(
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent/
yr)
=
­$
25,922/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Appendix
K
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Solvents
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
K­
4
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,125/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
7
tons
residual/
yr)
=
$
315/
yr
Total
$
45,367/
yr
­$
3,690/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
49,057/
yr
L­
1
Appendix
L
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
30
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
30
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.26
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.75
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
5.8
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
100%
of
waste
quantity
will
be
disposed
(
1)
*
(
30
tons
disposed
waste/
yr)
=
30
tons
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
26%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.26)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
7.8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
75%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.75)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
5.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
25%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.25)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
L
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
L­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
74%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
acid
product
(
0.74)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste)
=
0
tons
recovered
acid
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
74%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
acid
product
(
0.74)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste)
=
22
tons
recovered
acid
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
30
tons
hazardous
waste/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
(
2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.11
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Facility
405
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Facility
405
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

On­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
$
79.50
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,809
=
$
0/
yr
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
$
79.50
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,809
=
$
4,194/
yr
On­
site
Treatment
Cost
by
Acid
Neutralization
(
baseline)
($
3.26/
ton
+
$
18,830)
*
(
30
tons
hazardous
waste
per
yr)
=
$
18,928/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
maximum
(($
38/
ton)
*
(
5.8
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
316/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
420/
yr
Appendix
L
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
L­
3
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
($
38/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
($
38/
ton)
*
(
2
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
76/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
0
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
0/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.11
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
2,030/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
0
shipments/
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.44
shipments/
yr)
=
$
128/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
residual)
=
$
0/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual)
=
$
20/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
3.50/
mile)*(
0
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
hazardous
acid
neutralization,
stabilization,
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
3.50/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
nonhazardous
acid
neutralization,
stabilization,
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
3.50/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
hazardous
acid
neutralization,
stabilization,
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
3.50/
mile)*(
0.11
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
nonhazardous
acid
neutralization,
stabilization,
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
2,055/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
298.12/
ton
acid)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
acid/
yr)
=
­$
0/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
298.12/
ton
acid)
*
(
22
tons
recovered
acid/
yr)
=
­$
6,559/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
0/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Appendix
L
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
L­
4
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
30
tons
neutralized
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,350/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
5.8
tons
residual
waste/
yr)
=
$
261/
yr
Total
$
41,983/
yr
$
14,958/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
27,025/
yr
M­
1
Appendix
M
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.32
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.95
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
7.6
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
25
tons/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
32%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.32)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
32%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.32)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
8
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
95%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.95)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
5%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.05)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0.4
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
M
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
M­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
20%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.20)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
5
tons
recovered
metal
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
20%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.20)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
5
tons
recovered
metal
Number
of
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
by
Generator
25
tons
recovered
waste
/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.4
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
by
Generator
25
tons
recovered
waste
/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.4
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
8
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
(
0.4
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.02
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Landfill
338
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Landfill
338
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Cost
for
Generator
($
308/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
7,700/
yr
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Cost
for
Generator
($
308/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
7,700/
yr
Appendix
M
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
M­
3
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Landfill
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
maximum(
($
312/
ton)
*
(
8
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
($
2,246/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
8,984/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Landfill
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
maximum
(
($
312/
ton)
*
(
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
2,246/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
2,987/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Landfill
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Landfill
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0.4
tons
non­
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
44/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.02
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
1,903/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
for
Generator
and
Recovery
Facility
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
1.4
Recovery
shipments/
yr
+
4
Hazardous
residual
shipments)
=
$
1,274/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
for
Generator
and
Recovery
Facility
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.33
residual
shipments/
yr
+
1.4
recovery
shipments/
yr)
=
$
243/
yr
Loading
Costs
for
Generator
and
Recovery
Facility
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8
tons
residual
+
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
$
85/
yr
Loading
Costs
for
Generator
and
Recovery
Facility
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8
tons
residual
+
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
$
85/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
3.73/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
338
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.16/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
50
miles
to
nonhazardous
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
5,047/
yr
Residual
Transportation
Costs
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
3.73/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
338
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.16/
mile)*(
0.02
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
50
miles
to
nonhazardous
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
1,668/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
for
Generator
($
6.20/
mile)*(
1.4
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
recovery
facility/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
4,522/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
for
Generator
($
6.20/
mile)*(
1.4
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
recovery
facility/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
4,522/
yr
Appendix
M
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
N­
4
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
4,770/
ton
metal)
*
(
5
tons
recovered
metal/
yr)
=
­$
23,850/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
4,770/
ton
metal)
*
(
5
tons
recovered
metal/
yr)
=
­$
23,850/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,125/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
7.6
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
342/
yr
Total
$
34,060/
yr
$
25,077/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
8,983/
yr
*
Given
wastes
are
transferred
within
the
same
NAICS,
it
is
assumed
that
the
recovery
facility
in
most
cases
is
owned
by
the
same
company
that
owns
the
generator
facility.
Costs
for
the
recovery
facility
are
added
to
the
generator's
costs
because
the
same
company
carrying
the
burden
of
the
added
cost.
J­
1
Appendix
N
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.33
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.85
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
7
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste
/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
33%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.33)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8.2
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility
*
33%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.33)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8.2
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
8.2
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
85%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.85)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
15%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.15)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
1.2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
N
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
J­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
67%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
solvent
product
(
0.67)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
67%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
solvent
product
(
0.67)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent
Number
of
Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
25
tons
recovered
waste
/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.4
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
25
tons
recovered
waste
/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.4
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
8.2
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
(
1.2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.07
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Energy
Recovery
577
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Energy
Recovery
Facility
577
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
($
1,066/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
26,650/
yr
Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
($
1,066/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
26,650/
yr
Appendix
N
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
J­
3
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
maximum(($
291/
ton)
*
(
8.2
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
($
338/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
2,386/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
maximum
(
($
291/
ton)
*
(
7
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
338/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
2,037/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
($
291/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
($
291/
ton)
*
(
1.2
tons
non­
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
349/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.07
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
1,974/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
for
Generator
&
Recovery
Facility*
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
1.4
Recovery
shipments/
yr
+
4
Hazardous
residual
shipments)
=
$
1,274/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
for
Generator
&
Recovery
Facility*
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.33
residual
shipments/
yr
+
1.4
recovery
shipments/
yr)
=
$
243/
yr
Loading
Costs
for
Generator
&
Recovery
Facility*
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual
+
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
$
85/
yr
Loading
Costs
for
Generator
&
Recovery
Facility*
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual
+
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
$
85/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
2.94/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
hazardous
energy
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.94/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
energy
recovery
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
nonhazardous
energy
recovery/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
6,786/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
2.94/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
hazardous
energy
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.94/
mile)*(
0.07
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
nonhazardous
energy
recovery/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
2,375/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
for
Generator
($
6.20/
mile)*(
1.4
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
recovery
facility/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
4,522/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
for
Generator
($
6.20/
mile)*(
1.4
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
hazardous
recovery
facility/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
4,522/
yr
Appendix
N
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
O­
4
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
1,543/
ton
solvent)
*
(
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent/
yr)
=
­$
25,922/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
1,543/
ton
solvent)
*
(
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent/
yr)
=
­$
25,922/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,125/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
7
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
315/
yr
Total
$
46,079/
yr
­$
24,961/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
21,118/
yr
*
Given
wastes
are
transferred
within
the
same
NAICS,
it
is
assumed
that
the
recovery
facility
in
most
cases
is
owned
by
the
same
company
that
owns
the
generator
facility.
Costs
for
the
recovery
facility
are
added
to
the
generator's
costs
because
the
same
company
carrying
the
burden
of
the
added
cost.
K­
1
Appendix
O
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
30
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
30
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.26
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.75
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
5.8
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
26%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.26)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
7.8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
26%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.26)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
7.8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
75%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.75)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
5.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
25%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.25)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
O
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
K­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
74%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.74)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste)
=
21.2
tons
recovered
acid
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
74%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.74)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste)
=
22.2
tons
recovered
acid
Number
of
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
30
tons
recovered
waste/
18
tons
per
truck
=
1.7
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
30
tons
recovered
waste/
18
tons
per
truck
=
1.7
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
7.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
(
2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.11
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
405
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
405
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
($
170/
ton)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
5,100/
yr
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
($
170/
ton)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
5,100/
yr
Appendix
O
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
K­
3
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
maximum(($
38/
ton)
*
(
7.8
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
($
316/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
1,264/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
maximum
(($
38/
ton)
*
(
5.8
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
316/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
1,264/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
38/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
38/
ton)
*
(
2
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
76/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.11
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
2,030/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
1.7
recovery
shipments/
yr
+
4
residual
shipments/
yr)
=
$
1,345/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.7
recovery
shipments/
yr
+
1.44
residual
shipments/
yr)
=
$
279/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual
+
50
tons
recovered
waste
)
=
$
149/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual
+
50
tons
recovered
waste
)
=
$
149/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
3.50/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
hazardous
acid
neutralization,
stab.,
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
3.50/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
nonhazardous
neutralization,
stab.,
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
5,670/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
3.50/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
hazardous
acid
neutralization,
stab.,
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
3.50/
mile)*(
0.11
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
nonhazardous
acid
neutralization,
stab.,
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
2,055/
yr
Appendix
O
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
K­
4
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
for
Generator
($
6.20/
mile)*(
1.7
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
hazardous
acid
regeneration/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
5,491/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
for
Generator
($
6.20/
mile)*(
1.7
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
acid
regeneration/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
5,491/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
298.12/
ton
acid)
*
(
22.2
tons
recovered
acid/
yr)
=
­$
6,618/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
298.12/
ton
acid)
*
(
22.2
tons
recovered
acid/
yr)
=
­$
6,618/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,575/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
6.5
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
293/
yr
Total
$
43,149/
yr
$
22,420/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
20,729/
yr
L­
1
*
Given
wastes
are
transferred
within
the
same
NAICS,
it
is
assumed
that
the
recovery
facility
in
most
cases
is
owned
by
the
same
company
that
owns
the
generator
facility.
Costs
for
the
recovery
facility
are
added
to
the
generator's
costs
because
the
same
company
carrying
the
burden
of
the
added
cost.
P­
2
Appendix
P
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.32
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.95
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
7.6
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
for
Generator
100%
of
waste
quantity
will
be
disposed
(
1)
*
(
50
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
50
tons
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
32%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.06)
*
(
50
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
3
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
95%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.95)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
5%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.05)
*
(
8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0.4
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
P
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
P­
3
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
20%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.20)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste)
=
0
tons
recovered
metal
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
20%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
metals
product
(
0.20)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
5
tons
recovered
metal
Number
of
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
0
tons
recovered
waste
/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
25
tons
recovered
waste
/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.4
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
by
Generator
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
25
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
by
Generator
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
(
0.4
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.02
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Landfill
338
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Landfill
338
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Cost
($
308/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Cost
for
Generator
($
308/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
7,700/
yr
Appendix
P
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
P­
4
Off­
site
Disposal
Cost
at
Hazardous
Landfill
(
baseline)
for
Generator
maximum(
($
312/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
($
2,246/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
8,984/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Landfill
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
maximum
(
($
312/
ton)
*
(
7.6
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
2,246/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
2,987/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Landfill
Cost
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Landfill
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0.4
tons
non­
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
44/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
for
Generator
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.02
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
1,903/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
for
Generator
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
4
shipments/
yr)
=
$
944/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
for
Generator
&
Recovery
Facility*
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.35
shipments/
yr
+
1.4
recovery
loads)
=
$
85/
yr
Loading
Costs
for
Generator
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
waste)
=
$
64/
yr
Loading
Costs
for
Generator
&
Recovery
Facility*
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8
tons
residual
+
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
$
85/
yr
Hazardous
Waste
Transportation
Costs
for
Generator
($
3.73/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
338
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.16/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
50
miles
to
nonhazardous
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
5,047/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
3.73/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
338
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.16/
mile)*(
0.02
nonhazardous
waste
landfill
shipments/
yr)*(
50
miles
to
nonhazardous
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
1,668/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
($
6.20/
mile)*(
0
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
metals
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
0/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
for
Generator
($
6.20/
mile)*(
1.4
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
hazardous
metals
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
4,522/
yr
Appendix
P
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Metals
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
P­
5
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
4,770/
ton
metal)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
metal/
yr)
=
­$
0/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
4,770/
ton
metal)
*
(
5
tons
recovered
metal/
yr)
=
­$
23,850/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
25
tons
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,125/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
7.6
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
342/
yr
Total
$
45,337/
yr
$
7,978/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
37,359/
yr
*
Given
wastes
are
transferred
within
the
same
NAICS,
it
is
assumed
that
the
recovery
facility
in
most
cases
is
owned
by
the
same
company
that
owns
the
generator
facility.
Costs
for
the
recovery
facility
are
added
to
the
generator's
costs
because
the
same
company
carrying
the
burden
of
the
added
cost.
Q­
1
Appendix
Q
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.33
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.85
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
7
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
for
Generator
100%
of
waste
quantity
will
be
disposed
(
1)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
25
tons
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
33%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.33)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
8.2
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
85%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.85)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
for
Recovery
Facility*
15%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.15)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual/
yr)
=
1.2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
Q
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Q­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
67%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
solvent
product
(
0.67)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste)
=
0
tons
recovered
solvent
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
67%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
solvent
product
(
0.67)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent
Number
of
Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
by
Generator
0
tons
recovered
waste
/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
25
tons
recovered
waste
/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.4
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
by
Generator
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
25
tons
hazardous
waste/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
by
Generator
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
for
Recovery
Facility*
(
1.2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.07
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Energy
Recovery
Facility
577
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Energy
Recovery
Facility
577
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
($
1,066/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
($
1,066/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
26,650/
yr
Appendix
Q
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Q­
3
Off­
site
Disposal
Cost
at
Energy
Recovery
Facility/
Cement
Kiln
(
baseline)
maximum(($
291/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
7,275/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
maximum
(
($
291/
ton)
*
(
7
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
338/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
2,037/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Landfill
Cost
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
($
291/
ton)
*
(
1.2
tons
non­
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
349/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
for
Generator
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.07
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
1,974/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
for
Generator
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
4
shipments/
yr)
=
$
944/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
for
Generator
&
Recovery
Facility*
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.40
shipments/
yr
+
1.4
recovery
loads)
=
$
249/
yr
Loading
Costs
for
Generator
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
25
tons
waste)
=
$
64/
yr
Loading
Costs
for
Generator
&
Recovery
Facility*
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
8.2
tons
residual
+
25
tons
recovered
waste)
=
$
85/
yr
Hazardous
Waste
Transportation
Costs
for
Generator
($
2.94/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
hazardous
energy
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.94/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
nonhazardous
energy
recovery/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
6,786/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
for
Recovery
Facility*
($
2.94/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
hazardous
energy
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.94/
mile)*(
0.07
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
nonhazardous
energy
recovery/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
2,375/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
($
6.20/
mile)*(
0
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
0/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
for
Generator
($
6.20/
mile)*(
7
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
22,611/
yr
Appendix
Q
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Q­
4
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
1,543/
ton
solvent)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
solvent/
yr)
=
­$
0/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
1,543/
ton
solvent)
*
(
16.8
tons
recovered
solvent/
yr)
=
­$
25,922/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
25
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,125/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
7
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
315/
yr
Total
$
45,367/
yr
$
43,056/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
2,311/
yr
*
Given
wastes
are
transferred
within
the
same
NAICS,
it
is
assumed
that
the
recovery
facility
in
most
cases
is
owned
by
the
same
company
that
owns
the
generator
facility.
Costs
for
the
recovery
facility
are
added
to
the
generator's
costs
because
the
same
company
carrying
the
burden
of
the
added
cost.
R­
1
Appendix
R
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
30
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
30
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.26
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.75
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
5.8
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
1.3
tons/
yr
<
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
<
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
SQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Waste
Quantity
by
Generator
100%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
disposed
(
1)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
30
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
by
Recovery
Facility*
26%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.26)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
7.8
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
100%
residual
is
listed
&
characteristically
hazardous;

(
1.00)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
by
Recovery
Facility*
75%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;

(
0.75)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
5.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
0%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
by
Recovery
Facility*
25%
residual
is
nonhazardous;

(
0.25)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual/
yr)
=
2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
R
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
R­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
74%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
acid
product
(
0.74)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste)
=
0
tons
recovered
acid
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
74%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
acid
product
(
0.74)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste)
=
22.2
tons
recovered
acid
Number
of
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
0
tons
recovered
waste
/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
by
Generator
30
tons
recovered
waste
/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.7
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
by
Generator
Given
LQG
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
30
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
4
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
by
Recovery
Facility*
Given
SQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
1.33
shipments
or
7.8
tons
hazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Shipments
per
Year
by
Recovery
Facility*
(
2
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.11
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
405
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
405
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Off­
site
Recovery
Facility
521
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

Of­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
for
Generator
($
170/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
for
Generator
($
170/
ton)
*
(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
5,100/
yr
Appendix
R
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
R­
3
On­
site
Treatment
Cost
by
Acid
Neutralization
(
baseline)
maximum(($
3.26/
ton
+
$
18,830)
*
(
30
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
18,928/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
by
Recovery
Facility*
maximum
(($
38/
ton)
*
(
5.8
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
316/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
420/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Landfill
Cost
($
111/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
by
Recovery
Facility*
($
38/
ton)
*
(
2
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
76/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
0
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
0/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
by
Recovery
Facility*
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
1.33
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.11
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
2,044/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
0
shipments/
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
for
Generator
&
Recovery
Facility*
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
1.44
shipments/
yr
+
1.7
recovery
loads)
=
$
279/
yr
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
residual)
=
$
0/
yr
Loading
Costs
for
Generator
&
by
Recovery
Facility*
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
7.8
tons
residual
+
30
tons
recovered
waste)
=
$
97/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
3.50/
mile)*(
0
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
hazardous
neutralization,
stab.,
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
3.50/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
nonhazardous
neutralization,
stab.,
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
by
Recovery
Facility*
($
3.50/
mile)*(
1.33
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
hazardous
neutralization,
stab.,
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
3.50/
mile)*(
0.11
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
nonhazardous
neutralization,
stab.,
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
2,055/
yr
Appendix
R
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1997
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Within
Same
NAICS
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
R­
4
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
($
6.20/
mile)*(
0
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
0/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
for
Generator
($
6.20/
mile)*(
1.7
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
hazardous
acid
regeneration/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
5,491/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
298.12/
ton
acid)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
acid/
yr)
=
­$
0/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
298.12/
ton
acid)
*
(
22.2
tons
recovered
acid/
yr)
=
­$
6,618/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
2,191/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
0/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
1,215/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
SQG
then
$
0
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Generator
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
30
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,350/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
for
Recovery
Facility*
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
5.8
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
261/
yr
Total
$
41,983/
yr
$
21,538/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
20,445/
yr
*
Given
wastes
are
transferred
within
the
same
NAICS,
it
is
assumed
that
the
recovery
facility
in
most
cases
is
owned
by
the
same
company
that
owns
the
generator
facility.
Costs
for
the
recovery
facility
are
added
to
the
generator's
costs
because
the
same
company
carrying
the
burden
of
the
added
cost.
S­
1
Appendix
S
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Outside
Industry
Group
Shifting
to
On­
Site
Solvent
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
140
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
140
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.33
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.85
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
39
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity*
33%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.33)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
0
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
33%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.33)
*
(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
46
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity*
85%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;
(
0.85)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
85%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;
(
0.85)
*
(
46
tons
residual/
yr)
=
39
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity*
15%
residual
is
nonhazardous;
(
0.15)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
15%
residual
is
nonhazardous;
(
0.15)
*
(
46
tons
residual/
yr)
=
7
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
S
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Outside
Industry
Group
Shifting
to
On­
Site
Solvent
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
S­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
67%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
solvent
product
(
0.67)
*
(
140
tons
recovered
waste)
=
94
tons
recovered
solvent
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
67%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
solvent
product
(
0.67)
*
(
140
tons
recovered
waste)
=
94
tons
recovered
solvent
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year*
0
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
Given
LQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
39
tons
recovery
wastes/
18
ton
truck)
=
4
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off
Site
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
Given
LQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
140
tons
recovery
wastes/
18
ton
truck)
=
7.8
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off
Site
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
0
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Facility
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
(
7
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.4
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Energy
Recovery
577
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Energy
Recovery
577
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Recovery
Facility.
521
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Recovery
Facility.
521
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)

On­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
($
43.29/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,615
=
$
0/
yr
On­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
($
43.29/
ton)
*
(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,615
=
$
7,676/
yr
Appendix
S
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Outside
Industry
Group
Shifting
to
On­
Site
Solvent
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
S­
3
Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
($
1,066/
ton)
*
(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
149,240/
yr
Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Cost
Given
small
loads
(
less
than
60%
of
a
full
18
ton
load):
($
1,066/
ton
+
$
160/
ton
surcharge)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost*
Given
small
loads
(
less
than
60%
of
a
full
18
ton
load):
(
($
291/
ton
+
$
44/
ton
)
*
(
0
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
Given
small
loads
(
less
than
60%
of
a
full
18
ton
load):
(
($
291/
ton
+
$
44/
ton
)
*
(
39
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
13,065/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
($
291/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Energy
Recovery
Cost
($
291/
ton)
*
(
7
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
2,037/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
7.8
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
10,998/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.4
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
6,240/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
7.8
shipments/
yr)
=
$
1,841/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
4
shipments/
yr)
=
$
944/
yr
+
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
0.4
shipments/
yr)
=
$
980/
yr
Loading
Costs
Cost
included
in
Off­
site
Solvent
Recovery
Costs
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
46
tons
residual)
=
$
118/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
2.94/
mile)*(
0
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
hazardous
energy
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.94/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
nonhazardous
Energy
recovery/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
2.94/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
hazardous
energy
recovery/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
2.94/
mile)*(
0.4
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
577
miles
to
nonhazardous
Energy
recovery/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
7,464/
yr
Appendix
S
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Solvents
Recovery
Outside
Industry
Group
Shifting
to
On­
Site
Solvent
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
S­
4
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
Cost
included
in
Management
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
(
6.20/
mile)*(
0
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
recovery
facility/
hazardous
waste
shipments)
=
$
0/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
1,543/
ton
solvent)
*
(
94
tons
recovered
solvent/
yr)
=
­
$
145,042/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
1,543/
ton
solvent)
*
(
94
tons
recovered
solvent/
yr)
=
­
$
145,042/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
6,300/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
39
tons
residual/
yr)
=
$
1,755/
yr
Total
$
46,870/
yr
­$
81,535/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
128,405/
yr
*
Given
wastes
are
transferred
outside
industry
group,
it
is
assumed
that
the
recovery
facility
in
most
cases
is
a
commercial
company
separate
and
distinct
from
the
generator.
Cost
for
the
recovery
facility
are
not
included
in
the
generator
costs
and
are
assumed
to
be
a
portion
of
the
offsite
recovery
facility
unit
cost.
Costs
not
listed
separately
for
off­
site
commercial
recovery
facilities
include
all
costs
associated
with
residual
management,
transportation,
and
disposal.
T­
1
Appendix
T
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Outside
Same
NAICS
Shifting
to
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Cost
Inputs
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
140
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
Total
Quantity
of
Hazardous
Waste
Generated
(
140
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr)
­
(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)+
(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr*
0.26
fraction
as
residuals
*
0.75
fraction
characteristically
hazardous)
=
27.3
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
(
recovered
waste
quantity
no
longer
hazardous
by
definition)

Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Generator
Status
If
(
tons
hazardous
waste/
yr
>
13.2
tons/
yr)
then
LQG
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
On
Site
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Quantity
of
Waste
Recovered
Off
Site
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity*
26%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.26)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
0
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Residual
Quantity
26%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
residual
(
0.26)
*
(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
36.4
tons
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity*
75%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;
(
0.75)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Hazardous
Residual
Quantity
75%
residual
is
characteristically
hazardous;
(
0.75)
*
(
36.4
tons
residual/
yr)
=
27.3
tons
hazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity*
25%
residual
is
nonhazardous;
(
0.25)
*
(
0
tons
residual/
yr)
=
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Estimated
Nonhazardous
Residual
Quantity
25%
residual
is
nonhazardous;
(
0.25)
*
(
36.4
tons
residual/
yr)
=
9.1
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
yr
Appendix
T
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Outside
Same
NAICS
Shifting
to
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
T­
2
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
74%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
acid
product
(
0.74)
*
(
140
tons
recovered
waste)
=
103.6
tons
recovered
acid
Estimated
Recovered
Product
Quantity
74%
of
recovered
waste
quantity
will
be
recovered
acid
product
(
0.74)
*
(
140
tons
recovered
waste)
=
103.6
tons
recovered
acid
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year*
0
hazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
Given
LQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
27.3
tons
recovery
wastes/
18
ton
truck)
=
4
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off
Site
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
Given
LQG
and
>
200
miles
then
maximum
of
(
4
shipments
or
140
tons
recovery
wastes/
18
ton
truck)
=
7.8
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off
Site
Recovery
Shipments
per
Year
0
recovery
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Number
of
Off­
site
Non­
Hazardous
Waste
Residual
Shipments
per
Year
(
9.1
tons
nonhazardous
residual/
18
tons
per
truck)
=
0.51
nonhazardous
waste
shipments
per
year
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Facility
for
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
and
Landfill
405
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Hazardous
Waste
Facility
for
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
and
Landfill
405
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Recovery
Facility.
521
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Recovery
Facility.
521miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Distance
to
Nearest
Offsite
Non­
hazardous
Waste
Landfill
50
miles
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Location
of
Generator
Oregon
Cost
Calculations
(
costs
are
positive
and
revenues
are
negative)
Appendix
T
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Outside
Same
NAICS
Shifting
to
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
T­
3
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
($
79.50/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,804
=
$
0/
yr
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
($
79.50/
ton)
*
(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
+
$
1,804
=
$
12,934/
yr
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
($
170/
ton)
*
(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
23,800/
yr
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Cost
Given
small
loads
(
less
than
60%
of
a
full
18
ton
load):
($
170/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost*
maximum(
($
38/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
($
316/
load)
*
(
0
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Hazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
maximum
(
($
38/
ton)
*
(
27.3
tons
hazardous
residual
per
yr)
or
(
($
316/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Waste
Shipments)
=
$
1,037/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
($
38/
ton)
*
(
0
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Off­
site
Nonhazardous
Acid
Neutralization,
Stabilization,
Landfill
Cost
($
38/
ton)
*
(
9.1
tons
nonhazardous
residual
per
yr)
=
$
346/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
5,640/
yr
Waste
Characterization
Testing
Cost
($
1,410/
load)
*
(
4
Hazardous
Loads
+
0.51
Non­
Hazardous
Load)
=
$
6,359/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
4
shipments/
yr)
=
$
944/
yr
Manifesting
Costs
($
236/
shipment)
*
(
4
shipments/
yr)
+
($
89/
shipment)
*
(
0.51
shipments/
yr)
=
$
989/
yr
Loading
Costs
Cost
included
in
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Costs
Loading
Costs
($
2.57/
ton)
*
(
36.4
tons
residual)
=
$
94/
yr
Appendix
T
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Outside
Same
NAICS
Shifting
to
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
T­
4
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
3.05/
mile)*(
0
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
3.05/
mile)*(
0
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
nonhazardous
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
0/
yr
Residual
Waste
Transportation
Costs
($
3.05/
mile)*(
4
hazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
hazardous
landfill/
hazardous
waste
shipment)
+
($
3.05/
mile)*(
0.51
nonhazardous
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
405
miles
to
nonhazardous
landfill/
nonhazardous
waste
shipment)
=
$
5,571/
yr
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
Cost
included
in
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Costs
Recovered
Waste
Transportation
Cost
(
6.20/
mile)*(
0
recovered
waste
shipments/
yr)*(
521
miles
to
recovery
facility/
hazardous
waste
shipments)
=
$
0/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
298.12/
ton
acid)
*
(
103.6
tons
recovered
acid/
yr)
=
­$
30,885/
yr
Salvage
(
Recovered
Product)
Value
($
298.12/
ton
acid)
*
(
103.6
tons
recovered
acid/
yr)
=
­$
30,885/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Hazardous
Material
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
9,794/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Manifest
Training
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
1,828/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Biennial
Report/
General
Administrative
Duties
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,430/
yr
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Contingency
Planning
Cost
Given
LQG
then
$
2,796
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Initial
Waste
Characterization
Cost
$
6,160
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
0
Exclusion
Filing
Fee
(
One
time
Expenditure)
$
639
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
LQG
then:
$
525
activity
verification
fee/
yr
State
Facility
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
and
SQG
then:
$
300
activity
verification
fee/
yr
Appendix
T
Example
Cost
Calculation:
1999
Off­
site
Acid
Recovery
Outside
Same
NAICS
Shifting
to
On­
site
Acid
Recovery
(
2001
$)

Pre­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
Post­
Rule
Cost
Calculation
T­
5
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
140
tons
recovered
waste/
yr)
=
$
1,800/
yr
State
Generation
Tax/
Fee
Given
Oregon
then:
($
45
generation
fee/
ton)*(
27.3
tons
residual/
yr)
=
$
1,229/
yr
Total
$
24,832/
yr
$
21,621/
yr
Incremental
Costs
­$
3,211/
yr
*
Given
wastes
are
transferred
outside
the
same
NAICS,
it
is
assumed
that
the
recovery
facility
in
most
cases
is
a
commercial
company
separate
and
distinct
from
the
generator.
Cost
for
the
recovery
facility
are
not
included
in
the
generator
costs
and
are
assumed
to
be
a
portion
of
the
offsite
recovery
facility
unit
cost.
Costs
are
not
listed
separately
for
off­
site
commercial
recovery
facilities
include
all
costs
associated
with
residual
management,
transportation,
and
disposal.
