RFP
AND
SOW
FOR
VENDORS
Evaluation
of
Mercury
Waste
Stabilization
Technologies
January
26,
2001
Prepared
by:

UT­
Battelle,
LLC
Acting
Under
Contract
with
the
U.
S.
Department
of
Energy
for
Management
and
Operation
of
Oak
Ridge
National
Laboratory
OAK
RIDGE
NATIONAL
LABORATORY
MANAGED
BY
UT­
BATTELLE
FOR
THE
DEPARTMENT
OF
ENERGY
P.
O.
Box
2008
Oak
Ridge,
TN
37831­
6192
(
865)
576­
1431
Fax:
(
865)
241­
2426
e­
mail
bradleykc@
ornl.
gov
January
26,
2001
CLOSING
DATE:
February
26,
2001
Request
for
Proposal
(
RFP)
No.
3400007805
UT­
Battelle,
LLC,
acting
under
its
contract
DE­
AC05­
00OR22725
with
the
U.
S.
Department
of
Energy
for
management
and
operation
of
Oak
Ridge
National
Laboratory,
invites
you
to
submit
a
fixed­
price
proposal
for
testing
program
to
evaluate
stabilization
technologies
to
treat
>
260
ppm
mercury
waste
sludges.
The
work
is
described
more
fully
in
the
Statement
of
Work
of
the
attached
draft
subcontract.
The
resulting
subcontract
will
be
a
fixed­
price
subcontract.

Address
your
proposal
and
all
questions
concerning
this
request
to:

UT­
Battelle,
LLC
Bethel
Valley
Road
Post
Office
Box
2008
Oak
Ridge,
Tennessee
37831­
6192
Attention:
Karen
Bradley
Telephone:
865­
576­
1431
The
closing
time
and
date
for
receipt
of
proposals
are
4:
00
p.
m.
at
Oak
Ridge
on
February
26,
2001.

Please
let
me
know
if
you
do
not
intend
to
submit
a
proposal.

NOTE:
Standard
government
forms
(
SF)
mentioned
in
this
RFP
are
available
at
http://
www.
gsa.
gov/
forms.
Other
forms
and
clauses
are
available
at
our
web
site.
http://
www.
ornl.
gov/
Procurement.

The
Company
may
award
multiple,
firm­
fixed
price
subcontracts
upon
initial
proposals
received.

Offeror's
will
participate
in
this
demonstration
at
their
expense
except
for
the
analytical
costs
incurred
from
the
use
of
an
outside
laboratory
to
perform
the
surrogate
waste
characterization,
TCLP
testing
on
the
treated
waste
forms,
and
the
cost
of
shipping
the
treated
waste
forms
to
the
University
of
Cincinnati
and
Oak
Ridge
National
Laboratory
(
ORNL).
1.
EVALUATION
CRITERIA
The
following
evaluation
criteria
are
listed
in
descending
order
of
importance.
A.
Technical
Approach
to
the
Treatment
Process
Methodology
of
the
proposed
treatment
process.
What
is
the
likelihood
of
success
using
the
Offeror's
proposed
plan
and
equipment?
Is
the
proposed
treatment
process
scientifically
sound,
complete,
and
well­
thought
out?

B.
Cost
Factors
The
Company
will
be
concerned
with
striking
the
most
advantageous
balance
between
expected
performance
and
overall
price
to
the
Company.
Cost
factors
will
be
considered
in
the
overall
evaluation
of
proposals,
the
Company
is
willing
to
pay
a
higher
price
for
higher
technical
merit,
but
only
to
the
extent
of
comparative
worth
among
the
competing
proposals.
The
Company
may
solicit,
from
available
sources,
relevant
information
concerning
the
Offeror's
record
of
performance
and
use
this
information
in
evaluation
and
selection.

C.
Past
Performance
Offeror's
experience
and
past
performance
of
the
process
in
treating
similar
types
of
wastes.
Background
qualifications,
specific
experience,
and
expertise
of
key
personnel
to
be
assigned
to
this
demonstration
in
the
development
and
operation
of
this
process
or
similar
process.
The
Company
may
solicit,
from
available
sources,
relevant
information
concerning
the
Offeror's
record
of
performance
and
use
this
information
in
evaluation
and
selection.

D.
Schedule
Is
the
Offeror's
proposed
schedule
credible,
realistic
and
reasonable
for
completion
of
all
deliverables
and
all
phases
of
the
work?
Has
the
vendor
demonstrated,
via
his
schedule,
a
thorough
understanding
of
what
steps
are
required
to
demonstrate
the
proposed
process?

In
evaluating
proposals,
the
Company
will
be
concerned
with
finding
the
most
advantageous
balance
between
expected
performance
and
overall
price
to
the
Company.
Offeror's
must
therefore
be
persuasive
in
describing
the
merit
and
value
of
methods,
characteristics,
and/
or
features
that
enhance
potential
performance/
application
or
otherwise
contribute
to
achieving
the
Company's
objectives.
The
Company
will
select
the
firm
whose
proposal
contains
the
combination
of
price
and
technical
factors
offering
the
best
overall
value
to
the
Company.

2.
PROPOSAL
AUTHORIZATION
The
proposal
must
be
signed
by
an
official
authorized
to
bind
your
organization
and
must
be
accompanied
by
a
statement
to
the
effect
the
proposal
is
firm
for
a
period
of
not
less
than
60
calendar
days
after
closing
date
for
receipt
of
proposals.

To
aid
in
our
evaluation,
you
proposal
shall
be
in
two
parts:
Part
I
 
Technical
Proposal;
and
Part
II
 
Business
Proposal.
Format
instructions
for
submission
of
the
separate
proposals
described
below:
3.
TECHNICAL
PROPOSAL
The
technical
proposal
will
indicate
your
capability
to
provide
a
testing
program
to
evaluate
stabilization
technologies
to
treat
>
260
ppm
mercury
waste
sludges
as
described
in
this
Request
for
Proposal,
it
shall
be
specific
and
complete
in
every
detail.
The
Proposal
should
not
merely
offer
to
perform
the
project
in
accordance
with
the
Statement
of
Work,
but
shall
outline
the
technical
and
implementation
approach
as
specifically
as
possible.

Part
I
 
Technical
Proposal
should
not
exceed
five
(
5)
8
l/
2
x
11­
inch,
single
spaced
pages
with
text
of
no
more
than
14
characters
per
inch,
exclusive
of
other
required
enclosures
or
attachments
per
the
statement
of
work.

The
technical
proposal
should
generally
follow
the
attached
evaluation
criteria
outline
and
should
contain
the
following:

A.
Table
of
Contents
Provide
table
of
contents
with
page
numbers
for
each
chapter
or
section
and
subsections.

B.
Regulatory
Permits
The
Offeror's
shall
be
responsible
for
and
obtain
all
necessary
regulatory
(
local,
state
and
federal)
permits
and
licenses
as
appropriate
to
perform
this
study.
Offeror's
will
be
required
to
supply
copies
of
all
permits.

C.
Short
Introduction
and
Summary
Provide
a
concise
summary
of
your
proposal
addressing
all
evaluation
criteria
as
follows:

1.
Technical
Approach
to
the
Treatment
Process
This
section
shall
include
a
detailed
presentation
of
the
proposed
treatment
process
and
the
equipment
to
be
used
in
the
tests.
Statements
made
by
the
Offeror
regarding
the
efficiency
of
the
treatment
process,
waste
loadings,
and
scaling
factors
must
be
supported
by
sound
engineering
calculations
or
results
of
past
experience
treating
similar
types
of
waste.
Address
the
issues
of
how
reliability
and
maintainability
of
the
process
will
be
demonstrated
for
the
testing.

2.
Past
Performance
This
section
shall
include
a
description
of
the
Offeror's
past
accomplishments
and
experience
in
the
waste
treatment
area,
specifically
elemental
mercury
and
mercury­
contaminated
wastes.
Focus
shall
be
placed
on
past
experience
(
including
experimental
results)
in
utilizing
the
proposed
process
in
treating
wastes
similar
to
that
described
in
the
SOW.

3.
Schedule
This
section
shall
include
the
proposed
schedule
adequately
detailing
and
identifying
work
elements
from
subcontract
receipt
through
completion
of
all
tasks
in
the
SOW.
The
requested
completion
schedules
for
the
tasks
are
depicted
in
the
SOW.
The
performance
requirements,
as
outlined
in
the
SOW,
must
be
strictly
adhered
to
and
positive
proof
of
the
ability
to
perform
to
the
standards
must
be
submitted
with
the
proposal.

4.
BUSINESS
PROPOSAL
A.
Cost
or
Pricing
Data
You
must
include
in
this
section
a
completed
"
Contract
Pricing
Proposal
Cover
Sheet
(
Standard
Form
1411)
and
Contract
Pricing
Proposal
(
Form
UCN­
4638A)"
or
your
own
cost
pricing
proposal
form
with
supporting
cost.
The
form
must
contain
a
complete
breakdown
of
the
cost
to
perform
the
work
proposed;
including,
at
a
minimum,
the
number
of
hours
and
total
cost
for
each
separate
direct
labor
category
proposed.
Direct
materials,
travel
and
subsistence,
and
other
direct
costs
also
must
be
detailed,
together
with
all
indirect
costs.

B.
Other
Information
This
section
of
your
proposal
shall
contain
all
information
as
listed
below.
Information
should
appear
in
the
order
as
it
appears
below:

1.
Any
exceptions
that
you
take
to
the
provisions
of
the
attached
draft
subcontract.
2.
A
completed,
signed
copy
of
the
form
entitled
"
Representations
and
Certifications.
3.
A
completed,
signed
copy
of
the
form
entitled
"
Exhibit
2
 
Representations
of
Limited
Rights
Data
and
Restricted
Computer
Software.
4.
If
applicable,
completed
copy
of
Exhibit
2D,
"
Refund
of
Royalties",
(
3/
95)

5.
RESTRICTION
ON
DISCLOSURE
AND
USE
OF
DATA
If
your
proposal
contains
data
that
you
do
not
want
disclosed
to
the
public
or
used
by
the
Company
or
the
Government
except
for
evaluation
purposes,
you
must
 
(
1)
Mark
the
title
page
with
the
following
legend:

The
proposal
contains
data
that
shall
not
be
disclosed
outside
the
Company
or
the
Government
and
shall
not
be
duplicated,
used,
or
disclosed
 
in
whole
or
in
part
 
for
any
purpose
other
than
to
evaluate
this
proposal.
If,
however,
a
subcontract
is
awarded
as
a
result
of
or
in
connection
with
the
submission
of
these
data,
the
Company
and
the
Government
shall
have
the
right
to
duplicate,
use,
or
disclose
the
data
to
the
extent
provided
in
the
resulting
subcontract.
This
restriction
does
not
limit
the
Company's
or
the
Government's
right
to
use
data
obtained
from
another
source
without
restriction.
The
data
subject
to
the
restriction
are
contained
in
pages
[
insert
numbers
or
other
identification
of
pages];

(
2)
Mark
each
page
containing
data
that
you
wish
to
restrict
with
the
following
legend:
Use
or
disclosure
of
data
contained
on
this
page
is
subject
to
the
restriction
on
the
title
page
of
this
proposal.

A.
The
Government
may
need
to
acquire
unlimited
rights
in
technical
data
(
but
not
commercial
or
financial
information)
in
a
proposal
upon
which
a
subcontract
award
is
based.
However,
before
such
unlimited
rights
are
acquired,
the
proposer
will
be
afforded
the
opportunity
either
 
(
1)
To
advise
that
the
technical
data,
or
identified
portions
thereof,
are
covered
by
any
restrictive
notice
regarding
the
disclosure
and
use
of
proposal
information
authorized
by
FAR
subparts
15.2
or
15.6
(
or
any
agency
supplement
thereto),
and
request
that
such
protection
be
maintained
by
excluding
the
data
from
the
Government's
rights;
or
(
2)
To
establish
that
identified
portions
of
the
technical
data
do
not
relate
directly
to
or
will
not
be
used
in
the
work
to
be
performed
under
the
subcontract
and
request
that
such
portions
be
excluded
from
the
Government's
rights.

A.
Unlimited
rights
to
clause
in
(
D)
below.
Technical
data
in
successful
proposals
are
acquired
by
use
of
the
Excluded
technical
data
are
identified
by
inserting
appropriate
proposal
page
numbers
in
the
clause.

B.
The
following
clause
(
Ref.:
FAR
52.227­
23)
shall
be
included
in
any
subcontract
awarded
based
on
consideration
of
a
technical
proposal:

Rights
to
Proposal
Data
(
Technical)

Except
for
data
contained
on
pages
_____,
it
is
agreed
that
as
a
condition
of
the
award
of
this
subcontract
and
notwithstanding
the
conditions
of
any
notice
appearing
thereon,
the
Government
shall
have
unlimited
rights
(
as
defined
in
the
Technical
Data
clause
contained
in
this
subcontract)
in
and
to
the
technical
data
contained
in
the
proposal
dated
______,
upon
which
this
subcontract
is
based.

6.
PROPOSAL
EXPENSES
AND
PRECONTRACT
COSTS
This
RFP
does
not
commit
us
to
pay
for
any
costs
incurred
in
the
preparation
and
submission
of
a
proposal
or
for
any
other
costs
incurred
before
the
execution
of
a
subcontract.

7.
CLAUSES
The
following
clauses
shall
be
included
in
any
resulting
subcontract:

INDEMNIFICATION
Seller
agrees
to
indemnify,
save
harmless
and
defend
the
Company,
from
and
against
any
and
all
liabilities,
claims,
penalties,
forfeitures,
suits
and
the
costs
and
expenses
incident
thereto
(
including
costs
of
defense,
settlement
and
reasonable
attorneys'
fees),
which
it
may
hereafter
incur,
become
responsible
for
or
pay
out
as
a
result
of
death
or
bodily
injuries
to
any
person,
destruction
or
damage
to
any
property,
contamination
of
or
adverse
effects
on
the
environment,
or
any
violation
of
governmental
laws,
regulations
or
orders,
caused,
in
whole
or
in
part,
by
(
i)
Seller's
breach
of
any
term
or
provision
of
this
Agreement
or
(
ii)
any
negligent
or
willful
act
or
omission
of
the
Seller,
its
employees
or
subcontractors
in
the
performance
of
this
Agreement.

Seller
further
agrees
to
indemnify,
save
harmless
and
defend
the
Company
from
and
against
any
and
all
liabilities,
claims,
penalties,
forfeitures,
suits,
and
the
costs
and
expenses
incident
thereto
(
including
costs
of
defense,
settlement,
and
reasonable
attorney's
fees)[
hereinafter
collectively
referred
to
as
"
liabilities"]
which
it
may
incur,
become
responsible
for
or
pay
out
as
a
result
of
releases
or
threatened
release
of
hazardous
substances,
contaminants
and
pollutants
(
as
defined
in
the
Comprehensive
Environmental
Response,
Compensation
and
Liability
Act
of
1980,
as
amended),
which
occur
at
a
facility
owned
or
operated
by
the
Seller
or
a
subcontractor
of
the
Seller
or
during
transportation
or
disposal
arranged
by
the
Seller
or
a
subcontractor.
This
agreement
applies
to
all
liabilities
arising
under
any
federal
or
state
law
relating
to
the
management
and
remediation
of
hazardous
substances,
pollutants
and
contaminants,
including
but
not
limited
to,
liabilities
for
remediation,
personal
injury,
property
damage,
or
natural
resources
damages,
which
are
predicated
upon
fault
or
upon
strict
liability.

INSURANCE
1.
Seller
will
be
responsible
for,
and
assumes
all
liability
for,
loss
or
destruction,
of
or
physical
Evaluation
criteria
and
technical
proposal
instructions
for
this
RFP
are
attached.
Damage
to,
all
vehicles,
equipment,
and
containers
owned
or
leased
by
Seller
or
any
subcontractor
and
all
personal
property
of
employees
of
Seller
or
of
any
subcontractor
unless
such
loss
or
damage
was
caused
by
the
negligence
of
the
Company
or
any
of
its
employees
or
agents.

2.
Seller
will
insure,
or
cause
to
be
insured,
each
and
every
workman
employed
in
the
performance
of
the
work,
the
compensation
provided
for
in
and
by
each
and
every
statute
applicable
thereto
with
respect
to
Workers'
Compensation
and
Employers'
liability,
and
will
procure
and
maintain
until
termination
of
this
subcontract
the
following
insurance
in
not
less
than
the
following
amounts
with
reputable
and
financially
responsible
insurance
companies:

a.
Seller's
public
liability
insurance
properly
safeguarding
Seller
against
liability
for
injuries
to
persons,
including
injuries
resulting
in
death
and
damage
to
or
destruction
of
property,
in
no
less
than
the
following
amounts:
$
500,000
for
injuries
to
one
person
and
$
1,000,000
for
injuries
to
two
or
more
persons
in
any
one
accident;
and
$
500,000
for
damage
to
or
destruction
of
property
in
any
one
accident.

b.
Contractual
liability
insurance
properly
safeguarding
Seller
against
liability
assumed
by
Seller
for
injuries
to
persons
including
injuries
resulting
in
death,
in
amounts
of
not
less
than
$
500,000
for
injuries
to
one
person
and
$
1,000,000
for
injuries
to
two
or
more
persons,
in
any
one
accident;
and
$
500,000
for
damage
to
or
destruction
of
property
in
any
accident.

c.
Automobile
liability
insurance
properly
safeguarding
Seller
against
liability
for
injuries
to
persons,
including
injuries
resulting
in
death
and
damage
to
or
destruction
of
property,
arising
out
of
the
ownership,
maintenance
or
use
of
automobiles
in
not
less
than
the
following
amounts:

$
500,000
for
injuries
to
one
person
and
$
1,000,000
for
injuries
to
two
or
more
persons,
in
any
one
accident;
and
$
500,000
for
damage
to
or
destruction
of
property
in
any
one
accident.

d.
If
any
portion
of
the
work
is
subcontracted,
Seller's
protective
liability
insurance
properly
safeguarding
Seller
against
claims
for
injuries
to
persons,
including
injuries
resulting
in
death,
and
damage
to
or
destruction
of
property,
in
not
less
than
the
following
amounts:
$
500,000
for
injuries
to
one
person
and
$
1,000,000
for
injuries
to
two
or
more
persons,
in
any
one
accident;
and
$
500,000
for
damage
to
or
destruction
of
property
in
any
one
accident.

e.
Before
commencing
work
under
this
Subcontract,
the
Seller
shall
certify
to
the
Company,
in
writing,
that
the
required
insurance
has
been
obtained.
The
policies
evidencing
required
insurance
shall
contain
an
endorsement
to
the
effect
that
any
cancellation
or
any
material
change
adversely
affecting
the
Government's
interest
shall
not
be
effective:
(
1)
for
such
period
as
the
laws
of
the
State
in
which
this
Subcontract
is
to
be
performed
prescribe,
or
(
2)
until
30
days
after
the
insurer
or
the
Seller
gives
written
notice
to
the
Company,
whichever
period
is
longer.

f.
The
Seller
shall
insert
the
substance
of
this
clause,
including
this
paragraph
(
f),
in
subcontracts
under
this
Subcontract
that
require
work
on
a
Government
installation
and
shall
require
subcontractors
to
provide
and
maintain
the
insurance
required
in
paragraph
(
a­
d)
above.
At
lease
five
(
5)
days
before
entry
of
each
subcontractor's
personnel
on
the
Government
installation,
the
Seller
shall
furnish
(
or
ensure
that
there
has
been
furnished)
to
the
Company
a
current
certificate
of
insurance,
meeting
the
requirements
of
paragraph
(
b)
above,
for
each
such
subcontractor.
8.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
OF
AMENDMENTS
If
we
amend
this
RFP,
you
must
acknowledge
receipt
of
the
amendments
(
by
number
and
date)
in
your
proposal.

Very
truly
yours,

Karen
Bradley
Subcontract
Administrator
ORNL
Procurement
DRAFT
SUBCONTRACT
NO.

DRAFT
SUBCONTRACT
between
UT­
BATTELLE,
LLC
(
the
"
Company")
and
___________
(
the
"
Seller").

This
Subcontract
is
entered
into
by
the
Company
acting
under
its
Prime
Contract
No.
DE­
AC05­
00or22725
with
the
United
States
Department
of
Energy
(
DOE).

ARTICLE
I.
SCHEDULE
A.
Statement
of
Work
The
Seller
hereby
undertakes
and
agrees
to
furnish
personnel,
facilities,
equipment,
materials,
supplies,
and
services
(
except
such
as
are
furnished
by
the
Company)
necessary
to
provide
support
as
described
in
the
Statement
of
Work
dated
January
16,
2001,
as
follows:

DEMONSTRATION
OF
THE
STABILIZATION
PROCESS
FOR
TREATMENT
OF
MERCURY
SLUDGE
WASTES
CONTAINING
>
260
PPM
MERCURY
INTRODUCTION
The
Environmental
Protection
Agency's
(
EPA)
Land
Disposal
Restrictions
(
LDR)
program
currently
has
technology­
specific
treatment
standards
for
hazardous
wastes
containing
greater
than
or
equal
to
260
ppm
total
mercury
(
Hg)
(
i.
e.
high
Hg
subcategory
wastes).
The
treatment
standards
specify
RMERC
for
high
Hg
subcategory
wastes
and
IMERC
if
the
high
Hg
subcategory
wastes
contain
organics.
RMERC
requires
retorting
or
roasting
in
a
thermal
processing
unit,
while
IMERC
specifies
incineration.
Both
of
these
standards
are
based
on
the
premise
of
recovering
the
Hg
for
recycle.
In
the
case
of
radioactivelycontaminated
Hg,
when
the
Hg
is
recovered,
it
is
typically
still
radioactive
and
therefore
can
not
be
recycled.
EPA
requires
that
this
recovered
radioactively
contaminated
Hg
undergo
additional
treatment,
specifically
amalgamation,
prior
to
disposal.
The
Department
of
Energy
(
DOE)
TRU
and
Mixed
Waste
Focus
Area
(
TMFA)
and
the
Mercury
Working
Group
(
HgWG)
chartered
under
the
TMFA
are
working
with
EPA
to
validate
technologies
that
can
directly
treat
radioactively
contaminated
high
Hg
subcategory
wastes
without
removing
the
mercury
from
the
waste.

To
date
under
this
program
a
waste
soil
from
Brookhaven
National
Laboratory
(
BNL)
containing
approximately
4,800
ppm
of
Hg
and
radioactive
contaminants
has
been
successfully
treated
by
several
different
vendors
to
meet
a
Hg
Toxic
Characteristic
Leaching
Procedure
(
TCLP)
treatment
goal
of
0.025
mg/
l
or
less.
These
treated
waste
forms
are
now
undergoing
additional
evaluations
using
new
analytical
protocols,
developed
by
Dr.
David
Kosson
of
Vanderbilt
University.
The
data
generated
will
be
compared
to
the
standard
TCLP
results.
These
new
protocols
provide
another
methodology
to
determine
how
the
treated
waste
form
will
behave
in
a
variety
of
disposal
environments.

To
supplement
the
data
on
treatment
of
soils
EPA
needs
additional
data
for
stabilization
of
high
Hg
subcategory
waste
sludges.
The
data
gathered
from
the
demonstration
of
treatment
of
this
sludge
should
then
provide
EPA
with
enough
information
to
support
a
revision
to
allow
stabilization
of
all
high
Hg
subcategory
wastes.
12
As
in
the
demonstration
on
the
BNL
soils
referenced
above,
this
effort
will
also
have
two
major
objectives.
The
first
objective
is
to
evaluate
alternative
processes
to
RMERC
and
IMERC
for
DOE's
legacy
mixed
waste.
To
that
end,
the
processes
will
treat
a
high
Hg
subcategory
surrogate
waste
to
meet
a
TCLP
treatment
goal
of
0.025
mg/
l
or
less.
A
non­
radioactive
surrogate
waste
sludge
has
been
selected
to
eliminate
the
added
cost
and
requirements
for
handling,
treatment,
and
disposal
of
an
actual
radioactive
mixed
waste.
The
surrogate
sludge
will
contain
five
different
forms
of
mercury
including
elemental.
The
second
objective
is
to
provide
EPA
with
the
treated
waste
forms
which
EPA
will
test
to
again
compare
proposed
new
analytical
protocols
to
the
standard
TCLP
results.
These
comparisons
will
be
used
by
EPA
in
their
efforts
to
revise
the
LDR
treatment
standards
for
Hg­
bearing
hazardous
wastes.
Technology
vendors
will
participate
in
this
demonstration
at
their
expense
except
for
the
analytical
costs
incurred
from
the
use
of
an
outside
laboratory
to
perform
the
surrogate
waste
characterization,
TCLP
testing
on
the
treated
waste
forms
and
the
costs
of
shipping
the
treated
waste
forms
to
the
University
of
Cincinnati
(
UC)
where
the
new
protocol
testing
will
be
performed
and
to
Oak
Ridge
National
Laboratory
(
ORNL)
where
vapor
pressure
testing
will
occur.
UC
will
provide
the
raw
materials
and
the
protocols
to
make
up
the
surrogate
waste.
All
testing
data
from
the
study
will
be
shared
with
the
vendors.

For
the
demonstration
the
seller
will
make
up
and
process
two
100
lb
batches
of
the
same
formulation
surrogate
waste.
The
seller
shall
perform
all
chemical,
physical,
and
engineering
analyses,
as
well
as
any
preliminary
treatability
studies
in
addition
to
the
final
demonstration
on
each
batch
that
the
seller
deems
necessary
to
ensure
the
successful
demonstration
of
the
seller's
stabilization
process
to
achieve
the
performance
targets
established.
Upon
completion
of
the
testing
the
seller
shall
prepare
a
report
documenting
the
methods
and
results
of
this
work.

Multiple
contracts
will
be
awarded
up
to
the
available
funding.
The
available
funding
will
pay
for
the
raw
materials,
shipment
of
the
raw
materials
to
the
various
treatment
vendors,
analytical
costs
for
waste
characterization
and
the
final
waste
forms
at
an
outside
laboratory,
and
shipment
of
these
treated
waste
forms
from
the
treatment
facilities
to
UC
and
ORNL.

WASTE
DESCRIPTION
The
surrogate
waste
to
be
tested,
as
described
by
this
SOW,
is
a
surrogate
sludge
containing
approximately
5,000
ppm
of
various
mercury
species.
The
composition
of
the
mercury
surrogate
is:

PARAMETER
Weight
Percentage
%
Mercury
Concentration
ppm
Mercury
Chloride
0.1
1,000
Mercury
Nitrate
0.1
1,000
Mercury
Oxide
0.1
1,000
Mercury
Elemental
0.15
1,500
Phenyl
Mercury
(
organic)
0.05
500
Diatomaceous
Earth
20
Aluminum
Hydroxide
10
Ferric
Chloride
10
Sodium
Chloride
10
13
Motor
Oil
1
Water
48.5
Total
100
5000
FINAL
WASTE
FORM
SAMPLING
&
ANALYSIS
FOR
WASTE
FORM
EVALUATION
In
a
cooperative
effort
with
the
EPA,
several
additional
analytical
protocols
are
to
be
run
on
the
untreated
and
treated
surrogate
waste.
These
protocols
will
be
run
by
the
University
of
Cincinnati
on
both
the
untreated
and
treated
surrogate
waste.
The
seller
will
be
required
to
take
the
samples
from
the
treated
waste
for
each
run,
package
them,
and
ship
them
to
the
University
of
Cincinnati.
The
data
generated
will
then
provide
EPA
with
a
comparison
of
the
TCLP
results
to
these
protocols
to
help
in
their
efforts
to
rewrite
the
mercury­
related
RCRA
regulations
to
make
them
more
environmentally
sound.
The
analyses
to
be
run
on
the
untreated
and
treated
wastes
are
to
help
EPA
develop
a
framework
for
evaluation
of
contaminant
leaching
that
should:
C
provide
a
conservative
but
more
realistic
estimate
of
mercury
leaching.
C
use
testing
approaches
that
can
be
carried
out
using
standard
laboratory
practices
in
a
reasonable
time
frame.
C
provide
release
limits
and
estimates
that
consider
site­
specific
conditions;
C
encourage
improvements
in
waste
management
practices
(
assuming
that
the
TCLP
results
are,
at
times,
misleading);
and,
C
provide
flexibility
to
allow
level
of
evaluation
(
and,
hence,
degree
of
over
conservatism)
to
be
based
on
the
user's
requirements.

The
following
intrinsic
waste
characteristics
will
be
used
to
estimate
the
mercury
release
for
the
scenario
outlined
above:

Samples
of
successfully
stabilized
surrogate
(
TCLP
<
.025
ppm)
will
be
characterized
and
leached
by
ALTER
Corporation
at
the
University
of
Cincinnati's
ALTER
facility.
The
following
testing
will
provide
information
on
the
characteristics
and
stability
of
the
stabilized
surrogate.

Characterization
testing
will
consist
of
bulk
density,
moisture
content,
percent
organic
matter,
cation
exchange
capacity
and
particle
size
distribution.

Leach
testing
will
consist
of
multiple
TCLP
extractions
followed
by
pH
based
leaching.
The
pH
based
leaching
will
provide
data
on
the
leachability
of
the
stabilized
surrogate
at
pH
2,
4,
6,
8,
10
and
12.
Acidity/
alkalinity
will
also
be
determined.

Only
the
TCLP
data
will
be
assessed
as
deviation
from
a
standard
value
(.
025
ppm),
all
other
data
will
be
reported
with
the
intent
of
providing
information
on
the
applicability
of
stabilization
as
a
treatment
for
mercury
wastes.

Mercury
vapor
pressure
testing
will
also
be
performed
on
the
seller's
final
treated
waste.
Therefore
the
seller
will
be
required
to
take
the
samples
from
the
treated
waste
for
all
runs
on
each
waste
stream,
package
and
then
ship
them
to
Oak
Ridge
National
Laboratory
for
this
testing.
14
PERFORMANCE
GOAL
The
performance
goal
for
treatment
by
stabilization
for
both
batches
of
the
surrogate
waste
sludge
is
to
meet
the
Universal
Treatment
Standards
(
UTS)
for
the
category
of
"
Mercury­
All
Other"
wastes
and
the
Land
Disposal
Restriction
(
LDR).
That
mercury
standard
is
0.025
mg/
L
TCLP.
Mercury
analysis
is
defined
in
40
CFR
Part
261,
Appendix
II.
The
detection
limit
for
this
analysis
should
be
a
minimum
of
0.0002
mg/
l
Hg.
The
vendors'
waste
form
must
meet
the
performance
goal
in
order
to
have
that
waste
form
tested
and
evaluated
at
the
University
of
Cincinnati
using
the
new
protocols
and
at
ORNL
for
the
vapor
pressure.

OTHER
FUNCTIONAL
PERFORMANCE
REQUIREMENTS
The
seller
process
must
also
be
able
to
perform
to
the
following
standards:

1.
The
mercury
stabilization
process
shall
stabilize
mercury
containing
wastes
without
removing
the
mercury
from
the
waste
matrix;
processes
that
involve
separating
the
mercury
from
the
waste
matrix
followed
by
amalgamation
are
not
within
the
scope
of
the
demonstration.

2
The
mercury
stabilization
process
must
stabilize
all
forms
of
mercury
including
organic
and
halogenated
mercury
compounds,
elemental
mercury,
mercury
oxides,
and
mercury
nitrates.

3
The
mercury
stabilization
process
should
minimize
secondary
wastes.
The
waste
volume
increase
of
the
final
waste
form
due
to
the
stabilization
process
should
also
be
minimized
.

4
During
the
stabilization
process
demonstration,
a
chemical
reaction
may
result
that
increases
the
temperature
and
releases
undesired
off­
gases.
If
this
is
the
case,
the
demonstration
must
include
control
technology
to
ensure
waste
integrity
and
contain
both
mercury
and
organic
emissions.

5
The
stabilization
process
is
to
accomplish
mercury
stabilization
within
the
boundaries
of
worker
and
public
exposure
limits
as
required
by
OSHA
and
local
radiation
control
requirements.
The
process
shall
be
developed
to
ensure
worker
exposure
to
mercury
vapors
is
below
0.05
g/
m3
QUALITY
ASSURANCE
(
QA)

Before
beginning
any
work,
the
seller
will
submit
to
the
company
a
QA
Plan
for
approval
that
complies
with
the
intent
of
DOE
order
414.1A
(
can
be
seen
or
downloaded
at
website
www.
explorer.
doe.
gov).
The
plan
shall
represent
the
seller's
approach
to
ensuring
that
quality
data
are
generated
from
all
analyzes,
performed.
The
plan
shall
contain
the
following
provisions
as
a
minimum;
however,
they
may
be
presented
in
any
order
that
the
seller
desires:

1.
Organization
and
Personnel.
The
roles,
responsibilities,
and
authorities
of
key
laboratory
personnel
are
described.
All
management
personnel
responsible
for
performing
analytical
work
will
be
listed,
along
with
their
job
assignments
and
years
of
experience
in
performing
applicable
work.

2.
Personnel
Training.
The
plan
will
address
how
personnel
are
trained
in
laboratory
analytical
methods,
quality
control/
QA
procedures,
and
safety
policies.
Frequency
of
training
and
training
records
will
be
addressed.

3.
Sample
Practices.
This
section
will
include
procedures
for
the
tracking
of
samples
through
the
laboratory,
receipt
of
samples,
verification
of
preservation,
log­
in
of
samples,
and
chain
of
custody
documentation.
Sample
storage
and
disposal
will
also
be
included,
along
with
preparation
of
sample
bottles
and
glassware
cleaning.
15
4.
Material
Procurement
and
Control.
This
section
will
include
a
description
of
procedures
for
purchasing
materials,
quality
inspection
before
use
in
sample
analysis,
chemical
standard
inventory
procedures,
solvent
storage
policies,
and
laboratory
waste
disposal.

5.
Facilities
and
Equipment.
This
section
will
include
a
list
of
basic
types
of
equipment,
and
general
description
of
the
facility
to
ensure
that
the
laboratory
is
large
enough
to
handle
the
sample
load
expected
and
that
the
equipment
is
capable
of
performing
the
required
analyses.

6.
Analytical
Procedures.
This
section
will
contain
a
list
of
procedures
the
laboratory
offers
(
by
method
number
and
matrix),
and
will
ensure
that
controlled
copies
of
analytical
procedures
and
Standard
Operating
Procedures
are
available
to
the
analysts.
This
will
also
address
approvals
and
changes
to
the
procedures.

7.
Calibration.
This
section
will
include
calibration
procedures
by
instrument
type.
Calibration
frequency,
reference
standards,
calibration
acceptance
criteria,
and
calibration
documentation
procedures
must
be
addressed.
Procedures
must
be
defined
for
ensuring
that
balances,
refrigerators,
and
ovens
are
accurate
and
that
their
performances
are
monitored
and
documented.

8.
Limits
of
Detection.
This
section
will
delineate
procedures
for
determining
limits
of
detection,
and
the
frequency
of
detection­
limit
verification
will
be
outlined.

9.
Analysis
of
Samples
and
Documentation.
This
section
will
summarize
procedures
and
documentation
to
be
used
in
the
day­
to­
day
operation.
Emphasis
shall
be
on
the
following:

°
Analysis
of
field,
method,
and
reagent
blanks.
°
Analysis
of
duplicates,
spiked
samples,
spiked
laboratory
blanks,
and
reference
or
control
standards,
such
as
EPA
check
standards.
°
Criteria
used
to
establish
warning
and
action
limits
for
the
above
types
of
samples.
°
Documentation
and
examples
of
control
data
and
control
charts.
°
Frequency
of
blanks
and
other
samples,
including
laboratory
control
sample.
°
How
data
from
samples
are
reported
and
reviewed.
°
How
requirements
of
the
minimum
control
program
will
be
met.
°
Verification
of
calibration.

10.
Corrective
Action.
This
section
will
define
types
of
nonconforming
occurrences,
how
these
occurrences
are
documented,
and
who
is
responsible
for
correction
and
documentation.

11.
Documents
and
QA
Records
Control.
This
section
will
provide
the
controls
necessary
for
all
data
packages,
calibration
records,
and
other
QA­
related
records
until
transmittal
to
the
Company.
Procedures
will
provide
instructions
for
recording,
storage,
and
document
control
to
include
tracking
and
retrieval.

12.
Data
Evaluation.
This
section
provides
instructions
for
data
evaluation
for
each
analytical
method,
as
well
as
for
an
entire
data
set.
The
process
for
data
review
and
approval
will
be
outlined.
Data
qualification
and
flagging
procedures
will
be
implemented.
13.
Holding
Times
and
Preservatives.
This
section
will
include
instructions
for
holding
times
and
for
ensuring
sample
analysis
procedures
are
met.

14.
Internal
Audits.
The
frequency
and
method
of
documentation
for
self
assessments
by
the
seller
will
be
provided
in
this
section.
16
15.
Independent
Assessment.
The
seller
shall
afford
access
to
the
company
at
all
tiers
to
the
seller's
facilities
and
records
for
inspection
or
audit
by
the
company,
a
designated
representative,
or
other
parties
authorized
by
the
company.

SELLER'S
RESPONSIBILITIES:

The
Seller
is
responsible
for
complying
with
all
applicable
laws
and
regulations.

Task
1.
Plans
and
Permits
The
seller
shall
be
responsible
for
and
obtain
all
necessary
regulatory
(
local,
state,
and
federal)
permits
and
licenses
as
appropriate
to
perform
this
study.
The
seller
shall
furnish
copies
of
all
permits
to
the
Company
to
demonstrate
compliance.
The
seller
shall
also
prepare
or
have
already
existing
plans
for
addressing
the
following:

1.
Project
work
2.
Health
and
safety
3.
Waste
management
4.
QA
5.
Sampling
and
analysis
6.
Compliance
with
40
CFR
260
etal.

All
of
these
plans
may
be
incorporated
into
one
overall
test
plan
that
addresses
each
of
these
topics.

All
these
plans
must
be
submitted
to
the
company
and
approved
in
writing
by
the
company
before
initiation
of
the
following
tasks.

The
waste
management
plan
must
include
the
name
and
address
of
the
site
where
the
seller
plans
to
dispose
of
the
material
if
it
does
not
meet
the
treatment
standard.

The
safety
and
health
plan
must
demonstrate
the
methods
used
to
ensure
the
safety
and
health
of
vendor
employees,
ensure
employee
understanding
of
hazards
and
controls,
and
methods
to
ensure
compliance
with
occupational
safety
and
health
requirements.
At
a
minimum,
safety
and
health
plans
should
provide
information
regarding:

1.
The
vendor
safety
and
health
policy
statement
2.
Safety
and
health
training
requirements
for
personnel
engaged
in
hazardous
operations
3.
Hazard
identification
and
communication
methods
4.
Appropriate
controls
for
hazardous
operations,
including
monitoring,
engineering
controls
and
use
of
personal
protective
equipment
The
project
work
plan
must
delineate
how
the
seller
will
address
the
issues
surrounding
the
stabilization
of
sludges
containing
>
260
ppm
of
mercury.
These
include,
but
may
not
be
limited
to:

1.
Required
pretreatment
mechanisms,
times,
throughput,
waste
loadings,
costs,
and
wastes
generated
during
the
process(
es).

2.
A
thorough
description
of
the
processes
to
be
used
and
the
range
of
variables
considered
by
the
seller
to
be
important
to
the
successful
operation
of
the
process.
These
could
include
the
waste
loading,
the
amounts
of
treatment
agents
and
other
necessary
ingredients,
and
the
speeds
and
residence
times
for
each
step
in
the
process.

3.
In
addition
to
the
operational
parameters
mentioned
in
No.
2
above,
the
seller
shall
identify
the
17
specific
processing
limits,
if
any,
associated
with
possible
co­
contaminants.
The
seller
shall
provide
the
test
results
to
support
these
limits.

All
work
performed
by
the
seller,
within
the
scope
of
the
contract
for
this
demonstration,
shall
be
performed
in
accordance
with
these
approved
plans
and
appropriate
permits
and
licenses.

Approval
of
Plans
The
Company
will
review
the
plans.
If
these
are
found
to
be
acceptable,
the
seller
will
be
given
written
instruction
by
the
Company
to
proceed.

Task
2.
Surrogate
Waste
Preparation
The
seller
shall
prepare
the
surrogate
waste
by
mixing
the
individual
constituents
as
provided
by
the
Company.
UC
will
provide
and
ship
all
needed
raw
materials
to
the
seller's
specified
facility
for
makeup
of
the
surrogate.
The
seller
shall
provide
the
mixing
procedure
as
part
of
their
project
plan
which
must
be
approved
by
the
Company
prior
to
the
seller
making
up
of
the
surrogate.

Task
3.
Waste
Characterization
The
seller
shall
characterize
the
waste
surrogate
to
establish/
confirm
the
baseline
for
assessing
treatment
performance.
The
seller
shall
do
any
other
characterization
deemed
necessary
to
facilitate
the
determination
of
their
operating
conditions
and
to
optimize
their
process.
The
seller
shall
include
in
their
proposal
a
table
that
describes
all
the
analyses
to
be
performed
by
an
outside
laboratory,
the
corresponding
reference
procedure
for
each
analysis
it
is
proposing,
and
the
cost.
The
seller
shall
also
take
samples
of
the
raw
surrogate
and
ship
them
to
the
University
of
Cincinnati.
The
Company
is
responsible
for
all
analytical
costs
by
an
outside
laboratory
and
the
shipping
costs
incurred
under
this
task.

Task
4.
Equipment
Cleanliness
Before
conducting
any
testing,
the
seller
shall
survey
the
equipment
to
be
used
for
the
study
to
ensure
that
it
is
not
contaminated
with
any
radioactive
or
hazardous
materials
such
that
the
proposed
equipment
would
not
contaminate
the
mercury
waste
as
the
demonstration
is
conducted.
The
seller
will
document
to
the
Company
that
the
equipment
is
free
of
any
contamination.

Task
5.
Pilot­
Scale
and/
or
Full­
Scale
Experiments
The
seller
shall
conduct
pilot­
scale
and/
or
full­
scale
experiments
using
its
stabilization
process
equipment
including
all
unit
operations
required
on
the
full­
scale
system
to
meet
regulatory
requirements
and
to
produce
a
waste
form
that
meets
the
treatment
goals.
The
seller
shall
determine
the
significant
process
variables
and
their
ranges
and
shall
determine
the
optimum
set
of
conditions
for
achieving
the
treatment
goals.

Task
6.
Analysis
of
the
Final
Waste
Forms
After
completion
of
task
5,
the
seller
shall
send
samples
of
the
waste
forms
from
both
batches
of
the
final
test
runs
to
an
outside
laboratory
that
complies
with
EPA's
current
edition
standard
SW846
for
TCLP
analysis.
The
Company
is
also
responsible
for
all
analytical
costs
by
an
outside
laboratory
incurred
under
this
task.
18
Task
7.
Sampling,
Packaging
and
Shipment
of
Final
Waste
Form
Samples
If
the
final
test
run
treated
waste
forms
have
met
the
treatment
goal
based
on
the
results
under
task
6,
the
Seller
will
package
and
ship
the
entire
volume
of
treated
waste
for
both
batches
as
follows:

Sample
Volume
Ship
to
Approximately
1liter
Oak
Ridge
National
laboratory
Oak
Ridge,
TN
Remainder*
University
of
Cincinnati
Cincinnati,
Ohio
*
If
desired,
the
seller
may
keep
an
archive
sample
The
Company
is
responsible
for
the
shipment
costs.

If
the
waste
forms
do
not
meet
the
treatment
standard,
it
will
be
the
responsibility
of
the
seller
to
dispose
of
the
material.
Seller
must
include
in
their
waste
management
plan
the
name
and
address
where
they
plan
to
dispose
of
the
material.

Task
8.
Final
Report
The
seller
shall
prepare
and
submit
to
the
company
5
copies
and
an
electronic
file
of
a
detailed
report
including
a
description
of
the
materials
and
methods,
a
discussion
of
results
and
recommendations
for
application
of
the
technology/
process
for
full­
scale
operation.
The
report
shall
address,
at
a
minimum,
the
following:

1.
Process
description
and
history.

2.
Pre­
experimentation
computations
and
analysis.

3.
Experimental
materials
and
methods,
including:

°
Description
of
the
apparatus
and
procedures.
°
The
statistical
design
for
the
experiment.
°
The
number
of
test
runs
conducted
and
the
conditions
for
each
run.
°
The
number
of
samples
taken
in
each
run
and
the
size
of
the
samples.
°
Sampling
and
analytical
procedures,
including
the
QA
procedures
to
ensure
validity
of
the
results.
°
Statistical
approach
to
data
analysis.

4.
Experimental
results,
including:

°
All
individual
data
and
summaries
thereof.
°
Statistical
analysis
of
the
data.
°
All
QA
data
and
documentation.
°
Waste
loading
and
the
conditions
for
which
that
waste
loading
should
be
valid.
19
C
Change
in
volume
of
the
treated
waste.
°
Types
and
amounts
of
secondary
wastes
generated
during
the
studies
and
the
anticipated
generation
rates
for
full­
scale.
°
The
mass
balance
on
the
system.
°
The
anticipated
operating
conditions
and
throughput.
°
The
duty
cycle,
reliability,
and
maintainability
of
the
integrated
system
as
well
as
the
individual
components.

I.
Discussion
of
the
results.

7.
A
life­
cycle
cost
analysis
of
the
proposed
full­
scale
treatment
facility.
The
analysis
should
include,
at
a
minimum:

°
operating
costs
°
capital
costs
°
disposal
costs
°
transportation
costs
°
material
costs
8.
Conclusions
and
recommendations.
Regarding
the
design
basis
for
scale­
up
to
a
full­
scale
system
if
the
system
is
not
already
at
full­
scale,
a
flow
sheet
of
the
system,
including
all
unit
operations
such
as
sizing,
process
conditions,
material
balances,
and
projected
capital
and
operating
costs
to
treat
the
waste,
must
be
provided.

Task
9.
Disposal
of
the
materials
and
waste
After
completing
the
testing,
the
seller
will
be
responsible
for
disposal
of
all
materials
and
waste
remaining
from
the
demonstration.

PROPOSED
SCHEDULE
The
following
schedule
will
be
completed
by
the
seller:

Company
contract
award
0
Weeks
Seller
submittal
of
all
plans
and
evidence
of
permits
(
if
any
needed)
to
the
company
Company
approval
of
plans
3
weeksa
Company
shipment
of
raw
materials
for
surrogate
preparation
Within
3
weeks
after
plan
approvala
Seller
Initiate
testing
Completion
of
seller
demonstration
testing
Seller
submittal
of
the
draft
final
report
to
the
company
Company
comments
on
draft
report
3
weeks
after
submittala
Seller
submittal
of
final
report
20
aThe
company
must
complete
these
tasks
within
the
specified
time,
or
the
schedule
will
be
adjusted
accordingly.

B.
Progress
Reports/
Deliverables
The
Seller
shall
submit
status
reports
and
deliverables
to
the
Company's
Technical
Project
Officer
as
specified
in
the
Statement
of
Work.

C.
Period
of
Performance
The
period
of
performance
under
this
Subcontract
shall
commence
on
and
expire
on
.

D.
Key
Personnel
The
following
are
identified
as
"
Key
Personnel"
and
are
considered
to
be
essential
to
the
work
being
performed
hereunder:

[
Insert
Name/
Title]

Prior
to
diverting
any
of
the
specified
person(
s)
to
other
programs,
the
Seller
shall
notify
the
Company
reasonably
in
advance
and
shall
submit
justification
(
including
proposed
substitutions)
in
sufficient
detail
to
permit
evaluation
of
the
impact
on
the
program.
No
diversion
shall
be
made
without
the
consent
of
the
Company;
provided,
that
the
Company
may
ratify
in
writing
such
diversion
and
such
ratification
shall
constitute
the
consent
of
the
Company
required
by
this
article.
The
list
of
key
personnel
may
be
amended
from
time
to
time
during
the
course
of
this
subcontract
to
either
add
or
delete
personnel,
as
appropriate.

ARTICLE
II.
CONSIDERATION
AND
PAYMENT
A.
Consideration
In
consideration
of
the
work
to
be
performed
under
Article
I.
A.,
Statement
of
Work,
the
Seller
shall
be
paid
the
fixed
price
amount
of
.

B.
Terms
of
Payment
Terms
of
payment
are
net
30
days
from
receipt
of
invoice.
21
C.
Invoicing
An
original
invoice
shall
be
submitted
to:

UT­
Battelle,
LLC
Accounts
Payable
Post
Office
Box
2308
Oak
Ridge,
Tennessee
37831­
6436
D.
Payment
Payment
shall
be
made
upon
submission
and
approval
of
proper
invoice
after
completion
and
acceptance
by
the
Company's
Technical
Project
Officer
and
in
accordance
with
the
following
Milestone
Schedule:

Date
Milestone
Amount
TDB
TBD
TBD
ARTICLE
III.
CONTENTS
OF
SUBCONTRACT
The
provisions
of
the
following
attached
articles
and
documents
are
made
a
part
of
this
Subcontract:

A..
General
Terms
and
Conditions
Fixed
Price
(
Sep
2000)

B.
Exhibit
1B,
Patent
Rights­
Acquisition
by
the
Government
(
9­
97)

C.
Exhibit
1C,
Patent
Rights
­
Retention
by
the
Seller
(
Short
Form),
(
3­
95)

D.
Exhibit
4,
Authorization
&
Consent
(
4/
84)

D.
Exhibit
9,
Technical
Data
(
7­
99)

E.
Exhibit
17,
Rights
to
Proposal
Data
(
Technical)
(
10­
91)

THE
PARTIES,
INTENDING
TO
BE
LEGALLY
BOUND,
have
executed
this
Subcontract
as
of
the
dates
set
forth
below.

THE
SELLER
UT­
BATTELLE,
LLC
22
BY:
BY:

TITLE:
TITLE:

DATE:
DATE:
