*****
Draft
Confidential
and
Deliberative
;
Do
not
Cite
or
Quote
*****

File
name:
stratus.
benefit.
schedule.
agelags.
july06.
xls
This
workbook
was
prepared
by
Status
Consulting
Inc.
7/
2/
04
contacts:
Liz
Strange
or
Dave
Cacela
303.381.8000
Worksheet
Description
benefit.
schedule
The
table
"
benefit.
schedule"
presents
estimates
of
the
fraction
of
total
benefit
that
are
expected
to
be
realized
in
years
subsequent
to
the
year
of
rule
implementation.
The
fractions
represent
the
delay
in
realization
due
to
the
fact
that
avoided
fish
deaths
occur
mainly
for
fish
that
are
not
of
harvestable
age,

so
use
benefits
of
saving
such
fish
are
realized
at
a
later
time,
typically
3­
4
years
later.
This
version
of
the
benefits
schedule
is
based
on
a
generalized
estimate
of
delays
that
are
intended
to
reflect
the
age
and
species
composition
of
I&
E
losses
on
a
national
basis.
The
basic
set
of
parameters
used
in
this
schedule
is
<
0.1,
0.2,
0.8,
0.9,
0.95,
1
>,
which
indicates
the
fraction
of
the
long­
term
annual
average
that
will
be
realized
1,2,3,4,5
and
6
years
after
implementation.
Beyond
6
years
the
fraction
is
defined
as
1.
These
parameters
are
approximations
based
on
a
review
of
the
age­
specific
fishing
mortality
rates
and
best
professional
judgment.
Estimates
are
presented
by
region
and
by
option.
The
year
of
implementation
is
defined
as
the
average
year
within
each
region
and
option.

source.
data
the
table
"
source.
data"
is
a
copy
of
a
table
previsously
provided
by
Abt
as
part
of
Average.
Compliance.
Years.
6­
14­
04.
xls.
The
table
indicates
the
average
compliance
year
by
region
and
option,
which
is
reiterated
as
"
average
year"
in
the
benefit.
schedule
DCTM_
ARP.
xls
;
File
Info
page
1
of
5
6/
21/
2006
region
average.
year
option
ben2007
ben2008
ben2009
ben2010
ben2011
ben2012
ben2013
ben2014
california
2012
option1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
california
2012
option2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
california
2010
option3
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.9
california
2012
option4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
california
2010
option5
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.9
california
2012
option6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
california
2010
option7
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.9
greatlakes
2012
option1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
greatlakes
2012
option2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
greatlakes
2012
option3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
greatlakes
2012
option4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
greatlakes
2012
option5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
greatlakes
2012
option6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
greatlakes
2011
option7
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
gulfmexico
2011
option1
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
gulfmexico
2011
option2
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
gulfmexico
2011
option3
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
gulfmexico
2011
option4
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
gulfmexico
2011
option5
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
gulfmexico
2011
option6
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
gulfmexico
2011
option7
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
inland
2012
option1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
inland
2012
option2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
inland
2012
option3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
inland
2012
option4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
inland
2012
option5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
inland
2012
option6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
inland
2012
option7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
midatlantic
2011
option1
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
midatlantic
2011
option2
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
midatlantic
2011
option3
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
midatlantic
2011
option4
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
midatlantic
2012
option5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
midatlantic
2012
option6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
midatlantic
2012
option7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
northatlantic
2010
option1
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.9
northatlantic
2010
option2
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.9
northatlantic
2010
option3
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.9
northatlantic
2010
option4
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.9
northatlantic
2010
option5
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.9
northatlantic
2010
option6
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.9
northatlantic
2010
option7
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.8
0.9
ben2015
ben2016
ben2017
ben2018
ben2019
ben2020
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.95
1
1
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.95
1
1
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.95
1
1
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.8
0.9
0.95
1
1
1
0.95
1
1
1
1
1
0.95
1
1
1
1
1
0.95
1
1
1
1
1
0.95
1
1
1
1
1
0.95
1
1
1
1
1
0.95
1
1
1
1
1
0.95
1
1
1
1
1
note.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
july06;
no
regional
distinctions
or
phase­
in
effects;
implement.
delay.
factors.
ssc
*****
Draft
Confidential
and
Deliberative
;
Do
not
Cite
or
Quote
*****

Source:
Stratus
Consulting.
P:\
INTAKE\
Intake8\
ie.
modeling\
data\
input.
workbooks\
design\
Average.
Compliance.
Years.
6­
14­
04.
xls
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Total
Average
Option
1
Inl
33.3
26.1
31.1
28.5
10.4
129.3
2012
Cal
1.1
­
­
2.8
­
3.9
2012
MA
2.1
­
1.3
1.1
­
4.4
2011
GL
4.3
13.3
16.7
3.3
2.3
39.8
2012
NA
2.0
1.8
­
­
­
3.8
2010
Mex
­
12.1
­
­
­
12.1
2011
Option
2
Inl
30.5
26.1
25.5
28.5
10.4
121.0
2012
Cal
1.1
­
­
2.8
­
3.9
2012
MA
2.1
­
1.3
1.1
­
4.4
2011
GL
4.3
13.3
16.7
3.3
2.3
39.8
2012
NA
2.0
1.8
­
­
­
3.8
2010
Mex
­
12.1
­
­
­
12.1
2011
Option
3
Inl
30.5
26.1
25.5
28.5
10.4
121.0
2012
Cal
1.1
­
­
­
­
1.1
2010
MA
2.1
­
1.3
1.1
­
4.4
2011
GL
4.3
7.9
10.6
3.3
1.3
27.2
2012
NA
2.0
1.8
­
­
­
3.8
2010
Mex
­
6.7
­
­
­
6.7
2011
Option
4
Inl
15.7
17.9
11.2
17.0
2.3
64.1
2012
Cal
1.1
­
­
2.8
­
3.9
2012
MA
2.1
­
1.3
1.1
­
4.4
2011
GL
4.3
13.3
16.7
3.3
2.3
39.8
2012
NA
2.0
1.8
­
­
­
3.8
2010
Mex
­
12.1
­
­
­
12.1
2011
Option
5
Inl
15.7
17.9
11.2
17.0
2.3
64.1
2012
Cal
1.1
­
­
­
­
1.1
2010
MA
1.1
­
1.3
1.1
­
3.4
2012
GL
4.3
6.9
4.4
3.3
1.3
20.1
2012
NA
2.0
1.8
­
­
­
3.8
2010
Mex
­
6.7
­
­
­
6.7
2011
Option
6
Inl
38.1
41.5
48.7
40.4
20.2
188.9
2012
Cal
1.1
­
­
2.8
­
3.9
2012
MA
2.1
­
1.3
1.1
1.0
5.4
2012
GL
4.3
23.3
16.7
7.4
5.1
56.7
2012
NA
2.0
1.8
­
­
­
3.8
2010
Mex
­
12.1
­
­
­
12.1
2011
Option
7
Inl
26.4
18.9
19.8
22.3
10.4
97.7
2012
Cal
1.1
­
­
­
­
1.1
2010
MA
1.1
­
1.3
1.1
­
3.4
2012
GL
4.3
7.9
4.4
3.3
1.3
21.1
2011
NA
2.0
1.8
­
­
­
3.8
2010
Mex
­
6.7
­
­
­
6.7
2011
DCTM_
ARP.
xls
;
source.
data
page
5
of
5
6/
21/
2006
