Abt
Associates
Inc.,
June
1,
2006
Identifying
Additional
Regulations
Affecting
316(
b)
Facilities
1
Environment,
Trade
and
Agriculture
55
Wheeler
Street,
Cambridge,
MA

Tel:
617
492­
7100

www.
abtassociates.
com
Date
June
1,
2006
To
316(
b)
Phase
III
Rulemaking
Record
From
Michael
Fisher,
Rob
Eggleston,
and
Antje
Siems
 
Abt
Associates
Inc.

Subject
Identifying
Additional
EPA
Regulations
That
May
Affect
316(
b)
Facilities
Background
The
public
comments
on
the
proposed
Phase
III
regulation
included
a
comment
arguing
that
the
manufacturers
analysis
should
account
for
other
environmental
regulations
that
were
recently
or
soon
to
be
promulgated,
potentially
imposing
additional
costs
beyond
those
reflected
in
the
survey
financial
statements.
As
we
explained
in
that
memorandum,
our
after­
tax
cash
flow
(
ATCF)
adjustment
analysis,
which
we
undertook
to
bring
the
estimates
of
cash
flow
forward
from
the
time
of
the
survey
(
1996­
1998)
to
the
time
of
the
regulatory
analysis
(
2004),
does
account
implicitly
for
additional
regulatory
costs
incurred
through
2004.
However,
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis
would
not
capture
the
impact
of
new
regulations
that
came
into
effect
during
this
period
and
for
which
costs
had
not
yet
been
incurred,
or
fully
incurred,
by
2004.

In
our
earlier
research,
we
confirmed
that
certain
rules
recently
came
into
effect
or
are
coming
into
effect
for
the
Primary
Manufacturing
Industries
and
whose
cost
impact
would
not
be
reflected
in
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis.
As
a
possible
approach
to
addressing
this
issue,
we
proposed
to
identify
additional
regulatory
requirements
whose
costs
are
not
likely
to
have
been
captured
in
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis,
and
then
to
consider
whether
estimation
of
facility­
specific
costs
for
these
regulations
might
be
warranted
for
the
Phase
III
final
regulation
analysis.

Following
discussion
with
EPA,
Abt
Associates
undertook
to
identify
additional
regulatory
requirements
applying
to
the
Primary
Manufacturing
Industries
or
the
Food
and
Kindred
Products
industry
(
we
refer
to
these
industries
as
the
"
316(
b)
Manufacturing
Industries"
below),
whose
costs
are
not
likely
to
have
been
captured
in
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis.
This
memorandum
reports
the
findings
from
that
research.

Approach
To
identify
recent
regulations
that
could
potentially
impose
additional
costs
to
facilities
in
the
316(
b)
Manufacturing
Industries,
we
reviewed
EPA's
Unified
Agenda
for
completed
EPA
regulatory
actions
from
2000
through
spring
2005
(
published
May
16,
2005).
Even
though
we
expect
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis
to
capture
costs
through
2005,
we
searched
back
to
2000
for
regulations
because
the
compliance
period
for
regulations
may
extend
for
five
years
or
more.
Thus,
the
costs
of
regulations
that
were
promulgated
as
early
as
2000
might
still
not
be
encompassed
in
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis.
We
identified
any
regulation
that
appeared
to
be
relevant
and
searched
for
its
Federal
Register
notice
to
ascertain
whether
the
regulation
was
indeed
one
that
could
potentially
impose
compliance
costs
on
memorandum
Abt
Associates
Inc.,
June
1,
2006
Identifying
Additional
Regulations
Affecting
316(
b)
Facilities
2
facilities
in
the
316(
b)
industries.
In
a
few
instances,
we
retrieved
and
reviewed
parts
of
the
regulatory
analysis
documents
to
confirm
the
likely
applicability
of
a
regulation
to
the
316(
b)
industries.

A
key
consideration
in
our
review
is
determining
whether
a
regulation's
costs
are
likely
to
be
reflected
in
the
updated
ATCF
adjustment
analysis
on
the
regulation's
final
compliance
date.
For
our
review,
we
set
the
following
"
rules"
for
this
determination:


Regulations
with
a
final
compliance
date
no
later
than
2004
are
assigned
to
the
category
"
compliance
costs
should
be
largely
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis."
For
these
regulations,
compliance­
related
outlays
should
have
been
fully
implemented
prior
to
2005
and
the
effect
of
these
outlays
on
depreciation
and
ongoing
expenses
should
be
reflected
in
the
2005
financial
statements,
which
serve
as
the
basis
for
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.


Regulations
with
a
final
compliance
date
in
2005
are
assigned
to
the
category
"
compliance
costs
are
not
likely
to
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis."
That
is,
although
some
compliance
activities
may
have
been
completed
early
enough
to
be
captured
in
the
ATCF
adjustment,
some
may
still
be
underway
and
will
not
be
fully
reflected
in
the
2005
financial
statements.


Regulations
with
a
final
compliance
date
of
2006
or
later
are
assigned
to
the
category
"
compliance
costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis."
In
effect,
we
assume
that
if
compliance
requirements
must
not
be
met
before
2006,
that
at
least
some
companies
will
not
comply
early
and,
as
a
result,
that
compliance
implementation
and
recording
of
costs
from
compliance
will
not
be
fully
reflected
in
a
company's
2005
financial
statements.

Findings
Our
review
identified
14
regulations
that
specifically
list
at
least
one
of
the
316(
b)
Manufacturing
Industries
(
by
SIC
or
NAICS)
as
industries
whose
facilities
may
be
subject
to
the
regulation.
We
identified
two
additional
regulations
that
may
apply
to
a
316(
b)
Manufacturing
Industry.
Our
findings
of
regulations
that
could
potentially
impose
additional
costs
on
these
industries
are
presented
in
two
tables
attached
to
this
memorandum.
Table
1:
Regulations
that
Explicitly
List
316(
b)
Industries
as
Potentially
Regulated
Industries
lists
regulations
for
which
the
Federal
Register
notice
explicitly
listed
the
Primary
Manufacturing
Industries
or
the
Food
and
Kindred
Products
industry
(
by
SIC
or
NAICS)
as
industries
whose
facilities
may
be
subject
to
the
regulation.
Table
2:
Regulations
That
Do
Not
Explicitly
List
316(
b)
Industries
As
Potentially
Regulated
Industries
lists
two
regulations
that
did
not
explicitly
identify
316(
b)
industries
as
within
their
scope.
From
our
review,
we
do
not
believe
that
these
regulations
would
impose
costs
on
316(
b)
industries.
The
tables
provide
information
on
each
regulation's
effective
date,
summary
requirement,
industries
affected,
compliance
dates,
and
estimated
compliance
costs.
Within
each
table,
the
regulations
are
ordered
from
the
highest
estimated
total
compliance
costs
to
the
lowest.

Of
the
14
regulations
identified
as
specifically
applying
to
one
or
more
of
the
316(
b)
Manufacturing
Industries,
we
assigned
only
one
regulation
to
the
compliance
costs
should
be
largely
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis
category.
1
The
compliance
date
for
the
remaining
13
regulations
is
sufficiently
late
to
suggest
that
the
cost
of
these
regulations
is
not
likely
to
be
captured
in
our
updating
of
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis.
While
all
of
these
13
regulations
have
the
potential
to
impose
costs
on
316(
b)
facilities
that
will
not
be
accounted
for
by
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis,
several
stand
out
as
more
likely
1
This
regulation
was
moved
to
the
end
of
Table
1.
Abt
Associates
Inc.,
June
1,
2006
Identifying
Additional
Regulations
Affecting
316(
b)
Facilities
3
to
impose
material
costs
on
a
substantial
number
facilities,
and
thus
may
warrant
additional
analysis
for
the
Phase
III
regulation:
2

The
NESHAP
Regulation
for
Industrial,
Commercial,
and
Institutional
Boilers
and
Process
Heaters
(
Regulation
1
in
Table
1)
appears
to
have
the
most
potential
to
impose
material
costs
on
a
substantial
number
of
316(
b)
facilities
and
that
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis
would
not
account
for,
for
the
following
reasons.
This
regulation
is
expected
to
impose
a
large
total
annualized
cost
($
860
million,
$
1999);
it
applies
to
facilities
with
boilers,
which
often
also
have
cooling
water
intake
systems;
and
it
was
recently
promulgated
(
11/
04)
with
a
final
compliance
date
(
9/
07)
beyond
the
period
of
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis.
The
regulation
is
expected
to
apply
to
348
facilities
with
an
average
annualized
cost
of
about
$
2.5
million
per
facility.


The
NESHAP
Regulation
for
Miscellaneous
Organic
Chemical
Manufacturers
(
Regulation
2)
imposes
relatively
substantial
costs
($
75
million,
dollar
year
assumed
to
be
2003)
on
a
more
narrowly
defined
industry.
The
regulation
is
estimated
to
affect
207
facilities
in
a
fairly
wide
range
of
organic
chemical
manufacturing
operations
and
thus
on
average
would
impose
annualized
costs
of
about
$
360,000
per
facility.
We
have
no
knowledge
of
whether
these
organic
chemical
operations
are
likely
to
be
present
at
316(
b)
chemical
industry
facilities.


The
NESHAP
Regulation
for
Petroleum
Refineries
(
Regulation
3)
would
impose
moderately
large
costs
($
47
million,
$
1998)
and
again
on
a
relatively
narrowly
defined
industry
(
184
units
at
127
affected
facilities),
and
thus
may
warrant
further
analysis.
Average
total
annualized
cost
per
affected
facility
is
about
$
370,000.


NESHAPs
for
Coke
Ovens
and
Integrated
Iron
and
Steel
Manufacturers
(
Regulations
5
and
6).
Together
these
regulations
impose
costs
of
approximately
$
36
million
($
20.1
million,
$
2001,
and
$
15.5
million,
$
2000)
on
integrated
operations
in
the
iron
and
steel
industry.
The
affected
processes
appear
to
be
widely
employed
in
integrated
operations.
These
rules
are
expected
to
affect
17
facilities
(
Coke
Ovens
rule)
and
18
facilities
(
Integrated
Iron
and
Steel
Manufacturers
rule)
and
impose
average
total
annualized
costs
of
$
1.2
million
and
$
860,000,
respectively.
In
terms
of
cost
on
a
per
facility
basis,
these
regulations
have
higher
potential
for
materially
affecting
316(
b)
facilities.

Several
of
the
remaining
regulations
are
NESHAP
regulations
that
apply
to
specific
processes
or
segments
of
the
chemical
industry
(
Regulations
7,
9,
11
and
12).
Individually,
these
regulations
impose
relatively
smaller
annualized
costs
($
1.4
­
$
15.0
million).
We
have
no
knowledge
of
whether
the
chemical
operations
covered
by
these
NESHAP
rules
are
likely
to
be
present
at
316(
b)
chemical
industry
facilities.
The
facility
average
of
total
annualized
costs
for
these
regulations
range
from
a
comparatively
low
value
of
$
124,000
per
facility
($
1999)
to
a
comparatively
high
value
of
$
746,000
per
facility
($
1998).
For
each
regulation,
the
number
of
facilities
expected
to
be
affected
is
quite
small,
ranging
from
nine
to
65
facilities.

The
Effluent
Limitations
Guideline
for
the
Iron
and
Steel
Industry
(
Regulation
8)
imposes
lower
total
cost
 
$
12.0
million
in
total
annualized
cost,
all
facilities
($
2001)
 
and
lower
average
facility
cost
 
$
47,000
in
total
annualized
cost,
per
facility
($
2001)
 
than
most
of
the
regulations
identified.

From
this
review,
we
conclude
that
several
EPA
regulations
have
recently
become
effective
that
are
likely
to
impose
costs
on
316(
b)
facilities
beyond
those
costs
accounted
for
in
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis.

2
Total
and
average
costs
are
annualized
industry
compliance
costs
based
on
the
preambles
to
the
respective
rules.
Abt
Associates
Inc.,
June
1,
2006
Identifying
Additional
Regulations
Affecting
316(
b)
Facilities
4
Table
1:
Regulations
that
Explicitly
List
316(
b)
Industries
as
Potentially
Regulated
Industries
No.
Regulation
Effective
Date
Summary
316(
b)
Industries
Affected
Compliance
Date
Annual
Cost;

N
Facilities
Affected
Comment
1
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Industrial,
Commercial,
and
Institutional
Boilers
and
Process
Heaters;
Final
Rule
11/
04
Sets
emission
limits
for
several
hazardous
air
pollutants
(
HAPs)
for
boilers
and
process
heaters
Most,
including
pulp
and
paper
mills,

petroleum
refineries,

chemical
manufacturers,
and
steel
works
(
blast
furnaces)
Not
later
than
9/
07
$
860
million
($
1999);

348
facilities
average
cost:
$
2.5
million
per
facility.
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
by
the
ATCF
adjustment
analysis.

Costs
are
likely
to
apply
to
a
substantial
number
of
316(
b)

facilities
since
cooling
water
systems
are
often
installed
with
boiler
systems.

2
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:

Miscellaneous
Organic
Chemical
Manufacturing;
Final
Rule
11/
03
Sets
emission
limits
for
several
HAPs
for
miscellaneous
organic
chemical
manufacturers
Chemical
manufacturers
Not
later
than
11/
06
$
75.1
million
assumed
$
2003);

207
facilities
average
cost:

$
360,000
per
facility.
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.

Costs
apply
only
to
a
segment
of
chemical
industry
facilities.

3
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Petroleum
Refineries:
Catalytic
Cracking
Units,
Catalytic
Reforming
Units,
and
Sulfur
Recovery
Units;
Final
Rule
04/
02
Sets
emission
limits
for
several
HAPs
for
catalytic
cracking
units,
catalytic
reforming
units,
and
sulfur
recovery
limits,
as
well
as
associated
by­
pass
lines
Petroleum
refineries
Not
later
than
4/
07;

12/
09
for
some
refineries
that
meet
certain
requirements
$
47.3
million
($
1998);
127
facilities
(
at
proposal)

average
cost:

$
370,000
per
facility.
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.

Because
of
pervasiveness
of
these
operations
at
refineries,
appears
likely
to
apply
most,
if
not,
all
refineries
subject
to
316(
b)

regulation
4
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:

Organic
Liquids
Distribution
(
Non­
Gasoline);
Final
Rule
02/
04
Sets
emission
limits
for
several
HAPs
for
new
and
existing
organic
liquids
distribution
operations
Chemical
manufacturers,

petroleum
refineries;

potentially
others
Not
later
than
02/
07;

02/
14
for
some
roof
storage
tanks
$
25.1
million
($
1997);

381
facilities;
183
are
chemical
manufacturers,
93
are
refineries
average
cost:

$
66,000
per
facility.
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.

Applies
to
distribution
operations.

While
we
have
no
specific
knowledge
of
the
extent
to
which
these
operations
overlap
with
316(
b)
facilities,
on
the
surface,
the
regulation
would
seem
less
likely
to
affect
316(
b)
facilities.

5
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Coke
Ovens:
Pushing,

Quenching,
and
Battery
Stacks;

Final
Rule
04/
03
Sets
emission
limits
for
several
HAPs
for
coke
ovens
Integrated
steel
mills
Not
later
than
04/
06
$
20.1
million
($
2001);

17
facilities
average
cost:
$
1.2
million
per
facility.
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.

Applies
to
integrated
I&
S
operations.

6
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:

Integrated
Iron
and
Steel
Manufacturing;
Final
Rule
05/
03
Sets
emission
limits
for
several
HAPs
for
integrated
iron
and
steel
manufacturing
facilities
Integrated
steel
mills
Not
later
than
05/
06
$
15.5
million
($
2000);

18
facilities
average
cost:

$
860,000
per
facility.
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.

Applies
to
integrated
I&
S
operations.
Abt
Associates
Inc.,
June
1,
2006
Identifying
Additional
Regulations
Affecting
316(
b)
Facilities
5
Table
1:
Regulations
that
Explicitly
List
316(
b)
Industries
as
Potentially
Regulated
Industries
No.
Regulation
Effective
Date
Summary
316(
b)
Industries
Affected
Compliance
Date
Annual
Cost;

N
Facilities
Affected
Comment
7
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:

Generic
Maximum
Achievable
Control
Technology;
Final
Rules
and
Proposed
Rule
07/
02
Sets
emission
limits
for
four
source
categories:

Cyanide
Chemicals
Manufacturing,
Carbon
Black
Production,

Ethylene
Production,
and
Spandex
Production.
Chemical
manufacturers,

certain
segments
Not
later
than
07/
05
$
15
million
($
1998);

53
facilities
average
cost:

$
283,000
per
facility.
Costs
are
not
likely
to
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.
Applies
only
to
limited
segments
of
the
chemical
industry.

8
Effluent
Limitations
Guidelines,

Pretreatment
Standards,
and
New
Source
Performance
Standards
for
the
Iron
and
Steel
Manufacturing
Point
Source
Category;
Final
Rule
11/
02
Revises
CWA
effluent
limitations
guidelines
and
standards
for
wastewater
discharges
from
the
iron
and
steel
manufacturing
industry
Steel
manufacturers
Not
later
than
10/
05
$
12.0
million
($
2001);

254
facilities
average
cost:

$
47,000
per
facility.
Costs
are
not
likely
to
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.
Previous
inquiry
(
2004,

during
analysis
for
proposal)
on
this
regulation
resulted
in
guidance
not
to
apply
costs
for
the
I&
S
effluent
guideline
to
316(
b)
facilities.
That
guidance
was
apparently
based
on
comparison
of
the
sample
facility
sets
for
both
regulations,
which
is
not
necessarily
a
valid
test
of
potential
effect
of
the
I&
S
regulation
on
316(
b)
facilities.

9
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:

Cellulose
Products
Manufacturing;
Final
Rule
06/
02
Sets
emission
limits
for
HAPs
for
cellulose
products
manufacturing
Chemical
manufacturers
Not
later
than
06/
05;

except
06/
10
for
rayon
operations
$
9.7
million
($
1998);

13
facilities
average
cost:

$
746,000
per
facility.
Costs
are
not
likely
to
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.
Applies
only
to
limited
segments
of
the
chemical
industry.

10
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Site
Remediation;
Final
Rule
10/
03
Sets
emission
limits
for
several
HAPs
from
site
remediation
Chemical
manufacturers,

primary
aluminum;

potentially
others
Not
later
than
10/
06
$
9
million
($
1997);

Due
to
nature
of
coverage,
no
hard
number
of
facilities,

but
chemicals
and
primary
aluminum
are
part
of
15
Industries
with
highest
total
annual
control
costs.
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.

Would
apply
to
only
a
limited
set
of
facilities.

11
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:

Hydrochloric
Acid
Production;

Final
Rule
04/
03
Sets
emission
limits
for
HAPs
for
hydrochloric
acid
production
facilities
Chemical
manufacturers
Not
later
than
04/
06
$
8.1
million
in
FR
($
1999);

65
facilities
average
cost:

$
124,000
per
facility.
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.

Applies
only
to
limited
segments
of
the
chemical
industry.
Abt
Associates
Inc.,
June
1,
2006
Identifying
Additional
Regulations
Affecting
316(
b)
Facilities
6
Table
1:
Regulations
that
Explicitly
List
316(
b)
Industries
as
Potentially
Regulated
Industries
No.
Regulation
Effective
Date
Summary
316(
b)
Industries
Affected
Compliance
Date
Annual
Cost;

N
Facilities
Affected
Comment
12
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:

Mercury
Emissions
from
Mercury
Cell
Chlor­
Alkali
Plants;
Final
Rule
12/
03
Sets
emission
limits
for
mercury
for
mercury
cell
chlor­
alkali
plants
Chemical
manufacturers
Not
later
than
12/
06
$
1.4
million
(
assumed
$
2002);

9
facilities
average
cost:

$
155,000
per
facility.
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.

Applies
only
to
limited
segments
of
the
chemical
industry.

13
Control
of
Emissions
of
Air
Pollution
From
Nonroad
Diesel
Engines
and
Fuel;
Final
Rule
08/
04
Sets
new
emission
standards
for
nonroad
diesel
engines
and
reduces
sulfur
content
of
nonroad
diesel
fuel.
Petroleum
refineries
(
for
production
of
lower
sulfur
content
diesel
fuel)
2007­
2014,

with
staged
reduction
in
sulfur
content
Costs
occur
in
stages
($
2002);

63
facilities.
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.

Phase
1
cost
(
begins
2007):
$
9.7
million
capital
outlay
and
$
5.9
million
annual
operating
expense
for
average
refinery.
Phase
2
(
begins
2010):
$
36.0
million
capital
outlay
and
$
8.3
million
annual
operating
expense
for
average
refinery.

14
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Chemical
Recovery
Combustion
Sources
at
Kraft,
Soda,
Sulfite,

and
Stand­
Alone
Semichemical
Pulp
Mills;
Final
Rule
03/
01
Sets
emission
limits
for
HAPs
for
new
and
existing
sources
used
in
chemical
recovery
processes
at
certain
paper
mills
Pulp
and
paper
mills
Not
later
than
01/
04
$
32.3
million
($
1997);

all
existing
kraft
and
soda
pulp
mills,
8
sulfite
mills,
and
12
stand­
alone
semichemical
pulp
mills
average
cost.
Costs
should
be
largely
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.

Costs
would
apply
only
to
facilities
with
operations
in
the
indicated
coverage.

Source:
Rule
preambles.
See
reference
section.
Abt
Associates
Inc.,
June
1,
2006
Identifying
Additional
Regulations
Affecting
316(
b)
Facilities
7
Table
2:
Regulations
That
Do
Not
Explicitly
List
316(
b)
Industries
As
Potentially
Regulated
Industries
No.
Regulation
Effective
Date
Summary
316(
b)
Industries
Affected
Compliance
Date
Annual
Cost;

N
Facilities
Affected
Comment
1
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Stationary
Reciprocating
Internal
Combustion
Engines;

Final
Rule
08/
04
Sets
emission
limits
for
HAPs
for
stationary
reciprocating
internal
combustion
engines
(
RICE)
with
a
site­
rating
of
more
than
500
brake
horsepower.
Any
industry
using
a
stationary
RICE
as
defined
in
the
final
rule.
Not
later
than
06/
07
Annual
cost
of
$
248
million
for
new
and
existing
RICE
in
5th
year
($
1998);
at
least
834
facilities,

however,
little
information
on
whether
these
are
likely
to
be
316(
b)

facilities
Costs
will
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.
However,
whether
316(
b)
facilities
would
have
the
applicable
equipment
is
questionable.

2
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Stationary
Combustion
Turbines;
Final
Rule
03/
04
Sets
emission
limits
for
HAPs
for
stationary
combustion
turbines
Any
industry
using
a
stationary
combustion
turbine
as
defined
in
the
regulation
03/
04.
Currently
only
applies
to
new
turbines,

which
must
meet
requirements
Annual
cost
of
$
43
million
in
the
5th
year
($
1998);
218
new
turbines
expected
to
come
online
between
2002
and
2007.
Costs
may
not
be
fully
captured
in
the
ACTF
adjustment
analysis.
Would
apply
to
facilities
installing
a
new
combustion
turbine.
The
extent
to
which
316(
b)
facilities
may
have
such
equipment
is
unknown.

Source:
Rule
preambles.
Abt
Associates
Inc.,
June
1,
2006
Identifying
Additional
Regulations
Affecting
316(
b)
Facilities
8
References
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Industrial,
Commercial,
and
Institutional
Boilers
and
Process
Heaters;
Final
Rule.
69
FR
55218.
September
13,
2004.
(
Rule
#
1)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Miscellaneous
Organic
Chemical
Manufacturing;
Final
Rule.
68
FR
63857.
November
10,
2003.
(
Rule
#
2)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Petroleum
Refineries:
Catalytic
Cracking,
Catalytic
Performing,
and
Sulfur
Plant
Units;
Final
Rule.
67
FR
17762.
April
11,
2002.
(
Rule
#
3)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Organic
Liquids
Distribution
(
Non­
Gasoline);
Final
Rule.
69
FR
5038.
February
3,
2004.
(
Rule
#
4)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Coke
Ovens:
Pushing,
Quenching,
and
Battery
Stacks;
Final
Rule.
68
FR
18008.
April
14,
2003.
(
Rule
#
5)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Integrated
Iron
and
Steel
Manufacturing;
Final
Rule.
68
FR
27646.
May
20,
2003.
(
Rule
#
6)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Generic
Maximum
Achievable
Control
Technology;
Final
Rules
and
Proposed
Rule.
67
FR
46259.
July
12,
2002.
(
Rule
#
7)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
Effluent
Limitations
Guidelines,
Pretreatment
Standards,
and
New
Source
Performance
Standards
for
the
Iron
and
Steel
Manufacturing
Point
Source
Category;
Final
Rule.
67
FR
64216.
October
17,
2002.
(
Rule
#
8)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Cellulose
Products
Manufacturing;
Final
Rule.
67
FR
40044.
June
11,
2002.
(
Rule
#
9)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Site
Remediation;
Final
Rule.
68
FR
58172.
October
8,
2003.
(
Rule
#
10)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Hydrochloric
Acid
Production;
Final
Rule.
68
FR
19076.
April
17,
2003.
(
Rule
#
11)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants:
Mercury
Emissions
from
Mercury
Cell
Chlor­
Alkali
Plants;
Final
Rule.
68
FR
70904.
December
19,
2003.
(
Rule
#
12)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
Control
of
Emissions
of
Air
Pollution
From
Nonroad
Diesel
Engines
and
Fuel;
Final
Rule.
69
FR
38958.
June
29,
2004.
(
Rule
#
13)

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
U.
S.
EPA).
National
Emission
Standards
for
Hazardous
Air
Pollutants
for
Chemical
Recovery
Combustion
Sources
at
Kraft,
Soda,
Sulfite,
and
Stand­
Alone
Semichemical
Pulp
Mills;
Final
Rule.
66
FR
3180.
January
12,
2001.
(
Rule
#
14)
