Science
Applications
International
Corporation.
11251
Roger
Bacon
Drive,
Reston,
VA
20190
1
MEMORANDUM
To:
316(
b)
Phase
III
NODA
Record
From:
John
Sunda,
SAIC
and
Regno
Arulgnanendran,
Tetra
Tech
Date:
November
10,
2005
Subject:
Compliance
Costs
for
Each
Flow
Alternative
As
part
of
the
review
of
the
Phase
III
Proposal
compliance
costs
estimation
methodology,
EPA
performed
the
following:

1.
Revised
compliance
costs
based
on
updated
facility
input
data
including
updated
Design
Intake
Flow
(
DIF);
update
cost­
test
tool,
including
incorporating
additional
input
variables
in
cost­
test
tool
2.
Revised
O&
M
costs
3.
Reviewed
and
revised
estimates
of
net
downtime
duration
4.
Conducted
sensitivity
analysis
on
compliance
costs
by
using
alternatives
to
DIF
such
as
Maximum
Reported
Intake
Flow
(
MRIF)
and
Average
Intake
Flow
(
AIF)

The
three
spreadsheets
under
DCN
8­
6608
provide
details
of
the
above
stated
review
and
revision.

(
i)
The
spreadsheet
titled
DIF
BASED
P3_
NODA_
Cost_
Summaries
(
7­
28­
05)
_
nonCBI13.
xls
(
DCN
8­
6608A)
provides
the
components
of
the
capital
costs
and
O&
M
costs
for
the
three
options
based
on
DIF
as
the
intake
flow.

The
spreadsheets
titled
(
ii)
MRIF
BASED
P3_
NODA_
Cost_
Summaries
(
7­
28­
05)
_
nonCBI13.
xls
(
DCN
8­
6608B)
and
(
iii)
AIF
BASED
P3_
NODA_
Cost_
Summaries
(
7­
28­
05)
_
nonCBI13.
xls
(
DCN
8­
6608C)
provide
the
components
of
the
capital
costs
and
O&
M
costs
for
the
three
options
based
on
MRIF
and
AIF,
respectively
as
the
intake
flow.

In
all
three
spreadsheets
costs
are
weighted
and
inflated
to
2004$
based
on
ENR
CCI
of
7115
for
mid­
2004
and
CCI
of
6605
for
mid­
2002,
unless
otherwise
indicated.

Details
of
the
revisions
made,
their
impact
of
the
various
cost
components
and
results
of
the
sensitivity
analysis
based
on
alternate
intake
flows
are
presented
under
DCN
8­
6600.
