FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
1
of
52
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
(
40
CFR
464)
Detailed
Investigation
for
2004/
2005
Planning
Process
Executive
Summary
During
the
Screening
Level
Review
phase
of
the
2004/
2005
planning
process,
metal
molding
and
casting
was
one
of
eight
industrial
categories
identified
solely
through
Factor
4
concerns.
Issues
driving
the
concerns
include:
1)
discharges
of
phenol,
2)
changes
to
the
industry
since
the
guidelines
were
promulgated,
3)
applicability
to
aluminum
die
casters,
and
4)
discrepancies
between
limits
set
for
these
guidelines
and
those
set
for
the
same
pollutants
by
the
guidelines
for
metal
finishing.
Based
on
information
reported
to
the
Toxic
Release
Inventory
(
TRI)
and
the
Permit
Compliance
System
(
PCS),
toxic
discharges
from
metal
molding
and
casting
facilities
are
low
relative
to
other
industrial
categories.
In
addition,
generally,
a
few
facilities
drive
the
toxic
weighted
pound
equivalent
(
TWPE)
loading
estimates
from
both
TRI
and
PCS.

The
information
in
the
record
at
this
time
does
not
support
a
decision
to
revise
these
effluent
guidelines.
In
the
event
that
stakeholders
provide
additional
data
and
supporting
information
during
subsequent
review
cycles,
EPA
will
reevaluate
them
at
that
time.
In
the
absence
of
revisions
to
the
effluent
guidelines,
these
concerns
could
be
addressed
through
improved
information
dissemination
and
outreach
by
EPA.
This
could
include
the
development
of
a
fact
sheet
with
answers
to
frequently
asked
questions
(
FAQs),
including
the
names
of
current
contacts
within
the
Office
of
Water.
The
Agency
could
announce
the
availability
of
this
fact
sheet
at
the
regular
meetings
for
permit
writers
and
pretreatment
coordinators
held
by
the
Office
of
Wastewater
Management
(
OWM)
and
through
internet
postings
and
email
alerts
to
the
Engineering
and
Analysis
Division
(
EAD)
stakeholders
mailing
list.
To
explore
the
concern
about
the
limits
for
phenol,
EPA
could
confirm
whether
smaller
aluminum
casters
were
evaluated
during
guideline
development.
If
in
fact
they
were
not
considered
in
depth,
EPA
could
then
solicit
data
from
the
respondents
or
the
facilities
they
identify
in
order
to
verify
and
clarify
the
issue.
Any
information
received
through
this
research
effort
could
be
considered
during
a
subsequent
planning
cycle.
Finally,
due
to
the
relatively
small
number
of
facilities
discharging
the
bulk
of
the
TWPE,
EPA
could
also
provide
assistance
to
permit
writers
in
preparing
permits
based
on
best
professional
judgment
(
BPJ).

Overview
This
report
presents
information
for
the
following
topics:
Background
Industry
and
Related
Subcategories
Wastewater
Characteristics
and
Pollutant
Sources
Pollutants
Discharged
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
2
of
52
Treatment
Technology
and
Pollution
Prevention
Concerns
Identified
Pre­
Proposal
Concerns
Identified
in
Comments
to
Proposal
Additional
Concerns
Identified
Post­
Proposal
Followup
Contacts
Possible
Solutions
Attachments
provide
the
following
supporting
information:
EPA
Databases
and
References
Used
in
this
Review
Point
Source
Categories
Identified
Solely
Through
Factor
4
Guidelines
Applicability
and
Regulatory
History
PCS
Discharges
TRI
Discharges
Reported
Pollutant
Loadings
Background
In
preparation
for
proposing
the
Preliminary
Effluent
Guidelines
Program
Plan
for
2004/
2005
("
Preliminary
Plan,"
published
in
February
2004),
EPA
analyzed
four
factors
identified
in
the
draft
"
National
Strategy
for
Industrial
Clean
Water"(
Edocket
OW­
2003­
0074­
0215).
See
Attachment
A
for
more
background
about
the
304(
m)
planning
Process.
The
four
factors
focus
on:
1
Potential
impacts
to
human
health
and
the
environment.
Preliminary
results
are
summarized
in
the
"
Factor
1
Analysis:
Human
Health
and
Environmental
Impacts
 
Status
of
Screening
Level
Review
Phase"
(
Edocket
OW­
2003­
0074­
0410).
2
Identification
of
an
applicable
and
demonstrated
technology,
process
change,
or
pollution
prevention
alternative
that
can
effectively
reduce
pollutants
discharged.
Preliminary
results
are
summarized
in
the
"
Factor
2
Analysis:
Technology
Advances
and
Process
Changes
 
Status
of
Screening
Level
Review
Phase."
(
Edocket
OW­
2003­
0074­
0287).
3
Evaluation
of
the
cost,
performance,
and
affordability
of
the
technology,
process
change,
or
pollution
prevention
measures
identified
using
the
second
factor.
4
Implementation
and
efficiency
concerns.
Preliminary
results
are
presented
in
the
"
Factor
4
Analysis:
Implementation
and
Efficiency
Considerations
 
Status
of
Screening
Level
Review
Phase"
(
Edocket
OW­
2003­
0074­
0329)

When
all
of
the
results
were
integrated
prior
to
proposing
the
Preliminary
Plan,
EPA
determined
that
8
point
source
categories
with
existing
effluent
guidelines
had
been
identified
solely
through
Factor
4
concerns.
(
See
list
in
the
Attachment
B.)
In
order
to
determine
the
best
course
of
action
to
address
these
concerns,
EPA
performed
an
analysis
of
issues
and
potential
solutions
for
each
of
the
8
categories.
The
results
of
that
analysis
for
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
are
presented
in
this
report.
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
3
of
52
Industry
and
Related
Subcategories
The
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
point
source
category
is
regulated
at
40
CFR
Part
464.
See
Attachment
C
for
the
applicability
and
regulatory
background.
This
point
source
category
includes
facilities
reporting
under
Standard
Industrial
Classification
(
SIC)
industry
group
33:
Primary
Metal
Industries,
and
the
subgroups
332:
Iron
and
Steel
Foundries
and
336:
Nonferrous
Foundries.
Specifically,
it
includes
SIC
3321
(
Gray
and
Ductile
Iron
Foundries),
3325
(
Steel
Foundries
Not
Elsewhere
Classified),
3364
(
Nonferrous
Die­
Castings,
Except
Aluminum),
3365
(
Aluminum
Foundries),
3366
(
Copper
Foundries),
and
3369
(
Nonferrous
Foundries
Except
Aluminum
and
Copper).
No
specific
subcategories
were
identified
during
the
Factor
4
analysis.

°
SIC
3321
­
Gray
and
Ductile
Iron
Foundries
Establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
gray
and
ductile
iron
castings,
including
cast
iron
pressure
and
soil
pipes
and
fittings.

°
SIC
3322
­
Malleable
Iron
Foundries
Establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
malleable
iron
castings.

°
SIC
3324
­
Steel
Investment
Foundries
Establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
steel
investment
castings.

°
SIC
3325
­
Steel
Foundries,
Not
Elsewhere
Classified
Establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
steel
castings,
not
elsewhere
classified.

°
SIC
3364
­
Nonferrous
Die­
Castings,
Except
Aluminum
Establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
nonferrous
metal
die­
castings,
except
aluminum.

°
SIC
3365
­
Aluminum
Foundries
Establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
aluminum
(
including
alloys)
castings,
except
die­
castings.

°
SIC
3366
­
Copper
Foundries
Establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
copper
(
including
alloys)
castings,
except
die­
castings.

°
SIC
3369
­
Nonferrous
Foundries,
Except
Aluminum
and
Copper
Establishments
primarily
engaged
in
manufacturing
nonferrous
metal
castings
(
including
alloys),
except
all
die­
castings
and
other
castings
of
aluminum
or
copper.

The
following
tables
present
the
facilities
in
this
category
that
report
to
the
Permit
Compliance
System
(
PCS)
and
to
the
Toxic
Release
Inventory
(
TRI).
(
Note:
Since
this
industry
ranked
low
during
the
screening
phase,
EPA
did
not
verify
any
of
the
information
reported
to
PCS
and
TRI,
and
has
used
it
as
reported.
Although
information
in
PCS
and
TRI
is
limited,
it
can
provide
insight
into
this
industry.
See
Attachment
A
for
more
details
about
PCS
and
TRI.)
Table
1
shows
the
number
of
facilities
identified
for
this
industry.
Table
2
lists
the
facilities
reporting
to
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
4
of
52
PCS
under
these
SIC
codes.
Table
3
lists
the
facilities
reporting
to
TRI
under
these
SIC
codes.
Attachments
D
and
E
list
these
facilities
along
with
their
reported
discharges.

Table
1.
Number
of
Facilities
SIC
1997
Census
PCS
TRI
Total
Major
Minor
Total
Reporters
No
reported
discharge
Direct
discharge
Indirect
discharge
Both
direct
&
indirect
3321
669
31
4
27
200
137
28
22
13
3322
28
4
0
4
8
5
2
1
0
3324
159
2
0
2
43
23
3
10
7
3325
288
8
2
6
99
72
15
8
4
3364
279
6
0
6
20
14
0
6
0
3365
626
14
2
12
74
60
8
4
2
3366
312
0
0
0
72
49
10
8
5
3369
141
6
0
6
58
32
6
14
6
Source:
PCSLoads2000,
TRIReleases2000
Table
2.
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
Facilities
Reporting
to
PCS,
Sorted
by
State
SIC
NPDES
ID
NAME
CITY
STATE
3321
IL0001830
CATERPILLAR
INC.­
MAPLETON
(
also
reports
to
TRI)
MAPLETON
IL
3365
IN0003573
G.
M.
CORP.
POWERTRAIN
DIV.
BEDFORD
IN
3325
KY0100153
STEEL
TECHNOLOGIES
INC
GHENT
GHENT
KY
3365
KY0001864
INVENSYS
PRECISION
DIE
CASTING
RUSSELLVILLE
KY
3325
NJ0004049
FLOWSERVE
CORP/
INGERSOLL
RAND
PHILLIPSBURG
NJ
3321
OH0004901
BURNHAM
CORPORATION
ZANESVILLE
OH
3321
OH0002666
GENERAL
MOTORS
CORP.
DEFIANCE
OH
3321
TX0001465
RANSOM
INDUSTRIES
LP
TYLER
TX
Table
3.
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
Facilities
Reporting
to
TRI
SIC
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
City
State
3321
36201MHVLV605WE
M
&
H
VALVE
CO.
ANNISTON
AL
3321
35023NTDST2023S
UNITED
STATES
PIPE
&
FNDY.
CO.
BESSEMER
AL
3321
36201SCSTN1831F
U.
S.
PIPE
&
FNDY.
CO.
INC.
U.
S.
CASTINGS
DIV.
ANNISTON
AL
SIC
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
City
State
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
5
of
52
3324
36201STHRNHIGHW
SOUTHERN
TOOL
INC.
OXFORD
AL
3324
36830VRMNT155AL
VERMONT
AMERICAN
AUBURN
AL
3325
35222THMSF900NO
SVEDALA
INDS.
INC.
THOMAS
DIV.
BIRMINGHAM
AL
3325
35055MRCNL1725O
AMERICAN
ALLOY
PRODS.
INC.
CULLMAN
AL
3325
36605MBLPL905SO
MOBILE
PULLEY
&
MACHINE
WORKS
MOBILE
AL
3365
35222STBRM831NO
EAST
BIRMINGHAM
BRONZE
FNDY.
INC
BIRMINGHAM
AL
3365
35094SQRDC940MO
ANDERSON
ELECTRICAL
PRODS.
INC.
LEEDS
AL
3366
35215LBMCP1501R
ALABAMA
COPPER
&
BRONZE
CO.
INC.
BIRMINGHAM
AL
3366
36202LBRSSGOLDE
LEE
BRASS
CO.
ANNISTON
AL
3369
35096LNCLNRAILR
LINCOLN
METALS
CORP.
LINCOLN
AL
3366
72143MTTHW501LI
MATTHEWS
INTL.
CORP.
SEARCY
AR
3324
85043DLPHN740SO
DOLPHIN
INC.
PHOENIX
AZ
3366
85714KNGHT420EA
TUCSON
FNDY.
&
MFG.
INC.
TUCSON
AZ
3321
94587NTDST1295W
U.
S.
PIPE
&
FNDY.
CO.
INC.
UNION
CITY
CA
3321
92627GRSWL1701P
GRISWOLD
INDS.
COSTA
MESA
CA
3324
91745TLDYN16800
TELEDYNE
CAST
PARTS
INDUSTRY
OPS.
CITY
OF
INDUSTRY
CA
3324
94577PRCSN414HE
WYMAN
GORDON
CO.
SAN
LEANDRO
CA
3365
90058LMNMC5151A
PECHINEY
CAST
PLATE
VERNON
CA
3369
93277MNC00401EC
EMI
INC.
VISALIA
CA
3369
90280TCHNC11220
TECHNI­
CAST
CORP.
SOUTH
GATE
CA
3369
90032RRWHD5142A
ARROWHEAD
BRASS
PRODS.
INC.
LOS
ANGELES
CA
3369
94590DGSSL403RY
TIMET
VALLEJO
CA
3369
95037DGSSC16035
UNAXIS
MATERIALS
INC.
MORGAN
HILL
CA
3369
80517RCKRB2050B
RICKER
BARTLETT
INC.
MICHAEL
RICKER
PEWTER
(
DBA)
ESTES
PARK
CO
3322
06786ZGDNYMAINS
O­
Z/
GEDNEY
L.
L.
C.
TERRYVILLE
CT
3365
06082YNKCS243SH
YANKEE
CASTING
CO.
INC.
ENFIELD
CT
3369
33634CHRML7030A
CHROMALLOY
CASTINGS
TAMPA
TAMPA
FL
3321
30458GRNNLHIGHW
ANVIL
INTL.
STATESBORO
GA
3321
30828WHLND1117T
WHELAND
AUTOMOTIVE
INDS.
WARRENTON
GA
3321
31995CLMBS1600N
INTERMET
COLUMBUS
FNDY.
INC.
COLUMBUS
GA
3321
51501GRFFN2601W
GRIFFIN
PIPE
PRODS.
CO.
COUNCIL
BLUFFS
IA
3321
52577CLWVLOLDHW
CLOW
VALVE
CO.
FNDY.
OSKALOOSA
IA
3325
52722SVYRS225S3
SIVYER
STEEL
CORP.
BETTENDORF
IA
3321
61547CTRPL8826W
CATERPILLAR
INC.
MAPLETON
PLANT
MAPLETON
IL
3321
61605CTRPL2411W
CATERPILLAR
INC.
SEAL
RING
MAPLETON
IL
3321
62521WGNRC1275E
INTERMET
DECATUR
FNDY.
DECATUR
IL
3324
60101FNSTL21NCH
FANSTEEL
ESCAST
ADDISON
IL
3325
62040MRCNS1700W
AMERICAN
STEEL
FOUNDRIES
GRANITE
CITY
IL
3364
60050LLDDC3923W
ALLIED
DIE
CASTING
CORP.
MC
HENRY
IL
3366
60538RRNDS1002G
AURORA
METALS
DIV.
L.
L.
C.
MONTGOMERY
IL
3366
60005MGNCS1117E
AMPCO
METAL
INC.
ARLINGTON
HTS
IL
3369
62223CNTRY1300N
CENTURY
CASTINGS
CORP.
SWANSEA
IL
3321
46580THDLTCORNE
DALTON
CORP.
WARSAW
IN
3321
46241CHRYS1100S
INDIANAPOLIS
FNDY.
INDIANAPOLIS
IN
3321
47374SLVCS2153W
PERFECT
CIRCLE
DIV.
DANA
CORP.
RICHMOND
LINER
FND
RICHMOND
IN
3321
46706BRNFN63563
AUBURN
FNDY.
INC.
AUBURN
IN
3321
47394MCCST900NM
OMCO
CAST
METALS
WINCHESTER
IN
SIC
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
City
State
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
6
of
52
3321
47202CWCTX1616T
GOLDEN
CASTING
CORP.
COLUMBUS
IN
3321
46706BRNFN2278C
AUBURN
FNDY.
INC.
PLANT
#
2
AUBURN
IN
3324
46580MDCST596EA
MED
CAST
INC.
WARSAW
IN
3324
46350RMTLSPOBOX
AERO
METALS
INC.
LA
PORTE
IN
3325
47918HRRSN900MO
HARRISON
STEEL
CASTINGS
CO.
ATTICA
IN
3365
46721BHNPRUSHWY
CITATION
­
BOHN
ALUMINUM
CORP.
BUTLER
IN
3369
46992THFRD775MA
FORD
METER
BOX
CO.
INC.
WABASH
IN
3369
46350HWMTC1110E
HOWMET
CORP.
LA
PORTE
IN
3325
66002RCKWL4THAN
ATCHISON
STEEL
CASTING
&
MACHINING
ATCHISON
KS
3321
41008DYTNW5212H
MERITOR
HVBS
CARROLLTON
CASTING
CENTER
CARROLLTON
KY
3321
41031GRDFNNEWLA
GREDE
FOUNDRIES
INC.
GREDE
PERM
CAST
CYNTHIANA
KY
3364
42420GMCPR11055
GAMCO
PRODS.
CO.
HENDERSON
KY
3365
42452KBLLYMCDON
KB
ALLOYS
INC.
ROBARDS
KY
3325
02184WLLST205WO
WOLLASTON
ALLOYS
INC.
BRAINTREE
MA
3321
48605SGNWG1629N
GMC
POWERTRAIN
SAGINAW
METAL
CASTING
OPS.
SAGINAW
MI
3321
48048NWHVN58391
NEW
HAVEN
FNDY.
NEW
HAVEN
MI
3321
49431GRTLK800NW
GREAT
LAKES
CASTINGS
CORP.
LUDINGTON
MI
3321
49441CWCCS2672H
TEXTRON
AUTOMOTIVE
FUNCTIONAL
COMPONENTS­
CWC
DIV.
MUSKEGON
MI
3321
49601CMCST23010
HAYES
LEMMERZ
INTL.
INC.
CADILLAC
INC.
CADILLAC
MI
3321
49224HRVRD601NO
HAYES­
ALBION
CORP.
ALBION
MI
3325
49441WSTMC1148W
WEST
MICHIGAN
STEEL
FNDY.
MUSKEGON
MI
3364
49502KLRBR236ST
KEELER
DIE
CAST
GRAND
RAPIDS
MI
3365
49247MTLLY103WM
METALLOY
CORP.
HUDSON
FNDY.
DIV.
HUDSON
MI
3369
49461HWMTCONEMI
HOWMET
CORP.
WHITEHALL
CASTINGS
WHITEHALL
MI
3369
49461HWMTC3850W
HOWMET
CORP.
PLANT
10
WHITEHALL
MI
3369
49417GRNDH230NO
GRAND
HAVEN
BRASS
FNDY.
GRAND
HAVEN
MI
3369
48823SPRRB4893D
SUPERIOR
BRASS
&
ALUMINUM
CASTING
CO.
EAST
LANSING
MI
3369
49461HWMTC1600S
HOWMET
CORP.
PLANT
5
WHITEHALL
MI
3321
55413PRSPC1225W
PROSPECT
FNDY.
INC.
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
3321
55746NRTHR555WE
NORTHERN
CASTINGS
CORP.
HIBBING
MN
3321
56303MNTRN711AN
GREDE
­
ST.
CLOUD
FNDY.
INC.
SAINT
CLOUD
MN
3325
55808MNTRN200EA
M
E
INTL.
DULUTH
MN
3321
63448CPRFN700NO
LAGRANGE
FNDY.
INC.
LA
GRANGE
MO
3364
63456DMKRS801SE
DIVERSIFIED
DIEMAKERS
(
DBA
INTERMET)
MONROE
CITY
MO
3365
63863FDRLMMALDE
FEDERAL­
MOGUL
CORP.
MALDEN
MO
3366
64501NTNLL1304W
NATIONAL
ALUMINUM
BRASS
FNDY.
INC.
INDEPENDENCE
MO
3366
65265CRRCP1500I
CERRO
COPPER
CASTING
CO.
MEXICO
MO
3366
39567BRDJH3719I
ROLLS­
ROYCE
NAVAL
MARINE
INC.
PASCAGOULA
MS
3321
28208CHRLT1335S
CHARLOTTE
PIPE
&
FNDY.
CO.
CHARLOTTE
NC
3366
28150CHSBR135OL
METALSAMERICA
SHELBY
NC
3366
68025MGNSFSOUTH
MAGNUS/
FARLEY
INC.
FREMONT
NE
3369
68305MGNLMMAGNO
MAGNOLIA
METAL
CORP.
AUBURN
NE
3324
03055HTCHNOLDWI
HITCHINER
MFG.
CO.
INC.
MILFORD
NH
3366
03235WBSTRSOMAI
WEBSTER
FNDY.
CO.
FRANKLIN
NH
3366
03061BRNZCSIMON
BRONZE
CRAFT
CORP.
NASHUA
NH
3321
08016SPPFNEASTP
U.
S.
PIPE
&
FNDY.
CO.
BURLINGTON
NJ
3321
08865TLNTC183SI
ATLANTIC
STATES
CAST
IRON
PIPE
CO.
PHILLIPSBURG
NJ
SIC
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
City
State
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
7
of
52
3324
07748NGNRD952PA
ENGINEERED
PRECISION
CASTING
CO.
MIDDLETOWN
NJ
3324
89706SRRCS2727L
WGIC­
SIERRA
CAST
CARSON
CITY
NV
3321
14901KNNDY1021E
KENNEDY
VALVE
ELMIRA
NY
3324
13037GRYSY901EA
GRAY­
SYRACUSE
INC.
CHITTENANGO
NY
3365
14094MLWRD500MI
MILWARD
ALLOYS
INC.
LOCKPORT
NY
3365
13662GNRLMPOBOX
GMC
POWERTRAIN
MASSENA
MASSENA
NY
3321
44142FRDMT5600H
FORD
MOTOR
CO.
CLEVELAND
CASTING
BROOK
PARK
OH
3321
43512GMC
STATE
GMC
POWERTRAIN
DEFIANCE
DEFIANCE
OH
3321
44460QKRCT310EU
QUAKER
CITY
CASTINGS
INC.
SALEM
OH
3321
44036LYRFN120FI
ELYRIA
FNDY.
ELYRIA
OH
3321
44903MNSFL500NO
CITATION
MANSFIELD
MANSFIELD
OH
3321
45638RNTNR2520S
INTERMET
CORP.
IRONTON
IRON
INC.
IRONTON
OH
3321
45804WHMC
1600M
WHEMCO
OHIO
FNDY.
DIV.
INC.
LIMA
OH
3321
45640SCNDSATHEN
OSCO
IND.
INC.
JACKSON
DIV.
JACKSON
OH
3321
43812CLWWT2266S
CLOW
WATER
SYS.
CO.
COSHOCTON
OH
3325
43207BCKYS2211P
BUCKEYE
STEEL
CASTINGS
CO.
COLUMBUS
OH
3325
45404DRRNC450NO
FLOWSERVE
CORP.
FDRY
OPS.
DAYTON
OH
3325
44871SNDSK615WE
SANDUSKY
INTL.
INC.
SANDUSKY
OH
3365
44030GNRLL1043C
GENERAL
ALUMINUM
MFG.
CO.
CONNEAUT
OH
3365
45822CLNLM7059S
CELINA
ALUMINUM
PRECISION
TECH.
CELINA
OH
3365
45365RSSLM70781
ROSS
ALUMINUM
FOUNDRIES
II
SIDNEY
OH
3366
44864MNSFL150FI
MANSFIELD
PLUMBING
PRODS.
L.
L.
C.
PERRYSVILLE
OH
3366
44052MRCNC305OB
JOHNSON
METALL
INC.
LORAIN
OH
3369
44902GLPCH153EA
BUNTING
BEARINGS
CORP.
MANSFIELD
OH
3369
44432LBCFN230WM
ALBCO
FOUNDRY
INC.
LISBON
OH
3324
97206LRGST4600S
PCC
STRUCTURALS
INC.
LARGE
PARTS
CAMPUS
PORTLAND
OR
3324
97015SMLLS13340
PCC
STRUCTURALS
INC.
SMALL
STRUCTURALS
BUSINESS
OP
CLACKAMAS
OR
3324
97045PDMNF13963
PED
MFG.
LTD.
OREGON
CITY
OR
3325
97062DRMTL9560S
DURAMETAL
CORP.
TUALATIN
OR
3369
97321MTTNM150QU
PACIFIC
CAST
TECHS.
INC.
ALBANY
OR
3369
97222PCCDR13350
PCC
STRUCTURALS
INC.
DEER
CREEK
ANNEX
MILWAUKIE
OR
3369
97756PCCSC345NE
PCC
STRUCTURALS
INC.
SCHLOSSER
REDMOND
OR
3321
16335DVNCDPOBOX
ADVANCED
CAST
PRODS.
INC.
MEADVILLE
PA
3321
18042VCTLC4901K
VICTAULIC
CO.
OF
AMERICA
FORKS
FACILITY
EASTON
PA
3321
16501MC
603W1
GUNITE
EMI
CORP.
ERIE
PA
3321
19545BYRTW9THRO
BOYERTOWN
FNDY.
CO.
NEW
BERLINVILLE
PA
3321
16125HDGFN42LEE
SVEDALA
GRINDING
HODGE
FNDY.
GREENVILLE
PA
3321
18011VCTLC8023Q
VICTAULIC
CO.
OF
AMERICA
ALBURTIS
FACILITY
ALBURTIS
PA
3322
17512GRNNL1411L
ANVIL
INTL.
INC.
COLUMBIA
PA
3324
17067CMQKR640SC
TECH
CAST
INC.
MYERSTOWN
PA
3325
17067QKRLLERICH
QUAKER
ALLOY
INC.
MYERSTOWN
PA
3325
15059WSTHMONE12
WEST
HOMESTEAD
ENG.
&
MACHINE
CO.
MIDLAND
PA
3325
15201MCCNW10948
MCCONWAY
&
TORLEY
CORP.
PITTSBURGH
PA
3325
15066DMSCSPOBOX
DAMASCUS
STEEL
CASTING
CO.
NEW
BRIGHTON
PA
3325
19526PNNSYTHIRD
PENNSYLVANIA
STEEL
FNDY.
&
MACHINE
CO.
HAMBURG
PA
3325
15683BLWKNBRIDG
DURALOY
TECHS.
INC.
SCOTTDALE
PA
3365
18017HWMTL2175A
HOWMET
ALUMINUM
CASTING
INC.
BETHLEHEM
PA
3366
19381MTLLR810LI
METALLURGICAL
PRODS.
CO.
WEST
CHESTER
PA
SIC
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
City
State
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
8
of
52
3366
16506RBRNZ6300W
ERIE
BRONZE
&
ALUMINUM
ERIE
PA
3364
02861RBCND645NA
RIBCO
MFG.
INC.
PAWTUCKET
RI
3366
29801GRHMB45WIN
YORK
BRONZE
CO.
(
DBA
GORHAM
BRONZE
LTD.)
AIKEN
SC
3321
37343WHLND2800S
NORTH
AMERICAN
ROYALTIES
INC.
WHELAND
FNDY.
DIV.
CHATTANOOGA
TN
3325
38478MRCNM2360I
MAGOTTEAUX
CORP.
PULASKI
TN
3366
37874NGKMT917ST
NGK
METALS
CORP.
SWEETWATER
TN
3369
37406STHRN4106S
SOUTHERN
CENTRIFUGAL
DIV.
CHATTANOOGA
TN
3321
75710TYLRPHIGHW
TYLER
PIPE
CO.
TYLER
TX
3324
78702PRCST2110E
PURE
CASTINGS
CO.
AUSTIN
TX
3325
76501DLTCN3402C
DELTA
CENTRIFUGAL
CORP.
TEMPLE
TX
3325
75604STHWS600FO
SOUTHWEST
STEEL
CASTING
CO.
LONGVIEW
TX
3369
76307HWMTC6200C
HOWMET
CORP.
WICHITA
FALLS
TX
3321
24505LYNCHRT726
INTERMET
ARCHER
CREEK
FNDY.
LYNCHBURG
VA
3321
24141LYNCHFIRST
INTERMET
RADFORD
FNDY.
RADFORD
VA
3321
24505GRFFNADAMS
GRIFFIN
PIPE
PRODS.
CO.
LYNCHBURG
VA
3366
22980VRGNM1010E
VIRGINIA
METALCRAFTERS
INC.
WAYNESBORO
VA
3369
23661HWMTCONEHO
HOWMET
CORP.
HAMPTON
VA
3325
98409TLSFN3021S
ATLAS
FNDY.
&
MACHINE
CO.
TACOMA
WA
3321
54981WPCFN406ND
WAUPACA
FNDY.
INC.
PLANT
1
WAUPACA
WI
3321
54981WPCFNTOWER
WAUPACA
FNDY.
INC.
PLANT
2/
3
WAUPACA
WI
3321
54143WPCFN805OD
WAUPACA
FNDY.
INC.
PLANT
4
MARINETTE
WI
3321
53511BLTCR1401E
PRIME
CAST
INC.
BELOIT
WI
3321
54110BRLLN200PA
BRILLION
IRON
WORKS
INC.
BRILLION
WI
3321
54956NNHFN2121B
NEENAH
FNDY.
CO.
NEENAH
WI
3321
53581RCHLNFOUND
RICHLAND
CENTER
FNDY.
RICHLAND
CENTER
WI
3322
53172PPLTN2105S
EGS
ELECTRICAL
GROUP
APPLETON
SO.
MILWAUKEE
WI
3324
53209STNLS5150N
STAINLESS
FNDY.
&
ENG.
INC.
MILWAUKEE
WI
3324
53223SGNCS9000N
SIGNICAST
CORP.
MILWAUKEE
WI
3324
53094WSCNS661S1
WISCONSIN
INVESTCAST
WATERTOWN
WI
3325
53188WSCNS905EA
WISCONSIN
CENTRIFUGAL
WAUKESHA
WI
3325
53404RCNST1442N
RACINE
STEEL
CASTING
DIV.
RACINE
WI
3325
53186WKSHF1300L
WAUKESHA
FNDY.
CO.
INC.
WAUKESHA
WI
3364
53022RHCSTN114W
RHEOCAST
CO.
GERMANTOWN
WI
3369
53080JHNSN270NM
JOHNSON
BRASS
&
MACHINE
SAUKVILLE
WI
3366
26537SHDWBSISLE
YORK
BRONZE
CO.
(
DBA
SHEIDOW
BRONZE
CORP.)
KINGWOOD
WV
3366
26003HBCNC21418
HUBCO
BRONZE
INC.
WHEELING
WV
3366
26537YRKBRKINNE
YORK
BRONZE
WEST
ANNEX
FACILITY
KINGWOOD
WV
Of
the
189
facilities
reporting
discharges
to
PCS
or
TRI,
over
50%
(
95)
are
concentrated
in
6
states:
Ohio
(
21),
Pennsylvania
(
17),
Wisconsin
(
16),
Indiana
(
14),
Michigan
(
14),
and
Alabama
(
13).
The
rest
are
located
in
30
states
around
the
country.
It
is
worth
noting
that
Region
V
covers
the
4
states
printed
in
bold,
and
over
40%
(
79)
of
the
reporting
facilities
are
located
in
this
Region.
The
map
on
the
following
page
shows
the
locations
of
the
facilities
reporting
to
TRI
or
PCS.
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
9
of
52
U.
S.
Census
data
indicates
an
overall
increase
in
the
number
of
the
number
of
metal
molding
facilities
between
1992
and
1997.
Value
of
goods
shipped
has
also
increased
by
15%
or
more
for
bituminous
coal
during
the
same
time
period.
See
Table
4
below.
Advance
comparative
statistics
for
1997
to
2002
for
the
broader
category
represented
by
NAICS
code
331
(
industries
that
smelt
and/
or
refine
metals
using
electrometallurgical
processes)
show
a
17.6%
increase
in
the
number
of
establishments
and
a
19%
decrease
in
the
value
of
shipments
(
not
adjusted
for
inflation).
See
Table
5
below.

Table
4.
1992
and
1997
Census
Data
SIC
Industry
Sector
Number
of
Establishments
Value
of
Goods
Shipped
(
billions
of
dollars)

1997
1992
%
Change
1997
1992
%
Change
3321
Gray
and
Ductile
Iron
Foundries
669
709
­
6
11.9
7.7
53
3322
Malleable
Iron
Foundries
28
24
17
0.35
0.25
42
3324
Steel
Investment
Foundries
159
152
5
2.3
1.7
35
3325
Steel
Foundries,
Not
Elsewhere
Classified
288
287
0.3
2.9
2.1
40
3364
Nonferrous
Die­
Casting,
Except
Aluminum
279
263
6
2.0
1.0
101
3365
Aluminum
foundries
626
591
6
3.9
1.9
101
3366
Copper
Foundries
312
329
­
5
0.86
0.74
15
3369
Nonferrous
Foundries,
Except
Aluminum
&
Copper
141
119
19
0.96
0.46
109
Source:
1997
U.
S.
Economic
Census
Table
5.
1997
and
2002
Census
Data
NAICS
Industry
Segment
Number
of
Establishments
Value
of
Goods
Shipped
(
billions
of
dollars)

2002
1997
%
Change
2002
1997
%
Change
331
Primary
Metal
Manufacturing
5,952
5,059
17.6
136
168
­
19
Source:
2002
U.
S.
Economic
Census
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
11
of
52
Wastewater
Characteristics
and
Pollutant
Sources
Wastewater
pollutant
loads
from
facilities
in
this
industry
depend
on
water
usage,
type
of
metal
being
cast,
and
the
production
process
employed.
Suspended
solids
and
metals
loading
are
higher
in
scrubber
wastewaters
than
in
mold
cooling
wastewaters.
Oil
and
grease
and
organic
priority
pollutant
loadings
are
higher
in
die
casting
wastewaters
than
in
casting
quench
wastewaters.
A
major
portion
of
the
wastewater
from
die
casting
operations
is
water
used
as
a
carrier
solution
for
oily
die
casting
lubricants.

Table
6
presents
information
about
wastewater
flows
for
this
industry
and
Table
7
presents
the
sources
of
process
wastewater
in
this
point
source
category.
Approximately
80
percent
of
the
regulated
wastewater
from
this
industry
is
generated
by
wet
air
pollution
control
devices.

Table
6.
Wastewater
Flows
SIC
No.
of
Major
Facilities
Reporting
Nonzero
Flows
Median
Facility
Flow
(
MG)
Range
of
Facility
Flows
(
MG)
Total
Flow
(
MG)

3321
4
709
315­
7008
8,740
3322
NA
NA
NA
NA
3324
NA
NA
NA
NA
3325
2
431
57­
805
862
3364
NA
NA
NA
NA
3365
2
90
89­
92
180
3366
NA
NA
NA
NA
3369
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source:
PCSLoads2000.
NA
indicates
that
PCS
data
were
not
available
for
the
SIC
code.

Table
7.
Sources
of
Process
Wastewater
in
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
Process
Wastewater
Pollutants
Casting
cleaning
metals,
suspended
solids,
oil
and
grease,
toxic
organics
Casting
quench
metals,
suspended
solids,
oil
and
grease,
toxic
organics
Die
Casting
metals,
suspended
solids,
oil
and
grease,
toxic
organics,
phenols
Dust
collection
scrubber
metals,
suspended
solids,
oil
and
grease,
toxic
organics,
phenols
Grinding
scrubber
metals,
suspended
solids,
oil
and
grease,
total
toxic
organics
Process
Wastewater
Pollutants
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
12
of
52
Investment
casting
metals,
suspended
solids,
oil
and
grease,
toxic
organics
Melting
furnace
scrubber
metals,
suspended
solids,
oil
and
grease,
toxic
organics,
phenols
Mold
cooling
metals,
suspended
solids,
oil
and
grease,
toxic
organics
Slag
quench
metals,
suspended
solids,
oil
and
grease,
toxic
organics
Wet
sand
reclamation
metals,
suspended
solids,
oil
and
grease,
toxic
organics,
phenols
Source:
Development
Document
for
Metal
Molding
and
Casting,
1985.

Pollutants
Discharged
Pollutant
discharges
to
surface
waters
as
reported
to
PCS
and
TRI
were
evaluated
as
part
of
the
Factor
1
Analysis:
Human
Health
and
Environmental
Impacts.
Pounds
reported
as
discharged
were
converted,
wherever
possible,
to
their
toxic
weighted
pound
equivalents
to
provide
a
sense
of
relative
hazard
associated
with
those
discharges.
(
Note:
indirect
discharge
amounts
reflect
reductions
that
are
expected
to
occur
at
the
receiving
treatment
facility.)
Both
TRI
and
PCS
contain
information
about
pollutants
discharged
by
metal
molding
and
casting
facilities.

PCS:
Of
the
8
facilities
reporting
discharges
to
PCS,
a
single
facility
in
Texas
accounts
for
66%
of
the
pounds
discharged.
A
second
facility
in
Kentucky
accounts
for
an
additional
20%
of
the
pounds
discharged.
When
looking
at
toxic
weighted
pounds,
discharges
reported
to
PCS
by
a
single
facility
in
Texas
accounts
for
77%
of
the
toxic
weighted
pound
equivalents
(
TWPE)
discharge
reported
to
that
database.
(
This
facility
is
also
the
highest
discharger
of
pollutant
pounds.)
A
second
facility
in
Indiana
contributes
an
additional
12%.

TRI:
Of
the
182
facilities
reporting
discharges
to
TRI,
2
facilities
in
Oregon
account
for
65%
of
the
pounds
discharged.
A
third
facility,
located
in
Pennsylvania,
contributes
an
additional
10%
of
the
pollutant
pounds
discharged.
When
looking
at
toxic
weighted
pounds,
discharges
reported
to
TRI
by
a
single
facility
in
Pennsylvania
accounts
for
65%
of
the
TWPE
reported
to
that
database.
A
second
facility
in
New
York
contributes
another
15%
of
the
reported
TRI
TWPE.

Overall:
Of
the
189
total
facilities
reporting
discharges
for
this
industry,
the
top
discharger
in
Texas
reporting
to
PCS
accounts
for
48%
of
the
total
pollutant
pounds
discharged.
The
top
two
dischargers
in
Oregon
reporting
to
TRI
account
for
an
additional
34%
of
the
total
pounds.
When
looking
at
toxic
weighted
pounds,
only
5
facilities,
all
in
SIC
3321
(
Gray
and
Ductile
Iron
Foundries),
account
for
85%
of
the
TWPE
discharged.
Two
facilities
account
for
over
70%
of
the
overall
TWPE
discharged:
one
in
Pennsylvania
(
58%)
and
one
in
New
York
(
13%).
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
13
of
52
Discharged
pollutants
can
be
characterized
as
nonconventional,
conventional,
or
priority
pollutants.
Table
8
below
shows
the
relative
contributions
of
each
pollutant
type.
See
Attachment
D
for
the
discharges
in
toxic
weighted
pounds
as
reported
to
PCS
by
each
facility
and
see
Attachment
E
for
the
discharges
in
toxic
weighted
pounds
as
reported
to
TRI
by
each
facility
See
Attachment
F
for
a
breakout
of
these
discharges
by
pollutant.
A
discussion
of
each
pollutant
type
discharged
follows
the
table.

Table
8.
Pollutant
Discharges
Reported
to
PCS
and
TRI
Pollutant
Category
&
Primary
Pollutants*
PCS
LBS
PCS
TWPE
TRI
POUNDS
TRI
TWPE
All
Pollutants
2,253,343
5,834
284,419
45,182
Nonconventional
2,008,818
561
257,189
31,399
SODIUM
NITRITE
 
 
78,062
29,143
(
93%)

CHLORINE,
TOTAL
RESIDUAL
817
398
(
71%)
2,600
1,266
(
4%)

MOLYBDENUM
517
104
(
19%)
 
 
Conventional
233,663
0
0
0
OIL
AND
GREASE
133,461
 
 
 
TOTAL
SUSPENDED
SOLIDS
91,425
 
 
 
BIOCHEMICAL
OXYGEN
DEMAND
8,777
 
 
 
Priority
10,862
5,273
27,230
13,783
LEAD
1,714
3,840
(
73%)
3,173
7,108
(
52%)

POLYCHLORINATED
BIPHENYLS
0.053
677
(
13%)
 
 
COPPER
532
333
(
6%)
8,380
5,254
(
38%)

*
The
majority
of
each
pollutant
type
is
discharged
by
facilities
in
SIC
3321.
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
14
of
52
Nonconventional
Pollutants
About
89%
of
the
pounds
of
both
discharged
pollutants
reported
to
TRI
and
PCS
are
nonconventional
pollutants
and
about
63%
of
all
TWPE
come
from
this
class
of
pollutant.
Sodium
nitrite
contributes
93%
of
the
nonconventional
TWPE
discharged
in
TRI
and
57%
of
the
overall
TWPE
discharged.
Total
residual
chlorine
contributes
71%
of
the
nonconventional
TWPE
discharged
to
TRI.

Conventional
Pollutants
Only
9%
of
the
total
discharged
pounds
reported
to
PCS
are
conventional
pollutants.
These
discharges
are
dominated
by
oil
and
grease,
which
comprises
57%
of
the
conventional
pounds
discharged.
However,
toxic
weights
are
not
available
for
conventional
pollutant
parameters.
No
information
on
conventional
pollutants
is
available
through
TRI.

Priority
Pollutants
Only
1%
of
the
total
discharged
pounds
reported
to
PCS
are
priority
pollutants.
About
37%
of
all
TWPE
discharged
by
this
industrial
category
come
from
discharges
of
priority
pollutants.
Among
the
priority
pollutants
discharged,
lead
and
copper
account
for
87%
of
the
discharged
priority
pollutant
TWPE
and
33%
of
the
overall
TWPE
discharged.

For
purposes
of
comparison,
the
toxic
weighted
pound
equivalents
(
TWPE)
for
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
are
presented
in
the
following
tables
along
with
the
industries
reporting
the
highest
discharges
in
each
database.
Table
9
presents
the
information
reported
to
PCS
and
Table
10
presents
the
information
reported
to
TRI.
For
a
description
of
the
derivation
of
the
values
in
these
tables,
see
the
memo
in
the
public
record
titled
"
Description
and
Results
of
EPA
Methodology
to
Synthesize
Screening
Level
Results
for
the
Effluent
Guidelines
Program
Plan
for
2004/
2005,"
which
is
available
through
Edocket
at
document
number
OW­
2003­
0074­
0391.

Table
9.
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
TWPE
Reported
to
PCS
Compared
to
Top
Ranking
Results
40
CFR
Part
Point
Source
Category
PCS
Reported
TWPE
PCS
Rank
423
Steam
electric
power
generation
2,933,209
1
414
Organic
chemicals,
plastics
and
synthetic
fibers
1,805,928
2
422
Phosphate
manufacturing
1,095,321
3
415
Inorganic
chemicals
manufacturing
853,568
4
421
Nonferrous
metals
manufacturing
434,925
5
440
Ore
mining
and
dressing
383,560
6
410
Textile
mills
296,601
7
40
CFR
Part
Point
Source
Category
PCS
Reported
TWPE
PCS
Rank
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
15
of
52
419
Petroleum
refining
198,251
8
455
Pesticide
chemicals
manufacturing,
formulating
178,977
9
418
Fertilizer
manufacturing
116,464
10
464
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
5,834
26
Table
10.
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
TWPE
Reported
to
TRI
Compared
to
Top
Ranking
Results
40
CFR
Part
Point
Source
Category
TRI
Reported
TWPE
TRI
Rank
414
Organic
chemicals,
plastics
and
synthetic
fibers
7,303,782
1
423
Steam
electric
power
generation
1,856,645
2
421
Nonferrous
metals
manufacturing
978,450
3
430
Pulp,
paper
and
paperboard
(
Phase
II)
628,785
4
415
Inorganic
chemicals
manufacturing
624,250
5
429
Timber
products
processing
404,926
6
419
Petroleum
refining
385,347
7
455
Pesticide
chemicals
manufacturing,
formulating
324,393
8
428
Rubber
manufacturing
166,343
9
463
Plastic
molding
and
forming
106,189
10
464
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
45,173
16
Treatment
Technology
and
Pollution
Prevention
Standard
treatment
may
include
chemical
precipitation
and
sedimentation,
oil
removal,
and
filtration.
Pollution
prevention
activities
focus
on
reducing
waste
sand,
waste
electric
arc
furnace
dust
and
desulfurization
slag,
and
increasing
energy
efficiency.
See
Table
11
for
water
conservation
and
pollution
prevention
alternatives.
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
16
of
52
Table
11.
Water
Conservation
and
Pollution
Prevention
Alternatives
To
Reduce
Water
Conservation/
Pollution
Prevention
Alternatives
Solid
Waste
or
Air
Pollution
°
Use
vacuum
molding
which
holds
the
sand
in
the
shape
of
the
pattern
after
pattern
is
removed.
No
shakeout
equipment
required
and
almost
no
waste
sand
is
generated.
°
Reclaim
and
reuse
waste
sand
and
metal
through
waste
segregation,
screening,
dry
scrubbing,
or
thermal
reclamation.
°
Improve
furnace
efficiency
°
Install
induction
furnaces
which
are
75­
80%
energy
efficient
and
emit
75%
less
dust
and
fumes
°
Minimize
metal
melting
by
reducing
excess
melted
metal
°
Use
alternative
furnace
fuels
(
e.
g.,
natural
gas,
lower
grade/
low
sulfur
or
low
nitrogen
fuel­
oil).
°
Proper
maintenance
of
furnaces
to
reduce
air
emissions.
°
Recycle
electric
arc
furnace
(
EAF)
dust
to
original
process
or
reuse
outside
original
process.
°
Use
charge
material
containing
lower
concentrations
of
lead,
zinc,
and
cadmium
(
e.
g.,
charge
modification
program
to
develop
reliable
sources
of
high­
grade
scrap
metal).
°
Minimize
hazardous
desulfurizing
slag
(
e.
g.,
alternative
desulfurization
agents.

Water
Uses
and/
or
Water
Pollution
°
Reduce
phenols
by
substituting
synthetic
oils
or
water­
based
materials,
segregating
waste
streams
at
point
of
generation.
°
Use
of
cooling
water
recycling
systems.
°
Optimize
deburring
operations
to
minimize
total
suspended
solids.
°
Use
fewer
additives,
such
as
biocides,
or
additives
containing
no
VOCs
or
HAPs.
°
Use
alternative
die
lubricants
Source:
OECA
Sector
Notebook:
Profile
of
the
Metal
Casting
Industry,
1998.

Concerns
Identified
Pre­
Proposal
The
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
point
source
category
was
identified
by
several
responders
surveyed
by
the
Agency
in
the
process
of
preparing
the
2004/
2005
Plan.
Their
suggestions
are
summarized
below.

Comments
on
the
Draft
Strategy
(
Section
2.2
of
the
"
Factor
4
Analysis:
Implementation
and
Efficiency
Considerations
 
Status
of
Screening
Level
Review
Phase"
(
Edocket
OW­
2003­
0074­
0329)
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
17
of
52
A
stakeholder
asserts
that
the
effluent
guidelines
should
be
re­
evaluated
to
address
the
discrepancy
of
metals
limits
between
this
category
and
those
in
the
Metal
Finishing
effluent
guidelines.
The
effluent
standards
for
the
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
category
are
production
based,
and
when
the
appropriate
values
are
applied
and
calculations
performed
to
convert
these
into
equivalent
concentration
limits,
the
resulting
discharge
limits
for
metals
are
orders
of
magnitude
lower
than
the
Metal
Finishing
standards.
This
suggests
there
is
a
problem
either
with
the
Metal
Finishing
standards
(
which
have
been
recently
reviewed
in
the
MP&
M
development)
or
the
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
standards.

Previous
Suggestions
(
Section
2.4
of
the
"
Factor
4
Analysis")
Specific
activities
of
concern
identified
by
responders
include
fastener
manufacturing,
job
shop
galvanizers,
and
jewelry
manufacturing.
These
activities
seemed
fit
poorly
into
the
scope
of
these
effluent
guidelines.
Phenol
was
identified
as
a
pollutant
of
concern.

Permitting
Authorities
(
Section
2.5
of
the
"
Factor
4
Analysis")
EPA
permit
writers
and
pretreatment
coordinators
have
found
cyanide
to
be
an
issue
when
molten
slag
is
allowed
to
come
into
contact
with
the
quench
water
in
the
quenching
process.
These
EPA
staff
also
identified
concerns
with
implementing
the
guidelines
for
the
aluminum
die
casters
subcategory:
1)
the
applicability
language
is
confusing
and
incomplete:
only
part
of
the
casting
process
is
covered;
2)
the
need
to
allow
additional
fundamentally
different
factors
(
FDF)
determinations;
and
3)
the
problems
meeting
the
limits
they
receive
using
the
formulas
provided
in
the
guidelines,
specifically
for
total
phenols
and
for
oil
and
grease.
Expanding
on
this
last
item,
EPA
permit
writers
and
pretreatment
coordinators
explain
that
the
building
block
method
for
determining
allowances,
when
applied
to
small
facilities,
results
in
a
low
limit
on
total
phenols.
These
EPA
staff
assert
that
it
is
difficult
to
find
technology
to
meet
these
low
limits,
resulting
in
a
number
of
facilities
being
unable
to
meet
a
limit
that
was
neither
reasonable
nor
necessary
to
protect
the
publicly
owned
treatment
works
(
POTW).
Although
protecting
POTWs
is
not
one
of
the
304(
m)
evaluation
criteria,
EPA
permit
writers
and
pretreatment
coordinators
note
that
the
resulting
noncompliance
forces
Control
Authorities
to
choose
between
escalating
enforcement
actions
for
a
relatively
minor
infraction
or
ignoring
the
violation
if
they
are
convinced
that
all
reasonable
efforts
have
been
made
to
meet
the
limits.
Possible
solutions
to
the
problem
could
include
1)
using
production
as
a
limiting
factor
to
provide
relief
to
smaller
facilities,
and
2)
allowing
Control
Authorities
to
apply
concentration
based
standards,
similar
to
the
approach
used
in
Porcelain
Enameling
(
40
CFR
466).
These
EPA
staffs
also
asserted
that
EPA
removed
the
phenol
limits
from
the
pretreatment
standards
of
the
Organic
Chemicals,
Plastics,
and
Synthetic
Fibers
effluent
guidelines
(
40
CFR
414)
after
finding
that
phenol
did
not
pass
through
POTWs.

AMSA
and
ASIWPCA
(
Section
2.6
of
the
"
Factor
4
Analysis")
ASIWPCA
stakeholders
(
AL)
identified
several
effluent
guidelines
that
are
out
of
date
relative
to
available
technology,
including
Metal
Molding
and
Casting.

Concerns
Identified
in
Comments
to
Proposal
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
18
of
52
A
commenter
on
the
Preliminary
Plan
identifies
inconsistencies
and
mistakes
in
the
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
point
source
category.
The
commenter
asserts
that
these
regulations
have
huge
discrepancies
between
the
regulations
and
the
development
document
and
urges
the
Agency
to
correct
the
many
errors
in
the
effluent
limitations
guidelines.

Additional
Concerns
Identified
Post­
Proposal
Several
additional
concerns
were
identified
during
followup
discussions
about
issues
raised
prior
to
proposal.
These
are
presented
here.

Discharge
of
Phenol
by
Die
Casters:
In
an
e­
mail
collection
of
suggestions,
four
state
pretreatment
coordinators
discussed
implementation
and
efficiency
issues
for
this
industrial
category.
One
coordinator
notes
that
having
die
casting
limits
based
on
production
results
in
a
lot
of
small
shops
being
often
out
of
compliance
because
they
can't
meet
the
limits
at
their
low
production
volumes.
A
second
coordinator
reports
that
die
casters
have
constant
problems
with
the
total
phenols
and
oil
&
grease
limits.
During
follow­
up
discussions,
an
additional
pretreatment
coordinator
explained
that
the
problem
usually
occurred
in
small
facilities
where
their
only
allowance
for
phenol
came
from
the
tiny
amount
provided
for
die
casting.
This
proves
insufficient
to
account
for
background
levels
of
phenol.

Another
coordinator
notes
that
casting
cleaning
operations
(
listed
in
the
aluminum
casting
and
ferrous
casting
subcategories)
does
not
occur
and
cannot
occur
given
the
definitions
and
conditions
of
the
regulation.
All
subcategories
have
a
casting
quench
operation,
but
the
definitions
make
it
clear
that
the
standard
applies
only
to
pre­
cooling
operations.
Because
of
the
way
the
definitions
are
written
at
464.02
(
a)
"
Aluminum
Casting"
and
464.02
(
b)
"
Ferrous
Casting,"
cleaning
operations
are
not
captured
by
the
regulation.
A
simple
solution
is
to
correct
the
general
definitions.
See
suggestions
in
the
following
paragraph.
An
alternative
to
changing
the
definitions
would
be
to
eliminate
the
allocations
for
casting
cleaning
from
these
subcategories
since
it
applies
to
an
operation
that
cannot
exist
under
this
regulation
the
way
it
is
written.

For
the
aluminum
casting
definition,
insert
the
underlined
text
"
Processing
operations
following
the
cooling
of
castings
not
covered
under
aluminum
forming,
except
for
grinding
scrubber
operations
and
casting
cleaning
operations,
which
are
covered
here,
are
covered
under
electroplating
and
metal
finishing
point
source
categories
(
40
CFR
413
&
433)."
For
the
ferrous
casting
definition,
insert
the
underlined
text
"
Except
for
grinding
scrubber
operations
and
casting
cleaning
operations
which
are
covered
here,
processing
operations
following
the
cooling
of
castings
are
covered
under
electroplating
and
metal
finishing
point
source
categories
(
40
CFR
413
&
433)."

A
fourth
coordinator
notes
that
in
the
aluminum
forming
subcategory,
production
standards
result
in
extremely
low
permit
limits.
Whenever
production
changes
by
as
little
as
20%,
permit
limits
have
to
be
changed
accordingly.
Concentration
based
standards
would
save
the
endless
modification
and
the
associated
administrative
burden.
It
also
seems
inconsistent
to
require
metal
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
19
of
52
finishers
to
discharge
a
pollutant
at
the
parts
per
million
(
ppm)
level
while
the
production
based
industry
is
required
to
meet
a
parts
per
billion
(
ppb)
level.

Poor
Fit
for
Subcategory:
Fastener
Manufacturing
operations
(
manufacture
of
screws,
bolts
and
other
small
parts,
frequently
for
aerospace
applications)
are
covered
by
either
the
metal
finishing
standards
and
metal
molding
&
casting
standards.
Due
to
the
small
and
complicated
configuration
of
the
parts,
however,
it
is
extremely
difficult
to
apply
the
existing
categorical
standards
correctly.
This
industry
generates
a
metal­
bearing,
oily
waste
stream
that
is
difficult
to
treat
and
it
is
not
well
reflected
in
the
current
categorical
standards.

Followup
Contacts
Don
Anderson,
EPA/
OST/
EAD
(
202)
566­
1021
Marshall
Hyatt,
EPA
Region
4,
(
404)
562­
9304
Lee
Boehme,
EPA
Region
6,
(
214)
665­
7532
Paul
Marshall,
EPA
Region
7,
(
913)
551­
7419
Keith
Silva,
EPA
Region
9,
(
415)
972­
3509
Allan
Gilliam,
Arkansas
DEQ
(
501)
682­
0625
Glenda
Dean,
Alabama,
(
334)
270­
5602
Steve
Caspers,
Kansas,
(
785)
296­
5551
Grace
Scott,
Michigan
(
scottg@
mi.
gov)
David
Knight,
Washington
Dept.
of
Ecology
Possible
Solutions
EPA
appreciates
all
comments
and
suggestions
provided
by
the
stakeholders
and
EPA
Regional
staff.
However,
as
with
any
comments
received
by
the
Agency,
EPA
cannot
address
these
suggestions
without
adequate
supporting
data.
In
the
event
that
stakeholders
provide
additional
data
and
supporting
information
on
these
issues,
EPA
will
reevaluate
them.
At
present,
based
on
information
reported
to
TRI
and
PCS,
toxic
discharges
from
metal
molding
and
casting
facilities
are
low
relative
to
other
industrial
categories.
In
addition,
generally,
a
few
facilities
drive
the
toxic
weighted
pound
equivalents
(
TWPE)
loading
estimates
from
both
TRI
and
PCS.
In
the
absence
of
revisions
to
the
effluent
guidelines,
these
concerns
could
be
addressed
through
improved
information
dissemination
and
outreach
by
EPA.

Discharge
of
Phenol
by
Die
Casters:
These
concerns
may
be
based
on
non­
recycled
wastewater;
however,
the
basis
for
the
guidelines
for
this
point
source
category
was
recycling.
One
respondent
noted
that
the
industrial
coupled
plasma
(
ICP)
sampling
method
is
the
least
sensitive
method
(
i.
e.
it
has
the
highest
detection
limits)
and
thus
provides
a
reasonable
measure
of
the
concentration
of
phenol
present
before
setting
limits
for
this
pollutant,
especially
for
manufacturers
of
small
products,
including
die
casters.
Therefore,
it
could
be
used
to
provide
a
more
reasonable
approach
to
determining
the
presence
of
phenol
prior
to
developing
limits
for
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
20
of
52
this
pollutant.
EPA
could
address
this
issue
through
the
preparation
of
a
fact
sheet
that
clearly
describes
that
basis.

However,
the
concern
may
be
the
result
of
conditions
in
smaller
die
casting
operations
that
may
not
have
been
adequately
studied
during
the
development
of
the
guidelines.
To
explore
this
concern,
EPA
could
confirm
whether
smaller
aluminum
casters
were
evaluated
during
guideline
development.
If
in
fact
they
were
not,
EPA
could
then
solicit
data
from
the
respondents
or
the
facilities
they
identify,
to
verify
these
claims.
Any
information
received
through
this
effort
could
be
considered
during
subsequent
planning
cycles.
Alternatively,
EPA
should
establish
metal
concentrations
which
are
considered
"
domestic
equivalent"
and
establish
that
no
categorical
standards
require
industry
to
treat
below
"
domestic
equivalent"
concentrations
so
long
as
the
control
authority
finds
that
there
are
no
unrealized
opportunities
for
flow
reduction
or
pollution
prevention.

Engineering
and
Analysis
Division
(
EAD)
can
share
all
of
these
concerns
with
the
Office
of
Wastewater
Management
(
OWM)
to
assist
them
in
improving
the
implementation
of
these
effluent
guidelines.

Consistency
Application
of
the
Guidelines,
especially
with
Metal
Finishing:
Applicability
issues
could
be
readily
addressed
through
the
preparation
of
a
fact
sheet
that
clearly
identifies
the
processes
that
may
be
common
to
both
industries,
possibly
in
a
table
of
potentially
overlapping
guidelines,
and
provides
clarification
about
the
process
of
identifying
the
applicable
effluent
guideline.
This
fact
sheet
can
draw
upon
the
clarifications
and
guidance
EPA
included
in
both
the
preamble
and
the
regulation.
For
more
complex
cases,
individual
discussions
with
EPA
staff
may
prove
to
be
the
most
efficient
approach.
EAD
can
share
these
concerns
with
OWM
to
assist
them
in
increasing
the
consistency
of
application
of
effluent
guidelines.

Poor
Fit
for
a
Subcategory:
Issues
surrounding
standards
for
fastener
manufacturing
seem
casespecific
and
may
be
best
addressed
through
individual
discussions
with
EPA
staff.
EAD
can
share
these
concerns
with
the
OWM
to
assist
them
in
increasing
the
consistency
of
application
of
effluent
guidelines.

Discrepancies
Between
These
Guidelines
and
Those
for
Metal
Finishers:
EPA
notes
that
limitations
and
standards
for
each
industrial
category
consider
the
best
available
technology
economically
achievable
for
a
particular
subcategory
of
a
particular
industry.
As
a
result
of
differences
in
wastewater
characteristics,
treatment
and
pollution
prevention
technologies,
and
economic
considerations,
limitations
vary
from
one
industrial
category
to
the
next.
Limits
in
effluent
guidelines
set
for
the
same
pollutant
can
differ
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
including
the
processes
in
use
by
each
industry,
the
characteristics
of
their
wastewaters,
the
technologies
in
use
by
the
industry,
and
industry­
specific
evaluations
of
affordability.
EAD
can
share
these
concerns
with
OWM
to
assist
them
in
increasing
the
consistency
of
application
of
effluent
guidelines.

Summary
of
Potential
Solutions:
Most
of
the
concerns
identified
for
this
industry
could
be
addressed
through
improved
information
dissemination
and
outreach
by
EPA.
The
Agency
could
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
21
of
52
prepare
a
fact
sheet
with
answers
to
frequently
asked
questions
(
FAQs),
including
a
table
of
potentially
overlapping
guidelines,
and
post
it
on
its
web
site.
In
addition,
the
Agency
could
announce
the
availability
of
this
fact
sheet,
and
the
name
of
the
current
EAD
staff
available
to
answer
questions
at
the
regular
meetings
for
permit
writers
and
pretreatment
coordinators
held
by
the
Office
of
Wastewater
Management
(
OWM).
Finally,
due
to
the
relatively
small
number
of
facilities
discharging
the
bulk
of
the
TWPE,
EPA
could
also
provide
assistance
to
permit
writers
in
preparing
BPJ­
based
permits.

To
explore
the
concern
about
the
limits
for
phenol,
EPA
could
confirm
whether
smaller
aluminum
casters
were
evaluated
during
guideline
development.
If
in
fact
they
were
not,
EPA
could
then
solicit
data
from
the
respondents
or
the
facilities
they
identify
in
order
to
verify
and
clarify
the
issue.
Any
information
received
through
this
research
effort
could
be
considered
during
a
subsequent
planning
cycle.
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
22
of
52
Attachment
A
EPA
Databases
and
References
Used
in
this
Review
Overview
of
the
304(
m)
Planning
Process
CWA
Section
304(
m)(
1)
requires
EPA
to
establish
a
schedule
for
the
annual
review
and
revision
of
all
existing
effluent
guidelines
and
to
identify
categories
of
point
sources
discharging
toxic
or
non­
conventional
pollutants
for
which
EPA
has
not
published
effluent
guidelines.
To
accomplish
this
review,
EPA
conducted
a
screening­
level
analysis
using
readily
available
information
from
EPA's
Permit
Compliance
System
(
PCS)
and
Toxics
Release
Inventory
(
TRI)
databases.
EPA
estimated
the
mass
of
pollutants
discharged
from
each
category,
weighted
the
pollutant
releases
based
on
chemical
toxicity,
and
ranked
the
categories
based
on
the
toxicweighted
pollutant
releases.

In
addition
to
reported
discharges
in
PCS
and
TRI,
EPA
used
other
readily
available
data,
as
well
as
information
from
public
outreach,
including
industry
categories
recommended
by
stakeholders
for
regulatory
development
or
regulatory
revision,
to
evaluate
implementation
and
efficiency
considerations.

For
additional
details
on
EPA's
screening­
level
analysis
refer
the
following
documents
in
EPA
Docket
Number
OW­
2003­
0074:


Memorandum:
Description
and
Results
of
EPA
Methodology
to
Synthesize
Screening
Level
Results
for
the
Effluent
Guidelines
Program
Plan
for
2004/
2005,
DCN
548,
Section
3.0;


Development
of
PCSLoads
2000,
DCN
620,
Section
2.1.2
(
this
document
explains
how
pollutant
loads
were
calculated
from
PCS
data);
and

Evaluation
of
RSEI
Model
Runs,
DCN
618,
Section
2.1.1.

Information
from
EPA's
Permit
Compliance
System
(
PCS)
and
Toxics
Release
Inventory
(
TRI)
databases
were
used
to
create
the
PCSLoads2000
and
TRIReleases2000
databases.
These
databases
were
the
primary
source
of
information
used
to
conduct
this
review.
Since
this
industry
ranked
low
during
the
screening
phase,
however,
EPA
did
not
verify
any
of
the
information
reported
to
PCS
and
TRI,
and
has
used
it
as
reported.

TRIReleases2000
The
Toxic
Release
Inventory
(
TRI)
is
the
major
source
of
data
for
the
TRIReleases2000
database.
TRI
is
the
common
name
for
Section
313
of
the
Emergency
Planning
and
Community
Right­
to­
Know
Act
(
EPCRA).
Each
year,
facilities
that
meet
certain
thresholds
must
report
their
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
23
of
52
releases
and
other
waste
management
activities
for
listed
toxic
chemicals.
That
is,
facilities
must
report
the
quantities
of
toxic
chemicals
recycled,
collected
and
combusted
for
energy
recovery,
treated
for
destruction,
or
disposed
of.
A
separate
report
must
be
filed
for
each
chemical
that
exceeds
the
reporting
threshold.
The
TRI
list
of
chemicals
for
reporting
year
2000
includes
more
than
600
chemicals
and
chemical
categories.
For
this
review,
EPA
used
data
for
reporting
year
2000,
because
they
were
the
most
recent
available
at
the
time
the
review
began.

There
are
three
criteria
that
a
facility
must
meet
to
be
required
to
submit
a
TRI
report
for
that
reporting
year.
The
criteria
are:

(
1)
SIC
Code
Determination:
Facilities
in
SIC
Codes
20
through
39,
seven
additional
SIC
codes
outside
this
range,
and
federal
facilities
must
concern
themselves
with
TRI
reporting.
EPA
rarely
checks
or
refutes
facility
claims
regarding
the
SIC
code
identification.
The
primary
SIC
code
determines
TRI
reporting.

(
2)
Number
of
Employees:
Facilities
must
have
10
or
more
full­
time
employees
or
their
equivalent.
EPA
defines
a
"
full­
time
equivalent"
as
a
person
that
works
2,000
hours
in
the
reporting
year
(
there
are
several
exceptions
and
special
circumstances
that
are
well­
defined
in
the
TRI
reporting
instructions).

(
3)
Activity
Thresholds:
If
the
facility
is
in
a
covered
SIC
code
and
has
10
or
more
full­
time
employee
equivalents
it
must
conduct
an
activity
threshold
analysis
for
every
chemical
and
chemical
category
on
the
current
TRI
list.
The
facility
must
determine
whether
it
manufactures,
processes,
OR
otherwise
uses
each
chemical
at
or
above
the
appropriate
activity
threshold.
Reporting
thresholds
are
not
based
on
the
amount
of
release.
All
TRI
thresholds
are
based
on
mass,
not
concentration.
Different
thresholds
apply
for
persistent
bioaccumulative
toxic
(
PBT)
chemicals
than
for
non­
PBT
chemicals.

In
TRI,
facilities
report
annual
loads
released
to
the
environment
of
each
toxic
chemical
or
chemical
category
that
meets
reporting
requirements.
They
must
report
onsite
releases
to
air,
receiving
streams,
disposal
to
land,
underground
wells,
and
several
other
categories.
They
must
also
report
the
amount
of
toxic
chemicals
in
wastes
transferred
to
off­
site
locations,
including
discharges
to
POTWs
and
other
off­
site
locations,
such
as
commercial
waste
disposal
facilities.

For
this
review,
EPA
focused
on
the
amount
of
chemicals
facilities
reported
either
discharging
directly
to
a
receiving
stream
or
transferring
to
a
POTW.
For
facilities
discharging
directly
to
a
stream,
the
loads
were
taken
directly
from
the
reported
TRI
data
for
calendar
year
2000.
For
facilities
that
transfer
toxic
chemicals
to
POTWs,
EPA
first
adjusted
the
TRI
pollutant
loads
reported
to
be
transferred
to
POTWs
to
account
for
pollutant
removal
that
occurs
at
the
POTW
prior
to
discharge
to
the
receiving
stream.
This
adjustment
was
made
using
POTW
removal
efficiencies
from
EPA's
Risk
Screening
Environmental
Indicators
(
RSEI)
model
(
see
Section
2.1.1
of
the
docket
for
more
information
on
TRI
and
the
RSEI
model).
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
24
of
52
Reporting
facilities
are
not
required
to
sample
and
analyze
wastestreams
to
determine
the
quantities
of
toxic
chemicals
released.
They
may
estimate
releases
based
on
mass
balance
calculations,
published
emission
factors,
site­
specific
emission
factors,
or
other
approaches.
Facilities
are
required
to
indicate,
by
a
reporting
code,
the
basis
of
their
release
estimate.
TRI's
reporting
guidance
is
that
for
chemicals
reasonably
expected
to
be
present
but
measured
below
the
detection
limit,
facilities
should
use
one
half
the
detection
limit
to
estimate
the
mass
released.
The
guidance
is
slightly
different
for
dioxins
and
dioxin­
like
compounds
in
that
it
allows
nondetects
to
be
treated
as
zero.

TRI
provides
the
option
for
facilities
to
report
releases
as
specific
numbers
or
as
ranges,
if
appropriate.
Specific
estimates
are
encouraged
if
data
are
available
to
ensure
the
accuracy;
however,
EPA
allows
facilities
to
report
releases
in
the
following
ranges:
1
to
10
pounds,
11
to
499
pounds,
and
500
to
999
pounds.
For
this
analysis,
EPA
used
the
mid­
point
of
each
reported
range
to
represent
a
facility's
releases.

EPA
weighted
the
direct
and
indirect
pollutant
releases
to
surface
waters
using
toxic
weighting
factors
(
TWFs)
developed
by
Office
of
Water/
Engineering
and
Analysis
Division
(
EAD),
to
calculate
toxic
weighted
pound
equivalents
(
TWPE)
for
each
reported
release.
See
4.2.3
and
4.2.4
for
more
discussion
of
TWFs
and
calculation
of
TWPE.
EPA
compiled
data
taken
from
TRI,
the
adjusted
releases
from
POTWs
to
surface
waters,
the
calculated
TWPE,
and
the
relationship
between
SIC
codes
and
point
source
category
into
a
Microsoft
Access
 
database
named
TRIReleases2000.
Some
corrections
were
made
to
this
database
as
further
study
was
conducted
on
the
TRI
data.
Limitations
of
TRI
are
discussed
in
Section
IV
of
the
Technical
Support
Document
for
this
planning
process.

PCSLoads2000
The
Permit
Compliance
System
(
PCS)
is
the
major
source
of
data
for
the
PCSLoads2000
database.
PCS
is
a
computerized
management
information
system
maintained
by
EPA's
Office
of
Enforcement
and
Compliance
Assurance
(
OECA).
It
was
created
to
track
permit,
compliance,
and
enforcement
status
of
facilities
regulated
by
the
National
Pollutant
Discharge
Elimination
System
(
NPDES)
program
under
the
Clean
Water
Act
(
CWA).

More
than
65,000
industrial
facilities
and
water
treatment
plants
have
obtained
permits
for
water
discharges
of
regulated
pollutants.
To
provide
an
initial
framework
for
setting
permit
issuance
priorities,
EPA
developed
a
major/
minor
classification
system
for
industrial
and
municipal
wastewater
discharges.
Major
discharges
almost
always
have
the
capability
to
impact
receiving
waters
if
not
controlled
and,
therefore,
have
been
accorded
more
regulatory
attention
than
minor
discharges.
There
are
approximately
6,400
facilities
(
including
sewerage
systems)
with
major
discharges
for
which
PCS
has
extensive
records.
Permitting
authorities
classify
discharges
as
major
based
on
an
assessment
of
six
characteristics:
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
25
of
52
(
1)
toxic
pollutant
potential;
(
2)
ratio
of
discharge
flow
to
stream
flow;
(
3)
conventional
pollutant
loading;
(
4)
public
health
impact;
(
5)
water
quality
factors;
and
(
6)
proximity
to
coastal
waters.

Facilities
with
major
discharges
must
report
compliance
with
NPDES
permit
limits
via
monthly
Discharge
Monitoring
Reports
(
DMRs)
submitted
to
the
permitting
authority.
The
permitting
authority
enters
the
reported
DMR
data
into
PCS,
including
the
type
of
violation
(
if
any),
concentration
and
quantity
values,
and
the
Quarterly
Non­
Compliance
Report
(
QNCR)
indicators.
Minor
discharges
may,
or
may
not,
adversely
impact
receiving
water
if
not
controlled.
Therefore,
EPA
does
not
require
DMRs
for
facilities
with
minor
discharges.
For
this
reason,
the
PCS
database
includes
data
only
for
a
limited
set
of
minor
dischargers
when
the
states
choose
to
include
these
data.
As
a
consequence,
extensive
data
are
not
available
for
minor
discharges
in
PCS.

Parameters
in
PCS
include
water
quality
parameters
(
such
as
pH
and
temperature),
specific
chemicals,
bulk
parameters
(
such
as
BOD
5
and
TSS),
and
flow
rates.
Although
other
pollutants
may
be
discharged,
PCS
only
contains
data
for
the
parameters
identified
in
the
facility's
NPDES
permit.
Facilities
typically
report
monthly
average
pounds
per
day
discharged,
but
also
report
daily
maxima,
and
pollutant
concentrations.

For
this
review,
EPA
used
data
for
reporting
year
2000,
to
correspond
to
the
data
obtained
from
TRI.
EPA
used
its
Effluent
Data
Statistics
(
EDS)
system
program
to
calculate
annual
pollutant
discharges
using
the
monthly
reports
in
PCS.
Because
units
of
measure
vary
widely
in
PCS,
EPA
developed
the
EDS
system
to
estimate
mass
loadings
based
on
data
stored
in
PCS.
The
EDS
system
uses
existing
PCS
reported
mass
loading
values
or
multiplies
reported
discharge
flows
and
effluent
concentrations
to
estimate
loadings
for
each
outfall
(
discharge
pipe),
taking
into
account
the
various
units
of
concentration
and
flow
rates.

Where
concentrations
were
reported
as
below
detection
limit
(
BDL)
EPA
assumed
the
parameter
concentration
was
equal
to
zero
for
parameters
never
detected
by
the
facility
in
2000.
For
parameters
sometimes
detected
and
sometimes
not,
the
"
BDL"
concentration
was
set
equal
to
half
of
the
detection
limit.
.
The
EDS
system
program
sums
the
monthly
loads
to
calculate
annual
discharges,
interpolating
(
using
average
reported
loads)
for
months
with
missing
reports.

EPA
weighted
the
calculated
annual
pollutant
discharges
using
EAD's
TWFs
to
calculate
TWPE
for
each
reported
discharge,
as
it
did
for
the
reported
TRI
releases.
See
sections
4.2.3
and
4.2.4
for
more
discussion
of
TWFs
and
calculation
of
TWPE.
EPA
compiled
data
taken
from
PCS,
the
calculated
TWPE,
and
the
relationship
between
SIC
codes
and
point
source
category
into
a
Microsoft
Access
 
database
named
PCSLoads2000.
As
further
study
was
conducted
on
the
PCS
data,
some
corrections
were
made.
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
26
of
52
Other
Information
Sources
In
addition
to
TRI
and
PCS,
EPA
used
the
following
sources
of
information
in
its
review
of
this
industry
include:


1997
Economic
Census
data;
and
2002
Economic
Census
data.


Contacts
with
reporting
facilities
to
verify
reported
releases
and
facility
categorization.


US
EPA,
October
1985.
Development
Document
for
Final
Effluent
Limitations
Guidelines
and
Standards
for
the
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
(
Foundry)
Point
Source
Category.
EPA440/
1­
85/
070.


US
EPA,
1998.
Office
of
Compliance
Sector
Notebook
Project:
Profile
of
the
Metal
Casting
Industry.
EPA/
310­
R­
97­
004.


US.
2001.
Code
of
Federal
Regulations.
40
CFR
Part
464:
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
Point
Source
Category.
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
27
of
52
Attachment
B
Point
Source
Categories
Identified
Solely
Through
Factor
4
Industry
Formal
Comment
Process
Previous
Suggestions
(
Sec.
2.4)
Draft
Strategy
Outreach
Comments
on
Draft
Strategy
(
Sec.
2.2)
Comments
on
2002/
2003
Plan
(
Sec.
2.3)
Permitting
Authorities
(
Sec.
2.5)
AMSA
&
ASIWPCA
(
Sec.
2.6)

Coal
Mining



Coil
Coating

Dairy
Products
Processing

Electrical
and
Electronic
Components

Fruits
and
Vegetable
Processing


Metal
Molding
and
Casting




Mineral
Mining
and
Processing

Seafood
Processing



FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
28
of
52
Attachment
C
Applicability
and
Regulatory
History
Applicability
of
40
CFR
Part
464
Subpart
A
­
Aluminum
Casting
Subcategory.
The
provisions
of
this
subpart
are
applicable
to
discharges
to
waters
of
the
United
States
and
to
the
introduction
of
pollutants
into
publicly
owned
treatment
works
resulting
from
aluminum
casting
operations.
definition:
The
term
aluminum
casting
shall
mean
the
remelting
of
aluminum
or
an
aluminum
alloy
to
form
a
cast
intermediate
or
final
product
by
pouring
or
forcing
the
molten
metal
into
a
mold,
except
for
ingots,
pigs,
or
other
cast
shapes
related
to
nonferrous
(
primary
and
secondary)
metals
manufacturing
(
40
CFR
part
421)
and
aluminum
forming
(
40
CFR
part
467).
Processing
operations
following
the
cooling
of
castings
not
covered
under
aluminum
forming,
except
for
grinding
scrubber
operations
which
are
covered
here,
are
covered
under
the
electroplating
and
metal
finishing
point
source
categories
(
40
CFR
parts
413
and
433).

Subpart
B
­
Copper
Casting
Subcategory.
The
provisions
of
this
subpart
are
applicable
to
discharges
to
waters
of
the
United
States
and
to
the
introduction
of
pollutants
into
publicly
owned
treatment
works
resulting
from
copper
casting
operations.
definition:
The
term
copper
casting
shall
mean
the
remelting
of
copper
or
a
copper
alloy
to
form
a
cast
intermediate
or
final
product
by
pouring
or
forcing
the
molten
metal
into
a
mold,
except
for
ingots,
pigs,
or
other
cast
shapes
related
to
nonferrous
(
primary
and
secondary)
metals
manufacturing
(
40
CFR
part
421).
Also
excluded
are
casting
of
beryllium
alloys
in
which
beryllium
is
present
at
0.1
or
greater
percent
by
weight
and
precious
metals
alloys
in
which
the
precious
metal
is
present
at
30
or
greater
percent
by
weight.
Except
for
grinding
scrubber
operations
which
are
covered
here,
processing
operations
following
the
cooling
of
castings
are
covered
under
the
electroplating
and
metal
finishing
point
source
categories
(
40
CFR
parts
413
and
433).

Subpart
C
­
Ferrous
Casting
Subcategory.
The
provisions
of
this
subpart
are
applicable
to
discharges
to
waters
of
the
United
States
and
to
the
introduction
of
pollutants
into
publicly
owned
treatment
works
resulting
from
ferrous
casting
operations.
definition:
The
term
ferrous
casting
shall
mean
the
remelting
of
ferrous
metals
to
form
a
cast
intermediate
or
finished
product
by
pouring
the
molten
metal
into
a
mold.
Except
for
grinding
scrubber
operations
which
are
covered
here,
processing
operations
following
the
cooling
of
castings
are
covered
under
the
electroplating
and
metal
finishing
point
source
categories
(
40
CFR
parts
413
and
433).

Subpart
D
­
Zinc
Casting
Subcategory.
The
provisions
of
this
subpart
are
applicable
to
discharges
to
waters
of
the
United
States
and
to
the
introduction
of
pollutants
into
publicly
owned
treatment
works
resulting
from
zinc
casting
operations.
definition:
The
term
zinc
casting
shall
mean
the
remelting
of
zinc
or
zinc
alloy
to
form
a
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
29
of
52
cast
intermediate
or
final
product
by
pouring
or
forcing
the
molten
metal
into
a
mold,
except
for
ingots,
pigs,
or
other
cast
shapes
related
to
nonferrous
(
primary)
metals
manufacturing
(
40
CFR
part
421)
and
nonferrous
metals
forming
(
40
CFR
part
471).
Processing
operations
following
the
cooling
of
castings
not
covered
under
nonferrous
metals
forming
are
covered
under
the
electroplating
and
metal
finishing
point
source
categories
(
40
CFR
parts
413
and
433).

REGULATORY
BACKGROUND
Regulatory
History
Effluent
limitations
were
first
proposed
November
1982.
Final
versions
of
the
effluent
limitations
for
Subparts
A
­
D
were
promulgated
October
30,
1985.
EPA
established
no
limitations
for
the
Magnesium
Casting
subcategory
as
the
Agency
determined
they
were
not
achievable
economically
for
existing
plants.

Existing
Limitations
Effluent
limitations
guidelines
are
mass­
based
on
the
basis
of
metric
ton
(
kkg)
of
metal
poured
or
sand
reclaimed,
or
standard
cubic
meters
(
Sm3)
of
air
scrubbed.
Limitations
were
established
based
on
a
subcategorization
and
production
process
segmentation
scheme.
Separate
limitations
were
developed
for
facilities
with
intermittent
or
non­
continuous
discharge.

The
technology
basis
of
existing
regulations
is
recycle,
lime
precipitation
and
sedimentation
for
BPT
and
recycle,
lime
precipitation
and
sedimentation,
and
filtration
for
BAT,
NSPS,
PSES
and
PSNS.

°
BCT
was
reserved
for
all
Subparts
(
A­
D).


NSPS
are
equal
to
BAT;
PSNS
are
equal
to
PSES.


"
No
discharge
of
process
wastewater"
is
the
basis
of
limitations
for
3
of
the
28
regulated
process
segments.
These
processes
are
the
grinding
scrubber
process
for
the
aluminum,
copper,
and
ferrous
casting
subparts.

Table
C­
1
presents
the
30­
day
averages
for
BPT
and
for
BAT/
NSPS/
PSES/
PSNS.
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
30
of
52
Table
C­
1.
Effluent
Guidelines
for
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
 
Continuous
Direct
Dischargers
(
kg/
kkg)

Pollutant
Parameter
BPT
30­
day
averages
BAT/
NSPS/
PSES/
PSNS
30­
day
averages
TSS
0.13­
165
0.104­
165
(
b)

Oil
and
grease
0.0864­
110
0.0864­
110
(
b)

Total
phenolsa
0.0026­
1.17
0.0026­
1.17
(
c)

Total
Toxic
Organics
not
regulated
for
BPT
0.0064­
8.29
(
d)

Copper
0.036­
4.63
0.0036­
4.63
(
c)

Lead
0.0034­
4.3
0.0022­
4.3
(
c)

Zinc
0.0037­
6.17
0.0025­
4.74
(
c)

pH
7.0­
10.0
Not
regulated
a
Phenols
not
regulated
at
BPT
for
casting
cleaning
and
quench,
investment
casting,
mold
cooling,
or
slag
quench.
b
NSPS
c
BAT,
NSPS,
PSES,
PSNS
d
PSES
AND
PSNS
Comment
on
304
plan
noted
the
discrepancy
of
metal
limits
between
the
metal
molding
and
casting
industry
and
the
metal
finishing
industry
(
molding
and
casting
are
orders
of
magnitude
lower).
A
summary
of
metal
molding
and
casting
treatment
effectiveness
concentrations
and
the
metal
finishing
limits
are
provided
in
the
following
table.

Table
C­
2.
Summary
of
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
Option
3
Concentrations
and
Metal
Finishing
Effluent
Limitations
Pollutant
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
Option
3
(
BAT)
Effluent
30­
Day
average
(
mg/
l)
Metal
Finishing
Effluent
Limitations
30­
Day
average
(
mg/
l)
Ferrous
Subcategory
Nonferrous
Subcategory
Copper
0.065
0.17
2.07a
Lead
0.15
0.15
0.43a
Pollutant
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
Option
3
(
BAT)
Effluent
30­
Day
average
(
mg/
l)
Metal
Finishing
Effluent
Limitations
30­
Day
average
(
mg/
l)
Ferrous
Subcategory
Nonferrous
Subcategory
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
31
of
52
Zinc
0.26
0.18
1.48a
TSS
2.6
2.6
31b
Oil
and
grease
5
5
26b
Phenol
0.20
0.20
31b
a
PSES
b
BPT
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
32
of
52
Attachment
D
PCS
Discharges
SIC
NPID
NAME
CITY
Flow(
M
GD)
LBS/
YR
TWPE
Percent
of
Total
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
of
Total
SIC
TWPE
3321
TX0001465
RANSOM
INDUSTRIES
LP
TYLER
3
1,489,733
4,509
88%
88%

3321
OH0004901
BURNHAM
CORPORATION
ZANESVILLE
1
4,703
211
4%
93%

3321
IL0001830
CATERPILLAR
INC.­
MAPLETON
MAPLETON
23
130,886
199
4%
96%

3321
OH0002666
GENERAL
MOTORS
CORP.
DEFIANCE
1
43,909
179
4%
100%

3321
TOTAL
28
1,669,232
5,099
3325
KY0100153
STEEL
TECHNOLOGIES
INC
GHENT
GHENT
0.16
453,778
16
69%
69%

3325
NJ0004049
FLOWSERVE
CORP/
INGERSOLL
RAND
PHILLIPSBURG
2
94,742
7
31%
100%

3325
TOTAL
2
548,521
23
3365
IN0003573
G.
M.
CORP.
POWERTRAIN
DIV.
BEDFORD
0.25
2,327
709
100%
100%

3365
KY0001864
INVENSYS
PRECISION
DIE
CASTING
RUSSELLVILLE
0
33,263
2
3365
TOTAL
0
35,590
711
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
33
of
52
Attachment
E
TRI
Discharges
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
3321
16335DVNCDPOBOX
ADVANCED
CAST
PRODS.
INC.
MEADVILLE
PA
87,067
29,144
87,067
29,144
70%
70%

3321
14901KNNDY1021E
KENNEDY
VALVE
ELMIRA
NY
4,500
6,531
163
253
4,663
6,784
16%
87%

3321
61547CTRPL8826W
CATERPILLAR
INC.
MAPLETON
PLANT
MAPLETON
IL
3,365
1,452
3,365
1,452
4%
90%

3321
54981WPCFN406ND
WAUPACA
FNDY.

INC.
PLANT
1
WAUPACA
WI
1,025
730
1,025
730
2%
92%

3321
54981WPCFNTOWER
WAUPACA
FNDY.

INC.
PLANT
2/
3
WAUPACA
WI
780
585
780
585
1%
93%

3321
54143WPCFN805OD
WAUPACA
FNDY.

INC.
PLANT
4
MARINETTE
WI
1,285
349
15
6
1,300
355
1%
94%

3321
46580THDLTCORNE
DALTON
CORP.
WARSAW
IN
2,153
261
2,153
261
1%
95%

3321
24505LYNCHRT726
INTERMET
ARCHER
CREEK
FNDY.
LYNCHBURG
VA
2,010
259
4
1
2,014
260
1%
96%

3321
53511BLTCR1401E
PRIME
CAST
INC.
BELOIT
WI
765
207
1
1
766
208
1%
96%

3321
54110BRLLN200PA
BRILLION
IRON
WORKS
INC.
BRILLION
WI
525
189
525
189
0%
97%

3321
30458GRNNLHIGHW
ANVIL
INTL.
STATESBORO
GA
510
178
510
178
0%
97%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
34
of
52
3321
44142FRDMT5600H
FORD
MOTOR
CO.

CLEVELAND
CASTING
BROOK
PARK
OH
2,357
158
2,357
158
0%
97%

3321
48605SGNWG1629N
GMC
POWERTRAIN
SAGINAW
METAL
CASTING
OPS.
SAGINAW
MI
2,686
134
2,686
134
0%
98%

3321
43512GMC
STATE
GMC
POWERTRAIN
DEFIANCE
DEFIANCE
OH
18,670
98
836
21
19,506
119
0%
98%

3321
46241CHRYS1100S
INDIANAPOLIS
FNDY.
INDIANAPOLIS
IN
1,667
99
1,667
99
0%
98%

3321
37343WHLND2800S
NORTH
AMERICAN
ROYALTIES
INC.

WHELAND
FNDY.

DIV.
CHATTANOOGA
TN
7
0.37
2,743
67
2,750
68
0%
98%

3321
47374SLVCS2153W
PERFECT
CIRCLE
DIV.
DANA
CORP.

RICHMOND
LINER
FND
RICHMOND
IN
286
60
286
60
0%
99%

3321
63448CPRFN700NO
LAGRANGE
FNDY.

INC.
LA
GRANGE
MO
770
57
14
2
784
58
0%
99%

3321
75710TYLRPHIGHW
TYLER
PIPE
CO.
TYLER
TX
107
56
107
56
0%
99%

3321
18042VCTLC4901K
VICTAULIC
CO.
OF
AMERICA
FORKS
FACILITY
EASTON
PA
73
44
73
44
0%
99%

3321
30828WHLND1117T
WHELAND
AUTOMOTIVE
INDS.
WARRENTON
GA
1,015
42
1,015
42
0%
99%

3321
61605CTRPL2411W
CATERPILLAR
INC.
SEAL
RING
MAPLETON
IL
391
41
391
41
0%
99%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
35
of
52
3321
46706BRNFN63563
AUBURN
FNDY.

INC.
AUBURN
IN
30
2
320
34
350
36
0%
99%

3321
24141LYNCHFIRST
INTERMET
RADFORD
FNDY.
RADFORD
VA
470
32
470
32
0%
99%

3321
51501GRFFN2601W
GRIFFIN
PIPE
PRODS.
CO.
COUNCIL
BLUFFS
IA
14
31
14
31
0%
99%

3321
24505GRFFNADAMS
GRIFFIN
PIPE
PRODS.
CO.
LYNCHBURG
VA
255
12
244
19
499
31
0%
99%

3321
47394MCCST900NM
OMCO
CAST
METALS
WINCHESTER
IN
260
28
260
28
0%
99%

3321
31995CLMBS1600N
INTERMET
COLUMBUS
FNDY.

INC.
COLUMBUS
GA
11,381
26
11,381
26
0%
100%

3321
16501MC
603W1
GUNITE
EMI
CORP.
ERIE
PA
265
22
715
1
980
23
0%
100%

3321
62521WGNRC1275E
INTERMET
DECATUR
FNDY.
DECATUR
IL
39
19
39
19
0%
100%

3321
44460QKRCT310EU
QUAKER
CITY
CASTINGS
INC.
SALEM
OH
160
18
160
18
0%
100%

3321
19545BYRTW9THRO
BOYERTOWN
FNDY.
CO.
NEW
BERLINVILLE
PA
255
18
255
18
0%
100%

3321
48048NWHVN58391
NEW
HAVEN
FNDY.
NEW
HAVEN
MI
9
17
9
17
0%
100%

3321
54956NNHFN2121B
NEENAH
FNDY.

CO.
NEENAH
WI
131
10
88
5
219
15
0%
100%

3321
94587NTDST1295W
U.
S.
PIPE
&
FNDY.

CO.
INC.
UNION
CITY
CA
470
11
73
3
543
14
0%
100%

3321
49431GRTLK800NW
GREAT
LAKES
CASTINGS
CORP.
LUDINGTON
MI
156
11
156
11
0%
100%

3321
52577CLWVLOLDHW
CLOW
VALVE
CO.

FNDY.
OSKALOOSA
IA
9
10
9
10
0%
100%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
36
of
52
3321
16125HDGFN42LEE
SVEDALA
GRINDING
HODGE
FNDY.
GREENVILLE
PA
56
8
56
8
0%
100%

3321
36201MHVLV605WE
M
&
H
VALVE
CO.
ANNISTON
AL
35
5
35
5
0%
100%

3321
35023NTDST2023S
UNITED
STATES
PIPE
&
FNDY.
CO.
BESSEMER
AL
2,380
5
2,380
5
0%
100%

3321
44036LYRFN120FI
ELYRIA
FNDY.
ELYRIA
OH
15
4
15
4
0%
100%

3321
53581RCHLNFOUND
RICHLAND
CENTER
FNDY.
RICHLAND
CENTER
WI
7
3
7
3
0%
100%

3321
55413PRSPC1225W
PROSPECT
FNDY.

INC.
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
7
2
7
2
0%
100%

3321
08016SPPFNEASTP
U.
S.
PIPE
&
FNDY.

CO.
BURLINGTON
NJ
1,645
2
1,645
2
0%
100%

3321
47202CWCTX1616T
GOLDEN
CASTING
CORP.
COLUMBUS
IN
9
2
9
2
0%
100%

3321
46706BRNFN2278C
AUBURN
FNDY.

INC.
PLANT
#
2
AUBURN
IN
20
1
13
1
33
2
0%
100%

3321
92627GRSWL1701P
GRISWOLD
INDS.
COSTA
MESA
CA
7
2
7
2
0%
100%

3321
55746NRTHR555WE
NORTHERN
CASTINGS
CORP.
HIBBING
MN
1
1
1
1
0%
100%

3321
49441CWCCS2672H
TEXTRON
AUTOMOTIVE
FUNCTIONAL
COMPONENTSCWC
DIV.
MUSKEGON
MI
7
1
7
1
0%
100%

3321
41008DYTNW5212H
MERITOR
HVBS
CARROLLTON
CASTING
CENTER
CARROLLTON
KY
1
1
1
1
0%
100%

3321
44903MNSFL500NO
CITATION
MANSFIELD
MANSFIELD
OH
1
1
1
1
0%
100%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
37
of
52
3321
45638RNTNR2520S
INTERMET
CORP.

IRONTON
IRON
INC.
IRONTON
OH
1
1
1
1
0%
100%

3321
56303MNTRN711AN
GREDE
­
ST.

CLOUD
FNDY.

INC.
SAINT
CLOUD
MN
381
1
381
1
0%
100%

3321
45804WHMC
1600M
WHEMCO
OHIO
FNDY.
DIV.
INC.
LIMA
OH
4
0.43
4
0.43
0%
100%

3321
41031GRDFNNEWLA
GREDE
FOUNDRIES
INC.

GREDE
PERM
CAST
CYNTHIANA
KY
4
0.38
4
0.38
0%
100%

3321
45640SCNDSATHEN
OSCO
IND.
INC.

JACKSON
DIV.
JACKSON
OH
5
0.35
5
0.35
0%
100%

3321
18011VCTLC8023Q
VICTAULIC
CO.
OF
AMERICA
ALBURTIS
FACILITY
ALBURTIS
PA
3
0.34
3
0.34
0%
100%

3321
49601CMCST23010
HAYES
LEMMERZ
INTL.
INC.
CADILLAC
INC.
CADILLAC
MI
249
0.20
249
0.20
0%
100%

3321
28208CHRLT1335S
CHARLOTTE
PIPE
&
FNDY.
CO.
CHARLOTTE
NC
102
0.15
102
0.15
0%
100%

3321
49224HRVRD601NO
HAYES­
ALBION
CORP.
ALBION
MI
4
0.11
4
0.11
0%
100%

3321
36201SCSTN1831F
U.
S.
PIPE
&
FNDY.

CO.
INC.
U.
S.

CASTINGS
DIV.
ANNISTON
AL
1
0.07
1
0.07
0%
100%

3321
43812CLWWT2266S
CLOW
WATER
SYS.
CO.
COSHOCTON
OH
11
0.02
11
0.02
0%
100%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
38
of
52
3321
08865TLNTC183SI
ATLANTIC
STATES
CAST
IRON
PIPE
CO.
PHILLIPSBURG
NJ
8
0.02
8
0.02
0%
100%

3321
Total
156,113
41,393
3322
17512GRNNL1411L
ANVIL
INTL.
INC.
COLUMBIA
PA
20
45
20
45
91%
91%

3322
06786ZGDNYMAINS
O­
Z/
GEDNEY
L.
L.
C.
TERRYVILLE
CT
86
4
86
4
8%
99%

3322
53172PPLTN2105S
EGS
ELECTRICAL
GROUP
APPLETON
SOUTH
MILWAUKEE
WI
5
0.35
5
0.35
1%
100%

3322
Total
111
49
3324
97206LRGST4600S
PCC
STRUCTURALS
INC.
LARGE
PARTS
CAMPUS
PORTLAND
OR
20
2
63,590
46
63,610
48
33%
33%

3324
46580MDCST596EA
MED
CAST
INC.
WARSAW
IN
294
29
294
29
20%
53%

3324
46350RMTLSPOBOX
AERO
METALS
INC.
LA
PORTE
IN
41
22
41
22
15%
68%

3324
97015SMLLS13340
PCC
STRUCTURALS
INC.
SMALL
STRUCTURALS
BUSINESS
OP
CLACKAMAS
OR
20
2
162
18
182
19
13%
82%

3324
53209STNLS5150N
STAINLESS
FNDY.

&
ENG.
INC.
MILWAUKEE
WI
15
4
9
1
24
5
4%
85%

3324
53223SGNCS9000N
SIGNICAST
CORP.
MILWAUKEE
WI
66
5
66
5
4%
89%

3324
36201STHRNHIGHW
SOUTHERN
TOOL
INC.
OXFORD
AL
12
2
12
2
2%
90%

3324
97045PDMNF13963
PED
MFG.
LTD.
OREGON
CITY
OR
15
1
8
1
23
2
2%
92%

3324
85043DLPHN740SO
DOLPHIN
INC.
PHOENIX
AZ
12
2
12
2
1%
93%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
39
of
52
3324
78702PRCST2110E
PURE
CASTINGS
CO.
AUSTIN
TX
3
2
3
2
1%
95%

3324
60101FNSTL21NCH
FANSTEEL
ESCAST
ADDISON
IL
6
2
6
2
1%
96%

3324
89706SRRCS2727L
WGIC­
SIERRA
CAST
CARSON
CITY
NV
9
2
9
2
1%
97%

3324
17067CMQKR640SC
TECH
CAST
INC.
MYERSTOWN
PA
10
1
4
0.43
14
1
1%
98%

3324
91745TLDYN16800
TELEDYNE
CAST
PARTS
INDUSTRY
OPS.
CITY
OF
INDUSTRY
CA
5
1
3
0.34
8
1
1%
99%

3324
13037GRYSY901EA
GRAY­
SYRACUSE
INC.
CHITTENANGO
NY
8
1
8
1
1%
99%

3324
94577PRCSN414HE
WYMAN
GORDON
CO.
SAN
LEANDRO
CA
4
0.42
4
0.42
0%
99%

3324
53094WSCNS661S1
WISCONSIN
INVESTCAST
WATERTOWN
WI
4
0.40
4
0.40
0%
100%

3324
36830VRMNT155AL
VERMONT
AMERICAN
AUBURN
AL
4
0.37
4
0.37
0%
100%

3324
07748NGNRD952PA
ENGINEERED
PRECISION
CASTING
CO.
MIDDLETOWN
NJ
1
0.09
1
0.09
0%
100%

3324
03055HTCHNOLDWI
HITCHINER
MFG.

CO.
INC.
MILFORD
NH
3
0.0045
28
0.043
31
0.05
0%
100%

3324
Total
64,356
146
3325
38478MRCNM2360I
MAGOTTEAUX
CORP.
PULASKI
TN
255
131
8
1
263
132
27%
27%

3325
35222THMSF900NO
SVEDALA
INDS.

INC.
THOMAS
DIV.
BIRMINGHAM
AL
1,260
95
1,260
95
20%
47%

3325
43207BCKYS2211P
BUCKEYE
STEEL
CASTINGS
CO.
COLUMBUS
OH
770
65
770
65
13%
61%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
40
of
52
3325
47918HRRSN900MO
HARRISON
STEEL
CASTINGS
CO.
ATTICA
IN
265
31
265
31
6%
67%

3325
52722SVYRS225S3
SIVYER
STEEL
CORP.
BETTENDORF
IA
270
29
270
29
6%
73%

3325
49441WSTMC1148W
WEST
MICHIGAN
STEEL
FNDY.
MUSKEGON
MI
260
28
260
28
6%
79%

3325
53188WSCNS905EA
WISCONSIN
CENTRIFUGAL
WAUKESHA
WI
42
20
42
20
4%
83%

3325
97062DRMTL9560S
DURAMETAL
CORP.
TUALATIN
OR
257
19
257
19
4%
87%

3325
62040MRCNS1700W
AMERICAN
STEEL
FOUNDRIES
GRANITE
CITY
IL
262
16
262
16
3%
90%

3325
53404RCNST1442N
RACINE
STEEL
CASTING
DIV.
RACINE
WI
535
12
535
12
2%
92%

3325
45404DRRNC450NO
FLOWSERVE
CORP.
FDRY
OPS.
DAYTON
OH
60
7
60
7
1%
94%

3325
44871SNDSK615WE
SANDUSKY
INTL.

INC.
SANDUSKY
OH
11
6
11
6
1%
95%

3325
02184WLLST205WO
WOLLASTON
ALLOYS
INC.
BRAINTREE
MA
24
6
24
6
1%
96%

3325
98409TLSFN3021S
ATLAS
FNDY.
&

MACHINE
CO.
TACOMA
WA
20
4
14
2
34
6
1%
97%

3325
76501DLTCN3402C
DELTA
CENTRIFUGAL
CORP.
TEMPLE
TX
15
3
15
3
1%
98%

3325
17067QKRLLERICH
QUAKER
ALLOY
INC.
MYERSTOWN
PA
17
2
17
2
0%
99%

3325
55808MNTRN200EA
M
E
INTL.
DULUTH
MN
31
2
31
2
0%
99%

3325
15059WSTHMONE12
WEST
HOMESTEAD
ENG.
&
MACHINE
CO.
MIDLAND
PA
14
1
14
1
0%
99%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
41
of
52
3325
35055MRCNL1725O
AMERICAN
ALLOY
PRODS.
INC.
CULLMAN
AL
10
1
10
1
0%
99%

3325
66002RCKWL4THAN
ATCHISON
STEEL
CASTING
&
MACHINING
ATCHISON
KS
1
1
0.28
0.17
1
1
0%
99%

3325
53186WKSHF1300L
WAUKESHA
FNDY.

CO.
INC.
WAUKESHA
WI
2
1
2
1
0%
100%

3325
36605MBLPL905SO
MOBILE
PULLEY
&

MACHINE
WORKS
MOBILE
AL
9
1
9
1
0%
100%

3325
15201MCCNW10948
MCCONWAY
&

TORLEY
CORP.
PITTSBURGH
PA
6
1
6
1
0%
100%

3325
15066DMSCSPOBOX
DAMASCUS
STEEL
CASTING
CO.
NEW
BRIGHTON
PA
4
0.30
4
0.30
0%
100%

3325
19526PNNSYTHIRD
PENNSYLVANIA
STEEL
FNDY.
&

MACHINE
CO.
HAMBURG
PA
3
0.22
3
0.22
0%
100%

3325
15683BLWKNBRIDG
DURALOY
TECHS.

INC.
SCOTTDALE
PA
1
0.076
0.47
0.036
1
0.11
0%
100%

3325
75604STHWS600FO
SOUTHWEST
STEEL
CASTING
CO.
LONGVIEW
TX
8
0.016
8
0.02
0%
100%

3325
Total
4,435
483
3364
42420GMCPR11055
GAMCO
PRODS.

CO.
HENDERSON
KY
101
24
101
24
70%
70%

3364
49502KLRBR236ST
KEELER
DIE
CAST
GRAND
RAPIDS
MI
86
4
86
4
12%
83%

3364
60050LLDDC3923W
ALLIED
DIE
CASTING
CORP.
MC
HENRY
IL
86
4
86
4
12%
95%

3364
53022RHCSTN114W
RHEOCAST
CO.
GERMANTOWN
WI
1
1
1
1
3%
97%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
42
of
52
3364
63456DMKRS801SE
DIVERSIFIED
DIEMAKERS
(
DBA
INTERMET)
MONROE
CITY
MO
1
1
1
1
3%
100%

3364
02861RBCND645NA
RIBCO
MFG.
INC.
PAWTUCKET
RI
2
0.08
2
0.08
0%
100%

3364
Total
278
33
3365
06082YNKCS243SH
YANKEE
CASTING
CO.
INC.
ENFIELD
CT
750
470
750
470
60%
60%

3365
35222STBRM831NO
EAST
BIRMINGHAM
BRONZE
FNDY.

INC
BIRMINGHAM
AL
255
160
255
160
20%
80%

3365
49247MTLLY103WM
METALLOY
CORP.

HUDSON
FNDY.

DIV.
HUDSON
MI
73
44
73
44
6%
86%

3365
14094MLWRD500MI
MILWARD
ALLOYS
INC.
LOCKPORT
NY
2
33
2
33
4%
90%

3365
90058LMNMC5151A
PECHINEY
CAST
PLATE
VERNON
CA
260
15
3
1
263
16
2%
92%

3365
35094SQRDC940MO
ANDERSON
ELECTRICAL
PRODS.
INC.
LEEDS
AL
16
14
16
14
2%
94%

3365
42452KBLLYMCDON
KB
ALLOYS
INC.
ROBARDS
KY
10
14
10
14
2%
96%

3365
13662GNRLMPOBOX
GMC
POWERTRAIN
MASSENA
MASSENA
NY
18
11
18
11
1%
97%

3365
63863FDRLMMALDE
FEDERAL­
MOGUL
CORP.
MALDEN
MO
72
8
8
1
80
9
1%
99%

3365
44030GNRLL1043C
GENERAL
ALUMINUM
MFG.

CO.
CONNEAUT
OH
10
4
10
4
0%
99%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
43
of
52
3365
46721BHNPRUSHWY
CITATION
­
BOHN
ALUMINUM
CORP.
BUTLER
IN
10
3
10
3
0%
100%

3365
45822CLNLM7059S
CELINA
ALUMINUM
PRECISION
TECH.
CELINA
OH
74
2
74
2
0%
100%

3365
18017HWMTL2175A
HOWMET
ALUMINUM
CASTING
INC.
BETHLEHEM
PA
20
1
20
1
0%
100%

3365
45365RSSLM70781
ROSS
ALUMINUM
FOUNDRIES
II
SIDNEY
OH
1
1
1
1
0%
100%

3365
Total
1,582
784
3366
60538RRNDS1002G
AURORA
METALS
DIV.
L.
L.
C.
MONTGOMERY
IL
750
470
750
470
41%
41%

3366
68025MGNSFSOUTH
MAGNUS/
FARLEY
INC.
FREMONT
NE
582
275
582
275
24%
65%

3366
19381MTLLR810LI
METALLURGICAL
PRODS.
CO.
WEST
CHESTER
PA
155
91
155
91
8%
73%

3366
29801GRHMB45WIN
YORK
BRONZE
CO.
(
DBA
GORHAM
BRONZE
LTD.)
AIKEN
SC
109
83
3
0.34
112
83
7%
81%

3366
28150CHSBR135OL
METALSAMERICA
SHELBY
NC
401
81
401
81
7%
88%

3366
26537SHDWBSISLE
YORK
BRONZE
CO.
(
DBA
SHEIDOW
BRONZE
CORP.)
KINGWOOD
WV
34
19
12
6
46
25
2%
90%

3366
03235WBSTRSOMAI
WEBSTER
FNDY.

CO.
FRANKLIN
NH
20
15
7
5
27
20
2%
92%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
44
of
52
3366
35215LBMCP1501R
ALABAMA
COPPER
&

BRONZE
CO.
INC.
BIRMINGHAM
AL
26
16
26
16
1%
93%

3366
72143MTTHW501LI
MATTHEWS
INTL.

CORP.
SEARCY
AR
10
14
10
14
1%
94%

3366
39567BRDJH3719I
ROLLS­
ROYCE
NAVAL
MARINE
INC.
PASCAGOULA
MS
32
12
32
12
1%
95%

3366
44864MNSFL150FI
MANSFIELD
PLUMBING
PRODS.
L.
L.
C.
PERRYSVILLE
OH
31
12
31
12
1%
96%

3366
85714KNGHT420EA
TUCSON
FNDY.
&

MFG.
INC.
TUCSON
AZ
8
7
8
7
1%
97%

3366
03061BRNZCSIMON
BRONZE
CRAFT
CORP.
NASHUA
NH
10
6
10
6
1%
98%

3366
36202LBRSSGOLDE
LEE
BRASS
CO.
ANNISTON
AL
5
5
5
5
0%
98%

3366
44052MRCNC305OB
JOHNSON
METALL
INC.
LORAIN
OH
3
5
3
5
0%
98%

3366
26003HBCNC21418
HUBCO
BRONZE
INC.
WHEELING
WV
10
4
4
1
14
5
0%
99%

3366
16506RBRNZ6300W
ERIE
BRONZE
&

ALUMINUM
ERIE
PA
10
4
10
4
0%
99%

3366
22980VRGNM1010E
VIRGINIA
METALCRAFTERS
INC.
WAYNESBORO
VA
5
3
5
3
0%
99%

3366
64501NTNLL1304W
NATIONAL
ALUMINUM
BRASS
FNDY.
INC.
INDEPENDENC
E
MO
5
3
5
3
0%
100%

3366
26537YRKBRKINNE
YORK
BRONZE
WEST
ANNEX
FACILITY
KINGWOOD
WV
1
1
1
1
0%
100%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
45
of
52
3366
60005MGNCS1117E
AMPCO
METAL
INC.
ARLINGTON
HEIGHTS
IL
1
1
1
1
0%
100%

3366
65265CRRCP1500I
CERRO
COPPER
CASTING
CO.
MEXICO
MO
1
1
0.28
0.17
1
1
0%
100%

3366
37874NGKMT917ST
NGK
METALS
CORP.
SWEETWATER
TN
0.28
0.17
0.28
0.17
0%
100%

3366
Total
2,235
1,140
3369
35096LNCLNRAILR
LINCOLN
METALS
CORP.
LINCOLN
AL
513
322
513
322
28%
28%

3369
62223CNTRY1300N
CENTURY
CASTINGS
CORP.
SWANSEA
IL
265
171
74
48
339
219
19%
47%

3369
93277MNC00401EC
EMI
INC.
VISALIA
CA
255
160
1
1
256
161
14%
61%

3369
37406STHRN4106S
SOUTHERN
CENTRIFUGAL
DIV.
CHATTANOOGA
TN
255
160
255
160
14%
75%

3369
46992THFRD775MA
FORD
METER
BOX
CO.
INC.
WABASH
IN
114
117
15
20
129
137
12%
87%

3369
49461HWMTCONEMI
HOWMET
CORP.

WHITEHALL
CASTINGS
WHITEHALL
MI
520
56
520
56
5%
91%

3369
76307HWMTC6200C
HOWMET
CORP.
WICHITA
FALLS
TX
20
2
391
41
411
43
4%
95%

3369
23661HWMTCONEH
O
HOWMET
CORP.
HAMPTON
VA
2,235
11
2,235
11
1%
96%

3369
53080JHNSN270NM
JOHNSON
BRASS
&
MACHINE
SAUKVILLE
WI
15
9
15
9
1%
97%

3369
49461HWMTC3850W
HOWMET
CORP.

PLANT
10
WHITEHALL
MI
54
6
54
6
0%
97%

3369
68305MGNLMMAGN
O
MAGNOLIA
METAL
CORP.
AUBURN
NE
5
5
5
5
0%
98%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
46
of
52
3369
44902GLPCH153EA
BUNTING
BEARINGS
CORP.
MANSFIELD
OH
6
4
2
1
8
5
0%
98%

3369
80517RCKRB2050B
RICKER
BARTLETT
INC.

MICHAEL
RICKER
PEWTER
(
DBA)
ESTES
PARK
CO
2
4
2
4
0%
99%

3369
44432LBCFN230WM
ALBCO
FOUNDRY
INC.
LISBON
OH
5
3
5
3
0%
99%

3369
97321MTTNM150QU
PACIFIC
CAST
TECHS.
INC.
ALBANY
OR
42,372
3
42,372
3
0%
99%

3369
97222PCCDR13350
PCC
STRUCTURALS
INC.
DEER
CREEK
ANNEX
MILWAUKIE
OR
15
1
8
1
23
2
0%
99%

3369
49417GRNDH230NO
GRAND
HAVEN
BRASS
FNDY.
GRAND
HAVEN
MI
1
2
1
2
0%
99%

3369
90280TCHNC11220
TECHNI­
CAST
CORP.
SOUTH
GATE
CA
7
1
7
1
0%
100%

3369
90032RRWHD5142A
ARROWHEAD
BRASS
PRODS.

INC.
LOS
ANGELES
CA
10
1
10
1
0%
100%

3369
33634CHRML7030A
CHROMALLOY
CASTINGS
TAMPA
TAMPA
FL
8
1
8
1
0%
100%

3369
46350HWMTC1110E
HOWMET
CORP.
LA
PORTE
IN
8
1
8
1
0%
100%

3369
94590DGSSL403RY
TIMET
VALLEJO
CA
8
1
8
1
0%
100%

3369
48823SPRRB4893D
SUPERIOR
BRASS
&
ALUMINUM
CASTING
CO.
EAST
LANSING
MI
2
1
2
1
0%
100%

3369
97756PCCSC345NE
PCC
STRUCTURALS
INC.
SCHLOSSER
REDMOND
OR
7,134
0.44
7,134
0.44
0%
100%
SIC
Code
Facility
TRI
ID
Facility
Name
Facility
City
Facility
State
Direct
lbs
Direct
TWPE
Indirect
lbs
Indirect
TWPE
Total
lbs
Total
TWPE
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
Cumulative
Percent
Total
of
SIC
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
47
of
52
3369
95037DGSSC16035
UNAXIS
MATERIALS
INC.
MORGAN
HILL
CA
1
0.09
1
0.09
0%
100%

3369
49461HWMTC1600S
HOWMET
CORP.

PLANT
5
WHITEHALL
MI
988
988
­
0%
100%

3369
Total
55,308
1,154
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
48
of
52
Attachment
F
Reported
Pollutant
Loadings
SIC
Pollutant
Name
CAS
Pollutan
t
Group
Code
PCS
Facilities
Reportin
g
Pollutant
PCS
Pounds
PCS
TWPE
TRI
Indirect
Facilities
Reporting
Pollutant
TRI
Indirect
Discharge
Pounds
TRI
Indirect
Discharge
TWPE
TRI
Direct
Facilities
Reporting
Pollutant
TRI
Direct
Pounds
TRI
Direct
TWPE
3321
OIL
AND
GREASE
C035
CP
4
130,723
3321
BOD
5­
DAY
(
CARBONACEOUS)
C003
CP
4
7,540
3321
TOTAL
SUSPENDED
SOLIDS
C009
CP
4
43,001
3321
SUM
OF
CONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
181,264
0
0
0
0
0
3321
CRESOL
(
MIXED
ISOMERS)
1319773
NC
1
1
0.0049
1
24
0.11
3321
NITROGEN,
NITRATE
TOTAL
(
AS
N)
14797558
NC
3
10,280
1
1
14,000
1
3321
N­
METHYL­
2­
PYRROLIDONE
872504
NC
1
1,112
1
1
3321
MOLYBDENUM
7439987
NC
1
517
104
3321
METHANOL
67561
NC
1
0.16
0.0000015
1
8
0.000074
3321
MANGANESE
7439965
NC
16
5,810
409
20
3,521
248
3321
IRON
7439896
NC
1
142
1
3321
HEXAVALENT
CHROMIUM
18540299
NC
1
70
36
3321
GLYCOL
ETHERS
N230
NC
1
1,350
0.14
3321
FORMALDEHYDE
50000
NC
2
140
0.32
1
460
1
3321
ETHYLENE
GLYCOL
107211
NC
4
2,740
4
1
3
0.0040
3321
1,2,4­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE
95636
NC
1
1
0.023
3321
DIETHANOLAMINE
111422
NC
1
11,366
20
3321
MOLYBDENUM
TRIOXIDE
1313275
NC
1
249
0.20
3321
SODIUM
NITRITE
7632000
NC
1
78,062
29,143
3321
COBALT
7440484
NC
2
177
20
1
5
1
3321
TOTAL
RECOVERABLE
C020
NC
4
183
5
SIC
Pollutant
Name
CAS
Pollutan
t
Group
Code
PCS
Facilities
Reportin
g
Pollutant
PCS
Pounds
PCS
TWPE
TRI
Indirect
Facilities
Reporting
Pollutant
TRI
Indirect
Discharge
Pounds
TRI
Indirect
Discharge
TWPE
TRI
Direct
Facilities
Reporting
Pollutant
TRI
Direct
Pounds
TRI
Direct
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
49
of
52
PHENOLICS
3321
CHLORINE,
TOTAL
RESIDUAL
7782505
NC
3
794
387
1
2,600
1,266
3321
CHEMICAL
OXYGEN
DEMAND
(
COD)
C004
NC
1
1,474,783
3321
TRIETHYLAMINE
121448
NC
1
1
0.00015
3321
BARIUM
7440393
NC
2
20
0.040
5
2,909
6
3321
AMMONIA
AS
NITROGEN
7664417
NC
2
44
0.081
2
664
1
1
3,000
5
3321
ALUMINUM
7429905
NC
4
153
10
3
15
1
3321
SUM
OF
NONCONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
1,476,533
533
112,123
29,608
26,547
1,528
3321
PHENOL
108952
PP
1
62
2
8
207
6
13
2,189
61
3321
ZINC
7440666
PP
4
8,280
387
10
1,882
88
8
1,603
75
3321
SELENIUM
7782492
PP
1
4
4
3321
NICKEL
7440020
PP
17
849
92
15
1,129
123
3321
MERCURY
7439976
PP
1
0.041
5
3321
LEAD
7439921
PP
3
1,705
3,820
6
129
288
7
2,837
6,355
3321
CYANIDE
57125
PP
1
5
5
1
18
0.046
3321
COPPER
7440508
PP
4
526
329
19
499
313
27
3,901
2,446
3321
CHROMIUM
7440473
PP
1
65
5
15
324
33
13
1,810
365
3321
CADMIUM
7440439
PP
1
1
2
3321
BIS(
2­
ETHYLHEXYL)

PHTHALATE
117817
PP
1
96
9
3321
BENZENE
71432
PP
1
0.12
0.0022
1
8
0.15
3321
NAPHTHALENE
91203
PP
2
1
0.019
1
16
0.25
3321
SUM
OF
PRIORITY
POLLUTANTS
10,742
4,566
3,911
823
13,493
9,425
3322
MANGANESE
7439965
NC
1
5
0.35
3322
SUM
OF
NONCONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
0
0
0
0
5
0
3322
ZINC
7440666
PP
1
86
4
3322
LEAD
7439921
PP
1
20
45
3322
SUM
OF
PRIORITY
POLLUTANTS
0
0
86
4
20
45
SIC
Pollutant
Name
CAS
Pollutan
t
Group
Code
PCS
Facilities
Reportin
g
Pollutant
PCS
Pounds
PCS
TWPE
TRI
Indirect
Facilities
Reporting
Pollutant
TRI
Indirect
Discharge
Pounds
TRI
Indirect
Discharge
TWPE
TRI
Direct
Facilities
Reporting
Pollutant
TRI
Direct
Pounds
TRI
Direct
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
50
of
52
3324
ALUMINUM
7429905
NC
1
5
0.32
3324
AMMONIA
AS
NITROGEN
7664417
NC
1
28
0.043
1
3
0.0045
3324
COBALT
7440484
NC
10
371
42
4
20
2
3324
MANGANESE
7439965
NC
5
17
1
3324
NITROGEN,
NITRATE
TOTAL
(
AS
N)
14797558
NC
1
63,195
4
3324
SUM
OF
NONCONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
0
0
63,611
48
28
3
3324
CHROMIUM
7440473
PP
15
254
21
7
28
2
3324
COPPER
7440508
PP
6
40
25
2
8
5
3324
NICKEL
7440020
PP
14
352
38
8
35
4
3324
SUM
OF
PRIORITY
POLLUTANTS
0
0
646
84
71
11
3325
TOTAL
SUSPENDED
SOLIDS
C009
CP
2
37,057
3325
OIL
AND
GREASE
C035
CP
1
2,025
3325
SUM
OF
CONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
39,082
0
0
0
0
0
3325
CHLORIDE
16887006
NC
1
368,647
9
3325
ALUMINUM
7429905
NC
1
750
48
3325
BARIUM
7440393
NC
2
13
0.026
3325
XYLENE
1330207
NC
1
0.072
0.00030
1
5
0.021
3325
CHEMICAL
OXYGEN
DEMAND
(
COD)
C004
NC
1
58,995
3325
CUMENE
98828
NC
1
5
0.013
3325
IRON
7439896
NC
1
1,242
7
3325
TOTAL
PETROLEUM
HYDROCARBONS
(
AS
SGT­
HEM
C037
NC
1
6,976
3325
MANGANESE
7439965
NC
8
193
14
11
577
41
3325
MOLYBDENUM
TRIOXIDE
1313275
NC
1
5
0.0039
3
15
0.012
3325
SUM
OF
NONCONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
435,859
16
198
14
1,365
89
3325
BENZENE
71432
PP
1
0.017
0.00032
SIC
Pollutant
Name
CAS
Pollutan
t
Group
Code
PCS
Facilities
Reportin
g
Pollutant
PCS
Pounds
PCS
TWPE
TRI
Indirect
Facilities
Reporting
Pollutant
TRI
Indirect
Discharge
Pounds
TRI
Indirect
Discharge
TWPE
TRI
Direct
Facilities
Reporting
Pollutant
TRI
Direct
Pounds
TRI
Direct
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
51
of
52
3325
ZINC
7440666
PP
1
5
0.25
1
86
4
3325
TOLUENE
108883
PP
1
0.032
0.00018
3325
PHENOL
108952
PP
3
21
1
2
260
7
3325
NAPHTHALENE
91203
PP
1
0.37
0.0057
1
255
4
3325
LEAD
7439921
PP
1
3
7
2
7
15
3325
COPPER
7440508
PP
1
1
0.35
6
18
11
4
14
9
3325
NICKEL
7440020
PP
8
74
8
12
1,301
142
3325
CHROMIUM
7440473
PP
7
22
3
14
809
177
3364
ZINC
7440666
PP
3
174
8
3364
COPPER
7440508
PP
3
29
18
3364
CYANIDE
57125
PP
1
2
0.0052
3364
NICKEL
7440020
PP
1
49
5
3364
CHROMIUM
7440473
PP
1
24
2
3364
SUM
OF
PRIORITY
POLLUTANTS
10
8
506
75
2,639
339
3365
OIL
AND
GREASE
C035
CP
1
713
3365
TOTAL
SUSPENDED
SOLIDS
C009
CP
2
11,366
3365
BOD
5­
DAY
(
CARBONACEOUS)
C003
CP
1
1,237
3365
SUM
OF
CONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
13,317
0
0
0
0
0
3365
CHLORINE,
TOTAL
RESIDUAL
7782505
NC
1
24
11
3365
ALUMINUM
7429905
NC
1
20
1
3365
PHOSPHORUS
7723140
NC
1
2
33
3365
MANGANESE
7439965
NC
1
3
0.22
1
51
4
3365
AMMONIA
AS
NITROGEN
7664417
NC
1
263
0.48
3365
SUM
OF
NONCONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
287
12
5
34
71
5
3365
ZINC
7440666
PP
1
98
5
1
2
0.079
2
260
12
3365
POLYCHLORINATED
BIPHENYLS
(
PCBS)
1336363
PP
1
0.053
677
SIC
Pollutant
Name
CAS
Pollutan
t
Group
Code
PCS
Facilities
Reportin
g
Pollutant
PCS
Pounds
PCS
TWPE
TRI
Indirect
Facilities
Reporting
Pollutant
TRI
Indirect
Discharge
Pounds
TRI
Indirect
Discharge
TWPE
TRI
Direct
Facilities
Reporting
Pollutant
TRI
Direct
Pounds
TRI
Direct
TWPE
FINAL
DRAFT
Metal
Molding
August
16,
2004
Page
52
of
52
3365
COPPER
7440508
PP
1
6
3
5
77
48
9
1,059
664
3365
LEAD
7439921
PP
1
6
14
2
8
18
3365
NICKEL
7440020
PP
2
6
1
3
23
3
3365
SUM
OF
PRIORITY
POLLUTANTS
110
699
85
49
1,350
696
3366
PHOSPHORUS
7723140
NC
1
0
0
3366
COBALT
7440484
NC
1
173
20
3366
MANGANESE
7439965
NC
2
20
1
3366
SUM
OF
NONCONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
0
0
173
20
20
1
3366
ZINC
7440666
PP
5
95
4
4
36
2
3366
NICKEL
7440020
PP
6
325
35
5
25
3
3366
LEAD
7439921
PP
7
101
226
6
26
58
3366
COPPER
7440508
PP
12
160
100
15
1,099
689
3366
ANTIMONY
7440360
PP
1
175
1
3366
SUM
OF
PRIORITY
POLLUTANTS
0
0
856
367
1,186
752
3369
COBALT
7440484
NC
8
400
46
2
10
1
3369
HYDROGEN
FLUORIDE
7664393
NC
1
988
3369
NITRIC
ACID
7697372
NC
2
0
3369
NITROGEN,
NITRATE
TOTAL
(
AS
N)
14797558
NC
3
51,639
3
3369
ALUMINUM
7429905
NC
1
5
0.32
3369
SUM
OF
NONCONVENTIONAL
POLLUTANTS
0
0
53,027
49
15
1
3369
ZINC
7440666
PP
2
3
0.16
2
10
0.47
3369
CHROMIUM
7440473
PP
9
142
11
2
10
1
3369
COPPER
7440508
PP
7
83
52
10
1,393
873
3369
LEAD
7439921
PP
5
13
29
2
33
74
3369
NICKEL
7440020
PP
10
567
62
3
11
1
3369
SUM
OF
PRIORITY
POLLUTANTS
0
0
808
154
1,457
950
