1Point
source
category
discharges
are
regulated
by
Effluent
Limitations
Guidelines
(
ELGs),
found
at
40
CFR
Part
405
to
471.

Page
1
of
20
Memorandum
From:
Carey
A.
Johnston,
P.
E.
USEPA/
OW/
OST
ph:
(
202)
566
1014
johnston.
carey@
epa.
gov
To:
Public
Record
for
the
Effluent
Guidelines
Program
Plan
for
2004/
2005
DCN
00705,
Section
3.0
EPA
Docket
Number
OW­
2003­
0074
(
www.
epa.
gov/
edockets/)

Date:
December
30,
2003
Re:
Industry
Data
Summary
Fact
Sheets
I.
Overview
The
Clean
Water
Act
(
CWA)
Section
304(
m)(
1)(
A)
requires
EPA
to
establish
a
schedule
for
the
annual
review
and
revision
of
all
existing
effluent
guidelines.
Additionally,
CWA
Section
304(
m)(
1)(
B)
requires
EPA
to
identify
categories
of
point
sources
discharging
toxic
or
nonconventional
pollutants
for
which
EPA
has
not
published
effluent
guidelines.
This
memorandum
presents
fact
sheets
summarizing
data
used
in
a
screening­
level
analysis
of
specific
industrial
categories
already
regulated
by
effluent
limitations
guidelines
and
industrial
sectors
not
yet
regulated
by
effluent
guidelines.
EPA
used
this
screening
level
data
in
its
development
of
the
preliminary
Effluent
Guidelines
Program
Plan
for
2004/
2005.

Generally,
EPA
used
SIC
codes
reported
by
facilities
to
assign
them
to
one
of
the
point
source
categories
already
regulated
by
existing
effluent
guidelines1
or
to
an
industrial
sector
not
regulated
by
effluent
guidelines.
In
some
cases,
after
a
data
quality
check
(
see
below),
EPA
revised
a
facility's
SIC
code
and
assignment
to
a
point
source
category
or
industrial
sector
to
better
reflect
the
industrial
processes
generating
wastewater
at
the
facility.
(
See
Corrections
to
Loads
Calculated
from
PCS
Discharge
Data,
DCN
00668,
Section
2.1.2.)
More
information
about
the
industrial
categories
and
sectors
listed
in
this
memorandum
is
found
in
the
record
(
DCN
548,
Section
3.0).

The
pollutant
discharges
included
in
the
fact
sheets
were
identified
from
two
data
sources:
(
1)
EPA's
Permit
Compliance
System
(
PCS)
data
(
located
on
EPA's
mainframe);
and
(
2)
EPA's
Toxic
Release
Inventory
(
TRI)
data
(
obtained
through
EPA's
Risk
Screening
Environmental
2On
April
7,
an
111,000­
gallon
oil
spill
occurred
at
the
Potomac
Electric
Power
Company
(
Pepco)
pipeline
at
the
Swanson
Creek,
epa.
gov/
reg3hwmd/
super/
MD/
swanson­
pepco/
pad.
htm
Page
2
of
20
Indicators
model,
see
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
opptintr/
rsei/
whats_
rsei.
html.)
EPA
also
performed
limited
quality
assurance
checks
on
the
data
used
for
screening
(
e.
g.,
by
calling
facilities
to
verify
data
reported
to
TRI
and
PCS).
These
quality
assurance
checks
are
documented
in
addenda
to
the
following
reports:
(
1)
Development
of
PCSLoads2000
(
DCN
00620,
Section
2.1);
and
(
2)
Evaluation
of
RSEI
Model
Runs
(
DCN
618,
Section
2.1).
As
different
industries
became
more
important
in
the
analysis,
their
data
were
scrutinized,
to
the
extent
possible,
to
determine
if
any
of
the
hazard
estimates
were
due
to
non­
production
events
(
e.
g.,
oil
spills)
or
to
incorrect
or
suspect
data.
For
example,
most
of
the
TRI
toxic
discharges
reported
in
year
2000
for
the
Steam
Electric
point
source
category
(
40
CFR
423)
were
related
to
a
non­
production
event
(
oil
spill)
at
one
facility.
2
This
facility
reported
to
TRI
a
release
of
9,500
pounds
of
polycyclic
aromatic
compounds
(
PACs)
in
2000.
Removing
these
toxic
pound
discharges
from
the
Steam
Electric
TRI
total
significantly
reduced
the
estimated
TRI
toxic
pound
discharges
associated
with
normal
operations.

This
memorandum
includes
unscaled
pollutant
loads
(
i.
e.,
loads
for
only
those
facilities
that
report
to
these
data
systems)
estimated
for
point
source
categories
for
the
year
2000
as
of
November
30,
2003.
Table
1
describes
some
of
the
elements
EPA
used
in
the
industrial
category
data
summary
fact
sheets
(
see
Attachment
A
and
B).
Page
3
of
20
Table
1:
Description
of
Data
Elements
Used
in
EPA's
Screening
Level
Analysis
Data
Element
or
Section
Description
New
or
Existing
"
New"
refers
to
an
industrial
activity
that
is
not
currently
regulated
by
existing
effluent
guidelines
or
identified
as
a
potential
new
subcategory
of
an
existing
effluent
guideline.
"
Existing"
refers
to
an
industry
category
already
regulated
under
existing
effluent
limitations
guidelines
or
identified
as
a
potential
new
subcategory
of
an
existing
effluent
guideline.

SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
This
refers
to
the
Standard
Industrial
Classification
(
SIC)
codes
that
were
used
to
`
roll
up'
data
at
the
SIC
level
into
this
industry
category.
Whenever
possible,
EPA
attempted
to
avoid
the
double
counting
of
SIC
level
data
into
two
or
more
industry
categories
investigated
as
part
of
the
304(
m)
planning
process.
SIC
codes
organizes
business
entities
into
production­
based
and
market­
based
categories
identified
by
a
4­
digit
code.
There
are
three
levels
of
SIC
codes:
primary,
secondary,
and
tertiary.

Primary
SIC
codes
are
assigned
based
on
the
principal
product
or
group
of
products
produced
or
distributed
by
an
establishment
or
for
services
rendered
by
the
plant.
Additional
SIC
codes
are
assigned
for
any
secondary
and
tertiary
products
produced
or
for
services
rendered
by
an
establishment.
As
described
in
Corrections
to
Loads
Calculated
from
PCS
Discharge
Data,
DCN
00668,
Section
2.1.2,
EPA
sometimes
reclassified
a
facility's
SIC
Code
to
better
represent
the
industrial
activities
generating
wastewater
at
a
facility.

Date(
s)
Promulgated/

Revised:
This
refers
to
the
first
time
EPA
promulgated
effluent
guidelines
for
this
industry
category
and
any
subsequent
revisions.

Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
This
refers
to
the
most
recent
date
when
EPA
completed
a
study
(
not
a
rulemaking)
for
this
industry
category.
Table
1:
Description
of
Data
Elements
Used
in
EPA's
Screening
Level
Analysis
Data
Element
or
Section
Description
Page
4
of
20
Facility
Count
Information
This
section
of
the
summary
sheet
uses
data
from
four
main
sources:

­
U.
S.
Census
1997
Economic
Census;

­
Toxic
Release
Inventory
(
TRI);

­
Permit
Compliance
System
(
PCS);
and
­
303(
d)
Impaired
Waters
Information.

Notes:
EPA
was
only
able
to
differentiate
between
direct
and
indirect
dischargers
using
TRI
data
(
indirect
dischargers
do
not
report
to
PCS).
The
PCS
data
element
"
All
Reporting"
identifies
all
facilities
(
major
and
minor)
that
report
a
SIC
code.
Please
note,
however,
that
many
minor
facilities
do
not
have
SIC
codes
reported
in
PCS.
The
PCS
data
element
"
w/
Loading
Estimates"
identifies
the
number
of
facilities
in
this
industry
category
for
which
EPA
was
able
to
calculate
pollutant
loadings
estimates.
The
term
"
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments"
lists
the
number
of
facilities
in
an
industrial
category
that
are
linked
to
"
Reach
File
1"
(
RF1)
segments
in
EPA's
water
quality
modeling
programs.

Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)
This
section
reports
the
estimate
of
pounds
discharged
from
TRI
and
PCS
in
categories
of
priority,

non­
conventional,
and
conventional
pollutants.
This
section
reports
the
straight
pollutant
pounds
discharged
(
unweighted)
and
the
toxic
pollutant
pounds
discharged
(
weighted
through
use
of
EAD's
toxic
weighting
factor
and
identified
as
toxic
weighted
pound
equivalents
(
TWPE)).
Table
1:
Description
of
Data
Elements
Used
in
EPA's
Screening
Level
Analysis
Data
Element
or
Section
Description
Page
5
of
20
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)
EPA
based
the
"
Hazard
Rank"
on
the
total
TWPE
discharged
by
an
industry.
The
TWPE
reported
by
all
industries
were
calculated
and
ranked.

For
the
"
Risk
Rank",
EPA
identified
those
industries
that
cumulatively
represent
90%
of
the
risk
across
all
industry
categories.
If
an
industry
category
is
a
component
of
this
90%
of
the
risk
total,
then
its
rank
is
listed
along
with
the
total
number
of
industrial
categories
that
make
up
this
90%
of
the
risk
total.
If
an
industry
category
is
not
part
of
this
90%
of
the
risk
total,
then
`
NA'
is
reported
in
the
table.

The
term
"#
facilities
=
90%
hazard"
identifies
the
number
of
facilities
in
this
industry
category
that
comprise
90%
of
the
hazard
for
this
industrial
sector.

The
term
"#
facilities
=
90%
risk"
identifies
the
number
of
facilities
that
comprise
90%
of
the
risk
for
this
industrial
sector.
EPA
was
only
able
to
calculate
this
value
for
TRI
data.

Cause(
s)
of
Impairment
This
term
identifies
the
reasons
for
impairment
on
water
segments
linked
to
facilities
in
this
industrial
category
(
see
also
"#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)").

#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.

reaches
(%
tot)
This
term
identifies
PCS
facilities
that
discharge
to
303(
d)
listed
impaired
waters,
where
at
least
one
"
pollutant
discharged"
is
the
same
as
at
least
one
of
the
pollutants
identified
as
a
cause
of
impairment.

"
Pollutant
discharged"
refers
to
either
PCS
parameters
or
Typical
Pollutant
Concentrations
(
TPCs
 
pollutants
typically
discharged
by
classes
of
similar
facilities).
EPA
used
PCS
limits
to
match
facilities
with
pollutant
limits
reported
in
PCS
(
usually
PCS
"
major"
facilities)
to
impaired
waters.
EPA
used
TPCs
to
match
facilities
without
limits
reported
in
PCS
to
impaired
waters.

The
percentage
in
parentheses
refers
to
the
percentage
of
the
number
of
PCS
facilities
in
this
industrial
category
on
impair
reaches
(
see
above)
to
the
total
number
of
facilities
in
this
industrial
category
indexed
to
RF1
segments
(
required
for
water
modeling).
Page
6
of
20
II.
Industrial
Category
Data
Summary
Fact
Sheets
These
data
summary
fact
sheets
are
split
into
two
groups:
(
1)
industrial
categories
currently
regulated
by
effluent
guidelines;
and
(
2)
industrial
categories
of
point
sources
discharging
toxic
or
non­
conventional
pollutants
for
which
EPA
has
not
published
effluent
guidelines.
Attachment
A
presents
fact
sheets
for
the
following
industries
regulated
under
a
set
of
existing
effluent
guidelines
or
industries
potentially
identified
as
a
new
subcategory
under
an
existing
set
of
effluent
guidelines.

1.
Battery
Manufacturing;
2.
Cement
Manufacturing;
3.
Coal
Mining;
4.
Electrical
and
Electronic
Components;
5.
Food
Processing:
Dairy
and
Seafood
Subcategories;
6.
Hospitals;
7.
Inorganic
Chemicals;
8.
Metal
Molding
and
Casting;
9.
Mineral
Mining
and
Processing;
10.
Nonferrous
Metals
Manufacturing;
11.
OCPSF:
Chemical
Formulators;
12.
Oil
and
Gas
Extraction:
Coal
Bed
Methane
Development;
13.
Ore
Mining
and
Dressing;
14.
Organic
Chemicals,
Plastics,
and
Synthetic
Fibers;
15.
Petroleum
Refining;
16.
Petroleum
Refining:
Petroleum
Bulk
Stations
and
Terminals
(
PBST);
17.
Phosphate
Manufacturing;
18.
Steam
Electric
Power
Generation;
and
19.
Timber
Products
Processing;

Attachment
B
presents
fact
sheets
for
the
following
industrial
sectors
currently
not
regulated
under
a
set
of
existing
effluent
guidelines:

20.
Airports
(
Deicing);
21.
Dental
Facilities;
22.
Drinking
Water
Supply
and
Treatment;
23.
Food
Service
Establishments;
24.
Gasoline
Service
Stations;
25.
Independent
and
Stand­
Alone
Laboratories;
26.
Ocean
Going
Vessels;
27.
Printing
and
Publishing;
28.
Stormwater
and
Urban
Runoff;
and
29.
Wastewater
Treatment
and
Sewerage
Systems.
Page
7
of
20
ATTACHMENT
A:

INDUSTRIAL
CATEGORIES
CURRENTLY
REGULATED
BY
EFFLUENT
GUIDELINES
Page
8
of
20
Summary
Table
for
Battery
Manufacturing
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
461
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
3691,
3692
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
1984,
1986
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:

Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
182
98
7
1
26
#
Directs
41
#
Indirects
68
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
4,505
7,969
0
0
Nonconventional
133,593
78
0
0
Conventional
0
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
26
35
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
28
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
METALS,
NUTRIENTS
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
2
(
8%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
9
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Battery
Manufacturing
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
(
How
Identified)

Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Substantial
changes
since
prom
in
`
84.
Consistent
queries
to
EPA
regarding
categorical
determinations.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

6.746B
32,144
127
TBD
298M
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?

Geographic
Concentration?
Kansas,
Illinois,
Indiana
Industry
Changed
since
ELG?
New
kinds
of
batteries,
new
metal
complexes,
new
processes
Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
10
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Cement
Manufacturing
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
411;
Concrete
as
a
new
subcategory
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
3241,
3273
[
Data
for
SIC
3273
is
included
in
parenthesis].

Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
'
75,
'
86,
'
95
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
279
(
5,253)
103
(
9)
49
(
69)
5
(
2)
67
#
Directs
5
(
7)

#
Indirects
1
(
1)

Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
93
(
0)
53
(
0)
1,046
(
0)
399
(
0)

Nonconventional
1,453
(
1,501)
10,774
(
0)
34,959,445
(
0)
14,714
(
0)

Conventional
4,711,937
(
0)

Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
23
(
NA)
19
(
NA)

#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
Risk
Rank*

#
facilities
=
90%
risk*

Impairment
Rank*
22
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
CHLORINE,
NUTRIENTS,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
PATHOGENS,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
OTHER
CAUSE
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)
25
(
37%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
11
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Cement
Manufacturing
(
continued)

Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

24.021B
111,162
3,076
TBD
1.325B
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
See
Recommendations
section
below.

Geographic
Concentration?
California,
Florida,
Texas,
Pennsylvania,
Missouri
Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?
Cement
Manufacturing
in
OPEI's
Sector
Strategies
Program
Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
Cement
Manufacturing
included
in
OPEI's
Sector
Strategies
program,
may
include
water
issues;
OECA
"
Sector
Note­
book"
available
for
concrete
(
1995)

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
12
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Coal
Mining
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
434
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
1221,
1222,
1231
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
1985,
2002
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:

Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
1,511
77
146
16
1,649
#
Directs
22
#
Indirects
0
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
1,125
20,227
8
5
Nonconventional
739,958
2,245
31,563,114
1,380
Conventional
1,966,515
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
8
of
8
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
2
Impairment
Rank*
5
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
263
(
16%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
13
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Coal
Mining
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
RSEI,
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Stakeholders
identified
concerns
for
rainfall
events:
limits
relaxed,
catch
basing
ineffective
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

18.207B
87,793
1,130
TBD
2.026B
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Mercury
in
processing
coal,
manganese.

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
14
of
20
Summary
Sheet
for
Electrical
and
Electronic
Components
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
469
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
3671,
3674
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
1983,
1985
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:

Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
1,258
163
18
5
47
#
Directs
13
#
Indirects
104
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
6,243
7,372
18,622
18,345
Nonconventional
4,199,195
2,428
8,431,671
5,369
Conventional
644,402
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
24
16
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
25
Cause
of
Impairment
NUTRIENTS,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
OTHER
CAUSE
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
14
(
30%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
15
of
20
Summary
Sheet
for
Electrical
and
Electronic
Components
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Identified
as
an
industrial
category
out
of
date
with
current
industrial
operations
(
e.
g.,
drastic
changes
in
the
industry
such
as
the
development
of
electronic
components
for
the
personal
computer.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?

Geographic
Dispersion?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?
Cathode
ray
tubes
and
crystals
no
longer
used
Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
16
of
20
Summary
Sheet
for
Food
Processing:
Dairy
and
Seafood
Subcategories
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Guidelines
Exist
at
40
CFR
405
(
Dairy)
and
408
(
Seafood)

SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
Dairy:
2021,
2022,
2023,
2024,
2026;
Seafood:
2091,
2092
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
1974,
1986,
1995
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:

Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
2,670
330
170
13
519
#
Directs
35
#
Indirects
195
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
5
0
161
29
Nonconventional
3,380,084
5,849
1,009,270
18,936
Conventional
102,392,819
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
64
50
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
12
Cause
of
Impairment
NUTRIENTS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
PH,
PATHOGENS,
OIL
AND
GREASE
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
104
(
20%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
17
of
20
Summary
Sheet
for
Food
Processing:
Dairy
and
Seafood
Subcategories
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Stakeholder
concerns
for
impacts
to
POTWs
and
small
streams,
includes
dairy,
seafood,
and
other
subcategories
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Nutrients
and
conventional
pollutants
such
as
BOD,
fecal
coliform.

Geographic
Dispersion?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?
New
automatic
grease
trap
system
available.

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.

Data
Summary
Table
for
Hospitals
Page
18
of
20
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
460
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
8062,
8063
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
1976,
1995
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
1989
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
1,126
1
30
3
87
#
Directs
1
#
Indirects
1
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
0
0
1
0
Nonconventional
1,486
724
19,952
5
Conventional
5,396
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
23
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment
METALS,
NUTRIENTS,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
18
(
21%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
19
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Hospitals
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Identified
along
with
dental
facilities
and
laboratories
as
a
significant
source
of
mercury.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

379.2B
4,933,038
4,386
TBD
no
data
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Possibly
mercury,
drug/
pharmaceuticals
and
metabolites.

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?
New
automatic
grease
trap
system
available.

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
20
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Inorganic
Chemicals
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
415
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
2812,
2813,
2816,
2819
Date(
s)
Promul'ed/
Revised:
1982,
1984
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
1996
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
1,410
489
231
92
406
#
Directs
132
#
Indirects
124
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
177,577
47,601
95,722
544,970
Nonconventional
16,711,203
582,617
2,502,077,560
308,598
Conventional
332,803,920
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
7
4
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
13
8
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
2
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
Metals,
Organic
Enrichment/
Low
D.
O.,
Nutrients,
Suspended
Solids/
Turbidity,
Ammonia,
Mercury,
Oil
and
Grease,
Copper
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
36
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
21
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Inorganic
Chemicals
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
RSEI,
Gulf
of
Mexico
Hypoxia
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Concerns
identified
for
chlor­
alkali
and
nitrous
oxide
subcategories
as
worth
revisiting
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

27.787B
77,157
598
TBD
2.014B
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Mercury
and
ammonia
Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?
New
affordable
technologies
for
making
chlorine.

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
22
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
July
2,
2003
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
464
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
3321,
3322,
3324,
3325,
3364,
3365,
3366,
3369
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
1985,
1986
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:

Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
2,502
574
71
8
203
#
Directs
109
#
Indirects
110
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
27,123
13,782
11,115
4,636
Nonconventional
257,296
31,399
2,008,565
1,197
Conventional
233,663
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
15
23
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
17
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment
METALS,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
NUTRIENTS,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
40
(
20%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
23
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Metal
Molding
and
Casting
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).
Identified
in
EPA's
Sediment
Inventory
(
see
Section
2.1
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Recommend
consistency
with
metal
finishing
industry;
EAD
receives
numerous
calls
regarding
applicability.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

29.116B
227,393
2,601
TBD
1.353B
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Possibly
phenols
Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
Metal
casting
participated
in
OPEI's
"
Sustainable
Industries
Program"
now
under
the
Sector
Strategies
Program.

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
24
Data
Summary
Table
for
Mineral
Mining
and
Processing
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
436
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
1422,
1423,
1429,
1442,
1446,
1455,
1459,
1474,
1475,
1479,
1499
1411,
1481,
3275
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
'
75,
'
79,
'
95
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:

Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
5,724
18
499
35
3,432
#
Directs
1
#
Indirects
0
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
0
0
9,200
1,187
Nonconventional
50
0
91,767,088
28,215
Conventional
4,116,305
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
39
15
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
3
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment
METALS,
HYDROGEN
SULFIDE,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
OTHER
CAUSE
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
392
(
11%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
25
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Mineral
Mining
and
Processing
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Stakeholders
concerned
about
need
for
completeness
(
e..
g.
add
TSS
limits)
and
inconsistent
application
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

16.626B
94,239
3,714
TBD
1.810B
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Possibly
TSS
Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
26
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Nonferrous
Metals
Manufacturing
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
421
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
3331,
3334,
3339,
3341,
2819
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
1984,
1990
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:

Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
1,102
236
82
56
357
#
Directs
86
#
Indirects
48
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
52,792
47,389
301,097
154,455
Nonconventional
4,754,969
931,061
213,064,622
280,470
Conventional
107,200,644
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
6
5
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
6
15
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*

Cause(
s)
of
Impairment
PESTICIDES,
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
PCB'S,
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
CHLORINE,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
THERMAL
MODIFICATIONS,
RADIATION,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
PATHOGENS,
CYANIDE,
FISH
CONSUMPTION
ADVIS.,
OTHER
CAUSE
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
124
(
35
percent)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
27
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Nonferrous
Metals
Manufacturing
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
OST
Sediment
Inventory;
Gulf
Hypoxia
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

21.617B
56,935
510
TBD
0.947B
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Sediment
contaminants,
nutrients
Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
28
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
OCPSF:
Chemical
Formulators
(
New
Subcategory)

Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
414;
chemical
formulating
as
a
new
subcategory
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
2841,
2842,
2844,
2851,
2891,
2893,
2899
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
1989,
1998
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
6169
1230
127
17
396
#
Directs
52
#
Indirects
318
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
24,325
3,042
4,421
33,014
Nonconventional
1,206,532
159,285
54,576,837
2,354
Conventional
1,094,004
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank
(
out
of
)*
15
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
NONPRIORITY
ORGANICS,
METALS,
OTHER
INORGANICS,
NUTRIENTS,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
CYANIDE,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES
PATHOGENS,
PH,
FISH
CONSUMPTION
ADVIS.,
OTHER
CAUSE
#
indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
84
(
21
percent)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
29
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
OCPSF:
Chemical
Formulators
(
New
Subcategory)
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Initially
identified
during
Consent
Decree
process
(
from
Plaintiff's
Exhibit
G)

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
Both
formulators
in
general
and
adhesives
specifically
are
DfE
partners
­
efforts
may
address
water
concerns
Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
30
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Oil
&
Gas
Extraction:
Coal
Bed
Methane
Development
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
435;
CBM
as
a
new
subcategory
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
1311,
1381,
1382,
1389
Date(
s)
Promul'ed/
Revised:
Oil
'
79,
`
93,
'
97,
'
01
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
on
CBM
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
16,691
1
191
6
262
#
Directs
1
#
Indirects
0
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
765
6
0
0
Nonconventional
255
1
363,842
267
Conventional
223,371
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
18
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
PH,
METALS,
NUTRIENTS,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
OIL
AND
GREASE
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
53
(
20%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
31
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Oil
&
Gas
Extraction:
Coal
Bed
Methane
Development
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Stakeholders
identified
significant
water
quality
impacts,
depleting
aquifers,
erosion,
sedimentation,
barium
concentrations
exceeded,
salinization
of
land,
plugging
of
soils
which
decreases
infiltration/
water's
return
to
groundwater;
national
effluent
guidelines
needed.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Total
dissolved
solids
Geographic
Concentration?
Alabama,
Wyoming,
New
Mexico,
Alabama,
Montana,
and
Utah;
EAD
currently
supporting
R8
Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
32
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Ore
Mining
and
Dressing
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
440
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
1011,
1021,
1031,
1041,
1044,
1061,
1094,
1099,
1081
Date(
s)
Promul'ed/
Revised:
1982,
1988
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
1988
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
696
96
128
77
135
#
Directs
39
#
Indirects
2
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
56,436
45,680
122,110
163,265
Nonconventional
434,812
6,947
789,322,770
220,295
Conventional
2,319,198
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
14
6
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
12
5
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
21
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
METALS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
OTHER
INORGANICS,
PH,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
NUTRIENTS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
32
(
24%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
33
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Ore
Mining
and
Dressing
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Stakeholders
note
continuing
water
quality
impacts;
add
waste
dump
seepage,
waste
rock,
spent
ore,
leach
material;
definite
active/
inactive,
closure
plans,
and
remediation.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

11.208B
45,499
394
TBD
2.011B
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?
Available
treatment
technology
has
advanced
since
ELG.

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
34
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Organic
Chemicals,
Plastics,
&
Synthetic
Fibers
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
414
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
2821,
2823,
2824,
2865,
2869
Date(
s)
Promul'ed/
Revised:
1987,
1993
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
since
`
93
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
1,570
1421
392
243
578
#
Directs
418
#
Indirects
492
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
399,266
59,278
1,827,141
1,745,864
Nonconventional
53,726,069
31,539,585
1,912,572,846
505,251
Conventional
436,749,923
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
1
2
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
4
22
Risk
Rank*
6
of
8
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
6
Impairment
Rank*
8
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
METALS,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
PATHOGENS,
UNKNOWN
TOXICITY,
PESTICIDES,
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
PH,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
CHLORINE,
CYANIDE,
OTHER
INORGANICS,
THERMAL
MODIFICATIONS,
PATHOGENS
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
205
(
35%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
35
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Organic
Chemicals,
Plastics,
&
Synthetic
Fibers
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
RSEI;
Gulf
of
Mexico
Hypoxia;
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record);
Identified
in
EPA's
Sediment
Inventory
(
see
Section
2.1
of
the
public
record);
PIRG
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Pollution
prevention
may
have
brought
significant
changes
to
the
industry
since
the
ELG;
reason
still
high
on
RSEI.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

142.7B
224,921
1,065
TBD
9.345B
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Possibly
solvents
substituted
for
regulated
ones;
and
VOCs.

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
36
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Petroleum
Refining
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
419
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
2911
Date(
s)
Promul'ed/
Revised:
1982,
1985
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
1996
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
242
182
168
115
195
#
Directs
114
#
Indirects
40
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
218,067
32,188
325,583
35,295
Nonconventional
19,570,442
2,362,443
293,673,204
162,195
Conventional
47,007,691
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
3
8
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
36
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
16
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
PESTICIDES,
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
PCB'S,
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
SULFATES,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
PATHOGENS,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
FISH
CONSUMPTION
ADVIS.,
OTHER
CAUSE
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
77
(
39%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
37
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Petroleum
Refining
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Gulf
of
Mexico
Hypoxia,
PIRG
Report
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Stakeholders
say
expand
list
of
pollutants:
metals,
nutrients;
also
make
consistent
w/
OCPSF
for
priority
pollutants
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

157.9B
64,789
123
TBD
4.248B
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Selenium,
ammonia,
BOD,
COD
Geographic
Concentration?
Texas,
Louisiana,
California
Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?
Potential
significant
changes
since
1982,
esp.
with
water
use
Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
38
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Petroleum
Refining:
Petroleum
Bulk
Stations
and
Terminals
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
419;
PBST
as
a
new
subcategory
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
5171
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
9,104
502
496
6
1,147
#
Directs
139
#
Indirects
41
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
7,430
112
168
3,538
Nonconventional
14,586
7,898
111,417
1,821
Conventional
267,850
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
5
of
6
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
167
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
4
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
PCB'S,
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
CYANIDE,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC,
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
PATHOGENS,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
FISH
CONSUMPTION
ADVIS.,
OTHER
CAUSES
#
of
indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
331
(
29
percent)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
39
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Petroleum
Refining:
Petroleum
Bulk
Stations
and
Terminals
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Gulf
Hypoxia;
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Number
of
facilities,
permit
writers
must
depend
on
BPJ
­­
consistency
issues,
resource
drain
(
time
consuming)

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

181.6
B
116,215
NA
TBD
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Toxic
organics,
surfactants,
metals
Geographic
Concentration?
Tops
for
facilities/
capacity:
TX,
CA,
NJ,
FL,
NY,
IL,
OH
Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
40
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Phosphate
Manufacturing
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
422
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
2874,
2819
Date(
s)
Promul'ed/
Revised:
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:

Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
728
371
23
15
263
#
Directs
104
#
Indirects
100
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
105
5
859
140
Nonconventional
44,542
250
77,786,447
1,097,868
Conventional
34,549,881
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
33
3
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
3
1
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
14
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
NUTRIENTS,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
PESTICIDES,
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
PCB'S,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
CHLORINE,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
THERMAL
MODIFICATIONS,
RADIATION,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
OTHER
CAUSE
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
93
(
35%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
Page
41
of
20
data.

Data
Summary
Table
for
Phosphate
Manufacturing
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
42
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Steam
Electric
Power
Generation
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
423
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
4911
Date(
s)
Promul'ed/
Revised:
1982,
1983
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
1996
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
6,212
638
835
541
1,249
#
Directs
333
#
Indirects
21
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
1,227,426
1,139,635
2,947,384
1,944,337
Nonconventional
2,966,298
714,569
13,149,098,074
6,790,253
Conventional
382,527,531
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
4
1
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
60
66
Risk
Rank*
1
of
8
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
4
Impairment
Rank*
2
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
PESTICIDES,
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
CHLORINE,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
THERMAL
MODIFICATIONS,
OTHER
HABITAT
ALTERATIONS,
PATHOGENS,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
FISH
CONSUMPTION
ADVIS.,
OTHER
CAUSE
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
445
(
36%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
43
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Steam
Electric
Power
Generation
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
RSEI;
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record);
PIRG
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Applicability
for
cogeneration
units,
toxic
pollutants
in
coal
pile
runoff,
growing
use
of
POTW
effluent
as
cooling
water;
facilities
inappropriately
exempt;
about
1,300
new
plants...

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

73.37B
148,686
490
TBD
TBD
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Mercury
and
selenium
Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?
Major
restructuring,
new
sources
need
to
be
included.

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Recommendations
Most
of
the
toxic
discharges
reported
in
TRI
for
this
industry
are
due
to
non­
production
event
(
oil
spill)
at
one
facility
(
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
reg3hwmd/
super/
MD/
swanson­
pepco/
pad.
htm)
This
facility
reported
a
release
of
9,500
pounds
of
polycyclic
aromatic
compounds
(
PACs)
in
2000.
Removing
these
toxic
pound
discharges
from
the
Steam
Electric
TRI
total
reduces
the
TRI
toxic
pound
discharges
to
approximately
722,000
TWPE.

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
44
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Timber
Products
Processing
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
Existing
Guidelines
at
40
CFR
Part
429
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
2421,
2435,
2436,
2491,
2493,
2499
Date(
s)
Promul'ed/
Revised:
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:

Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
9,272
364
185
11
1,205
#
Directs
85
#
Indirects
42
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
8,022
9,217
2,013
334
Nonconventional
81,989
5,537,350
4,771,284
626
Conventional
10,211,039
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
2
29
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
9
2
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
10
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
METALS,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
CHLORINE,
THERMAL
MODIFICATIONS,
PESTICIDES,
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
OTHER
CAUSE
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
134
(
11%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
45
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Timber
Products
Processing
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changed
Since
ELG?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
ATTACHMENT
B:

INDUSTRIAL
SECTORS
NOT
CURRENTLY
REGULATED
BY
EFFLUENT
GUIDELINES
Page
1
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Airports
(
Deicing)

Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
New
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
4581
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
1999
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
4,340
NA
34
2
315
#
Directs
NA
#
Indirects
NA
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
NA
NA
28
31
Nonconventional
NA
NA
2,144,565
435
Conventional
2,121,572
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
19
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
FISH
CONSUMPTION
ADVIS.,
OTHER
CAUSES
#
indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
44
(
14
percent)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
2
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Airports
(
Deicing)
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Stakeholders
(
States)
expressed
concern
for
a
level
"
playing
field"
and
difficulties
modeling
oxygen
demand.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

$
9.35
B
121,210
NA
TBD
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changing?
Voluntary
efforts
planned/
discussed
in
1999
Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
Phase
II
Stormwater
regulations
being
implemented.

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
3
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Dental
Facilities
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
New
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
8021
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
N/
A
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
114,178
NA
2
0
NA
#
Directs
NA
#
Indirects
NA
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nonconventional
NA
NA
NA
NA
Conventional
NA
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
NA
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
NA
#
PCS
facilities
on
imp.
reaches
(%
tot)*
NA
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
4
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Dental
Facilities
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Identified
as
a
major
nationwide
source
of
mercury
discharges
to
sewage
treatment
systems,
and
that
cost
effective
control
technologies
are
readily
available.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

48.5
B
641,674
NA
TBD
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Mercury
Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?
Amalgam
separators
affordable,
straightforward
to
use.

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
5
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Drinking
Water
Supply
&
Treatment
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
New
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
4941
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
3,721
2
899
16
2,029
#
Directs
2
#
Indirects
0
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
3
2
9,149
8,776
Nonconventional
74
5
99,749,845
602,548
Conventional
9,590,916,107
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
6
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment
Matched
With
Discharges*
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
METALS,
CHLORINE,
NUTRUENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRIGHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES.
OTHER
CAUSES
#
Indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
243
(
12%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
6
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Drinking
Water
Supply
&
Treatment
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Need
minimum
technology­
based
guidelines,
especially
for
TDS,
TSS,
pH,
treatment
chemicals,
and
for
disposal
of
treatment
sludges
and
backwash
waters
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

4.35
B
26,597
NA
TBD
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
See
Recommendations
section.

Geographic
Concentration?
See
Recommendations
section.

Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
EPA/
OGWDW
is
developing
significant
new
regulations
affecting
this
category.

Additional
Information
EPA
determined
that
one
facility,
the
Washington
Aqueduct,
accounts
for
99
percent
of
the
total
estimated
discharge
from
the
16
major
facilities
that
reported
to
PCS
in
2000.
Moreover,
the
Washington
Aqueduct
accounted
for
virtually
all
estimated
discharge
of
iron.
Iron
comprised
73
percent
of
the
total
toxic
weighted
pound
equivalents
released
by
the
16
major
facilities
that
reported
to
PCS
in
2000.
Chlorine,
which
was
the
other
potential
toxic
chemical
of
concern,
is
currently
being
used
in
smaller
amounts
at
the
head
of
treatment
­
and
consequently,
there
is
less
chlorine
being
found
in
the
discharge
of
drinking
water
plant
backwash.

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
7
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Food
Service
Establishments
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
New
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
5812
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
423,082
NA
2
0
169
#
Directs
NA
#
Indirects
NA
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
NA
NA
0
0
Nonconventional
NA
NA
0
0
Conventional
0
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
26
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
METALS,
NUTRIENTS,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
PATHOGENS,
OTHER
CAUSES
#
indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
21
(
12
percent)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
8
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Food
Service
Establishments
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Grease
from
food
service
establishments
reduces
the
capacity
of
sewers
and
causes
or
contributes
to
SSOs
and
CSOs.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

NA
NA
NA
TBD
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Conventional
pollutants
specifically
grease
and
other
pollutants
that
interfere
with
collection
systems.

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?
New
automatic
grease
trap
system
available.

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
9
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Gasoline
Service
Stations
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
New
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
5541
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
NA
352
0
1,488
#
Directs
NA
#
Indirects
NA
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
NA
NA
0
0
Nonconventional
NA
NA
0
0
Conventional
0
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank
(
out
of
)*
7
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
PATHOGENS,
OIL
AND
GREASE,
OTHER
CAUSES
#
indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
239
(
16
percent)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
10
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Gasoline
Service
Stations
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

170.7
B
741,040
NA
TBD
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
UIC
program
Class
V
motor
vehicle
waste
disposal
wells
covers
stations
that
dispose
of
their
service
wastewater
into
septic
systems
or
drywells
1999
rules
Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
11
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Independent
and
Stand­
Alone
Laboratories
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
New
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
8071
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
9,076
NA
3
0
6
#
Directs
NA
#
Indirects
NA
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
NA
NA
0
0
Nonconventional
NA
NA
0
0
Conventional
0
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
30
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
METALS
#
of
indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
1
(
17
percent)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
12
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Independent
and
Stand­
Alone
Laboratories
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Identified
along
with
dental
facilities
and
hospitals
as
a
significant
source
of
mercury.
Initially
identified
during
Consent
Decree
process
(
from
Plaintiff's
Exhibit
G)

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

19.3
B
192,532
NA
TBD
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Possibly
mercury.

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
Labs
related
to
industries
covered
by
ELGs
also
covered.

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
13
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Ocean
Going
Vessels
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
New
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
4412,
4481
(
Impairment
Information
only
for
4412)

Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
631
NA
2
0
7
#
Directs
NA
#
Indirects
NA
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
NA
NA
0
0
Nonconventional
NA
NA
0
0
Conventional
0
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
29
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
NUTRIENTS,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO
#
of
indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
2
(
29
percent)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
14
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Ocean
Going
Vessels
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Stakeholders
noted
ballast
and
bilge
water
concerns
in
general;
for
cruise
ships,
large
vol.
of
wastewater,
graywater,
hazardous
wastes
from
printing,
photo
proc.,
dry
cleaning.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

15.57
B
31,731
NA
TBD
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
oil
and
grease,
metals,
toxics,
and
invasive
species
Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
Covered
by
CWA
§
312.
Ongoing
work
in
OWOW/
OWM.
OPEI's
Sector
Strategies
Program
includes
Ports.

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
15
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Printing
and
Publishing
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
New
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
27**
(
except
2796)
(
Impairment
information
for:
2711,
2732,
2752,
2754,
2759)

Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
61,079
167
22
2
84
#
Directs
4
#
Indirects
55
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
2,159
275
628
1,405
Nonconventional
11,906
4
7,277,081
842
Conventional
190,409
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
24
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
METALS,
CHLORINE,
NUTRIENTS,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO
#
indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
18
(
21
percent)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
16
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Printing
and
Publishing
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Initially
identified
during
Consent
Decree
process
(
from
Plaintiff's
Exhibit
G)

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

210.9
B
1,534,299
NA
TBD
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?

Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
Flexographic
printing,
gravure
printing,
lithographic
printing,
and
screen
printing
listed
as
DfE
partners.

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
17
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Stormwater
and
Urban
Runoff
Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
New
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
Includes
"
Scrap
and
Waste
Materials"
in
5093
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
9,088
3
21
0
499
#
Directs
2
#
Indirects
1
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
277
16
0
0
Nonconventional
10
1
0
0
Conventional
0
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
13
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
METALS,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
OIL
AND
GREASE
#
indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
94
(
19
percent)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
18
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Stormwater
and
Urban
Runoff
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
NWQI
2000
Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Need
technology­
based
limitations
for
oil
&
grease,
pesticides,
pathogens,
metals,
and
sediment;
can't
use
WQbased
effluent
limits,
rely
on
BMPs;
recommend
goal
as
"
reducing
pollutants
to
the
maximum
extent
possible."

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
Oil
and
grease,
pesticides,
pathogens,
metals,
and
sediment
Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
Covered
by
CWA
§
402(
p);
OWM
has
responsibility.
Discharges
to
any
type
of
well
are
covered
in
UIC
program
as
Class
V
Stormwater
Well
Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
Page
19
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Wastewater
Treatment
and
Sewerage
Systems,
(
including
POTWs
and
Municipal
Treatment
Facilities)

Category
Information
New
or
Existing:
New
SIC
Code(
s)
Covered
in
Whole
or
in
Part:
4952
Date(
s)
Promulgated/
Revised:
N/
A
Date
of
Most
Recent
EAD
Study:
none
Facility
Count
Information
Facilities
Census
Data
(
Year
1997)
TRI/
RSEI
Reporters
(
Year
2000)
PCS
(
Year
2000)
Indexed
to
Waterbody
Segments*
All
Reporting
w/
Loading
Estimates
Total
3
11,627
4,113
19,458
#
Directs
2
#
Indirects
0
Discharge
Information
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Pollutant
Type
&
Pounds
TRI/
RSEI
PCS
Other
Sources
Lbs
TWPE
Lbs
TWPE
Priority
0
0
not
reliable
not
reliable
Nonconventional
530
258
not
reliable
not
reliable
Conventional
not
reliable
Category
Ranking
(
All
for
Year
2000)

Hazard
Rank
NA
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
hazard
NA
NA
Risk
Rank*
NA
#
facilities
=
90%
risk*
NA
Impairment
Rank*
1
Cause(
s)
of
Impairment*
UNKNOWN
TOXICITY,
PESTICIDES,
PRIORITY
ORGANICS,
NONPRIORITY,
ORGANICS,
PCB'S,
DIOXINS,
METALS,
UNIONIZED
AMMONIA,
CHLORINE,
CYANIDE,
SULFATES,
OTHER
INORGANICS,
NUTRIENTS,
PH,
SEDIMENT/
SILTATION,
ORGANIC
ENRICHMENT/
LOW
DO,
SALINITY/
TDS/
CHLORIDES,
THERMAL
MODIFICATIONS,
FLOW
ALTERATION,
OTHER
HABITAT
ALTERATIONS,
PATHOGENS,
OIL
AND,
GREASE,
TASTE
AND
ODOR,
TOTAL
TOXICS,
FISH
CONSUMPTION
ADVIS.,
OTHER
CAUSE
#
Indexed
PCS
facilities
on
impaired
reaches
(%
total
indexed)*
4,
341
(
22%)

*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003
and
does
not
reflect
any
recent
corrections
to
the
TRI
and
PCS
data.
Page
20
of
20
Data
Summary
Table
for
Wastewater
Treatment
and
Sewerage
Systems,
(
including
POTWs
and
Municipal
Treatment
Facilities)
continued
Factor
Analyses
Results
Screening
Level
Factor
1
Concerns
NWQI
2000;
Gulf
of
Mexico
Hypoxia;
Identified
in
EPA's
impaired
waters
analysis
(
see
Section
2.1.4
of
the
public
record).

Screening
Level
Factor
4
Concerns
Need
technology­
based
controls
for
nutrients
and
metals
via
either
improved
secondary
treatment
or
tertiary
treatment
requirements.

Economic
Screen
(
1997
Data)

Sales/
Revenue*
#
Employees*
#
Firms*
%
Small*
Capital
Expend*

NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Noteworthy
Issues
Pollutants
Driving
Concern?
nutrients
(
ammonia,
nitrate­
nitrite,
phosphorus)
and
metals
Geographic
Concentration?

Industry
Changing?

Advances
in
P2
and
WWT?

Economic
Trends?

Other
Tools
to
Address
Concern?

Ongoing
Agency
Activities?
Covered
by
CWA
§
301(
b)(
1)(
B)
&
EPA's
municipal
program.

Additional
Information
*
This
information
was
last
updated
in
Summer
2003.
