INFORMATION
COLLECTION
REQUEST
FOR
NATIONAL
PRIMARY
DRINKING
WATER
REGULATIONS:
RADIONUCLIDES
FINAL
Prepared
for:

U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
1200
Pennsylvania
Ave.,
N.
W.
Washington,
D.
C.
20460
Prepared
by:

ISSI
Consulting
Group
8455
Colesville
Road,
Suite
915
Silver
Spring,
MD
20910
EPA
Contract
No.
68­
C7­
0005
Work
Assignment
No.
2­
06
September
22,
2000
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
IDENTIFICATION
OF
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
1a
Title
and
Number
of
the
Information
Collection
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
1b
Short
Characterization
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
NEED
FOR
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTION
2a
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
2b
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5
NONDUPLICATION,
CONSULTATIONS,
AND
OTHER
COLLECTION
CRITERIA
3a
Nonduplication
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7
3b
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
Submission
to
OMB
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7
3c
Consultations
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7
3d
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
11
3e
General
Guidelines
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
11
3f
Confidentiality
and
Sensitive
Questions
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
11
THE
RESPONDENTS
AND
THE
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
4a
Respondents/
SIC
Codes
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
12
4b
Information
Requested
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
12
(
i)
Data
Items
(
ii)
Respondent
Activities
(
a)
State
Activities
(
b)
Public
Water
System
Activities
4c
ICR
Approval
Activities
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
21
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTED
 
AGENCY
ACTIVITIES,
COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY,
AND
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
5a
Agency
Activities
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
22
5b
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
22
5c
Small
Entity
Flexibility
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
22
5d
Collection
Schedule
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
23
ESTIMATING
THE
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
THE
COLLECTION
6a
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
26
(
i)
Burden
and
Cost
to
PWSs
(
a)
Start­
up
Activities
(
b)
Annual
Monitoring
(
ii)
Burden
and
Cost
to
States
(
a)
Start­
up
Activities
(
b)
Annual
Activities
6b
Timeframe
for
Cost
and
Burden
Estimates
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
28
6c
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
28
6d
Respondent
Universe
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
29
6e
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Costs
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
29
6f
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
29
6g
Burden
Statement
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
30
SURVEY
INFORMATION
LIST
OF
TABLES
Table
1­
1.
Radionuclides
Rule
Summary
Costs
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2
Table
1­
2.
PWS
Monitoring
Costs
by
Radionuclide
and
Labor
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2
Table
4­
1.
Revised
Radionuclides
Federal
Reporting
Violations
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
15
Table
4­
2:
State
Rule
Implementation
and
Revision
Timetable
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
16
Table
4­
3.
General
Radionuclides
Monitoring
Frequency
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
19
Table
5
­
1:
Public
Water
System
Timetable
for
the
Radionuclides
Requirements
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
24
Table
6­
1.
Summary
of
Burden
and
Costs
for
the
Radionuclides
Rule
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
26
Table
6­
2.
Summary
of
Burden
and
Costs
for
the
Radionuclides
Rule
for
the
Post­
ICR
Approval
Period
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
27
Table
6­
3.
Average
Burden,
Respondents,
and
Responses
During
the
Three­
Year
ICR
Approval
Period
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
29
Table
6­
4.
Comparison
of
Monitoring
Burden
and
Costs
Associated
with
2000
Radionuclides
Rule
with
the
1976
Rule
(
Baseline)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
31
LIST
OF
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
1.
BURDEN,
RESPONDENTS,
RESPONSES,
AND
COSTS
FOR
THE
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
33
EXHIBIT
2.
BURDEN
ESTIMATES
FOR
THE
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
HOURS)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
34
EXHIBIT
3.
RESPONDENT
ESTIMATES
FOR
THE
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
NUMBER)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
35
EXHIBIT
4.
RESPONSES
ESTIMATES
FOR
THE
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
NUMBER)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
36
EXHIBIT
5.
COST
ESTIMATES
FOR
THE
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
DOLLARS)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
37
EXHIBIT
6.
BURDEN,
RESPONDENTS,
RESPONSES,
AND
COSTS
FOR
THE
POST­
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
38
EXHIBIT
7.
BURDEN
ESTIMATE
FOR
THE
POST­
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
HOURS)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
39
EXHIBIT
8.
RESPONDENTS
ESTIMATE
FOR
THE
POST­
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
NUMBER)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
40
EXHIBIT
9.
RESPONSES
ESTIMATE
FOR
THE
POST­
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
NUMBER)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
41
EXHIBIT
10.
COST
ESTIMATE
FOR
THE
POST­
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
DOLLARS)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
42
LIST
OF
WORK
SHEETS
WORKSHEET
1.
ASSUMPTIONS
AND
ANALYSIS
FOR
PWS
START
UP
ACTIVITIES
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
43
WORKSHEET
2.
ASSUMPTIONS
AND
ANALYSES
FOR
PWS
MONITORING
ACTIVITIES
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
45
WORKSHEET
3.
ASSUMPTIONS
AND
ANALYSIS
FOR
STATE
START
UP
ACTIVITIES
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
46
WORKSHEET
4.
ASSUMPTIONS
AND
ANALYSIS
FOR
STATE
ACTIVITIES
RELATED
TO
MONITORING
SUPERVISION
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
49
APPENDIX
­
FLOW
CHARTS
AND
COST
SHEETS
FOR
MONITORING
SCENARIOS
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
51
1
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
REQUEST
FOR
NATIONAL
PRIMARY
DRINKING
WATER
REGULATIONS:
RADIONUCLIDES
SUPPORTING
STATEMENT
FOR
RECORD
KEEPING
AND
REPORTING
1
IDENTIFICATION
OF
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
1a
Title
and
Number
of
the
Information
Collection
Title:
Information
Collection
Request
for
National
Primary
Drinking
Water
Regulations:
2000
Radionuclides
Final
Rule
U.
S.
EPA
Tracking
Number:
1972.01
Note:
The
description
of
reporting
and
record
keeping
burden
in
this
supporting
statement
covers
all
that
is
required
for
the
existing
National
Primary
Drinking
Water
Regulations
for
radionuclides
and
the
amendments
that
will
result
from
the
2000
final
rule.
These
requirements
exceed
the
3­
year
approval
period
for
the
Information
Collection
Request
(
ICR).
For
purposes
of
the
ICR
approval
period,
the
3­
year
costs
and
burden
are
described
in
Section
6,
with
the
supporting
tables
at
the
end
of
the
document.

1b
Short
Characterization
This
regulation
includes
information
collection
requirements
for
four
categories
of
radionuclide
standards:
gross
alpha
(
minus
uranium
and
radon),
combined
radiums
(
226
and
228),
beta/
photon
emitters
and
uranium.
Three
of
these
radionuclide
standards
(
gross
alpha
particle
activity,
combined
radium­
226
and
228,
and
the
beta
particle/
photon
emitters)
have
been
regulated
since
1976.
Some
of
the
main
elements
of
the
2000
final
radionuclides
rule
that
will
subsequently
result
in
information
collection
include:
a
maximum
contaminant
level
for
(
MCL)
uranium,
separate
monitoring
requirements
for
radium­
226
and
radium­
228
and
implementation
of
entry
point
monitoring
and
a
standardized
monitoring
framework
(
SMF)
scheme.
State
and
local
respondents
will
be
required
to
collect
and
report
information
on
the
levels
of
radionuclides
in
drinking
water
supplies
on
a
quarterly,
annual,
and
in
some
cases,
on
a
monthly
basis.
The
U.
S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
the
Agency),
through
the
Safe
Drinking
Water
Information
System
(
SDWIS),
uses
the
information
to
ensure
compliance
with
these
regulations
to
protect
public
health.

Monitoring,
reporting,
and
record
keeping
are
required
at
both
the
system
and
State
levels
under
the
National
Primary
Drinking
Water
Regulations
(
NPDWRs)
(
§
141.26,
§
142.14,
§
142.15,
§
142.16).
All
public
water
systems
(
PWSs)
must
maintain
and
report
to
the
State
information
documenting
compliance
with
the
treatment
and
monitoring
requirements
under
the
NPDWRs.
2
The
radionuclides
rule
is
only
applicable
to
community
water
systems.
States
must
maintain
records
sufficient
to
support
program
implementation
and
oversight.
Reports
provided
by
States
are
stored
in
SDWIS
and
assist
the
Agency
in
evaluating
State
compliance
activities,
including
the
implementation
of
NPDWRs
for
radionuclides.

Radionuclide
data
will
be
collected
under
the
authority
of
the
Safe
Drinking
Water
Act
(
SDWA)
and
are
used
by
the
Agency's
Office
of
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
(
OGWDW).
These
data
also
support
analyses
for
the
Agency's
Superfund
and
Resource
Conservation
and
Recovery
Act
(
RCRA)
hazardous
waste
programs.
External
agencies,
such
as
the
Department
of
the
Interior,
U.
S.
Army
Corps
of
Engineers,
State
environmental
agencies,
public
interest
groups,
and
private
companies,
all
utilize
these
data.

This
information
collection
effort
will
involve
53,121
private
sector
respondents,
56
public
sector
respondents,
and
$
4.9
million
in
annual
costs
(
see
Table
1­
1).
These
costs
include
operational
expenditure
annualized
over
23
years.
The
start
up
costs
annualized
over
the
first
3
years
after
promulgation
of
the
final
rule
are
$
10.2
million.
The
annualized
PWS
monitoring
costs
over
23
years
broken
out
by
radionuclide
category,
are
shown
below
in
Table
1­
2.

Table
1­
1.
Radionuclides
Rule
Summary
Costs*

Category
3
Year
Total
3
Year
Annualized
23
Year
Total
23
Year
Annualized
PWS
Start
Up
$
26,046,448
$
9,925,042
PWS
Monitoring
$
54,730,515
$
4,855,439
State
Start
Up
$
650,578
$
247,905
State
Monitoring
$
718,299
$
63,723
TOTAL
$
26,697,026
$
10,172,947
$
55,448,814
$
4,919,162
*
Present
Value
at
7%
discount
rate
Table
1­
2.
PWS
Monitoring
Costs
by
Radionuclide
and
Labor*

Category
23
Year
Total
23
Year
Annualized
Gross
Alpha
Analysis
$
4,953,727
$
438,565
Gross
Beta
Analysis
$
12,833,302
$
1,138,493
Combined
Radiums
Analysis
$
29,163,035
$
2,578,167
Uranium
Analysis
$
1,720,814
$
152,660
Analysis
Subtotal
$
48,670,878
$
4,317,885
PWS
Labor
$
6,059,637
$
537,574
TOTAL
$
54,730,515
$
4,855,439
*
Present
Value
at
7%
discount
rate
3
2
NEED
FOR
AND
USE
OF
THE
COLLECTION
The
following
sections
describe
the
need
for
this
information
collection
and
the
legal
authority
under
which
the
information
will
be
collected,
as
well
as
identifies
the
specific
uses
and
users
of
the
data.

2a
Need/
Authority
for
the
Collection
The
information
collected
under
this
rule
is
required
by
EPA
to
carry
out
its
monitoring
and
enforcement
responsibilities
under
the
Safe
Drinking
Water
Act.
Without
comprehensive,
upto
date
information
on
drinking
water
contaminants,
the
Agency
would
not
be
able
to
meet
the
SDWA
statutory
requirements.
The
Act
requires
that
"
there
must
be
criteria
and
standards
to
assure
a
supply
of
drinking
water
which
dependably
complies
with
such
maximum
contaminant
levels;
including
quality
control
and
testing
procedures
to
insure
compliance
with
such
levels
and
to
insure
proper
operation
and
maintenance
of
the
system..."

Furthermore,
section
1445
of
the
SDWA
requires
that
"
every
person
who
is
a
supplier
of
water
shall
establish
and
maintain
such
records,
make
such
reports,
conduct
such
monitoring,
and
provide
such
information
as
the
Administrator
may
reasonably
require
by
regulation
to
assist
him
in
establishing
regulations,
in
determining
whether
such
person
has
acted
or
is
in
compliance
with
this
title..."

Under
the
authority
of
the
Safe
Drinking
Water
Act
(
SDWA)
and
its
amendments,
EPA
sets
drinking
water
standards
for
contaminants,
which
potentially
pose
a
threat
to
public
health
via
a
public
drinking
water
source.
In
1976,
EPA
promulgated
National
Interim
Primary
Drinking
Water
Regulations
(
NIPDWR)
for
three
categories
of
radionuclides:
gross
alpha
particl
activity,
combined
radium
226
and
228,
and
gross
beta
particle
and
photon
radioactivity.
The
1976
NIPDWRs
for
these
radionuclides
regulated:

°
gross
alpha
at
15
picoCuries
per
liter
(
pCi/
L)(
excluding
radon
and
uranium);
°
radium­
226
and
radium­
228
combined
at
5
pCi/
L;
°
and
beta/
photon
emitters
at
a
4
millirem
dose
of
radioactivity.

The
SDWA
Amendments
of
1986
required
EPA
to
establish
health­
based
regulatory
targets,
called
Maximum
Contaminant
Level
Goals
(
MCLGs)
and
an
enforceable
standard,
the
Maximum
Contaminant
Level
(
MCL).
In
addition,
the
1986
amendments
identified
83
contaminants
for
the
Agency
to
regulate,
including
the
currently
regulated
radionuclides
that
lacked
MCLGs,
and
two
additional
radionuclides,
uranium
and
radon.
Also,
the
1986
amendments
declared
the
1976
interim
standards
to
be
NPDWRs.

On
July
18,
1991
(
56
FR
33050),
EPA
proposed:
4

A
Maximum
Contaminant
Level
Goal
(
MCLG)
of
zero
for
all
radionuclides;


An
NPDWR
for
uranium
at
20
ug/
L
(
or
30
pCi/
L);


An
NPDWR
for
radon
of
300
pCi/
L;


To
revise
the
standards
for
the
combined
radiums
(
226
and
228)
from
an
MCL
of
5
pCi/
L
to
a
MCL
of
20
pCi/
L
each;


To
revise
gross
alpha
to
exclude
not
only
uranium
and
radon
but
also
radium­
226
(
while
keeping
the
gross
alpha
MCL
of
15
pCi/
L);


To
revise
the
MCL
for
beta/
photon
emitters
from
4
mrem
to
4
mrem
ede;


Entry
point
sampling;


A
standardized
monitoring
framework;
and

To
extend
the
applicability
of
the
radionuclide
NPDWRs
to
include
Non­
Transient
Non­
community
Water
Systems
(
NTNCWS).

Comments
on
the
proposed
rule
were
received
from
approximately
600
individuals
and
organizations.
Due
largely
to
concerns
by
commenters
and
Congress
over
the
most
effective
way
to
regulate
radon,
the
proposed
rule
was
never
finalized.
The
1996
reauthorization
of
the
Safe
Drinking
Water
Act
withdrew
the
radon
portion
of
the
1991
radionuclides
proposal.
In
the
1996
amendments,
Congress
did
not
specify
a
new
time
frame
for
finalizing
rulemaking
for
the
other
radionuclides,
as
it
did
for
radon.
Subsequent
to
the
1996
SDWA
amendments,
EPA
was
sued
by
an
Oregon
plaintiff
(
Bull
Run
Coalition)
for
failure
to
finalize
the
radionuclides
rule.
EPA
entered
into
a
court­
stipulated
agreement
with
the
Oregon
Bull
Run
Coalition
to
promulgate
a
final
action
for
the
non­
radon
portion
of
the
1991
proposal
by
November
21,
2000.

On
April
21,
2000,
EPA
published
a
Notice
of
Data
Availability
(
NODA)
to
update
the
public
and
the
regulated
community
on
issues
regarding
radionuclides
since
the
publication
of
the
1991
proposed
rule.
This
notice
presented
additional
information
about
the
occurrence,
health
effects,
and
treatment
options
for
radionuclides
in
drinking
water,
as
well
as
analytical
methods,
and
monitoring
requirements.
The
NODA
also
presented
data
concerning
the
costs
and
benefits
of
several
regulatory
options
for
uranium.
EPA
received
approximately
70
comments
(
on
time
and
late)
in
response
to
the
NODA.
The
additional
information
and
analyses
provided
in
the
NODA,
as
well
as
public
comments,
were
taken
into
account
as
EPA
evaluated
the
1991
proposal
and
made
the
final
decisions
for
the
radionuclides
NPDWR.

This
2000
radionuclides
regulatory
action
will
revise
and
amend
40
CFR
Part
141
(
National
Primary
Drinking
Water
Regulations)
and
Part
142
(
National
Primary
Drinking
Water
Regulations
Implementation)
and
includes
the
following
elements:


An
MCLG
of
zero
for
all
radionuclides.


Maintaining
the
1976
gross
alpha
MCL
of
15
pCi/
L
(
which
includes
radium­
226
and
excludes
uranium
and
radon),
which
is
more
protective
than
the
1991
proposed
changes.


Maintaining
the
1976
MCL
of
5
pCi/
L
for
combined
radium­
226
and
­
228,
which
is
more
protective
than
the
1991
proposed
changes.
5

Maintaining
the
1976
beta
particle
and
photon
radioactivity
MCL
of
4
mrem/
year,
which
is
more
protective
than
the
1991
proposed
changes.


An
MCL
of
30
ug/
L
for
uranium
for
community
water
systems.


Separate
monitoring
requirements
for
radium­
226
and
radium­
228.


Maintaining
the
beta/
photon
screening
levels
set
in
the
1976
rule
for
vulnerable
systems
(
as
deemed
by
the
State).
Surface
water
systems
serving
greater
than
100,000
persons
will
no
longer
be
required
to
monitor
unless
they
are
deemed
vulnerable.


Sampling,
compliance,
and
monitoring
waivers
revised
to
standardized
monitoring
framework
at
entry
points
to
the
distribution
system.
States
will
have
discretion
in
grandfathering
existing
distribution
system
data
for
determining
initial
monitoring
baselines.


Non­
transient,
non­
community
water
systems
will
not
be
regulated
for
radionuclides
in
drinking
water
at
this
time.

2b
Practical
Utility/
Users
of
the
Data
Compliance
data
collected
under
this
rule
will
be
used
by
PWSs,
State
primacy
agencies,
this
Agency,
other
Federal
agencies,
public
interest
groups,
and
private
companies.
For
PWSs
primary
uses
will
include:


determination
of
system­
specific
water
quality
improvement
needs,


optimization
of
monitoring
schedules
and
frequencies,
and

alerting
the
public
of
water
quality
problems
and
violations.

States
and
primacy
agencies
will
utilize
the
data
to
monitor
the
compliance
of
public
water
systems
with
drinking
water
standards.
Data
will
also
be
used
to
keep
track
of
State
approvals
of
plans
and
specifications,
enforcement
activities,
and
variances
and
exemptions
for
public
water
systems.
State
level
planning
is
enhanced
by
being
able
to
target
PWSs
for
enforcement
actions
and
remedial
actions.

Because
the
information
is
captured
in
SDWIS,
it
will
become
available
to
the
general
public
through
the
Envirofacts
web
interface.
Federal
agencies,
scholars,
State
agencies,
private
companies,
and
private
citizens
can
all
access
this
information
through
the
Internet.
Geographic
and
time­
series
research
on
trends
in
water
quality
can
be
conducted
to
advance
the
science
of
drinking
water
quality.
System
level
data
can
be
compared
and
trends
associated
with
individual
PWSs
can
be
established.
6
In
their
regulatory
role,
the
Agency
and
the
States
can
ask
certain
key
questions:


Is
each
PWS
in
compliance
with
each
drinking
water
standard?


For
systems
that
are
not
in
compliance,
why
are
they
not
in
compliance?


For
systems
not
in
compliance,
how
can
compliance
be
achieved?


What
is
the
threat
to
public
health
for
a
system
that
is
not
in
compliance?


What
are
the
National,
regional,
State,
and
local
trends
in
drinking
water
quality?


What
changes
in
policy
or
regulations
may
be
needed
to
increase
compliance?


Is
noncompliance
a
function
of
location,
size,
or
some
other
characteristic
of
a
system?

In
addition,
this
information
will
be
useful
in
satisfying
Freedom
of
Information
requests
from
members
of
the
general
public
who
are
often
interested
in
the
performance
of
their
local
public
water
systems.

3
NONDUPLICATION,
CONSULTATIONS,
AND
OTHER
COLLECTION
CRITERIA
7
The
following
sections
verify
and
affirm
that
this
ICR
satisfies
the
Office
of
Management
and
Budget's
(
OMB)
collection
guidelines,
has
public
support,
and
does
not
duplicate
another
collection.

3a
Non­
duplication
The
Agency
has
searched
the
Federal
Information
Locator
System
(
FILS)
in
an
effort
to
ensure
non­
duplication
of
the
data
collection
efforts.
To
the
best
of
the
Agency's
knowledge,
data
currently
required
by
this
rule
are
not
available
from
any
other
source.

3b
Public
Notice
Required
Prior
to
Submission
to
OMB
The
Agency
published
a
Proposed
Rule
for
"
National
Primary
Drinking
Water
Regulations:
Radionuclides"
in
the
Federal
Register
on
July
18,
1991
(
56
FR
33050)
and
a
Notice
of
Data
Availability
(
NODA)
in
the
Federal
Register
on
April
21,
2000
(
65
FR
21576).
Comments
received
on
both
of
these
actions
are
germane
and
valuable
to
this
ICR.
These
comments
were
used
in
making
the
final
decisions
for
the
this
2000
radionuclides
rulemaking.

3c
Consultations
EPA
encourages
public
input
into
regulation
development.
To
gather
stakeholder
input,
a
Radionuclide
Stakeholder
Meeting
took
place
on
December
11­
12,
1997.
EPA
consulted
with
a
broad
range
of
stakeholders
and
technical
experts.
During
the
meeting,
EPA
discussed
a
range
of
regulation
development
issues
with
the
stakeholders,
including
the
statutory
requirements,
court
stipulated
agreement,
MCLs
for
each
of
the
radionuclides,
new
scientific
information
on
health
effects,
occurrence,
analytical
methods,
treatment
technologies,
and
current
and
proposed
monitoring
framework.
The
presentations
generated
useful
discussion
and
provided
feedback
to
EPA
regarding
technical
issues,
stakeholder
concerns
and
possible
regulatory
options.
Participants
in
EPA's
stakeholder
meeting
included
representatives
from
the
Association
of
Metropolitan
Water
Agencies
(
AMWA),
Association
of
State
Drinking
Water
Administrators
(
ASDWA),
American
Water
Works
Association
(
AWWA),
National
Association
of
Water
Companies,
State
departments
of
environmental
protection,
State
health
departments,
State
drinking
water
programs,
Federal
agencies,
environmental
groups,
and
city
water
systems.
Meeting
notes
are
available
at
http://
www.
epa.
gov/
safewater/
ndwac/
sum_
radn.
html.
The
following
is
a
complete
list
of
the
stakeholder
participants:

Meeting
Attendees
Affiliation
Brad
Addison
Georgia
Department
of
Natural
Resources/
Environmental
Protection
Division
James
Bachmaier
US
Department
of
Energy
Ambika
Bathija
EPA
Office
of
Water,
Office
of
Science
and
Technology
Gerald
Bever
City
of
DeKalb,
IL
8
Teresa
Boepple
New
York
State
Department
of
Health,
Bureau
of
Public
Water
Supply
Protection
Dori
Burg
Residents
and
Children
of
DeKalb,
IL
Mitchell
Childrey
Virginia
Department
of
Health
Jeannie
Cho
Vicki
Cochran
Kilpatrick
Stockton
Peter
Coon
NAWC
Richard
Cunningham
US
Department
of
Energy
Miguel
Del
Toral
EPA
Region
V,
Safe
Drinking
Water
Branch
Bill
Diamond,
Director,
EPA
Office
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
Dennis
Duffield
City
of
Joliet
Mike
Focazio
US
Geological
Survey
Harold
Fuhrman
City
of
Waukesha
Water
Utility
John
Guggi
EPA
NAREL
Baker
Hamill
Chief,
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection,
Bureau
of
Safe
Drinking
Water
Joseph
Harrison
Water
Quality
Association
William
Roy
Harrison
US
Department
of
Energy
Scott
Hay
S.
Cohen
&
Associates,
Inc.

David
Huber
EPA
Office
of
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
Ben
Hull
EPA
Office
of
Radiation
and
Indoor
Air
Amit
Kapadia
EPA
Office
of
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
John
Karhnak
EPA
Office
of
Radiation
and
Indoor
Air
James
Scott
Kirk
Nuclear
Fuel
Services
Debbie
Kopsick
EPA
Office
of
Radiation
and
Indoor
Air
Ron
Kovach
EPA
Region
V
Max
Kukoy
ASDWA
Bill
Labiosa
EPA
Office
of
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
Diane
Larsen
US
Department
of
Energy
Patricia
Lawson
National
Safety
Council
Vicki
Lloyd
EPA
Office
of
Radiation
and
Indoor
Air
Bernard
Lucey
New
Hampshire
Department
of
Environmental
Services
Frank
Marcinowski
EPA
9
Corey
McDaniel
EOP
Group
Jim
McFarland
EPA
Office
of
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
Dr.
Neal
Nelson
EPA
Office
of
Radiation
and
Indoor
Air
Erik
Olson
Natural
Resources
Defense
Council
Mike
Osinski
EPA
Office
of
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
Marc
Parrotta
EPA
Office
of
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
Glenn
Patterson
US
Geological
Survey
David
Pauel
EPA
Office
of
Radiation
and
Indoor
Air
Dan
Pedersen
American
Water
Works
Association
Pat
Phibbs
Environmental
Health
Letter
Stephen
Pia
EPA
Office
of
Research
and
Development/
ESD
Dawn
Porto
Designers
&
Planners
Jerry
Puskin
EPA
Office
of
Radiation
and
Indoor
Air
Lowell
Ralston
EPA
Office
of
Radiation
and
Indoor
Air
Edward
Regnier
US
Department
of
Energy
Nancy
Reilman
Maryland
Department
of
the
Environment
Edward
Regnier
DOE
Waste
Management
Unit
David
Robbins
EPA
Region
8
Dr.
Robert
Rowland
Waukesha
Water
Utility
System
Tom
Schaeffer
AMWA
Roger
Selburg
Illinois
EPA,
DPWS
Shantini
Senanjahe
Nancy
Stanley
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection,
Radiation
Protection
Programs
Todd
Steiner
International
Consultants,
Inc.

Katie
Sweeney
National
Mining
Association
Zoltan
Szabo
US
Geological
Survey
Mark
Thaggard
US
Nuclear
Regulatory
Commission
Chao­
Hsiung
Tung
SAIC
Sherri
Umansky
EPA,
Office
of
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
Pat
Ware
Bureau
of
National
Affairs
Michael
Weber
US
Nuclear
Regulatory
Commission
Corry
Westbrook
EPA,
Office
of
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
10
Jim
York
ASE,
Inc.

Conference
Call
Participants
Sylvia
Barrett
Metropolitan
Water
District
of
Southern
California
Jennifer
Cox
South
Carolina
Drinking
Water
Program
Thomas
DeGaetano
EPA
Region
IV
Peter
Denk
Daily
Chronicle
Jacob
Dumelle
American
Lung
Association
of
Chicago
Julia
Fauci
Northern
Illinois
University
John
Hepperley
Janet
Johnson
Shepard
Miller,
Inc.

Linda
Lahey
Ellen
Partridge
Partridge
&
Niro
Fred
Pontius
AWWA
Dr.
Terry
Sandman
Jane
Smith
Indiana
State
Department
of
Health
Gene
Taylor
EPA
Region
X
In
addition
to
the
1997
stakeholder
meeting,
the
Office
of
Ground
Water
and
Drinking
Water
(
OGWDW)
staff
gave
presentations
on
the
radionuclides
regulation
at
meetings
sponsored
by
AWWA,
ASDWA,
and
EPA
State/
Regional
conferences,
and
met
with
States
from
Regions
2,
3,
7,
and
8
regarding
radionuclides
issues
and
the
upcoming
final
rule.
The
staff
participated
in
AWWA's
Technical
Advisory
Workgroup
(
TAW),
which
meets
annually
to
discuss
technical
issues
including
treatment,
occurrence,
and
health
risks.
State
public
health
department
and
drinking
water
program
representatives,
large
and
small
drinking
water
districts
participated
in
TAW
meetings.
The
OGWDW
staff
also
held
frequent
conference
calls
with
interested
State
drinking
water
programs
about
the
development
of
the
rule.
The
staff
made
presentations
and
received
input
at
Tribal
meetings
in
Nevada,
Alaska,
and
California.
Finally,
a
one­
day
meeting
was
held
with
associations
that
represent
State,
county,
and
local
government
elected
officials
on
May
30,
2000
to
discuss
five
upcoming
drinking
water
regulations,
including
radionuclides.

Stakeholders
were
also
asked
to
comment
on
a
variety
of
issues
in
the
April
21,
2000
Notice
of
Data
Availability.
The
feedback
received
from
the
stakeholders
during
all
these
meetings
and
comments
from
the
NODA
were
used
in
developing
the
final
2000
radionuclides
rule.

3d
Effects
of
Less
Frequent
Collection
The
Agency
has
determined
that
less
frequent
data
collection
may
fail
to
identify
significant
contaminant
concentrations
in
a
timely
manner.
Such
concentrations
may
threaten
the
11
health
and
safety
of
drinking
water
consumers.
The
Agency
believes
it
has
considered
a
wide
range
of
alternatives
in
terms
of
the
frequency
and
burden
of
data
collection.
It
has
selected
the
approach
requiring
the
least
possible
frequency
consistent
with
contaminant
monitoring
requirements.

3e
General
Guidelines
The
Radionuclides
Rule
complies
with
the
guidelines
(
5
CFR
1320.5(
d)(
2))
implemented
under
the
Paperwork
Reduction
Act.
In
addition,
this
rule
does
not
alter
existing
record
maintenance
requirements
that
require
records
of
chemical
analyses
be
kept
for
not
less
than
10
years,
and
records
of
actions
taken
by
a
PWS
to
correct
violations
of
NPDWRs
be
kept
for
a
period
of
not
less
than
three
years.

3f
Confidentiality
and
Sensitive
Questions
This
data
collection
effort
does
not
raise
confidentiality
issues
or
ask
sensitive
questions
concerning
sex
behavior
or
attitudes,
religious
beliefs,
or
other
personal
matters.

4
THE
RESPONDENTS
AND
THE
INFORMATION
REQUESTED
The
following
sections
provide
information
on
the
respondents
and
the
information
they
are
being
requested
to
provide.
12
4a
Respondents/
SIC
Codes
Under
this
rule,
respondents
to
the
monitoring,
reporting,
and
record
keeping
requirements
include
the
owners
and
operators
of
PWSs
that
are
more
specifically,
community
water
systems.
Respondents
also
include
State
officials
who
must
report
data
to
the
Agency.
The
Standard
Industrial
Classification
(
SIC)
code
for
investor­
owned
water
systems
is
4941
and
the
SIC
code
for
both
publically­
owned
water
systems
and
State
agencies
is
9511.

PWSs
are
defined
as
those
systems
that
provide
piped
water
for
human
consumption
and
have
at
least
15
service
connections
or
regularly
serve
at
least
25
people
at
least
60
days
per
year.
A
community
water
system
is
one
that
serves
at
least
15
connections
used
by
year­
round
residents
or
regularly
serves
at
least
25
year­
round
residents.
By
definition,
all
other
PWSs
are
noncommunity
systems.
Non­
community
systems
include
transient
systems
and
non­
transient
systems.
Non­
transient
systems
serve
the
same
25
people
at
least
six
months
per
year.
(
See
40
CFR
141.2.)

The
radionuclides
rule
is
only
applicable
to
community
water
systems.
At
this
time,
transient
and
non­
transient
non­
community
water
systems
(
NTNCWSs)
will
not
be
covered
by
these
regulations.
The
Agency
does
not
have
sufficient
information
to
consider
regulating
these
water
systems
at
a
national
level.

4b
Information
Requested
(
§
142.14
and
§
142.15
)

The
following
sections
provide
details
on
data
items
requested
and
associated
activities
respondents
will
be
required
to
undertake
to
provide
this
information.

4b(
i)
Data
Items
Currently,
§
142.14
of
the
regulations
already
require
States
with
primacy
enforcement
responsibility
to
keep
records
of
analytical
results
to
determine
compliance,
system
inventories,
sanitary
surveys,
State
approvals,
vulnerability
determinations,
monitoring
requirements,
monitoring
frequency
decisions,
enforcement
actions,
and
the
issuance
of
variances
and
exemptions.
The
aforementioned
data
items
are
already
required
for
gross
alpha
particle
activity,
combined
radium­
228
and
226,
and
beta
particle
and
photon
radioactivity.
The
current
rule
already
require
the
following
records
to
be
for
radionuclides:


Any
determination
of
a
system's
vulnerability
to
contamination
by
beta
and
photon
emitters
(
§
142.14(
d)(
4));
and

Any
determination
that
a
system
can
reduce
or
increase
monitoring
frequency
for
gross
alpha
particle
activity,
gross
beta
particle
and
photon
radioactivity,
radium­
13
226
and
228.
The
records
must
include
the
basis
for
the
decision,
and
the
repeat
monitoring
frequency
(
§
142.14(
d)(
5)).

Since
uranium
is
a
newly
regulated
radionuclide,
records
will
need
to
be
kept
for
uranium
as
well.
Since
these
requirements
are
generally
included
in
142.14(
d)(
4)
and
(
5),
revisions
under
the
current
rule
will
not
necessary.

Currently,
States
must
report
to
EPA
information
under
40
CFR
142.15
regarding
violations,
variances
and
exemptions,
enforcement
actions
and
general
operations
of
State
public
water
supply
programs.
Under
sections
142.15(
c)(
6)
and
(
7)
of
today's
rule,
the
States
are
required
to
provide
the
following
additional
information
to
EPA:


A
list
of
community
water
systems
the
State
assessed
to
determine
their
vulnerability
to
contamination
by
beta
particle
and
photon
radioactivity,
the
dates
of
the
assessments,
the
results
of
the
assessments,
and
the
basis
for
the
State's
determination
as
to
whether
or
not
a
system
is
vulnerable;
and

A
list
of
community
water
systems
for
which
the
State
is
requiring
repeat
monitoring
for
gross
beta
particle
and
photon
radioactivity,
the
results
of
the
assessment,
and
the
basis
for
that
determination.

4b(
ii)
Respondent
Activities
Respondents
to
this
rule
include
States
and
PWSs.
In
this
rule,
the
Agency
is
adding
new
record
keeping
and
reporting
requirements
for
States
and
PWSs
due
to
the
new
uranium
standard,
separate
monitoring
for
radium­
226
and
228
and
changes
in
the
monitoring
frequency.
These
new
requirements
are
discussed
in
sections
below.

4b(
ii)(
a)
State
Activities
State
officials
serve
in
the
role
of
respondents
when
reporting
compliance
data
to
the
Agency.
States
are
currently
required
to
maintain
records
of
State
verification
activities
and
for
each
determination
made,
report
to
the
Agency
(
§
142.15)
in
accordance
with
the
SDWA,
through
SDWIS.

States
with
primacy
act
as
the
Agency
in
ensuring
implementation
of
the
radionuclides
rule.
To
successfully
meet
their
responsibilities,
States
will
engage
in
the
following
activities:


regulation,
adoption
and
program
development;


coordination
and
data
reporting
to
the
Agency;


formal
enforcement,
including
the
certification
of
laboratories,
as
well
as
on­
going
technical
assistance
and
compliance
verification;


vulnerability
assessments;


notification
to
PWSs
of
requirements;
14

on­
going,
rule­
specific
training
for
drinking
water
staff
and
PWS
staff;


data
management,
system
maintenance
and
enhancements;


monitoring
compliance
schedule
development
and
statusing;


laboratory
and
testing
capacity
expansion,
training,
and
regulatory
enforcement;


treatment
and
construction
plan
review
and
approvals;
and,


data
entry
and
record
keeping.

Detailed
below
are
descriptions
of
the
specific
State
activities
which
are
currently
required
for
radionuclides
and
any
additional
requirements
which
result
from
this
final
rule.

State
Record
keeping
Requirements
Currently,
§
142.14
of
the
regulations
already
require
States
with
primacy
enforcement
responsibility
to
keep
records
of
analytical
results
to
determine
compliance,
system
inventories,
sanitary
surveys,
State
approvals,
vulnerability
determinations,
monitoring
requirements,
monitoring
frequency
decisions,
enforcement
actions,
and
the
issuance
of
variances
and
exemptions.
The
aforementioned
data
items
are
already
required
for
gross
alpha
particle
activity,
combined
radium­
228
and
226,
and
beta
particle
and
photon
radioactivity.
The
current
rule
already
require
the
following
records
to
be
for
radionuclides:


Any
determination
of
a
system's
vulnerability
to
contamination
by
beta
and
photon
emitters
§
142.14(
d)(
4));
and

Any
determination
that
a
system
can
reduce
or
increase
monitoring
frequency
for
gross
beta,
radium­
226
or
228
or
increase
monitoring
frequency.
The
records
must
include
the
basis
for
the
decision,
and
the
repeat
monitoring
frequency
(
§
142.14(
d)(
5)).

Since
uranium
is
a
newly
regulated
radionuclide,
records
will
need
to
be
kept
for
uranium
as
well.
Since
these
requirements
are
generally
included
in
142.14(
d)(
4)
and
(
5),
revisions
under
the
current
rule
will
not
necessary.

State
Reporting
Requirements
As
required
by
142.15,
States
with
primacy
enforcement
responsibility
are
required
to
submit
quarterly
reports
to
the
Agency
on:


new
violations
by
PWSs
that
occurred
during
the
previous
quarter;


new
enforcement
actions
that
occurred
during
the
previous
quarter;


variance
and
exemptions
that
have
been
granted
and
the
reasons
for
granting
them.
15
On
an
annual
basis,
States
are
required
to
submit
reports
on
the
additions
or
corrections
to
the
States
inventory
of
PWSs
and
the
status
of
variance
and
exemptions.

The
Safe
Drinking
Water
Information
System/
Federal
Version
(
SDWIS/
FED)
is
an
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(
EPA)
database
which
stores
basic
information
about
the
nation's
drinking
water
supply.
The
information
in
SDWIS/
FED
comes
from
the
States
and
EPA's
regional
offices
and
is
reported
for
every
PWS
in
the
United
States.
States
report
information
quarterly
to
EPA
on
whether
any
PWSs
have
violated
these
standards.
SDWIS/
FED
contains
basic
information
on
every
public
water
system,
including,
but
not
limited
to:


the
name
of
the
public
water
system

information
about
the
type
of
area
served
by
the
water
system
(
e.
g.,
households,
schools,
restaurants,
gas
stations,
or
rest
areas)


how
many
people
the
water
system
serves
and
its
operating
season
(
year
round
or
seasonal)


who
regulates
the
water
system
(
typically,
states
regulate
systems
within
their
jurisdictions;
EPA
currently
regulates
Tribal
systems
and
systems
in
Wyoming)


when
(
or
if)
a
water
system
has
violated
any
national
drinking
water
standard

what
(
if
any)
follow­
up
actions,
including
enforcement
actions,
have
been
taken
to
make
sure
the
water
system
returns
to
compliance
following
a
violation.

Table
4­
1
is
a
summary
of
SDWIS/
FED
reporting
requirements
specific
to
this
radionuclides.
The
summary
contains
SDWIS/
FED
violation
and
contaminant
codes.
The
violation
summary
table
only
lists
potential
Federal
violations.

Table
4­
1.
Revised
Radionuclides
Federal
Reporting
Violations
Contaminant
Code
Contaminant
Violation
4000
Gross
Alpha
01,
02,
03,
06
4010
Combined
Radium
(­
226
&­
228)
01,
02,
03,
06
4006
Uranium
01,
02,
03,
06
4101
Man­
Made
Beta
Particle
and
Photon
Emitters
01,
02,
03,
06
4102
Tritium
02,
03,
06
4174
Strontium­
90
02,
03,
06
4264
Iodine­
131
02,
03,
06
4270
Cesium­
134
02,
03,
06
4172
Strontium­
89
02,
03,
06
Note:
Violation
Types
and
Definitions
01
­
MCL,
Single
Sample
02
­
MCL,
Average
03
­
Failure
to
Monitor/
Report
06
­
Failure
to
Provide
the
Appropriate
Public
Notification
16
Primacy
Revision
Applications
Pursuant
to
40
CFR
§
142.12,
Revision
of
State
Programs,
complete
and
final
requests
for
approval
of
program
revisions
to
adopt
new
or
revised
Agency
regulations
must
be
submitted
to
the
Administrator
no
later
than
2
years
after
promulgation
of
the
new
or
revised
federal
regulations
(
see
Table
4­
2).
Until
those
applications
are
approved,
EPA
Regions
have
responsibility
for
directly
implementing
the
Radionuclides
Rule.
The
State
and
the
Agency
can
agree
to
implement
the
rule
together
during
this
period.
However,
if
a
State
is
eligible
for
interim
primacy,
once
it
submits
a
complete
and
final
revision
package,
it
will
have
full
implementation
and
enforcement
authority.
A
State
may
be
granted
additional
time,
up
to
two
years,
to
submit
its
application
package.
During
this
period,
a
Memorandum
of
Understanding
(
MOU)
outlining
the
State's
and
the
Agency's
responsibilities
is
required.

Table
4­
2:
State
Rule
Implementation
and
Revision
Timetable
EPA/
State
Action
Time
Frame*

Rules
published
by
EPA
November
2000
State
and
Region
establish
a
process
and
agree
upon
a
schedule
for
application
review
and
approval
April
2001
State,
at
its
option,
submits
draft
program
revision
package
including:
Preliminary
Approval
Request
Draft
State
Regulations
and/
or
Statutes
Regulation
Crosswalk
August
2001
Regional
(
and
Headquarters
if
necessary)
review
of
draft
Completed
within
90
days
of
State
submission
of
Draft
State
submits
final
program
revision
package
including:
Adopted
State
Regulations
Regulation
Crosswalk
40
CFR
142.10
Primacy
Update
Checklist
40
CFR
142.14
and
142.15
Reporting
and
Record
keeping
40
CFR
142.16
Special
Primacy
Requirements
Attorney
General's
Enforceability
Certification
November
2002**

EPA
final
review
and
determination:
Regional
review
(
program
and
ORC)
Headquarters
concurrence
and
waivers
(
OGWDW,
OECA,
OGC)
Public
Notice
Opportunity
for
hearing
EPA's
Determination
Completed
within
90
days
of
State
submittal
of
final
45
days
Region
45
days
Headquarters
Rule
Effective
Date
3
years
after
publication
(
November
2003)

*
Timetable
is
based
on
a
projected
promulgation
date
of
November
2000
for
the
final
rule.
**
An
extension
of
up
to
2
additional
years
may
be
requested
by
the
State.
17
The
approval
of
State
program
revisions
is
recommended
to
be
a
two­
step
process
comprising
submission
of
a
draft
request
(
optional)
and
then
submission
of
a
complete
and
final
request
for
program
approval.

Draft
Request
C
At
the
State's
option,
it
may
submit
a
draft
request
for
EPA
review
and
tentative
determination.
The
request
should
contain
drafts
of
all
required
primacy
application
materials.
A
draft
request
should
be
submitted
within
9
months
after
rule
promulgation.
EPA
will
make
a
tentative
determination
on
whether
the
State
program
meets
the
applicable
requirements.
The
tentative
determination
should
be
made
within
90
days.

Complete
and
Final
Request
C
This
submission
must
be
in
accordance
with
§
142.12(
c)(
1)
and
(
2)
and
include
the
Attorney
General's
statement.
The
State
must
also
include
its
response
to
any
comments
and/
or
program
deficiencies
identified
in
the
tentative
determination
(
if
applicable).
Regions
should
make
States
aware
that
submission
of
only
a
final
request
may
make
it
more
difficult
for
the
States
to
address
any
necessary
changes
within
the
allowable
time
for
State
rule
adoption.

EPA
requests
that
States
submit
their
complete
and
final
revision
package
within
21
months
of
rule
promulgation.
This
will
ensure
that
States
will
have
interim
primacy
within
24
months
and
will
prevent
States
from
becoming
backlogged
with
revision
applications
to
adopt
future
federal
requirements.
The
State
and
Region
should
agree
to
a
plan
and
timetable
for
submitting
the
State
primacy
revision
application
as
soon
as
possible
after
rule
promulgation
C
ideally
within
5
months
of
promulgation.

4b(
ii)(
b)
PWS
Activities
Each
PWS
is
required
to
take
samples
at
intervals
specified
in
this
rule
and
keep
records
of
the
data
obtained
during
sampling.
Owners
and
operators
of
PWSs
are
required
to
report
laboratory
results
to
the
State
(
or
to
the
Agency
in
non­
primacy
States)
at
frequencies
specified
in
the
Federal
and
State
regulations
implemented
under
the
SDWA.
In
general,
each
PWS
will
be
involved
in
the
following
activities:


reading
this
rule;


planning
activities
as
required
by
this
rule;


training
staff;


gathering
information
by
identifying
sample
sites
and
taking
samples;


gathering
information
by
conducting
tests
on
samples
collected;


processing,
compiling,
and
reviewing
information
collected;


developing
and
distributing
public
notices
when
violations
occur;


producing
and
submitting
reports
and
other
documentation;
and,


recording
and
maintaining
the
information
in
accordance
with
record
keeping
requirements.
18
Detailed
below
are
descriptions
of
the
specific
PWS
activities
that
will
occur
with
implementation
of
this
rule.

PWS
Monitoring
(
40
CFR
§
141.26
(
a)
and
(
b))

Under
the
1976
rule,
CWSs
were
required
to
monitor
and
comply
with
the
MCLs
for
gross
alpha
particle
activity
(
minus
uranium
and
radon),
combined
radium
226
and
228,
and
the
beta
particle
and
photon
emitters.
To
be
consistent
with
other
SDWA
analytes
(
i.
e.
the
chemical
analytes),
this
2000
radionuclides
rule
will
implement
a
standard
monitoring
framework
(
SMF)
for
the
currently
regulated
gross
alpha
particle
activity
and
combined
radium
226/
228
standards
and
the
new
uranium
standard.
Also,
whereas
the
1976
rule
required
samples
to
be
taken
in
the
distribution
system,
this
final
rule
will
require
samples
to
be
taken
at
the
entry
point
to
the
distribution
system.
In
addition,
this
final
rule
will
require
separate
monitoring
for
radium­
226
and
radium­
228
to
determine
compliance
with
the
combined
radium
standard.

Monitoring
for
radionuclides
is
complex,
in
part,
because
of
the
inter­
relationship
of
the
analytes
(
i.
e.,
the
alpha
emitters,
radium­
226,
and
uranium
contribute
to
gross
alpha
activity).
Due
to
this
relationship,
results
from
gross
alpha
and
gross
beta
monitoring
can
be
used
as
a
trigger
to
guide
other
monitoring.
Table
4­
3
summarizes
the
monitoring
framework
for
radionuclides
that
incorporates
the
Standard
Monitoring
Framework
that
allows
reduced
monitoring
under
conditions
where
it
safe
to
do
so.
Through
initial
monitoring,
or
the
use
of
historic
data
(
some
of
which
may
be
formally
grandfathered),
public
water
systems
can
determine
their
reduced
monitoring
frequency
for
gross
alpha,
combined
radiums
and
uranium.
Vulnerable
systems,
which
have
to
monitor
for
beta/
photons,
is
not
allowed
to
reduce
the
monitoring
frequency.

Ideally,
a
system
would
establish
initial
compliance
by
collecting
4
consecutive
quarterly
samples
for
gross
alpha,
radium­
226,
radium­
228,
and
uranium
concurrently,
at
each
entry
point
to
the
distribution
system
(
EPTDS),
during
the
initial
round
of
monitoring.
The
annual
average
of
the
quarterly
results
will
determine
a
system's
reduced
monitoring
frequency.
The
results
from
the
initial
sampling
can
be
used
to
establish
its
continuing
(
repeat)
monitoring
framework.

Table
4­
3.
General
Radionuclides
Monitoring
Frequency
Routine
(
Initial)
Reduced
(
Repeat)

GROSS
ALPHA
PARTICLE
ACTIVITY
CWSs:
Four
consecutive
quarters
of
monitoring
at
each
entry
point,
anytime
during
first
3
years.
Systems
will
be
allowed
to
substitute
historical
distribution
point
data,
in
some
cases,
to
determine
if
they
can
go
to
reduced
monitoring.
Compositing
will
be
allowed.
CWSs:
One
sample
every
three
years
if
previous
monitoring
is
reliably
and
consistently
at
or
below
MCL;
one
sample
every
six
years
if
previous
results
are
reliably
and
consistently
at
or
below
½
MCL;
or
one
sample
every
nine
years
if
previous
monitoring
results
are
reliably
and
consistently
at
or
below
the
detection
limit
(
DL).
19
COMBINED
RADIUM
226
AND
228
CWSs:
If
the
system
has
no
data
for
Ra­
228,
the
system
will
be
required
to
meet
the
4
quarterly
sample
requirement
to
determine
the
baseline.
For
radium­
226,
as
with
the
1976
rule,
a
system
can
substitute
the
gross
alpha
value
for
the
radium­
226
measurement
or
measure
226
specifically.
Systems
will
be
allowed
to
use
historical
data,
if
available.
To
reduce
burden,
after
adding
the
radium
228
and
226
results,
if
the
first
two
quarters
are
less
than
50%
of
the
combined
MCL,
then
the
system
may
be
immediately
be
placed
into
the
"
once
every
six
years"
category;
if
the
first
two
results
are
less
than
the
regulatory
detection
limit,
the
system
may
be
placed
immediately
into
the
"
once
every
nine
years"
category.
Compositing
will
be
allowed
as
long
as
a
system
can
meet
the
DL.
CWSs:
One
sample
every
three
years
if
previous
monitoring
is
reliably
and
consistently
at
or
below
MCL;
one
sample
every
six
years
if
previous
results
are
reliably
and
consistently
at
or
below
½
MCL;
or
one
sample
every
nine
years
if
previous
monitoring
results
are
reliably
and
consistently
at
or
below
the
DL.

URANIUM
CWSs:
Four
consecutive
quarters
of
monitoring
for
uranium
any
time
during
first
3
years.
Gross
alpha
will
be
allowed
to
substitute
for
uranium
when
gross
alpha
values
are
less
than
30
pCi/
L.
If
gross
alpha
is
>
15
pCi/
L,
systems
already
check
for
uranium.
Grandfathering
data
and
compositing
will
be
allowed.
CWSs:
One
sample
every
three
years
if
previous
monitoring
is
reliably
and
consistently
at
or
below
MCL;
one
sample
every
six
years
if
previous
results
are
reliably
and
consistently
at
or
below
½
MCL;
or
one
sample
every
nine
years
if
previous
monitoring
results
are
reliably
and
consistently
at
or
below
the
DL.

BETA
AND
PHOTON
EMITTERS
Vulnerable
CWSs
(
as
designated
by
the
State):
Two
gross
beta
screening
levels
depending
on
location
from
an
emitting
source
or
whether
a
system
is
using
a
contaminated
source.
Systems
within
15
miles
of
a
radioactive
source,
use
a
screen
of
30
pCi/
L;
quarterly
monitoring
for
gross
beta
required,
along
with
annual
monitoring
for
tritium
and
strontium­
90.
If
quarterly
average
>
30
pCi/
L,
speciate
for
radioactive
constituents.
Systems
using
radioactive
contaminated
source,
use
screen
of
15
pCi/
L;
quarterly
monitoring
for
gross
beta
and
I­
131
required,
H­
3
and
Sr­
90
annually.
If
quarterly
>
15,
analyze
for
Sr­
89
and
Cs­
134;
if
>
30,
speciate
for
radioactive
constituents.
Vulnerable
systems
only
(
as
designated
by
the
State):
Since
only
vulnerable
systems
are
required
to
monitor,
no
reduced
monitoring
is
allowed.

Grandfathering
of
data:
Since
gross
alpha
particle
activity,
combined
radium­
226
and
228,
and
beta
particle
and
photon
emitters
have
been
regulated
since
1976,
many
systems
have
historic
data
that
can
be
used
as
an
indicator
of
the
most
likely
radionuclide
activity
levels.
Many
systems
that
have
had
gross
alpha
levels
greater
than
15
pCi/
L
and
had
to
determine
their
adjusted
gross
alpha
to
demonstrate
compliance
already
have
historic
data
on
uranium
as
well.
Depending
on
the
concentrations
of
this
historical
data,
systems
may
opt
to
collect
some
or
all
of
these
samples
to
determine
the
reduced
monitoring
frequency.
This
will
save
systems
some
monitoring
expense
and
burden.
20
Compositing:
Systems
will
still
be
allowed
to
composite
(
over
time
or
temporally)
their
gross
alpha
particle
activity,
radium­
226,
radium­
228,
and
uranium
samples.

PWS
Record
keeping
Requirements
In
addition
to
the
record­
keeping
requirements
that
are
already
required
for
the
currently
regulated
categories
of
radionuclides,
the
standard
record­
keeping
requirements
for
PWSs
monitoring
programs
under
the
SDWA
still
apply
to
the
revisions
to
the
radionuclides.
(
40
CFR
§
141.33,
Records
Maintenance).


Records
of
analyses
should
be
kept
for
at
least
10
years.
Data
may
be
kept
as
laboratory
reports,
or
can
be
transferred
to
tabular
summaries
including
the
date,
place,
and
time
of
sampling;
the
name
of
the
person
who
collected
the
sample;
identification
of
the
sample
as
a
routine
distribution
system
sample,
check
sample,
raw
or
process
water
sample,
or
other
special
purpose
sample;
date
of
analysis;
laboratory
and
person
responsible
for
performing
analysis;
the
analytical
technique/
method
used;
and
the
results
of
the
analysis.


Records
of
action
taken
by
the
system
to
correct
violations
of
primary
drinking
water
regulations
must
be
kept
for
at
least
3
years
after
the
last
action
taken
with
respect
to
the
particular
violation
involved.


Records
concerning
a
variance
or
exemption
granted
to
the
system
must
be
kept
for
at
least
5
years
following
the
expiration
of
such
variance
or
exemption.
PWS
Reporting
Requirements
Reports
to
the
State:
The
standard
reporting
requirements
for
PWS
monitoring
programs
under
the
SDWA
already
apply
to
the
currently
regulated
radionuclides.
The
reporting
requirements
will
apply
to
the
2000
revisions
to
radionuclides.
A
water
supplier
must
report
analysis
results
to
the
State
within
either
the
first
10
days
following
the
month
in
which
the
result
is
received,
or
the
first
10
days
following
the
end
of
the
required
monitoring
period,
as
stipulated
by
the
State,
whichever
of
these
is
shorter.
The
water
supplier
must
report
to
the
State
within
48
hours
the
failure
to
comply
with
any
NPDWRs
(
including
failure
to
comply
with
monitoring
requirements).
The
water
supplier
is
not
required
to
report
analytical
results
to
the
State
in
cases
where
a
State
laboratory
performs
the
analysis
and
reports
the
results
to
the
State
office.
The
water
supply
system,
within
ten
days
of
completion
of
each
public
notification
required
pursuant
to
SDWA
§
141.32,
must
submit
to
the
State
a
representative
copy
of
each
type
of
notice
distributed,
published,
posted,
and/
or
made
available
to
the
persons
served
by
the
system
and/
or
to
the
media.
The
water
supply
system
must
submit
to
the
State
within
the
time
stated
in
the
request
copies
of
any
records
required
to
be
maintained
under
SDWA
§
141.33
hereof
or
copies
of
any
documents
then
in
existence
which
the
State
or
the
Administrator
is
entitled
to
inspect
pursuant
to
the
authority
of
SDWA
§
1445
of
the
Safe
Drinking
Water
Act
or
the
equivalent
provisions
of
State
law.

4c
ICR
Approval
Activities
21
The
preponderance
of
the
burden
associated
with
this
rule
does
not
occur
during
the
first
three
years
after
promulgation
(
ICR
approval
period).
Typically,
the
activities
that
will
occur
during
this
ICR
approval
period
will
include
the
following:


reading
the
rule;


statutory
and
regulatory
adoption;


planning
and
budgeting
for
the
program;


training
personnel
to
implement
the
program;


acquiring
equipment,
materials,
and
other
supplies;


updating
public
information
notifications;


laboratory
expansions
and
certifications;


technical
assistance
and
development
of
guidance
and
training
materials;


reviewing
plans
and
specifications;
and

enforcement
staff
training.

Burden
and
cost
estimates
associated
with
both
the
ICR
Approval
Period
and
the
post­
ICR
approval
period
are
provided
in
Exhibits
1
and
6,
respectively,
presented
at
the
end
of
this
ICR.
22
5
THE
INFORMATION
COLLECTED
 
AGENCY
ACTIVITIES,
COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY,
AND
INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
The
following
sections
describe
the
Agency's
activities
related
to
analyzing,
maintaining,
and
distributing
the
information
collected.

5a
Agency
Activities
The
Agency
will
be
responsible
for
promulgating
this
rule
and
overseeing
its
implementation.
Implementation
of
monitoring
requirements
will
rely
extensively
on
State
governments
in
those
States
that
have
assumed
primacy
under
the
SDWA.
The
Agency
will
be
involved
in
the
following
activities:


Developing
this
rule
and
guidance
materials;


Reviewing
and
analyzing
data
submissions
from
the
States;
and,


Processing
and
maintaining
SDWIS.

5b
Collection
Methodology
and
Management
No
specific
requirements
on
information
collection
methodology
and
management
are
mandated
in
this
rule.
PWSs
are
expected
to
be
responsible
for
validating
the
information
collected.

5c
Small
Entity
Flexibility
The
Regulatory
Flexibility
Act
requires
the
Agency
to
explicitly
consider
the
effects
of
regulations
on
small
entities
and
develop
a
regulatory
flexibility
analysis
(
RFA)
describing
these
impacts.
For
the
purposes
of
this
rule,
the
Agency
defines
small
entities
as
PWSs
that
serve
fewer
than
10,000
people.
The
Agency
regards
any
impact
on
small
entities
as
significant.

It
is
believed
that
the
provisions
of
these
regulations
intended
to
minimize
the
burden
on
all
PWSs
will
significantly
reduce
the
burden
on
small
water
systems.
A
RFA
incorporated
in
the
Health,
Risk
Reduction,
and
Cost
Analysis
(
HRRCA)
supporting
this
rule
describes
the
steps
considered
by
the
Agency
to
minimize
the
burden
on
small
entities.
These
provisions
are
described
below.

Minimizing
Burden
The
Agency
is
promulgating
monitoring
requirements
that
meet
the
goal
of
achieving
compliance
and
providing
efficient
use
of
the
State
and
PWS
resources
to
decrease
the
overall
national
costs
of
this
rule.
The
Agency
has
taken
steps
to
minimize
the
burden
on
PWSs.
These
measures
include
the
following:


Designating
sampling
locations
and
frequencies
that
permit
simultaneous
monitoring
for
all
regulated
contaminants
whenever
possible
and
advantageous.
23

Using
recent
monitoring
data
in
lieu
of
conducting
initial
monitoring
for
systems
that
are
currently
conducting
a
monitoring
program
using
reliable
methods.


Allowing
States
to
use
historical
monitoring
data
reflecting
and
other
available
records
to
make
decisions
regarding
vulnerability.


Providing
latitude
to
the
States
to
target
monitoring
efforts
based
on
the
vulnerability
of
the
system
to
a
particular
contaminant
if
its
occurrence
is
not
widespread,
thus
avoiding
unnecessary
monitoring
efforts.


Reducing
the
frequency
of
monitoring
for
systems
that
obtain
occurrence
data
consistently
and
reliably
below
MCLs.


Allowing
the
compositing
of
gross
alpha
and
uranium
samples.


Allowing
initial
monitoring
to
be
phased­
in
over
the
first
three­
year
compliance
cycle
in
order
to
allow
States
enough
time
to
obtain
necessary
resources.

Consideration
of
Alternatives
The
Agency
developed
and
considered
several
alternatives
for
each
of
the
key
provisions
of
the
final
rule.
The
development
and
evaluation
of
alternatives
included
the
following
tasks:


Examination
of
available
analytical
methods
for
assessing
compliance
with
MCLs
and/
or
performance
requirements
to
determine
whether
they
were
economically
and
technologically
feasible;


Identification
of
pertinent
compliance
monitoring
issues;


Evaluation
of
available
occurrence
data
to
determine
the
adequacy
of
existing
interim
drinking
water
regulations
for
radionuclides;


Requesting
comments
from
water
systems,
State
regulators,
and
the
scientific
community
to
redefine
alternatives
and
select
the
proposed
requirements;
and,


Projecting
costs
and
burden
associated
with
the
monitoring
requirements.

5d
Collection
Schedule
The
Agency
has
considered
a
wide
range
of
alternatives
for
frequency
of
data
collection,
and
has
chosen
the
option
requiring
the
least
frequent
collection
possible
while
still
remaining
consistent
with
its
overall
monitoring
objectives.
Where
possible,
State
discretion
in
adjusting
these
24
frequencies
has
been
allowed.
Monitoring
frequencies
for
public
water
systems
have
been
carefully
devised
based
on
the
following
factors:


type
of
contaminant;


type
and
size
of
system;


system
vulnerability;
and

contaminant
occurrence
history.

As
described
in
Section
4
of
this
ICR,
this
proposed
rule
applies
the
Standard
Monitoring
Framework
(
SMF)
to
monitoring
and
allows
for
reduced
monitoring
under
conditions
where
the
health
and
safety
of
the
public
is
reasonably
assured.

The
effective
date
for
the
revised
radionuclides
drinking
water
regulation
is
November
2003
and
all
systems
must
complete
the
initial
monitoring
requirements
by
December
31,
2007.
The
timetable
and
key
dates
for
the
Radionuclides
Regulation
are
presented
in
Table
5­
1.
The
table
is
based
on
a
promulgation
date
of
November
2000
for
the
radionuclides
final
rule.

Table
5
­
1:
Public
Water
System
Timetable
for
the
Radionuclides
Requirements
Actual
or
Potential
Date
Radionuclides
Rule
Action
or
Requirements
July
9,
1976
Radionuclides
Drinking
Water
Regulation
Final
Rule
July
18,
1991
Revised
Radionuclides
Proposed
Rule
June
24,
1996
Data
collected
at
the
entry
point
to
the
distribution
system
after
6/
96
can
be
used
as
grandfathered
data
to
satisfy
the
initial
monitoring
requirements
for
gross
alpha,
radium­
226/
228
and
uranium.
(
Note:
All
systems
with
1
EPTDS
can
use
grandfathered
data
at
the
States
discretion.)

April
21,
2000
Revised
Radionuclides
Notice
of
Data
Availability
(
NODA).

Nov.
2000
Revised
Radionuclides
Final
Rule.

Nov.
2002
State
primacy
revision
application
package
due.

Nov.
2003
Rule
effective
date.

Nov.
2004
State
primacy
revision
application
package
due
for
those
States
requesting
2
year
extensions.

Jan
1,
2005
All
systems
must
begin
initial
monitoring.

Dec
31,
2007
All
systems
must
complete
initial
monitoring.

If
the
rule
is
finalized
in
November
of
2000,
enforcement
of
the
new
monitoring
requirements
would
begin
in
November
of
2003.
If
the
Agency
implements
a
one
year
extension,
water
systems
would
have
until
November
of
2007
to
complete
the
required
initial
monitoring.
This
25
would
allow
for
the
"
one
third
of
systems
per
year"
strategy
in
the
SMF,
while
allowing
one
additional
year
to
address
laboratory
capacity
issues.
26
6
ESTIMATING
THE
BURDEN
AND
COST
OF
THE
COLLECTION
The
following
sections
discuss
costs
and
burden
for
monitoring
requirements
associated
with
this
rule.

6a
Estimating
Respondent
Burden
and
Cost
The
following
sections
discuss
and
compare
the
costs
and
burden
faced
by
the
States
and
PWSs
.
This
analysis
also
separates
the
start­
up
activities
from
the
routine,
annual
monitoring
activities.

Table
6­
1
provides
a
summary
of
the
total
respondents,
responses,
burden
and
costs
associated
with
the
implementation
of
this
rule
for
PWSs
and
States
associated
with
the
ICR
approval
period.
The
figures
in
this
table
are
disaggregated
by
year
in
Exhibit
1,
which
in
turn
is
supported
by
Exhibits
2,
3,
4,
and
5
presented
at
the
conclusion
of
this
ICR.

Table
6­
1.
Summary
of
Burden
and
Costs
for
the
Radionuclides
Rule
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Respondent
Category
Number
of
Respondents
Annually
Number
of
Responses
Annually
Total
Annual
Burden
Total
Annual
Labor
Costs
Total
Annual
Capital
Cost
Total
Annual
O&
M
Cost
PWSs
53,121
(
preparation
only)
336,433
$
9,925,042
0
0
States
56
33
(
2
per
respondent
over
3
year
period)
6,440
$
247,905
0
0
TOTAL
53,177
33
342,873
$
10,172,947
0
0
Table
6­
2
provides
a
summary
of
the
total
respondents,
responses,
burden
and
costs
associated
with
the
implementation
of
this
rule
for
PWSs
and
States
associated
with
the
post­
ICR
approval
period.
The
figures
in
this
table
are
supported
by
Exhibit
6,
which
in
turn
is
supported
by
Exhibits
7,
8,
9,
and
10
presented
at
the
conclusion
of
this
ICR.
27
Table
6­
2.
Summary
of
Burden
and
Costs
for
the
Radionuclides
Rule
for
the
Post­
ICR
Approval
Period
Respondent
Category
Number
of
Respondents
Annually
Number
of
Responses
Annually
Total
Annual
Burden
(
hours)
Total
Annual
Labor
Costs
Total
Annual
Capital
Cost
Total
Annual
O&
M
Cost
(
Monitoring)

PWSs
53,121
50,394
25,197
$
537,574
0
$
4,855,439
States
56
224
4,170
$
63,723
0
$
63,723
TOTAL
53,177
50,618
29,367
$
601,297
0
$
4,919,162
(
i)
Burden
and
Cost
to
PWSs
The
sections
below
describe
the
activities
and
other
assumptions
that
affect
the
burden
and
cost
analysis
for
PWSs
provided
in
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
2.

(
a)
Start­
up
Activities
Start
up
activities
for
PWS
include
reading
the
final
rule
to
become
familiar
with
the
requirements
and
training
staff
to
perform
the
required
activities.
Since
States
will
be
mainly
responsible
for
understanding
and
adopting
these
regulations
and
for
notifying
PWSs
of
specific
rule
requirements,
especially
small
systems,
PWSs
are
believed
to
bear
a
relatively
moderate
burden
and
cost
in
conducting
these
activities.

For
PWSs,
labor
costs
per
hour
are
assumed
to
range
from
$
32
for
supervisory
staff
to
$
18
for
an
administrative
assistant
in
year
2000
dollars.
Labor
costs
of
reading
and
training
are
estimated
by
multiplying
the
hours
estimated
to
read
the
rule
and
train
staff
by
each
labor
category
to
estimate
the
cost
per
system.
This
number
was
then
multiplied
by
the
number
of
systems
expected
to
have
to
change
their
monitoring
requirements
under
this
rule.
(
See
Worksheet
1)

(
b)
Annual
Monitoring
Monitoring
activities
for
PWSs
will
begin
three
years
following
promulgation
of
the
rule.
Thus
there
will
be
no
monitoring
burden
or
cost
during
the
ICR
approval
period.

Monitoring
costs
during
the
post­
ICR
approval
period
represent
the
burden
and
cost
incurred
by
implementing
this
rule,
and
do
not
include
existing
monitoring
efforts.
(
See
Worksheet
2)
28
(
ii)
Burden
and
Cost
to
States
The
sections
below
describe
the
activities
and
other
assumptions
that
affect
the
burden
and
cost
analysis
for
States
provided
in
Tables
6­
1
and
6­
2.

(
a)
Start­
up
Activities
State
start­
up
costs
are
more
extensive
than
for
PWSs,
since
States
must
implement
the
rule.
State
start­
up
costs
are
estimated
using
labor
hour
assumptions
for
each
anticipated
activity.
One
FTE
is
assumed
to
work
1,680
person
hours
per
year.
The
number
of
labor
hours
estimated
for
each
activity
is
multiplied
by
the
appropriate
labor
rate
to
obtain
the
start­
up
costs.
(
See
Worksheet
3)

(
b)
Annual
Activities
States
will
begin
annual
activities
when
PWSs
begin
monitoring.
State
costs
and
burden
for
annual
activities
are
calculated
on
the
basis
of
the
number
of
analyses
that
the
States
will
be
supervising.
State
activities
consist
primarily
of
keeping
records
received
from
PWSs
and
coordinating
activities
with
the
Agency.
States
must
also
submit
information
to
SDWIS
to
assist
both
the
Agency
and
States
in
tracking
PWS
compliance.
(
See
Worksheet
4)

6b
Timeframe
for
Cost
and
Burden
Estimates
The
effective
date
for
the
revised
radionuclides
drinking
water
regulation
is
November
2003
and
all
systems
must
complete
the
initial
monitoring
requirements
by
December
31,
2007,
based
on
a
promulgation
date
of
November
2000
for
the
radionuclides
final
rule.
If
the
rule
is
finalized
in
November
of
2000,
enforcement
of
the
new
monitoring
requirements
would
begin
in
November
of
2003.
If
the
Agency
implements
a
one
year
extension,
water
systems
would
have
until
November
of
2007
to
complete
the
required
initial
monitoring.
All
PWSs
will
have
begun
monitoring
by
January
1,
2005,
and
all
PWSs
will
have
completed
initial
monitoring
by
December
31,
2007.

States
will
begin
their
start­
up
activities
in
Year
1
(
November
2000
to
October
2001)
in
order
to
be
prepared
to
regulate
the
monitoring
activities
that
will
begin
in
Year
4
(
starting
November
2003).
State
annual
cost
and
burden
are
assumed
to
be
incurred
in
the
same
schedule
and
proportion
as
PWS
monitoring
during
the
transition
period
between
2004
and
2007.

6c
Estimating
Agency
Burden
and
Cost
Agency
costs
include
those
incurred
by
regional
offices
and
headquarters
to
process,
analyze,
and
maintain
SDWIS
for
the
additional
information
generated
by
this
rule.
This
additional
cost
is
not
believed
to
be
significant
relative
to
the
overall
level
of
effort
for
all
other
monitored
contaminants.

6d
Respondent
Universe
29
There
are
approximately
53,121
PWSs
and
56
States
and
Territories
considered
in
this
Information
Collection
Request.

6e
Bottom
Line
Burden
Hours
and
Costs
Table
6­
3
presents
the
average
annual
respondent
burden
over
the
three
year
ICR
approval
period
for
PWSs
and
States.

Table
6­
3.
Average
Burden,
Respondents,
and
Responses
During
the
Three­
Year
ICR
Approval
Period
PWSs
States
TOTAL
Average
Burden
Hours
per
Year
336,433
6,440
342,873
Average
Respondents
per
Year
53,121
56
53,177
Average
Burden
Hours
per
Respondent
per
Year
6
115
121
Average
Responses
per
Year
0
(
preparation
only)
33
33
Average
Burden
Hours
per
Response
per
Year
0
(
preparation
only)
17
17
Average
Responses
per
Respondent
per
Year
0
(
preparation
only)
.66
(
2
over
3
year
period)
.66
6f
Reasons
for
Change
in
Burden
National
burden
estimates
increase
because
of
the
preparation
costs
borne
by
States
and
PWSs
for
the
new
rule
(
displayed
previously
in
Figure
6­
1),
and
three
monitoring
requirements
under
the
2000
final
radionuclides
rule
(
see
Table
6­
4):

°
the
requirement
for
separate
monitoring
of
radium­
228
and
radium­
226
(
§
141.26(
a))
°
the
adoption
of
the
uranium
MCL
of
30
ug/
L
(
§
141.66(
e))
and
its
monitoring
requirements
(
§
141.26(
a));
and
30
°
the
requirement
for
entry
point
monitoring
as
part
of
the
standard
monitoring
(
§
141.26
(
a)
and
(
b)).

To
alleviate
much
of
the
burden
associated
with
these
changes,
the
Agency
is
allowing
grandfathering
for
many
systems
which
have
historical
data
[
§
141.26(
a)(
2)(
ii)],
compositing
for
certain
categories
of
radionuclides
[
§
141.26(
a)(
4)]
and
a
gross
alpha
screen
to
substitute
(
under
some
circumstances)
for
uranium
[
§
141.26)(
a)(
8)].
In
order
to
determine
compliance
with
gross
alpha
(
excluding
radon
and
uranium),
many
systems
which
had
a
gross
alpha
value
greater
than
15
pCi/
L
will
also
have
historical
data
on
uranium.
These
systems
will
be
allowed
(
with
State
discretion)
to
grandfather
this
uranium
data.

It
should
be
noted
that
the
1993
Public
Water
Supply
Supervision
Program
ICR
estimated
annual
burden
and
cost
for
radionuclides
at
5,637
hours
and
$
594,790.
For
this
ICR
and
for
comparison,
the
burden
and
costs
for
the
current
rule
(
1976)
were
recalculated
to
establish
a
more
detailed
baseline.
The
recalculated
1976
baseline
burden
and
cost
are
shown
in
Table
6­
4
After
adjustment
of
the
radionuclides
portion
of
the
programmatic
ICR
to
year
2000
dollars
($
678,061),
this
ICR
estimates
the
1976
baseline
($
2,004,674)
to
be
above
the
values
calculated
in
the
programmatic
ICR.

6g
Burden
Statement
The
annual
burden
for
this
Information
Collection
Request
is
estimated
to
be
19
hours
per
PWS
respondent
and
345
hours
per
State
for
the
three­
year
ICR
approval
period
(
2001­
2003),
including
time
for
reading
and
reviewing
the
rule
and
training
the
staff
necessary
to
comply
with
the
rule.

Burden
means
the
total
time,
effort,
or
financial
resources
expended
by
persons
to
generate,
maintain,
retain,
disclose,
or
provide
information
to
or
for
a
Federal
agency.
This
includes
the
time
needed
to
review
instructions;
adjust
the
existing
schedule
to
comply
with
any
previously
applicable
instruction
and
requirements;
train
personnel
to
be
able
to
respond
to
the
information
collection
requirements;
and,
transmit
or
otherwise
disclose
the
information.
An
agency
may
not
conduct
or
sponsor,
and
a
person
is
not
required
to
respond
to,
a
collection
of
information
unless
it
displays
a
currently
valid
OMB
control
number.
The
OMB
control
numbers
for
the
Agency's
regulations
are
listed
in
40
CFR
Part
9
and
48
CFR
Chapter
15.
31
Table
6­
4.
Comparison
of
Monitoring
Burden
and
Costs
Associated
with
2000
Radionuclides
Rule
with
the
1976
Rule
(
see
Appendix
for
the
derivation
monitoring
burden
and
cost
by
scenario)

Total
Analyses
Total
Burden
(
hours)
Annual
Burden
(
hours)
23
Year
Total
Cost
($,
present
value)
23
Yr.
Annual
Cost
($,
present
value)

1976
Baseline
Gross
Alpha
323,252
161,626
7,027
7,310,686
648,560
Gross
Beta
293,250
146,625
6,375
10,072,779
893,596
Combined
Radiums
30,490
15,245
663
1,091,458
96,828
TOTAL
646,992
323,496
14,065
18,474,923
1,638,984
PWS
labor
rate
26
26
26
26
PWS
labor
costs
8,410,896
365,690
4,410,734
391,294
Total
PWS
costs
26,885,819
2,004,674
2000
Rule
Gross
Alpha
254,638
127,319
5,536
4,953,727
439,565
Gross
Beta
423,646
211,823
9,210
12,833,302
1,138,493
Combined
Radiums
453,427
226,713
9,857
29,163,035
2,587,167
Uranium
27,345
13,672
594
1,720,814
152,660
TOTAL
1,159,056
579,527
25,197
48,670,878
4,317,885
PWS
labor
rate**
26
26
26
26
PWS
labor
costs
($)
15,067,702
655,122
6,059,637
537,574
Total
PWS
costs
($)
54,730,515
4,855,439
*
7%
discount
rate
**
dollars
per
hour,
fully
loaded
32
7
SURVEY
INFORMATION
This
information
collection
is
not
a
survey.
33
EXHIBIT
1.
BURDEN,
RESPONDENTS,
RESPONSES,
AND
COSTS
FOR
THE
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
PWSs
Source
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Annual
Average
Burden
(
hours)
Exhibit
2
424,968
371,847
212,484
336,433
Respondents
(
number)
Exhibit
3
53,121
53,121
53,121
53,121
Responses
(
number)
Exhibit
4
0
0
0
0
Costs*
(
dollars)
Exhibit
5
$
11,686,620
$
9,880,506
$
5,843,310
$
9,925,042
STATES
Source
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Annual
Average
Burden
(
hours)
Exhibit
2
6,440
6,160
6,720
6,440
Respondents
(
number)
Exhibit
3
56
56
56
56
Responses
(
number)
Exhibit
4
49
49
0
32.7
Costs*
(
dollars)
Exhibit
5
$
259,056
$
240,224
$
151,298
$
247,905
*
Present
Value
over
3
years
34
EXHIBIT
2.
BURDEN
ESTIMATES
FOR
THE
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
HOURS)

PWSs
(
see
Worksheet
1)

Activity
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
Annual
Average
Read
and
Understand
Rule
424,968
424,968
141,656
Mobilization
and
Planning
371,847
371,847
123,949
Train
PWS
Staff
212,484
212,484
70,828
TOTAL
424,968
371,847
212,484
1,009,299
336,433
STATES
(
see
Worksheet
3)

Activity
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
Annual
Average
Read
and
Understand
Rule
560
560
187
Mobilization
and
Planning
2,240
2,240
747
Train
State
Staff
2,240
2,240
747
Train
PWS
Staff
and
Provide
Technical
Assistance
4,480
4,480
1,493
Primacy
Application
Revision
and
Regulation
Adoption
5,880
3,920
9,800
3,267
TOTAL
6,440
6,160
6,720
19,320
6,440
35
EXHIBIT
3.
RESPONDENT
ESTIMATES
FOR
THE
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
NUMBER)

PWSs
Activity
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Read
and
Understand
Rule
53,121
Mobilization
and
Planning
53,121
Train
PWS
Staff
53,121
STATES
Activity
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Read
and
Understand
Rule
56
Mobilization
and
Planning
56
56
Train
State
Staff
56
Train
PWS
Staff
and
Provide
Technical
Assistance
56
Primacy
Application
Revision
and
Regulation
Adoption
49
49
36
EXHIBIT
4.
RESPONSES
ESTIMATES
FOR
THE
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
NUMBER)

PWSs
Activity
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Read
and
Understand
Rule*
0
0
0
Mobilization
and
Planning*
0
0
0
Train
State
Staff*
0
0
0
*
No
responses
are
applicable,
preparation
activities
only.

STATES
Activity
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Read
and
Understand
Rule*
0
0
0
Mobilization
and
Planning*
0
0
0
Train
State
Staff*
0
0
0
Train
PWS
Staff
and
Provide
Technical
Assistance*
0
0
0
Primacy
Application
Revision
and
Regulation
Adoption
49**
49***
0
*
No
responses
are
applicable,
preparation
activities
only.
**
Draft
Primacy
Revision
Applications
***
Final
Primacy
Revisions
Applications
37
EXHIBIT
5.
COST
ESTIMATES
FOR
THE
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
DOLLARS)

PWSs
(
see
Worksheet
1)

Activity
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
Present
Value*
Annualized
Present
Value**

Read
and
Understand
Rule
$
11,686,620
$
11,686,620
$
4,453,206
Mobilization
and
Planning
$
9,880,506
$
9,234,118
$
3,518,676
Train
PWS
Staff
$
5,843,310
$
5,125,710
$
1,953,160
TOTAL
$
11,686,620
$
9,880,506
$
5,843,310
$
26,046,448
$
9,925,042
*
discount
rate
=
7%;
**
calculated
over
3
years
STATES
(
see
Worksheet
3)

Activity
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
Present
Value*
Annualized
Present
Value**

Read
and
Understand
Rule
$
16,016
$
16,016
$
6,103
Mobilization
and
Planning
$
57,120
$
53,383
$
20,342
Train
State
Staff
$
57,120
$
50,105
$
19,093
Train
PWS
Staff
and
Provide
Technical
Assistance
$
115,360
$
101,193
$
38,560
Primacy
Application
Revision
and
Regulation
Adoption
$
243,040
$
199,920
$
429,881
$
163,807
TOTAL
$
259,056
$
257,040
$
172,480
$
650,578
$
247,905
*
discount
rate
=
7%;
**
calculated
over
3
years
38
EXHIBIT
6.
BURDEN,
RESPONDENTS,
RESPONSES,
AND
COSTS
FOR
THE
POSTICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
PWSs
Source
23
Year
Total
Annual
Average
Burden
(
hours)
Exhibit
7
579,527
25,197
Respondents
(
number)
Exhibit
8
53,121
17,707
Responses
(
number)
Exhibit
9
1,159,056
50,394
Costs
(
dollars)*
Exhibit
10
$
54,730,515
$
4,855,439
STATES
Source
23
Year
Total
Annual
Average
Burden
(
hours)
Exhibit
7
69,543
3,024
Respondents
(
number)
Exhibit
8
56
56
Responses
(
number)
Exhibit
9
5,152
224
Costs
(
dollars)*
Exhibit
10
$
718,299
$
63,723
*
discounted
over
23
years
at
7%
39
EXHIBIT
7.
BURDEN
ESTIMATE
FOR
THE
POST­
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
HOURS)

PWSs
(
see
Worksheet
2)

Activity
Radionuclide
23
Year
Total
Annual
Average
Sample
Collection
Gross
Alpha
127,319
5,536
Sample
Collection
Gross
Beta
211,823
9,210
Sample
Collection
Combined
Radiums
226,713
9,857
Sample
Collection
Uranium
13,672
594
Total
579,527
25,197
STATES
(
see
Worksheet
4)

Activity
23
Year
Total
Annual
Average
Record
keeping
13,909
605
Reporting
30,135
1,310
Compliance
Tracking
and
Analysis
25,499
1,109
Total
69,543
3,024
40
EXHIBIT
8.
RESPONDENTS
ESTIMATE
FOR
THE
POST­
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
NUMBER)

PWSs
Activity
Radionuclide
23
Year
Total
Universe
Annual
Estimate
Sample
Collection
and
Analysis
Gross
Alpha
53,121
17,707*

Sample
Collection
and
Analysis
Gross
Beta
2,114
2,114
Sample
Collection
and
Analysis
Combined
Radiums
53,121
17,707*

Sample
Collection
and
Analysis
Uranium
1,507
644
Total
53,121
17,707*

*
estimate
based
on
SMF
goal
of
1/
3
per
year
STATES
Activity
23
Year
Total
Universe
Annual
Estimate
Record
keeping
56
56
Reporting
56
56
Compliance
Tracking
and
Analysis
56
56
Total
56
56
41
EXHIBIT
9.
RESPONSES
ESTIMATE
FOR
THE
POST­
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
(
NUMBER)

PWSs
(
see
Worksheet
2)

Activity
Radionuclide
23
Year
Total
Annual
Average
Analyses
Gross
Alpha
254,638
11,071
Analyses
Gross
Beta
423,646
18,419
Analyses
Combined
Radiums
453,427
19,714
Analyses
Uranium
27,345
1,189
Total
1,159,056
50,394
STATES
Activity
23
Year
Total
Annual
Average
Record
keeping
0
0
Reporting
5,152
224
Compliance
Tracking
and
Analysis
0*
0*

Total
5,152
224
*
integrated
with
quarterly
reporting
42
EXHIBIT
10.
COST
ESTIMATE
FOR
THE
POST­
ICR
APPROVAL
PERIOD
BY
ACTIVITY
BY
YEAR
(
DOLLARS)

PWSs
(
see
Worksheet
2)

Activity
Radionuclide
23
Year
Total*
Annual
Average*

Analysis
Gross
Alpha
$
4,953,727
$
439,565
Analysis
Gross
Beta
$
12,833,302
$
1,138,493
Analysis
Combined
Radiums
$
29,163,035
$
2,587,167
Analysis
Uranium
$
1,720,814
$
152,660
Sample
Collection
­
all
radionuclides­
$
6,059,637
$
537,574
Total
$
54,730,515
$
4,855,439
STATES
(
see
Worksheet
4)

Activity
23
Year
Total*
Annual
Average*

Record
keeping
$
129,294
$
11,470
Reporting
$
280,137
$
24,852
Compliance
Tracking
and
Analysis
$
308,869
$
27,401
Total
$
718,299
$
63,723
*
discounted
over
23
years
at
7%
43
WORKSHEET
1
ASSUMPTIONS
AND
ANALYSIS
FOR
PWS
START
UP
ACTIVITIES
ACTIVITIES
FOR
EACH
PWS
Read
and
Understand
Rule
STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Supervisor
2
$
32/
hr
$
64
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
6
$
26/
hr
$
156
Administrative
Asst.
$
18/
hr
TOTAL
8
$
220
Mobilization
and
Planning
STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Supervisor
2
$
32/
hr
$
64
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
4
$
26/
hr
$
104
Administrative
Asst.
1
$
18/
hr
$
18
TOTAL
7
$
186
Train
PWS
Staff
STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Supervisor
1
$
32/
hr
$
32
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
3
$
26/
hr
$
78
Administrative.
Asst.
$
18/
hr
TOTAL
4
$
110
44
NATIONAL
SUMMARIES
FOR
INITIAL
THREE­
YEAR
PERIOD
BURDEN
TOTAL
COST
ANNUALIZED
COST*

19
hours
per
PWS
x
53,121
PWSs
=
1,009,299
hours
or
601
FTE
$
516
per
PWS
x
53,121
PWSs
=
$
27,410,436
or
$
27.16
per
hour
$
9,789,460
*
at
7%
over
3
years
assuming
costs
are
spread
evenly
over
first
three
years
45
WORKSHEET
2.
ASSUMPTIONS
AND
ANALYSIS
FOR
PWS
MONITORING
ACTIVITIES
(
see
Appendix
for
derivation
of
cost
and
burden
estimates
for
monitoring
scenarios)

Total
Analyses
Total
Burden
(
hours)
Annual
Burden
(
hours)
23
Year
Total
Cost
($,
present
value)
23
Yr.
Annual
Cost
($,
present
value)
1976
Baseline
Gross
Alpha
323,252
161,626
7,027
7,310,686
648,560
Gross
Beta
293,250
146,625
6,375
10,072,779
893,596
Combined
Radiums
30,490
15,245
663
1,091,458
96,828
TOTAL
646,992
323,496
14,065
18,474,923
1,638,984
PWS
labor
rate
26
26
26
26
PWS
labor
costs
8,410,896
365,690
4,410,734
391,294
Total
PWS
costs
26,885,819
2,004,674
2000
Rule
Gross
Alpha
254,638
127,319
5,536
4,953,727
439,565
Gross
Beta
423,646
211,823
9,210
12,833,302
1,138,493
Combined
Radiums
453,427
226,713
9,857
29,163,035
2,587,167
Uranium
27,345
13,672
594
1,720,814
152,660
TOTAL
1,159,056
579,527
25,197
48,670,878
4,317,885
PWS
labor
rate**
26
26
26
26
PWS
labor
costs
($)
15,067,702
655,122
6,059,637
537,574
Total
PWS
costs
($)
54,730,515
4,855,439
*
7%
discount
rate
**
dollars
per
hour,
fully
loaded
46
WORKSHEET
3
ASSUMPTIONS
AND
ANALYSIS
FOR
STATE
START
UP
ACTIVITIES
GENERAL
PREPARATION
ACTIVITIES
FOR
EACH
JURISDICTION
Read
and
Understand
Rule
(
56
Jurisdictions)

STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Supervisor
4
$
32/
hr
$
128
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
6
$
26/
hr
$
158
Administrative
Asst.
$
18/
hr
TOTAL
10
$
286
Mobilization
and
Planning
(
56
Jurisdictions)

STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Supervisor
10
$
32/
hr
$
320
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
20
$
26/
hr
$
520
Administrative
Asst.
10
$
18/
hr
$
180
TOTAL
40
$
1,020
Train
State
Staff
(
56
Jurisdictions)

STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Supervisor
10
$
32/
hr
$
320
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
20
$
26/
hr
$
520
Administrative
Asst.
10
$
18/
hr
$
180
TOTAL
40
$
1,020
47
Train
PWSs
and
Provide
Technical
Assistance
(
56
Jurisdictions)

STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Supervisor
10
$
32/
hr
$
320
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
60
$
26/
hr
$
1,560
Administrative
Asst.
10
$
18/
hr
$
180
TOTAL
80
$
2,060
STATE
PRIMACY
APPLICATION
REVISIONS
AND
ASSOCIATED
REGULATORY
ADOPTION
Draft
Application
in
Year
1
(
49
Jurisdictions)

STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Lawyer
40
$
80/
hr
$
3,200
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
40
$
26/
hr
$
1,040
Administrative
Asst.
40
$
18/
hr
$
720
TOTAL
120
$
4,960
Final
Application
in
Year
2
(
49
Jurisdictions)

STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Lawyer
40
$
80/
hr
$
3,200
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
20
$
26/
hr
$
520
Administrative
Asst.
20
$
18/
hr
$
360
TOTAL
80
$
4,080
48
NATIONAL
SUMMARIES
FOR
INITIAL
THREE­
YEAR
PERIOD
GENERAL
PREPARATION
ACTIVITIES
FOR
EACH
JURISDICTION
BURDEN
TOTAL
COST
170
hours
per
jurisdiction
x
56
jurisdictions
9,520
=
hours
or
5.7
FTE
$
4,386
per
jurisdiction
x
56
jurisdictions
=
$
245,616
or
$
25.80
per
hour
STATE
PRIMACY
APPLICATION
REVISIONS
AND
ASSOCIATED
REGULATORY
ADOPTION
BURDEN
TOTAL
COST
200
hours
per
jurisdiction
x
49
jurisdictions
=
9,800
hours
or
5.8
FTE
$
9,040
per
jurisdiction
x
49
jurisdictions
=
$
442,960
or
$
45.20
per
hour
THREE
YEAR
NATIONAL
SUMMARY
BURDEN
TOTAL
COST
ANNUALIZED
COSTS*

19,320
hours
or
11.5
FTE
$
688,576
or
$
35.64
per
hour
$
262,383
or
$
4,685
per
jurisdiction
*
over
3
years
at
7%
assuming
all
costs
occur
in
first
year
49
WORKSHEET
4
ASSUMPTIONS
AND
ANALYSIS
FOR
STATE
ACTIVITIES
RELATED
TO
MONITORING
SUPERVISON
Recordkeeping
activities
per
1000
analyses
STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Supervisor
1
$
32/
hr
$
32
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
1
$
26/
hr
$
26
Administrative
Asst.
10
$
18/
hr
$
180
TOTAL
12
$
238
Reporting
Activities
per
1000
analyses
STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Supervisor
1
$
32/
hr
$
32
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
5
$
26/
hr
$
130
Administrative
Asst.
20
$
18/
hr
$
360
TOTAL
26
$
522
Compliance
Tracking
and
Analysis
Activities
per
1000
analyses
STAFF
HOURS
RATE
TOTAL
COST
Supervisor
2
$
32/
hr
$
64
Tech./
Prog.
Analyst
20
$
26/
hr
$
520
Administrative
Asst.
$
18/
hr
TOTAL
22
$
584
50
NATIONAL
SUMMARIES
STATE
BURDEN
AND
COST
FOR
STATES
TO
SUPERVISE
MONITORING
PER
1000
ANALYSES
TOTAL
BURDEN
TOTAL
COST
60
hours
or
.06
hours
per
analysis
(
response)
$
1,344
or
$
22.40
per
hour
or
$
1.34
per
analysis
(
response)

NATIONAL
SUMMARIES
STATE
BURDEN
AND
COST
FOR
STATES
TO
SUPERVISE
MONITORING
FOR
THE
PROPOSED
RULE
­
YEAR
2000
SCENARIOS
TOTAL
BURDEN
TOTAL
COST
1,159,056
total
analyses
at
.06
hours
per
analysis
(
response)

equals
69,543
hours
divide
by
23
years
equals
3,024
hours
per
year
1,159,056
total
analyses
or
$
1.34
per
analysis
(
response)

equals
$
1,553,135
divided
by
20
years
(
Years
4
through
23)
equals
$
77,657
per
year
discounted
at
7%
over
23
years
equals
a
present
value
of
$
718,299
or
an
annualized
cost
of
$
63,723
51
APPENDIX
­
FLOW
CHARTS
AND
COST
SHEETS
FOR
MONITORING
SCENARIOS
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
BASELINE
GROSS
BETA
2000
GROSS
BETA
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
2000
URANIUM
52
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
53
Initial
Monitoring
Perform
Gross
Alpha
Screen
­
Based
on
the
results
of
4
quarterlies
Gross
Alpha
Screen
>
15
Check
for
uranium
and
adjust.

Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
>
15
­
Systems
are
out
of
Compliance
for
Gross
alpha
MCL
­

Assume
that
States
will
require
systems
to
monitor
1
per
yr.

Adjusted
Gross
Alpha
<
15
­
Systems
are
in
compliance
for
gross
alpha
MCL
­
monitor
4
times
in
4
years
Gross
Alpha
between
>
7.5
and
<
or
=
to
15
then
monitor
4
times
in
4
years.

Gross
Alpha
between
<

or
=
to
7.5,
then
1
every
4
years.
Gross
Alpha
­
1976
Baseline
Monitoring
94.7%
ofSmall
CWSs
93.1%
of
Large
CWSs
0.8
%
of
Small
CWSs
1.3%
of
Large
CWSs
Gross
Alpha
Std
=
15
pCi/
L
Cost
of
Analyis
fo
r
GA
is
$
45
Cost
of
Analysis
for
Uranium
is
$
128
Samples
are
taken
from
the
distribution
system
No
Compositing
3.2%
of
Small
CWSs
4.7%
of
Large
CWSs
1.4%
of
Small
CWSs
0.9%
of
Large
CWSs
54
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA<
7.5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
Total
Samples
0
0
0
29738
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
1338210
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
1087976
0
0
GA<
7.5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
Total
Samples
0
0
0
20220
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
909900
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
739756.1
0
0
7.5<
GA<
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
Total
Samples
1005
1005
1005
1005
1005
1005
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
45225
45225
45225
45225
45225
45225
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
45225
42266.36
39671.05
36768.29
34522.9
32303.57
7.5<
GA<
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
1021
1021
1021
1021
1021
1021
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
45945
45945
45945
45945
45945
45945
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
45945
42939.25
40302.63
37353.66
35072.52
32817.86
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
440
440
440
440
440
440
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
19800
19800
19800
19800
19800
19800
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
19800
18504.67
17368.42
16097.56
15114.5
14142.86
55
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA<
7.5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
1
0
0
0
1
Systems
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
Total
Samples
0
29738
0
0
0
29738
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
Total
Cost
0
1338210
0
0
01338210
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
831186.3
0
0
0637242.9
GA<
7.5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
1
0
0
0
1
Systems
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
Total
Samples
0
20220
0
0
0
20220
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
Total
Cost
0
909900
0
0
0
909900
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
565155.3
0
0
0433285.7
7.5<
GA<
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
Total
Samples
1005
1005
1005
1005
1005
1005
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
45225
45225
45225
45225
45225
45225
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
30150
28090.06
26293.6
24578.8
22956.85
21535.71
7.5<
GA<
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
1021
1021
1021
1021
1021
1021
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
45945
45945
45945
45945
45945
45945
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
30630
28537.27
26712.21
24970.11
23322.34
21878.57
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
440
440
440
440
440
440
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
19800
19800
19800
19800
19800
19800
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
13200
12298.14
11511.63
10760.87
10050.76
9428.571
56
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA<
7.5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
Total
Samples
0
0
0
29738
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
1338210
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
484858.7
0
0
GA<
7.5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
Total
Samples
0
0
0
20220
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
909900
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
329673.9
0
0
7.5<
GA<
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
Total
Samples
1005
1005
1005
1005
1005
1005
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
45225
45225
45225
45225
45225
45225
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
20100
18765.56
17529.07
16385.87
15330.51
14311.71
7.5<
GA<
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
1021
1021
1021
1021
1021
1021
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
45945
45945
45945
45945
45945
45945
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
20420
19064.32
17808.14
16646.74
15574.58
14539.56
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
440
440
440
440
440
440
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
19800
19800
19800
19800
19800
19800
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
8800
8215.768
7674.419
7173.913
6711.864
6265.823
57
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA<
7.5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
29,738
Total
Samples
0
29738
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
Total
Cost
0
1338210
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
369671.3
0
0
0
GA<
7.5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
20,220
Total
Samples
0
20220
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
Total
Cost
0
909900
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
251353.6
0
0
0
7.5<
GA<
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
Total
Samples
1005
1005
1005
1005
1005
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
45225
45225
45225
45225
45225
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
13380.18
12493.09
11686.05
10923.91
10208.8
7.5<
GA<
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
1021
1021
1021
1021
1021
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
45945
45945
45945
45945
45945
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
13593.2
12691.99
11872.09
11097.83
10371.33
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
440
440
440
440
440
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
19800
19800
19800
19800
19800
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
5857.988
5469.613
5116.279
4782.609
4469.526
58
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA<
7.5
SM
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
148690
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
3410934.769
GA<
7.5
LG
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
101100
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
2319224.596
7.5<
GA<
15
SM
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
23115
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
545476.9623
7.5<
GA<
15
LG
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
23483
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
554161.1726
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
SM
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
10120
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
238815.7845
59
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
195
195
195
195
195
195
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
8775
8775
8775
8775
8775
8775
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
8775
8200.935
7697.368
7134.146
6698.473
6267.857
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
251
251
251
251
251
251
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
11295
11295
11295
11295
11295
11295
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
11295
10556.07
9907.895
9182.927
8622.137
8067.857
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
282
282
282
282
282
282
Total
Samples
282
282
282
282
282
282
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
12690
12690
12690
12690
12690
12690
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
12690
11859.81
11131.58
10317.07
9687.023
9064.286
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
60
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
195
195
195
195
195
195
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
8775
8775
8775
8775
8775
8775
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
5850
5450.311
5101.744
4769.022
4454.315
4178.571
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
251
251
251
251
251
251
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
11295
11295
11295
11295
11295
11295
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
7530
7015.528
6566.86
6138.587
5733.503
5378.571
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
282
282
282
282
282
282
Total
Samples
282
282
282
282
282
282
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
12690
12690
12690
12690
12690
12690
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
8460
7881.988
7377.907
6896.739
6441.624
6042.857
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
61
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
195
195
195
195
195
195
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
8775
8775
8775
8775
8775
8775
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
3900
3641.079
3401.163
3179.348
2974.576
2776.899
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
251
251
251
251
251
251
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
11295
11295
11295
11295
11295
11295
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
5020
4686.722
4377.907
4092.391
3828.814
3574.367
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
282
282
282
282
282
282
Total
Samples
282
282
282
282
282
282
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
12690
12690
12690
12690
12690
12690
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
5640
5265.56
4918.605
4597.826
4301.695
4015.823
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
62
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
195
195
195
195
195
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
8775
8775
8775
8775
8775
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
2596.154
2424.033
2267.442
2119.565
1980.813
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
SM
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
251
251
251
251
251
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
11295
11295
11295
11295
11295
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
3341.716
3120.166
2918.605
2728.261
2549.661
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
LG
Samples
per
System
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
282
282
282
282
282
Total
Samples
282
282
282
282
282
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
12690
12690
12690
12690
12690
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
3754.438
3505.525
3279.07
3065.217
2864.56
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
63
BASELINE
GROSS
ALPHA
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
LG
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
4485
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
105838.8136
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
SM
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
5773
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
136233.5498
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
LG
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
6486
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
153059.2073
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
7310685.647
YEARS
COVERED
23
INTEREST
RATE
7%
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
($
648,559.63)

TOTAL
SAMPLES
323252
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
0.5
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
161626
YEARS
COVERED
23
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
7027.217391
THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
182835.5017
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
($
69,669.77)
64
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
65
Initial
M
onitoring
P
erform
Gross
Alpha
Screen
­
B
ased
on
the
results
o
f
4
quarterlies
in
3
yrs
Gross
A
lpha
Screen
>

15.
C
heck
for
uranium
and
ad
just.*

Adjusted
G
ross
A
lpha
>
15
­
System
s
a
re
out
of
C
ompliance
fo
r
Gross
a
lpha
M
CL
­

Assume
that
States
will
require
sy
stems
to
monitor
1
/
y
r
Adjusted
G
ross
A
lpha
<
15
­
System
s
a
re
in
compliance
for
gross
a
lpha
M
CL
­
monitor
1
in
9
y
ears**

Gross
A
lpha
between
>

7.5
and
<
or
=
to
15
then
monitor
1
every
3
yrs.

Gross
A
lpha
<
or
=
3
,
then
1
every
9
yrs
Gross
A
lpha
­
2000
Monitoring
(
Scenario
3A:
Initial
m
onitoring
in
Y
rs.
4
­
7,
SM
F
3
yr.
cycles
thereafter)

88.8%
o
f
Small
CWSs
88.4%
o
f
L
arge
CWSs
Gross
A
lpha
S
td
=
15
pC
i/
L
Cost
of
A
nalysis
for
GA
is
$
45
Cost
of
A
nalysis
for
U
ranium
is
$
128
Samples
taken
from
entry
point
to
distribution
system
Assumes
N
o
Compositing
Assumes
grandfathering
for
all
systems
except
those
for
out
o
f
compliance.
Gross
A
lpha
between
>
3
and
<
or
=
to
7
.5,

then
1
every
6
yrs
Can
GF
a
ll
data
Can
GF
a
ll
data
Can
GF
a
ll
data
Assume
all
new
monitoring
­
no
grandfathering
5.9%
of
Small
CWSs
4.7%
of
Large
CWSs
3
.2%
o
f
Small
CWSs
4
.7%
o
f
Large
CWSs
1.4%
of
Small
CWSs
0.9%
of
Large
CWSs
0
.8%
o
f
Small
CWSs
1
.3%
o
f
L
arge
CWSs
*
U
costs
calculated
in
the
U
ranium
scenario.

**
GA
and
U
do
not
u
sua
lly
co­
occur,
so
GA
w
ill
be
v
ery
small.
66
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA<
3
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA<
3
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
3<
GA<
7.5
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
3<
GA<
7.5
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
7.5<
GA<
15
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
67
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA<
3
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
Systems
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
Total
Samples
0
34856.25
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
1568531
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
974243
0
0
0
0
GA<
3
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
Total
Samples
0
0
43776
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
1969920
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
1145302
0
0
0
3<
GA<
7.5
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
Total
Samples
0
0
2316.25
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
104231.3
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
60599.56
0
0
0
3<
GA<
7.5
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
0
0
2327.88
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
104754.6
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
60903.84
0
0
0
7.5<
GA<
15
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
Total
Samples
0
0
0
1256.25
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
56531.25
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
30723.51
0
0
68
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA<
3
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
Systems
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
34856.25
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
1568531
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
531705.5
0
GA<
3
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
Total
Samples
0
0
43776
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
1969920
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
763534.9
0
0
0
3<
GA<
7.5
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
Total
Samples
0
0
2316.25
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
104231.3
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
40399.71
0
0
0
3<
GA<
7.5
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
0
0
2327.88
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
104754.6
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
40602.56
0
0
0
7.5<
GA<
15
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
Total
Samples
1256.25
0
0
1256.25
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
56531.25
0
0
56531.25
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
25125
0
0
20482.34
0
0
69
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA<
3
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
27,885
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA<
3
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
19,200
Total
Samples
0
0
43776
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
1969920
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
509023.3
0
0
3<
GA<
7.5
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
1,853
Total
Samples
0
0
2316.25
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
104231.3
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
26933.14
0
0
3<
GA<
7.5
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
0
0
2327.88
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
104754.6
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
27068.37
0
0
7.5<
GA<
15
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
Systems
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
1,005
Total
Samples
1256.25
0
0
1256.25
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
56531.25
0
0
56531.25
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
16725.22
0
0
13654.89
0
70
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA<
3
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
69712.5
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
1505948.521
GA<
3
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
131328
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
2417860.465
3<
GA<
7.5
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
6948.75
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
127932.4128
3<
GA<
7.5
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
6983.64
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
128574.7674
7.5<
GA<
15
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
6281.25
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
106710.9556
71
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
7.5<
GA<
15
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
128
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
128
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
SM
NO
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
2
1
1
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
0
0
0
627.5
313.75
313.75
Cost
per
Sample
45
128
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
28237.5
14118.75
14118.75
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
22957.32
10777.67
10084.82
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
LG
NO
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
2
1
1
Systems
275
275
275
275
275
275
Total
Samples
0
0
0
1254
627
627
Cost
per
Sample
45
128
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
56430
28215
28215
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
45878.05
21538.17
20153.57
72
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
7.5<
GA<
15
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
0
0
0
2327.88
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
104754.6
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
56931.85
0
0
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
1
0
0
0
0
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
0
550
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
24750
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
15372.67
0
0
0
0
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
1
0
0
0
0
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
0
444.6
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
20007
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
12426.71
0
0
0
0
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
SM
NO
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
313.75
313.75
313.75
313.75
313.75
313.75
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
14118.75
14118.75
14118.75
14118.75
14118.75
14118.75
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
9412.5
8769.41
8208.576
7673.234
7166.878
6723.214
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
LG
NO
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
275
275
275
275
275
275
Total
Samples
627
627
627
627
627
627
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
28215
28215
28215
28215
28215
28215
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
18810
17524.84
16404.07
15334.24
14322.34
13435.71
73
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
7.5<
GA<
15
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
2327.88
0
0
2327.88
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
104755
0
0
104755
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
46557.6
0
0
37954.6
0
0
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
1
0
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
550
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
24750
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
8389.83
0
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
1
0
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
444.6
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
20007
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
6782.03
0
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
SM
NO
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
313.75
313.75
313.75
313.75
313.75
313.75
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
14118.8
14118.8
14118.8
14118.8
14118.8
14118.8
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
6275
5858.4
5472.38
5115.49
4786.02
4467.96
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
LG
NO
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
275
275
275
275
275
275
Total
Samples
627
627
627
627
627
627
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
28215
28215
28215
28215
28215
28215
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
12540
11707.5
10936
10222.8
9564.41
8928.8
74
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
7.5<
GA<
15
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
Systems
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
1,021
Total
Samples
2327.88
0
0
2327.88
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
104755
0
0
104755
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
30992.5
0
0
25303
0
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
SM
NO
GF
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
313.75
313.75
313.75
313.75
313.75
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
14118.8
14118.8
14118.8
14118.8
14118.8
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
4177.14
3900.21
3648.26
3410.33
3187.08
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
LG
NO
GF
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
275
275
275
275
275
Total
Samples
627
627
627
627
627
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
28215
28215
28215
28215
28215
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
8347.63
7794.2
7290.7
6815.22
6369.07
75
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
7.5<
GA<
15
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
11639.4
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
197739.5417
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
SM
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
1100
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
23762.50132
GA>
15
AND
AGA<
15
LG
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
889.2
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
19208.74197
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
SM
NO
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
6588.75
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
142071.8839
GA>
15
and
AGA>
15
LG
NO
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
13167
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
283917.3584
76
2000
GROSS
ALPHA
SCENARIO
3
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
4953727.149
YEARS
COVERED
23
INTEREST
RATE
7%
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
($
439,464.58)

TOTAL
SAMPLES
254638.49
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
0.5
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
127319.245
YEARS
COVERED
23
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
5535.619348
THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
0
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
$
0.00
77
BASELINE
GROSS
BETA
78
SurfaceWater
Systems
>
100,000
or
systems
targeted
as
vulnerable
by
the
State
?
Is
the
system
known
to
be
using
contaminated
source?

Gross
Beta
­
1976
Baseline
Monitoring
Monitoring
not
required
Quarterly
Gross
Beta
screen
of
15
pCi/
L;

quarterly
iodine
131;

and
annual
tritium
and
strontium
Yes
No
No
Yes
Gross
Beta
quarterly
screen
of
50
pCi/
L
and
annual
tritium
and
strontium.

96
%
of
CWSs
4
%
of
CWSs
0
%
of
CWSs
Monthly
gross
beta
and
quarterly
tritium
and
strontium
Quarterly
Gross
Beta;
annual
tritium
and
strontium
>
4
mrem
<
or
=
4
mrem
0
%
of
CWSs
4
%
of
CWSs
Gross
Beta
MCL
=
4
mrem
Gross
Beta
analysis
$
45
Tritium
analysis
=
$
60
Strontium
analysis
=
$
153
Iodine
131
analysis
=
$
131
79
BASELINE
GROSS
BETA
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
Not
Vulnerable
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
<
4
Samples
per
System
6
6
6
6
6
6
Systems
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
Total
Samples
12750
12750
12750
12750
12750
12750
Cost
per
Sample
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
Total
Cost
835125
835125
835125
835125
835125
835125
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
835125
780490.7
732565.8
678963.4
637500
596517.9
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
>
4
Samples
per
System
20
20
20
20
20
20
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
known
contam.
Samples
per
System
10
10
10
10
10
10
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
80
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
81
BASELINE
GROSS
BETA
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
Not
Vulnerable
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
<
4
Samples
per
System
6
6
6
6
6
6
Systems
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
Total
Samples
12750
12750
12750
12750
12750
12750
Cost
per
Sample
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
Total
Cost
835125
835125
835125
835125
835125
835125
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
556750
518711.2
485537.8
453872.3
423921.3
397678.6
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
>
4
Samples
per
System
20
20
20
20
20
20
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
known
contam.
Samples
per
System
10
10
10
10
10
10
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
82
83
BASELINE
GROSS
BETA
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
Not
Vulnerable
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
<
4
Samples
per
System
6
6
6
6
6
6
Systems
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
Total
Samples
12750
12750
12750
12750
12750
12750
Cost
per
Sample
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
Total
Cost
835125
835125
835125
835125
835125
835125
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
371166.7
346524.9
323691.9
302581.5
283093.2
264280.1
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
>
4
Samples
per
System
20
20
20
20
20
20
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
known
contam.
Samples
per
System
10
10
10
10
10
10
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
84
85
BASELINE
GROSS
BETA
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
Not
Vulnerable
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
<
4
Samples
per
System
6
6
6
6
6
Systems
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
2,125
Total
Samples
12750
12750
12750
12750
12750
Cost
per
Sample
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
Total
Cost
835125
835125
835125
835125
835125
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
247078.4
230697.5
215794.6
201721
188515.8
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
>
4
Samples
per
System
20
20
20
20
20
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
known
contam.
Samples
per
System
10
10
10
10
10
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
86
87
BASELINE
GROSS
BETA
TOTAL
TOTAL
Not
Vulnerable
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
<
4
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
293250
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
10072779.39
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
>
4
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
Vulnerable
w/
known
contam.
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
10072779.39
YEARS
COVERED
23
INTEREST
RATE
7%
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
($
893,595.81)

TOTAL
SAMPLES
293250
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
0.5
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
146625
YEARS
COVERED
23
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
6375
THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
2348181.444
88
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
($
894,778.45)
89
2000
GROSS
BETA
90
Only
systems
targeted
as
vulnerable
by
the
State
Is
the
system
known
to
be
using
contaminated
source?

Gross
Beta
­
2000
Monitoring
(
Initial
monitoring
to
begin
in
the
4th
year)

Monitoring
not
required
Quarterly
Gross
Beta
screen
of
15
pCi/
L;

quarterly
iodine
131;

and
annual
tritium
and
strontium
Yes
No
No
Yes
Gross
Beta
quarterly
screen
of
50
pCi/
L
and
annual
tritium
and
strontium.

96
%
of
CWSs
4
%
of
CWSs
(
then
subtract
out
SW
>

100,000)

0
%
of
CWSs
Monthly
gross
beta
and
quarterly
tritium
and
strontium
Quarterly
Gross
Beta;
annual
tritium
and
strontium
>
4
mrem
<
or
=
4
mrem
0
%
of
CWSs
4
%
of
CWSs
minus
SW
>

100K
Gross
Beta
MCL
=
4
mrem
Gross
Beta
analysis
$
45
Tritium
analysis
=
$
60
Strontium
analysis
=
$
153
Iodine
131
=
$
131
Is
the
system
a
SW
system
>
100,000?

No
Yes
0.02
%
of
CWSs
91
2000
GROSS
BETA
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
Not
Vulnerable
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
SW
>
100,000
Sites
per
System
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
11
11
11
11
11
11
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
60
153
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
<
4
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
6
6
6
Systems
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
Total
Samples
0
0
0
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
Cost
per
Sample
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
Total
Cost
0
0
0
1387439
1387439
1387439
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
1127999
1059114
991028.1
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
>
4
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
20
20
20
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
known
contam.
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
10
10
10
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
92
2000
GROSS
BETA
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
Not
Vulnerable
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
SW
>
100,000
Sites
per
System
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
11
11
11
11
11
11
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
60
153
45
45
60
153
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
<
4
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
6
6
6
6
6
6
Systems
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
Total
Samples
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
Cost
per
Sample
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
Total
Cost
1387439
1387439
1387439
1387439
1387439
1387439
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
924959.6
861763.6
806650.8
754043.1
704283.9
660685.4
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
>
4
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
20
20
20
20
20
20
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
known
contam.
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
10
10
10
10
10
10
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
93
2000
GROSS
BETA
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
Not
Vulnerable
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
SW
>
100,000
Sites
per
System
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
11
11
11
11
11
11
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
60
153
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
<
4
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
6
6
6
6
6
6
Systems
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
Total
Samples
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
Cost
per
Sample
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
Total
Cost
1387439
1387439
1387439
1387439
1387439
1387439
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
616639.7
575701
537767.2
502695.4
470318.4
439063.1
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
>
4
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
20
20
20
20
20
20
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
known
contam.
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
10
10
10
10
10
10
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
2000
GROSS
BETA
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
Not
Vulnerable
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
50,996
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
SW
>
100,000
Sites
per
System
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.2
Samples
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
11
11
11
11
11
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
60
153
45
45
60
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
<
4
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
6
6
6
6
6
Systems
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
2,114
Total
Samples
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
21182.28
Cost
per
Sample
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
65.5
Total
Cost
1387439
1387439
1387439
1387439
1387439
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
410485
383270.5
358511.5
335130.3
313191.7
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
>
4
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
20
20
20
20
20
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
69.5
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Vulnerable
w/
known
contam.
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Samples
per
Site
10
10
10
10
10
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
91.7
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
95
2000
GROSS
BETA
TOTAL
TOTAL
Not
Vulnerable
Sites
per
System
Samples
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
Vulnerable
SW
>
100,000
Sites
per
System
Samples
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
<
4
Sites
per
System
Samples
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
423645.6
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
12833301.7
Vulnerable
w/
o
known
contam.,
GB
>
4
Sites
per
System
Samples
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
Vulnerable
w/
known
contam.
Sites
per
System
Samples
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
96
2000
GROSS
BETA
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
12833301.7
YEARS
COVERED
23
INTEREST
RATE
7%
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
($
1,138,492.58)

TOTAL
SAMPLES
423645.6
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
0.5
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
211822.8
YEARS
COVERED
23
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
9209.686957
THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
0
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
$
0.00
97
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
98
Based
on
Gross
Alpha
Screen
­
is
the
GA
>
5
pCi/
L
or
<
5
pCi/
L
?
Gross
Alpha
>
5.
Determine
radium
226.
Is
it
>
3
or
<
or
=
to
3
pCi/
L?

Combined
Radiums
­
1976
Baseline
Monitoring
Gross
Alpha
<
or
=
5
pCi/
L
­

Substitute
GA
value
for
combined
radiums
­
in
compliance
for
combined
radiums
­
Go
to
1
every
4
years
for
GA*
Radium
226
>
3
pCi/
L.
Determine
radium
228.

Radium
226
<
or
=
3
pCi/
L.
In
compliance
for
combined
radiums.

Monitor
1
every
4
years
for
Radium
226
Combined
radium
226
+

228
<
or
=
5
pCi/
L
Monitor
1
every
4
yrs.

for
Radium
226/
228
Combined
radium
226
+
228
>
5
p
Ci/
L
­
Out
of
compliance
1
per
yr.
for
Radium
226/
228
97.1
%
of
Large
CWSs
90.6
%
of
Small
CWSs
0
%
of
CWSs
*
Gross
Alpha
not
counted
under
this
scenario;

it
is
counted
in
Gross
Alpha
scenario
1.8
%
of
Large
CWSs
2.6
%
of
Small
CWSs
1.1
%
of
Large
CWSs
0.9
%
of
Small
CWSs
99
100
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
(
CR)
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA<
5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA<
5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226<
3
SM
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
565
565
565
565
565
565
Total
Samples
0
0
0
565
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
90
90
90
90
90
90
Total
Cost
0
0
0
50850
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
41341.46
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226<
3
LG
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
565
565
565
565
565
565
Total
Samples
0
0
0
565
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
90
90
90
90
90
90
Total
Cost
0
0
0
50850
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
41341.46
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR<
5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
101
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
(
CR)
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA<
5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA<
5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226<
3
SM
Samples
per
System
0
1
0
0
0
1
Systems
565
565
565
565
565
565
Total
Samples
0
565
0
0
0
565
Cost
per
Sample
90
90
90
90
90
90
Total
Cost
0
50850
0
0
0
50850
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
31583.85
0
0
024214.29
GA>
5
AND
RA226<
3
LG
Samples
per
System
0
1
0
0
0
1
Systems
565
565
565
565
565
565
Total
Samples
0
565
0
0
0
565
Cost
per
Sample
90
90
90
90
90
90
Total
Cost
0
50850
0
0
0
50850
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
31583.85
0
0
024214.29
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR<
5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
2
0
0
0
2
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
102
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
(
CR)
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA<
5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA<
5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226<
3
SM
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
565
565
565
565
565
565
Total
Samples
0
0
0
565
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
90
90
90
90
90
90
Total
Cost
0
0
0
50850
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
18423.91
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226<
3
LG
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
565
565
565
565
565
565
Total
Samples
0
0
0
565
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
90
90
90
90
90
90
Total
Cost
0
0
0
50850
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
18423.91
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR<
5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
103
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
(
CR)
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA<
5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
30,491
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA<
5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
20,981
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
45
45
45
45
45
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226<
3
SM
Samples
per
System
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
565
565
565
565
565
Total
Samples
0
565
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
90
90
90
90
90
Total
Cost
0
50850
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
14046.96
0
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226<
3
LG
Samples
per
System
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
565
565
565
565
565
Total
Samples
0
565
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
90
90
90
90
90
Total
Cost
0
50850
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
14046.96
0
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR<
5
SM
Samples
per
System
0
2
0
0
0
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
104
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
(
CR)
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA<
5
SM
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
GA<
5
LG
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226<
3
SM
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
2825
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
129610.4744
GA>
5
AND
RA226<
3
LG
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
2825
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
129610.4744
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR<
5
SM
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
105
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
(
CR)
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR<
5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR>
5
SM
Samples
per
System
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
345
345
345
345
345
345
Total
Samples
690
690
690
690
690
690
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
69000
69000
69000
69000
69000
69000
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
69000
64485.98
60526.32
56097.56
52671.76
49285.71
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR>
5
LG
Samples
per
System
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
390
390
390
390
390
390
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
39000
39000
39000
39000
39000
39000
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
39000
36448.6
34210.53
31707.32
29770.99
27857.14
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COSTS
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COSTS
106
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
(
CR)
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR<
5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
2
0
0
0
2
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR>
5
SM
Samples
per
System
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
345
345
345
345
345
345
Total
Samples
690
690
690
690
690
690
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
69000
69000
69000
69000
69000
69000
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
46000
42857.14
40116.28
37500
35025.38
32857.14
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR>
5
LG
Samples
per
System
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
390
390
390
390
390
390
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
39000
39000
39000
39000
39000
39000
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
26000
24223.6
22674.42
21195.65
19796.95
18571.43
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COSTS
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COSTS
107
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
(
CR)
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR<
5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR>
5
SM
Samples
per
System
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
345
345
345
345
345
345
Total
Samples
690
690
690
690
690
690
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
69000
69000
69000
69000
69000
69000
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
30666.67
28630.71
26744.19
25000
23389.83
21835.44
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR>
5
LG
Samples
per
System
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
390
390
390
390
390
390
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
39000
39000
39000
39000
39000
39000
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
17333.33
16182.57
15116.28
14130.43
13220.34
12341.77
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COSTS
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COSTS
108
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
(
CR)
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR<
5
LG
Samples
per
System
0
2
0
0
0
Systems
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR>
5
SM
Samples
per
System
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
345
345
345
345
345
Total
Samples
690
690
690
690
690
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
69000
69000
69000
69000
69000
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
20414.2
19060.77
17829.46
16666.67
15575.62
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR>
5
LG
Samples
per
System
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
390
390
390
390
390
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
39000
39000
39000
39000
39000
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
11538.46
10773.48
10077.52
9420.29
8803.612
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COSTS
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COSTS
109
BASELINE
COMBINED
RADIUMS
(
CR)
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR<
5
LG
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
0
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
0
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR>
5
SM
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
15870
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
832236.8247
GA>
5
AND
RA226>
3
AND
CR>
5
LG
Samples
per
System
Systems
Total
Samples
8970
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
470394.727
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
1091457.774
YEARS
COVERED
23
INTEREST
RATE
7%
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
($
96,827.50)

TOTAL
SAMPLES
30490
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
0.5
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
15245
YEARS
COVERED
23
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
662.826087
THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COSTS
194012.2971
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COSTS
($
73,928.71)
110
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
111
Based
on
Gross
Alpha
Screen
­
is
the
GA
>
5
pCi/
L
or
<
5
pCi/
L
?
**
These
systems
have
GA
>
5
.
Under
1976
rules,
would
have
checked
for
radium
226,
so
they
should
have
the
data
to
GF.
Some
of
these
would
have
possibly
have
226
>
3
and
checked
for
228.
For
simplicity,
assume
everyone
checked
for
228
and
will
GF
their
data.

Then
they
can
combine
their
GF
data
to
determine
monitoring
schedule,
ie.,
reduced
monitoring
or
out
of
compliance.
Analysis
cost
would
be
for
both
radium
226
and
228
and
is
a
total
of
$
200.

Combined
Radiums
­
2000
Monitoring
Scenario
2a
(
Initial
monitoring
in
Yrs.
4­
7,
SMF
3
yr.
cycles
thereafter)
Approx.
3
%
of
CWSs
will
have
radium
228
data
to
GF
and
also
will
have
radium
226
data
to
GF**

Approx.
97
%
of
CWSs
will
not
have
radium
228
data
­
so
will
have
to
monitor
for
it
*
Rad
226
analysis
=
$
90
Rad
228
analysis
=
$
110
<
5
pCi/
L
>
5
pCi/
L
For
CWSs
<
2.5
pCi/
L
of
228,
collect
2
Q,
or
if
>

2.5
collect
4Q,
then
after
adding
to
GA
to
get
CR,

go
to
reduced
monitoring.
CR
<
1
so
1
in
9
yrs
CR
>
1
but
<

2.5
pCi/
L
so
1
in
6
yrs
CR
>
2.5
but
<
5
so
1
in
3
yrs
CR
>
5
Out
of
compliance.

Assume
4
Q
first
year
then
1
per
yr.

*
These
systems
had
GA
<
5.
Under
1976
rules,
would
not
have
checked
for
radium
226.

Since
GA
is
less
than
5,
they
can
sub
this
for
radium
226
value
when
they
add
for
combined
radiums.
Only
analysis
cost
is
for
radium
228
­
$
110.
For
those
out
of
compliance,
assume
they
will
go
back
and
check
their
radium
226
so
$
200
total
for
both.

radium
228
<
2.5
radium
228
>
2.5
77.5%,
18.5%,
3.2%,
0.8%
have
CR
<
1,<
2.5,<
5,>
5,
respectively.

First
three
do
reduced
monitoring
per
SMF.
For
the
0.8%,
assume
these
will
also
check
radium
226
and
do
4
Qs
initially
then
1
per
yr.
77.5%,
18.5%,
3.2%,
0.8%
have
CR<
1,<
2.5,<
5,>
5,
respectively.

First
three
do
reduced
monitoring
per
SMF.
For
the
0.8%,
assume
these
will
also
check
radium
226
and
do
4
Qs
initially
then
1
per
yr.
1.4%
of
Small
CWSs
0.9%
of
Large
CWSs
0.3%
of
Small
CWSs
0.4%
of
Large
CWSs
0.5%
of
Small
CWSs
0.9%
of
Large
CWSs
0.8%
of
Small
CWSs
1.3%
of
Large
CWSs
96.2%
of
Small
CWSs
95.3%
of
Large
CWSs
0.9%
of
Small
CWSs
1.3%
of
Large
CWSs
112
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR<
1
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
Total
Samples
0
0
0
58530
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
6438300
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
5234390
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR<
1
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
Total
Samples
0
0
0
73146.96
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
8046166
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
6541598
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
2
0
Systems
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
13972.5
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
01536975
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
01173263
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
2
0
Systems
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
Total
Samples
0
0
0
017460.24
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
01920626
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
01466127
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
2
Systems
967
967
967
967
967
967
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
2417.5
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
265925
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0189946.4
113
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR<
1
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
1
0
0
0
0
Systems
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
Total
Samples
0
29265
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
3219150
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
1999472
0
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR<
1
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
1
0
0
0
0
Systems
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
Total
Samples
0
36573.48
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
4023083
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
2498809
0
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
Total
Samples
0
0
6986.25
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
768487.5
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
446795.1
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
Total
Samples
0
0
8730.12
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
960313.2
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
558321.6
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
967
967
967
967
967
967
Total
Samples
0
0
0
1208.75
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
132962.5
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
72262.23
0
0
114
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR<
1
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
1
0
Systems
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
29265
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
3219150
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
1091237
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR<
1
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
1
0
Systems
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
36573.48
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
4023083
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
1363757
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
Total
Samples
0
0
6986.25
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
768487.5
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
297863.4
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
Total
Samples
0
0
8730.12
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
960313.2
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
372214.4
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
967
967
967
967
967
967
Total
Samples
1208.75
0
0
1208.75
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
132962.5
0
0
132962.5
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
59094.44
0
0
48174.82
0
0
115
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR<
1
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
23,412
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR<
1
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
16,041
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
5,589
Total
Samples
0
0
6986.25
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
768487.5
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
198575.6
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
3,829
Total
Samples
0
0
8730.12
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
960313.2
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
248142.9
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
Systems
967
967
967
967
967
Total
Samples
1208.75
0
0
1208.75
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
132962.5
0
0
132962.5
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
39338.02
0
0
32116.55
0
116
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR<
1
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
117060
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
8325099.582
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR<
1
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
146293.92
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
10404164.12
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
34931.25
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
2116497.37
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
43650.6
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
2644806.015
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
8461.25
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
440932.4838
117
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
2
Systems
662
662
662
662
662
662
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
3018.72
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0332059.2
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0237185.1
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
8
2
2
Systems
242
242
242
242
242
242
Total
Samples
0
0
0
2420
605
605
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
242000
60500
60500
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
196748
46183.21
43214.29
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
8
2
2
Systems
166
166
166
166
166
166
Total
Samples
0
0
0
3027.84
756.96
756.96
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
302784
75696
75696
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
246165.9
57783.21
54068.57
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR<
1
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
219
219
219
219
219
219
Total
Samples
0
0
0
547.5
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
60225
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
48963.41
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR<
1
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
219
219
219
219
219
219
Total
Samples
0
0
0
998.64
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
109850.4
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
89309.27
0
0
118
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
662
662
662
662
662
662
Total
Samples
0
0
0
1509.36
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
166029.6
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
90233.48
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
242
242
242
242
242
242
Total
Samples
605
605
605
605
605
605
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
60500
60500
60500
60500
60500
60500
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
40333.33
37577.64
35174.42
32880.43
30710.66
28809.52
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
166
166
166
166
166
166
Total
Samples
756.96
756.96
756.96
756.96
756.96
756.96
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
75696
75696
75696
75696
75696
75696
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
50464
47016.15
44009.3
41139.13
38424.37
36045.71
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR<
1
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
1
0
0
0
0
Systems
219
219
219
219
219
219
Total
Samples
0
273.75
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
30112.5
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
18703.42
0
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR<
1
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
1
0
0
0
0
Systems
219
219
219
219
219
219
Total
Samples
0
499.32
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
54925.2
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
34115.03
0
0
0
0
119
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
662
662
662
662
662
662
Total
Samples
1509.36
0
0
1509.36
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
166029.6
0
0
166029.6
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
73790.93
0
0
60155.65
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
242
242
242
242
242
242
Total
Samples
605
605
605
605
605
605
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
60500
60500
60500
60500
60500
60500
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
26888.89
25103.73
23449.61
21920.29
20508.47
19145.57
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
166
166
166
166
166
166
Total
Samples
756.96
756.96
756.96
756.96
756.96
756.96
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
75696
75696
75696
75696
75696
75696
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
33642.67
31409.13
29339.53
27426.09
25659.66
23954.43
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR<
1
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
1
0
Systems
219
219
219
219
219
219
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
273.75
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
30112.5
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
10207.63
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR<
1
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
1
0
Systems
219
219
219
219
219
219
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
499.32
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
54925.2
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
18618.71
0
120
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
Systems
662
662
662
662
662
Total
Samples
1509.36
0
0
1509.36
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
166029.6
0
0
166029.6
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
49121.18
0
0
40103.77
0
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
242
242
242
242
242
Total
Samples
605
605
605
605
605
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
60500
60500
60500
60500
60500
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
17899.41
16712.71
15633.07
14613.53
13656.88
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
166
166
166
166
166
Total
Samples
756.96
756.96
756.96
756.96
756.96
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
75696
75696
75696
75696
75696
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
22395.27
20910.5
19559.69
18284.06
17087.13
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR<
1
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
219
219
219
219
219
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR<
1
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
219
219
219
219
219
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
121
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
10565.52
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
550590.1582
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
13915
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
707163.6411
GA<
5
and
RA228<
2.5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
17410.08
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
884784.4459
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR<
1
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
1095
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
77874.4579
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR<
1
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
1997.28
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
142043.0112
122
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
2
0
Systems
52
52
52
52
52
52
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
130
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
14300
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
010916.03
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
2
0
Systems
52
52
52
52
52
52
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
237.12
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
26083.2
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
019910.84
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
2
Systems
9
9
9
9
9
9
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
22.5
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
2475
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
01767.857
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
2
Systems
9
9
9
9
9
9
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
41.04
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
4514.4
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
03224.571
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
8
2
2
Systems
2
2
2
2
2
2
Total
Samples
0
0
0
20
5
5
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
2000
500
500
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
1626.016
381.6794
357.1429
123
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
52
52
52
52
52
52
Total
Samples
0
0
65
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
7150
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
4156.977
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
52
52
52
52
52
52
Total
Samples
0
0
118.56
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
13041.6
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
7582.326
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
9
9
9
9
9
9
Total
Samples
0
0
0
11.25
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
1237.5
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
672.5543
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
9
9
9
9
9
9
Total
Samples
0
0
0
20.52
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
0
2257.2
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
1226.739
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
2
2
2
2
2
2
Total
Samples
5
5
5
5
5
5
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
500
500
500
500
500
500
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
333.3333
310.559
290.6977
271.7391
253.8071
238.0952
124
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
52
52
52
52
52
52
Total
Samples
0
0
65
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
7150
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
2771.318
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
0
Systems
52
52
52
52
52
52
Total
Samples
0
0
118.56
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
13041.6
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
5054.884
0
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
9
9
9
9
9
9
Total
Samples
11.25
0
0
11.25
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
1237.5
0
0
1237.5
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
550
0
0
448.3696
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
9
9
9
9
9
9
Total
Samples
20.52
0
0
20.52
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
2257.2
0
0
2257.2
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
1003.2
0
0
817.8261
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
2
2
2
2
2
2
Total
Samples
5
5
5
5
5
5
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
500
500
500
500
500
500
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
222.2222
207.4689
193.7984
181.1594
169.4915
158.2278
125
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
52
52
52
52
52
Total
Samples
0
0
65
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
7150
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
1847.545
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
52
52
52
52
52
Total
Samples
0
0
118.56
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
0
0
13041.6
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
3369.922
0
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
Systems
9
9
9
9
9
Total
Samples
11.25
0
0
11.25
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
1237.5
0
0
1237.5
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
366.1243
0
0
298.913
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
0
1
0
Systems
9
9
9
9
9
Total
Samples
20.52
0
0
20.52
0
Cost
per
Sample
110
110
110
110
110
Total
Cost
2257.2
0
0
2257.2
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
667.8107
0
0
545.2174
0
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
2
2
2
2
2
Total
Samples
5
5
5
5
5
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
500
500
500
500
500
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
147.929
138.1215
129.199
120.7729
112.8668
126
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
325
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
19691.87033
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
592.8
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
35917.97148
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
78.75
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
4103.81836
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
143.64
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
7485.364688
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
115
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
5844.327612
127
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
8
2
2
Systems
2
2
2
2
2
2
Total
Samples
0
0
0
36.48
9.12
9.12
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
3648
912
912
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
2965.854
696.1832
651.4286
GA>
5
and
CR<
1
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
CR<
1
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
282
282
282
282
282
282
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
157
157
157
157
157
157
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
128
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
2
2
2
2
2
2
Total
Samples
9.12
9.12
9.12
9.12
9.12
9.12
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
912
912
912
912
912
912
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
608
566.4596
530.2326
495.6522
462.9442
434.2857
GA>
5
and
CR<
1
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
2
0
0
0
0
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
0
627.5
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
62750
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
38975.16
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
CR<
1
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
2
0
0
0
0
Systems
282
282
282
282
282
282
Total
Samples
0
1285.92
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
128592
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
79870.81
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
2
0
0
0
Systems
157
157
157
157
157
157
Total
Samples
0
0
392.5
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
39250
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
22819.77
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
2
0
0
0
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
0
0
889.2
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
88920
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
51697.67
0
0
0
129
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
2
2
2
2
2
2
Total
Samples
9.12
9.12
9.12
9.12
9.12
9.12
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
912
912
912
912
912
912
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
405.3333
378.4232
353.4884
330.4348
309.1525
288.6076
GA>
5
and
CR<
1
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
2
0
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
627.5
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
62750
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
021271.19
0
GA>
5
and
CR<
1
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
2
0
Systems
282
282
282
282
282
282
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
1285.92
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
128592
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
043590.51
0
GA>
5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
2
0
0
0
Systems
157
157
157
157
157
157
Total
Samples
0
0
392.5
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
39250
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
15213.18
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
2
0
0
0
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
0
0
889.2
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
88920
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
34465.12
0
0
0
130
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
2
2
2
2
2
Total
Samples
9.12
9.12
9.12
9.12
9.12
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
912
912
912
912
912
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
269.8225
251.9337
235.6589
220.2899
205.8691
GA>
5
and
CR<
1
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
251
251
251
251
251
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
CR<
1
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
282
282
282
282
282
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
157
157
157
157
157
Total
Samples
0
0
392.5
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
39250
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
10142.12
0
0
GA>
5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
0
0
889.2
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
88920
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
22976.74
0
0
131
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA<
5
and
RA228>
2.5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
209.76
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
10660.05357
GA>
5
and
CR<
1
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
1255
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
60246.34172
GA>
5
and
CR<
1
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
2571.84
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
123461.3159
GA>
5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
1177.5
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
48175.0646
GA>
5
and
1<
CR<
2.5
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
2667.6
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
109139.5349
132
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA>
5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
94
94
94
94
94
94
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
87
87
87
87
87
87
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
8
2
2
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
0
0
0
4400
1100
1100
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
440000
110000
110000
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
357723.6
83969.47
78571.43
GA>
5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
8
2
2
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
0
0
0
3556.8
889.2
889.2
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
355680
88920
88920
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
289170.7
67877.86
63514.29
133
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA>
5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
94
94
94
94
94
94
Total
Samples
0
0
0
235
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
23500
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
12771.74
0
0
GA>
5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
87
87
87
87
87
87
Total
Samples
0
0
0
396.72
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
0
0
0
39672
0
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
21560.87
0
0
GA>
5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
110000
110000
110000
110000
110000
110000
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
73333.33
68322.98
63953.49
59782.61
55837.56
52380.95
GA>
5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
889.2
889.2
889.2
889.2
889.2
889.2
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
88920
88920
88920
88920
88920
88920
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
59280
55229.81
51697.67
48326.09
45137.06
42342.86
134
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA>
5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
94
94
94
94
94
94
Total
Samples
235
0
0
235
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
23500
0
0
23500
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
10444.44
0
0
8514.493
0
0
GA>
5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
0
0
2
0
0
Systems
87
87
87
87
87
87
Total
Samples
396.72
0
0
396.72
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
39672
0
0
39672
0
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
17632
0
0
14373.91
0
0
GA>
5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
110000
110000
110000
110000
110000
110000
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
48888.89
45643.15
42635.66
39855.07
37288.14
34810.13
GA>
5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
889.2
889.2
889.2
889.2
889.2
889.2
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
88920
88920
88920
88920
88920
88920
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
39520
36896.27
34465.12
32217.39
30142.37
28139.24
135
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA>
5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
0
0
2
0
Systems
94
94
94
94
94
Total
Samples
235
0
0
235
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
23500
0
0
23500
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
6952.663
0
0
5676.329
0
GA>
5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
0
0
2
0
Systems
87
87
87
87
87
Total
Samples
396.72
0
0
396.72
0
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
39672
0
0
39672
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
11737.28
0
0
9582.609
0
GA>
5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
440
440
440
440
440
Total
Samples
1100
1100
1100
1100
1100
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
110000
110000
110000
110000
110000
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
32544.38
30386.74
28423.77
26570.05
24830.7
GA>
5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
2.28
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
2
2
2
2
2
Systems
195
195
195
195
195
Total
Samples
889.2
889.2
889.2
889.2
889.2
Cost
per
Sample
100
100
100
100
100
Total
Cost
88920
88920
88920
88920
88920
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
26307.69
24563.54
22976.74
21478.26
20072.23
136
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA>
5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
w/
GF
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
1175
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
44359.66755
GA>
5
and
2.5<
CR<
5
w/
GF
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
1983.6
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
74886.66941
GA>
5
and
CR>
5
SM
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
25300
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
1285752.075
GA>
5
and
CR>
5
LG
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
20451.6
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
1039355.223
137
2000
COMBINED
RADIUMS
SCENARIO
2
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
29163034.59
YEARS
COVERED
23
INTEREST
RATE
7%
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
($
2,587,167.30)

TOTAL
SAMPLES
453426.99
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
0.5
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
226713.495
YEARS
COVERED
23
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
9857.108478
THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
0
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
$
0.00
138
2000
URANIUM
139
Gross
alpha
>
15
p
Ci/
L
?
System
w
ill
analyze
for
uranium.*
U
ranium
>
30
pCi/
L
Uranium
­
2000
M
onitoring
(
Scenario
2A:
Initial
monitoring
in
Y
rs.
4­
7,
SMF
3
yr.
Cycles
thereafter)

Monitoring
for
uranium
not
required.
Can
assume
all
GA
is
uranium
and
substitute
GA
for
uranium.
Yes
No
Out
of
Compliance
for
U.
Treat/
Monitor
Q
for
one
year..**
Assume
States
w
ill
require
systems
to
monitor
1
per
year
GA
>
15
and
U
<
30
Monitor
1
every
3
years
Uranium
Std
=
30
pCi/
L
Cost
of
Analysis
for
GA
is
$
45
Cost
of
Analysis
for
Uranium
is
$
128
Samples
taken
from
entry
point
to
distribution
system
No
Compositing
Can
grandfather
GA
but
don't
assume
they
will
all
grandfather
uranium
results.
Yes
No
GA
between
3
and
15
monitor
1
every
6
years
GA
<
3
then
monitor
1
every
9
*
Assume
50%
of
the
GW
systems
will
initially
check
for
uranium
­
4
Q
samples.
Others
will
GF.

*
Assume
25%
of
SW
systems
will
actually
m
onitor
for
uranium
and
take
4
Q
and
the
others
will
GF.

**
One
quarter
per
year
covered
by
GA
monitoring.

Assume
all
these
w
ill
check
initially
for
uranium
­
4
Q
samples.

88.8%
of
SM
CWSs
88.4%
of
LG
CWSs
9.1%
of
SM
CWSs
9.4%
of
LG
CWSs
0.6%
of
SM
CWSs
1.7%
of
LG
CWSs
1.5%
of
SM
CWSs
0.4%
of
LG
CWSs
140
141
2000
URANIUM
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
1
YEAR
2
YEAR
3
YEAR
4
YEAR
5
YEAR
6
GA>
15
AND
U<
30
with
GF
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
0
0
0
Systems
305
305
305
305
305
305
Total
Samples
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA>
15
AND
U<
30,
No
GF
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
1
1
1
Systems
252
252
252
252
252
252
Total
Samples
0
0
0
420.84
420.84
420.84
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
0
0
0
53867.52
53867.52
53867.52
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
43794.73
41120.24
38476.8
GA>
15
and
U>
30
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
0
3
1
1
Systems
558
558
558
558
558
558
Total
Samples
0
0
0
2795.58
931.86
931.86
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
0
0
0
357834.2
119278.1
119278.1
Discount
Rate
1
1.07
1.14
1.23
1.31
1.4
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
0
290922.1
91051.97
85198.63
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
142
2000
URANIUM
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
7
YEAR
8
YEAR
9
YEAR
10
YEAR
11
YEAR
12
GA>
15
AND
U<
30
with
GF
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
1
0
0
1
0
Systems
305
305
305
305
305
305
Total
Samples
0
509.35
0
0
509.35
0
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
0
65196.8
0
0
65196.8
0
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
0
40494.91
0
0
33094.82
0
GA>
15
AND
U<
30,
No
GF
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
0
1
0
0
1
Systems
252
252
252
252
252
252
Total
Samples
420.84
0
420.84
0
0
420.84
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
53867.52
0
53867.52
0
0
53867.52
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
35911.68
0
31318.33
0
0
25651.2
GA>
15
and
U>
30
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
558
558
558
558
558
558
Total
Samples
931.86
931.86
931.86
931.86
931.86
931.86
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
Discount
Rate
1.5
1.61
1.72
1.84
1.97
2.1
Present
Value
Cost
79518.72
74085.76
69347.72
64825.04
60547.25
56799.09
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
143
2000
URANIUM
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
13
YEAR
14
YEAR
15
YEAR
16
YEAR
17
YEAR
18
GA>
15
AND
U<
30
with
GF
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
1
0
0
1
0
Systems
305
305
305
305
305
305
Total
Samples
0
509.35
0
0
509.35
0
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
0
65196.8
0
0
65196.8
0
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
27052.61
0
0
22100.61
0
GA>
15
AND
U<
30,
No
GF
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
1
Systems
252
252
252
252
252
252
Total
Samples
0
0
420.84
0
0
420.84
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
0
0
53867.52
0
0
53867.52
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
20878.88
0
0
17046.68
GA>
15
and
U>
30
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
558
558
558
558
558
558
Total
Samples
931.86
931.86
931.86
931.86
931.86
931.86
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
Discount
Rate
2.25
2.41
2.58
2.76
2.95
3.16
Present
Value
Cost
53012.48
49492.98
46231.81
43216.7
40433.25
37746.23
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
144
2000
URANIUM
SCENARIO
2
YEAR
19
YEAR
20
YEAR
21
YEAR
22
YEAR
23
GA>
15
AND
U<
30
with
GF
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
1
0
0
1
Systems
305
305
305
305
305
Total
Samples
0
509.35
0
0
509.35
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
0
65196.8
0
0
65196.8
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
18010.17
0
0
14717.11
GA>
15
AND
U<
30,
No
GF
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
0
0
1
0
0
Systems
252
252
252
252
252
Total
Samples
0
0
420.84
0
0
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
0
0
53867.52
0
0
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
0
0
13919.26
0
0
GA>
15
and
U>
30
Sites
per
System
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
1.67
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
1
1
1
1
1
Systems
558
558
558
558
558
Total
Samples
931.86
931.86
931.86
931.86
931.86
Cost
per
Sample
128
128
128
128
128
Total
Cost
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
119278.1
Discount
Rate
3.38
3.62
3.87
4.14
4.43
Present
Value
Cost
35289.37
32949.75
30821.21
28811.13
26925.07
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
YEARS
COVERED
INTEREST
RATE
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
TOTAL
SAMPLES
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
YEARS
COVERED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)

THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
145
2000
URANIUM
SCENARIO
2
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
GA>
15
AND
U<
30
with
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
3056.1
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
155470.2298
GA>
15
AND
U<
30,
No
GF
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
3787.56
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
268117.8046
GA>
15
and
U>
30
Sites
per
System
Sampling
Frequency
per
Site
Systems
Total
Samples
20500.92
Cost
per
Sample
Total
Cost
Discount
Rate
Present
Value
Cost
1297226.304
TOTAL
PRESENT
VALUE
1720814.339
YEARS
COVERED
23
INTEREST
RATE
7%
ANNUALIZED
PRESENT
VALUE
($
152,660.20)

TOTAL
SAMPLES
27344.58
BURDEN
PER
SAMPLE
(
HRS.)
0.5
TOTAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
13672.29
YEARS
COVERED
23
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
BURDEN
(
HRS.)
594.4473913
THREE
YEAR
TOTAL
COST
0
THREE
YEAR
ANNUALIZED
COST
$
0.00
