0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
1
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
1
of
13
APPENDIX
B
­
1
­
2
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
200
400
600
Lab:
2
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
Lab:
3
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Lab:
4
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
5
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
100
200
300
400
500
600
Lab:
6
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
­
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
7
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
200
400
600
Lab:
9
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Lab:
1
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
2
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
31:
40
2002
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
200
400
600
Lab:
2
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
3
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
200
400
600
Lab:
4
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
5
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Lab:
6
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
200
400
600
Lab:
7
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Lab:
8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
200
400
600
Lab:
9
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
1
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
3
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
31:
42
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
2
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
Lab:
3
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
4
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
5
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
6
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
Lab:
7
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
8
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
9
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
1
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
4
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
31:
44
2002
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
2
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
3
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
4
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
5
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
6
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
7
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
9
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
1
COPPER,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
5
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
31:
46
2002
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
2
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
Lab:
3
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
4
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
5
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
6
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
7
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
Lab:
8
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
9
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
1
LEAD,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
6
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
31:
48
2002
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Lab:
2
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
Lab:
3
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Lab:
4
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
5
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
6
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
7
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
8
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
9
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
Lab:
1
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
7
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
31:
50
2002
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
20
40
Lab:
2
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
Lab:
3
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
4
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
Lab:
5
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
Lab:
6
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
Lab:
7
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
Lab:
8
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
Lab:
9
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
1
MERCURY,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
8
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
31:
52
2002
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
2
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
3
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
4
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
5
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
2
4
6
8
Lab:
6
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
7
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
8
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
9
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
1
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
9
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
31:
54
2002
0
50
100
150
200
250
­
50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
2
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
3
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
4
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
5
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
6
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
7
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
9
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
1
NICKEL,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
10
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
31:
56
2002
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
2
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
Lab:
3
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
4
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
5
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
6
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
Lab:
7
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
9
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Lab:
1
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
11
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
31:
58
2002
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Lab:
2
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
3
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
4
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
5
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Lab:
6
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
7
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Lab:
9
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
1
SILVER,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
12
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
00
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
2
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
Lab:
3
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
4
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
5
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
6
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
Lab:
7
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
Lab:
8
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
9
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
1
ZINC,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
13
of
13
Measured
Concentration
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
02
2002
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
100
200
Lab:
2
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
3
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
100
200
300
Lab:
4
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
5
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
6
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
7
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
8
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
9
ZINC,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Classicals,
Method
130.2
HARDNESS,
MG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
1
of
32
APPENDIX
B
­
2
­
1
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
0.5
5.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Classicals,
Method
160.2
TOTAL
SUSPENDED
SOLIDS,
MG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Classicals,
Method
1677
WAD
CYANIDE,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Classicals,
Method
350.3
AMMONIA
AS
NITROGEN,
MG/
L
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Classicals,
Method
365.2
TOTAL
PHOSPHORUS,
MG/
L
10^­
4
10^­
2
10^
0
10^
2
10^
4
1
10
100
1000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Ag
107,
ppt
10^­
4
10^­
2
10^
0
10^
2
10^
4
1
10
100
1000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Cd
111,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
10
50
100
500
1000
5000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Cu
63,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
10
100
1000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Ni
60,
ppt
10^­
4
10^­
2
10^
0
10^
2
10^
4
1
10
100
1000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
206,
ppt
10
50
500
5000
10
50
100
500
1000
5000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
207,
ppt
10
50
500
5000
1
10
100
1000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
208,
ppt
10^­
4
10^­
2
10^
0
10^
2
10^
4
1
10
100
1000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Sb
123,
ppt
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
2
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
40:
05
2002
10^­
4
10^­
2
10^
0
10^
2
10^
4
10
100
1000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Se
82,
ppt
10^­
4
10^­
2
10^
0
10^
2
10^
4
10
100
1000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Tl
205,
ppt
10^­
4
10^­
2
10^
0
10^
2
10^
4
50
100
500
1000
5000
10000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Zn
66,
ppt
1
5
10
50
100
500
1
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Metals,
Method
1620
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
ANTIMONY,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
BARIUM,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
L
100
500
1000
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Metals,
Method
1620
BORON,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Metals,
Method
1620
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
1
10
100
1000
Metals,
Method
1620
CALCIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Metals,
Method
1620
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
3
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
40:
18
2002
1
5
10
50
100
500
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
Metals,
Method
1620
COBALT,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
COPPER,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
500
1
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Metals,
Method
1620
IRON,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
LEAD,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5000
1
10
100
1000
Metals,
Method
1620
MAGNESIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Metals,
Method
1620
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
500.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
500.0
Metals,
Method
1620
SILVER,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5000
1
10
100
1000
Metals,
Method
1620
SODIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
THALLIUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
4
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
40:
31
2002
1
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
500.0
Metals,
Method
1620
TIN,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
500.0
Metals,
Method
1620
TITANIUM,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
500
1
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Metals,
Method
1620
VANADIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
YTTRIUM,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
1620
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
500.0
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Metals,
Method
200.8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Metals,
Method
200.8
ANTIMONY,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Metals,
Method
200.8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Metals,
Method
200.8
BARIUM,
UG/
L
0.005
0.050
0.500
5.000
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Metals,
Method
200.8
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.0001
0.0010
0.0100
0.1000
1.0000
Metals,
Method
200.8
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Metals,
Method
200.8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
5
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
40:
45
2002
0.0005
0.0050
0.0500
0.5000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0050
0.0100
0.0500
0.1000
0.5000
Metals,
Method
200.8
COBALT,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Metals,
Method
200.8
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
Metals,
Method
200.8
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Metals,
Method
200.8
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.005
0.050
0.500
5.000
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Metals,
Method
200.8
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0005
0.0050
0.0500
0.5000
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Metals,
Method
200.8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Metals,
Method
200.8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
200.8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Metals,
Method
200.8
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.0005
0.0050
0.0500
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Metals,
Method
200.8
THALLIUM,
UG/
L
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Metals,
Method
200.8
THORIUM,
UG/
L
0.0001
0.0005
0.0050
0.0500
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Metals,
Method
200.8
URANIUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
6
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
40:
59
2002
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Metals,
Method
200.8
VANADIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
200.8
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,1,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,1­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
1
5
10
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,2,2­
TCE+
1,2,3­
TCP,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,2­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.0001
0.0010
0.0100
0.1000
1.0000
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.0001
0.0010
0.0100
0.1000
1.0000
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DIBROMOETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
7
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
41:
12
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
1
5
10
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
1
5
10
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOFORM,
UG/
L
1
5
10
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
8
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
41:
25
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CARBONTET+
1,1­
DCP,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
5
10
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROFORM,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
5
10
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CIS­
1,2­
DCE+
2,2­
DCP,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
DIBROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.0001
0.0010
0.0100
0.1000
1.0000
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
METHYLENE
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
9
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
41:
38
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRANS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
1
5
10
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
5
10
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
VINYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0.0001
0.0010
0.0100
0.1000
1.0000
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2,4­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,3,5­
TMB+
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
10
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
41:
51
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
BENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
ETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.0001
0.0100
1.0000
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
HEXCHLOBUTADIENE+
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
M+
P
XYLENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
N­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
N­
PROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
O­
XYLENE+
STYRENE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
11
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
42:
05
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
P­
ISOPROPTOL+
1,4­
DCB,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
SEC­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TERT­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,1,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,1­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,2,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,2­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
12
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
42:
18
2002
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
50
100
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROPROPANONE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,4­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DIBROMO­
3­
CHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DIBROMOETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
13
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
42:
31
2002
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,3,5­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
1000.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1­
CHLOROBUTANE,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
2,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
BUTANONE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
HEXANONE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
NITROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
4­
ISOPROPYLTOLUENE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
14
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
42:
45
2002
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
4­
METHYL­
2­
PENTANONE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
ACETONE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
ACRYLONITRILE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
ALLYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
BENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOFORM,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
CARBON
DISULFIDE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
15
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
42:
58
2002
10
50
100
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROACETONITRILE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROFORM,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
CIS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
DIBROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
DIETHYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
ETHYL
METHACRYLATE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
16
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
43:
13
2002
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
ETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
ISOPROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
M+
P
XYLENE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHACRYLONITRILE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYL
IODIDE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYL
TERT­
BUTYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYLACRYLATE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYLENE
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYLMETHACRYLATE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
N­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
17
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
43:
27
2002
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
N­
PROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
O­
XYLENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
PENTACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
SEC­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
STYRENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
TERT­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
TOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRANS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRANS­
1,4­
DICHLORO­
2­
BUTENE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
18
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
43:
42
2002
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
VINYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
XYLENE
(
TOTAL),
UG/
L
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2­
DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,3,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4,5­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
19
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
43:
57
2002
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DIMETHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DINITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,6­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
CHLORONAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
CHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
PICOLINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
3,3'­
DICHLOROBENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
20
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
44:
12
2002
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
CHLORO­
3­
METHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
CHLOROPHENYLPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ACENAPHTHENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ACENAPHTHYLENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ALPHA­
TERPINEOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
A)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
A)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
B)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
GHI)
PERYLENE,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
21
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
44:
28
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
K)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BETA­
NAPHTHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIPHENYL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROISOPROPYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BUTYL
BENZYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
CARBAZOLE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
CHRYSENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
BUTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
OCTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
22
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
44:
43
2002
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
PROPYLNITROSAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZO(
A,
H)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZOFURAN,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIMETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
FLUORENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
23
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
44:
57
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
INDENO(
1,2,3­
CD)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ISOPHORONE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
DECANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
DOCOSANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
DODECANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
EICOSANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
HEXACOSANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
HEXADECANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
24
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
45:
11
2002
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
OCTACOSANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
OCTADECANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
TETRACOSANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
TETRADECANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
TRIACONTANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
NAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
NITROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
P­
CYMENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PENTACHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PHENANTHRENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PHENOL,
2­
METHYL­
4,6­
DINITRO­,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
25
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
45:
25
2002
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
STYRENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2­
DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,3,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4,5­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
26
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
45:
39
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DIMETHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DINITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,6­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
CHLORONAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
CHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
PICOLINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
3,3'­
DICHLOROBENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
CHLORO­
3­
METHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
CHLOROPHENYLPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
27
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
45:
52
2002
1
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ACENAPHTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ACENAPHTHYLENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ALPHA­
TERPINEOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
A)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
A)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
B)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
GHI)
PERYLENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
K)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BETA­
NAPHTHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
28
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
46:
06
2002
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIPHENYL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROISOPROPYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BUTYL
BENZYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
CARBAZOLE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
CHRYSENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
BUTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
OCTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
PROPYLNITROSAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZO(
A,
H)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
29
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
46:
20
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZOFURAN,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIMETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
FLUORENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
30
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
46:
33
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
INDENO(
1,2,3­
CD)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ISOPHORONE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DECANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DOCOSANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DODECANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
EICOSANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
HEXACOSANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
HEXADECANE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
OCTACOSANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
100.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
OCTADECANE,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
31
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
46:
47
2002
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TETRACOSANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TETRADECANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TRIACONTANE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
NAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
NITROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
P­
CYMENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PENTACHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PHENANTHRENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
50.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PHENOL,
2­
METHYL­
4,6­
DINITRO­,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
10^­
4
10^­
3
10^­
2
10^­
1
10^
0
10^
1
10^
2
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
STYRENE,
NG/
UL
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
32
of
32
Log­
10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
47:
01
2002
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
50
100
500
Lab:
1
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
1
of
13
APPENDIX
B
­
2
­
2
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
10
50
100
500
Lab:
2
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
500.0
Lab:
3
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
50
100
500
1000
Lab:
4
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
90
100
200
300
400
500
600
Lab:
5
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
50
100
500
Lab:
6
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
50
100
500
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
7
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
50
100
500
Lab:
8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
9
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
1
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
2
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
16:
51
2002
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
50
100
500
Lab:
2
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
3
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
4
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Lab:
5
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
6
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
1
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
7
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
Lab:
9
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
1
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
3
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
16:
54
2002
1
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Lab:
2
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
3
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
4
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
5
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
6
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
7
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
8
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
9
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
1
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
4
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
16:
56
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
2
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
3
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
4
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
5
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
6
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Lab:
7
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Lab:
8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Lab:
9
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
1
COPPER,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
5
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
16:
59
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
2
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
3
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
4
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
5
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
6
COPPER,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Lab:
7
COPPER,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Lab:
8
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
9
COPPER,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
1
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
1
LEAD,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
6
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
17:
01
2002
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
2
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
3
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
4
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
5
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
6
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
7
LEAD,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
8
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
50
100
500
Lab:
9
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
5
10
50
Lab:
1
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
7
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
17:
04
2002
5
10
50
1
5
10
50
Lab:
2
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Lab:
3
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Lab:
4
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Lab:
5
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Lab:
6
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Lab:
7
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
Lab:
8
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Lab:
9
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Lab:
1
MERCURY,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
245
CVA)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
8
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
17:
07
2002
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Lab:
2
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Lab:
3
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Lab:
4
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Lab:
5
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Lab:
6
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Lab:
7
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Lab:
8
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Lab:
9
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
1
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
9
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
17:
10
2002
5
10
50
100
10
50
100
Lab:
2
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
3
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
4
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
5
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
6
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Lab:
7
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
9
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Lab:
1
NICKEL,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
10
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
17:
13
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
2
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
3
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
50
100
Lab:
4
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
5
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Lab:
6
NICKEL,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Lab:
7
NICKEL,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
5
10
50
100
Lab:
9
NICKEL,
UG/
L
10
50
100
500
1000
10
50
100
500
1000
Lab:
1
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
11
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
17:
16
2002
10
50
100
500
1000
1
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Lab:
2
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
500.0
1000.0
Lab:
3
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
10
50
100
500
1000
10
50
100
500
1000
Lab:
4
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
1
10
100
1000
Lab:
5
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
1
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Lab:
6
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
10
50
100
500
1000
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Lab:
7
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
5
10
50
100
500
1000
Lab:
8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
10
50
100
500
1000
Lab:
9
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
1
SILVER,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
12
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
17:
19
2002
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
2
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
3
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
4
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
5
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
6
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
7
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
8
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Lab:
9
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
1
ZINC,
UG/
L
Measurement
Results
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
13
of
13
Log­

10
of
Measured
Concentration
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Tue
Mar
26
17:
17:
21
2002
5
10
50
100
1
5
10
50
100
Lab:
2
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
3
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
4
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
5
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
6
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
50
100
Lab:
7
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
8
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Lab:
9
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Classicals,
Method
130.2
HARDNESS,
MG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
1
of
32
APPENDIX
B
­
3
­
1
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
0
50
100
150
200
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Classicals,
Method
160.2
TOTAL
SUSPENDED
SOLIDS,
MG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Classicals,
Method
1677
WAD
CYANIDE,
UG/
L
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Classicals,
Method
350.3
AMMONIA
AS
NITROGEN,
MG/
L
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
Classicals,
Method
365.2
TOTAL
PHOSPHORUS,
MG/
L
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
50
100
150
200
250
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Ag
107,
ppt
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Cd
111,
ppt
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Cu
63,
ppt
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
50
100
150
200
250
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Ni
60,
ppt
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
50
100
150
200
250
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
206,
ppt
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
50
100
150
200
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
207,
ppt
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
50
100
150
200
250
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
208,
ppt
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
50
100
150
200
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Sb
123,
ppt
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
2
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
03:
03
2002
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
100
200
300
400
500
600
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Se
82,
ppt
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Tl
205,
ppt
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Zn
66,
ppt
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method
1620
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Metals,
Method
1620
ANTIMONY,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Metals,
Method
1620
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Metals,
Method
1620
BARIUM,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Metals,
Method
1620
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
L
0
500
1000
1500
5
10
15
20
25
Metals,
Method
1620
BORON,
UG/
L
0
5
10
15
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Metals,
Method
1620
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
5
10
15
20
Metals,
Method
1620
CALCIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Metals,
Method
1620
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
3
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
03:
16
2002
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
5
10
15
Metals,
Method
1620
COBALT,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
2
4
6
8
10
Metals,
Method
1620
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
0
100
200
300
Metals,
Method
1620
IRON,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Metals,
Method
1620
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
20
30
40
50
60
Metals,
Method
1620
MAGNESIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
1620
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Metals,
Method
1620
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
500
1000
1500
5
10
15
20
25
30
Metals,
Method
1620
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0.5
1.0
1.5
Metals,
Method
1620
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
2
3
4
5
6
Metals,
Method
1620
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
20
30
40
50
60
70
Metals,
Method
1620
SODIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Metals,
Method
1620
THALLIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
4
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
03:
29
2002
0
100
200
300
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Metals,
Method
1620
TIN,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
1
2
3
4
Metals,
Method
1620
TITANIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
5
10
15
Metals,
Method
1620
VANADIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Metals,
Method
1620
YTTRIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Metals,
Method
1620
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Metals,
Method
200.8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
Metals,
Method
200.8
ANTIMONY,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Metals,
Method
200.8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
5
10
15
20
0.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
Metals,
Method
200.8
BARIUM,
UG/
L
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
Metals,
Method
200.8
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
Metals,
Method
200.8
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
5
10
15
20
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
Metals,
Method
200.8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
5
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
03:
44
2002
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.01
0.02
0.03
Metals,
Method
200.8
COBALT,
UG/
L
0
5
10
15
20
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Metals,
Method
200.8
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Metals,
Method
200.8
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.02
0.04
0.06
Metals,
Method
200.8
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Metals,
Method
200.8
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Metals,
Method
200.8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Metals,
Method
200.8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Metals,
Method
200.8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
Metals,
Method
200.8
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
Metals,
Method
200.8
THALLIUM,
UG/
L
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.025
Metals,
Method
200.8
THORIUM,
UG/
L
0.0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.0
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
Metals,
Method
200.8
URANIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
6
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
04:
01
2002
0
50
100
150
200
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Metals,
Method
200.8
VANADIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Metals,
Method
200.8
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,1,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,1­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
5
10
15
20
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,2,2­
TCE+
1,2,3­
TCP,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,2­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DIBROMOETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
7
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
04:
15
2002
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOFORM,
UG/
L
2
4
6
8
10
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
8
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
04:
28
2002
0
5
10
15
20
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CARBONTET+
1,1­
DCP,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROFORM,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
5
10
15
20
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CIS­
1,2­
DCE+
2,2­
DCP,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
DIBROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
METHYLENE
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
9
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
04:
44
2002
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRANS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
6.835908*
10^­
6
1.000055*
10^­
1
2.000041*
10^­
1
3.000027*
10^­
1
4.000013*
10^­
1
5*
10^­
1
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.1
0.2
0.3
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
VINYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2,4­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
5
10
15
20
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,3,5­
TMB+
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
10
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
05:
01
2002
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
BENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
ETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
5
10
15
20
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
HEXCHLOBUTADIENE+
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
5
10
15
20
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
M+
P
XYLENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
N­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
N­
PROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
5
10
15
20
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
O­
XYLENE+
STYRENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
11
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
05:
18
2002
0
5
10
15
20
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
P­
ISOPROPTOL+
1,4­
DCB,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
SEC­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TERT­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TOLUENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,1,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,1­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,2,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,2­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
12
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
05:
42
2002
0
50
100
150
200
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
50
100
150
200
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROPROPANONE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,4­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DIBROMO­
3­
CHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DIBROMOETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
13
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
06:
06
2002
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,3,5­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
100
200
300
Organics,
Method
524.2
1­
CHLOROBUTANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
2,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
BUTANONE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
HEXANONE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
NITROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
4­
ISOPROPYLTOLUENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
14
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
06:
27
2002
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
524.2
4­
METHYL­
2­
PENTANONE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
524.2
ACETONE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
ACRYLONITRILE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
ALLYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
BENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOFORM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
524.2
CARBON
DISULFIDE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
524.2
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
15
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
06:
40
2002
50
100
150
200
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROACETONITRILE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROFORM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
CIS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
524.2
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
524.2
DIBROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
524.2
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
DIETHYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
ETHYL
METHACRYLATE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
16
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
06:
53
2002
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
ETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
524.2
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
524.2
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
ISOPROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
M+
P
XYLENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHACRYLONITRILE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYL
IODIDE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYL
TERT­
BUTYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYLACRYLATE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYLENE
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYLMETHACRYLATE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
N­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
17
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
07:
07
2002
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
N­
PROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
524.2
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
O­
XYLENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
PENTACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
SEC­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
STYRENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
524.2
TERT­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
524.2
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
TOLUENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRANS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRANS­
1,4­
DICHLORO­
2­
BUTENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
18
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
07:
20
2002
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0.0
4.9998
9.9995
14.9993
19.9990
Organics,
Method
524.2
VINYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
524.2
XYLENE
(
TOTAL),
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2­
DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,3,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4,5­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
19
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
07:
34
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DIMETHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DINITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,6­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
CHLORONAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
CHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
PICOLINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
3,3'­
DICHLOROBENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
20
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
07:
51
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
CHLORO­
3­
METHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
CHLOROPHENYLPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ACENAPHTHENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ACENAPHTHYLENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ALPHA­
TERPINEOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
A)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
A)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
B)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
GHI)
PERYLENE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
21
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
08:
07
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
K)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BETA­
NAPHTHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIPHENYL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROISOPROPYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BUTYL
BENZYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
CARBAZOLE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
CHRYSENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
BUTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
OCTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
22
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
08:
29
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
PROPYLNITROSAMINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZO(
A,
H)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZOFURAN,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIMETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
FLUORENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
23
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
08:
46
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
INDENO(
1,2,3­
CD)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ISOPHORONE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
DECANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
DOCOSANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
DODECANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
EICOSANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
HEXACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
HEXADECANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
24
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
09:
01
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
OCTACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
OCTADECANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
TETRACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
TETRADECANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
TRIACONTANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
NAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
NITROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
P­
CYMENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PENTACHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PHENANTHRENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PHENOL,
2­
METHYL­
4,6­
DINITRO­,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
25
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
09:
20
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
STYRENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2­
DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,3,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4,5­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
26
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
09:
39
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DIMETHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DINITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,6­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
CHLORONAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
CHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
PICOLINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
3,3'­
DICHLOROBENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
CHLORO­
3­
METHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
CHLOROPHENYLPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
27
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
09:
54
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ACENAPHTHENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ACENAPHTHYLENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ALPHA­
TERPINEOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
A)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
A)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
B)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
GHI)
PERYLENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
K)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BETA­
NAPHTHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
28
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
10:
07
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIPHENYL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROISOPROPYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BUTYL
BENZYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
CARBAZOLE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
CHRYSENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
BUTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
OCTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
PROPYLNITROSAMINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZO(
A,
H)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
29
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
10:
21
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZOFURAN,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIMETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
FLUORENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
30
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
10:
35
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
INDENO(
1,2,3­
CD)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ISOPHORONE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DECANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DOCOSANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DODECANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
EICOSANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
HEXACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
HEXADECANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
OCTACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
OCTADECANE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
31
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
10:
49
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TETRACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TETRADECANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TRIACONTANE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
NAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
NITROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
P­
CYMENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PENTACHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PHENANTHRENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PHENOL,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PHENOL,
2­
METHYL­
4,6­
DINITRO­,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
STYRENE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
32
of
32
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
11:
03
2002
0
100
200
300
400
500
10
12
14
16
18
20
Lab:
1
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
1
of
13
APPENDIX
B
­
3
­
2
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
0
100
200
300
400
500
50
60
70
80
90
100
Lab:
2
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
8
9
10
11
Lab:
3
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
260
270
280
290
300
Lab:
4
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Lab:
5
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
15
20
25
30
35
Lab:
6
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
45
50
55
60
Lab:
7
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
20
30
40
50
60
70
Lab:
8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
120
130
140
150
160
170
Lab:
9
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
8
10
12
14
16
Lab:
1
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
2
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
21
2002
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
30
40
50
60
70
Lab:
2
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Lab:
3
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Lab:
4
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2
4
6
8
Lab:
5
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
6
7
8
9
10
11
Lab:
6
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Lab:
7
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
5
10
15
20
Lab:
8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
15
20
25
30
Lab:
9
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
1
2
3
4
Lab:
1
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
3
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
23
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
3
4
5
6
Lab:
2
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
3
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
6
8
10
12
Lab:
4
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
5
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
1
2
3
4
Lab:
6
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Lab:
7
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
1
2
3
4
5
Lab:
8
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
1
2
3
4
5
Lab:
9
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
Lab:
1
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
4
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
24
2002
0
50
100
150
200
250
2
4
6
8
10
12
Lab:
2
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
1
2
3
4
5
Lab:
3
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Lab:
4
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
2
4
6
Lab:
5
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
1
2
3
4
5
Lab:
6
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
2
4
6
8
10
Lab:
7
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
2
4
6
8
10
12
Lab:
8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
4
6
8
10
12
Lab:
9
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
2
3
4
5
6
Lab:
1
COPPER,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
5
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
26
2002
0
50
100
150
200
2
4
6
8
10
Lab:
2
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
1
2
3
4
Lab:
3
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
40
41
42
43
44
45
Lab:
4
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lab:
5
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
1
2
3
4
5
Lab:
6
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
4
6
8
Lab:
7
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
2
4
6
8
10
Lab:
8
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Lab:
9
COPPER,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Lab:
1
LEAD,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
6
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
28
2002
0
100
200
300
400
500
50
100
150
200
Lab:
2
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
2
4
6
8
10
12
Lab:
3
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
20
25
30
35
Lab:
4
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
2
4
6
8
10
Lab:
5
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
5
10
15
20
Lab:
6
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
10
15
20
25
Lab:
7
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
5
10
15
20
Lab:
8
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
100
200
300
400
500
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
Lab:
9
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
1.0
1.2
1.4
Lab:
1
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
7
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
30
2002
0
10
20
30
40
50
5.8
6.0
6.2
6.4
6.6
Lab:
2
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Lab:
3
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
20
40
60
80
100
120
Lab:
4
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
5
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
1
2
3
4
Lab:
6
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
7
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
Lab:
8
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0
10
20
30
40
50
2
3
4
5
Lab:
9
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Lab:
1
MERCURY,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
8
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
32
2002
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
Lab:
2
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Lab:
3
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Lab:
4
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
Lab:
5
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Lab:
6
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Lab:
7
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Lab:
8
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.05
0.10
0.15
Lab:
9
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
3
4
5
Lab:
1
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
9
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
34
2002
0
50
100
150
200
250
18
20
22
24
26
Lab:
2
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
2
4
6
8
10
Lab:
3
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
8
10
12
14
16
18
Lab:
4
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
1
2
3
4
5
Lab:
5
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
5
10
15
20
Lab:
6
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
6
8
10
12
14
16
Lab:
7
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
1
2
3
4
Lab:
8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
4
6
8
10
12
14
Lab:
9
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
Lab:
1
NICKEL,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
10
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
36
2002
0
50
100
150
200
20
40
60
80
Lab:
2
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
1
2
3
4
Lab:
3
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
10
15
20
25
30
35
Lab:
4
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
1
2
3
4
5
Lab:
5
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
0
100
200
300
Lab:
6
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Lab:
7
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
2
4
6
8
Lab:
8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
4
6
8
10
Lab:
9
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
10
20
30
40
Lab:
1
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
11
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
38
2002
0
200
400
600
800
1000
100
200
300
400
Lab:
2
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
10
20
30
40
Lab:
3
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
40
50
60
70
Lab:
4
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
5
10
15
20
25
Lab:
5
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0
100
200
300
Lab:
6
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
20
30
40
50
60
Lab:
7
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
5
10
15
20
25
30
Lab:
8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
200
400
600
800
1000
40
60
80
100
Lab:
9
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
1
SILVER,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
12
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
40
2002
0
20
40
60
80
100
5
10
15
Lab:
2
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Lab:
3
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
43
44
45
46
47
Lab:
4
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Lab:
5
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
20
40
60
80
Lab:
6
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Lab:
7
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
1
2
3
4
Lab:
8
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
20
40
60
80
100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lab:
9
SILVER,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
2
3
4
5
Lab:
1
ZINC,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Original
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
13
of
13
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
42
2002
0
50
100
150
200
250
42
44
46
48
50
52
Lab:
2
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
2
3
4
5
Lab:
3
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
10
20
30
40
Lab:
4
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
2
4
6
8
Lab:
5
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
1
2
3
4
Lab:
6
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
6
8
10
12
14
16
Lab:
7
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
5
10
15
Lab:
8
ZINC,
UG/
L
0
50
100
150
200
250
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
9
ZINC,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Classicals,
Method
130.2
HARDNESS,
MG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
1
of
32
APPENDIX
B
­
4
­
1
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Classicals,
Method
160.2
TOTAL
SUSPENDED
SOLIDS,
MG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
Classicals,
Method
1677
WAD
CYANIDE,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.005
0.010
0.050
Classicals,
Method
350.3
AMMONIA
AS
NITROGEN,
MG/
L
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
Classicals,
Method
365.2
TOTAL
PHOSPHORUS,
MG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Ag
107,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Cd
111,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
5
10
50
100
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Cu
63,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
5
10
50
100
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Ni
60,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
206,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
1
5
10
50
100
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
207,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
5
10
50
100
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
208,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
100.0
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Sb
123,
ppt
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
2
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
24:
15
2002
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
50
100
500
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Se
82,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
1
5
10
50
100
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Tl
205,
ppt
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
5
10
50
100
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Zn
66,
ppt
1
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
50
100
Metals,
Method
1620
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Metals,
Method
1620
ANTIMONY,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Metals,
Method
1620
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Metals,
Method
1620
BARIUM,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.1
0.5
1.0
Metals,
Method
1620
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
Metals,
Method
1620
BORON,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
Metals,
Method
1620
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
Metals,
Method
1620
CALCIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.1
0.5
Metals,
Method
1620
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
3
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
24:
28
2002
1
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
Metals,
Method
1620
COBALT,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
5
10
Metals,
Method
1620
COPPER,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
50
100
Metals,
Method
1620
IRON,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Metals,
Method
1620
LEAD,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5000
20
30
40
50
60
Metals,
Method
1620
MAGNESIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Metals,
Method
1620
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.0
Metals,
Method
1620
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
Metals,
Method
1620
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Metals,
Method
1620
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
500.0
2
3
4
5
6
Metals,
Method
1620
SILVER,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
500
5000
20
30
40
50
60
70
Metals,
Method
1620
SODIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Metals,
Method
1620
THALLIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
4
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
24:
42
2002
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.0
3.0
Metals,
Method
1620
TIN,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Metals,
Method
1620
TITANIUM,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
500
5
10
Metals,
Method
1620
VANADIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Metals,
Method
1620
YTTRIUM,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Metals,
Method
1620
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
500.0
1
5
10
Metals,
Method
200.8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Metals,
Method
200.8
ANTIMONY,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Metals,
Method
200.8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Metals,
Method
200.8
BARIUM,
UG/
L
0.005
0.050
0.500
5.000
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Metals,
Method
200.8
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.001
0.005
0.010
Metals,
Method
200.8
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
Metals,
Method
200.8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
5
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
24:
55
2002
0.0005
0.0050
0.0500
0.5000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0050
0.0100
Metals,
Method
200.8
COBALT,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
Metals,
Method
200.8
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Metals,
Method
200.8
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.005
0.010
0.050
Metals,
Method
200.8
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.005
0.050
0.500
5.000
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Metals,
Method
200.8
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.0005
0.0050
0.0500
0.5000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0050
0.0100
0.0500
0.1000
Metals,
Method
200.8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Metals,
Method
200.8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Metals,
Method
200.8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.0005
0.0050
0.0500
0.5000
0.001
0.005
0.010
Metals,
Method
200.8
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.0001
0.0005
0.0050
0.0500
0.0005
0.0010
Metals,
Method
200.8
THALLIUM,
UG/
L
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0050
0.0100
Metals,
Method
200.8
THORIUM,
UG/
L
0.0001
0.0010
0.0100
0.1000
0.00005
0.00010
0.00050
0.00100
Metals,
Method
200.8
URANIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
6
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
25:
09
2002
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.1
0.5
1.0
Metals,
Method
200.8
VANADIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
Metals,
Method
200.8
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,1,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,1­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
1
5
10
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,2,2­
TCE+
1,2,3­
TCP,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,2­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,1­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DIBROMOETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
7
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
25:
23
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOFORM,
UG/
L
1
5
10
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.20
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
8
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
25:
36
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CARBONTET+
1,1­
DCP,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROFORM,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CIS­
1,2­
DCE+
2,2­
DCP,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
DIBROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
METHYLENE
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
9
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
25:
49
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRANS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
Organics,
Method
502.2­
ELCD
VINYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2,4­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,3,5­
TMB+
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
10
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
26:
02
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
BENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
ETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.01
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
HEXCHLOBUTADIENE+
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
M+
P
XYLENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
N­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
N­
PROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
O­
XYLENE+
STYRENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
11
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
26:
16
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
P­
ISOPROPTOL+
1,4­
DCB,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
SEC­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TERT­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.05
0.50
5.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
Organics,
Method
502.2­
PID
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,1,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,1­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,2,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1,2­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
12
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
26:
29
2002
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
50
100
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROPROPANONE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2,4­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DIBROMO­
3­
CHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DIBROMOETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
13
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
26:
42
2002
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,3,5­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
1­
CHLOROBUTANE,
UG/
L
1
5
10
50
100
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
2,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
BUTANONE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
HEXANONE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
2­
NITROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
4­
ISOPROPYLTOLUENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
14
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
26:
55
2002
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
4­
METHYL­
2­
PENTANONE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
ACETONE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
ACRYLONITRILE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
ALLYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
BENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOFORM,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
BROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
CARBON
DISULFIDE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
15
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
27:
09
2002
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROACETONITRILE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROFORM,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
CHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
CIS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
DIBROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
DIETHYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
ETHYL
METHACRYLATE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
16
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
27:
22
2002
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
ETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
ISOPROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
M+
P
XYLENE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHACRYLONITRILE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYL
IODIDE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYL
TERT­
BUTYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYLACRYLATE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYLENE
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
METHYLMETHACRYLATE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
N­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
17
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
27:
36
2002
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
N­
PROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
O­
XYLENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
PENTACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
SEC­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
STYRENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
524.2
TERT­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
TOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRANS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
5
10
50
100
0.5
1.0
5.0
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRANS­
1,4­
DICHLORO­
2­
BUTENE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
18
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
27:
49
2002
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
VINYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
524.2
XYLENE
(
TOTAL),
UG/
L
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,2­
DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,3,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4,5­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
19
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
28:
03
2002
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DIMETHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DINITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2,6­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
CHLORONAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
CHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
2­
PICOLINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
3,3'­
DICHLOROBENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
20
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
28:
17
2002
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
CHLORO­
3­
METHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
CHLOROPHENYLPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
4­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ACENAPHTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ACENAPHTHYLENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ALPHA­
TERPINEOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
A)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
A)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
B)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
GHI)
PERYLENE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
21
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
28:
30
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
K)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BETA­
NAPHTHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIPHENYL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROISOPROPYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
BUTYL
BENZYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
CARBAZOLE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
CHRYSENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
BUTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
OCTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
22
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
28:
44
2002
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
PROPYLNITROSAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZO(
A,
H)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZOFURAN,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIMETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
DIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
FLUORENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
23
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
28:
58
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
INDENO(
1,2,3­
CD)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
ISOPHORONE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
DECANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
DOCOSANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
DODECANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
EICOSANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
HEXACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
HEXADECANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
24
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
29:
11
2002
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
OCTACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
OCTADECANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
TETRACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
TETRADECANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
N­
TRIACONTANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
NAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
NITROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
P­
CYMENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PENTACHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PHENANTHRENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PHENOL,
2­
METHYL­
4,6­
DINITRO­,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
25
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
29:
25
2002
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
0
STYRENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,2­
DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,3,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4,5­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DICHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
26
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
29:
39
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DIMETHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DINITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2,6­
DINITROTOLUENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
CHLORONAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
CHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
2­
PICOLINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
3,3'­
DICHLOROBENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
CHLORO­
3­
METHYLPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
CHLOROPHENYLPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
27
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
29:
53
2002
1
5
10
50
100
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
4­
NITROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ACENAPHTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ACENAPHTHYLENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ALPHA­
TERPINEOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZIDINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
A)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
A)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
B)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
GHI)
PERYLENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
K)
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BETA­
NAPHTHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
28
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
30:
06
2002
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIPHENYL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0.1
0.5
5.0
50.0
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROISOPROPYL)
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
BUTYL
BENZYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
CARBAZOLE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
CHRYSENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
BUTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
OCTYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
PROPYLNITROSAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZO(
A,
H)
ANTHRACENE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
29
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
30:
20
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZOFURAN,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIMETHYL
PHTHALATE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIPHENYL
ETHER,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
DIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
FLUORANTHENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
10.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
FLUORENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
5.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
30
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
30:
35
2002
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
INDENO(
1,2,3­
CD)
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
ISOPHORONE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DECANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DOCOSANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DODECANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
EICOSANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
HEXACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
HEXADECANE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
OCTACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
OCTADECANE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
31
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
30:
49
2002
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TETRACOSANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TETRADECANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TRIACONTANE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
NAPHTHALENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
NITROBENZENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
5.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
P­
CYMENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.50
1.00
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PENTACHLOROPHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PHENANTHRENE,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.001
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PHENOL,
NG/
UL
0.05
0.50
5.00
50.00
0.005
0.010
0.050
0.100
0.500
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PHENOL,
2­
METHYL­
4,6­
DINITRO­,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
PYRENE,
NG/
UL
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
Organics,
Method
1625:
T=
1000
STYRENE,
NG/
UL
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
32
of
32
Log­
10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd1.
s
Mon
Mar
18
16:
31:
04
2002
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
9
10
20
Lab:
1
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
1
of
13
APPENDIX
B
­
4
­
2
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
50
60
70
80
90
100
Lab:
2
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
8
9
10
Lab:
3
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
300
Lab:
4
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
20
Lab:
5
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
20
30
Lab:
6
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
50
60
Lab:
7
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
20
30
40
50
60
70
Lab:
8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
100
Lab:
9
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
7
8
9
10
Lab:
1
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
2
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
49
2002
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
30
40
50
60
70
Lab:
2
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Lab:
3
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
20
30
40
50
Lab:
4
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1
5
Lab:
5
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
7
8
9
10
Lab:
6
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
20
30
40
Lab:
7
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1
5
10
Lab:
8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
20
30
Lab:
9
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Lab:
1
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
3
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
51
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
3
4
5
6
Lab:
2
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Lab:
3
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lab:
4
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Lab:
5
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
Lab:
6
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.0
3.0
Lab:
7
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
Lab:
8
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Lab:
9
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
6
7
8
9
Lab:
1
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
4
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
53
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
Lab:
2
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
Lab:
3
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lab:
4
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
Lab:
5
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
2
3
4
5
Lab:
6
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lab:
7
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lab:
8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lab:
9
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
2
3
4
5
6
7
Lab:
1
COPPER,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
5
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
55
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
10
Lab:
2
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Lab:
3
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
40
Lab:
4
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Lab:
5
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.9
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Lab:
6
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lab:
7
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
Lab:
8
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
Lab:
9
COPPER,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
6
7
8
9
10
20
Lab:
1
LEAD,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
6
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
57
2002
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
10
50
100
Lab:
2
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
Lab:
3
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
20
30
Lab:
4
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Lab:
5
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
6
7
8
9
10
20
Lab:
6
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
8
9
10
20
Lab:
7
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
5
10
Lab:
8
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
10
20
Lab:
9
LEAD,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.9
1.0
Lab:
1
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
7
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
32:
59
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
6
Lab:
2
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Lab:
3
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
4
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Lab:
5
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.9
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Lab:
6
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Lab:
7
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.0
Lab:
8
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
2
3
4
5
Lab:
9
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.05
0.10
0.50
Lab:
1
MERCURY,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
8
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
01
2002
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
Lab:
2
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.05
0.10
Lab:
3
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.20
0.30
Lab:
4
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.05
0.10
Lab:
5
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.5
1.0
Lab:
6
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0.20
Lab:
7
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.05
0.10
Lab:
8
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.001
0.005
0.050
0.500
0.05
0.10
Lab:
9
MERCURY,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
3
4
5
Lab:
1
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
9
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
03
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
20
Lab:
2
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
Lab:
3
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
7
8
9
10
Lab:
4
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
Lab:
5
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
Lab:
6
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
6
7
8
9
10
Lab:
7
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Lab:
8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lab:
9
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
2
3
4
Lab:
1
NICKEL,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
10
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
05
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10
50
Lab:
2
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Lab:
3
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10
20
30
Lab:
4
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
Lab:
5
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
6
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
3
4
5
Lab:
7
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
10
Lab:
8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Lab:
9
NICKEL,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
7
8
9
10
20
30
40
Lab:
1
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
11
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
07
2002
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
50
100
Lab:
2
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
5
10
Lab:
3
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
40
50
60
70
Lab:
4
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
5
10
Lab:
5
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
5
10
50
100
Lab:
6
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
20
30
40
50
60
Lab:
7
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
5
10
Lab:
8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
1.0
10.0
100.0
1000.0
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Lab:
9
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.9
1.0
2.0
Lab:
1
SILVER,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
12
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
09
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
1
5
10
Lab:
2
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
2.0
Lab:
3
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
40
Lab:
4
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Lab:
5
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
5
10
50
Lab:
6
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
3
4
5
Lab:
7
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
Lab:
8
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
10.0
50.0
0.5
1.0
5.0
Lab:
9
SILVER,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
2
3
4
5
Lab:
1
ZINC,
UG/
L
Standard
Deviations
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
13
of
13
Log­

10
of
Observed
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd1.
s
Wed
Mar
20
13:
33:
11
2002
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
50
Lab:
2
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
2
3
4
5
Lab:
3
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
7
8
9
10
20
30
40
Lab:
4
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
5
10
Lab:
5
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
1
2
3
4
5
Lab:
6
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
6
7
8
9
10
Lab:
7
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
5
10
Lab:
8
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.1
0.5
1.0
5.0
50.0
10
50
100
Lab:
9
ZINC,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
5
10
15
20
Classicals,
Method
130.2
HARDNESS,
MG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
1
of
32
APPENDIX
B
­
5
­
1
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Classicals,
Method
160.2
TOTAL
SUSPENDED
SOLIDS,
MG/
L
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
Classicals,
Method
1677
WAD
CYANIDE,
UG/
L
open
circle:
postitive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
3.0
­
2.5
­
2.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
5
10
15
20
Classicals,
Method
350.3
AMMONIA
AS
NITROGEN,
MG/
L
­
2.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0
20
40
60
80
Classicals,
Method
365.2
TOTAL
PHOSPHORUS,
MG/
L
0
1
2
3
4
0
20
40
60
80
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Ag
107,
ppt
0
1
2
3
4
0
10
20
30
40
50
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Cd
111,
ppt
(
o)

0
1
2
3
4
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Cu
63,
ppt
open
circle:
postitive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)

0
1
2
3
4
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Ni
60,
ppt
open
circle:
postitive
of
negative
RSD
value
0
1
2
3
4
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
206,
ppt
(
o)

0
1
2
3
4
0
20
40
60
80
100
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
207,
ppt
open
circle:
postitive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)

0
1
2
3
4
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
Metals,
Method
ICP/
MS
Pb
208,
ppt
open
circle:
postitive
of
negative
RSD
value
0
1
2
3
4
0
20
40
60
80
Metals,
Method:
ICP/
MS
Sb
123,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
2
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
43:
23
2002
(
o)

0
1
2
3
4
0
2000
4000
6000
Metals,
Method:
ICP/
MS
Se
82,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0
1
2
3
4
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method:
ICP/
MS
Tl
205,
UG/
L
0
1
2
3
4
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method:
ICP/
MS
Zn
66,
UG/
L
(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)

­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
5000
10000
15000
Metals,
Method:
1620
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Metals,
Method:
1620
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
20
40
60
80
Metals,
Method:
1620
LEAD,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)(
o)
(
o)
(
o)(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Metals,
Method:
1620
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Metals,
Method:
1620
TIN,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
20
40
60
Metals,
Method:
1620
ANTIMONY,
UG/
L
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0
1000
2000
3000
Metals,
Method:
1620
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method:
1620
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
Metals,
Method:
1620
THALLIUM,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
3
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
43:
37
2002
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Metals,
Method:
1620
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)(
o)
(
o)

­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0
200
400
600
800
Metals,
Method:
1620
BARIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)

­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
Metals,
Method:
1620
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)

0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
20
40
60
80
Metals,
Method:
1620
BORON,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method:
1620
CALCIUM,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
100
200
300
400
Metals,
Method:
1620
COBALT,
UG/
L
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
50
100
150
200
Metals,
Method:
1620
COPPER,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
Metals,
Method:
1620
IRON,
UG/
L
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
Metals,
Method:
1620
MAGNESIUM,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Metals,
Method:
1620
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
20
40
60
80
Metals,
Method:
1620
NICKEL,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
2000
4000
6000
Metals,
Method:
1620
SILVER,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
4
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
43:
51
2002
(
o)(
o)
(
o)

1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Metals,
Method:
1620
SODIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Metals,
Method:
1620
TITANIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
100
200
300
400
Metals,
Method:
1620
VANADIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Metals,
Method:
1620
YTTRIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Metals,
Method:
1620
ZINC,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0
1
2
3
0
20
40
60
80
Metals,
Method:
200.8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
50
100
150
200
Metals,
Method:
200.8
ANTIMONY,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
1
0
1
2
0
100
200
300
Metals,
Method:
200.8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
20
40
60
80
100
Metals,
Method:
200.8
BARIUM,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Metals,
Method:
200.8
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)
(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)

­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
Metals,
Method:
200.8
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
10
20
30
40
Metals,
Method:
200.8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
5
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
44:
05
2002
(
o)
(
o)(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)

­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
20
40
60
80
Metals,
Method:
200.8
COBALT,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method:
200.8
COPPER,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Metals,
Method:
200.8
LEAD,
UG/
L
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
20
40
60
80
Metals,
Method:
200.8
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
Metals,
Method:
200.8
MERCURY,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)(
o)
(
o)

(
o)

­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method:
200.8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
50
100
150
Metals,
Method:
200.8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)

(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)

­
1
0
1
2
0
200
400
600
800
Metals,
Method:
200.8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
(
o)

­
3
­
2
­
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
Metals,
Method:
200.8
SILVER,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
4
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
20
40
60
Metals,
Method:
200.8
THALLIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
5
10
15
20
Metals,
Method:
200.8
THORIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
4
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
10
20
30
40
Metals,
Method:
200.8
URANIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
6
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
44:
20
2002
(
o)
(
o)(
o)(
o)
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
1
0
1
2
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Metals,
Method:
200.8
VANADIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Metals,
Method:
200.8
ZINC,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,1,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,1­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,2,2­
TCE+
1,2,3­
TCP,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,1,2­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,1­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,1­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
1
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DIBROMOETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
7
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
44:
33
2002
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
­
2.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
1
2
3
4
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOFORM,
UG/
L
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
BROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
8
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
44:
47
2002
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
CARBONTET+
1,1­
DCP,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROFORM,
UG/
L
­
2.0
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
CHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
CIS­
1,2­
DCE+
2,2­
DCP,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
DIBROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
METHYLENE
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
9
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
45:
00
2002
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
20
40
60
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
TRANS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
ELCD
VINYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
1,2,4­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
1,3,5­
TMB+
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
10
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
45:
14
2002
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
20
40
60
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
BENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
ETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
HEXCHLOBUTADIENE+
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
ISOPROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
M+
P
XYLENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
N­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
N­
PROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
O­
XYLENE+
STYRENE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
11
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
45:
27
2002
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
P­
ISOPROPTOL+
1,4­
DCB,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
SEC­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
TERT­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
­
1.5
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
TOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
502.2­
PID
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,1,1,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,1,1­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,1,2,2­
TETRACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,1,2­
TRICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
12
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
45:
41
2002
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROPROPANONE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,1­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,2,4­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
1.0
1.5
2.0
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,2­
DIBROMO­
3­
CHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,2­
DIBROMOETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
13
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
45:
54
2002
­
1
0
1
2
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,3,5­
TRIMETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
100
200
300
Organics,
Method:
524.2
1­
CHLOROBUTANE,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method:
524.2
2,2­
DICHLOROPROPANE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
524.2
2­
BUTANONE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method:
524.2
2­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
524.2
2­
HEXANONE,
UG/
L
1.0
1.5
2.0
1
2
3
4
5
Organics,
Method:
524.2
2­
NITROPROPANE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
524.2
4­
CHLOROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
524.2
4­
ISOPROPYLTOLUENE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
14
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
46:
07
2002
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
524.2
4­
METHYL­
2­
PENTANONE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
524.2
ACETONE,
UG/
L
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
524.2
ACRYLONITRILE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
524.2
ALLYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
524.2
BENZENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
BROMOBENZENE,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
524.2
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
524.2
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method:
524.2
BROMOFORM,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
524.2
BROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
CARBON
DISULFIDE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
524.2
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
15
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
46:
21
2002
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
524.2
CHLOROACETONITRILE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
524.2
CHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
524.2
CHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
CHLOROFORM,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
524.2
CHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
524.2
CIS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
524.2
CIS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
524.2
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
524.2
DIBROMOMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
524.2
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
DIETHYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
524.2
ETHYL
METHACRYLATE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
16
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
46:
35
2002
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
524.2
ETHYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method:
524.2
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
524.2
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
524.2
ISOPROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
524.2
M+
P
XYLENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method:
524.2
METHACRYLONITRILE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
METHYL
IODIDE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
524.2
METHYL
TERT­
BUTYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
524.2
METHYLACRYLATE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
524.2
METHYLENE
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
METHYLMETHACRYLATE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
524.2
N­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
17
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
46:
48
2002
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
524.2
N­
PROPYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
524.2
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
O­
XYLENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
524.2
PENTACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
524.2
SEC­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Organics,
Method:
524.2
STYRENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
524.2
TERT­
BUTYLBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
524.2
TETRACHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method:
524.2
TOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
TRANS­
1,2­
DICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
524.2
TRANS­
1,3­
DICHLOROPROPENE,
UG/
L
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
524.2
TRANS­
1,4­
DICHLORO­
2­
BUTENE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
18
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
47:
02
2002
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
524.2
TRICHLOROETHENE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Organics,
Method:
524.2
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Organics,
Method:
524.2
VINYL
CHLORIDE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
524.2
XYLENE
(
TOTAL),
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
1,2­
DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2,3,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2,4,5­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
19
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
47:
16
2002
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2,4,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DICHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DIMETHYLPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DINITROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2,4­
DINITROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2,6­
DINITROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2­
CHLORONAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2­
CHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2­
NITROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
2­
PICOLINE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
3,3'­
DICHLOROBENZIDINE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
4­
BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
20
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
47:
30
2002
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
4­
CHLORO­
3­
METHYLPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
4­
CHLOROPHENYLPHENYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
4­
NITROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
ACENAPHTHENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
ACENAPHTHYLENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
ALPHA­
TERPINEOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
ANTHRACENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BENZIDINE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
A)
ANTHRACENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
A)
PYRENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
B)
FLUORANTHENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
GHI)
PERYLENE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
21
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
47:
44
2002
­
1
0
1
2
2
4
6
8
10
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BENZO(
K)
FLUORANTHENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BETA­
NAPHTHYLAMINE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BIPHENYL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHYL)
ETHER,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
CHLOROISOPROPYL)
ETHER,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BIS(
2­
ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
BUTYL
BENZYL
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
CARBAZOLE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
CHRYSENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
BUTYL
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
OCTYL
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
22
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
47:
58
2002
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
DI­
N­
PROPYLNITROSAMINE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZO(
A,
H)
ANTHRACENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZOFURAN,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
50
100
150
200
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
DIETHYL
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
DIMETHYL
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
DIPHENYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
DIPHENYLAMINE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
FLUORANTHENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
FLUORENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
23
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
48:
12
2002
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
INDENO(
1,2,3­
CD)
PYRENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
ISOPHORONE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
DECANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
DOCOSANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
DODECANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
EICOSANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
HEXACOSANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
HEXADECANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
24
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
48:
26
2002
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
OCTACOSANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
OCTADECANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
TETRACOSANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
TETRADECANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
N­
TRIACONTANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
NITROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
P­
CYMENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
PENTACHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
PHENANTHRENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
PHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
PHENOL,
2­
METHYL­
4,6­
DINITRO­,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
25
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
48:
40
2002
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
PYRENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
0
STYRENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
1,2,3­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
1,2,4­
TRICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
1,2­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
1,2­
DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
1,3­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
50
100
150
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
1,4­
DICHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2,3,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2,4,5­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2,4,6­
TRICHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DICHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
26
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
48:
54
2002
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DIMETHYLPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
50
100
150
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DINITROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2,4­
DINITROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2,6­
DINITROTOLUENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2­
CHLORONAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2­
CHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2­
NITROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
2­
PICOLINE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
3,3'­
DICHLOROBENZIDINE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
4­
BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
4­
CHLORO­
3­
METHYLPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
4­
CHLOROPHENYLPHENYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
27
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
49:
08
2002
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
4­
NITROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
ACENAPHTHENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
ACENAPHTHYLENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
ALPHA­
TERPINEOL,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
ANTHRACENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BENZIDINE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
A)
ANTHRACENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
A)
PYRENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
B)
FLUORANTHENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
GHI)
PERYLENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BENZO(
K)
FLUORANTHENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BETA­
NAPHTHYLAMINE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
28
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
49:
22
2002
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BIPHENYL,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROETHYL)
ETHER,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
CHLOROISOPROPYL)
ETHER,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BIS(
2­
ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
BUTYL
BENZYL
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
CARBAZOLE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
CHRYSENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
BUTYL
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
OCTYL
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
DI­
N­
PROPYLNITROSAMINE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZO(
A,
H)
ANTHRACENE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
29
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
49:
36
2002
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZOFURAN,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
DIBENZOTHIOPHENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
DIETHYL
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
DIMETHYL
PHTHALATE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
DIPHENYL
ETHER,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
DIPHENYLAMINE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
FLUORANTHENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
FLUORENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
HEXACHLOROETHANE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
30
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
49:
50
2002
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
INDENO(
1,2,3­
CD)
PYRENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
ISOPHORONE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DECANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DOCOSANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
DODECANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
EICOSANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
HEXACOSANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
HEXADECANE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
OCTACOSANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
OCTADECANE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
31
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
50:
04
2002
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
2
4
6
8
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TETRACOSANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TETRADECANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
N­
TRIACONTANE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
NAPHTHALENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
NITROBENZENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
P­
CYMENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
PENTACHLOROPHENOL,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
2
4
6
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
PHENANTHRENE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
PHENOL,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
40
50
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
PHENOL,
2­
METHYL­
4,6­
DINITRO­,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
5
10
15
20
25
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
PYRENE,
UG/
L
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
0
10
20
30
Organics,
Method:
1625:
T=
1000
STYRENE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)
Episode
6000
Data
Page
32
of
32
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req004/
r004sd3.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
50:
18
2002
0
1
2
10
20
30
40
50
60
Lab:
1
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
1
of
13
APPENDIX
B
­
5
­
2
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
0
1
2
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Lab:
2
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
1
2
0
20
40
60
80
Lab:
3
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
1
2
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Lab:
4
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
1
2
5
10
15
Lab:
5
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
1
2
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Lab:
6
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
1
2
0
100
200
Lab:
7
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
1
2
0
50
100
150
Lab:
8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0
1
2
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Lab:
9
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Lab:
1
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
2
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
00
2002
(
o)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Lab:
2
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
3
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Lab:
4
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
5
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
6
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
(
o)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
100
200
300
Lab:
7
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
100
200
300
Lab:
8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Lab:
9
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)

­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Lab:
1
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
3
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
02
2002
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
2
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
3
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
100
200
300
Lab:
4
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)

­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
100
200
300
Lab:
5
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
Lab:
6
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)

­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
100
200
300
400
Lab:
7
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)

­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
8
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
(
o)

­
1.0
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
100
200
300
400
Lab:
9
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Lab:
1
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
4
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
04
2002
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
2
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
3
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
200
400
600
Lab:
4
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10
20
30
40
Lab:
5
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
100
200
300
Lab:
6
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Lab:
7
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
500
1000
1500
Lab:
8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
9
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
1
COPPER,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
5
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
06
2002
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
2
COPPER,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
3
COPPER,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
4
COPPER,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
20
40
60
80
Lab:
5
COPPER,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
6
COPPER,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
7
COPPER,
UG/
L
(
o)
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
8
COPPER,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
9
COPPER,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)

0
1
2
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
1
LEAD,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
6
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
08
2002
0
1
2
50
100
150
Lab:
2
LEAD,
UG/
L
0
1
2
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Lab:
3
LEAD,
UG/
L
(
o)
0
1
2
0
1000
2000
3000
Lab:
4
LEAD,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0
1
2
10
20
30
40
50
Lab:
5
LEAD,
UG/
L
(
o)
0
1
2
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Lab:
6
LEAD,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
(
o)

0
1
2
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Lab:
7
LEAD,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0
1
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
8
LEAD,
UG/
L
(
o)
0
1
2
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Lab:
9
LEAD,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1
0
1
0
200
400
600
Lab:
1
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
7
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
10
2002
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

­
1
0
1
0
100
200
300
400
Lab:
2
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1
0
1
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
3
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
(
o)

­
1
0
1
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Lab:
4
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1
0
1
0
20
40
60
Lab:
5
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
6
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
(
o)
­
1
0
1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
7
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
­
1
0
1
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
8
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1
0
1
50
100
150
Lab:
9
MANGANESE,
UG/
L
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
1
MERCURY,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
245.1
Cold
Vapor)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
8
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Wed
May
8
15:
03:
41
2002
(
o)
(
o)

­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
100
200
300
Lab:
2
MERCURY,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
(
o)

­
3
­
2
­
1
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
3
MERCURY,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
4
MERCURY,
UG/
L
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
5
MERCURY,
UG/
L
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
80
100
120
140
Lab:
6
MERCURY,
UG/
L
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
7
MERCURY,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)

­
3
­
2
­
1
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Lab:
8
MERCURY,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
20
40
60
80
Lab:
9
MERCURY,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
100
200
300
400
Lab:
1
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
9
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
14
2002
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
2
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10
20
30
40
50
Lab:
3
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
50
100
150
Lab:
4
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
50
100
150
Lab:
5
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Lab:
6
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Lab:
7
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
8
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
9
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
100
200
300
400
Lab:
1
NICKEL,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
10
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
16
2002
(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Lab:
2
NICKEL,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
Lab:
3
NICKEL,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
100
200
300
400
Lab:
4
NICKEL,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
Lab:
5
NICKEL,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
80
100
120
140
160
Lab:
6
NICKEL,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
7
NICKEL,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
(
o)
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Lab:
9
NICKEL,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
(
o)

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Lab:
1
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
11
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
18
2002
(
o)

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
Lab:
2
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
100
200
300
400
Lab:
3
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)
(
o)
(
o)

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Lab:
4
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
5
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Lab:
6
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)

0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
7
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0
200
400
600
800
Lab:
9
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
(
o)

­
1
0
1
2
0
100
200
300
400
500
Lab:
1
SILVER,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
12
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
20
2002
(
o)
(
o)

­
1
0
1
2
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
2
SILVER,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
1
0
1
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
3
SILVER,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
4
SILVER,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
50
100
150
200
Lab:
5
SILVER,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
50
100
150
200
Lab:
6
SILVER,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
200
400
600
Lab:
7
SILVER,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
Lab:
8
SILVER,
UG/
L
­
1
0
1
2
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Lab:
9
SILVER,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
20
40
60
Lab:
1
ZINC,
UG/
L
Relative
Standard
Deviation
vs
Spike
Concentrations
(
Log­
10
Scale)

(
Matrix
A,
Method
EPA
200.7
ICP/
AES)

AAMA
Metals
Data
Page
13
of
13
Relative
Standard
Deviation
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
c:/
pw/
ostmdl/
req005/
r005sd2.
s
Tue
May
7
16:
55:
22
2002
(
o)
(
o)

­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Lab:
2
ZINC,
UG/
L
open
circle:
positive
of
negative
RSD
value
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
20
40
60
Lab:
3
ZINC,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
100
200
300
Lab:
4
ZINC,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
20
40
60
80
Lab:
5
ZINC,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
Lab:
6
ZINC,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
10
20
30
40
Lab:
7
ZINC,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Lab:
8
ZINC,
UG/
L
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0
100
200
300
400
Lab:
9
ZINC,
UG/
L
10
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
1620
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
Standardized
Residuals
vs
Spike
Concentration
Episode
6000
Data
Page
1
of
3
APPENDIX
B
­
6
­
3
Standardized
Residuals
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
no
valid
MLE
estimate
Metals,
Method
1620
CADMIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
3
10
­
4
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
1620
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
0.1
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
1620
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
3
100
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
1620
LEAD,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
1
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
1620
LEAD,
UG/
L
calibration:
3
100
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
Metals,
Method
1620
MOLYBDENUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
100
­
1
0
1
2
Metals,
Method
1620
TIN,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
1
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
Metals,
Method
1620
TIN,
UG/
L
calibration:
3
100
1000
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
Metals,
Method
200.8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
1
10
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
200.8
ALUMINUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
3
1
10
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
Metals,
Method
200.8
ANTIMONY,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
10
100
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
200.8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
Standardized
Residuals
vs
Spike
Concentration
Episode
6000
Data
Page
2
of
3
Standardized
Residuals
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
0.1
1
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
200.8
ARSENIC,
UG/
L
calibration:
2
1
10
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
200.8
BARIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
0.1
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
200.8
BARIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
2
0.1
1
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
200.8
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
0.01
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
200.8
BERYLLIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
2
1
10
­
6
­
4
­
2
0
2
4
6
Metals,
Method
200.8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
0.1
­
4
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
200.8
CHROMIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
2
0.1
1
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
200.8
COBALT,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
1
10
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
200.8
COPPER,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
0.1
­
6
­
4
­
2
0
2
4
6
Metals,
Method
200.8
COPPER,
UG/
L
calibration:
2
1
10
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
Metals,
Method
200.8
LEAD,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
0.1
­
4
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
200.8
LEAD,
UG/
L
calibration:
2
Standardized
Residuals
vs
Spike
Concentration
Episode
6000
Data
Page
3
of
3
Standardized
Residuals
Log­
10
of
Spike
Concentration
1
10
­
0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Metals,
Method
200.8
MERCURY,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
1
10
­
5
0
5
Metals,
Method
200.8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
0.01
0.1
­
6
­
4
­
2
0
2
4
6
Metals,
Method
200.8
NICKEL,
UG/
L
calibration:
2
10
100
­
4
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
200.8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
0.1
1
­
4
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
200.8
SELENIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
2
10
100
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
200.8
VANADIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
1
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
200.8
VANADIUM,
UG/
L
calibration:
2
10
100
­
3
­
2
­
1
0
1
2
3
Metals,
Method
200.8
ZINC,
UG/
L
calibration:
1
1
­
4
­
2
0
2
4
Metals,
Method
200.8
ZINC,
UG/
L
calibration:
2
