UPDATED
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
COSTS
FOR
SECTION
316(
b)
PHASE
II
NOTICE
OF
DATA
AVAILABILITY
(
NODA)

January
31,
2003
1
I.
Information
Collection
Requirement
Cost
Analysis
Since
proposal,
EPA
has
made
several
corrections
and
revisions
to
its
burden
and
cost
estimates
for
implementing
the
information
collection
requirements
of
the
Section
316(
b)
Phase
II
rule,
based
on
comments
received
and
additional
analysis.
The
following
corrections
and
revisions
have
been
made
since
proposal:

°
EPA
corrected
the
hourly
rates
for
the
statistician
and
biological
technician
labor
categories,
which
were
inadvertently
transposed
at
proposal.
°
EPA
has
increased
the
burdens
associated
with
impingement
and
entrainment
monitoring
associated
with
the
Impingement
Monitoring
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study.
°
EPA
has
revised
the
pilot
study
costs
to
assume
that
only
facilities
which
are
projected
to
install
new
technologies
will
perform
pilot
studies,
and
to
be
proportional
to
the
projected
capital
costs
for
installing
these
new
technologies
to
comply
with
the
rule.

The
following
sections
present
the
rationale
and
results
of
EPA's
estimation
of
burden
and
costs
for
implementing
the
information
collection
requirements
of
the
Section
316(
b)
Phase
II
rule.

A.
Respondent
Labor
Categories
This
section
describes
the
facility
burden
estimates
for
information
collection
activities
associated
with
the
NPDES
permit
application
as
well
as
information
collection
activities
that
will
occur
on
an
annual
basis
after
the
permit
is
issued.
These
information
collection
activities
can
be
separated
into
monitoring,
conducting
analyses,
developing
reports,
and
maintaining
records.
Information
collection
would
require
in­
scope
facilities
to
devote
time
(
i.
e.,
as
measured
by
staff
hours)
and
resources
(
e.
g.,
copies
of
documents
and
report
mailings)
to
produce
the
necessary
NPDES
permit
applications,
implementation
plans,
and
yearly
status
reports.

EPA
expects
that
facility
employees,
including
managers,
engineers,
engineering
technicians,
statisticians,
biologists,
biological
technicians,
draftsmen,
and
clerical
staff,
will
devote
time
toward
gathering,
preparing,
and
submitting
the
various
documents.
To
develop
representative
profiles
of
each
employee's
relative
contribution,
EPA
assumed
burden
estimates
that
reflect
the
staffing
and
expertise
typically
found
in
manufacturing
facilities
and
power
generating
plants.
In
doing
this,
EPA
considered
the
time
and
qualifications
necessary
to
complete
a
variety
of
tasks:
reviewing
instructions,
planning
responses,
researching
data
sources,
gathering
and
analyzing
data,
typing
or
writing
the
information
requested,
reviewing
results,
conferring
with
permitting
authorities
and
expert
consultants,
and
sending
documents.

EPA
anticipates
that
facilities
will
use
contracted
services
to
perform
many
of
their
required
sampling
and
analysis
tasks.
The
contracted
staff
are
likely
to
include
project
managers,
biologists,
statisticians,
and
biological
technicians.
The
work
done
by
these
contracted
2
employees
will
be
done
on­
site
on
a
regular
basis.
Therefore,
the
hourly
burdens
associated
with
their
work
are
included
in
the
overall
burden
estimates
for
each
facility.

For
each
activity
burden
assumption,
EPA
selected
time
estimates
to
reflect
the
expected
effort
necessary
to
carry
out
these
activities
under
normal
conditions
and
reasonable
labor
efficiency
rates.
EPA
assumed
that
the
majority
of
the
actual
work
performed
by
facility
staff,
such
as
researching,
collecting,
and
analyzing
data,
as
well
as
writing
the
documents,
will
be
carried
out
by
junior
technical
staff.
Burdens
associated
with
managerial
and
senior
engineering
staff
include
time
for
actions
such
as
occasional
or
seasonal
visits
to
supervise
sampling
efforts,
as
well
as
periodic
review
of
lab
results
and
documentation.
EPA
assumed
that
the
facilities
will
employ
a
drafter
to
perform
computer
aided
drafting
(
CAD)
operations.
For
contracted
employees,
EPA
assumed
that
the
majority
of
the
work
would
be
carried
out
by
the
biologists
and
the
biological
technicians.

Labor
burdens
are
often
described
in
terms
of
days
or
weeks.
For
the
purpose
of
the
NODA,
the
term
day
refers
to
eight
total
hours
worked
by
one
or
more
employees
within
a
given
labor
category.
Likewise,
a
week
refers
to
when
one
or
more
employees
work
a
total
40
hours.
The
labor
costs
to
the
respondent
facilities
can
be
estimated
by
multiplying
the
time
spent
in
each
labor
category
by
an
appropriately
loaded
hourly
wage
rate.
All
base
wage
rates
for
facility
labor
categories
were
derived
from
the
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
Occupational
Outlook
Handbook
2002­
2003.
These
reported
labor
rates
were
based
upon
data
from
the
year
2000,
and
required
adjustment
for
inflation.
An
inflation
factor
of
3.9%,
derived
from
the
BLS
Employment
Cost
Index
(
BLS,
2001),
was
used
to
adjust
the
Occupational
Outlook
Handbook
labor
rates
to
reflect
labor
rates
for
June
of
2001.

A
compensatory
loading
factor
of
35%
was
used
to
account
for
any
paid
leave,
supplemental
pay,
insurance,
retirement
and
savings,
and
required
and
nonrequired
benefits
received
by
employees
(
BLS,
2001b).
EPA
assumed
an
additional
loading
factor
of
15%
to
account
for
general
overhead
costs
directly
attributable
to
facility
employees
performing
work
in
support
of
the
permit
process.
Expenses
for
contracted
employees
typically
include
higher
overhead
costs,
as
well
as
fee
to
ensure
profit
for
the
contracting
company.
EPA
assumes
that
the
overhead
for
the
contracted
employees
will
be
50%
and
the
fee
will
be
8%.

To
represent
the
base
labor
rate
for
facility
management,
EPA
used
the
average
national
salary
for
an
engineering
manager
of
$
84,070
per
year.
This
figure
was
divided
by
2,080
hours
to
derive
the
hourly
managerial
wage
rate
of
approximately
$
40
per
hour.
After
adjusting
this
rate
for
inflation,
compensation
and
overhead,
the
rate
is
approximately
$
67
per
hour.
The
median
annual
salary
of
$
40,020
for
an
engineering
technician
was
used
to
represent
the
base
labor
rate
for
junior
technical
staff.
After
determining
the
hourly
wage
rate
and
adjusting
for
inflation
and
other
factors,
this
labor
rate
was
approximately
$
32
per
hour.
The
median
annual
salary
for
a
drafter
performing
CAD
work
was
reported
to
be
$
17
per
hour,
and
after
adjusting
and
loading
the
rate
it
is
approximately
$
28.
The
reported
average
annual
salary
for
clerical
workers
was
$
21,130,
and
the
fully
adjusted
and
loaded
hourly
rate
is
$
18
per
hour.
3
To
represent
the
base
labor
rate
for
a
contracted
manager
of
monitoring
work
done
onsite
EPA
used
the
average
national
salary
for
a
natural
sciences
manager
of
$
75,880
per
year,
with
a
fully
loaded
rate
of
$
85
per
hour.
The
median
annual
salary
for
a
statistician
was
$
51,990
per
year,
with
an
adjusted
hourly
rate
of
approximately
$
57
per
hour.
Biologists
and
biological
technicians
had
an
average
hourly
pay
of
$
24
and
$
15,
and
a
fully
loaded
rate
of
$
55
and
$
35,
respectively.

B.
Permit
Application
Reporting
Labor
Burden
and
Costs
Permit
application
activities
refer
to
the
development
and
submittal
of
the
required
elements
of
the
application
for
reissuance
of
the
NPDES
permit.
This
involves
gathering,
analyzing,
and
characterizing
information
and
then
submitting
this
information
to
the
Director
for
review.
For
the
purpose
of
the
NODA,
the
labor
burden
and
costs
for
these
permit
application
activities
are
grouped
into
either
reporting
or
monitoring
requirements.
These
permitting
requirements
also
have
corresponding
capital
and
O&
M
costs
associated
with
them.

As
part
of
the
permit
application
process,
Phase
II
existing
facilities
will
gather
source
water
physical
data,
cooling
water
intake
structure
data
and
cooling
water
system
data.
This
information
is
analyzed
and
summarized
in
reports
which
are
delivered
to
the
director
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
permit
requirements.
Information
gathered
by
the
facility
for
a
report
can
also
be
used
as
a
starting
point
for
other
required
studies,
or
to
help
the
facility
determine
how
it
will
comply
with
permit
requirements.
As
a
result,
many
of
the
studies
will
be
done
in
a
manner
so
that
information
from
one
can
be
used
as
a
basis
for
another.

Reporting
activities
typically
have
incidental
record
keeping
burdens
associated
with
them.
These
burden
estimates
typically
cover
the
time
spent
printing,
copying,
filing
paper
documents,
and
making
back­
up
copies
of
electronic
files.
EPA
expects
that
much
of
this
work
is
done
by
clerical
staff.
However,
EPA
assumes
that
approximately
3%
of
the
time
non­
clerical
employees
spend
performing
rule­
related
activities
can
be
attributed
to
record
keeping
as
well.

Rule­
related
reporting
activities
will
also
result
in
incidental
costs
to
facilities
for
specific
items
not
covered
by
general
overhead.
These
costs,
often
referred
to
as
Other
Direct
Costs
(
ODCs),
are
for
office
supplies,
occasional
field
work
supplies,
and
shipping
and
handling
fees.
EPA
assumes
for
the
proposed
rule
that
typical
ODCs
are
between
$
1
and
$
2
per
total
hours
spent
on
an
activity,
but
could
be
as
much
as
$
3
to
$
4
per
hour
worked
when
the
activity
requires
some
field
work.
ODCs
incurred
by
the
company
contracted
to
do
the
monitoring
work
are
not
considered
because
they
are
factored
into
the
rates
charged
for
the
contracted
work.

Because
record
keeping
and
ODC
costs
for
reporting
activities
are
relatively
small
in
comparison
to
other
facility
costs,
detailed
breakouts
showing
record
keeping
burdens
and
costs
for
each
activity
are
not
included
in
the
NODA,
but
can
be
found
in
Appendix
A
of
the
ICR
Supporting
Statement.
4
1.
Start­
Up
Activities
All
facilities
will
incur
a
start­
up
burden
associated
with
reading
the
published
regulations,
sample
permits,
and
any
guidance
materials
associated
with
the
rule;
determining
the
required
staff
and
resources
necessary
to
successfully
complete
the
application
process,
and
meet
all
annual
monitoring
and
reporting
requirements;
and
training
staff
to
perform
tasks
that
they
would
not
be
required
to
conduct
if
the
rule
were
not
implemented.
These
start­
up
activities
are
assumed
to
be
performed
by
facility
management
and
junior
technical
staff.

Start­
Up
Activities
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
6
18
$
403
$
1,208
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
7.3
22
$
234
$
702
Clerical
$
18.20
1.0
3
$
18
$
55
2.
Permit
Application
Activities
Phase
II
existing
facilities
are
required
to
gather
permit
application
information
as
specified
by
40
CFR
122.21(
r)
so
that
the
Director
can
evaluate
the
potential
impact
to
the
water
body
in
which
the
intake
structure
is
located.
The
information
collected
under
40
CFR
122.21(
r)
includes
source
water
physical
data,
cooling
water
intake
structure
data,
source
water
baseline
biological
characterization
data,
and
a
Phase
II
existing
facility
cooling
water
system
description.

a.)
Source
Water
Physical
Data
EPA
anticipates
that
much
of
the
data
required
to
characterize
the
water
body
and
the
cooling
water
intake
structure
has
already
been
gathered
by
the
facility,
and
that
much
of
the
actual
facility
burden
is
from
deriving
the
requested
information
from
this
data.
To
derive
the
source
water
physical
data,
EPA
assumes
that
junior
technical
staff
will
work
with
a
CAD
operator
to
develop
a
description
of
the
physical
configuration
of
the
source
water
body
where
the
CWIS
is
located,
including
areal
dimensions,
depths,
salinity
and
temperature
regimes.
The
CAD
operator
will
produce
scaled
drawings
showing
the
physical
configuration
of
the
source
water
body
and
prepare
locational
maps
of
the
water
body.
The
junior
technical
staff
will
use
this
information
and
available
data
to
produce
a
report
characterizing
and
documenting
the
hydrological
and
geomorphological
features
of
the
source
water
body.
Depending
on
the
extent
of
existing
information
it
may
be
necessary
for
some
facilities
to
conduct
physical
studies
to
determine
the
intake's
area
of
influence
within
the
water
body.
EPA
assumes
these
studies
are
likely
to
consist
of
releasing
dyes
in
the
vicinity
of
CWIS
and
observing
how
the
dye
behaves
5
when
the
CWIS
is
operating.
Such
studies
are
routinely
done
when
a
facility
is
determining
an
appropriate
site
for
a
CWIS.

Source
Water
Physical
Data
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
0.7
2
$
45
$
134
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
5.3
16
$
170
$
510
CAD
Operator
$
28.10
13.3
40
$
375
$
1,124
b.)
Cooling
Water
Intake
Structure
Characterization
Cooling
water
intake
structure
data
will
be
used
to
develop
a
report
on
the
operation
of
the
intake
structure.
EPA
assumes
that
a
CAD
operator
will
spend
a
day
assisting
junior
technical
staff
in
preparing
a
narrative
description
of
the
configuration
of
the
CWIS
and
its
location
within
the
waterbody
and
in
the
water
column,
including
measurements
of
the
latitude
and
longitude
of
the
CWIS.
In
addition,
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
one
week
developing
a
narrative
that
describes
the
operation
of
the
CWIS,
including
design
flows,
daily
hours
of
operation,
number
of
days
of
the
year
in
operation,
and
seasonal
changes,
if
applicable.
Management
will
spend
two
days
reviewing
and
revising
this
characterization.
Junior
technical
staff
will
also
spend
one
week
developing
a
narrative
characterizing
the
facility's
cooling
water
system,
which
includes
a
flow
distribution
and
water
balance
diagram
for
the
facility
depicting
all
sources
of
water
to
the
facility,
recirculating
flows,
and
discharges.
Management
will
spend
two
days
reviewing
and
revising
this
characterization.

CWIS
Characterization
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
11.7
35
$
783
$
2,349
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
28.7
86
$
914
$
2,743
CAD
Operator
$
28.10
3.0
9
$
84
$
253
6
c.)
Permit
Application
Engineering
Calculations
EPA
anticipates
that
the
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
four
days
performing
engineering
calculations
for
the
source
water
body
and
CWIS
documents.
Management
will
spend
a
day
reviewing
and
revising
these
calculations.

Permit
Application
Engineering
Calculations
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
2.7
8
$
179
$
536
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
10.7
32
$
340
$
1,021
3.
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
Facilities
will
also
collect
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
to
evaluate
the
condition
of
the
biological
community
prior
to
each
permit
application.
The
level
of
effort
needed
to
collect
the
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
may
vary
considerably
from
one
facility
to
another,
depending
on
the
availability
of
existing
background
information
and
the
characteristics
of
the
water
body
in
which
the
CWIS
will
be
located.
EPA
assumes
that
for
most
facilities
there
is
sufficient
existing
data
for
facilities
to
develop
a
baseline
characterization
of
the
contributing
water
body's
biological
community.
Junior
technical
staff
are
anticipated
to
spend
two
weeks
gathering
existing
data,
and
documenting
data
that
are
not
available
along
with
efforts
made
to
identify
sources
of
data.
The
facility
manager
spends
one
week
overseeing
this
work
and
reviewing
the
results.
The
junior
technical
staff
then
spends
an
additional
week
and
a
half
analyzing
and
summarizing
the
available
data,
and
a
CAD
operator
spends
half
a
week
assisting
with
the
development
of
maps
and
diagrams.
The
manager
spends
four
days
reviewing
and
revising
the
results.

Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
24.0
72
$
1,610
$
4,831
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
46.7
140
$
1,489
$
4,466
CAD
Operator
$
28.10
6.7
20
$
187
$
562
Clerical
$
18.20
4.0
12
$
73
$
218
7
4.
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
Facilities
choosing
to
install
new
technologies
rather
than
reducing
flows
to
levels
commensurate
with
wet
cooling
towers
are
required
to
gather
and
submit
additional
information
in
the
form
of
a
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
to
confirm
that
the
technology(
ies),
operational
measures
and
restoration
measures
proposed
and/
or
implemented
at
the
intake
meet
the
applicable
performance
standards.

a.)
Description
of
Historical
Studies
That
Will
Be
Used
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
As
a
first
step
in
the
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study,
the
facility
must
develop
and
submit
a
proposal
for
the
collection
of
information
to
support
the
Study.
EPA
assumes
that
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
one
week
developing
a
list
and
description
of
any
historical
studies
characterizing
impingement
and
entrainment
and/
or
the
physical
and
biological
conditions
in
the
vicinity
of
the
intakes
and
their
relevancy
to
the
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study.
The
facility
management
will
spend
half
a
week
reviewing
the
collected
information
to
determine
the
extent
to
which
existing
data
are
representative
of
current
conditions,
are
sufficient
to
develop
a
scientifically
valid
estimate
of
impingement
and
entrainment,
and
were
collected
using
appropriate
quality
assurance/
quality
control
procedures.

Description
of
Historical
Studies
That
Will
Be
Used
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
6.7
20
$
447
$
1,342
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
13.3
40
$
425
$
1,276
Clerical
$
18.20
0.7
2
$
12
$
36
b.)
Description
of
Proposed
and/
or
Implemented
Technologies
Junior
technical
staff
are
assumed
to
spend
half
a
week
developing
a
description
of
the
proposed
and/
or
implemented
technologies,
operational
measures
and
restoration
measures
to
be
evaluated
in
the
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study.
Facility
management
spend
one
day
reviewing
and
revising
this
description.
8
Description
of
Proposed
and/
or
Implemented
Technologies
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
2.7
8
$
179
$
536
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
6.7
20
$
213
$
638
c.)
Source
Water
Sampling
Plan
Although
some
facilities
are
likely
to
have
sufficient
available
information
to
forego
an
extensive
monitoring
study,
EPA
assumes
that
all
facilities
performing
a
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
will
perform
an
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
involving
three
years
of
monitoring.
Therefore,
these
facilities
will
need
to
develop
and
submit
a
source
water
sampling
plan
that:
documents
all
methods
and
quality
assurance
procedures
for
sampling
and
data
analysis,
as
well
as
describes
the
study
area
(
including
the
area
of
influence
of
the
cooling
water
intake
structure
and
at
least
100
meters
beyond).
EPA
assumes
that
the
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
twenty
hours
reviewing
source
water
and
CWIS
data,
as
well
as
information
gathered
for
the
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization.
They
will
then
spend
another
twenty
hours
using
this
information
to
write
a
draft
of
the
source
water
sampling
plan.
A
CAD
operator
will
spend
one
day
assisting
the
junior
technical
staff
in
this
effort.
The
facility
manager
will
spend
four
days
supervising
this
effort,
reviewing
the
draft,
and
consulting
with
the
manager
of
the
contracted
firm
that
will
perform
the
monitoring.
The
contracted
manager
will
spend
one
day
reviewing
the
draft
and
providing
feedback.
The
junior
technical
staff
will
then
take
twenty
hours
to
revise
the
sampling
plan
and
the
facility
manager
will
spend
one
day
reviewing
and
revising
the
final
sampling
plan.

Source
Water
Sampling
Plan
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
13.3
40
$
895
$
2,684
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
20.0
60
$
638
$
1,914
CAD
Operator
$
28.10
2.7
8
$
75
$
225
Contracted
Manager
$
85.30
2.7
8
$
227
$
682
Clerical
$
18.20
1.3
4
$
24
$
73
9
5.
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
As
part
of
the
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study,
facilities
with
intakes
located
on
freshwater
rivers/
streams
must
submit
source
water
body
flow
information.
This
information
is
used
to
determine
the
impact
of
the
CWIS
on
the
natural
flow
of
the
source
water
and
is
an
important
factor
in
determining
the
appropriate
technologies.
Similarly,
facilities
with
intakes
on
freshwater
lakes
or
reservoirs
need
to
determine
the
extent
to
which
the
CWIS
disrupts
the
thermal
stratification
of
the
water
body.
EPA
anticipates
that
most
facilities
will
have
ready
access
to
existing
flow
and
thermal
stratification
information.
However,
EPA
assumes
that
some
facilities
will
need
to
take
flow
or
thermal
stratification
measurements
immediately
around
the
intake.
Junior
technical
staff
are
expected
to
take
four
days
to
gather
existing
information
and
take
measurements
for
freshwater
river
and
stream
flows,
and
one
week
for
lakes
and
reservoirs.
Junior
technical
staff
will
spend
an
additional
four
days
performing
engineering
calculations
and
developing
a
report.
Facility
management
will
spend
one
day
reviewing
and
revising
stream/
river
information,
and
take
one
and
a
half
days
for
lake/
reservoir
information.

Freshwater
Stream/
River
Flow
Information
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
2.7
8
$
179
$
536
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
21.3
64
$
681
$
2,042
Lake/
Reservoir
Thermal
Stratification
Information
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
4
12
$
268
$
805
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
24.0
72
$
766
$
2,297
6.
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
If
the
facility
chooses
to
use
design
and
construction
technologies
or
operational
measures
in
whole
or
in
part
to
meet
the
requirements
of
§
125.94,
the
facility
must
also
submit
a
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
as
part
of
the
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study.
EPA
assumes
that
a
CAD
operator
will
spend
one
day
delineating
the
hydraulic
zone
of
influence,
and
that
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
five
hours
assisting
them,
and
management
10
will
spend
two
hours
reviewing
work.
Junior
technical
staff
will
then
spend
one
and
a
half
days
performing
engineering
calculations
to
determine
anticipated
impingement
rates,
and
an
additional
two
days
developing
narrative
descriptions
of
the
design
and
operation
of
all
design
and
construction
technologies
or
operational
measures
(
existing
and
proposed),
used
to
meet
the
requirements
to
reduce
impingement
mortality.
Management
will
spend
a
day
reviewing
the
calculations
and
three
hours
reviewing
the
write­
up.
Those
facilities
that
also
must
address
entrainment
will
spend
approximately
the
same
amount
of
time
performing
engineering
calculations
and
developing
a
narrative
description.
Finally
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
one
week
documenting
that
these
chosen
technologies
reflects
BTA
at
the
facility's
site.

Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
(
Impingement
Only)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
4.3
13
$
291
$
872
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
24.3
73
$
776
$
2,329
CAD
Operator
$
28.10
2.7
8
$
75
$
225
Clerical
$
18.20
2.0
6
$
36
$
109
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
(
Impingement
&
Entrainment)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
8.0
24
$
537
$
1,610
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
33.7
101
$
1,074
$
3,222
CAD
Operator
$
28.10
2.7
8
$
75
$
225
Clerical
$
18.20
2.0
6
$
36
$
109
7.
Verification
Monitoring
Plan
As
part
of
the
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study,
facilities
must
include
a
plan
to
conduct,
at
a
minimum,
two
years
of
monitoring
to
verify
the
full­
scale
performance
of
the
proposed
or
implemented
technologies,
operational
measures,
or
restoration
measures.
EPA
assumes
that
the
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
a
week
and
a
half
writing
a
plan
that
describes
11
the
frequency
and
duration
of
monitoring,
the
locations
to
be
monitored,
the
basis
for
determining
the
locations,
and
the
information
that
will
be
included
in
the
final
report.
A
CAD
operator
will
spend
a
day
assisting
the
junior
technical
staff
with
the
drawings
and
diagrams
contained
in
the
plan.
The
facility
management
will
spend
a
week
overseeing
the
writing
of
the
plan
and
reviewing
and
revising
the
various
drafts
of
the
plan
before
it
is
finalized.

Verification
Monitoring
Plan
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
13.3
40
$
895
$
2,684
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
20.0
60
$
638
$
1,914
CAD
Operator
$
28.10
2.7
8
$
75
$
225
8.
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
If
a
facility
requests
a
site­
specific
evaluation
of
BTA,
it
will
first
need
to
demonstrate
to
the
Director
that
it
meets
one
of
two
cost
criteria.
The
first
criteria
requires
the
facility
to
demonstrate
that
its
cost
of
compliance
with
the
applicable
performance
standards
specified
would
be
significantly
greater
than
those
considered
when
the
performance
standards
were
established.
The
second
criteria
requires
a
facility
to
demonstrate
that
its
costs
would
be
significantly
greater
than
benefits
of
complying
with
the
performance
standards
at
the
facility's
site.

a.)
Comprehensive
Cost
Evaluation
Study
EPA
assumes
that
for
a
facility
to
demonstrate
to
the
Director
that
its
actual
implementation
costs
will
be
higher
than
those
suggested
by
the
performance
standard,
the
facility
will
need
to
provide
the
Director
with
detailed
information
about
the
site,
along
with
engineering
calculations
and
cost
estimates
used
to
justify
this
conclusion.
Much
of
the
sitespecific
information
will
have
been
gathered
during
the
initial
permit
application
process
and
the
source
water
baseline
biological
characterization.
Likewise,
many
of
the
initial
engineering
calculations
will
have
been
performed
for
the
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan.
Therefore,
the
main
effort
for
the
Comprehensive
Cost
Evaluation
Study
will
be
for
the
facility
to
justify
the
cost
estimates
it
claims
that
it
will
incur
to
install
and
operate
the
BTA
prescribed
in
the
performance
standards.
EPA
assumes
that
the
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
a
week
developing
cost
estimates
and
developing
an
initial
draft
of
the
study.
The
facility
manager
will
spend
two
days
overseeing
the
work
done
by
the
junior
staff
and
revising
the
initial
draft.
The
junior
technical
staff
will
then
spend
approximately
half
a
week
making
the
revisions
and
12
finalizing
the
report.
The
management
will
then
spend
half
a
day
reviewing
the
final
draft
and
writing
the
executive
summary.

Comprehensive
Cost
Evaluation
Study
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
6.7
20
$
447
$
1,342
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
20.0
60
$
638
$
1,914
b.)
Evaluate
Detailed
Mortality
Data
Facilities
choosing
to
demonstrate
that
their
costs
would
be
significantly
greater
than
the
benefits
of
complying
with
the
otherwise
applicable
requirements
must
use
a
comprehensive
methodology
to
fully
value
the
impacts
of
impingement
mortality
and
entrainment
at
the
site
and
the
benefits
achievable
by
compliance
with
the
applicable
requirements.
To
compare
benefits
to
costs,
the
facility
must
have
cost
estimates.
EPA
assumes
that
the
facility
will
use
the
cost
information
from
Comprehensive
Cost
Evaluation
for
this
purpose.
To
begin
assessment
of
potential
benefits,
the
facility
will
need
estimates
of
impingement
and
entrainment
reductions
resulting
from
use
of
the
proposed
technology
at
the
facility.
EPA
assumes
that
the
facility
will
use
the
estimates
of
impingement
and
entrainment
reductions
from
the
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
for
this
purpose.
The
facility
must
then
estimate
the
potential
recreational
and
commercial
value
of
these
organisms
over
the
same
period
of
time
that
it
would
be
paying
for
the
proposed
technology.
This
begins
with
a
detailed
evaluation
of
mortality
data.
EPA
assumes
that
the
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
a
week
reviewing
mortality
data
derived
from
the
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study,
and
developing
a
list
of
species,
their
impacted
life
stages,
and
corresponding
mortality
and
injury
reduction
estimates.
The
facility
manager
will
spend
half
a
day
reviewing
and
revising
this
list.

Evaluate
Detailed
Mortality
Data
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
1.3
4
$
89
$
268
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
13.3
40
$
425
$
1,276
c.)
Valuation
of
Monetized
Benefits
13
After
the
detailed
list
of
impacted
species
is
developed,
facility
and
contracted
staff
will
work
together
to
develop
estimates
of
the
commercial
and
recreation
value
of
the
impacted
species
and
the
other
species
which
depend
on
them
as
a
food
source.
EPA
assumes
the
biologists
contracted
to
do
the
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
will
take
the
lead
on
developing
the
monetized
benefit
estimates,
spending
five
weeks
to
develop
a
comprehensive
valuation
of
the
current
impacts
from
impingement
mortality
and
entrainment
at
the
site
and
the
benefits
derived
from
reducing
the
impact
to
commercial
and
recreational
species
residing
in
the
source
water.
The
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
three
and
a
half
weeks
assisting
the
biologist
and
helping
develop
and
revise
the
monetized
benefit
estimates.
A
statistician
will
spend
a
week
helping
with
the
development
of
present
value
estimates
for
the
technology
costs
and
the
monetized
benefits
so
that
they
can
be
compared.
Facility
management
and
the
contracted
manager
will
spend
a
week
and
a
week
and
a
half,
respectively,
reviewing
and
revising
the
work.

Perform
Valuation
of
Monetized
Benefits
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
13.3
40
$
895
$
2,684
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
46.7
140
$
1,489
$
4,466
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
20.0
60
$
1,706
$
5,118
Biologist
$
55.4
66.7
200
$
3,693
$
11,080
Statistician
$
56.8
13.3
40
$
757
$
2,272
d.)
Engineering
Calculations
for
Site­
Specific
BTA
Both
the
Comprehensive
Cost
Evaluation
and
the
Valuation
of
Monetized
Benefits
will
require
the
junior
technical
staff
to
perform
engineering
calculations
to
support
the
facility's
assertions.
EPA
assumes
that
the
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
approximately
one
week
performing
engineering
calculations
to
support
the
case
for
site­
specific
determination,
and
the
facility
management
will
spend
about
ten
hours
reviewing
and
revising
these
calculations.

Perform
Engineering
Calculations
for
Site
Specific
BTA
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
3.3
10
$
224
$
671
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
13.3
40
$
425
$
1,276
14
9.
Site­
Specific
Technology
Plan
This
plan
is
based
on
the
Comprehensive
Cost
Evaluation
Study,
and
the
valuation
of
monetized
benefits
if
one
was
performed
by
the
facility.
It
describes
the
design
and
operation
of
all
design
and
construction
technologies,
operational
measures,
and
restoration
measures
selected,
and
provides
information
that
demonstrates
the
effectiveness
of
the
selected
technologies
or
measures
for
reducing
the
impacts
on
the
species
of
concern.

a.)
Narrative
Description
of
Technologies
EPA
assumes
that
the
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
half
a
week
developing
a
narrative
description
of
the
technologies
and
measures
selected
by
the
facility.
The
facility
manager
will
devote
one
day
to
reviewing
and
revising
this
description.

Narrative
Description
of
Technologies
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
2.7
8
$
179
$
537
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
6.7
20
$
213
$
638
b.)
Document
That
Technologies
are
Optimal
The
facility
must
document
the
efficacy
of
the
proposed
and/
or
implemented
technologies
or
operational
measures
for
reducing
impingement
mortality
and
entrainment
of
all
life
stages
of
fish
and
shellfish.
EPA
assumes
that
the
junior
technical
staff
spends
one
week
documenting
the
efficacy
of
the
technologies
or
measures
based
on
the
information
used
to
support
a
site­
specific
determination
of
BTA,
and
results
from
representative
studies
and/
or
sitespecific
pilot
studies.
Facility
management
spends
one
day
reviewing
and
revising
this
document.

Document
Technologies
are
Optimal
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.10
2.7
8
$
179
$
537
Junior
Technical
$
31.90
13.3
40
$
425
$
1,276
Clerical
$
18.20
2.0
6
$
36
$
109
15
c.)
Site­
Specific
BTA
Design
Estimates
and
Engineering
Calculations
Both
the
narrative
description
and
the
documentation
of
efficacy
for
the
proposed
technology
or
measures
will
require
engineering
calculations,
design
estimates,
and
drawings.
EPA
assumes
that
the
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
a
week
and
a
half
performing
this
engineering
work.
The
facility
management
will
spend
three
days
reviewing
and
revising
this
work.
In
addition,
the
biologist
will
spend
a
day
assisting
the
junior
technical
staff
with
the
efficacy
calculations,
and
the
contracted
manager
will
spend
half
a
day
reviewing
the
work.

Site­
Specific
BTA
Design
Estimates
and
Engineering
Calculations
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
8.0
24
$
537
$
1,610
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
20.0
60
$
638
$
1,914
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
1.3
4
$
114
$
341
Biologist
$
55.4
2.7
8
$
148
$
443
C.
Permit
Application
Monitoring
Labor
Burden
and
Costs
Although
no
monitoring
studies
are
specifically
required
under
the
proposed
rule,
facilities
are
required
to
provide
the
Director
with
a
comprehensive
set
of
data
to
demonstrate
that
their
chosen
method
of
compliance
adequately
addresses
impingement
and
entrainment.
As
a
result,
EPA
anticipates
that
many
facilities
will
perform
monitoring
studies
to
obtain
the
necessary
information
to
complete
their
permit
application.
EPA
recognizes
that
there
will
be
a
range
of
potential
durations
and
costs
for
monitoring
studies
performed
by
facilities
as
part
of
the
permit
application
process.

1.
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
On
average,
the
study
is
expected
to
take
three
years
for
the
facilities
to
perform.
This
estimate
takes
into
account
that
some
facilities
will
have
access
to
existing
data,
which
may
allow
them
to
reduce
the
duration
of
the
monitoring
period,
while
other
facilities
may
require
additional
time
due
to
the
confounding
effects
of
other
factors
such
as
very
dry
years
or
fish
kills
due
to
red
tides.
The
Study
is
assumed
to
be
performed
prior
to
permit
issuance.
Facilities
that
become
subject
to
the
rule
within
the
first
three
years
are
assumed
to
provide
the
Director
with
preliminary
study
results,
and
complete
the
monitoring
after
the
permit
has
been
issued,
to
avoid
16
delays
in
permit
reissuance.
The
monitoring
study
consists
of
an
extensive
sampling
effort
performed
primarily
by
contracted
employees,
and
then
the
characterization
of
the
data
in
the
form
of
a
study
report
that
is
produced
by
both
facility
and
contracted
employees.

a.)
Sample
Types
To
accurately
characterize
the
effects
of
impingement
and
entrainment
on
the
aquatic
communities
found
in
the
source
water,
offshore
monitoring
must
occur
at
the
same
time
that
monitoring
for
impingement
and
entrainment
is
occurring.
As
a
result,
EPA
assumes
that
monitoring
is
performed
simultaneously
at
the
facility
for
impingement
and
entrainment,
and
offshore
at
the
edge
of
the
determined
zone
of
influence.
Since
impingement
more
often
impacts
adult
organisms,
while
entrainment
affects
juvenile
organisms,
offshore
samples
must
be
taken
of
both
juvenile
and
adult
organisms.
Therefore,
EPA
assumes
that
four
types
of
sampling
will
occur.

Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Sample
Types
Sample
Type
Location
of
Sample
Impingement
Sample
At
the
intake
structure.

Entrainment
Sample
In
the
facility.

Offshore
Sample
for
Juvenile
Organisms
At
the
edge
of
the
zone
of
influence.

Offshore
Sample
for
Adult
Organisms
At
the
edge
of
the
zone
of
influence.

To
accurately
characterize
seasonal
and
annual
fluctuations
in
aquatic
communities
impacted
by
the
CWIS,
EPA
assumes
sampling
is
performed
at
the
facility
on
a
biweekly
basis
over
three
years.
To
characterize
daily
fluctuations
each
time
sampling
occurs,
five
samples
are
taken
over
a
twenty­
four
hour
period.
As
a
result,
there
are
assumed
to
be
390
samples
taken
over
the
three
year
period
(
3
years
×
26
weeks
×
5
samples
=
390
samples),
for
each
sample
type.

b.)
Implementing
Offshore
Sampling
EPA
believes
that
a
sizable
majority
of
the
monitoring
work
will
be
carried
out
by
the
biologists
and
biological
technicians.
Over
the
course
of
the
three
year
monitoring
period,
other
employees
will
also
spend
time
contributing
to
the
use
of
the
monitoring
data.
For
example,
a
statistician
is
likely
to
spend
five
weeks
over
the
course
of
the
three
years
analyzing
the
monitoring
data.
This
work
is
not
likely
to
be
distributed
evenly
between
sample
type
or
from
month
to
month.
However,
for
illustrative
purposes
EPA
is
providing
estimates
of
employee
burdens
for
each
sample
type.

For
offshore
freshwater
sampling,
EPA
assumes
that
the
labor
burden
is:
17
°
Biologist:
A
biologist
spends
approximately
4
hours
conducting
each
offshore
freshwater
sampling
event.
°
Biological
Technician:
A
biological
technician
accompanies
the
biologist
on
each
site
visit,
spending
approximately
4
hours
conducting
each
offshore
freshwater
sampling
event.
°
Contracted
Manager:
Every
two
weeks
the
manager
of
the
contracted
firm
spends
on
average
of
two
hours
managing
the
offshore
sampling
part
of
the
project.
°
Statistician:
A
statistician
spends
approximately
four
days
each
year
analyzing
the
sampling
results
for
statistical
significance.
°
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
approximately
one
hour
every
two
weeks
to
review
the
monitoring
data
and
summarize
the
results.
°
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
will
read
over
these
offshore
monitoring
summaries.
°
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spend
approximately
two
days
a
year
handling
and
delivering
documents
to
the
facility
and
contracted
employees.

Implement
Offshore
Sampling,
Freshwater
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
2.7
8
$
179
$
537
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
26.0
78
$
829
$
2,488
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
53.3
160
$
4,549
$
13,648
Biologist
$
55.4
1,040.0
3120
$
57,616
$
172,848
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
1,040.0
3120
$
36,920
$
110,760
Statistician
$
56.8
33.3
100
$
1,893
$
5,680
Clerical
$
18.2
16.7
50
$
303
$
910
Similar
to
freshwater
offshore
sampling,
EPA
expects
that
the
same
number
of
samples
(
780
offshore
samples)
and
the
same
type
of
activities
will
occur
at
facilities
with
marine
waters.
However,
EPA
assumed
that
offshore
sampling
would
require
more
effort
at
marine
sites
than
at
freshwater
sites,
due
to
the
higher
levels
of
biota
typically
present.
Therefore,
EPA
estimates
that
the
offshore
marine
sampling
takes
approximately
30%
more
time
than
offshore
freshwater
sampling.
18
Implement
Offshore
Sampling,
Marine
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
3.3
10
$
224
$
671
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
33.7
101
$
1,074
$
3,222
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
53.3
160
$
4,549
$
13,648
Biologist
$
55.4
1,352.0
4056
$
74,901
$
224,702
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
1,352.0
4056
$
47,996
$
143,988
Statistician
$
56.8
33.3
100
$
1,893
$
5,680
Clerical
$
18.2
16.7
50
$
303
$
910
c.)
Implement
Impingement
Sampling
Impingement
monitoring
involves
collecting
data
on
aquatic
organisms
trapped
on
the
outer
part
of
an
intake
structure
or
against
screening
devices
during
periods
of
cooling
water
withdrawal,
to
determine
the
taxa
and
abundance
of
impinged
organisms.
Over
the
three
year
period,
EPA
assumes
that
the
freshwater
impingement
sampling
labor
burden
is:

°
Biologist:
A
biologist
spends
approximately
two
hours
taking
each
freshwater
impingement
sample,
and
an
additional
two
hours
analyzing
the
impinged
organisms.
°
Biological
Technician:
A
biological
technician
accompanies
the
biologist
on
each
site
visit,
spending
two
hours
taking
each
freshwater
impingement
sample,
and
an
additional
two
hours
analyzing
the
impinged
organisms.
°
Contracted
Manager:
Every
two
weeks
the
manager
of
the
contracted
firm
spends
on
average
of
one
hour
managing
the
impingement
sampling
portion
of
the
contract.
°
Statistician:
A
statistician
spends
approximately
two
days
each
year
analyzing
the
impingement
sampling
results
for
statistical
significance.
°
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
approximately
two
hours
every
three
months
to
review
the
monitoring
results
from
the
impingement
sampling
and
summarize
the
results.
°
Facility
Manager:
Is
assumed
to
review
the
impingement
monitoring
summaries.
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spends
approximately
one
day
over
the
course
of
a
year
handling
and
delivering
documents
to
the
facility
and
contracted
employees.
19
Implement
Freshwater
Impingement
Characterization
Sampling
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
1.3
4
$
89
$
268
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
8.0
24
$
255
$
766
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
26.7
80
$
2,275
$
6,824
Biologist
$
55.4
520.0
1560
$
28,808
$
86,424
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
520.0
1560
$
18,460
$
55,380
Statistician
$
56.8
16.7
50
$
947
$
2,840
Clerical
$
18.2
8.3
25
$
152
$
455
Impingement
sampling
at
facilities
with
intakes
in
marine
waters
is
expected
to
be
performed
in
the
same
manner
as
freshwater
impingement
sampling.
However,
the
sampling
effort
is
expected
to
take
30%
more
time
due
to
the
greater
abundance
and
diversity
of
organisms.

Implement
Marine
Impingement
Characterization
Sampling
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
1.3
4
$
89
$
268
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
10.3
31
$
330
$
989
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
26.7
80
$
2,275
$
6,824
Biologist
$
55.4
676.0
2028
$
37,450
$
112,351
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
676.0
2028
$
23,998
$
71,994
Statistician
$
56.8
16.7
50
$
947
$
2,840
Clerical
$
18.2
8.3
25
$
152
$
455
d.)
Implement
Entrainment
Sampling
20
Entrainment
monitoring
involves
the
collection
of
data
on
eggs,
larvae,
and
plankton
incorporated
with
cooling
water
flow
(
entering
and
passing
through
a
cooling
water
intake
structure
and
into
a
cooling
water
system),
to
determine
the
taxa
and
abundance
of
entrained
organisms.
Over
the
three
year
period,
EPA
assumes
that
the
entrainment
freshwater
sampling
labor
burden
is:

C
Biologist:
A
biologist
spends
on
average
two
hours
taking
each
entrainment
sample
and
one
hour
preserving
and
preparing
it
for
delivery
to
the
laboratory.
C
Biological
Technician:
A
biological
technician
accompanies
the
biologist
on
each
site
visit,
taking
approximately
two
hours
for
each
entrainment
sample
and
one
hour
helping
to
prepare
the
sample
for
shipping.
°
Contracted
Manager:
Every
two
weeks
the
manager
of
the
contracted
firm
spends
on
average
one
hour
managing
the
entrainment
sampling
portion
of
the
contract.
°
Statistician:
A
statistician
spends
half
a
day
every
three
months
analyzing
the
entrainment
sampling
results
for
statistical
significance.
°
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
approximately
two
hours
every
three
months
to
review
the
monitoring
results
from
the
entrainment
sampling
and
summarize
the
results.
°
Facility
Manager:
Is
assumed
to
review
these
entrainment
monitoring
summaries.
°
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spends
approximately
one
day
over
the
course
of
a
year
handling
and
delivering
documents
to
the
facility
and
contracted
employees.

Implement
Freshwater
Entrainment
Characterization
Sampling
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
1.3
4
$
89
$
268
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
8.0
24
$
255
$
766
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
26.7
80
$
2,275
$
6,824
Biologist
$
55.4
390.0
1170
$
21,606
$
64,818
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
390.0
1170
$
13,845
$
41,535
Statistician
$
56.8
16.7
50
$
947
$
2,840
Clerical
$
18.2
8.3
25
$
152
$
455
Entrainment
sampling
at
facilities
with
intakes
in
marine
waters
is
expected
to
be
performed
in
the
same
manner
as
freshwater
entrainment
sampling.
However,
the
sampling
effort
is
expected
to
take
30%
more
time
due
to
the
greater
abundance
and
diversity
of
organisms.
21
Implement
Marine
Entrainment
Characterization
Sampling
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
1.3
4
$
89
$
268
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
10.3
31
$
330
$
989
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
26.7
80
$
2,275
$
6,824
Biologist
$
55.4
507.0
1521
$
28,088
$
84,263
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
507.0
1521
$
17,999
$
53,996
Statistician
$
56.8
16.7
50
$
947
$
2,840
Clerical
$
18.2
8.3
25
$
152
$
455
e.)
Profile
of
Source
Water
Biota
It
was
assumed
that
much
of
the
work
of
profiling
the
source
water
biota
is
carried
out
by
the
contracted
employees
during
the
first
year
of
the
study,
although
updates
to
the
profile
are
likely
to
be
made
as
additional
information
becomes
available
over
the
remainder
of
the
study
period.
The
facility
management
and
staff
also
take
an
active
role
in
reviewing
this
work
as
this
information
forms
the
basis
of
the
study
results
that
are
submitted
to
the
Director.
This
information
may
also
be
used
by
the
facility
for
other
parts
of
the
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study.
EPA
assumes
that
the
labor
burden
for
profiling
source
water
biota
is:

C
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
spends
approximately
four
days
reviewing
the
data
and
results
of
the
biological
profile.
C
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
approximately
twenty
hours
assisting
the
facility
manager
with
reviewing
the
data
and
results
of
the
biological
profile.
C
Contracted
Manager:
The
contracted
manager
spends
approximately
four
days
reviewing
lab
results
and
documentation
used
for
developing
the
biological
profile.
C
Biologist:
A
biologist
spends
a
week
and
a
half
identifying
the
species
and
characterizing
the
data
based
on
lab
results
and
statistical
analysis.
C
Biological
Technician:
A
biological
technician
spends
twenty
hours
assisting
the
biologist
with
the
review
of
lab
results.
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spend
approximately
one
day
handling
the
documentation
for
the
biological
profile.
22
Profile
Source
Water
Biota
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
10.7
32
$
716
$
2,147
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
6.7
20
$
213
$
638
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
10.7
32
$
910
$
2,730
Biologist
$
55.4
20.0
60
$
1,108
$
3,324
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
6.7
20
$
237
$
710
Clerical
$
18.2
2.7
8
$
49
$
146
f.)
Identification
of
Critical
Species:

The
identification
of
critical
species
is
based
on
the
profiles
of
source
water
biota,
the
results
of
the
statistical
analysis,
and
a
review
of
relevant
information.
Much
of
the
identification
is
carried
out
by
the
contracted
employees,
although
updates
may
be
made
to
it
as
additional
information
becomes
available.
However,
the
facility
manager
takes
a
more
active
role
in
reviewing
this
work
as
this
information
will
form
the
basis
of
the
study
results
that
he
submits
to
the
State.
EPA
assumes
that
the
labor
burden
for
identification
of
critical
species
is:

C
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
spends
approximately
four
days
reviewing
the
data
for
the
critical
species
identification
and
then
determining
the
significance
of
these
results
to
their
overall
compliance
efforts.
C
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
approximately
twenty
hours
assisting
the
facility
manager
with
reviewing
the
data
and
results
of
the
critical
species
identification.
C
Contracted
Manager:
The
contracted
manager
spends
approximately
half
a
week
assisting
the
biologist
with
the
identification.
C
Biologist:
A
biologist
spends
a
week
identifying
the
critical
species
from
the
data
and
statistical
analysis.
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spend
approximately
three
hours
handling
the
documentation
for
the
critical
species
list.
23
Identification
of
Critical
Species
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
10.7
32
$
716
$
2,147
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
6.7
20
$
213
$
638
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
6.7
20
$
569
$
1,706
Biologist
$
55.4
13.3
40
$
739
$
2,216
Clerical
$
18.2
1.3
4
$
24
$
73
h.)
Description
of
Additional
Stresses
It
was
assumed
much
of
the
description
of
additional
stresses
is
carried
out
by
the
contracted
employees,
since
they
have
the
most
direct
knowledge
of
the
waterbody,
biological
communities,
and
the
monitoring
data.
This
work
is
assumed
to
occur
at
the
same
time
as
the
identification
of
critical
species
and
to
be
approximately
half
of
the
Source
Water
Biota
profile
burden.
EPA
assumes
that
the
labor
burden
for
description
of
additional
stresses
is:

C
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
spends
approximately
two
days
reviewing
the
data
on
additional
stresses.
C
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
approximately
ten
hours
assisting
the
facility
manager
with
reviewing
the
data
on
additional
stresses.
C
Contracted
Manager:
The
contracted
manager
spends
approximately
two
days
reviewing
lab
results
and
documentation
used
for
determining
additional
stresses.
C
Biologist:
A
biologist
spends
approximately
thirty
hours
identifying
and
describing
additional
stresses.
C
Biological
Technician:
A
biological
technician
spends
ten
hours
assisting
the
biologist
with
the
description
of
additional
stresses.
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spend
approximately
one
half
a
day
handling
the
documentation
for
the
description
of
additional
stresses.
24
Description
of
Additional
Stresses
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
5.3
16
$
358
$
1,074
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
3.3
10
$
106
$
319
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
5.3
16
$
455
$
1,365
Biologist
$
55.4
10.0
30
$
554
$
1,662
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
3.3
10
$
118
$
355
Clerical
$
18.2
1.3
4
$
24
$
73
i.)
Write
Study
Based
on
Results
and
Submit
for
Review
by
the
Director
The
study
will
be
written
towards
the
end
of
the
third
year
primarily
by
the
facility
manager
and
junior
staff.
EPA
assumes
that
the
labor
burden
for
writing
the
study
is:

C
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
spends
two
weeks
outlining
the
report,
writing
critical
sections,
and
reviewing
the
work
done
by
the
junior
staff.
C
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
approximately
four
weeks
drafting
the
bulk
of
the
report
and
supporting
materials.
C
Contracted
Manager:
The
manager
of
the
contracted
firm
spends
approximately
one
day
assisting
the
facility
manager
by
providing
expert
opinion
when
needed
and
one
day
reviewing
a
draft
of
the
study.
C
Biologist:
A
biologist
spends
one
day
assisting
with
providing
expert
opinion
and
reviewing
study.
C
Statistician:
A
statistician
also
spends
one
day
assisting
with
providing
expert
opinion
and
reviewing
study.
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spends
8
hours
assisting
with
preparing
the
report
for
submission.
25
Write
Report
for
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
26.7
80
$
1,789
$
5,368
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
53.3
160
$
1,701
$
5,104
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
5.3
16
$
455
$
1,365
Biologist
$
55.4
2.7
8
$
148
$
443
Statistician
$
56.8
2.7
8
$
151
$
454
Clerical
$
18.2
2.7
8
$
49
$
146
j.)
Recordkeeping
Due
to
the
necessity
of
the
study
for
obtaining
a
permit,
the
facility
staff
and
the
contractor
will
spend
time
to
ensure
that
both
paper
and
electronic
copies
of
all
results,
analyses,
studies,
and
reviews
are
maintained.
This
record
keeping
is
expected
to
be
carried
out
through
the
course
of
the
three
year
study,
but
the
majority
of
it
will
likely
occur
during
the
last
year
when
they
study
report
is
written
and
finalized.
EPA
assumes
that
the
labor
burden
for
this
recordkeeping
is:

C
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
spends
six
hours
maintaining
records
over
the
three
years.
C
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
12
hours
maintaining
records
over
three
years.
C
Contracted
Manager:
The
manager
of
the
contracted
firm
spends
six
hours
maintaining
records
over
the
three
years.
C
Biologist:
The
biologist
spends
12
hours
maintaining
records
over
the
three
years.
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spends
three
days
maintaining
study
records
over
the
three
years.
26
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Record
Keeping
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
2.0
6
$
134
$
403
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
4.0
12
$
128
$
383
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
2.0
6
$
171
$
512
Biologist
$
55.4
4.0
12
$
222
$
665
Statistician
$
56.8
1.0
3
$
57
$
170
Clerical
$
18.2
8.0
24
$
146
$
437
k.)
Finalize
Study
Based
on
State
Review
EPA
anticipates
that
the
State
will
have
questions
and
comments
on
the
study
that
will
require
the
facility
staff
to
revise
the
study
further.
EPA
assumes
that
the
labor
burden
for
revising
the
study
is:

C
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
spends
two
days
reviewing
the
State's
comments
and
questions
and
then
crafting
appropriate
responses.
C
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
four
days
revising
the
study.
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spends
one
day
resubmitting
the
study
and
maintaining
records.

Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Final
Report
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
5.3
16
$
358
$
1,074
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
10.7
32
$
340
$
1,021
Clerical
$
18.2
2.7
8
$
49
$
146
27
l.)
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Other
Direct
Costs
Facility
ODCs
for
the
Impingement
Mortality
and
Characterization
Study
include
supplies
for
periodic
work
at
monitoring
sites
by
facility
employees,
which
may
occasionally
include
boat
rental.
These
ODCs
are
expected
to
vary
for
facilities
depending
on
whether
they
are
located
adjacent
to
freshwater
or
marine
waterbodies.
EPA
assumes
that
the
ODCs
for
freshwater
facilities
over
three
years
are
$
7,800.
EPA
anticipates
that
marine
facilities
would
incur
67%
more
ODCs
than
freshwater
facilities,
so
their
three
year
ODCs
are
$
13,000.

m.)
Biological
Study
Laboratory
Analysis
EPA
assumes
that
all
offshore
and
entrainment
samples,
a
total
of
1,170
samples,
will
be
analyzed
by
an
outside
laboratory.
These
laboratory
analysis
costs
are
considered
O&
M
costs.
For
samples
from
facilities
with
intakes
on
freshwater,
the
laboratory
analysis
cost
are
expected
to
be
$
100
per
sample.
The
laboratory
analysis
cost
per
marine
sampling
event
was
assumed
to
be
30%
more
expensive
than
for
freshwater
samples,
due
to
both
the
greater
abundance
of
biomass
and
higher
diversity
of
the
biota.

Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Laboratory
Analysis
­
Summary
O&
M
Cost
Table
Water
body
that
the
Sample
was
taken
from
Laboratory
Cost
per
Sample
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Freshwater
Sample
$
100
$
39,000
$
117,000
Marine
Sample
$
130
$
50,700
$
152,100
2.
Pilot
Study
for
New
Impingement
and
Entrainment
Technology
As
part
of
the
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan,
facilities
must
include
a
sitespecific
evaluation
of
the
technology(
ies)
and/
or
operational
measures.
This
site­
specific
evaluation
can
be
based
on
representative
studies
(
i.
e.,
studies
that
have
been
conducted
at
cooling
water
intake
structures
located
in
the
same
waterbody
type
with
similar
biological
characteristics)
and/
or
site­
specific
technology
prototype
studies.
EPA
assumes
for
the
sitespecific
technology
prototype
studies,
that
the
facilities
will
conduct
an
on­
site
pilot
study
for
the
new
technology
or
operational
measure.

Pilot
studies
are
the
temporary
installation
and
operation
of
a
small
scale
version
of
the
proposed
technology.
Facilities
typically
use
pilot
studies
to
determine
how
well
a
technology
will
work
under
the
site­
specific
conditions
before
carrying
out
a
full
scale
installation
of
the
technology.
When
determining
the
relative
scope
and
duration
of
the
pilot
study,
size
of
the
pilot
study
equipment
as
compared
to
the
full
scale
technology
and
the
extent
of
the
data
that
the
28
study
will
need
to
generate
are
considered.
Facilities
weigh
how
likely
the
performance
of
the
pilot
equipment
will
translate
adequately
to
the
full
scale
technology
(
i.
e.
will
the
pilot
study
results
be
applicable
to
the
actual
proposed
technology).
The
next
decision
facilities
weigh
is
the
cost
of
the
pilot
study
against
the
financial
risk
of
installing
the
actual
technology
without
being
tested
on­
site.
In
other
words,
the
greater
the
potential
of
financial
risk
associated
with
the
proposed
technology
failing,
the
higher
the
expenses
a
facility
is
willing
to
spend
on
a
pilot
study
to
ensure
that
it
will
work
properly.

In
general,
pilot
study
costs
vary.
The
variables
that
affect
pilot
study
costs
are
regulations,
testing
protocols,
and
testing
duration.
Pilot
equipment
is
either
rented
or
manufactured
to
suit
specific
site
conditions.
Generally,
in
either
case,
a
typical
ratio
of
total
pilot
study
costs
to
the
actual
technology
costs
is
less
than
one
to
ten
for
technologies
that
cost
more
than
one
million
dollars.
Therefore,
EPA
assumes
that
facilities
will
be
willing
to
spend
10%
of
the
technology
installation
cost
on
a
pilot
study
to
determine
if
the
technology
will
function
properly
when
installed
and
operated.

EPA
assumes
that
a
typical
pilot
study
will
involve
the
following
activities:
installing
an
intake
pipe
separate
from
the
facility's
actual
cooling
water
system,
but
in
the
vicinity
of
the
operating
CWIS;
deploying
the
proposed
technology
to
feed
in
the
separate
intake
pipe
and
pumping
water
through
the
intake
so
that
impingement
and
entrainment
levels
can
be
observed
under
various
pumping
scenarios
and
seasonal
conditions.

An
important
cost
element
in
the
Pilot
Study
is
the
cost
of
monitoring.
EPA
realizes
that
the
amount
of
monitoring
necessary
will
vary
depending
on
the
technology
and
the
biological
characteristics
of
the
source
water.
However,
EPA
assumes
that
a
typical
monitoring
effort
would
involve
five
samples
being
collected
over
a
twenty­
four
hour
period,
every
two
weeks
for
six
months.
Facilities
will
need
to
analyze
the
data,
summarize
the
results,
and
use
this
information
as
the
basis
for
their
site­
specific
evaluation.
EPA
estimates
that
the
pilot
study
monitoring
and
reporting
costs
will
typically
range
between
$
50,000
and
$
110,000
for
a
facility,
depending
on
the
source
water
type,
and
whether
the
facility
will
need
to
monitor
for
both
impingement
and
entrainment
or
just
impingement.

As
part
of
the
economic
analysis
for
the
proposed
rule,
EPA
has
developed
technology
cost
estimates
for
those
facilities
that
EPA
anticipates
will
install
new
technologies.
The
installation
costs
for
these
technologies
vary
widely
with
the
capital
costs
of
the
relatively
inexpensive
technologies
being
less
than
$
500,000.
EPA
assumes
that
the
financial
risk
to
facilities
installing
relatively
low
cost
technologies
(
in
comparison
to
a
facility's
overall
cost
of
operation,
revenues,
or
anticipated
benefits)
are
not
likely
to
warrant
conducting
a
pilot
study.
In
these
cases,
EPA
believes
that
facilities
with
low
cost
technology
options
will
forgo
a
pilot
study
and
install
the
proposed
technology
based
on
existing
performance
information
or
manufacturers'
guarantees
to
cover
the
cost
of
dismantling
the
equipment.
The
facility
will
then
use
the
impingement
and
entrainment
monitoring
data
from
the
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
to
evaluate
how
well
the
technology
performs.
EPA
assumes
that
when
the
capital
cost
for
the
proposed
technology
is
less
than
$
500,000,
the
facility
will
not
29
perform
a
pilot
study.
A
pilot
study
may
not
be
practical
for
some
of
the
proposed
technologies,
such
as
widening
the
opening
of
the
intake
structure
to
reduce
intake
velocity.
For
those
facilities
anticipated
to
install
technologies
where
a
pilot
study
is
impractical,
EPA
assumes,
for
the
purpose
of
estimating
the
regulatory
economic
burden,
that
they
will
not
perform
pilot
studies
either.

To
develop
total
pilot
study
cost
estimates
for
facilities,
EPA
assumes
that
facilities
will
spend
approximately
10%
of
the
capital
costs
for
installing
the
proposed
technology
on
a
cooling
water
intake.
This
cost
covers
the
installation,
operation,
monitoring,
and
reporting
costs
associated
with
the
pilot
study.
However,
EPA
assumes
that
the
minimum
cost
to
perform
an
acceptable
pilot
study
would
be
$
150,000.
Therefore,
if
10%
of
a
facility's
technology
cost
was
below
$
150,000,
the
facility
was
automatically
assigned
a
cost
of
$
150,000.

For
the
Economic
Analysis,
total
pilot
study
costs
are
reported
on
a
per
facility
basis.
For
the
ICR
Analysis,
average
labor
burdens
and
capital
and
O&
M
costs
are
reported.

a.)
Implement
Pilot
Study
Impingement
Sampling
All
facilities
performing
pilot
studies
will
conduct
impingement
monitoring.
Impingement
monitoring
involves
collecting
data
on
aquatic
organisms
trapped
on
the
outer
part
of
an
intake
structure
or
against
screening
devices
during
periods
of
cooling
water
withdrawal,
to
determine
the
taxa
and
abundance
of
impinged
organisms.
During
the
course
of
the
pilot
study,
EPA
assumes
that
the
impingement
freshwater
sampling
labor
burden
is:

°
Biologist:
A
biologist
will
perform
twelve
sampling
events
over
the
course
of
six
months.
For
each
sampling
event
the
biologist
will
take
five
samples
over
a
twenty­
four
hour
period.
The
biologists
spends
approximately
two
hours
taking
each
freshwater
impingement
sample,
and
an
additional
two
hours
analyzing
the
impinged
organisms.
°
Biological
Technician:
A
biological
technician
accompanies
the
biologist
on
each
site
visit,
spending
two
hours
taking
each
freshwater
impingement
sample,
and
an
additional
two
hours
analyzing
the
impinged
organisms.
°
Contracted
Manager:
The
contracted
manager
spends
a
total
of
eighty
hours
managing
the
impingement
sampling
portion
of
the
contract
and
making
occasional
visits
to
the
site
to
supervise
the
impingement
sampling.
°
Statistician:
A
statistician
spends
approximately
one
week
analyzing
the
impingement
sampling
results
for
statistical
significance.
°
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
take
approximately
three
days
to
review
the
monitoring
results
from
the
impingement
sampling
and
summarize
the
results.
°
Facility
Manager:
Is
assumed
to
take
two
days
observing
the
collection
of
data
and
reviewing
the
impingement
monitoring
summaries.
30
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spends
approximately
two
and
a
half
days
the
course
of
the
study
handling
and
delivering
documents
to
the
facility
and
contracted
employees.

Pilot
Study
Freshwater
Impingement
Sampling
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
5.3
16
$
358
$
1,074
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
8.3
25
$
266
$
798
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
26.7
80
$
2,275
$
6,824
Biologist
$
55.4
80.0
240
$
4,432
$
13,296
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
80.0
240
$
2,840
$
8,520
Statistician
$
56.8
13.3
40
$
757
$
2,272
Clerical
$
18.2
6.7
20
$
121
$
364
Impingement
sampling
at
facilities
with
intakes
in
marine
waters
is
expected
to
be
performed
in
the
same
manner
as
freshwater
impingement
sampling.
However,
the
sampling
effort
is
expected
to
take
30%
more
time
due
to
the
greater
abundance
and
diversity
of
organisms.

Pilot
Study
Marine
Impingement
Sampling
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
5.3
16
$
358
$
1,074
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
11.0
33
$
351
$
1,053
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
26.7
80
$
2,275
$
6,824
Biologist
$
55.4
104.0
312
$
5,762
$
17,285
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
104.0
312
$
3,692
$
11,076
Statistician
$
56.8
17.3
52
$
985
$
2,954
Clerical
$
18.2
8.7
26
$
158
$
473
31
b.)
Implement
Pilot
Study
Entrainment
Sampling
Facilities
which
are
subject
to
the
entrainment
requirements
will
conduct
entrainment
monitoring
as
part
of
their
pilot
studies.
Entrainment
monitoring
involves
the
collection
of
data
on
eggs,
larvae,
and
other
plankton
incorporated
with
cooling
water
flow
(
entering
and
passing
through
a
cooling
water
intake
structure
and
into
a
cooling
water
system),
to
determine
the
taxa
and
abundance
of
entrained
organisms.
During
the
course
of
the
pilot
study,
EPA
assumes
that
the
entrainment
freshwater
sampling
labor
burden
is:

°
Biologist:
A
biologist
will
perform
twelve
sampling
events
over
the
course
of
six
months.
For
each
sampling
event
the
biologist
will
take
five
samples
over
a
twenty­
four
hour
period.
The
biologists
spends
approximately
two
hours
taking
each
freshwater
entrainment
sample,
and
an
additional
hour
to
prepare
the
sample
for
delivery
to
the
lab.
°
Biological
Technician:
A
biological
technician
accompanies
the
biologist
on
each
site
visit,
spending
two
hours
taking
each
freshwater
entrainment
sample,
and
an
additional
hour
to
prepare
the
sample
for
delivery
to
the
lab.
°
Contracted
Manager:
The
contracted
manager
spends
a
total
of
eighty
hours
managing
the
entrainment
sampling
portion
of
the
contract
and
making
occasional
visits
to
the
site
to
supervise
the
entrainment
sampling.
°
Statistician:
A
statistician
spends
approximately
one
week
analyzing
the
entrainment
sampling
results
for
statistical
significance.
°
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
take
approximately
three
days
to
review
the
monitoring
results
from
the
entrainment
sampling
and
summarize
the
results.
°
Facility
Manager:
Is
assumed
to
take
two
days
observing
the
collection
of
data
and
reviewing
the
entrainment
monitoring
summaries.
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spends
approximately
two
and
a
half
days
the
course
of
the
study
handling
and
delivering
documents
to
the
facility
and
contracted
employees.

Pilot
Study
Freshwater
Entrainment
Sampling
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
5.3
16
$
358
$
1,074
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
8.3
25
$
266
$
798
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
26.7
80
$
2,275
$
6,824
Biologist
$
55.4
60.0
180
$
3,324
$
9,972
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
60.0
180
$
2,130
$
6,390
32
Statistician
$
56.8
13.3
40
$
757
$
2,272
Clerical
$
18.2
6.7
20
$
121
$
364
Entrainment
sampling
at
facilities
with
intakes
in
marine
waters
is
expected
to
be
performed
in
the
same
manner
as
freshwater
entrainment
sampling.
However,
the
sampling
effort
is
expected
to
take
30%
more
time
due
to
the
greater
abundance
and
diversity
of
organisms.

Pilot
Study
Marine
Entrainment
Sampling
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
5.3
16
$
358
$
1,074
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
11.0
33
$
351
$
1,053
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
26.7
80
$
2,275
$
6,824
Biologist
$
55.4
78.0
234
$
4,321
$
12,964
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
78.0
234
$
2,769
$
8,307
Statistician
$
56.8
17.3
52
$
985
$
2,954
Clerical
$
18.2
8.7
26
$
158
$
473
c.)
Calculate
Reduction
in
Impingement
and
Entrainment
It
was
assumed
that
much
of
the
work
of
calculating
the
reduction
in
impingement
and
entrainment
is
carried
out
by
the
facility
staff.
EPA
assumes
that
the
labor
burden
is:

C
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
spends
approximately
two
weeks
reviewing
results
of
the
pilot
study
monitoring,
comparing
these
results
with
the
impingement
and
entrainment
data
being
gathered
for
the
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study,
and
reviewing
the
calculations
made
by
the
junior
technical
staff.
C
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
approximately
two
weeks
assisting
the
facility
manager
with
the
analysis
of
the
data
and
they
will
perform
most
of
the
actual
reduction
calculations.
C
Contracted
Manager:
The
contracted
manager
spends
approximately
one
day
reviewing
the
data
comparison
and
the
subsequent
reduction
calculations.
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spend
approximately
one
and
a
half
days
handling
the
documentation
for
the
reduction
calculations.
33
Calculate
Reduction
in
Impingement
and
Entrainment
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
26.7
80
$
1,789
$
5,368
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
26.7
80
$
851
$
2,552
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
2.7
8
$
227
$
682
Clerical
$
18.2
4.0
12
$
73
$
218
d.)
Engineering
Estimates
of
Technology
Efficacy
After
the
facility
has
used
the
pilot
study
data
to
develop
estimates
of
impingement
and
entrainment
reduction,
the
facility
must
then
evaluate
how
well
a
full
scale
version
of
the
technology
will
perform
at
the
site.
At
this
point,
initial
engineering
design
and
cost
estimates
will
be
revised
to
reflect
what
has
been
learned
about
how
the
technology
is
likely
to
operate
under
the
site­
specific
conditions.
EPA
assumes
that
the
labor
burden
for
these
engineering
estimates
is:

C
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
spends
approximately
one
week
revising
the
engineering
estimates
and
determining
the
efficacy
of
the
proposed
technology.
C
Junior
Technical:
Facility
junior
technical
staff
spend
approximately
four
days
assisting
the
facility
manager
with
determining
the
efficacy
of
the
proposed
technology.
C
Clerical:
Clerical
staff
spend
approximately
half
a
day
handling
the
documentation
for
the
engineering
estimates.

Engineering
Estimates
of
Efficacy
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Total
Hrs
for
ICR
Period
Annual
Cost
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
13.3
40
$
895
$
2,684
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
10.7
32
$
340
$
1,021
Clerical
$
18.2
1.3
4
$
24
$
73
e.)
Pilot
Study
Laboratory
Analysis
For
facilities
subject
to
entrainment
reduction
requirements,
EPA
assumes
that
all
pilot
study
entrainment
samples,
a
total
of
60
samples,
will
be
analyzed
by
an
outside
laboratory.
34
These
laboratory
analysis
costs
are
considered
O&
M
costs.
For
samples
from
facilities
with
intakes
on
freshwater,
the
laboratory
analysis
cost
are
expected
to
be
$
100
per
sample.
The
laboratory
analysis
cost
per
marine
sampling
event
was
assumed
to
be
30%
more
expensive
than
for
freshwater
samples,
due
to
both
the
greater
abundance
of
biomass
and
higher
diversity
of
the
biota.

Pilot
Study
Entrainment
Laboratory
Analysis
­
Summary
Cost
Table
Water
body
that
the
Sample
was
taken
from
Laboratory
Cost
per
Sample
Number
of
Entrainment
Samples
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Freshwater
Sample
$
100
60
$
6,000
Marine
Sample
$
130
60
$
7,800
f.)
Pilot
Study
Capital
and
O&
M
Costs
Pilot
study
costs
were
developed
on
a
per
facility
basis
using
the
approach
described
above.
However,
for
the
purpose
of
the
ICR
analysis,
average
monitoring
and
reporting
costs,
as
well
as
average
capital
and
O&
M
costs
were
estimated.
To
develop
estimates
of
average
capital
and
O&
M
costs,
EPA
developed
four
average
total
pilot
study
costs,
based
on
a
facility's
source
water
type
and
whether
or
not
the
facility
must
address
both
impingement
and
entrainment
or
just
impingement.
The
estimated
average
monitoring
and
reporting
costs
were
then
subtracted
from
these
average
total
costs,
to
derive
average
installation
and
operation
costs.

Average
Pilot
Study
Costs­
Summary
Table
Facility
Category
Average
Monitoring
and
Reporting
Costs
Average
Installation
and
Operation
Costs
Average
Total
Costs
Freshwater
Pilot
Study
$
84,156
$
251,754
$
335,910
Freshwater
Pilot
Study
­
Impingement
Only
$
50,463
$
198,206
$
248,669
Marine
Pilot
Study
$
99,469
$
422,926
$
522,395
Marine
Pilot
Study
­
Impingement
Only
$
58,037
$
392,544
$
450,581
35
D.
Annual
Monitoring
Labor
Burden
and
Costs
All
Phase
II
existing
facilities
would
need
to
monitor
both
impingement
and
entrainment
of
the
commercial,
recreational
and
forage
base
fish
and
shellfish
species
and
their
life
stages
identified
in
either
the
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
data
or
the
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study.
The
monitoring
methods
used
must
be
consistent
with
those
used
for
the
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
data
or
the
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study.
The
facility
must
follow
the
prescribed
monitoring
frequencies
for
at
least
two
years
after
the
initial
permit
issuance.
After
that
time,
the
Director
may
approve
a
request
for
less
frequent
sampling
in
the
remaining
years
of
the
permit
term
and
when
the
permit
is
reissued,
if
supporting
data
show
that
less
frequent
monitoring
would
still
allow
for
the
detection
of
any
seasonal
and
daily
variations
in
the
species
and
numbers
of
individuals
that
are
impinged
or
entrained.

1.
Biological
Monitoring
for
Impingement
Impingement
monitoring
involves
collecting
data
on
aquatic
organisms
trapped
on
the
outer
part
of
an
intake
structure
or
against
screening
devices
during
periods
of
cooling
water
withdrawal,
to
determine
the
taxa
and
abundance
of
impinged
organisms.
The
proposed
rule
requires
facilities
to
monitor
no
less
than
once
per
month
for
impingement.
So
EPA
assumes
that
facilities
will
have
contracted
employees
take
three
samples
for
impingement,
over
a
24
hour
period,
twelve
times
a
year,
for
a
total
of
36
impingement
samples
annually.

a.)
Monthly
Impingement
Sample
Collection
As
with
the
impingement
samples
taken
for
the
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study,
the
collection
of
the
samples
is
performed
on­
site
by
the
biologist
and
biological
technician.
For
freshwater
facilities
the
assumed
labor
burden
is:

°
Facility
Manager:
Is
assumed
to
make
four
visits
per
year
to
observe
sampling,
spending
approximately
one­
half­
hour
per
visit.
°
Contracted
Manager:
The
contracted
manager
is
expected
to
make
four
visits
to
oversee
sampling
per
year
each
at
one
hour
per
sampling
event.
°
Biologist:
The
biologist
is
assumed
to
conduct
12
sampling
events
annually
at
one
site
with
three
samples
being
taken
over
a
twenty
four
hour
period.
Each
sample
taking
two
hours
to
obtain.
°
Biological
Technician:
The
technician
assists
the
biologist
in
conducting
12
sampling
events
annually
at
one
site
with
three
samples,
each
taking
two
hours
to
obtain.
36
Monthly
Impingement
Sample
Collection
(
Freshwater)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
2.0
$
134
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
4.0
$
341
Biologist
$
55.4
72.0
$
3,989
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
72.0
$
2,556
Impingement
sampling
done
at
facilities
with
intakes
on
marine
waters
is
assumed
to
require
on
average
30%
more
effort
than
sampling
at
freshwater
facilities.

Monthly
Impingement
Sample
Collection
(
Marine)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
2.0
$
134
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
5.0
$
427
Biologist
$
55.4
94.0
$
5,208
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
94.0
$
3,337
b.)
Onsite
Analysis
of
Impingement
Samples
As
with
the
impingement
sampling
performed
for
the
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study,
the
analysis
of
the
impingement
samples
is
performed
onsite
by
the
biologist
and
the
biological
technician.
For
freshwater
facilities
the
burden
for
analyzing
impingement
samples
is:
°
Facility
Manager:
Is
assumed
to
make
four
visits
to
observe
impingement
sample
analysis
per
year,
spending
approximately
one
hour
per
visit.
°
Contracted
Manager:
The
contracted
manager
is
expected
to
make
four
visits
to
oversee
sampling
analysis
per
year
each
at
one
hour
per
impingement
sample
analysis.
°
Biologist:
Each
year,
the
biologist
is
assumed
to
conduct
12
on­
site
sampling
analysis
for
impingement,
for
three
different
samples,
each
taking
two
hours
to
analyze.
°
Biological
Technician:
Each
year,
the
technician
assists
the
biologist
in
conducting
12
on­
site
sampling
analysis
for
impingement,
for
three
different
samples,
each
taking
two
hours
to
analyze.

Onsite
Analysis
of
Impingement
Samples
(
Freshwater)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
37
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
4.0
$
268
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
12.0
$
1,024
Biologist
$
55.4
72.0
$
3,989
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
72.0
$
2,556
Impingement
sample
analysis
done
at
facilities
with
intakes
on
marine
waters
are
assumed
to
require
on
average
30%
more
effort
than
sample
analysis
at
freshwater
facilities.

Onsite
Analysis
of
Impingement
Samples
(
Marine)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
4.0
$
268
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
16.0
$
1,365
Biologist
$
55.4
94.0
$
5,208
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
94.0
$
3,337
c.)
Perform
Statistical
Analysis
on
Impingement
Sample
Data
The
annual
impingement
monitoring
data
will
be
analyzed
for
statistical
significance.
The
results
of
the
statistical
analyses
will
be
used
for
the
yearly
status
report
on
316(
b)
compliance.
EPA
assumes
that
the
burden
for
the
statistical
analysis
on
impingement
sample
data
is:

°
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
spends
one
day
per
year
reviewing
lab
results
and
statistical
analysis.
°
Junior
Technical:
The
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
one­
half
day
per
year
assisting
the
facility
manager
in
reviewing
the
lab
results
and
statistical
analysis.
°
Statistician:
A
statistician
spends
a
day
every
quarter
analyzing
the
sampling
results
for
statistical
significance.
38
Statistical
Analysis
on
Annual
Impingement
Sample
Data
(
Freshwater)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
8
$
537
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
4
$
128
Statistician
$
56.8
32
$
1,818
Because
of
the
higher
volume
of
sampling
data
that
is
likely
to
be
produced
from
impingement
sampling
at
marine
facilities,
EPA
assumes
statisticians
will
spend
30%
more
time
on
statistical
analysis
of
data
from
these
facilities.

Statistical
Analysis
on
Annual
Impingement
Sample
Data
(
Marine)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
8
$
537
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
4
$
128
Statistician
$
56.8
42
$
2,386
2.
Biological
Monitoring
for
Entrainment
Entrainment
monitoring
involves
the
collection
of
data
on
eggs,
larvae,
and
plankton
incorporated
with
cooling
water
flow
(
entering
and
passing
through
a
cooling
water
intake
structure
and
into
a
cooling
water
system),
to
determine
the
taxa
and
abundance
of
entrained
organisms.
The
proposed
rule
suggests
facilities
would
need
to
monitor
no
less
than
once
every
two
weeks
over
a
24­
hour
period,
while
the
CWIS
is
in
operation
and
during
the
primary
period
of
reproduction,
larval
recruitment
and
peak
abundance,
as
determined
by
the
Source
Water
Biological
Characterization
and
the
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
Characterization
Study.

a.)
Biweekly
Entrainment
Sample
Collection
EPA
assumes
that
facilities
will
have
contracted
employees
take
three
samples
for
entrainment,
over
a
24­
hour
period,
26
times
a
year,
for
a
total
of
78
entrainment
samples
39
annually.
This
is
a
conservative
estimate,
considering
that
the
critical
periods
in
reproduction,
larval
recruitment,
and
peak
abundance
will
not
span
an
entire
year.
For
freshwater
facilities
the
assumed
burden
is:

°
Facility
Manager:
Is
assumed
to
make
four
visits
to
observe
sampling
per
year,
spending
approximately
one
hour
per
visit.
°
Contracted
Manager:
The
contracted
manager
is
expected
to
make
four
visits
to
oversee
sampling
per
year,
spending
one
hour
per
sample.
°
Biologist:
The
biologist
is
assumed
to
conduct
26
sampling
events
annually
at
one
site
with
three
samples
over
a
24
hour
period,
each
taking
two
hours
to
obtain.
°
Biological
Technician:
The
technician
assists
the
biologist
in
conducting
26
sampling
events
annually
at
one
site
with
three
samples,
each
taking
two
hours
to
obtain.

Biweekly
Entrainment
Sample
Collection
(
Freshwater)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
4.0
$
268
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
12.0
$
1,024
Biologist
$
55.4
156.0
$
8,642
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
156.0
$
5,538
Entrainment
sampling
done
at
facilities
with
intakes
on
marine
waters
is
assumed
to
require
on
average
30%
more
effort
than
sampling
at
freshwater
facilities.

Biweekly
Entrainment
Sample
Collection
(
Marine)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
4.0
$
268
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
12.0
$
1,024
Biologist
$
55.4
203.0
$
11,246
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
203.0
$
7,207
b.)
Handling
and
Preparation
of
Entrainment
Samples
EPA
assumes
that
the
entrainment
samples
will
be
preserved
and
prepared
for
being
transported
to
an
off­
site
laboratory.
For
freshwater
facilities,
the
assumed
burden
is:
40
°
Facility
Manager:
Is
assumed
to
make
four
visits
to
oversee
sampling
analysis
per
year,
spending
approximately
one
hour
per
visit.
°
Contracted
Manager:
The
contracted
manager
is
expected
to
make
four
visits
to
oversee
sampling
analysis
per
year.
Spending
one
hour
per
sample
preparation.
°
Biologist:
Every
two
weeks,
the
biologist
is
assumed
to
spend
an
hour
preparing
each
of
three
entrainment
samples
for
delivery
to
the
lab.
°
Biological
Technician:
Every
two
weeks,
the
biological
technician
is
expected
to
spend
three
hours
assisting
the
biologist
is
preparing
entrainment
samples
for
delivery
to
the
lab.

Handling
and
Preparation
of
Entrainment
Samples
(
Freshwater)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
4.0
$
268
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
12.0
$
1,024
Biologist
$
55.4
78.0
$
4,321
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
78.0
$
2,769
Entrainment
sample
preparation
done
at
facilities
with
intakes
on
marine
waters
is
assumed
to
require
on
average
30%
more
effort
than
sampling
at
freshwater
facilities.

Handling
and
Preparation
of
Entrainment
Samples
(
Marine)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
4.0
$
268
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
12.0
$
1,024
Biologist
$
55.4
101.0
$
5,595
Biological
Technician
$
35.5
101.0
$
3,586
41
c.)
Perform
Statistical
Analysis
on
Entrainment
Sample
Data
The
annual
entrainment
monitoring
data
will
be
analyzed
for
statistical
significance.
The
results
of
the
statistical
analyses
will
be
used
for
the
yearly
status
report
on
316(
b)
compliance.
EPA
assumes
that
the
burden
for
the
statistical
analysis
will
be
somewhat
greater
than
that
for
impingement,
due
to
the
additional
need
to
characterize
organisms
in
their
various
stages
of
development,
and
due
to
the
inherent
difficulty
interpreting
entrainment
sample
data.
The
assumed
burden
is:

°
Facility
Manager:
The
facility
manager
spends
two
days
per
year
reviewing
lab
results
and
statistical
analysis.
°
Junior
Technical:
The
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
one­
half
day
per
year
assisting
the
facility
manager
in
reviewing
the
lab
results
and
statistical
analysis.
°
Statistician:
A
statistician
spends
two
days
every
quarter
analyzing
the
sampling
results
for
statistical
significance.

Statistical
Analysis
on
Annual
Entrainment
Sample
Data
(
Freshwater)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
16
$
1,074
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
4
$
128
Statistician
$
56.8
64
$
3,635
Because
of
the
higher
volume
of
sampling
data
that
is
likely
to
be
produced
from
entrainment
sampling
at
marine
facilities,
EPA
assumes
statisticians
will
spend
30%
more
time
analyzing
data
from
these
facilities.

Statistical
Analysis
on
Annual
Entrainment
Sample
Data
(
Marine)
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
16
$
1,074
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
4
$
128
Statistician
$
56.8
83
$
4,714
42
d.)
Annual
Entrainment
Study
Laboratory
Analysis
EPA
assumes
that
all
annual
entrainment
samples,
a
total
of
78
samples
per
year,
will
be
analyzed
by
an
outside
laboratory.
These
laboratory
analysis
costs
are
considered
O&
M
costs.
For
samples
from
facilities
with
intakes
on
freshwater,
the
laboratory
analysis
cost
are
expected
to
be
$
100
per
sample.
The
laboratory
analysis
cost
per
marine
sampling
event
was
assumed
to
be
30%
more
expensive
than
for
freshwater
samples,
due
to
both
the
greater
abundance
of
biomass
and
higher
diversity
of
the
biota.

Annual
Entrainment
Monitoring
Laboratory
Analysis
­
Summary
O&
M
Cost
Table
Water
body
that
the
Sample
was
taken
from
Laboratory
Cost
per
Sample
Number
of
Samples
Total
Cost
for
ICR
Period
Freshwater
Sample
$
100
78
$
7,800
Marine
Sample
$
130
78
$
10,140
E.
Annual
Reporting
Labor
Burden
and
Costs
1.
Verification
Study
The
verification
study
uses
monitoring
results
to
prove
that
the
implemented
technologies,
operational
measures,
or
restoration
measures
are
performing
as
stated
in
the
permit.
The
Study
is
assumed
to
be
written
and
submitted
in
the
beginning
of
the
third
year
after
permit
issuance.
Study
data
is
derived
from
the
biological
monitoring
that
takes
place
during
the
first
two
years
of
the
permit
term.
The
Verification
Study
is
not
an
annual,
but
a
one­
time
task.
However,
it
is
based
on
the
results
of
the
first
two
years
of
annual
monitoring
performed
by
the
facility.

EPA
assumes
that
the
facility
manager
spends
approximately
9
hours
comparing
lab
results
and
statistical
analyses
with
the
verification
methods
outlined
in
the
Verification
Monitoring
Plan
submitted
with
the
facility's
permit
application.
Then
the
manager
spends
two
days
drafting
the
report.
The
junior
technical
staff
will
spend
30
hours
assisting
the
facility
manager
in
reviewing
the
lab
results
and
statistical
analysis
and
drafting
the
report.
The
contracted
manager
and
the
biologist
are
each
expected
to
take
approximately
two
days
to
review
various
drafts
of
the
study
analyses
and
provide
comments.
The
statistician
spends
about
three
days
analyzing
the
sampling
results
from
the
previous
two
years
to
determine
how
they
compare
with
the
verification
methods
outlined
in
the
Verification
Monitoring
Plan
submitted
with
the
facility
application.
43
Verification
Study
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
25
$
1,677
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
30
$
957
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
15.0
$
1,280
Biologist
$
55.4
15.0
$
831
Statistician
$
56.8
25
$
1,420
Clerical
$
18.2
1.0
$
18
2.
Yearly
Status
Report
a.)
Report
on
Inspection
and
Maintenance
The
facility
management
and
junior
technical
staff
each
spend
two
days
reviewing
and
summarizing
the
facility's
internal
inspection
and
maintenance
records
at
the
plant
for
the
previous
year.

Yearly
Status
Report
on
Inspection
and
Maintenance
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
16.0
$
1,074
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
16.0
$
510
b.)
Summary
of
Biological
Monitoring
Results
The
yearly
status
report
provides
evidence
to
the
Director
that
the
level
of
impingement
and
entrainment
are
being
reduced
to
the
levels
specified
in
the
permit.
EPA
assumes
that
the
facility
will
spend
several
days
reviewing
the
results
of
the
monitoring
data
and
the
statistical
analysis,
to
find
evidence
supporting
its
assertions.
Facility
management
is
expected
to
spend
three
days
reviewing
the
data,
consulting
with
the
contracted
employees
about
the
significance
of
the
data,
and
developing
a
summary
of
the
findings.
Junior
technical
staff
are
expected
to
spend
four
days
assisting
management
with
the
review
and
characterization
of
the
data.
The
contracted
manager
and
biologist
will
each
spend
half
a
day
conferring
with
facility
staff
over
the
44
significance
of
the
results.
The
statistician
will
also
spend
three
days
working
with
facility
staff
to
determine
the
significance
of
the
results.

Summary
of
Biological
Monitoring
Results
for
Yearly
Status
Report
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
24
$
1,610
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
32
$
1,021
Contracted
Manager
$
85.3
4.0
$
341
Biologist
$
55.4
4.0
$
222
Statistician
$
56.8
24
$
1,363
c.)
Compile
and
Submit
Status
Report
EPA
assumes
that
facility
management
will
devote
two
weeks
to
outlining,
drafting,
and
reviewing
the
yearly
status
report.
Junior
technical
staff
is
expected
to
spend
an
equivalent
amount
of
time
assisting
in
this
effort.
Clerical
staff
will
take
two
days
to
retrieve
documents,
distribute
and
track
various
drafts
of
the
report,
and
prepare
the
final
draft
for
submitting
to
the
Director.

Drafting
and
Submitting
the
Yearly
Status
Report
­
Summary
Burden/
Cost
Table
Labor
Category
Labor
Rate
Annual
Hours
Annual
Cost
Facility
Manager
$
67.1
80
$
5,368
Junior
Technical
$
31.9
80
$
2,552
Clerical
$
18.2
16.0
$
291
SUPPORTING
SPREADSHEETS
FOR
UPDATED
INFORMATION
COLLECTION
COSTS
FOR
SECTION
316(
b)
PHASE
II
NOTICE
OF
DATA
AVAILABILITY
(
NODA)

31­
Jan­
03
Exhibit
A.
1
Facility
Cost
and
Burden
Estimates
for
NPDES
Permit
Application
Activities
Exhibit
A.
1a
Start­
up
Activities
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Read
and
Understand
Rule
331
91
98
520
12
12
0
0
0
0
0
1
25
$
1,206
13,000
$
627,224
Mobilization/
Planning
331
91
98
520
4
8
0
0
0
0
0
1
13
$
542
6,760
$
281,736
Training
331
91
98
520
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
$
216
2,600
$
112,424
Totals
331
91
98
520
18
22
0
0
0
0
0
3
43
$
1,964
$
50
$
2,014
22,360
$
1,047,384
Exhibit
A.
1b
Permit
Application
Activities
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Statement
of
Intent
to
perform
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
113
112
87
312
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
$
85
624
$
26,614
Source
Water
Physical
Data
135
113
112
360
2
16
40
0
0
0
0
0
58
$
1,769
20,880
$
636,696
Configuration
and
Location
of
CWIS
135
113
112
360
2
5
8
0
0
0
0
0
15
$
519
5,400
$
186,660
Facility
Water
Balance
Diagram
135
113
112
360
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
$
127
1,080
$
45,756
CWIS
Operation
Narrative
135
113
112
360
16
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
56
$
2,350
20,160
$
845,856
CWS
Operation
Narrative
135
113
112
360
16
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
56
$
2,350
20,160
$
845,856
Engineering
Calculations
135
113
112
360
8
32
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
$
1,558
14,400
$
560,736
Submit
Materials
for
Review
by
State
135
113
112
360
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
$
109
2,160
$
39,312
Recordkeeping
135
113
112
360
2
5
2
0
0
0
0
2
11
$
386
3,960
$
139,068
Totals
135
113
112
360
247
$
9,252
$
500
$
9,752
88,824
$
3,479,940
Water
balance
diagram
is
assumed
to
be
taken
from
the
facility
design
report.
The
hours
reported
here
are
for
incorporation
of
the
diagram(
s)
in
the
permit.
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)

Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
A
Facilities
(
Respondents)
A
Facilities
(
Respondents)

ODCs
lump
sum*
Burden
Per
Facility
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Total
Initial
Cost
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)

Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Total
Initial
Cost
January31,
2003
Exisiting
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
1­
1
Exhibit
A.
1c
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Identify
Available
Data
and
Document
Efforts
135
113
112
360
40
80
0
0
0
0
0
8
128
$
5,382
46,080
$
1,937,376
Compile
and
Analyze
Existing
Data
135
113
112
360
32
60
20
0
0
0
0
4
116
$
4,696
41,760
$
1,690,560
Submit
Data
for
Review
by
State
135
113
112
360
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
$
146
2,880
$
52,416
Recordkeeping
135
113
112
360
3
5
1
0
0
0
0
6
15
$
498
5,400
$
179,316
Totals
135
113
112
360
267
$
10,721
$
750
$
11,471
96,120
$
4,129,668
OPTION
3
HIDE
TABLE
Flow
Reduction
Information
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Develop
Narrative
23
13
16
52
8
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
$
1,047
1,248
$
54,454
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
23
13
16
52
4
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
$
651
832
$
33,862
Document
Minimization
of
Make­
up
and
Blowdown
23
13
16
52
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
6
46
$
1,385
2,392
$
72,030
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
23
13
16
52
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
$
146
416
$
7,571
Recordkeeping
23
13
16
52
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
8
14
$
407
728
$
21,185
Totals
23
13
16
52
108
$
3,637
$
400
$
4,037
5,616
$
209,903
Exhibit
A.
1d
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Description
of
Historical
Studies
that
will
be
Used
308
78
82
468
20
40
0
0
0
0
0
2
62
$
2,654
29,016
$
1,242,259
Description
of
Proposed
and/
or
Implemented
Technologies
308
78
82
468
8
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
$
1,175
13,104
$
549,806
Develop
Source
Water
Sampling
Plan
308
78
82
468
40
60
8
8
0
0
0
4
120
$
5,578
56,160
$
2,610,504
Submit
Data
and
Plans
for
Review
308
78
82
468
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
12
$
218
5,616
$
102,211
Revise
Based
on
State
Review
308
78
82
468
8
16
4
0
0
0
0
4
32
$
1,232
14,976
$
576,763
Recordkeeping
308
78
82
468
3
5
1
1
0
0
0
8
18
$
620
8,424
$
290,066
Totals
308
78
82
468
272
$
11,478
$
750
$
12,228
127,296
$
5,722,610
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Facilities
(
Respondents)

A
Facilities
(
Respondents)
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Burden
Per
Facility
Total
Initial
Cost
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)

Total
Burden
(
hrs.)

A
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Total
Initial
Cost
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Initial
Cost
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Facilities
(
Respondents)
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*

A
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)

January31,
2003
Exisiting
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
1­
2
Exhibit
A.
1e
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Gather
Information
to
Characterize
Flow
(
FW
River/
Stream)
64
47
63
174
0
32
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
$
1,021
5,568
$
177,619
Water
Body
Thermal
Stratification
Narrative
(
Lake/
Reservoir)
28
23
17
68
4
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
$
1,544
2,992
$
105,019
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
92
70
80
242
8
32
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
$
1,558
9,680
$
376,939
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
92
70
80
242
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
16
$
291
3,872
$
70,470
Recordkeeping
92
70
80
242
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
8
12
$
308
2,904
$
74,633
Totals
92
70
80
242
103
$
3,325
$
200
$
3,525
25,016
$
853,081
Exhibit
A.
1f
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Delineate
Hydraulic
Zone
of
Influence
112
100
96
308
2
5
8
0
0
0
0
0
15
$
519
4,620
$
159,698
Develop
Narrative
Description
of
Technologies
(
Impingement)
112
100
96
308
8
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
$
1,047
7,392
$
322,538
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
(
Impingement)
112
100
96
308
3
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
$
584
4,620
$
179,903
Develop
Narrative
Description
of
Technologies
(
Entrainment)
54
55
46
155
8
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
$
1,047
3,720
$
162,316
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
(
Entrainment)
54
55
46
155
3
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
$
584
2,325
$
90,536
Document
that
Technologies
Are
Optimal
112
100
96
308
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
6
46
$
1,385
14,168
$
426,642
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
112
100
96
308
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
$
109
1,848
$
33,634
Recordkeeping
112
100
96
308
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
6
11
$
304
3,388
$
93,601
Totals
112
100
96
308
137
$
4,769
$
400
$
5,169
42,081
$
1,592,066
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)

Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Facilities
(
Respondents)

A
A
Burden
Per
Facility
Facilities
(
Respondents)
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Total
Initial
Cost
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*

Total
Initial
Cost
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)

January31,
2003
Exisiting
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
1­
3
Exhibit
A.
1g
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Implement
Offshore
Freshwater
Sampling
194
242
291
291
8
78
0
160
3120
100
3120
50
6636
$
306,871
$
7,800
1,606,516
$
74,290,707
Impingement
Monitoring
Freshwater
194
242
291
291
4
24
0
80
1560
50
1560
25
3303
$
152,957
799,627
$
37,029,513
Entrainment
Monitoring
Freshwater
194
242
291
291
4
24
0
80
1170
50
1170
25
2523
$
117,506
610,796
$
28,447,145
Implement
Offshore
Marine
Sampling
114
144
177
177
10
101
0
160
4056
100
4056
50
8533
$
392,821
$
13,000
1,236,048
$
56,902,129
Impingement
Monitoring
Marine
114
144
177
177
4
31
0
80
2028
50
2028
25
4246
$
195,722
615,054
$
28,351,238
Entrainment
Monitoring
Marine
114
144
177
177
4
31
0
80
1521
50
1521
25
3232
$
149,635
468,171
$
21,675,407
Profile
of
Source
Water
Biota
308
78
82
468
32
20
0
32
60
0
20
8
172
$
9,694
80,496
$
4,536,979
Identification
of
Critical
Species
308
78
82
468
32
20
0
20
40
0
0
3
115
$
6,762
53,820
$
3,164,522
Description
of
Additional
Stresses
308
78
82
468
16
10
0
16
30
0
10
4
86
$
4,847
40,248
$
2,268,490
Write
Study
based
on
Results
and
Submit
for
Review
by
State
112
100
96
308
80
160
0
16
8
8
0
8
280
$
12,880
86,240
$
3,967,040
Recordkeeping
112
100
96
308
6
12
0
6
12
3
0
24
63
$
2,569
19,404
$
791,314
Finalize
study
based
on
State
review
112
100
96
308
16
32
0
0
0
0
0
8
56
$
2,240
17,248
$
689,920
Totals
308
242
291
468
14,576
$
677,159
$
9,767
$
686,925
5,633,667
$
265,885,829
$
21,303
$
17,689
Exhibit
A.
1h
Pilot
Study
for
New
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Technology
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Calculate
Reduction
in
Impingement
Mortality
and
Entrainment
54
44
37
135
80
80
8
0
0
0
0
12
180
$
8,363
24,300
$
1,129,032
Perform
Engineering
Estimates
of
Efficacy
54
44
37
135
40
32
0
0
0
0
0
4
76
$
3,778
10,260
$
509,976
Perform
Impingement
Monitoring
(
Freshwater)
25
23
25
73
16
25
0
80
240
40
240
20
661
$
33,147
48,253
$
2,419,738
Perform
Entrainment
Monitoring
(
Freshwater)
12
13
17
42
16
25
0
80
180
40
180
20
541
$
27,693
22,722
$
1,163,110
Perform
Impingement
Monitoring
(
Marine)
29
21
12
62
16
33
0
80
312
52
312
26
831
$
40,722
51,491
$
2,524,761
Perform
Entrainment
Monitoring
(
Marine)
25
17
11
53
16
33
0
80
234
52
234
26
675
$
33,632
35,749
$
1,782,483
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
54
44
37
135
8
10
0
8
6
4
0
16
52
$
2,389
7,020
$
322,515
Recordkeeping
54
44
37
135
4
8
0
4
8
2
0
20
46
$
1,786
6,210
$
241,056
Totals
54
44
37
135
1,526
$
74,761
$
1,000
$
75,761
206,005
$
10,227,671
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
A
Facilities
(
Respondents)

A
Avg.
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
over
3
yrs
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Initial
Cost
Facilities
(
Respondents)

Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Avg.
Burden
Per
Facility
over
3
yrs
Avg.
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
for
3
yrs
lump
sum
ODCs
for
3
yrs*
Total
Initial
Cost
($)
for
ICR
period
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
for
ICR
period
January31,
2003
Exisiting
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
1­
4
Exhibit
A.
1i
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
Facility
Junior
CAD
Contracted
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Perform
Comprehensive
Cost
Evaluation
Study
54
55
46
155
20
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
80
$
3,256
12,400
$
504,680
Perform
Valuation
of
Monetized
Benefits
54
55
46
155
40
140
0
60
200
40
0
0
480
$
25,620
74,400
$
3,971,100
Evaluate
Detailed
Mortality
Data
54
55
46
155
4
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
$
1,544
6,820
$
239,382
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
54
55
46
155
10
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
$
1,947
7,750
$
301,785
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
54
55
46
155
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
16
$
291
2,480
$
45,136
Recordkeeping
54
55
46
155
3
9
0
2
6
2
0
8
30
$
1,251
4,650
$
193,843
Totals
54
55
46
155
700
$
33,909
$
780
$
34,689
108,500
$
5,376,826
Exhibit
A.
1j
Site­
Specific
Technology
Plan
Facility
Junior
CAD
Contracted
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Develop
Narrative
Description
of
Technologies
54
55
46
155
8
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
$
1,175
4,340
$
182,094
Document
that
Technologies
Are
Optimal
54
55
46
155
8
40
0
0
0
0
0
6
54
$
1,922
8,370
$
297,910
Develop
Design
Calculations,
Drawings,
&
Estimates
54
55
46
155
8
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
$
1,175
4,340
$
182,094
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
54
55
46
155
16
40
0
4
8
0
0
0
68
$
3,134
10,540
$
485,770
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
54
55
46
155
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
$
109
930
$
16,926
Recordkeeping
54
55
46
155
2
4
0
1
1
0
0
6
14
$
512
2,170
$
79,314
Totals
54
55
46
155
198
$
8,027
$
370
$
8,397
30,690
$
1,301,458
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Initial
Cost
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)

Facilities
(
Respondents)

A
Facilities
(
Respondents)

A
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Total
Initial
Cost
January31,
2003
Exisiting
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
1­
5
Exhibit
A.
1k
Verification
Monitoring
Plan
Facility
Junior
CAD
Contracted
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Develop
Verification
Monitoring
Plan
112
100
96
308
40
60
8
0
0
0
0
4
112
$
4,896
34,496
$
1,507,845
Submit
Data
and
Plans
for
Review
112
100
96
308
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
$
36
616
$
11,211
Revise
Based
on
State
Review
112
100
96
308
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
1
8
$
308
2,464
$
94,895
Recordkeeping
112
100
96
308
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
2
6
$
249
1,848
$
76,630
Totals
112
100
96
308
128
$
5,489
$
400
$
5,889
39,424
$
1,813,781
Total
Labor
Burden,
Labor
Cost,
and
ODCs
for
All
NPDES
Application
Activities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
Totals
6,419,983
$
301,430,314
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Initial
Cost
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Facilities
(
Respondents)
Facilities
(
Respondents)

A
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Initial
Cost
January31,
2003
Exisiting
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
1­
6
Exhibit
A.
1l
Permitting
Process
Capital
and
O&
M
Costs
Activity
ODCs
lump
sum
Cost
($)
Purchase
and
Installation
of
Remote
Monitoring
Device
23
22
17
62
$
50,000
$
1,000
$
3,162,000
Purchase,
Installation
&
Operation
of
Pilot
Study
Technology­
Freshwater
12
13
17
42
$
251,800
$
10,575,600
Purchase,
Installation
&
Operation
of
Pilot
Study
Technology­
Freshwater­
Impingement
Only
13
10
8
31
$
198,200
$
6,144,200
Purchase,
Installation
&
Operation
of
Pilot
Study
Technology­
Marine
25
17
11
53
$
422,900
$
22,413,700
Purchase,
Installation
&
Operation
of
Pilot
Study
Technology­
Marine­
Impingement
Only
4
4
1
9
$
392,500
$
3,532,500
Biological
Study
Laboratory
Analysis
(
Freshwater)
194
242
291
291
$
28,353,000
Biological
Study
Laboratory
Analysis
(
Marine)
114
144
177
177
$
22,054,500
Pilot
Study
Entrainment
Laboratory
Analysis
(
Freshwater)
12
13
17
42
$
252,000
Pilot
Study
Entrainment
Laboratory
Analysis
(
Marine)
25
17
11
53
$
413,400
$
96,900,900
Total
Burden
and
Costs
for
All
NPDES
Application
Activities
Totals
6,419,983
$
398,331,214
*
The
ODC
estimate
was
not
estimated
for
each
activity,
but
rather
as
a
lump
sum
for
each
provision
of
the
rule.
Facilities
(
Respondents)

Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Initial
Cost
$
7,800
Activity
Cost
$
6,000
$
117,000
$
152,100
January31,
2003
Exisiting
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
1­
7
Exhibit
A.
2
Facility
Cost
and
Burden
Estimates
for
Annual
Activities
Exhibit
A.
2a
Biological
Monitoring
for
Impingement
(
Freshwater)

Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)

Monthly
Sample
Collection
0
92
162
162
2
0
4
72
0
72
0
150
$
7,020
38,100
$
1,137,272
Onsite
Analysis
of
Samples
0
92
162
162
4
0
12
72
0
72
0
160
$
7,837
40,640
$
1,269,562
Perform
Statistical
Analysis
0
92
162
162
8
4
0
0
32
0
0
44
$
2,482
11,176
$
402,084
Record
Keeping
0
92
162
162
2
1
1
4
1
0
16
25
$
821
6,350
$
133,002
Totals
0
92
162
162
16
5
17
148
33
144
16
379
$
18,160
$
500
$
18,660
96,266
$
3,022,920
Exhibit
A.
2b
Biological
Monitoring
for
Impingement
(
Marine)

Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)

Monthly
Sample
Collection
0
43
86
86
2
0
5
94
0
94
0
194
$
9,086
25,078
$
781,396
Onsite
Analysis
of
Samples
0
43
86
86
4
0
16
94
0
94
0
207
$
10,107
26,677
$
869,230
Perform
Statistical
Analysis
0
43
86
86
8
4
0
0
42
0
0
54
$
3,027
6,914
$
260,346
Record
Keeping
0
43
86
86
2
1
1
5
1
0
16
27
$
930
3,457
$
79,989
Totals
0
43
86
86
16
5
22
192
43
187
16
482
$
23,151
$
650
$
23,801
62,126
$
2,046,861
Exhibit
A.
2c
Biological
Monitoring
for
Entrainment
(
Freshwater)

Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)

Biweekly
Sample
Collection
0
92
162
162
4
0
12
156
0
156
0
328
$
15,472
83,312
$
2,506,529
Handling
and
Preparation
of
Samples
0
92
162
162
4
0
12
78
0
78
0
172
$
8,382
43,688
$
1,357,916
Perform
Statistical
Analysis
0
92
162
162
16
4
0
0
64
0
0
84
$
4,836
21,336
$
783,497
Recordkeeping
0
92
162
162
2
1
1
8
2
0
16
30
$
1,099
7,620
$
178,103
Totals
0
92
162
162
26
5
25
242
66
234
16
614
$
29,790
$
500
$
30,290
155,956
$
4,907,045
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)

Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Burden
(
hrs)
Labor
Cost
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Costs
Burden
(
hrs.)
Annual
Cost
Burden
(
hrs.)
Annual
Cost
Totals
Per
Facility
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Total
for
AllFacilities
in
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Total
for
AllFacilities
in
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Burden
(
hrs)
Labor
Cost
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Costs
A
Facilities
(
Respondents)

A
Facilities
(
Respondents)

A
Facilities
(
Respondents)
Totals
Per
Facility
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Total
for
AllFacilities
in
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Burden
(
hrs.)
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Costs
Totals
Per
Facility
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Burden
(
hrs)
Annual
Cost
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Labor
Cost
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)

January
31,
003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
2­
1
Exhibit
A.
2d
Biological
Monitoring
for
Entrainment
(
Marine)

Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)

Biweekly
Sample
Collection
0
43
86
86
4
0
12
203
0
203
0
422
$
19,745
54,438
$
1,698,044
Handling
and
Preparation
of
Samples
0
43
86
86
4
0
12
101
0
101
0
218
$
10,473
28,122
$
900,669
Perform
Statistical
Analysis
0
43
86
86
16
4
0
0
83
0
0
103
$
5,916
13,287
$
508,742
Recordkeeping
0
43
86
86
2
1
1
10
3
0
16
33
$
1,267
4,257
$
108,962
Totals
0
43
86
86
26
5
25
314
86
304
16
776
$
37,400
$
650
$
38,050
100,104
$
3,272,317
Exhibit
A.
2e
Visual
or
Remote
Inspections
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)

Visually
or
Remotely
Inspect
All
InstalledTechnologies
0
135
248
383
24
208
0
0
0
0
0
232
$
8,246
88,856
$
3,158,065
Recordkeeping
0
135
248
383
3
16
0
0
0
0
2
21
$
748
8,043
$
286,522
Totals
0
135
248
383
27
224
0
0
0
0
2
253
$
8,994
$
100
$
9,094
96,899
$
3,482,887
Exhibit
A.
2f
Yearly
Status
Report
Activities
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)

Report
on
Inspection
and
Maintenance
0
135
248
383
16
16
0
0
0
0
0
32
$
1,584
12,256
$
606,672
Detail
Biological
Monitoring
Results
0
135
248
383
24
32
4
4
24
0
0
88
$
4,557
33,704
$
1,745,408
Compile
and
Submit
Report
0
135
248
383
80
80
0
0
0
0
16
176
$
8,211
67,408
$
3,144,890
Recordkeeping
0
135
248
383
8
12
0
0
0
0
8
28
$
1,065
10,724
$
407,972
Totals
0
135
248
383
128
140
4
4
24
0
24
324
$
15,418
$
750
$
16,168
124,092
$
6,192,191
Annual
Cost
Facilities
(
Respondents)

A
Total
for
AllFacilities
in
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Totals
Per
Facility
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Burden
(
hrs)
Labor
Cost
ODCs
lump
sum*
Annual
Cost
Total
Costs
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Burden
(
hrs.)
Annual
Cost
ODCs
lump
sum*
Burden
(
hrs)
Labor
Cost
Total
for
AllFacilities
in
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Total
for
AllFacilities
in
the
ICR
Approval
Period
A
Facilities
(
Respondents)
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Burden
(
hrs)

Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)

Totals
Per
Facility
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Labor
Cost
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Costs
Facilities
(
Respondents)

A
Totals
Per
Facility
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Burden
(
hrs.)
Burden
(
hrs.)

Total
Costs
January
31,
003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
2­
2
Exhibit
A.
2g
Verification
Study
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
$
67
$
32
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)

Perform
Statistical
Analysis
0
135
248
383
25
30
15
15
25
0
1
111
$
6,183
42,513
$
2,368,166
Submit
Monitoring
Results
&
Study
Analysis
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
$
73
­
$
0
Record
Keeping
0
135
248
383
1
2
0
0
0
0
4
7
$
204
2,681
$
78,017
Totals
0
135
248
383
26
32
15
15
25
0
9
122
$
6,460
$
500
$
6,960
45,194
$
2,637,683
Total
Burden
and
Cost
for
All
Annual
Activities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Total
Totals
680,637
$
25,561,904
Exhibit
A.
2h
Facility
Annual
O&
M
Costs
Activity
ODCs
lump
sum*
Cost
($)

Operation
of
Remote
Monitoring
Device
0
27
50
77
$
50
$
19,250
Identify
&
Enumerate
Entrained
Freshwater
Biota
0
92
162
162
$
500
$
1,344,600
Identify
&
Enumerate
Entrained
Marine
Biota
0
43
86
86
$
500
$
915,040
$
1,050
$
2,278,890
Total
Cost
for
All
NPDES
Application
Activities
Total
Cost
($)
Totals
$
27,840,794
A
Labor
Cost
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Costs
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Totals
Per
Facility
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Facilities
(
Respondents)
Total
for
AllFacilities
in
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Burden
(
hrs)
Annual
Cost
Burden
(
hrs.)

Total
Annual
Cost
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)

$
7,800
$
10,140
Facilities
(
Responses)
Contracted
Laboratory
Analysis
Cost
Facilities
(
Respondents)

Operation
and
Maintenance
Costs
$
200
January
31,
003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
2­
3
Exhibit
A.
3
Director
Burden
and
Cost
Estimates
for
Activities
Exhibit
A.
3a
Director
Start­
up
Activities
Senior
Technical
Junior
Technical
Clerical
$
45
$
29
$
22
Activity
A
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Read
and
Understand
Rule
45
12
12
0
24
$
877
1,080
$
39,474
Mobilization/
Planning
45
24
16
0
40
$
1,526
1,800
$
68,652
Training
45
4
32
0
36
$
1,093
1,620
$
49,194
Totals
45
40
60
0
100
$
3,496
$
50
$
3,546
4,500
$
159,570
Exhibit
A.
3b
Director
Permit
Issuance
Activities
Senior
Technical
Junior
Technical
Clerical
$
45
$
29
$
22
Activity
A
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Review
Source
Water
Physical
Data
360
2
6
0
8
$
261
2,880
$
93,816
Review
CWIS
Data
360
6
18
0
24
$
782
8,640
$
281,448
Review
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
360
20
20
0
40
$
1,462
14,400
$
526,320
Review
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
468
16
16
0
32
$
1,170
14,976
$
547,373
Review
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
242
2
6
0
8
$
261
1,936
$
63,065
Review
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
308
24
8
0
32
$
1,297
9,856
$
399,414
Review
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
308
400
50
0
450
$
19,230
138,600
$
5,922,840
Review
Pilot
Study
for
New
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Technology
135
16
16
0
32
$
1,170
4,320
$
157,896
Review
Restoration
Measures
36
400
100
0
500
$
20,660
18,000
$
743,760
Review
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
155
800
200
0
1,000
$
41,320
155,000
$
6,404,600
Determine
Monitoring
Frequency
360
2
6
0
8
$
261
2,880
$
93,816
Determine
Record
keeping
and
Reporting
Frequency
360
2
6
0
8
$
261
2,880
$
93,816
Establish
Requirements
for
Site­
Specific
Technology
155
8
24
0
32
$
1,042
4,960
$
161,572
Considering
Public
Comments
360
16
16
0
32
$
1,170
11,520
$
421,056
Issuing
Permit
360
1
6
1
8
$
238
2,880
$
85,680
Permit
Record
Keeping
360
1
1
2
4
$
117
1,440
$
42,084
Totals
468
1716
499
3
856
$
34,368
$
300
$
34,668
395,168
$
16,146,556
Directors
(
Responses)
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Burden
Per
Director
Labor
Cost
per
Director
ODCs
lump
sum*

Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Initial
Cost*
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Initial
Cost
Total
Cost
Per
Director
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Permit
Burden
Per
Permit
Labor
Cost
per
Permit
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Directors
(
Responses)

January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
3­
1
Exhibit
A.
3c
Verification
Study
Review
Senior
Technical
Junior
Technical
Clerical
$
45
$
29
$
22
Activity
A
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Review
of
Verification
Studies
0
2
4
0
6
$
203
0
$
0
Permit
Modification
Due
to
Unfavorable
Results
0
4
10
0
14
$
464
0
$
0
Record
Keeping
0
0
0
1
1
$
22
0
$
0
Totals
0
6
14
1
21
$
689
$
10
$
699
0
$
0
Exhibit
A.
3d
Alternative
Regulatory
Requirements
Senior
Technical
Junior
Technical
Clerical
$
45
$
29
$
22
Activity
A
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Document
Alternative
Regulatory
Requirements
10
12
24
0
36
$
1,220
360
$
12,204
Document
Environmental
Conditions
within
Watershed
10
16
32
0
48
$
1,627
480
$
16,272
Include
Supporting
Historical
Studies,
Calculations,
&
Analyses
10
20
80
0
100
$
3,178
1,000
$
31,780
Submit
Documentation
10
0
0
4
4
$
88
40
$
876
Record
Keeping
10
1
2
1
4
$
124
40
$
1,236
Totals
10
49
138
5
192
$
6,237
$
100
$
6,337
1,920
$
63,368
Exhibit
A.
3e
Annual
Director
Activities
Senior
Technical
Junior
Technical
Clerical
$
45
$
29
$
22
Activity
A
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Review
of
Yearly
Status
Report
383
6
12
0
18
$
610
6,894
$
233,707
Compliance
Tracking
383
4
12
0
16
$
521
6,128
$
199,620
Determination
on
Monitoring
Frequency
Reduction
383
4
8
0
12
$
407
4,596
$
155,804
Record
Keeping
383
1
2
1
4
$
124
1,532
$
47,339
Totals
383
15
34
1
50
$
1,662
$
25
$
1,687
19,150
$
646,044
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Annual
Cost
Burden
Per
Permit
Labor
Cost
per
Permit
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Permit
Burden
Per
Permit
Labor
Cost
per
Permit
Directors
(
Responses)
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Directors
(
Responses)
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)

Directors
(
Responses)

Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Permit
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Initial
Cost
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Annual
Cost
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Burden
Per
Permit
Labor
Cost
per
Permit
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Permit
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
3­
2
Total
Burden
and
Cost
for
All
Director
Activities
Totals
420,738
17,015,538
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Initial
Cost
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
3­
3
Exhibit
A.
4
Federal
Burden
and
Cost
Estimates
for
Activities
Exhibit
A.
4a
Federal
Permit
Program
Oversight
Activities
Senior
Technical
Junior
Technical
Clerical
$
45
$
29
$
22
Activity
A
B
C
D
C+
D
A*
B
A*(
C+
D)
Review
Source
Water
Physical
Data
360
1
3
0
4
$
130
1,440
$
46,908
Review
CWIS
Data
360
1
2
0
3
$
102
1,080
$
36,612
Review
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
360
1
2
0
3
$
102
1,080
$
36,612
Review
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
468
1
2
0
3
$
102
1,404
$
47,596
Review
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
242
1
2
0
3
$
102
726
$
24,611
Review
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
308
1
3
0
4
$
130
1,232
$
40,132
Review
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
308
3
6
0
9
$
305
2,772
$
93,971
Review
Pilot
Study
for
New
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Technology
135
1
2
0
3
$
102
405
$
13,730
Review
Restoration
Measures
36
3
6
9
$
305
324
$
10,984
Review
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
155
6
12
0
18
$
610
2,790
$
94,581
Review
the
Monitoring
Frequency
360
1
2
0
3
$
102
1,080
$
36,612
Review
Establish
Requirements
for
Site­
Specific
Technology
155
1
3
0
4
$
130
620
$
20,197
Permit
Record
Keeping
360
1
1
2
4
$
117
1,440
$
42,084
Totals
468
22
46
2
40
$
1,331
$
50
$
1,381
16,393
$
562,629
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Total
Burden
(
hrs.)
Total
Initial
Cost
*
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
per
Permit
Review
Federal
(
Responses)
Burden
per
permit
Review
Labor
Cost
per
Permit
Review
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
4­
1
Exhibit
A.
5
Respondents
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Year
by
Year
by
Activity
Facilities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Start­
up
Activities
331
91
98
173
Permit
Application
Activities
135
113
112
120
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
135
113
112
120
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
308
78
82
156
FW
River/
Stream
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
64
47
63
58
FW
Lake/
Reservoir
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
28
23
17
23
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
(
Impingement
Only)
58
45
50
51
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
(
Impingement
&
Entrainment)
54
55
46
52
Freshwater
Monitoring
for
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
194
242
291
242
Marine
Monitoring
for
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
114
144
177
145
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Initial
Analysis
308
78
82
156
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Final
Report
112
100
96
103
Pilot
Study
Impingement
Monitoring
Only
(
Freshwater)
13
10
8
10
Pilot
Study
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Monitoring
(
Freshwater)
12
13
17
14
Pilot
Study
Impingement
Monitoring
Only
(
Marine)
4
4
1
3
Pilot
Study
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Monitoring
(
Marine)
25
17
11
18
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
54
55
46
52
Site­
Specific
Technology
Plan
54
55
46
52
Verification
Monitoring
Plan
112
100
96
103
Biological
Monitoring
for
Impingement
(
Freshwater)
0
92
162
85
Biological
Monitoring
for
Impingement
(
Marine)
0
43
86
43
Biological
Monitoring
for
Entrainment
(
Freshwater)
0
92
162
85
Biological
Monitoring
for
Entrainment
(
Marine)
0
43
86
43
Visual
or
Remote
Inspections
0
135
248
128
Yearly
Status
Report
Activities
0
135
248
128
Verification
Study
0
135
248
128
Respondents
331
278
343
317
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A5.­
1
Directors
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Director
Start­
up
Activities
45
0
0
15
Director
Permit
Issuance
Activities
Review
Permit
Application
Information
135
113
112
120
Review
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
308
78
82
156
Review
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
92
70
80
81
Review
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
112
100
96
103
Review
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
112
100
96
103
Review
Pilot
Study
for
New
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Technology
54
44
37
45
Review
Restoration
Measures
14
11
11
12
Review
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
54
55
46
52
Determine
Monitoring
Frequency
135
113
112
120
Determine
Permit
Requirements
and
Issue
Permit
135
113
112
120
Verification
Study
Review
0
0
0
0
Alternative
Regulatory
Requirements
10
0
0
3
Annual
Director
Activities
Review
of
Yearly
Status
Report
0
135
248
128
Compliance
Tracking
0
135
248
128
Determination
on
Monitoring
Frequency
Reduction
0
135
248
128
Record
Keeping
0
135
248
128
Respondents
45
35
39
40
Sum
for
Facilities
and
Directors
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Facilities
331
278
343
317
Directors
45
35
39
40
Yearly
Total
376
313
382
357
[
1]
Each
facility
is
one
respondent.
One
respondent
may
be
involved
in
more
than
one
activity;
however,
in
order
to
avoid
double­
counting,
the
maximum
number
of
respondents
expected
to
be
involved
in
the
rule
activities
annually
is
assumed
to
be
the
number
of
respondents
for
that
year.
[
2]
Each
Director
is
one
respondent.

January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A5.­
2
Exhibit
A.
6
Responses
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Year
by
Year
by
Activity
Facilities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Start­
up
Activities
331
91
98
173
Permit
Application
Activities
135
113
112
120
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
135
113
112
120
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
308
78
82
156
FW
River/
Stream
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
64
47
63
58
FW
Lake/
Reservoir
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
28
23
17
23
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
(
Impingement
Only)
58
45
50
51
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
(
Impingement
&
Entrainment)
54
55
46
52
Freshwater
Monitoring
for
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
194
242
291
242
Marine
Monitoring
for
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
114
144
177
145
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Initial
Analysis
308
78
82
156
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Final
Report
112
100
96
103
Pilot
Study
Impingement
Monitoring
Only
(
Freshwater)
13
10
8
10
Pilot
Study
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Monitoring
(
Freshwater)
12
13
17
14
Pilot
Study
Impingement
Monitoring
Only
(
Marine)
4
4
1
3
Pilot
Study
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Monitoring
(
Marine)
25
17
11
18
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
54
55
46
52
Site­
Specific
Technology
Plan
54
55
46
52
Verification
Monitoring
Plan
112
100
96
103
Biological
Monitoring
for
Impingement
(
Freshwater)
0
92
162
85
Biological
Monitoring
for
Impingement
(
Marine)
0
43
86
43
Biological
Monitoring
for
Entrainment
(
Freshwater)
0
92
162
85
Biological
Monitoring
for
Entrainment
(
Marine)
0
43
86
43
Visual
or
Remote
Inspections
0
135
248
128
Yearly
Status
Report
Activities
0
135
248
128
Verification
Study
0
135
248
128
Responses
2,115
2,058
2,691
2,288
Directors
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Director
Start­
up
Activities
45
0
0
15
Director
Permit
Issuance
Activities
Review
Permit
Application
Information
135
113
112
120
Review
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
308
78
82
156
Review
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
92
70
80
81
Review
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
112
100
96
103
Review
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
112
100
96
103
Review
Pilot
Study
for
New
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Technology
54
44
37
45
Review
Restoration
Measures
14
11
11
12
Review
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
54
55
46
52
Determine
Monitoring
Frequency
135
113
112
120
Determine
Permit
Requirements
and
Issue
Permit
135
113
112
120
Verification
Study
Review
0
0
0
0
Alternative
Regulatory
Requirements
10
0
0
3
Annual
Director
Activities
Review
of
Yearly
Status
Report
0
135
248
128
Compliance
Tracking
0
135
248
128
Determination
on
Monitoring
Frequency
Reduction
0
135
248
128
Record
Keeping
0
135
248
128
Responses
1,206
1,337
1,776
1,440
Sum
for
Facilities
and
Directors
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Facilities
2,115
2,058
2,691
2,288
Directors
1,206
1,337
1,776
1,440
Yearly
Total*
3,321
3,395
4,467
3,728
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A6.­
1
Exhibit
A.
7
Hourly
Burden
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Year
by
Year
for
Facilities
Facility
Activities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
NPDES
Permit
Application
Activities
Start­
up
Activities
A1a
14,233
3,913
4,214
7,453
Permit
Application
Activities
A1b
33,345
27,911
27,664
29,640
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
A1c
36,045
30,171
29,904
32,040
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
A1d
83,776
21,216
22,304
42,432
FW
River/
Stream
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
A1e
6,400
4,700
6,300
5,800
FW
Lake/
Reservoir
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
A1e
3,136
2,576
1,904
2,539
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
(
Impingement
Only)
A1f
6,786
5,265
5,850
5,967
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
(
Impingement
&
Entrainment)
A1f
8,424
8,580
7,176
8,060
Freshwater
Monitoring
for
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
A1g
805,070
1,004,263
1,207,605
1,005,646
Marine
Monitoring
for
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
A1g
607,810
767,759
943,704
773,091
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Initial
Analysis
A1g
114,884
29,094
30,586
58,188
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Final
Report
A1g
44,688
39,900
38,304
40,964
Pilot
Study
Impingement
Monitoring
Only
(
Freshwater)
for
Pilot
Study
A1h
13,195
10,150
8,120
10,488
Pilot
Study
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Monitoring
(
Freshwater)
for
Pilot
Study
A1h
18,672
20,228
26,452
21,784
Pilot
Study
Impingement
Monitoring
Only
(
Marine)
for
Pilot
Study
A1h
4,738
4,738
1,185
3,554
Pilot
Study
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Monitoring
(
Marine)
for
Pilot
Study
A1h
46,475
31,603
20,449
32,842
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
A1i
37,800
38,500
32,200
36,167
Site­
Specific
Technology
Plan
A1j
10,692
10,890
9,108
10,230
Verification
Monitoring
Plan
A1k
14,336
12,800
12,288
13,141
NPDES
Permit
Application
Activity
Total
1,910,505
2,074,257
2,435,317
2,140,026
Annual
Activities
Biological
Monitoring
for
Impingement
(
Freshwater)
A2a
0
34,868
61,398
32,089
Biological
Monitoring
for
Impingement
(
Marine)
A2b
0
20,709
41,418
20,709
Biological
Monitoring
for
Entrainment
(
Freshwater)
A2c
0
56,488
99,468
51,985
Biological
Monitoring
for
Entrainment
(
Marine)
A2d
0
33,368
66,736
33,368
Visual
or
Remote
Inspections
A2e
0
34,155
62,744
32,300
Yearly
Status
Report
Activities
A2f
0
43,740
80,352
41,364
Verification
Study
A2g
0
15,930
29,264
15,065
Annual
Activity
Yearly
Labor
Total
0
239,258
441,380
226,879
Yearly
Labor
Total
1,910,505
2,313,515
2,876,697
2,366,905
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
7­
1
Exhibit
A.
8
Hourly
Burden
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Year
by
Year
for
Directors
and
Federal
Government
Director
Activities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Director
Start­
up
Activities
A3a
4,500
0
0
1,500
Director
Permit
Issuance
Activities
A3b
146,602
129,990
118,576
131,723
Verification
Study
Review
A3c
0
0
0
0
Alternative
Regulatory
Requirements
A3d
1,920
0
0
640
Annual
Director
Activities
A3e
0
6,750
12,400
6,383
Yearly
Total
153,022
136,740
130,976
140,246
Federal
Activities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Federal
Permit
Program
Oversight
Activities
A4a
6,423
5,109
4,862
5,464
Yearly
Total
6,423
5,109
4,862
5,464
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
8­
1
Exhibit
A.
9
Costs
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Year
by
Year
for
Facilities
Facility
Activities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
NPDES
Permit
Application
Activities
Start­
up
Activities
A1a
$
650,150
$
178,742
$
192,492
$
340,461
Permit
Application
Activities
A1b
$
1,248,993
$
1,045,453
$
1,036,202
$
1,110,216
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
A1c
$
1,447,376
$
1,211,507
$
1,200,786
$
1,286,556
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
A1d
$
3,535,162
$
895,268
$
941,180
$
1,790,537
FW
River/
Stream
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
A1e
$
203,392
$
149,366
$
200,214
$
184,324
FW
Lake/
Reservoir
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
A1e
$
103,645
$
85,137
$
62,927
$
83,903
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
(
Impingement
Only)
A1f
$
228,990
$
177,665
$
197,405
$
201,353
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
(
Impingement
&
Entrainment)
A1f
$
301,288
$
306,867
$
256,652
$
288,269
Freshwater
Monitoring
for
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
A1g
$
37,296,931
$
46,525,038
$
55,945,397
$
46,589,122
Marine
Monitoring
for
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
A1g
$
28,022,713
$
35,397,111
$
43,508,949
$
35,642,925
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Initial
Analysis
A1g
$
6,561,447
$
1,661,665
$
1,746,879
$
3,323,330
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Final
Report
A1g
$
1,981,190
$
1,768,920
$
1,698,163
$
1,816,091
Pilot
Study
Impingement
Monitoring
Only
(
Freshwater)
for
Pilot
Study
A1h
$
643,013
$
494,625
$
395,700
$
511,113
Pilot
Study
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Monitoring
(
Freshwater)
for
Pilot
Study
A1h
$
925,867
$
1,003,023
$
1,311,645
$
1,080,178
Pilot
Study
Impingement
Monitoring
Only
(
Marine)
for
Pilot
Study
A1h
$
228,149
$
228,149
$
57,037
$
171,112
Pilot
Study
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Monitoring
(
Marine)
for
Pilot
Study
A1h
$
2,266,728
$
1,541,375
$
997,360
$
1,601,821
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
A1i
$
1,831,097
$
1,865,006
$
1,559,823
$
1,751,975
Site­
Specific
Technology
Plan
A1j
$
433,431
$
441,458
$
369,219
$
414,703
Verification
Monitoring
Plan
A1k
$
614,757
$
548,890
$
526,934
$
563,527
NPDES
Permit
Application
Activity
Total
$
88,524,318
$
95,525,265
$
112,204,964
$
98,751,516
Annual
Activities
Marine
Monitoring
for
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
A2a
$
0
$
1,670,720
$
2,941,920
$
1,537,547
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Initial
Analysis
A2b
$
0
$
995,481
$
1,990,961
$
995,481
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Final
Report
A2c
$
0
$
2,740,717
$
4,826,045
$
2,522,254
Pilot
Study
Impingement
Monitoring
Only
(
Freshwater)
A2d
$
0
$
1,608,209
$
3,216,417
$
1,608,209
Visual
or
Remote
Inspections
A2e
$
0
$
1,214,150
$
2,230,438
$
1,148,196
Yearly
Status
Report
Activities
A2f
$
0
$
2,081,376
$
3,823,565
$
1,968,314
Verification
Study
A2g
$
0
$
862,232
$
1,583,951
$
815,394
Annual
Activity
Yearly
Labor
Total
$
0
$
11,172,883
$
20,613,297
$
10,595,393
Yearly
Labor
Total
$
88,524,318
$
106,698,148
$
132,818,261
$
109,346,909
Facility
O&
M
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
NPDES
Application
Purchase
and
Installation
of
Remote
Monitoring
Device
A.
1l
$
1,150,000
$
1,100,000
$
850,000
$
1,033,333
Purchase,
Installation
&
Operation
of
Pilot
Study
Technology­
Freshwater
A.
1l
$
3,021,600
$
3,273,400
$
4,280,600
$
3,525,200
Purchase,
Installation
&
Operation
of
Pilot
Study
Technology­
Freshwater­
Impingement
Only
A.
1l
$
2,576,600
$
1,982,000
$
1,585,600
$
2,048,067
Purchase,
Installation
&
Operation
of
Pilot
Study
Technology­
Marine
A.
1l
$
10,572,500
$
7,189,300
$
4,651,900
$
7,471,233
Purchase,
Installation
&
Operation
of
Pilot
Study
Technology­
Marine­
Impingement
Only
A.
1l
$
1,570,000
$
1,570,000
$
392,500
$
1,177,500
Biological
Study
Laboratory
Analysis
(
Freshwater)
A.
1l
$
7,558,434
$
9,428,562
$
11,337,651
$
9,441,549
Biological
Study
Laboratory
Analysis
(
Marine)
A.
1l
$
5,774,020
$
7,293,499
$
8,964,926
$
7,344,149
Pilot
Study
Entrainment
Laboratory
Analysis
(
Freshwater)
A.
1l
$
72,000
$
78,000
$
102,000
$
84,000
Pilot
Study
Entrainment
Laboratory
Analysis
(
Marine)
A.
1l
$
195,000
$
132,600
$
85,800
$
137,800
Other
Direct
Costs
A.
1a­
l
$
1,660,802
$
1,679,497
$
1,928,176
$
1,756,158
Annual
Operation
of
Remote
Monitoring
Device
A.
2f
$
0
$
5,400
$
10,000
$
5,133
Identify
&
Enumerate
Entrained
Freshwater
Biota
A.
2f
$
0
$
717,600
$
1,263,600
$
660,400
Identify
&
Enumerate
Entrained
Marine
Biota
A.
2f
$
0
$
436,020
$
872,040
$
436,020
Other
Direct
Costs
A.
2a­
f
$
0
$
399,000
$
735,100
$
378,033
Equipment
Cost
Subtotal
$
4,171,600
$
4,378,800
$
5,140,600
$
4,563,667
Laboratory
Analysis
Subtotal
$
13,599,454
$
18,086,281
$
22,626,017
$
18,103,918
Other
Direct
Costs
Subtotal
$
1,660,802
$
2,078,497
$
2,663,276
$
2,134,192
Yearly
O&
M
Total
$
34,150,956
$
35,284,878
$
37,059,894
$
35,498,576
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
9­
1
Exhibit
A.
10
Costs
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
Year
by
Year
for
Directors
and
Federal
Government
Director
Activities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Director
Start­
up
Activities
A3a
$
157,320
$
0
$
0
$
52,440
Director
Permit
Issuance
Activities
A3b
$
5,927,115
$
5,291,165
$
4,820,277
$
5,346,185
Verification
Study
Review
A3c
$
0
$
0
$
0
$
0
Alternative
Regulatory
Requirements
A3d
$
62,368
$
0
$
0
$
20,789.33
Annual
Director
Activities
A3e
$
0
$
224,343
$
412,126
$
212,156
Yearly
Total
$
6,146,803
$
5,515,508
$
5,232,403
$
5,631,571
Director
O&
M
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Start­
Up
&
NPDES
Application
Other
Direct
Costs
A3a­
b
$
42,750
$
33,900
$
33,600
$
36,750
Annual
Other
Direct
Costs
A3c­
d
$
1,000
$
3,375
$
6,200
$
3,525
Yearly
O&
M
Cost
Total
$
43,750
$
37,275
$
39,800
$
40,275
Federal
Labor
Activities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Federal
Permit
Program
Oversight
Activities
A4a
213,603
169,651
161,374
$
181,543
Yearly
Total
$
213,603
$
169,651
$
161,374
$
181,543
Federal
O&
M
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Federal
Permit
Program
Oversight
ODCs
A4a
$
6,750
$
5,650
$
5,600
$
6,000
Yearly
Total
$
6,750
$
5,650
$
5,600
$
6,000
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
10­
1
Exhibit
A.
11
Summary
of
the
Burden,
Respondents,
Responses,
and
Costs
for
the
ICR
Approval
Period
by
Year
and
Annual
Averages
Facilities
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)*
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Burden
(
hours)
A7
1,910,505
2,313,515
2,876,697
2,366,905
7,100,716
Respondents
(
number)
A5
331
278
343
317
520
Responses
(
number)
A6
2,115
2,058
2,691
2,288
6,864
Costs
(
labor)
A9
$
88,524,318
$
106,698,148
$
132,818,261
$
109,346,909
$
328,040,727
Costs
(
Equipment)
A9
$
4,171,600
$
4,378,800
$
5,140,600
$
4,563,667
$
13,691,000
Costs
(
Lab
Analysis)
A9
$
13,599,454
$
18,086,281
$
22,626,017
$
18,103,918
$
54,311,753
Costs
(
Other
Direct
Costs)
A9
$
1,660,802
$
2,078,497
$
2,663,276
$
2,134,192
$
6,402,575
Total
Costs
$
107,956,174
$
131,241,726
$
163,248,155
$
134,148,685
$
402,446,055
Directors
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)*
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Burden
(
hours)
A8
153,022
136,740
130,976
140,246
420,738
Respondents
(
number)
A5
45
35
39
40
45
Responses
(
number)
A6
1,206
1,337
1,776
1,440
4,319
Costs(
labor)
A10
$
6,146,803
$
5,515,508
$
5,232,403
$
5,631,571
$
16,894,714
Costs
(
Other
Direct
Costs)
A10
$
43,750
$
37,275
$
39,800
$
40,275
$
120,825
Total
Costs
$
6,190,553
$
5,552,783
$
5,272,203
$
5,671,846
$
17,015,539
Federal
Government
Year
1
Year
2
Year
3
Source
(
Exhibit)
Sep.
2004
­
Aug.
2005
Sep.
2005
­
Aug.
2006
Sep.
2006
­
Aug.
2007
Annual
Average
Burden
(
hours)
A8
6,423
5,109
4,862
5,464
16,393
Costs(
labor)
A10
$
213,603
$
169,651
$
161,374
$
181,543
$
544,629
Costs
(
O&
M)
A10
$
6,750
$
5,650
$
5,600
$
6,000
$
18,000
Total
Costs
$
220,353
$
175,301
$
166,974
$
187,543
$
562,629
Totals
for
Respondents
(
Facilities
and
Directors)*
Annual
Average
Three
Year
Total
Total
Respondent
Burden
(
hours)
2,507,151
7,521,454
Total
Respondents
(
number)
357
565
Total
Respondent
Labor
Costs
$
114,978,480
$
344,935,441
Total
Respondent
Capital
and
O&
M
Costs
$
24,842,051
$
74,526,152
Total
Respondent
Cost
for
All
Activities
$
139,820,531
$
419,461,593
*
Totals
for
annual
averages
may
not
match
exactly
due
to
rounding
discrepancies
Three
Year
Total
Three
Year
Total
Three
Year
Total
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A11.­
1
Exhibit
A.
12
Facility
Cost
and
Burden
Estimates
for
NPDES
Permit
Renewal
Activities
Exhibit
A.
12a
Start­
up
Activities
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Read
and
Understand
Rule
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
$
262
Mobilization/
Planning
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
$
131
Training
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
$
99
Totals
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
$
492
$
50
$
542
Exhibit
A.
12b
Permit
Application
Activities
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Source
Water
Physical
Data
1
5
12
0
0
0
0
0
18
$
564
Configuration
and
Location
of
CWIS
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
$
127
Facility
Water
Balance
Diagram
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
$
127
CWIS
Operation
Narrative
12
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
42
$
1,762
CWS
Operation
Narrative
12
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
42
$
1,762
Engineering
Calculations
6
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
$
1,168
Submit
Materials
for
Review
by
State
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
$
109
Recordkeeping
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
1
6
$
209
Totals
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
150
$
5,829
$
250
$
6,079
Exhibit
A.
12c
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Identify
Available
Data
and
Document
Efforts
12
24
0
0
0
0
0
2
38
$
1,607
Compile
and
Analyze
Existing
Data
10
18
6
0
0
0
0
1
35
$
1,432
Submit
Data
for
Review
by
State
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
$
73
Recordkeeping
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
3
9
$
313
Totals
24
45
7
0
0
0
0
10
86
$
3,425
$
250
$
3,675
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Burden
Per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*

ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*

Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Burden
Per
Facility
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A12­
1
Exhibit
A.
12d
Flow
Reduction
Information
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Develop
Narrative
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
$
294
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
$
182
Document
Minimization
of
Make­
up
and
Blowdown
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
2
14
$
419
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
$
36
Recordkeeping
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
$
135
Totals
32
$
1,067
$
400
$
1,467
Exhibit
A.
12e
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Description
of
Historical
Studies
that
will
be
Used
7
12
0
0
0
0
0
1
20
$
871
Description
of
Proposed
and/
or
Implemented
Technologies
3
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
$
393
Develop
Source
Water
Sampling
Plan
13
18
2
0
0
0
0
2
35
$
1,550
Submit
Data
and
Plans
for
Review
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
$
109
Revise
Based
on
State
Review
3
5
1
0
0
0
0
2
11
$
425
Recordkeeping
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
4
11
$
416
Totals
28
44
5
1
0
0
0
15
92
$
3,764
$
200
$
3,964
Exhibit
A.
12f
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Gather
Information
to
Characterize
Flow
(
FW
River/
Stream)
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
$
306
Water
Body
Thermal
Stratification
Narrative
(
Lake/
Reservoir)
1.2
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
$
463
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
2.4
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
$
467
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
$
87
Recordkeeping
0.3
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
$
93
Totals
4
32
­
­
0
0
0
7
43
$
1,417
$
100
$
1,517
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)

January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A12­
2
Exhibit
A.
12g
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Delineate
Hydraulic
Zone
of
Influence
1
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
8
$
275
Develop
Narrative
Description
of
Technologies
(
Impingement)
4
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
$
524
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
(
Impingement)
2
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
$
326
Develop
Narrative
Description
of
Technologies
(
Entrainment)
4
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
$
524
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
(
Entrainment)
2
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
$
326
Document
that
Technologies
Are
Optimal
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
3
23
$
693
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
$
55
Recordkeeping
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
6
$
186
Totals
14
53
4
0
0
0
0
9
80
$
2,906
$
150
$
3,056
Exhibit
A.
12h
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Implement
Offshore
Freshwater
Sampling
2
23
0
96
1872
60
1872
15
3940
$
182,903
Impingement
Monitoring
Freshwater
1
7
0
0
0
30
0
8
46
$
2,140
Entrainment
Monitoring
Freshwater
1
7
0
0
0
30
0
8
46
$
2,140
Implement
Offshore
Marine
Sampling
3
30
0
96
2434
60
2434
15
5072
$
234,279
Impingement
Monitoring
Marine
1
9
0
0
0
30
0
8
48
$
2,204
Entrainment
Monitoring
Marine
1
9
0
0
0
30
0
8
48
$
2,204
Profile
of
Source
Water
Biota
10
6
0
10
18
0
6
2
52
$
2,962
Identification
of
Critical
Species
10
6
0
6
12
0
0
1
35
$
2,057
Description
of
Additional
Stresses
5
3
0
5
9
0
3
1
26
$
1,481
Write
Study
based
on
Results
and
Submit
for
Review
by
State
24
48
0
5
2
2
0
2
83
$
3,829
Recordkeeping
2
4
0
2
4
1
0
7
20
$
838
Finalize
study
based
on
State
review
5
10
0
0
0
0
0
2
17
$
691
Freshwater
Totals
59
109
0
124
1917
93
1881
38
4221
$
437,727
$
7,500
$
445,227
Marine
Totals
63
139
0
124
2479
183
2443
62
5493
$
692,552
$
7,500
$
700,052
ODCs
lump
sum*

Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
ODCs
lump
sum*

Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Burden
Per
Facility
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)

Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
3
Year
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A12­
3
Exhibit
A.
12i
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Perform
Comprehensive
Cost
Evaluation
Study
6
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
$
977
Perform
Valuation
of
Monetized
Benefits
27
93
0
40
133
27
0
0
320
$
17,092
Evaluate
Detailed
Mortality
Data
3
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
$
1,158
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
3
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
$
584
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
$
146
Recordkeeping
2
5
0
1
3
1
0
4
16
$
675
Totals
41
158
0
41
136
28
0
12
416
$
20,632
$
100
$
20,732
Exhibit
A.
12j
Site­
Specific
Technology
Plan
Facility
Manager
Junior
Technical
CAD
Operator
Contracted
Manager
Biologist
Statistician
Biological
Technician
Clerical
$
67
$
32
$
28
$
85
$
55
$
57
$
36
$
18
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Develop
Narrative
Description
of
Technologies
4
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
$
587
Document
that
Technologies
Are
Optimal
4
20
0
0
0
0
0
3
27
$
961
Develop
Design
Calculations,
Drawings,
&
Estimates
2
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
$
326
Perform
Engineering
Calculations
5
13
0
1
3
0
0
0
22
$
1,002
Submit
Data
and
Analysis
for
Review
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
$
109
Recordkeeping
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
3
8
$
326
Totals
16
51
0
2
4
0
0
12
85
$
3,311
$
100
$
3,411
Exhibit
A.
12k
Repermitting
Process
O&
M
Costs
Activity
3
yr
Cost
($)

Biological
Study
Laboratory
Analysis
(
Freshwater)
$
46,800
$
46,800
Biological
Study
Laboratory
Analysis
(
Marine)
$
60,840
$
60,840
$
107,640
Activity
Cost
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Burden
Per
Facility
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Total
Cost
Per
Facility
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Labor
Cost
per
Facility
Burden
Per
Facility
ODCs
lump
sum*

January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A12­
4
Exhibit
A.
13
Director
Burden
and
Cost
Estimates
for
Permit
Renewal
Exhibit
A.
13
Director
Permit
Reissuance
Activities
Senior
Technical
Junior
Technical
Clerical
$
45
$
29
$
22
Activity
B
C
D
C+
D
Review
Source
Water
Physical
Data
1
2
0
3
$
102
Review
CWIS
Data
2
5
0
7
$
232
Review
Source
Water
Baseline
Biological
Characterization
Data
6
6
0
12
$
439
Review
Proposal
for
Collection
of
Information
for
Comprehensive
Demonstration
Study
5
5
0
10
$
366
Review
Source
Water
Body
Flow
Information
1
2
0
3
$
102
Review
Design
and
Construction
Technology
Plan
7
2
0
9
$
369
Review
Impingement
Mortality
&
Entrainment
Characterization
Study
120
15
0
135
$
5,769
Review
Pilot
Study
for
New
Impingement
&
Entrainment
Technology
5
5
0
10
$
366
Review
Restoration
Measures
120
30
0
150
$
6,198
Review
Information
to
Support
Site­
Specific
Determination
of
BTA
240
60
0
300
$
12,396
Determine
Monitoring
Frequency
1
2
0
3
$
102
Determine
Record
keeping
and
Reporting
Frequency
1
2
0
3
$
102
Establish
Requirements
for
Site­
Specific
Technology
2
7
0
9
$
289
Considering
Public
Comments
5
5
0
10
$
366
Issuing
Permit
0
2
0
2
$
57
Permit
Record
Keeping
0
0
1
1
$
22
Totals
516
150
1
667
$
27,274
$
300
$
27,574
Assumed
Loaded
Hourly
Rate
Level
of
Effort
(
hrs)
ODCs
lump
sum*
Total
Cost
Per
Permit
Burden
Per
Permit
Labor
Cost
per
Permit
January
31,
2003
Existing
Facility
Rule
Information
Collection
Request
A.
13­
1
